July 6, 2026 • 25 mins
Sean Hannity opens Hour 2 alongside Senator Rick Scott of Florida to dissect the critical need for nationwide voter integrity, examining the push for the SAVE America Act and the necessity of total transparency—including matching signatures, citizen validation, and public surveillance cameras on ballot rooms. The conversation shifts to the failures of Governor Gavin Newsom in California, targeting his silence on predictable wildfires, high taxes, and out-migration.
Later, Sean opens up the phone lines to callers to debate how rapid advancements in artificial intelligence and robotics are transforming trades like home building. Sean offers his personal take on tools like Grok and underscores the enduring value of traditional trades that automation can't replace.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Listen
Watch
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Hour two Sean Hannity Show, eight hundred and ninety four one,
Shawn on number you want to be a part of
the program. In a minute, we're going to be joined
by my great Senator from the Free State of Florida,
Rick Scott, now Florida. Over the years, you can go
back to two thousand, had issues with voting, and all
I can tell you is they have resolved every issue
(00:21):
and it has such integrity in the system that on
election night you will know within two hours ninety percent
of the vote, you'll probably know the projected winner. And
they have mastered the process, and they did it out
of a necessity. And all of these Democrats, all these
blue state you know, rules and regulations are this is
(00:44):
absolute madness. It's like they want to live in the
Stone Age. There is no reason for any state not
to adopt integrity measures so that people can have confidence
in the result of our elections.
Speaker 2 (00:58):
There's just no reason reason at all.
Speaker 1 (01:01):
If you go back to twenty twenty four, seventy five
percent of the vote nationwide in the presidential election, seventy
five percent was counted within three hours. Every single state
except Gavin Newsom's communist utopia of California had counted more
than seventy five percent of the vote after two days. California,
they took five days to get to that number. California
(01:24):
got to ninety percent of the vote after about eleven days.
There is no excuse for any of this, none at
all whatsoever. And you know, now we're on the precipice
where it looked like Spencer Pratt had a very solid
lead to be one of the top two finishers to
(01:45):
make a runoff. Now La will be guaranteed to have
a radical leftist mayor.
Speaker 2 (01:51):
And I can't give.
Speaker 1 (01:52):
You specifics about what voter integrity issues exist there, except
this is no way to run an election. Democrats don't
want integrity in the system, and when you don't have
integrity in the system, it causes people to doubt. They
are responsible for doubt in people's minds, and people won't
(02:13):
have confidence in the results, and they're going to get disgusted,
and they have every right to be anyway, My great
Senator Rick Scott of Florida.
Speaker 2 (02:21):
Is with me.
Speaker 1 (02:22):
Is there any possible reason rationale other than I suspect
that there might be nefarious intentions in play that they
would not want to adopt integrity issues.
Speaker 3 (02:33):
Yeah, it's all because the people that are in office
they want fraud. I mean the same America Act. You know,
you have to be an American to register to vote,
you have to show an ID to vote. Over eighty
percent of Americans want it. Democrats want it, Independence wanted,
Republicans want it. You know who doesn't want it? Elected Democrats.
That's the only group that doesn't want this because guess
(02:54):
what they know, what their radical ideas, they can't get
re elected all right unless there's fraud. What's going on
with Spencer out in LA? How could that happen? How
could be that big a change? Right? Other than what
I mean? And even if you do, even if you say, oh,
may maybe that could happen. Do you feel comfortable? Why
(03:17):
would these people want people feel comfortable? So? Has there
been anybody sitting there both parties looking at every ballot?
Are they made sure there's no ballots coming in? After
election night? They say, oh yeah, Spencer was up by
like fifty thousand votes, so we got to figure out
how do we get fifty thousand more votes? So I
don't know if any that's happening, but guess what we
else knows either, and so well, no.
Speaker 1 (03:38):
I mean it lends itself to nobody trusting the system.
That's the biggest problem.
Speaker 3 (03:43):
You're going to go it.
Speaker 1 (03:44):
Let no reasonable person is going to want to trust
this system or believe there's integrity. And then after the election,
you know, if it's a Democrat or a Republican. Both
parties have complained bitterly about quote rigged and stolen elections.
So the only antidote to prevent people from having questions,
(04:05):
in my mind, is voter integrity. Put these measures in place.
Democrats steadfastly refuse.
Speaker 3 (04:11):
Yeah, I mean, you have to be an American the vote,
you have to show an ID. And on top of that,
when you're checking the ballot, when you're counting them, there
ought to be observers. I mean you ought to be
able to watch them. Republicans ought to be a watching
Democrats ought to be a watch them independence. I mean,
we ought to have cameras. We have to make sure
everybody is comfortable, right. So you know, I was with
(04:35):
a grandson yesterday that's about a year away from driving,
and I was teaching me how to drive, and I said,
when you start driving, your job is to make everybody
that is with you comfortable, tell them what you're doing.
Are you looking there? Are you looking right? That's what
we should be doing with complete transparency with this stuff.
And so everybody knows and there's no chance you know
your vote, your vote has to if you're vote by mail,
(04:56):
and I think mails always suspect although we do it
and vote well, then you are to be so careful
here to make sure are those sures going to match?
And if you're not going to check cinters, then you
know there's gonna be fraud.
Speaker 1 (05:06):
There's going to be How about any mail in ballots
immediately from the moment they're delivered, are on a video camera,
put in a locked room that can be monitored by
the public twenty four hours and they can go online
and see if anybody's in that room tampering with those ballots?
Would that not add integrity and confidence?
Speaker 3 (05:25):
Absolutely? And you need to ask every cycle of well
we do him sort of is every cycle you got
to ask for a mail in ballot and your sature
has to match.
Speaker 2 (05:35):
Oh, they just send them out in California.
Speaker 1 (05:37):
You know this is amazing to me because if you
listen to Democrats, they're putting many of them are putting
their hope in Gavin Newsom. Gavin Newsom has been utterly
silent on most of this, doesn't care. He's an absentee governor.
You know what it takes to be a governor. You're
a governor of this state for eight years. You did
(05:57):
a great job. That's when you and I really came
friends because you were always up in New York coaching
business out of New York, and I got to see
you all the time.
Speaker 2 (06:05):
We became very good friends.
Speaker 1 (06:07):
And what's amazing is he you know, predictable wildfires, predictable
Santa Ana wins. And they don't practice the science of forestry.
They don't have hydrants with water, they don't have a
reservoir with water. All these homes burn on the ground
a year and a half later. Nobody can get a
building permit. And he doesn't talk about it. Highest poverty rate,
(06:27):
highest homeless rate, highest state income tax, highest sales tax,
highest gas tax. And he's a world traveler, trump stalker,
half Hannity stalker, author, you know, lecturer, almost full time
ex poster.
Speaker 2 (06:43):
He does nothing.
Speaker 1 (06:44):
And this is what they want for the next president,
the Democrats.
Speaker 3 (06:48):
Well, they're telling you who they are all right. I
mean there's no competency, right, So he is so incompetent.
The people are continuing to move, businesses have to move.
You can't get a home in the Palisades. He didn't
care that there was a fire smoldering and they didn't
put it out right. He didn't care that the insurance
(07:10):
program didn't work. He didn't care that it takes fortune
to rebuild a house. He doesn't care that you can't
get a permit. He doesn't care about any of this stuff.
And he wants to be the president. So the non
caring president that doesn't care about anything other about him
than his election. That's exactly what Gavenousom is.
Speaker 2 (07:27):
Well, it really is awful.
Speaker 1 (07:29):
I've got to move on to other issues because you're
up to a lot of good stuff that I think
people need to wear be aware of.
Speaker 2 (07:34):
You have taken on the.
Speaker 1 (07:36):
Issue of anti Semitic, anti semitism in this country, and
I'm glad you are. You're speaking out against anti semitism.
We're seeing it now all over worldwide. It's rising. It's
rising in the halls of Congress, it's rising on the airwaves,
and I really don't I'm having a hard time understanding
(07:56):
what would Americans expect after October seventh and after decades
of NonStop rocket barrage. But if they killed the court
equivalent of forty thousand Americans in a day, when you
extrapolate population out, Uh, and they murder and they rape,
and they torture and they kidnapped, what would we expect
our country to do if, in fact we.
Speaker 3 (08:16):
Were hit where you'd sure sector hope our leaders would
show up and defend our country.
Speaker 2 (08:22):
Uh not.
Speaker 3 (08:23):
But there's so many of these people that are anti
Semitic and anti Israel and anti jew. I mean, they're
just it's unbelievable. So now we've got down in Tampa, Okay,
we got a public a public stadium supported by taxpayers
is going it is going to allow to give a
contract there one of the biggest anti Semites in the
in the country, in the in the world. But other
(08:44):
countries won't let him with Kanye West, No, other countries
won't let him even show up into a concert. But Tampa,
with public money, is allowing this to happen. This and
and so one. I don't get that too. I don't
understand anti Semitism. Why they want to pick on Jews.
But think about it, they're not just picking on Jews.
They're just the beginning. These people hate ju Dale's Christian values.
(09:07):
They might start with the Jews, they hate the Christians next.
So we're going to start standing up and say enough's enough.
We're not going to put up with this. We're not
going to have another Holocaust.
Speaker 1 (09:18):
I mean, that's the whole thing about every single person.
And I hear a lot of lying, and I hear
a lot of misinformation from both people in Congress elected officials,
and I hear from the punditry class that.
Speaker 2 (09:30):
This is a forever war.
Speaker 1 (09:32):
This is that Donald Trump and President Trump walked off
meet the press, which I love this weekend actually myself.
And they're saying he's doing this for bb He's doing
this for Israel, He's doing this for Fox News.
Speaker 2 (09:45):
No he's not.
Speaker 1 (09:46):
Because every person that I know that reads the intelligence
said under twelve days they could have up to eleven
bombs if they get a hold of that dust, and
the President decided it was in our best national security
interest not to allow that to happen.
Speaker 3 (10:06):
What would we have done if they got the weapon?
Could we have stopped them? And you won't to have.
You won't have country that's that's been killing Americans for
forty seven years, says they're going to kill Americans. Have
a nuclear weapons they can bomb off the coast of
Tampa or Miami or Palm Beach. No, this president's got
the guns to show up Obama as a peace or
Biden was an appeaser. This president defends this country. He's
(10:28):
defending American citizens. I'm proud to call him my friend,
and I went to thank you for what he's doing, you.
Speaker 1 (10:34):
Know, and he's fighting and he's getting Republicans on a
lot of issues.
Speaker 2 (10:37):
Tovite.
Speaker 1 (10:38):
Look, I wish we would have I wish he would
have gotten through and maybe you can shed some light
on the issue of the Save Act.
Speaker 2 (10:46):
What happened.
Speaker 3 (10:48):
Well, I mean, he's got we got to we have
to work on it, and we have to you know,
we have to stay up here and we have to.
In my opinion, we have to give her the filibuster.
I mean, the Democrats, the democrants choose this to block
all good legislation, and then when they're in power, right
then there was Republicans that will go along with their stuff,
but don't go along with anything that's logical and this
(11:09):
is taxpayers won. But so we couldn't we couldn't get
the votes. We had Republicans a vote against it. Then
Mike Lee put up a bill just to say, okay,
well we'll do something in this reconciliation package that we
could say we can give inema centeviize states to do
the right thing on the elections. And you have Republicans
a vote against that. All the Democrats, of course, vote
(11:31):
against it, but one the Republicans vote against the stuff
that all we're trying to do is make our elections
more secure. It was just an incentive even to do it,
and you had you had Republicans vote against it. That
doesn't make any sense.
Speaker 2 (11:45):
It doesn't.
Speaker 1 (11:46):
All right, quick break more with Senator Rick Scott my
free state of Florida. On the other side than your
calls coming up this Monday, eight hundred and nine four
one Sean, if you want to be a part of
the program, Uh, all right, where are we here?
Speaker 2 (11:59):
Well?
Speaker 1 (11:59):
I love Donald Trump walking off meet the press. Some
people said he shouldn't have walked off. You know what,
why not? First of all, nobody watches this show. I
see the ratings every week. They don't watch this show,
and the President is with Kristen Walker or Welker, whatever
her name is, and it's she just doesn't get it.
Speaker 2 (12:19):
It's all gotcha, gotcha, gotcha.
Speaker 1 (12:21):
Let's go back to January sixth for a four hundred
million time. I mean, it's such a waste of his time.
And then he actually said something in this interview that
really stuck with me when he said, if you guys
had any influence, I would not have won this election.
And I've been making that point. Their impact is dead
(12:42):
and they don't even know it. With all the dramas
Scott Pelly and crying, Scott Pelly is telling his new boss,
within minutes of meeting him at the first meeting, the
new producer of CBS's sixty Minutes that his boss is
destroying the place, taking a wrecking ball to the place,
and that he will never be welcome. And do you
(13:04):
expect to keep your job? I mean, would any of
you in America keep your job? It's pretty remarkable and
he's gone. Interestingly, the remaining the remaining people have decided
to stay. And I'm going to tell you why, because
where else are they going to go? How old does
Leslie stall now? The probably eighty or something like that.
(13:26):
I'm guessing a hundred.
Speaker 4 (13:28):
I don't like it.
Speaker 2 (13:28):
Yeah, it's even.
Speaker 1 (13:31):
You got your first good crack in very good right,
But she's where is she going to work after sixty minutes?
I mean if she wants to keep working, which I
support people that want to work as long as they
want to work. But anyway, let's play the Trump walking
off NBC, and I was glad you did it.
Speaker 5 (13:50):
These elections are rigged. Your network knows that they're rigged.
You know that I won an election in a landslide
and I got ninety four present bad press. You know
why I got because you have no credibility.
Speaker 2 (14:04):
But you've never presented evidence it was rigged. Let's keep
talking about I want to talk about Tom.
Speaker 5 (14:08):
You have more evidence, there's more evidence than ever presented.
Let's talk to your elections in this country. We're like
a third world country. Your elections are crooked, and your crooked,
and mister presses crooked, and show is ABC and CBS
and CNN, your one sided, crooked network. Let's call it
(14:28):
quits because I've had a note.
Speaker 3 (14:30):
Thank you, darling, have.
Speaker 2 (14:31):
A good times president.
Speaker 6 (14:32):
Let's please I traveled all the way to Wisconsin, traveled,
I know, on and off in the ring, and I've
given you enough time.
Speaker 5 (14:42):
You want to straighten out your press because you know what,
country can never be great travel?
Speaker 2 (14:48):
We traveled all the way to Wisconsin. Too bad. I
mean this what he said is so spot on.
Speaker 1 (14:56):
If Hollywood had influence in the twenty four elections, there's
no way Donald Trump could have won this election. If
if the legacy media mob had impact, There's no way
Donald Trump could have won the election.
Speaker 2 (15:11):
They don't. They have lost their credibility.
Speaker 1 (15:15):
They have gotten so much wrong so often that it
is it is such a spectacular fail. How is it
that these companies never make a correction? Doesn't mean that
news media outlets don't make mistakes. They all do, every
one of them. Doesn't mean we haven't made mistakes. When
we do, we correct the mistakes. We try to right wrongs,
(15:38):
correct injustices. You know or you know it is NBC
News reporting that federal investigators had placed a wire tab
on Michael Cohne's phones, monitoring communication in the weeks leading
up to the raid on his home in office. It
was a false story. Where is the correction? NBC News
(15:58):
reporting Rudy Juliet his personal attorney warned by the FBI
that he was a target of the Russian influence operation.
Speaker 2 (16:06):
He had, in fact never been warned.
Speaker 1 (16:07):
The FBI prepared a briefing for Julianni and never gave
it to him. You know, all of these false reports,
and let's bring up other issues they got wrong. How
many times do they rush to judgment? You know, Richard Jewell,
we can start there. You can go to Ferguson, Missouri.
We can go there. We can go to Duke Lacrosse,
we can go to Freddie Gray and Baltimore, we can
(16:29):
go to UVA, and time after time after time we
end up being right.
Speaker 2 (16:33):
I'm never going to get a Pulitzer, I think.
Speaker 1 (16:36):
To get don't you have to life submit information to
those those award shows to get considered for the award?
Speaker 2 (16:43):
Linda, I'm not sure I think you do. Yeah, it's
it's all inside and you know, well, I'm sure you
submit our name every year, right? Oh yeah? Have you
ever submitted?
Speaker 3 (16:55):
Absolutely not.
Speaker 1 (16:56):
I think the best one would be you backsliding. That
would be the best one. This is absurd for anybody, Pullitzer.
Speaker 2 (17:02):
You have to be a lunatic liberal to get the
pulletr anymore.
Speaker 3 (17:05):
It doesn't even hold the same week.
Speaker 1 (17:07):
Listen, it sounds self serving when I say that we
got Russia, right, we got every one of those cases
I just mentioned, right, Does anybody care?
Speaker 5 (17:14):
No?
Speaker 2 (17:15):
They just don't.
Speaker 1 (17:16):
All right, let's get to our phones. I got to
deal with this. Charlie and Delaware.
Speaker 2 (17:20):
Charlie. How are you happy Monday? Glad your called, sir?
Speaker 6 (17:23):
Fine, thank you very much. How you're doing?
Speaker 4 (17:25):
True?
Speaker 2 (17:26):
I'm good. What's going on? Hope? Life is good?
Speaker 6 (17:29):
Yeah, until last Thursday I was a little upset.
Speaker 2 (17:33):
Reason so what's up?
Speaker 6 (17:36):
A long time listener of viewers? And Thursday you came
out with comment that you wanted to see the New
York knicker.
Speaker 3 (17:42):
Rocker and lose.
Speaker 2 (17:44):
I have now changed my position. You want to know why?
Not for the reasons that you think.
Speaker 1 (17:53):
Because I want people watching my show. I don't want
them to watch them a stupid basketball game and all
the sports is always nine o'clock.
Speaker 3 (18:00):
I hate it, all right, Well, they can reques.
Speaker 1 (18:03):
Well, I'm a little surprised, to be honest, that San
Antonio Los lost both games.
Speaker 2 (18:09):
But you know, I'm not that interested in NBA. I'm
just not.
Speaker 1 (18:14):
I love this series going on, in the Stanley Cup
series with in the NHL. I love Carolina and Vegas.
I think these have been three of the best games
I've ever seen in my life. Last game four nothing
Vegas in thirty nine seconds, Carolina gets to four to three.
Speaker 2 (18:33):
With just like five or six minutes left in the game.
Speaker 1 (18:35):
They tie it up double you know, sudden death overtime,
and then Vegas ended up winning. I was kind of
half cheering for Carolina, but you know what, I'm loving
the hockey even though my Panthers are.
Speaker 6 (18:48):
I'm playing one other thing I wanted to mess to say.
I was born in Cornwall in New York and raised
in Cornwall on Hudson and the New York Knickerbocker's. Back
in the sixties, they had like a summer camp over
at New York Military Academy, right. I used to go
there every day every day.
Speaker 1 (19:10):
Look, I would be less than gracious's if I didn't
say to these long suffering nick fans that I'm happy
for them.
Speaker 2 (19:17):
I am.
Speaker 1 (19:19):
You know, when I went to NYU for a year
of my life, I used to my economics class would
finish around nine pm. And I lived on thirty fourth Street,
and ninth Avenue at the thirty fourth Street y, which
is a dump. I lived in a closet and anyway,
but as I was walking back, if the Rangers were
playing or the Knicks were playing, I could hit a
(19:42):
scalper up and you know, pay ten bucks and walk
in the door and watch the rest of the game.
And I used to do it all the time, so
I kind of like that part of it. I could
tell you, you know, the best Knicks team ever Walt Clyde
Fraser or all the pro Monroe, Willis Reid, Dave de
Bush or Bill Bradley Wing go off the bench, so
it might shock people how aware I was of the Knicks.
(20:04):
Then when I lived in Rhode Island, it was during
the Magic and Larry Bird era, and I love watching
that that heated rivalry I think the best ever in sports.
I was like giddy when I met Magic Johnsons, I
really was, and I was.
Speaker 2 (20:20):
I mean, it was just never better.
Speaker 1 (20:23):
And then of course you look at Michael Jordan and
there's so many gifted. I don't like Lebron personally, as
politics seemed to irritate me a little bit, but you know, you.
Speaker 2 (20:33):
Can't deny he's so gifted and talented.
Speaker 1 (20:35):
I mean, I like watching talented people perform. And you know,
so I guess for people that like, I'm just more
of a hockey fan, more of a football fan than
I am a basketball fan.
Speaker 6 (20:49):
And the game basketball has changed so much, they'd never
call traveling and they're just about punching you.
Speaker 2 (20:55):
Oh my god, they're taking five steps going to the net.
Speaker 3 (20:57):
It cracks me up, exactly.
Speaker 1 (20:59):
Yeah, yes, all right, buddy, appreciate the call. We're not
doing sports talk, but I appreciate it. Right back to
our busy phones eight hundred and ninety four one, Sean,
if you want to join us, let's say to Mike Ohio,
the Buckeye State, Mike, how are you glad you called?
Speaker 5 (21:17):
Sir?
Speaker 4 (21:17):
Are you doing all right?
Speaker 2 (21:19):
Mike?
Speaker 1 (21:19):
I'm doing great, Glad you joined us? What's going on?
Happy Monday, my friend.
Speaker 4 (21:23):
Happy Monday to you. Last on Friday, I heard I
heard listen to your radio show, and I heard you
talk to somebody about jobs building houses, and he was
talking about this company that either he started or he
knew about, that was using robots to build houses, and
how good it's going to be, and how the affordability
(21:44):
is going to be.
Speaker 1 (21:45):
Well, I've actually spent a lot of time with somebody
I don't know if he wants me to mention his
name or not, who is building out a robotic homebuilding company.
We're seventy five percent of the home, including the wiring
and the sheet rocking, and the framing and the roofing
and the siding and the windows can all be done
(22:06):
by robotics. Now there's a company in Australia that actually
does cinderblock building and if you look at the videos,
they're sick. You can't believe it. So yeah, it's definitely
the future. Do I think it's gonna displace every every trade?
Not even close?
Speaker 2 (22:21):
No, I don't.
Speaker 4 (22:22):
Well that's what I was thinking. You said how availability,
that the howunges would be affordable, But if you only
have a job, how are you going to flow the house?
How many jobs is AI gonna take?
Speaker 1 (22:35):
Listen, it's a fair question. We're having a debate. The
person I've been paying the closest attention to in terms
of analysis has been Elon because I think he's the smartest.
He thinks it's going to be a net net positive. However,
what I'm telling young people they've got this school in
New York what's the name of though, it's called the
Alpha School. And what they do is they will they
(22:58):
take kids they're not in great like traditionally in grades.
Speaker 2 (23:02):
They take kids wherever they're at.
Speaker 1 (23:04):
Academically, they spend the first couple of hours of every
day and they go through reading, writing, math, science, history
and all that stuff. And then the kids work on
their computers. They become masters at AI. They are going
to all be very wealthy people, you know, considering they
assuming they keep the nose clean. Because of that knowledge.
(23:26):
There's not a day that goes by now that I
don't use rock. I use artificial intelligence every day. I
use it during the show every day.
Speaker 4 (23:36):
Back in day, were schools they had, they had shop passes,
you had vocational classes. Now, you know, the last couple
of years everything's been gyrated to go to college, do
this and that. Now the college people are coming up,
they don't have jobs, and they kind of a vocational
I mean, you need plumbers, you need electricians. You know,
(23:56):
people got to build selfing. That seems like this we well.
Speaker 2 (24:01):
Remember everything breaks.
Speaker 1 (24:02):
I mean I had my air conditioning to go down
recently and I had to stay up overnight to get
somebody to finally get somebody to come over, and it
was not a good situation. Uh, there's no robot that's
going to be able to fix that in the foreseeable future,
I can promise you.
Speaker 3 (24:19):
Yeah.
Speaker 4 (24:19):
But they're just going to take away some of the
jobs that normal people would have, the day to day
stuff building this, building a trust, putting a wall together,
building a window to install. It just seems like, oh,
that's going to be going to robotic.
Speaker 1 (24:36):
Some of that will go away, but contractors and will
be needed, and you're going to need some hands on
people and some of the trades on every one of
those jobs.
Speaker 2 (24:43):
There's no doubt. I think that you're going to see a.
Speaker 1 (24:46):
Lot of resistance from contractors and a lot of resistance
you know, the technologies. I don't see that it's perfected yet.
I want to see greater proof of concept as a
community built out In Texas, we have AI robots.
Speaker 2 (25:00):
They just drop.
Speaker 1 (25:01):
Beads of cement, you know, one on top of the
other at a rapid speed. I just don't like that
particular look and design, but you know, well it'll unfold
and will adapt, you know. One of the beauties of
Trump bringing in trillions of dollars in new manufacturing investment.
Those are going to create a lot of high paying
(25:22):
career jobs.
Speaker 4 (25:23):
Yeah, probably an AI though, but you know, no.
Speaker 1 (25:26):
No, I mean you're talking about automobile manufacturing, semiconductor ship manufacturing.
I'm just telling you make sure, I don't care what
your age is. Download some AI system and play with it,
use it, and then get used to using it. That's
my humble recommendation.
Hour two Sean Hannity Show, eight hundred and ninety four one,
Shawn on number you want to be a part of
the program. In a minute, we're going to be joined
by my great Senator from the Free State of Florida,
Rick Scott, now Florida. Over the years, you can go
back to two thousand, had issues with voting, and all
I can tell you is they have resolved every issue
(00:21):
and it has such integrity in the system that on
election night you will know within two hours ninety percent
of the vote, you'll probably know the projected winner. And
they have mastered the process, and they did it out
of a necessity. And all of these Democrats, all these
blue state you know, rules and regulations are this is
(00:44):
absolute madness. It's like they want to live in the
Stone Age. There is no reason for any state not
to adopt integrity measures so that people can have confidence
in the result of our elections.
Speaker 2 (00:58):
There's just no reason reason at all.
Speaker 1 (01:01):
If you go back to twenty twenty four, seventy five
percent of the vote nationwide in the presidential election, seventy
five percent was counted within three hours. Every single state
except Gavin Newsom's communist utopia of California had counted more
than seventy five percent of the vote after two days. California,
they took five days to get to that number. California
(01:24):
got to ninety percent of the vote after about eleven days.
There is no excuse for any of this, none at
all whatsoever. And you know, now we're on the precipice
where it looked like Spencer Pratt had a very solid
lead to be one of the top two finishers to
(01:45):
make a runoff. Now La will be guaranteed to have
a radical leftist mayor.
Speaker 2 (01:51):
And I can't give.
Speaker 1 (01:52):
You specifics about what voter integrity issues exist there, except
this is no way to run an election. Democrats don't
want integrity in the system, and when you don't have
integrity in the system, it causes people to doubt. They
are responsible for doubt in people's minds, and people won't
(02:13):
have confidence in the results, and they're going to get disgusted,
and they have every right to be anyway, My great
Senator Rick Scott of Florida.
Speaker 2 (02:21):
Is with me.
Speaker 1 (02:22):
Is there any possible reason rationale other than I suspect
that there might be nefarious intentions in play that they
would not want to adopt integrity issues.
Speaker 3 (02:33):
Yeah, it's all because the people that are in office
they want fraud. I mean the same America Act. You know,
you have to be an American to register to vote,
you have to show an ID to vote. Over eighty
percent of Americans want it. Democrats want it, Independence wanted,
Republicans want it. You know who doesn't want it? Elected Democrats.
That's the only group that doesn't want this because guess
(02:54):
what they know, what their radical ideas, they can't get
re elected all right unless there's fraud. What's going on
with Spencer out in LA? How could that happen? How
could be that big a change? Right? Other than what
I mean? And even if you do, even if you say, oh,
may maybe that could happen. Do you feel comfortable? Why
(03:17):
would these people want people feel comfortable? So? Has there
been anybody sitting there both parties looking at every ballot?
Are they made sure there's no ballots coming in? After
election night? They say, oh yeah, Spencer was up by
like fifty thousand votes, so we got to figure out
how do we get fifty thousand more votes? So I
don't know if any that's happening, but guess what we
else knows either, and so well, no.
Speaker 1 (03:38):
I mean it lends itself to nobody trusting the system.
That's the biggest problem.
Speaker 3 (03:43):
You're going to go it.
Speaker 1 (03:44):
Let no reasonable person is going to want to trust
this system or believe there's integrity. And then after the election,
you know, if it's a Democrat or a Republican. Both
parties have complained bitterly about quote rigged and stolen elections.
So the only antidote to prevent people from having questions,
(04:05):
in my mind, is voter integrity. Put these measures in place.
Democrats steadfastly refuse.
Speaker 3 (04:11):
Yeah, I mean, you have to be an American the vote,
you have to show an ID. And on top of that,
when you're checking the ballot, when you're counting them, there
ought to be observers. I mean you ought to be
able to watch them. Republicans ought to be a watching
Democrats ought to be a watch them independence. I mean,
we ought to have cameras. We have to make sure
everybody is comfortable, right. So you know, I was with
(04:35):
a grandson yesterday that's about a year away from driving,
and I was teaching me how to drive, and I said,
when you start driving, your job is to make everybody
that is with you comfortable, tell them what you're doing.
Are you looking there? Are you looking right? That's what
we should be doing with complete transparency with this stuff.
And so everybody knows and there's no chance you know
your vote, your vote has to if you're vote by mail,
(04:56):
and I think mails always suspect although we do it
and vote well, then you are to be so careful
here to make sure are those sures going to match?
And if you're not going to check cinters, then you
know there's gonna be fraud.
Speaker 1 (05:06):
There's going to be How about any mail in ballots
immediately from the moment they're delivered, are on a video camera,
put in a locked room that can be monitored by
the public twenty four hours and they can go online
and see if anybody's in that room tampering with those ballots?
Would that not add integrity and confidence?
Speaker 3 (05:25):
Absolutely? And you need to ask every cycle of well
we do him sort of is every cycle you got
to ask for a mail in ballot and your sature
has to match.
Speaker 2 (05:35):
Oh, they just send them out in California.
Speaker 1 (05:37):
You know this is amazing to me because if you
listen to Democrats, they're putting many of them are putting
their hope in Gavin Newsom. Gavin Newsom has been utterly
silent on most of this, doesn't care. He's an absentee governor.
You know what it takes to be a governor. You're
a governor of this state for eight years. You did
(05:57):
a great job. That's when you and I really came
friends because you were always up in New York coaching
business out of New York, and I got to see
you all the time.
Speaker 2 (06:05):
We became very good friends.
Speaker 1 (06:07):
And what's amazing is he you know, predictable wildfires, predictable
Santa Ana wins. And they don't practice the science of forestry.
They don't have hydrants with water, they don't have a
reservoir with water. All these homes burn on the ground
a year and a half later. Nobody can get a
building permit. And he doesn't talk about it. Highest poverty rate,
(06:27):
highest homeless rate, highest state income tax, highest sales tax,
highest gas tax. And he's a world traveler, trump stalker,
half Hannity stalker, author, you know, lecturer, almost full time
ex poster.
Speaker 2 (06:43):
He does nothing.
Speaker 1 (06:44):
And this is what they want for the next president,
the Democrats.
Speaker 3 (06:48):
Well, they're telling you who they are all right. I
mean there's no competency, right, So he is so incompetent.
The people are continuing to move, businesses have to move.
You can't get a home in the Palisades. He didn't
care that there was a fire smoldering and they didn't
put it out right. He didn't care that the insurance
(07:10):
program didn't work. He didn't care that it takes fortune
to rebuild a house. He doesn't care that you can't
get a permit. He doesn't care about any of this stuff.
And he wants to be the president. So the non
caring president that doesn't care about anything other about him
than his election. That's exactly what Gavenousom is.
Speaker 2 (07:27):
Well, it really is awful.
Speaker 1 (07:29):
I've got to move on to other issues because you're
up to a lot of good stuff that I think
people need to wear be aware of.
Speaker 2 (07:34):
You have taken on the.
Speaker 1 (07:36):
Issue of anti Semitic, anti semitism in this country, and
I'm glad you are. You're speaking out against anti semitism.
We're seeing it now all over worldwide. It's rising. It's
rising in the halls of Congress, it's rising on the airwaves,
and I really don't I'm having a hard time understanding
(07:56):
what would Americans expect after October seventh and after decades
of NonStop rocket barrage. But if they killed the court
equivalent of forty thousand Americans in a day, when you
extrapolate population out, Uh, and they murder and they rape,
and they torture and they kidnapped, what would we expect
our country to do if, in fact we.
Speaker 3 (08:16):
Were hit where you'd sure sector hope our leaders would
show up and defend our country.
Speaker 2 (08:22):
Uh not.
Speaker 3 (08:23):
But there's so many of these people that are anti
Semitic and anti Israel and anti jew. I mean, they're
just it's unbelievable. So now we've got down in Tampa, Okay,
we got a public a public stadium supported by taxpayers
is going it is going to allow to give a
contract there one of the biggest anti Semites in the
in the country, in the in the world. But other
(08:44):
countries won't let him with Kanye West, No, other countries
won't let him even show up into a concert. But Tampa,
with public money, is allowing this to happen. This and
and so one. I don't get that too. I don't
understand anti Semitism. Why they want to pick on Jews.
But think about it, they're not just picking on Jews.
They're just the beginning. These people hate ju Dale's Christian values.
(09:07):
They might start with the Jews, they hate the Christians next.
So we're going to start standing up and say enough's enough.
We're not going to put up with this. We're not
going to have another Holocaust.
Speaker 1 (09:18):
I mean, that's the whole thing about every single person.
And I hear a lot of lying, and I hear
a lot of misinformation from both people in Congress elected officials,
and I hear from the punditry class that.
Speaker 2 (09:30):
This is a forever war.
Speaker 1 (09:32):
This is that Donald Trump and President Trump walked off
meet the press, which I love this weekend actually myself.
And they're saying he's doing this for bb He's doing
this for Israel, He's doing this for Fox News.
Speaker 2 (09:45):
No he's not.
Speaker 1 (09:46):
Because every person that I know that reads the intelligence
said under twelve days they could have up to eleven
bombs if they get a hold of that dust, and
the President decided it was in our best national security
interest not to allow that to happen.
Speaker 3 (10:06):
What would we have done if they got the weapon?
Could we have stopped them? And you won't to have.
You won't have country that's that's been killing Americans for
forty seven years, says they're going to kill Americans. Have
a nuclear weapons they can bomb off the coast of
Tampa or Miami or Palm Beach. No, this president's got
the guns to show up Obama as a peace or
Biden was an appeaser. This president defends this country. He's
(10:28):
defending American citizens. I'm proud to call him my friend,
and I went to thank you for what he's doing, you.
Speaker 1 (10:34):
Know, and he's fighting and he's getting Republicans on a
lot of issues.
Speaker 2 (10:37):
Tovite.
Speaker 1 (10:38):
Look, I wish we would have I wish he would
have gotten through and maybe you can shed some light
on the issue of the Save Act.
Speaker 2 (10:46):
What happened.
Speaker 3 (10:48):
Well, I mean, he's got we got to we have
to work on it, and we have to you know,
we have to stay up here and we have to.
In my opinion, we have to give her the filibuster.
I mean, the Democrats, the democrants choose this to block
all good legislation, and then when they're in power, right
then there was Republicans that will go along with their stuff,
but don't go along with anything that's logical and this
(11:09):
is taxpayers won. But so we couldn't we couldn't get
the votes. We had Republicans a vote against it. Then
Mike Lee put up a bill just to say, okay,
well we'll do something in this reconciliation package that we
could say we can give inema centeviize states to do
the right thing on the elections. And you have Republicans
a vote against that. All the Democrats, of course, vote
(11:31):
against it, but one the Republicans vote against the stuff
that all we're trying to do is make our elections
more secure. It was just an incentive even to do it,
and you had you had Republicans vote against it. That
doesn't make any sense.
Speaker 2 (11:45):
It doesn't.
Speaker 1 (11:46):
All right, quick break more with Senator Rick Scott my
free state of Florida. On the other side than your
calls coming up this Monday, eight hundred and nine four
one Sean, if you want to be a part of
the program, Uh, all right, where are we here?
Speaker 2 (11:59):
Well?
Speaker 1 (11:59):
I love Donald Trump walking off meet the press. Some
people said he shouldn't have walked off. You know what,
why not? First of all, nobody watches this show. I
see the ratings every week. They don't watch this show,
and the President is with Kristen Walker or Welker, whatever
her name is, and it's she just doesn't get it.
Speaker 2 (12:19):
It's all gotcha, gotcha, gotcha.
Speaker 1 (12:21):
Let's go back to January sixth for a four hundred
million time. I mean, it's such a waste of his time.
And then he actually said something in this interview that
really stuck with me when he said, if you guys
had any influence, I would not have won this election.
And I've been making that point. Their impact is dead
(12:42):
and they don't even know it. With all the dramas
Scott Pelly and crying, Scott Pelly is telling his new boss,
within minutes of meeting him at the first meeting, the
new producer of CBS's sixty Minutes that his boss is
destroying the place, taking a wrecking ball to the place,
and that he will never be welcome. And do you
(13:04):
expect to keep your job? I mean, would any of
you in America keep your job? It's pretty remarkable and
he's gone. Interestingly, the remaining the remaining people have decided
to stay. And I'm going to tell you why, because
where else are they going to go? How old does
Leslie stall now? The probably eighty or something like that.
(13:26):
I'm guessing a hundred.
Speaker 4 (13:28):
I don't like it.
Speaker 2 (13:28):
Yeah, it's even.
Speaker 1 (13:31):
You got your first good crack in very good right,
But she's where is she going to work after sixty minutes?
I mean if she wants to keep working, which I
support people that want to work as long as they
want to work. But anyway, let's play the Trump walking
off NBC, and I was glad you did it.
Speaker 5 (13:50):
These elections are rigged. Your network knows that they're rigged.
You know that I won an election in a landslide
and I got ninety four present bad press. You know
why I got because you have no credibility.
Speaker 2 (14:04):
But you've never presented evidence it was rigged. Let's keep
talking about I want to talk about Tom.
Speaker 5 (14:08):
You have more evidence, there's more evidence than ever presented.
Let's talk to your elections in this country. We're like
a third world country. Your elections are crooked, and your crooked,
and mister presses crooked, and show is ABC and CBS
and CNN, your one sided, crooked network. Let's call it
(14:28):
quits because I've had a note.
Speaker 3 (14:30):
Thank you, darling, have.
Speaker 2 (14:31):
A good times president.
Speaker 6 (14:32):
Let's please I traveled all the way to Wisconsin, traveled,
I know, on and off in the ring, and I've
given you enough time.
Speaker 5 (14:42):
You want to straighten out your press because you know what,
country can never be great travel?
Speaker 2 (14:48):
We traveled all the way to Wisconsin. Too bad. I
mean this what he said is so spot on.
Speaker 1 (14:56):
If Hollywood had influence in the twenty four elections, there's
no way Donald Trump could have won this election. If
if the legacy media mob had impact, There's no way
Donald Trump could have won the election.
Speaker 2 (15:11):
They don't. They have lost their credibility.
Speaker 1 (15:15):
They have gotten so much wrong so often that it
is it is such a spectacular fail. How is it
that these companies never make a correction? Doesn't mean that
news media outlets don't make mistakes. They all do, every
one of them. Doesn't mean we haven't made mistakes. When
we do, we correct the mistakes. We try to right wrongs,
(15:38):
correct injustices. You know or you know it is NBC
News reporting that federal investigators had placed a wire tab
on Michael Cohne's phones, monitoring communication in the weeks leading
up to the raid on his home in office. It
was a false story. Where is the correction? NBC News
(15:58):
reporting Rudy Juliet his personal attorney warned by the FBI
that he was a target of the Russian influence operation.
Speaker 2 (16:06):
He had, in fact never been warned.
Speaker 1 (16:07):
The FBI prepared a briefing for Julianni and never gave
it to him. You know, all of these false reports,
and let's bring up other issues they got wrong. How
many times do they rush to judgment? You know, Richard Jewell,
we can start there. You can go to Ferguson, Missouri.
We can go there. We can go to Duke Lacrosse,
we can go to Freddie Gray and Baltimore, we can
(16:29):
go to UVA, and time after time after time we
end up being right.
Speaker 2 (16:33):
I'm never going to get a Pulitzer, I think.
Speaker 1 (16:36):
To get don't you have to life submit information to
those those award shows to get considered for the award?
Speaker 2 (16:43):
Linda, I'm not sure I think you do. Yeah, it's
it's all inside and you know, well, I'm sure you
submit our name every year, right? Oh yeah? Have you
ever submitted?
Speaker 3 (16:55):
Absolutely not.
Speaker 1 (16:56):
I think the best one would be you backsliding. That
would be the best one. This is absurd for anybody, Pullitzer.
Speaker 2 (17:02):
You have to be a lunatic liberal to get the
pulletr anymore.
Speaker 3 (17:05):
It doesn't even hold the same week.
Speaker 1 (17:07):
Listen, it sounds self serving when I say that we
got Russia, right, we got every one of those cases
I just mentioned, right, Does anybody care?
Speaker 5 (17:14):
No?
Speaker 2 (17:15):
They just don't.
Speaker 1 (17:16):
All right, let's get to our phones. I got to
deal with this. Charlie and Delaware.
Speaker 2 (17:20):
Charlie. How are you happy Monday? Glad your called, sir?
Speaker 6 (17:23):
Fine, thank you very much. How you're doing?
Speaker 4 (17:25):
True?
Speaker 2 (17:26):
I'm good. What's going on? Hope? Life is good?
Speaker 6 (17:29):
Yeah, until last Thursday I was a little upset.
Speaker 2 (17:33):
Reason so what's up?
Speaker 6 (17:36):
A long time listener of viewers? And Thursday you came
out with comment that you wanted to see the New
York knicker.
Speaker 3 (17:42):
Rocker and lose.
Speaker 2 (17:44):
I have now changed my position. You want to know why?
Not for the reasons that you think.
Speaker 1 (17:53):
Because I want people watching my show. I don't want
them to watch them a stupid basketball game and all
the sports is always nine o'clock.
Speaker 3 (18:00):
I hate it, all right, Well, they can reques.
Speaker 1 (18:03):
Well, I'm a little surprised, to be honest, that San
Antonio Los lost both games.
Speaker 2 (18:09):
But you know, I'm not that interested in NBA. I'm
just not.
Speaker 1 (18:14):
I love this series going on, in the Stanley Cup
series with in the NHL. I love Carolina and Vegas.
I think these have been three of the best games
I've ever seen in my life. Last game four nothing
Vegas in thirty nine seconds, Carolina gets to four to three.
Speaker 2 (18:33):
With just like five or six minutes left in the game.
Speaker 1 (18:35):
They tie it up double you know, sudden death overtime,
and then Vegas ended up winning. I was kind of
half cheering for Carolina, but you know what, I'm loving
the hockey even though my Panthers are.
Speaker 6 (18:48):
I'm playing one other thing I wanted to mess to say.
I was born in Cornwall in New York and raised
in Cornwall on Hudson and the New York Knickerbocker's. Back
in the sixties, they had like a summer camp over
at New York Military Academy, right. I used to go
there every day every day.
Speaker 1 (19:10):
Look, I would be less than gracious's if I didn't
say to these long suffering nick fans that I'm happy
for them.
Speaker 2 (19:17):
I am.
Speaker 1 (19:19):
You know, when I went to NYU for a year
of my life, I used to my economics class would
finish around nine pm. And I lived on thirty fourth Street,
and ninth Avenue at the thirty fourth Street y, which
is a dump. I lived in a closet and anyway,
but as I was walking back, if the Rangers were
playing or the Knicks were playing, I could hit a
(19:42):
scalper up and you know, pay ten bucks and walk
in the door and watch the rest of the game.
And I used to do it all the time, so
I kind of like that part of it. I could
tell you, you know, the best Knicks team ever Walt Clyde
Fraser or all the pro Monroe, Willis Reid, Dave de
Bush or Bill Bradley Wing go off the bench, so
it might shock people how aware I was of the Knicks.
(20:04):
Then when I lived in Rhode Island, it was during
the Magic and Larry Bird era, and I love watching
that that heated rivalry I think the best ever in sports.
I was like giddy when I met Magic Johnsons, I
really was, and I was.
Speaker 2 (20:20):
I mean, it was just never better.
Speaker 1 (20:23):
And then of course you look at Michael Jordan and
there's so many gifted. I don't like Lebron personally, as
politics seemed to irritate me a little bit, but you know, you.
Speaker 2 (20:33):
Can't deny he's so gifted and talented.
Speaker 1 (20:35):
I mean, I like watching talented people perform. And you know,
so I guess for people that like, I'm just more
of a hockey fan, more of a football fan than
I am a basketball fan.
Speaker 6 (20:49):
And the game basketball has changed so much, they'd never
call traveling and they're just about punching you.
Speaker 2 (20:55):
Oh my god, they're taking five steps going to the net.
Speaker 3 (20:57):
It cracks me up, exactly.
Speaker 1 (20:59):
Yeah, yes, all right, buddy, appreciate the call. We're not
doing sports talk, but I appreciate it. Right back to
our busy phones eight hundred and ninety four one, Sean,
if you want to join us, let's say to Mike Ohio,
the Buckeye State, Mike, how are you glad you called?
Speaker 5 (21:17):
Sir?
Speaker 4 (21:17):
Are you doing all right?
Speaker 2 (21:19):
Mike?
Speaker 1 (21:19):
I'm doing great, Glad you joined us? What's going on?
Happy Monday, my friend.
Speaker 4 (21:23):
Happy Monday to you. Last on Friday, I heard I
heard listen to your radio show, and I heard you
talk to somebody about jobs building houses, and he was
talking about this company that either he started or he
knew about, that was using robots to build houses, and
how good it's going to be, and how the affordability
(21:44):
is going to be.
Speaker 1 (21:45):
Well, I've actually spent a lot of time with somebody
I don't know if he wants me to mention his
name or not, who is building out a robotic homebuilding company.
We're seventy five percent of the home, including the wiring
and the sheet rocking, and the framing and the roofing
and the siding and the windows can all be done
(22:06):
by robotics. Now there's a company in Australia that actually
does cinderblock building and if you look at the videos,
they're sick. You can't believe it. So yeah, it's definitely
the future. Do I think it's gonna displace every every trade?
Not even close?
Speaker 2 (22:21):
No, I don't.
Speaker 4 (22:22):
Well that's what I was thinking. You said how availability,
that the howunges would be affordable, But if you only
have a job, how are you going to flow the house?
How many jobs is AI gonna take?
Speaker 1 (22:35):
Listen, it's a fair question. We're having a debate. The
person I've been paying the closest attention to in terms
of analysis has been Elon because I think he's the smartest.
He thinks it's going to be a net net positive. However,
what I'm telling young people they've got this school in
New York what's the name of though, it's called the
Alpha School. And what they do is they will they
(22:58):
take kids they're not in great like traditionally in grades.
Speaker 2 (23:02):
They take kids wherever they're at.
Speaker 1 (23:04):
Academically, they spend the first couple of hours of every
day and they go through reading, writing, math, science, history
and all that stuff. And then the kids work on
their computers. They become masters at AI. They are going
to all be very wealthy people, you know, considering they
assuming they keep the nose clean. Because of that knowledge.
(23:26):
There's not a day that goes by now that I
don't use rock. I use artificial intelligence every day. I
use it during the show every day.
Speaker 4 (23:36):
Back in day, were schools they had, they had shop passes,
you had vocational classes. Now, you know, the last couple
of years everything's been gyrated to go to college, do
this and that. Now the college people are coming up,
they don't have jobs, and they kind of a vocational
I mean, you need plumbers, you need electricians. You know,
(23:56):
people got to build selfing. That seems like this we well.
Speaker 2 (24:01):
Remember everything breaks.
Speaker 1 (24:02):
I mean I had my air conditioning to go down
recently and I had to stay up overnight to get
somebody to finally get somebody to come over, and it
was not a good situation. Uh, there's no robot that's
going to be able to fix that in the foreseeable future,
I can promise you.
Speaker 3 (24:19):
Yeah.
Speaker 4 (24:19):
But they're just going to take away some of the
jobs that normal people would have, the day to day
stuff building this, building a trust, putting a wall together,
building a window to install. It just seems like, oh,
that's going to be going to robotic.
Speaker 1 (24:36):
Some of that will go away, but contractors and will
be needed, and you're going to need some hands on
people and some of the trades on every one of
those jobs.
Speaker 2 (24:43):
There's no doubt. I think that you're going to see a.
Speaker 1 (24:46):
Lot of resistance from contractors and a lot of resistance
you know, the technologies. I don't see that it's perfected yet.
I want to see greater proof of concept as a
community built out In Texas, we have AI robots.
Speaker 2 (25:00):
They just drop.
Speaker 1 (25:01):
Beads of cement, you know, one on top of the
other at a rapid speed. I just don't like that
particular look and design, but you know, well it'll unfold
and will adapt, you know. One of the beauties of
Trump bringing in trillions of dollars in new manufacturing investment.
Those are going to create a lot of high paying
(25:22):
career jobs.
Speaker 4 (25:23):
Yeah, probably an AI though, but you know, no.
Speaker 1 (25:26):
No, I mean you're talking about automobile manufacturing, semiconductor ship manufacturing.
I'm just telling you make sure, I don't care what
your age is. Download some AI system and play with it,
use it, and then get used to using it. That's
my humble recommendation.
The Sean Hannity Show News
Host
Sean Hannity
Popular Podcasts
Hey Jonas!
Hey Jonas! The official Jonas Brothers podcast. Hosted by Kevin, Joe, and Nick Jonas. It’s the Jonas Brothers you know... musicians, actors, and well, yes, brothers. Now, they’re sharing another side of themselves in the playful, intimate, and irreverent way only they can. Spend time with the Jonas Brothers here and stay a little bit longer for deep conversations like never before.
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com