February 3, 2026 • 29 mins
In the final hour, Sean reacts to explosive comments from Arizona Attorney General Kris Mays suggesting residents could use deadly force against ICE agents—a claim law enforcement leaders say is dangerously false. Sean is joined by Arizona Senate President Warren Petersen, who explains why the rhetoric misrepresents the law and puts officers’ lives at risk. The discussion expands to border-state realities, responsible gun ownership, and why elected officials must choose their words carefully. Hannity argues that leadership matters most when tensions are high—and this is a moment demanding clarity, not chaos.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
All right, News round up and information overload our here's
(00:02):
a Toulfrey telephone number eight hundred and nine four one
sean if you want to be a part of the program.
I think if you look at Arctic frost and now
we do know for a fact, it's been confirmed by
the Attorney General Pam Bondi, it's been confirmed by the
FBI Director Cash Bettel, that there is an investigation into
(00:22):
what is a grand conspiracy to influence the outcome of
elections and much more, going back to the dirty disinformation dossier,
the double standard in terms of applying the law, no
reasonable prosecutor would prosecute July twenty sixteen. Of course that
was mister Higher Honor himself, James Coomi, the dirt, you know,
(00:44):
the Faiza warrant, abuse, all the way through Russia, Russia, Russia,
all the way through every other issue. You know, the
Biden's being protected, the family syndicate. I mean, this is
a real investigation. When when they had Jack Smith before Congress,
I think one of the best moments was when Congressman
(01:07):
Brandon gil Lam Jack Smith were making up his own
legal theory as a means of justifying his conduct and
in this case specifically about spying on members of Congress
and then hiding it with non disclosure orders on top
of making payments, which is a separate issue. Here's that exchange.
Speaker 2 (01:28):
In May of twenty twenty three, you also issued subpoenas
for toll records of nine US senators and an additional representative.
Speaker 3 (01:35):
Is that right?
Speaker 4 (01:36):
In May of twenty three we did issue.
Speaker 2 (01:39):
You did, and there were non disclosure orders in conjunction
with those subpoenas as well.
Speaker 4 (01:42):
Right, that's correct, consistent with Department policy law.
Speaker 2 (01:46):
So again, nobody would know what you were doing. The
senators would, and the representatives would, and the American people
wouldn't know what you were doing.
Speaker 3 (01:51):
Is that right?
Speaker 4 (01:52):
The toll records that we secured in the non disclosure
orders were consistent with policy.
Speaker 2 (01:58):
And you knew whenever you're doing that that there was
a risk you were violating the speechure debate clause.
Speaker 3 (02:03):
Is that right?
Speaker 4 (02:04):
The toll record subpene is that we secured, where with
the concurrence of the public.
Speaker 2 (02:07):
Conte your own analysis says that you knew there was
a risk you were violating the speech or debate clause.
Speaker 3 (02:13):
I have it right here.
Speaker 2 (02:14):
This is an email from John Keller at Public Integrity
Section to your team, as you are aware. Quote, as
you are aware, there is some litigation risk regarding whether
compelled disclosure of toll records of a member's legislative calls
violates the speech or debate clause in the DC circuit.
That's from your own analysis, right there. So you did know,
didn't you.
Speaker 4 (02:34):
So with respect to the item you just put up
on the screen, the last sentence states.
Speaker 2 (02:39):
Uh, oh, we're going to get to the last sentence. Okay,
we're going to get to the last sentence, and you
cite case Lawn here. Quote the bar on compelled disclosure
is absolute, is right?
Speaker 3 (02:48):
Is that right?
Speaker 2 (02:49):
Or do you think that you didn't have to abide
by that precedent?
Speaker 4 (02:52):
To be clear, this is not this statement is not
from my office. This is the statement.
Speaker 2 (02:57):
This is This is your justification for those penis and
indios that you ordered. This was part of your analysis.
It's a cursory analysis. I think it's worth noting let's
get to that last sentence then.
Speaker 3 (03:08):
Quote.
Speaker 2 (03:08):
Given my understanding of the low likelihood that any of
the members listed below would be charged, the litigation risk
should be minimal here. In other words, you're using a
novel legal theory, which you knew was novel, has never
been tested by any court. You're not charging any of
these members. Nobody's going to know about it because you
issued indios. Nobody is going to sue about it. So
(03:30):
sue this, So who cares? We're going to do it? Anyways,
you walked all over the Constitution throughout this entire process.
The gentlemen's time behind are members of Congress, and you
know it. It's absolutely disgraceful.
Speaker 1 (03:42):
All right, Congressman Brandon Gill joins us now from the
great state of Texas. God bless Texas.
Speaker 3 (03:47):
Sean, I'm doing great, Thanks for having me.
Speaker 1 (03:49):
All right, So a very important exchange in my view.
Do you think anything's going to happen with this? Probably
the question I could asked the most is yeah, Sean,
and you've done great work. You've exposed a lot of
corruption and then nothing ever happens. And you know, I
try to explain to people a lot, in a lot
of cases the statute limitations have run.
Speaker 3 (04:09):
Out, well, that that could be the case. Here. The
goal of these hearings, whether we do it on Somali
fraud or about Jack Smith or anybody else. The goal
of the hearings is to develop the information to bring
a case to dj CA and then used to prosecute
people who have been who have engaged in illegal activity.
It seems like jack Smith probably did engage in quite
(04:32):
a bit of illegal things throughout this entire investigation. Remember
this whole Arctic frost investigation began with testimony from Cassidy
Hutchinson that was completely debunked. Then they used information from
the January sixth Select Committee, which was run by Democrats
for Democrats that was highly political. And then of course Jackson, by.
Speaker 1 (04:54):
The way, is do you believe a crime took place?
Because apparently all of the records involving I called the
Predetermined Outcome made for primetime movie the novel that was
the January sixth hearings. I mean, they used Cassidy Hutchinson,
but not the driver of the vehicle that they had
testified that Donald Trump never tried to commandeer the car
(05:17):
that he was being driven in that day. But you know,
a hearsay witness, We'll put that person up because that
person heard that Donald Trump tried.
Speaker 3 (05:25):
To Right, We're going to base this entire DOJ Special
Investigation off of hearsay and then use that to start
justifying tapping, collecting phone data on sitting Republican congressman and
sitting Republican senators, including the then Speaker of the House,
Kevin McCarthy. And they were doing this all in order
(05:46):
to do to get one person, and that was to
get President Trump press charges against him influenced the results
of the twenty twenty election. I mean, this is throughout
this entire process, just walked all over the content Institution,
violating the speech or debate clause, for one, by collecting
data on sitting Republican congressmen around the time of a
(06:08):
major vote, and you mentioned it earlier, in order to
sort of justify himself. We have the internal analysis that
Jack Smith used to get these phone taps, and even
their own analysis said that we believe that there is
some litigation risk, but we're going to do it anyways.
We're going to do it anyways because we're not collecting
data or we're not pressing charges rather on these members
(06:32):
of Congress. So we're going to concoct an entirely new
legal theory that says that this is okay. Remember this
legal theory has never been tested in any court, and
we're going to slap Indos on it non disclosure order
so nobody knows what we're doing. In other words, this
is probably illegal, but here's some new legal theory that
we're going to use to justify it, and nobody's going
(06:52):
to know, so we're going to do it anyways. I mean,
that was the analysis. It was about a paragraph long
legal analysis that Jack Smith used, and this was so
flagrantly unconstitutional, but that's what we were dealing with, and
that's what we're trying to get to the bottom of
still right now.
Speaker 1 (07:09):
I mean, it really is remarkable. They knew all these
top members of Congress and the Senate. They know who
they called, where the call was made from, they knew
the location of where they made the call, the location
of who received the call. I mean, this is so
invasive and atrusive. Wouldn't you normally, you know, under you know,
(07:31):
the Fourth Amendment, have protections against unreasonable search and seizure.
Speaker 3 (07:36):
Of course you would, And I think Jack Smith knew that,
and that's why he wanted to keep all of this private.
In conjunction with those with those phone tamps, the subpoenas
that he issued, he also issued non disclosure orders. And
I found that the non disclosure order related to Kevin
McCarthy particularly interesting because he referred to in that order
that he sent to a judge, referred to Kevin McCarthy,
(07:58):
the sitting Republicans Speaker of the House, as a flight risk.
As if you think that Kevin McCarthy is going to
hop on a plane and fly to Argentina and live
his life as a fugitive. I mean, that is insane.
And yet that was the justification that he brought brought
forward with a judge. Now they try to claim that
those those ndos are just sort of standard form letters,
(08:20):
but we also have the indos that they used to
collect data on Senator Cruz and other senators, and they
don't refer to them as a flight risk.
Speaker 1 (08:27):
So this wellplain explain to me how the January sixth
committee was able to destroy or I guess they're missing
all of the records because I assume and suspect, let's
put it that way, maybe a better word. I suspect
they got rid of those records because they knew it
would be incriminating with the new Trump administration coming in,
and they were not going to leave any evidence behind.
Speaker 3 (08:50):
I think you're right there. And you know, the amazing
thing about this whole Arctic frost investigation that we're doing
to oversee what happened is most of them ormation we
have isn't coming from the FBI. And that's not a
reflection on cash. Butttel, he's been great. It's because the
people who were engaged in this knew what they were
doing is wrong. They destroyed documents, they hid documents. What
(09:12):
we have here is information that we got from whistleblowers
primarily I mean, I mean, they knew what they were
doing was wrong. You know, typically if you want to
hide what you're doing, you probably have something on your
conscience that you know what you're doing in this context
is illegal and unconstitutional.
Speaker 1 (09:28):
Quick break more with Congressman Brandon Gilla, Texas on the
other side. Then we'll get to your calls coming up.
Eight hundred nine four one Sean. As we continue, we
continue with Brandon Gill, Congressman Texas. Then we'll get to
your calls coming up eight hundred nine four one Sean.
As we roll along this Tuesday, let me ask you
(09:49):
about it. Well, it's kind of related. Everything in Washington's related,
and for those that don't know. By the way, there
was an announcement earlier that we reported on the House
did pass this bill to end the government shutdown, at
one point two trillion dollars spending package to end the
partial government shutdown. Today it cleared a bipartisan vote under
(10:13):
the insistence of President Trump. I don't know what's going
to happen if Democrats want to run on defunding the
Department of Homeland Security and eliminating ICE. I'm all in
favor of that, because the American people and overwhelming numbers
won't want that, and it won't go over well and
it won't end the way they think it will end.
But you know, you had written Mitch McConnell asking his committee.
(10:36):
And this goes back sometime on the issue of the
Save Act and how eighty three percent of Americans want
proof of citizenship to vote. The House did their job
with it, the Senate needed to do theirs. Where are
we with that.
Speaker 3 (10:52):
That's something that we're continuing to push. The shutdown. It
is over. We've got the bill pass out of the
House today, but I think that the fight on the
save back still remains, and we've still got a DHS
Appropriations Bill that we're going to be working on there
as well, And I agree. I'd love to hear Democrats
run this next election cycle on defunding ICE and you know,
(11:14):
reopening up the borders and all of the things that
stopping all of the things we got a mandate to
do last fall. But with the Save Act, this is
something that the vast majority of Americans, including Democrats, agree
with it. The American people do not want illegal aliens,
are foreign nationals influencing our election system. I mean, that's
a core part of American stock.
Speaker 1 (11:35):
A big part of it, though, is proof of citizenship.
Now I've said we need, we need national standards, voter ID,
signature verification, pain of custody control, runny mail in ballots.
They should be under a camera's watch from the minute
it enters any voting facilities so nobody can tamper with it,
updated voter rolls, partisan observers, and every precinct watching the
(11:59):
voting all day and the vote counting all night. I'd
prefer paper ballots myself. Why would Democrats be against that?
Speaker 3 (12:06):
You know, I think the Democrats believe that this is
an existential political battle for them because their whole ticket
towards long term electoral politics in the US is allowing
foreign nationals and illegal aliens to vote. I mean, that
was the core premise behind open borders for four years
under Joe Biden. We'll let us miss so, in.
Speaker 1 (12:25):
Other words, we'll let you come in, we won't vet you.
Among you will be murderers, rapists, kyle molesters, known terrorists,
cartel members, and gang members, and then we'll give you
something of great value, American citizenship and wink, wink, we
hope you vote for US. Is that what it was.
Speaker 3 (12:42):
That's exactly what it was. And on top of that,
illegal aliens being in the United States are counted in
the census, which impacts congressional apportionment, meaning the number of
congressmen that each state gets. So blue states get bigger
representation than red states do because they tend to be
the states where you have more sanctuary juris dictions. So
this entire, this entire open border's agenda from the left
(13:05):
was intended to systematically rig America's elections in favor of
the left.
Speaker 1 (13:11):
Look, the polls show this isn't popular. I think it's
in the high eighties in terms of the percentage of
Americans that want proof of citizenship to vote. If you
look at the actual numbers, and I went over this
last night, the number of people that want illegal immigrants
and home is in the upper sixties. It's breathtaking to me.
(13:31):
The Democrats have now staked out this hill where they
want a defund dismantle of no bail laws. Reimagine the
police open borders.
Speaker 3 (13:40):
Uh.
Speaker 1 (13:40):
And they are fighting against ice, supporting the worst of
the worst criminals and attacking them and smearing and slandering them.
They voted for the largest tax increase in history. They
have you know, they have married themselves to the climate
alarmist religious cult, and Republicans voted for the largest tax
(14:02):
reduction in history. I'm like, okay, I'll take a choice
election like that every day of the week.
Speaker 3 (14:07):
Oh, I mean, you're exactly right. I mean, this is
the same party who told the American people that boys
can become girls and boys should be playing in girls'
sports and thought that that would be politically popular. And
this isn't a party that's particularly known for living in reality.
But the bet that they've made, they think that, however unpopular,
open borders are, however unpopular, just wildly unchecked spending. Is
(14:31):
what we can do is bring these people in and
we will tell them you vote for Democrats and we'll
give you amnesty. And that's the plan. That is their
electoral strategy. They can't win over voters in the country
currently through logic or through any kind of compelling political argumentation,
so they've got to rake the elections.
Speaker 1 (14:49):
All right, we appreciate your time. Brandon gil Congressman Texas.
Thank you, sir. Keep up the good work. Eight hundred
nine four one, Shawn our number if you want to
be a part of the program. Now did you see
or hear were you watching this week Weekend? Any of
the Grammys? You like me? I didn't watch it, but
I saw the highlights of it. You know Billie Eilish,
(15:12):
I do? Okay, Now, did you know that Billie Eilish
said that we all live on lands that were stolen?
Speaker 5 (15:21):
I did hear that?
Speaker 3 (15:22):
Yes?
Speaker 1 (15:24):
Did you know that Billie Eilish has a three million
dollar home.
Speaker 5 (15:30):
I do know that.
Speaker 6 (15:31):
Yes.
Speaker 1 (15:32):
Yeah, she was railing against ice and insisting that no
one is illegal on stolen land. That was the comment
that she made. She has a three million dollar mansion
in Los Angeles, and now It was a little background
checked by The New York Post. The indigenous inhabitants of
the La Basin, known as the First Angelinos, said they
(15:55):
appreciate Eilish's sentiment. However, they noted the performers never come
back to them directly insisted the next time she explicitly
referenced them. Quote, Eilish has not contacted our tribe directly
regarding her property. We do value the instance when public
figures provide visibility to the true history of our country,
(16:16):
and it is our hope that in future discussions, the
tribe can explicitly be referenced to ensure the public understands
that the Greater Los Angeles Basin remains part of their territory. Huh,
I'm sure she's.
Speaker 5 (16:33):
Going to sell our house right away. Absolutely. Really what
she should do is she should, with her own money,
turn it into some sort of incredible museum. To pay homage,
as you would say to.
Speaker 6 (16:48):
All of.
Speaker 4 (16:51):
It was too easy. I had to do it. Homage.
Speaker 1 (16:55):
Homage, right, it's homage. It's not homage like you usually say.
Speaker 5 (17:01):
I do say homage, but I was teasing.
Speaker 1 (17:03):
You, but homage.
Speaker 5 (17:05):
She really should turn it into the trial.
Speaker 1 (17:08):
Not sauce. It's it's not sauce. It's not it is
it always is. Hand over.
Speaker 5 (17:16):
She should hand it over and turn it into a museum,
and pay for her home to be turned into the museum,
to pay homage to the tribe, and really just do
it all in her own dime, to show that she's committed.
Speaker 1 (17:29):
She is committed to the effort. You're butchering the King's English.
Just for the record, all right, this is the this
is one weird story. Joe Biden, her ex husband, arrested
yesterday on charges he murdered his wife in their Delaware
home in December. Guy, his name is William Stevenson, previously
(17:49):
married to the former First Lady. He's been hit with
first degree murder charges for allegedly killing his current spouse
at their Oaks Hill. You know, according to the house
at Oaks Hill in Delaware, cops resounded domestic dispute, found
her unresponsive on the floor. What the hell is that?
(18:10):
And you know there was an article about the woman
from Arkansas that hunter had a child with the girl.
There was a picture of the little girl she was.
She was just adorable. How do you as a as
a father? I'm not saying you have to stay with somebody.
I'm just saying, how about if you bring a child
into this world, you got to you gotta man up
(18:32):
and be responsible, take care of your kids. Man, that's
just yeah.
Speaker 5 (18:36):
But he doesn't see it like that. He told her
he didn't want that kid. He told her to handle it,
and she said, no, I don't believe in that. I'm
gonna have the baby. He's like, all right, you're on
your own.
Speaker 1 (18:45):
So, I mean, you know, people saying she's a former stripper,
I don't care what she did for a living. They
had a consensual relationship, she had a child, and then
the worst part is the President and first Lady ignored
her at the time, Joe Biden and Joe Biden wouldn't
even acknowledge their own granddaughter.
Speaker 5 (19:04):
Honestly, in the long run, I think it's a really
good thing. I don't even know why this woman wants
anything from these people.
Speaker 1 (19:10):
You know what, that's actually not a bad analysis. I
don't maybe you know, I do know people that get
divorced and then like one parent just skips out and
they just check out and they just go away, And
it's actually in the best interest of the kids that
that person is gone. There are horrible people that are
not meant to be parents.
Speaker 5 (19:31):
It's totally true.
Speaker 1 (19:33):
So I met Savannah guf Thrie one time, and now
I knew Katie Kirk. Never liked Katie Kirk. Katie Kirk
was not a nice person. It just wasn't every time
I used to remember, I used to do all those
shows GMA and The View and the Today Show and
all those shows. I don't do that crap anymore. I
don't need it. I don't need them. But anyway I
(19:56):
met her, she could not have been nicer just and
I'm just straight up telling you, she was a very
genuine nice person. Wasn't triggered or offended that Sean Hannity,
the Conservative is there. She didn't care. And I met her,
talked to her a little bit, really liked her. I
feel terrible for her because, you know, the sheriff out
(20:16):
there saying that her eighty four year old mother did
not leave on her own from their residence on Saturday night,
and you know, more details are coming out and they
think that she might have was likely snatched from her
bed in her home. And Pema County Sheriff Chris Nanos,
(20:37):
you know, said to CBS, I can't think of the
last time we're in the middle of the night in
someone's bed. An eighty four year old woman disappeared on us.
We believe she was taken out against her will. Now
I think she had a ring tone, one of those
ringtone everyone's would really have simply safe. They're just so much,
it's so superior. But ringtone is pretty good. I guess
it's better than nothing. But they think this woman was
(20:59):
abducted from her home. And I you know, why would
anyone want to abduct an eighty four year old woman
that apparently was not doing well healthwise? It's terrible.
Speaker 5 (21:09):
Yeah, I mean they said after twenty four hours that
she was going to be in bad shape because she's
going to need her medicine. I have ring and I
have to say, you know, I actually have ring ends.
Simply say if I have two systems, but and I've
had simply save for years and then we had it
ring on for another reason. Anyways, more details than you need,
but the point is.
Speaker 1 (21:29):
You've got Have you gotten the updated AI generated outdoor
Guard Protection for simply I haven't.
Speaker 5 (21:36):
I haven't gotten need to update.
Speaker 1 (21:37):
It because it is like it's the next generation on steroids.
It's incredable.
Speaker 5 (21:41):
So they have they have a great program and it
works really great, and we've kept it for years.
Speaker 1 (21:46):
But I will tell you that I have facial recognition,
I have recording all day long that lasts for years.
It just is a scary environment because the left is
is so radicalized to me, and you know how chilling
is it for Savannah Guthrie and her eighty four year
old mom. What looks like a ransom note being reported,
(22:08):
As we said earlier by TMZ, it's scary.
Speaker 5 (22:12):
It is scary, And what's more scary is it's like, Okay,
if they pay this ransom, do they get their mom back?
Has this person already hurt their mom? Like we said
it before. You know, again, she hasn't had her medication
in twenty four hours. It's been thirty six, I think,
or forty hours since she's been missing. And it's a
really scary thing.
Speaker 1 (22:33):
We're praying for Savannah's mom. It sounds terrible. The only
thing I'm going to add to it, and it's separate
in the part, it's just the commentary. I think we
should give the proper amount of attention in the hopes
of finding this woman, and everybody now in the country
knows this woman is missing and knows what she looks like.
That's a good thing. However, in the month of January,
(22:54):
one hundred and thirty some odd people shot nearly thirty
dead in Chicago, nobody knows one name. And then all
of the people that have been raped and murdered and
victims of violent crime and child molestation that Ice has
been arresting, that never gets put into perspective by the
legacy media mob. Now they might not seem related in
(23:17):
many many ways, they're not. However, you know, with all
the concern rightly that we're giving Savannah Guthrie's mom, why
don't we give concern about You know, this is like
the Democrats not standing for Lake and Riley's family or
Joscelyn Nungarry's family. You know, either you care about humanity
or you don't. You know, black lives matter. Every life
(23:39):
matters to me. I believe God created every man, woman,
and child on this earth. I don't like it when
people are raped and murdered and victims of violent crime.
And you can't think of a worse punishment for a
child molestor In my mind, I agree with.
Speaker 5 (23:57):
You, and I will and I will say I read
a story yesterday about it gentleman whose daughter was snatched
out of her bed and there was a child predator
that was registered in the area. He was released because
all across these Blue cities we have lowered the incarceration
time for people who commit any type of pedophilia, which
is beyond me. And this guy climbed into her window,
(24:17):
took this child and was in the process of raping her,
and her father came and killed him and rescued his daughter,
and he went to jail. He's now out of jail
and running for Congress, which is kind of amazing in
and of itself. But those are the stories we don't
hear about every single day. So while I love that,
you know people are paying attention and praying for Savannah Guthrie,
(24:38):
I wish they prayed for everybody this way.
Speaker 1 (24:40):
I wish they played then I think if we did
and people, I wish people appreciated ice. Anyway, let me
get to our phones. Eight hundred nine to point one.
Shawn is on number Greg and Tennessee what's up? Greg?
How are you glad you called Sir Hi?
Speaker 6 (24:55):
Hi Sean. It's good to talk to you.
Speaker 1 (24:57):
Uh, pleasure, pleasure is mine circle? Did you call?
Speaker 6 (25:01):
Yeah, we go way back to I don't know, nineteen
eighty nine when you used to fill him for Rush.
So I've listened to you for a long time.
Speaker 1 (25:10):
I hope you didn't hear that first show at Rush
the Golden EIB, Mike Fell and Rush comes back from vacation,
Don Hannity and to the Golden IB microphone. I mean,
is there anybody that was more good?
Speaker 6 (25:28):
No?
Speaker 1 (25:29):
Every other There were people that never understood Rush, and
it cracked me up because he had his tongue in
his cheek the whole time, and that was so stupid.
Speaker 6 (25:38):
He was a great guy.
Speaker 3 (25:42):
Uh.
Speaker 6 (25:42):
The reason why I'm calling it I have a Well,
first of all, you know, there's I'm sure there's tens
of thousands of people around the world that want to
become US citizens and they go they do things like
they go to the US embassies wherever they're you know,
whatever country they're in, and they do things the proper way.
(26:02):
So my question is how many of those people are
bumped or even denied because of all the illegal immigration
into our country. You know, the millions that come here
illegally how does that affect legal immigration. I don't know.
Speaker 1 (26:24):
I mean, I mean there's a fundamental unfairness to it,
and people don't want to bring that part up. Look,
what I want ICE to do is to first prioritize
all the violent criminals to make our street streets, town
cities more safe and secure. As it relates to the
people that enter this country illegally, I think that we
(26:47):
have a system in place that works perfectly. They self
deport we pay for their airfare home, we give them
money in their pocket, and the right to come in
legally after we vet them. I think that is has
got to be a penalty. And I'm quoting Barack Obama
when I say that, However, that that's not the immediate problem.
(27:08):
The immediate problem are the murderers, rapists, child molesters, other
violent criminals, gang members, known terrorists in the country. I
would prioritize them first, which is what they're doing.
Speaker 6 (27:22):
I agree with that. However, I want them all to
leave because the people that do it legally are probably
going to be a better benefit to our country and
help our country not be a a you know, a
bad thing to our country. They're going to take from
us instead of get to us as you know, as
(27:43):
American citizens, and cost us money.
Speaker 1 (27:47):
And of course it's costing untold hundreds of billions of dollars.
And this is the the This is why I like
Lindsay Graham's bill. It will totally completely codify once and
for all that sanctuary cities and states have to be abolished.
And they're not going to get any taxpayer support if
they don't because they're aiding a betting and obstructing. And
(28:09):
it has to end. It has to and they do it.
They've institutionalized this law breaking. It has to stop. All right.
That's gonna wrap things up for today. We will have
the latest Savannah Guthrie. This TMZ blockbuster now looks like
there might be a ransom note. We're following that. Nancy
(28:30):
Grace will join us on that. We will have the
latest on the immigration in sanity or a Fleischer writes.
Previous Senator Tom Cotton will join us. We are officially
officially on a RAN Watch Trisha McLachlan, Tommy larn and
much more. Set your DVR tonight, Hannity nine Eastern News.
You will never get from the legacy media mob. That's
why you should set your DVR. We'll see you tonight.
(28:52):
Back here tomorrow. Thank you for making this show possible.
All right, News round up and information overload our here's
(00:02):
a Toulfrey telephone number eight hundred and nine four one
sean if you want to be a part of the program.
I think if you look at Arctic frost and now
we do know for a fact, it's been confirmed by
the Attorney General Pam Bondi, it's been confirmed by the
FBI Director Cash Bettel, that there is an investigation into
(00:22):
what is a grand conspiracy to influence the outcome of
elections and much more, going back to the dirty disinformation dossier,
the double standard in terms of applying the law, no
reasonable prosecutor would prosecute July twenty sixteen. Of course that
was mister Higher Honor himself, James Coomi, the dirt, you know,
(00:44):
the Faiza warrant, abuse, all the way through Russia, Russia, Russia,
all the way through every other issue. You know, the
Biden's being protected, the family syndicate. I mean, this is
a real investigation. When when they had Jack Smith before Congress,
I think one of the best moments was when Congressman
(01:07):
Brandon gil Lam Jack Smith were making up his own
legal theory as a means of justifying his conduct and
in this case specifically about spying on members of Congress
and then hiding it with non disclosure orders on top
of making payments, which is a separate issue. Here's that exchange.
Speaker 2 (01:28):
In May of twenty twenty three, you also issued subpoenas
for toll records of nine US senators and an additional representative.
Speaker 3 (01:35):
Is that right?
Speaker 4 (01:36):
In May of twenty three we did issue.
Speaker 2 (01:39):
You did, and there were non disclosure orders in conjunction
with those subpoenas as well.
Speaker 4 (01:42):
Right, that's correct, consistent with Department policy law.
Speaker 2 (01:46):
So again, nobody would know what you were doing. The
senators would, and the representatives would, and the American people
wouldn't know what you were doing.
Speaker 3 (01:51):
Is that right?
Speaker 4 (01:52):
The toll records that we secured in the non disclosure
orders were consistent with policy.
Speaker 2 (01:58):
And you knew whenever you're doing that that there was
a risk you were violating the speechure debate clause.
Speaker 3 (02:03):
Is that right?
Speaker 4 (02:04):
The toll record subpene is that we secured, where with
the concurrence of the public.
Speaker 2 (02:07):
Conte your own analysis says that you knew there was
a risk you were violating the speech or debate clause.
Speaker 3 (02:13):
I have it right here.
Speaker 2 (02:14):
This is an email from John Keller at Public Integrity
Section to your team, as you are aware. Quote, as
you are aware, there is some litigation risk regarding whether
compelled disclosure of toll records of a member's legislative calls
violates the speech or debate clause in the DC circuit.
That's from your own analysis, right there. So you did know,
didn't you.
Speaker 4 (02:34):
So with respect to the item you just put up
on the screen, the last sentence states.
Speaker 2 (02:39):
Uh, oh, we're going to get to the last sentence. Okay,
we're going to get to the last sentence, and you
cite case Lawn here. Quote the bar on compelled disclosure
is absolute, is right?
Speaker 3 (02:48):
Is that right?
Speaker 2 (02:49):
Or do you think that you didn't have to abide
by that precedent?
Speaker 4 (02:52):
To be clear, this is not this statement is not
from my office. This is the statement.
Speaker 2 (02:57):
This is This is your justification for those penis and
indios that you ordered. This was part of your analysis.
It's a cursory analysis. I think it's worth noting let's
get to that last sentence then.
Speaker 3 (03:08):
Quote.
Speaker 2 (03:08):
Given my understanding of the low likelihood that any of
the members listed below would be charged, the litigation risk
should be minimal here. In other words, you're using a
novel legal theory, which you knew was novel, has never
been tested by any court. You're not charging any of
these members. Nobody's going to know about it because you
issued indios. Nobody is going to sue about it. So
(03:30):
sue this, So who cares? We're going to do it? Anyways,
you walked all over the Constitution throughout this entire process.
The gentlemen's time behind are members of Congress, and you
know it. It's absolutely disgraceful.
Speaker 1 (03:42):
All right, Congressman Brandon Gill joins us now from the
great state of Texas. God bless Texas.
Speaker 3 (03:47):
Sean, I'm doing great, Thanks for having me.
Speaker 1 (03:49):
All right, So a very important exchange in my view.
Do you think anything's going to happen with this? Probably
the question I could asked the most is yeah, Sean,
and you've done great work. You've exposed a lot of
corruption and then nothing ever happens. And you know, I
try to explain to people a lot, in a lot
of cases the statute limitations have run.
Speaker 3 (04:09):
Out, well, that that could be the case. Here. The
goal of these hearings, whether we do it on Somali
fraud or about Jack Smith or anybody else. The goal
of the hearings is to develop the information to bring
a case to dj CA and then used to prosecute
people who have been who have engaged in illegal activity.
It seems like jack Smith probably did engage in quite
(04:32):
a bit of illegal things throughout this entire investigation. Remember
this whole Arctic frost investigation began with testimony from Cassidy
Hutchinson that was completely debunked. Then they used information from
the January sixth Select Committee, which was run by Democrats
for Democrats that was highly political. And then of course Jackson, by.
Speaker 1 (04:54):
The way, is do you believe a crime took place?
Because apparently all of the records involving I called the
Predetermined Outcome made for primetime movie the novel that was
the January sixth hearings. I mean, they used Cassidy Hutchinson,
but not the driver of the vehicle that they had
testified that Donald Trump never tried to commandeer the car
(05:17):
that he was being driven in that day. But you know,
a hearsay witness, We'll put that person up because that
person heard that Donald Trump tried.
Speaker 3 (05:25):
To Right, We're going to base this entire DOJ Special
Investigation off of hearsay and then use that to start
justifying tapping, collecting phone data on sitting Republican congressman and
sitting Republican senators, including the then Speaker of the House,
Kevin McCarthy. And they were doing this all in order
(05:46):
to do to get one person, and that was to
get President Trump press charges against him influenced the results
of the twenty twenty election. I mean, this is throughout
this entire process, just walked all over the content Institution,
violating the speech or debate clause, for one, by collecting
data on sitting Republican congressmen around the time of a
(06:08):
major vote, and you mentioned it earlier, in order to
sort of justify himself. We have the internal analysis that
Jack Smith used to get these phone taps, and even
their own analysis said that we believe that there is
some litigation risk, but we're going to do it anyways.
We're going to do it anyways because we're not collecting
data or we're not pressing charges rather on these members
(06:32):
of Congress. So we're going to concoct an entirely new
legal theory that says that this is okay. Remember this
legal theory has never been tested in any court, and
we're going to slap Indos on it non disclosure order
so nobody knows what we're doing. In other words, this
is probably illegal, but here's some new legal theory that
we're going to use to justify it, and nobody's going
(06:52):
to know, so we're going to do it anyways. I mean,
that was the analysis. It was about a paragraph long
legal analysis that Jack Smith used, and this was so
flagrantly unconstitutional, but that's what we were dealing with, and
that's what we're trying to get to the bottom of
still right now.
Speaker 1 (07:09):
I mean, it really is remarkable. They knew all these
top members of Congress and the Senate. They know who
they called, where the call was made from, they knew
the location of where they made the call, the location
of who received the call. I mean, this is so
invasive and atrusive. Wouldn't you normally, you know, under you know,
(07:31):
the Fourth Amendment, have protections against unreasonable search and seizure.
Speaker 3 (07:36):
Of course you would, And I think Jack Smith knew that,
and that's why he wanted to keep all of this private.
In conjunction with those with those phone tamps, the subpoenas
that he issued, he also issued non disclosure orders. And
I found that the non disclosure order related to Kevin
McCarthy particularly interesting because he referred to in that order
that he sent to a judge, referred to Kevin McCarthy,
(07:58):
the sitting Republicans Speaker of the House, as a flight risk.
As if you think that Kevin McCarthy is going to
hop on a plane and fly to Argentina and live
his life as a fugitive. I mean, that is insane.
And yet that was the justification that he brought brought
forward with a judge. Now they try to claim that
those those ndos are just sort of standard form letters,
(08:20):
but we also have the indos that they used to
collect data on Senator Cruz and other senators, and they
don't refer to them as a flight risk.
Speaker 1 (08:27):
So this wellplain explain to me how the January sixth
committee was able to destroy or I guess they're missing
all of the records because I assume and suspect, let's
put it that way, maybe a better word. I suspect
they got rid of those records because they knew it
would be incriminating with the new Trump administration coming in,
and they were not going to leave any evidence behind.
Speaker 3 (08:50):
I think you're right there. And you know, the amazing
thing about this whole Arctic frost investigation that we're doing
to oversee what happened is most of them ormation we
have isn't coming from the FBI. And that's not a
reflection on cash. Butttel, he's been great. It's because the
people who were engaged in this knew what they were
doing is wrong. They destroyed documents, they hid documents. What
(09:12):
we have here is information that we got from whistleblowers
primarily I mean, I mean, they knew what they were
doing was wrong. You know, typically if you want to
hide what you're doing, you probably have something on your
conscience that you know what you're doing in this context
is illegal and unconstitutional.
Speaker 1 (09:28):
Quick break more with Congressman Brandon Gilla, Texas on the
other side. Then we'll get to your calls coming up.
Eight hundred nine four one Sean. As we continue, we
continue with Brandon Gill, Congressman Texas. Then we'll get to
your calls coming up eight hundred nine four one Sean.
As we roll along this Tuesday, let me ask you
(09:49):
about it. Well, it's kind of related. Everything in Washington's related,
and for those that don't know. By the way, there
was an announcement earlier that we reported on the House
did pass this bill to end the government shutdown, at
one point two trillion dollars spending package to end the
partial government shutdown. Today it cleared a bipartisan vote under
(10:13):
the insistence of President Trump. I don't know what's going
to happen if Democrats want to run on defunding the
Department of Homeland Security and eliminating ICE. I'm all in
favor of that, because the American people and overwhelming numbers
won't want that, and it won't go over well and
it won't end the way they think it will end.
But you know, you had written Mitch McConnell asking his committee.
(10:36):
And this goes back sometime on the issue of the
Save Act and how eighty three percent of Americans want
proof of citizenship to vote. The House did their job
with it, the Senate needed to do theirs. Where are
we with that.
Speaker 3 (10:52):
That's something that we're continuing to push. The shutdown. It
is over. We've got the bill pass out of the
House today, but I think that the fight on the
save back still remains, and we've still got a DHS
Appropriations Bill that we're going to be working on there
as well, And I agree. I'd love to hear Democrats
run this next election cycle on defunding ICE and you know,
(11:14):
reopening up the borders and all of the things that
stopping all of the things we got a mandate to
do last fall. But with the Save Act, this is
something that the vast majority of Americans, including Democrats, agree
with it. The American people do not want illegal aliens,
are foreign nationals influencing our election system. I mean, that's
a core part of American stock.
Speaker 1 (11:35):
A big part of it, though, is proof of citizenship.
Now I've said we need, we need national standards, voter ID,
signature verification, pain of custody control, runny mail in ballots.
They should be under a camera's watch from the minute
it enters any voting facilities so nobody can tamper with it,
updated voter rolls, partisan observers, and every precinct watching the
(11:59):
voting all day and the vote counting all night. I'd
prefer paper ballots myself. Why would Democrats be against that?
Speaker 3 (12:06):
You know, I think the Democrats believe that this is
an existential political battle for them because their whole ticket
towards long term electoral politics in the US is allowing
foreign nationals and illegal aliens to vote. I mean, that
was the core premise behind open borders for four years
under Joe Biden. We'll let us miss so, in.
Speaker 1 (12:25):
Other words, we'll let you come in, we won't vet you.
Among you will be murderers, rapists, kyle molesters, known terrorists,
cartel members, and gang members, and then we'll give you
something of great value, American citizenship and wink, wink, we
hope you vote for US. Is that what it was.
Speaker 3 (12:42):
That's exactly what it was. And on top of that,
illegal aliens being in the United States are counted in
the census, which impacts congressional apportionment, meaning the number of
congressmen that each state gets. So blue states get bigger
representation than red states do because they tend to be
the states where you have more sanctuary juris dictions. So
this entire, this entire open border's agenda from the left
(13:05):
was intended to systematically rig America's elections in favor of
the left.
Speaker 1 (13:11):
Look, the polls show this isn't popular. I think it's
in the high eighties in terms of the percentage of
Americans that want proof of citizenship to vote. If you
look at the actual numbers, and I went over this
last night, the number of people that want illegal immigrants
and home is in the upper sixties. It's breathtaking to me.
(13:31):
The Democrats have now staked out this hill where they
want a defund dismantle of no bail laws. Reimagine the
police open borders.
Speaker 3 (13:40):
Uh.
Speaker 1 (13:40):
And they are fighting against ice, supporting the worst of
the worst criminals and attacking them and smearing and slandering them.
They voted for the largest tax increase in history. They
have you know, they have married themselves to the climate
alarmist religious cult, and Republicans voted for the largest tax
(14:02):
reduction in history. I'm like, okay, I'll take a choice
election like that every day of the week.
Speaker 3 (14:07):
Oh, I mean, you're exactly right. I mean, this is
the same party who told the American people that boys
can become girls and boys should be playing in girls'
sports and thought that that would be politically popular. And
this isn't a party that's particularly known for living in reality.
But the bet that they've made, they think that, however unpopular,
open borders are, however unpopular, just wildly unchecked spending. Is
(14:31):
what we can do is bring these people in and
we will tell them you vote for Democrats and we'll
give you amnesty. And that's the plan. That is their
electoral strategy. They can't win over voters in the country
currently through logic or through any kind of compelling political argumentation,
so they've got to rake the elections.
Speaker 1 (14:49):
All right, we appreciate your time. Brandon gil Congressman Texas.
Thank you, sir. Keep up the good work. Eight hundred
nine four one, Shawn our number if you want to
be a part of the program. Now did you see
or hear were you watching this week Weekend? Any of
the Grammys? You like me? I didn't watch it, but
I saw the highlights of it. You know Billie Eilish,
(15:12):
I do? Okay, Now, did you know that Billie Eilish
said that we all live on lands that were stolen?
Speaker 5 (15:21):
I did hear that?
Speaker 3 (15:22):
Yes?
Speaker 1 (15:24):
Did you know that Billie Eilish has a three million
dollar home.
Speaker 5 (15:30):
I do know that.
Speaker 6 (15:31):
Yes.
Speaker 1 (15:32):
Yeah, she was railing against ice and insisting that no
one is illegal on stolen land. That was the comment
that she made. She has a three million dollar mansion
in Los Angeles, and now It was a little background
checked by The New York Post. The indigenous inhabitants of
the La Basin, known as the First Angelinos, said they
(15:55):
appreciate Eilish's sentiment. However, they noted the performers never come
back to them directly insisted the next time she explicitly
referenced them. Quote, Eilish has not contacted our tribe directly
regarding her property. We do value the instance when public
figures provide visibility to the true history of our country,
(16:16):
and it is our hope that in future discussions, the
tribe can explicitly be referenced to ensure the public understands
that the Greater Los Angeles Basin remains part of their territory. Huh,
I'm sure she's.
Speaker 5 (16:33):
Going to sell our house right away. Absolutely. Really what
she should do is she should, with her own money,
turn it into some sort of incredible museum. To pay homage,
as you would say to.
Speaker 6 (16:48):
All of.
Speaker 4 (16:51):
It was too easy. I had to do it. Homage.
Speaker 1 (16:55):
Homage, right, it's homage. It's not homage like you usually say.
Speaker 5 (17:01):
I do say homage, but I was teasing.
Speaker 1 (17:03):
You, but homage.
Speaker 5 (17:05):
She really should turn it into the trial.
Speaker 1 (17:08):
Not sauce. It's it's not sauce. It's not it is
it always is. Hand over.
Speaker 5 (17:16):
She should hand it over and turn it into a museum,
and pay for her home to be turned into the museum,
to pay homage to the tribe, and really just do
it all in her own dime, to show that she's committed.
Speaker 1 (17:29):
She is committed to the effort. You're butchering the King's English.
Just for the record, all right, this is the this
is one weird story. Joe Biden, her ex husband, arrested
yesterday on charges he murdered his wife in their Delaware
home in December. Guy, his name is William Stevenson, previously
(17:49):
married to the former First Lady. He's been hit with
first degree murder charges for allegedly killing his current spouse
at their Oaks Hill. You know, according to the house
at Oaks Hill in Delaware, cops resounded domestic dispute, found
her unresponsive on the floor. What the hell is that?
(18:10):
And you know there was an article about the woman
from Arkansas that hunter had a child with the girl.
There was a picture of the little girl she was.
She was just adorable. How do you as a as
a father? I'm not saying you have to stay with somebody.
I'm just saying, how about if you bring a child
into this world, you got to you gotta man up
(18:32):
and be responsible, take care of your kids. Man, that's
just yeah.
Speaker 5 (18:36):
But he doesn't see it like that. He told her
he didn't want that kid. He told her to handle it,
and she said, no, I don't believe in that. I'm
gonna have the baby. He's like, all right, you're on
your own.
Speaker 1 (18:45):
So, I mean, you know, people saying she's a former stripper,
I don't care what she did for a living. They
had a consensual relationship, she had a child, and then
the worst part is the President and first Lady ignored
her at the time, Joe Biden and Joe Biden wouldn't
even acknowledge their own granddaughter.
Speaker 5 (19:04):
Honestly, in the long run, I think it's a really
good thing. I don't even know why this woman wants
anything from these people.
Speaker 1 (19:10):
You know what, that's actually not a bad analysis. I
don't maybe you know, I do know people that get
divorced and then like one parent just skips out and
they just check out and they just go away, And
it's actually in the best interest of the kids that
that person is gone. There are horrible people that are
not meant to be parents.
Speaker 5 (19:31):
It's totally true.
Speaker 1 (19:33):
So I met Savannah guf Thrie one time, and now
I knew Katie Kirk. Never liked Katie Kirk. Katie Kirk
was not a nice person. It just wasn't every time
I used to remember, I used to do all those
shows GMA and The View and the Today Show and
all those shows. I don't do that crap anymore. I
don't need it. I don't need them. But anyway I
(19:56):
met her, she could not have been nicer just and
I'm just straight up telling you, she was a very
genuine nice person. Wasn't triggered or offended that Sean Hannity,
the Conservative is there. She didn't care. And I met her,
talked to her a little bit, really liked her. I
feel terrible for her because, you know, the sheriff out
(20:16):
there saying that her eighty four year old mother did
not leave on her own from their residence on Saturday night,
and you know, more details are coming out and they
think that she might have was likely snatched from her
bed in her home. And Pema County Sheriff Chris Nanos,
(20:37):
you know, said to CBS, I can't think of the
last time we're in the middle of the night in
someone's bed. An eighty four year old woman disappeared on us.
We believe she was taken out against her will. Now
I think she had a ring tone, one of those
ringtone everyone's would really have simply safe. They're just so much,
it's so superior. But ringtone is pretty good. I guess
it's better than nothing. But they think this woman was
(20:59):
abducted from her home. And I you know, why would
anyone want to abduct an eighty four year old woman
that apparently was not doing well healthwise? It's terrible.
Speaker 5 (21:09):
Yeah, I mean they said after twenty four hours that
she was going to be in bad shape because she's
going to need her medicine. I have ring and I
have to say, you know, I actually have ring ends.
Simply say if I have two systems, but and I've
had simply save for years and then we had it
ring on for another reason. Anyways, more details than you need,
but the point is.
Speaker 1 (21:29):
You've got Have you gotten the updated AI generated outdoor
Guard Protection for simply I haven't.
Speaker 5 (21:36):
I haven't gotten need to update.
Speaker 1 (21:37):
It because it is like it's the next generation on steroids.
It's incredable.
Speaker 5 (21:41):
So they have they have a great program and it
works really great, and we've kept it for years.
Speaker 1 (21:46):
But I will tell you that I have facial recognition,
I have recording all day long that lasts for years.
It just is a scary environment because the left is
is so radicalized to me, and you know how chilling
is it for Savannah Guthrie and her eighty four year
old mom. What looks like a ransom note being reported,
(22:08):
As we said earlier by TMZ, it's scary.
Speaker 5 (22:12):
It is scary, And what's more scary is it's like, Okay,
if they pay this ransom, do they get their mom back?
Has this person already hurt their mom? Like we said
it before. You know, again, she hasn't had her medication
in twenty four hours. It's been thirty six, I think,
or forty hours since she's been missing. And it's a
really scary thing.
Speaker 1 (22:33):
We're praying for Savannah's mom. It sounds terrible. The only
thing I'm going to add to it, and it's separate
in the part, it's just the commentary. I think we
should give the proper amount of attention in the hopes
of finding this woman, and everybody now in the country
knows this woman is missing and knows what she looks like.
That's a good thing. However, in the month of January,
(22:54):
one hundred and thirty some odd people shot nearly thirty
dead in Chicago, nobody knows one name. And then all
of the people that have been raped and murdered and
victims of violent crime and child molestation that Ice has
been arresting, that never gets put into perspective by the
legacy media mob. Now they might not seem related in
(23:17):
many many ways, they're not. However, you know, with all
the concern rightly that we're giving Savannah Guthrie's mom, why
don't we give concern about You know, this is like
the Democrats not standing for Lake and Riley's family or
Joscelyn Nungarry's family. You know, either you care about humanity
or you don't. You know, black lives matter. Every life
(23:39):
matters to me. I believe God created every man, woman,
and child on this earth. I don't like it when
people are raped and murdered and victims of violent crime.
And you can't think of a worse punishment for a
child molestor In my mind, I agree with.
Speaker 5 (23:57):
You, and I will and I will say I read
a story yesterday about it gentleman whose daughter was snatched
out of her bed and there was a child predator
that was registered in the area. He was released because
all across these Blue cities we have lowered the incarceration
time for people who commit any type of pedophilia, which
is beyond me. And this guy climbed into her window,
(24:17):
took this child and was in the process of raping her,
and her father came and killed him and rescued his daughter,
and he went to jail. He's now out of jail
and running for Congress, which is kind of amazing in
and of itself. But those are the stories we don't
hear about every single day. So while I love that,
you know people are paying attention and praying for Savannah Guthrie,
(24:38):
I wish they prayed for everybody this way.
Speaker 1 (24:40):
I wish they played then I think if we did
and people, I wish people appreciated ice. Anyway, let me
get to our phones. Eight hundred nine to point one.
Shawn is on number Greg and Tennessee what's up? Greg?
How are you glad you called Sir Hi?
Speaker 6 (24:55):
Hi Sean. It's good to talk to you.
Speaker 1 (24:57):
Uh, pleasure, pleasure is mine circle? Did you call?
Speaker 6 (25:01):
Yeah, we go way back to I don't know, nineteen
eighty nine when you used to fill him for Rush.
So I've listened to you for a long time.
Speaker 1 (25:10):
I hope you didn't hear that first show at Rush
the Golden EIB, Mike Fell and Rush comes back from vacation,
Don Hannity and to the Golden IB microphone. I mean,
is there anybody that was more good?
Speaker 6 (25:28):
No?
Speaker 1 (25:29):
Every other There were people that never understood Rush, and
it cracked me up because he had his tongue in
his cheek the whole time, and that was so stupid.
Speaker 6 (25:38):
He was a great guy.
Speaker 3 (25:42):
Uh.
Speaker 6 (25:42):
The reason why I'm calling it I have a Well,
first of all, you know, there's I'm sure there's tens
of thousands of people around the world that want to
become US citizens and they go they do things like
they go to the US embassies wherever they're you know,
whatever country they're in, and they do things the proper way.
(26:02):
So my question is how many of those people are
bumped or even denied because of all the illegal immigration
into our country. You know, the millions that come here
illegally how does that affect legal immigration. I don't know.
Speaker 1 (26:24):
I mean, I mean there's a fundamental unfairness to it,
and people don't want to bring that part up. Look,
what I want ICE to do is to first prioritize
all the violent criminals to make our street streets, town
cities more safe and secure. As it relates to the
people that enter this country illegally, I think that we
(26:47):
have a system in place that works perfectly. They self
deport we pay for their airfare home, we give them
money in their pocket, and the right to come in
legally after we vet them. I think that is has
got to be a penalty. And I'm quoting Barack Obama
when I say that, However, that that's not the immediate problem.
(27:08):
The immediate problem are the murderers, rapists, child molesters, other
violent criminals, gang members, known terrorists in the country. I
would prioritize them first, which is what they're doing.
Speaker 6 (27:22):
I agree with that. However, I want them all to
leave because the people that do it legally are probably
going to be a better benefit to our country and
help our country not be a a you know, a
bad thing to our country. They're going to take from
us instead of get to us as you know, as
(27:43):
American citizens, and cost us money.
Speaker 1 (27:47):
And of course it's costing untold hundreds of billions of dollars.
And this is the the This is why I like
Lindsay Graham's bill. It will totally completely codify once and
for all that sanctuary cities and states have to be abolished.
And they're not going to get any taxpayer support if
they don't because they're aiding a betting and obstructing. And
(28:09):
it has to end. It has to and they do it.
They've institutionalized this law breaking. It has to stop. All right.
That's gonna wrap things up for today. We will have
the latest Savannah Guthrie. This TMZ blockbuster now looks like
there might be a ransom note. We're following that. Nancy
(28:30):
Grace will join us on that. We will have the
latest on the immigration in sanity or a Fleischer writes.
Previous Senator Tom Cotton will join us. We are officially
officially on a RAN Watch Trisha McLachlan, Tommy larn and
much more. Set your DVR tonight, Hannity nine Eastern News.
You will never get from the legacy media mob. That's
why you should set your DVR. We'll see you tonight.
(28:52):
Back here tomorrow. Thank you for making this show possible.
The Sean Hannity Show News
Host
Sean Hannity
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
Betrayal Season 5
Saskia Inwood woke up one morning, knowing her life would never be the same. The night before, she learned the unimaginable – that the husband she knew in the light of day was a different person after dark. This season unpacks Saskia’s discovery of her husband’s secret life and her fight to bring him to justice. Along the way, we expose a crime that is just coming to light. This is also a story about the myth of the “perfect victim:” who gets believed, who gets doubted, and why. We follow Saskia as she works to reclaim her body, her voice, and her life. If you would like to reach out to the Betrayal Team, email us at betrayalpod@gmail.com. Follow us on Instagram @betrayalpod and @glasspodcasts. Please join our Substack for additional exclusive content, curated book recommendations, and community discussions. Sign up FREE by clicking this link Beyond Betrayal Substack. Join our community dedicated to truth, resilience, and healing. Your voice matters! Be a part of our Betrayal journey on Substack.