U.S. Takes SERIOUS Action Against Venezuela & Kristi Noem Drops BOMBSHELL On National Guard Attacker
December 2, 2025 • 44 mins
Jesse Kelly honors the fallen on this edition of I'm Right following a horrific attack on America's National Guard. Who is truly responsible? Jesse breaks that down alongside Julio Rosas. This comes as the Democrats are working overtime to run an operation to get a key Trump official fired. What does it have to do with Venezuela? Jesse brings on Ammon Blair to discuss that and more.
I'm Right with Jesse Kelly on The First TVMasa Chips: Ready to give MASA or Vandy a try? Get 25% off your first order by going to http://masachips.com/JESSETV and using code JESSETV.
Beam: Visit https://shopbeam.com/JESSEKELLY and use code JESSEKELLY to get our exclusive discount of up to 40% off.
Choq: Visit https://choq.com/jessetv for a 17.76% discount on your CHOQ subscription for life
Follow The Jesse Kelly Show on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@TheJesseKellyShow
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:02):
We're going to discuss communist operations recognizing them. There's one
happening right now. We're going to discuss the refugee situation.
We have a huge show tonight, and I'm right, all right,
(00:23):
before we get into communist ops, communist operations, operations targeted
directly at you, we wanted to take a moment, because
we didn't get a chance to last week, to honor the.
Speaker 2 (00:34):
Fallen Army specialist.
Speaker 1 (00:36):
Sarah Beckstrom was twenty years old walking a post with
the National Guard in Washington, DC. A vicious, violent animal
who should not have been in the country killed it,
and she.
Speaker 2 (00:51):
Died for this country.
Speaker 1 (00:52):
Her services every bit as honorable, her sacrifice every bit
as honorable as anybody who's ever.
Speaker 2 (00:58):
Worn the uniform.
Speaker 1 (01:00):
She died twenty years old, serving her country, and we
just honor this warrior as she passes on. All right,
say a prayer please for her family. Christmas coming up.
It's just going to be it's a very tough time
for her family. Say a prayer for them, please. All Right, Now,
this is going to be You're gonna have to bear
(01:21):
with me for a couple moments. This is going to
be about communist ops, Communist operations because they're always running them.
They're very very good, have always been very very good
at coordinating seemingly different entities to converge to run in
operation operations. Always for a purpose, and not to spoil
(01:42):
the ending for you. The purpose is never for your good,
Believe me, it's always for your ill. But there's been
a lot of talk in the past couple of days
about war crimes.
Speaker 2 (01:52):
Pete ha acsass did he order sealed team section to
murder a couple of drug dealers?
Speaker 1 (01:57):
Okay, so, first of all, you remember Afghanistan specifically, you
remember the terrible way Afghanistan ended.
Speaker 2 (02:07):
I know you do, we all do. It was awful.
Speaker 1 (02:10):
Biden administration just ruined the whole thing so they could
try to have a September eleventh parade. It didn't work
out well, we pulled out, a bunch of people started dying.
Speaker 2 (02:22):
We went back in.
Speaker 1 (02:23):
Then thirteen of our warriors were incinerated by an ISIS
suicide bomber with ball bearings at Abygate. And you remember
that we lost all those warriors. Okay, so we got
all that, we got all.
Speaker 2 (02:35):
We know that. You remember what happened afterwards?
Speaker 1 (02:38):
The Biden administration they had thought that the pullout of
Afghanistan was going to be a big political win for them,
turned out to be a huge political loss, a big scandal.
Speaker 2 (02:46):
It looks bad.
Speaker 1 (02:47):
People were falling from C one thirties and then thirteen
of our warriors die.
Speaker 2 (02:52):
Now it went from any kind of a wind to
the worst possible loss.
Speaker 1 (02:57):
And they were very very image conscious that, in fact,
that's all they cared about at all. Lives, your life,
the country. That never crossed their mind. They were very
image conscious. So what did they do. They felt pressure
to respond to that terrorist attack at Abby.
Speaker 2 (03:12):
Gate, and what did they do.
Speaker 1 (03:14):
They sent a reaper drone out, a reaper drone, very
deadly weapon in modern combat, incinerated ten people. Seven of
the people incinerated were children, and they were all innocent.
None of them were terrorists. They weren't with isis completely innocent?
(03:38):
Not really morally any different than the federal government sending
a reaper drone to incinerate your house at that Thanksgiving celebration.
You just had you and your family just as innocent.
And after we incinerated ten innocent people, seven of them children,
chairmen of the Joint Chief stepped up and he said.
Speaker 3 (03:56):
This we know from a variety of other means, at
least one of those people that were killed was a
ISIS facilitator. So where there are others killed, Yes, there
are others killed. Who they are, we don't know. We'll
try to sort through all that, but we believe that
the procedures at this point, I don't want to influence
the outcome of an investigation, but at this point we
(04:18):
think that the procedures were correctly followed and it was
a righteous strike.
Speaker 2 (04:24):
A righteous strike.
Speaker 1 (04:26):
And after that, I'm not going to play it for
you here, John Kirby. He was asked on camera, Hey,
we just murdered ten people. After the facts came out,
we just murdered ten completely innocent people, seven of them children.
Who's going to jail? Who's getting fired? Kirby responded, Oh no, no, no, no, no, no,
no no. We did an investigation and it was a
(04:48):
process failure. No no, no, no one's going to jail.
Speaker 2 (04:51):
And the guy's like, boy, is anybody gonna get fired?
Speaker 1 (04:53):
No, no, no, no, no, nobody's nobody's gonna be fired. Okay, well,
is anyone going to be reprimanded?
Speaker 2 (04:59):
He was actual.
Speaker 1 (05:00):
She asked that, no, there's not gonna be any reprimands
at all. Ten innocent people, seven children, Like the federal
government bombing a daycare in your town. No one was fired,
no one was even reprimanded for it. Now, why did
I bring all this up. Let's this have to do
with what's going on right now? As I mentioned Pete
(05:21):
hag Seth, the Defense Department, this is all happening under
the Trump administration. Obviously, were nuking drug boats coming from Venezuela.
Speaker 2 (05:29):
The drug boats leave Venezuela by the way, they go
up into Mexico.
Speaker 1 (05:33):
There the drugs they drop off are trafficked up through
our southern border. Were nuking the drug boats on their
way to Mexico, essentially the drugs on the way to
the United States of America. This has happened over twenty
times already.
Speaker 2 (05:45):
Well, you see, you've.
Speaker 1 (05:48):
Noticed in the last twenty four to forty eight hours,
calls for Pete hag Seth to be arrested, for him
to resign, for him to step down. Let me go
ahead and let you know right now, what you're watching
are not people upset about war crimes, innocent civilians, international law.
(06:10):
These were all the same people who had nothing to
say after we murdered seven Afghani children. What you're watching
right now is a communist op, a communist operation, an
operation that is designed to do something. And we'll get
to the something in a moment, but designed to do something.
And the important part of this is they do this
(06:32):
kind of thing all the time, and once you pick
up on the patterns, you can recognize it. And you
have to always understand that the something, whatever that's something
is they're trying.
Speaker 2 (06:41):
To do, is not good for you. It's always bad
for you. You never ever, ever, ever, ever, ever.
Speaker 1 (06:51):
Ever, under any circumstances participate in a communist op because
you understand the communist op is designed to hurt you
and things you love.
Speaker 2 (07:00):
So let's rewind remember.
Speaker 1 (07:03):
That video the Seditious six put out about illegal orders.
Speaker 2 (07:09):
This administration is pitting our uniform military.
Speaker 4 (07:13):
And intelligence community professionals.
Speaker 2 (07:14):
Against American citizens like us. You all swore an oath
to protect and defend this constitution. Right now, the threats
to our constitution aren't just coming from a broad but
from right here at home. Our laws are clear.
Speaker 5 (07:27):
You can refuse illegal orders.
Speaker 2 (07:29):
You can refuse illegal orders. You must refuse illegal orders.
Speaker 4 (07:34):
No one has to carry out orders that violate the
law or our constitution.
Speaker 2 (07:38):
We know this is okay, Well, let's go through this chronologically.
Speaker 1 (07:44):
Did you know what took place before that video came out?
A Soros actually I believe multiple Soros funded NGO started
putting up billboards, billboards really saying this exact same thing. Hey,
you in uniform, don't follow any illegal orders. Hey you
(08:05):
can give us anonymous tips, refuse these illegal orders.
Speaker 2 (08:09):
Billboards go up.
Speaker 1 (08:11):
Then really, out of nowhere, it was out of nowhere,
it wasn't it. You have these United States senators put
out putting out this produced, edited even music in the
background video.
Speaker 2 (08:20):
Refuse illegal orders.
Speaker 1 (08:22):
Okay, okay, So we have the billboards, then we have
the seditious six, and then comes the Washington Post because
that's really where this story about executed drug dealers originates.
So I'm not gonna go over the long, ugly, sordid
history of the Washington Post. I know you don't need
any help to hate the Washington Post any more than
you already do. But one thing you absolutely positively have
(08:46):
to understand is the Washington Post has been a mouthpiece
for the deep state for longer than you've been alive
a long, long, long time. They have a long hite
street of working directly with a central intelligence agency on
various operations. The Washington Post can never be trusted. They
(09:10):
work hand in hand with the deep State. We had billboards,
we had the video, and then boom, Sunday, the story
comes out in the Washington Post, the big Sunday paper.
That's the that's the paper that's always the widest in circulation.
After all, Pete hag Seth has drug dealers executed. Okay, Well,
(09:33):
after that, all these people ran to the news to say.
Speaker 6 (09:38):
This, based on what you what CNN is reporting, what
the Washington Post is reporting, do you believe if there
was a second strike to eliminate any survivors, that that
constitutes a war crime?
Speaker 3 (09:55):
It seems to if that, if that is true, if
what has been report it is accurate, I've got serious concerns.
Speaker 7 (10:04):
Well, first, if that reporting is true, it's a clear
violation of the DoD's own laws of war as well
as international laws about the way you treat people who
are in that circumstance. And so this rises to the
level of a war crime.
Speaker 2 (10:20):
If it's true. Do you think there was a war
crime committed.
Speaker 8 (10:24):
Oh, I think it's very possible there was a war
crime committed. Of course, it's either murder from the first
strike if their whole theory is wrong. And I think
the weight of the legal opinion here is that they've
concocted this ridiculous legal theory. But even if you accept
their legal theory, that it is a war crime. And
so I do believe that the Secretary of Defense should
(10:46):
be held accountable for giving those kind of orders.
Speaker 2 (10:53):
The billboards, the video, then the news story, then every
single news program, all these communist senators running to the
media with accusations.
Speaker 1 (11:06):
Of war crime, and of course after this story comes out,
Donald Trump's being asked about it. You see, this is
(11:41):
how an OP operates, and once you see it laid
out before you, you can recognize it more easily.
Speaker 2 (11:48):
It's not just about the OP they're.
Speaker 1 (11:50):
Currently running against Pete hag Seth, which is obviously designed
to divide the Trump administration, possibly costs Pete haig Seth
his job, dropped Donald Trump's approval numbers of all these
different things, and clearly the OP is designed for that.
But you have billboards, you have senators, you have commercials,
you have this show, this show, this show, the Washington Post,
all collaborating, all collaborating for what is an obvious op.
(12:16):
Now here's a word of caution for you. The chances
are probably pretty strong you like Pete Haig Seth, so
you'd be more apt to defend Pete Haig Seth.
Speaker 2 (12:27):
But let's say you hate him. Maybe you do. Lots
of people do. Maybe you hate Pete Haig Seth.
Speaker 1 (12:32):
This is a key for how communist ops have been
successful many times in the past. Human beings, all of us,
we are naturally biased for and against certain people, whether
or not we like them. And when you hear something
bad about someone you like, you tend to question it.
Speaker 2 (12:54):
I do something, we question it, And.
Speaker 1 (12:55):
When you hear something bad about someone you hate, you
tend to believe it. Communist ops rely on you participating
in them to be successful. They need the masses to
take it in and spread the word in order for
the op to succeed. Otherwise, these communists are all just
(13:18):
talking to each other on CNN at the Washington Post.
If it can't break out from that bubble, then it's
not going to succeed. Let's say you hate Pete Hegseath,
You see these stories on the news, you see the
read the story in the Washington Post.
Speaker 2 (13:36):
If you hate them, you're apt to believe it.
Speaker 1 (13:39):
And then soon, probably unknowingly, you are online participating in
the communist opp But you know that is against the lag.
Speaker 2 (13:46):
You know, I've never liked that guy. I never trusted
them at all.
Speaker 1 (13:49):
You probably don't even know that's what you're doing, but
you're participating in the op, and you are helping it succeed.
Speaker 2 (13:59):
They run this playbook over and over and over and
over again. They always have.
Speaker 1 (14:04):
Before before the America's communist movement ever took hold, they
were running ops like this in Cambodia and the Soviet
Union in China.
Speaker 2 (14:12):
They always do this.
Speaker 1 (14:14):
It is effective unless you recognize it. So right now,
it's not even about this one. Right now, repeat after me.
I will not take part in communist ops. I will
not take part in communist ops. I will recognize them
(14:35):
and refuse to participate, because I know that communist is
an evil demon who only.
Speaker 2 (14:41):
Has my worst at heart.
Speaker 1 (14:44):
All right, all that may have made you uncomfortable, but
I am right now speaking of Venezuela Communist opposide.
Speaker 2 (14:52):
What's going on down there and why.
Speaker 1 (14:55):
We'll talk to Ammon Blair in a moment about that
before we talk to him. Don't want to brag, but
we had a big neighborhood Thanksgiving party.
Speaker 2 (15:06):
What we brought was a pretty big hit. No, it
wasn't just obs dessert. See.
Speaker 1 (15:11):
I brought a dip and Massa chips and no one
at the party had heard of Massa chips. And I
actually got made fun of when I walked in because
these the healthy chips.
Speaker 2 (15:24):
What are you doing? And then the chips were gone
like that.
Speaker 1 (15:29):
When I tell you to buy massive chips, I actually
don't tell you to buy them just because they're better
for you. That's a nice side benefit. They're the best
chips I've ever eaten in my entire life. With three ingredients,
you don't have to feel fat and bloated and miserable.
Speaker 2 (15:42):
You don't have to live like that.
Speaker 1 (15:45):
Go to massachips dot com, slash jessetv and buy a
couple bags, get a couple of different flavors.
Speaker 2 (15:51):
You'll never buy another chip, and you can eat them
guilt free. We'll be back. The airspace is closed over Venezuela. Look.
Speaker 1 (16:10):
President Trump put this up on social media. I'm going
to quote him directly, to all airlines, pilots, drug dealers,
and human traffickers, please consider the air space above and
surrounding Venezuela to be closed in its entirety.
Speaker 2 (16:24):
Uh. What joining me now?
Speaker 1 (16:27):
Emmon Blair, Senior Fellow at the Texas Public Policy Foundation.
He's also a veteran fought for this country and he
was awesome last time he was on here. Okay, can
you can you break down what exactly is going on?
We have fifteen thousand troops in the Caribbean and now
we've closed the Venezuelan airspace. This kind of seems like
something's about to go down.
Speaker 2 (16:46):
Yeah.
Speaker 9 (16:47):
One, if you remember Jesse, I think three days after
the attack, the Hamas attack in twenty twenty three, the
Houthy's took over the Red Sea. And how did they
do that and how did they support that effort? Well,
the majority of that support came through illicit channels, whether
that's by seer what not, through our greatest enemies that's
(17:09):
going to be the CCP Iran in Russia. So they
were supporting logistically also with weapons and whatnot to the
who to the who thies as well as the drug trade.
So when we look now at what we're doing with Venezuela.
All we're trying to do is we're trying to suppress
that same pipeline that traffics, whether that's going to be weapons, personnel, technology,
(17:33):
like telecom systems, you have it. We're going to try
to shut down every avenue, every domain, and that includes
the air domain. You know what's interesting, Something I wish
we could do is actually control our own airspace on
our southern border, which is kind of interesting that we've
asked or we've told that the airspace surrounding Venezuela is
(17:55):
going to be shut down for all commercial and also
other ways or means to travel outside and in Venezuela.
I really wish we could do that, not only on
our military basis here, but also our southern border. If
you recall recently the NORAD commander came out and said
that we can't even understand the threat of our own
(18:16):
air domain and surrounding our military bases as drones are
making incursions on a daily basis, and then on our
southern border, we have thousands of drones making incursions.
Speaker 2 (18:25):
So it'd be.
Speaker 9 (18:26):
Great if we if we applied the same same level
of measure that we're doing to Venezuela. That we are
I mean that we do to Mexico itself.
Speaker 1 (18:36):
I remember when we let a Chinese spy balloon over
all those bases as well, But that's another story for
another day, all right, and zoom out for us here,
what's the angle?
Speaker 2 (18:45):
What is this about?
Speaker 1 (18:46):
Because honestly, I'd spent a lot of time over the
last few days with just normal people, not political hacks
like you, and maybe normal people, and they weren't necessarily
against or for action in Venezuela, but none of them
really understood why. I got a lot of that question.
Why what's this really about? Is this about Maduro leaving?
Is that simple?
Speaker 2 (19:08):
Sure?
Speaker 9 (19:09):
Great question. So if you take a step back and
you talk about communism all the time, and you yourself
are the leading expert on anti communism, if you look
at our western hemisphere, the epicenter for communist activity, for
the CCP, for Russia and others to enact their operations
on the western hemisphere, that is going to be Venezuela.
(19:32):
It used to beat Cuba, and then Hugo Chavez kind
of learned his ropes. So I guess you could say,
with the Cuban regime took it to Venezuela, and then
Maduro followed with that. So right now, what you're seeing
as strategically and as well as operationally, Venezuela is the
(19:54):
epicenter for all of our our enemies throughout the world,
whether that's China, Russia, you name it, to operate.
Speaker 2 (20:04):
And so in order for us.
Speaker 9 (20:05):
To attack the system that seeks to thwart us in
the United States, we must attack it at the center
of gravity. That center of gravity where all operations exist
is going to be Venezuela in Maduro. So if we
can take it at the focal point, if we can
take it out at that center focal point, then a
(20:26):
lot of the other actions, whether they're in the Caribbean nations,
every other nation in the Western hemisphere will also crumble
as well.
Speaker 1 (20:36):
And so these people have the backing of places like
China and Russia, and they obviously do. I mean, they've
done military exercises together. So you do speak the truth.
Speaker 2 (20:46):
Aren't China and Russia going to help them? Or can
they even help them? Can they project power over here
in a significant way to hold us back? If we're
trying to get rid of Maduro great question.
Speaker 9 (20:58):
And what's interesting is they are actually looking like they're
pulling back a little bit in terms of helping Maduro
at this point. There was a New York Post piece
just recently, just a day ago, talking about this, and
for your listeners out there, I would highly suggest you
guys starting to read Southcomm's media platform. It's called Dia
(21:19):
Logos Americas. They're actually putting out a lot of information
in regards to exactly why we're operating in the US Southcom,
how we're operating, what Maduro is doing. There are links
to China, there are links to Russia, there are links
to Iran. All of that can actually be found. And
they're writing articles, information pieces almost on a daily basis.
Speaker 1 (21:42):
And let's shift gears here and talk Mexican cartels because
this is the Trump's been all over this as well.
He's been ramping up things down there. Every other day
we wake up to a story of Trump says he's
gonna bomb them, then the Mexican president says, no, don't
do that. That is okay, I might, but what is happening?
Are we going to escalate? Is it as it stands now?
(22:03):
Is it going to stay this way?
Speaker 9 (22:06):
Jesse to be honest, I hope it doesn't stay this way.
As as I said earlier, Look, I really wish we
would take the same level of threat analysis, in the
same level of actions that were taken against Maduro and
Venezuela in the and also in the Caribbean, as we
(22:26):
would to Mexico. As it stands out, it looks like
we're still letting Mexico decide what they're going to do
in terms of the southern border, in terms of counting
their own cartels. They're going to extra diet, They're not
going to extra diet. They're going to go after fentelcy
labs in Mexico, They're not. It is very difficult to
(22:47):
ascertain exactly what Mexico is doing because they're they're in
Afghanistan next door. The Mexican cartels are embedded from the
subnational level all the way to the national level. It's
very difficult to trust any intel report that is actually
coming from Mexico whether they are taking out fentanyl labs.
And so when you look at everything that we're doing
(23:09):
in the Caribbean, when it comes to going after three
in di Adagua or cartel the Suns and their drug boats.
Why are we doing that same very thing to the
Mexican cartels. Why aren't we doing the same level of
national offence operations on our southern border here in Texas.
Why is it that are air domain like I said
(23:30):
mentioned earlier, why is it still open? Why is it
that we still can't understand or have domain awareness of
how many occursions, what's making occursions both in air, land,
sea at the Rio Grande and our coastal waters electromagnetic
spectrum as well as the cyber spectrum. We still don't
have operational or one hundred percent domain awareness of our
(23:51):
southern border. And so to me, it seems why is
it that we're addressing Maduro with so much weight when
we could be addressing that very issue with President Scheinbaum
in Mexico they're elected officials, and also our southern border.
Speaker 1 (24:08):
Why can't we get a hold of this drone situation?
You've mentioned it several times. People I know who know
a lot more than I do, just like people like
you all talk about this same situation. We cannot get
a hold of the drones around our basis, around the border.
Is it just a matter of that I'm genuinely asking,
I'm too dumb to know. Is it just a question
of what the technology isn't there yet to defeat drones?
(24:30):
The drones have outpaced the anti drone technology as of
right now.
Speaker 9 (24:34):
You know a great question. You actually posted something on
social media really recently. You asked about what are the
current tactics, techniques and procedures in Ukraine. Well, it's funny
that you mentioned that because Mexican cartel's actually went to
the Ukraine battlefront to learn specifically drone warfare. So then
(24:57):
they now come back and you look at the cartel
and there Este down there south of Laredo. You look
at the Gulf Cartel, you look at Cartel Holisco New Generation,
you look at the type of drones that they're operating with.
You're seeing that they're using fiber optic systems just like
you see in Ukraine to make it so that we
can't take them down with electronic warfare. And something that's
(25:17):
really interesting that never really made the news is that
they actually took down two of our military drones on
our southern border. They took it, took two drones from
our Texas Military Department down, one kinetically and one using
electronic warfare. The cartels don't have the bureaucratic system in
order to procure the necessary means to make incursions into
(25:40):
the US like we do. If we want to go
through the process of trying to counter these drones, we
must have to go through the FAA. We must have
to go through the Department of War. Now, we must
have to go through the Department of Homeland Security. We
must then we're gonna probably get sued by whatever state
in the Union. And so we have all this backdrop
at the same time we have the cartels figure out Chay.
(26:02):
You know, all we have to do is do exactly
what's happening on the Ukraine Russia battlefront, bring it into Mexico.
Mexico's not going to stop us. The US is bureaucratic
process is not going to stop us. And so here
we sit. We sit with the southern border where they
can make incursions on a daily basis without us even
stopping it. They can make incursions on our military installations
(26:25):
without us even stopping it. And that is not even
me saying that. That is also the commander of NORAD's grief.
Speaker 2 (26:32):
I having awesome as always. Brother, come back soon.
Speaker 1 (26:37):
We're going to talk a little bit about these refugees
in a moment before we do that, probably going to
have troubles sleep in a night, and we all do
occasionally too much stress, too much caffeine, life being what
it is, and that's where dream powder comes in.
Speaker 2 (26:55):
Now.
Speaker 1 (26:55):
I know it sounds pretty pretty exotic, if you will.
It's just oneful natural stuff, drug free. It's a cup
of hot chocolate. It's delicious, and it has ratio and
magnesium in it and all these melotone and all these
things that are natural.
Speaker 2 (27:12):
And so you before.
Speaker 1 (27:13):
Bed, you sip on a cup of hot chocolate and
then you just drift off to sleep. That sound good,
good natural sleep where you wake up feeling great. Shotbeam
dot com slash Jesse Kelly, We'll be back. Why do
(27:39):
communists bring in so many foreigners? What it's the angle?
Is it that all these foreigners have read the works
of Karl Marx and now they just want to implement
It's not that at all. It's not that at all.
The communist is a revolutionary. He is trying to have.
Speaker 2 (27:58):
A revolution wherever he happens to be. That revolution is going.
Speaker 1 (28:02):
To involve killing people, destroying things, burning down the country where.
Speaker 2 (28:08):
His revolution is taking place.
Speaker 1 (28:10):
Therefore, the biggest threat to him, the biggest enemy to
the communist are patriotic citizens of whatever country he's having
a revolution in, because people who love their country don't
want it destroyed and don't want it burnt down. So
if you want to burn it down, you got to
go find some people who will allow you to do
(28:32):
it and in fact help you to do it if
you bring them into the country. That afghanis scumbag who killed.
Speaker 2 (28:40):
That wonderful young lady, the National Guard soldier Sarah Bestrom.
He was, of course brought in from Afghanistan. Now why
was he here? What happened? You remember talked about it
a little bit in the opening of the show.
Speaker 1 (28:53):
Afghanistan fell because the Biden administration they screwed everything up.
Then they looked bad on camera where they looked bad
on camera because civilians were falling from sea one thirties
into the whole country was in chaos. But then they
found what was for them the perfect solution. You see,
what's the solution. Well, if people are pointing out how
(29:14):
many innocent civilians are dying over there, then what you
need to do is save them. You see, how do
you save them? Throw them on a plane and bring
them to America. That's how you save them. Then you've,
in the mind of a communist, killed two birds with
one stone. You get great pr from saving these refugees,
(29:37):
and you get a loyal, hostile foreigner who will vote
Democrat and murder as many Republicans as they possibly can,
and so will their eighty five kids they've brought. And
the Biden administration, of course, lied through their teeth and
talked about all the vetting. What reassurances can you make
about the screening process and the attempts to make sure
(29:59):
that somebody like that doesn't make it right here, I
can absolutely assure you that no one is coming into
the United States of America who has not been through
a thorough screening and background check process.
Speaker 10 (30:11):
We're conducting thorough security screening and the intermediate stops they're
making for anyone who is not a US citizen or
a lawful permanent resident of the United States. Anyone arriving
in the United States will have undergone a background check,
and we must all work together to resettle thousands of
(30:33):
Afghans who ultimately qualify for refugee status.
Speaker 2 (30:39):
Well, that's a lie.
Speaker 1 (30:41):
You ever been through a background check or known someone
who has been through a background check.
Speaker 2 (30:46):
You know how long it takes? What does it take
so long?
Speaker 1 (30:50):
Well, you have to go and you have to interview
people who know that person. You have to dig through documentation,
criminal history. We were loading Afghanis on the sea in
thirties as fast as humanly possible. It took about five minutes.
They didn't background check anybody, They didn't vet anybody. Ali
Handro Majorcis essentially had to say as much a little
(31:11):
while later.
Speaker 11 (31:13):
The standard procedure is an in person interview for refugees
or visa applicants. Now you've testified that you're not doing
those interviews, that they're not happening.
Speaker 12 (31:24):
You are correct that we are not conducting in person
full refugee interviews of one hundred percent of the individual.
Speaker 2 (31:33):
What percentage are you conducting?
Speaker 12 (31:34):
I don't have that information.
Speaker 2 (31:36):
What number have been interviewed?
Speaker 12 (31:38):
What we are doing?
Speaker 2 (31:38):
Wait?
Speaker 11 (31:39):
Wait, wait, what number of the more than sixty thousand
brought to the country, what number have received an in
person interview before they came to the country. Because you
said one hundred percent of screen, so what percentage have
been given an actual interview by a trained official before
they come to the country.
Speaker 12 (31:55):
When you're speaking of a full refugee, like interview have
that data.
Speaker 1 (32:04):
They didn't interview them. They didn't care. This is about
pr and bringing foreigners in. Some people die afterwards. It
doesn't matter to the communists.
Speaker 2 (32:16):
He's fighting a revolution.
Speaker 1 (32:17):
People die, and you had dutifull little communists foot soldiers
like Jack Tapper calling you a bigot if you didn't
want all these people here.
Speaker 13 (32:28):
There are a number of other voices in the Republican
Party that are already, whether on television or on tweets
or whatever, starting to talk about starting to demonize Afghan immigrants,
starting to talk about this is Biden's plan to put
more Muslims in the country, starting to insinuate that these
(32:51):
are these are bad people, they're terrorists, et cetera, et cetera.
Speaker 2 (32:55):
Really rank bigotry.
Speaker 13 (32:59):
What's your reaction when you see it, Because it is
I wouldn't say it's the prevalent voice in the Republican Party,
but it's getting louder.
Speaker 1 (33:09):
That's what the communist does. Bring as many barbarians into
your country to rape and murder and pillage and of
course bleed. You drive your packs and a taxpayer money.
In the second you throw a fit about it, they'll
call you a racist. Don't allow these communist tactics to work.
Cut off all immigration, legal and illegal, and start deporting
(33:30):
tens of millions of people if you want to save America.
All right, speaking of which, we're going to talk to
Julio Rosas about all this stuff. And just a moment
before we talk to Julio, I want to talk to
you about maximizing your masculinity, your energy, you're focus. That's
really what we're talking about here. How do you do that?
(33:50):
What do you do when you drink estrogen? When there's
estrogen and the waters and you're showering and your tea
levels are dropping every single battle of wat they go down, Well,
you got to keep drinking water. You have to take
steps to reverse it. And that's what a male vitality
stack from Chok will do for you. They have female
vitality stacks for the ladies as well. Natural herbal supplements
(34:13):
from Chok will save your freaking existence. You'll be so
much better at work at home. You will be mad
at yourself for all the time you spent not taking
any chalk. Natural herbal supplements are the way forward. Go
to chalk dot com slash jessetv. Start today. You are
ninety days away from feeling better.
Speaker 2 (34:34):
We'll be back.
Speaker 12 (34:46):
Do you know what the motive was at this point?
Speaker 10 (34:48):
Do you believe the suspect acted alone?
Speaker 4 (34:54):
You know, we're still going through all of that information
and all of the FBI and DOJ reveal new information,
but I will say we believe he was radicalized since
he's been here in this country. We do believe it
was through connections in his home community and state, and
we're going to continue to talk to those who interacted
with him, who were his family members, talk to them.
So far, we've had some participation, but anyone who has
(35:17):
the information on this needs to know that we will
be coming after you and we will bring you to justice.
We absolutely will persecute you because we do know that
we will never allow this to continue to happen in
our country. Allowed individuals who came to our country that
were unvetted by Joe Biden allowed to run free and loose.
We are going to bring them to justice and make
(35:37):
sure that they're returned out of this country. If they
aren't here for the purposes of being in American.
Speaker 1 (35:45):
Who was this freaking guy who killed one of our soldiers?
Has another fighting for his life. Let's talk to Julio
about it. Joining me now, United States Marine. You can
check out his sub stack at mostly Peaceful dot media.
Julio Rosas Julio as always have done some digging on
this scumbag.
Speaker 2 (36:03):
Who was he? Why was he here? Why do you
do what he did?
Speaker 5 (36:07):
So apparently he was brought over during the fall of
Afghanistan back in twenty twenty one, and so, I mean
at the time there were concerns obviously that because the
Biden administration was really focused on just getting people onto
planes to juice up the numbers, that the people that
quote unquote deserve to be on the planes weren't necessarily
(36:28):
the ones getting on it. Now in this case, it
you know, appears that this this this guy was part
of a CIA unit from from from during that time
and and there's some reporting by Jerry Dunleevy where the
unit that he was a part of the CIA kind
of deal that said if you help secure uh, the
the the airport and cobble you will be you will
(36:50):
be evacuated along with your families. And so that that
that appears to be kind of a deal that was
set up. And so I know that people are you know,
there's there's still lot of you know, questions that that
need to be answered, right because it's not just the
fact of how he got here. So it's like, Okay,
so he's been in the country for about you know,
four years, you know, going on five years. You know,
(37:11):
what has he been doing? You know, did he have
any of this animosity prior to to you know, being
flown from Afghanistan? You know, And and I was I
was the first one to report that this guy, you know,
this guy, this terrorist screamed you know, a la huakbar
while he was carrying out this attack, and you know,
and so there's very much a lot of you know,
(37:34):
just this is just the continuing effects of the Bide
administration's disastrous policies. And I will say that people have said, well,
his asylum claim was was was approved this year under
the Trump administration, and so so clearly the Trump administration
is that fault.
Speaker 2 (37:50):
And what I would say to that is like, well, actually.
Speaker 5 (37:52):
It shows that clearly even though this guy was supposedly vetted,
you know, to the point where you're you're working not
just with just the regular military, but with the CIA.
And they're still willing to carry out this attack even
though they were brought over to the United States. That
shows that this was a bad idea to begin with.
And I think a lot of people knew that at
the time, but they still said, well, we can't have
(38:13):
the bad optics.
Speaker 2 (38:14):
We already have bad optics at the border because.
Speaker 5 (38:16):
That was that was happening during that time, So we
gotta we gotta compromise national security in order to avoid that.
So this is it's it's it's to be expected. Unfortunately,
that's something like this was bound to happen, whether it's
thrown from the southern border or someone that was brought
over in that chaotic evacuation period.
Speaker 1 (38:39):
OHO, the oh clarification on something and I understand so
many details are fuzzy, we may not know, but worked
with the CIA.
Speaker 2 (38:47):
Second, people hear that they think this guy was.
Speaker 1 (38:50):
Dressed in all black, low crawling through an air conditioning
vent to pick locks and things like that. You know,
people immediately go to that, But doesn't sound like his
involvement was that in depth. It was hey, help secure
an airport. Was he more involved than that?
Speaker 5 (39:06):
From what from what I've seen, yes, because it was
beyond translation, right, I mean that that was kind of
the that was kind of the standard, uh you know,
priority for people. It's like, you know, like, oh, we
got to get the translators, we got to get all
these people out. But from what I've seen, it looks
like he was more involved with carrying out carrying out
(39:30):
significant missions on you know, with with CIA, with CIA units,
you know, on behalf of the CIA. And and again
I just go back to okay, so but then you
but then you go back and you ask anybody, not
even just Afghanistan, but you know, since we're talking about Afghanistan,
you ask any g WAT that that deployed to Afghanistan,
and you would they will have dozens of stories about
(39:52):
how problematic Backgan allies were, how they were not trustworthy.
Speaker 2 (39:56):
And I know that right now, the.
Speaker 5 (39:58):
The the people that have been advocating for Afghanist to
be relocated to the United States, they say, well, we
can't blame this one guy, and you know, put it
to the whole population.
Speaker 2 (40:10):
But this is but insider.
Speaker 5 (40:11):
Attacks were common throughout the entire time period that we
were there in that country. I mean, unfortunately, there were
there were you know, many cases of green on blue attacks,
and now you're seeing a lot of veterans on social
media talking about how so one case like yeah, like
before we went on on missions, we had to confiscate
the afghanist phones for you know, for forty eight hours,
(40:32):
and we couldn't tell them where we were going because
we didn't want them to leak that information to the.
Speaker 2 (40:37):
Taliban or al Kaida.
Speaker 5 (40:39):
So this this was problematic from the start, right, and
so it is completely crazy then to say, well, We're
gonna airlift one hundred thousand people out of this out
of this country with all these problems and resettle them
in the United States and just assume nothing bad is
going to happen as a result of that. And really,
(41:01):
you know, that's one of the reasons why President Trump
was was elected because we're done with that idiotic policy.
You know, America First means that we've put the priority
and the well being of American citizens first, and when
something like this happens, it just highlights how we can't
continue policies like that.
Speaker 1 (41:19):
Who the old State Department is pausing visas for Afghan
passport holders. That sounds great, I'm all on board with that,
But how many of these people are already here and
what's the plan for that? Are we rounding them up
and shipping them home? But how does this work?
Speaker 5 (41:36):
Well, well, the first part the answer is too many
in my opinion. But also, but this is a problem,
right because the administration unfortunately is having to play catch
up on everything, and especially when it comes to immigration.
I mean that's just so that's just a web that
they can go all different places, and it's not as
simple as because you know then that people some people
(41:59):
have kids at this point, so now they're technically American
citizens and not just with afghanis right. I mean, this
is just, like I said, the whole totality of this problem.
So I think obviously there's going to be a renewed
focus on that. And I mean because this guy drove
from Washington State, I mean, this guy went out of
his way and the most inconvenient way possible to do this, right,
(42:22):
So this was premeditated. This was you know, clearly thought
out to do this. And we're seeing all these other
cases where again Afghan nationals who were brought over or
who came over the southern border, they're being arrested for
plotting attacks on American soil. So I think the administration
(42:43):
is going to have to really focus on that, and
I know that they are. But then you take in
all the other nationalities from all the other problematic countries
that have problems with terrorism, because Afghanistan not the only
one where you had people coming up through the southern
order from So it's just it's a cluster. It's a cluster,
and that's why it was important that you know, DHS
(43:06):
and ICE and Border Patrol got their increase in funding
through the one big beautiful Bill, but that obviously takes
time to implement, and so you know, I don't fully
expect this, unfortunately, to get resolved even within Trump's supermaining term,
because because of all the problems that I've said, this
is gonna work, This has been gonna be a decade
long problem and and and we don't really have that time.
(43:30):
So I I I believe it's gonna be worked on,
is being worked on, but it definitely requires, you know,
move with a purpose.
Speaker 2 (43:41):
Well, Bill, thanks my brother.
Speaker 1 (43:43):
As always, all right, light the mood.
Speaker 2 (43:49):
It's AIDS day next. All right, it is time to
lighten the mood.
Speaker 1 (44:03):
And I know we're all kind of tired of there
being a national day for everything. But today is National
AIDS Day, and I thought, you know, I'm probably not
qualified to speak about this, so I'm sorry, World Age Day.
I'm probably not qualified to speak about this, but I
just want to go back to win. The American President
(44:24):
gave credit where credit was due.
Speaker 2 (44:28):
By the way, it's all his fault.
Speaker 10 (44:31):
We're spending six billion dollars in taxpayer money this month
to help age fight HIV ah.
Speaker 2 (44:42):
Ah. I was thinking of tomorrow
We're going to discuss communist operations recognizing them. There's one
happening right now. We're going to discuss the refugee situation.
We have a huge show tonight, and I'm right, all right,
(00:23):
before we get into communist ops, communist operations, operations targeted
directly at you, we wanted to take a moment, because
we didn't get a chance to last week, to honor the.
Speaker 2 (00:34):
Fallen Army specialist.
Speaker 1 (00:36):
Sarah Beckstrom was twenty years old walking a post with
the National Guard in Washington, DC. A vicious, violent animal
who should not have been in the country killed it,
and she.
Speaker 2 (00:51):
Died for this country.
Speaker 1 (00:52):
Her services every bit as honorable, her sacrifice every bit
as honorable as anybody who's ever.
Speaker 2 (00:58):
Worn the uniform.
Speaker 1 (01:00):
She died twenty years old, serving her country, and we
just honor this warrior as she passes on. All right,
say a prayer please for her family. Christmas coming up.
It's just going to be it's a very tough time
for her family. Say a prayer for them, please. All Right, Now,
this is going to be You're gonna have to bear
(01:21):
with me for a couple moments. This is going to
be about communist ops, Communist operations because they're always running them.
They're very very good, have always been very very good
at coordinating seemingly different entities to converge to run in
operation operations. Always for a purpose, and not to spoil
(01:42):
the ending for you. The purpose is never for your good,
Believe me, it's always for your ill. But there's been
a lot of talk in the past couple of days
about war crimes.
Speaker 2 (01:52):
Pete ha acsass did he order sealed team section to
murder a couple of drug dealers?
Speaker 1 (01:57):
Okay, so, first of all, you remember Afghanistan specifically, you
remember the terrible way Afghanistan ended.
Speaker 2 (02:07):
I know you do, we all do. It was awful.
Speaker 1 (02:10):
Biden administration just ruined the whole thing so they could
try to have a September eleventh parade. It didn't work
out well, we pulled out, a bunch of people started dying.
Speaker 2 (02:22):
We went back in.
Speaker 1 (02:23):
Then thirteen of our warriors were incinerated by an ISIS
suicide bomber with ball bearings at Abygate. And you remember
that we lost all those warriors. Okay, so we got
all that, we got all.
Speaker 2 (02:35):
We know that. You remember what happened afterwards?
Speaker 1 (02:38):
The Biden administration they had thought that the pullout of
Afghanistan was going to be a big political win for them,
turned out to be a huge political loss, a big scandal.
Speaker 2 (02:46):
It looks bad.
Speaker 1 (02:47):
People were falling from C one thirties and then thirteen
of our warriors die.
Speaker 2 (02:52):
Now it went from any kind of a wind to
the worst possible loss.
Speaker 1 (02:57):
And they were very very image conscious that, in fact,
that's all they cared about at all. Lives, your life,
the country. That never crossed their mind. They were very
image conscious. So what did they do. They felt pressure
to respond to that terrorist attack at Abby.
Speaker 2 (03:12):
Gate, and what did they do.
Speaker 1 (03:14):
They sent a reaper drone out, a reaper drone, very
deadly weapon in modern combat, incinerated ten people. Seven of
the people incinerated were children, and they were all innocent.
None of them were terrorists. They weren't with isis completely innocent?
(03:38):
Not really morally any different than the federal government sending
a reaper drone to incinerate your house at that Thanksgiving celebration.
You just had you and your family just as innocent.
And after we incinerated ten innocent people, seven of them children,
chairmen of the Joint Chief stepped up and he said.
Speaker 3 (03:56):
This we know from a variety of other means, at
least one of those people that were killed was a
ISIS facilitator. So where there are others killed, Yes, there
are others killed. Who they are, we don't know. We'll
try to sort through all that, but we believe that
the procedures at this point, I don't want to influence
the outcome of an investigation, but at this point we
(04:18):
think that the procedures were correctly followed and it was
a righteous strike.
Speaker 2 (04:24):
A righteous strike.
Speaker 1 (04:26):
And after that, I'm not going to play it for
you here, John Kirby. He was asked on camera, Hey,
we just murdered ten people. After the facts came out,
we just murdered ten completely innocent people, seven of them children.
Who's going to jail? Who's getting fired? Kirby responded, Oh no, no, no, no, no, no,
no no. We did an investigation and it was a
(04:48):
process failure. No no, no, no one's going to jail.
Speaker 2 (04:51):
And the guy's like, boy, is anybody gonna get fired?
Speaker 1 (04:53):
No, no, no, no, no, nobody's nobody's gonna be fired. Okay, well,
is anyone going to be reprimanded?
Speaker 2 (04:59):
He was actual.
Speaker 1 (05:00):
She asked that, no, there's not gonna be any reprimands
at all. Ten innocent people, seven children, Like the federal
government bombing a daycare in your town. No one was fired,
no one was even reprimanded for it. Now, why did
I bring all this up. Let's this have to do
with what's going on right now? As I mentioned Pete
(05:21):
hag Seth, the Defense Department, this is all happening under
the Trump administration. Obviously, were nuking drug boats coming from Venezuela.
Speaker 2 (05:29):
The drug boats leave Venezuela by the way, they go
up into Mexico.
Speaker 1 (05:33):
There the drugs they drop off are trafficked up through
our southern border. Were nuking the drug boats on their
way to Mexico, essentially the drugs on the way to
the United States of America. This has happened over twenty
times already.
Speaker 2 (05:45):
Well, you see, you've.
Speaker 1 (05:48):
Noticed in the last twenty four to forty eight hours,
calls for Pete hag Seth to be arrested, for him
to resign, for him to step down. Let me go
ahead and let you know right now, what you're watching
are not people upset about war crimes, innocent civilians, international law.
(06:10):
These were all the same people who had nothing to
say after we murdered seven Afghani children. What you're watching
right now is a communist op, a communist operation, an
operation that is designed to do something. And we'll get
to the something in a moment, but designed to do something.
And the important part of this is they do this
(06:32):
kind of thing all the time, and once you pick
up on the patterns, you can recognize it. And you
have to always understand that the something, whatever that's something
is they're trying.
Speaker 2 (06:41):
To do, is not good for you. It's always bad
for you. You never ever, ever, ever, ever, ever.
Speaker 1 (06:51):
Ever, under any circumstances participate in a communist op because
you understand the communist op is designed to hurt you
and things you love.
Speaker 2 (07:00):
So let's rewind remember.
Speaker 1 (07:03):
That video the Seditious six put out about illegal orders.
Speaker 2 (07:09):
This administration is pitting our uniform military.
Speaker 4 (07:13):
And intelligence community professionals.
Speaker 2 (07:14):
Against American citizens like us. You all swore an oath
to protect and defend this constitution. Right now, the threats
to our constitution aren't just coming from a broad but
from right here at home. Our laws are clear.
Speaker 5 (07:27):
You can refuse illegal orders.
Speaker 2 (07:29):
You can refuse illegal orders. You must refuse illegal orders.
Speaker 4 (07:34):
No one has to carry out orders that violate the
law or our constitution.
Speaker 2 (07:38):
We know this is okay, Well, let's go through this chronologically.
Speaker 1 (07:44):
Did you know what took place before that video came out?
A Soros actually I believe multiple Soros funded NGO started
putting up billboards, billboards really saying this exact same thing. Hey,
you in uniform, don't follow any illegal orders. Hey you
(08:05):
can give us anonymous tips, refuse these illegal orders.
Speaker 2 (08:09):
Billboards go up.
Speaker 1 (08:11):
Then really, out of nowhere, it was out of nowhere,
it wasn't it. You have these United States senators put
out putting out this produced, edited even music in the
background video.
Speaker 2 (08:20):
Refuse illegal orders.
Speaker 1 (08:22):
Okay, okay, So we have the billboards, then we have
the seditious six, and then comes the Washington Post because
that's really where this story about executed drug dealers originates.
So I'm not gonna go over the long, ugly, sordid
history of the Washington Post. I know you don't need
any help to hate the Washington Post any more than
you already do. But one thing you absolutely positively have
(08:46):
to understand is the Washington Post has been a mouthpiece
for the deep state for longer than you've been alive
a long, long, long time. They have a long hite
street of working directly with a central intelligence agency on
various operations. The Washington Post can never be trusted. They
(09:10):
work hand in hand with the deep State. We had billboards,
we had the video, and then boom, Sunday, the story
comes out in the Washington Post, the big Sunday paper.
That's the that's the paper that's always the widest in circulation.
After all, Pete hag Seth has drug dealers executed. Okay, Well,
(09:33):
after that, all these people ran to the news to say.
Speaker 6 (09:38):
This, based on what you what CNN is reporting, what
the Washington Post is reporting, do you believe if there
was a second strike to eliminate any survivors, that that
constitutes a war crime?
Speaker 3 (09:55):
It seems to if that, if that is true, if
what has been report it is accurate, I've got serious concerns.
Speaker 7 (10:04):
Well, first, if that reporting is true, it's a clear
violation of the DoD's own laws of war as well
as international laws about the way you treat people who
are in that circumstance. And so this rises to the
level of a war crime.
Speaker 2 (10:20):
If it's true. Do you think there was a war
crime committed.
Speaker 8 (10:24):
Oh, I think it's very possible there was a war
crime committed. Of course, it's either murder from the first
strike if their whole theory is wrong. And I think
the weight of the legal opinion here is that they've
concocted this ridiculous legal theory. But even if you accept
their legal theory, that it is a war crime. And
so I do believe that the Secretary of Defense should
(10:46):
be held accountable for giving those kind of orders.
Speaker 2 (10:53):
The billboards, the video, then the news story, then every
single news program, all these communist senators running to the
media with accusations.
Speaker 1 (11:06):
Of war crime, and of course after this story comes out,
Donald Trump's being asked about it. You see, this is
(11:41):
how an OP operates, and once you see it laid
out before you, you can recognize it more easily.
Speaker 2 (11:48):
It's not just about the OP they're.
Speaker 1 (11:50):
Currently running against Pete hag Seth, which is obviously designed
to divide the Trump administration, possibly costs Pete haig Seth
his job, dropped Donald Trump's approval numbers of all these
different things, and clearly the OP is designed for that.
But you have billboards, you have senators, you have commercials,
you have this show, this show, this show, the Washington Post,
all collaborating, all collaborating for what is an obvious op.
(12:16):
Now here's a word of caution for you. The chances
are probably pretty strong you like Pete Haig Seth, so
you'd be more apt to defend Pete Haig Seth.
Speaker 2 (12:27):
But let's say you hate him. Maybe you do. Lots
of people do. Maybe you hate Pete Haig Seth.
Speaker 1 (12:32):
This is a key for how communist ops have been
successful many times in the past. Human beings, all of us,
we are naturally biased for and against certain people, whether
or not we like them. And when you hear something
bad about someone you like, you tend to question it.
Speaker 2 (12:54):
I do something, we question it, And.
Speaker 1 (12:55):
When you hear something bad about someone you hate, you
tend to believe it. Communist ops rely on you participating
in them to be successful. They need the masses to
take it in and spread the word in order for
the op to succeed. Otherwise, these communists are all just
(13:18):
talking to each other on CNN at the Washington Post.
If it can't break out from that bubble, then it's
not going to succeed. Let's say you hate Pete Hegseath,
You see these stories on the news, you see the
read the story in the Washington Post.
Speaker 2 (13:36):
If you hate them, you're apt to believe it.
Speaker 1 (13:39):
And then soon, probably unknowingly, you are online participating in
the communist opp But you know that is against the lag.
Speaker 2 (13:46):
You know, I've never liked that guy. I never trusted
them at all.
Speaker 1 (13:49):
You probably don't even know that's what you're doing, but
you're participating in the op, and you are helping it succeed.
Speaker 2 (13:59):
They run this playbook over and over and over and
over again. They always have.
Speaker 1 (14:04):
Before before the America's communist movement ever took hold, they
were running ops like this in Cambodia and the Soviet
Union in China.
Speaker 2 (14:12):
They always do this.
Speaker 1 (14:14):
It is effective unless you recognize it. So right now,
it's not even about this one. Right now, repeat after me.
I will not take part in communist ops. I will
not take part in communist ops. I will recognize them
(14:35):
and refuse to participate, because I know that communist is
an evil demon who only.
Speaker 2 (14:41):
Has my worst at heart.
Speaker 1 (14:44):
All right, all that may have made you uncomfortable, but
I am right now speaking of Venezuela Communist opposide.
Speaker 2 (14:52):
What's going on down there and why.
Speaker 1 (14:55):
We'll talk to Ammon Blair in a moment about that
before we talk to him. Don't want to brag, but
we had a big neighborhood Thanksgiving party.
Speaker 2 (15:06):
What we brought was a pretty big hit. No, it
wasn't just obs dessert. See.
Speaker 1 (15:11):
I brought a dip and Massa chips and no one
at the party had heard of Massa chips. And I
actually got made fun of when I walked in because
these the healthy chips.
Speaker 2 (15:24):
What are you doing? And then the chips were gone
like that.
Speaker 1 (15:29):
When I tell you to buy massive chips, I actually
don't tell you to buy them just because they're better
for you. That's a nice side benefit. They're the best
chips I've ever eaten in my entire life. With three ingredients,
you don't have to feel fat and bloated and miserable.
Speaker 2 (15:42):
You don't have to live like that.
Speaker 1 (15:45):
Go to massachips dot com, slash jessetv and buy a
couple bags, get a couple of different flavors.
Speaker 2 (15:51):
You'll never buy another chip, and you can eat them
guilt free. We'll be back. The airspace is closed over Venezuela. Look.
Speaker 1 (16:10):
President Trump put this up on social media. I'm going
to quote him directly, to all airlines, pilots, drug dealers,
and human traffickers, please consider the air space above and
surrounding Venezuela to be closed in its entirety.
Speaker 2 (16:24):
Uh. What joining me now?
Speaker 1 (16:27):
Emmon Blair, Senior Fellow at the Texas Public Policy Foundation.
He's also a veteran fought for this country and he
was awesome last time he was on here. Okay, can
you can you break down what exactly is going on?
We have fifteen thousand troops in the Caribbean and now
we've closed the Venezuelan airspace. This kind of seems like
something's about to go down.
Speaker 2 (16:46):
Yeah.
Speaker 9 (16:47):
One, if you remember Jesse, I think three days after
the attack, the Hamas attack in twenty twenty three, the
Houthy's took over the Red Sea. And how did they
do that and how did they support that effort? Well,
the majority of that support came through illicit channels, whether
that's by seer what not, through our greatest enemies that's
(17:09):
going to be the CCP Iran in Russia. So they
were supporting logistically also with weapons and whatnot to the
who to the who thies as well as the drug trade.
So when we look now at what we're doing with Venezuela.
All we're trying to do is we're trying to suppress
that same pipeline that traffics, whether that's going to be weapons, personnel, technology,
(17:33):
like telecom systems, you have it. We're going to try
to shut down every avenue, every domain, and that includes
the air domain. You know what's interesting, Something I wish
we could do is actually control our own airspace on
our southern border, which is kind of interesting that we've
asked or we've told that the airspace surrounding Venezuela is
(17:55):
going to be shut down for all commercial and also
other ways or means to travel outside and in Venezuela.
I really wish we could do that, not only on
our military basis here, but also our southern border. If
you recall recently the NORAD commander came out and said
that we can't even understand the threat of our own
(18:16):
air domain and surrounding our military bases as drones are
making incursions on a daily basis, and then on our
southern border, we have thousands of drones making incursions.
Speaker 2 (18:25):
So it'd be.
Speaker 9 (18:26):
Great if we if we applied the same same level
of measure that we're doing to Venezuela. That we are
I mean that we do to Mexico itself.
Speaker 1 (18:36):
I remember when we let a Chinese spy balloon over
all those bases as well, But that's another story for
another day, all right, and zoom out for us here,
what's the angle?
Speaker 2 (18:45):
What is this about?
Speaker 1 (18:46):
Because honestly, I'd spent a lot of time over the
last few days with just normal people, not political hacks
like you, and maybe normal people, and they weren't necessarily
against or for action in Venezuela, but none of them
really understood why. I got a lot of that question.
Why what's this really about? Is this about Maduro leaving?
Is that simple?
Speaker 2 (19:08):
Sure?
Speaker 9 (19:09):
Great question. So if you take a step back and
you talk about communism all the time, and you yourself
are the leading expert on anti communism, if you look
at our western hemisphere, the epicenter for communist activity, for
the CCP, for Russia and others to enact their operations
on the western hemisphere, that is going to be Venezuela.
(19:32):
It used to beat Cuba, and then Hugo Chavez kind
of learned his ropes. So I guess you could say,
with the Cuban regime took it to Venezuela, and then
Maduro followed with that. So right now, what you're seeing
as strategically and as well as operationally, Venezuela is the
(19:54):
epicenter for all of our our enemies throughout the world,
whether that's China, Russia, you name it, to operate.
Speaker 2 (20:04):
And so in order for us.
Speaker 9 (20:05):
To attack the system that seeks to thwart us in
the United States, we must attack it at the center
of gravity. That center of gravity where all operations exist
is going to be Venezuela in Maduro. So if we
can take it at the focal point, if we can
take it out at that center focal point, then a
(20:26):
lot of the other actions, whether they're in the Caribbean nations,
every other nation in the Western hemisphere will also crumble
as well.
Speaker 1 (20:36):
And so these people have the backing of places like
China and Russia, and they obviously do. I mean, they've
done military exercises together. So you do speak the truth.
Speaker 2 (20:46):
Aren't China and Russia going to help them? Or can
they even help them? Can they project power over here
in a significant way to hold us back? If we're
trying to get rid of Maduro great question.
Speaker 9 (20:58):
And what's interesting is they are actually looking like they're
pulling back a little bit in terms of helping Maduro
at this point. There was a New York Post piece
just recently, just a day ago, talking about this, and
for your listeners out there, I would highly suggest you
guys starting to read Southcomm's media platform. It's called Dia
(21:19):
Logos Americas. They're actually putting out a lot of information
in regards to exactly why we're operating in the US Southcom,
how we're operating, what Maduro is doing. There are links
to China, there are links to Russia, there are links
to Iran. All of that can actually be found. And
they're writing articles, information pieces almost on a daily basis.
Speaker 1 (21:42):
And let's shift gears here and talk Mexican cartels because
this is the Trump's been all over this as well.
He's been ramping up things down there. Every other day
we wake up to a story of Trump says he's
gonna bomb them, then the Mexican president says, no, don't
do that. That is okay, I might, but what is happening?
Are we going to escalate? Is it as it stands now?
(22:03):
Is it going to stay this way?
Speaker 9 (22:06):
Jesse to be honest, I hope it doesn't stay this way.
As as I said earlier, Look, I really wish we
would take the same level of threat analysis, in the
same level of actions that were taken against Maduro and
Venezuela in the and also in the Caribbean, as we
(22:26):
would to Mexico. As it stands out, it looks like
we're still letting Mexico decide what they're going to do
in terms of the southern border, in terms of counting
their own cartels. They're going to extra diet, They're not
going to extra diet. They're going to go after fentelcy
labs in Mexico, They're not. It is very difficult to
(22:47):
ascertain exactly what Mexico is doing because they're they're in
Afghanistan next door. The Mexican cartels are embedded from the
subnational level all the way to the national level. It's
very difficult to trust any intel report that is actually
coming from Mexico whether they are taking out fentanyl labs.
And so when you look at everything that we're doing
(23:09):
in the Caribbean, when it comes to going after three
in di Adagua or cartel the Suns and their drug boats.
Why are we doing that same very thing to the
Mexican cartels. Why aren't we doing the same level of
national offence operations on our southern border here in Texas.
Why is it that are air domain like I said
(23:30):
mentioned earlier, why is it still open? Why is it
that we still can't understand or have domain awareness of
how many occursions, what's making occursions both in air, land,
sea at the Rio Grande and our coastal waters electromagnetic
spectrum as well as the cyber spectrum. We still don't
have operational or one hundred percent domain awareness of our
(23:51):
southern border. And so to me, it seems why is
it that we're addressing Maduro with so much weight when
we could be addressing that very issue with President Scheinbaum
in Mexico they're elected officials, and also our southern border.
Speaker 1 (24:08):
Why can't we get a hold of this drone situation?
You've mentioned it several times. People I know who know
a lot more than I do, just like people like
you all talk about this same situation. We cannot get
a hold of the drones around our basis, around the border.
Is it just a matter of that I'm genuinely asking,
I'm too dumb to know. Is it just a question
of what the technology isn't there yet to defeat drones?
(24:30):
The drones have outpaced the anti drone technology as of
right now.
Speaker 9 (24:34):
You know a great question. You actually posted something on
social media really recently. You asked about what are the
current tactics, techniques and procedures in Ukraine. Well, it's funny
that you mentioned that because Mexican cartel's actually went to
the Ukraine battlefront to learn specifically drone warfare. So then
(24:57):
they now come back and you look at the cartel
and there Este down there south of Laredo. You look
at the Gulf Cartel, you look at Cartel Holisco New Generation,
you look at the type of drones that they're operating with.
You're seeing that they're using fiber optic systems just like
you see in Ukraine to make it so that we
can't take them down with electronic warfare. And something that's
(25:17):
really interesting that never really made the news is that
they actually took down two of our military drones on
our southern border. They took it, took two drones from
our Texas Military Department down, one kinetically and one using
electronic warfare. The cartels don't have the bureaucratic system in
order to procure the necessary means to make incursions into
(25:40):
the US like we do. If we want to go
through the process of trying to counter these drones, we
must have to go through the FAA. We must have
to go through the Department of War. Now, we must
have to go through the Department of Homeland Security. We
must then we're gonna probably get sued by whatever state
in the Union. And so we have all this backdrop
at the same time we have the cartels figure out Chay.
(26:02):
You know, all we have to do is do exactly
what's happening on the Ukraine Russia battlefront, bring it into Mexico.
Mexico's not going to stop us. The US is bureaucratic
process is not going to stop us. And so here
we sit. We sit with the southern border where they
can make incursions on a daily basis without us even
stopping it. They can make incursions on our military installations
(26:25):
without us even stopping it. And that is not even
me saying that. That is also the commander of NORAD's grief.
Speaker 2 (26:32):
I having awesome as always. Brother, come back soon.
Speaker 1 (26:37):
We're going to talk a little bit about these refugees
in a moment before we do that, probably going to
have troubles sleep in a night, and we all do
occasionally too much stress, too much caffeine, life being what
it is, and that's where dream powder comes in.
Speaker 2 (26:55):
Now.
Speaker 1 (26:55):
I know it sounds pretty pretty exotic, if you will.
It's just oneful natural stuff, drug free. It's a cup
of hot chocolate. It's delicious, and it has ratio and
magnesium in it and all these melotone and all these
things that are natural.
Speaker 2 (27:12):
And so you before.
Speaker 1 (27:13):
Bed, you sip on a cup of hot chocolate and
then you just drift off to sleep. That sound good,
good natural sleep where you wake up feeling great. Shotbeam
dot com slash Jesse Kelly, We'll be back. Why do
(27:39):
communists bring in so many foreigners? What it's the angle?
Is it that all these foreigners have read the works
of Karl Marx and now they just want to implement
It's not that at all. It's not that at all.
The communist is a revolutionary. He is trying to have.
Speaker 2 (27:58):
A revolution wherever he happens to be. That revolution is going.
Speaker 1 (28:02):
To involve killing people, destroying things, burning down the country where.
Speaker 2 (28:08):
His revolution is taking place.
Speaker 1 (28:10):
Therefore, the biggest threat to him, the biggest enemy to
the communist are patriotic citizens of whatever country he's having
a revolution in, because people who love their country don't
want it destroyed and don't want it burnt down. So
if you want to burn it down, you got to
go find some people who will allow you to do
(28:32):
it and in fact help you to do it if
you bring them into the country. That afghanis scumbag who killed.
Speaker 2 (28:40):
That wonderful young lady, the National Guard soldier Sarah Bestrom.
He was, of course brought in from Afghanistan. Now why
was he here? What happened? You remember talked about it
a little bit in the opening of the show.
Speaker 1 (28:53):
Afghanistan fell because the Biden administration they screwed everything up.
Then they looked bad on camera where they looked bad
on camera because civilians were falling from sea one thirties
into the whole country was in chaos. But then they
found what was for them the perfect solution. You see,
what's the solution. Well, if people are pointing out how
(29:14):
many innocent civilians are dying over there, then what you
need to do is save them. You see, how do
you save them? Throw them on a plane and bring
them to America. That's how you save them. Then you've,
in the mind of a communist, killed two birds with
one stone. You get great pr from saving these refugees,
(29:37):
and you get a loyal, hostile foreigner who will vote
Democrat and murder as many Republicans as they possibly can,
and so will their eighty five kids they've brought. And
the Biden administration, of course, lied through their teeth and
talked about all the vetting. What reassurances can you make
about the screening process and the attempts to make sure
(29:59):
that somebody like that doesn't make it right here, I
can absolutely assure you that no one is coming into
the United States of America who has not been through
a thorough screening and background check process.
Speaker 10 (30:11):
We're conducting thorough security screening and the intermediate stops they're
making for anyone who is not a US citizen or
a lawful permanent resident of the United States. Anyone arriving
in the United States will have undergone a background check,
and we must all work together to resettle thousands of
(30:33):
Afghans who ultimately qualify for refugee status.
Speaker 2 (30:39):
Well, that's a lie.
Speaker 1 (30:41):
You ever been through a background check or known someone
who has been through a background check.
Speaker 2 (30:46):
You know how long it takes? What does it take
so long?
Speaker 1 (30:50):
Well, you have to go and you have to interview
people who know that person. You have to dig through documentation,
criminal history. We were loading Afghanis on the sea in
thirties as fast as humanly possible. It took about five minutes.
They didn't background check anybody, They didn't vet anybody. Ali
Handro Majorcis essentially had to say as much a little
(31:11):
while later.
Speaker 11 (31:13):
The standard procedure is an in person interview for refugees
or visa applicants. Now you've testified that you're not doing
those interviews, that they're not happening.
Speaker 12 (31:24):
You are correct that we are not conducting in person
full refugee interviews of one hundred percent of the individual.
Speaker 2 (31:33):
What percentage are you conducting?
Speaker 12 (31:34):
I don't have that information.
Speaker 2 (31:36):
What number have been interviewed?
Speaker 12 (31:38):
What we are doing?
Speaker 2 (31:38):
Wait?
Speaker 11 (31:39):
Wait, wait, what number of the more than sixty thousand
brought to the country, what number have received an in
person interview before they came to the country. Because you
said one hundred percent of screen, so what percentage have
been given an actual interview by a trained official before
they come to the country.
Speaker 12 (31:55):
When you're speaking of a full refugee, like interview have
that data.
Speaker 1 (32:04):
They didn't interview them. They didn't care. This is about
pr and bringing foreigners in. Some people die afterwards. It
doesn't matter to the communists.
Speaker 2 (32:16):
He's fighting a revolution.
Speaker 1 (32:17):
People die, and you had dutifull little communists foot soldiers
like Jack Tapper calling you a bigot if you didn't
want all these people here.
Speaker 13 (32:28):
There are a number of other voices in the Republican
Party that are already, whether on television or on tweets
or whatever, starting to talk about starting to demonize Afghan immigrants,
starting to talk about this is Biden's plan to put
more Muslims in the country, starting to insinuate that these
(32:51):
are these are bad people, they're terrorists, et cetera, et cetera.
Speaker 2 (32:55):
Really rank bigotry.
Speaker 13 (32:59):
What's your reaction when you see it, Because it is
I wouldn't say it's the prevalent voice in the Republican Party,
but it's getting louder.
Speaker 1 (33:09):
That's what the communist does. Bring as many barbarians into
your country to rape and murder and pillage and of
course bleed. You drive your packs and a taxpayer money.
In the second you throw a fit about it, they'll
call you a racist. Don't allow these communist tactics to work.
Cut off all immigration, legal and illegal, and start deporting
(33:30):
tens of millions of people if you want to save America.
All right, speaking of which, we're going to talk to
Julio Rosas about all this stuff. And just a moment
before we talk to Julio, I want to talk to
you about maximizing your masculinity, your energy, you're focus. That's
really what we're talking about here. How do you do that?
(33:50):
What do you do when you drink estrogen? When there's
estrogen and the waters and you're showering and your tea
levels are dropping every single battle of wat they go down, Well,
you got to keep drinking water. You have to take
steps to reverse it. And that's what a male vitality
stack from Chok will do for you. They have female
vitality stacks for the ladies as well. Natural herbal supplements
(34:13):
from Chok will save your freaking existence. You'll be so
much better at work at home. You will be mad
at yourself for all the time you spent not taking
any chalk. Natural herbal supplements are the way forward. Go
to chalk dot com slash jessetv. Start today. You are
ninety days away from feeling better.
Speaker 2 (34:34):
We'll be back.
Speaker 12 (34:46):
Do you know what the motive was at this point?
Speaker 10 (34:48):
Do you believe the suspect acted alone?
Speaker 4 (34:54):
You know, we're still going through all of that information
and all of the FBI and DOJ reveal new information,
but I will say we believe he was radicalized since
he's been here in this country. We do believe it
was through connections in his home community and state, and
we're going to continue to talk to those who interacted
with him, who were his family members, talk to them.
So far, we've had some participation, but anyone who has
(35:17):
the information on this needs to know that we will
be coming after you and we will bring you to justice.
We absolutely will persecute you because we do know that
we will never allow this to continue to happen in
our country. Allowed individuals who came to our country that
were unvetted by Joe Biden allowed to run free and loose.
We are going to bring them to justice and make
(35:37):
sure that they're returned out of this country. If they
aren't here for the purposes of being in American.
Speaker 1 (35:45):
Who was this freaking guy who killed one of our soldiers?
Has another fighting for his life. Let's talk to Julio
about it. Joining me now, United States Marine. You can
check out his sub stack at mostly Peaceful dot media.
Julio Rosas Julio as always have done some digging on
this scumbag.
Speaker 2 (36:03):
Who was he? Why was he here? Why do you
do what he did?
Speaker 5 (36:07):
So apparently he was brought over during the fall of
Afghanistan back in twenty twenty one, and so, I mean
at the time there were concerns obviously that because the
Biden administration was really focused on just getting people onto
planes to juice up the numbers, that the people that
quote unquote deserve to be on the planes weren't necessarily
(36:28):
the ones getting on it. Now in this case, it
you know, appears that this this this guy was part
of a CIA unit from from from during that time
and and there's some reporting by Jerry Dunleevy where the
unit that he was a part of the CIA kind
of deal that said if you help secure uh, the
the the airport and cobble you will be you will
(36:50):
be evacuated along with your families. And so that that
that appears to be kind of a deal that was
set up. And so I know that people are you know,
there's there's still lot of you know, questions that that
need to be answered, right because it's not just the
fact of how he got here. So it's like, Okay,
so he's been in the country for about you know,
four years, you know, going on five years. You know,
(37:11):
what has he been doing? You know, did he have
any of this animosity prior to to you know, being
flown from Afghanistan? You know, And and I was I
was the first one to report that this guy, you know,
this guy, this terrorist screamed you know, a la huakbar
while he was carrying out this attack, and you know,
and so there's very much a lot of you know,
(37:34):
just this is just the continuing effects of the Bide
administration's disastrous policies. And I will say that people have said, well,
his asylum claim was was was approved this year under
the Trump administration, and so so clearly the Trump administration
is that fault.
Speaker 2 (37:50):
And what I would say to that is like, well, actually.
Speaker 5 (37:52):
It shows that clearly even though this guy was supposedly vetted,
you know, to the point where you're you're working not
just with just the regular military, but with the CIA.
And they're still willing to carry out this attack even
though they were brought over to the United States. That
shows that this was a bad idea to begin with.
And I think a lot of people knew that at
the time, but they still said, well, we can't have
(38:13):
the bad optics.
Speaker 2 (38:14):
We already have bad optics at the border because.
Speaker 5 (38:16):
That was that was happening during that time, So we
gotta we gotta compromise national security in order to avoid that.
So this is it's it's it's to be expected. Unfortunately,
that's something like this was bound to happen, whether it's
thrown from the southern border or someone that was brought
over in that chaotic evacuation period.
Speaker 1 (38:39):
OHO, the oh clarification on something and I understand so
many details are fuzzy, we may not know, but worked
with the CIA.
Speaker 2 (38:47):
Second, people hear that they think this guy was.
Speaker 1 (38:50):
Dressed in all black, low crawling through an air conditioning
vent to pick locks and things like that. You know,
people immediately go to that, But doesn't sound like his
involvement was that in depth. It was hey, help secure
an airport. Was he more involved than that?
Speaker 5 (39:06):
From what from what I've seen, yes, because it was
beyond translation, right, I mean that that was kind of
the that was kind of the standard, uh you know,
priority for people. It's like, you know, like, oh, we
got to get the translators, we got to get all
these people out. But from what I've seen, it looks
like he was more involved with carrying out carrying out
(39:30):
significant missions on you know, with with CIA, with CIA units,
you know, on behalf of the CIA. And and again
I just go back to okay, so but then you
but then you go back and you ask anybody, not
even just Afghanistan, but you know, since we're talking about Afghanistan,
you ask any g WAT that that deployed to Afghanistan,
and you would they will have dozens of stories about
(39:52):
how problematic Backgan allies were, how they were not trustworthy.
Speaker 2 (39:56):
And I know that right now, the.
Speaker 5 (39:58):
The the people that have been advocating for Afghanist to
be relocated to the United States, they say, well, we
can't blame this one guy, and you know, put it
to the whole population.
Speaker 2 (40:10):
But this is but insider.
Speaker 5 (40:11):
Attacks were common throughout the entire time period that we
were there in that country. I mean, unfortunately, there were
there were you know, many cases of green on blue attacks,
and now you're seeing a lot of veterans on social
media talking about how so one case like yeah, like
before we went on on missions, we had to confiscate
the afghanist phones for you know, for forty eight hours,
(40:32):
and we couldn't tell them where we were going because
we didn't want them to leak that information to the.
Speaker 2 (40:37):
Taliban or al Kaida.
Speaker 5 (40:39):
So this this was problematic from the start, right, and
so it is completely crazy then to say, well, We're
gonna airlift one hundred thousand people out of this out
of this country with all these problems and resettle them
in the United States and just assume nothing bad is
going to happen as a result of that. And really,
(41:01):
you know, that's one of the reasons why President Trump
was was elected because we're done with that idiotic policy.
You know, America First means that we've put the priority
and the well being of American citizens first, and when
something like this happens, it just highlights how we can't
continue policies like that.
Speaker 1 (41:19):
Who the old State Department is pausing visas for Afghan
passport holders. That sounds great, I'm all on board with that,
But how many of these people are already here and
what's the plan for that? Are we rounding them up
and shipping them home? But how does this work?
Speaker 5 (41:36):
Well, well, the first part the answer is too many
in my opinion. But also, but this is a problem,
right because the administration unfortunately is having to play catch
up on everything, and especially when it comes to immigration.
I mean that's just so that's just a web that
they can go all different places, and it's not as
simple as because you know then that people some people
(41:59):
have kids at this point, so now they're technically American
citizens and not just with afghanis right. I mean, this
is just, like I said, the whole totality of this problem.
So I think obviously there's going to be a renewed
focus on that. And I mean because this guy drove
from Washington State, I mean, this guy went out of
his way and the most inconvenient way possible to do this, right,
(42:22):
So this was premeditated. This was you know, clearly thought
out to do this. And we're seeing all these other
cases where again Afghan nationals who were brought over or
who came over the southern border, they're being arrested for
plotting attacks on American soil. So I think the administration
(42:43):
is going to have to really focus on that, and
I know that they are. But then you take in
all the other nationalities from all the other problematic countries
that have problems with terrorism, because Afghanistan not the only
one where you had people coming up through the southern
order from So it's just it's a cluster. It's a cluster,
and that's why it was important that you know, DHS
(43:06):
and ICE and Border Patrol got their increase in funding
through the one big beautiful Bill, but that obviously takes
time to implement, and so you know, I don't fully
expect this, unfortunately, to get resolved even within Trump's supermaining term,
because because of all the problems that I've said, this
is gonna work, This has been gonna be a decade
long problem and and and we don't really have that time.
(43:30):
So I I I believe it's gonna be worked on,
is being worked on, but it definitely requires, you know,
move with a purpose.
Speaker 2 (43:41):
Well, Bill, thanks my brother.
Speaker 1 (43:43):
As always, all right, light the mood.
Speaker 2 (43:49):
It's AIDS day next. All right, it is time to
lighten the mood.
Speaker 1 (44:03):
And I know we're all kind of tired of there
being a national day for everything. But today is National
AIDS Day, and I thought, you know, I'm probably not
qualified to speak about this, so I'm sorry, World Age Day.
I'm probably not qualified to speak about this, but I
just want to go back to win. The American President
(44:24):
gave credit where credit was due.
Speaker 2 (44:28):
By the way, it's all his fault.
Speaker 10 (44:31):
We're spending six billion dollars in taxpayer money this month
to help age fight HIV ah.
Speaker 2 (44:42):
Ah. I was thinking of tomorrow
Host
Jesse Kelly
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
The Male Room with Dr. Jesse Mills
As Director of The Men’s Clinic at UCLA, Dr. Jesse Mills has spent his career helping men understand their bodies, their hormones, and their health. Now he’s bringing that expertise to The Male Room — a podcast where data-driven medicine meets common sense. Each episode separates fact from hype, science from snake oil, and gives men the tools to live longer, stronger, and happier lives. With candor, humor, and real-world experience from the exam room and the operating room, Dr. Mills breaks down the latest health headlines, dissects trends, and explains what actually works — and what doesn’t. Smart, straightforward, and entertaining, The Male Room is the show that helps men take charge of their health without the jargon.