Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
I think the Communists went too far this time.
Speaker 2 (00:02):
The Democrats knew that if they get Raman into the
top two is Karen Bass.
Speaker 3 (00:07):
There are many people in Los Angeles that probably don't
even live there, whose ballots are being cast for them,
and they don't know it, and there's no.
Speaker 2 (00:15):
Way to verify it.
Speaker 4 (00:16):
Jesse.
Speaker 3 (00:16):
It's a rigged system.
Speaker 5 (00:18):
Fraud is the issue here in Minnesota.
Speaker 6 (00:20):
Everybody's pissed off about it.
Speaker 7 (00:22):
Here is a system. That system is being defended, being
defitted by those that ultimately profit from it.
Speaker 1 (00:30):
All Right, before we get rolling on the show, we
have to do something that we hate doing with something
we believe in. On the show, we have to honor
the fallen. We honor the fallen who die in training
as well. That's very very important. They are so often forgotten, dismissed,
but it matters. A Sergeant Devin, a syble guy in
(00:51):
a training accident, training exercise in Iraq. He was twenty
six years old, a native of Texas, a combat metic specialist,
and he gave his life for this country and we
honored him and his sacrifice and we say a prayer
for his family. Now let me move on to something
(01:11):
I know what you're angry about right now. I'm angry
about it too, and maybe you're feeling a bit deflated.
I'm talking about the mayoral election in Los Angeles and
what I'm about saying, believe it. There actually is a
kind of a happy ending to this. I believe there's
happy ending to this, So just stay with me. First
of all, let's let's talk about a saying you've heard
(01:35):
many times before. I have no doubt. I don't even
know who originally came up with it, but it's a saying.
Speaker 8 (01:42):
Here.
Speaker 1 (01:42):
It is you can vote your way into communism, but
you have to shoot your way out. Okay, it's a
little extreme. You can vot your way into communism, but
you have to shoot your way out. All right, I'm
sitting aside the shooting part. Why is that saying and
saying why have you heard that before? I know you
have you heard that before? Because over and over and
(02:05):
over and over and over again, throughout history, societies have
learned the hard way that if you vote for communists
and you leave them in power long enough, communists will
put into place systems and people within those systems to
ensure they can't lose elections. They'll institutionalize cheating in elections,
(02:30):
and for a lot of people, decent people you, that
can be hard to understand. Why is it so consistent?
Why is it every communist area, every communist country. Why
is it always the same? It always works the same way.
They get ower if they're in power long enough, they
put into place systems so they can steal elections. Why
do they all do this? Well, this comes back to
(02:52):
something that we all struggle with. They don't share your morality.
If you sat down to play again aim of monopoly,
when nobody was looking, would you go grab a handful
of the five hundred dollar bills? Look, even if you
would that you'd feel bad about it. But I bet
(03:13):
you wouldn't because that's stealing. That's cheating. It's not how
you're supposed to play the game. But you have to understand.
To a communist, that's crazy, that's an insane way to think.
Of course, you steal five hundred dollar bills. You steal
everything you can possibly get your hands on, because winning
(03:34):
and power is all that matters. Communists do not share
your morality. They don't. They don't. They don't look at
it as cheating. That's crazy, But they don't they look
at it as well. This is how we keep power,
this is how we get power, this is how we
punish our enemies, this is how we reward our friends.
(03:56):
It's it's an extremely demonic, sick religion, but that is
what they actually believe now. In Los Angeles, of course,
on election night, Karen Bass looked like she came in first.
But then there was Spencer Pratt. Remember the only the
top two advance. So there's Spencer Pratt and then there's
this ram and comedy nut job, and Pratt looked like
(04:19):
he was pretty solidly in second in brav and then
she'll see here, look like she knew she was comming
in last year.
Speaker 4 (04:25):
What I've been a candidate for something as long as
you can remember, and you've had to live through it
with me, and you've been so patient through all of it.
Speaker 6 (04:37):
Thank you, Good night, Comedy.
Speaker 4 (04:39):
I hope you know that everything every person in this
room is fighting for in this campaign has.
Speaker 3 (04:46):
Been about building a city that's worthy.
Speaker 6 (04:49):
Of you and every child in the city. I love you,
Thank you so much.
Speaker 9 (05:00):
I have a great night. Thank you so much.
Speaker 6 (05:02):
The Communists already lost.
Speaker 10 (05:04):
So.
Speaker 1 (05:07):
Spencer Pratt looking very confident as he should have been.
With the numbers, Ramen looking sounding quite defeated, and every
single day since then, you've woken up and you've found
a new batch of votes have been located. I put
it that way, located. A new batch of votes have
(05:28):
been located. Pretty much. None of them have gone to
Spencer Pratt. They've all gone to the socialist Ramen, and
now she's overtaken him, and she's already projected to be
the winner. These companies that are projecting this, by the way,
who are not fly by night liar companies. These companies
(05:49):
are all very reputable companies like Decision Desk and others.
They're saying it's over Pratt loss, the two communists will advance. Now,
I have so many friends and south in California who
worked very hard and we're very hopeful about this race.
And perhaps you, no matter where you are, were emotionally
invested in this race, and you convinced yourself that this
(06:10):
is Hey because of the fire and the LA is
such a disaster, that this time was going to be different.
But I'm warned, and I'm warned weeks ago it's going
to get crushed. And a lot of people were very hopeful,
and people emotionally invested were understandably mad. I know if
I got mad, i'd be mad too. You don't know
what you're talking about, but I didn't know what I
(06:32):
was talking about. And here's what I know. When it
comes to an area under communists control, if that area
has been under communists control long enough, the communists have
put into place systems, laws, regulations, people, They've put into
place everything they need to ensure. It doesn't matter how
(06:54):
mad the people are. It doesn't matter how much money
gets spent here, what this Internet, It doesn't matter at all.
They can't possibly lose California. I have friends in California,
many of them who tell me California hasn't had a
fair election in their lifetime. Remember do you remember this?
Speaker 11 (07:18):
This is from two thousand In ten, four weeks after
the November twond election, California finally has declared a winner
in the attorney general race. Harris finished so close to
her Republican opponent that it took a month to finish
counting every vote.
Speaker 6 (07:37):
She won by less than one percentage point.
Speaker 1 (07:46):
Four weeks. It took them to locate the votes don't
needed to become Attorney general this is how things operated
in Cambodia, It's how things operated in East Germany. It's
how things operated in the Soviet Union. And it's how
things operate in Baltimore, Chicago, New York City, whole states
(08:06):
like California. This is how things operate in communist systems.
Once you vote them in and leave them in long enough,
you can't get them out. Now that's the bad news.
There is a light at the end of this time.
I believe some good news. Trump is getting a lot
of publicity over the last twenty four hours because Trump
(08:29):
sat down with the communist Kristen Welker and brought this
whole thing up in that storm out.
Speaker 10 (08:35):
This tremendous evidence is nothing but all this is because
the election was reached. It was a dirty election. This
is sound heading again right now in Californa is ed.
It ain't happening right now in California. Right now, it's
look if look at what's happened in California. Down it's
what we're doing, jing welling ailed California.
Speaker 6 (08:54):
It's how they're not there, big, dropping fast because it's
a ringed election.
Speaker 10 (08:58):
Let me tell you, it's four days and they aren't
even close, they're coming up with them. They can't know
why they're doing it all because they're cheating are the election?
Speaker 9 (09:06):
There's what do you have evidence?
Speaker 6 (09:08):
They're I have to do is look, we'll I have
to do. It's not and I'm listening and I listen
to people, and let's see what happens. Sir, that's not evident.
Speaker 10 (09:16):
Who think it's appropriate that they have the vote? Do
you think it's appropriate that they have an election? And
five days later they're nowhere close to pict it a win.
Speaker 6 (09:24):
Well, the officials acknowledge they are slow.
Speaker 3 (09:27):
They're urging.
Speaker 6 (09:27):
No, they're crooked.
Speaker 9 (09:28):
They're urging votes to be counting quickly.
Speaker 6 (09:30):
That's how they are in Carlile, just like your crooked.
Your press is booking and meet the presses crooked. To
be fair, I'm not crooked, but really, well, you play
right into their hands. Continue to either crooked or you stupid.
Speaker 1 (09:43):
Okay, So what's the good news. It's not Trump beating
up a reporter, although we all love that. The good
news is this Communists have never been able to control
their demonic urges. They just can't hold themselves back and
they push too far, too fast. This Los Angeles mayor
race the breeze and stealing of it out in the open.
(10:06):
I think the communists went too far this time. And
once this issue, once it lands on Normy's desk, on
Norman Norman, once they start waking up to this back,
that's the beginning us stepping in and making big changes.
The good news is Normani's are waking up and you
should feel good about all right, we'll talk to Katie
(10:29):
Zachariah about it. In the moment she told you this
was all coming before we talked to Katie. Maybe when
you think about Democrats at elections, maybe you can't sleep
at night. That's your problem. I can't. I've got dream
powder from being But for one I love hot chocolate.
That's what this is. It's a cup of hot chocolate.
I might wave a little cup of milk, put scup
and dream powder in there, about twenty thirty minutes for bed,
(10:53):
and I just drift off to sleep like a little baby.
Dream powder has all kinds of natural things that you see.
These are natural ingredients rashie and belatonin and things like that.
Can't taste it, but it's delicious. Mine is cinnamon chocolate.
I drink a cup of hot chocolate and sleep like
a baby, and I wake up ready to go. Every
(11:14):
single day. Go to shotbeam dot com, slash Jesse Kelly
and get you some today. We'll be back. There's something
about telling people the truth. Sometimes they appreciate it. Oftentimes
(11:35):
they do not appreciate it at all. Oftentimes when you
tell people the truth, they get angry, they get defensive.
Now Oftentimes, if they have any integrity at all, they
will come back to you later and they'll thank you
for being that person. But if you choose to be
that person in life, they're gonna get slapped around a
little bit. Jadie Zachariah, to her credit, came on this
(11:57):
show talking about the La mayor ray and she told
you the truth.
Speaker 3 (12:04):
No matter what visuals Spencer Pratt puts up, Karen Bass
still seems to have a stronghold over the mayoral race.
And so I hope, I hope for Spencer Pratt's sake
that he starts to gain more momentum. I'm not seeing
it in the polling if I'm really honest with you,
and as a kind of political strategist and analysts, I'm
(12:25):
looking at this thinking it's going to be Karen Bass again.
Speaker 1 (12:31):
Well, Govin pat Her on the back for that one.
Joining me now, Katie Zacharia, a former Trump DHS spokesman, Katie,
it's awful. Everyone's angry right now. Everyone. We like to
be hopeful. I would be hopeful. Hope was a good thing,
but people were kind of feeling a little bit kicked
in the teeth by how all this ballading stuff is going.
(12:51):
But the truth is it was kind of always going
to go this way, right, I agree.
Speaker 2 (12:56):
One of the things I continued to say is hope
does not win elections. And you can have the best strategy,
you can have the best messaging, and you can honestly
have people the ground population come out and support you
in mass including celebrities that have never probably voted for
a Republican in their life came out and voted for
Spencer Pratt. But what you can't have is a system
(13:19):
with sanctuary city and sanctuary state that let in a
mass amount of illegal aliens. You can't have a state
that passed a bill that bans you from checking an
ID in order to vote. Our Senate bill, actually that
Gavin Newsom sign bans any polar or any ballot, any
person running the ballot box from checking a voter for
(13:42):
a voter ID, and you can't have universal mail in
ballots that are able to you're able to cast your
ballot on election day and still they can count it
seven days up until seven days after the election. You
cannot have this and think that Republicans are ever going
to win. I said it so many times to your point.
(14:03):
I got a lot of flack from the right saying
I was a wet blanket, that I was not hopeful,
that I wasn't putting my support behind Spencer Pratt. But
the truth is is that you have to be a
realistic and I've been a broken record. Until California passes
voter ID, which Carl Demyo for wide, for state wide races,
Carl Deon Mayo has on our ballot for November. Until
(14:27):
we pass that, which is an eighty twenty issue, there
will not be a Republican governor, and there will not
be Republican there will not be a Republican breakthrough of
the Democrat super majority.
Speaker 1 (14:36):
Jesse neat to ask you to be a wet blanket again,
But again, I've watched these things. I'm happy to be
the jaded old man because that's apparently where I am now.
I've watched these kind of cold campaigns in everywhere Baltimore,
New York, Chicago. I've watched the app and open over
and over again. It always ends the same way. So
(14:58):
in these blue hell holes that have been blue hell
holes forever, is it just impossible.
Speaker 2 (15:07):
It's going to be impossible until there is a system
that is fair. And people kept saying Spencer Pratt is
the Mom Donnie for Los Angeles because no one could
believe a Mom Donnie could win, especially after nine to eleven.
It's as breakthrough an unusual as the New York Knicks
having a chance winning the playoffs here and we have
(15:29):
the New York Knicks and the playoffs, and we have
Mom Donnie in office, but we are not going to
get Spencer Pratt. And what's the big difference. The big
difference is is Spencer Pratt is a conservative Republican. He's
not an establishment Democrat. He's not a Democrat Socialist Party
of America. So raman who a lot of people underestimated,
and they should have overestimated her performance, not because of
(15:49):
the quality of her candidacy, not because she ran a
great campaign, but because the Democrats knew that if they
get Raman into the top two, it's Karen Bass. And
I said this from the outset. This state is run
by Nancy Pelosi, the state is run by the Kamala Harris,
the Gavin Newsom, the Joe Biden Democrat Party, the Barack
Obama Democrat Party. That if they want a candidate installed,
(16:12):
they will get that candidate installed. And this is Ramon.
This is the piece that Raman played, is that if
she's in the top two, they'll give her a sweetheart deal,
either to drop out and then it's just Karen Bass
so they can save money on campaigning, or they're just
going to run her and make it a very somewhat
(16:32):
fair race, and then Karen Bass will take the cake
because despite having been an abysmal failure for Los Angeles,
she's still going to win because the system is rigged
for Karen Bass to win and has been since the beginning.
Speaker 1 (16:48):
Katie, can you help us understand, who are watching this
from Afar and war, how it's so bopsided with all
the new votes they're counting. I don't I don't need
an innocent explanation. I want what you think is a
real explanation. What's going on here?
Speaker 2 (17:06):
If you look at this, at some of these latest drops,
and I would bring people's attention to one of the
most profound and shocking, well shocking for an objective viewer,
not shocking for someone who's watched this happen in California before.
But one of the drops had twelve and a half
percent of the votes cast, or one hundred percent of
(17:26):
those were for Raman and that was the only office
voted for, and nobody voted for the city attorney. This
is twelve and a half percent of one way, and
that same group of people didn't vote for the city attorney.
Now that shows your ballot harvesting. There's no question about
what's happening there. So where are they harvesting these bellets?
(17:47):
Spencer Pratt alluded to. I think it was a number
about forty three thousand. If I'm not mistaken, then I
could be wrong. And then he correlated it to the
number of people and homelessness on skid row. Look if
there are if they are ballot harvesting, and we don't
know who's voting, because they won't let us audit the election,
(18:07):
they won't let us verify who's voting. By voter ID.
Then then there's no way to determine if if you
can say this is fraud or if you can say
this is you know, legal fraud, which is essentially that
they are able to harvest all these ballots and cast
them legally within all of the framework required but not
(18:29):
actually following true rules that allow one person, one vote
and legal residents, legal citizens of this country, and within
the allotted timeframe. We have no way of verifying all
of that. And the signature verification process and ballot curing
process which they call is kind of a joke because
(18:50):
signature verification does not actually my signature is maybe one
straight line. How are they going to verify that that's me?
Speaker 1 (18:58):
And Jesse.
Speaker 2 (18:59):
I just want to add this quick story. When I
went to vote on election day in person, they said
that I had moved and I wasn't a valid voter.
Speaker 1 (19:08):
So for.
Speaker 2 (19:10):
I voted in twenty sixteen, twenty eighteen, twenty twenty twenty two,
twenty four, twenty six I was able to vote, but
they had to call the Secretary of State's assistant to
verify me. And yet there are many people in Los
Angeles that probably don't even live there, whose ballots are
being cast for them and they don't know it, and
(19:32):
there's no way to verify it. Jesse, it's a rigged system.
I have to be honest about that.
Speaker 1 (19:37):
Okay, Katie, I want to shift gears just because I
feel like I need a shower after all this talk.
Mandy an extra announce we're about to talk about Dahl
Kamala Harris. I'm sorry. We just had a poll come out,
and I've seen every poll basically reflects the same thing.
That she is still on top, which is unsurprising. But
where we go a pause on that for a moment.
She's on top consistently in Democrat poles. Is there somebody
(20:02):
who's going to overtake the home or is it going
to beat her again?
Speaker 2 (20:06):
Well for Kamala Harris, I think the Democrat Party has
not learned its lesson President Trump. As we know, Kamala
had to spend the DNC had to spend over a
billion dollars, and I think that they thought they got
a short change. What was the one hundred and seven
day run and she lost, but President Trump beat her
decisively seven swing states, the House, in the Senate. And
(20:27):
if they can't put up a better candidate, than Kamala.
I think they're hoping that they get some kind of
weak sauce Republican that can't take her on like President
Trump did, but that won't.
Speaker 1 (20:39):
Be the case.
Speaker 2 (20:39):
The Republican contenders for president are all very strong. If
you look at Jadie Vancemarco Rubio, any of the people
in that top tier list are going to be able
to beat Kamala Harris and her failed policies both as
vice president, Attorney General of California, and DA of California
in California. So if that's the best they have, it's
(21:00):
also an indictment Jesse on Gavin Newsom, right, because Gavin
Newsom was looking like the darling child that the DNC
was going to run, even Barack Obama came out and
supported him. He peddled what was asked of him, which
is the redistricting in California, and got rid of five seats,
or attempted to get rid of five seats, not so successfully.
And maybe we'll see that in November. But Jennifer Newsom
(21:24):
really thanks Gavin Newsom outside of his failed policies. His
wife did a nice job at kind of sinking him
as well. Hunter Biden might be the token DNC vice
presidential candidate who knows what they're going to put up
and who they're going to put up.
Speaker 1 (21:39):
Jesse Hunter Biden for the world we live in kay
Thank you so much. I appreciate it.
Speaker 2 (21:48):
Thank you.
Speaker 1 (21:50):
I have to be honest with you. I'm a patriot,
I love my country. I want one's best for my country.
But in the selfish, selfish interest of my show, I
kind of want hunter by It to be vice president.
I'm kidding, all right, all right, as a patriot that
I do have Pure Talk. You know, I do have
(22:12):
the patriotic mobile service. Those other big wireless companies they
hate your country. How much celebrating America for our two
and fifty and fiftieth anniversary have you seen from those
other wireless countries companies? You know? They all hire foreigners, right,
Not Pure Talk, though. When you get old pure Talk,
you get to speak to a pleasant, lovely American who
(22:33):
speaks English. Puretalk CEO fought for this country in Vietnam.
Pure Talk when they give back, they give back to veterans,
and they do this while delivering you amazing plans for amazing,
amazing discounts. Go to puretalk dot com slash Jesse TV.
We'll be back. Well, I guess as long as we're
(23:03):
talking about corruption, we might as well talk about Minnesota.
You see, this is not a it's not a California story.
California is a pleasant punching bag for all of us
because it's such a big, important state. It's been so
crazy and calming for a long time. And honestly, Minnesota
should be thankful for California because Minnesota gets lost in
this talk a lot. The truth that is, any state
(23:25):
that is run by Democrats for long enough is going
to become corrupt beyond belief. Joining me now, a guy
who talks about this a lot then knows a lot
about it, as the columnists from town Hall Dustin Gravy. Okay,
given everything that's going on in California, congratulations to you.
Your state seems to be a little bit lost in
the show right now. Good job.
Speaker 5 (23:48):
Oh no, it's incredible, especially watching though Spencer Pratt returns
there with the mail in ballots that we were somehow
able to capture the national spotlight after watching that theft
happen overnight. So yeah, no, glad to be back in
the news for all the wrong reasons.
Speaker 1 (24:04):
Let's talk about quote welfare fraud. It was the House
Oversight Committee just talked about Tim Walls Keith Ellison as
an I want to quote turning a blind eye to
massive welfare fraud in Minnesota. That seems awfully charitable to
me what happened in Minnesota.
Speaker 5 (24:23):
Yeah, I was just about to use those exact words.
It's charitable because at the end of the day, Yeah,
we've known about this fraud for a while. I'd say,
going back as late as early as twenty twelve. The
report I believe here says twenty twenty. But that's just
simply acknowledging fraud exists and that we have a problem.
But Tim Walls went an extra step further. His administration
(24:45):
actually went and retaliated against the whistleblowers for coming out
and saying there was fraud. And not only that. Fay
Bernstein one of the people who came out here publicly
as a whistleblower. She's a Democrat, she voted for these politicians.
She came out and said, hey, me, as a government employee,
I have a problem here and I think there's fraud occurring.
(25:07):
Then they painted her as a racist, a Democrat, not
a Republican, not a mega Republican, but they're painting Democrats
in this administration for being racist, for simply acknowledging fraud exists.
So they went an extra step further beyond just simply
turning a blind eye. They went directly head on and
went after the actual whistleblowers.
Speaker 1 (25:29):
Doestin, Can you elaborate in some detail what exactly does
welfare fraud mean when it comes to Minnesota? What is
the scheme, what do we know happened, What do we
think happened here?
Speaker 5 (25:41):
Yeah, so right now the we're mostly just talking for
just a perspective. We'll compare Californian here as well. California
has about eight to nine high risk Medicaid fraud programs.
Minnesota has fourteen. So in the scope of just these
fourteen programs, which is it's almost double of what we're
(26:03):
looking at at California, eighteen billion dollars in those programs alone.
The former first Assistant US Attorney here in Minnesota, who's,
by the way, a Democrat votes Democrat, said over half
of the money, okay, to these fourteen programs specifically, which
(26:24):
is like autism services and these daycare service actually daycares
not even included in that, but these other these fourteen programs,
he said, well over half is probably fraudulent. So that's
how we get that nine billion dollar figure that we've
been looking at here. And a lot of that is
just simply programs that uses Medicaid Medicare funding and allocates
(26:45):
it to these programs that are state created run. So
autism services is a big one everyone hears about. I
actually highlighted a legitimate autism service provider here in Minnesota,
Nick Sorder. We went to the program and how they're
funding with Pause, an organization that helps hundreds of legitimate
(27:07):
high high on that spectrum autism kids who can't function
an actual school. Their programs are getting shut down because
of these Somali fraudsters that are taking and pillaging our
resources and going out there and taking them and going
to fund terrorism in Somalia. That's basically what we're talking
about here. But it's other programs that you really don't
think should really fall under these actual programs we're talking about.
(27:31):
Simply people who are homeless and want to find assistance
finding a home.
Speaker 1 (27:36):
These are also.
Speaker 5 (27:37):
Programs included in this. So it's all these state programs
that find ways to create new programs that can associate
themselves with Medicaid Medicare funding, and then they take that
funding create these corrupt programs that have absolutely no oversight.
And if you do have oversight, they're gonna the government's
actually gonna come after you and try to demote you,
(27:58):
fire you, or lay you a racist in the process
for simply noticing that people are actually following the rules
with these weak oversight programs.
Speaker 1 (28:08):
I'nblady brought up over psych because that's exactly where I
was going next. It's not exactly surprising, honestly, It's to
be expected that when you bring some hostile foreign barbarian
into your country, he's going to conduct himself like a barbaria,
and that's all he ever knows. But you're supposed to
have some system of government in plays federal, state and
local that prevents them from doing such things. What kind
(28:30):
of system do you have there?
Speaker 5 (28:33):
There is no program there's nothing like that. In fact,
when we've talked about this, Jesse quite a bit in
extent with the Somali population in particular, but eight and
ten of them are on some type of welfare some
way or form. There's absolutely no programs out there that
are at least effective. I've heard of some programs, but
(28:54):
they're not effective in our school systems right now. They're
not actually educating these kids to learn English and integrate
into our society, and when they do, we have a
whole nother problem. We're bringing in more on top of
that that are adults that are going to continue to
refuse to assimilate. So even if we do get some
of these kids who are legitimly assimilating and learning culture
(29:15):
and they're taking off a jobs and they're going out
and there being productive members of society and you know,
possibly not going to be on a victim of what
their parents brought them up into and not be absolutely
dependent on the welfare state, but then we bring in
a whole new batch and then the process restarts again
and again and again. So there's absolutely no planning whatsoever
(29:38):
to actually do this. And yeah, when Republicans even bring
up some of this stuff with the oversight, I'll bring
up an example where a Republican legislator of mine actually
brought forth mandatory site visits must happen, and they must
happen twice a year, and in addition, you don't warn
the fraudsters that there's going to be a visit in
the next three months, so they could prepare them piper
(30:00):
work and actually pretend that they're doing their jobs. They
should be random. They should happen multiple times a year,
especially when they're being dealt out.
Speaker 1 (30:09):
Millions of dollars.
Speaker 5 (30:10):
But I've had instances where I've had a tipster send
me everything the documentation this place is committing fraud, and
then they report it to DHS, And I almost always
tell those tipsters that was the wrong move because what
happens now under the current programs with Minnesota DHS, they
actually go out and they warned the fraudsters ahead of time.
You're gonna have a site visit in the next three months.
(30:32):
So what are the fraudsters gonna do, Jesse, They're gonna
prepare their paperwork and they're gonna make sure everything's up
to code. They're actually a grocery shopping for the first
time in two years, and bring the food over and
it's gonna look great, I'm sure. Will they have a
million dollars laying around from collecting fraud, they have no
problem turning things around over the course of a week.
(30:52):
And then yeah, we get into the system where Yeah,
well we check them out. They were fine and Nick Shirley,
a lot of the people in this video, these organizations
they had received site visits before and passed them all
because they were warned ahead of time to prepare. But
of course what's the time where we caught them when
they weren't prepared because Nick Shirley show put the camera
(31:14):
unannounced and they didn't get any warning in advance. And
sure enough we caught some fraudsters. And just here in
the last month, we had a dozen raids happen at
different organizations in the twin days met shro and multiple
organizations that were in the Nick Shirley video were a
part of those raids and are being charged right now.
Speaker 1 (31:33):
All right, let's shift gears here. So I have to
ask about the governor's race, Tim Walls, is it running,
Who's going to be the Democrat nominee? And how are
they handling this? Because this is one of those things
where there's been some mud that has landed on Tim Walls.
Over all this the Minnesota Democrat Party doesn't look good.
How are they deal with this?
Speaker 5 (31:54):
Yeah, so they're in panic mode right now when it
comes to fraud. They're trying everything in their power to
avoid fraud. They're trying to make this selection about guns
and the Annunciation shooting. They're trying to make it about
Operation Metro Surgeon, the billion dollars lost to commerce and hospitality.
But you know, don't blame the Antifa rioters that were
(32:15):
breaking down the windows of the hotels on why the
hospitality industry is failing in Minneapolis. Don't blame that. We
gotta blame Trump because he's a NAZII. But the nominee
who will be the nominee for the Democrat Party is
Amy Klobashark for the current US Senator here in Minnesota. Now,
the reason they picked her is because she's in the
(32:35):
US Senate, she's not necessarily tied very directly to what's
happening here in the state, versus a Peggy Flanagan who's
reigning for US Senate. She's the lieutenant governor. She's much
much closer in connection with the frauds. So when we
look at some of that's polling with like a Michelle
Tafoya that I gotta signed back here for when they're
polled against Peggy and it's specifically tied to the issue
(32:59):
of fraud. That race is tied right now in Minnesota.
Michelle Defoya and Peggy fan again when we put a
microscope on fraud, are tied in the state of Minnesota.
We haven't won a Republican election here in over twenty years.
We're the longest running one without voting for a Republican president.
So this is amazing, This is great news for Republicans.
(33:22):
And yeah, why they're running away from fraud when it
comes to sorry my phone there, when it comes to
this because even when so this is internal polling, it's
not quite out there publicly. It's been done by some
packs that have informed me about it, but there is
also polling in the governor's race. Even when Amy Kolbishark,
you know, she's in the US and she's a little
bit more detached from the fraud happening at the state level,
(33:45):
but there's ear marks of her going and funding some
of these fraudulent programs with ilhan Omar. Whether she's complicit
in it directly by being intentional or not, we don't
quite know, but she's tied to a lot of these
earmark funding mechanisms are going to the fraud. And when
you're even pulled in specifically to a candidate Dame Lisa
(34:05):
Damuth and Ryan Wilson, her running mate, who ran for
Otter the last time, only lost by a percentage point
statewide in twenty twenty two when he ran Frauder. They
are also within one point of tying Amy Klobashar in
the governor's race. So fraud is the massive issue because
when you detach fraud and fraud's not an issue here
(34:26):
in the state of Minnesota, they're all behind by five
to six points. So fraud is the issue here in Minnesota.
Everybody's pissed off about it, and rightfully so, as we've
talked about throughout this, there's no oversight. People are complicit
in it to the point even Keith Ellison, who, by
the way, he's eight points underwater in internal polling right now.
(34:46):
He is absolutely cooked right now if the current state
of things continuing. For good reason, he met with these
fraudsters directly and said he's going to fight for them
before they were actually caught and convicted. So yeah, everybody's
tied to it in some way or for him now.
The more detached ones is a little harder, but there's
still those earmarks to point to and different things like that.
(35:08):
But at the end of the day, Minnesota Republicans were
in a great position, one of the more prominent positions
we've ever been in through elect Republican leadership for the
first time.
Speaker 1 (35:19):
Dustin, thank you, my brother as always. All right, we're
gonna talk to Aaron McIntyre. He's one of my favorites
in just the moment. Let me talk to you about
high interest debt. Do you have it? What do you
paying twenty percent on twenty five thirty? Don't worry. American
(35:40):
financing has hurt at all. Do you own a whole?
Do you own a whole? American financing They're going to
help you get out of those steeve waters. I know
that's what it feels like. It feels like you're drowning
when you're stroking a check whenever you can. You're baby
covering the interest payments, and it just feels like you
never can. Now that's not true. Don't sit and pay
(36:02):
twenty thirty percent the rest of your life. American financing
will chart you a path forward. Let them help you.
The only bad news is they can't do anything for
you unless you get a hold of them. Good to
one American financing dot net slash Jesse and let's let's
get you out of it. You need help. Help is
(36:24):
on the way. American financing dot net slash Jesse will
be bad. Well, we're not getting the same act. I understand.
That was a nice rallying cry for a lot of
people for about fifteen minutes, But the truth is it's
not going to happen. It just died again. And it
(36:46):
wasn't just Democrats, of course, it was four subversive Republicans
who stepped up and put their foot in the door
while we were getting ready to slam it on a
significant preace of communism in this country. And that's the
way it's gone for a while. So that people are
frustrated joining me now, the great Arn McIntyre of the
Arn McIntyre Show are in why did we have eighty
(37:08):
twenty issues? We can't get Congress to move on? How
is that possible? In a what do they call it again? Representative?
Speaker 7 (37:16):
Well, of course, because we don't have one Jesse, which
I'm sure you already know it's a joke and we
all understand it at this point. There is a system.
That system is being defended. It's being defended by those
that ultimately profit from it. Many of these people are
called Democrats, but a good number of them are called Republicans.
That doesn't mean that there's a difference between Republicans and Democrats.
(37:37):
There are I think more people on the right in
the Republican Party who genuinely care about the future of
this country, and we leant to make a difference. However,
that is not the entire party, or perhaps not even
the majority of it, and so over and over again,
even though in any understanding of a normal political system
you would see the Republicans, who clearly benefit from the
same act politically support that, even just on their own
(38:00):
self interest. But of course the self interest isn't in
having two competing parties. The self interest is in having
one unified system. And to the extent that any Republican
tries to change that, they are the enemy of the system.
Speaker 1 (38:13):
Okay, Aaron that the bad news is obviously we stew
up some Mitch McConnell types. The good news is John
Cornyn's Donoi was defeated, Bucassidy was defeated, Mitch mcconnoll's retiring
Tom Tillis is retiring. Are we improving? Are we getting better.
I know it's not fast and easy, but are we
getting better?
Speaker 10 (38:32):
Well?
Speaker 7 (38:32):
When I see people like Eric Schmidt or Brandon Gilt
in Texas, I do see improvements. I do see senators
and congressmen who have a vision for what needs to
come next. That we need to win, that we need
to secure political power and use it, and we need
to do so directly in the interests of the American
people and not some international empire or some continued financial situation.
(38:55):
So I do think we are seeing some improvement. The
question is can that improvement come fast enough. Of course,
every democratic win, every win for the system, makes it
harder and harder for us to dig ourselves out of
this hole because the problem is, of course immigration. As
long as our system operates, at least theoretically as a democracy,
then that means that every time we bring in new
(39:16):
people and those people have children here due to birthright citizenship,
we have people who will fundamentally change the way America
works through voting. And so the Democrats have to win
just a few times, we have to win every time.
So I am encouraged by a new crop of politicians
who are rising in the GOP. Unfortunately, I do worry
that perhaps that crop has come a little too late
(39:37):
to stave off what is coming.
Speaker 1 (39:40):
Speaking of Eric Schmidt, he's hot on it issue that
I don't know that I've ever seen a United States
Center or a senator talk about legal immigration. Obviously at
CEC for the GOP to stand up and rally against
trendy or AGWA com into your neighborhood to stab your
son in high school, and that one's a big fan
of that. It takes actual care reach to stand up
(40:01):
against very powerful money, very very powerful money in this
country and say no, we have way too many legal
immigrants here and we need to stop bringing them. It's
a huge issue.
Speaker 7 (40:13):
It's I think the most important issue is the issue
that drives everything else. If voting is what changes what
we do in the United States or who represents us,
then the people who select it are the only thing
that matters. And if you're bringing in new people to
change how that's done and how they're going to vote
and what our principles will be, then that's the ballgame.
Every other issue is downstream from that selection process. That said,
(40:35):
it is a huge deal that we now see the
GP going after legal immigration as well. We're even seeing
this from the Trump administration, which is stepping up its
game on he b's trying to reduce the number of
legal migrants that come in, the number of legal workers
that come in, and the number of legal refugees come in,
and decide where they come from and have them be
places that are far more in tune with American values.
(40:57):
These are all positive steps, and I think this is
something that always needed to go hand in hand with
the hard border enforcement. The mass deportations are good and
they're important, but of course it is this soft power
that also drives self deportations. People who cannot stay here,
who cannot get citizenship, who cannot plug in and get
benefits and jobs, they will not stay in the United States.
(41:18):
And so we always needed this too prompt approach, one
of the soft power, the regulation, the procedure, and then
one of the physical removal and the hard boundary of
the border. That's what we all wanted to see. The
trumpministration has gone a little soft, I think, on the
actual hard deportations, but they are trying to make up
with it with some of the soft power stuff. I'd
like to see both, but it is encouraging to see
(41:40):
improvements on that front.
Speaker 1 (41:43):
Trump was asked about Iran. You know that this whole
no new wars thing. Trump was asked about it in
an interview. And here's how that went.
Speaker 8 (41:52):
What changed because you insisted NOLO wars fedwisn't guarantee. Note what,
why would I I built this strama military that well,
I built our military. I inherited a terrible military that
we had no equipped that wind nothing. I built a
tremendous military might ga him out of it away, but
it's still a relatively small portion compared to what I built.
Speaker 6 (42:13):
She said, Where again, why would I build a military?
Speaker 9 (42:16):
Now?
Speaker 8 (42:17):
I didn't want to use this, but I'm doing you
and everybody else a big favor.
Speaker 6 (42:23):
All right.
Speaker 1 (42:24):
Obviously Trump is he's not a moron. You can read
poll numbers. He knows this whole Iran business. It's no
longer popular, if it ever was. He needs out. But
can he get out?
Speaker 7 (42:36):
Well, that's the biggest problem.
Speaker 1 (42:37):
Right.
Speaker 7 (42:37):
It does seem very clear that for at least the
last few months, Trumps understood the gravity of entering into
this war. It was not what it was sold to him.
It's not the easy in and out. It's not to
decapitation strike and the replacement like it was in Venezuela,
and more or less, Israel has Trump where he wants,
and they have him stuck in the Middle East where
they can constantly escalate the situation and force the United
(42:59):
States over and over again back into this conflict. Trump
knows he needs to get out. It's been very very clear.
If he wanted to be there, he would have easily
reignited these hostilities. But he is pushed at every moment
to basically ignore violations of the ceasefire by both Israel
and Iran as long as he can to try to
get this piece deal done. That said, is he actually
(43:20):
going to be able to extract himself because every single
time he seems to try to get these people to
the negotiating table, Israel fires off more rockets in Lebanon,
and then Iran fires off more rockets towards Israel. Neither
side seems interested in actually stopping their continued hostilities towards
each other. So the United States has a very difficult
moment here. Does it try to side with the ally
(43:42):
it went into the war with and end it in
what has to be a very costly both politically troops,
actual financial cost wise maneuver of a full hard invasion
into Iran, or does he simply leave and leave Israel
and Iran to figure this out on their own. It's
not an enviable situation. All options will cost Donald Trump
(44:05):
and the United States significantly, which is why many of
us begged to not enter into the situation. But we
have nonetheless, and so Trump has to make the hardest
of calls in the scenario. And I don't envy him.
Speaker 1 (44:18):
Yeah, that freaking sucks. All right, Alron, thank you, brother, come.
Speaker 7 (44:21):
Back, so thanks for having.
Speaker 1 (44:25):
You need to control your potty mouth. Next. All right,
it's time to light in the mood and grandma vodka.
She may have lost her fastball, you know when not
father time comes for all of us. But at least
(44:47):
I'll say this. She's still holding back f BOMs like
a champ.
Speaker 3 (44:51):
Here she was hik Commerson Pelosi. Last time I asked
you about January sixth, why you turn the National Guard away?
On January sixth, you told me to shut up and
that I was repeating republic to.
Speaker 9 (45:02):
Shut up again because you're speaking lies and out of
the right here here, right here, on the records, say
no I'll admit, no, I did not admit. The president
never assent. What was his cue as sin and nast
of life? Bill Face a fewer time or mine on you?
Speaker 3 (45:18):
Why was your daughter filming you on January seven?
Speaker 6 (45:21):
Just to get away?
Speaker 3 (45:23):
These are just questions the American people want answers to you.
Speaker 6 (45:26):
You know what I mean to peak you a real journalist?
You work for my pillow Man.
Speaker 3 (45:31):
Actually I do, and we're very proud.
Speaker 6 (45:33):
So don't consider that journalism like the pillow Man. That's
not journalism. I don't have any reason to talk to you.
Speaker 3 (45:38):
You don't love to give you a free would reclark this.
Speaker 9 (45:41):
I want people to know that you are not a
real journalist. You work for Mike and pillow Man, and
all you do is spout on tooths.
Speaker 6 (45:49):
Get away from you, gonna insult me. All you got
bay from me?
Speaker 3 (45:52):
Thank you, Congressoman. We'll give you a night pillow so
you can have a nice sleep tonight.
Speaker 4 (45:56):
Okay, take care.
Speaker 1 (46:03):
Let's see them are