April 30, 2026 • 28 mins
In the final hour, Sean Hannity delivers a deep dive into the indictment of former FBI Director James Comey, analyzing the legal implications and broader political fallout. Hannity questions the credibility of Comey’s defense while exploring how this case fits into what he describes as a much larger investigation into alleged government overreach.
Featuring insights from legal analyst Greg Jarrett and investigative journalist John Solomon, the conversation expands into what could be a sweeping “grand conspiracy” case. The discussion outlines potential next steps, key figures who may be implicated, and how past investigations could connect to current legal developments.
Hannity also takes calls from listeners, addressing concerns about security, accountability, and political division. He closes the hour by tying together themes of justice, consequence, and the long-term impact these events may have on the country.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Listen
Watch
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
News round up in information ob load hour. Here's our
toll free telephone number at eight hundred and nine foot
one Shawn if you want to be a part of
the program. If you are not following the news today,
it turns out mister Higher Honor James Colly himself turned
himself into a federal authorities at an Alexandria, Virginia courthouse today.
(00:21):
The grand jury indictment revealed on Tuesday charges call me
with threatening to kill President Trump. That's the eighty six
forty seven shell thing. I have no idea what it meant,
none at all, whatsoever. Now James call me, maintaining his
innocence after the second indictment, here's what he had to say.
Speaker 2 (00:40):
Well, they're back, this time about a picture of seashells
on a North Carolina beach a year ago. And this
won't be the end of it. But nothing has changed
with me. I'm still innocent, I'm still not afraid, and
I still believe in the independent federal judiciary. So let's go.
But it's really important and that all of us remember
(01:02):
this is not who we are as a country. This
is not how the Department of Justice is supposed to be,
and the good news is we get closer every day
to restoring those values. Keep the faith.
Speaker 1 (01:14):
Anyway, so, now indicted presidential death threat suspect James Calemy
decided not to wait till his squad cards showed up
at his house this morning and haul him down to
police headquarters.
Speaker 3 (01:26):
No.
Speaker 1 (01:26):
I spent a couple of hours with John Solomon and
Greg Jarrett on my podcast, Hanging Out with Me Sean Hannity.
You can watch it wherever you get your video podcast,
and it's on YouTube and Spotify and Apple. You know,
I would urge you all to watch it because it
really is the culmination of years of work that we
all did together. We did it collaboratively, we worked very
(01:50):
hard at it, and we were able to get to
the bottom of it. The left wing legacy media mob
was wrong. We have been vindicated time and time again.
I look at this at the as the lower hanging
fruit when it comes to Comy, mister higher honor, and
I think, especially with my interview with Dan Bongino and
(02:10):
what they have found, I think that this Grand conspiracy
investigation is going to be the mother load that may
implicate a lot more people. Bongino told me that he
really felt that there were people in the FBI the
purposefully preserved evidence, knowing and hoping that one day when
(02:33):
he and Cash Pttel got in the FBI, that they
would find it. They did find it, and that's where
you know. Dan famously said he didn't think a Republican
survive under these circumstances. But I think that that is
the case that I'm paying the most attention to. However,
this is significant anyway. Joining us now, John Solomon. He
(02:53):
is the founder, editor in chief, chief investigative reporter justinews
dot com, Greig Jarrett, Fox News, legal analyst, and of
course number one New York Times bestselling author. John, let's
start with you. I think you agree with me. This
is the lower hanging fruit. I think, yeah, I think
the big investigation is into the Grand Conspiracy.
Speaker 4 (03:13):
Yeah, you're exactly right. This is sort of a side issue,
but one that takes on more significance when you remember
what just happens Saturday night. People are getting motivated by
these social media posts. They are getting motivated by the
hateful rhetoric. And so if an FBI director or a
former FBI director wants to suggest it's a good idea
to eighty six forty seven, get rid of forty seven,
(03:34):
and that might motivate someone. You're going to charge him
just like you charge anyone else. If a guy in
Las Vegas said, Hey, I'm going to kill the lawmaker tomorrow,
they're going to go arrest him too. So that's what
went on here. This is a minor case compared to
what's playing out in Port Pierce, Florida. They are systemically
looking at an effort to get Donald Trump violate his
civil liberties over a ten year period, using four or
(03:56):
five code name investigations, and along the way, not only
lating President Trump's simil liberties and those around them, but
very likely members of Congress whose own records were taken,
lawyers whose law firm records were taken. Us keep in
mind that they use secret measures to suck up entire
law firm files as they were looking at certain lawyers
(04:18):
in these cases. That is going to be such a big,
inconsequential place, far more consequential than what went on in
North Carolina yesterday.
Speaker 1 (04:26):
And John, if you can explain how arctic frost is
only the tip of the iceberg, that there are multiple
investigations with multiple names that they also now have discovered,
and we will learn a lot more in the days,
weeks and months ahead about these examples.
Speaker 4 (04:44):
Yeah, Basically, there's a Washprin's repeat cycle of weaponizing law enforcement,
and each time a Democrat has a problem, they then
hang a fake scandal on a Republican and the youth
of powers of the intelligence in law enforcement commute to
try to give the elude usion that this is a
serious matter. Hillary Clinton has that Russia collusion problem after
(05:04):
the Peter Schweizer book, they make the crossfiy a hurricane
investigation against Trump. We know that had no merit. Then
Joe Biden has a Ukraine corruption problem with this son
a hunter, and they hang Ukraine impeachment around him. A
little bit while after that, they find Joe Biden's classified
documents right after he got named president. They want to
(05:25):
neutralize that. They create the investigation against President Trump that
leads to the raid on mar A Lago, for which,
now that we know, the FBI believe there was no
probable cause to do that. And then as it's becoming
clear in twenty three that Joe Biden has a mental
acuity problem that he's fading away, they need to put
Donald Trump back on the defensive because he's doing well
(05:46):
on the polls. They use Arctic Cross, which basically goes
all the way back to twenty twenty and says we're
going to look at that period after the election and
charge Donald Trump with something that John Kennedy and Sam
Tilden did and never got charged, which is submit alternate
electors to a Senate as a former protest. Twice in
American history that wasn't a crime, but when it came
(06:07):
to Donald Trump, they tried to turn it into a crime.
Four consecutive Washerton's repeat cycles all along, capturing hundreds of
people into a dragnet who were clearly innocent.
Speaker 1 (06:18):
Let's get your take, Greg Jarrett. Let's start with eighty
six forty seven. According to Komi, he had no idea
what that meant. He had no idea. It just happened
to stumble upon it.
Speaker 5 (06:29):
Yeah, he said, gosh, it never occurred to me that
some folks associate those numbers with violence. I mean, that
kind of fakery is a pattern with James Cummy. He
feigns ignorance, he plays the dummy to try to weasel
out of wrongdoing, and he's proven to be a master
(06:49):
of deceit lying about leaks to the media, line of
the Pies accords, secretly weaponizing the FBI and the Russia hoax,
while denying it all with a straight faith. Were under
testimony before Congress, he claims, acute, am Nigia, I don't
remember anything. It's all a phony act.
Speaker 6 (07:09):
You know.
Speaker 5 (07:09):
Komy loves to portray himself as Saint James, that there's
nothing virtuous about Komy. I will say this. I've been
mildly amused at all the legal commentators who've been quick
to condemn the Komy indictment as frivolous or absurd. They're
overlooking several important points, and if I may, I'll just
(07:32):
run through them quickly. This case, first of all, is
in the Eastern District of North Carolina, predominantly conservative, and
in a politically charge case like this, that helps the prosecution,
it doesn't help Komy. Second of all, the federal grand
jury was persuaded that Komy wilfully intended to threaten the
life of the president. Will the trial jury from the
(07:56):
exact same district may agree, even though there's a higher
burden of proof. Third, it's important to realize that the
second count against Komy does not require a willful threat. Instead,
recklessly disregarding the risk of violence is sufficient. It's a
(08:18):
lower standard. It's easier to prove.
Speaker 4 (08:21):
For the all.
Speaker 5 (08:22):
You know, other people in that same eastern district in
North Carolina have been successfully prosecuted on the exact same charge,
which will undermine Comy's claim that g I'm a victim
of selective, vindictive prosecution. And finally, I point out, you know,
Comy is surely going to argue I have a free
(08:44):
speech right, that's my defense. Well, the Supreme Court has
made it abundantly clear that the First Amendment is not
a shield for threats against the president the seminole case
Watts versus the United States in nineteen sixty nine.
Speaker 4 (09:01):
So you know, I.
Speaker 5 (09:03):
Also suspect that prosecutors have marshalled together a lot more
incriminating evidence than we now know. The attorney acting Attorney
General said yesterday, we have witnesses, we have documents that
will help prove the government's case. Well, it's quite quite
possible they've uncovered evidence that Comy's doobious story is a
(09:29):
brazen lie. Will wait and see.
Speaker 1 (09:33):
You know, this is the low hanging fruit. John Solomon
that I often talk about, but there is being built
as confirmed by the Attorney General still Pam Bondi, confirmed
by Todd Blenz, confirmed by the FBI Director Cash Bettel,
new evidence put forward by Tulca Gabbert at D and
I that in fact, a grand conspiracy investigation is not
(09:57):
only going ongoing, but it is being built out. How
do you imagine that that will play out?
Speaker 4 (10:05):
I think the first likely charges if a grand jury
decides to do something, we'll be to charge John Brennan
in the next few weeks, once the Sendate transmits its evidence,
so that you begin to and grand jury begins to
understand there was a cover up as far late as
twenty twenty three. People were lying in twenty twenty three,
(10:25):
trying to cover up what began in twenty sixteen. That
is I think the starter gun firing for a larger
conspiracy case. All right, there's a lie. That lie is
trying to cover up the fact that the intelligence community
committed created a fake intelligence document to justify the fact
that the FBI previously tried to investigate Donald Trump wrongly
(10:48):
for Russian collusions. So that sort of becomes a what
we call the pattern case. And then from that pattern case,
you're going to start to look for people like fbidence
or CIA analysts who did think that exceeded the role
of their job, that exceeded the evidence, exceeded their training,
and say, these guys were part of it too, different
part of the conspiracy. And at some point you're going
(11:10):
to flip someone because when you look at all the
great conspiracies that have been brought against the mob or
against drug CARTELSI you usually flip an insider Sammy the
Bold in the case of the famous Gambino trials. Whoever
flips first, whoever becomes that key critical witness he can
help or she He or she can help tie it
up in a very big way. And I think that, well,
who might.
Speaker 1 (11:30):
That person be? Is it going to be like an
Andrew Weisman? Who's it going to be?
Speaker 4 (11:34):
It's a great question, right, we don't know yet. You know,
who's going to take a deal, who's funding their law fers.
You know, maybe the Left will pay a lot of
people's legal bills and try to keep people from cooperating.
So we'll see. But you know, someone like an Andrew
McKay would be a really interesting thing. Now I'm not
saying that Andrew k committed to crime yet I don't
know the evidence against him. But he's a guy that
can testify upward on a James Comey and Chris Ray
(11:56):
and Barack Obama because he had contacts with him, and
he can testify downward to the agents who didn't think
so to Pete Struck's in the lease of pages and
other So you're looking for someone that is like a
man in the middle or a woman in the middle,
that has visibility up and down. That sort of conspiracy
witness becomes really key to a good prosecution.
Speaker 1 (12:16):
Right, quick break more with John Solomon, Greg Jarrett on
the other side than your calls coming up eight hundred
and ninety four to one, Sean. If you want to
be a part of the program, I we continue now.
John Solomon, Greg Jarrett are with us. Greg Jarrett, I'll
give you an opportunity explain how you think this will
play out in terms of the broader case, the larger case,
(12:39):
the more significant case of an eleven year grand conspiracy
to destroy Donald Trump.
Speaker 5 (12:46):
Well, I think John has summarized it as he always
does with his reporting quite well. You post an important question,
who might flip and implicate others, for example, like John Brennan,
who is right is clearly the next person of you indicted.
There were people high up in the CIA and in
(13:08):
fact in other intelligence agencies that warn Brennant, you can't
use this dossier by Christopher Steele, paid for by Hillary Clinton.
There was a total smear and a complete lie. It's phony.
You can't use it to try to implicate Trump and
altering the intelligence community assessment upon the orders of President
(13:34):
of Barack Obomb he can't do it. Brennan did it anyway.
He essentially had one person compose it. And I would
think that that person who was the writer who penned
this thing would be somebody. If I were a prosecutor,
I'd be looking at the flip along with some others
(13:54):
who were in on it against John Brennan. And once
you get people to begin again to flip to save
their own butts, you know, then a snowball effect invariably happens.
And so you know, look, you've got a grand jury
investigation going on, it's very intensive. Dan and Fort Pierce, Florida.
(14:21):
You've got some new blood there that took over recently
that are motivated to make sure that justice is done,
so we're going to see some action over the course
of the next few weeks.
Speaker 1 (14:35):
By the way, if you want a longer discussion on
this very topic, both John Solomon and Greg Jarrett came
on my podcast, and you know we go over this
in great specificity, in detail for nearly two hours NonStop
conversation about it, and you will learn a lot, I
promise you. John Solomon, Greg Jarrett, thank you both. Appreciate
both of you. Anyway, we'll get to our busy phones.
(14:57):
Eight hundred and ninety four one, Shawn our number Hannah
in Utah. Next on the Sean Hannity Show.
Speaker 7 (15:03):
Hi, hey, Hey, can you hear me?
Speaker 1 (15:07):
I can hear you? Can you hear me? The worst
words in the English language?
Speaker 3 (15:11):
Go ahead, yes, I can.
Speaker 7 (15:13):
Hey. So it's in honor to speak with you. But
what I wanted to comment on is a gentleman saying
wondering why this last shooter wasn't dead, and and you
wanted to have him alive so that you could get
information from him. And I'm just kind of the opinion
(15:34):
that there's hint this flashooter and there's so many more
people that have drink drank the kool aid and they
aren't thinking for themselves anymore. And I feel like there
just needs to be a consequence, and tell there's consequences
for people doing this, like call me not knowing what
the show represented. That's that's just ridiculous. And I want
(16:00):
to know when the consequences are going to happen.
Speaker 1 (16:03):
Well, they may never happen to the extent that they should,
and I'm not gonna I'm not going to give you
false hope. Too many of these people. Oh, they're going
to be in jail for the rest of their life.
They will never see another day free. And you know,
look at John Hinckley who shot Reagan. He's free as
a bird. So it frustrates me. In terms of dead
(16:25):
or alive, I'm perfectly fine if the guy ends up dead. However,
if you have the person alive, you do have an
opportunity to discover if there might be other people that
were aiding a betting, supporting and that were part of
a grander conspiracy. And in that sense, I would like
(16:45):
to know the answer to that so you can get
information you otherwise would not be able to get from
a dead person. But with that said, if the guy
ended up dead, I would not be sitting on this
program today, you know, shedding a tear, I promise you, right.
Speaker 7 (16:59):
But I think we can pretty much guarantee that there's
unfortunately many more like him every and they're where well.
Speaker 1 (17:07):
I think there's plenty of them. And I think we're
doing a very poor job in terms of creating a
safe perimeter for the president, his cabinet and high ranking
government officials. And we're doing a poor job. We're not sweeping,
we're not securing, we're not holding areas. In this case,
the entire hotel should have been swept. It was not,
(17:27):
just like it was not swept. The area around Trump International,
just like Butler was not swept the way it should
have been swept. And at this point, how many how
many more examples do we need before we make the
changes that are necessary?
Speaker 7 (17:42):
By zero zero?
Speaker 1 (17:46):
Yeah, I appreciate the call, Janet, Thank you. Uh let
us say hi to doctor George in my free state
of Florida. Doctor George, how are you? What kind of
doctor are you?
Speaker 3 (17:57):
For longevity medicine? But in any case, mister Sean Hannity,
my wife and I hold you in such high esteem
because you're very few bona fide.
Speaker 6 (18:09):
Professional journalists who is not going to lose their professional
journalism card because you've never attended one of those White
House dinners through the years, and any journalists who did
participate in those events ought to lose their professional journalism card.
Speaker 1 (18:31):
Let me ask you a question, doctor, If you know
you have to go to an event, and there are
events all of us have to go to that we
really don't want to go to. It's not at the
top of our list of things we would choose to
do on a day off. Why would I want to
go in a room full of people most of whom
(18:52):
I don't particularly like, that don't like me. What is
the point? I don't see any point to that.
Speaker 3 (18:59):
Well, the point is that professional journalists ought to not
casually cavort with the people whom they have to ask
probing questions off. And this is the problem we saw
when the Democrats were in power, When they get together
at that White House dinner and they joke around about
(19:21):
serious issues that affect our country. Journalists should not be
doing that if they want to maintain their ethics and
still be highly respected bona fide professional journalists. And the
very fact that you had the spine and the determination
(19:42):
knowing that that would challenge the ethics of any professional journalists.
We just admire you for your fortitude, for your patriotism,
and we just think the world of you. Thank you
for fighting the good fight. By the way, you have
the best screen or calling shows.
Speaker 1 (20:03):
I appreciate that, George, Thank you, doctor George. Thanks uh.
But look, if people want to go, if that's fun
for them, then I guess we just have very different
definitions of what's fun. I think I would rather hang
out at a barbecue joint or a restaurant with friends
and family, and I think there's better use of my
time than hanging out with these DC you know, arrogant
(20:26):
elitists that hate the president. And you know they call
it nerd prom for a reason. Marty in North Carolina,
next on the Sean Hannity Show, Marty, how are you, Sean?
Speaker 8 (20:39):
Thank you for taking my call. I saw you recently
by the way in Florida, and you were looking dapper,
and you were looking healthy. And I've been following you
all the way since you used to sit in for
Rush last century.
Speaker 1 (20:52):
Wow, thank you. Where did you see me in Florida?
If I may be so bold to ask, it was
a it was a real.
Speaker 8 (21:01):
State gathering, and you found the only liberal in the room.
Remember he was on the camera crew.
Speaker 1 (21:09):
You know, I'm actually I've got liberal you know, I
have liberal detectors that are working twenty four to seven.
They don't stop. I can usually spot them a mile away.
Speaker 3 (21:20):
It was fun.
Speaker 8 (21:21):
It was so fun, and you were funny. So that
was that was great to be with you.
Speaker 1 (21:25):
Well, it was nice to meet you. And you should
move to my free state of Florida. Although I do
like North Carolina. I love the mountains of North Carolina.
I think it's great there.
Speaker 8 (21:35):
Actually, I'm from the mountains, and I might move to
the free State of Florida if we can't get a
democratic if we can't get rid of this democratic governor
that we've got. But listen, the reason I called you
is because I got a question for you. You know,
selling real estate last century and the average prot the
average age of the first time home buyer. When I
(21:56):
first started selling real estate, it was twenty seven, twenty
eight years old. The average age for somebody to buy
their first time home now is forty forty one. What happened?
Speaker 1 (22:08):
Look, a lot of things happen. Government has you know, adopted, waste, fraud, abuse, corruption,
et cetera. You have governments on the state level, federal level.
They have been taking more and more people's harder and money.
Donald Trump now seeking to reverse that. I think, you know,
as soon as we get the Sarran situation over, I
(22:30):
think you'll see a dramatic move with the economy. I
think interest rates will come down. I think manufacturing will
go up dramatically because we have committed investments trillions of
dollars worth. I think high paying career jobs will come
online once interest rates go down. People that have been
reluctant to sell a home that they want to sell
because they don't want to give up their two three
(22:50):
four percent thirty year fixed rate mortgage, I think that'll
get fixed. And I think you'll see, you know, sale
of pre existing homes, a new home construction starts to go.
That's my hope. Yeah, I absolutely hope that that will
happen sooner than later. I think I'll never forget when
I bought my first home and it was in Roswelt, Georgia,
and I was in my early thirties and I paid it.
(23:12):
I think I don't know what did I pay for that?
Home one hundred and twelve thousand dollars. I was the
happiest guy on earth. I felt like I'd.
Speaker 8 (23:19):
Made it, I know, but you know when this first
started happening is when Pelosi started selling young people on
you can have some kind of universal income and you
can go out there and be an artist. And it's
the lack of commitment. We've got to sell home ownership.
That's been the backbone of the American family's economy for years,
(23:40):
and I don't want to see that change so anything.
Speaker 1 (23:43):
I know and I know more people that are waiting
for interest rates to go down so that they can
move up to the next level of home that they
want to get into. But they're not willing to sacrifice
a low thirty year fixed rate mortgage to get there.
So that's an important part of the equation. And I
think it will happen sooner than later. Let's get this
(24:06):
Iranian conflict behind us, and I think things will change quickly.
Speaker 8 (24:10):
I do tell Slump to do anything that promotes tax
deductions on American home ownership and for the American family we've.
Speaker 1 (24:19):
Got the average American is getting over thirty five hundred
dollars in terms of their tax refund more than they
were getting under Joe Biden. That is a significant increase.
People's take home pay has gone up significantly again because
of the one Big, Beautiful Bill and the largest tax
cut in history. So people are beginning to feel the
(24:41):
benefit of Trump's economic policies. However, I mean, stopping Iran
from ever acquiring a nuclear weapon did kind of get
in the way of all of this, and for a
short period of time until this is resolved, unfortunately, it'll
slow down progress, but then it'll pick up right now
after great but.
Speaker 8 (25:01):
I feel the ground shaking. The Golden Age is coming,
and it always begins with America real estate.
Speaker 1 (25:08):
One hundred percent, and I urge every American if you can,
once you get to the point you can afford your
own home, I urge you to get it. But most
people it is the biggest investment they have in their life.
And look, the value of property is not going to
go down on the end. Property values keep going up.
Look for property that is unique, look for property that
(25:30):
is special, Look for property that you can improve. Don't
buy the nicest house on the street, buy the one
that needs a little elbow grease, and you can invest
in yourself in your spare time. Improve the property and
you'll make more money. Appreciate it, Marty, God bless you
eight hundred ninety four one, Sean if you want to
be a part of the program. Jeff and Oregon. Jeff,
how are you glad you call?
Speaker 3 (25:52):
Hi?
Speaker 9 (25:52):
Sean? Yeah, thanks for taking my call. I'm a long
time a listener since Comb's day. Also, I'm a retired MD.
Point only is a quick one. I find it extraordinary
that Cole Thomas was able to travel across the country
on a train. Trains have rules, regulations. You can't carry guns,
you have to check them in and I think I
(26:13):
ride trains all the time and I actually have a
license to carry, but I won't carry because I'm afraid
of getting caught and getting a felony. He could have
been caught if they had security at trains like they
have at planes. And the days now are not safe
for trains. God awful things can happen without security.
Speaker 1 (26:30):
Listen. I think, probably, deep down in my heart, I
think you're one hundred percent right. I think the same
protocols we have in place for anybody to get on
an airplane should be institutionalized for trains. And buses. I
think it would make travel more safe and secure. I
don't think it's a bad idea, but I hate the
idea of being further inconvenienced.
Speaker 9 (26:50):
I hate it they being blown up on a train
also or having some If.
Speaker 1 (26:56):
I had a dollar for every time I was wanted
in my life, i'd be a very very wealthy man.
And whatever you do, don't ever travel with sweet Baby James,
and don't ever travel with Linda because they're wearing signs
on their forehead. It's tattooed in saying wand me, you know,
give me extra security, you know, sweeps. And Linda gets
(27:17):
impatient when they pull her out of the line because
it's very impatient. Sweet Baby James is a lot nicer
about it.
Speaker 9 (27:23):
I've had drunks that the police have pulled out who
are threatening, but that's the that's the worst I've ever had.
Speaker 1 (27:30):
Yeah, it's just not fun. But you know, unfortunately, I
guess you know, it's the twenty fifth anniversary year of
nine to eleven. I guess you know we can't go
back to where we were, and you can thank radical
Islamis for changing all way of life and now you know,
we don't even think about it anymore, and it's just
it's just unfortunate. It really is. I wish it wasn't
(27:52):
that way, but in this day and age, we have
to put safety first. I'm gonna wrap things up for today,
Hannity Tonight, nine Eastern on the Fox News Channel. Senator
John Kennedy, our favorite Senator Louisiana, Senator Ted Cruz, Keith Kellogg, Tonight,
Greg Jared, Tommy larn David Asman, much more. Set your DVR,
(28:16):
nine Eastern, Hannity on Fox. We'll see you then back
here tomorrow, and thank you for making this show possible
News round up in information ob load hour. Here's our
toll free telephone number at eight hundred and nine foot
one Shawn if you want to be a part of
the program. If you are not following the news today,
it turns out mister Higher Honor James Colly himself turned
himself into a federal authorities at an Alexandria, Virginia courthouse today.
(00:21):
The grand jury indictment revealed on Tuesday charges call me
with threatening to kill President Trump. That's the eighty six
forty seven shell thing. I have no idea what it meant,
none at all, whatsoever. Now James call me, maintaining his
innocence after the second indictment, here's what he had to say.
Speaker 2 (00:40):
Well, they're back, this time about a picture of seashells
on a North Carolina beach a year ago. And this
won't be the end of it. But nothing has changed
with me. I'm still innocent, I'm still not afraid, and
I still believe in the independent federal judiciary. So let's go.
But it's really important and that all of us remember
(01:02):
this is not who we are as a country. This
is not how the Department of Justice is supposed to be,
and the good news is we get closer every day
to restoring those values. Keep the faith.
Speaker 1 (01:14):
Anyway, so, now indicted presidential death threat suspect James Calemy
decided not to wait till his squad cards showed up
at his house this morning and haul him down to
police headquarters.
Speaker 3 (01:26):
No.
Speaker 1 (01:26):
I spent a couple of hours with John Solomon and
Greg Jarrett on my podcast, Hanging Out with Me Sean Hannity.
You can watch it wherever you get your video podcast,
and it's on YouTube and Spotify and Apple. You know,
I would urge you all to watch it because it
really is the culmination of years of work that we
all did together. We did it collaboratively, we worked very
(01:50):
hard at it, and we were able to get to
the bottom of it. The left wing legacy media mob
was wrong. We have been vindicated time and time again.
I look at this at the as the lower hanging
fruit when it comes to Comy, mister higher honor, and
I think, especially with my interview with Dan Bongino and
(02:10):
what they have found, I think that this Grand conspiracy
investigation is going to be the mother load that may
implicate a lot more people. Bongino told me that he
really felt that there were people in the FBI the
purposefully preserved evidence, knowing and hoping that one day when
(02:33):
he and Cash Pttel got in the FBI, that they
would find it. They did find it, and that's where
you know. Dan famously said he didn't think a Republican
survive under these circumstances. But I think that that is
the case that I'm paying the most attention to. However,
this is significant anyway. Joining us now, John Solomon. He
(02:53):
is the founder, editor in chief, chief investigative reporter justinews
dot com, Greig Jarrett, Fox News, legal analyst, and of
course number one New York Times bestselling author. John, let's
start with you. I think you agree with me. This
is the lower hanging fruit. I think, yeah, I think
the big investigation is into the Grand Conspiracy.
Speaker 4 (03:13):
Yeah, you're exactly right. This is sort of a side issue,
but one that takes on more significance when you remember
what just happens Saturday night. People are getting motivated by
these social media posts. They are getting motivated by the
hateful rhetoric. And so if an FBI director or a
former FBI director wants to suggest it's a good idea
to eighty six forty seven, get rid of forty seven,
(03:34):
and that might motivate someone. You're going to charge him
just like you charge anyone else. If a guy in
Las Vegas said, Hey, I'm going to kill the lawmaker tomorrow,
they're going to go arrest him too. So that's what
went on here. This is a minor case compared to
what's playing out in Port Pierce, Florida. They are systemically
looking at an effort to get Donald Trump violate his
civil liberties over a ten year period, using four or
(03:56):
five code name investigations, and along the way, not only
lating President Trump's simil liberties and those around them, but
very likely members of Congress whose own records were taken,
lawyers whose law firm records were taken. Us keep in
mind that they use secret measures to suck up entire
law firm files as they were looking at certain lawyers
(04:18):
in these cases. That is going to be such a big,
inconsequential place, far more consequential than what went on in
North Carolina yesterday.
Speaker 1 (04:26):
And John, if you can explain how arctic frost is
only the tip of the iceberg, that there are multiple
investigations with multiple names that they also now have discovered,
and we will learn a lot more in the days,
weeks and months ahead about these examples.
Speaker 4 (04:44):
Yeah, Basically, there's a Washprin's repeat cycle of weaponizing law enforcement,
and each time a Democrat has a problem, they then
hang a fake scandal on a Republican and the youth
of powers of the intelligence in law enforcement commute to
try to give the elude usion that this is a
serious matter. Hillary Clinton has that Russia collusion problem after
(05:04):
the Peter Schweizer book, they make the crossfiy a hurricane
investigation against Trump. We know that had no merit. Then
Joe Biden has a Ukraine corruption problem with this son
a hunter, and they hang Ukraine impeachment around him. A
little bit while after that, they find Joe Biden's classified
documents right after he got named president. They want to
(05:25):
neutralize that. They create the investigation against President Trump that
leads to the raid on mar A Lago, for which,
now that we know, the FBI believe there was no
probable cause to do that. And then as it's becoming
clear in twenty three that Joe Biden has a mental
acuity problem that he's fading away, they need to put
Donald Trump back on the defensive because he's doing well
(05:46):
on the polls. They use Arctic Cross, which basically goes
all the way back to twenty twenty and says we're
going to look at that period after the election and
charge Donald Trump with something that John Kennedy and Sam
Tilden did and never got charged, which is submit alternate
electors to a Senate as a former protest. Twice in
American history that wasn't a crime, but when it came
(06:07):
to Donald Trump, they tried to turn it into a crime.
Four consecutive Washerton's repeat cycles all along, capturing hundreds of
people into a dragnet who were clearly innocent.
Speaker 1 (06:18):
Let's get your take, Greg Jarrett. Let's start with eighty
six forty seven. According to Komi, he had no idea
what that meant. He had no idea. It just happened
to stumble upon it.
Speaker 5 (06:29):
Yeah, he said, gosh, it never occurred to me that
some folks associate those numbers with violence. I mean, that
kind of fakery is a pattern with James Cummy. He
feigns ignorance, he plays the dummy to try to weasel
out of wrongdoing, and he's proven to be a master
(06:49):
of deceit lying about leaks to the media, line of
the Pies accords, secretly weaponizing the FBI and the Russia hoax,
while denying it all with a straight faith. Were under
testimony before Congress, he claims, acute, am Nigia, I don't
remember anything. It's all a phony act.
Speaker 6 (07:09):
You know.
Speaker 5 (07:09):
Komy loves to portray himself as Saint James, that there's
nothing virtuous about Komy. I will say this. I've been
mildly amused at all the legal commentators who've been quick
to condemn the Komy indictment as frivolous or absurd. They're
overlooking several important points, and if I may, I'll just
(07:32):
run through them quickly. This case, first of all, is
in the Eastern District of North Carolina, predominantly conservative, and
in a politically charge case like this, that helps the prosecution,
it doesn't help Komy. Second of all, the federal grand
jury was persuaded that Komy wilfully intended to threaten the
life of the president. Will the trial jury from the
(07:56):
exact same district may agree, even though there's a higher
burden of proof. Third, it's important to realize that the
second count against Komy does not require a willful threat. Instead,
recklessly disregarding the risk of violence is sufficient. It's a
(08:18):
lower standard. It's easier to prove.
Speaker 4 (08:21):
For the all.
Speaker 5 (08:22):
You know, other people in that same eastern district in
North Carolina have been successfully prosecuted on the exact same charge,
which will undermine Comy's claim that g I'm a victim
of selective, vindictive prosecution. And finally, I point out, you know,
Comy is surely going to argue I have a free
(08:44):
speech right, that's my defense. Well, the Supreme Court has
made it abundantly clear that the First Amendment is not
a shield for threats against the president the seminole case
Watts versus the United States in nineteen sixty nine.
Speaker 4 (09:01):
So you know, I.
Speaker 5 (09:03):
Also suspect that prosecutors have marshalled together a lot more
incriminating evidence than we now know. The attorney acting Attorney
General said yesterday, we have witnesses, we have documents that
will help prove the government's case. Well, it's quite quite
possible they've uncovered evidence that Comy's doobious story is a
(09:29):
brazen lie. Will wait and see.
Speaker 1 (09:33):
You know, this is the low hanging fruit. John Solomon
that I often talk about, but there is being built
as confirmed by the Attorney General still Pam Bondi, confirmed
by Todd Blenz, confirmed by the FBI Director Cash Bettel,
new evidence put forward by Tulca Gabbert at D and
I that in fact, a grand conspiracy investigation is not
(09:57):
only going ongoing, but it is being built out. How
do you imagine that that will play out?
Speaker 4 (10:05):
I think the first likely charges if a grand jury
decides to do something, we'll be to charge John Brennan
in the next few weeks, once the Sendate transmits its evidence,
so that you begin to and grand jury begins to
understand there was a cover up as far late as
twenty twenty three. People were lying in twenty twenty three,
(10:25):
trying to cover up what began in twenty sixteen. That
is I think the starter gun firing for a larger
conspiracy case. All right, there's a lie. That lie is
trying to cover up the fact that the intelligence community
committed created a fake intelligence document to justify the fact
that the FBI previously tried to investigate Donald Trump wrongly
(10:48):
for Russian collusions. So that sort of becomes a what
we call the pattern case. And then from that pattern case,
you're going to start to look for people like fbidence
or CIA analysts who did think that exceeded the role
of their job, that exceeded the evidence, exceeded their training,
and say, these guys were part of it too, different
part of the conspiracy. And at some point you're going
(11:10):
to flip someone because when you look at all the
great conspiracies that have been brought against the mob or
against drug CARTELSI you usually flip an insider Sammy the
Bold in the case of the famous Gambino trials. Whoever
flips first, whoever becomes that key critical witness he can
help or she He or she can help tie it
up in a very big way. And I think that, well,
who might.
Speaker 1 (11:30):
That person be? Is it going to be like an
Andrew Weisman? Who's it going to be?
Speaker 4 (11:34):
It's a great question, right, we don't know yet. You know,
who's going to take a deal, who's funding their law fers.
You know, maybe the Left will pay a lot of
people's legal bills and try to keep people from cooperating.
So we'll see. But you know, someone like an Andrew
McKay would be a really interesting thing. Now I'm not
saying that Andrew k committed to crime yet I don't
know the evidence against him. But he's a guy that
can testify upward on a James Comey and Chris Ray
(11:56):
and Barack Obama because he had contacts with him, and
he can testify downward to the agents who didn't think
so to Pete Struck's in the lease of pages and
other So you're looking for someone that is like a
man in the middle or a woman in the middle,
that has visibility up and down. That sort of conspiracy
witness becomes really key to a good prosecution.
Speaker 1 (12:16):
Right, quick break more with John Solomon, Greg Jarrett on
the other side than your calls coming up eight hundred
and ninety four to one, Sean. If you want to
be a part of the program, I we continue now.
John Solomon, Greg Jarrett are with us. Greg Jarrett, I'll
give you an opportunity explain how you think this will
play out in terms of the broader case, the larger case,
(12:39):
the more significant case of an eleven year grand conspiracy
to destroy Donald Trump.
Speaker 5 (12:46):
Well, I think John has summarized it as he always
does with his reporting quite well. You post an important question,
who might flip and implicate others, for example, like John Brennan,
who is right is clearly the next person of you indicted.
There were people high up in the CIA and in
(13:08):
fact in other intelligence agencies that warn Brennant, you can't
use this dossier by Christopher Steele, paid for by Hillary Clinton.
There was a total smear and a complete lie. It's phony.
You can't use it to try to implicate Trump and
altering the intelligence community assessment upon the orders of President
(13:34):
of Barack Obomb he can't do it. Brennan did it anyway.
He essentially had one person compose it. And I would
think that that person who was the writer who penned
this thing would be somebody. If I were a prosecutor,
I'd be looking at the flip along with some others
(13:54):
who were in on it against John Brennan. And once
you get people to begin again to flip to save
their own butts, you know, then a snowball effect invariably happens.
And so you know, look, you've got a grand jury
investigation going on, it's very intensive. Dan and Fort Pierce, Florida.
(14:21):
You've got some new blood there that took over recently
that are motivated to make sure that justice is done,
so we're going to see some action over the course
of the next few weeks.
Speaker 1 (14:35):
By the way, if you want a longer discussion on
this very topic, both John Solomon and Greg Jarrett came
on my podcast, and you know we go over this
in great specificity, in detail for nearly two hours NonStop
conversation about it, and you will learn a lot, I
promise you. John Solomon, Greg Jarrett, thank you both. Appreciate
both of you. Anyway, we'll get to our busy phones.
(14:57):
Eight hundred and ninety four one, Shawn our number Hannah
in Utah. Next on the Sean Hannity Show.
Speaker 7 (15:03):
Hi, hey, Hey, can you hear me?
Speaker 1 (15:07):
I can hear you? Can you hear me? The worst
words in the English language?
Speaker 3 (15:11):
Go ahead, yes, I can.
Speaker 7 (15:13):
Hey. So it's in honor to speak with you. But
what I wanted to comment on is a gentleman saying
wondering why this last shooter wasn't dead, and and you
wanted to have him alive so that you could get
information from him. And I'm just kind of the opinion
(15:34):
that there's hint this flashooter and there's so many more
people that have drink drank the kool aid and they
aren't thinking for themselves anymore. And I feel like there
just needs to be a consequence, and tell there's consequences
for people doing this, like call me not knowing what
the show represented. That's that's just ridiculous. And I want
(16:00):
to know when the consequences are going to happen.
Speaker 1 (16:03):
Well, they may never happen to the extent that they should,
and I'm not gonna I'm not going to give you
false hope. Too many of these people. Oh, they're going
to be in jail for the rest of their life.
They will never see another day free. And you know,
look at John Hinckley who shot Reagan. He's free as
a bird. So it frustrates me. In terms of dead
(16:25):
or alive, I'm perfectly fine if the guy ends up dead. However,
if you have the person alive, you do have an
opportunity to discover if there might be other people that
were aiding a betting, supporting and that were part of
a grander conspiracy. And in that sense, I would like
(16:45):
to know the answer to that so you can get
information you otherwise would not be able to get from
a dead person. But with that said, if the guy
ended up dead, I would not be sitting on this
program today, you know, shedding a tear, I promise you, right.
Speaker 7 (16:59):
But I think we can pretty much guarantee that there's
unfortunately many more like him every and they're where well.
Speaker 1 (17:07):
I think there's plenty of them. And I think we're
doing a very poor job in terms of creating a
safe perimeter for the president, his cabinet and high ranking
government officials. And we're doing a poor job. We're not sweeping,
we're not securing, we're not holding areas. In this case,
the entire hotel should have been swept. It was not,
(17:27):
just like it was not swept. The area around Trump International,
just like Butler was not swept the way it should
have been swept. And at this point, how many how
many more examples do we need before we make the
changes that are necessary?
Speaker 7 (17:42):
By zero zero?
Speaker 1 (17:46):
Yeah, I appreciate the call, Janet, Thank you. Uh let
us say hi to doctor George in my free state
of Florida. Doctor George, how are you? What kind of
doctor are you?
Speaker 3 (17:57):
For longevity medicine? But in any case, mister Sean Hannity,
my wife and I hold you in such high esteem
because you're very few bona fide.
Speaker 6 (18:09):
Professional journalists who is not going to lose their professional
journalism card because you've never attended one of those White
House dinners through the years, and any journalists who did
participate in those events ought to lose their professional journalism card.
Speaker 1 (18:31):
Let me ask you a question, doctor, If you know
you have to go to an event, and there are
events all of us have to go to that we
really don't want to go to. It's not at the
top of our list of things we would choose to
do on a day off. Why would I want to
go in a room full of people most of whom
(18:52):
I don't particularly like, that don't like me. What is
the point? I don't see any point to that.
Speaker 3 (18:59):
Well, the point is that professional journalists ought to not
casually cavort with the people whom they have to ask
probing questions off. And this is the problem we saw
when the Democrats were in power, When they get together
at that White House dinner and they joke around about
(19:21):
serious issues that affect our country. Journalists should not be
doing that if they want to maintain their ethics and
still be highly respected bona fide professional journalists. And the
very fact that you had the spine and the determination
(19:42):
knowing that that would challenge the ethics of any professional journalists.
We just admire you for your fortitude, for your patriotism,
and we just think the world of you. Thank you
for fighting the good fight. By the way, you have
the best screen or calling shows.
Speaker 1 (20:03):
I appreciate that, George, Thank you, doctor George. Thanks uh.
But look, if people want to go, if that's fun
for them, then I guess we just have very different
definitions of what's fun. I think I would rather hang
out at a barbecue joint or a restaurant with friends
and family, and I think there's better use of my
time than hanging out with these DC you know, arrogant
(20:26):
elitists that hate the president. And you know they call
it nerd prom for a reason. Marty in North Carolina,
next on the Sean Hannity Show, Marty, how are you, Sean?
Speaker 8 (20:39):
Thank you for taking my call. I saw you recently
by the way in Florida, and you were looking dapper,
and you were looking healthy. And I've been following you
all the way since you used to sit in for
Rush last century.
Speaker 1 (20:52):
Wow, thank you. Where did you see me in Florida?
If I may be so bold to ask, it was
a it was a real.
Speaker 8 (21:01):
State gathering, and you found the only liberal in the room.
Remember he was on the camera crew.
Speaker 1 (21:09):
You know, I'm actually I've got liberal you know, I
have liberal detectors that are working twenty four to seven.
They don't stop. I can usually spot them a mile away.
Speaker 3 (21:20):
It was fun.
Speaker 8 (21:21):
It was so fun, and you were funny. So that
was that was great to be with you.
Speaker 1 (21:25):
Well, it was nice to meet you. And you should
move to my free state of Florida. Although I do
like North Carolina. I love the mountains of North Carolina.
I think it's great there.
Speaker 8 (21:35):
Actually, I'm from the mountains, and I might move to
the free State of Florida if we can't get a
democratic if we can't get rid of this democratic governor
that we've got. But listen, the reason I called you
is because I got a question for you. You know,
selling real estate last century and the average prot the
average age of the first time home buyer. When I
(21:56):
first started selling real estate, it was twenty seven, twenty
eight years old. The average age for somebody to buy
their first time home now is forty forty one. What happened?
Speaker 1 (22:08):
Look, a lot of things happen. Government has you know, adopted, waste, fraud, abuse, corruption,
et cetera. You have governments on the state level, federal level.
They have been taking more and more people's harder and money.
Donald Trump now seeking to reverse that. I think, you know,
as soon as we get the Sarran situation over, I
(22:30):
think you'll see a dramatic move with the economy. I
think interest rates will come down. I think manufacturing will
go up dramatically because we have committed investments trillions of
dollars worth. I think high paying career jobs will come
online once interest rates go down. People that have been
reluctant to sell a home that they want to sell
because they don't want to give up their two three
(22:50):
four percent thirty year fixed rate mortgage, I think that'll
get fixed. And I think you'll see, you know, sale
of pre existing homes, a new home construction starts to go.
That's my hope. Yeah, I absolutely hope that that will
happen sooner than later. I think I'll never forget when
I bought my first home and it was in Roswelt, Georgia,
and I was in my early thirties and I paid it.
(23:12):
I think I don't know what did I pay for that?
Home one hundred and twelve thousand dollars. I was the
happiest guy on earth. I felt like I'd.
Speaker 8 (23:19):
Made it, I know, but you know when this first
started happening is when Pelosi started selling young people on
you can have some kind of universal income and you
can go out there and be an artist. And it's
the lack of commitment. We've got to sell home ownership.
That's been the backbone of the American family's economy for years,
(23:40):
and I don't want to see that change so anything.
Speaker 1 (23:43):
I know and I know more people that are waiting
for interest rates to go down so that they can
move up to the next level of home that they
want to get into. But they're not willing to sacrifice
a low thirty year fixed rate mortgage to get there.
So that's an important part of the equation. And I
think it will happen sooner than later. Let's get this
(24:06):
Iranian conflict behind us, and I think things will change quickly.
Speaker 8 (24:10):
I do tell Slump to do anything that promotes tax
deductions on American home ownership and for the American family we've.
Speaker 1 (24:19):
Got the average American is getting over thirty five hundred
dollars in terms of their tax refund more than they
were getting under Joe Biden. That is a significant increase.
People's take home pay has gone up significantly again because
of the one Big, Beautiful Bill and the largest tax
cut in history. So people are beginning to feel the
(24:41):
benefit of Trump's economic policies. However, I mean, stopping Iran
from ever acquiring a nuclear weapon did kind of get
in the way of all of this, and for a
short period of time until this is resolved, unfortunately, it'll
slow down progress, but then it'll pick up right now
after great but.
Speaker 8 (25:01):
I feel the ground shaking. The Golden Age is coming,
and it always begins with America real estate.
Speaker 1 (25:08):
One hundred percent, and I urge every American if you can,
once you get to the point you can afford your
own home, I urge you to get it. But most
people it is the biggest investment they have in their life.
And look, the value of property is not going to
go down on the end. Property values keep going up.
Look for property that is unique, look for property that
(25:30):
is special, Look for property that you can improve. Don't
buy the nicest house on the street, buy the one
that needs a little elbow grease, and you can invest
in yourself in your spare time. Improve the property and
you'll make more money. Appreciate it, Marty, God bless you
eight hundred ninety four one, Sean if you want to
be a part of the program. Jeff and Oregon. Jeff,
how are you glad you call?
Speaker 3 (25:52):
Hi?
Speaker 9 (25:52):
Sean? Yeah, thanks for taking my call. I'm a long
time a listener since Comb's day. Also, I'm a retired MD.
Point only is a quick one. I find it extraordinary
that Cole Thomas was able to travel across the country
on a train. Trains have rules, regulations. You can't carry guns,
you have to check them in and I think I
(26:13):
ride trains all the time and I actually have a
license to carry, but I won't carry because I'm afraid
of getting caught and getting a felony. He could have
been caught if they had security at trains like they
have at planes. And the days now are not safe
for trains. God awful things can happen without security.
Speaker 1 (26:30):
Listen. I think, probably, deep down in my heart, I
think you're one hundred percent right. I think the same
protocols we have in place for anybody to get on
an airplane should be institutionalized for trains. And buses. I
think it would make travel more safe and secure. I
don't think it's a bad idea, but I hate the
idea of being further inconvenienced.
Speaker 9 (26:50):
I hate it they being blown up on a train
also or having some If.
Speaker 1 (26:56):
I had a dollar for every time I was wanted
in my life, i'd be a very very wealthy man.
And whatever you do, don't ever travel with sweet Baby James,
and don't ever travel with Linda because they're wearing signs
on their forehead. It's tattooed in saying wand me, you know,
give me extra security, you know, sweeps. And Linda gets
(27:17):
impatient when they pull her out of the line because
it's very impatient. Sweet Baby James is a lot nicer
about it.
Speaker 9 (27:23):
I've had drunks that the police have pulled out who
are threatening, but that's the that's the worst I've ever had.
Speaker 1 (27:30):
Yeah, it's just not fun. But you know, unfortunately, I
guess you know, it's the twenty fifth anniversary year of
nine to eleven. I guess you know we can't go
back to where we were, and you can thank radical
Islamis for changing all way of life and now you know,
we don't even think about it anymore, and it's just
it's just unfortunate. It really is. I wish it wasn't
(27:52):
that way, but in this day and age, we have
to put safety first. I'm gonna wrap things up for today,
Hannity Tonight, nine Eastern on the Fox News Channel. Senator
John Kennedy, our favorite Senator Louisiana, Senator Ted Cruz, Keith Kellogg, Tonight,
Greg Jared, Tommy larn David Asman, much more. Set your DVR,
(28:16):
nine Eastern, Hannity on Fox. We'll see you then back
here tomorrow, and thank you for making this show possible
The Sean Hannity Show News
Host
Sean Hannity
Popular Podcasts
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
The Breakfast Club
The World's Most Dangerous Morning Show, The Breakfast Club, With DJ Envy, Jess Hilarious, And Charlamagne Tha God!
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.