6/26/26 - Matt Kittle fills in for Dan O'Donnell

6/26/26 - Matt Kittle fills in for Dan O'Donnell

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Good afternoon, Madison, Milwaukee, and all of God's Country and
the rest of the free world, wherever you may be.
Let's talk Matt Kittle, your radio talk show host phil
in Daddy, the lesser known, less talented Kittle filling in.
I was told recently that I am the Kittle who

(00:22):
will not be attending Taylor Swift's wedding. That is true,
at least to the best of my knowledge. I'm still
waiting on the invitation. However, come on, Taylor, it's about time.
It's go time. Not it'll be George Kittle. I'm told
that we'll be at the wedding, and that makes good
sense to me. He's a good friend of Travis Kelsey.

(00:46):
The blushing Groom is the wedding of the century, the
Royal wedding. Yes, another spectacle is all we need. Speaking
of spectacles, this is a bad transition. Dave Michaels are
excellent producer, of course, taking us through this afternoon and

(01:07):
doing the Lord's work, trying to keep this fill in
talk show host on the right path. I was going
to say that, speaking of spectacles, Dan O'Donnell, Dan O'Donnell
is at a spectacle. That's why I'm filling in. Of
course he is attending the big FIFA World Cup matches.

(01:30):
Not so good last night, as I understand it for
the Americans, but they were resting their guys, right, It
didn't really matter. They're already in. But they got beat
by what is it now? Turkey? Yea Turkey? Ya Dave?
What is it? Because I don't know how to spell it.

(01:51):
I always liked it like the bird, and then they
had to screw around with it. Anyway, there's there's some
new name to it, like the Czech Republic, which used
to be the checklos Lapakia Czechloslovakia. Now it's Chechia. I
don't know. Why can't we just keep the things the

(02:12):
way they are? It's much less confusing. Hey, we have
a lot going on on this show today and we're
very close to the weekend. You can almost smell it.
Smells great, doesn't it. Coming up on the show today,
we are going to give you a chance at pocketing

(02:35):
twenty five hundred dollars. That sound all right? Yeah? I
said it before. That is the way to start a weekend.
You bet we will do that again. Coming up in
the five o'clock hour, it's our two hundred and fifty
k USA giveaway. We're going to give you a shot
at part of that two hundred and fifty thousand dollars

(02:56):
we're giving away in this contest. We'll give you the keyword,
you know, the drill coming up in the five o'clock hour,
also a little bit later this hour. Never forget what
the COVID experts did to us. There's an interesting piece,
at least I find it so because I'm a bit

(03:18):
self involved. It's in the Federalists today and it is
a reminder. In fact, there's a video montage that did
I play this yesterday? Now? I can't remember. Yeah, I
think I did, But that video montage just really takes
you back to what an awful time. Obviously it's a pandemic,

(03:43):
but it was made all the more worse. Exacerbated is
the word by the scientist who we were supposed to
blindly follow. We've got some new information on that. We'll
share that with you coming up a little bit later
this hour. And oh, let's set our watches, let's synchronize

(04:03):
our watches. Is it just about riot season? Maybe? And
there was a Supreme Court decision that I have a
hunch may launch riot season coming up just in time
for the midterm elections, of course, And here we go again.
Dane County is exploring the Oregon model of homelessness. That's right,

(04:29):
Make homelessness great again is the idea in Dane County.
We'll chat about that coming up in just a bit.
Talking about Dan at the Big Soccer tournament, big soccer match, well,
they have many many matches, of course, and the foreigners
they love the ranch dressing so much. So you've probably

(04:52):
heard this, but I do believe this is very interesting.
They have gotten such a Jones hankering for the ranch
dressing that the TSA, the Transportation Safety Administration, had to
issue a notice advising folks heading back to their home

(05:15):
countries that know, it's not a good idea to bring
ranch into your carry on baggage. Putting that overhead is
a recipe for disaster. But I'm telling you they love
the ranch. A little bit later on in the show,
have you seen it? Was one of my funny but

(05:35):
one of the funniest bits, and there are so few anymore.
On SNL what used to be known as Saturday Night Live.
Who is that comedian with the googly eyes? I like him?
But I never remember his name. He was on there.
They did this skit about Washington as they were standing
on the brink of fighting in the early parts of

(05:58):
the Revolutionary War. Nate Barns exactly. I like that guy.
I never remember his name, and I probably it's probably
not nice of me to call him the googly eyed guy,
but that's how I remember him anyway. Dave, do you
know that skit? I'm talking about Washington's Vision. I love it.

(06:18):
Oh no, no, I know that. I know he's not
a cast member, can't. I don't know. The only guy
I know is what's his name, Keenan no Kel. I
don't know Keenan Thompson. He's been on there for seven
hundred years, and I like that guy. He's funny. His
faces are delightful, as they are in the skit. If

(06:42):
we have some time, I'm gonna play that. As we
get closer to the two hundred and fiftieth anniversary of
this Exceptional Nation, I think we revisit the Washington's Vision
skit from SNL. But here's a little play on that.
As we're thinking about Dan traveling to the FIFA World Cup,

(07:03):
this is what Washington would say about it all and
in this great country we will call it soccer. But
isn't it played with the feat sir? Of course it is.
And we will let the clock run for forty five
minutes straight without breaks. But what about when they aren't playing?

(07:25):
We will call it stoppage time? And how much stoppage
will there be?

Speaker 2 (07:31):
Sir?

Speaker 1 (07:33):
Nobody knows well more about that coming up. Yeah, I
struggle with the rules of football myself. Straight ahead, an
important conversation. Jackson Barrick, a University of Minnesota student entering
his senior year, as joined with the Southeastern Legal Foundation
and the Young America's Foundation with former Governor Scott Walker

(07:56):
to sue his school for violating his right to free speech,
even after the Trump administration ruled to protect it. Jackson
and Kimberly Herman, who serves as president of a Southeastern
Legal Foundation, will join us to talk about that. Straight ahead.
We're just getting started, just getting warmed up. I hope

(08:17):
you will stay with us. It is the Dan o'donald
Show with your old radio me ego, Matt Kittle, hang on,
caving it real, caving it right. It's the Dan o'donald Show.
Kittle filling in on this Friday. Oh baby, is that
the stroke? You know? That song takes on a different

(08:40):
meaning the older you grow. There's the soundtrack of my
older age coming up in just a bit. Never forget
what the COVID experts did to us. Some want to
sweep it all under the rug. We can't let that happen. Now,

(09:04):
let us talk about individual rights and where DEI and
the crazy pronoun movement have gone in this country. Jason Barrick,
a University of Minnesota student entering his senior year, has
joined with the Southeastern Legal Foundation and the Young America's Foundation.

(09:24):
Of course is that's led by former Governor Scott Walker
to sue his school for violating his right to free speech,
even after the Trump administration ruled to protect it. Some
of these institutions just don't and can't get the message.
Jackson and Kimberly Herman, who serves as president of the

(09:47):
Southeastern Legal Foundation, joins us now in the Dan O'Donnell
Show with Matt Kittle. Thank you both for being here.
I very much appreciate it.

Speaker 3 (09:55):
Thank erl thanks for having us.

Speaker 1 (09:59):
Absolutely I heard Jackson, you and the governor and Gosha.
We miss him. We've missed him over the last eight
long years in the state. But that's a topic for
another day. But I heard you, folks. Were you on
Hannity yesterday one of the national shows. You sounded great,

(10:20):
by the.

Speaker 4 (10:21):
Way, Thank you very much. Yes, I was on the Governor.
I was on Hannity with the Governor yesterday. Pretty influential
step in my hopefully long media career.

Speaker 1 (10:34):
There you go. I hope so too. I know that
you're actually in a path, as I understand it, in healthcare,
and you're standing up to fight I think the good fight.
Tell us what happened your experiences with the pronoun police.

Speaker 4 (10:52):
Yeah, so, as you kind of mentioned in my intro there.
So going into my senior year, I'm the president of
the app Chap. You're at the University of Minnesota. So
we're a conservative student organization, and the university is pretty
much try to put a muzzle on us as best
as we can to make sure that we don't talk
about pretty normal, normy issues on campus. I mean, the

(11:15):
goal that we try to bring is to get university
students to feel a different kind of vibe around the
area and to make people exposed to different ideas. Bringing
on selected speakers and whatnot, and the way that the
university policies are outlying kind of hamper us from doing that.
I mean, we want to bring people like people to
speak about transgenderism, to speak about biological sex. But you know,

(11:38):
I don't want to be punished up to including expulsion
for that. I don't want to be expelled at waste
tens of thousands of dollars for you know, saying a
man as a woman or seeing a man in a
woman's bathroom and pointing it out. I think that's pretty ridiculous.

Speaker 1 (11:52):
I think it's pretty ridiculous too. I think it's a
massive infringement on your right to free speech in the
name of political directness and allyship whatever they're calling this crap.
But you raise some very good points, So let me
give you. For instance, if you were a student on campus,
were to, as they say, misidentify a trans individual and

(12:20):
it was a mistake, because sometimes it's difficult, but even
a mistake could cost you your academic career, is that correct?

Speaker 4 (12:32):
Yeah? I would say that that's pretty accurate. I mean,
the way that they define quote harassment is incredibly subjective
and pretty vague in my mind. I mean, it's pretty
much whoever's reading it or who's filing the claim of
harassment that's going to be the one who defines it.
I mean, it's simply subjective. There's no standards.

Speaker 1 (12:50):
Whatsoever, Kim. As we mentioned, this is something that the
Trump administration was very interested at the very outset of
his second term in office, started right away with some
very important executive orders. These universities, these leftist and doctrination centers,
do not want to follow the executive orders that come

(13:18):
with the cash for all of this. What has the
university leadership said in regard to that executive order, of
these executive orders and where this whole thing stands.

Speaker 3 (13:36):
Actually, coincidentally, I was there standing right behind him with
my daughter when he signed those executive orders on Title nine.
So it was a monumental day for so many and
for our country. But the school is basically saying that
they don't care. Right, they've continued these policies. Not only
do they make it harassment, but there's actually express policies

(13:58):
that compel this type of pronoun usage.

Speaker 4 (14:02):
And then you.

Speaker 3 (14:03):
Can be expelled if you refuse or accidentally use the
wrong pronouns for somebody, which I would actually argue are
the correct pronouns for that person? And so these forces
don't care, They're just going to That's why we have
to file these lawsuits. It's going to be the only
way to hold them accountable.

Speaker 1 (14:20):
Well, should it come as any surprise in a city
where they didn't care about the rule of law as
it related to federal law enforcement officers doing their job
and enforcing federal law enforcement. What we saw was just
absolute chaos in that city. And that's what I see
the whole leftist agenda, in the whole pronoun agenda, the

(14:43):
EI agenda, as being can't they kim can't they lose
funding in all of this? I mean that funding question
has to be an issue for them. What do they
say about that?

Speaker 3 (14:57):
Yeah, they absolutely lutely can.

Speaker 5 (14:59):
Right.

Speaker 3 (14:59):
So, our lawsuits focused on the First Amendment. But it
would be amazing to see the Department of Education come
in now that we've been able to bring all of
these policies to light and start an investigation against the
University of Minnesota. And we know what they'll ultimately find,
and they're going to find that they're not following Title

(15:20):
nine because their policies are a slap in the face
to Title nine and then threaten that federal funding. And
so not only do we intend to win this case
and increase free speech on campuses, but I think it's
a call to action to the Department of Education to
step in here, launch an investigation, and let's see what
the University of Minnesota does when all of those federal

(15:41):
dollars are on the line. You know, they've got huge
endowments at universities like this, and this is what they're spending.

Speaker 1 (15:48):
Their money on.

Speaker 3 (15:48):
I also hope that donors would walk.

Speaker 1 (15:52):
I hope so too. I think we're seeing some of that,
but certainly not enough of that from people who really
value free speech on campus. Wisconsin clearly is going through
the same problem like so many other campuses. Jackson Barrick,
a University of Minnesota student entering his senior year, has
joined with the Southeastern Legal Foundation and the Young America's

(16:16):
Foundation YEAFF. They are suing the University of Minnesota for
violating his rights to his free speech. And again, as
we noted, the leftist university is doubling down. Jackson. Let
me ask you this, have there been students caught up
in this? I mean, have we seen students suspended or

(16:39):
expelled because they failed to genuflect at the altar of DEI.

Speaker 4 (16:45):
I think that's a perfect way of describing it. But
I could say with pretty good confidence that in the
last two years there's been nearly twenty two points filed
with the university that students have violated these quote unquote
pronoun policies or harassment policy. So this is not something
that's just there and hasn't been used. It's actively being
used against students up to again the start of the

(17:08):
Trump administration.

Speaker 1 (17:11):
Yeah, it's so you have students who whatever their their
thought crime was, uh, they've had to what I have
to shit out? Have they they lost their eligibility for
a semester? What's what's happened so far?

Speaker 4 (17:29):
I honestly don't know. I I'm not sure, and I
don't want to speculate on things that I don't know.
I try and stick to I try and stick the
fact as much I can. Sorry that, Yeah, that's not
the ideal.

Speaker 3 (17:40):
Unfortunately, No, no, no, Unfortunately, it's a black box out there.
We just know that these complaints have been filed, and
then once they are the university can pretty much do
whatever they want because it's not transparent. So that's why
none of us really know. But we do know that
their policy says that they can expel students.

Speaker 1 (17:58):
That's a big problem. I mean, even if nobody has
been expelled so far, the fact that they can do this,
the fact that they can discipline a student just simply
because of free speech, that's very, very troubling and obviously
chilling to the First Amendment rights of students on campus.

(18:19):
Kim let me ask you this, the lawsuit is filed,
where is it right now in terms of the legal process.

Speaker 3 (18:28):
Yeah, so we're at the very very beginning. We filed
the lawsuit last week, and so you know, we hope
to have briefings filed later this summer. Obviously, we're going
to move this just as quickly as we can because
you know, come August September, these students go back onto
this campus and every single day, you know that they're

(18:49):
forced to have to comply with these policies. Every single day,
that a female student can't stand up for herself in
a locker room or a bathroom, or that yaff can't
bring a speaker like a de transitioner like Chloe Cole
onto campus, their rights are being violated and so beginning stages,
but I can tell you we're going to move as
aggressively as we kind went to lawsuit.

Speaker 1 (19:12):
I don't doubt that this isn't your first road. You
go at the Southeastern Legal Foundation on these issues. I
would imagine that it will be as expeditious as you
can possibly make it. There is the court system, the
wheels of justice and all of that. Can I ask you,
Jason Jackson, have you had any rough feedback on this front?

(19:37):
I know that so many who have challenged this stood
up courageously challenge these kinds of policies. They've gotten a
lot of pushback from the left and sometimes threats. Sometimes
they've dealt with the damage of property and those sorts
of things. Have you experienced any of that pushback yet?

(19:58):
I would imagine that we Because it's the summer, not
a lot of folks know about it, but I know
they will when you head back to campus in the fall. Yeah.

Speaker 4 (20:08):
Honestly, all the feedback that I've gone an have been
from people, you know, so that have been supporting me
in this process, and a lot of people have been like, wow,
I wish I would have been like on the gun
like you were being as willing to partake in this
as I was, and I've really appreciate that. But thankfully
I haven't really received any pushback from the radical left

(20:31):
at all, and hopefully things go smooth into the fall semester.
But you know, I'm ready to get I'm ready to
jump at the gun to get speakers on campus and
to make sure that you know, people's rights are spoken
for and it's not just my own rights to everyone's right.

Speaker 1 (20:45):
All right, final question for you. We reach a long
way throughout the state of Wisconsin, and of course we're
very close to the leftist border of Minnesota. If you could,
and if there are those rats medical administrators listening in
on the show right now, what would you say to
them about this policy and about your efforts to secure

(21:09):
free speech on campus.

Speaker 4 (21:12):
You know, two hundred and fifty years ago, people died
in mass numbers star rights, and I'm ready to take
up the fight two hundred and fifty years later to
protect people's liberty, to protect people's pursuit of happiness. And
I want a change in the policy that allows people
to have free speech, to be able to have their
rights spoken in a free, undetermined, unhampered way. I want

(21:34):
to make sure that people have the ability for their
own predestination to be able to make the decision that's
right for them and not be hampered by arbitrary university policies.

Speaker 1 (21:44):
Well, I think that is fantastic, and I'm hoping that
you are, you know, not in the minority anymore, people
coming out courageously like you. Strange turn of phrase, I know,
but sup against this this stuff because it is just
so reprehensible. I suppose if you screamed out from the

(22:10):
river to the sea, or if you you hated Jews
and made that clear, you'd be all right on campus
right now. But calling someone by the wrong pronouns so
to speak, or speaking out about men and women showers,
that's trouble right.

Speaker 4 (22:28):
Yeah, that would be perfect. And again I live in Minnesota.
I live in the Twin Cities area, so I saw
everything that happened in full four K quality, And again
we had I think it was what the thirteen people
breaking to the administration building and get arrested, and you
didn't hear anything from university after that, So obviously it's

(22:49):
pretty selective plan here.

Speaker 1 (22:52):
Amazing. Keep up the good work. Both Jackson and Kim Kim,
We've had you on the show before. I always appreciate
your active and your expertise on this front.

Speaker 3 (23:02):
Yeah, thanks for having us and covering the case and
for highlighting Jackson's bravery here.

Speaker 1 (23:09):
Absolutely we'll follow up as well. I wish you guys
the best of luck and we will be in touch.

Speaker 4 (23:15):
Thank you.

Speaker 1 (23:16):
Jackson Barrick University of Minnesota student entering his senior year,
joining with the Southeastern Legal Foundation and the Young America's
Foundation to sue his school for violating his right to
free speech, even after the Trump administration ruled to protect it.
The battle for free speech on campus goes on. Conservatives,

(23:41):
you have every right in the world to freely speak,
and when that is abridged, when that is taken from
you on these college campuses, stand up, just like Jackson
has done here. We'll take a quick break. Coming up
in just a bit, we will delve into I think

(24:03):
a story that is coming back again, and it needs
to come back again and again. We need to be
reminded of what the COVID experts did to us. We're
getting a better reminder of that with some of the
new documents that have been released by the intelligence community.

(24:25):
More on that straight ahead on this edition of the
Dan o'donald Show, stay with us doing that voodoo that
we do so well. It's the Dan o'donald Show, your
old radio amigo emphasis on old Matt Kittle filling in
on this Friday, just about there a weekend. Dan will

(24:50):
be back with you on Monday. But I guess he's
enjoying some FIFA World Cup hot action going on. I
believe in Los ang Lees, have you, yeah, l A,
I wonder if this guy is there. Uh, he definitely
is at the World Cup, and he is definitely excited.

(25:10):
This may be the most excited fan there, although the
Scots guy's pretty excited too. I'm pretty drunk.

Speaker 5 (25:18):
Uh.

Speaker 1 (25:19):
This Japanese fella, if you haven't heard, get in on
the excitement of FIFA. Oh yeah, okay, yeah, my name is.

Speaker 6 (25:31):
Okay.

Speaker 2 (25:32):
Yeah yeah, yeah.

Speaker 1 (25:33):
How excited are you? You are so excited? Right japan right?

Speaker 7 (25:37):
Excuse me, Okay, I can not speak English, but but
I'm excited.

Speaker 2 (25:49):
Baby. Look, I'm just like, okay, what are we looking at?
Oh my gosh, can you tell me what this is?

Speaker 1 (25:55):
We're looking at his back?

Speaker 7 (25:56):
Japanese Toyama, Toyama Okay, Toya Mathmthage eat bye yes, codection
mythage Codec Toya math Smith his cordec sons.

Speaker 6 (26:10):
I love it, okay, I love the energy.

Speaker 2 (26:12):
Thank you so much for talking to us.

Speaker 3 (26:13):
You got any predictions?

Speaker 2 (26:14):
You got to score?

Speaker 1 (26:15):
What do you think, Japan?

Speaker 2 (26:17):
What to score? The score?

Speaker 1 (26:18):
What do you think?

Speaker 2 (26:19):
One?

Speaker 6 (26:19):
Zip?

Speaker 1 (26:20):
One's zero two ween.

Speaker 8 (26:25):
Japan?

Speaker 1 (26:27):
I love that guy. That guy is excited. Do you
think he's gotten the bottle of the ranch yet? Look out,
very very excited. That had a bit of a Borot
vibe to it, didn't it. I know that's gone viral.
Perhaps you've heard it before, but I couldn't resist because
there's so much excitement. Let us turn our attention now

(26:51):
to some very dark times populated by some very dark bureaucrats. Yes,
COVID sometimes. Yeah, I don't want to think about it.
I don't want to think about those lost years. I
don't want to think about the lockdowns, about how they
tried to force us out of our churches, remember that

(27:17):
evers pushing that back in early twenty twenty. The jobs lost, obviously,
the people who died from this disease, this virus, and
so many people infected by it. And we still are
asking the question. But I think it's pretty clear where

(27:40):
did this deadly thing come from? Spoiler alert A lab
in China and not a bat at a wet market
or whatever the hell they're trying to push. But that
still is the sticky situation. I played this on the

(28:00):
show yesterday. I believe a twoy twenty four video montage
serves as a painful and necessary reminder of what they
did to us and why the Trump Department of Justice
needs to hold them accountable so that they can never

(28:21):
do it again. This is from the Federalist. A reporter
over there. This guy's he's on the money, not too bad.
They in question are the scientists, bureaucrats, health officers, the
big pharma executives, the experts so called who destroyed so

(28:45):
many lives with orders and lockdowns and lies, lots of lies.
The video is titled mass Psychosis, Trust science and stop
thinks for yourself, because that is exactly what these bureaucrats,

(29:07):
these scientists, told us to do. It is produced by
Grabian Bills itself as the news clip factory, very familiar
with their good work, and it is volume six in
the news outlets COVID retrospective series. It features scores of
clips from the so called experts who demanded we trust

(29:30):
the experts. The montage opens with the credibility challenged Jake Tapper.
You remember old Jake, don't You had to go on
a mia culpa tour with his book to try to
sell his books, saying, Wow, we were really fooled by
those geniuses at the White House. It kept telling us

(29:51):
that Joe Biden had more cognitive ability than a bowl
of KFC mashed potatoes. But I'd digress. Jake Tapper in
the video launches into a fear laden CNN segment in
October twenty twenty, the rating President Donald Trump for writing

(30:12):
on Twitter, don't be afraid of COVID, don't let it
dominate your life. The President, of course, trying to do
what FDR did so many years ago in a great depression.
It's the fear that you have to fear. No doubt
this was a deadly virus, but fear, the churning of fear,

(30:37):
made everything so much worse. But the sanctimonious Tapper screams out,
don't let it dominate your life. The full segment includes
a full screed about Trump and the latest number of
deaths in cases of COVID as of the evening of
October fifth, twenty twenty, and it was filled with absolute hysteria.

(31:04):
It's okay to be afraid of COVID, and it's okay
that it's dominating your life. Tapper assureance CNN viewers after
medical expert doctor Sanjay Gupta disapprovingly says of the President
in terms of responding to a comment like that, it's gross.
It's gross, doctor Gupta said, as I noted, fear was

(31:33):
the most widely circulated currency in those deadly days of
the pandemic, churned and spread faster than the virus by
some very hysterical and irresponsible journalist, politicians, and health officials
who demanded, upon threat of imprisonment in some cases, that

(31:54):
we must follow the science. Follow the science, follow the science.
What's the matter with you? Why aren't you following the science? Science?
She blinded me. They blinded us with science. This is

(32:15):
one of my favorite quotes from the video. You shall
know the truth, and the truth shall set you free,
mister Inconvenient Truth himself. Al Gore says in another edited
CNN clip, we won't be free of this pandemic until
we listen to the acknowledged truth. Listen to the scientist.

(32:38):
Gore continued, the acknowledged truth and the piece to resistance.
Within the first forty five seconds of the four minute
montage is a curious clip of doctor Anthony Fauci, the
disgraced COVID czar. This is what he said, Now is

(33:02):
the time to do what you're told, and he chuckled,
do what you told. Listen to doctor Fauci. Yes, he's
got so much experience. Senator Ran Paul, Republican from Kentucky
has led a year's long crusade seeking answers from an

(33:27):
accountability for those who so badly betrayed the public's trust.
I will add to that it's not in this story,
but Senator Ron Johnson, Wisconsin, senior Senator, has done the same,
and he's come up with some very important and concerning
information on that front. But Paul has particularly trained his

(33:51):
focus on the bad doctor director of the at least
at that time, director of the National Institute of Allergy
and Infectious Diseases. The senator, who chairs the Senate Committee
on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, announced earlier this week
that he has issued a subpoena to Fauci compelling him

(34:12):
to testify before the committee. Is he old? Fauci has
been no less than cooperative? Why should he? The expert
received a very generous get out of jail free card
from Joe Biden's auto pen. As the senile former president

(34:33):
was leaving the White House. Last week, Anthony Fauci notified
US he will not voluntarily testify before the Senate Homeland
Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, even though he had previously
agreed to do so. Paul wrote in an ex post. Therefore,
today we have issued a subpoena for him to publicly testify.

(34:59):
Paul added, Paul has previously referred Fauci to the DOJ
for prosecution the Biden prosecution by the Biden Department of
Justice on allegations that the doctor lied under oath during
a heated exchange with the Senator as he testified at

(35:19):
the twenty twenty one Congressional hearing. Fauci's own emails, the
Senator asserts directly contradicted a twenty twenty one testimony in
which he denied the National Institutes of Health funded gain
of function research at the notorious Wuhan, China laboratory where

(35:39):
the virus is suspected to have originated. As I said before,
I think it's becoming increasingly clear, or at least it
should be where this virus originated. Paul's quest for accountability
only intensified after last week's release of newly declassified documents
by out going Director of National Intelligence Tulsey Gabbard. The

(36:04):
Before Scene files assert that Fauci worked with politicized career
leadership in the intelligence community to suppress the truth about
his actions, the virus's lablique origins, and his role in
directing US funding for his dangerous research that caused immeasurable

(36:26):
harm and countless lost lives. Let's break that down again,
because there's a lot to unpacked this guy that we
were supposed to trust, according to these documents, or at
least what Gabbard is saying, and I think having read
the documents, there are some very concerning issues about that.

(36:49):
But you have the COVID czar working with the intelligence
community to stop the flow of information. Now this this
has to ring true for anybody who remembers going on
Facebook at this time and saying, well, wait a minute,
I don't think it is all that scientific to believe

(37:11):
that standing six feet apart from someone will spare me
from an airborne virus. And you know, masks, they're kind
of stupid. They don't really work. All of that. They
were silenced. Of course, perhaps the noos is tightening, even
as the prov depress provides cover for the scientists who

(37:32):
said we could avoid COVID by, as I said, donning
cloth masked and standing six feet away from each other
in grocery stores. The same scientist who repeatedly advised us
that we were just weeks away from Yeah, say it
with me flattening the curve, which is a great lyric

(37:56):
in the Dukes of Hazard theme song by Wills Jennings.
They're the same scientist that said we needed only to
give up our liberties, our reason, and human contact until
an ever changing mystery number was achieved. The scientist who

(38:17):
dangerously evasive and misleading about the taxpayer money going into
virus manipulation research aimed at studying the effects of viruses
mutated more powerful kinds in some cases in labs. Now,

(38:37):
the latest information that came out from the Director of
National Intelligence is just the beginning. It is time now
to follow the evidence, not those scientists, and hold bad
actors accountable and never ever forget what they did to us,

(39:00):
and never allow them to do it again. You can
find the full story at The Federalist The Federalist dot com.
Four o'clock hours, straight Ahead, We've got much to accomplish,
tell you more about how you can win big straight
ahead and The Dan o'donald Show with Matt Kittle. Hang on,

(39:23):
Welcome back, thrill Seekers, our number two of our little
get together on this Friday edition of The Dan o'donald Show.
Your old radiomego Matt Kittle filling in. Dan's back with
you on Monday, same bat time, same bat channel. Glad

(39:47):
you're along with us. We have plenty to accomplish coming
up this hour. In the next hour, we're going to
give you a chance to win twenty five hundred dollars.
How does that sound? That sounds all right? That sounds
all right to me. It's kind of creepy, wasn't it. Yeah,
we'll do that coming up in the five o'clock hour.

(40:11):
See if we can make another winner in our two
hundred and fifty k USA giveaway coming up a little
bit later this hour. Here we go, Dane County is
exploring the Oregon model of rampant homelessness. Delve into that

(40:31):
coming up. I'll tell you something. We're heading out to
the famin. I are heading out to Oregon for a
little vacation. We have to. It seems we have no
other choice unless we want to drive quite a bit.
We have to fly into Portland. I have been told

(40:52):
by so many suffering people in Portland that don't do it, man,
don't do it. Awful. I would escape if I could.
The homelessness problem in Portland, Oregon is it's like a

(41:13):
few can compare it really is. I mean, you've got
the fentanyl zombies there like you have in Los Angeles
and these other cities, but just stacked up in a
Supreme Court decision. As we were talking about last hour,
we have a lot of defiance on that front. So anyway,
that's what Dane County apparently is aiming for. We'll talk

(41:37):
about that a little bit later on in the hour.
And here we go again. No no, no, no, no no, no,
I already did that. Here come the riots. Could we
see the return of the Summer of Love as they
called it twenty twenty, The whole BLM movement, the leftist

(41:58):
I think they always have to be careful. You always
have to know situational awareness. I think some recent US
Supreme Court decisions could be the manufactured fuse that they
intend to light to get back into the riot business. Well,
we'll talk more about that coming up, but let us

(42:20):
begin here this hour, shall we. Yeah, that's it, that's
the decision that I was talking about. Yeah. Absolutely, The
Supreme Court earlier this week came out with some truly
significant wins, not only for the Trump administration on immigration

(42:44):
and immigration law enforcement and the power of the executive
and there's all kinds of things. In these two Supreme
Court decisions, you also have a reminder that executives need
to read the executive branch needs to read and follow
the law, the language of the law. The Biden administration,

(43:07):
of course, didn't want anything to do with that when
they were dealing with their asylum protection program, the temporary asylum. Yeah,
the problem that we have had in this country for
many years now thanks to the Biden administration, the Obama administration.

(43:33):
You have Trump now and you did back in Trump
one point zero trying to set this whole mess, trying
to fix the whole mess, and they're back at it again.
They have to fix this whole mess. They had to
secure the border first, which of course was open, wide open,
left the door open for the invasion of millions upon

(43:54):
millions of illegal immigrants, and we know the impacts therein.
Just ask some of those nasty, dirty cities what that
has meant for their resources, for their taxpayers. A lot
of people are leaving those cities, of course, and this
has something to do with that. But the Supreme Court

(44:17):
this week ruled that you can't call temporary sixteen years
and that is what the temporary asylum, so called temporary
asylum has been in this country, particularly for the Haitians
and the Syrians. Now, you could certainly make an argument

(44:42):
that when the earthquakes hit in Haiti in twenty ten,
they did a lot of damage and people were displaced
in it was awful. You could make the argument that
they were people in need of assistance, and the Obama
administration more than glad to help. So we got, you know,

(45:03):
thousands and thousands of Haitian refugees who were here on
the idea of temporary asylum and the protections therein That
was sixteen years ago. This stuff goes back even farther
than that, the Syrians as well, again amid war and devastation.

(45:29):
You can make an argument that, okay, we are going
to we are going to provide temporary asylum while things
get straight, now get back, but you cannot do this forever.
And the law was never intended to do that. And
so the US Supreme Court, in a ruling this week said, no,

(45:53):
I'm sorry leftist, I'm sorry immigration activists and agitators. The
law is pretty specific about what temporary means. The other
one is a semantics issue as well. That's well, as
I put it this morning on VICKI Show, this really

(46:16):
boils down to the old model, the old motto in
real estate, location, location location, right. Well, the interpretation by
the Biden administration in particular about asylum and where you
have to be to receive asylum has been in conflict.

(46:39):
The Biden administration said, you can be anywhere near the
border in Mexico, miles away, we don't care, will grant
you asylum. But the law really says you have to
be in the United States in order to receive asylum

(47:01):
if that's what you're seeking. So the Supreme Court had
to give leftist in this country a geography lesson that
Mexico at least, I should say, the United States, at
least for now, is not Mexico. It is baffling to me.

(47:28):
But here is where the rubber meets the road. And
this is the point that I was getting into before.
We are already hearing from leftist activist talking about demonstrations
over the evil that's what they're calling it, the evil

(47:49):
decision of the Supreme Court to actually rule on the
law and follow the law. You know, the rulings in
those cases of course six three, So you had six
justices who followed the law, and then you had three
leftist justices who said, no, it's our job to not

(48:13):
interpret the law, but to make the law. Or when
the executive branch makes the law, we need to back
them up. And so they were backing up bad Biden decisions,
bad Obama decisions on this front. And that can't be
if you're going to going to have a constitutional republic.

(48:36):
That just doesn't work. You know, there's the whole separation
of powers thing that kind of conflicts with all of that.
So now you have the leftist and their leaders just
a screaming about this we need to stand up. This
is a moral, moral duty. That's what old Senator Ed

(49:01):
Markey of Massachusetts said at the Capitol right after the decision.
He said, we have a moral duty to protect TPS
Temporary Protective Service. We have to protect TPS holders and

(49:26):
provide this vulnerable group with a permanent pathway to citizenship
in our country. And in fact, let's listen to a
little bit of what Ed had to say about all
of this, because this is the kind of rhetoric we
are starting to hear, and it points to something a
little bit bigger and a little bit more menacing that

(49:48):
I think may be on the.

Speaker 6 (49:50):
Way placing great risk the lives of people. And Trump
wants to send TPS holders back to unsafe conditions. And
it's the far right extremists sitting on the Supreme Court
who has just let him sever this critical lifeline for

(50:12):
Haitians and for TPS holders from.

Speaker 2 (50:15):
All around the world.

Speaker 6 (50:17):
We have a moral duty to protect TPS holders and
provide this vulnerable group with protections and a permanent pathway
to citizenship in our country.

Speaker 1 (50:29):
Do you think he sounds a little bit like an
elderly mayor? Quimby from Springfield on the Simpsons. Based on
his track record, he has the same moral compass. Senator
Ed Markey talking once again about the grave injustice that

(50:52):
the US Supreme Court did to immigration in this country
in ruling on temporary protected status, that the idea of
temporary is temporary, not more than a decade, a decade
and a half, twenty years. That had to end because

(51:14):
it's not the law, and it has significant ramifications for
domestic policy, for national security, for all kinds of things.
But you notice the rhetoric here, and this is kind
of milder rhetoric than what we're starting to hear in
other leftist circles. Mark he was talking about the Supreme

(51:40):
Court almost in the same kind of way as Chuck Schumer,
the useless Democrat leader of the Senate. Remember, as he
stood on the just outside the steps of the Supreme Court,
saying that you you will how did he phrase that

(52:05):
you have unloosed the winds, You will pay for your decision,
all of this sort of thing, right, the whirlwind. You
have unleashed the whirlwind. And he threatened that if that
Supreme Court did anything to lay a finger on there

(52:27):
coveted abortion decision Roe v. Wade, why there would be trouble,
all kinds of trouble, And the implication was, even if
he didn't mean so, it echoed in the minds of
some nutjob radicals that overturning Roe v. Wade was the

(52:50):
invitation to murder members of the Supreme Court, to threaten,
to menace them, to murder them. And that's exactly what
we saw the decision in Dobbs a little more than
four years ago. Justice Brett Kavanaugh, of course, was the
victim of a plot. They caught his would be killer,

(53:15):
thankfully and broke that up. He has been sentenced now.
Annie Cony Barrett was constantly under threat. Her sister was
threatened many many miles away. It was a very very
difficult time. It was a violent time, and that was

(53:38):
just the threat. So that's kind of what we're hearing
here from Markey and pointing at these conservative justices. How
could they possibly do that? Well, how they could possibly
do that is they actually care about the rule of law.
We're seeing some more extreme chatter on this this from

(54:01):
the leftist the Guardian, lawmakers and immigration advocacy groups. On
Thursday sharply denounced to US Supreme Court rulings that allowed
the Trump administration to strip certain immigration protections and finally
reshape the asylum system. If that means following the law,

(54:27):
then yeah, I guess they reshaped the asylum system that
the Democrat presidents reshaped without the benefit of the law.
But you can expect that kind of lead from the Guardian.
Dozens of groups, advocates, and members of Congress called the

(54:48):
Court's decisions disastrous and cruel, while the Trump administration, Republican lawmakers,
and anti immigrant groups celebrated the rulings. Today, Trump's loyalists
in the Supreme Court have joined forces with him to
deny immigrants internationally recognized human rights and advance an authoritarian,

(55:11):
white supremacist agenda at home, said Illinois Congresswoman Delia Ramirez,
a Democrat. You don't have to put that in the story.
We know the Supreme Court's decisions put more than three
hundred and fifty thousand TPS holders at risk of deportation

(55:34):
and countless more asylum seekers lives in danger. This is
the people suffering badly from TDS talking about TPS, So
keep that in mind. But the rhetoric here is not surprising,

(55:56):
but I think it may be a signal of where
all of this is heading, because we are seeing the
formation of demonstrations protest against this decision, and you start
throwing in the language of the Black Lives Matter movement,
which was so disastrous in twenty twenty you had cities burned.

(56:20):
Ask the good folks in Kenosha about that time period,
Ask the good folks in Madison, around the capital about
all of that. It feels very similar. And a lot
of the BLM stuff was clearly manufactured by radicals who
saw an opening to break up, to do some dismantling

(56:49):
of the republic and its ideals and the governance. Speaking
of which we saw plenty of insurrections at that time,
attacks on government buildings, but we didn't have a January
sixth committee for all of that. But this feels a
lot like that. In the first forty eight hours or

(57:13):
so thirty six hours after this decision, I do see
this as as an avenue for some very opportunist, radical
leftist groups who are going to say, in the name
of humanity, a, we should not have borders. It's this

(57:36):
evil fascist Donald Trump and the fascist they will say
on the US Supreme Court. They're the ones they're responsible
get them. And this is of course a very potentially
volatile time as we celebrate this country's two hundred fiftieth anniversary.

(58:02):
The left, of course in this country have already hung
their heads and had a shame meeting, a shame circle.
They just cannot celebrate this exceptional republic, of course, because

(58:23):
that runs absolutely counter to their whole narrative, their whole philosophy,
their religion, which is this is a country of oppressors,
white oppressors, white supremacists, and there's nothing to celebrate, and

(58:44):
there will be nothing to celebrate until the revolution, the
Marxist revolution sweeps through. Just I say this in all sincerity,
be on the lookout. There are a number of demonstration
and protests coming up. I do see this in their
twisted minds as a catalyst to say, come join us.

(59:08):
They've taken away fundamental rights. No, they haven't taken away
fundamental rights. You don't have that right according to the law,
temporary does not mean forever. Location matters, but language matters
more to the leftist, and they will use it like

(59:30):
they will use anything for their advantage, and that often
leads to some very violent clashes. Beyond the lookout for
the next Riot season. We'll take a quick break. Coming
up in just a bit. I wanted to delve in

(59:54):
a little bit about this Dane County is it policy
or kind of a direction where they're going with homeless policy?
And be concerned if you live in the area, be
very concerned. That and so much more on this Friday

(01:00:16):
edition of The Dan O'Donnell Show, with yours truly, Matt Kittle,
stay with us. How do you do? Hey, It's Friday,
there comes the weekend. Really about half an hour from
quitting time, the standard five PM. I'm going to give
you a permission right now. Your boss fine with this,
go ahead, leave early. What are you going to get done?

Speaker 2 (01:00:39):
Now?

Speaker 1 (01:00:40):
I'm sure your boss will agree? And then I'm going
to get some angry phone calls. Hey Kittle, you said, yeah,
really you believe me? What kind of power do you
think I have here? Coming up again, want to remind
you of the five o'clock hour, going to give you
another chance to win twenty five hundred dollars. We've had
seven winners over the last several weeks, and we want

(01:01:03):
to see if we can make you a winner in
our nationwide contest. Coming up in just a bit. What's
the Trumpster saying about the socialist Well, he is speaking
his mind, and I think putting this whole thing in perspective.

(01:01:24):
President Donald Trump took aim at the trajectory of the
Democrat Party on Friday, telling attendees at the Faith and
Freedom Coalition conference that its recent socialist primary winners are
godless communists. He doesn't mince words, does he. These are

(01:01:44):
not social Democrats. These are hardcore godless communists. They're godless communists.
All communists are godless. They don't believe in God. This
is the most serious threat to our country since its existence,
in my opinion, two hundred and fifty years ago. This
is a major threat to our country, said Trump. Did

(01:02:07):
you pick up what he was laying down there? I
think the bullet points here are that communist are godless.
And yeah, that's that's pretty much true. Yeah, a lot
of atheists in that camp, for sure, plenty of agnostics,
but yeah, a lot of godless folk in the communist movement.

(01:02:31):
Tuesday's primary results in New York signaled a shift in
the Democrat Party, with several socialist backed candidates defeating incumbent
office holders. Trump speaking ahead of the nation's two hundred
and fiftieth birthday, highlighted America's founding principles, arguing they stand

(01:02:54):
in sharp contrast to the growing influence of socialist movements
within the Democrat Party. He said, our most important birthday
so far, two hundred and fifty years. And instead of
speaking about Christ, and instead of speaking about freedom and
victories of all different kinds, we're speaking about yet another
threat to the foundations of America. And Trump is right

(01:03:20):
about that. There's all kinds of talk and there have
been has been for some time about America is an
idea that's partially true. But America is also a country
that has borders, at least it does now it didn't
for four years. It is a country that has.

Speaker 2 (01:03:46):
Has a.

Speaker 1 (01:03:49):
Culture that is America. And I know there's a lot
of argument about this, but just let me put it succinctly.
When you invite the third world into your country, you

(01:04:13):
get the third world. And we have seen that over
and over again in our nation's largest cities, sanctuary cities,
where now, of course, sanctuary city leaders are saying, this
is very expensive. Can the federal government pick up the
tab for this? No, no, But that's where the Zorn

(01:04:37):
Mandanis of the world are moving. And Trump pointed this
out because it really is coming into sharper focus. This
guy is not a democratic socialist. Zoran Mandani is a socialist,
a communist, and he took a step another step toward that,

(01:05:02):
confirming that. This week, Trump took aim at New York
City socialist mayor Zhron Mam Donnie over a historic decision
by New York City New York City. Yes, New York City,
New York City's rent guidelines board. Uh oh, that smells

(01:05:23):
trouble mom. Donnie scored another political victory Tuesday with all
three congressional candidates. He endorsed Brad Lander, a beta white
male who has apparently rented out his skull to Marxist cultist.

(01:05:45):
Same with Claire Valdez and Diarrhea. No, that's not her name,
Dariel Darieliza, dary Eliza. I'm just gonna stick with diarrhea. Diarrhea.
That's a tough name growing up as a kid, a
lot of a lot of nicknames for guys and gals

(01:06:08):
with different names, but man for diarrhea, that's trouble. No,
her name is dari Eliza, Daria Liza via Chevalier. That
is a salad bar of foreigner right there winning their
respective Democratic primaries for the first time in history. The
powerful Rent Stabilization Board, as an example, that sets rents

(01:06:34):
in New York City just happened today. They've done it
for years and years, and they've been very far left.
That was Donald Trump, and that's all part of the
democratic socialist agenda. They're going to set rent, which sounds

(01:06:58):
really good. It does. I don't want to when I rented,
I didn't like to see rent increases. And New York
City is all about rent increases, there's no doubt about it.
But you don't fix the problem by putting your fist
down on the property owners because they won't stay. And

(01:07:24):
the only other option then is that New York City
the government starts purchasing properties. This is a government that
is very much in debt already by leftist policies. This
guy is just going to destroy this city. And Trump

(01:07:49):
knows that. Trump sees that coming, and he has a
special perspective on that as a longtime New York resident,
as a guy who built there, as a guy who
knows what the climate is like. How he succeeded there
or anybody does. I don't know, but success is about

(01:08:13):
to leave town. In fact, a lot of folks already
have with increasing tax rates and collectivism in city owned
grocery stores, and now the rent control programs, the rent board.
What could possibly go wrong? We're about to find out.

(01:08:40):
Trump said this, and I think he hit it right
on the head. As this spreads throughout the country, very
much like an uncontrollable form of cancer, the country itself
will be taken down. It will be third world, strictly
third world. And it's happened many times before, very big
and powerful countries. But it's not going to happen to

(01:09:03):
the United States of America. It's not going to happen
to the United States of America. If Americans can wake
up and say no, no more, this is a bridge
too far. One of the biggest problems this Republic has
is that over the last two to three generations, the

(01:09:26):
next the next generation of Americans, they have been trained
in indoctrination camps, Marxist indoctrination camps in our public schools
and our institutions of higher education. We already talked about
that earlier on the show. The leftist and what we're seeing,

(01:09:53):
what we have seen on college campuses and in high schools.
That is going to be difficult because that's the mindset.
These are the individuals who are electing these democratic socialist
We shall see. We'll take a quick break. Coming up

(01:10:15):
in just a bit. Yes, here we go again, Dane
County exploring the Oregon model. Tell you more about that
straight ahead on this edition of the Vicky McKenna Show
with Matt Kittle. Hang on on the Dan o'donald Show.
Of course, I'm not exactly sure where I am. Just

(01:10:39):
had to fit a little bit. Yes, we'll be back
soon here on the Dan o'donald Show. We're back and
we're doing it to it on a Friday. Let's get
ready to embrace our weekendness. Huh. Yes, live your weekend truth,
as the left may say. Matt Kittle filling in on
the Dan donald Show. Sometimes we older folks get confused. Yes,

(01:11:04):
it's the Dan o'donnald Show where you, dear friend, can
win twenty five hundred dollars. That's coming up in oh
I would say just about fifteen minutes plus or so,
So stay tuned to that. Dane County has decided to
go the Portland way in terms of dealing with the homeless.

(01:11:30):
This is from WKOWTV in Madison, the Dane County Board
and they say will vote. They did vote on Thursday,
and they did approve funding for a new men's shelter. Okay,
they also gave the thumbs up to a camp for

(01:11:52):
the homeless. Now, wait, hold on, hold on a minute.
You're not gonna win a merit badge for this. Guys
certainly not going to win a merit badge in Dane County.
The county's first purpose built shelter can house up to
two hundred and fifty men. It will replace the current
men's shelter on Zyler Roads, an Zire Road, which can

(01:12:15):
hold about four hundred. The vote is was considered procedural, however,
because the Zire Road shelter will eventually close the number
of available beds will be reduced. To address this, the
vote includes funds for a possible outdoor camp round. That's right,

(01:12:35):
it's time for one of my favorite shows, camping with
the homeless. When it was first planned, it was going
to meet the need, said Heidi wegg Lightner from the
Dane County Board of supervisors. Here we are, and the

(01:12:58):
crisis has only gotten worse, and there's people that will
not be able to be served by the shelter because
there's just not enough beds. The overarching issue, of course,
is not not a shelter. A lot of communities that
are doing just that, and you know that's what you
want to do, that's what you do when you create camps. However,

(01:13:22):
that creates a big problem. And Madison has been down
this this road before. Why I remember, I'm old enough
to remember the occupy movement, and the occupy movement took
over a portion of East Washington Avenue. It was an
old concrete parking lot. Basically it used to be a

(01:13:45):
car dealership. The city though I had different ideas. I
believe old Paul Soglan was the mayor at the time.
So you had this homeless encampment identifying as an occupy protest.
There were lots of complaints in the neighborhood, plenty of problems.

(01:14:05):
And here was the biggest problem for Madison at the time.
They were redeveloping this whole corridor near the capitol, east
of the Capitol, and they had a lot of rundown
buildings and they were really starting to fix this place up,
and you had restaurants and entertainment centers, and it just
kind of clashed with the occupy, the homeless occupy movement, right,

(01:14:30):
so they had to make a decision and that did
not sit well with the occupy movement. Now they are back,
but more so doing what Portland and other Oregon communities
have done. Even in the face of the Supreme Court
ruling that has said no, you can't just camp on

(01:14:53):
public sites, Dane County says we're gonna let them camp
on public sites, and that, of course has worked out
terribly for San Francisco and Los Angeles, in Portland and
so many others. When it was first planned, it was

(01:15:17):
going to meet the need. Well we talked about the shelter.
Officials are now looking for ways to house the remaining people,
including using close to half a million dollars toward a
winter overflow shelter and now two million dollars for an
outside group to buy land for legal outdoor sleeping. There

(01:15:39):
needs to be a legal place for people to sleep,
said wegg Lighter. It's a human rights issue, okay. Is
it a human rights issue that people in the area
do they are they humans? Do they have rights? What

(01:16:01):
do they get a say in this? Because I assure
you that there are a lot of humans who believe
their rights are trampled on when fentanyl zombies start rolling around.
I believe their rights are infringed upon when you have
drug deals happening, which happens quite frequently at homeless camp sites,

(01:16:26):
when you have a higher crime violent behavior, you have
mental illness issues out in the middle, like severe mental
health issues going on. But that's Madison. That's what Madison does.
While talks for the campground are in their very early stages, again,

(01:16:48):
as I noted, according to the Wisconsin State Journal, the
board gave this the go ahead, basically gave it at
least the thumbs up. Well, let's move forward, let's get
this thing happen. The county is talking with one provider
for the overflow shelter. Wegg Lightner said, while the moves

(01:17:11):
are critical, what's needed is more low income housing. Sure, yes,
more low income housing. That's fine if that's what you
want to invest in. But campgrounds for the homeless is
a recipe for disaster. And it's not like the citizens

(01:17:35):
of Madison haven't seen this movie before. But it is Madison,
and that's what Madison does. Okay, we're going to break
for news and all of the usual things that come
up at the top of the hour. Straight ahead. I
hope you will stay with us. Your chance to win
in the five o'clock hour twenty five hundred dollars. We

(01:17:57):
got some fun stuff too, as we celebrate this beautiful
country's two hundred and fiftieth birthday. Have a couple of
fun things for you. And hey, way to go walk
a shaw that's in the five o'clock hour. Two. Hope
you stick around because at the five o'clock hour to me,
I don't know, sounds like it might be fun, extremely entertaining,

(01:18:17):
maybe informative too, who knows. We'll do it next. Stay
with us The Dan O'donnald Show with Matt Kittle. Hang on,
here we go Milwaukee, Madison, God's Country and the entire
free world. Through the access of your iHeartRadio app, you

(01:18:45):
literally have the world at your fingertips. You bet. Matt
Kittle filling in on the Dan O'donnald Show this Friday edition.
It's five o'clock. It is five o'clock somewhere. It's here,
opening up. Get a cold one, and we got this
weekend here and now. And what a way to start

(01:19:08):
your weekend? Maybe by winning twenty five hundred dollars how
about that? Yes, it's our two hundred and fifty k
USA giveaway Explore America with a Great American Getaway. We
do it four times a day. Your chance to win
a share of two hundred and fifty thousand dollars prizes
awarded leading up to the fourth of July. Every day

(01:19:31):
during the Dan O'Donnell Show, you have your chance to win.
You know how we do this. You get the keyword
and you take the keyword to the website of the
fine radio station you are now listening to News Talk
eleven thirty dot com or WIBA dot com. The keyword
this hour, fittingly enough, is America. America. America America A

(01:20:01):
M E R I c A. Again. Take that keyword
America to news Talk eleven thirty dot com WIBA dot com.
Put that keyword where it tells you to do so
you may get a phone call from one of our
very kind and generous iHeart Radio Assistance who may tell

(01:20:25):
you are the winner in this nationwide contest. We've had
several of them. I'm hoping we can make somebody listening
in today Big Winner twenty five hundred dollars. Again, the
keyword is America. Good luck to you. We need to
dispel a terrible, terrible rumor that appears to be going around.

(01:20:47):
We have no confirmation for this. The rumor on Facebook
and x and all of the social media is that
William the Refrigerator Perry, the husky fella who played for
the Chicago Bear, is one of the great football players

(01:21:08):
big defensive linemen of all time. The rumor is that
the fridge had passed away. That does not appear to
be the case. There's really no legitimate site that is
saying this. Now, all of that said, here's a really
sad footnote. First of all, thank god, I'm very happy

(01:21:31):
to know that the fridge is still with us. But
I looked for this story to see if I could
confirm it. And there are like fifteen stories about a
rumor of William the Refrigerator Perry dying in twenty twenty four,

(01:21:54):
twenty twenty five, in twenty thirteen, twenty thirty. I kidding,
William Perry did die this week in South Carolina, but
it was not William the Refrigerator Kerry. About Perry, another question,
is Refrigerator Perry dead? No, no, here is a site

(01:22:17):
that says it has the information behind the William Perry
cause of death Rumors. Searches for William Perry cause of
death have surged online today after a false losing this

(01:22:37):
web page. Anyway it was, it was false, It's not true. Now.
When I first heard about this, my heart was was
very sad. Obviously, it's a human being passing away. But
I in some ways grew up with William the Refrigerator Perry.
I grew up in the the college hamlet of Platteville,

(01:23:03):
Wisconsin and the University of Wisconsin. Platteville was the summer
training camp site for the Chicago Bears for many many years,
much to the dismay of Packers fans. No, no, no,
we had lots of Packers fans in Platteville, and they
still enjoyed the national attention that the community got. Obviously,

(01:23:27):
they enjoyed the pickup in revenue that always helped a lot.
And you know, watching football in the summertime, you can't
beat that. And in these years, this was after the
Super Bowl, the year after they decided to come to Platteville,
and they were there for about twenty years or so.

(01:23:51):
But you could go out and see them just like
anybody else. They had their scrimmage game and you could
go and watch them practice and you right up close
to it. But in Platteville you could go to the
Quick Trip and see these guys, and I did. There
was on one occasion where I saw the fridge come

(01:24:14):
into the Quick Trip on Water Street, and I kid
you not, he was. He was loading up on Hostess products.
I just I just remember, uh, Hostess cupcakes, no Twinkies,
maybe some fruit pies in there, but his hands, he
had a bunch of stuff and he was taking it

(01:24:36):
up to the counter and I thought to myself, Yeah,
that uh that tracks with William the refrigerator. Perry a nice,
a nice guy. I mean, a lot of those guys
were just really nice. You know, you had McMahon at
that time, who wasn't so nice, But that's neither hear that.

(01:24:56):
Gary Fensik was not a real nice guy either, I
have to tell you that, but we had sweetness. He
was just wonderful, of course, and a lot of those
guys on the line, they were always there to didn't care.
They would stay longer to give autographs to kids in particular,
and I thought a lot of those folks were class acts,

(01:25:19):
including the Fridge, and he was a big attraction, and
he did sign a lot of autographs I remember at
that time. But seeing him in that element, quick trip,
no pads on, of course, you know, just in street clothes,
and there he is picking out his myriad junk food items.

(01:25:40):
And so when I think about William the Refrigerator Perry,
and I think about those encounters in Platteville, it is
perhaps no wonder that I see headline after headline over
the last several years that the death of William the

(01:26:03):
Refrigerator Perry is premature, or, as Mark Twain to paraphrase
Mark Twain, the the rumors of his demise have been exaggerated.
I hope that's not the case. But there is no
credible source this hour that the Fridge has passed away,

(01:26:24):
And so my heart leaps. Speaking of junk food, there
was a program and it was quite successful in Iowa
and Kansas, I believe several states. They got a waiver
from the Trump administration. No longer did they have to,

(01:26:45):
nor would they allow snap users to buy junk food
with their taxpayer funded Snap cards. No more big gulps,
no more slowes, no more cupcakes. Fruit Pie the magician,

(01:27:06):
he's gone, although as I understand it, fruit Pie has
been celebrating pride in a very joyous way. Anyway, Yeah,
the junk food, the candy bars, and the chips and
all of that, it was gone. And man, were people
on that program some anyway very upset about that. And

(01:27:30):
they had an organization, of course, a law firm that
was more than glad to sue the federal government and say,
bring these people back their chocodiles. They deserve chocodiles. It's
written in the Declaration of Independence that all men are

(01:27:52):
created equal and all should have access to chocodiles and
twinkies and creamer for your coffee. I don't all this
kinds of stuff. Well, a federal court judge this week,

(01:28:14):
and I should not't an Obama appointed judge. Yes, of
course you knew that said No, the folks on Snap
they should have access to the junk food too, And
so we're going to stop this waiver program. It's junk
food for everybody. Well, a lot of taxpayers are not

(01:28:38):
happy about that decision, and I understand it. I get it.
They do not want to pay for people who want
to load up on the junk food because it is,
after all, the supplemental nutrition Assistance program that SNAP. And

(01:29:02):
while most of us don't begrudge three squares a day,
you know, food for people really in need, the junk
food is no, no, no no. But in Congress this
week we had an activist, I believe what was her name,

(01:29:28):
Gina Plata Nino Nino, director of Policy and Advocacy for
the Food Research and Action Center. I'm just curious if
there's been an audit of any potential fraud over there.
It sounds like one of those one of those places
that Somalians are running or something. There is a Congressman

(01:29:53):
from Texas by the name of Brandon Gill who has
done some great work grilling folks and a very least
making them very uncomfortable and really shining a light on
some shenanigans. Well, he asked some very important questions of

(01:30:13):
Gina Plata Plata Nino, and here's a little of that
audio from the the congressional hearing this week.

Speaker 2 (01:30:29):
Got a couple of questions for you should SNAP dollars
be spent on sodas.

Speaker 5 (01:30:39):
The purpose of the SNATHS program is to provide families
to have food and beverages.

Speaker 2 (01:30:44):
Should it be sent on spent on sugary sodas?

Speaker 5 (01:30:48):
I am happy to talk about hungery, nutrition, but not
dictate what Americans should or should.

Speaker 2 (01:30:52):
Not eat or may have excellent I'm asking if tax
dollars should be used to pay for sodas.

Speaker 5 (01:31:00):
Taxpayers money should be utilized to ing sure that individuals
have access to the food that they need to survive
or maybe accessible to them.

Speaker 2 (01:31:07):
Do they need sugary sodas to survive? Some of them do?

Speaker 5 (01:31:10):
Who do have low blood issues?

Speaker 2 (01:31:12):
Right? I think they need Coca cola to survive? Do
you think that's the most appropriate use of our tax dollars.

Speaker 5 (01:31:19):
I am not a physician, but medical records.

Speaker 2 (01:31:21):
And you're just citing have the health needs apparently of
the American people. So do the American people need coca
cola to survive?

Speaker 5 (01:31:32):
I did not say that.

Speaker 2 (01:31:34):
I said then I'm asking the opportunity to so yes
or no.

Speaker 5 (01:31:39):
I will not answer for individuals and their choices.

Speaker 2 (01:31:43):
Do you think that there are some Americans who need
Coca cola to survive. Is that your testimony?

Speaker 5 (01:31:48):
I am happy to talk about the food, and you
just don't know.

Speaker 2 (01:31:51):
Individuals, You just don't know. I think most people can
rationally say that you don't need coca cola to survive.
Wouldn't you agree?

Speaker 5 (01:32:01):
I agree that we have a hunger crisis.

Speaker 1 (01:32:04):
Oh my god. And it goes on and on, on
and on. She's a Democrat, no doubt about it. Just
evasive as you can possibly be. It reminded me of
that moment during the Senate confirmation hearings of the Associate

(01:32:26):
Justice Ktanji Brown Jackson. I remember it well when they
asked the the new the incoming justice whether she could
define what a woman is and she said, well, I'm
not a biologist. That was that was her explanation. That

(01:32:51):
was her defense in not answering that question, which you know,
kind of shows you where we went on that left
side of the Supreme Court, the same kind of thing. Well,
I'm just here to talk about the hunger crisis that
we have. Yeah, we have a hunger crisis. Okay, very good.
But do you need coca cola? Do you need a

(01:33:15):
big gulp of pepsi to survive? Or could you simply
have you know staples do you need to have? And
we've heard the argument over and over again. She didn't
get too much into it, but she was hinting at it.
The argument from the plaintiffs in the lawsuit against the

(01:33:39):
federal government was that there are diabetics and people suffering
with allergies who absolutely need crap in their diet, and
that just seems rather counterintuitive because that's the sort of
stuff it would seem that got you to diabetes land. Anyway,

(01:34:05):
the battle goes on for sanity in Washington, d c.
In communities across the country. We'll take a quick break.
We've got some fun stuff coming up. I hope you
will stay with us because we're going to celebrate as
we get closer and closer a week away now to
this great country's two hundred and fiftieth birthday. We've got

(01:34:26):
a few things on that front coming up. And hey,
way to go walk a shop. We'll tell you more
about that straight ahead on this edition of the Dan
O'Donnell Show with your radio talk show host Phil and
Daddy Matt Kittle. Hang on, well, it looks like the
cease fire in Iran has it's ceased. That's it? It

(01:34:54):
seems to be in doubt right now. Once again, news
coming out of Fox News, US launches strikes on Iran
after drone attack threatens vital shipping lane. Was reported today
that a drone did indeed, was that yesterday, but a

(01:35:17):
drone attacked a vessel. Was it from Sri Lanka or
something like Senegal, That's what it was. And so now
the US is striking Iran once again for Iran doing
what is just nobody saw coming going back on the

(01:35:39):
terms of the deal and being bellocostic. It's very surprising.
So the latest details that we have is that in
Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps drone struck a Singapore flagged cargo ship.
I knew it was one of the s country in

(01:36:01):
the Strait of Hormuz. On Thursday, the International Maritime Organization
said it temporarily is pausing its vessel evacuation operation in
the region following the attack. And now there are reprisals

(01:36:21):
for these kinds of things. It's just back and forth,
back and forth. So at this point all we know
is that the US is in the process of striking
Iran after the cargo ship was attacked. The ceasefire tensions

(01:36:44):
are escalating. Remember you've got this memorandum of understanding. They
have sixty days to hammer out this peace deal. And
nothing says peace more than a drone attack on a
non military ship. I've said this before. If you cannot
trust the world's leading sponsor of terrorism, who can you trust?

(01:37:11):
Want to say congratulations to the good folks over in Waukeshaw.
A new study listing the safest mid sized cities according
to the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, the safest midside cities in
the United States in twenty twenty six, has been released
by financial advisor website smart Asset. Oh I see where

(01:37:35):
they're going there? Yes, naughty smart Asset and three Wisconsin
cities are among the top dozen. What do we got
out there? The study list Waukeshaw as the eighth safest
city out of more than three hundred cities in the

(01:37:55):
nation with populations between sixty five thousand and two hundred
fifty thousand. Apple ten is number ten, and eu Claire
is number eleven. How about that for good living. The
rankings were determined by evaluations of four primary aspects of
public safety violent crime rates, property crime rates, traffic fatality rates,

(01:38:22):
and natural disaster risk. Certainly, this bumpy springtime weather that
we've had is always a problem, but we don't have
to worry about earthquakes and such. The study found that
per one thousand residents, Waukeshaw has about one point one

(01:38:43):
four violent crimes and eight point seventy five property crimes
per one hundred thousand residents, it has five point six
y nine auto fatalities, and its natural disaster disaster risk
was rankedinked relatively moderate by the Federal Emergency Management Act,

(01:39:06):
and Appleton and maclaire had similar statistics, with just slightly
higher rates of violent crime, property crime, and auto fatalities.
Both cities were designated relatively low for risks of natural disasters.
Smart Smart Assets rankings found that most of the highest
ranked cities are inland, with fifteen of the twenty safest

(01:39:31):
mid size cities in non coastal states. The safest mid
size city of twenty twenty six was Broomfield, Colorado, while
the last of the cities evaluated otherwise known as the
least safe was Bill Clinton's Little Rock, Arkansas. Oh boy,

(01:39:53):
that's too bad for Little Rock, Arkansas. No, I guess
Chicago didn't make the list. This year. We're really really
pulling for for those folks. Of course in Chicago right now,
as they are dealing with wave after wave of gun violence,

(01:40:15):
gang bangers, lots of shootings, lots of people being killed
in another long, hot summer in Chicago. You have a
mayor there who is really concerned about how does he
describe that. It's not going to come to me. I'm
gonna have to look it up, but basically he is

(01:40:38):
concerned about terrorism against trans people. The story that I
read said there was one one murder of a trans
individual all of last year, and that was a domestic
violence case. And the good people of Chicago are really

(01:41:02):
getting that kind of leadership that you need to make
a successful city. We'll take a quick break. Coming up
to celebrate America's two hundred and fiftieth birthday, I would
like to share with you Washington's great vision. You know,
as as the founding father was just setting out on

(01:41:27):
a revolutionary war, he saw the future of America and
what America could and would be. He had some very
far reaching thoughts and a few strange thoughts at that.
We'll delve into that coming up next, so please stay

(01:41:49):
with us. It is the Dan O'Donnell Show, the Friday
Edition with Matt Kittlehang on giving it you're ill keeping
it right the Dan O'Donnell Show. Kittle here, you are
there at least for just a few more minutes. Got

(01:42:09):
a couple of things I want to finish up here.
I want to remind you as well, you still have
a chance to win twenty five one hundred dollars in
our two hundred and fifty k USA giveaway. America's two
hundred and fiftieth birthday is just about here and we
are celebrating in a big way again this hour you

(01:42:32):
could score twenty five hundred dollars toward a dream getaway. Yeah,
the keyword this hour is America. America. Take that keyword
to the website of the fine radio station you are
listening to Newstalk eleven thirty dot com, WIBA dot com.

(01:42:56):
Enter it where it tells you to the keyword America.
Perhaps you will be our next big winner in the
two hundred and fifty k USA giveaway. Again. We do
it four times a day, eight am, eleven and then
two o'clock. Right here on the Dan O'Donnell Show at

(01:43:16):
five PM and the five o'clock hour, a couple of
things I wanted to note one at least, and then
I think that kind of ties into where we're going
with the celebration, thinking really about two hundred and fifty
years of this exceptional nation and the declaration that began it.

(01:43:39):
Actually the revolutionary wars started years before, but that's a
good starting point, when we told mother, the mother country,
screw you, We're done, Bye bye. This is one of
the stupid stories, but it is very indicative. It is

(01:44:04):
exhibit A of the Democrat Party today. The headline from
Politico is Democrats grapple uncomfortably with World Cup success. Anytime
someone is grappling with something, you know it's difficult, and

(01:44:25):
the reporter Adam Wrenn writes the following the triumph of
the World Cup's first two weeks, boosting the US global
reputation with sold out stadiums and few logical logistical complications,
has forced Democrats, who had criticized President Donald Trump's role

(01:44:46):
in preparations to grudgingly reconsider because basically what they were
doing was praying for well, no, not a lot of
praying go going on there, hoping for with their fingers crossed,
all of that sort of thing hoping that the World

(01:45:06):
Cup would be a disaster, and they're really upset that
it isn't by this point, because just like the reflecting
pool and the algae, they want things to go terribly
wrong for Donald Trump, their number one enemy. I think
that there was a little bit of the like liberal

(01:45:29):
wish casting that this would maybe be a disaster to
sort of stick it to Trump, said Rob Flaherty, the
digital democratic strategist and soccer fan who attended the US
group stage match with Australia. He concedes it hasn't been
that stick it to Trump moment. Before the tournament, attitudes

(01:45:53):
about the World Cup were polarizing, like so much else,
along partisan lines, with Democrats confronting FIFA and the Trump
administration over high ticket prices, shortfalls in public funding, and
the government's posture to foreign visitors. Keep in mind, again,

(01:46:14):
this is from Politico, German owned Politico. By the way,
As the the tournament approached, local officials in areas hosting matches,
including New York City, New York City, It's New York City,
New York City Mayor Zorron Mandani and New Jersey Governor
Mike Mickey. Cheryl turned from critics to cheerleaders. It goes

(01:46:41):
on and on and on. I this sentence here struck
me as well. Before the tournament, attitudes about the World
Cup were polarizing. No, no, no, they weren't. They were
polarizing in this sense. My buddy Dan o'donald love some soccer?

(01:47:04):
Is that true, Dave? Obviously he's attending the FIFA World Cup.
I do not share that interest. So the only real
divide was people who think that the foreign version of
football or football is about as exciting as watching paint dry.

(01:47:28):
And then those who, of course are fanatical and love it.
And I love the fact that we are hosting this event.
It's a big money maker. And clearly what it has
done is it has shown America to people of all
countries involved in this, people from all over the world,

(01:47:50):
that the accomplice media has been lying to them. They're
watching stuff on their channels America, Donald Trump bad, scary. Uh.
They get here and they discover, hey, this is not
the country that has been promoted to me, and it

(01:48:11):
is not. I think that's that is a story. I
think that is striking. You get people coming from all
over the world and they say, wow, the people are
friendly here. Look around this, My god, this is they
have this. They have ranch dressing. Oh yeah, I love

(01:48:36):
the ranch dressing. No, the real deal was the the
attitudes about the World Cup being polarizing. It's not the
World Cup. It's that the dour have to be constantly

(01:48:56):
hating on Donald Trump because they have TDS. They they
don't like it because Donald Trump is in a large
part responsible for America America's hosting of the World Cup.

(01:49:17):
They are rooting against Donald Trump there again number one
political enemy. But really they're rooting against America. And that's
where we are in this country. That's where the polarizing is.
I said it earlier that we really have two choices
on the ballot this year, and that is people who

(01:49:39):
hate the United States of America and people who love
the United States of America. And I'm hoping that love prevails.
Let's just put it that way. Now, thinking about this
great nation of ours two hundred and fifty years, we
need to think back what it was like and seventeen

(01:50:03):
seventy five, seventy six and into seventeen seventy seven, when
things didn't look good for the new Americans. In fact,
it looked pretty dark. It took a man like George
Washington to put things in perspective and let his soldiers

(01:50:28):
know exactly at least remind them what they were fighting for.
I say all that by way of the skit titled
Washington's Dream by SNL. If you have not seen this,
and you'll just hear this, but I think it will
do it some justice. One of the funniest things that

(01:50:49):
SNL has done in a long time. Let's listen in.

Speaker 9 (01:50:55):
I hear the British are sending another five thousand troops.

Speaker 1 (01:50:58):
How will we ever win this war.

Speaker 8 (01:51:01):
By remembering what we fight for? G Washington said, please,
and you just drinked for the fight ahead. We fight
for a country of our own, a new nation, or
we choose our own laws, sir, choose our own leaders, yes,
and choose our own systems of weights and measures, Weights

(01:51:29):
and measures, sir, yes, yes, I dream of that one
day our proud nation will measure weights and pounds, and
that two thousand pounds shall be called a ton.

Speaker 1 (01:51:43):
And what would one thousand pounds be.

Speaker 8 (01:51:44):
Called, sir, Nothing, because we will have no word for that.
It seems like we should have a word for one
thousand pounds, sir, and yet we won't.

Speaker 1 (01:52:00):
Because we are free men, and.

Speaker 8 (01:52:02):
We will be free to measure liquids and leaders and
middle leaders. But not all liquids, only soda one alcohol.

Speaker 1 (01:52:11):
Only, no, sir.

Speaker 8 (01:52:13):
Yes, because for milk and paint we will use gallons,
pints and quarts. God will, okay?

Speaker 4 (01:52:19):
How many leaders are in a gallon?

Speaker 1 (01:52:21):
Sir?

Speaker 9 (01:52:23):
Nobody knows, sir, in this new country, what plans are
there for men of color such as I?

Speaker 8 (01:52:36):
Distance will be measured in inches?

Speaker 1 (01:52:40):
Skip past that question? Difficult, So twelve inches to a foot,
twelve feet to a yard, if they were all so simple?

Speaker 8 (01:52:48):
Three feet to a yard, and how many yards to
a mile?

Speaker 1 (01:52:53):
Nobody knows?

Speaker 9 (01:52:56):
Okay, well, how many feet to a mile?

Speaker 6 (01:53:02):
Eighty?

Speaker 5 (01:53:02):
Of course.

Speaker 8 (01:53:06):
It's a simple number that everyone will remember. This confess
it feels a little complicated, sir.

Speaker 4 (01:53:14):
Why not use meters and kilometers?

Speaker 8 (01:53:18):
We will, soldier, but only in certain and popular sports
like track and swimming. For popular sports like football, we
will use yours football, sir, Yes, to sport where you
throw a ball with your hands. So in football there
is no kicking.

Speaker 1 (01:53:39):
There's a little kicking.

Speaker 8 (01:53:47):
Kick the ball to get points.

Speaker 1 (01:53:50):
How many points, sir?

Speaker 8 (01:53:52):
Sometimes one and sometimes three very confused, Sir, do not worry.
For our new nation. We will have rules with two
sets of numbers, inches on one side, centimeters on the other, so.

Speaker 1 (01:54:08):
We can see where they line up.

Speaker 8 (01:54:10):
Yes, except that they don't line up, and they never will. Liberty, Son, liberty,
and the.

Speaker 1 (01:54:19):
Slaves, Sir.

Speaker 8 (01:54:19):
One of them you asked about the temperature, I did not.
We show up two different, unrelated scales of temperature. One
of them will make sense to the entire world, and
the other will be super random. Our great nation will

(01:54:42):
use the random one. What is the scale, call, sir, fahrenheit.

Speaker 2 (01:54:49):
Spell that for me impossible.

Speaker 8 (01:54:55):
But one day, if we are brave, we'll get rid
of you and a lot of British words like color
and armor. But God, we will keep the British y
in the word glamour.

Speaker 1 (01:55:05):
Only glamour, sir, only glamour.

Speaker 8 (01:55:09):
That is my dream for our countryman, a melting pot
of different measurements that will make Europeans so little tantums.

Speaker 2 (01:55:18):
It's sure, a.

Speaker 9 (01:55:19):
Land of liberty where all men are free.

Speaker 2 (01:55:29):
We're all men.

Speaker 1 (01:55:30):
Free, right, Oh, that is good stuff. You've seen that before, right, Dave,
you said it earlier. Nate BARGATSI right, the comedian. I
think at the outset of the show, I called him
the googly eyed comedian. I like the guys funny, and
I'm told that Dave, have you seen his new movie.

(01:55:52):
I'm told it's pretty good. It's something for the whole family.
I guess. So that's refreshing. That's nice funny stuff. And
SNL does not deliver a lot of funny stuff these days.
But that was fun. An alternate look, if you will,
at Washington's vision, Washington's dream for America as we celebrate

(01:56:20):
and get ready to celebrate two hundred fifty years of
this exceptional nation, got to take off. Always a pleasure
filling in. Dan will be back with you on Monday.
Until we talk again. Matt Kittles saying, make it a
great weekend. Goodbye, Salong, God bless