August 24, 2026 • 35 mins
In Part Two, we give our take on what the existence of Lindsay Clancy supporters says about the state of America. We also dig into new revelations in the Karmelo Anthony case, as well as the Paramount / Warner Brothers merger...and how it signals a monumental opportunity to reform Hollywood.
Episode powered by: Surfshark.
Online security starts with Surfshark. Use code "RPA" at checkout for four extra months of SurfShark.
Join the FamBam by becoming a Red Pilled America backstage subscriber. Visit https://www.RedPilledAmerica.com and click join in the top menu!
Support the show: https://redpilledamerica.com/support/
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Listen
Watch
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:03):
This is Red Pilled America listening to Red Pilled America's famboogie.
(00:27):
Join the Fanbam. Go to red Pilled America dot com
and click join in the top of the menu. So
this Lindsey Clancy case. I believe that this is the
great filter. It's a litmus test because there are some
crimes that are so repulsive that we should not spend
(00:48):
a single brain cell rationalizing them. Murdering your three babies
is one of those crimes. Anyone expressing a shred of
sympathy for someone who commits such an act and admits
that she committed such an act, that person, the person
sympathizing for them, they should be shamed from the public
stage forever, all right, That is my opinion. There's a
(01:12):
reason why years hundreds of years ago, they used to
do public executions, public floggings, you know, burning at the
stake in their view society at that time. They believed
that there were certain things that were so societally destabilizing
that they needed to set an example for the audience.
(01:35):
And this is one of those instances. This woman, she's
not claiming not guilty because she didn't do it, or
she was framed or what have you. She's claiming not guilty,
admits to strangling her three children, but she is blaming
other environmental aspects, whether it be her doctors, whether it
be her medication, whether it be her pleas for help
(01:58):
that went unanswered. You could make an argument that some
of thesesri drugs, or some of these kinds of prescriptions
that these doctors are giving, they need to be addressed,
and maybe some of those practitioners or some of those
people that offered up those prescriptions should face some civil
action that does not wipe away what this woman did.
(02:21):
When you first started talking to me about this case,
immediately I said, okay, did this woman strangle her kids?
Did she admit to doing it? Okay, fine, I don't
care about anything else. Nothing can be said after that
that matters, because we live in a society and we
need to make some things so taboo, so against the
(02:43):
norm that immediately that person should be wiped from civilization,
wiped from society. This is one of those cases. Yeah.
Speaker 2 (02:52):
I mean, here's the thing too.
Speaker 3 (02:53):
A lot of the people that create heinous crimes were
themselves abused or suffered some horrible injustice, and we don't say, okay, well,
you know, they were abused as a child, and so
now that they you know, they molested these other these
young kids in their adulthood, we should feel sorry for them.
(03:13):
We should let them go. It just it doesn't work
that way, because it cannot work that way.
Speaker 1 (03:18):
It can't. We know somebody that horribly violated their daughter
in the worst possible way imaginable. Okay, And when we
found this out, we were shocked. We also learned that
that person was horribly violated this man when he was
a child by his mother. Horrible. This guy was a victim,
(03:42):
victim of abuse by his mother, and his mother was
probably a victim of abuse as well too, this chain
reaction that goes from generation to generation. But when we
learned that he made the decision later on in life
to violate his daughter, that guy needs to be strung
up and hung and wipe from.
Speaker 3 (04:03):
Thens for him. I have no forgiveness for him, and none.
Speaker 1 (04:07):
It doesn't matter if he was a victim when he
was younger. We've all been victims to things, some things
worse than others. But at the end of the day,
we have to live in a society, a stable society
that you are in control of your decision making. Okay,
every criminal out there has probably been the victim of
(04:30):
some heinous act, whether it be child abuse, whether it
be you know, some kind of a violence, you know, bullying,
whether it be you know, a victim of drug addiction,
what have you. There could be potentially an excuse for
all of these people.
Speaker 3 (04:43):
Yes, I mean, it's it's what made them the monster
that they turned out to be. But we still cannot
turn a blind eye to it.
Speaker 1 (04:50):
We just can't because you have to imagine what this
woman did. Okay, she planned this out. She went online
to figure out how long it was going to take
for him to be gone, She sent him on an
errand that she knew that was, and to take x
amount of time, She goes and systematically strangles each one
of her babies Okay, children, defenseless children. It looked like
(05:15):
she potentially isolated one of them because this was the
kid that was the harder to deal with to kill him,
and then systematically killed the other two. She had to
strangle them for anywhere from four minutes to ten minutes
to make sure that they were dead, and then she
cowardly jumps from a window in a pseudo attempt to
(05:36):
take her own life. This woman needs to be no
questions asked, capital punishment, although there isn't capital punishment in
the state that she's in, locked away for life, no
questions asked, and she needs to be so thoroughly destroyed
that there are no copycats out there. When you see
(05:56):
cases like this, you start to understand why there was
burning at the Stakes prior.
Speaker 3 (06:01):
To No Now you know what happened at the Salem
witch hunts.
Speaker 1 (06:05):
I'm not maybe we should look at that with some
fresh eyes.
Speaker 3 (06:10):
That's a bridge too far for me. But I feel
like there's a lot of support for this woman, Lindsay,
because there are millions and millions of women who have
struggled with postpartum, But I would add that millions and
millions of women did not kill their children. This woman
took it obviously much too far, and we just as
(06:30):
a society, we can't we can't support that behavior no
matter what, no matter the reason.
Speaker 1 (06:34):
And I think that there are there are obviously a
lot of people that have women that have faced severe
depression after having their children, and that is where this
sympathy is coming from. Yes, I understand people getting caught
up in conspiracy theories and getting misinformation. I do not
understand sympathizing with a woman that kills three of their kids.
(06:56):
There are so many people out there that are sympathizing
with this woman knowing that she killed her own kids.
The same kind of consideration isn't given to men in
these kinds of situations. When you hear a man executing
his three sons, no one feels sorry for this man
us as men don't feel sorry for this man. And
(07:17):
I could say this from a male perspective. A lot
of women are using this argument that men shouldn't be
talking about this because they have pressures on them. That
they are the ones that are giving birth, they are
the ones that are going through the hormonal changes. There
are these societal pressures on them, and so because of that,
men shouldn't be responding to this or shouldn't have an
(07:39):
opinion on this, and that they are sympathizing with this
woman for killing her three children because of the hormones
and because of the societal pressure on them. In a
similar way, men can use that as a crutch as well.
Speaker 3 (07:54):
Their experiences of being men and their pressures that men.
Speaker 1 (07:58):
Experience exactly societally speaking, men have pressures, whether they succeeded
it or not. There are societal pressures to provide a
roof over their family's house, to keep them secure, to
protect them, to be these kinds of financial kind of
they have the financial burden on them. Whether they are
(08:19):
succeeding at that or not is a whole different subject.
There is these societal pressures on men that they could
use as a crutch in these kinds of moments, but
that is not societally acceptable for a good reason. I
don't want it to be succidedly such.
Speaker 3 (08:35):
I mean, I think both sexes has things that they
can use as a crutch, some warranted, some not exactly.
Speaker 1 (08:41):
But I think what we're seeing now is we're seeing
this suicidal empathy take hold. For oddly, I feel like
this subject is connected to abortion in some ways. It's
almost like the more that we've allowed abortion. By the way,
the state that this happened in, they recently passed a
law that you can have an abortion up to the
(09:03):
moment that you give birth. Okay, this is an extension
of that. It feels like to me, you literally have
women online making videos saying that men they have no
input on this because they aren't the ones giving birth,
and they support Lindsey Clancy in this kind of moment
(09:25):
of crisis that she had. Okay, it's almost like they
are arguing for post birth abortions. And this is kind
of the realm that we are going on that the
society has allowed us to enter into this realm because
we are not having open conversations about this. I feel
for the biological pressures on women. I always have. I
(09:49):
made my wife a business partner in my business ventures,
so I obviously have an affinity for women. I was
raised by a woman my father left at a young age.
I was in a woman in a house with all women.
I feel like I have an understanding of them from
a male perspective in a way that maybe others don't.
(10:12):
And the point being is that I can align with
your the pressures that are on you. We cannot use
those as a crutch to sympathize with these heinous acts.
We must as a public shame these heinous acts.
Speaker 3 (10:30):
I agree with that we cannot give excuses for this
is what happened to those kids. We certainly we cannot.
We can't condone this behavior under any circumstances, no matter
what she went through, no matter what you go through
in life, no matter what happens, it is never okay,
no matter what, to kill your children.
Speaker 1 (10:51):
And there's this movement too to support.
Speaker 3 (10:53):
That, and the movement supporting her is I just find
it really, really scary.
Speaker 1 (10:58):
And it's this. This is why I've been calling it
a great filter, because if you are out there simply
with this woman, based on all of the evidence that's
gone out now, then I think you need to look
in the mirror because this is something that must be shunned.
There is this movement to remove responsibility. And if you
(11:18):
are aligning with this woman because you can align with
her postpartum crisis that she allegedly went through, you are
aligning yourself with the anti prison movement, with these lunatics
out there that don't think people should go to jail
for rape, that believe that people should just be released
from prison and maybe go through some kind of a
(11:42):
therapy session or what have you. No, there is evil
out there. That evil must be dealt with in the
harshest way possible so that it does not spread because
it becomes a societal contagion. This is one of those moments.
There's no gray area here. This is a black and
white issue. This woman midst to killing her kids. She
(12:04):
systematically strangled them. She did it in a premeditated way,
She sent her husband out, she strangled each one of
these children, and then she basically now is claiming that
she had some kind of postpartum issue. I don't care.
I want this woman to fry, and I want everyone
(12:25):
to see her fry so that they do not do
or think of doing anything like this. We are supposed
to protect children. That is one of the biggest responsibilities
of adults. That is how society stays stable is protecting
the children and fostering them in a positive way. This
(12:45):
is not that, and what we are seeing on social media,
this is kind of one of the silver linings of
these kinds of events, is you're seeing the level of
insanity that is out there. You are seeing a lot
of people that are amongst us aligning with this woman.
This isn't some fringe thing. This is something that has
taken storm on not just social media. You have people
(13:07):
showing up on site at the courtrooms, showing support, going
on camera supporting this woman, willing to do that in
their their nurse outfit. That's how little they fear repercussions.
Those people should be petrified from doing that on camera,
and they're not.
Speaker 3 (13:28):
I think that when you bring home a baby, when
you have a baby, I think a lot of women
have an experience that I don't think is often talked about,
which is they regret it. They don't like the situation
that they've gotten themselves into.
Speaker 1 (13:41):
Yeah, this thing sucking on you for you know, a
year or what have you, Your body changes.
Speaker 2 (13:47):
They don't like it.
Speaker 3 (13:47):
I did not experience any type of postpartum I feel like,
and I think you can attest to this. I was
a natural born mother. I also had my daughter much
later in life, I was older. But I have seen
firsthand women who had babies, and you know immediately they
don't like it. They're not enjoying it. They regret their decision.
(14:09):
And I think that the support Lindsay is getting is
from a lot of women who have had those types
of thoughts and experiences.
Speaker 1 (14:19):
I think we've all had kind of evil thoughts pop
into our mind at some point, but this is one
of those.
Speaker 2 (14:26):
Except right now and I'm looking at you, just get well.
Speaker 1 (14:28):
And the fascinating thing is is that this Lindsay person,
it doesn't appear that she's felt any remorse. You haven't
heard that expression of remorse in any of the testimony.
If I killed my three children in a moment as
some kind of psychotic break and I come out of it,
(14:49):
there's no I don't want to go on to live. Okay,
I'm signing up for capital punishment. That's what a normal
person would do. This person is fighting to stay alive
and to live the rest of her life.
Speaker 2 (15:01):
Well, she's gonna live anyway, because she's a ma to
choose it.
Speaker 3 (15:03):
But she I know some people are saying that the
cuts on her wrists were superficial.
Speaker 1 (15:09):
Yes, and the one on her neck as well too.
Speaker 2 (15:12):
Yes.
Speaker 1 (15:12):
At the end of the day, you are not seeing
the remorse that this woman that you would think that
you would see after somebody that just went through some
kind of blackout, let's say, comes to her senses and
is now living with the horror of what she has done.
You're not seeing that with this woman. And then, of
course you have one of the most fascinating things. And
(15:35):
this is this great filter that I'm talking about. And
Candace Owens has been, you know, kind of a popular
topic with us for quite some time now. How did
Candace Owens react to this case? What do you think
her position was on this?
Speaker 2 (15:50):
Let me guess.
Speaker 3 (15:51):
Let me guess she thinks Lindsay is innocent. Well, it's
the husband's fault.
Speaker 1 (15:56):
You're right on part of that. And here's Candace's take
on the Lindsay Clancy case.
Speaker 4 (16:01):
Your girl, Karen writes, I know you're busy, but I'd
love to know your thoughts. I'm a Lindsay Clancy case
in Massachusetts. I made my thoughts clear on this the
moment that she was arrested, the moment that it made
the news. Lindsay Clancy is obviously not guilty. There are
a fleet of doctors who should be imprisoned for what
they put her on. I regularly speak out against big Pharma.
(16:21):
They get away with murder all the time, and in
this case, they are getting away with the murder of
really her three children, but also completely destroyed her life. Well,
Lindsay Clancy, in my opinion, is not guilty. She was
put into an intentional psychosis when she probably just needed
to give her kids away for a weekend to get better.
(16:42):
But they constantly give you these drugs that do not
make things better, and the cocktail of ten pharmaceuticals that
she was on is absolute madness, absolute madness.
Speaker 1 (16:52):
Now, this is how stupid this woman is. Candie Owens. Okay, One,
she did give her kids up for a little bit.
She was actually committed at one point. Okay, so she's
wrong on that. Two, there is now testimony that came
out through the court case that she got these prescriptions. Yes,
but she didn't take a lot of them. She didn't
take any of the pills of some of them, and
(17:14):
with the other one she would take one or two pills. Okay,
she doesn't even have that right. And this is what
she is basing her innocence on. She's putting this message
out there with false information. She is so stupid, this woman.
She is a great broadcaster, but she is illiterate, horrible researcher.
(17:36):
She is a moron, but she knows where her audience is,
and her audience are the wine moms that back this
Lindsay Clancy person.
Speaker 2 (17:45):
So now I feel like it's kind of harsh to
call her stupid.
Speaker 3 (17:48):
I think we should maybe coin a new phrase like
she's got a shrinky brain or something.
Speaker 1 (17:53):
She is, okay, shrinky brain, she's a shrinky brain. She's
a shrinking brain.
Speaker 2 (17:57):
I'll go with that, shrunken up, shribbled up.
Speaker 1 (18:00):
I want to get into this give an update on
this Carmelo Anthony murder case as well as the Paramount merger,
because I think that it's kind of the the thesis
of our Red Pilled America show in regards to storytelling. Big,
big updates on both of those things. We'll get to
that right after the break. Every site you visit, every
search you type, every public Wi Fi network you connect
(18:21):
to leaves a record, and that record gets collected, packaged,
and sold. Surf Shark deals with that. You probably know
of them from the VPN, which encrypts your entire connection
under a strict, independently audited no logs policy and also
lets you get around GEO restrictions while traveling or streaming.
They've built a full security suite around it. The AD
(18:43):
and Tracker Blocker shuts down the profiling that follows you
around from site to site, and surf Shark Alert watches
your email, your passwords, even your credit card turning up
in a breach and tells you the moment it happens.
Secure your entire digital life with surf Shark it's completely
risk free with a thirty day money back guarantee. Go
do so surfshark dot com slash RPA or use code
(19:06):
RPA at checkout for four extra months of surf Shark again.
That's surfshark dot Com slash RPA code RPA. You're listening
to Red Pilled America's famboogie this Carmelo Anthony murder case.
You guys might remember this. We spoke about this when
(19:28):
it first broke God, when was this Now it's been
over a year, I believe for those of you guys
that need a little bit of refresher Carmelo Anthony was
a seventeen year old I believe at the time Texan
kid went to a track meet.
Speaker 2 (19:43):
Well it was in two thousand and four. It's been
a while.
Speaker 1 (19:46):
Okay, goes to this track meet. I believe it starts
to sprinkle or what have you. One of the other
kind of group of students there had a cover and
they were sitting under the cover, and he decides to
go sit under the cover with them. Austin Metcalf, who
was another student, asked him to leave. They get in
(20:07):
some kind of a verbal altercation. There might have been
some pushing that went along with it. Carmelo kind of
dares him to do something, ends up stabbing him and
admits to the stabbing on site after he's caught by
the police. He was found guilty sentenced to thirty five
years in prison. Some people, including myself, thought he got
(20:30):
off easy, but he decides that he wants to appeal
the case with his pro bono lawyers. The reason that
they're using is is that he didn't have proper representation beforehand.
That there was a gentleman's agreement between the defendant, Carmelo
Anthony's lawyer and the prosecution to not submit certain parts
(20:53):
of evidence. They wanted to keep it out of the
case because they didn't want to inflame some of the
racial aspects of the case. Both of these kids had
some things in their past that might have been used
to kind of inflame racial division, so the lawyers at
that time decide to not include this, let's just focus
on the incident itself. As the case went on. As
(21:17):
the trial actually went on, Carmelo Anthony decided he wanted
to testify. Well, the prosecution said, well, if you do that,
we're going to have to basically bring up some of
these things that we had a gentleman agreement on because
now we're you're going to testify and make divulge your
personality to the public, and now we are going to
(21:38):
challenge those assertions that you are making via this evidence
that we agreed we were not going to be including
in the case. So Carmelo Anthony decided to not testify
because of that, because he didn't want that information within
the court case. So now he is using that that
as a way to appeal. So it comes out that
(22:02):
some of these things that they did not want to
include in the case. Carmelo Anthony on the day prior
to in the morning, I believe it was early morning
of the day that he murdered Austin Metcalf, he threatened
his ex girlfriend. He was sending texts about wanting to
stab somebody and lick the blood off of the knife.
(22:22):
He had texted her things about killing her. He said
that he was on the verge.
Speaker 3 (22:29):
He was basically stalking her and wouldn't let her break
up with exactly.
Speaker 2 (22:34):
He was aggressive.
Speaker 3 (22:34):
He was exhibiting some very very exhibiting and engaging in
very aggressive behavior.
Speaker 1 (22:40):
So the texts are showing that he was no angel,
So now he wants a retrial, and they had submitted something.
They ended up getting the previous judge taken off of
the case, so now it's going to a new judge.
The new judge looks at everything basically denies this retrial,
and everyone's saying, oh, let's bring this trial back because
(23:01):
he should be serving more time. But all they have
to do is get one person on that jury that
sympathizes with this kid, and he will end up getting off.
So I think at the end of the day, the
thirty five years, we're going to have to live with that.
They're going to appeal that to a higher court. But
it's this same movement that we're seeing of removing responsibility
(23:24):
from people. This kid stabbed somebody. He shouldn't have had
a knife on campus. It sounds by all accounts that
it was something that he was trying to get a
reaction out of these kids. He got that reaction and
then he ended up stabbing somebody.
Speaker 3 (23:38):
You know what, sometimes I see things like this, and
I'll see let's say, a white liberal defending Carmelo Anthony,
and they're doing it because in their mind, like you know,
he's black and he suffered an injustice because you know
they're treating him this way because he's black. And I
always look at those types of perspective as that person's
a racist. Yes, if you're unable to call somebody out,
(24:02):
you know, because they're too brown to know better, that's racist.
Speaker 1 (24:09):
We recently went on a trip and we came back
and we got on the shuttle and the driver was black.
Every time you take one of these hotel shuttles, you
park your car at the hotel and you leave it
there for a couple of days and the shuttle comes
and pick you up. They help you with your luggage.
Speaker 2 (24:26):
And by the way, you're paying for that service.
Speaker 1 (24:28):
Yes, okay, yes, So we get into the shuttle and
the guy stops and he immediately says, oh, do you
need help with your your luggage, doesn't get up to
help with the luggae. I'm like, okay, fine, you don't
want to help with the luggage. You ain't getting a tip,
so but I'm lugging six, you know, huge pieces of luggage.
There are people waiting on the shuttle, there are people
(24:48):
on the on the outside waiting to get in. This
guy is not helping. Clearly one of the worst shuttle
drivers that I've ever had.
Speaker 2 (24:55):
But then we kind of got a little bit of
a hurry up.
Speaker 3 (24:59):
Okay, yes, So when we got that little bit of
a from driver like, you know, hurry up and get
all of your luggage in yourself, that I'm not going
to help you in, I said, Okay, we'll give us
a minute because we're having to put it all in ourselves. Yes,
and I kind of I bit back.
Speaker 1 (25:13):
Yes.
Speaker 3 (25:14):
And there was a woman on the shuttle, a white woman,
who was like, oh, she couldn't believe I said that.
Speaker 1 (25:19):
Yes.
Speaker 2 (25:20):
She was highly offended by that.
Speaker 1 (25:22):
Yes. So we go through the we get on the bus,
we get on the shuttle. He's taking us back to
the hotel. This woman strikes up this conversation, very open
conversation with the.
Speaker 2 (25:32):
Driver for everyone in the shuttle to hear.
Speaker 1 (25:34):
And basically starts to you know, glaze him as one
of the greatest shuttle drivers she's ever had in her life.
Speaker 2 (25:41):
She started to say, you are the best. She literally said,
you are the best shuttle driver I have ever had.
Speaker 3 (25:47):
Yes, this guy that's done nothing, this white woman. And
later I looked at Patrick and I said, she's a racist.
Speaker 1 (25:54):
That's clearly erasists. It's the what's that, what's the term?
Speaker 2 (25:58):
The bigotry of low expectations?
Speaker 1 (26:00):
Thank you very much. That is what she was exp
resting there. And I see this time and time again
all the time. And you're seeing this with a lot
of these kinds of these white liberals that end up
going into these kinds of cases and supporting somebody that
is clearly a monster. People do not want to be
seen as racist, and you're seeing that a lot with
these kinds of cases. We saw it pretty heavily with
(26:22):
Carmelo Anthony. I am so happy that the judge, this
new judge, denied a retrial. Let's put this one behind
us and counted as a win. Yes, he only got
thirty five years, he should have gotten life. This guy
is a monster penalty he should have gotten the death penalty.
But we have to take the win where we can
take the win. This young man could easily have been
(26:44):
acquitted if there was just one jury member that on
that trial that sided with him or sympathized with him.
So I think that that we have to count this
one as a win. Finally, this paramount merger, we've been
talking about this now for months and the excitement that
we have the industry is on the verge of changing.
(27:05):
The Ellisons purchased Paramount, then they ended up winning the
merger battle that they had with Netflix with Warner Brothers.
The reason why you're getting a huge reaction from Hollywood
is because the Ellisons are Republicans. They're conservative, and there
was some slight build up of rejection of this merger
(27:29):
and a fight against it. It started with some of
the unions. You had the Writers Guild of America kind
of come out against it. Then you had the Age
of California. Then multiple other deep blue states have now
filed a lawsuit to block this merger on anti trust
conditions or anti trust arguments. Well, now you have a
(27:54):
pushback to those people now because they're fearing that Paramount
is going to leave California. I think that it is
very possible for them to leave. There's only certain areas
that it could move. You need a talent pull to
pull from, So there's really only a few places that
Paramount can move to. One being Austin. They have a
(28:16):
film school there, they have an entertainment pool there that
they can kind of draw from. Another being potentially Georgia.
There is a huge kind of film studio movement there.
There's a lot of studios in Atlanta. There is SCAD
which is a film school there that can feed them
talent as well. You're not going to see them move
(28:38):
into some random red state. They're going to move into
an area that has an infrastructure there. But at the
end of the day, there is this incredible shift happening,
or at least a foothold into Hollywood by conservatives because
of this merger, and it is driving certain corners of
Hollywood nuts right now, one of those people being Mark Ruffalo.
(29:02):
Mark Ruffalo has been a progressive activist for quite some time.
I would say he's a progressive activist before an actor.
But he has come out very harshly against this merger.
He's Hulk, He's the guy that plays the Hulk.
Speaker 2 (29:16):
And incredible Hulk, the Green Guy.
Speaker 1 (29:18):
But what he did was is he made an incredibly
huge mistake. What he decided to do. Instead of arguing
against the merger based on job loss arguments or anti
trust arguments, he started to make an argument that it
was a support of genocide in Gaza because the Ellisons
(29:39):
are Jewish, because they have yes, he made a huge
leap he's tying the Oracle business to this, but he's
conflating all of these issues and making an anti Semitic attack.
Let's just be clear. It is an anti Semitic attack
to conflate all of those issues and say that they
are supporting genocide. This merger supports genocide in Gaza. He
(30:02):
showed his cards. The guy has been anti Semitic for
quite some time, and I think that you're seeing the
end of somebody's career in Hollywood. I well, let me
put it this way. Let me put it this way.
I should put it this way. This is a litmus test,
another litmus test. I guess this show is about several
litmus tests, and we're seeing that now with this Mark
(30:23):
Ruffalo thing. And this is what I mean by that.
If his career is able to survive this, then maybe
the Jewish hold in Hollywood isn't as strong as many
people think. I do not think he survives this because
I think it is clearly an anti Semitic attack. I
think there is going to be people that are afraid
to hire him based on this attack. He pulled his
(30:46):
mask off. But I am so excited about this merger.
It's going to happen. They can fight it all they want.
You have Mayor Bass, who is pretty well known as
having socialist ties. She's coming out and wanting these ages,
these attorney generals to settle this case. She is very
afraid that the industry is going to leave Los Angeles
(31:09):
on her watch. Yes, okay, and it is very possible.
You aren't tied to locations the same way that you
were in the past. Los Angeles used to be the
kind of stand in for all of these different locations.
People used Los Angeles as stand ins for various locations
in their filming. Nobody films in Los Angeles anymore. Go
(31:31):
to downtown is blocks and blocks and blocks of homeless encampments.
It's not safe to shoot there anymore. They can't get
permits the way that as quickly as they can in
other areas. They don't get the credits that they do,
the kind of kickbacks to film in the area the
way they do in other areas. I should make one
correction to what I said earlier. There is one area
(31:51):
that doesn't necessarily have a huge film school that could
also be a home places like Louisiana because they have
huge financial or film credits. If you shoot there. And
because of that, they said they've created this pool of
producers and a film staff basically within that area because
of that. But this is an exciting time. I know
(32:13):
a lot of you guys out there hate Hollywood, view
it as a cess pool, view it as something that
it should just kind of burn. But it is one
of America's strongest exports. It is America's strongest cultural export.
We can't allow a foreign power to take control of
this incredibly strong tool. Storytellings is something that we as
(32:38):
human beings naturally align with. This is how we store information,
This is how we empathize with each other. This is
how we pass on culture from generation to generation is
through storytelling. And if we allow, say a China or
some other foreign power, to take control of that tool,
then we are giving away something that we have almost invented,
(33:02):
an perfected and mastered. We're giving it to an enemy
of ours. And we cannot do that. And so we
must welcome this merger because now conservatives are getting a
foothold into the industry through this merger. You have the
Ellsons at the top of this enterprise that agree with
(33:23):
you on a lot of things, and so do not
just be willing to throw out the baby with the bathwater.
Speaker 3 (33:31):
I agree, I agree, and I want to add something
as well. You know, we've talked about this a little bit,
but our daughter is going to film school now.
Speaker 2 (33:38):
She got into all of.
Speaker 3 (33:40):
The top film schools, and the film school that we chose,
she chose for herself. You know, we walked into the
student union the other day and guess what they were
playing Fox News. So there is a shift happening. But
those of us who are outside of the system, we
still need to support that system so that it can
continue to thrive and to grow in our direction. Yes,
(34:01):
let's not abandon it.
Speaker 2 (34:03):
A one eighty on this. You know, when we first
started the show, I was bitter. I was bitter. I
hated Hollywood. I hated what they'd done to it to
my family.
Speaker 3 (34:09):
Yes, but I have now come back to this position,
which is we must support it. We cannot abandon these institutions.
Speaker 1 (34:16):
We cannot. And there's a reason why the hardcore socialists
were able to take over these institutions is they decided
to take them over from within. And when I see
people that are willing to burn it down to the ground,
they don't understand the importance of storytelling in driving and
shaping culture. It is what creates culture.
Speaker 3 (34:39):
I think that that's changing as well. I think that
people have started to understand that.
Speaker 1 (34:43):
I know, the listeners of this show, I.
Speaker 3 (34:45):
Mean absolutely they they've embraced that, that yes, idea.
Speaker 2 (34:49):
So I think that I feel hopeful.
Speaker 1 (34:52):
That's it for this installation of Famboogie. Keep an eye
out for our Red Pilled America documentary episode coming out soon.
We'll send out email in the email newsletter. Go to
Redpilled America dot com and join the email newsletter and
you'll get the first news of it when it hits
the hits the broadcast platforms. Until next time, enjoy you guys.
(35:14):
The rest of you guys' day.
Speaker 3 (35:16):
By everyone,
This is Red Pilled America listening to Red Pilled America's famboogie.
(00:27):
Join the Fanbam. Go to red Pilled America dot com
and click join in the top of the menu. So
this Lindsey Clancy case. I believe that this is the
great filter. It's a litmus test because there are some
crimes that are so repulsive that we should not spend
(00:48):
a single brain cell rationalizing them. Murdering your three babies
is one of those crimes. Anyone expressing a shred of
sympathy for someone who commits such an act and admits
that she committed such an act, that person, the person
sympathizing for them, they should be shamed from the public
stage forever, all right, That is my opinion. There's a
(01:12):
reason why years hundreds of years ago, they used to
do public executions, public floggings, you know, burning at the
stake in their view society at that time. They believed
that there were certain things that were so societally destabilizing
that they needed to set an example for the audience.
(01:35):
And this is one of those instances. This woman, she's
not claiming not guilty because she didn't do it, or
she was framed or what have you. She's claiming not guilty,
admits to strangling her three children, but she is blaming
other environmental aspects, whether it be her doctors, whether it
be her medication, whether it be her pleas for help
(01:58):
that went unanswered. You could make an argument that some
of thesesri drugs, or some of these kinds of prescriptions
that these doctors are giving, they need to be addressed,
and maybe some of those practitioners or some of those
people that offered up those prescriptions should face some civil
action that does not wipe away what this woman did.
(02:21):
When you first started talking to me about this case,
immediately I said, okay, did this woman strangle her kids?
Did she admit to doing it? Okay, fine, I don't
care about anything else. Nothing can be said after that
that matters, because we live in a society and we
need to make some things so taboo, so against the
(02:43):
norm that immediately that person should be wiped from civilization,
wiped from society. This is one of those cases. Yeah.
Speaker 2 (02:52):
I mean, here's the thing too.
Speaker 3 (02:53):
A lot of the people that create heinous crimes were
themselves abused or suffered some horrible injustice, and we don't say, okay, well,
you know, they were abused as a child, and so
now that they you know, they molested these other these
young kids in their adulthood, we should feel sorry for them.
(03:13):
We should let them go. It just it doesn't work
that way, because it cannot work that way.
Speaker 1 (03:18):
It can't. We know somebody that horribly violated their daughter
in the worst possible way imaginable. Okay, And when we
found this out, we were shocked. We also learned that
that person was horribly violated this man when he was
a child by his mother. Horrible. This guy was a victim,
(03:42):
victim of abuse by his mother, and his mother was
probably a victim of abuse as well too, this chain
reaction that goes from generation to generation. But when we
learned that he made the decision later on in life
to violate his daughter, that guy needs to be strung
up and hung and wipe from.
Speaker 3 (04:03):
Thens for him. I have no forgiveness for him, and none.
Speaker 1 (04:07):
It doesn't matter if he was a victim when he
was younger. We've all been victims to things, some things
worse than others. But at the end of the day,
we have to live in a society, a stable society
that you are in control of your decision making. Okay,
every criminal out there has probably been the victim of
(04:30):
some heinous act, whether it be child abuse, whether it
be you know, some kind of a violence, you know, bullying,
whether it be you know, a victim of drug addiction,
what have you. There could be potentially an excuse for
all of these people.
Speaker 3 (04:43):
Yes, I mean, it's it's what made them the monster
that they turned out to be. But we still cannot
turn a blind eye to it.
Speaker 1 (04:50):
We just can't because you have to imagine what this
woman did. Okay, she planned this out. She went online
to figure out how long it was going to take
for him to be gone, She sent him on an
errand that she knew that was, and to take x
amount of time, She goes and systematically strangles each one
of her babies Okay, children, defenseless children. It looked like
(05:15):
she potentially isolated one of them because this was the
kid that was the harder to deal with to kill him,
and then systematically killed the other two. She had to
strangle them for anywhere from four minutes to ten minutes
to make sure that they were dead, and then she
cowardly jumps from a window in a pseudo attempt to
(05:36):
take her own life. This woman needs to be no
questions asked, capital punishment, although there isn't capital punishment in
the state that she's in, locked away for life, no
questions asked, and she needs to be so thoroughly destroyed
that there are no copycats out there. When you see
(05:56):
cases like this, you start to understand why there was
burning at the Stakes prior.
Speaker 3 (06:01):
To No Now you know what happened at the Salem
witch hunts.
Speaker 1 (06:05):
I'm not maybe we should look at that with some
fresh eyes.
Speaker 3 (06:10):
That's a bridge too far for me. But I feel
like there's a lot of support for this woman, Lindsay,
because there are millions and millions of women who have
struggled with postpartum, But I would add that millions and
millions of women did not kill their children. This woman
took it obviously much too far, and we just as
(06:30):
a society, we can't we can't support that behavior no
matter what, no matter the reason.
Speaker 1 (06:34):
And I think that there are there are obviously a
lot of people that have women that have faced severe
depression after having their children, and that is where this
sympathy is coming from. Yes, I understand people getting caught
up in conspiracy theories and getting misinformation. I do not
understand sympathizing with a woman that kills three of their kids.
(06:56):
There are so many people out there that are sympathizing
with this woman knowing that she killed her own kids.
The same kind of consideration isn't given to men in
these kinds of situations. When you hear a man executing
his three sons, no one feels sorry for this man
us as men don't feel sorry for this man. And
(07:17):
I could say this from a male perspective. A lot
of women are using this argument that men shouldn't be
talking about this because they have pressures on them. That
they are the ones that are giving birth, they are
the ones that are going through the hormonal changes. There
are these societal pressures on them, and so because of that,
men shouldn't be responding to this or shouldn't have an
(07:39):
opinion on this, and that they are sympathizing with this
woman for killing her three children because of the hormones
and because of the societal pressure on them. In a
similar way, men can use that as a crutch as well.
Speaker 3 (07:54):
Their experiences of being men and their pressures that men.
Speaker 1 (07:58):
Experience exactly societally speaking, men have pressures, whether they succeeded
it or not. There are societal pressures to provide a
roof over their family's house, to keep them secure, to
protect them, to be these kinds of financial kind of
they have the financial burden on them. Whether they are
(08:19):
succeeding at that or not is a whole different subject.
There is these societal pressures on men that they could
use as a crutch in these kinds of moments, but
that is not societally acceptable for a good reason. I
don't want it to be succidedly such.
Speaker 3 (08:35):
I mean, I think both sexes has things that they
can use as a crutch, some warranted, some not exactly.
Speaker 1 (08:41):
But I think what we're seeing now is we're seeing
this suicidal empathy take hold. For oddly, I feel like
this subject is connected to abortion in some ways. It's
almost like the more that we've allowed abortion. By the way,
the state that this happened in, they recently passed a
law that you can have an abortion up to the
(09:03):
moment that you give birth. Okay, this is an extension
of that. It feels like to me, you literally have
women online making videos saying that men they have no
input on this because they aren't the ones giving birth,
and they support Lindsey Clancy in this kind of moment
(09:25):
of crisis that she had. Okay, it's almost like they
are arguing for post birth abortions. And this is kind
of the realm that we are going on that the
society has allowed us to enter into this realm because
we are not having open conversations about this. I feel
for the biological pressures on women. I always have. I
(09:49):
made my wife a business partner in my business ventures,
so I obviously have an affinity for women. I was
raised by a woman my father left at a young age.
I was in a woman in a house with all women.
I feel like I have an understanding of them from
a male perspective in a way that maybe others don't.
(10:12):
And the point being is that I can align with
your the pressures that are on you. We cannot use
those as a crutch to sympathize with these heinous acts.
We must as a public shame these heinous acts.
Speaker 3 (10:30):
I agree with that we cannot give excuses for this
is what happened to those kids. We certainly we cannot.
We can't condone this behavior under any circumstances, no matter
what she went through, no matter what you go through
in life, no matter what happens, it is never okay,
no matter what, to kill your children.
Speaker 1 (10:51):
And there's this movement too to support.
Speaker 3 (10:53):
That, and the movement supporting her is I just find
it really, really scary.
Speaker 1 (10:58):
And it's this. This is why I've been calling it
a great filter, because if you are out there simply
with this woman, based on all of the evidence that's
gone out now, then I think you need to look
in the mirror because this is something that must be shunned.
There is this movement to remove responsibility. And if you
(11:18):
are aligning with this woman because you can align with
her postpartum crisis that she allegedly went through, you are
aligning yourself with the anti prison movement, with these lunatics
out there that don't think people should go to jail
for rape, that believe that people should just be released
from prison and maybe go through some kind of a
(11:42):
therapy session or what have you. No, there is evil
out there. That evil must be dealt with in the
harshest way possible so that it does not spread because
it becomes a societal contagion. This is one of those moments.
There's no gray area here. This is a black and
white issue. This woman midst to killing her kids. She
(12:04):
systematically strangled them. She did it in a premeditated way,
She sent her husband out, she strangled each one of
these children, and then she basically now is claiming that
she had some kind of postpartum issue. I don't care.
I want this woman to fry, and I want everyone
(12:25):
to see her fry so that they do not do
or think of doing anything like this. We are supposed
to protect children. That is one of the biggest responsibilities
of adults. That is how society stays stable is protecting
the children and fostering them in a positive way. This
(12:45):
is not that, and what we are seeing on social media,
this is kind of one of the silver linings of
these kinds of events, is you're seeing the level of
insanity that is out there. You are seeing a lot
of people that are amongst us aligning with this woman.
This isn't some fringe thing. This is something that has
taken storm on not just social media. You have people
(13:07):
showing up on site at the courtrooms, showing support, going
on camera supporting this woman, willing to do that in
their their nurse outfit. That's how little they fear repercussions.
Those people should be petrified from doing that on camera,
and they're not.
Speaker 3 (13:28):
I think that when you bring home a baby, when
you have a baby, I think a lot of women
have an experience that I don't think is often talked about,
which is they regret it. They don't like the situation
that they've gotten themselves into.
Speaker 1 (13:41):
Yeah, this thing sucking on you for you know, a
year or what have you, Your body changes.
Speaker 2 (13:47):
They don't like it.
Speaker 3 (13:47):
I did not experience any type of postpartum I feel like,
and I think you can attest to this. I was
a natural born mother. I also had my daughter much
later in life, I was older. But I have seen
firsthand women who had babies, and you know immediately they
don't like it. They're not enjoying it. They regret their decision.
(14:09):
And I think that the support Lindsay is getting is
from a lot of women who have had those types
of thoughts and experiences.
Speaker 1 (14:19):
I think we've all had kind of evil thoughts pop
into our mind at some point, but this is one
of those.
Speaker 2 (14:26):
Except right now and I'm looking at you, just get well.
Speaker 1 (14:28):
And the fascinating thing is is that this Lindsay person,
it doesn't appear that she's felt any remorse. You haven't
heard that expression of remorse in any of the testimony.
If I killed my three children in a moment as
some kind of psychotic break and I come out of it,
(14:49):
there's no I don't want to go on to live. Okay,
I'm signing up for capital punishment. That's what a normal
person would do. This person is fighting to stay alive
and to live the rest of her life.
Speaker 2 (15:01):
Well, she's gonna live anyway, because she's a ma to
choose it.
Speaker 3 (15:03):
But she I know some people are saying that the
cuts on her wrists were superficial.
Speaker 1 (15:09):
Yes, and the one on her neck as well too.
Speaker 2 (15:12):
Yes.
Speaker 1 (15:12):
At the end of the day, you are not seeing
the remorse that this woman that you would think that
you would see after somebody that just went through some
kind of blackout, let's say, comes to her senses and
is now living with the horror of what she has done.
You're not seeing that with this woman. And then, of
course you have one of the most fascinating things. And
(15:35):
this is this great filter that I'm talking about. And
Candace Owens has been, you know, kind of a popular
topic with us for quite some time now. How did
Candace Owens react to this case? What do you think
her position was on this?
Speaker 2 (15:50):
Let me guess.
Speaker 3 (15:51):
Let me guess she thinks Lindsay is innocent. Well, it's
the husband's fault.
Speaker 1 (15:56):
You're right on part of that. And here's Candace's take
on the Lindsay Clancy case.
Speaker 4 (16:01):
Your girl, Karen writes, I know you're busy, but I'd
love to know your thoughts. I'm a Lindsay Clancy case
in Massachusetts. I made my thoughts clear on this the
moment that she was arrested, the moment that it made
the news. Lindsay Clancy is obviously not guilty. There are
a fleet of doctors who should be imprisoned for what
they put her on. I regularly speak out against big Pharma.
(16:21):
They get away with murder all the time, and in
this case, they are getting away with the murder of
really her three children, but also completely destroyed her life. Well,
Lindsay Clancy, in my opinion, is not guilty. She was
put into an intentional psychosis when she probably just needed
to give her kids away for a weekend to get better.
(16:42):
But they constantly give you these drugs that do not
make things better, and the cocktail of ten pharmaceuticals that
she was on is absolute madness, absolute madness.
Speaker 1 (16:52):
Now, this is how stupid this woman is. Candie Owens. Okay, One,
she did give her kids up for a little bit.
She was actually committed at one point. Okay, so she's
wrong on that. Two, there is now testimony that came
out through the court case that she got these prescriptions. Yes,
but she didn't take a lot of them. She didn't
take any of the pills of some of them, and
(17:14):
with the other one she would take one or two pills. Okay,
she doesn't even have that right. And this is what
she is basing her innocence on. She's putting this message
out there with false information. She is so stupid, this woman.
She is a great broadcaster, but she is illiterate, horrible researcher.
(17:36):
She is a moron, but she knows where her audience is,
and her audience are the wine moms that back this
Lindsay Clancy person.
Speaker 2 (17:45):
So now I feel like it's kind of harsh to
call her stupid.
Speaker 3 (17:48):
I think we should maybe coin a new phrase like
she's got a shrinky brain or something.
Speaker 1 (17:53):
She is, okay, shrinky brain, she's a shrinky brain. She's
a shrinking brain.
Speaker 2 (17:57):
I'll go with that, shrunken up, shribbled up.
Speaker 1 (18:00):
I want to get into this give an update on
this Carmelo Anthony murder case as well as the Paramount merger,
because I think that it's kind of the the thesis
of our Red Pilled America show in regards to storytelling. Big,
big updates on both of those things. We'll get to
that right after the break. Every site you visit, every
search you type, every public Wi Fi network you connect
(18:21):
to leaves a record, and that record gets collected, packaged,
and sold. Surf Shark deals with that. You probably know
of them from the VPN, which encrypts your entire connection
under a strict, independently audited no logs policy and also
lets you get around GEO restrictions while traveling or streaming.
They've built a full security suite around it. The AD
(18:43):
and Tracker Blocker shuts down the profiling that follows you
around from site to site, and surf Shark Alert watches
your email, your passwords, even your credit card turning up
in a breach and tells you the moment it happens.
Secure your entire digital life with surf Shark it's completely
risk free with a thirty day money back guarantee. Go
do so surfshark dot com slash RPA or use code
(19:06):
RPA at checkout for four extra months of surf Shark again.
That's surfshark dot Com slash RPA code RPA. You're listening
to Red Pilled America's famboogie this Carmelo Anthony murder case.
You guys might remember this. We spoke about this when
(19:28):
it first broke God, when was this Now it's been
over a year, I believe for those of you guys
that need a little bit of refresher Carmelo Anthony was
a seventeen year old I believe at the time Texan
kid went to a track meet.
Speaker 2 (19:43):
Well it was in two thousand and four. It's been
a while.
Speaker 1 (19:46):
Okay, goes to this track meet. I believe it starts
to sprinkle or what have you. One of the other
kind of group of students there had a cover and
they were sitting under the cover, and he decides to
go sit under the cover with them. Austin Metcalf, who
was another student, asked him to leave. They get in
(20:07):
some kind of a verbal altercation. There might have been
some pushing that went along with it. Carmelo kind of
dares him to do something, ends up stabbing him and
admits to the stabbing on site after he's caught by
the police. He was found guilty sentenced to thirty five
years in prison. Some people, including myself, thought he got
(20:30):
off easy, but he decides that he wants to appeal
the case with his pro bono lawyers. The reason that
they're using is is that he didn't have proper representation beforehand.
That there was a gentleman's agreement between the defendant, Carmelo
Anthony's lawyer and the prosecution to not submit certain parts
(20:53):
of evidence. They wanted to keep it out of the
case because they didn't want to inflame some of the
racial aspects of the case. Both of these kids had
some things in their past that might have been used
to kind of inflame racial division, so the lawyers at
that time decide to not include this, let's just focus
on the incident itself. As the case went on. As
(21:17):
the trial actually went on, Carmelo Anthony decided he wanted
to testify. Well, the prosecution said, well, if you do that,
we're going to have to basically bring up some of
these things that we had a gentleman agreement on because
now we're you're going to testify and make divulge your
personality to the public, and now we are going to
(21:38):
challenge those assertions that you are making via this evidence
that we agreed we were not going to be including
in the case. So Carmelo Anthony decided to not testify
because of that, because he didn't want that information within
the court case. So now he is using that that
as a way to appeal. So it comes out that
(22:02):
some of these things that they did not want to
include in the case. Carmelo Anthony on the day prior
to in the morning, I believe it was early morning
of the day that he murdered Austin Metcalf, he threatened
his ex girlfriend. He was sending texts about wanting to
stab somebody and lick the blood off of the knife.
(22:22):
He had texted her things about killing her. He said
that he was on the verge.
Speaker 3 (22:29):
He was basically stalking her and wouldn't let her break
up with exactly.
Speaker 2 (22:34):
He was aggressive.
Speaker 3 (22:34):
He was exhibiting some very very exhibiting and engaging in
very aggressive behavior.
Speaker 1 (22:40):
So the texts are showing that he was no angel,
So now he wants a retrial, and they had submitted something.
They ended up getting the previous judge taken off of
the case, so now it's going to a new judge.
The new judge looks at everything basically denies this retrial,
and everyone's saying, oh, let's bring this trial back because
(23:01):
he should be serving more time. But all they have
to do is get one person on that jury that
sympathizes with this kid, and he will end up getting off.
So I think at the end of the day, the
thirty five years, we're going to have to live with that.
They're going to appeal that to a higher court. But
it's this same movement that we're seeing of removing responsibility
(23:24):
from people. This kid stabbed somebody. He shouldn't have had
a knife on campus. It sounds by all accounts that
it was something that he was trying to get a
reaction out of these kids. He got that reaction and
then he ended up stabbing somebody.
Speaker 3 (23:38):
You know what, sometimes I see things like this, and
I'll see let's say, a white liberal defending Carmelo Anthony,
and they're doing it because in their mind, like you know,
he's black and he suffered an injustice because you know
they're treating him this way because he's black. And I
always look at those types of perspective as that person's
a racist. Yes, if you're unable to call somebody out,
(24:02):
you know, because they're too brown to know better, that's racist.
Speaker 1 (24:09):
We recently went on a trip and we came back
and we got on the shuttle and the driver was black.
Every time you take one of these hotel shuttles, you
park your car at the hotel and you leave it
there for a couple of days and the shuttle comes
and pick you up. They help you with your luggage.
Speaker 2 (24:26):
And by the way, you're paying for that service.
Speaker 1 (24:28):
Yes, okay, yes, So we get into the shuttle and
the guy stops and he immediately says, oh, do you
need help with your your luggage, doesn't get up to
help with the luggae. I'm like, okay, fine, you don't
want to help with the luggage. You ain't getting a tip,
so but I'm lugging six, you know, huge pieces of luggage.
There are people waiting on the shuttle, there are people
(24:48):
on the on the outside waiting to get in. This
guy is not helping. Clearly one of the worst shuttle
drivers that I've ever had.
Speaker 2 (24:55):
But then we kind of got a little bit of
a hurry up.
Speaker 3 (24:59):
Okay, yes, So when we got that little bit of
a from driver like, you know, hurry up and get
all of your luggage in yourself, that I'm not going
to help you in, I said, Okay, we'll give us
a minute because we're having to put it all in ourselves. Yes,
and I kind of I bit back.
Speaker 1 (25:13):
Yes.
Speaker 3 (25:14):
And there was a woman on the shuttle, a white woman,
who was like, oh, she couldn't believe I said that.
Speaker 1 (25:19):
Yes.
Speaker 2 (25:20):
She was highly offended by that.
Speaker 1 (25:22):
Yes. So we go through the we get on the bus,
we get on the shuttle. He's taking us back to
the hotel. This woman strikes up this conversation, very open
conversation with the.
Speaker 2 (25:32):
Driver for everyone in the shuttle to hear.
Speaker 1 (25:34):
And basically starts to you know, glaze him as one
of the greatest shuttle drivers she's ever had in her life.
Speaker 2 (25:41):
She started to say, you are the best. She literally said,
you are the best shuttle driver I have ever had.
Speaker 3 (25:47):
Yes, this guy that's done nothing, this white woman. And
later I looked at Patrick and I said, she's a racist.
Speaker 1 (25:54):
That's clearly erasists. It's the what's that, what's the term?
Speaker 2 (25:58):
The bigotry of low expectations?
Speaker 1 (26:00):
Thank you very much. That is what she was exp
resting there. And I see this time and time again
all the time. And you're seeing this with a lot
of these kinds of these white liberals that end up
going into these kinds of cases and supporting somebody that
is clearly a monster. People do not want to be
seen as racist, and you're seeing that a lot with
these kinds of cases. We saw it pretty heavily with
(26:22):
Carmelo Anthony. I am so happy that the judge, this
new judge, denied a retrial. Let's put this one behind
us and counted as a win. Yes, he only got
thirty five years, he should have gotten life. This guy
is a monster penalty he should have gotten the death penalty.
But we have to take the win where we can
take the win. This young man could easily have been
(26:44):
acquitted if there was just one jury member that on
that trial that sided with him or sympathized with him.
So I think that that we have to count this
one as a win. Finally, this paramount merger, we've been
talking about this now for months and the excitement that
we have the industry is on the verge of changing.
(27:05):
The Ellisons purchased Paramount, then they ended up winning the
merger battle that they had with Netflix with Warner Brothers.
The reason why you're getting a huge reaction from Hollywood
is because the Ellisons are Republicans. They're conservative, and there
was some slight build up of rejection of this merger
(27:29):
and a fight against it. It started with some of
the unions. You had the Writers Guild of America kind
of come out against it. Then you had the Age
of California. Then multiple other deep blue states have now
filed a lawsuit to block this merger on anti trust
conditions or anti trust arguments. Well, now you have a
(27:54):
pushback to those people now because they're fearing that Paramount
is going to leave California. I think that it is
very possible for them to leave. There's only certain areas
that it could move. You need a talent pull to
pull from, So there's really only a few places that
Paramount can move to. One being Austin. They have a
(28:16):
film school there, they have an entertainment pool there that
they can kind of draw from. Another being potentially Georgia.
There is a huge kind of film studio movement there.
There's a lot of studios in Atlanta. There is SCAD
which is a film school there that can feed them
talent as well. You're not going to see them move
(28:38):
into some random red state. They're going to move into
an area that has an infrastructure there. But at the
end of the day, there is this incredible shift happening,
or at least a foothold into Hollywood by conservatives because
of this merger, and it is driving certain corners of
Hollywood nuts right now, one of those people being Mark Ruffalo.
(29:02):
Mark Ruffalo has been a progressive activist for quite some time.
I would say he's a progressive activist before an actor.
But he has come out very harshly against this merger.
He's Hulk, He's the guy that plays the Hulk.
Speaker 2 (29:16):
And incredible Hulk, the Green Guy.
Speaker 1 (29:18):
But what he did was is he made an incredibly
huge mistake. What he decided to do. Instead of arguing
against the merger based on job loss arguments or anti
trust arguments, he started to make an argument that it
was a support of genocide in Gaza because the Ellisons
(29:39):
are Jewish, because they have yes, he made a huge
leap he's tying the Oracle business to this, but he's
conflating all of these issues and making an anti Semitic attack.
Let's just be clear. It is an anti Semitic attack
to conflate all of those issues and say that they
are supporting genocide. This merger supports genocide in Gaza. He
(30:02):
showed his cards. The guy has been anti Semitic for
quite some time, and I think that you're seeing the
end of somebody's career in Hollywood. I well, let me
put it this way. Let me put it this way.
I should put it this way. This is a litmus test,
another litmus test. I guess this show is about several
litmus tests, and we're seeing that now with this Mark
(30:23):
Ruffalo thing. And this is what I mean by that.
If his career is able to survive this, then maybe
the Jewish hold in Hollywood isn't as strong as many
people think. I do not think he survives this because
I think it is clearly an anti Semitic attack. I
think there is going to be people that are afraid
to hire him based on this attack. He pulled his
(30:46):
mask off. But I am so excited about this merger.
It's going to happen. They can fight it all they want.
You have Mayor Bass, who is pretty well known as
having socialist ties. She's coming out and wanting these ages,
these attorney generals to settle this case. She is very
afraid that the industry is going to leave Los Angeles
(31:09):
on her watch. Yes, okay, and it is very possible.
You aren't tied to locations the same way that you
were in the past. Los Angeles used to be the
kind of stand in for all of these different locations.
People used Los Angeles as stand ins for various locations
in their filming. Nobody films in Los Angeles anymore. Go
(31:31):
to downtown is blocks and blocks and blocks of homeless encampments.
It's not safe to shoot there anymore. They can't get
permits the way that as quickly as they can in
other areas. They don't get the credits that they do,
the kind of kickbacks to film in the area the
way they do in other areas. I should make one
correction to what I said earlier. There is one area
(31:51):
that doesn't necessarily have a huge film school that could
also be a home places like Louisiana because they have
huge financial or film credits. If you shoot there. And
because of that, they said they've created this pool of
producers and a film staff basically within that area because
of that. But this is an exciting time. I know
(32:13):
a lot of you guys out there hate Hollywood, view
it as a cess pool, view it as something that
it should just kind of burn. But it is one
of America's strongest exports. It is America's strongest cultural export.
We can't allow a foreign power to take control of
this incredibly strong tool. Storytellings is something that we as
(32:38):
human beings naturally align with. This is how we store information,
This is how we empathize with each other. This is
how we pass on culture from generation to generation is
through storytelling. And if we allow, say a China or
some other foreign power, to take control of that tool,
then we are giving away something that we have almost invented,
(33:02):
an perfected and mastered. We're giving it to an enemy
of ours. And we cannot do that. And so we
must welcome this merger because now conservatives are getting a
foothold into the industry through this merger. You have the
Ellsons at the top of this enterprise that agree with
(33:23):
you on a lot of things, and so do not
just be willing to throw out the baby with the bathwater.
Speaker 3 (33:31):
I agree, I agree, and I want to add something
as well. You know, we've talked about this a little bit,
but our daughter is going to film school now.
Speaker 2 (33:38):
She got into all of.
Speaker 3 (33:40):
The top film schools, and the film school that we chose,
she chose for herself. You know, we walked into the
student union the other day and guess what they were
playing Fox News. So there is a shift happening. But
those of us who are outside of the system, we
still need to support that system so that it can
continue to thrive and to grow in our direction. Yes,
(34:01):
let's not abandon it.
Speaker 2 (34:03):
A one eighty on this. You know, when we first
started the show, I was bitter. I was bitter. I
hated Hollywood. I hated what they'd done to it to
my family.
Speaker 3 (34:09):
Yes, but I have now come back to this position,
which is we must support it. We cannot abandon these institutions.
Speaker 1 (34:16):
We cannot. And there's a reason why the hardcore socialists
were able to take over these institutions is they decided
to take them over from within. And when I see
people that are willing to burn it down to the ground,
they don't understand the importance of storytelling in driving and
shaping culture. It is what creates culture.
Speaker 3 (34:39):
I think that that's changing as well. I think that
people have started to understand that.
Speaker 1 (34:43):
I know, the listeners of this show, I.
Speaker 3 (34:45):
Mean absolutely they they've embraced that, that yes, idea.
Speaker 2 (34:49):
So I think that I feel hopeful.
Speaker 1 (34:52):
That's it for this installation of Famboogie. Keep an eye
out for our Red Pilled America documentary episode coming out soon.
We'll send out email in the email newsletter. Go to
Redpilled America dot com and join the email newsletter and
you'll get the first news of it when it hits
the hits the broadcast platforms. Until next time, enjoy you guys.
(35:14):
The rest of you guys' day.
Speaker 3 (35:16):
By everyone,
Hosts And Creators
Adryana Cortez
Patrick Courrielche
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
The Bobby Bones Show
Listen to 'The Bobby Bones Show' by downloading the daily full replay.