Dems Used to Hate False Pedophilia Accusations

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Welcome into the Friday edition of The Dan o'donalds Show.
Enjoy that spring like weather while we got it. Three
inches of snow potentially on the way just in time
for the weekend. Hey, this is late winter, early spring
in Wisconsin. We are used to it. But to make
you feel a little better, and really, how could you
feel any better than you do on a Friday afternoon,

(00:22):
we have got three straight hours of broadcast excellence, or
at the very least, and let's face it, far more
likely broadcast competence on the way here on the Dan
o'donalds Show. Welcome to it. Some of the top stories
we are following right now. President Trump is on his
way to Corpus Christy, Texas. He is expected to kick

(00:43):
off a post State of the Union tour. The Daily
Trump date is coming up at four o'clock. Then right afterwards,
at about ten after maybe four fifteen, Wisconsin's Governor Tony
Evers inadvertently admits that Democrats don't actually want fair electoral maps.
After all, why are they opposing his call for a

(01:06):
special session on a nonpartisan jerry manderin constitutional amendment. We
will dive into that and a press conference in a
story that has I'll be honest with you, folks vexed
me all week long the case of the dog food
kid from Madison East High School. I'll explain why I

(01:27):
am very skeptical of what it is that is being
alleged here. And of course the biggest story in America
right now. Former President Bill Clinton testifies behind closed doors
in Chappaqua, New York, before the House Oversight Committee. James Comer,
the chairman of that committee, actually came out during a

(01:51):
break in testimony and said that the former president said
the current president, Donald Trump really didn't do anything wrong
with respect to Epstein, went and.

Speaker 2 (02:00):
Said, that's for you to decide. And the president went
on to say that the President Trump has never said
anything to me to make me think he was involved,
and he met with Epstein. So just I know, there's
a lot of curiosity about President Trump. I thought that
was an interesting thing that President Clinton said.

Speaker 1 (02:22):
Coming up later this hour, we are going to dive
into all of the evidence contained in the Epstein files
that suggests that Donald Trump is guilty of whatever liberals
have insanely accused him of. That's actually kind of a joke.
There is no actual evidence We're actually going to go
into the evidence, and there is a lot of it

(02:45):
that exonerates President Trump, going all the way back to
a two thousand and six phone call to the guy
who was leading the initial Jeffrey Epstein investigation, way back
when Trump actually kicked Epstein out of his Maral Logo resort,
and Trump actually praised this local police chief for finally

(03:05):
doing something about a guy that apparently Trump said everyone
knew was doing something untoward with those girls. We will
dive into that in just a second. If you want
to join The Dan o'donald Show, four one four seven
nine to nine eleven thirty is our advetnos dot com
talk and text line, Email me d od at iHeartMedia

(03:26):
dot com or follow the show. We are across social
media at Dan o'donald Show. Just search for Dan o'donald Show.
We will pop up on Facebook, on Instagram, on x
We are streaming live via the Danocam all Over plus
on our YouTube channel smash that like button as the
kids say, and be sure to follow the Dan o'donald

(03:47):
Show podcast on your iHeartRadio app. We are in the
top one hundred podcasts in the entire world and that
is all thanks to your support. You want to show
my bosses, the powers that be just how much you
love the Dan O'Donnell Show. They measure us, yes, in
radio ratings, and the ratings are actually stunningly strong. I

(04:08):
want to thank you so much for that. Oftentimes when
we don't have elections coming up and yes, I know
we have a Supreme Court election in a couple of months,
and the ratings of course rebounded. I mean, we are
just doing incredibly well on this show and across our
Dan o'donnelld network, WIBA News Talk eleven thirty. The streaming
numbers are just incredible. Normally people get burned out on politics,

(04:33):
and you actually saw that burnout factor reflected in the
Marquette University Law School poll that was just released this week,
where you had something like sixty percent of Democrats essentially
had no idea who any of the candidates are who
are running for governor. That election is coming up in November,
and it seems like people have checked out. This is

(04:53):
also reflected in the fact that there are still two
thirds of voters who have not yet made up their
mind in the Supreme Court race that set for April seventh,
and the liberal who is supposed to be the heavy
favorite only as a five point lead seventeen percent for
Chrissy Taylor to twelve percent among registered voters for the
conservative challenger, Mario Lazar. We will dive into that in

(05:15):
just a little bit. Also coming up in the five
o'clock hour, It is one of our favorite segments talk
radio Roulette. I open up the phone lines and have
absolutely no idea what any of you are going to say.
You can ask me any question, you can raise, any point,
you can do or say anything, and I just kind
of have to respond. Then, of course, how bizarre, strangest

(05:36):
stories of the past seven days. We always have fun
on Friday's Unhinged Liberal. They're going after golf. Now, golf
apparently is fascist. I actually took a little break in
between my hours and hours and hours of show prep
to go to the driving range. Apparently I was being
a fascist. Well, who am I kidding? The Libs already

(05:58):
consider me to be a fanshist and of course a
pedophile protector. This is the Democrat's newest insult. It's almost
like they didn't learn their lesson from the Russia collusion
hoax In the first couple of years of the first
Trump term that they just kind of throw out. Trump
is a Manchurian candidate. Trump is a Russian stooge. Trump

(06:20):
is having a steamy gay love affair with Vladimir Putin.
You have no idea how many weird homo erotic memes
I saw coming from liberals on social media throughout the
first Trump term. Well, now it's just calling Trump and
all of his supporters pedophiles or pedophile protectors. Now, what's

(06:40):
actually kind of amazing about this is that the people
who are leading the charge in maybe not out and out,
calling Trump a pedophile or pedophile protector and his supporters
people who love pedophiles or pedophile protectors, they're certainly creating
the permission structure for these wild allegations. They are using

(07:02):
every little drip and drop from the Epstein files, none
of which, of course, has actually proved any sort of
actionable criminal or otherwise wrongdoing on the part of Donald Trump,
But they are using that in order to create in
people's minds this idea that Donald Trump is a pedophile. Now,
this would come as an incredible surprise to these exact

(07:27):
same liberals in the media who spent much of the
first Trump term and certainly part of the intervening Biden years,
ripping on Republicans for seizing on the Jeffrey Epstein conspiracy
to fuel various q A Noon craziness or Pizzagate conspiracies.

(07:49):
In fact, Rachel Maddow on a show during the Trump
term one his first administration, right after Jeffrey Epstein was
found dead in his cell, said, anybody who is weaponizing allegations,
false allegations of pedophilia against their political opponents is frankly evil.

Speaker 3 (08:09):
Pedophilia, of course, is the most repulsive of all human behavior.
To decide that you're gonna try to harness that for
political gain, that you're going to make false accusations of
that kind systematically to reduce your political opponents to non
human status, that is a horrific abuse of its own,

(08:31):
like meta level exploitative and evil and base and cynical.

Speaker 1 (08:37):
Cynical, base, evil, exploitative to just sort of make up
allegations of pedophilia against your political opponents. One wonders now
Rachel is only on one night a week, or maybe
she's up to two, because the ratings at MS now
are just so incredibly pathetic I think I saw that
Fox News now its nightly lineup has a thirty five

(09:00):
five percent higher share of the audience than MS now
and CNN combined. Fox News actually does better than the
CBS Nightly News and CBS Primetime, which is almost unheard of.
It just goes to show a how strong Fox News
has been now for about thirty years, and just how
horrible and I mean horrible network programming actually is. Hey,

(09:23):
speaking of network programming, how about Jimmy Kimmel who was
so upset about Trump's supporters calling their opponent's pedophiles that
he took to his show to get emotional about it.
So how he's nuts to do it? Now, you don't like Trump,
you're a pedophile. It's their go to move, and it
shows you how much they actually care about pedophilia. Oh

(09:44):
you see, you don't actually care about pedophilia. If you're
just sort of saying things like, if you don't like Trump,
you're a pedophile. Well, what happens if you say if
you like Trump you're a pedophile, if you like Trump
you're a pedophile protector. Because I'm fairly certain that is
what has been said for almost a full year now
after the disaster was that was the partial release of

(10:07):
the Epstein files just after the fourth of July. It's
like the narrative went out, and then Democrats flipped like that,
from calling conspiracy mongers anyone who would dare suggest that, hey,
maybe there's something a little bit deeper and a little
bit more nefarious at play about this Epstein character. They
actually went full into Donald Trump is covering things up.

(10:31):
He is a pedophile. Not just that he's mentioned in
the Epstein files because he was a neighbor, He was
someone who was socially in the same circles as Epstein
in the nineteen nineties and very early two thousands. No, no, no,
it's because he was actually a part of Epstein's crimes,
even though there's no evidence whatsoever to suggest this. Well,

(10:54):
Chris Hayes, who has been all in on the Donald
Trump Jeffrey Epstein connect ever since the fourth of July,
back when Republicans and his grave enemies at Fox News
were talking about the Epstein files and trying to weaponize
it against Democrats, he thought this was the worst possible thing.

Speaker 4 (11:13):
Fox News Republicans concerns had made Jeffrey Epstein Jeffrey Epstein
the focal point of their worldview about.

Speaker 1 (11:21):
Who the bad guys are in society. That is so
weird because Hayes had very strong opinions back then about
people who make Jeffrey Epstein the focal point of their
worldview about who are the good guys and who are
the bad guys. One wonders what he thinks about Rocanna
and Thomas Massey and pretty much every single person Marjorie

(11:42):
Taylor Green who has found common ground with leftists over
the Epstein Files, anybody and everybody who has been weaponizing
that and trading in just the most vile sort of
defamation online and in traditional media ever since the narrative
shifted and Democrats were given permission to go nuts over

(12:04):
the Epstein Files. How about Stephanie Rule. She is one
of the ones who, for years during the Pizzagate and
qann conspiracy eras saying that accusations of pedophilia are stomach
turning and fundamentally.

Speaker 5 (12:20):
Real Republicans are testing this strategy of branding anybody who
disagrees with them as a pedophile. A pedophile, I mean,
one of the sickest, most twisted things you can be.
What in the world is behind this well.

Speaker 1 (12:33):
Of course, she concluded political opportunism a sort of cynical
advantage playing by leveraging some of the worst accusations in civilization.
Even the supposed Democrat voicive reason Bill Maher was up
in arms on his show about Republicans accusing their political

(12:55):
opponents of being pedophiles.

Speaker 6 (12:57):
He said, it was terrible Republicans have become obsessed with
that aphiliate. And I remember when pedophilia was like the
worst thing you could ever call somebody a pedophile, and
now it's like casually thrown up.

Speaker 1 (13:09):
Like Senators Anderson. Cooper took it a step further, saying
that if you engage in Jeffrey Epstein conspiracy mongering and
hurling accusations, you're anti Semitic, you're anti.

Speaker 7 (13:22):
Catholic, trafficking in age old anti Semitic, anti Catholic, you know,
anti immigrant tropes of you know, there's this cabal of
of you know, Jewish bankers who are controlling the world
monetary system. It's essentially kind of an offshoot of that,
saying that this is a cabal of sex traffickers.

Speaker 1 (13:43):
Ah, it's it's just wrong. You can't say that it's
anti Semitic, it's anti Catholic. Oh, it's these sex traffickers
who secretly run the world. How dare you? Jake Tapper
over at CNN was saying back when someone burst into
the Comet Pizza Ping Pong restaurant in Washington, DC, armed

(14:06):
with a gun and looking for evidence of Hillary Clinton's
sex trafficking operation, he said, Look, if you traffic in
these sorts of conspiracies, you shouldn't be surprised when one
of your nutty followers potentially engages in a violent confrontation
with the people you accused.

Speaker 8 (14:24):
When leaders claim that their opponents are pedophiles, is anyone
really surprised when somebody who hears this acts?

Speaker 1 (14:33):
I mean, what is wrong with these people?

Speaker 9 (14:35):
Now?

Speaker 1 (14:36):
What is wrong with these people? I mean, you did
just have someone go all the way from North Carolina
to Mara a Lago armed himself with a long gun
and a can of gasoline because, according to friends and colleagues,
he was obsessed with the Epstein files. He was clearly
at Mara a Lago looking to commit some act of
violence against Trump and potentially burn the thing down. Brian

(15:00):
Stelter over at CNN even accused Republicans of the most
cynical kind of politicking, saying that accusing their enemies of
being pedophiles was just a crass midterm election strategy.

Speaker 10 (15:15):
Republicans used for confirmation hearing to mainstream the notion that
Democrats protect pedophiles. This really is a popular charge in
GOP media circles right now. They're smearing their opponents has
either pedophiles or being pro pedophile. It's a sexual panic
strategy aimed at the November midterms and beyond.

Speaker 1 (15:33):
Ah. Yes, it's just a midterm election strategy, that's all.
It is. Sexual panic, Its crass, it's evil, it's vile
when Republicans do it, and it should be noted only
fringe Republicans at the outskirts of the Internet. It isn't

(15:54):
and never did, form the central focus of Republican attacks. Now, however,
Democrats are almost solely focused on attacking President Trump over
the Epstein files, intimating that he has something to hide,
that he himself engaged in pedophilia or other sex crimes,
despite not having any evidence. This is their central message,

(16:19):
this is what all of their foot soldiers online are
using as their central attack. One wonders what every single
one of those leading lights of Democrat liberal thought would
think about this now, Oh wait, they're all foreign when
it's a that Republicans. A Texter on our noos dot

(16:45):
com talk and text line makes a great point, which
do left wingers throw out more casually accusations of their
political opponents, or really anyone who disagrees with them, of
being pedophiles or Nazis. Welcome back to the Dan O'Donnell Show.
It is a tour de force of truth coming up

(17:06):
in about ten minutes, the truth that you simply aren't
going to hear anywhere else. We dive into the Epstein
files and go point by point by point to prove
that not only did President Trump do absolutely nothing wrong,
that he was actually one of the first major political

(17:28):
or entertainment or wealth figures that actually called in and
praised law enforcement for finally doing something about Jeffrey Epstein.
I will refute every left wing narrative that you have
likely heard, and yes, should we do the thousand dollars

(17:48):
Jeffrey Epstein challenge again. A couple of weeks ago, I
got so irritated with left wingers just casually throwing out
allegations that anyone in every one who disagrees with them
is a quote pedophile protector. The ironic thing is I
actually what I do when people are stupid enough to

(18:09):
use their real names and they post just some of
the most vile, awful things on Facebook comments. I'll actually,
just as a way of, you know, kind of entertaining myself,
say I wonder what this person is up to, and
I'll look up their criminal record on the WCCA page
formerly known as seacap or commonly known as seacap. Would

(18:31):
you believe I have not one but two different people
who have called me me. I am a radio host
in a mid size media market. I do have a
pretty outsized influence on social media thanks to all of
these lefties going nuts. But would you believe there were

(18:51):
not one but two different people who have been convicted
of various sex crimes, neither of which it should be noted,
with children. But I have two convicted sexual assault perpse
calling me a pedophile protector, which I just think is
absolutely hilarious. Well, now is your chance, lefties. I am
offering one thousand dollars to anyone, anyone who is able

(19:15):
to call in four to one forst seven nine to
nine eleven thirty, and we will take your phone calls
straight up until we do talk Radio Roulette at five o'clock.
Anybody who can provide any sort of evidence, any sort
of proof that Donald Trump committed sex crimes with Jeffrey
Epstein that I am unable to refute, we will actually

(19:38):
have our producer. If you're able to do so, I'm
actually going to put you on hold. We'll get your
Venmo or PayPal account, and you will win one thousand
dollars of my money. It seems pretty easy, right, All
you need to do call in and provide that proof.
I know, I can't wait. Four one, four seven, nine
to nine eleven thirty is our phone number. You've got

(19:59):
until now, from now until five pm. Now. If you're
like me and you're just sick of these jackasses constantly
using the phrase pedophile or pedophile protector whenever they they
just casually drop it into discourse, it's actually kind of amazing.
Hit them with this montage. We put together a minute

(20:21):
and forty seconds of the leading lights of liberal intelligentsia.
And yes, I'm being facetious when I say there is
no such thing as a leading light of liberal intelligentsia,
because in large measure, there's no such thing as liberal intelligentsia,
or at least liberal intelligence. I guess there are people
who profess to be part of intelligentsia. But a minute

(20:44):
forty one seconds straight of leading left wing media figures
saying false accusations of pedophilia are evil and.

Speaker 5 (20:52):
Wrang Anglicans are testing this strategy of branding anybody who
disagrees with them as a pedophile a pedophile. I mean,
one of the sickest, most twisted things you.

Speaker 8 (21:03):
Can be when leaders claim that their opponents are pedophiles.
Is anyone really surprised when somebody who hears this.

Speaker 1 (21:12):
Acts, I mean, what is wrong with these people?

Speaker 4 (21:15):
Fox News Republicans concerns have made Jeffrey Epstein Jeffrey Epstein
the focal point of their worldview about who the bad
guys are in society.

Speaker 6 (21:24):
The Republicans have become obsessed with pedophilia. And I remember
when pedophilia was like the worst thing you could ever
call somebody a pedophile, and now it's like casually thrown
up by senators.

Speaker 3 (21:37):
Pedophilia, of course, is the most repulsive of all human behavior.
To decide that you're gonna try to harness that for
political gain. That is a horrific abuse of its own.

Speaker 7 (21:48):
It's trafficking in age old, anti Semitic, anti Catholic, you know,
anti immigrant tropes of you know, there's this cabal of
you know, Jewish bankers who are controlling the world monetary system.
It's essentially kind of an offshoot of that, saying that
this is a cabal of sex traffickers.

Speaker 11 (22:09):
This is how these nuts do it.

Speaker 1 (22:10):
Now you don't like Trump, you're a pedophile. It's their
go to move, and it shows you how much they
actually care about pedophilia.

Speaker 10 (22:16):
Republicans used their confirmation hearing to mainstream the notion that
Democrats protect pedophiles. This really is a popular charge in
GOP media circles right now. They're smearing their opponents has
either pedophiles or being pro pedophile. It's a sexual panic
strategy aimed at the November midterms and beyond.

Speaker 1 (22:34):
Yeah, how dare those Democrats do that?

Speaker 12 (22:37):
Oh?

Speaker 1 (22:37):
Wait, no, they were only upset when Republicans did. You'll
actually dive into those files and everything you ever wanted
to know about why President Trump is completely and totally innocent.
Of course, you'll never hear it anywhere else that's coming
up next. Come on, libs, call in four one, four, seven, nine, nine,

(23:02):
eleven thirty. Any proof that I am unable to refute
that Donald Trump committed sex crimes with Jeffrey Epstein. You
win one thousand dollars of my money. I am apparently
very very bad with money. Either that or I know
something that you inherently kind of know but will not

(23:24):
admit to yourself. There is no proof. This is probably
why even though I have offered a thousand, should I
up my money to two thousand dollars. My wife is
going to absolutely kill me two thousand dollars of my
money if you can just call in and provide some proof.
The best we actually had the first time I did

(23:44):
this a couple of weeks ago, was some guy saying, well,
Epstein and Trump were on a plane together, and there
was also some twenty year old woman, who, by the way,
is not underage, and they were the only three people
listed on a flight log on a short flight from
I believe it was Florida to New York. The guy

(24:06):
actually said, well, I don't have proof that he committed
a crime, but he could have. He could have that
was literally the best I got. There have never been
any federal or state prosecutors who have pursued any cases
against Trump in connection to any of Jeffrey Epstein's activities. Now,

(24:26):
you would think that in New York, which would have
had jurisdiction over anything that would have taken place on
Jeffrey Epstein's property, that they would have gone hog wild.
And obviously Trump was a man about town in New
York and was supposedly very very close with Jeffrey Epstein

(24:46):
in the nineteen nineties. Why was it that the Manhattan
District Attorney's office instead quite literally invented crimes financial crimes
for President Trump to be convicted of right before the
twenty twenty four presidential election. Why didn't they just go
with all of this mountain of evidence included in the

(25:07):
Epstein files that Trump was a dangerous sex criminal. Well,
you might be saying, Dan, it's because the Justice Department
had control of all of the files and all of
the investigative material three million files released just last month
under the Epstein Files Transparency Act. Not a single one

(25:28):
of those files provides any sort of proof. And oh,
by the way, all of that investigative material was held
by the Joe Biden Justice Department for four years. The FBI,
when Donald Trump was first elected president in twenty sixteen,
launched a massive attempt to try to get him impeached

(25:50):
and removed from office by creating out of thin air
this false notion that he was a Russian agent. Didn't
they use any of the investigative material on Jeffrey Epstein, Well,
it was because Epstein didn't kill himself in until twenty nineteen. Okay,
Then why was it Merrick Garland, the attorney general under

(26:11):
Joe Biden, who hated Trump with the fire of a
thousand sons? Why was it that he also essentially made
up charges to pursue two different federal prosecutions, one having
to do with documents stored at mar Lago. If Trump
was raping underage girls at mar Lago with Jeffrey Epstein,

(26:31):
you would think if there was even an iota of
evidence that that was going on, that would have been
the charge that would have ended not just Trump's political career,
but Trump's life as he knows it. That was never pursued.
Now at liberals will invariably point to is the fact
that Trump was in fact a passenger on Epstein's plane,

(26:54):
known as the Lolita Express, seven flights between nineteen ninety
three nineteen ninety seven. Most of those flights had Trump
his baby daughter Tiffany. His wife Marla Maples was on
the flight. There was one where Eric Trump was very
young he was on the plane. There was never once

(27:15):
a plane trip to Epstein's Pervert Island. There was one
nineteen ninety three flight where Trump and Epstein were the
only two listed passengers, and on another the passengers were Epstein,
Trump and a then twenty year old woman whose name
was redacted. Now liberals have seized on this, saying that
the only reason that this woman's name would be redacted
is because she was a victim or a potential victim. No,

(27:39):
there has never been any sort of legal action, any
sort of civil action arising from anything even remotely close
to a period in time when that flight was taken,
that was ever launched against Trump or Epstein. Names are
redacted for a variety of reasons, and the biggest one
is because this twenty year old woman had absolutely no
connection to anything. She would not a victim. She was

(28:01):
very likely something akin to a stewardess. Trump in fact,
even went so far as to ban Jeffrey Epstein from
mar A Lago in the early two thousands. Now, Epstein
was never actually a full member at mar A Lago.
This is something else that Democrats have basically been lying about.
Even though he was not a full member, Trump allowed

(28:24):
him to use the SPA, and in two thousand and three,
the SPA sent a beautician on a house call to
Epstein's mansion nearby. Now, normally they would only do this
for members, but because Epstein was a friend or an
associate of Trump, he did it. The worker returned and
immediately told her manager that Epstein pressured her to undress

(28:48):
and engage in sexual acts. Immediately, Trump got involved and
banned Epstein from the SPA. The following year, Trump and
Epstein actually competed for a real state transaction. There was
an auction of a mansion that had been owned by
a real estate nursing home magnate by the name of

(29:09):
Abe Gossman, who went bankrupt, and Trump eventually outbid Epstein
for the property, but Epstein kept raising the stakes. Trump
actually paid a whole lot more than he wanted to,
eventually something like forty one million dollars back in two
thousand and four, that is an absurd price to pay
for this mansion. But the two of them never had

(29:33):
the same relationship after that. I mean, first, you've got okay,
this guy is trying to get with an eighteen year
old girl. Trump says, okay, no more visits to the spa,
no more house calls. Then, in October two thousand and seven,
Epstein reportedly acted very inappropriately toward the underage daughter of

(29:53):
another member at mar A Lago. He apparently at some
point tried to get her to take her clothes off.
The girl's father went ballistic, as you would imagine, went
right to Trump. Trump immediately and permanently banned Jeffrey Epstein.
Now in two thousand and six, right when Epstein was

(30:15):
first charged with sex crimes. Now, this is right around
the summer of two thousand and six. According to Michael Writer,
the former Palm Beach police chief who was leading the
initial investigation into Epstein's sex crimes, actually told the FBI
in an interview in twenty nineteen that Trump called him

(30:38):
in July of two thousand and six to say, and
I quote this is directly from the FBI's transcript of
that interview. Thank goodness, you're stopping him. Everyone has known
he's been doing this, including it would seem Trump, because
Trump in two thousand and three knew that this guy
was acting like a PERV towards women who were barely legal,

(31:01):
in this case, an eighteen year old. The following year
he would do it to an underage girl, and that
led to his complete banning. Trump said later in that
interview people in New York knew Epstein was disgusting. He
further describes Glaine Maxwell as evil and actually told writer
to focus on her in his ongoing investigation as what

(31:25):
he described as Epstein's operative. Writer actually said in that
interview Trump was one of the very first people to
call when that criminal investigation went public. Now, how about
one of the few victims who has actually been deemed
to have been somewhat credible in her allegations against men

(31:49):
who have been criminally charged or otherwise publicly humiliated because
of their connections to Jeffrey Epstein. Virginia Giuffrey, the former
Virginia Roberts, who was actually poached by Epstein from Trump's
maral Lago club to go work for him, actually said

(32:11):
in her memoir released in October, after she unfortunately killed
herself back in the spring of twenty twenty five, She
said Trump could not have been friendlier. In a twenty
sixteen deposition related to her defamation lawsuit against Glene Maxwell,
she also said quote Trump was also a good friend

(32:32):
of Jeffrey's. He didn't partake in any sex with any
of us, but he flirted with me. He laugh and
tell Jeffrey, you've got the life now. She actually recanted
that in a twenty nineteen interview. She said the flirted
part was inaccurate. Trump never flirted with her or acted inappropriately.
This was right around the same time that she was

(32:53):
sued by Epstein's former attorney Alan Dershowitz for making up
lie about him and his conduct with her. Now Virginia Giuffrey,
who of course is no longer with us, had a
co writer on this memoir. Her name is Amy Wallace.
Wallace said Giuffrey told her she had fond memories of

(33:16):
Trump and never saw him in a compromising situation. Wallace
also said Giuffrey said Trump was kind to me. She
later became a quote huge Trump fan because he promised
when he was elected president again to release the Epstein files.
Not only that, every single allegation that has ever been

(33:39):
made against Trump with respect to Jeffrey Epstein has been
demonstrably proven to be not credible. In fact, one of
the big things that leftists have been going crazy over
is the fact that because the Epstein Act requires all files,
regardless of how potentially defamatory they may be, be released,

(34:04):
this has resulted in even allegations that are called into
the FBI's tip line and are rather obviously not going
to be credible at all released. This has been a
massive problem, and the vast majority of the wildest allegations,
including the latest the one that National Public Radio went

(34:24):
with earlier this week, timed of course, to directly before
the State of the Union, where Democrats brought Epstein victims
to sit with them as their guests to sit in
the gallery to try to raise the Epstein issue again.
There was an allegation that Trump's DOJ didn't release these

(34:45):
documents because they proved that Trump had sex with a
thirteen year old girl. This was yet another investigation that
was deemed to be not credible. It was a tip
that was actually pursued by the FBI and was determined
to be not credible because it mimics almost totally. Another
non credible tip that weirdly enough, came into the FBI

(35:08):
shortly before the twenty sixteen presidential election. A woman by
the name of Jenny Thomas, widely believed to be a pseudonym.
She actually sued Trump, alleging that in the early nineteen eighties,
Trump sexually assaulted her when she was wait for it,
thirteen years old. Sound familiar. So you've got in nineteen

(35:31):
ninety four a woman saying that Trump, when I was
thirteen sexually assaulted me, and you've got Jenny Thomas saying, hey,
in nineteen eighty two, Trump sexually assaulted me when I
was thirteen. Neither of those were credible. She actually sued,
but because she got so many facts demonstrably wrong, she
was forced to refile. She apparently never did, but actually

(35:54):
made more accusations, and one of them just happened to
be Right before the twenty sixteen in presidential election. Every
single tip that came in with respect to Trump came
in from somebody who was deemed to be not credible,
including one accuser who it was actually noted in the
call log in the documentation of the FBI's disposition on

(36:17):
that call that she had been institutionalized twice. So this
is where democrats are. They have no actual evidence. All
of the evidence actually points to the fact that Donald
Trump was one of the very first people to call
and commend law enforcement for actually digging into and getting
this scumbag Jeffrey Epstein. That Epstein was actually kicked out

(36:39):
of mar A Lago, first from the spaw and then
from the club itself for being a complete and total creep.
Democrats have absolutely no evidence whatsoever. And this is why
you will notice that in spite of me offering one
thousand dollars, two thousand dollars, hell, I could offer ten
thousand dollars. I'm just that stupid, and yes I do

(37:00):
have just that much money to put on the line
because I am so confident that Democrats are total liars.
They just like hurling out the allegation that Trump is
either a pedophile or a pedophile protector. But when their
money is literally put where their mouth is, they go

(37:21):
silent because they have no evidence, just a whole bunch
of conjecture and obvious smears.

Speaker 11 (37:33):
The Dan o'donald's show is coming right back.

Speaker 13 (37:43):
Germany.

Speaker 1 (37:50):
Trump is dangerous because he's evil.

Speaker 9 (37:54):
America.

Speaker 1 (37:57):
It is time here on the Dan o'donald's show to
name the unhinged liberal of the day, and it is
this lib from TikTok who says golf is fascist.

Speaker 14 (38:09):
I don't care.

Speaker 15 (38:10):
Playing golf in the United States is fascist behavior, Using
up all the water, using up all the land, getting
frecked up with your bros to talk business on a course.
I'm sorry, it's so. It's fascy, it's real fasci abolished
golf courses. The worst people I've ever met in my
life play golf all the time. And it's like, well,

(38:31):
why play golf when you can just yourself?

Speaker 1 (38:35):
I just like, do they know how crazy they sound?
It's well, hopefully they don't, so they keep providing us
with content that lib your unhinged liberal of the day.
When The Dan o'donald Show returns, President Trump speaking right
now in Corpus Christy, we will get you some sound
bites in the daily Trump Day. Welcome back to the

(38:57):
Dan o'donald's Show. One hour from now. We have all
sorts of fun talk radio roulette. You call, you say anything,
you ask anything. I have no idea what it is
you're going to say, and I have to answer it.
We always have fun with this. We try to do
some rapid fire calls, so start getting those ready. Now

(39:19):
I do have an active challenge out here. It is
round two of the Epstein Challenge. We did round one.
I would say, what would you say, Producer Doug about
a were you here for the first Epstein Challenge? By
the way, that was about a month ago, and we
had all sorts of fun doing this. I actually put

(39:40):
one thousand dollars of my own money on the line.
And when I say my own money, I mean I
will personally venmo you or PayPal you one thousand dollars.
I think I have zell. I'm not sure cash app.
I do not have cash app. I just there's something
about that that I don't really like the security of it.

(40:00):
Venmo is usually my go to, and of all the
money transfer apps, that one seems like it's by far
the easiest. I will actually Venmo you one thousand dollars.
Now we actually have somebody who wants to take me
up on the Epstein challenge. Before we get to the
Daily Trump date, let's go to Pepen. Do I have
that right, Pepin in Milwaukee.

Speaker 9 (40:20):
Yeah, that's correct.

Speaker 1 (40:21):
Oh, that's awesome. Are you by any chance Are you
by any chance named after Pepin the Short? And I
don't mean that as you are. That's okay, Okay, that's
that's wild, because yes, yes, okay, I was. I was
very curious about that because I was like, man, oh man,
that is so weird. Pepin. I saw your name pop

(40:41):
up literally two nights ago. A lot of times when
I'm just trying to like wind down and you know, uh,
not focus on the news, I actually read about random
stuff on Wikipedia or anywhere else, and I was reading
about Pepin the Short. I don't even know how I
got I was. I was reading about I think carlam
or Charles Martel or someone in that Frankish line, and

(41:04):
I saw your name. I'm like, you gotta be kidding me.
Pepin is called?

Speaker 11 (41:07):
All right?

Speaker 1 (41:07):
All right? So you you have some proof, or at
least you think you do, that Trump committed sex crimes
with Jeffrey Epstein.

Speaker 9 (41:16):
Uh yeah, And actually it's been public for a while.
And honestly, I don't even want the money because I'm
just so sick and tired of what's going on. Sure,
you know. The thing is he called in to Howard
Stern and he talked about how he liked to walk
in underage girls stresses.

Speaker 1 (41:37):
That's actually not actually true. Uh he did, well, you
didn't not not not super closely because he was talking
about the Miss Universe beauty pageant. This was from two
thousand and five. I believe Miss Universe is actually for
This is not Miss teen Universe. This is Miss Universe.

Speaker 16 (41:58):
Uh.

Speaker 9 (41:58):
And you're saying, okay, regardless, like you don't walk in
on women changing. Okay, Like, let's be real.

Speaker 1 (42:05):
How do you know it actually happened.

Speaker 9 (42:08):
Because he and he bragged about it.

Speaker 1 (42:12):
Yeah, but if you're on Howard Stern, if you're on
Howard Stern, you kind of want to fit in with
you know Jojo the dog faced boy.

Speaker 9 (42:19):
No, no, no, no.

Speaker 1 (42:22):
But do you I mean, do you have proof that
he actually walked in on underage girls. I'm not saying
he didn't. What what Trump would have done is known.

Speaker 9 (42:30):
What it's.

Speaker 1 (42:32):
What it is is it's a statement against interest in
the law, so that would be said like, okay, you
don't normally say that. So a statement against interest, you
have statement against penal interest, statement against financial interest, and
it's it's presumed that it's probably true because you probably
wouldn't say that. Okay, that in and of itself isn't

(42:53):
actually proof.

Speaker 9 (42:55):
No, but it's okay, look look, okay, I got to
young two young girls. Okay. And the thing is, if
anybody ever talked about that sort of stuff around me,
I would not associate with them at all. Okay, I
might even call the cops.

Speaker 1 (43:13):
That's also not evidence at all. That and this is
completely unrelated.

Speaker 9 (43:19):
Everything is you keep on seeing evidence piling up, like
what else? You know, It's like there's a lot of smoke.

Speaker 1 (43:27):
Okay, what what? What is that smoke?

Speaker 9 (43:31):
You know what they're doing with Epstein files? Man?

Speaker 1 (43:34):
Like, what's specifically hit me here? Know what?

Speaker 14 (43:36):
What?

Speaker 9 (43:36):
Specifically by the fact that it is publicly known, had
agents going through the files looking for Trump's name to redact.

Speaker 1 (43:47):
Okay, so okay, they were redacting based on standard FBI redactions.
In fact, it has been it has been repeatedly proven
that there are routine redactions. And a lot of this
is so we don't pepin get into what we're getting into,
and we have over the last like jeez, really six

(44:10):
seven years, I mean, frankly, I'm not even going to
deny that Republicans and sort of fringe conservatives, the QAnon types,
were the ones who started this where it's just like
there are the wildest accusations that get thrown out there.
They're not provable at all, right, and did you happen
to hear for jeez, a good twenty minutes we went

(44:33):
through prominent left wing media hosts saying this is the
height of irresponsibility to just sort of throw out these allegations.
So one of the reasons, and a big reason, big,
big reason the FBI was very careful to redact, is
the same reason that if like, let's say you or
I were witnesses. Let's say you know, God forbid, someone

(44:56):
tried to do something like you said with your daughters, okay,
while you were on the phone with Dan o'donald, right,
that would be like Dan o'donald's name would be in
that file. But I have nothing to do. You just
happen to be talking to me, right, so my name
would be redacted.

Speaker 9 (45:11):
So look, look, you're asking me to accept that either
they are so incompetent that they couldn't recognize that they
should have removed the images of underage minors, Like if
you can't see that, if your main focus is is
Trump and making sure that nothing in there is embarrassing

(45:32):
to Trump or criminally, Uh.

Speaker 1 (45:35):
That wasn't the main focus. And there's actually no evidence
that that was the main focus. There's there's none. There
were three million pages of documents. Do you have any
idea the size of that pepen?

Speaker 15 (45:46):
Like?

Speaker 1 (45:46):
You couldn't. You couldn't go through all three million pages
of the Epstein files in I mean even if you
were going at a page a minute, right a, it
would take you far along, like you could you could
read it. Okay, this is saying this, This is saying this.
In order to properly contextualize it, it would take hundreds,

(46:08):
hundreds of years. I'm not even kidding you. There is
so much material out there. This has been a long
standing thing that somehow Donald Trump in all of his
interviews about talking with Howard Stern about girls, Oh yes,
I was going into the locker room and doing all this.
He would brag about his sexual conquests all the time.

(46:33):
There is also another very commonly misunderstood interview quote where
he said, you know, age is really no I have
no age limit on the girls that I like. That
was from two thousand and two, and he actually said
the age thirty was the perfect age for a woman. Now,
what is Trump almost eighty? He's eighty, So he back

(46:54):
then would have been what fifty five somewhere in there. Okay,
it's twenty five years or twenty years younger than he
was at the time he said thirty five was I
think he said something like its checkout time when a
woman turns thirty five. He said, I have no age limit.
I mean I have an age. This is a direct quote.

(47:15):
I don't want to be like Congressman Foley with you know,
the twelve year olds. So that was a quote that
was taken out of context and it was actually lied
about that somehow Donald Trump was attracted to twelve year olds.
This idea. Again, this is not proof. It is I

(47:35):
will admit a statement against interest. Like he said, I
like walking in while the girls are changing. Okay, this again,
as any dude will say, Producer, Doug, do you enjoy
seeing women in various states of undress? Yes, as most

(47:57):
red blooded American men do. Now is he saying I
am going into the locker room and then I raped
a bunch of them. No, he's saying, Okay, well they're
getting there in their swimsuits whatever. Not something I would
say or ever admit to, even if I was on
the Howard Stern Show. But not proof of any sort

(48:20):
of crime.

Speaker 14 (48:22):
We're gonna win so much you may even get tired
of winning.

Speaker 1 (48:25):
Trump just keeps winning. It is a win for the administration.

Speaker 11 (48:28):
It's also a big win for the United States. We
have to keep winning. We have to win more.

Speaker 1 (48:34):
We're gonna win more. Time now for the daily Trump Day.
President Trump campaigning in Porpoise Christi, Texas. This is right
before the all important Texas US Senate primary. But the
president's primary focus was on energy policy.

Speaker 14 (48:53):
Delighted to be here at this national treasure, one of
the largest energy export hubs anywhere in the world, anywhere
in the world, the port of Corpus Christie. We had
a lot to do with it. That bridge, we had
so much. What a nice bridge.

Speaker 13 (49:08):
I like that color.

Speaker 14 (49:10):
What a nice bridge. And we dreadged nation deeply. I
guess I said, fifty four feet or something. It's about
as deep as you can go. I think we could
go a few feet deeper, and then you could then
you could you want to go a little bit deeper.

Speaker 1 (49:24):
What the hell? Oh now, now, what do you think
do you think libs are going to say?

Speaker 9 (49:29):
Ah?

Speaker 1 (49:29):
Trump saying you want to go a little bit deeper,
it's a sexual comment, proves he's a perf.

Speaker 14 (49:35):
What the hell, it's only money. With the men and
women here today, we're unleashing America's potential, strengthening our security,
increasing our prosperity. We have the most successful country anywhere
in the world.

Speaker 1 (49:49):
A year and a half ago, had we had.

Speaker 14 (49:51):
A dead country, our country was dead, you know, better
than anybody, and cementing America's status as the number one
energy superpower by far.

Speaker 1 (50:01):
Energy Secretary Chris Wright also in attendance. Before the President
started speaking, he talked with Fox News about just what
the Trump administration has done to unleash America's energy prowess.

Speaker 17 (50:13):
Biden did everything he could to push electricity prices up,
closing thirty forty gigawatts of coal power. President Trump, on
the other hand, kept seventeen gigawatts of coal power plants
open last year that would have been closed under the Democrats.
So yes, there was inertia for those arising electricity prices, but.

Speaker 1 (50:32):
That a nurse is over.

Speaker 17 (50:34):
Indiana just announced a lowering of electricity rates. Georgia and
Alabama announced a three year freeze. So with our efforts,
we're getting electricity production up, new jobs coming here, and
ending these ruinous President Biden electricity price rises.

Speaker 1 (50:52):
Now, the Texas Senate primary is projected to be a
barn burner on both sides. John Corny is being challenged
by a couple of Republicans, including the Lieutenant Governor Ken Paxton.
But on the Democrat side, you might remember the controversy
surrounding James tallerco and his interview on the Stephen Colbert Show.

(51:15):
They were trying to say that well, it was the
federal government that didn't want Colbert to interview a prominent Democrat. No,
it was an equal time objection. Colbert and his team
didn't want to give equal time to Jasmine Crockett. She
is the outspoken Democrat rep who is widely believed to
be winning this primary because of her dominance amongst black

(51:38):
voters in Dallas and especially Houston, as well as Hispanic voters.
We shall see. Taller Rico is widely backed by the
powers that be in the Democrat Party. Because Jasmin Crockett
is Jasmine Crockett and Republicans just like here in Wisconsin,
who would be licking their chops at the prospect of
Francesca Hong or Mandela Barr being the gubernatorial nominee they

(52:02):
would love to run against Jasmine Crockett. Would Democrats be
able to run on the issue of illegal immigration, Well,
they seem to think so after everything that happened in
Minneapolis with the ice surge. But new polling by CNN's
Harry Enton suggests that immigration is a horrible issue for Democrats.

Speaker 18 (52:25):
Still, this, I think is so important to note. After
all the events in Los Angeles, after all the events
in Minneapolis, after all the events of the last year
on immigration, can Democrats actually take advantage on this issue?
And a look at the polling suggests actually no, They're
in a worse position, in a worse position than they
were at this point during Donald Trump's first term. Take
a look here, just which party more on immigration? In

(52:47):
twenty eighteen, Democrats had an edge of about six points.
You come over to this side of the screen, now
look at that Republicans are the ones who have actually
have an edge on immigration. So this whole idea that
Democrats are going to be able to take advantage of
the immigration group of the immigration issue actually doesn't bear
itself out in the polling, despite everything that's been going on.

(53:09):
In fact, Democrats through a worse position than they were
during Donald Trump's first term.

Speaker 1 (53:13):
That is actually kind of shocking if you can believe that.
I mean, Democrats have been harping on Ice is a
bunch of Nazis, They're Trump's brown shirts for weeks and
Trump still and Republicans still pulled a significant edge on
the issue of immigration. Believe I misspoke. I said Ken
Paxton was the lieutenant governor. That's actually Dan Patrick, not

(53:36):
off the sportscaster. Ken Paxton is the Attorney general of Texas.
That Senate primary is scheduled for Tuesday, March third. All right,
that is the daily Trump date. When we come back,
Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers accidentally says the quiet part out loud.
Democrats really don't want fair congressional maps. They want to

(53:59):
be able to but Jerry mender to their hearts content,
stay tuned, classical conservatism and contemporary style. It is the
Dan O'Donnell show. Welcome back to it. How bizarre strangest
stories of the past seven days. Our fun weekly segment
that is coming up at the bottom of the five
o'clock hour. Top of the five o'clock hour, it is

(54:22):
talk Radio Roulette. The floor is yours, ladies and gentlemen,
and a reminder if you would like to be like
Peppin and attempt to prove that Donald Trump committed sex
crimes and win one thousand dollars from me. I can
see why Pepin didn't want the money because saying on
Howard Stern, I walked into the locker room or I

(54:46):
walked into the dressing room is rather obviously and since
this was completely unrelated to Jeffrey Epstein and it is
not an admission of any sort of sex crime, that unfortunately.

Speaker 9 (54:58):
Is not proof.

Speaker 1 (55:00):
But if you think you can do better than Pepen,
be my guest four one, four, seven, nine, nine, eleven thirty.
The Epstein challenge is open call up. Provide proof that
I am unable to refute that Donald Trump committed sex crimes.
In other words, actually back up the wild, unhinged allegations
that you and your fellow lefties have been making for

(55:23):
the better part of nine months now and win my
money seems like a no brainer. Too bad. In multiple
instances of us doing this, a nobody ever seems to
want to call. It's almost like I think my reputation
precedes me about just how ill equipped most Democrats are

(55:45):
to actually go against me in a debate. Heck, if
Democrat congressional representatives, do you realize I have been challenging
Congressman Mark Pocan for probably two months now to come
on this show and debate literally any topic. I have
offered thousands of dollars to his favorite causes, to his

(56:08):
favorite charities, plan Parenthood. I don't know what's the ACLU
Man Boy Love Association. I don't know whatever the hell
Mark Pocan wants to give my money to. By all
means refuses to do it. If he's scared of me,
I can see why your rank and file Libs might

(56:30):
be as well. Governor Ever is accidentally just undid every
single Democrat talking point in this state about fair maps
and Republican jerrymandering, and Democrats, well, gosh darn it, they
just want fair congressional maps and fair legislative maps. They

(56:51):
don't want those partisan jerrymanders anymore. After a wispolitics dot
Com luncheon Yesterday, reporters asked Governor Evers about his call
for a special legislative session for a constitutional amendment banning
partisan jerrymandering and instead potentially imposing in this state an

(57:13):
Iowa style nonpartisan redistricting commission. Would you believe Ebs admitted
that he heard through the grapevine that Democrats do not
want any sort of fair maps. They want to continue jerrymandering.

Speaker 12 (57:30):
Readistrict that neither said it's excited about this.

Speaker 19 (57:34):
I was through the grapevine.

Speaker 9 (57:36):
Did you know.

Speaker 1 (57:40):
In case you couldn't hear, that was? I believe. Jesse
o'paian of the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, you said you've gotten
pushback from both Democrats and Republicans on the redistricting push.
Have you gotten pushed back from Democrats through the grapevine?
I have, yes, Opion follows up. Do you want to
follow up on that? No, I don't stistically you.

Speaker 11 (58:00):
Democrats and recalled against me.

Speaker 12 (58:03):
I know they want to have advantage.

Speaker 1 (58:07):
I'm not position so Democrats and Republicans they both want
to have an advantage in redistricting, and I'm not in
that position. He said, I'm europe that I have not heard,
but I have heard through the grapevine, meaning that Democrats
don't want to do this, but I have not yet
heard directly.

Speaker 19 (58:26):
Did you notice that during your State of the State
there were some Democrats not clapping when you talked about.

Speaker 1 (58:31):
The redistricting I.

Speaker 19 (58:33):
Really could who would define redistricting or excuse me, whould
define jerry mandering under this constitutional amendment?

Speaker 1 (58:41):
Well, we'll work with anybody to take that happen. Will
you reporters please stop abusing the old bat. He has
no idea any of this substance behind any of real
Governor Maggie Gow's proposals. He has no idea who's going
to determine what is and is not jerry manning. And
you know why Democrats don't want any sort of non

(59:03):
partisan redistricting commission now because they know that for the
next generation, they've got control of the Wisconsin Supreme Court,
and the Supreme Court and its liberal majority will simply
do the jerry mandering for them. Even though the only
entity in the state of Wisconsin that is constitutionally authorized

(59:24):
to draw maps for the purposes of redistricting one not
the governor, not the Supreme Court, not the People's Maps Commission.
It is the state legislature. What we are seeing right
now is an attempt again by the liberal Supreme Court
to usurp this power from the legislature. They have, in
fact done quite possibly one of the most unconstitutional things

(59:48):
I have seen in quite some time. They have appointed
two three district panels of Circuit Court judges to review
a past Wisconsin Supreme Court decision on whether or not
the congressional map that is going to be used in
the upcoming twenty twenty six midterm is in fact a jerrymander.
Why do I say this is grossly unconstitutional? Well, because

(01:00:11):
the Wisconsin Constitution provides that the Wisconsin Supreme Court is
the court of last resort in Wisconsin, not a group
of random Circuit Court judges. Circuit Court judges have no
statutory or constitutional power to review Supreme Court decisions. Yet
that is exactly what they're doing now. The left wing

(01:00:33):
Supreme Court, you might remember, just before Christmas in twenty
twenty three, struck down the state legislative map that Republicans
in the legislature had drawn, and Republicans, recognizing that Democrats
and liberals on the Supreme Court were going to appoint
their own jerrymandering experts to just do a number on

(01:00:55):
the map, said okay, we have no choice but to
agree with Governor Evers. It was a rather obvious jerrymander.
Democrats won ten seats instantly in the state Assembly and
ten seats instantly in the state Senate, even though the
previous maps were reviewed by both the state Supreme Court
and the United States Supreme Court and past constitutional muster

(01:01:19):
both times. In fact, it was Governor Ever's map that
the United States Supreme Court said, yeah, this is an
illegal racial jerrymander. Back to the drawing board with you
People's Maps Commission. Now, after multiple lawsuits and multiple efforts
by left wing attorneys, they got their woman on the

(01:01:41):
court in Susan Crawford. Last year, they maintained their balance
of power on the court. Crawford, of course, very infamously
directly promised a large group of big money Democrat donors
on what was supposed to be a secret campaign phone
call that she was going to put quote two congressional

(01:02:03):
seats in play for the twenty twenty six midterms. That
was her entire fundraising strategy nationalize the race by saying,
I'm going to Jerrymander, Derek Van Orden, and Brian Style
right out of their congressional seats. Democrats in the legislature
naturally want this to happen. If there's a nonpartisan commission
that gives them, supposedly what they've wanted all the time,

(01:02:25):
fair maps. That takes the power out of the State
Supreme Court's hands, now, doesn't it. Democrats never wanted fair maps.
They wanted left wing jerry mandered maps, and they're going
to fight tooth and nail to ensure that they get them.
When we come back the curious case of the dog

(01:02:46):
food feeding in Madison, State two. Sometimes during the commercial breaks,
I wonder what would happen if I did my show
in the cadence of some of our advertising. I was
just like Dan O'Donnell's show four one, four, seven, nine,

(01:03:09):
nine eleven thirty positivity and good results. I kid, I kid,
we love all of our advertisers. I'll be totally honest
with you, folks. I have been I have been working
on a number of different things today and the last
couple of days. I am just I have just been

(01:03:30):
fro I was kind of I was kind of I'm
not nodding off. But I'm just like, oh my gosh,
just like you folks. As much as I love this job.

Speaker 11 (01:03:39):
I truly do.

Speaker 1 (01:03:40):
I don't think I could ever be happier doing anything else.
That's how much I truly love doing this. But you know,
I'm just I'm kind of like, oh my gosh, I'm
still looking forward to the weekend. I like, I'm seeing
over my shoulder in our in our window at the
at the studio, the sun is is star and to

(01:04:00):
hang low in the sky. It's a beautiful spring afternoon.
Of course we're gonna get like three inches of snow tomorrow.
I'm like, I want to get out of there. And
I'm I'm I'm just awakened from my from my half
slumper with Relativity equals ah what Okay, Okay, it worked,

(01:04:23):
it worked, I am. Now I am like, I'll bet
you that guy could help me get so I am.
I'll be I'll admit I am. I don't think I
consume a lot of seed oils, but now I am
very interesting. What is what is I don't even remember
what the company is? Relativity is that Total Health Ink,

(01:04:43):
Total Health Inc.

Speaker 13 (01:04:44):
That's it.

Speaker 1 (01:04:45):
I'll be honest with you. I am now very interested
in total health ink. So I guess I just proved
why we have some of that cadence that just kind
of woke me up. You know what is has just
kind of set wrong with me all week long? Is
this story about Madison East High School feeding a kid

(01:05:07):
dog food. Because there's no good result from this. This
is an either or scenario. Either Madison East High School
has an employee who fed a nonverbal autistic kid dog
food as a form of punishment, or the mother is

(01:05:28):
lying and is for whatever reason, attempted. Well, actually I
would know the reason. What is always the motivation to
lie about this? It's so you can file a lawsuit
and you can make a lot of money. There is
just something that is not sitting right with me about
this story. She held a big press conference today at

(01:05:50):
the Capitol in Madison. She's joined by Shelia Stubbs, state
legislator of course the NAACP, and she talked about the
timeline of her son being fed allegedly dog food.

Speaker 12 (01:06:05):
I have a non barble autistic sign named Jamie Hawks
that I found out was given dog food February the thirteenth, Friday,
February thirteen. I didn't hear about it until the following week,
So they covered it up for the whole weekend, and

(01:06:28):
I was trying to figure out why my son was
active different a little wrestled, not one and he hoping,
kind of bear, did you cannot know me?

Speaker 1 (01:06:40):
Did you have to go with the pooping? Kind of
where I could have I could have gone all weekend
without hearing that.

Speaker 12 (01:06:44):
They didn't tell me about the situation until Tuesday at
four o'clock.

Speaker 1 (01:06:50):
To you the next week, Okay, why would they not
tell on Monday because they were off it was President's Day.
If this allegedly happened on Friday, February thirteenth, it would
have happened somewhere around lunch, right. Obviously nobody knew that

(01:07:10):
it happened all weekend long. There's no school on Monday.
Somebody figures out that this happens, and after school four
o'clock Tuesday afternoon, immediately after school is out, the mom
is told here's where the timeline. Also, it kind I

(01:07:31):
question it. She doesn't call the police until a week later. Now,
maybe she didn't believe that this had happened to her son.
She obviously that the kid has grown up with you know,
maybe the same caregivers in the school. She doesn't want
to believe that this happened, but she waited a full
week to report what is very obviously a crime. Madison

(01:07:56):
East has said only that they are investigating this, but
then at the press conference today, the woman appears to
be setting up the inevitable lawsuit if you couldn't tell
by the fact that the NAACP was involved in this.
She blames racism for her son being forced to eat
dog from.

Speaker 12 (01:08:17):
Feel breathing and it wouldn't have to stop because you
would think the people that have your child every day
almost will take care of them, and you want to
put your best trust in them. And then you turn
around and find out and I don't feel like they're
not taking this series. We'll be blessing all over sons

(01:08:37):
in African American. It's been a lot of issues with
Wisconsin racism. I'm speaking out on everything because I don't
feel like nothing should be covered up.

Speaker 20 (01:08:52):
Aha.

Speaker 1 (01:08:55):
So without evidence, we are going to allegation that this
is being covered up and not taken seriously because of racism.
The very thing that would demonstrate a civil rights violation
that would open you up to being able to collect

(01:09:15):
on a civil rights lawsuit filed by Oh I don't
know the NAACP folks, I just I have. I was
one of the very first people I can remember in
the what was it? January of twenty nineteen. January of

(01:09:35):
twenty nineteen. It was the morning after Jesse Smolette said
that he was attacked by the guys screaming, this is
Maga country. And I went on my friend John Bachman
over at Newsmax. I went on his show. He still
talks about this seven years later. He's like, how did
you know? You called it immediately? I said, John, it

(01:09:57):
is like the coldest stretch of weather that I've had
in decades. I'm ninety miles away from Chicago. There was
nobody who was out that night. It was the night
before we had like the coldest night in fifty years.
I said, I don't believe this story. I'm not saying
definitively that I don't believe this story. It just seems

(01:10:22):
very odd that a school would hey have a can
of dog food there, Like, this is the thing that
I just fundamentally do not get. Okay, if he was
made to eat like ketchup packets or something like that,
or like hot sauce. Okay, there's hot sauce there. Somebody

(01:10:43):
clearly brought a can of dog food to make the
kid eat the dog food and it wasn't. And what
I think if this did happen, if the kid actually
was fed the dog food, my immediate suspicion would be, Okay,
it was some just peace of human garbage fellow student
bullying this kid. Look far be it from me to

(01:11:08):
stand up for presumably left wing educational bureaucrats here, especially
ones at Madison East. You might remember, on this very
show we reported exclusively that Madison East was holding an
underage drag show where they were inviting members of the
public to see underage students in drag prancing around the

(01:11:30):
auditorium and hilariously, even though most of these people do
not want motor ID, they don't want a photo ID
for voting, they were actually requiring an ID to get
in the underage drag show. There is no love lost
between yours truly and Madison East High School. I just

(01:11:51):
have a very difficult time accepting this story at face value.
This is why I am glad the Lease are involved.
If there was in fact a forced feeding of a
truly vulnerable, innocent kid of dog food. Then prosecute that

(01:12:12):
to the fullest extent of the law. I'm talking prison time.
That's child abuse, and it's a pretty extreme form of
child abuse. But if this is a hoax and this
was contrived, prosecute that as well. For filing a false
police report. We name the unsung hero of the day.

(01:12:33):
When The Dan o'donald Show returns, stay tuned.

Speaker 11 (01:12:38):
Classical conservatism, contemporary style. The Dan o'donald Show is coming
right back.

Speaker 1 (01:12:48):
During the commercial break, I was made aware of some
information regarding the Madison East High School situation that sort
of confirms my suspicion. I hate to be vague about this, folks,
but I'm going to, i think, follow up on this
with another report on Monday that there is a lot

(01:13:11):
more to this story than just the cut and dry
racist Madison East High School aid fed a nonverbal, autistic
black kid dog food. And I just I hate waiting
into stuff like this. You know, when it's these these
are a private citizen, right like this is this is

(01:13:32):
a mom. She's obviously very upset. I there is information
that I think the public needs to know about, and
I want to present it in. Look, i've got four
minutes before we're going to talk radio roulette. Yes, I
suppose I can push, but I just want to cross
my t's dot my eyes. So stay tuned. Probably a

(01:13:54):
more in depth investigation into this coming up on Monday
here on Dan O'donald's show. Right now, let's name the
unsung hero of the day. He really wanted to do
this yesterday because it was fitting. Didn't get a chance

(01:14:18):
because of time. We had a whole lot of stuff
to do. Today's Unsung Hero of the Day is legendary
Major League baseball umpire Bruce Freming. A native of the
Milwaukee area, he was from Mechwon. In fact, umpired his
very first baseball game, the very first baseball game at

(01:14:39):
Miller Park when it opened in two thousand and one,
called the very final game of his career, in the
exact same spot. He passed away yesterday at the age
of eighty six. He set a record all time for
longest umpiring career. He umpired the third most games in

(01:15:02):
Major League Baseball history, five thousand, one hundred and sixty
three games. He made his major league debut in the
early nineteen seventies. The nineteen seventy one baseball season, to
be precise, and he worked a whole lot of World Series,
five of them nineteen seventy six, eighty four, eighty eight,

(01:15:22):
nineteen ninety and nineteen ninety five, as well as ten
League Championship Series and three All Star Games, including of
course Oneett County Stadium in Milwaukee in nineteen seventy five.
Everything I ever heard about Bruce Freming is that he
was just an incredible man. He didn't just call balls

(01:15:45):
and strikes. He was a truly decent human being. After
his umpiring career wrapped up, he stayed with Major League
Baseball as an umpiring coordinator and as someone who worked
with young umpires. Bruce Freming, dead at the age of
eighty six, and your unsung hero of the day. I

(01:16:08):
know producer Doug was a big fan of Bruce Freming. Obviously,
both Doug, you and I covered the Milwaukee Brewers very
very closely. You ever have any experience talking with Freming?
He never really, I mean that I don't think they
were ever allowed to really talk to the press. He did,
I mean, I know he did. He was sort of
a larger than life figure and just always an entertaining guy,

(01:16:33):
and yeah, all right, coming up after the top of
the hour news. We always have a lot of fun
with this. It is called talk radio Roulette, and ladies
and gentlemen, the floor is yours. And I say that
it's not just like open line Friday, like the late
legendary Rush Limbaugh had every Friday for decades. You call

(01:16:54):
up and I'm not going to have any idea what
it is you are going to say. I am just
going to in relative rapid fire fashion, answer your questions,
take your points, respond to them, and we are going
to have some fun. So give me a call right now.
You can say anything, ask anything within reason of course,

(01:17:14):
and I will respond to it. It's talk radio Roulette,
and we are taking your calls right now. Four one,
four seven nine to nine eleven thirty or one eight
hundred eight three eight nine four seven six day two.
We have made it quittin time on a Friday evening,

(01:17:37):
well for pretty much everybody except your humble host, it
is five oh six, and for most people the weekend
is underway and we want to have some fun. Look,
we recognize that we cover a lot of heavy stuff
here on the Dan o'donald show. So for the next
few minutes, we're going to have some fun. It is

(01:17:57):
a brand new segment we call Talk Radio Roulette. Well,
I'm not gambling with my life, per se, maybe my
professional life, because unlike Open Line Friday by the late

(01:18:21):
great Rush Limbaugh, I have absolutely no idea what any
of these callers that I am about to take are
going to say. If you would like to join Talk
Radio Roulette, give us a call right now for one
four seven, nine, nine eleven thirty. Yes, our producer Doug
is going to screen your call, but he is not
putting up on my computer where I can see who

(01:18:42):
it is that's calling. What it is you're going to say?
You can ask any question, you can make any point.
I just kind of have to respond. Let's roll that
Rulette reel and it lands first on Lisa. Lisa, welcome
to Talk Radio Roulette. My Dan pleasure be with you today. Well,
the pleasure is all mine, Lisa.

Speaker 18 (01:19:03):
My question is, well, Tuesday Trump's speech was electrifying.

Speaker 16 (01:19:08):
I just loved it.

Speaker 13 (01:19:09):
Yeah.

Speaker 12 (01:19:11):
My question is on the Democrat side, in the front row,
there was a lady with a red dress that kept standing.

Speaker 21 (01:19:17):
Up and crapping.

Speaker 1 (01:19:18):
Who was she Oh, my gosh, I had this. She
was sitting right next to Tammy Baldwin, right, and it
was oh gosh, it was a Republican. I thought it wasn't,
at least Stephonic it was. I don't know, honestly. I'm

(01:19:42):
sure somebody will text me and if you know who
it was. It was, in fact a Republican legislator. I
think it was a member of the House. I'm not
exactly sure who. I'm sure we will be able to
get an answer very very quickly. Lisa. Let's go next
to Nick in receip. Nick, welcome to Talk Radio Roulette.

Speaker 16 (01:20:03):
What's up Dan?

Speaker 9 (01:20:04):
Thanks for driving home with me after work.

Speaker 1 (01:20:06):
Everybody, No, it's my pleasure, sir, my pleasure.

Speaker 22 (01:20:10):
Hey, whatever happened to mister President Joseph Biden? He was
supposed to be in this.

Speaker 23 (01:20:15):
Brilliant, non mental challenged guy that could lead our country
for another four years.

Speaker 24 (01:20:20):
Where is he now?

Speaker 22 (01:20:21):
What's going on with him?

Speaker 1 (01:20:22):
Well, actually he was just in South Carolina. In fact,
he was I think there to make a speech yesterday
and there was video emerged of him. He's flying commercial
now and he of course still has his security detail.
He's still got Secret Service protection, and I'm not making

(01:20:43):
this up. A woman in the airport as he's waiting
for his plane obviously recognizes him and asks for a picture.
Instead of taking the picture, he kind of grabs her
camera and just sort of stares at him it blankly.
So yes, obviously Biden was ready for four more years.

(01:21:06):
Let's spin that wheel once again. It lands on Steve
up next on the Dan o'donald Show. Welcome to Talk
Radio Roulette, Steve.

Speaker 25 (01:21:15):
What's happening, Dan, You're doing a.

Speaker 1 (01:21:17):
Great job, Thank you, sir. I appreciate that.

Speaker 9 (01:21:20):
Well.

Speaker 25 (01:21:20):
I never thought anybody could replaced the great Mark Bellen,
but you are.

Speaker 24 (01:21:24):
You are just talking.

Speaker 1 (01:21:25):
Oh well, thank you, thank you. It was it was, uh,
nobody nobody will ever and I just i'd want to
be clear, nobody will ever replace Mark, just as Clay
and fuck say nobody will ever replace Rush.

Speaker 13 (01:21:39):
But you know it is.

Speaker 1 (01:21:41):
It is my pleasure to sit in this chair. By
the way, before before we go any further, a whole
lot of people did get it ready. It was Kat Camick,
who was the woman in the red dress who kept
standing up. She is a Republican representative from Florida. Our
very first caller Lisa wanted to know who that was.
It was on the tip of my top. I knew
it was a rep She is a Republican representative. She

(01:22:02):
happened to be sitting right next to Tammy Baldwin. Yes,
she was in the Democrat area. It's because I think
she was taking the seat of one of the Democrats
who was boycotting the state of the Union. But it
was cat Chemick who kept standing up and cheering for
the president. All right, Steve, what do you got for me?

Speaker 9 (01:22:19):
My question is about the Brewers.

Speaker 25 (01:22:21):
Yes, a lot of the people are confused, and so
are we going to be able to watch them on
cable this year or do we have to buy a
streaming thing or like fs one used to have on
Fan Duel. How how we're going to be a watched
Brewer games this year.

Speaker 9 (01:22:36):
Over the air?

Speaker 1 (01:22:37):
You are going to still watch Brewers games on cable? Okay,
their former channel, uh, which was what fan Duel TV.
That's basically ended. So if you have a cable provider,
so if you have Charter Communications or you have the dish,

(01:22:59):
you are still going to be able to watch them
through MLB TV. They're calling it Brewers TV or Brewers
dot TV. I believe if you want to just stream them,
if you're like me and you have YouTube TV, where
unfortunately there isn't an agreement with local Major League Baseball,
you would actually have to pay ninety nine ninety nine.

(01:23:22):
But if you have got cable, if you've just got
basic cable, Spectrum, Charter, whatever, you are going to be
able to watch them for free. It is included with
your package. Also, if you have satellite Dish, if you
have Direct TV, you are also going to be able
to watch them. We actually had the president of business
Operations for the Brewers, Rick Slessinger, on just as training

(01:23:46):
caps pitchers and catchers reported for that exact question, because
I'm sure they have gotten it a ton up. Next
on talk radio Roulette is tim Ingreenfield. Tim you're on
the Dan O'Donnell's show. Welcome to it.

Speaker 24 (01:23:59):
Thank you.

Speaker 20 (01:24:01):
Very quickly.

Speaker 21 (01:24:02):
We're all sick to death of Epstein. Did the President
miss an opportunity to put Epstein to bed? Knowing that
Democrats brought Epstein victims as guests.

Speaker 24 (01:24:19):
Should not the President have extemporarily.

Speaker 21 (01:24:23):
Honored them and they had those victims to stand?

Speaker 1 (01:24:27):
That would have been something no I think he played
it exactly perfectly, because no matter what he did, if
he acknowledged those victims at all, he would have been
I mean, this was clearly a partisan hit from the
NPR story the day before, directly timed that the Trump

(01:24:47):
DOJ was selectively redacting Epstein files that named Trump. It
was completely and totally bogus. It was false. And by
the way, the story that they were supposedly redacting was
one that was investigating. It was one that came in
on this FBI basically this tip line, and it was
a woman who was very obviously lying or mentally ill

(01:25:08):
or both, who said that back in nineteen ninety four,
Donald Trump raped her when she was thirteen years old.
There was no credibility to it whatsoever. The allegation was
that the Trump DOOJ was blocking the release of fifty
three pages of documents related to that. Well, there was
no there there, So there was really nothing the president

(01:25:30):
could have done. I like the way you're thinking about that,
but no, unfortunately, I don't think there was anything he
could have done to put out the Epstein fire. John
and Receiving up next on talk radio Roulette.

Speaker 20 (01:25:45):
Good evening, mister, o'donald, enjoyed your shoul Thank you. One
point I'd like to make is nobody has mentioned anything
about any pictures that somebody as cunning as Jeffrey Epstein
or would would would at least think about it. I
was wondering what your comments is about that.

Speaker 1 (01:26:03):
That he didn't have any pictures of anybody in compromising positions. Well,
that was actually a chief part of the Jeffrey Epstein conspiracy.
That he got his money because he was blackmailing rich
and powerful people like Bill Gates and Donald Trump and
whomever else because he had videos of them. That there
were secret video cameras that were affixed everywhere on Epstein

(01:26:25):
Island and in his penthouse or in his townhouse, i
should say, in New York City and on the New
Mexico ranch that apparently Read Hoffman, the single biggest donor
to the Wisconsin Democratic Party, stayed for a week at
There was no video, there were no compromising pictures. The
best we got there are about five different pictures of

(01:26:47):
Bill Clinton getting a massage. There's one He's getting a
massage from Virginia Giuffrey. There's another He's getting a massage
in what appears to be an airport from another one
of Jeffrey Epstein's girls. There's another picture of him just
smiling with what appears to be one of the girls
or young women in Jeffrey Epstein's employ That's it, I mean,

(01:27:10):
that's literally it. There were no blackmail pictures, and that
sort of destroyed when real big plank of the Epstein
conspiracy theory, we all the wheel yet again, and we
go back to recein. Apparently talk radio Roulette is remarkably
popular and racine. Paul is up next. What's going on, Paul,
Welcome to talk radio or Lett. Happy Friday?

Speaker 16 (01:27:32):
Yeah, Happy Friday.

Speaker 13 (01:27:33):
Dan.

Speaker 16 (01:27:34):
A couple of comments here. I think it's important that
you know, and I appreciate you staying focused on the
midterms because that's everything really And one of the things
that I was thinking about was, I think we need
to come up with some level of a slogan, you know,
save the style steel, right, because Bryan so was, like,

(01:27:58):
by firing away in my lifetime, the best congressman in
my district that I've ever had, and I just perished
the thought of him getting you know, you know, losing
that seat after all his hard work, and just what
kind of a man he is. And then the second thing,
I have a question I asked for you. It seemed

(01:28:18):
as though what was so effective in the last presidential
elective election was the involvement of Lara Trump and that
team you know, too Big to Rig right in getting
out the vote. Are they actively involved in this state
and across the country for the midterms.

Speaker 1 (01:28:41):
Well, yeah, Laura Trump is with the RNC, I mean
the Republican National Committee is deeply involved in all of
these races. And yes, the narrative, hey, let's make it
too big to rig everybody get out there, that was
very prominent. Yet save I think he meant to say
save the Style seat. It came out as save the
Style Steel. I'm like, oh my god, what a congressman

(01:29:03):
Style Steel. Yes, I agree with you. He is an
incredibly effective congressional representative. I see bright things in his future.
I don't think Democrats could actually jerrymander him out of
the seat. Remember, they already redrew his district to include
way more of southern Milwaukee County in an effort to
try to draw more Democrats in, and he absolutely cleaned

(01:29:26):
up in his last two reelection bids in twenty twenty
two and twenty twenty four. The man is just incredibly
popular because he is incredibly effective and what he does.
And he got a shout out for the bill that
he introduced at the State of the Union on banning
congressional stock trade. We roll that wheel again and go

(01:29:49):
to Fredonio, where we find Kurt. Kurt Welcome to Talk
Radio Roulette.

Speaker 9 (01:29:55):
Hey Dan, my call.

Speaker 22 (01:29:59):
Well, first of all, I have to say fulling up
on style. Yeah, he is incredibly good. I actually I
told him that he should be running for governor and
he wasn't interested in it.

Speaker 1 (01:30:11):
No, I don't think he is. It would not shock
me if he does one day, it really would not.
I mean he's only forty forty three. Yeah, so plenty
of time for him to do that.

Speaker 22 (01:30:23):
So but anyways, my question was, I haven't heard my
favorite talk show or game show in a while.

Speaker 16 (01:30:33):
What's racist?

Speaker 1 (01:30:34):
Guess What's Racist?

Speaker 14 (01:30:36):
You know?

Speaker 1 (01:30:37):
I think I actually I've been thinking about that. I
sort of thought, thank you so much, Kurt. I really
do appreciate that. Yeah, we did, for those who are
new to the program, a weekly game show called Guess
What's Racist? Where I would just find random articles where
democrats were just saying a random thing was racist. And
we started it in twenty twenty, and I thought it

(01:30:58):
would kind of peter out, and it lasted for years
and years and years. We did it. I sort of
thought that in the era of Trump, you know what,
I don't want to highlight this nonsense that yes, they
keep doing it, and yes, I could find three things
every single week that the media or a Democrat is
just randomly calling racist. But I think we're sort of

(01:31:22):
beyond that, right, We're sort of as a culture. We've
decided we are going to just thoroughly reject the wokeism
of the Biden era and the post George Floyd era.
Tell you what, we're gonna step aside for a break.
We've got jam fow minds. We're gonna keep talk radio
Roulette going. So if you're on hold, stay there, we'll

(01:31:42):
get to you after the break. You're on the Dan
o'donald Show. It is talk radio Roulette, where the floor,

(01:32:06):
dear listeners, is yours. We simply spin the wheel and
wherever it lands, that's whose call we take. I have
no idea what it is the callers are going to say.
That's what makes it so fun. Let's spin that wheel
once again. It lands in New Berlin and we talk
with Brad. Brad Welcome to the Dan O'Donnell Show.

Speaker 16 (01:32:26):
Hey, Dan, is there a legal avenue to split California
and the North California and South California?

Speaker 9 (01:32:32):
And what could we give South California back to Mexico.

Speaker 1 (01:32:37):
I was gonna say, why would you want that? You're
guaranteed to have two more Democrat senators. That's exactly what
they want. In fact, I have heard some crazy ideas
about actually splitting California into four different states. You can't,
actually you cannot create a new state from territory that
is already a state, so territory that was already broken

(01:33:02):
off from another state. This is why Washington, DC, in
my constitutional opinion, can never be the fifty first state. Canada,
on the other hand, absolutely could be. Let's go to
Alan in Shorewood up next on talk radio Roulette. What's
going on Allan?

Speaker 13 (01:33:19):
Well? Nice talking to you. Dan. My question is are
you a born again Christian? If you are, have you
put your total faith in Christ alone for your salvation
and you believe the Bible to be the eric and
fallible word of the Living God.

Speaker 1 (01:33:39):
Oh, boy, what in that question, Allan, this is supposed
to be like a light little thing. Am I a
born again Christian? I am a Catholic, which means I
was baptized when I was a little baby. I was
confirmed when I was about sixteen seventeen. I believe I
was a high school junior, which means I confirm my

(01:34:01):
belief in God, in Jesus Christ. I am, yes, what
you would consider to be a lapsed Catholic. I still
do consider myself to My wife always makes fun of me.
I say I'm ethnically Catholic because I'm half Italian and
half Irish. You don't get two more Catholic nations than that.

(01:34:21):
But we do go to a non denominational church, and
unfortunately youth sports has absolutely destroyed our ability to go
to church on a consistent basis, and also just all
sorts of things. Do I believe the Bible is the
inerrant word of God. I believe it is the inerrant
word of God that was translated and written down by

(01:34:42):
human beings. And in fact, there were multiple counsels in
the early days of Christianity to decide what actually went
into what we now know as the Bible. The New Testament.
So yes, I do believe the Bible is the word
of God, but I do belie believe that it was
edited by human beings and there just is really no

(01:35:04):
way around that. Hope that answers your question. Let's roll
that wheel yet again. That was probably the least Shorewood
call I could have ever gotten out of shore. What
way to prove Allan that it's not just a bunch
of godless libs down on the north Shore? Peter and
Madison up next on talk radio Roulette, What's going on?

Speaker 9 (01:35:25):
Peter?

Speaker 24 (01:35:29):
I could have googled this, but I figure you probably
would have a better answer for it. But h John Fetterman, Yes,
did he stand? Oh you see, nobody ever highlighted that.

Speaker 13 (01:35:42):
I didn't.

Speaker 24 (01:35:43):
I didn't hear it on anything from Fox. And I
think that he's the great hope for talk about the
dark horse for the Democrats. But he would be somebody
who would be a real fight to hushmumpy.

Speaker 9 (01:36:00):
Uh yeah, I h what sort of puppy?

Speaker 1 (01:36:02):
What sort of puppy you got there? I heard that
as well.

Speaker 24 (01:36:06):
Oh my gosh, Mom left me with two long haired
miniature doccents.

Speaker 1 (01:36:11):
Oh that's adorable, adorable, Give them give them, oh, go ahead.

Speaker 9 (01:36:17):
Oh they're adorable.

Speaker 24 (01:36:19):
But they uh, they also sleep with me and they
get very picky about.

Speaker 25 (01:36:26):
Where they sleep.

Speaker 24 (01:36:27):
Ay, yes, they once they laid their heads down. It's
a it's a real it's a real chore to so
a lot of times I'm sleeping at the end of
the back.

Speaker 1 (01:36:36):
Yeah, you're like fitting in there. You're fitting in between
the two dogs like a Tetris piece. I I feel you, man,
give them some pets and scratches for me.

Speaker 9 (01:36:45):
All right.

Speaker 1 (01:36:46):
They're they're very good boys or good girls, as it were.
To answer your question about John Fetterman, Yes, I do
believe Fetterman did stand a couple of times. I couldn't
say for certain because I was obviously watching the exact
same feed you were. I know he was, in fact
a plotting for a number of things that President Trump said,
let's roll that reel again and it lands on Pat

(01:37:07):
on the east side of Milwaukee. What is going on?

Speaker 13 (01:37:09):
Pat?

Speaker 9 (01:37:10):
Yeah?

Speaker 26 (01:37:10):
Hi Dan, I just want to say you're in a
great job. Since market tired, thank you. I got a
couple of things. Yeah, First, Maria that you talked about
the polling yesterday, and Maria Lazar so she's only five
points down. She's been out spent ten to one. Yep,
there's only six weeks left before the election. I mean,
if she gets some money, I think she's got a
damn good chance.

Speaker 1 (01:37:30):
I think she does too.

Speaker 26 (01:37:31):
I want you to man and also, like I said, again,
you're in a great job. But I'm just wondering.

Speaker 9 (01:37:35):
You know.

Speaker 26 (01:37:36):
You know in baseball they have old timer's games. Maybe
you got to go on vacation two.

Speaker 1 (01:37:40):
So maybe we have Belling fill in.

Speaker 26 (01:37:42):
Be sure you can Ark Bellying or Jay Weber come
back for a week as like an old timer's.

Speaker 1 (01:37:46):
Oh that would be a lot of fun. My guess
is well, Jay is a hard note. Jay said he
is retired from Daily Radio. He has made no bones
about the fact. The podcast, which by the way, debuts
a little more than a month April seventh, that is
his retirement gig Mark. I you know, Mark has a

(01:38:08):
very successful podcast himself. I think that is what he's
focused on. I'll tell you what. His office is two
doors down from mine, and he was actually in a
couple of days ago recording an episode which is up
on iHeartRadio, the Mark Belling Podcast. It's sort of a
bridge episode he's talking about the state of the Union
and a whole bunch of other stuff. It's a shorter

(01:38:30):
episode and just reminding people he is coming back for
season two in May. I'm going to take a while, guest.
Both of those guys are happy to be in the
digital space. But yeah, I mean, it would be a
lot of fun. I think that would be a lot
of fun to have Mark come back. I actually, I
know he's usually gone right around New Year's Eve, but

(01:38:50):
I actually floated by him. If he wants to do
the Mark Belling Show quiz, I mean, I would say.
The only thing I would demand is that I would
be allowed to sit in the studio and like play along,
because I always had so much fun playing along in
the newsroom when Mark would do the quiz and I
was his news guy. The Roulette Wheel lands on Leo

(01:39:12):
in Walka Shaw. Welcome to Talk Radio Roulette, sir.

Speaker 24 (01:39:16):
Well, thanks for having me.

Speaker 9 (01:39:18):
Really enjoy listening to your show.

Speaker 1 (01:39:20):
Thank you, Leo.

Speaker 16 (01:39:21):
I appreciate that I've always wondered what Tiger Woods politics were.

Speaker 9 (01:39:28):
I mean, where did he come from?

Speaker 1 (01:39:31):
Oh dude, total Republican, But.

Speaker 16 (01:39:35):
Listening to your wacky liberal today, come.

Speaker 13 (01:39:39):
To find out that he's as Nazi.

Speaker 1 (01:39:44):
Yes, we did have an thank you for that laugh, Leo,
I needed that this afternoon. Yeah, Tiger Woods, who would
have guessed our unhinged liberal today was some crazy person
I found thanks to our friends over at libs of
TikTok who said golf is fascist. If you play golf,
you are a fascist and bleep you No, Tiger Woods
actually has always been a Republican and now he's dating

(01:40:06):
a member of the Trump family. I know that it
was always kept quiet when he was the biggest athletic
superstar in the world. But oh yeah, he has always
been a conservative Republican, as like ninety five, if not higher,
percent of the PGA tour is all of these guys
are right wingers. Don't believe me. Look at Phil Mickelson's

(01:40:29):
Twitter account. He is a heck of an entertaining follow,
big big conservative and we have we have well, we
accidentally nuked whoever's name that was. That would be true
talk radio Roulette. Doug accidentally deleted the caller I was
going to put on We'll get you next, sir. Let's

(01:40:49):
go to Lee and Rhinelander listening on the iHeartRadio app. Lee,
Welcome to talk radio Roulette.

Speaker 9 (01:40:56):
Yeah, thanks for taking my call.

Speaker 1 (01:40:58):
Oh, the pleasure is all mine, sir.

Speaker 22 (01:41:01):
My question is about the voice vote taken on the
wakeboat bill that I think you played late ye.

Speaker 9 (01:41:13):
That had to be Robin Voss conducting.

Speaker 12 (01:41:16):
That wasn't it.

Speaker 1 (01:41:18):
Voss or Tyler August or someone in leadership wanted that
to be a voice vote. I honestly could not say
who that was, but yeah, it was. I'll be honest
with you. I called, just like the late great Bruce
Freming who passed away yesterday, the legendary mlb umpire, I
called balls and strikes, and that one was a horrible move.

(01:41:40):
I was actually a little nauseated by the fact that
there was a voice vote. When you had half of
the chamber screaming saying no, no, I'll opposed Ney. It
sounded like the nays were louder than the ya's, but
they just moved on very very quickly.

Speaker 13 (01:41:57):
All right.

Speaker 1 (01:41:57):
The caller whose name we accidentally deleted, which we should
have just gone to him, Doug would say, caller, I
know so little about what you're gonna say. I don't
even know your name. It is, in fact, Steve in Milwaukee,
Welcome to talk radio Roulette.

Speaker 23 (01:42:10):
Sir, damn, thanks for letting me on the number one
radio talk show in Milwaukee.

Speaker 1 (01:42:16):
Oh well, I appreciate you saying that, sir, thank you.

Speaker 23 (01:42:20):
First thing I want to do is get at the
Wisconsin legislature. Why do we keep talking about having a
surplus when we've already spent the.

Speaker 16 (01:42:27):
Money we owe money all over?

Speaker 23 (01:42:29):
Why do not one Republican, one Democrat not want to
talk about paying down the state debt?

Speaker 1 (01:42:36):
Well, why does nobody in the national government ever want
to talk about paying down the state debt? Or more
accurately stated, they'll talk about it, but then they never
actually will. It's the same reason because you want Well,
because to answer your question, Steve, it's because politicians exist
in a very very abbreviated time frame. Their life cycles

(01:43:01):
are very short. That doesn't mean like they're you know,
cicadas that they live for like thirty days and then
die after spending most of their life underground, although some
politicians sort of fit that mold. No, what I mean
is they're constantly thinking about the next election, whether it's
in two years, whether it's in four years, whether it's
next year. They are always thinking in a very short

(01:43:21):
time span and paying down the debt. Alleviating the burden
on our children is not something that's very politically expedient
for them, whereas if you say, hey, we're gonna, you know,
give this money back to you in the form of
tax credits, which frankly I think actually should be done

(01:43:42):
with pretty much every deficit, or excuse me, with every surplus,
because it is our money you give us back. When
we pay extra in taxes, we ideally get a refund.
And oh, by the way, did you see tax refunds
are significantly higher, at least for early filers. STATU is
showing tax refunds this year significantly higher. Weird how that

(01:44:04):
works when you significantly cut taxes and offer good deductions
and that sort of thing. Hey, have a lot of
fun playing talk radio lette when we come back. Strangest
stories of the week. It is how bizarre here on
the Dan o'donald Show.

Speaker 11 (01:44:18):
Keep in touch with Dan on Twitter at Dan o'donald's show.
More of the Show is next.

Speaker 1 (01:44:29):
Welcome back to the Dan o'donald Show. It is classical
conservatism and contemporary style and hopefully a lot of fun too.
Each and every Friday evening, we like to take a
break from the series and focus on the silly in
a segment we call how Baza how bizarre. Easily the
best political quote of the week belongs to embattled Minnesota

(01:44:53):
Governor Tim Walls, who said, look, even though I presided
over an unprecedent amount of fraud in Minnesota's welfare system,
nobody is angrier about this stuff than.

Speaker 9 (01:45:05):
Maybe why this is so hard to understand? And I
will continue to say this. You can trust me on this.
The person who's angriest about this fraud is me.

Speaker 7 (01:45:13):
There is certainly no political upside to having fraud in
your state, and it undermines the very program that I
have spent a lifetime advocating for and trying to implement.

Speaker 1 (01:45:22):
Really, because the year before Tim Walls was elected governor
in twenty seventeen, autism remittances to the federal government or
from the federal government or about a million dollars last
year two hundred million dollars. Now did autism cases in

(01:45:42):
a mid sized, upper Midwestern state really increase two hundredfold?
Or is there just an insane amount of fraud on
Tim Walls's watch? You be the judge. But rest assured
nobody is angrier about it than him. Wink Win pabaz.

Speaker 27 (01:46:01):
Alsomal bizarre Conservative influencer Ian Miles Chong shared findings from
a Netherlands study examining possible toxic chemicals in eighty one
different models of European made headphones and.

Speaker 1 (01:46:17):
Came to the conclusion the headphones make you gay. That
the study didn't quite find that. According to that study,
while these products do not pose an acute or imminent danger,
the cumulative and synergistic effects of chronic exposure to these

(01:46:37):
chemical classes pose a long term risk to public health.
The study listing some of the alleged long term effects cancers,
reproductive issues, and chronic diseases. But Chong seems to have
taken this to mean that using headphones will make you gay.
He wrote in a post X Dutch scientists. As I'm

(01:46:59):
looking at myself in my camera wearing my headphones and
suddenly very attracted to producer Doug he wrote, Cheong wrote,
Dutch scientists say your headphones are making you gay. A
lab in the Netherlands performed tests on numerous headphones and
found them to possess endocrine disrupting chemicals, Chewn claimed, which

(01:47:23):
mimic hormones that can cause neurodevelopmental problems and the feminization
of males. John also said that products associated with Bose, Panasonic, Samsung,
and some Sennheiser's headphones were now being pulled off the shelves.
That does not appear to be accurate. But seeing as

(01:47:44):
I use Sony's studio monitors, thank Heavens that I am
not gay albaza talbazar.

Speaker 9 (01:47:54):
All right?

Speaker 1 (01:47:54):
This is both bizarre and rather terrifying. A Spanish software
engineer report abordedly contacted a tech outlet based in New
York to reveal that he had remotely taken control of
about seven thousand vacuum cleaners across the world. In the process,
he hoped to shed light on a broad vulnerability with

(01:48:15):
smart products. The Verge reports that the situation came to
light when Sammy Osdefall was trying to reverse engineer his
new Dji Romo vacuum so that he can control it
with his PlayStation five game pad. Osdavol soon discovered that
when his self styled remote control started communicating with Dji's servers,

(01:48:37):
it wasn't just one vacuum cleaner that replied, roughly seven
thousand of them. He said, all around the world began
treating him like their boss. Osdoval found he could look
and listen through the vacuum's live camera feeds and collected
more than one hundred thousand images from the devices. He
could use any robots Internet Protocol or I he addressed

(01:49:00):
to determine its approximate location. He reportedly said he was
not trying to hack into other devices, and in fact,
he contacted the Verge to inform the publication of this vulnerability.
DJI reported and others confirmed that it had since solved
the problem. What do you think did this guy really
want to do some white night hacking? He's got one

(01:49:22):
hundred thousand pictures from inside people's homes, allegedly taken from
their vacuum cleaners, which he was controlling. Let's just say
I have my doubts, ladies and gentlemen. This has been
your weekly look back at the strangest stories of the
past seven days here on the Dan o'donald Show. It
is a segment we call.

Speaker 9 (01:49:40):
Howbaza Tubazar.

Speaker 1 (01:49:54):
Always fun, taking a look at the strangest stories of
the week on How Bizarre. Welcome back to the Dano
Donald Show. One of the strangest things in the NFL
has got to be the Green Bay Packers just complete
inability to get there, you know what together on special teams.
Well after former coordinator Rich Bisaccia informed the team very

(01:50:16):
very late that he was not going to come back,
that he was resigning his position, Packers made a higher today.
Cam a Cord. No, not the running back for the
Los Angeles Ram that's Cam Akers. Cam a Cord. He
was with the New England Patriots. He actually won a

(01:50:37):
Super Bowl with them years ago, and he was hired today.
The same day he apparently interviewed with head coach Matt Lafleur.
Special teams has been an unmitigated disaster for the Packers
in recent years. Bisacia was supposed to be the guy

(01:50:58):
to come in and finally figure it out after Sean Slocum,
ron Zook and a long parade of coordinators. Who is
the other one? Oh yeah, Maurice Drayton, I mean judge
every couple of years, it seems like the Packers were
going through special teams coordinators and Bisaccia provided some stability,

(01:51:24):
but it was terrible stability. Look at these grades since
twenty twenty. Pro Football Focus does a Special Team's overall grade.
And yes, I know people have mixed feelings about Pro
Football Focus. It only has the spot it does on
Sunday Night Football because one of the co owners is
who producer Doug Great NBC and Chris Collinsworth specifically, he's

(01:51:49):
one of the co founders, so of course he was
going to push how much power does Chris Collinsworth have
at NBC? His son is on the Sunday Night Football broadcast.
He gets to use Pro Football Focus like if I
invented my own stats for like who is the most
unhinged lib? Would I be able to force iHeartMedia to

(01:52:11):
use it like you'd hear on the ben yaut Show. Yes,
Tony Evers has a seventy five ranking out of one
hundred on the dan O'Donnell Unhinged Lib Scale. I think
I should actually patent that. Take a listen to these
Pro Football Focus grades. Twenty twenty they were second worst
in the league twenty twenty one, second worst twenty twenty two,

(01:52:36):
twenty sixth in the league twenty three. They were fifth
worst twenty twenty four, dead last in the Pro Football
Focus Special Team's grade last year sixth worst overall. Rich
Goslin or Rick Goslin. I guess actually also does an

(01:52:56):
annual special team's ranking. It is highly regarded, I am
told by people who know more than me about such things.
Packers under Bisaccia have never been higher than twentieth. They
finish last in the league in twenty twenty one, twenty
ninth in twenty twenty, twenty ninth again in twenty twenty three,

(01:53:17):
and twenty second in twenty four, twentieth last year. According
to Advanced Metrics Special Teams EPA that is expected points
at IT, which measures the impact in points per play
of a special teams unit. Since twenty twenty, the Packers

(01:53:41):
have a total EPA lost of one hundred and sixty
five points. They are minus one sixty five, meaning for
all of the plays that they've run on special teams
according to this formula, they have lost one hundred and
sixty five points. That is a lot of points in
six years. That ranks thirty first in the NFL over

(01:54:04):
that span and indicates that the Packers have consistently cost
themselves points on special teams. Anybody who watched the Chicago
Bears playoff loss could have told you that. Heck, anybody
who has watched any of the Packers stunningly gut wrenching,

(01:54:26):
soul crushing recent playoff losses could tell you that. I mean,
you had the infamous fumble on the kickoff return, remember
that one when the Packers were playing in the NFC
Championship game against Tom Brady and the Tampa Bay Buccaneers.
You of course had two years ago, or was it

(01:54:49):
last year when they lost to the forty nine Ers
when they missed critical field goals, including one where the
Niners just took the ball right down the field and
scored the winning touchdown. Of course, the Chicago Bears loss.
I mean, this has been a consistent issue for the Packers,
so hopefully, hopefully cam Acord is the guy. Also, in

(01:55:15):
case you were thinking the Packers might be able to
keep Malik Willis as their backup quarterback, No, dice, do
you know what this guy is expected to make in
free agency? Thirty million dollars per season. He is almost
certainly going to be the starting quarterback of either the
Arizona Cardinals or the Miami Dolphins, both of whom look

(01:55:36):
like they're going to be moving on from their relatively
long term starters Kyler Murray and Arizona to attack of
Aaloa in Miami. Malik Willis is almost certainly going to
be the most sought after free agent by teams that
in a weak quarterback draft, it's pretty much Fernando Mendoza
going to the Raiders at number one overall and then

(01:55:59):
a whole lot enough. Then good for Malik Willis that
he had to suffer the indignity of being cut by
the Tennessee Titans resurrected his career. By all accounts, he
is a fantastic guy, a fantastic teammate. It's going to
be sad to let him go, but I will be
reading for Malik wherever he goes. Have a wonderful weekend
Wisconsin back Monday afternoon right here on the Dan o'donna Show.

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

The Dan O'Donnell Show News

Popular Podcasts

Stuff You Should Know

Crime Junkie

Betrayal Season 5

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Dems Used to Hate False Pedophilia Accusations

Episode Transcript

The Dan O'Donnell Show News .css-1q01m3q{margin:0 0 -2px 0;}

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}Stuff You Should Know

Crime Junkie

Betrayal Season 5

All Episodes