The Rod and Greg Show: Are Leftist Women a Scourge on Society?; How to Build a Pro-AI Majority

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
They're going to do tests for our men and our
men in the military, and if they find themselves deficient
and testosterone uh, they will have the option. It is
entirely up to them uh to uh have provided free
of charge testosterone replacement therapy.

Speaker 2 (00:14):
They will.

Speaker 1 (00:15):
They will make sure so that they're not low te
beta boys. We don't need these beta men running around.
We need we need men.

Speaker 2 (00:21):
Well, this show today is high te high T thirty baby. Yep.
What by the way, I'll tell you what it means.

Speaker 1 (00:28):
Go watch that flyover across the beach in Pensacola, Florida.
If that if you just hear freedom ring when you
watch it, you got it. You got good testosterone levels.
If it makes you. If you own pearls and you
clutch them when you see that and you're offended by
that flyover, then you're you're you're testosterone deficient.

Speaker 2 (00:44):
You're in trouble. We welcome to the Rod and Gregg
Show right here on Utah's Talk Radio one O five nine,
Kate and r As live everywhere on the iHeartRadio app.
I brought our kit good to be with you today,
and I'm citizen in Hughes. We have got a Dynamite
show lined up today, We're going to talk about the
straight or horror moves, what is going on there. The President,
of course speaking to the nation tonight, Steve Moore will

(01:06):
be joining us. We'll take a look at all the
economic indicators that have come by. I really am looking
forward to this interview coming up a little bit later
on in the show. Today, Greg, we're talking about AI
and how we you know, how you sell the idea
of AI to the American people, because I think a
lot of people are nervous about AI because they don't

(01:26):
understand it, they don't know the benefits. They're worried about
losing their job. And I don't blame them. I would
be too. But we're all get into this because we've
been an interesting discussion I think coming up where they're
guest in the six o'clock calor.

Speaker 1 (01:37):
Well, this is I consider the Rod and Greg show
listening audience to be the largest focus group smart smart
focus group in Utah, and we discussed this at great
length yesterday, and I do think there's a lot of
good quality questions, a lot of concerns, and in communication
is the key. I think a lot of what we've
discussed collectively together us as the radio host in our audience.

(01:59):
You're got I think these are things that are part
at least part of the article. I think it's going
to be part of the interview, and so a lot
of it will sound familiar.

Speaker 2 (02:05):
Yeah. Yeah. And a little bit later on, our good
friend Kurt Schlichter will join us. Man, your hat is
he on one?

Speaker 1 (02:12):
He is worried about a certain demographic in this country.

Speaker 2 (02:15):
And you, yeah, you want to be worried. Yeah, he's worried.
So we've got a lot to get to. Plus we've
got Red West Festival tickets to give away and get
tickets to give away today. Now guess who that's coming up?
All right, let's turn first. So here we have Pete Hags,
Secretary Defense, really trying to build the you know, this

(02:38):
nation's defense is to be the best they possibly can be.
They're good right now. I mean he's just trying to
get them even better. So he announced what was that,
I think it was just yesterday that they will now
do testosterone testing on people in the military who are
over thirty years old. And it's those under I thought it. Well,

(03:00):
he says, if you're under thirty, it's voluntary. I see,
if you're over thirty, you'll be required to do it
because he wants to make sure that men serving in
the military had the testosterone levels that they need to
be to provide their peak performance.

Speaker 1 (03:17):
And you know what, we've heard RFK Junior talk about
what's in our food chain. What we're seeing in young
people that usually should have by design high testosterone levels.
It's that age, it's that window of life. Those are
historically low since they've been measuring. As a demographic, our
young twenty year old males are in America are low

(03:37):
as they've ever been. This is a real issue, and
I haven't heard anybody politicize it actually and argue that, well,
testosterone levels being low, that's totally fine, and why would
you ever want to restore your testosterone levels to normal rates.
For the left to find a fence of over that,
it is honestly, it's just they're always going to be

(03:58):
offended by any Trump does anything that his administration does,
whether logic, if they have to overcome logic to do it,
they will.

Speaker 2 (04:06):
Yeah, yeah, well they're tested, but they don't have then
it's their choice if they want supplements, is that right?
I mean Haig Seth isn't forcing it on everybody, saying,
let's get tested. If you're low and you want it,
will help you get the tree.

Speaker 1 (04:20):
My question is, what red blooded American man would say, no,
you want a chocolate chip cookie?

Speaker 2 (04:24):
Yes please? You want you want more testosterone? Yes please?
I mean I don't. I don't even know what the
question is. There are a few on the Democratic so
I do probably will. Yeah, you're forgetting the Democratic men.

Speaker 1 (04:34):
Those beta beta males, boy, they don't want it. Those yeah,
the soy boys, they don't want they don't want any
of that testosterone. But you know what, we don't want them. No,
so we don't want them in the military.

Speaker 2 (04:44):
By the way, here's the Atlantic magazine or website west
very liberal, right, yes, saying today the manly man is
back in the Democratic Party.

Speaker 1 (04:54):
In the Democrat Party as they as they lament, weep
and well over testosterone being available for our military. The
men or back. That makes perfect sense.

Speaker 2 (05:05):
First thing I thought was Tim Walls. Yeah, now there's
a manly men.

Speaker 1 (05:09):
I would call that low tee Thursday if Tim Walls
was on this show. That is a low t man.
That is not a high tea man.

Speaker 2 (05:15):
Yeah, yeah, well this whole thing could be connected to
this flyover in Florida that is causing everybody to go crazy.
What happened.

Speaker 1 (05:25):
This story if you have seen a bit of this,
this this was a developing story. Yesterday. Uh, there was
a in Pensacle of Florida along the beach. You'll see
video it's gone viral of two Blue angel the US
Navy's fighter planes that fighter jets that do the shows
and everything else. And there's low flyers. One's over the ocean,
just off the beach, and then one comes screaming right

(05:47):
over the top of the beach. Yes, so much so
that you see that. You see the chairs kind of
fly up, and you know, and it's loud and everything.
But you should also see people that are cheering. But
here's the issue. The Left got a hold of this
video and they wanted heads to roll. They wanted whoever
this pilot was should never fly again. Well it's Amanda Lee. Okay,
Amanda Lee.

Speaker 2 (06:07):
She flew it.

Speaker 1 (06:08):
She's got more testosterone, I would say than the Collective
Left all the men in the Collective Left have. But
you know they did, they did a So there was
a lot of hysteria yesterday about it.

Speaker 2 (06:19):
Here's the way.

Speaker 1 (06:20):
You don't know one or you might not know that
is an air show that is annual. People start lining
up on that beach at seven thirty in the morning
to see what to see. What they saw in that
viral video, This is not a surprise.

Speaker 2 (06:31):
They're probably doing practice run. So I imagine the event
is coming up this weekend and they do practice. I
saw the air show here.

Speaker 1 (06:38):
I saw the ad saying what they're doing is they're
they're mapping and targeting. They got digital mapping of where
the show will take place, and they're kind of going
around the perimeter of it and and in true form,
and they do this every year. They will fly along
or over that beach as a flyer, and everyone loves it.
It's never The only thing that's changed is our cameras
and videos that we now put it on the internet.

(06:58):
That's the only thing that's changed. This is been something
that the people of that area have looked forward to
and have been part of for years. The eye then
they said, well, you know, the decibel level was so
high it could hurt their ears. Yeah, well, it looks
like they went and they had the Navy put out
of statement we're looking, we're reviewing it. They're trying to,

(07:18):
you know, be respectful. Secretary of War p Hegseth put
out a post eight hours ago. It says the flyovers
will continue until morale improves. Okay, that was kind of
a hat tip of you know where we thought. We
didn't think this is a great offense. The Secretary of
Navy Is announced earlier today that they have reviewed every
aspect of this and there are no there's no reprimands,

(07:39):
there's no punishments, and everything is fine.

Speaker 2 (07:42):
Everything was done. Let freedom ring. Yeah. Talking about loud, yes, no,
As you know, I live up in Davis County, Yes,
south of Hill Air Force Face. Let me tell you
what you want. Loud when those guys and I love
it when those guys are doing nighttime exercises and they're
about to be and it's usually about this time because
they fly out to the Utah Test and Training Range

(08:04):
and do their runs. Right, those things are loud, and
at three o'clock in the morning, they're really loud. But
you know what, we get used to it. We understand
too many people up there. It is the sound of freedom.
We understand this. For these people on the beach, it's
too loud. My years hurt.

Speaker 1 (08:21):
Yeah, it's not the people on the beach, it's just
everybody watching ABC news dramatic video of the US Navy
Blue Angels making a low altitude flyover. Eric Trump, you know,
he responded to this. He's like, I can't he says,
can't stand the manufactured outrage by the low t mainstream media.
This was undoubtedly the highlight of these people's day. I'm

(08:42):
telling you, I don't see I see everybody smiling. I
you know, I go to that yeah, Coronatto, right, and
you know I hate the Tijuana toilet that the Tijuana
is made out of our Pacific Ocean. Along that beach
that isn't there's a naval base and it has the
airport there. I for years now, I run out on
that balcony and well, I can hear. They could be
a helicopter. It could be a slow moving helicopter.

Speaker 3 (09:04):
It is.

Speaker 1 (09:05):
I run out on that and I take pictures. I
look at it like it's the first time ever.

Speaker 2 (09:08):
It is. I love it.

Speaker 1 (09:10):
I absolutely when I see the Navy seals run along
the beach, I love it when they land, whether it
be a jet, whether it be a helicopter when they're
coming across. Man, I want to see what kind of
plane it is. I want to see what they are,
what they're doing.

Speaker 2 (09:21):
Who does not like a flyover? We love it? I
mean you see them. I mean, where was it? It was?
It was one of the Super Bowls several years ago.
The first time we got to see a B one bomber.
Oh wow, remember that? And it flew over. It was
the Rose Bowl, I think, and I and you just
sat there went wow. Look, I've seen them coming home.

(09:43):
I've seen them coming in for a landing. They've been
pretty high as they come in for landing, which makes sense.
Do you know how excited I'd be if they came
as like I saw in Pensacola, Florida coming in that
out Oh, I would be eye level, man, I would
love that. Waites, Okay, yes, all right. We've got a
lot to get to and talk about the future of
the straight up horror moves coming up next on the

(10:04):
Thursday edition of The Rotten Gregg Show right here on
Utah's Talk Radio one oh five nine can arrests. You know,
the straight of horror moves. How many Americans do you
think knew where and what the Straight of Horror Moves
was up until a few months ago.

Speaker 1 (10:16):
I'd say very little. I probably didn't appreciate. It's that
that corridor and the supply chain route and how much
I ran to the degree that I ran controlled it.
So I've learned a lot in this time as well.

Speaker 2 (10:28):
Yeah.

Speaker 1 (10:28):
Well, I'm a little bit of an information junk. Yes
you are, so, You're always very knowledgeable out there news.

Speaker 2 (10:33):
Yeah. Well, joining us on our news Miker Line to
talk about that is Caleb Josso. He is a senior
policy advisor at the Institute for Energy Research wrote a
real interesting article about how the running conflict has forever
changed the Straight of Horror Moves, and Caleb is on
our news Miker line. Run now, Caleb, how are you
welcome to the Rodd and Gregg Show.

Speaker 3 (10:53):
Thank you for having me. I'm doing very well. Thank you.

Speaker 4 (10:55):
Caleb.

Speaker 2 (10:56):
Let me ask you how have things changed there? I
mean talk about dramatic and just what does the future
look like for the Straight of Horror Moves?

Speaker 3 (11:05):
Well, straight aut Horror Moose is historically, as everyone has
been learning over the past few months, been one of
the most strategically important choke points for trade anywhere in
the world. It's been handling upwards of twenty percent of
the global flow of energy products for decades. And because
of this, what we have now witnessed is Iran has,

(11:27):
with advancements in military technology, discovered that they have the
ability to exert quite a great deal of leverage given
how important the volume of trade that transpires through it.
So it's a critical trade route for the entire global economy.
And given that Iran has now begun there and continued

(11:50):
the harassment of vessels of all kinds using especially their
one way attack drounds a lot of people, shippers, companies,
they are becoming understandably quite weary of utilizing that straight
and because of that, the economic and strategic value of
the choke point, though it won't ever go away, because

(12:13):
there are things that will have to continue to be
shipped through it. You're seeing regional nations producers of oil,
especially such as Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates and Iraq,
they're developing alternative routes to get products to market via
especially pipelines.

Speaker 1 (12:33):
Caleb, you say that, so they'll pipe around it, maybe
find different routes to go there. That I can see
that part. How about the oil reserves of it, if
you take the United States and maybe Venezuela together. I've
heard those comparison there that it's as large in the
world as you're going to find. Do we pick up
new customers, do we find a new supply chain to

(12:55):
sell oil gas around the world because of what's happened
to the Strait of Hermos.

Speaker 3 (13:00):
That will certainly become something that will continue to be discussed.
What this whole event in terms of energy supply has
really been teaching is the importance of global diversification of
resource and supply chain volume, moving volume from anywhere that

(13:21):
is possible.

Speaker 5 (13:21):
Now.

Speaker 3 (13:22):
The United States has become the world's largest exporter, has
some of the greatest levels of known reserves, as does Venezuela,
so you will likely see a greater shift toward Western
Hemisphere producers, including places like in Argentina who have great
shale reserves as well. So just a movement toward a

(13:42):
diversification of that energy supply chain, which is just as
simply a natural free market response to supply chain disruption,
which is a good thing now, not sugar coating what's
currently happening in the Strait with Iran's actions and not
trying to flower over how mitigated the response has been

(14:05):
in terms of wild price fluctuations that were originally predicted.
But we are seeing the free market take a natural
reaction of diversifying that supply chain in terms of replacing
where that volume has been displaced to the straight up
hormits Caleb.

Speaker 2 (14:23):
Tensions between the US and Iran have existed since what
about nineteen seventy nine. Why hasn't Iran used the straight
or horror moves as a weapon against not only the
US but the world before this conflict broke out earlier
this year? Why haven't they used it before this happened.

Speaker 3 (14:42):
It's happened a few times in the error of boil
embargo in the seventies. It's just that it hasn't done
so to this extent, given the fact that it hasn't
really had that type of technological advantage, given that it's
a it's at a disadvant in terms of mass complexity

(15:05):
and resources. So utilizing things such as the Shiheb one
three six one way attack drone has been critical for
their essentially strategy of defensive attrition, which is to try
to just wear down the much much stronger, well supplied
United States military. So it's not that they haven't necessarily

(15:26):
threatened the straight up hormus before, it's that they didn't
necessarily have the capability to this level to do so.
Also preparing their underground missile facilities that are significantly more
difficult to reach. So they've been preparing for this type
of a strategy for a long time and it's unfortunately

(15:48):
having some fielding them some results. However, it will just
time will tell what that attrition long term defensive strategy
will how long that will actually last.

Speaker 2 (16:00):
Interesting to follow. Caleb, We appreciate your time, thank you
for joining us.

Speaker 3 (16:04):
Absolutely, thank you very much.

Speaker 2 (16:06):
All right on our newsmaker line. That's Caleb Josso. He
is a senior policy advisor at the Institute for Energy Research,
talking about the future illustrator, horror moves and the President.
We'll have something to say about that tonight as well.
More coming up on the Rod and Greg Show in
Utah's Talk Radio one oh five nine. Can Arris. Let's
talk about the economy. A lot of economic reports coming

(16:26):
out this week, Greg, and they're showing inflation slowing down,
not to the level yet where it needs to be.
But it's slowing down.

Speaker 1 (16:32):
Yeah, and that's you know, that's we've got to see
that happen because again, inflation's like weight gain. And when
you see that three it didn't mean you, like, if
it's lower than last month, it doesn't mean that you
lost weight. It just means you didn't gain as much weight. Yeah,
and so it's still going Inflation always goes up, but
you want to see that number shrink more and more.

Speaker 2 (16:51):
Steve Moore joining US top economic advisor to President Trump
at one time, now the also the head of co founder,
we should say of Unleashed Prosperity. We invite you to
get that email every day, Steve, thanks for joining. Its
a lot of numbers out this week, Steve, what do
you make of it all?

Speaker 6 (17:06):
Well, look, we got a consumer price index number that
showed if you want the good news for the bad news.

Speaker 2 (17:11):
Now, let's say we want to start off with the
good news.

Speaker 6 (17:16):
No, the good news is we did see a big
fall in the inflation rate in the month of June,
and that was very welcome. We we saw one of
the biggest productions in a long time. And now the
inflation rate is at three point five percent. So that's
the good news and the bad news is the inflation
rate is three point five percent. That's still too high.
You know, we want that. We want to get that
inflation rate down to well below two percent. You know,

(17:39):
two percent is the FED target rate that they set
for monetary policy. I would like to see the Kevin
worsh get that rate down to zero so we can
actually start to see, you know, an end to things
costing more after you know, the forty to fifty percent
increase we've seen in prices over the last six or

(17:59):
seven years. So the direction is good, but there's still
work to be done. And I keep looking every day
at the oil price. You know, it's hovering rounds between
seventy five and eighty dollars a barrel. That's still too high.
We've got to figure out how we can get energy
prices down, because until we get energy prices down, it's
going to be hard to bring inflation back down to

(18:21):
that two percent level.

Speaker 2 (18:22):
We'd love to see, you know, Stee.

Speaker 1 (18:24):
There is a disturbing announcement by the US Attorney's Office yesterday.
The former FED Senior Advisor for the FED Reserve Board
has been sentenced to thirty eight months in prison. Why
because he was passing along sensitive economic information and data
to Chinese spies. You know, we talk about the Federal
Reserve with you quite a bit, and Worsh is now

(18:46):
the chair, and we hope for good things. But when
you get it, when you see that arrests are made guilty, please,
and sentencing of people that are inside that building and advisors,
what do we make of that?

Speaker 5 (18:58):
Is it?

Speaker 1 (18:58):
Is it a systemic problem? Are we going to be
able to turn what?

Speaker 2 (19:01):
What? What should I take from this?

Speaker 6 (19:04):
Well, it's a great question because first of all, that
is outrageous, it is it is uh, it is treason
us almost to be selling these States secrets to the Chinese.
And I don't know all the facts of the case,
but boy, it sure looks like he was guilty and
he should be very punished for that crime. We have
way too many people at the Federal Reserve Board. One

(19:24):
of my pieces of advice to Kevin Worsh, who I
think will be excell and he's only been in a
job for a couple of months now, is to just
clean house that the You know, why do they need
three hundred PhD economists over there?

Speaker 2 (19:35):
What do they do?

Speaker 7 (19:36):
You know?

Speaker 6 (19:36):
And They certainly gave a lot of bad advice when
when Jerome Powell was chairman. So, you know, I think
he needs to clean house. I think he needs to
listen to smart economists like Art Laugher and Sea Forbes
and people like that. But it shows there's just too
much power in the hands of the Federal Reserve Board too.
I've always been in favor of why did they have
to Why did they have to.

Speaker 8 (19:57):
Meet in secret?

Speaker 6 (19:58):
Why can't all really need be open? Why do they
have to you know, why do we have to know?
You know, well, what did the minutes say from their meeting?
Why can't they just release that? How about c SPAN
cameras over there at the FAD meeting so that it's
all open and transparent to the American public. I think
that's what the kind of government we should have.

Speaker 2 (20:17):
I will love that idea. Steve. There is not bad
peace in the journal over the week or this past
or well this weekend talking about capitalism getting abund the wrap.
Why are young people looking so down on capitalism right now?
What do you see going on, Steve? And what would
you tell young people about capitalism?

Speaker 6 (20:34):
You know, I was old enough to have been friends
one of my proud moments is I was friends with
Milton Friedman up until the time he died. He died
about twenty, a little over twenty years ago, but you know,
it was probably the most important economists of the twentieth century,
maybe next to John Maynard Keynes.

Speaker 8 (20:50):
And you know, when it.

Speaker 6 (20:52):
Was towards the end of his life and we used
to meet, and he used to say to me, you know, Steve,
he was.

Speaker 2 (20:56):
Kind of desponded.

Speaker 6 (20:57):
He said, you know, the central lesson that every around
the world should have learned about the twentieth century, and
what's the great takeaway from the twentieth century, the twentieth
century is that all of these isms communism, Leninism, and Nazism, socialism,
none of them work. And the lesson we should have
learned is that, you know, what does work is free

(21:18):
market capitalism. And yet he said, the lesson all the
academics seem to have learned is we need more socialism.
And I think about him saying that all the time,
because that's exactly what a lot of these crazy politicians
who are running our cities are saying. You know, the
crazy statement of the year was when Zora Mandami said
the warm embrace of socialism.

Speaker 2 (21:38):
I mean, that's what is he talking about.

Speaker 6 (21:40):
It's not a warm embrace, it's a sack right in
the nose. And so I am I'm very concerned about this.
I think if you had ask me what I am
most worried about in our country. And look, I'm very patriotic.
Beyways at the of the All Star Game the other
night in Philadelphia, and I have to tell you, guys,
I was really you know, after remembering COVID and all

(22:01):
the football players taking their knee on the you know,
the the national anthem and so on, I'm just lost
respect for all these professional athletes, you know that tampered babies.
But I have to say that they put an incredibly
patriotic event. That they were singing God Bless America and
the national anthem and all of these things, and all
the players, you know, are putting their hands on their heart.

(22:23):
I mean that that gave me a very good feeling.
I don't know how I got off on that subject,
but you know, we are the greatest country on the
in the world. We're the best country in the world,
and it's because we have freedom, we have free markets,
and I get frustrated when with the young people, I said, look,
we fought two world wars, a civil war, a revolutionary
to win these freedoms. Don't give them away. Never give

(22:45):
away your freedoms. And yet that's what so many of
these young millennials want to do.

Speaker 1 (22:50):
You know you in your Newslayer today, I smiled as
I read the report that Massachusetts taxed me More fund
has raised no money. I have to tell you, twenty
years ago, as a young lawmaker, state lawmaker Iry, I
attempted to pass a tax me More built as a
lie detector test for those that kept saying that we
need to raise taxes. And I was unsuccessful in passing it.

(23:13):
And I'm amazed that Massachusetts was in Utah wasn't. But
I the outcome is exactly as I predicted. For all
the talk of socialism, for all the talk of how
you know, you know, and you don't get anything unless
you acquire or take people's income and redistribute it. How
revealing is it that Massachusetts doesn't have a soul who
feels like they just want to kick more into the

(23:34):
pot and put more in their tax me More because
there's just education, every other good cause. Doesn't this show
that the talk is cheap and that people don't want
to pay as much in taxes, no matter if they're
Massachusetts or you two.

Speaker 6 (23:46):
Yeah, yeah, of course. And the story behind this is
the Massachusetts you know, an act of the tax cut
and a liberal we can't complet you know, cut taxes
for rich people. And they said, okay, but if you
want to continue to pay the rates before, you're welcome
to do it. And they called it that, you know,
I forgot what they called tax me more fund or
something like that. And of course, only one out of

(24:08):
every two hundred taxpayers actually you know, stood up and
paid more taxes than they were required to. Shows the hypocrisy. Well,
you know, this was one group you guys are familiar
with that event we had a few years ago where
this group patriotic millionaire said we've got to raise tax
on the rich. We're all millionaires were in favor of
taking on the ritchs. And I went, i'd, you know,

(24:28):
bust into their party. He said, well, how many of
you are willing to pay you know, more taxes right now?
And they out ran away as as they could. So
there is a lot of hypocrisy in this, and you
know that's why I've always been for us a low
flat rate income tax like you have in Utah. And
by the way, the best rate would probably be zero.
But you know, get rid of all the special interest
loopholes in the tax code. Make it really simple. Everybody

(24:50):
pays their fair share. If you make ten times more
money than I do, you pay ten times more tax,
not twenty or fifty times more tax. And that's the
system that would work the best people.

Speaker 2 (25:00):
It's fair.

Speaker 6 (25:01):
Eraises the revenue the government needs. Unlet's not stop using
the uh you know, the tax code as a is
a welfare fund.

Speaker 2 (25:10):
Steve Moore on our newsmaker Line talking about economic news today.
A lot out there and inflation is down, but not
down enough. I love Steve.

Speaker 1 (25:19):
I'm glad he takes time every week then check in
with us. He's got a big brain.

Speaker 2 (25:23):
Yeah, Mark coming up on the Roddy greg Show and
Talk Radio one oh five nine can Orrs. Bill Maher
was on National Public Radio Sat Down, didn't interview with
me o day and he hit him right in the face.
He said, you are part of the extreme far left.
Nice that's what he said to an interviewer with NPR. Yeah,

(25:44):
needs to be a compliment to Bill. The NPR guy
was kind of taken back. What and he said, no,
you you are You represent the far left to a
lot of people in this country. Yeah, they do.

Speaker 1 (25:54):
Look, I think you're seeing it now where the President's
having an address to the nation tonight, and A and
NBC have both said they're not going to cover it live.

Speaker 2 (26:04):
I'm not going to do it. He did also say
one other things, and I think this is at the
heart of what really angers people on the right, like
you and I against those on the left. List of
what he had to say.

Speaker 5 (26:14):
What the right wing hates the most about the left
is their condescending attitude. And I don't blame them. They
the left has this attitude like and this is true
of the Trump dinner, you are just too deplorable even
to break bread with. That really gets them. And I
don't blame the feeling the feeling they have about that.
You know, talk to them there, as I always say,

(26:35):
everybody's a monster to you, talk to them.

Speaker 2 (26:37):
Yeah, and he makes a point greg those of us
on the right hate the liberals because they look down
on us. Yeah, yes, Oh you're stupid. You love the
you know, you love the flag, the country and the Bible,
and you own a gun. Yeah, you're dumb.

Speaker 1 (26:50):
You're racist if you fly the American flag. Now here's
the problem with And Bill Maher said it pretty well,
pretty good there, And I love that he's saying it
to the regime media right in front of them. If
you don't subscribe to the leftists and the elitists and
the regime media's worldview, then they will tell you that
you suffer from a moral failing or an intellectual failing.

(27:11):
You're just too dumb, or you're too immoral, you're a bigot,
you're a racist or something if you don't agree with him,
or you're just a hic, a hillbilly, someone that's just
too dumb to understand complex thought. That there is no
such thing as one worldview. There's a diversity of thought,
and there always has been. The leftists, elitists and energy
media have abandoned that mindset and that's it. And we've

(27:34):
noticed and we don't like it.

Speaker 2 (27:36):
Imagine that one of the note the unidentified bison that
he's unidentified now identified him as a bison buffalo. I said, yeah,
well who went after the guy that is No, it's
not Bill, but uh they're going to keep them alive.

(27:56):
I should wrong. There was talk because of what he
did that they would put him down, and park officials
have said they will take no action against the BIS.

Speaker 1 (28:05):
You said it was mating season. I think he's feeling
a little randy. Yeah, you know, Can'tfalo can't. Yeah, he's
just you know, he's just he's just nature was calling.
He was just kind of frustrated. That poor guy. He's
still sorry for Grandpa.

Speaker 2 (28:19):
Yellow Stone official will say that no management action will
be taken against the BIS. Good leaves. The poor Buffalo.
He's got enough problems.

Speaker 1 (28:27):
He's really trying to work through some serious issues issues, right, Yeah,
he took out a trying to take out a tree.

Speaker 2 (28:32):
He's still frustrating. Yeah, all right, he doesn't need test
out the rown.

Speaker 4 (28:37):
No, he does.

Speaker 6 (28:38):
That.

Speaker 2 (28:38):
Buffalo's fine. That Byson's fine. More coming up on the
Rod Show, Stay with us.

Speaker 1 (28:45):
Yeah, you know, I find that people start the weekends
earlier and earlier. He used to rush hour start usually
before five o'clock to be an elitmit mid afternoon. Is
anyone even going to work on Fridays?

Speaker 4 (28:55):
Now?

Speaker 2 (28:55):
Well? We do, we do, Yeah, we're here on Friday
we're here, yea, the teams here a port for duty. Yeah,
but you're right, I see. I think especially in the summer,
I think they slip out a little early if they
try to get.

Speaker 1 (29:07):
Trying to eke out the last of vacations, you know,
because look a lot of schools starting in like mid
August nowadays, in August, you don't get too deep into August.

Speaker 2 (29:15):
Now without schools, I would get starting around August twentieth
this year, somewhere around there, third week.

Speaker 1 (29:21):
Yeah, yeah, yeah, So anyway, summers go fast, yeah, and
so that people enjoying all. Yeah, so Friday, but you
know we'll be here as at reporting for duty.

Speaker 2 (29:32):
Yeah. Well, in the early years when we all went
to a one room school, walked uphill to school both ways,
we didn't We went to school after Labor Day. In
New York State, you didn't get out until the end
of June.

Speaker 1 (29:47):
So I I that was well, I am like spring
chicken compared to you. I was an after Labor day,
first day of school attend.

Speaker 2 (29:54):
When did you get out of school every like?

Speaker 1 (29:58):
No, Mine was probably in the first week of June
to the beginning of.

Speaker 2 (30:03):
The second week. In fact, I distinctly remember graduating from
high school on June twenty eighth. Wow, No, that's way late.

Speaker 1 (30:12):
I would I would quit school if that was how
long they try to trap me there through my summer,
I would leave.

Speaker 2 (30:17):
I thought you did, yeh Sa.

Speaker 1 (30:19):
I got through by the skin of my teeth and
a lot of a lot of a lot of protests
going on from a lot of side that had a
lot of multi front war to get out of that
school with it.

Speaker 2 (30:26):
The yeah you story because it would ruin your career.

Speaker 1 (30:32):
That's a little bit of an overstatement, but I was.
You know, they should have just been happy to see
me go. I don't know why they were giving me
so much grief from.

Speaker 2 (30:41):
Trying to get Yeah. That point, good point, all right.
Marco Rubio a powerful address today, Greg, And I really
like Marco Rubio. He has done wonderful. But he spoke
at a symposium apparently there were leaders from six to
other countries and the issue was how do we stop

(31:03):
global political terrorism? And it was a powerful address today.
And I want to let you hear one sound bye
because I think he really nails it. He talks about
some examples of what we've seen in this country alone
when it comes to political terrorism. He mentions Charlie Kirk,
He mentions the healthcare executive that was killed on the

(31:24):
streets of Manhattan. He mentions the school shootings with people
writing messages on their bullets and their casings right, and
he said, this is leading to something that the American
people and the world need to be aware of and
to understand what is really going on.

Speaker 9 (31:40):
This is a distinctive and unique evil.

Speaker 7 (31:43):
It has always been driven by a hatred above all else,
a hatred for civilization itself. It is a revolt of
the worst against the best, a revolt of the weak
and the cowardly.

Speaker 9 (31:55):
Against the strong and the good.

Speaker 7 (31:58):
It is perpetrated by those who who cannot build, who
cannot create, who cannot achieve great things, and take their
revenge upon the world for their own inadequacy by seeking
to destroy those who can.

Speaker 9 (32:12):
This is what radical leftism is.

Speaker 7 (32:15):
It may wear various different slogans and ideologies across place
and time. They can call themselves anti capitalists or anti imperialists,
or communists or anarchists or Marxists, but the fundamental.

Speaker 9 (32:27):
Character is always the same. It's always the same.

Speaker 7 (32:30):
It is a poisonous resentment cloaked in the language of
equality and justice and liberation, and overwhelming need to tear
down what greater men have built, to wreck what is
beautiful and what is right on behalf of people who
are only filled with ugliness and have nothing else to.

Speaker 9 (32:48):
Offer the world.

Speaker 2 (32:49):
Well, he hit it right on the I mean, he
hit the nail on the head.

Speaker 1 (32:52):
He sure does, he says in that address. He also says,
for far too long, are the United States counter terrorism
effort or doctrine has had a blind spot, a blind
spot when it comes to the extreme violence from the political.

Speaker 2 (33:06):
Left and nobody. Yeah, and you talk about this all
the time, the both it is not both sides.

Speaker 1 (33:14):
No, I'm going to tell you that Tesla takedown is
everything that Secretary of State Mark Rubio just described. Tearing
down the builders, the people that build, they don't know
how to build. They're going to attack people's cars that
are Teslas. They are going to attack the dealerships. Because
he was doing what he was leading Doge, he was
finding the fraud, he was finding the money. They that
they went after him violently and his company violently, and

(33:37):
and all the other examples that you mentioned. That is
not of both sides. That they cannot wrap everybody into
what they're doing. And what they're doing is they're trying
to create chaos through violence to cement fear. And why
do they want you afraid? Because they want to compel
your behavior. They just want to give it. They want
you to feel like, give into what they want, so
they'll just stop. Well, you know, we won't enforce immigration

(34:00):
laws because it's just getting too violent. It's too chaotic,
it's too unsettling, it's it's it's causing riots. Just stop
enforcing the law because we don't want the violence.

Speaker 2 (34:10):
Who's doing that.

Speaker 1 (34:11):
They are creating the fear to create that human reaction
out of people, and we got to recognize it. And
I love hearing this from Mark Ruby. I just think
he has he was always a good US senator man
in this role.

Speaker 2 (34:24):
Yeah, he has shined great. Well, you mentioned immigration. You
know there was a Mark Wayne Mullen, the new head
of Homeland Security after the shootings and where was it
main in Texas? Yeah, he ordered him stopped. Donald Trump
turned right around said, uh eh, this is part of
immigration enforcement, you know. And the media hooks and oh

(34:45):
look at this poor man who was shot and killed
well down in Texas. You know what they found. They
found drugs in his car, a lot of drugs in
his car, so you know, and he's trying to get
away from police. I mean. And Rubio in this speech
today I got a good portion of it in his
speech today says the media is going right along with this,

(35:05):
and he brought up that famous MSNBC reporter Vauci I
think is his name, standing in front of the the
burning building in Milwaukee and the chiron below, said this
is a peaceful protest, Yes, mostly peaceful? Were they doing
roasting marshmallows over that burning.

Speaker 1 (35:22):
Building behind him is burning to the ground? And he
called it mostly peaceful, mostly peaceful protests.

Speaker 2 (35:27):
So Rubio said, look it, we're getting caught up in this.
And they shade it, as he said, as a fight
for equality, a fight for justice. No it is not.

Speaker 1 (35:36):
It gets even more insidious when you consider that the
Southern Poverty Law Center was paying white Nash like, Oh,
but they were in Clex clan members to create, to
have rallies, and to and to create and have and
and create hate. And if you look at the number
of white supremacism, all these different things in white hate,
all those references in the media. They spike a year

(35:58):
over year, like I can't remember what year it was,
it just went up exponentially. And this is when they
wanted to start making people afraid. They wanted the violence,
they wanted to start narrating it. And who wasn't responsible
they were doing this, They were paying for this violence.
They were so they could then fight. It's it's just
and again i'm not that's not a conspiracy.

Speaker 2 (36:17):
There's that's an indictment. You can read the indictment.

Speaker 1 (36:20):
You can see the amount of money paid to members
of the klu Klux Klan by the Southern Poverty Law Center. Yeah,
it's just so I'm glad to see the Secretary of
State Rubio defining this, talking about counter terrorism measures that
really do address the terroristic behavior and the violence happening domestically.

Speaker 2 (36:39):
You know who also spoke there was Scott Bessett, brilliant,
Trialy secretary another one. And you know what they're doing.
They're fine, we're starting to think through these things. Greg
and Best said, we're looking at the money. We're going
to cut off all the funding we can as much
as we possibly can through US financial institutions. These organizations,

(36:59):
these people are not going to have access to our
banking system or a financial system. You know, you have
to fight the war, you know, these groups to be
able to be successful and to carry out what they're
trying to carry out, they got to have money. Well,
Scott Best said, guess what you ain't getting anymore. It's
not coming your way, so don't try.

Speaker 1 (37:18):
They had such a money trained with that federal money.
The NGOs they were getting federal dollars for non government organizations.
Think about the irony of that government's paying for non
government organizations. That takes them right outside the checks and
balances of Congress, who's supposed to have the power of
the purse washed through universities for different I mean you
watched out a Republican who followed that money and houtates

(37:39):
that that flowchart the way they the complicated way they would.
They never thought people would know what they're doing and
that money, that that faucet's been turned off. And now
you hear Secretary Best and even going further and saying
we're gonna we're gonna stop it as we would Cartel's, Narco's,
you know, terrorists from from other countries.

Speaker 2 (37:57):
We're going to stop this Antifa. I like you, probably
Wall Street, maybe even Black Lives Matter. I mean, they're
going after this Black Lives Matter. They got a bunch
of money. They had those little charter buses everywhere, and
they didn't pay for a single kid's college education. They
just bought a bunch of real estate to flip and
to make money. It's unbelievable. All right, mare coming up,
Rod and Greg with you on this Thursday right here

(38:18):
on Utah's Talk Radio one oh five nine k n RS.
High t Thursday. What are we doing differently?

Speaker 1 (38:24):
Well, well, today, the reason we dedicate today is high
tee Thursday is because we're praising Secretary head Access for
providing test aster and replacement therapy for military members of
the military that have low tea. It's time to get
that TV up. Test ostern up. Boys, let's go, And.

Speaker 2 (38:43):
We're praising those pilots for the down there WHI. I
love that the pilot that they're all so upset, it's Amanda.
Her name is Amananda.

Speaker 1 (38:51):
Amanda Leaf flew over that beach that they were by
the way in Pensacola. They it's an annual affair. They
knew it was coming. They they love it. Everybody's cheering.
It is loud leftists.

Speaker 2 (39:00):
I know that.

Speaker 1 (39:01):
Really you're really worried about her nose. Everybody loved that flyover.
And Amanda Lee, the pilot for the Blue Angels, she's
got more testoster room than those soy boy beta males
in the left collectively have in this country. I love
it well, So that's why I that's why today at
least it's high te Thursday. Now we're gonna probably have
to have some high octane different guests or something.

Speaker 2 (39:23):
We'll have to keep this going on Thursdays going forward.
Now we'll figure out something.

Speaker 1 (39:28):
We need a spawn. We had a test osterroon sponsor.
That's what we need for Thursday. It Thursday, Yeah, Thursday.
That story you've got to jump on and tell us
his story. We have a story about you a little
bit yesterday after you were GONEBA. Give us the details
as to what exactly happened to you when it comes
to High t Thursday. This is like the opposite of

(39:49):
you were. This was an attack on you. I think, yeah,
it might have been.

Speaker 2 (39:53):
Well. I had I keep an aquarium home.

Speaker 10 (39:55):
I have a twenty five gallon aquarium full of fish,
and I purchased the filters from my filtration system through Amazon, okay.

Speaker 2 (40:04):
Which you normally do.

Speaker 10 (40:06):
Yeah, that's where I normally get them Amazon, and it's
never been a problem. I've done it, I don't know
how many hundred times over the last five or ten years. Well,
I ordered a package of filters, and when I got
home last week, late last week, there was a package
on my doorstep that should have been filters, and the

(40:27):
box was way too big, okay to be filtered. So
you were pick up the box, Yeah, you were little rattles,
you were suspect. Well, filters don't rattle, They're just made
of cotton. So I'm like, I don't know what this is.
So it's it's package is addressed to me, so I
make sure of that, and so I open up the
package and it's this giant box. So I open up
the box and it is twelve sixty pill bottles of

(40:52):
estrogen pills. I did not order now over seven hundred
estrogen pill But I don't know what.

Speaker 1 (41:01):
You know what, somebody knew we were going to high
t Thursday and they just wanted to They wanted to
thwart you. I think I think they wanted to send
you the other direction.

Speaker 2 (41:10):
Yeah, we're just are you transitioning to ray without telling? Yeah,
I mean it is this part of the transitioning process.
It's it's insane. I don't know what to do.

Speaker 10 (41:20):
I don't have an anonymously Second of all, I was curious,
so I looked him up on Amazon and it's like
a two hundred dollars value.

Speaker 2 (41:26):
This box is worth two hundred bucks. So that's forging pill.

Speaker 11 (41:29):
Hey, don't waste money, start taking thirteen dollars.

Speaker 1 (41:33):
So you got a two hundred dollars value package for
thirteen dollars, I did, but you know, useless. Well, I
was gonna say, why waste the money? You might want
to try it out? Yeah, why you don't want to
waste money? That's two hundred bucks. Maybe you'll stop liking
the Mariners if you get a little you know, low
T high estrogen count.

Speaker 2 (41:52):
I don't know. Is he giving us the one finger
in that studio? No, I think it's I think he's
saying that we're number one. Yeah, number one. I knew that.
I already knew that. I mean, you do not test
the metal of the chair.

Speaker 1 (42:07):
Yeah, I you know, I I somethings someone's trying to
tell erase something.

Speaker 2 (42:12):
You think, dum, well, someone in Amazon sent those to you.
That's where the dumb person is. Yeah, well it's rude,
is what it is.

Speaker 1 (42:24):
I mean, if you got right, If you get that,
do you think someone's trying to send you a message?

Speaker 2 (42:28):
Not even no, I think they just screwed up.

Speaker 10 (42:30):
But what do I do with two hundred dollars worth
of estrogen pills? I just can't flush Facebook market. You can't,
you can't you send them back? They don't want them back.

Speaker 2 (42:43):
I ask them that, Oh they don't want They say,
keep your.

Speaker 1 (42:45):
Estrogen pay If you had second thoughts, pout, that's that's
on you. That's not an Amazon problem. That's what they're
trying to tell you.

Speaker 10 (42:50):
I went on to first off, finding how to speak
to anyone at Amazon about a messed up order is
darn near impossible.

Speaker 2 (42:59):
It's like going into the ether.

Speaker 10 (43:01):
But I did finally get into a chat with a
person at Amazon and they said, we'll send you the
right order. We'll send you the filters. So should have
had those yesterday, don't still still don't have them. But
I said, well, what do I do with two with
all these estrogen pills? And they said, we don't want
them back. You just just dispose of them.

Speaker 2 (43:21):
Whatever you do.

Speaker 1 (43:22):
Don't flush him not a toilet. We'll have all these
effeminate fish or something. I don't know where is that
water go, it's something battle happened.

Speaker 2 (43:28):
What I want to know? You right? Have you told
your bowling buddies the story? Yes? I do?

Speaker 4 (43:33):
You know?

Speaker 1 (43:35):
Yeah, you're going this is just between us. No, it's
just we're keeping us, just between the three of us.
This is in the cone.

Speaker 2 (43:43):
By the way. In returning things to Amazon, we did
the same thing you rate. I got a couple of
bottles of ordered something and instead I got two bottles.
We tried to send it back and Amazon said, don't
worry about just keep it.

Speaker 1 (43:54):
Well, okay, nice that way, Okay, fine, they're nice until
it's something that you like, and then they'll say go
ahead center. If he didn't want it, they'll tell you
to keep it.

Speaker 2 (44:04):
Do you know how much crap he must be getting
from his bowling buddies? Yeah, for having the estrogen pills.

Speaker 1 (44:09):
I was I thought you're gonna say, you know much
crap he's getting from Amazon that they just mix the
mix up the words.

Speaker 2 (44:15):
He's yeah, that he still has his fish filters no,
so what's the effect of it needs to be clean too.
I want to know.

Speaker 1 (44:24):
We got to look up the side effects of high
estrogen and men, see what what symptoms we might see
in an e ray when he realizes he doesn't want
to waste the two hundred dollars, now.

Speaker 2 (44:32):
I am told I spend, I spent. I know, but
it has a value.

Speaker 11 (44:37):
You want to you want to realize the value.

Speaker 2 (44:40):
I am told that you may have heard this before,
that the older men get they are levels of estrogen
increase and their levels of testosterone go down.

Speaker 1 (44:50):
I think that democrats amongst democrat men.

Speaker 2 (44:54):
All men speak for yourself.

Speaker 11 (45:00):
Correct relatives in the Seattle area say, you know what
that Eureka see. I know if we talked this through
we would come out. Do we talk up with a solution?
You got to send that to those leftists center in
your family.

Speaker 2 (45:11):
Wrap it up with that nice packaging. Ray, put a
little for it, Send it to him, say here's a gift.
They're from Seattle. They're left of center, raging, oh left. Yes,
when the Kurt Schlicker is going to talk about next up,
he will too, and I hang on your hat. I
think is going to be a rant. All right, what
do you do with I'm with you? Send them up

(45:32):
to your relatives Seattle. Yeah, they'll take it.

Speaker 1 (45:35):
They're left of center. They love estrogen, they hate testosterone.

Speaker 2 (45:38):
Well, in the last five minutes we certainly have made
a difference in the world, and we'll try and do
so again when we come back here on the Rod
and Greg Show and Utah's Talk Radio one oh five
nine k n rs. What's your feeling about the Sun's
Sunshine Protection Act? Love it?

Speaker 6 (45:52):
You?

Speaker 2 (45:52):
You could? You could tell me.

Speaker 1 (45:53):
They say, well, it's gonna get the it'll get light
so late in the morning, eight thirty eight, whatever, light
at ten am for all I care. I like the
later evenings. I like sunlight at the end of the
day and if we get to sleep in more in
the morning. Oh, that's not the worst thing I've ever encountered.

Speaker 2 (46:10):
Well, you're you're well known for that.

Speaker 1 (46:12):
I am not a morning person, so I think these
are totally cool.

Speaker 2 (46:17):
See I am. I like the sunshine in the morning.
But the problem aren't you?

Speaker 1 (46:21):
Because you to be one of these You know, these
guys wake up cracka dawn. Before that, you got to
make it worse for the rest of us.

Speaker 4 (46:29):
We don't.

Speaker 1 (46:29):
Well, we don't, okay, so with like, leave us alone,
let us have more daylight when we're awake.

Speaker 2 (46:34):
We like it when we're awake. Yes, well, here are
five arguments and they're they're they're described as the dumbest
arguments against the sunshine protection. You ready for these, I'm ready.
Permanent standard time is better for your health. The argument
here is that keeping our clocks in sync with the

(46:55):
sun promost a healthier life by aligning with our circadian rhythms.

Speaker 1 (46:59):
Well, then we already we already don't do that because
we've changed we go daylight sea, we've stretched at it's
not fifty to fifty year. Yeah, we've already changed that.

Speaker 2 (47:09):
So that's that's the dumb argument against it. We shouldn't
fool with God's time. Oh please, Well, you didn't have
a watch man that you were quick on that one. No,
it's just that doesn't make any sense.

Speaker 1 (47:21):
I mean, if it's eight or it's seven, it doesn't
God does not care about seven a m or eight
a m. Yeah, probably there's no watch there's no that
I'm aware of.

Speaker 2 (47:31):
Yeah, number two kid or number three kids would have
to walk to school in the dark. Who who.

Speaker 1 (47:37):
By the way, if you if the order you get
the earlier school starts, you probably do that anyway. And
if you lived outside of Utah and you went to
early morning seminary, welcome to dark every morning for four years.

Speaker 2 (47:49):
Well, I mean there's always been this argument, especially for teenagers,
because they're growing and things are changing, that they should
start schools at a later time. They never do.

Speaker 1 (47:58):
I've heard that that they need more sleeping so that
school should start an hour or so later. This is
this is that is a good So this is really
coming together with daylight savings being the permanent time.

Speaker 2 (48:08):
Yeah, and just I mean what time does elementary school start?
What about eight thirty in the morning. I'm trying to remember.

Speaker 1 (48:19):
You should you should go back? Actually I never went
to kindergarten.

Speaker 2 (48:24):
We tried it before and it failed. When did we try?
That's what?

Speaker 1 (48:29):
Yes, I do think there was something about that, but
I thought it was that I didn't think they they
did daylight savings. I thought they did standard time.

Speaker 2 (48:35):
There was a bill in nineteen seventy four. It was
right during the energy crisis. Thank you, Yeah, you know Nixon.
Let's see emergency daylight savings time energy conservation Act and
it was kicked out ten months later. Didn't prove anything.
The bill passed in a panic during the energy crisis

(48:57):
and forced people to spring forward in the dead of
the winter.

Speaker 1 (49:03):
Huh, Well, look, but I think we're smarter than we
were in seventy four.

Speaker 2 (49:06):
Yeah, it only lasted ten months.

Speaker 1 (49:08):
Yeah, I think we I think we're I think we
got technology. We got a lot of things going on
now that we didn't have in seventy four. I think
we're just more nimble. We're ready for this now. Maybe
that was the practice run. Maybe in seventy four just
too much to digest too quickly. I think we're ready
for it.

Speaker 2 (49:21):
And the dumbest of the five arguments. And this will
not surprise you. Trump supports it, so it must be bad.
There you go.

Speaker 1 (49:29):
That's probably the one that will carry the door, although
Senator Tom Cotton has expressed case. With Tom Cotton, he's
a wus, you know. He says, oh, it's dangerous for
kids in the morning. Hey, kids are going to school
and they're starting their days in the dark. I don't
know where he didn't get the memo, but kids, the
day starts in the dark for kids already, So start
school an hour later. Let him sleep in and let

(49:50):
the sun shine longer.

Speaker 2 (49:52):
You like it into the See, we would get off
work under this plan and it'd still be daylight. I
mean when we get off around here, it's dark in
the way.

Speaker 1 (50:00):
Yeah, it's way there. I love I love more sun
in the later in the day. It's such an it's
not even it's a no brainer. I'd vote for that hard.

Speaker 2 (50:08):
Yeah. Well, we'll see if it gets My guess is
it is not going to go anywhere.

Speaker 1 (50:11):
This is because I don't that's the Senate. But they
don't do anything.

Speaker 2 (50:15):
Yeah, they don't do anything.

Speaker 1 (50:17):
People are like, well, you know, they can't pass the
Save America Act, but daylight savings and that's that's that's
a mountain too high to climate for them as well.

Speaker 2 (50:24):
And what we said yesterday, they're all going, we did
liquid We did, folks. There are a lot more important
things to do than the sun's sunshine protection. How about
the Save America Act.

Speaker 1 (50:35):
Yeah, but to your point, they can't even do that.
They can't go down. I say, that's not even a
tough one, and they can't. They'll never do that one.

Speaker 2 (50:43):
They're in their August recess. What ten days away from
now nine days, so nothing's good to get done. I
like to be wrong.

Speaker 1 (50:53):
I hate to be a pessimist, so I would I
would be glad to be wrong about that. This three
and a half day work week from the Senate. Go
ahead and show them, show me you can pass something. Yeah,
something that we'll notice, well, not just pork you know
and spending for you know whoever.

Speaker 2 (51:07):
Yeah, you know, I'd love to see him do something.
And Ben, it's okay. More coming up Rod and Greg
with you on this Thursday and Utah's Talk Radio want
oh five nine can arrest Artificial Intelligence coming up in
the six o'clock calory this. I'm looking forward to this
interview because it talks about how do we put a
positive spin on AI, Greg, because so many people are

(51:28):
afraid of it, are concerned about it.

Speaker 1 (51:30):
Yep, absolutely, I I it is it's I think this
is This discussion is not going away, and somebody's got
to lead this discussion.

Speaker 2 (51:37):
So we'll do it. Yeah.

Speaker 1 (51:38):
Okay, if if O'Leary doesn't want to get on boots
on the ground, come into this town and go to
box Celler and start talking to people, we'll just we'll
start the discussion here.

Speaker 2 (51:46):
Yeah, we will. We will. Now coming up later on
in the hour, we're on talk with Kurt Schlickter, and
he talks about leftist women are an abomination.

Speaker 1 (51:55):
Yes, they're very hostile, they're very toxic. He is calling
it out.

Speaker 2 (51:59):
Well, I have an example of this. Now. There is
a podcast hosted by I think her name is Jennifer
Welch and Angie Sullivan. You may have heard. Jennifer Welch
in my opinion, is despicable. I mean, you know, she
made cons like she's crude. She gets as low as
you possibly can get and low rent, and her co host,

(52:24):
woman by the name of Angie Sullivan, doesn't go quite
that far, but goes pretty far. Listen to what she
said the other day. She basically says that she does
not trust moms who love their kids. That's about right.
Is that despicable? Listen to this.

Speaker 12 (52:42):
I just think homeschooling is a bad idea from suit
to night. I don't care if you're a nuclear physicist.
I think it's just weirdest that you want your kids
around you all day, every day and all night, and
just the socialization for me personally was that I would
have gotten up on my hands and knees and strapped

(53:03):
them to my back and crawled to get them to
school every day just to get them where I wasn't.
So I don't trust somebody that wants to be with
their kids twenty four to seven. I think a lot
of dumb people do it because it's just easier.

Speaker 9 (53:16):
And that's a concern.

Speaker 2 (53:18):
The homeschool is easier people, and it's easier. Uh huh.
Has she tried homeschooling? I'll tell you what.

Speaker 1 (53:25):
I wish you'd say that more often, because I think
that I think the homeschooling movement has grown incredibly because
our public schools have gotten, you know, so much propaganda.
There's a lot of things going on that I don't
even think my kids had to confront. And so I
think school choice is a growing phenomenon and across the country.
Let her keep saying that that you're just strange and

(53:46):
there's something wrong with you if you want your childre
if you want to homeschool your kids, and that those
parents should not be trusted. And she's a loving mother
because she would have done anything, walk through glass, whatever
she said, whatever she compared it to get those kids
away from her. Oh, there's there's beauty. That's a beautiful
story in motherhood, isn't it.

Speaker 2 (54:02):
Yeah. I mean for her to say, you know, she
doesn't trust moms who want their kids around her all
the time. Yeah, somewhere having a mom around their children. Now,
I know, you know, we're guys. So we got up,
we went to work, and you know, my wife, like
your wife, stayed at home and raised their children. There
were probably days where they didn't want to be around

(54:25):
the kids. Yes, that that would be the case, but
on the whole. But to say that they don't love
them because they want to be around them all day,
I mean, come on, this is what we're talking about
with leftist women.

Speaker 1 (54:38):
Yeah, and I don't think it. I don't think it
would ever stand serious scrutiny. I mean they get to
say these things untested, unchallenged, in their own echo chambers.
We get to play it so that we can let
people listen. This is the lunacy being talked about with
a straight face. Uhhure, So you know who the people,
so you.

Speaker 2 (54:54):
Know who they are.

Speaker 1 (54:55):
But but yeah, no, I think if more normies, more
everyday American, every day, Utahn's got a dose of what
what is being said out there that's left of center,
that that says that that anyone that's conservative is has
a moral failing or an intellectual failing. But that what
she said is that is actually smart. They say is
the way to go. Yeah, I'd love I'd love them

(55:18):
to say it more often.

Speaker 2 (55:18):
Well, you are free to watch or listen to whatever
you want. But if you really want to get ticked
off sometime, yeah, just take five minutes and listen to
I've Had It podcast.

Speaker 1 (55:26):
That sounds like a stick to beat myself with. I
don't know that I could do it. I mean, I
think the clips are The host of the program is,
like I said, despicable. She is as crude and is
downright nasty as anybody out there. And you know what,
the Democrats.

Speaker 2 (55:41):
Just love it.

Speaker 1 (55:42):
Worse than whoopy, worse than whoopye that's bad, worse than woman.

Speaker 2 (55:49):
Will use language that would embarrass you and me. Yeah,
and we're hard to embarrass, and you get to embarrass
us pretty good. Yeah.

Speaker 1 (55:57):
And you know you you're you're a bit of a
swear bear, so embarrass bear. I'm just kidding, I know,
I am, I'm.

Speaker 2 (56:06):
Yeah, when you've unleashed.

Speaker 1 (56:08):
I get I have sometimes I get a little salty. Yeah,
but if I get the point of that isn't to
you know, out myself. The point of that is to say,
if I can get embarrassed by the language and the
contry and it is her conduct, that's pretty bad.

Speaker 2 (56:23):
Yeah, But to say moms don't like to be around
their children, she doesn't trust a mom who loves her child.

Speaker 1 (56:29):
Yeah, Again, I just wish more people knew this is
the drange left that we're dealing with. And Kurt Schlicker,
I think, is caught onto this movie and he is here.

Speaker 2 (56:39):
To warn he is going to be joining us coming up.
At the bottom of the coming out. He has a
few colorful things to say about Left and seven. Yeah,
I can't wait. But we've got tickets to Red West
Festival and that's coming up. And artificial intelligence right off
the bat in the coming out here on the ros

(56:59):
get in the the debate over the big data center
up there in box Elder County, Yes, which I guess
is still proceeding. Have you heard anything different.

Speaker 1 (57:12):
I think they're trying. I think they are, but I
think there's a lot of I think there's a lot
of things in the works, but that they are they are.
They are moving forward, but my I don't think MIGHTA
will go against a massive opposition. I think they're they
are going to seek public support, and if it's not there,
I don't know how I think they could. They could
just the state might they could draw the process out

(57:33):
to the point where O'Leary's group would go somewhere else
or probably ought to do it. But I I do
think that it has to be done right. But you
know they're going to have to do it right. Yeah,
they just can't keep they can't just do what they've
done up till now.

Speaker 2 (57:47):
I know that. Well, you've got a couple of issues.
We're waiting for a judge's ruling, and if the issue
can be put on the ballot, because remember the county
attorney said it can't and actually sound leg strong legal footing.

Speaker 1 (57:59):
Yeah, I think he is. And I don't know how
you could take. The only thing in front of those
commissioners to vote on was did they follow the law?

Speaker 2 (58:06):
And as about laws, and.

Speaker 1 (58:08):
That is that's an executive branch function that a three
member commission does, so there was it's not a legislative
one where they get to impose their opinion. Now, if
they wanted to be political animals. They could have said no,
we vote.

Speaker 3 (58:19):
Know.

Speaker 1 (58:20):
Then the O'Leary could assued the county Boxeler County for
arbitrary and capricious decision of what is clearly a yes
that they followed the law, and then the taxpayers of
Boxelder County would pay the You'd have a judge say
they can build and they would pay the damages.

Speaker 2 (58:36):
Yeah. Now, another couple of other developments that have taken
places with Kevin O'Leary spent a good hour the first
hour on Glenn Beck showed the other morning talking about
what's going on up there, answering Glenn's questions about water,
about electricity, about jobs that drain errated a lot of interest.
And then you have late yesterday we learned that I

(58:56):
think it's Elevate Utah and the Alliance for a Better
Utah are suing Kevin O'Leary because he accused them of
being fed information by the Chinese.

Speaker 1 (59:05):
You know what I say, Bravo, let's discovery begin. Just
start opening your books. Elevate Utah and Lines for Better Utah.
They get to subpoena you and all your finances, just
you know, to show whether they're correct or not. I
think that there are nefarious funders of a lot of
NGOs left of center organizations. Alliance for Better Utah is

(59:26):
part of the Progress Now organization out of Colorado who
they have affiliates and every they try to have affiliates
in every state, and so there's a lot of dollars
that are getting washed all over and you wouldn't It
would not surprise me. In fact, it's true that left
of center where that starts in China or where that goes,
or where it comes from. I mean you just had

(59:47):
Marco Rubio say that Antifa was being funded by Iran
in Cuba. C So yeah, copen up the discovery, see
where the money comes from.

Speaker 2 (59:56):
Well, I think a lot of this, and we've talked
about this on the show before, is not only the
data centers, but concerned about AI and what impact it's
going to have on our lives. Will we have a
job because of AI? How is it going to benefit us?
What are the bad effects the side effects of AI.
Let's talk more about that with our next guest. Shawn
Spear is a technical writer the City Journal. How do

(01:00:17):
you build AI? A pro AI story out there? Right? Now, John,
thanks for joining us tonight. There is fear about AI.
Is that the basis of this opposition to data centers
as well?

Speaker 8 (01:00:28):
Yeah, great question.

Speaker 4 (01:00:29):
I think you're precisely right that the growing political fight
over data centers is actually a proxy for a much
bigger sense of public discomfort and uncertainty around artificial intelligence itself.
And it has been seized on by different political actors

(01:00:50):
and groups to kind of litigate what, on one hand,
seems like a relatively straightforward thing, where and how should
we build these data centers, to something much much more
fundamental about whether America is going to aspire to be
the technological leader when it comes to this massive technology.

(01:01:11):
And I think you're at a moment I can't be
underscored enough for your audience. But if we don't make
the right decisions in the next twelve months, eighteen months,
thirty six months, sixty months, we risk passing off that
global leadership to others like China.

Speaker 8 (01:01:27):
So we're at a bit of a hinge moment here.

Speaker 4 (01:01:29):
And I think those of us who want America to
be a leader when it comes.

Speaker 8 (01:01:33):
To artificial intelligence seem to kind of wake up.

Speaker 4 (01:01:35):
And realize that we are in a big political fight.

Speaker 1 (01:01:39):
This article is very timely. As Rod just mentioned, we've
been talking about this is this listening audience of the
Rod and Greg Show. I think they keep track of
a lot of things. We spent an hour of yesterday's
show talking about what are the concerns over a data
center that's been proposed in a rural county here in Utah.
We are callers, and there's an absence of real information.
There's uh and so you hear surveillance state, you hear,

(01:02:02):
you hear a lot of draconian fears, and and some
of them are water and power, legitimate concerns that have
good answers, but no one's really sharing them. How do
you envision getting good information to make good decisions to
the general public?

Speaker 2 (01:02:15):
This is America.

Speaker 1 (01:02:15):
We can't we don't want the government just forcing things
down people's strokes. We have to we have to do
this collectively. You recognize that, But what's the what's the mechanism?

Speaker 2 (01:02:24):
How do you do it?

Speaker 4 (01:02:25):
Yeah?

Speaker 2 (01:02:26):
A million percent?

Speaker 8 (01:02:26):
Great quick questions, just just on the data centers.

Speaker 2 (01:02:28):
You're right there.

Speaker 4 (01:02:30):
If done poorly, they could have bad outcomes. So jurisdictions
need to make sure that they have energy policies in place,
water policies in place, et cetera, where these types of
investments can be additive and don't come at the expense
of local rate payers or citizens. On the other hand,
the bigger question about AI is such an.

Speaker 2 (01:02:51):
Important one, uh.

Speaker 4 (01:02:53):
I think the argument that has the that's probability of
convincing those those listeners of yours who aren't outright hostiles
but are unsure what to make of all of this
is the kind of democratizing opportunity here represented by AI.
You think about someone who aspires to start a business
and they're overwhelmed by all of the things that go

(01:03:16):
into it. I need to hire lawyers, I need to
hire accounts, I need to hire HR.

Speaker 8 (01:03:19):
People, I need to do all these things.

Speaker 4 (01:03:22):
Suddenly, artificial intelligence makes that opportunity to start a business
much simpler, much straightforward, and much more affordable. And so
it seems to me this is not about This is
about getting after the gatekeepers and creating opportunity for everyone,
and I think artificial intelligence represents that. The question, as

(01:03:44):
you say, is are there enough people out there making
that case, providing that information, addressing legitimate concerns and pushing
back against illegitimate ones.

Speaker 2 (01:03:54):
Who should take the lead lead in your opinion, Sean,
and getting that message out that let's look at this
and look at not only maybe the negative impacts that
some people fear, but there may be positive impacts here
as well. Who should take the lead in getting that
message out?

Speaker 8 (01:04:10):
Well, it's certainly not companies themselves. Yeah, who I think, on.

Speaker 4 (01:04:14):
Balance have done have contributed to the kind of confusion
and concern that your listeners and others across the United.

Speaker 2 (01:04:22):
States are are are grappling with.

Speaker 4 (01:04:25):
What's really interesting about this issue is it doesn't fall
along traditional left right or Republican Democrat lines. In fact,
there's a lot of pull in the shows that there
is a kind of mushy middle here, if I can
put it that way, of people who aren't who aren't
exactly supportive, but who are kind of open to arguments.

(01:04:47):
And so I think it's going to involve everyone, As
you say, this has to be a collective effort, politicians,
local leaders, and others making the case that if we
do this right, if we diffuse this technology so that
it not just rich concentrated companies but individuals in Salt
Lake City and elsewhere, to start businesses or enhance their

(01:05:09):
productivity or purchase more leadure time because they're able to
do their work faster and better. I think we can
start to build a coalition that sees this as the
opportunities that it is for themselves and their communities and
their economies, but also to make sure that America remains
on the at the forefront of a technology that I
really do think is going to define this century.

Speaker 1 (01:05:32):
One of the things you brought up that I think
we again we've discussed this is this we don't have
a very The time horizon is small. You just mentioned it.
Twelve months, eighteen months, maybe five years. A lot of
people are pointing at twenty thirty. If you're if you're
not well positioned in your infrastructure for this type of
new technology and industries in place, we're going to offshore
it to other nations. And there's a lot of bad
scenarios that come after that. Is what is a reasonable time, Like,

(01:05:56):
give me a pace, How do you if you have
to have the infrastructure by twenty thirty reverse engineer that
for ian? What what does it? What is coming together
look like?

Speaker 2 (01:06:05):
And when?

Speaker 4 (01:06:06):
Yeah, this is why I'm so grateful guys that you're
having this conversation with the one yesterday and others, because
right now, if you were looking at the list of
issues that are animating Americans, AI doesn't yet climb to
near the top of it. But I think it's going to.
It's going too fast.

Speaker 8 (01:06:23):
And as I say, we don't make the right decisions
on data.

Speaker 4 (01:06:26):
Centers, on you know, security, on making sure that we're
protecting ourselves from foreign technologies, et cetera.

Speaker 8 (01:06:36):
We don't do that in the next.

Speaker 4 (01:06:39):
Several months and years, we've risked falling behind.

Speaker 8 (01:06:42):
And so you know, my bet to you on today's.

Speaker 4 (01:06:44):
Show I'll come back in the future is that the
twenty twenty eighth presidential election may hinge on artificial intelligence.
I really do think it's that big, and it's going
to move so that fast as a political issue, and
we're going to have kind of competing views on what
either should this is a problem to manage or an
opportunity to seize.

Speaker 8 (01:07:04):
And I hope but between now and then we.

Speaker 4 (01:07:07):
Can build a coalition so that America as it has
been in the past in the past has been a
leader when it comes to the newest and most dynamic
and most promising technologies.

Speaker 2 (01:07:17):
He is the technical writer of the City Journal. Sean
Spear joining us talking how to build a pro AI
majority in America and the speed of this Greg He's right,
it is moving so quickly. I mean we haven't even
scratched the surface. I don't think when it comes to AI,
and I think that's where a lot of people are
concerned trying to stay on top of it.

Speaker 1 (01:07:38):
Just real quickly some of the things the example he gave,
I think it's something we should think about. I know
that before we had these entrepreneurial centers of state tried
to create some resources for people that wanted to start
a business but wouldn't necessarily know how to have great
ideas but not know all the technical aspects. That his
example of where AI can be that consultant. They can
walk you through how to set up that business for

(01:07:59):
an entrepreneur that has good ideas or has wants to
do something but not have the expertise on a bunch
of levels.

Speaker 2 (01:08:05):
AI is a leveling.

Speaker 1 (01:08:07):
It a leveling creates the level playing field and gives
them information so the state doesn't have to create resources
or try to to help empower people.

Speaker 2 (01:08:14):
Well, just think about the advances in medicine this could bring.
I mean that future is very, very bright, and the
pace of it. I'm with you, Greg. If we don't
stay on get on top of this. I don't know
where we stand now, but get on top of it
and stay on top of it. Other countries are going
to pick up on this. Well.

Speaker 1 (01:08:31):
A lot of countries pay attention to us. And again
Marco Rubio's statement to Cuba and Iran have been funding
Antifa and some of the nonsense we see happening in
this country. There's a lot a lot of world, a
lot of nations that would like to see America fail
and certainly losing the race on on data centers aid
that would put America in a vulnerable spot.

Speaker 2 (01:08:51):
More coming up, Rod and Greg with you on this
Thursday in Utah's Talk Radio one oh five nine can Arrest.
Let's get you. Well. You say it's turned around. I
remember years ago there was talking moving it.

Speaker 1 (01:09:00):
Yes, people wanted to just develop that land, have a
have a state fair that would just rotate from county
fair grounds to county fair grounds around the state.

Speaker 2 (01:09:09):
Uh, some states do it that way.

Speaker 1 (01:09:11):
It was a big decision whether to keep it there,
and it was it was running in a deficit, the
state was paying the legislature had in its budget almost
every year, so it just seemed like we're in a whole,
we're digging more. But it got reorganized and it is.
It is turning a healthy profit there. There's they're reinvesting
in the in the buildings. It's it's and I'll tell
you this, the people in North Temple, which are Salt

(01:09:32):
Lake City residents, love that fair park and it's part
of their community and they did not want to see
it go away.

Speaker 2 (01:09:40):
It's coming up. What they usually have it in September,
isn't it right around Reptember the State Fair? Yep, yeah,
right around Labor Day.

Speaker 1 (01:09:46):
Yeah. It's fun, it's it's a good time. And uh
and again the facility now is utilized throughout the year
like the Red West Festival.

Speaker 2 (01:09:54):
Yeah, so that's around that time. Will be I think
we're broadcasting this year again from the Greek Fest. Oh,
that'll be fair. I think we're doing that this year.
And we missed it last year. Yeah, George was gone.
George was gone. But I think Georgia will be here there.

Speaker 1 (01:10:09):
And we eat, we get to eat a lot and
we go there. I remember that part like.

Speaker 2 (01:10:13):
It, remember that part? Yeah, well you just cut in
line and get the food to it. Georgia takes us
the VIP treaty and he takes care of us. Yes
like that. Uh, this took a lot of guts. Okay.
The governor of Colorado, Jared Poulos, yes, who is a Democrat,
that's right, right, has come out and said he's declared, basically,
I don't want socialists to destroy my state. Good for him,

(01:10:37):
actually that I mean that, that's gutsy. It is.

Speaker 1 (01:10:40):
It goes back to what I said about that the
clip that you played of that lunatic woman who just
thinks that if you want to be around your kids
all time, you shouldn't be trusted. There's something weird about that,
and there's something weird about her. Well, you see, the
governor of Colorado a Democrat, and he's not a he's
not a right of center, he's not even a boar.

Speaker 2 (01:10:56):
I think he's liberal.

Speaker 1 (01:10:57):
No, but he knows a socialist and all the thing
crazy thing that are being said right now from their base.
The American people and the people of Colorado are going
to reject this. Yeah, I mean they do not one
look what those people are selling.

Speaker 2 (01:11:09):
Look at that platform they've come up with.

Speaker 1 (01:11:11):
I mean they to eliminate the military, the Senate, the Senate, Yeah,
they won't get rid.

Speaker 2 (01:11:16):
Of the Supreme Court, and they won't get rid of
the Supreme Court. Yeah, and combine the House and the
President together in one body.

Speaker 1 (01:11:24):
Yeah, so you would have four and thirty five brothers
to be the executive branch as well.

Speaker 2 (01:11:29):
Well, here's what Paula said. He said, he posted this
on his Facebook page. Socialism dangerously concentrates political and economic
power together. Government should be an independent check on the
private sector, not the owner of it, and not controlled
by it. And that's exactly what socialism is.

Speaker 1 (01:11:48):
I think it's courageous for not actually he's courageous, But
I do think he's taking a political risk that a
lot of Democrats right now in America are not willing
to take. Did they know that there's cuckoo for Coco
Pops voices in their party?

Speaker 2 (01:12:01):
But they won't call it out. He just did, so
that's good doing it too. Yes, he is, all right,
one of the few more coming up, we'll talk with
Kurt Schlickter about the leftist women.

Speaker 1 (01:12:12):
Yeah, they're just they're mad, they're angry, and we got
to watch out.

Speaker 2 (01:12:15):
Yeah, that's coming up on the Roden greg Show and
Talk Radio one O five nine k n RS. And yes,
mister Kirk Schlichter is on our any hour newsmaker line
right now. Wrote an article today about leftist women are
an abomination. Amen, and Kurk. Great to have you on
the show. I'm not sure what got into you, but man,
you had a field today. What's up?

Speaker 13 (01:12:36):
Well, you know, I'm look, I'm all about the women folk.

Speaker 2 (01:12:41):
Yeah right, you're the advocate.

Speaker 13 (01:12:45):
Yeah, I'm I'm out there supporting to fight the power
ladies except for the tubby, blue haired wine women whose
husbands want to shoot themselves in the head because they
come home to a babbling crone who would talk Trump
arrangement syndrome and an inability to either give or receive
pleasure from a man.

Speaker 2 (01:13:07):
So, Kurly, let's just say this. You know, someone said
a long time.

Speaker 1 (01:13:14):
So you know, I'm trying to keep a straight face here,
but look what everything you're saying is funny, but it's
actually this. If we didn't laugh, we'd cry because I
heard it said a long time ago. Democrat party is
really based made up of weak men and angry women.
I think today's version of the angry woman, and that's
what you're talking about here, is taking on a new life.
I don't even know if the name Karen actually does

(01:13:36):
justice to the kind of rage that you're seeing in
the finger pointing, in the in the blue hair. Maybe
what is this a hybrid? What's going on here? Is
this a movement or is this just an outlier? What
do you you're a social scientist, Kurt, tell us what
you see?

Speaker 13 (01:13:49):
Well, I think it's a combination between the young, alienated
women with bizarre hair and piercings and the older ones
who are reek of petruly and dysfunction. They all look
like Billy Jack's girlfriend.

Speaker 2 (01:14:02):
And I know.

Speaker 13 (01:14:06):
Right we're getting we're going for a deep cut, but
that but that's the vibe. Right. If you looked at
Greg Plantner, he's standing up there, he got one or
two femboys standing there who look like they they they
break if they try to do a push ups. And
you've got these older, gray haired women, you know, there's
tie dye in their claws, that their husbands are freaking,

(01:14:28):
you know, out there fashioning nooses for themselves and and
it's just it. And these are the ones who are
like aggressively stupid. You know they they watch h M,
S NBC and actually believe it. And and now people
are gonna Kurt your sexist, to which I always respond, sexy,
what's wrong being sexy?

Speaker 2 (01:14:49):
That's right.

Speaker 13 (01:14:50):
I'm the Nigel Toughnel of UH of the American Conservatives
or David Saint Hubbins. I think, now, Kurt, it's sexist
to say these things specifically about women, to which I answered,
Wait a minute, I thought women brought unique positive things
to the discussion. I thought diversity means everybody brings their

(01:15:11):
unique positive attributes to the rich tapestry of diversity. But
if people by group have unique positive aspects, isn't it
also possible?

Speaker 9 (01:15:25):
Nay?

Speaker 13 (01:15:25):
Is it also probable that they would have unique negative aspects?
And I'm talking about the uniquely negative aspects of women.
What about men? Yes, men have a different Men also
have uniquely bad aspects. But enough about James Tallerico. But
we're talking about chicks here, So let's talk about chicks angry, bitter,

(01:15:48):
emotion driven, living out their own weird personal young adult
novel heroin psychodramas and enforcing it on the rest of us.
It's it's a it's a they're an abomination.

Speaker 2 (01:16:02):
Well, Kurt, what made them so mad? I mean, what
has gotten inside beside you? Because I'm thinking that they're
really mad. When they listen to that, they can't come
across what you're saying. But they were mad before they
read it. So what what? What? What? What is making
them that med?

Speaker 13 (01:16:17):
Well? Look, a lot of the reason that they're mad
seems to be to fulfill a personal, private need to
have something interesting going on in their lives. Look at
these women. They have been provided largely by men with guns.
The safest, most prosperous society in all of human history,

(01:16:37):
a place where in almost all cases, yeah, there are
bad areas almost all cases, they can walk the streets
without a hajib, knowing they're not going to be raped
or murdered. They get to participate in American society. They
have no challenges, they have no risk, and there's no
like uh romance novelate there to sweep them away. They're bored.

(01:17:03):
They're bored and need a way to direct their energy,
to give their empty lives to meetings. You don't see
a lot of women who spend Sunday morning in church
with their families falling for this nonsense. In fact, those
ladies are mostly voting Republicans. What you see the ones, uh,
the ones who've alienated their families or decided they weren't

(01:17:24):
going to have families at all because of uh climate change.
You see them with bad marriages to weak men. You
see them living alone with cats, scooping hogandas and loneliness.
These the normal people fill that that that part of
their soul with faith, family and the flag. All they

(01:17:46):
have is failure. And this is a way by being
by generating this, this fantasy that they're fighting dragons, that
they are uh, you know, standing up to an oppressor
who's not oppressing anybody at all. It gives them meaning,
allows them to be the main character in a story

(01:18:10):
nobody would otherwise read.

Speaker 1 (01:18:12):
How does what you just said, which I agree with,
how does that fit into the midterms? How persuasive do
these people become in our midterm elections?

Speaker 13 (01:18:19):
I don't think they're persuasive at all. I think they're
alienating because look, normal men look at them and go, gosh,
if I was married to that, my big question would
be thirty eight or forty five right to the Temple.
I mean, I mean, really, could you could you imagine
going home to that sort of creature? Just I mean,
it's it's horrifying, and men know it. Look, men, men

(01:18:43):
aren't great at feelings. But guys, when you saw Graham Platner,
didn't you know exactly what that guy was. You didn't
have to be told. You looked at him and said,
I know that guy. He's scum. You know. I wouldn't
let him babysit my teenage daughter, just like I wouldn't
let Tallarico babies my teenage son.

Speaker 1 (01:19:01):
John Fetterman saw it as a Democrat center. He spotted
it from day one.

Speaker 13 (01:19:05):
Well, Ethn Look, Tennerman and us do not agree on
a lot of our politics. He's much more liberal, but
he's also a Pennsylvanian guy. My family's from Pennsylvania, even
though I live in la in Texas, and you guys
are from Utah. You guys are from hartleyand we we
are normal people and we can see problems. You look

(01:19:27):
at the as a man, you look at these women,
you go, this woman is a problem. From the resting
bee face to the exaggerated, over emotional emoting. This is
somebody who's living out some sort of personal fantasy that
none of us are or want to be a part of.

Speaker 1 (01:19:46):
Kertch Lick joining, how do you feel such the cards
so close to the chest, and he speaks in riddle.
I just it's hard to kind of discern the nuance.
The nuance of his points are just you've got to
listen closely.

Speaker 2 (01:20:01):
I tell you what. Someone wound him up today. Yeah,
well I think we should have asked him if he
had a bad week. No, I know, I was, consider
me a witness from the congregation. I thought everything you've said.
I love how he said. You know, uh, men with
guns actually a lot, you know.

Speaker 1 (01:20:17):
Created an environment where these women can actually be this
mad and say all the things that they say. And Yeah, anyway,
I found it refreshingly candid.

Speaker 4 (01:20:27):
Yeah.

Speaker 2 (01:20:27):
Yeah, that's one thing you can never accrue accused Kurt
schlicktter of being is not being candid. No, he is.
He will shoot straight with you, man, you will if
you like it.

Speaker 1 (01:20:37):
Or man have problems, and I mean tell Rico and
plant Grand Platinum.

Speaker 2 (01:20:43):
So yeah, that's he's right. Yeah, we do. We do
have our problems. Yep, yeah we do. And we can
be kind of an abomination at times. I'm going to
make a prediction.

Speaker 1 (01:20:53):
I think I'm reading a lot of social media here
about you know, they're starting to slow They're informing members
of Congress in the Senate of what the presidents can
address America. You're going to see some I think there's
going to be a lot of evidence in some disturbing
information presented about how these elections have been manipulated, even
by China. It's going to be I think we'll be

(01:21:14):
talking about this a lot tomorrow.

Speaker 2 (01:21:15):
We will be all right. More coming up. It is
the routing Greg show here on Utah's Talk Radio one
O five to nine. Can arrest the debate going on
at UVU over a Charlie Kirk statue. Yes, some kind
of tribute to Charlie Kirk assassinated there back on September
tenth of last year, and I mentioned there's another statue
being put together. A statue of Charlie Kirk will be
unveiled at the center of the New Universe, New York

(01:21:38):
City on the one year anniversary of his death. According
to the artists behind it. He's an Italian born artist
named Sergio fer Nari who hand sculpted handcrafted the metal
sculpture of the co founder of Turning Point USA, and
he's sitting there, Greg you saw pictures of it holding

(01:21:59):
a micro phone like he's at one of the colleges
in the universities went to and he visited and answered questions.
You have an Italian artist. It's got a permit. He's
made this.

Speaker 1 (01:22:09):
He's called this beautiful sculpture, and he's going to have
that in Times Square and at UVU. We have a
debate about whether we should have anything there where it's
where it occurred and the lessons we would learn from that.

Speaker 2 (01:22:20):
Really can I say my concern though, how long is
that statue going to go without being vandalized? Well, in
times like where really Square, not u VU, I think
it'd be okay, oh well we don't know what's UVU
either anymore anymore. But at Times Square, I mean.

Speaker 1 (01:22:36):
Now, yeah, you might you might find that. I think
you're right. I hope hopefully though, I mean that's it.
That's not a small artist. I mean as that has
a lot of value to it, So hopefully there's they've
contemplated that, Yeah, not going to secure it and have
people there.

Speaker 2 (01:22:49):
Yeah, he's been very tight lipped on the exact location
of it right now. Good for him because he knows
what's going to happen.

Speaker 1 (01:22:56):
Yeah, I again, but I just find almost embarrassing that
we have artists from other countries. We have people that
want to remember this or or talk about this and
the lessons learned, and then we here in Utah and
at Uvu.

Speaker 2 (01:23:12):
We can't do it.

Speaker 1 (01:23:13):
We're nothing to see here, Folks move along. Why would
we put something here We don't want to be We
don't want to think about this. Well, we probably should.

Speaker 2 (01:23:20):
Yeah, the plan is for him, he said, to mount
it really high on a truck so everybody can see it,
and probably to protect it.

Speaker 1 (01:23:28):
I'm sure, I'm glad he got a you know, mom,
Donni's running that city. I cannot believe he got a
permit for this, but I'm I'm glad he did. Yeah,
you know, I wouldn't think that New York City or
its government right now would be too accommodating something like that.

Speaker 2 (01:23:40):
Interesting story, Greg coming out of Tennessee. A Memphis restaurant
is facing intense backlash after his owner openly admitted Greg
that he refused to serve four uniform members of the
Tennessee National Guard and says he has absolutely no regrets
about doing so good. You know what, he can do

(01:24:00):
that and then we can choose not to. That's exactly right.
Patronize the man's restaurant four members of the Memphis Safe
Task Force. Memphis had one and I think still has
the highest murder rate in the country. Yeah. Remember Trump
said in the National Guard surprising you get a hold
of that. Uh, they were simply trying to get a
meal while in uniform. Saturday night denied service at Temple

(01:24:23):
Leed's Pizza and Pasta restaurant in midtown Memphis. The restaurant
owner later confirmed the decision in a public statement. He says,
I am a peace lover. These four people represent war.
They're trained to kill, and therefore I am not going
to serve them.

Speaker 1 (01:24:39):
Do you know what every criminal in Memphis heard. Yeah,
this guy's weak as water and he doesn't like any
law enforcement.

Speaker 2 (01:24:44):
He doesn't want protected. So let's go rob him. That's
advertisement O.

Speaker 1 (01:24:50):
He come on in and take everything I got because
I detest public safety and national security.

Speaker 2 (01:24:55):
Yeah, here's what's interesting. His father, the owner of the place,
his f issued an opinion. Sandy Backs's son there you go.

Speaker 1 (01:25:04):
Well, I look, let let the free market of of
you know, consumer choice carry the day. You can spend
your discretional discretionary income anyway you want. Would you would
you patronize a place that goes out of their way
to make that kind of point. I wouldn't, And I'm
not into canceling. I'm just personally, I'm not going to
spend my money at a place that is that aggressive

(01:25:25):
towards and hostile towards national security, public safety.

Speaker 9 (01:25:29):
Uh.

Speaker 1 (01:25:30):
Men and women in the military or in law enforcement,
if they feel that way, they have a right to.
It's America. But I don't have any need to spend
my money there.

Speaker 4 (01:25:38):
I would.

Speaker 1 (01:25:38):
I wish I could. I wish I went there so
I could stop going there.

Speaker 2 (01:25:41):
Stop going there real quick. The story out of I
think it's Florida who got a license plate squeeze.

Speaker 1 (01:25:48):
Something that poor woman that was not custom They gave
her that supposedly randomly, and it looks like and it's
a private part they talk about, so it's very inappropriate.
And she does not like her license plate. She does
not want that one she was issued at.

Speaker 2 (01:26:07):
She's become a celebrity. I'd put on my car.

Speaker 1 (01:26:10):
I guess maybe get maybe that's her twenty twenty six.

Speaker 2 (01:26:13):
You go ahead and put it on.

Speaker 1 (01:26:14):
But her first instinct was to say, I did not
choose this, nor do I want this on my car.

Speaker 2 (01:26:19):
It's like he goodness, that's for. Yeah, he didn't needn't
ask for that.

Speaker 1 (01:26:22):
He does him And now look at him use it's
you know, very sensitive.

Speaker 2 (01:26:27):
Now that does it for us, deny to head up,
shoulders back. May God bless you and your family, this
great cook

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

The Rod & Greg Show News

Popular Podcasts

Stuff You Should Know

Crime Junkie

NFL Daily with Gregg Rosenthal

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}The Rod and Greg Show: Are Leftist Women a Scourge on Society?; How to Build a Pro-AI Majority

Episode Transcript

The Rod & Greg Show News .css-1q01m3q{margin:0 0 -2px 0;}

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}Stuff You Should Know

Crime Junkie

NFL Daily with Gregg Rosenthal

All Episodes