Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:02):
Well, what we need is more common sense.
Speaker 2 (00:10):
Breaking down the world's nonsense about how American common sense.
Speaker 3 (00:13):
Will see us through With the common sense of Houston.
I'm just pro common sense for Houston. From Houston dot com.
This is the Jimmy Barrett Show, brought to you by
viewind dot Com.
Speaker 2 (00:29):
Now here's Jimmy Barrett.
Speaker 4 (00:31):
All right. This may this may seem like a kind
of a strange way to start a Friday show, but
I want to talk a little bit about the CIA.
And uh, do you remember the clip of President Dwight Eisenhower.
You remember ever seeing that clip where he's warning about
the military industrial Complex. I think you know he was
(00:53):
talking about He wasn't just talking about the Pentagon. He
was talking about the c i A. And I'm really
do believe, at the risk of sounding like some crazy
conspiracy theorists, that we have a shadow government and that
we have a bureaucracy in the CIA that is keeping
a whole lot of secrets, not just away from the
American people, but away from our own government, our current government.
(01:17):
And I think that there's a lot of secrets, especially
having to do with the assassination of John F. Kennedy
and some of the other programs that the CIA has
been involved with over the years, like MK Ultra. In fact,
that's what we're gonna start with today, these missing files.
You may recall that President Trump ordered the JFK files
(01:39):
to all be released. So Tosy Gabbert's National Intelligence director,
had these files, both the MK Ultra files and the
JFK files, and she was going through them evidently to
see if there was any reactions. Easy for me say,
reactions that had to be made aid on behalf of
(02:03):
not to keep a secrets so much as to just
protect identities in those types of things. In fact, it
came up earlier this week. We'll get into all this,
but it came up earlier this week when we had
that whistle blower from the CIA testifying in front of
the Senate. Here's what he had to say about these
missing files.
Speaker 5 (02:23):
The CIA illegally monitored the computer and phone usage of
DIG personnel, their investigations, and contact with whistleblowers. These were
Americans being spied upon illegally while executing duties directed by
the President and under the authority of the Director National Intelligence.
Speaker 6 (02:44):
When I asked an intelligence official why the CIA would
take these materials and refuse to.
Speaker 7 (02:49):
Give them back.
Speaker 6 (02:50):
The official said, quote the CIA doesn't think they answered
to anyone, referring to those who took the files, but
also doubted that CIA Director John Ratcliffe quote even knew
what happened. So to be extra clear, there was not
a raid yesterday. But there were JFK and MK ultrafiles
under DNA Gaberg's jurisdiction taken and not given back, and
(03:14):
they were still and still are being withheld despite an
executive order from President Trump calling for their release.
Speaker 4 (03:22):
How can you possibly do that? And by the way,
the raide she's talking about there there was a story
going around yesterday that the CIA had rated Tulca Gabbert's
office to take these files. That's not true. They didn't
raid her office. These files were not in her office.
But they did take these files after the president and
the CIA Director John Ratcliffe had left for the trip
(03:45):
to China. So what in the world's going on? And
what do you mean they're refusing to give them back?
Who's in charge here? Evidently the CIA thinks that they're
in charge. So let's let's take this to the next level.
Speaker 8 (04:02):
Here.
Speaker 4 (04:03):
This is from the day before. This is Representative Anna
Pauline A Luna making this accusation about the CIA taking
these files and what they may be up to.
Speaker 9 (04:15):
Yeah, so we were actually just notified that the CIA
went in and took documents out of OD and I
multiple boxes pertaining to the JFK files as well as
MK Ultra. The reason why this is troubling is a
there was an executive order that the President had directed
the full declassification of JFK, but then also to the
(04:36):
mk ulture files. The CIA famously has said that, you know,
all documents were released and other documents had been destroyed.
So these are allegedly those documents that apparently never existed,
and so very troubling. I did just talk to Chairman
Comer and we are sending in the next hour or
so a preservation of documents requests to the CIA. I
have calls into the White House to the Director of
(04:58):
the CIA himself, and so obviously as this develops, will
keep everyone up to date. But strange times we're living in,
that's for sure.
Speaker 6 (05:05):
Does the CIA have jurisdiction to go into Gabbard's office
like that and take documentation.
Speaker 9 (05:13):
Well, the CIA does not have jurisdiction to work against
an executive order by the President, and so the fact
that someone did this when the President is out of country.
From what I gather, I believe that Director Radcliffe is
with him, and so this seems like it was an
internal coup to be honest.
Speaker 4 (05:29):
What yes, you heard right? She called it an internal coup.
This is the CIA defying the President of the United
States and members of his administration and taking files that
they want to keep secret. Why do they want to
keep the JFK files so secret? It's been over sixty years.
(05:54):
The President ordered the release of everything in the JFK files.
Clearly there's information there that is incriminating to the CIA,
But my question would be why is it that. I
guess I'm surprised that the CIA wouldn't take it to
the next level and destroy any documents that they may
(06:15):
incriminate them in any way, shape or form. Not that
any of those people in the CIA are still around.
I mean we're talking sixty years ago. Those people are
dead and gone, but they obviously don't want certain information
in there to get out. Also saw Joe Consha on Fox.
Here's Joe concry talking about the CIA and how things
(06:39):
like this are just one of the many reasons why
many of us don't trust our own government.
Speaker 10 (06:45):
And you see polls over and over again showing that
the government is trusted less than I don't know anything.
These days, you hear stories like this and very accurate
by the way, as far as whistleblowers and files being taken.
Obviously this happened, and you wonder, can we trust our
government now at this point? Can we trust people that
(07:06):
work in government at this point? And the JFK assassination
has been something that for let's put it this way,
that was November of nineteen sixty three. We're talking more
than what sixty three years ago. Still many people do
not trust the fact that Lee Harvey Oswald was the
loan shooter in that particular assassination from that book depository
(07:29):
in Dallas against the president. And again, when these things happen,
we don't really trust anything that our government tells us anymore.
If they were taken out, why were they taken out?
Why is the CIA involved at this at this point,
who ordered that particular raid that happened here, and why
can't we get the truth? So in the end, again, Liz,
(07:53):
I mean, this is something that is so frustrating to
the American people.
Speaker 2 (07:57):
Why can't we just know what we know?
Speaker 10 (08:00):
And why can't we be as transparent as possible in
terms of what we know when it comes to the
JFK assassination, when it comes to let's say nine to eleven,
and a lot of other things where people have questions.
Speaker 4 (08:14):
We all have we have we have all have a
lot of questions. I think about what's going on with
this right now? Quick a little break. We're back with
one in a moment to stick around Jimmy Baird Show on
a Friday here on AM nine fifty KPRC. So, President
(08:45):
Trump is back from China. Evidently a very productive trip,
and that's a good thing.
Speaker 2 (08:50):
I guess.
Speaker 4 (08:52):
There's only one area of disagreement, and that would have
been Taiwan, but that's constantly an area of disagreement. We'll
get to Taiwan in a bit. But before he left China,
the President did an interview with Sean Hannity, and so
I wanted to share some of that audio with you
so he can kind of get a feel for what
got accomplished and what didn't get accomplished. It wasn't a
whole lot they didn't get accomplished. If you want to
(09:13):
know why so many business people were on the trip,
I mean a lot of deals were made. We'll get
into the deals here in a second. But the topic,
even though the President had kind of downplayed the idea
of the topic of Iran coming up, the topic of
Iran did come up, and the President she seems to
be completely cooperative as it relates to Ron. I think
they're only concern about Iran is that they get seventy
(09:35):
percent of their oil from Iran, and they're worried about
how to replace that. And I think the President offered
up quite a bit of energy sources from the United
States to President She, so there's an opportunity for us
to sell more things to China. I don't know if
we're going to give China the same kind of a
sweetheart deal they evidently they were getting from Iran, but
(09:57):
they seemed to be cooperating on that particularly aspect. But
the President told Sean Hennity last night, and I have
the clip for you right here about him talking to
Iran about their relationship. Here is Hennity and President Trump
from last night on Iran and the closeness of China
(10:18):
to Iran. And whether or not China would interfere in
any way in our efforts in Iran.
Speaker 11 (10:25):
Let me ask let me ask you.
Speaker 12 (10:27):
This the issue, and you've been asked about it and
you've spoken about it, and that is China's support of Iran.
How big a discussion was that today, We discussed it.
Speaker 8 (10:39):
I mean when you say support, they're not fighting a
war with us or anything. No, he said, he's not
going to give military equipment. That's a big savement. He
said that today. That's a big savement. Said that strongly.
But at the same time, he said, you know, they
buy a lot of their oil there and I'd like
to keep doing that. He'd like to see Hormos straight opened. Well,
(11:00):
we didn't stop it. They did it and then we
stopped them. You know, sort of interesting, he joked. He said,
you know, it's sort of it. They stopped it, then
you stopped them. But they'd like to see it open,
but they actually closed it. He didn't like the fact
that they're charging tolls. I don't know if they are not,
I don't know who would pay them. I mean, where
do they put the money in the The country's decimented,
(11:21):
you know, the charging tolls where's the money gun?
Speaker 12 (11:24):
Do you think President She and China have the ability
to influence the Iranians considering they are one of their
biggest But.
Speaker 8 (11:37):
Look, he's not coming in with guns, he's not coming
in with ratus and not coming in shooting. You know,
somebody said he's been he's been very good. They get
a lot of their of their oil from that location.
So what has happened? And one thing I think that
we were going to make a deal on he's they've
agreed they want to buy oil from the United States.
(11:58):
They're going to go to Texas. I'm going to start
sending Chinese ships to Texas and to Louisiana and to Alaska.
And I think that was another thing that was agreed to.
Speaker 2 (12:07):
That's a big thing.
Speaker 11 (12:09):
What about liquified it's not that much longer.
Speaker 2 (12:12):
Yeah, anything.
Speaker 11 (12:13):
Energy.
Speaker 8 (12:14):
Energy, that's the one thing they really need energy, that's
the one thing. They have an insatiable appetite for energy.
And we have unlimited energy.
Speaker 4 (12:23):
Well you know, I know the President says that we
don't have unlimited energy. If we had unlimited energy, we
wouldn't be importing from anywhere, right, we would just take
off our own energy needs and export. We don't have
unlimited energy. Can we supply China? Sure, I'm sure we can.
(12:45):
Can we provide them the same kind of pricing that
they got from Iran? I wouldn't think we could. But
then again, maybe that maybe that's not an important part
of the deal. Maybe they don't care that they have
to pay a little bit more for American oil. They
just want to make sure that they get their hands
on it. That could be all right, So what else? Well,
the business aspect of it, right, one of the things
(13:07):
that the President talked to Ti about was opening up
China to US businesses. Here's Sean Hennity with the president.
Speaker 8 (13:15):
These people are really what I'd like to see. I'd
like to see China doesn't open the country. It's massive,
It's a massive It would be unbelievable for our companies
if they opened it, and I think it would be
good for China to.
Speaker 11 (13:26):
Re indication they will open.
Speaker 8 (13:28):
Well, they're going to open some of it. Yeah, they
open it in stages. I'd like to just see him
open it. But you know, they guard their country and
they he cherishes his country. He wants to take you know,
he wants China to.
Speaker 2 (13:40):
Be you know what does he What does he want
from you?
Speaker 8 (13:42):
What is the greatest phrase of all time?
Speaker 11 (13:44):
What dorom similar?
Speaker 8 (13:46):
What does he want from the US? A lot of
things we talked about. We talked about a lot of things.
Too many things to discuss, but a lot of things.
We had a very good meeting. But we want things
from them. One thing he agreed to today's going to
order two hundred jets.
Speaker 11 (14:04):
That's a big thing.
Speaker 8 (14:05):
Boeing owing two hundred big ones. It's a lot of jobs.
It's a lot. Boeing wanted one hundred and fifty got
two hundred. He said, sort of. I think it was
a commitment. I mean, you know, it was sort of
like a statement, but I think it was a commitment.
It's a great thing. It's a lot of jobs. Boeing's
doing a good job. They're catching up. They're catching up.
(14:27):
The requests were a lot, and our requests were alloted.
We requested for a lot. We have Visa, which is
not allowed to trade, and.
Speaker 11 (14:37):
They were there.
Speaker 8 (14:37):
It was a big company and other companies are allowed
to trade. And I said, what about letting visa. We
had to head a visa there today. By the way,
visa's a big deal. I said, what about using visa
in China? For some reason they were black balled.
Speaker 4 (14:54):
Yeah, not quite for some reason. I'm pretty sure he
Maybe you didn't want to say what the reason was,
but I'm pretty sure he does what the reason was.
I don't know what the reason was, but I'm pretty
sure he would know. Okay, so that covers a couple
of the main things they got done with China. Yeah,
we sold them a bunch of stuff. That's why the
businessmen went along. In addition to trying to convince China
(15:17):
to open up to US businesses, they also wanted to
sell stuff, which they evidently did sell some stuff, especially
Boeing with the two hundred jumbo jets. Also the topic
here's the one area of disagreement, I guess, and whether
or not we need to be concerned about it. There
(15:37):
was the accusation, if you will, that there was a
thinly veiled threat against US, US being the United States,
if we would ever consider getting between China and Taiwan.
And I think cheez just trying to make sure that
if they decide to go in and do something in Taiwan,
(15:59):
that we're going to interfere. And I don't think we
did anything to alleviate their concern that we might be
willing to interfere. I don't know if we are actually
willing to interfere military militarily, pardon me, with China or not.
But I don't think we gave them any assurances that
we wouldn't. Of course, you wouldn't want to, right if
you want them to stay out of Taiwan, you wouldn't
(16:20):
want them to think that you wouldn't be willing to
come in, because then they would just take that as
an invitation to go in and hit time one and
whenever they wanted to. I saw that Secretary of Saint
Marco Rubio did an interview with NBC on that topic.
Here's a little bit of that.
Speaker 11 (16:35):
President.
Speaker 13 (16:35):
She stressed to President Trump that the Taiwan question is
the most important issue in China US relations.
Speaker 2 (16:41):
Talk to me about that moment that well.
Speaker 1 (16:43):
They certainly feel that way, and they always raise that issue,
and we understand they raised that issue. From our perspective,
any forced change in the status quo and the situation
that's there now would be bad for both countries. One
of the things that Chinese emphasize, which we agree, is
strategic stability in our relationship, a constructive relationship, but also
one that establishes strategic stability so that we don't have
(17:03):
misunderstandings that could lead to broader conflict. And so we
always reiterate the point we hear them when they say this.
We always respond by saying anything that would compel or
force a change and what we have now would be
problematic and that we would certainly. Our policies on that
have not changed. It's been pretty consistent across multiple presidential
administrations and remains consistent now.
Speaker 13 (17:22):
Did President she requests to President Trump not to sell
weapons to Taiwan.
Speaker 1 (17:27):
Well, that topic may has been discussed in the past,
it did not feature primarily in today's discussion. We know
what their position on that is already. Remember Congress plays
a role in that process as well, and we have
sold them weapons in the past. That's existed as recently
as December, which they were very upset about. And that's
a decision the president gets to make, as Congress appropriates,
and as Congress decides what to do with those topics,
(17:48):
we will respond accordingly.
Speaker 13 (17:49):
But nothing has changed in the way the US use
a relationship with Taiwan. It will defend Taiwan as has been.
Speaker 1 (17:56):
US policy on the issue of Taiwan is unchanged as
of today, and as of the meeting that we had
here today, it was raised. They always raise it on
their side. We always make clear our position and we
move on to the other topics. We know where they stand,
and I think they know where we stand.
Speaker 4 (18:09):
Boom, there you go. Nothing's changed. You know, China made
a little threat like don't you dare, and then we
basically said, hey, don't you dare? And so nothing's changed
as far as Taiwan. What would actually happen if China
went after Taiwan hard to say at this point. This
president has a tendency to not mess around, but he
(18:30):
also seems to have a pretty good personal relationship with
China's president, which I think also allows China to get
off the hook on some things like stealing our technology,
for example, and spying on us. But it's the President's
always said, well, we spy on them too, so so
what Well, I don't think we spy on them to
(18:51):
the level that they spy on us, but I get
what he's saying. All right, quickly break back with more
in a moment. Jimmy Birtt Show, Garney in nine fifty KPRC.
(19:11):
All right, let's make this third segment on our Friday
show all about Let's make it about Mexico. Let's make
it about gang members in the cartel, because we're going
to get into well, first of all, we're going to
get into a couple of aspects. Number Let's do this
one first though. One area that I think Maria Espinosa
from the America from the Remembrance Project is a little
(19:35):
concerned about with the Trump administration is how long it's
been taking them to arrest and prosecutes and then hopefully
deport once they're done serving their jail time. Members of gangs.
Venezuelan gangs come into mind. Trend Day Arragua. There's been
some recent arrest of trend Day Arragua gang members. This
(19:58):
is really the first time that they've really done it
and they and it's been a while, it's been a
long time coming. Here's my conversation with Bria Espinosa from
the other morning about the Trump administration, the Department of
Justice and how they're now finally arresting frind Day or
Ragua gang members. Why do I get the feeling that's
probably just a drop in the bucket.
Speaker 7 (20:19):
Yeah, because it is. It's just not a nuts jimmy.
Speaker 14 (20:22):
You know, if we're just counting only the god Aways,
and those are the worst of the worst of these
illegal aliens.
Speaker 7 (20:28):
Who intentionally avoided.
Speaker 14 (20:31):
Turning themselves in as we as the Bio administration was just.
Speaker 7 (20:35):
Inviting them all in.
Speaker 14 (20:37):
You know, those are the ones who have most likely
criminal records in their own countries. So in that estimate
of the god Aways is about a million and a
half to two million, So we're looking at you know,
we still have you know, basically another million and a
half with got aways that are probably have criminal records
(20:59):
to fight two hundred and sixty PDA gang members, you know,
charge by d oj it's simply not enough.
Speaker 4 (21:07):
All right, Well, why has it been so difficult to
round them up and to charge them? It seems like
it should be a fairly Maybe the rounding up party
is a little bit more difficult because you're talking about
gang members who obviously they have resources of their own
to hide out and bang and safe places for them
to go. Is that the biggest problem?
Speaker 7 (21:29):
Absolutely? Two things that asked why would if I was
in charge? Number One, First of all, we have to
elect those who are.
Speaker 14 (21:37):
Pro American and who are for our families and protect
our families and our children and our businesses, our resources.
But there are so many sanctuary jurisdictions where they go
and hide out. And look at Houston Harricks County alone,
and I gave public testimony several years ago before Commissioner's
Court and to not give and.
Speaker 7 (21:58):
Create a slush and for illegal aliens.
Speaker 14 (22:01):
To help them battle our own lots.
Speaker 7 (22:03):
To remain here.
Speaker 14 (22:05):
And look, HARRISCI tax payer had to pay over eight
million dollars so far and another million is earmarked for
this year. So we need good people at Harris as judge,
Harris County Judge.
Speaker 7 (22:17):
Right now. I know there's a primary going own, and
my good friend Warren Powell is in there.
Speaker 14 (22:22):
But look, if I was in charge, I would cut
up all signs to illegal aliens, those angos and non
governmental organizations and stop US aiding and a betting taxpayers
are forced to aid in the bet illegal aliens. I
would also stop all visa applications requesting to come to
the US and resend those visas and fraudulent assi lee
(22:48):
cases because look, we're doing it the hard way.
Speaker 7 (22:51):
They came here illegally and we're.
Speaker 14 (22:52):
Trying to put them through the system when they've committed
fraud under when Biden was in charge. And look, let's
repay the tax payer. Let's get creative here. And reality is,
when the drug lords.
Speaker 7 (23:05):
Are caught, we use recal laws.
Speaker 14 (23:08):
Every single illegal alien that crossed illegally through a southern
border had to negotiate with the cartels. They are affiliates
of the cartels and at even given times they can
be tapped on the shoulder by these cartels to do
them a favor. That's usually drug trafficking, committing crimes.
Speaker 7 (23:28):
But let's confiscate their property.
Speaker 14 (23:30):
They've given, have had enough time, they've given, We have
given them notice that they are not welcome here and
crossing illegally is not what to do. And it's really
a slap in the face to all Latinos and those
who did it the right way to allow them to stay.
Confiscate these illegal aliens properties and reimburse the taxpayer. My goodness,
(23:53):
we certainly need our roads, our bridges, our draining system
to be repaired.
Speaker 7 (23:59):
Let's get created with this. Jimmy, I'm set up, and.
Speaker 14 (24:02):
I think a lot of taxpayers are for getting nickel
and dived. Our property taxes are high, and yet we're
forced to aid in the bit illegal aliens.
Speaker 4 (24:12):
I like the way that woman thinks I do. And
that makes a nice little segue into something we talked
about in this morning program today, and that is the
Mexican government itself. You know, these cartels are in business
because the Mexican government allows them to be in business.
Do they allow them to be in business because they're
afraid of them, these politicians, or do they allow them
(24:34):
to be in business because they're profiting profiting from them?
I had Bob Price, he's the Texas editor for Breitbart
on our morning program today. Here's my conversation with him
about the Mexican government in bed with the cartels. You
think it's the same for Claudia Steinbaum.
Speaker 11 (24:51):
Oh absolutely.
Speaker 15 (24:52):
You know, we've seen evidence of major contributions to her
political campaign by the Mexican cartels, especially the Sinaloa cartel,
among others. And so we're seeing officials appointed by her
at all levels of her government being influenced and corrupted
(25:12):
and even indicted by the United States government for drug
trafficking related charges also fuel theft charges. The head of
the Mexican Navy has relatives that are heavily involved in
that in the fuel theft operations. So it's deep. It
runs from the lowest levels of government all the way
(25:33):
to the top, and the Trump administration and now finally
the State Department, through the great leadership of Marco Rubio,
is taking action and putting a lot of pressure on
Mexico to do this. But Claudia still seems to determine.
Claudia Scheinbaum, the Mexican president, still seems to determine to
protect the cartels, including the sitting governor of Cineloa, the
(25:55):
Mexican state of Cineloa, who is under federal indictment in
the United States.
Speaker 4 (26:00):
That determined bot price because she's concerned about her own
personal safety or is it just too much of a
money maker for her and other Mexican politicians.
Speaker 11 (26:08):
It's a combination of both.
Speaker 15 (26:09):
I think the country actually is dependent on that revenue
that comes in from the cartels, and you know, we're
seeing major influx of that. Of course, the human smuggling
component has dropped dramatically of that income level, and so
they're replacing it with other things more kidnappings, more fuel theft,
(26:31):
more involvement in legitimate business operations with Monday laundering, all
of these kind of things. The shining light on the
hill is that with the Iran war going on right now,
China and India are actually buying more fuel from Mexico
and Venezuela, which is helping those countries get some independent
revenue sourses.
Speaker 4 (26:51):
What about the Mexican military. Is the Mexican military also
corrupt or if somebody actually had the cojones if you will,
to take on the cartels, could the Mexican military handle
the cartels if they if they were allowed to.
Speaker 11 (27:06):
It depends on where you are.
Speaker 15 (27:08):
Some places, the Mexican military is very helpful and they're
the actually the only people that are taking any actions
to defend the country and defend some of these states,
particularly in tamilpis And and.
Speaker 11 (27:22):
You know, some of the other states right along the
Texas border.
Speaker 15 (27:26):
The Mexican military is about the only people you see
in they're fighting and defending the people.
Speaker 11 (27:31):
But there are other places where it's not that way.
Speaker 4 (27:35):
You know, from our standpoint, you mentioned Marco Ruvio, and
there are reports that the CIA has been operating south
of the border, and I think Claudia Scheinbaum has mentioned
that is a is a major concern for the for
the Mexican government, but there's been threats in the past
from the President that you know, if they won't take action,
then we will. I guess the question would be how
far do you think the US is willing to go
(27:56):
in order to tackle the cartels.
Speaker 15 (27:58):
I think President Trump is willing to do whatever it takes.
They're putting economic pressure on the Shinebam administration trying to
get them to take some action, but if they don't,
we have an obligation to do whatever it takes to
put an end to these cartels. They've killed hundreds of
thousands of American citizens with their drug trafficking coming into
the United States, independent of the torture of the illegal
(28:23):
aliens that has happened over the past decades, particularly in
the past decade and during the four years of the
Biden administration.
Speaker 11 (28:32):
So we have to do it.
Speaker 15 (28:35):
And this president is determined that he's not going to
kick the can down the road, just like he's not
with Iran. He's going to deal with issues as they
come up, and I think Mexico's pretty high on his list.
Speaker 4 (28:46):
Okay, that's Bob Price Brightbart Texas. All right, coming up,
final segment in just a moment here running M nine
fifty KPRC. Have you ever heard of Adam McKay. He's
a Hollywood director. He's that no group is worse than
white liberals.
Speaker 2 (29:05):
So is he a.
Speaker 4 (29:06):
Conservative or did he mean something else by that? We'll
share some audio with you coming up next. Stand by
for more Jimmy Barrett Show on a Friday here on
AM nine fifty KPRC. All Right, So it made a
(29:31):
story coming out of Hollywood. You kind of assume that
we're talking about a progressive order, at the very least
a liberal right, and I think in this case we are.
Adam McKay is a Hollywood director. He made the comment
that no group is worse than white liberals. But what
exactly did he mean by that comment that no group
(29:53):
is worse than white liberals? Greg Guffeld and Harold Ford
Jor the Lone Democrat yesterday on the on the five
with their analysis of what he meant by it.
Speaker 16 (30:05):
It's kind of it's kind of interesting because he's not
bashing the white liberal. He's bashing the white liberal because
he's more liberal than the white liberal.
Speaker 2 (30:14):
It's his own flex.
Speaker 16 (30:15):
He's saying, I'm I am on my own alone, on
an island, an intellectual and ideological giant, purity on climate change,
on progressivism, and you cannot match it one battle after another.
I have to go through this because you're not just wrong,
you're evil.
Speaker 2 (30:36):
See this what's.
Speaker 16 (30:37):
Interesting about this? And I think I think Harold would
agree with me. We don't have this kind of person
on the right because we have humility in this sense
that we are never one hundred percent certain about anything
or everything.
Speaker 2 (30:50):
That is why you tend to find, you.
Speaker 16 (30:52):
Know, more god fearing people on our side than on
the left. You of more atheist because they are so
certain there is no God, and I myself am God.
Speaker 17 (31:00):
He he is okay with illegal violent crime, recidivism of
violent criminals, trans scams that masked predator predators, and rape,
the cover ups in the fraud because.
Speaker 16 (31:15):
In his mind that it didn't go far enough. So
he knows something none of us else do when we
are suffering.
Speaker 11 (31:23):
He's got the answer. We just don't know what it is.
Speaker 2 (31:26):
Harold, you were invoked.
Speaker 18 (31:27):
Look, I agree with Adam McKay about liberals in my party.
Speaker 2 (31:32):
Had white people.
Speaker 11 (31:33):
You hate white people.
Speaker 18 (31:34):
I think I think liberals I don't see race. The
liberals of my party have taken us to a place,
and you talk about it.
Speaker 16 (31:40):
He's you're criticizing them for a different reason than he is.
Speaker 18 (31:44):
Perhaps, But I'm coming back to you. You identify often
and so as Jesse and DP does as well. The
eighty twenty issues comes ninety ten issues, one of the
most prolific one being boys playing in the girls sports.
And you still have a group of Democrats out on
these social issues, and when they're out there, you can't
be taken seriously if you have a really positive idea
(32:05):
about housing. Democrats wonder why Spencer Pratt may be finding
some traction in Los Angeles. It's because he actually is,
we've said on this show, offering answers and solutions. Whether
you agree with his answers or solutions or all of them,
he's actually offering answers to real problems. That's what's missing
in politics. The true deficit is that they're they're derivatives
(32:26):
of it. People don't like Democrats working Republicans. Democrats don't
like Democrats working with Trump. I mean, but we've got
to get back to offering answers. But if you're not
taken serious on most the most basic things. People don't
listen to you on the things that you might be
right about that are serious in their lives.
Speaker 4 (32:44):
There's a lot of truth to what he just said.
I find him kind of refreshing. The other liberal that
they have on what's her name, can't remember what her
name is. I think I haven't blocked out by Psycha,
she's crazy. But I think Harold Ford he's more of
an old school Democrat. He's a little bit more rational
(33:04):
and reasonable. He actually makes some sense, and he makes
perfect sense there. And what he's saying is is that
you may be a liberal who has some good ideas
on some things, but you take extreme positions on things
like men in women's sports, or voter id laws where
(33:25):
you need to show a photo in order of the
driver's license, some sort official identification or to be able
to vote, and you take an extreme position on those,
and they just negates anything else you have to say,
because because even the majority of people in your own
party would support Republicans on that particular issue, but you
won't because you're sticking with your party, or at least
(33:49):
the politicians in your party. So I get exactly what
he's saying with that, that makes perfect sense to me.
All Right, one last quick little story here, because I
got to kick out of watching this. I can't believe
that this is doing it. The headline is why airlines
are cracking down on seat squatters. Seat squatters are a
problem on airplanes. Evidently airlines are finally tightening enforcement because
(34:11):
seat squatting can disrupt carefully planed boarding procedures. I'm fully
booked flights where every seat is accounted for it and
even small issues can create delays. Evidently, people are coming
on board the plane. They've been assigned a seat, but
they don't want that seat, so they go sit in
the seat that they want, and dare you to get
them to move? Even if you have that seat assigned,
you can say, well, i'm sitting here. People actually have
(34:33):
the nerve to do something like that, which is ridiculous.
If you're sitting in my assigned seat, get the hell
out of my seat. That's my seat. You can't have
my seat. I want my seat. And if that means
that you're going to get thrown off the flight for
causing a commotion, then so be it. Seat squatters here
heard of such a thing. Hey, listen, the weekend is here.
(34:54):
I hope you have a great weekend. Get out there.
There supposed to dry all weekend, so you might as
well get out there and enjoy yourself. Us Dad, you say,
get out there and blow off a little stink. I'll
see you Monday morning, bright and early, five am over
on news radio seven forty k t R H. Hope
you're back here at four Monday afternoon on AM nine
fifty k PRC.
Well, what we need is more common sense.
Speaker 2 (00:10):
Breaking down the world's nonsense about how American common sense.
Speaker 3 (00:13):
Will see us through With the common sense of Houston.
I'm just pro common sense for Houston. From Houston dot com.
This is the Jimmy Barrett Show, brought to you by
viewind dot Com.
Speaker 2 (00:29):
Now here's Jimmy Barrett.
Speaker 4 (00:31):
All right. This may this may seem like a kind
of a strange way to start a Friday show, but
I want to talk a little bit about the CIA.
And uh, do you remember the clip of President Dwight Eisenhower.
You remember ever seeing that clip where he's warning about
the military industrial Complex. I think you know he was
(00:53):
talking about He wasn't just talking about the Pentagon. He
was talking about the c i A. And I'm really
do believe, at the risk of sounding like some crazy
conspiracy theorists, that we have a shadow government and that
we have a bureaucracy in the CIA that is keeping
a whole lot of secrets, not just away from the
American people, but away from our own government, our current government.
(01:17):
And I think that there's a lot of secrets, especially
having to do with the assassination of John F. Kennedy
and some of the other programs that the CIA has
been involved with over the years, like MK Ultra. In fact,
that's what we're gonna start with today, these missing files.
You may recall that President Trump ordered the JFK files
(01:39):
to all be released. So Tosy Gabbert's National Intelligence director,
had these files, both the MK Ultra files and the
JFK files, and she was going through them evidently to
see if there was any reactions. Easy for me say,
reactions that had to be made aid on behalf of
(02:03):
not to keep a secrets so much as to just
protect identities in those types of things. In fact, it
came up earlier this week. We'll get into all this,
but it came up earlier this week when we had
that whistle blower from the CIA testifying in front of
the Senate. Here's what he had to say about these
missing files.
Speaker 5 (02:23):
The CIA illegally monitored the computer and phone usage of
DIG personnel, their investigations, and contact with whistleblowers. These were
Americans being spied upon illegally while executing duties directed by
the President and under the authority of the Director National Intelligence.
Speaker 6 (02:44):
When I asked an intelligence official why the CIA would
take these materials and refuse to.
Speaker 7 (02:49):
Give them back.
Speaker 6 (02:50):
The official said, quote the CIA doesn't think they answered
to anyone, referring to those who took the files, but
also doubted that CIA Director John Ratcliffe quote even knew
what happened. So to be extra clear, there was not
a raid yesterday. But there were JFK and MK ultrafiles
under DNA Gaberg's jurisdiction taken and not given back, and
(03:14):
they were still and still are being withheld despite an
executive order from President Trump calling for their release.
Speaker 4 (03:22):
How can you possibly do that? And by the way,
the raide she's talking about there there was a story
going around yesterday that the CIA had rated Tulca Gabbert's
office to take these files. That's not true. They didn't
raid her office. These files were not in her office.
But they did take these files after the president and
the CIA Director John Ratcliffe had left for the trip
(03:45):
to China. So what in the world's going on? And
what do you mean they're refusing to give them back?
Who's in charge here? Evidently the CIA thinks that they're
in charge. So let's let's take this to the next level.
Speaker 8 (04:02):
Here.
Speaker 4 (04:03):
This is from the day before. This is Representative Anna
Pauline A Luna making this accusation about the CIA taking
these files and what they may be up to.
Speaker 9 (04:15):
Yeah, so we were actually just notified that the CIA
went in and took documents out of OD and I
multiple boxes pertaining to the JFK files as well as
MK Ultra. The reason why this is troubling is a
there was an executive order that the President had directed
the full declassification of JFK, but then also to the
(04:36):
mk ulture files. The CIA famously has said that, you know,
all documents were released and other documents had been destroyed.
So these are allegedly those documents that apparently never existed,
and so very troubling. I did just talk to Chairman
Comer and we are sending in the next hour or
so a preservation of documents requests to the CIA. I
have calls into the White House to the Director of
(04:58):
the CIA himself, and so obviously as this develops, will
keep everyone up to date. But strange times we're living in,
that's for sure.
Speaker 6 (05:05):
Does the CIA have jurisdiction to go into Gabbard's office
like that and take documentation.
Speaker 9 (05:13):
Well, the CIA does not have jurisdiction to work against
an executive order by the President, and so the fact
that someone did this when the President is out of country.
From what I gather, I believe that Director Radcliffe is
with him, and so this seems like it was an
internal coup to be honest.
Speaker 4 (05:29):
What yes, you heard right? She called it an internal coup.
This is the CIA defying the President of the United
States and members of his administration and taking files that
they want to keep secret. Why do they want to
keep the JFK files so secret? It's been over sixty years.
(05:54):
The President ordered the release of everything in the JFK files.
Clearly there's information there that is incriminating to the CIA,
But my question would be why is it that. I
guess I'm surprised that the CIA wouldn't take it to
the next level and destroy any documents that they may
(06:15):
incriminate them in any way, shape or form. Not that
any of those people in the CIA are still around.
I mean we're talking sixty years ago. Those people are
dead and gone, but they obviously don't want certain information
in there to get out. Also saw Joe Consha on Fox.
Here's Joe concry talking about the CIA and how things
(06:39):
like this are just one of the many reasons why
many of us don't trust our own government.
Speaker 10 (06:45):
And you see polls over and over again showing that
the government is trusted less than I don't know anything.
These days, you hear stories like this and very accurate
by the way, as far as whistleblowers and files being taken.
Obviously this happened, and you wonder, can we trust our
government now at this point? Can we trust people that
(07:06):
work in government at this point? And the JFK assassination
has been something that for let's put it this way,
that was November of nineteen sixty three. We're talking more
than what sixty three years ago. Still many people do
not trust the fact that Lee Harvey Oswald was the
loan shooter in that particular assassination from that book depository
(07:29):
in Dallas against the president. And again, when these things happen,
we don't really trust anything that our government tells us anymore.
If they were taken out, why were they taken out?
Why is the CIA involved at this at this point,
who ordered that particular raid that happened here, and why
can't we get the truth? So in the end, again, Liz,
(07:53):
I mean, this is something that is so frustrating to
the American people.
Speaker 2 (07:57):
Why can't we just know what we know?
Speaker 10 (08:00):
And why can't we be as transparent as possible in
terms of what we know when it comes to the
JFK assassination, when it comes to let's say nine to eleven,
and a lot of other things where people have questions.
Speaker 4 (08:14):
We all have we have we have all have a
lot of questions. I think about what's going on with
this right now? Quick a little break. We're back with
one in a moment to stick around Jimmy Baird Show on
a Friday here on AM nine fifty KPRC. So, President
(08:45):
Trump is back from China. Evidently a very productive trip,
and that's a good thing.
Speaker 2 (08:50):
I guess.
Speaker 4 (08:52):
There's only one area of disagreement, and that would have
been Taiwan, but that's constantly an area of disagreement. We'll
get to Taiwan in a bit. But before he left China,
the President did an interview with Sean Hannity, and so
I wanted to share some of that audio with you
so he can kind of get a feel for what
got accomplished and what didn't get accomplished. It wasn't a
whole lot they didn't get accomplished. If you want to
(09:13):
know why so many business people were on the trip,
I mean a lot of deals were made. We'll get
into the deals here in a second. But the topic,
even though the President had kind of downplayed the idea
of the topic of Iran coming up, the topic of
Iran did come up, and the President she seems to
be completely cooperative as it relates to Ron. I think
they're only concern about Iran is that they get seventy
(09:35):
percent of their oil from Iran, and they're worried about
how to replace that. And I think the President offered
up quite a bit of energy sources from the United
States to President She, so there's an opportunity for us
to sell more things to China. I don't know if
we're going to give China the same kind of a
sweetheart deal they evidently they were getting from Iran, but
(09:57):
they seemed to be cooperating on that particularly aspect. But
the President told Sean Hennity last night, and I have
the clip for you right here about him talking to
Iran about their relationship. Here is Hennity and President Trump
from last night on Iran and the closeness of China
(10:18):
to Iran. And whether or not China would interfere in
any way in our efforts in Iran.
Speaker 11 (10:25):
Let me ask let me ask you.
Speaker 12 (10:27):
This the issue, and you've been asked about it and
you've spoken about it, and that is China's support of Iran.
How big a discussion was that today, We discussed it.
Speaker 8 (10:39):
I mean when you say support, they're not fighting a
war with us or anything. No, he said, he's not
going to give military equipment. That's a big savement. He
said that today. That's a big savement. Said that strongly.
But at the same time, he said, you know, they
buy a lot of their oil there and I'd like
to keep doing that. He'd like to see Hormos straight opened. Well,
(11:00):
we didn't stop it. They did it and then we
stopped them. You know, sort of interesting, he joked. He said,
you know, it's sort of it. They stopped it, then
you stopped them. But they'd like to see it open,
but they actually closed it. He didn't like the fact
that they're charging tolls. I don't know if they are not,
I don't know who would pay them. I mean, where
do they put the money in the The country's decimented,
(11:21):
you know, the charging tolls where's the money gun?
Speaker 12 (11:24):
Do you think President She and China have the ability
to influence the Iranians considering they are one of their
biggest But.
Speaker 8 (11:37):
Look, he's not coming in with guns, he's not coming
in with ratus and not coming in shooting. You know,
somebody said he's been he's been very good. They get
a lot of their of their oil from that location.
So what has happened? And one thing I think that
we were going to make a deal on he's they've
agreed they want to buy oil from the United States.
(11:58):
They're going to go to Texas. I'm going to start
sending Chinese ships to Texas and to Louisiana and to Alaska.
And I think that was another thing that was agreed to.
Speaker 2 (12:07):
That's a big thing.
Speaker 11 (12:09):
What about liquified it's not that much longer.
Speaker 2 (12:12):
Yeah, anything.
Speaker 11 (12:13):
Energy.
Speaker 8 (12:14):
Energy, that's the one thing they really need energy, that's
the one thing. They have an insatiable appetite for energy.
And we have unlimited energy.
Speaker 4 (12:23):
Well you know, I know the President says that we
don't have unlimited energy. If we had unlimited energy, we
wouldn't be importing from anywhere, right, we would just take
off our own energy needs and export. We don't have
unlimited energy. Can we supply China? Sure, I'm sure we can.
(12:45):
Can we provide them the same kind of pricing that
they got from Iran? I wouldn't think we could. But
then again, maybe that maybe that's not an important part
of the deal. Maybe they don't care that they have
to pay a little bit more for American oil. They
just want to make sure that they get their hands
on it. That could be all right, So what else? Well,
the business aspect of it, right, one of the things
(13:07):
that the President talked to Ti about was opening up
China to US businesses. Here's Sean Hennity with the president.
Speaker 8 (13:15):
These people are really what I'd like to see. I'd
like to see China doesn't open the country. It's massive,
It's a massive It would be unbelievable for our companies
if they opened it, and I think it would be
good for China to.
Speaker 11 (13:26):
Re indication they will open.
Speaker 8 (13:28):
Well, they're going to open some of it. Yeah, they
open it in stages. I'd like to just see him
open it. But you know, they guard their country and
they he cherishes his country. He wants to take you know,
he wants China to.
Speaker 2 (13:40):
Be you know what does he What does he want
from you?
Speaker 8 (13:42):
What is the greatest phrase of all time?
Speaker 11 (13:44):
What dorom similar?
Speaker 8 (13:46):
What does he want from the US? A lot of
things we talked about. We talked about a lot of things.
Too many things to discuss, but a lot of things.
We had a very good meeting. But we want things
from them. One thing he agreed to today's going to
order two hundred jets.
Speaker 11 (14:04):
That's a big thing.
Speaker 8 (14:05):
Boeing owing two hundred big ones. It's a lot of jobs.
It's a lot. Boeing wanted one hundred and fifty got
two hundred. He said, sort of. I think it was
a commitment. I mean, you know, it was sort of
like a statement, but I think it was a commitment.
It's a great thing. It's a lot of jobs. Boeing's
doing a good job. They're catching up. They're catching up.
(14:27):
The requests were a lot, and our requests were alloted.
We requested for a lot. We have Visa, which is
not allowed to trade, and.
Speaker 11 (14:37):
They were there.
Speaker 8 (14:37):
It was a big company and other companies are allowed
to trade. And I said, what about letting visa. We
had to head a visa there today. By the way,
visa's a big deal. I said, what about using visa
in China? For some reason they were black balled.
Speaker 4 (14:54):
Yeah, not quite for some reason. I'm pretty sure he
Maybe you didn't want to say what the reason was,
but I'm pretty sure he does what the reason was.
I don't know what the reason was, but I'm pretty
sure he would know. Okay, so that covers a couple
of the main things they got done with China. Yeah,
we sold them a bunch of stuff. That's why the
businessmen went along. In addition to trying to convince China
(15:17):
to open up to US businesses, they also wanted to
sell stuff, which they evidently did sell some stuff, especially
Boeing with the two hundred jumbo jets. Also the topic
here's the one area of disagreement, I guess, and whether
or not we need to be concerned about it. There
(15:37):
was the accusation, if you will, that there was a
thinly veiled threat against US, US being the United States,
if we would ever consider getting between China and Taiwan.
And I think cheez just trying to make sure that
if they decide to go in and do something in Taiwan,
(15:59):
that we're going to interfere. And I don't think we
did anything to alleviate their concern that we might be
willing to interfere. I don't know if we are actually
willing to interfere military militarily, pardon me, with China or not.
But I don't think we gave them any assurances that
we wouldn't. Of course, you wouldn't want to, right if
you want them to stay out of Taiwan, you wouldn't
(16:20):
want them to think that you wouldn't be willing to
come in, because then they would just take that as
an invitation to go in and hit time one and
whenever they wanted to. I saw that Secretary of Saint
Marco Rubio did an interview with NBC on that topic.
Here's a little bit of that.
Speaker 11 (16:35):
President.
Speaker 13 (16:35):
She stressed to President Trump that the Taiwan question is
the most important issue in China US relations.
Speaker 2 (16:41):
Talk to me about that moment that well.
Speaker 1 (16:43):
They certainly feel that way, and they always raise that issue,
and we understand they raised that issue. From our perspective,
any forced change in the status quo and the situation
that's there now would be bad for both countries. One
of the things that Chinese emphasize, which we agree, is
strategic stability in our relationship, a constructive relationship, but also
one that establishes strategic stability so that we don't have
(17:03):
misunderstandings that could lead to broader conflict. And so we
always reiterate the point we hear them when they say this.
We always respond by saying anything that would compel or
force a change and what we have now would be
problematic and that we would certainly. Our policies on that
have not changed. It's been pretty consistent across multiple presidential
administrations and remains consistent now.
Speaker 13 (17:22):
Did President she requests to President Trump not to sell
weapons to Taiwan.
Speaker 1 (17:27):
Well, that topic may has been discussed in the past,
it did not feature primarily in today's discussion. We know
what their position on that is already. Remember Congress plays
a role in that process as well, and we have
sold them weapons in the past. That's existed as recently
as December, which they were very upset about. And that's
a decision the president gets to make, as Congress appropriates,
and as Congress decides what to do with those topics,
(17:48):
we will respond accordingly.
Speaker 13 (17:49):
But nothing has changed in the way the US use
a relationship with Taiwan. It will defend Taiwan as has been.
Speaker 1 (17:56):
US policy on the issue of Taiwan is unchanged as
of today, and as of the meeting that we had
here today, it was raised. They always raise it on
their side. We always make clear our position and we
move on to the other topics. We know where they stand,
and I think they know where we stand.
Speaker 4 (18:09):
Boom, there you go. Nothing's changed. You know, China made
a little threat like don't you dare, and then we
basically said, hey, don't you dare? And so nothing's changed
as far as Taiwan. What would actually happen if China
went after Taiwan hard to say at this point. This
president has a tendency to not mess around, but he
(18:30):
also seems to have a pretty good personal relationship with
China's president, which I think also allows China to get
off the hook on some things like stealing our technology,
for example, and spying on us. But it's the President's
always said, well, we spy on them too, so so
what Well, I don't think we spy on them to
(18:51):
the level that they spy on us, but I get
what he's saying. All right, quickly break back with more
in a moment. Jimmy Birtt Show, Garney in nine fifty KPRC.
(19:11):
All right, let's make this third segment on our Friday
show all about Let's make it about Mexico. Let's make
it about gang members in the cartel, because we're going
to get into well, first of all, we're going to
get into a couple of aspects. Number Let's do this
one first though. One area that I think Maria Espinosa
from the America from the Remembrance Project is a little
(19:35):
concerned about with the Trump administration is how long it's
been taking them to arrest and prosecutes and then hopefully
deport once they're done serving their jail time. Members of gangs.
Venezuelan gangs come into mind. Trend Day Arragua. There's been
some recent arrest of trend Day Arragua gang members. This
(19:58):
is really the first time that they've really done it
and they and it's been a while, it's been a
long time coming. Here's my conversation with Bria Espinosa from
the other morning about the Trump administration, the Department of
Justice and how they're now finally arresting frind Day or
Ragua gang members. Why do I get the feeling that's
probably just a drop in the bucket.
Speaker 7 (20:19):
Yeah, because it is. It's just not a nuts jimmy.
Speaker 14 (20:22):
You know, if we're just counting only the god Aways,
and those are the worst of the worst of these
illegal aliens.
Speaker 7 (20:28):
Who intentionally avoided.
Speaker 14 (20:31):
Turning themselves in as we as the Bio administration was just.
Speaker 7 (20:35):
Inviting them all in.
Speaker 14 (20:37):
You know, those are the ones who have most likely
criminal records in their own countries. So in that estimate
of the god Aways is about a million and a
half to two million, So we're looking at you know,
we still have you know, basically another million and a
half with got aways that are probably have criminal records
(20:59):
to fight two hundred and sixty PDA gang members, you know,
charge by d oj it's simply not enough.
Speaker 4 (21:07):
All right, Well, why has it been so difficult to
round them up and to charge them? It seems like
it should be a fairly Maybe the rounding up party
is a little bit more difficult because you're talking about
gang members who obviously they have resources of their own
to hide out and bang and safe places for them
to go. Is that the biggest problem?
Speaker 7 (21:29):
Absolutely? Two things that asked why would if I was
in charge? Number One, First of all, we have to
elect those who are.
Speaker 14 (21:37):
Pro American and who are for our families and protect
our families and our children and our businesses, our resources.
But there are so many sanctuary jurisdictions where they go
and hide out. And look at Houston Harricks County alone,
and I gave public testimony several years ago before Commissioner's
Court and to not give and.
Speaker 7 (21:58):
Create a slush and for illegal aliens.
Speaker 14 (22:01):
To help them battle our own lots.
Speaker 7 (22:03):
To remain here.
Speaker 14 (22:05):
And look, HARRISCI tax payer had to pay over eight
million dollars so far and another million is earmarked for
this year. So we need good people at Harris as judge,
Harris County Judge.
Speaker 7 (22:17):
Right now. I know there's a primary going own, and
my good friend Warren Powell is in there.
Speaker 14 (22:22):
But look, if I was in charge, I would cut
up all signs to illegal aliens, those angos and non
governmental organizations and stop US aiding and a betting taxpayers
are forced to aid in the bet illegal aliens. I
would also stop all visa applications requesting to come to
the US and resend those visas and fraudulent assi lee
(22:48):
cases because look, we're doing it the hard way.
Speaker 7 (22:51):
They came here illegally and we're.
Speaker 14 (22:52):
Trying to put them through the system when they've committed
fraud under when Biden was in charge. And look, let's
repay the tax payer. Let's get creative here. And reality is,
when the drug lords.
Speaker 7 (23:05):
Are caught, we use recal laws.
Speaker 14 (23:08):
Every single illegal alien that crossed illegally through a southern
border had to negotiate with the cartels. They are affiliates
of the cartels and at even given times they can
be tapped on the shoulder by these cartels to do
them a favor. That's usually drug trafficking, committing crimes.
Speaker 7 (23:28):
But let's confiscate their property.
Speaker 14 (23:30):
They've given, have had enough time, they've given, We have
given them notice that they are not welcome here and
crossing illegally is not what to do. And it's really
a slap in the face to all Latinos and those
who did it the right way to allow them to stay.
Confiscate these illegal aliens properties and reimburse the taxpayer. My goodness,
(23:53):
we certainly need our roads, our bridges, our draining system
to be repaired.
Speaker 7 (23:59):
Let's get created with this. Jimmy, I'm set up, and.
Speaker 14 (24:02):
I think a lot of taxpayers are for getting nickel
and dived. Our property taxes are high, and yet we're
forced to aid in the bit illegal aliens.
Speaker 4 (24:12):
I like the way that woman thinks I do. And
that makes a nice little segue into something we talked
about in this morning program today, and that is the
Mexican government itself. You know, these cartels are in business
because the Mexican government allows them to be in business.
Do they allow them to be in business because they're
afraid of them, these politicians, or do they allow them
(24:34):
to be in business because they're profiting profiting from them?
I had Bob Price, he's the Texas editor for Breitbart
on our morning program today. Here's my conversation with him
about the Mexican government in bed with the cartels. You
think it's the same for Claudia Steinbaum.
Speaker 11 (24:51):
Oh absolutely.
Speaker 15 (24:52):
You know, we've seen evidence of major contributions to her
political campaign by the Mexican cartels, especially the Sinaloa cartel,
among others. And so we're seeing officials appointed by her
at all levels of her government being influenced and corrupted
(25:12):
and even indicted by the United States government for drug
trafficking related charges also fuel theft charges. The head of
the Mexican Navy has relatives that are heavily involved in
that in the fuel theft operations. So it's deep. It
runs from the lowest levels of government all the way
(25:33):
to the top, and the Trump administration and now finally
the State Department, through the great leadership of Marco Rubio,
is taking action and putting a lot of pressure on
Mexico to do this. But Claudia still seems to determine.
Claudia Scheinbaum, the Mexican president, still seems to determine to
protect the cartels, including the sitting governor of Cineloa, the
(25:55):
Mexican state of Cineloa, who is under federal indictment in
the United States.
Speaker 4 (26:00):
That determined bot price because she's concerned about her own
personal safety or is it just too much of a
money maker for her and other Mexican politicians.
Speaker 11 (26:08):
It's a combination of both.
Speaker 15 (26:09):
I think the country actually is dependent on that revenue
that comes in from the cartels, and you know, we're
seeing major influx of that. Of course, the human smuggling
component has dropped dramatically of that income level, and so
they're replacing it with other things more kidnappings, more fuel theft,
(26:31):
more involvement in legitimate business operations with Monday laundering, all
of these kind of things. The shining light on the
hill is that with the Iran war going on right now,
China and India are actually buying more fuel from Mexico
and Venezuela, which is helping those countries get some independent
revenue sourses.
Speaker 4 (26:51):
What about the Mexican military. Is the Mexican military also
corrupt or if somebody actually had the cojones if you will,
to take on the cartels, could the Mexican military handle
the cartels if they if they were allowed to.
Speaker 11 (27:06):
It depends on where you are.
Speaker 15 (27:08):
Some places, the Mexican military is very helpful and they're
the actually the only people that are taking any actions
to defend the country and defend some of these states,
particularly in tamilpis And and.
Speaker 11 (27:22):
You know, some of the other states right along the
Texas border.
Speaker 15 (27:26):
The Mexican military is about the only people you see
in they're fighting and defending the people.
Speaker 11 (27:31):
But there are other places where it's not that way.
Speaker 4 (27:35):
You know, from our standpoint, you mentioned Marco Ruvio, and
there are reports that the CIA has been operating south
of the border, and I think Claudia Scheinbaum has mentioned
that is a is a major concern for the for
the Mexican government, but there's been threats in the past
from the President that you know, if they won't take action,
then we will. I guess the question would be how
far do you think the US is willing to go
(27:56):
in order to tackle the cartels.
Speaker 15 (27:58):
I think President Trump is willing to do whatever it takes.
They're putting economic pressure on the Shinebam administration trying to
get them to take some action, but if they don't,
we have an obligation to do whatever it takes to
put an end to these cartels. They've killed hundreds of
thousands of American citizens with their drug trafficking coming into
the United States, independent of the torture of the illegal
(28:23):
aliens that has happened over the past decades, particularly in
the past decade and during the four years of the
Biden administration.
Speaker 11 (28:32):
So we have to do it.
Speaker 15 (28:35):
And this president is determined that he's not going to
kick the can down the road, just like he's not
with Iran. He's going to deal with issues as they
come up, and I think Mexico's pretty high on his list.
Speaker 4 (28:46):
Okay, that's Bob Price Brightbart Texas. All right, coming up,
final segment in just a moment here running M nine
fifty KPRC. Have you ever heard of Adam McKay. He's
a Hollywood director. He's that no group is worse than
white liberals.
Speaker 2 (29:05):
So is he a.
Speaker 4 (29:06):
Conservative or did he mean something else by that? We'll
share some audio with you coming up next. Stand by
for more Jimmy Barrett Show on a Friday here on
AM nine fifty KPRC. All Right, So it made a
(29:31):
story coming out of Hollywood. You kind of assume that
we're talking about a progressive order, at the very least
a liberal right, and I think in this case we are.
Adam McKay is a Hollywood director. He made the comment
that no group is worse than white liberals. But what
exactly did he mean by that comment that no group
(29:53):
is worse than white liberals? Greg Guffeld and Harold Ford
Jor the Lone Democrat yesterday on the on the five
with their analysis of what he meant by it.
Speaker 16 (30:05):
It's kind of it's kind of interesting because he's not
bashing the white liberal. He's bashing the white liberal because
he's more liberal than the white liberal.
Speaker 2 (30:14):
It's his own flex.
Speaker 16 (30:15):
He's saying, I'm I am on my own alone, on
an island, an intellectual and ideological giant, purity on climate change,
on progressivism, and you cannot match it one battle after another.
I have to go through this because you're not just wrong,
you're evil.
Speaker 2 (30:36):
See this what's.
Speaker 16 (30:37):
Interesting about this? And I think I think Harold would
agree with me. We don't have this kind of person
on the right because we have humility in this sense
that we are never one hundred percent certain about anything
or everything.
Speaker 2 (30:50):
That is why you tend to find, you.
Speaker 16 (30:52):
Know, more god fearing people on our side than on
the left. You of more atheist because they are so
certain there is no God, and I myself am God.
Speaker 17 (31:00):
He he is okay with illegal violent crime, recidivism of
violent criminals, trans scams that masked predator predators, and rape,
the cover ups in the fraud because.
Speaker 16 (31:15):
In his mind that it didn't go far enough. So
he knows something none of us else do when we
are suffering.
Speaker 11 (31:23):
He's got the answer. We just don't know what it is.
Speaker 2 (31:26):
Harold, you were invoked.
Speaker 18 (31:27):
Look, I agree with Adam McKay about liberals in my party.
Speaker 2 (31:32):
Had white people.
Speaker 11 (31:33):
You hate white people.
Speaker 18 (31:34):
I think I think liberals I don't see race. The
liberals of my party have taken us to a place,
and you talk about it.
Speaker 16 (31:40):
He's you're criticizing them for a different reason than he is.
Speaker 18 (31:44):
Perhaps, But I'm coming back to you. You identify often
and so as Jesse and DP does as well. The
eighty twenty issues comes ninety ten issues, one of the
most prolific one being boys playing in the girls sports.
And you still have a group of Democrats out on
these social issues, and when they're out there, you can't
be taken seriously if you have a really positive idea
(32:05):
about housing. Democrats wonder why Spencer Pratt may be finding
some traction in Los Angeles. It's because he actually is,
we've said on this show, offering answers and solutions. Whether
you agree with his answers or solutions or all of them,
he's actually offering answers to real problems. That's what's missing
in politics. The true deficit is that they're they're derivatives
(32:26):
of it. People don't like Democrats working Republicans. Democrats don't
like Democrats working with Trump. I mean, but we've got
to get back to offering answers. But if you're not
taken serious on most the most basic things. People don't
listen to you on the things that you might be
right about that are serious in their lives.
Speaker 4 (32:44):
There's a lot of truth to what he just said.
I find him kind of refreshing. The other liberal that
they have on what's her name, can't remember what her
name is. I think I haven't blocked out by Psycha,
she's crazy. But I think Harold Ford he's more of
an old school Democrat. He's a little bit more rational
(33:04):
and reasonable. He actually makes some sense, and he makes
perfect sense there. And what he's saying is is that
you may be a liberal who has some good ideas
on some things, but you take extreme positions on things
like men in women's sports, or voter id laws where
(33:25):
you need to show a photo in order of the
driver's license, some sort official identification or to be able
to vote, and you take an extreme position on those,
and they just negates anything else you have to say,
because because even the majority of people in your own
party would support Republicans on that particular issue, but you
won't because you're sticking with your party, or at least
(33:49):
the politicians in your party. So I get exactly what
he's saying with that, that makes perfect sense to me.
All Right, one last quick little story here, because I
got to kick out of watching this. I can't believe
that this is doing it. The headline is why airlines
are cracking down on seat squatters. Seat squatters are a
problem on airplanes. Evidently airlines are finally tightening enforcement because
(34:11):
seat squatting can disrupt carefully planed boarding procedures. I'm fully
booked flights where every seat is accounted for it and
even small issues can create delays. Evidently, people are coming
on board the plane. They've been assigned a seat, but
they don't want that seat, so they go sit in
the seat that they want, and dare you to get
them to move? Even if you have that seat assigned,
you can say, well, i'm sitting here. People actually have
(34:33):
the nerve to do something like that, which is ridiculous.
If you're sitting in my assigned seat, get the hell
out of my seat. That's my seat. You can't have
my seat. I want my seat. And if that means
that you're going to get thrown off the flight for
causing a commotion, then so be it. Seat squatters here
heard of such a thing. Hey, listen, the weekend is here.
(34:54):
I hope you have a great weekend. Get out there.
There supposed to dry all weekend, so you might as
well get out there and enjoy yourself. Us Dad, you say,
get out there and blow off a little stink. I'll
see you Monday morning, bright and early, five am over
on news radio seven forty k t R H. Hope
you're back here at four Monday afternoon on AM nine
fifty k PRC.
Popular Podcasts
Hey Jonas!
Hey Jonas! The official Jonas Brothers podcast. Hosted by Kevin, Joe, and Nick Jonas. It’s the Jonas Brothers you know... musicians, actors, and well, yes, brothers. Now, they’re sharing another side of themselves in the playful, intimate, and irreverent way only they can. Spend time with the Jonas Brothers here and stay a little bit longer for deep conversations like never before.
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by Audiochuck Media Company.
Betrayal Weekly
Betrayal Weekly is back for a new season. Every Thursday, Betrayal Weekly shares first-hand accounts of broken trust, shocking deceptions, and the trail of destruction they leave behind. Hosted by Andrea Gunning, this weekly ongoing series digs into real-life stories of betrayal and the aftermath. From stories of double lives to dark discoveries, these are cautionary tales and accounts of resilience against all odds. From the producers of the critically acclaimed Betrayal series, Betrayal Weekly drops new episodes every Thursday. If you would like to share your story, you can reach out to the Betrayal Team by emailing them at betrayalpod@gmail.com and follow us on Instagram at @betrayalpod and @glasspodcasts. Please join our Substack for additional exclusive content, curated book recommendations, and community discussions. Sign up FREE by clicking this link Beyond Betrayal Substack. Join our community dedicated to truth, resilience, and healing. Your voice matters! Be a part of our Betrayal journey on Substack.