August 13, 2026 • 46 mins
Primary elections determine who gets the chance to represent voters when the general election arrives. When the process is manipulated or voters stop paying attention, the consequences can reshape entire parties and governments. Jesse Kelly explains why primaries matter and why election integrity has to start long before Election Day.
Choq: Visit https://choq.com/jessetvfor a 17.76% discount on your CHOQ subscription for life
PureTalk: Stop overpaying for big wireless and switch to Pure Talk to get unlimited data when you visit https://PureTalk.com/JESSETV
Follow The Jesse Kelly Show on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@TheJesseKellyShow
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Listen
Watch
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Whenever a Democrat. Whenever the Democrat Party controls any area, city, county, state,
federal government, if they control it long enough, they will
put into place systems that allow them to steal elections.
Speaker 2 (00:16):
The fact that he knew that didn't tell anybody suspective
those sydekim storms after the second dose could lead to
miscarriage hold no one.
Speaker 3 (00:25):
Its followers insist on strict adherents, so broad in scope
but very narrowly applied, and its narrow application is insisted
upon by the sword.
Speaker 1 (00:39):
Last night there were primaries, Wisconsin primaries, Minnesota primaries, and
I'm passionate about primaries. I want you to be passionate
about primaries. Primaries matter a lot because primaries are what
determined the direction of the country. Have you ever looked
at the Democrat Party and said, oh my god, they're
(01:00):
so crazy now, I certainly hope you've said that because
they are so crazy now? Why though? What has made
them so crazy? Primaries? The nutballs keep winning the primaries,
and now the party's crazy. On the flip side, have
you ever looked at the GOP, who I affectionately call
the low t GOP and wondered, why don't they stand up.
(01:20):
Why don't they fight? Why are their amnesty losers like
James Landford? What we butt because we don't show up
and vote for hardcore right wingers in the primaries and
we end up with low t weenis like James Langford
screwing us over in the United States Senate. Long story, short,
primaries matter a lot, good news. Kind of this fran
(01:41):
hang nutball. You know this lady, she lost last night.
Speaker 4 (01:44):
You said Americans should cancel Thanksgiving. Should have done this
in sixteen twenty one. The post has been deleted. Republicans
have been highlighting it. Do you still believe that Thanksgiving
should be canceled?
Speaker 5 (01:56):
Thanksgiving is also a time that's incredibly painful for many
people in our communities, and so I think there I
wanted to make sure that people understood that there are
multiple views, but views can evolve. And do you believe
right now in our Supreme Court that we should be
working to expand the.
Speaker 6 (02:12):
Court, defund the police, protect black lives, and build a
care community.
Speaker 3 (02:17):
This is what we need.
Speaker 6 (02:18):
That is in the service industry, we are finally having
this conversation about you know, how our industry really did
come from it and kind of is rooted in white supremacy.
That tipping in itself. If we look at the history
of tipping and how racist it is in the restaurant industry.
Speaker 7 (02:36):
When we're out of something, we say it's eighty six,
and I'd say it's about time we eighty six Trump.
He represents the utter failure of our government to keep
us safe from threats, both viral and systemic.
Speaker 1 (02:51):
Well, she lost, that's good, right, Look, it is good,
but did you see the circumstances is around the loss.
Speaker 8 (03:04):
Are two things. There's the audit log and the results.
What we uncovered was that five of the sticks had
the audit log downloaded and not the results. It's a
human error. These things can happen. So basically what we
need to do is go back to the operation center
and we're going to download out of those five machines
(03:26):
the results and make sure that it's not the audit log.
Speaker 9 (03:30):
I guess the exact thing, yes, is if five of
the USB sticks were missing results from the election, so
then they have to they have to go try to
regrab them.
Speaker 3 (03:46):
Yeah, and they're.
Speaker 9 (03:48):
All the folks behind the scenes are talking about this
as well. So we can also look, it's unfortunate.
Speaker 10 (03:55):
The folks by the scenes here you're saying, yes, we.
Speaker 11 (03:59):
Are are are?
Speaker 10 (04:02):
How do I ask this artfully?
Speaker 12 (04:13):
That was awkward.
Speaker 1 (04:15):
Look, Democrats cheat because Democrats are communists. Whenever a Democrat,
whenever the Democrat Party controls any area, city, county, state,
federal government, if they control it long enough, they will
put into place systems that allow them to steal elections.
(04:38):
It's what they believe. It's how they've always operated. And
you even have these guys on TV left speechless. You know,
in television, you're not supposed to have that kind of
dead air.
Speaker 12 (04:50):
That uh what That's how it is. I'm sure they
stole it. That's what they do, all right.
Speaker 1 (05:01):
Minnesota Liberal Liberal and Peggy Flanagan Tree wonner primary Sally Willikum.
Speaker 13 (05:09):
My name's Peggy Flanagan. I am the Lieutenant Governor of Minnesota,
and I'm really honored and humbled to be here with
all of you today. I am incredibly clear that the
Somali community is part of the fabric of the state
of Minnesota. My name in the Ojibwean language is easy
waywodam Ukway, or in English speaks with a clear and
(05:34):
loud voiced woman.
Speaker 14 (05:36):
I'm a member of the White Earth Nation and my
family is the Wolf Clan.
Speaker 12 (05:42):
We need to rip Ice apart and.
Speaker 14 (05:45):
Stop them from terrorizing our communities. This is life affirming
and life saving healthcare. When our children tell us who
they are, it is our job as grown ups to
listen and to believe them.
Speaker 1 (06:09):
Probably going to be United States Senator, I don't want
to say speaking of Minnesota, this is going to be
a lesson, not for Minnesota, not for any one particular person.
Mike Lindell's who we're going to talk about here. This
is a lesson for every single Republican politician who is
in office or is thinking about running for office going
(06:31):
forward in the year of Our Lord twenty twenty six,
there is more anger around the mass immigration into this
country than you can possibly fathom.
Speaker 12 (06:44):
The average Republican voter has.
Speaker 1 (06:47):
Turned into a rabbit animal like me when it comes
to deporting every one of these dirty foreigners out of
our country. This is not an extreme position with the
Republican base.
Speaker 12 (06:59):
It is d Republican base.
Speaker 1 (07:02):
And so how in the world could Mike Lindell earn
the sacred endorsement of Donald Trump, the loud endorsement of
Donald Trump and go on to lose a primary.
Speaker 12 (07:13):
Would you like to know how here's how.
Speaker 15 (07:17):
You now have all the money that you gain. It's
in the billions, not millions, in the billions you gained
from them paying taxes and all these employers. Okay, you
take that money and you use it to get to
legalize people. You bring it to you know, because right
now a lot of the people think can't afford five
to fifteen thousand dollars to go through the system to
(07:38):
be legalized. I went down to Florida and checked it
all out of people that are coming in legally.
Speaker 10 (07:43):
Well, I know, I know that farmers would be thrilled
with something like this because.
Speaker 15 (07:46):
They all would be.
Speaker 12 (07:50):
That's it.
Speaker 1 (07:52):
And there are a lot of Republican politicians in office
and thinking about running for office. Maybe they run in
Wealthy Circle or Washington, DC or something like that.
Speaker 12 (08:03):
Maybe they think they have to.
Speaker 1 (08:04):
Give people like me and you a pat on the head.
Speaker 12 (08:07):
No no, no, no, we'll deport some people.
Speaker 1 (08:09):
But then they think they can just wow, we need
a path citizenship. I'm just warning you, however you feel
about this issue, if you flirt with amnesty, your political
candidacy is over.
Speaker 12 (08:22):
In the Republican Party. Night's over.
Speaker 1 (08:24):
By the way, this applies to everyone thinks Jadvance is
going to be the presidential nominee and Jadvance is not
an amnesty guye let me be clear.
Speaker 12 (08:32):
But if jd.
Speaker 1 (08:33):
Vance is Trump's air apparent and Trump endorses them, and
jd Vance is running away with the primary and jd
Vance came out tomorrow and said, you know what, we
need a path to citizenship. These kids are dreamers and
stuff like that, boom gone, primary over.
Speaker 12 (08:47):
He would lose. Let it be known. We are angry.
Speaker 1 (08:51):
We're tired of the filth, the costs that the housing prices,
the jobs market.
Speaker 12 (08:58):
Get these people out, all of.
Speaker 1 (09:00):
Them, all right, all right, I mean we have such
a great show for you, Senator Ron Johnson. He's still
tearing faalgi apart. We'll talk to Senator Johnson about that next.
Before we talk to Senator Johnson, I want you to
talk to your loved ones right now on your peertalk phone.
Speaker 12 (09:18):
Of course, I.
Speaker 1 (09:19):
Don't want you to pay one of the big wireless
companies to go talk to your loved ones. These big
wireless companies hate us. They fund all these left wing causes.
They hate our freaking guts. But pure Talk doesn't do that.
Pure Talk is so pro America that Puretalk hires Americans. Nobody,
(09:40):
no major corporation does that anymore. Pere talk does. There's Ceo,
the guy who runs the company, Vietnam veteran. Two tours,
no contract, no cancelation fee, a fraction of the cost
of the big guys. Go to puretalk dot com, slash
Jesse TV.
Speaker 12 (10:00):
We'll be bad.
Speaker 1 (10:01):
I love the fact that Ron Johnson is still on
Fauci like a dog. He's just not letting it go,
which I love because I know you haven't let it go.
Speaker 12 (10:08):
I haven't let it go.
Speaker 1 (10:09):
And now we have this little tidbit courtesy of Senator
Ron Johnson.
Speaker 12 (10:14):
This is in twenty twenty one quote.
Speaker 1 (10:17):
Theoretically the COVID shot could be associated with miscarriage in
the first trimester. Okay, that's funny because I know you've
seen the video, maybe you even remember it. Fauci was
on TV every five minutes telling pregnant women, I get
the COVID shot.
Speaker 12 (10:35):
What happened?
Speaker 15 (10:36):
There?
Speaker 1 (10:36):
Joining me now, the great senator from the state of Wisconsin,
Senator Ron Johnson, Senator, break down these texts for us
just telling nefarious?
Speaker 12 (10:44):
Are these these texts?
Speaker 2 (10:46):
I think pretty nefarious? You know, probably the most galling
state he ever made is they're just no red flags,
just like Peter marks all these people saying we're just
not seeing safety signals, even though VEARS was being deluged
with adverssi V reports safety signals, red flags were screaming
at them. But what is important about this is now
(11:07):
the news media is being forced to cover the cover
up of adverse events because it came out of Fauci's lips.
They completely ignored my bombshell report that Peter Marx knew
about a month later algorithm was going to hide safety signals.
He was shown. His senior FDA officials were shown dozens
of safety signals, including sudden cardiac death pulmnarian farction, which
(11:30):
Anti Fauci suffered from in June to twenty twenty one,
told no one different times of strokes. But you know
what's interesting about this, Jesse, You know how closely I
followed this. I had never heard that the second dose
produced greater cytokine storms. I'd never heard that before. I
wonder where Fauci got that from. Remember cykine storms and
(11:52):
the lungs that caused all these respiratory problems and stuff
in COVID.
Speaker 3 (11:56):
This's was killing people.
Speaker 2 (11:58):
So the fact that he knew that, tell anybody suspected
those ceydekim storms after the second dose could lead to
miscarriage told no one. Again, this is scandalous. But as
if not more scandalous, is the fact that our legacy
media has completely covered for him, covered this up, and
(12:18):
only now here in August of twenty twenty six are
they finally reporting on one instance, only one instance are
they reporting on where one of these people who are
in charge of and whose responsibility it was to surveil
for safety on these experimental gene therapy injections, and this
is not a job. They got an emergency so authorization.
(12:40):
They should have been tracking this like a hawk. I was,
and I was vilified and ridiculed for watching for following veyors.
As soon as I started publishing my veyor's charts. People
that have me on their shows would be deplatformed by
Facebook because Anti Fauci told them to depplatform people like us.
So again, this is scandalous. I don't know, I don't
(13:02):
know how many people lost their lives because anti Faucine
and others didn't do their job and reported to doctors,
practitioners and the American public what they knew. They simply
didn't do it. You know why, because they didn't want
to create vaccine hesdancy.
Speaker 3 (13:18):
That was their main goal.
Speaker 2 (13:20):
Do not create vaccine hesnancy, because their main goal was
to come up with a universal global vaccination program. Fauci
broke that back in October twenty nineteen, with rig Bright
and the Milican instudents saying there'd be moaning the fact
they would have a universal vaccination program. Flu just doesn't
do it. We need a pandemic. Well they got that pandemic.
(13:41):
They got their excuse to have a universal and it's
not a vaccine, it's an experimental gene therapy injection. But
they got it. They forced it on the global public
and did not tell them the dangers of this experimental
gene therapy.
Speaker 1 (13:55):
It's sick, Senator, Can you help stupid people like me
understand some of this stuff. Why is the second shot
of this gene therapy? Why is it doing things that
maybe the first one didn't do? And the reason I
ask a technical, stupid question like that is every.
Speaker 12 (14:12):
Time I have you on.
Speaker 1 (14:13):
People who have been heard or think lost someone and
they suspected They email me with questions, Jesse, why this?
Can you explain this? Can you help me understand as
best you can? Why is it when you went in
for number two your lungs aren't working anymore?
Speaker 2 (14:27):
It's actually, I think pretty easy to potentially understand. First
of all, you have to understand what this mRNA does.
It bio distributes all over the body because the lipid
nanoparticle was designed to permeate difficult to permate barriers. They
knew that.
Speaker 15 (14:40):
They lie to you.
Speaker 2 (14:41):
So you have this lipid nanoparticle containing mr and A
distribute all over the body. When it attaches to a cell,
it allows the mRNA modified so it doesn't degrade into
the cell, turns the cell into a manufacturing site of
the spike protein, which is the most toxic part of
the coronavirus. So you turned your body into a manufacturing
(15:03):
site for something toxic to it. When the body recognizes
something that's not it, that is toxic to it in
a taxic that causes inflammation. Now that we know that
this mRNA was modified to stay in the body a
long time, for weeks, it's cumulative. So the first shot,
maybe you were lucky the lipid nanoparticle didn't distribute to
(15:25):
places and constrated places that really caused your problem. Your
body was able to handle it better. The second shot,
it's cublative. Now you got more of this stuff, circlaring.
They found spike protein circling the body over seven hundred
days post vaccination. They found the mRNA weeks after vaccination.
Yet we were told, no, this is mRNA degradesed in hours. No,
(15:48):
it was a pseudo uridine modified modified RNA that hung
around the body for weeks, months, probably years in terms
of the spike protein. So they just they lie boldfaced
to us. It's cumulative. You know, hopefully you didn't get
all the boosters. The more you got, the bigger problem
you had. But by the by the way, by the
fourth the second booster, the fourth shot, now you have
(16:11):
an antibody switch where it's an immune system reaction to
like say an allergy, where you actually end up being
more resistant to the allergen, so your body doesn't have
an immune response, so you don't have like allergic impact.
And this is getting again. I'm not a doctor. I've
got a pretty good medical education just over the last
six years. But again, this has all been known. I've
(16:33):
known this for years. I've tried holding public events to
warn the public, but I've been ridiculed. I've been vilified.
The medical establishment that should know better, they've remained silent.
Now it's maybe maybe the dam is breaking now, but
I'm not holding my breath. I mean, there's so many
powerful interests that want universal vaccination programs because there's no liability.
(16:55):
It's a multi billion dollar profit type of potential for
these folks.
Speaker 15 (16:59):
It's good.
Speaker 2 (17:02):
They want to silence people like me and you.
Speaker 12 (17:04):
Senator.
Speaker 1 (17:05):
I have to ask a lame question because it's an
obvious question, but it's true. We're supposed to have a CDC,
We're supposed to have an FDA, We're supposed to have
ANNIH and a whole list of other government agencies that
are supposed to be protections for me the citizen. Because
I don't know crap about medicine. I went to community college.
I don't know any of these things. I'm supposed to
(17:26):
have agencies that I can rely on that will make
sure this maybe pharmaceutical company cannot hurt me. But the
more we learn about COVID, the more we learn they're
all in it with each other.
Speaker 12 (17:39):
And against me. Sorry, but that's how it seems.
Speaker 2 (17:42):
Well that's because it seems, because that's how it is.
That's the problem with big government big businesses. You know,
the first they figure out how to survive under regulation.
Then they learn how to capture the regulator, they learn
how to turn it to their advantage. So you see
the evolving door between these tops officials and big farma.
(18:03):
Scott Gottlieb goes to Pfizer. Okay, I mean you know,
Peter Marx went to Eli Lilly, So it's a revolving door.
They approve different products, so then when they're tenuring government's up,
they go and get They make multimillions of dollars in
these big farmer companies. So it's it's all cooked. Just
let's face it, there's a one word definition of government.
(18:24):
It's power. As Lord Acton pointed out, power corrupts, absolute
power corrupts, corrupts absolutely. So government has been corrupted thoroughly.
And it's not just big farm, it's not just a
pharaceutical industry. It's throughout, you know, whether it's big food,
whether it's big big agriculture. All these agencies that have
(18:45):
been set up to regulate on behalf and protect the
American public's interest, they've been captured by by big business.
And that that's what's that's really what's wrong with capitalism
today in our country. It's it's it's not small little
businesses competing like Adamsmith's Invisible Hand is run by big
corporations having to kow taut to big government and then
(19:08):
learning how to take advantage of big government to their
own advantage and capture and corrupt it. That's what's happening
across the board.
Speaker 1 (19:17):
Senator, Can you help me understand is there any legal
accountability that can come for people like Rachelle what's the name,
Michelle Willinski, Deborah Burkes.
Speaker 12 (19:28):
Vivek Murphy.
Speaker 1 (19:29):
I understand found she has this pardon from up on
High and I understand there are limitations there, but these
other people do not, and they were participating wholeheartedly.
Speaker 2 (19:39):
I sure hope there is. I'm not a lawyer or prosecutor,
but again, this is the problem of government. First of all,
government is almost impossible to sue the agency of government
pretty difficult to sue them as well. I mean, government
protects itself. Yes, it's not protecting the public, it's protecting itself.
It's protecting its interest and the in the interests of
(20:00):
those big corporations that have captured it. So again it's
going to be difficult, but you know, so my job
is exposed the truth, to expose who the bad actors were. Again,
we've taken a pretty one, one big step from a
standpoint of these texts, and this is just one text.
And we got thirty four thousand, about nine hundred different
(20:20):
phone numbers that just found out. There's his phone numbers.
They're not contexts. He only had three contexts in his
context list, which indicates to me he deleted them or
something deleted those contexts. So it's making a job more difficult.
But fortunately my staff picked this need a lot of
the haystacks, so we could at least warn public, public,
the you know, the public, the pregnant women that Anthony
(20:43):
Fauci was concerned about this thing maybe causing miscarriages. Maybe
you ought to be concerned, Maybe maybe you ought to
take that into your own personal risk benefit equation. That's
what Fauci, that's all these people denied the American public.
They denied them informed consent, They denied them information, and
they did not undertake their responsibility or fulfill their responsibility
(21:04):
of warning the public of what they knew, telling the
public what they knew.
Speaker 3 (21:09):
They didn't do that.
Speaker 12 (21:11):
What was Operation Round River.
Speaker 2 (21:15):
So that was a concerted effort on the part of
the FBI, and I was a target of it to
basically protect Joe Biden and a group of people that
are fellow travelers and then go over and attack those
of us who are trying to expose that. We're gonna
learn more about it, you know, John Solomon working with
(21:36):
this task force inside the White House. President Trump has
been absolutely dedicated to uncovering this stuff and making it public,
declassifying it, but he's had hard time inside the agencies. Again,
you have I don't care what government agency it is.
You have the deep staters. They're trying to sabotage and
frustrate President Trump's efforts and trying to come clean. But
(21:58):
here here's one example. The information is starting to come out.
Let's say we've known now for quite a few years
that the russ inclusion hoax was just that it was
a dirty trick dreamed up by the Hilly Clinton campaign.
The Washington Post got a Pultzer Prize for reporting and
creating all this political turmoil over that Rush collusion hoax.
(22:19):
Have they returned that Poltzer prize?
Speaker 1 (22:23):
Well, Senator, I thought we just had a Supreme Court
ruling that said we can fire people in these agencies.
So can you help me understand why it doesn't go, Hey,
show me this, No, you're fired. I mean, that's certainly
how it works in the private sector. If my boss
has told me this, Hey, Jesse, show up at corporate
headquarters and I said no, Well, that would be a
(22:44):
quick conversation.
Speaker 12 (22:46):
Why is it not quick?
Speaker 2 (22:48):
Because a lot of these people are weasels and they
actually know how to survive and that could get taken out.
They just know how to hide this stuff. Again, it's
not easy. Problem is big government. That's our founders knew that,
which is why they try to set up as system
they would limit the growth of government. But unfortunately, the
federal government busted out of its enumerated power constraints decades ago,
(23:12):
primarily under the Big Deal, and now it's just grown,
it's fantasticized. It's taking away our freedoms and it's a
very difficult to Pandora to put back in that box.
Speaker 12 (23:24):
Senator, last one for me.
Speaker 1 (23:25):
I can't let you go without asking about the primaries
took place in Wisconsin last night and mostly the tabulation
error that everybody's talking about.
Speaker 12 (23:34):
Senator. Maybe it's totally innocent.
Speaker 1 (23:36):
I have a hard time believing that, but it looks
so bad that this keeps happening in the blue areas
of the country.
Speaker 2 (23:43):
It's complete incompetence. If it's not fraudulent, Okay, at a minimum,
at a minimum, best case, it's total incompetence. I'm part
of these election officials. Our goal should be to restore
confidence in our election system. Now we can't do it legislatively,
either at the state or federal level, because Democrats refuse
to vote for any confidence building election in Tegerty measures
(24:07):
they won't do it. And then in their precincts, you know,
the ones controlled by Democrats, they run these elections with
grotesque in competence. Again, if it's not totally fraudulent, can't
I can't tell you, because like it's really difficult to
investigate election fraud. Once it occurs, it's really difficult. You
have to control it on the front side. Just like
(24:28):
welfare fraud really hard to recover the funds. You've got
to stop the money before it ever falls out the door.
Speaker 1 (24:35):
Senator, appreciate you as always come back, all right?
Speaker 12 (24:39):
THEO. Wold knows a lot about.
Speaker 1 (24:41):
This stuff, former Assistant Attorney General. I have a lot
of things I want to get to with him before
I get to that. One good thing I can definitely
say about the covid era is it led to the
merge me and Chalk Natural Herbal Supplements. A Chalk Chalk
was out there, this natural urbal supplement company being loud
(25:04):
on social media, getting themselves in trouble, getting their social
media accounts banned for what telling the truth? Telling the
truth about things we all know now to be true.
But they were telling it back when it was unpopular.
And isn't that the mark of real courage, when you're
saying and doing things that are risky.
Speaker 12 (25:22):
That's what Chuck did.
Speaker 1 (25:24):
I've been taking a male vitality stack for over four
years now, better energy, like a million bucks, My mind
works better. They have female vitality stacks for women. Go
to Chalk dot com slash jessetv get a subscription.
Speaker 12 (25:41):
We'll be back.
Speaker 15 (25:42):
We had a very unfortunate decision in the Supreme Court
concerning birthriter was close, but a very very unfortunate decision.
Speaker 3 (25:51):
So we're making adjustments.
Speaker 10 (25:54):
Birth tourism is by definition of fraud on the American system,
on the America and taxpayer on the American visa. If
you're coming here and again in your stated purposes that
you're a tourist, that by definition you are here to
come for a few weeks. Look what we have, engage
in commerce and leave. So if you're telling a constler
officer you're here as a tourist, but your true purpose
(26:16):
and intent is to go to a baby mail, give
birth and try to mint an American citizen while you're here,
then you're committing a fraud against the American government, and
by definition that visa can and should and will be
now denied.
Speaker 1 (26:32):
That's awesome, I think, But I know about the Supreme
Court roop. We need THEO in here joining me now,
THEO old former Assistant Attorney General, former White House Deputy
Assistant for Domestic policy of course under President Trump.
Speaker 12 (26:47):
Okay, THEO help me understand this. The Supreme Court issued
this horrible ruling. We all hated it. We all cried
and gride ourselves asleep that night. I got it. Then
we get this executive order.
Speaker 3 (26:58):
What, Yeah, well, I think some of that's warranted, Jesse.
I think, look, here's the best way to understand this.
There have always been understood to be a couple of
exceptions to birthright citizenship under the fourteenth Amendment, the most
notable being the children of foreign envoys or foreign ambassadors. Basically,
(27:21):
what this executive order that the President just signed in
the last few days targets is precisely those exceptions. And
what they're trying to do is use the power of
the executive branch to ferret out the granting of passport materials,
social security material application materials to children born to these
categories of exceptions. And they're also trying to graft on
(27:45):
one new one, which is so called birth tourists. And
I say so called because it's going to be really
difficult to determine who exactly is here for birth tourism
and who isn't. And I think you and I could
probably figure that out. But once we pass this along
to hospital administrators who have an incentivized desire to encourage
birth tourism, as we saw in South Texas, with the
(28:06):
billboards encouraging Mexican nationals to come across the border to
give birth. Once you give it over to hospital administrators, nurses, doctors,
all the offices of vital statistics in the states that
collect the paperwork to give birth certificates, none of these
people have any interest in curtailing the granting of citizenship
to foreign nationals. But this executive order will rely on
(28:28):
those people to identify who's here for the purposes of
birth tourism. So I think there's categories that fall in
the traditional understanding of what are exceptions to who can
be denied birthright citizenship, and then there's this new one
called birth tourism, and that's what the executive order is
trying to tackle. We'll see immediately the same group of
(28:49):
litigants from the original Supreme Court case filed to enjoin
this new executive order, saying, you know, same story, different day.
They're just trying to reward what they already did, Mister
Justice stop them from going forward with this. So we'll
see if they survive that initial phase of litigation, and
then from there, if it is allowed to proceed, the
(29:10):
question will be how do you enforce it?
Speaker 12 (29:13):
Okay, theos.
Speaker 1 (29:14):
Let's let's talk about this stopping these women coming in?
Why can't we just legally, I guess I should ask,
can we just stop a woman from coming in if
she looks like she's ready to pop? So when I
run into Hong Chain at the customs, or I run
into you know, Maria Gonzalez at customs and she's clearly
getting ready to have a baby, can't we just say no?
Speaker 12 (29:38):
Yeah?
Speaker 3 (29:38):
Well, so we should be able to. And the process
to do this, Jesse would be pretty simple, which is
you would just have the FAA, for example, that handles
you know, air traffic, you know the different types of
behaviors at airlines can engage in in our airports and
air facilities. You just have them do a rulemaking. This
is what the Left does all the time. You just
(30:00):
creator regulation that says, up until you know, three weeks,
three months, or first trimester or second trimester or pregnancy,
no one is allowed to board a plane unless it's
for a documented short term reason. You could even you
could even restrict it beyond that. But you know, here's
the key thing. You got to do the hard work
of actually writing the regulation and then forcing the airline
(30:21):
industries to abide by this, because again the problem here,
as is the case with the hospitals, is none of
the people in our country who should give a damn
about US citizenship do because their financial incentives all run
the opposite direction. No airline wants to say to you know,
an obviously pregnant for national boarding a plane and Heathrow
(30:42):
bound for JFK. Sorry, we know you bought a ticket
in first class, but we're gonna have to ask you
to turn around and exit the airport because we're not
letting you board this plane because you're obviously pregnant. The
airline is they don't care, so you're going to have
to make them care, and the way to do that
is through a rule making.
Speaker 1 (31:00):
Speaking of making them care, and stories that just continue
to get more insane by the day. New York, Connecticut, Vermont,
they're currently being sued by the Trump DOJ because do
I have this right? They give taxpayer money to illegals
so they can go to college.
Speaker 3 (31:16):
Yeah, that's exactly right. I mean, and this should be
one of those things that pisses off every American taxpayer.
This has been going on actually for years, and this
was really, in my mind, one of those early phases
of the woke left signaling how much they value foreign
nationals over American citizens. Because none of this is new.
(31:37):
This has been on the book since the early two thousands,
where Blue states started to give in state tuition benefits
to the children of illegal aliens or illegal aliens who
entered the country and were then eligible to attend university.
I mean, there's no more a slap in the face
to American especially American young people, but American taxpayers, especially
(32:00):
at publicly funded universities. Then the idea that you would
prefer foreign nationals for tuition advantages and admission over American
citizens and American miners, and so look, this has been
going on for a long time. I think this litigation
is extremely important. The one thing I want to see though, Jesse,
from this is whether or not they actually want to
(32:22):
push these states to revoke in state tuition benefits to
illegal aliens, because the way it's kind of been construed
so far in the core proceedings is you can continue
to give benefits to illegal aliens, you just can't not
give those benefits to American citizens even if they reside
in other states. And my point would be no benefits
(32:44):
to illegal aliens. This is something we've pushed for in
the Idaho state legislature, for example, which is to forbid
the ability of any future legislature to give benefits to
foreign nationals. And I'll just say, Jesse, this is happening
across the board. It's not just tuition for universities in college.
Foreign nationals are preferred in our healthcare system, and our
education system and our housing system. If you total the
(33:07):
actual expenditures that Blue states have, you know, taking for example,
the state of Maine main gave out about ninety two
billion dollars in housing grants to foreign nationals, in particular
Somali nationals in Maine for essentially free housing, government constructed
housing in Portland and in Augusta, while Americans can't pay
(33:29):
the skyrocketing costs of housing and as well as you know,
these own affordable mortgages. So while you're busting your butt
to pay for your kids to get some kind of
opportunity to go to your in States, you know school,
whether it's you know, a big ten school or something
out west, foreign nationals are coming here and they're getting
your tax dollars to go to school for free.
Speaker 1 (33:51):
They'll walk me through the decision on the mustache, and
I ask because I can go a spectacular mustache. But
my wife hates it, I mean absolutely hates it, to
the point she will make threats if I threatened to
shave in the mustache and tell me about yours.
Speaker 3 (34:06):
Uh, this is a long story. This has to do
with Secretary of Hexcess new restriction on beard waivers. So
I'm an Air Force reservist and I reported down to
my unit in Florida and my beard waiver is no
longer good. So I shaved the beard and came out
and my wife was like, what is on your face?
Speaker 16 (34:26):
What?
Speaker 3 (34:27):
What is that? As is Tom Selleck. That's what we're doing.
We're doing this right now. So she said, we're doing something.
It's a choice and it's not the one. So my
wife's right there. We're at Jesse. It's not been popular
in my house at all. My kids are just like,
can you please grow grow your beard back?
Speaker 16 (34:43):
Dad.
Speaker 12 (34:45):
I don't know why they hate it.
Speaker 3 (34:46):
They still fit, they really do, they really do universally hated.
Speaker 12 (34:51):
Yeah, it is it is.
Speaker 7 (34:52):
Well.
Speaker 1 (34:53):
I think you're doing great, buddy. You have nothing but
heartfelt support.
Speaker 12 (34:56):
All right.
Speaker 1 (34:57):
The State Department has my support as well, because they
did she one hundred and seventy five thousand visas from
people who they yank them from.
Speaker 15 (35:04):
Yeah.
Speaker 3 (35:04):
No, this is an unmitigated success story for the administration.
This is something that should have been done over the
last three or four presidential administrations. And the best way
I can explain this for your viewers, Jesse, is to
think about look, a visa, a legal visa to enter
the United States is essentially a contract. It's where the
United States saying, hey, you get to come in under
(35:25):
these terms for this long to do these kinds of
things while you're here, and if you violate any of
those stipulated terms, we get to send you back. You
don't get to stay. You're out of here and for
a long time. We would give these visas, whether it's
an H one B supposedly to work in the tech sector,
but that's kind of a lie. The J one, which
(35:45):
is to be au pairs or what we call summer
work and travel visa, so you can work at some
kind of you know, summer camp or be a lifeguard somewhere. Again,
all of these visas are ones that we should definitely
think about either pausing or scaling back because these are
definitely the issue to foreign labor for jobs that Americans
could do. But here's the point. People would get these visas,
(36:07):
come into the country and do all kinds of things,
not just you know, heinous crimes like rape, murder, you know,
armed robbery, of course that occurred, but other things like
you get a visa to be a summer camp counselor,
and the next thing you know, you're getting a job
working at bank, which is a total violation of the
terms of the visa. So for the first time ever,
Marco Rubio State Department said, let's start to go through
(36:30):
and systematically review the visas that we've actually issued that
are out running around in our country and see if
the holders of those visas have complied with the terms.
And what they found is you've got people who have
been convicted of child pornography, of aggravated sexual assault, of
domestic abuse, of murder, and they still have their visa
(36:51):
to stay in the United States. So they pulled one
hundred and seventy five thousand of these visas so far
that have led obviously to deportation and removal proceedings of
the the immigrants who held those visas. And they're looking
to do a whole bunch more. I think this is
such important work. And as they said, the best way
to understand illegal visa is, it's a contract between the
American taxpayer and a foreign national. You get to come
(37:13):
here so long as you abide by our rules, obey
our laws, and comply with the terms of when you
come and when your visa says you have to leave.
And if you don't play by those rules, then we're
going to take the visa back and we're going to
send your ass out of here. And it's great that
Marco Rubio State Department is doing that.
Speaker 1 (37:28):
The Massachusetts just created a I'm going to make sure
I read this right, a Muslim commission to help make
sure Muslims are placed inside the government. Now this sounds
unbelievably unconstitutional, but you're the one with a college degree.
Speaker 2 (37:43):
What is this?
Speaker 3 (37:46):
You know, I don't know if a college degree actually
gets you very far anymore. But look, the first thing
I'll say is we've had these kinds of commissions in
the United States for a long time. We've got Hispanic commissions,
Black employment commissions, you know, commissions for Asian Pacific islanders.
So you know, if people are offended by the idea
(38:08):
of having commission, let's go and take out all of
the race based commissions. But this one in particular is
pretty pretty offensive. It would provide job assistance training for Muslims.
It would ensure that Muslims are getting equal, if not
preferential treatment and state based government hiring. It would allow
the commission to raise and solicit funds to pay not
(38:31):
just for an executive director, but also to advertise its
work and to expand its footprint. And here's the thing
that should should scare most Americans is models like this
have been used in Belgium, in the Netherlands, in the
United Kingdom, and these have these kinds of commissions, or
call them councils, have been used essentially to ferret all
(38:55):
kinds of radical Islamic clerics and even some jihadists into
official local and state and then of course national governmental roles.
I think, you know, the Islamic world has figured out
how permeable our system of government is, and they will
use any tool to spread their radical teachings and their
(39:15):
sort of fundamentalist view of power, which is really there
is no ability to have a temporal secular authority over
Muslims that I mean, that's just basic theology, Islamic theology.
So using this kind of commissioner or council will be
essentially a battering ram to advance the interests of radical Islam.
And look, someone may say, plenty of your viewers may
(39:37):
say as well, less Massachusetts, those people are nuts anyways, true,
but these kinds of things start small and then they
spread like wildfire. I think lots of people used to
dismiss Dearborn, Michigan as a one off, and now you
see communities all around the country that look and sound
just like Dearborn. So we should all be concerned about
this commission. It's in the Ways and Means Committee in
(39:59):
massachuse said so far, which is basically a rubber stamp
to ensure you know, the spending provisions are you know,
lined up and correct, and then it'll go to the
floor of one of the chambers of the Massachusetts State
Legislature for a vote and from there, god knows where
it could be. I mean, this is the same place
you know that just essentially legalized and fanticize. So the
idea that it won't pass or the Governor Healy won't
(40:21):
sign this into law is kind of hard to believe.
Speaker 1 (40:25):
Thee My concern about this kind of stuff is that
it is and I hate to use this word because
I don't like to. I don't I'm not trying to
take away anyone's hope or my own, but that it
almost seems inevitable because it's such a soft underbelly of
our free system, where our system is based on, you know,
limited government, the practice of whatever religion you want, things
like that, and these Islamists seems so perfect to take
(40:49):
over a system like that, right.
Speaker 3 (40:53):
I think that's exactly right. I mean so GK. Chesterton
and Claire Belloc to Christian writers of the last cent
he wrote extensively about Islam, and Chesterton has this great
line where he says, you know, the appeal of Islam
is that it appeals. It seems very broad, and it's
very simple in sort of its theological claims, simple rules
(41:14):
to follow, a few dictums, but its followers insists on
strict adherents, so broad in scope but very narrowly applied,
and its narrow application is insisted upon by the sword
and Chesterdan also has this great line where he says, essentially,
you know, Islam is a consumptive force. Wherever it goes,
(41:35):
it devours the institutions that it encounters. And I think
that's true in France, it's true increasingly obviously in the
United Kingdom. It's true in the Netherlands, and in Belgium.
I mean, the joke now in the Belgium isn't whether
or not a Belgian will win office in any contested campaign.
It's whether or not a Turkish or a Syrian Muslim
will win. That's happening all throughout the West, and I
(41:56):
think our institutions are not really gear for this kind
of ideological political threat. And I think it's really important
to define it as such because some people say, oh, well,
there goes another religious bigot sort of, you know, encouraging
discrimination against a religion. I think if Islam wants to
essentially correct its own theology and deny it has temporal
(42:18):
political ideological aims. Okay, fine, But insofar as it says
there can be no authority other than the religious authority,
that's going to be a real problem for any local
or state government. Obviously for what we're seeing in Congress
as well.
Speaker 1 (42:35):
Do you have those quotes just memorized, Do you just
walk around with all these great quotes just in your
head already.
Speaker 3 (42:43):
I'll look. I'll tell you. You know, someone I retweeted
something that you had the other day, and someone sent
me a nasty gram on a DM saying, you know,
when are people like you and Jesse going to stand
up and start talking about the threat posed by radical Islam?
And I want to be like, dude, this has been
something I've been thinking about for sixteen years. You know,
I went over I literally went over to London for
(43:04):
a whole year of my life to live in East London,
to see what the reality of what Melanie Phillips, you know,
articulated in her famous book Londinas Dan. I wanted to
see with my own eyes. So I went over to
London and live there for a year in a largely
Bangladeshi community, and I walked away more frightened than ever.
I think the challenge to Western institutions by radical Islam
(43:25):
is real, and unfortunately it's growing in our country. And
so I think we would all be you know, really
well served considering what a lot of writers in the
late nineteenth and early twentieth century we're thinking about, Because,
as Belloc said, a lot of people want to say
in Christendom that Islam is dead. Islam is not. It's
religion is intact, but more importantly, its political force is
more potent than ever.
Speaker 1 (43:48):
Will hunting. Thank you for joining us. We'll talk to
you soon. Lighten the mood. Thankt it's time to lighten
the mood. And we always hear I hear a lot
from people, and I understand this way of thinking that
the next generation sucks. Oh these kids today. Every generation
(44:08):
says that. By the way, every generation complains about kids today.
And obviously sometimes that's true. Sometimes you run into a
young person today, teenager, and you think, Wow, what a tird,
what a rude person. Okay, that's fair, But I just
want to point this out. I travel a lot in
this country, and I live in red rural America. I
(44:29):
see and meety wonderful young people all the time, hard working, polite,
helpful young people.
Speaker 12 (44:36):
I run into them all the time. You see this
story about these two Alabama boys.
Speaker 16 (44:40):
And a cop has stopped us and asked us if
we've seen like an elderly woman walking around anywhere, and
then he said like she was missing and just told
us to keep an eye out.
Speaker 17 (44:51):
And we was riding and we stopped about where that
one poll is and he like turned around and saw her,
and I was like, Okay, well then let's go over
there and see. So then we went over there and
talked to her.
Speaker 11 (45:06):
Call an Adulton tell me. When they walked toward the woman,
they saw her sitting in this rocking chair at someone's home.
The boys say, after speaking to her, they realized she
was the missing woman. They quickly called police.
Speaker 16 (45:21):
It was very exhilarating to find her. I was happy
that we found her, and I.
Speaker 17 (45:25):
Was glad that God helped her and God made her.
Speaker 1 (45:29):
Okay, kids are all right, A suitable I would thank
you for coming to my YouTube channel, but I know
how brilliant it is, and I know you love it here,
(45:49):
so subscribe and watch.
Speaker 12 (45:51):
We're gonna start really ramping.
Speaker 1 (45:53):
Things up and putting some funny stuff, some interesting stuff
out there, some collaborations. Either way, my YouTube channel was
officially the place to be, so stick around.
Whenever a Democrat. Whenever the Democrat Party controls any area, city, county, state,
federal government, if they control it long enough, they will
put into place systems that allow them to steal elections.
Speaker 2 (00:16):
The fact that he knew that didn't tell anybody suspective
those sydekim storms after the second dose could lead to
miscarriage hold no one.
Speaker 3 (00:25):
Its followers insist on strict adherents, so broad in scope
but very narrowly applied, and its narrow application is insisted
upon by the sword.
Speaker 1 (00:39):
Last night there were primaries, Wisconsin primaries, Minnesota primaries, and
I'm passionate about primaries. I want you to be passionate
about primaries. Primaries matter a lot because primaries are what
determined the direction of the country. Have you ever looked
at the Democrat Party and said, oh my god, they're
(01:00):
so crazy now, I certainly hope you've said that because
they are so crazy now? Why though? What has made
them so crazy? Primaries? The nutballs keep winning the primaries,
and now the party's crazy. On the flip side, have
you ever looked at the GOP, who I affectionately call
the low t GOP and wondered, why don't they stand up.
(01:20):
Why don't they fight? Why are their amnesty losers like
James Landford? What we butt because we don't show up
and vote for hardcore right wingers in the primaries and
we end up with low t weenis like James Langford
screwing us over in the United States Senate. Long story, short,
primaries matter a lot, good news. Kind of this fran
(01:41):
hang nutball. You know this lady, she lost last night.
Speaker 4 (01:44):
You said Americans should cancel Thanksgiving. Should have done this
in sixteen twenty one. The post has been deleted. Republicans
have been highlighting it. Do you still believe that Thanksgiving
should be canceled?
Speaker 5 (01:56):
Thanksgiving is also a time that's incredibly painful for many
people in our communities, and so I think there I
wanted to make sure that people understood that there are
multiple views, but views can evolve. And do you believe
right now in our Supreme Court that we should be
working to expand the.
Speaker 6 (02:12):
Court, defund the police, protect black lives, and build a
care community.
Speaker 3 (02:17):
This is what we need.
Speaker 6 (02:18):
That is in the service industry, we are finally having
this conversation about you know, how our industry really did
come from it and kind of is rooted in white supremacy.
That tipping in itself. If we look at the history
of tipping and how racist it is in the restaurant industry.
Speaker 7 (02:36):
When we're out of something, we say it's eighty six,
and I'd say it's about time we eighty six Trump.
He represents the utter failure of our government to keep
us safe from threats, both viral and systemic.
Speaker 1 (02:51):
Well, she lost, that's good, right, Look, it is good,
but did you see the circumstances is around the loss.
Speaker 8 (03:04):
Are two things. There's the audit log and the results.
What we uncovered was that five of the sticks had
the audit log downloaded and not the results. It's a
human error. These things can happen. So basically what we
need to do is go back to the operation center
and we're going to download out of those five machines
(03:26):
the results and make sure that it's not the audit log.
Speaker 9 (03:30):
I guess the exact thing, yes, is if five of
the USB sticks were missing results from the election, so
then they have to they have to go try to
regrab them.
Speaker 3 (03:46):
Yeah, and they're.
Speaker 9 (03:48):
All the folks behind the scenes are talking about this
as well. So we can also look, it's unfortunate.
Speaker 10 (03:55):
The folks by the scenes here you're saying, yes, we.
Speaker 11 (03:59):
Are are are?
Speaker 10 (04:02):
How do I ask this artfully?
Speaker 12 (04:13):
That was awkward.
Speaker 1 (04:15):
Look, Democrats cheat because Democrats are communists. Whenever a Democrat,
whenever the Democrat Party controls any area, city, county, state,
federal government, if they control it long enough, they will
put into place systems that allow them to steal elections.
(04:38):
It's what they believe. It's how they've always operated. And
you even have these guys on TV left speechless. You know,
in television, you're not supposed to have that kind of
dead air.
Speaker 12 (04:50):
That uh what That's how it is. I'm sure they
stole it. That's what they do, all right.
Speaker 1 (05:01):
Minnesota Liberal Liberal and Peggy Flanagan Tree wonner primary Sally Willikum.
Speaker 13 (05:09):
My name's Peggy Flanagan. I am the Lieutenant Governor of Minnesota,
and I'm really honored and humbled to be here with
all of you today. I am incredibly clear that the
Somali community is part of the fabric of the state
of Minnesota. My name in the Ojibwean language is easy
waywodam Ukway, or in English speaks with a clear and
(05:34):
loud voiced woman.
Speaker 14 (05:36):
I'm a member of the White Earth Nation and my
family is the Wolf Clan.
Speaker 12 (05:42):
We need to rip Ice apart and.
Speaker 14 (05:45):
Stop them from terrorizing our communities. This is life affirming
and life saving healthcare. When our children tell us who
they are, it is our job as grown ups to
listen and to believe them.
Speaker 1 (06:09):
Probably going to be United States Senator, I don't want
to say speaking of Minnesota, this is going to be
a lesson, not for Minnesota, not for any one particular person.
Mike Lindell's who we're going to talk about here. This
is a lesson for every single Republican politician who is
in office or is thinking about running for office going
(06:31):
forward in the year of Our Lord twenty twenty six,
there is more anger around the mass immigration into this
country than you can possibly fathom.
Speaker 12 (06:44):
The average Republican voter has.
Speaker 1 (06:47):
Turned into a rabbit animal like me when it comes
to deporting every one of these dirty foreigners out of
our country. This is not an extreme position with the
Republican base.
Speaker 12 (06:59):
It is d Republican base.
Speaker 1 (07:02):
And so how in the world could Mike Lindell earn
the sacred endorsement of Donald Trump, the loud endorsement of
Donald Trump and go on to lose a primary.
Speaker 12 (07:13):
Would you like to know how here's how.
Speaker 15 (07:17):
You now have all the money that you gain. It's
in the billions, not millions, in the billions you gained
from them paying taxes and all these employers. Okay, you
take that money and you use it to get to
legalize people. You bring it to you know, because right
now a lot of the people think can't afford five
to fifteen thousand dollars to go through the system to
(07:38):
be legalized. I went down to Florida and checked it
all out of people that are coming in legally.
Speaker 10 (07:43):
Well, I know, I know that farmers would be thrilled
with something like this because.
Speaker 15 (07:46):
They all would be.
Speaker 12 (07:50):
That's it.
Speaker 1 (07:52):
And there are a lot of Republican politicians in office
and thinking about running for office. Maybe they run in
Wealthy Circle or Washington, DC or something like that.
Speaker 12 (08:03):
Maybe they think they have to.
Speaker 1 (08:04):
Give people like me and you a pat on the head.
Speaker 12 (08:07):
No no, no, no, we'll deport some people.
Speaker 1 (08:09):
But then they think they can just wow, we need
a path citizenship. I'm just warning you, however you feel
about this issue, if you flirt with amnesty, your political
candidacy is over.
Speaker 12 (08:22):
In the Republican Party. Night's over.
Speaker 1 (08:24):
By the way, this applies to everyone thinks Jadvance is
going to be the presidential nominee and Jadvance is not
an amnesty guye let me be clear.
Speaker 12 (08:32):
But if jd.
Speaker 1 (08:33):
Vance is Trump's air apparent and Trump endorses them, and
jd Vance is running away with the primary and jd
Vance came out tomorrow and said, you know what, we
need a path to citizenship. These kids are dreamers and
stuff like that, boom gone, primary over.
Speaker 12 (08:47):
He would lose. Let it be known. We are angry.
Speaker 1 (08:51):
We're tired of the filth, the costs that the housing prices,
the jobs market.
Speaker 12 (08:58):
Get these people out, all of.
Speaker 1 (09:00):
Them, all right, all right, I mean we have such
a great show for you, Senator Ron Johnson. He's still
tearing faalgi apart. We'll talk to Senator Johnson about that next.
Before we talk to Senator Johnson, I want you to
talk to your loved ones right now on your peertalk phone.
Speaker 12 (09:18):
Of course, I.
Speaker 1 (09:19):
Don't want you to pay one of the big wireless
companies to go talk to your loved ones. These big
wireless companies hate us. They fund all these left wing causes.
They hate our freaking guts. But pure Talk doesn't do that.
Pure Talk is so pro America that Puretalk hires Americans. Nobody,
(09:40):
no major corporation does that anymore. Pere talk does. There's Ceo,
the guy who runs the company, Vietnam veteran. Two tours,
no contract, no cancelation fee, a fraction of the cost
of the big guys. Go to puretalk dot com, slash
Jesse TV.
Speaker 12 (10:00):
We'll be bad.
Speaker 1 (10:01):
I love the fact that Ron Johnson is still on
Fauci like a dog. He's just not letting it go,
which I love because I know you haven't let it go.
Speaker 12 (10:08):
I haven't let it go.
Speaker 1 (10:09):
And now we have this little tidbit courtesy of Senator
Ron Johnson.
Speaker 12 (10:14):
This is in twenty twenty one quote.
Speaker 1 (10:17):
Theoretically the COVID shot could be associated with miscarriage in
the first trimester. Okay, that's funny because I know you've
seen the video, maybe you even remember it. Fauci was
on TV every five minutes telling pregnant women, I get
the COVID shot.
Speaker 12 (10:35):
What happened?
Speaker 15 (10:36):
There?
Speaker 1 (10:36):
Joining me now, the great senator from the state of Wisconsin,
Senator Ron Johnson, Senator, break down these texts for us
just telling nefarious?
Speaker 12 (10:44):
Are these these texts?
Speaker 2 (10:46):
I think pretty nefarious? You know, probably the most galling
state he ever made is they're just no red flags,
just like Peter marks all these people saying we're just
not seeing safety signals, even though VEARS was being deluged
with adverssi V reports safety signals, red flags were screaming
at them. But what is important about this is now
(11:07):
the news media is being forced to cover the cover
up of adverse events because it came out of Fauci's lips.
They completely ignored my bombshell report that Peter Marx knew
about a month later algorithm was going to hide safety signals.
He was shown. His senior FDA officials were shown dozens
of safety signals, including sudden cardiac death pulmnarian farction, which
(11:30):
Anti Fauci suffered from in June to twenty twenty one,
told no one different times of strokes. But you know
what's interesting about this, Jesse, You know how closely I
followed this. I had never heard that the second dose
produced greater cytokine storms. I'd never heard that before. I
wonder where Fauci got that from. Remember cykine storms and
(11:52):
the lungs that caused all these respiratory problems and stuff
in COVID.
Speaker 3 (11:56):
This's was killing people.
Speaker 2 (11:58):
So the fact that he knew that, tell anybody suspected
those ceydekim storms after the second dose could lead to
miscarriage told no one. Again, this is scandalous. But as
if not more scandalous, is the fact that our legacy
media has completely covered for him, covered this up, and
(12:18):
only now here in August of twenty twenty six are
they finally reporting on one instance, only one instance are
they reporting on where one of these people who are
in charge of and whose responsibility it was to surveil
for safety on these experimental gene therapy injections, and this
is not a job. They got an emergency so authorization.
(12:40):
They should have been tracking this like a hawk. I was,
and I was vilified and ridiculed for watching for following veyors.
As soon as I started publishing my veyor's charts. People
that have me on their shows would be deplatformed by
Facebook because Anti Fauci told them to depplatform people like us.
So again, this is scandalous. I don't know, I don't
(13:02):
know how many people lost their lives because anti Faucine
and others didn't do their job and reported to doctors,
practitioners and the American public what they knew. They simply
didn't do it. You know why, because they didn't want
to create vaccine hesdancy.
Speaker 3 (13:18):
That was their main goal.
Speaker 2 (13:20):
Do not create vaccine hesnancy, because their main goal was
to come up with a universal global vaccination program. Fauci
broke that back in October twenty nineteen, with rig Bright
and the Milican instudents saying there'd be moaning the fact
they would have a universal vaccination program. Flu just doesn't
do it. We need a pandemic. Well they got that pandemic.
(13:41):
They got their excuse to have a universal and it's
not a vaccine, it's an experimental gene therapy injection. But
they got it. They forced it on the global public
and did not tell them the dangers of this experimental
gene therapy.
Speaker 1 (13:55):
It's sick, Senator, Can you help stupid people like me
understand some of this stuff. Why is the second shot
of this gene therapy? Why is it doing things that
maybe the first one didn't do? And the reason I
ask a technical, stupid question like that is every.
Speaker 12 (14:12):
Time I have you on.
Speaker 1 (14:13):
People who have been heard or think lost someone and
they suspected They email me with questions, Jesse, why this?
Can you explain this? Can you help me understand as
best you can? Why is it when you went in
for number two your lungs aren't working anymore?
Speaker 2 (14:27):
It's actually, I think pretty easy to potentially understand. First
of all, you have to understand what this mRNA does.
It bio distributes all over the body because the lipid
nanoparticle was designed to permeate difficult to permate barriers. They
knew that.
Speaker 15 (14:40):
They lie to you.
Speaker 2 (14:41):
So you have this lipid nanoparticle containing mr and A
distribute all over the body. When it attaches to a cell,
it allows the mRNA modified so it doesn't degrade into
the cell, turns the cell into a manufacturing site of
the spike protein, which is the most toxic part of
the coronavirus. So you turned your body into a manufacturing
(15:03):
site for something toxic to it. When the body recognizes
something that's not it, that is toxic to it in
a taxic that causes inflammation. Now that we know that
this mRNA was modified to stay in the body a
long time, for weeks, it's cumulative. So the first shot,
maybe you were lucky the lipid nanoparticle didn't distribute to
(15:25):
places and constrated places that really caused your problem. Your
body was able to handle it better. The second shot,
it's cublative. Now you got more of this stuff, circlaring.
They found spike protein circling the body over seven hundred
days post vaccination. They found the mRNA weeks after vaccination.
Yet we were told, no, this is mRNA degradesed in hours. No,
(15:48):
it was a pseudo uridine modified modified RNA that hung
around the body for weeks, months, probably years in terms
of the spike protein. So they just they lie boldfaced
to us. It's cumulative. You know, hopefully you didn't get
all the boosters. The more you got, the bigger problem
you had. But by the by the way, by the
fourth the second booster, the fourth shot, now you have
(16:11):
an antibody switch where it's an immune system reaction to
like say an allergy, where you actually end up being
more resistant to the allergen, so your body doesn't have
an immune response, so you don't have like allergic impact.
And this is getting again. I'm not a doctor. I've
got a pretty good medical education just over the last
six years. But again, this has all been known. I've
(16:33):
known this for years. I've tried holding public events to
warn the public, but I've been ridiculed. I've been vilified.
The medical establishment that should know better, they've remained silent.
Now it's maybe maybe the dam is breaking now, but
I'm not holding my breath. I mean, there's so many
powerful interests that want universal vaccination programs because there's no liability.
(16:55):
It's a multi billion dollar profit type of potential for
these folks.
Speaker 15 (16:59):
It's good.
Speaker 2 (17:02):
They want to silence people like me and you.
Speaker 12 (17:04):
Senator.
Speaker 1 (17:05):
I have to ask a lame question because it's an
obvious question, but it's true. We're supposed to have a CDC,
We're supposed to have an FDA, We're supposed to have
ANNIH and a whole list of other government agencies that
are supposed to be protections for me the citizen. Because
I don't know crap about medicine. I went to community college.
I don't know any of these things. I'm supposed to
(17:26):
have agencies that I can rely on that will make
sure this maybe pharmaceutical company cannot hurt me. But the
more we learn about COVID, the more we learn they're
all in it with each other.
Speaker 12 (17:39):
And against me. Sorry, but that's how it seems.
Speaker 2 (17:42):
Well that's because it seems, because that's how it is.
That's the problem with big government big businesses. You know,
the first they figure out how to survive under regulation.
Then they learn how to capture the regulator, they learn
how to turn it to their advantage. So you see
the evolving door between these tops officials and big farma.
(18:03):
Scott Gottlieb goes to Pfizer. Okay, I mean you know,
Peter Marx went to Eli Lilly, So it's a revolving door.
They approve different products, so then when they're tenuring government's up,
they go and get They make multimillions of dollars in
these big farmer companies. So it's it's all cooked. Just
let's face it, there's a one word definition of government.
(18:24):
It's power. As Lord Acton pointed out, power corrupts, absolute
power corrupts, corrupts absolutely. So government has been corrupted thoroughly.
And it's not just big farm, it's not just a
pharaceutical industry. It's throughout, you know, whether it's big food,
whether it's big big agriculture. All these agencies that have
(18:45):
been set up to regulate on behalf and protect the
American public's interest, they've been captured by by big business.
And that that's what's that's really what's wrong with capitalism
today in our country. It's it's it's not small little
businesses competing like Adamsmith's Invisible Hand is run by big
corporations having to kow taut to big government and then
(19:08):
learning how to take advantage of big government to their
own advantage and capture and corrupt it. That's what's happening
across the board.
Speaker 1 (19:17):
Senator, Can you help me understand is there any legal
accountability that can come for people like Rachelle what's the name,
Michelle Willinski, Deborah Burkes.
Speaker 12 (19:28):
Vivek Murphy.
Speaker 1 (19:29):
I understand found she has this pardon from up on
High and I understand there are limitations there, but these
other people do not, and they were participating wholeheartedly.
Speaker 2 (19:39):
I sure hope there is. I'm not a lawyer or prosecutor,
but again, this is the problem of government. First of all,
government is almost impossible to sue the agency of government
pretty difficult to sue them as well. I mean, government
protects itself. Yes, it's not protecting the public, it's protecting itself.
It's protecting its interest and the in the interests of
(20:00):
those big corporations that have captured it. So again it's
going to be difficult, but you know, so my job
is exposed the truth, to expose who the bad actors were. Again,
we've taken a pretty one, one big step from a
standpoint of these texts, and this is just one text.
And we got thirty four thousand, about nine hundred different
(20:20):
phone numbers that just found out. There's his phone numbers.
They're not contexts. He only had three contexts in his
context list, which indicates to me he deleted them or
something deleted those contexts. So it's making a job more difficult.
But fortunately my staff picked this need a lot of
the haystacks, so we could at least warn public, public,
the you know, the public, the pregnant women that Anthony
(20:43):
Fauci was concerned about this thing maybe causing miscarriages. Maybe
you ought to be concerned, Maybe maybe you ought to
take that into your own personal risk benefit equation. That's
what Fauci, that's all these people denied the American public.
They denied them informed consent, They denied them information, and
they did not undertake their responsibility or fulfill their responsibility
(21:04):
of warning the public of what they knew, telling the
public what they knew.
Speaker 3 (21:09):
They didn't do that.
Speaker 12 (21:11):
What was Operation Round River.
Speaker 2 (21:15):
So that was a concerted effort on the part of
the FBI, and I was a target of it to
basically protect Joe Biden and a group of people that
are fellow travelers and then go over and attack those
of us who are trying to expose that. We're gonna
learn more about it, you know, John Solomon working with
(21:36):
this task force inside the White House. President Trump has
been absolutely dedicated to uncovering this stuff and making it public,
declassifying it, but he's had hard time inside the agencies. Again,
you have I don't care what government agency it is.
You have the deep staters. They're trying to sabotage and
frustrate President Trump's efforts and trying to come clean. But
(21:58):
here here's one example. The information is starting to come out.
Let's say we've known now for quite a few years
that the russ inclusion hoax was just that it was
a dirty trick dreamed up by the Hilly Clinton campaign.
The Washington Post got a Pultzer Prize for reporting and
creating all this political turmoil over that Rush collusion hoax.
(22:19):
Have they returned that Poltzer prize?
Speaker 1 (22:23):
Well, Senator, I thought we just had a Supreme Court
ruling that said we can fire people in these agencies.
So can you help me understand why it doesn't go, Hey,
show me this, No, you're fired. I mean, that's certainly
how it works in the private sector. If my boss
has told me this, Hey, Jesse, show up at corporate
headquarters and I said no, Well, that would be a
(22:44):
quick conversation.
Speaker 12 (22:46):
Why is it not quick?
Speaker 2 (22:48):
Because a lot of these people are weasels and they
actually know how to survive and that could get taken out.
They just know how to hide this stuff. Again, it's
not easy. Problem is big government. That's our founders knew that,
which is why they try to set up as system
they would limit the growth of government. But unfortunately, the
federal government busted out of its enumerated power constraints decades ago,
(23:12):
primarily under the Big Deal, and now it's just grown,
it's fantasticized. It's taking away our freedoms and it's a
very difficult to Pandora to put back in that box.
Speaker 12 (23:24):
Senator, last one for me.
Speaker 1 (23:25):
I can't let you go without asking about the primaries
took place in Wisconsin last night and mostly the tabulation
error that everybody's talking about.
Speaker 12 (23:34):
Senator. Maybe it's totally innocent.
Speaker 1 (23:36):
I have a hard time believing that, but it looks
so bad that this keeps happening in the blue areas
of the country.
Speaker 2 (23:43):
It's complete incompetence. If it's not fraudulent, Okay, at a minimum,
at a minimum, best case, it's total incompetence. I'm part
of these election officials. Our goal should be to restore
confidence in our election system. Now we can't do it legislatively,
either at the state or federal level, because Democrats refuse
to vote for any confidence building election in Tegerty measures
(24:07):
they won't do it. And then in their precincts, you know,
the ones controlled by Democrats, they run these elections with
grotesque in competence. Again, if it's not totally fraudulent, can't
I can't tell you, because like it's really difficult to
investigate election fraud. Once it occurs, it's really difficult. You
have to control it on the front side. Just like
(24:28):
welfare fraud really hard to recover the funds. You've got
to stop the money before it ever falls out the door.
Speaker 1 (24:35):
Senator, appreciate you as always come back, all right?
Speaker 12 (24:39):
THEO. Wold knows a lot about.
Speaker 1 (24:41):
This stuff, former Assistant Attorney General. I have a lot
of things I want to get to with him before
I get to that. One good thing I can definitely
say about the covid era is it led to the
merge me and Chalk Natural Herbal Supplements. A Chalk Chalk
was out there, this natural urbal supplement company being loud
(25:04):
on social media, getting themselves in trouble, getting their social
media accounts banned for what telling the truth? Telling the
truth about things we all know now to be true.
But they were telling it back when it was unpopular.
And isn't that the mark of real courage, when you're
saying and doing things that are risky.
Speaker 12 (25:22):
That's what Chuck did.
Speaker 1 (25:24):
I've been taking a male vitality stack for over four
years now, better energy, like a million bucks, My mind
works better. They have female vitality stacks for women. Go
to Chalk dot com slash jessetv get a subscription.
Speaker 12 (25:41):
We'll be back.
Speaker 15 (25:42):
We had a very unfortunate decision in the Supreme Court
concerning birthriter was close, but a very very unfortunate decision.
Speaker 3 (25:51):
So we're making adjustments.
Speaker 10 (25:54):
Birth tourism is by definition of fraud on the American system,
on the America and taxpayer on the American visa. If
you're coming here and again in your stated purposes that
you're a tourist, that by definition you are here to
come for a few weeks. Look what we have, engage
in commerce and leave. So if you're telling a constler
officer you're here as a tourist, but your true purpose
(26:16):
and intent is to go to a baby mail, give
birth and try to mint an American citizen while you're here,
then you're committing a fraud against the American government, and
by definition that visa can and should and will be
now denied.
Speaker 1 (26:32):
That's awesome, I think, But I know about the Supreme
Court roop. We need THEO in here joining me now,
THEO old former Assistant Attorney General, former White House Deputy
Assistant for Domestic policy of course under President Trump.
Speaker 12 (26:47):
Okay, THEO help me understand this. The Supreme Court issued
this horrible ruling. We all hated it. We all cried
and gride ourselves asleep that night. I got it. Then
we get this executive order.
Speaker 3 (26:58):
What, Yeah, well, I think some of that's warranted, Jesse.
I think, look, here's the best way to understand this.
There have always been understood to be a couple of
exceptions to birthright citizenship under the fourteenth Amendment, the most
notable being the children of foreign envoys or foreign ambassadors. Basically,
(27:21):
what this executive order that the President just signed in
the last few days targets is precisely those exceptions. And
what they're trying to do is use the power of
the executive branch to ferret out the granting of passport materials,
social security material application materials to children born to these
categories of exceptions. And they're also trying to graft on
(27:45):
one new one, which is so called birth tourists. And
I say so called because it's going to be really
difficult to determine who exactly is here for birth tourism
and who isn't. And I think you and I could
probably figure that out. But once we pass this along
to hospital administrators who have an incentivized desire to encourage
birth tourism, as we saw in South Texas, with the
(28:06):
billboards encouraging Mexican nationals to come across the border to
give birth. Once you give it over to hospital administrators, nurses, doctors,
all the offices of vital statistics in the states that
collect the paperwork to give birth certificates, none of these
people have any interest in curtailing the granting of citizenship
to foreign nationals. But this executive order will rely on
(28:28):
those people to identify who's here for the purposes of
birth tourism. So I think there's categories that fall in
the traditional understanding of what are exceptions to who can
be denied birthright citizenship, and then there's this new one
called birth tourism, and that's what the executive order is
trying to tackle. We'll see immediately the same group of
(28:49):
litigants from the original Supreme Court case filed to enjoin
this new executive order, saying, you know, same story, different day.
They're just trying to reward what they already did, Mister
Justice stop them from going forward with this. So we'll
see if they survive that initial phase of litigation, and
then from there, if it is allowed to proceed, the
(29:10):
question will be how do you enforce it?
Speaker 12 (29:13):
Okay, theos.
Speaker 1 (29:14):
Let's let's talk about this stopping these women coming in?
Why can't we just legally, I guess I should ask,
can we just stop a woman from coming in if
she looks like she's ready to pop? So when I
run into Hong Chain at the customs, or I run
into you know, Maria Gonzalez at customs and she's clearly
getting ready to have a baby, can't we just say no?
Speaker 12 (29:38):
Yeah?
Speaker 3 (29:38):
Well, so we should be able to. And the process
to do this, Jesse would be pretty simple, which is
you would just have the FAA, for example, that handles
you know, air traffic, you know the different types of
behaviors at airlines can engage in in our airports and
air facilities. You just have them do a rulemaking. This
is what the Left does all the time. You just
(30:00):
creator regulation that says, up until you know, three weeks,
three months, or first trimester or second trimester or pregnancy,
no one is allowed to board a plane unless it's
for a documented short term reason. You could even you
could even restrict it beyond that. But you know, here's
the key thing. You got to do the hard work
of actually writing the regulation and then forcing the airline
(30:21):
industries to abide by this, because again the problem here,
as is the case with the hospitals, is none of
the people in our country who should give a damn
about US citizenship do because their financial incentives all run
the opposite direction. No airline wants to say to you know,
an obviously pregnant for national boarding a plane and Heathrow
(30:42):
bound for JFK. Sorry, we know you bought a ticket
in first class, but we're gonna have to ask you
to turn around and exit the airport because we're not
letting you board this plane because you're obviously pregnant. The
airline is they don't care, so you're going to have
to make them care, and the way to do that
is through a rule making.
Speaker 1 (31:00):
Speaking of making them care, and stories that just continue
to get more insane by the day. New York, Connecticut, Vermont,
they're currently being sued by the Trump DOJ because do
I have this right? They give taxpayer money to illegals
so they can go to college.
Speaker 3 (31:16):
Yeah, that's exactly right. I mean, and this should be
one of those things that pisses off every American taxpayer.
This has been going on actually for years, and this
was really, in my mind, one of those early phases
of the woke left signaling how much they value foreign
nationals over American citizens. Because none of this is new.
(31:37):
This has been on the book since the early two thousands,
where Blue states started to give in state tuition benefits
to the children of illegal aliens or illegal aliens who
entered the country and were then eligible to attend university.
I mean, there's no more a slap in the face
to American especially American young people, but American taxpayers, especially
(32:00):
at publicly funded universities. Then the idea that you would
prefer foreign nationals for tuition advantages and admission over American
citizens and American miners, and so look, this has been
going on for a long time. I think this litigation
is extremely important. The one thing I want to see though, Jesse,
from this is whether or not they actually want to
(32:22):
push these states to revoke in state tuition benefits to
illegal aliens, because the way it's kind of been construed
so far in the core proceedings is you can continue
to give benefits to illegal aliens, you just can't not
give those benefits to American citizens even if they reside
in other states. And my point would be no benefits
(32:44):
to illegal aliens. This is something we've pushed for in
the Idaho state legislature, for example, which is to forbid
the ability of any future legislature to give benefits to
foreign nationals. And I'll just say, Jesse, this is happening
across the board. It's not just tuition for universities in college.
Foreign nationals are preferred in our healthcare system, and our
education system and our housing system. If you total the
(33:07):
actual expenditures that Blue states have, you know, taking for example,
the state of Maine main gave out about ninety two
billion dollars in housing grants to foreign nationals, in particular
Somali nationals in Maine for essentially free housing, government constructed
housing in Portland and in Augusta, while Americans can't pay
(33:29):
the skyrocketing costs of housing and as well as you know,
these own affordable mortgages. So while you're busting your butt
to pay for your kids to get some kind of
opportunity to go to your in States, you know school,
whether it's you know, a big ten school or something
out west, foreign nationals are coming here and they're getting
your tax dollars to go to school for free.
Speaker 1 (33:51):
They'll walk me through the decision on the mustache, and
I ask because I can go a spectacular mustache. But
my wife hates it, I mean absolutely hates it, to
the point she will make threats if I threatened to
shave in the mustache and tell me about yours.
Speaker 3 (34:06):
Uh, this is a long story. This has to do
with Secretary of Hexcess new restriction on beard waivers. So
I'm an Air Force reservist and I reported down to
my unit in Florida and my beard waiver is no
longer good. So I shaved the beard and came out
and my wife was like, what is on your face?
Speaker 16 (34:26):
What?
Speaker 3 (34:27):
What is that? As is Tom Selleck. That's what we're doing.
We're doing this right now. So she said, we're doing something.
It's a choice and it's not the one. So my
wife's right there. We're at Jesse. It's not been popular
in my house at all. My kids are just like,
can you please grow grow your beard back?
Speaker 16 (34:43):
Dad.
Speaker 12 (34:45):
I don't know why they hate it.
Speaker 3 (34:46):
They still fit, they really do, they really do universally hated.
Speaker 12 (34:51):
Yeah, it is it is.
Speaker 7 (34:52):
Well.
Speaker 1 (34:53):
I think you're doing great, buddy. You have nothing but
heartfelt support.
Speaker 12 (34:56):
All right.
Speaker 1 (34:57):
The State Department has my support as well, because they
did she one hundred and seventy five thousand visas from
people who they yank them from.
Speaker 15 (35:04):
Yeah.
Speaker 3 (35:04):
No, this is an unmitigated success story for the administration.
This is something that should have been done over the
last three or four presidential administrations. And the best way
I can explain this for your viewers, Jesse, is to
think about look, a visa, a legal visa to enter
the United States is essentially a contract. It's where the
United States saying, hey, you get to come in under
(35:25):
these terms for this long to do these kinds of
things while you're here, and if you violate any of
those stipulated terms, we get to send you back. You
don't get to stay. You're out of here and for
a long time. We would give these visas, whether it's
an H one B supposedly to work in the tech sector,
but that's kind of a lie. The J one, which
(35:45):
is to be au pairs or what we call summer
work and travel visa, so you can work at some
kind of you know, summer camp or be a lifeguard somewhere. Again,
all of these visas are ones that we should definitely
think about either pausing or scaling back because these are
definitely the issue to foreign labor for jobs that Americans
could do. But here's the point. People would get these visas,
(36:07):
come into the country and do all kinds of things,
not just you know, heinous crimes like rape, murder, you know,
armed robbery, of course that occurred, but other things like
you get a visa to be a summer camp counselor,
and the next thing you know, you're getting a job
working at bank, which is a total violation of the
terms of the visa. So for the first time ever,
Marco Rubio State Department said, let's start to go through
(36:30):
and systematically review the visas that we've actually issued that
are out running around in our country and see if
the holders of those visas have complied with the terms.
And what they found is you've got people who have
been convicted of child pornography, of aggravated sexual assault, of
domestic abuse, of murder, and they still have their visa
(36:51):
to stay in the United States. So they pulled one
hundred and seventy five thousand of these visas so far
that have led obviously to deportation and removal proceedings of
the the immigrants who held those visas. And they're looking
to do a whole bunch more. I think this is
such important work. And as they said, the best way
to understand illegal visa is, it's a contract between the
American taxpayer and a foreign national. You get to come
(37:13):
here so long as you abide by our rules, obey
our laws, and comply with the terms of when you
come and when your visa says you have to leave.
And if you don't play by those rules, then we're
going to take the visa back and we're going to
send your ass out of here. And it's great that
Marco Rubio State Department is doing that.
Speaker 1 (37:28):
The Massachusetts just created a I'm going to make sure
I read this right, a Muslim commission to help make
sure Muslims are placed inside the government. Now this sounds
unbelievably unconstitutional, but you're the one with a college degree.
Speaker 2 (37:43):
What is this?
Speaker 3 (37:46):
You know, I don't know if a college degree actually
gets you very far anymore. But look, the first thing
I'll say is we've had these kinds of commissions in
the United States for a long time. We've got Hispanic commissions,
Black employment commissions, you know, commissions for Asian Pacific islanders.
So you know, if people are offended by the idea
(38:08):
of having commission, let's go and take out all of
the race based commissions. But this one in particular is
pretty pretty offensive. It would provide job assistance training for Muslims.
It would ensure that Muslims are getting equal, if not
preferential treatment and state based government hiring. It would allow
the commission to raise and solicit funds to pay not
(38:31):
just for an executive director, but also to advertise its
work and to expand its footprint. And here's the thing
that should should scare most Americans is models like this
have been used in Belgium, in the Netherlands, in the
United Kingdom, and these have these kinds of commissions, or
call them councils, have been used essentially to ferret all
(38:55):
kinds of radical Islamic clerics and even some jihadists into
official local and state and then of course national governmental roles.
I think, you know, the Islamic world has figured out
how permeable our system of government is, and they will
use any tool to spread their radical teachings and their
(39:15):
sort of fundamentalist view of power, which is really there
is no ability to have a temporal secular authority over
Muslims that I mean, that's just basic theology, Islamic theology.
So using this kind of commissioner or council will be
essentially a battering ram to advance the interests of radical Islam.
And look, someone may say, plenty of your viewers may
(39:37):
say as well, less Massachusetts, those people are nuts anyways, true,
but these kinds of things start small and then they
spread like wildfire. I think lots of people used to
dismiss Dearborn, Michigan as a one off, and now you
see communities all around the country that look and sound
just like Dearborn. So we should all be concerned about
this commission. It's in the Ways and Means Committee in
(39:59):
massachuse said so far, which is basically a rubber stamp
to ensure you know, the spending provisions are you know,
lined up and correct, and then it'll go to the
floor of one of the chambers of the Massachusetts State
Legislature for a vote and from there, god knows where
it could be. I mean, this is the same place
you know that just essentially legalized and fanticize. So the
idea that it won't pass or the Governor Healy won't
(40:21):
sign this into law is kind of hard to believe.
Speaker 1 (40:25):
Thee My concern about this kind of stuff is that
it is and I hate to use this word because
I don't like to. I don't I'm not trying to
take away anyone's hope or my own, but that it
almost seems inevitable because it's such a soft underbelly of
our free system, where our system is based on, you know,
limited government, the practice of whatever religion you want, things
like that, and these Islamists seems so perfect to take
(40:49):
over a system like that, right.
Speaker 3 (40:53):
I think that's exactly right. I mean so GK. Chesterton
and Claire Belloc to Christian writers of the last cent
he wrote extensively about Islam, and Chesterton has this great
line where he says, you know, the appeal of Islam
is that it appeals. It seems very broad, and it's
very simple in sort of its theological claims, simple rules
(41:14):
to follow, a few dictums, but its followers insists on
strict adherents, so broad in scope but very narrowly applied,
and its narrow application is insisted upon by the sword
and Chesterdan also has this great line where he says, essentially,
you know, Islam is a consumptive force. Wherever it goes,
(41:35):
it devours the institutions that it encounters. And I think
that's true in France, it's true increasingly obviously in the
United Kingdom. It's true in the Netherlands, and in Belgium.
I mean, the joke now in the Belgium isn't whether
or not a Belgian will win office in any contested campaign.
It's whether or not a Turkish or a Syrian Muslim
will win. That's happening all throughout the West, and I
(41:56):
think our institutions are not really gear for this kind
of ideological political threat. And I think it's really important
to define it as such because some people say, oh, well,
there goes another religious bigot sort of, you know, encouraging
discrimination against a religion. I think if Islam wants to
essentially correct its own theology and deny it has temporal
(42:18):
political ideological aims. Okay, fine, But insofar as it says
there can be no authority other than the religious authority,
that's going to be a real problem for any local
or state government. Obviously for what we're seeing in Congress
as well.
Speaker 1 (42:35):
Do you have those quotes just memorized, Do you just
walk around with all these great quotes just in your
head already.
Speaker 3 (42:43):
I'll look. I'll tell you. You know, someone I retweeted
something that you had the other day, and someone sent
me a nasty gram on a DM saying, you know,
when are people like you and Jesse going to stand
up and start talking about the threat posed by radical Islam?
And I want to be like, dude, this has been
something I've been thinking about for sixteen years. You know,
I went over I literally went over to London for
(43:04):
a whole year of my life to live in East London,
to see what the reality of what Melanie Phillips, you know,
articulated in her famous book Londinas Dan. I wanted to
see with my own eyes. So I went over to
London and live there for a year in a largely
Bangladeshi community, and I walked away more frightened than ever.
I think the challenge to Western institutions by radical Islam
(43:25):
is real, and unfortunately it's growing in our country. And
so I think we would all be you know, really
well served considering what a lot of writers in the
late nineteenth and early twentieth century we're thinking about, Because,
as Belloc said, a lot of people want to say
in Christendom that Islam is dead. Islam is not. It's
religion is intact, but more importantly, its political force is
more potent than ever.
Speaker 1 (43:48):
Will hunting. Thank you for joining us. We'll talk to
you soon. Lighten the mood. Thankt it's time to lighten
the mood. And we always hear I hear a lot
from people, and I understand this way of thinking that
the next generation sucks. Oh these kids today. Every generation
(44:08):
says that. By the way, every generation complains about kids today.
And obviously sometimes that's true. Sometimes you run into a
young person today, teenager, and you think, Wow, what a tird,
what a rude person. Okay, that's fair, But I just
want to point this out. I travel a lot in
this country, and I live in red rural America. I
(44:29):
see and meety wonderful young people all the time, hard working, polite,
helpful young people.
Speaker 12 (44:36):
I run into them all the time. You see this
story about these two Alabama boys.
Speaker 16 (44:40):
And a cop has stopped us and asked us if
we've seen like an elderly woman walking around anywhere, and
then he said like she was missing and just told
us to keep an eye out.
Speaker 17 (44:51):
And we was riding and we stopped about where that
one poll is and he like turned around and saw her,
and I was like, Okay, well then let's go over
there and see. So then we went over there and
talked to her.
Speaker 11 (45:06):
Call an Adulton tell me. When they walked toward the woman,
they saw her sitting in this rocking chair at someone's home.
The boys say, after speaking to her, they realized she
was the missing woman. They quickly called police.
Speaker 16 (45:21):
It was very exhilarating to find her. I was happy
that we found her, and I.
Speaker 17 (45:25):
Was glad that God helped her and God made her.
Speaker 1 (45:29):
Okay, kids are all right, A suitable I would thank
you for coming to my YouTube channel, but I know
how brilliant it is, and I know you love it here,
(45:49):
so subscribe and watch.
Speaker 12 (45:51):
We're gonna start really ramping.
Speaker 1 (45:53):
Things up and putting some funny stuff, some interesting stuff
out there, some collaborations. Either way, my YouTube channel was
officially the place to be, so stick around.
Host
Jesse Kelly
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Betrayal Weekly
Betrayal Weekly is back for a new season. Every Thursday, Betrayal Weekly shares first-hand accounts of broken trust, shocking deceptions, and the trail of destruction they leave behind. Hosted by Andrea Gunning, this weekly ongoing series digs into real-life stories of betrayal and the aftermath. From stories of double lives to dark discoveries, these are cautionary tales and accounts of resilience against all odds. From the producers of the critically acclaimed Betrayal series, Betrayal Weekly drops new episodes every Thursday. If you would like to share your story, you can reach out to the Betrayal Team by emailing them at betrayalpod@gmail.com and follow us on Instagram at @betrayalpod and @glasspodcasts. Please join our Substack for additional exclusive content, curated book recommendations, and community discussions. Sign up FREE by clicking this link Beyond Betrayal Substack. Join our community dedicated to truth, resilience, and healing. Your voice matters! Be a part of our Betrayal journey on Substack.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com