PM Show Hr 2 | Dems Always Whitewash Their Radical Candidates

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:03):
It's that time. Lock and load. The Michael Derry Show
is on the air.

Speaker 2 (00:14):
Mark Cuban looks to me like a lesbian woman.

Speaker 1 (00:28):
But it's not his look that bothers me. It is
the fact that Mark Cuban has used his fame from
Shark Tank, from being the Mavericks owner, from making a
billion dollars. He has parlayed that fame and celebrity and
money into trying to influence the political world. The problem

(00:55):
you find with very wealthy or famous people is that
most of them are out of touch with the way
most Americans live. So they come up with these pie
in the sky ideas, which are really designed to pull
up the ladder behind them. They don't want anybody who's

(01:17):
middle class to get ahead. They really like this aristocracy
idea where the rich people will make pronouncements from up
in their towers, And the poor people down below will
cheer for them. They don't want there to be a
layer in between. So they get really excited over this

(01:42):
idea of Democrat candidates like Gavin Newsom. Democrat candidates like
Barack Obama. Cuban recently said that the California system is broken.
The Texas system is much better. And then he comes

(02:03):
out and endorses Tallarico. Now, here is a moment from
Tallarico that is carefully scripted because Tallarico is bought and
paid for by the billionaires. That's who's funding his campaign,
California billionaires. And Mark Cuban is really the mindset of

(02:27):
a California billionaire. So we have this moment on a
podcast called Raging Moderates. And what we're set to do
here is he's going to whip Mark Cuban in front
of you and show you that he's a tough guy.
He cannot be controlled by the rich people. And Cuban,

(02:51):
in return, agrees to go along with this. So here's
that moment.

Speaker 3 (02:57):
But you talk about it a lot, and part of
that is also pushing back on billionaires, big corporations.

Speaker 1 (03:03):
I mean, your health care.

Speaker 3 (03:04):
Plan takes it right to people who have accumulated and
organizations that have accumulated just too much money. We do
have a billionaire on the stage. It's not me.

Speaker 1 (03:21):
One of the good ones, though. So....

Speaker 4 (03:26):
I mean, I actually I've joked with Mark calling him
one of the good ones.

Speaker 1 (03:30):
And and what I you made me last.

Speaker 4 (03:33):
That's right.

Speaker 1 (03:34):
That's right.

Speaker 4 (03:35):
You know, one of the if I think about my
political heroes, Franklin Roosevelt, Bobby Kennedy, they both of those
both of those leaders were the billionaires of their day.
And in fact, they inherited it. At least Mark made
his money the old fashioned way, which I appreciate.

Speaker 1 (03:54):
Did he, though? So that was 437. Let's play 432 here.
And this was scripted. This is the performative moment that
they will use in ads, that they will share on
radio spots, TV spots. This is Tallarico saying, listen, Mr.
Rich Guy, if you want to be on my campaign,

(04:16):
you have to give up everything. your political influence to
join this movement. And Mark Cuban says, yes, I will
go along with it. This is as scripted and as
performative as Joe Biden and corn pop and the swimming
pool story. Here we go.

Speaker 4 (04:35):
Mark, I've told every wealthy person I come across in
this race, if you are OK with getting taxed, More,
if you're okay with me limiting your influence in politics,
you are welcome to join this movement that we are building.

Speaker 1 (04:47):
And we're thankful to have Mark Cuban as part of this. Yep,
we're thankful to have him. But he has to understand,
I am my own man. And we're going after those billionaires.
And that's why the billionaires are all contributing. Because they
seek to destroy their own fortune?

Speaker 5 (05:08):
No.

Speaker 1 (05:09):
But you've got to tell the poor people... You got
to tell the poor people that you're going to suffer.
You got to tell the poor people that he's going
to get over on those billionaires. So before Cuban endorsed Talafrico,
he had one question. He said, not two, one. Will
you co-sponsor the breakup big medicine bill? Josh Hawley, Republican.

(05:35):
Elizabeth Warren, Democrat, Socialist. And he says, if you break
apart CVS, UnitedHealthcare, and the big pharmacy benefit managers, health
care costs drop 20%, 30%, 40% overnight. Now, listen to
this clip, and then we'll discuss it.

Speaker 6 (05:55):
You know, it's funny, when James and I started talking
about healthcare, and we've had multiple conversations and exchanges, and
we talked about my coming out here and putting together
this plan. And I'm like, okay, well, I just have
to ask you a question. There was a bill, a
bipartisan bill, that was proposed by Josh Hawley and Elizabeth
Warren called the Break Up Big Medicine Bill. And I

(06:18):
have literally talked to senator after senator after senator asking
them why they haven't co-sponsored it or supported it or
come out publicly and said anything.

Speaker 7 (06:28):
And I won't get into names, but James nailed it on.

Speaker 6 (06:31):
The reasons why. And so prior to our doing this,
I asked one question. I said, this is key. When
you are elected, I didn't say if, I said when
you are elected.
Will you co-sponsor the Break Up Big Medicine bill? Because

(06:51):
that is key. If we can break up those big companies,
the CVSs, the Unites, et cetera, we literally could see
the cost of pharmaceuticals and healthcare literally drop overnight 20, 30, 40%
depending on where you live.

Speaker 1 (07:04):
So James said yes, so here I am.

Speaker 7 (07:07):
And we are going to break up Big Medicine.

Speaker 1 (07:10):
And why does he want to break up Big Medicine?
Because he has a company that competes with Big Medicine.
He's not out to serve or save his fellow Americans.
He's out to use government to harm his competitor, get
an entry into the market. He'd be for gun control

(07:32):
if he had some product he could sell. He is
for gun control. He'd be for anything else that added
to his riches. I actually think there is an advantage
to restricting– the influence and governmental protection that Big Pharma
has received. And so does Ken Paxton, the Attorney General

(07:55):
of Texas, who has brought case after case against Big
Pharma and beat them. And where was Tallarico? Nowhere to
be found. You know, this cosplaying as the Jesse James,
the protector, the El Cid of the populace on behalf
of the people. It's really, really good Hollywood scripting. And

(08:20):
it's all alive.

Speaker 9 (08:21):
Mr.

Speaker 5 (08:22):
Michael Berry, remember that.

Speaker 1 (08:28):
They have pointed out again and again how the Democrats
try to whitewash their candidates. They try to make them
seem less radical than they are. They try to seem
more accessible and approachable and like you than they are.
Abdul El-Sayed, the Democrat socialist candidate in Michigan, Democrat nominee

(08:51):
for the Senate, was on MS Now. And he was giddy.
He's gone from saying that college football is toxic masculinity
to now they've said, no, no, switch that. You really,
really like college football. And they told him. That Michigan

(09:14):
football is religion in Michigan. So you want to say
that you hope Michigan beats Ohio State. But he doesn't
know Ohio State is what you call that university that
is the rival of Michigan. So he says he can't

(09:37):
wait for Michigan to beat Ohio State. Ohio. Imagine any
fan of the Big Ten. Imagine any Michigander being asked
about the biggest game of the year and saying, yeah, yeah,
we're going to beat Ohio. There's never been. been anyone

(10:00):
ever say that. It's not the biggest gaffe ever. It's
just representative of the fact that they are coaching these
people to say things that So the peasants will think
they're like you. So the Christians will think they're like you.
So the white people will think they're like you, but

(10:21):
they are not. Play the clip, please, Ramon.

Speaker 10 (10:23):
Well, I'll tell you what I'm excited about. All right,
it's about to be football season. And you mentioned Ohio
for some reason in this interview. And I can't wait
to beat Ohio. And let's just remember J.D. Vance, Ohio J.D.

Speaker 7 (10:32):
Vance, Peter Thiel, J.D.

Speaker 10 (10:34):
Vance is coming to Michigan next week. They are putting
a spotlight on this campaign for a reason.

Speaker 1 (10:42):
Yep, just can't wait to beat Ohio. That's the first clip.
Here's the second clip from 2021. It's the same Abdul
El-Sayed saying that football is toxically masculine. Listen to this.

Speaker 11 (10:57):
Football is very much associated with a particularly masculine and
oftentimes toxic, toxically masculine culture. And so much of it
was about you wanted to be able to get back
up and play for your team. And you you really
aren't allowed to show pain or vulnerability.

Speaker 1 (11:13):
That's part of the sport. It's toxically masculine. Interesting. Abdul
El-Sayed has invited Hassan Piker to campaign with him, and
now that Piker's words have come out, he says, oh, no, no, no,
I don't want to talk about him. He's just some

(11:35):
streamer in California. Piker now says, I went to Michigan
to campaign to the Muslims with him at his request,
not mine. Let's check in, shall we? with Dr. Shabir Ali,
an Islamic scholar. And he is explaining here classical Islamic

(11:58):
thought with regard to marriage. You tell me, is this
compatible with the culture you live in? So what is
Islam's view on concubines?

Speaker 12 (12:08):
In essence, generally, in classical Islamic thought, it is taken
for granted that a Muslim man.

Speaker 1 (12:17):
Can have up to four wives at once.

Speaker 12 (12:20):
In addition to the four wives, he can have an
unlimited number of concubines, which refer to women who basically
have slave status. when they are owned by her master,
a woman owned by her master has to freely give
herself to the master. The master has the right to

(12:42):
have sexual relations with her as though she were one
of his wives. The classical Muslim interpreters of the Quran,
some of them said that the woman's main responsibility in
a marriage is to fulfill the sexual needs of her husband.
And for that reason, the husband has the right and
the claim to this, and she cannot refuse. So some

(13:06):
of them even speak of the possibility that the man
could force himself onto his wife, and she cannot refuse,
because that is his right. The woman in marriage itself
did not have so much right as we might expect
of women today, and we would argue for today, even
within the Islamic context. So when women did not have

(13:29):
this full right, then, you know, it's not a far
cry from the position of slavery.

Speaker 1 (13:36):
Isn't it that the leaders of the Me Too movement
are Democrats who are pushing for candidates who share this belief?
Katie Hopkins is an English media personality. And she makes
the point that mosques are not churches. They are command centers.
That is her position. She states it plainly. Katie Hopkins.

(14:02):
A pack. an area with Muslims. You've seen this happen.

Speaker 13 (14:05):
You're watching it happen in Minnesota, in Minneapolis, in Dearborn.
You are seeing this happen. They bring them in, they
pack them in. They put up mosques to facilitate them.
In flows the funding. Suddenly you've got mosques putting funding
in and an imam that's in charge of a densely
packed population. Now they have political power. People are going

(14:27):
to vote according to what the imam tells them to do.
They are voting according to religion instead of any policy
or political belief. It's why we have the Islam Party
in Belgium. Their policies are segregation on buses, halal and
face covering.

Speaker 1 (14:46):
They even want a couple seats. This is where we're headed.

Speaker 13 (14:50):
And when they come to mobilize in future time, when
this conflict wraps up, ramps up as it surely will,
the mosques are where these people will mobilize from. Do
not mistake mosques for churches. They are not places of worship.
They are places of organization.

Speaker 1 (15:09):
Florida State Representative Angie Nixon was at a CARE event,
the Council on American Islamic Relations. Someone asked, what are
the right organizing vehicles for your community? She says, CARE Florida.
That's her answer. A sitting Florida state legislator, the Democrat

(15:32):
nominee for the U.S. Senate at a CARE event, naming
CARE as the right vehicle for her community.

Speaker 9 (15:41):
This past presidential election was our Brexit event. And we
need to start working on building the right vehicles. And
the right vehicles are Care Florida. We can't just build parties.
We have to build up our people in order to
build up our country. And so right now is a

(16:03):
time where we need to grieve, but we do need
to take some time and make space, right, and then
come together and start having uncomfortable conversations.

Speaker 1 (16:13):
And there you have it. We've got the Democrat nominee
to the U.S. Senate saying that the right vehicle to
organize in the state of Florida is care. Just do
five minutes of research on the background in activities of care.
I've almost went to law school myself. The Michael Berry Show.

(16:35):
There are nine members of the United States Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court is the top court in our country.
It is the highest court in the third branch of
our government called the judiciary. That branch, the Supreme Court,

(16:56):
the nine justices, reviews the actions of the chief executive,
the head of the executive branch, the president, and the
laws and actions of the Congress, the House and the Senate,
to determine whether their actions are consistent with the limitations

(17:17):
placed on them by the Constitution, the bylaws. The Constitution
incorporates the first round, and every one thereafter, of amendments
to it. Those first 10, there were 12 proposed. The
first 10 passed just a few years after the Constitution.

(17:37):
And those 10 amendments came to be known as the
Bill of Rights. And then, of course, we added after that.
But when the Supreme Court does not rule the way
you want them to, the Democrats, going back most prominently
to FDR, Franklin D. Roosevelt, who was basically running a

(17:58):
dictatorship during the Depression era, he wanted government to run everything,
which was a terrible idea. And there's quite a bit
of thought that he's the one that it was our
monetary policy and fiscal policy that led to the Depression,

(18:20):
and that the Depression was on its way back. The
economy was on its way back. It was a year
after the end, by economic data, of the Depression that
governmental action spurred a spiral into what came to be
known as the Depression. But when the judiciary does not

(18:42):
rule the way you want it to, for Republicans, the
answer has been, well, we'll have to elect more Republicans
so that we have better jurors, better justices, sorry, on
the Supreme Court. The Democrat answer has been, well, we'll

(19:03):
just stack the court. We'll just put more people on
the court so we get the rulings that we want.
Jim Clyburn is the worst of the worst of American politics.
He's a guy that reaches for race as an answer

(19:23):
to everything. He is a guy who is a race baiter.
I think he's corrupt. I think he's a bad human being.
He's the dean of the Congressional Black Caucus. And he thinks...
here he is on Meet the Press, that the Supreme
Court needs to be stacked. Go ahead.

Speaker 5 (19:46):
We have now a Supreme Court that has decided to
reverse course and take this country back, I say, to
those rulings of Justice Taney that said that no black
man has any rights that a white man must respect.

Speaker 1 (20:04):
Good grief. I got it that he's dumb. I got
it that he did. You know, it's like the person
that everything they don't like is literally Hitler. That's that's Clyburn.
He's a one trick pony. His entire career is racism, racism, racism.
So here he is. He wants he wants the Supreme

(20:25):
Court to be stacked.

Speaker 14 (20:29):
Former Vice President Kamala Harris shares some of your criticisms clearly.

Speaker 1 (20:34):
She's called for expanding.

Speaker 14 (20:36):
The Supreme Court from nine justices to 13. Do you
support adding four more seats to the Supreme Court, Congressman?

Speaker 5 (20:46):
Yes, I do. I think that we are in a
position now that calls for some significant actions taken by
the Congress. And we ought to expand. In 13, there's
a pretty good number. A baker's dozen will be a
good number to have on the court.

Speaker 1 (21:08):
Next, you're going to see a great example of what
is known as the crab in a bucket. I had
never heard this used until I got into politics 26
years ago. And I had a black elected official say
to me, well, that's just a crab in a bucket.

(21:32):
And I said, what does this mean? Well, if you've
ever seen crabs in a bucket, if one gets close
to getting out, the others will reach up, grab them,
and pull them back. And you will see this happen
when a black man dares to have conservative views or

(21:54):
be a Republican or not blame the white man or
slavery for the reason a black person is suffering or
fails or doesn't win. What you're going to hear here
is Jim Clyburn, no intellectual giant, Trying to pull Clarence

(22:18):
Thomas back into the bucket. Clarence Thomas is one of
the two greatest thinkers alive today, along with Thomas Sowell.
Both happen to be black men. That should be a
point of pride for every black person, but it's not.
In fact, it's quite the opposite. Clarence Thomas has changed.

(22:39):
to be destroyed because he dares to think for himself.
And the black Democrats will not tolerate this. The blacks
in the media will not tolerate this. The blacks in
academia will not tolerate this. You cannot have blacks on
the other side. We all have to line up on

(22:59):
the same side against the Republicans because they're evil white folks.
And a Clarence Thomas, a Thomas Sowell, a free-thinking black man,
is dangerous to that narrative. So James Clyburn, here he
is on Meet the Press, he says that Clarence Thomas rebelled.
He rebelled from the narrative that he was supposed to tell.

Speaker 14 (23:24):
Do you stand by your decision to make the case
for Clarence Thomas' confirmation?

Speaker 5 (23:32):
Absolutely not. You know, I have made mistakes in my life.
And that's one that I made. And I will own
up to that mistake. The fact of the matter is
I had faith and confidence in the fact that his
background and experiences would instruct him in his professionalism, especially

(23:53):
sitting on the bench. We had worked together when he
was chair of the Equal Opportunity Commission. And of course,
I was running the state agency here in South Carolina.
We had differences over how that agency should run. But
I also thought that he believed in precedence of the law.

(24:16):
And I thought, sure, that he would be there upholding
those precedents set down in 1954 in the Brown v.
Board of Education decision. I thought that he would follow
those court decisions that upheld the Voting Rights Act, the
Civil Rights Act. I had no idea that Clarence Thomas

(24:40):
would rebel the way he has against his own background
and experiences. He was raised by his grandfather. And he
has shown very little sensitivity to the environment his grandfather
grew up down in Pinpoint, Georgia, just south of where
I now sit. And so, yes, that was a mistake

(25:04):
on my part, and.

Speaker 14 (25:05):
I own up to it.

Speaker 1 (25:07):
This is the Michael Berry Show Locked and Loaded. Locked
and Loaded. Locked and Loaded. With the independence of African
republics in.

Speaker 7 (25:21):
The 50s and 60s, there was a whole new breed
of leaders in these now.

Speaker 1 (25:23):
Newly independent African nations. And the French and the Belgians
had positions in Africa, but mostly it was the English.

(25:49):
And as the English pulled back and as these new
republics started, there was understandably some growing pains. This happens
in every country. There were growing pains in India and
then Pakistan. There are growing pains when a new nation

(26:09):
And you have a whole new group of people without
a precedent to draw upon. You know, you go from
being a student activist to drive Whitey out to now
you're the leader. How that first generation of people behaves

(26:30):
will set the course for the future. We saw some.
who set a good example. We saw others who didn't.
Idi Amin and what he did in Uganda set that
country back to the point that they suffer to this day.

(26:51):
The Indian leadership set a precedent that they can draw
upon to this day. Two very different approaches and you
can see the difference. India is relatively wealthy today And
most of Africa is not. Independence did not bring financial

(27:12):
prosperity to most of Africa. South Africa being a good,
what's the word when it doesn't follow with a good
exception to all of that? But when the African leaders
took over who had been revolutionaries the day before, they

(27:37):
instituted this sort of very, very vicious revenge approach. And
Barack Obama's father was actually involved in this movement in Kenya.
It was known as the Mau Mau Movement. And whites

(27:57):
were said to have been Mao Maoed. It's a very,
very tribal. It's a very tribal approach. And what we're
witnessing before our eyes in America today is a return
of that type of policy. Let's look to Chicago, where

(28:21):
you have Brandon Johnson, not exactly a mental giant, but
And he is announcing, and this has been done before,
he is announcing that Chicago wants to know when companies
come to do business with the city of Chicago, he
wants to know, he doesn't want you bringing a bunch

(28:42):
of white guys in here. He wants you to bring
black guys.

Speaker 8 (28:47):
Why?

Speaker 1 (28:47):
Because he cares about black people?

Speaker 11 (28:49):
No.

Speaker 1 (28:52):
He doesn't just want black guys. I've watched this happen
in the city of Houston. He wants his black guys.
This gives him the power to pick and choose the
people who are going to get jobs and equity. Now,
are they going to kick back some of that cash

(29:12):
that they get out of it? I can't prove that.
I didn't even say it. But it sure makes you wonder,
doesn't it? Clip number 415. Let's listen in on the
mayor of Chicago saying, we don't want a bunch of
white guys coming in here.

Speaker 8 (29:26):
If you want to do business with this city, we
want to know whether the people leading your company reflect
the diversity of the communities whose tax dollars are paying
your contracts.

Speaker 1 (29:40):
Now, Washington may be choosing.

Speaker 15 (29:42):
To look away, but Chicago, our eyes are wide open.

Speaker 1 (29:49):
I see. He also says that the mayor's office in
Chicago used to be 70% white. Uh-uh, we ain't gonna
allow that anymore. We are not going to have a
bunch of white guys around here.

Speaker 15 (30:02):
There are more Latinos in my administration than any time
in the history of Chicago. I believe we're at about 30%
of my administration in top executive positions that are Latinos.
Same thing with chairs of boards on city council. More
Latinos have chairs of committees than any other time in

(30:24):
the history of Chicago. And I believe that's important. Once
upon a time, the mayor's office was 70 percent white men.

Speaker 1 (30:30):
That day is long behind us.

Speaker 15 (30:32):
Do we have to continue to work hard to make
sure that representation is there?

Speaker 1 (30:35):
Absolutely.

Speaker 15 (30:36):
Has my administration reflected that value?

Speaker 11 (30:38):
Hmm.

Speaker 1 (30:42):
Interesting. And how's the city of Chicago doing? Is it prospering?
Is there a budget surplus? Are the schools thriving? Are
the streets safe?

Speaker 8 (30:54):
No.

Speaker 1 (30:56):
But there's a lot of black guys in the government.
Speaking of Chicago, Michelle Obama. Let's check in on Michelle Obama.
I have never seen someone so spoiled by this country
who seems to hate it so much. Here she is
talking to Jon Stewart, and my goodness, did he ever

(31:18):
embarrass himself just lapping up whatever she said. Here we go.

Speaker 7 (31:23):
You know, the energy and excitement of the kids being
around is so incredible.

Speaker 1 (31:26):
I don't miss them.

Speaker 13 (31:28):
I don't.

Speaker 16 (31:29):
I love them. I'm going to see them tonight for dinner.
I love them.

Speaker 8 (31:33):
Yeah.

Speaker 16 (31:33):
But, you know, Barack cried when they went to college.

Speaker 1 (31:36):
I was like, bye, little guy. Goodbye.

Speaker 16 (31:42):
Now Friday nights aren't wrecked with terror and fear about
where are you?

Speaker 1 (31:46):
Where are you?

Speaker 5 (31:47):
Right.

Speaker 1 (31:48):
No, I get that.

Speaker 16 (31:49):
I love their emancipation and growth. The thing I miss, though,
is the job.

Speaker 1 (31:55):
Don't you miss?

Speaker 6 (31:55):
No.

Speaker 7 (31:56):
See, your kids are still in high school, so it's
still a job.

Speaker 1 (31:58):
Yes.

Speaker 7 (31:59):
It gave a meaning and pattern to my life.

Speaker 16 (32:03):
I'm good.

Speaker 8 (32:03):
Yeah.

Speaker 1 (32:05):
Look at all the meaning I have. She's different. I
have a wonderful pattern.

Speaker 5 (32:10):
Oh, man.

Speaker 1 (32:10):
I love my kids' schedule.

Speaker 7 (32:13):
Yeah, there's something about the schedule.

Speaker 1 (32:14):
I love their schedule. I love my schedule.

Speaker 16 (32:16):
I have a great schedule, and it's all mine. But
I think fathers can be that way because you weren't there.

Speaker 7 (32:26):
From six and nine. And we missed a lot of it.
You missed a lot of it.

Speaker 16 (32:28):
I mean, I've had so much quality time with my children.

Speaker 1 (32:33):
There's something very dark and sinister about her. Very dark
and sinister about her. I've sensed it all along. It
goes back to the first time you see it is
at Princeton. Here she is, a black woman who's admitted
on her blackness. So she's admitted to school. She gets
to go to this prestigious, exclusive school. And so she

(32:57):
has to write a thesis. And so her thesis was
that Princeton did not support blacks when they graduated, so
they didn't get good jobs. The data says otherwise. She
goes to school and says, I want to list a
black alumni. Here it is. She writes a letter, a
form letter that goes out and says, if you're black

(33:17):
and graduated and feel that Princeton didn't support you, write back.
I want to talk to you for my paper. There
were only a handful of people who even responded and
they said, no, that's not true. She went on and
wrote the paper anyway because she couldn't let facts get
in the way. She needed you to be a black

(33:38):
graduate of Princeton who suffered for your blackness even if
it wasn't true. And she has been conning and lying
and conniving ever since. My goodness, what an unpleasant human being.

Speaker 8 (33:53):
Hey!

Speaker 1 (33:58):
And good night.