April 14, 2026 • 37 mins
Sean Hannity turns to what he calls one of the biggest political scandals in modern American history, laying out the evidence behind a possible long-running conspiracy to undermine Donald Trump. With fresh revelations tied to Tulsi Gabbard, Kash Patel, Pam Bondi, and the Ukraine impeachment storyline, Hannity and John Solomon revisit the Russia collusion saga, FISA abuse, intelligence manipulation, and whether top officials could finally face accountability. This hour mixes investigative depth with political urgency, while also touching on the Iran blockade, the future of Eric Swalwell, and Hannity’s broader case that the truth is finally catching up with the people who targeted Trump for more than a decade.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Listen
Watch
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:10):
Well, well, come in.
Speaker 2 (00:12):
Your city.
Speaker 1 (00:15):
Way saying you are conscious.
Speaker 3 (00:18):
Sound will be.
Speaker 4 (00:22):
Let tell.
Speaker 3 (00:25):
And if you want a little banging a yin, I
come along. We can't let a country black belt.
Speaker 5 (00:31):
Or extort the world, because that's what they're doing.
Speaker 3 (00:35):
They're really black belting the world. We're not going to
let that happen. That this person who clearly is unhinged
and who I think the twenty forth Amendment was written
with Donald Trump's in mind.
Speaker 4 (00:44):
A lot has been said about me today through anonymous allegations.
Speaker 3 (00:47):
I thought it was important that you see and hear
from me directly.
Speaker 2 (00:50):
I have certainly made mistakes and judgment in my past.
Speaker 5 (00:54):
Freedom is back in style. Welcome to the revolution.
Speaker 3 (01:00):
Ye away.
Speaker 2 (01:00):
I'm coming to your site.
Speaker 1 (01:05):
A way out against and sane You a conscious.
Speaker 2 (01:08):
Son, Sean Hennity show more me.
Speaker 6 (01:13):
I'm the scenes.
Speaker 5 (01:14):
Information on freaking news and more bold inspired solutions for America.
Stay right here for our final news round up and
Information Overload.
Speaker 7 (01:25):
All right news round up in Information Overload hour. Here's
our tot free number. It's eight hundred and nine to
four one, Sean. If you want to be a part
of the program, we have dropped a podcast with Greg
Jarrett and John Solomon.
Speaker 1 (01:35):
We just dropped it abound ten o'clock this.
Speaker 7 (01:37):
Morning, and we now know from the FBI Director Cash Bettel,
former ag Pambondi, that there is an investigation that is
very real going into the possibility of a grand conspiracy
against Donald Trump that has gone on for eleven years.
There is information in here that is as far as
(02:00):
I'm concerned, the evidence is overwhelming. The evidence is incontrovertible.
We have spent years on radio and TV covering these issues,
you know, starting with James Comy, and no reasonable prosecutor
would prosecute, including Hillary Clinton, you know, bleach Bit and
classified information on servers leading up to the dirty Russian
(02:24):
disinformation dossier, which was then used as the basis but
not one, but four FISA warrant applications, even though it
was not only unverified but unverifiable, you know. Then immediately
following the twenty sixteen elections, the next thing that we
know is that the rank and file, career, top level
(02:46):
intelligence community officials determined that there was no Russian interference.
There's a big meeting at the White House. Obama's there,
Biden's there, Clapper's there, Brennan's there and they have a
meeting in Barack Obama apparently didn't like the results of
that intel assessment, so they order another intelligence community assessment.
(03:09):
They came to a very different conclusion. Is this all
part of an effort to get Trump? You know, followed
by everything that would happen, especially thirty four indictments when
you have a novel legal theory that you turn into,
you know, federal crimes never should have happened. Everything else
that they did, legal non disclosure agreement. I mean, it
(03:31):
was this was a method of insanity. But one of
the other issues of weaponization was the issue of the
very very innocuous phone call that Donald Trump had with
with Zolensky that led to the first impeachment. Now we're learning,
thanks to Tulsi Gabbard and the d and I the
(03:53):
Director of National Intelligence, we are learning that a lot
of things that they knew that we didn't know from
the beginning. The so called whistleblower was a registered Democrat.
The so called whistleblower had spent years working with Joe Biden.
The so called whistleblower wasn't even on that perfect phone
(04:14):
call between Trump and Zelensky, as it was often referred to,
and now we have Cash Bettel confirming that, in fact,
he is investigating this as a conspiracy. Now, are all
of the people It's one of the questions I get
asked most often by people, you know, are all of
these people that have now spent eleven years from the
moment Donald Trump came down that escalator until he became
(04:38):
president in twenty seventeen until now, has there been pop
ranking officials within our government that have abused power, that
have weaponized the Department of Justice all in an effort
to destroy Donald J.
Speaker 1 (04:52):
Trump?
Speaker 7 (04:52):
And the answer that I come to the conclusion, I
come to the conclusion I think our next guest comes
to is absolutely positively. Yet anyway, the person that has
been breaking down all of this new information is John Solomon.
He's the founder, creator, editor in chief, chief investigative reporter
Justinnews dot com. He's on my new podcast. You can
watch the video podcast on YouTube just look for Hanging
(05:17):
Out with Me Sean Hannity and take a look at it.
I think this is the most definitive, informative, you know,
brand conspiracy breakdown of anybody in the media. Because we
have covered this story exhaustively for all of these years. Anyway,
welcome back, John Solomon.
Speaker 3 (05:33):
Ten years. It's hard to believe it's been going on
ten years with that podcast was a blast. The studio
is amazing. Hanging out with you and Greg was one
of my favorite moments in a long time. It was
such a fun time.
Speaker 7 (05:44):
Because the topic has gets so complicated, we couldn't even
have a cocktail on the set, which I do offer
most of my other guests.
Speaker 1 (05:51):
I apologize for that.
Speaker 6 (05:52):
That.
Speaker 7 (05:54):
Oh, if you would have known, it would have changed
how you feel? What have changed how you felt?
Speaker 3 (05:58):
Exactly?
Speaker 7 (05:59):
All right, I'll let you break down this latest chapter
and what Paulsey Gabbard has concluded, what John Ratcliffe has confirmed,
and what now Cash Bottello is looking into.
Speaker 3 (06:11):
Yeah, listen, it's so important. What Cashi? What Tulci just did?
Telsea Gabbard gave us documents that had been kept from
the American public, from even the Gang of Eight and
others in Congress for a long time because it showed
that the Ukraine impeachment ramp up was just like the
Russia collusion ramp up. Biased intelligence officers promote a hearsay
(06:36):
evidence that isn't corroborated, and they injected into the system
and try to take down Donald Trump. And by the way,
it starts, just a few months after Donald Trump's cleared
of Russia collusion, the same intelligence community goes back to
the same dirty tricks. It's a wash, rinse, repeat cycle.
And if this evidence had been made public, I've talked
(06:57):
a lot of people in the last couple of days,
including defense law for President Trump like Alan Dershowitz, and
impeachment managers like Mark Meadows and Devin Nunez and John Radcliffe.
All of them said, if this evidence had been surfaced
at the time the allegations were made, it would have
undercut impeachment. Impeachment might not have even occurred. Why because
(07:18):
we now know the chief accuser, the guy that goes
with a whistleblower complaint, and I put that whistleblower in
air quotes, is got a bias. He's a registered Democrat.
He had worked for Joe Biden, specifically on Ukraine prosecutor corruption,
the very issue that President Trump was asking Ukraine to
look into. He only had hearsay evidence, he had nothing
(07:42):
he knew firsthand. And most importantly, he had given a falsehood,
total falsehood to the Intelligence Committee when he forwarded his complaint.
Those are very important credibility issues that normally would be
turned over by the government to the defense as required
by but in the case of impeachment, it was kept secret.
(08:02):
They used classification to hide this, much like they used
classification to hide the lies about Carter Page and George
Papadopolis and the bogus Russia collusion, the Steel DA State
Washburn's repeat again and again. Alan Dershowitz actually said last
night that the president actually has a good case now
to go to the trial judge for impeachment. By the way,
(08:24):
that was the Chief Justice of the United States, John Roberts,
and or Congress and say you should vacate, you should
expund from the record the impeachment vote of the House
in twenty nineteen because the impeachment prosecutors, the government cheated
the president, didn't give him a fair trial, didn't let
him confront his accusers with very damning evidence about their credibility.
(08:49):
That's how big a deal this is. If this was
a criminal court, and by the way, impeachment was run
like a criminal court, they agreed to the same rules
as the federal court system. A judge would have thrown
out a conviction, thrown out the case immediately upon learning
this evidence withheld, Alan Dershowitz thinks the president's ever been
done before in American history, could possibly do that, and
(09:09):
he'd be on very solid ground based on what Tulsa
Gabbett just made public.
Speaker 1 (09:13):
I mean, I guess.
Speaker 7 (09:15):
And we go into this in the podcast, and again
I urge people, if you've not seen Hanging Out with
Me Sean Hannity, you can find it where you find
your video podcast, because we really go into a lot
of depth and we cover eleven years worth of material,
and then we tie it all together because this is
a very real investigation. Like, for example, there's been a
(09:35):
lot of chatter that John Brennan is about to be indicted.
I've heard this now going on for weeks. I assume
you probably hear the same chatter.
Speaker 3 (09:45):
Yeah, there's a reason for it. It is very rare
for a grand jury and federal prosecutors to go to
Congress and say, would you please send us a certified
transcript of an interaction with a witness. The government would
have had the on certified ones for a long time
when grand jury asked for that, and they did do that.
The Senate in the House, we're both asked us and
(10:06):
certified transcripts to the grand jury. It usually means they're
getting close to making an indictment and they want to
make it on the official record of Congress, not something
that they read the newspaper on a website. That's why
so much has been there's been that much attention on
John Brennan. We know that Jim Jordan referred him to
lying for lying and obstructing Congress in twenty three. The
intelligence community also did that Tulca Gabbard and John Ratcliffe.
(10:30):
There's a reason for it. His testimony and his own
emails are in direct conflict. What he said about using
the Steele dass and the intelligence community assessment and what
actually happened appeared to be in direct conflict. That's how
someone usually gets charged with lying to Congress or obstructing Congress,
which is the two charges that John Brennan has been
referred to. Meanwhile, there's been some new recent activity about
(10:53):
James Comey, the former FBI director. Some new evidence of
my sources tell me that have come up from the NSA,
the National Security Agency, about information and what was testified
to what was known during Russia collusion that is putting
a focal point on him, and I would be keeping
an eye on both of those guys this month. I
think there's a lot of activity and we could see decisions. Again,
(11:15):
they're presumed innocent, but I do think there's a lot
of activities that suggest charges could be forthcoming.
Speaker 7 (11:21):
All Right, quick breakball with the founder, editor in chief,
chief investigative reporter justinnews dot com, John Solomon. On the
other side, eight hundred and nine four one. Sean our
number if you want to be a part of the
program as we continue, when.
Speaker 5 (11:39):
Fake news gives you lies, Annity supplies the truth. Sean
Annity is on right now.
Speaker 7 (12:15):
All right, we continue with John Solomon. He is the founder,
editor in chief, chief investigative reporter for justinews dot com.
Let me go back to what you suggested with Professor Dershowitz,
who's a smart lawyer in so many different ways, and
he talked about going to the Supreme Court and vacating
this impeachment, which I think they'd have a very very
(12:36):
strong legal standing in a strong legal case to make happen,
especially in light of this new information released by Tulsea
Gabbard and you know, who's the director of National Intelligence.
I like the idea. Here's the problem. John Roberts is
in charge of the judges that preside over the Pfizer Court.
Speaker 1 (12:55):
Is that correct?
Speaker 3 (12:56):
Yeah? Absolutely? As the chief Justice, he is the chief
disciplinary of everyone who wears a black robe in the
federal court system.
Speaker 7 (13:02):
So here's my question. So when we discovered that people
knowingly lied to a pfisor court and provided as the
bulk of information, you know, Hillary Clinton's dirty Russian disinformation dossier,
and that they were all warned in advance that they
should not use it, starting with Bruce or himself, which
(13:25):
is ironic considering his wife Nelly were profusion gps. But
the fact that they were warned repeatedly that this was
a political document that should not be used, and they
used it anyway, how come he never held these judges accountable?
Or how come he never held the people that signed
those warrants accountable? Wouldn't that have been in his purview?
Speaker 3 (13:47):
Well, the people who signed the warrants or executive branch,
so those who would have to be held accountable by
the Justice Department. And I would make a good argument
that the Trump won Justice Department and the Biden Department
with on what should have been more serious charges in
what we now know is a very orchestrated effort to
mislead the Vice of Court. There hasn't been any substantial
(14:07):
evidence that the judges knew they were signing a false warrant,
but I do think they were rubber stamping things. They
didn't put enough diligence into it, They didn't ask enough questions.
There was a reason when the first and second pis
of warrants came in and say, hey, you told me
you thought you were going to get this done the
first one. Why do I need a second warrant? They
don't do that right, just say a rubber stamp. Go on.
(14:29):
I think that is something that's begun to change. I've
been talking to prosecutors who say the price of court
judges are much more aggressive. Are you sure we need this?
What you promised me this would happen. So we may
have changed a little bit of the culture in the
Vice ofp Court because of what we exposed and the
outrage that we've rightly been able to generate over what
(14:49):
really was a lack system that trampled many civil liberties,
particularly people like Carter Page and President Trump and George Poppadopolis.
I want to point you to something that just happened.
The DC Court of Appeals, which is one of the
most prominent DC federal appeals courts. It's the one that
oversees the nation's capital. Judges. Tonight they today they slap
(15:11):
down Judge James Bodseburg. He's been I think the poster
child for Republicans of what they think is an activist judge. Today,
the second the DC Court of Appeals agreed that Judge
Boseburg overstepped his authority, abused his discretion. Those are their words,
not mine, in trying to block and order a contempt
(15:32):
investigation of Donald Trump over some immigration issues. That is
a rear rebuke. You don't see that happen very many
And I think we're seeing now that the court system,
which usually would give the benefit of the to the
of doubt to the judges, are starting to look at
these judges saying you're looking more like those partisan intelligence
officers and those partisan FBI agents, and we're not going
(15:54):
to let you get away with that. I think today
is ruling by the second by the DC District Court
of Appeal is a big warning sign to any judge
who wants to step out and exercise their political beliefs
that they're going to get slapped down. And that's something
that could This ruling could definitely get up to the
Supreme Court and catch Justice Chief Justice John Roberts. This
(16:16):
was a very tough ruling on Judge Bursberg, saying you
had no right to do this. This was not the
work of a judge. That doesn't happen very often in
the court system.
Speaker 7 (16:25):
John Solomon, editor and chief founder and chief investigative reporter
justinnews dot com, Sir, thank you for being with us.
We appreciate you more than you know. Great work. And
by the way, if you want to see the podcast
video pod, it's on YouTube, and we go into the
whole eleven year Grand Conspiracy and is it possible now
a lot of these people will be held accountable. We
(16:47):
examine it in great, great detail with Greg Jarrett and
John Solomon. Anyway, listen, I'm a proud partner with our
friends at American for Prosperity. They have a new program
it's called One Small Step. It's a one Small Step
in initiative because this is about the future of the
greatest country God gave man the country we all love,
and there is a growing chorus out there to try
(17:09):
to rewrite America's story and telling our founding principles, you know, oh,
telling people that these principles are outdated and flawed or
something to even apologize for.
Speaker 1 (17:19):
No, they're not.
Speaker 7 (17:21):
This is the greatest constitutional republic in history. This is
a country that was built on dignity, freedom, our constitution,
opportunity for all, the rule of law, limited government, greater freedom,
civic duty, a blueprint for keeping America strong for future generations. Now,
one small step is about action, not a slogan, not
(17:43):
a hashtag. Freedom doesn't defend itself. As Reagan said, freedom
is but one generation away from extinction, and so to
preserve it, it depends on people like you stepping up. Now,
here's what you need to do. Go to a two
point fifty tool case dot com a the number two
fifty toolkit dot com, slash Hannity and sign up, and
(18:06):
then every month you're going to get a toolkit with
very clear, simple ways to take action in your community
with your lawmakers, all in defense of your freedoms and
your rights. This is about more than an anniversary America's
two hundred and fiftieth is an inflection point. We either
recommit to what has made us the greatest country on
Earth or we lose it. It's that simple, take one
(18:27):
small step, be a part of something that actually matters.
A two fifty toolkit is simple to get. Go to
a the number two fifty toolkit dot com slash Hannity
a the number two fifty toolkit dot com slash Hannity
Today paid.
Speaker 2 (18:42):
For by Americans for prosperity.
Speaker 1 (19:16):
Standing up for what's right with America. We're back on
the Sean Hannity Show.
Speaker 7 (19:23):
Hey, if you're a business owner, I want you to
pay very close attention. You probably have experienced the unbelievable
bureaucracy just to open the doors of your business and
get started, especially when it comes to insurance. What you
need to open the doors, how much you need, what
insurances you need, what's in the insurance you're actually buying,
(19:44):
and how many agents are you actually dealing with. It's
worse than the healthcare system. Well, I've got an answer
for you, and you can get back to running your
business very quickly thanks to a new super Sure insurance agency.
It's one agent for all the insurance you need to
run your business. Now, I've sat with these guys for
hours and what they showed me absolutely blew me away.
(20:06):
They have AI software. Now what they will do for
you for free is they're going to take every insurance
policy your business has and they're going to run it
through their AI software program, and you're going to get
a full report, in plain English, exactly what your insurance covers,
what it doesn't cover, what they suggest.
Speaker 1 (20:26):
You need, what you may have that you don't need.
Speaker 7 (20:29):
And if you go to supershot dot com, they will
do all of that for you, all that analysis for
you for free, with no obligation.
Speaker 1 (20:37):
It's simple.
Speaker 7 (20:38):
Just go to supershort dot com and you have nothing
to lose to get the information. Nobody's ever read the
fine print of any insurance policy. I promise you how
many people all of a sudden you want to file
a claim and you find out, oh, that's not covered.
That has happened to more people than I can count
that I know. Anyway, it's one super agency. Let's super
(21:00):
sure handle the insurance and give it to you in
a way that anyone can understand and comprehend and know
the insurance that you have that you're paying for go
to supersuore dot com. That's supersure dot com today.
Speaker 8 (21:14):
Paid for it by super Shore Insurance Agency LLC, a
license insurance agency.
Speaker 7 (21:18):
I just want to remind Linda before we go to
our busy phones here and Tracy from Texas, who you know,
is buying into Linda Terianism, which is insanity to me. Now,
Linda's take is is that you know the Lord's prayer
which says, forgive us as we forgive those that trust,
forgive us our treuspasses, as we forgive those that trespass
(21:39):
against us, very clear, but give them father, they know
not what they do. Linda is saying, well, first they
gotta they've gotta ask for forgiveness. No, they don't. You
should forgive anyway, seventy times seven. The Lord is very
clear in the Bible about it. And I found a
quote that I wish that I'd used from the beginning
because it would have put this whole issue to rest,
because I got sick and tired of talking about it
(22:01):
for the last week and a half. And this is
from Matthew. Matthew six fourteen and fifteen for if you
forgive other people when they sin, against you, Your heavenly
father will also forgive you. But if you do not
forgive others their sins, your father will not forgive you
your sins. Linda has argued that when she gets to
(22:22):
the Pearly Gates, she's going to remind God that God
created her, and that God knew what he was creating
when he made her, and that that somehow rationalizes the
fact that she did not follow the Lord's prayer with
its literal meaning, which is to forgive us as we forgive.
(22:44):
Very very clear. Now I have more scripture to back
it up. It can't be any more clear. If you
do not forgive others their sins, your Father will not
forgive you your sins, which means your hate list is
not complying with biblical with biblical text as it is written.
Speaker 1 (23:01):
I'll give you the last word. This is the last
word on this.
Speaker 8 (23:05):
Jesus said it best in Luke seventeen, chapters one through four.
To forgive someone without rebuke does not give them their
chance to repent. And it's like letting a child do
whatever they want without them ever knowing what was wrong,
and then saying, Okay, we forgive them. They're confused, so
if God never rebuked.
Speaker 1 (23:25):
Does is all of this in? Luke? No, I want
you to read the exact chapters.
Speaker 8 (23:30):
One through four.
Speaker 1 (23:32):
Read it.
Speaker 8 (23:32):
I'm not reading chapters one through four. This is not CCD.
This is me telling you that.
Speaker 7 (23:38):
I don't want perverted and distorted. You absolutely distort.
Speaker 1 (23:45):
This is the text.
Speaker 8 (23:46):
This is the text, the one line. First of all,
I'm not copying down the whole Bible. I took down
one line the whole chapters. I look for it. I said,
you know, I know I'm not crazy, and I know
that God doesn't want me walking around forgiving the swallowells
and the murderers.
Speaker 1 (24:01):
And let me ask you, this is not what God wants.
What are you quoting again, Luke?
Speaker 8 (24:07):
What Luke seventeen chapters one through four. To forgive someone
without a rebuke and thereby their chance to repent is
like allowing a child to do whatever they want without
them ever knowing what they did wrong, and then saying
I forgive you. You have to rebuke, you have to repent,
you have to come to me and then we'll talk.
(24:27):
I'm not just walking around saying I forgive you because
I don't. That's not honest.
Speaker 1 (24:31):
Let me read I don't forget.
Speaker 7 (24:32):
We'll text, call things, will call. People to stumble are
bound to come. But woe to anyone through whom they come.
It would be better for them to be thrown into
the sea with a millstone tied around their neck than
to cause one of these little ones to stumble. So
watch yourselves. If your brother or sister sins against you,
(24:53):
rebuke them, and if they repent, forgive them. Even if
they sin against you seven times in a day and
seven times come back to you saying I repent, you
must forgive them now again. I go to Matthew six
fourteen and fifteen.
Speaker 8 (25:10):
I'm so sorry. What what was that right there? What
were the words? I just want to watch.
Speaker 4 (25:14):
I heard.
Speaker 1 (25:16):
What you can't not. No, they're not mutually exclusive. No no, no.
In other words, you have to acknowledge it says.
Speaker 8 (25:24):
Rebuke and repent.
Speaker 1 (25:26):
You can't just walk around.
Speaker 8 (25:27):
Forgiven people that don't even want it.
Speaker 1 (25:30):
No, you're guilty of sin.
Speaker 8 (25:31):
I'm not forgiving you.
Speaker 1 (25:33):
Oh I need I won't pay the time. That's different,
all right? Can I can I finish the sentence? Sure?
Because what you're saying is not contradict what it says
in Matthew.
Speaker 8 (25:43):
Okay, reach me, no problem.
Speaker 1 (25:45):
I have no problem rebuking. I have not.
Speaker 8 (25:48):
I been saying, rebuking and repent for three days.
Speaker 1 (25:50):
You had a big probuke.
Speaker 7 (25:52):
No, I have a problem with you saying that you're
going to go to the pearlygue gates and you're going
to talk to God and you're going to say, well,
you made me, God, you made me, and you know
what I was like when you made me. And you know,
all of a sudden, you know I have my hate
list because these people didn't ask me to forgive them.
That would contradict Matthew six fourteen and fifteen. If you
(26:16):
believe against you, your heavenly Father will forgive you. But
if you do not forgive others their sins, your father
will not forgive your sins. Forgive us as we forgive,
very straightforward.
Speaker 8 (26:31):
Right, but my sins. When I do something wrong, as
you well know, I always say, you know what, I'm sorry.
Speaker 3 (26:38):
That was my fault.
Speaker 8 (26:39):
I'd screw that up. I didn't mean to do that. YadA, YadA, YadA.
Speaker 1 (26:41):
You know it's true. I come to you all words.
I'm sorry, barely ever have come out of this woman's
I'm very fortunate.
Speaker 8 (26:47):
I don't have to say it that much because I'm
not walking around doing the wrong thing, Thank God, I'm
trying to do the right thing pretty much all the time.
Speaker 7 (26:55):
Got in Florida. I give up this. This discussion is
now forever blocked. What's up, Scott?
Speaker 1 (27:01):
How are you?
Speaker 4 (27:03):
Hey? Sean? Thanks for letting me be part of the show.
This is so great and such a privilege. I've been
a great fan of yours for a long long time,
and this cover thank you is right up my alley,
kind of off part for what I wanted to call about,
forgiveness is all about us because we have well. When
you forgive people, you open yourself up to the blessing
(27:26):
to the Lord without carrying the weight of non forgiveness
inside of you. So forgiven people is what you do
for yourself to keep a high place with your relationship
with the Lord.
Speaker 1 (27:37):
Listen, there have been.
Speaker 7 (27:40):
The most destructive emotion that exists in mankind. In my
humble opinion, this is not biblical. Is the emotion of anger,
and your anger towards others hurts you more than it
does the other people. I have learned that the hard
way in my life. There have been times I've withheld
(28:02):
forgiveness of my life and I've had to do a
deep dive and realize that that it hurts me more
than it does them. If that makes any sense. It's
not a cliche. It is just a fact. And if
you're consumed with anger, you're hurting yourself in life. If
you're consume with impatience, you're hurting yourself in life. You
(28:24):
know what, if I talk to young people about their
dating life, for example, like I talked to my kids,
I would say that if you run into somebody that
has a horrible temper, run don't walk away, because I
think a temper is one of the worst attributes you
can have.
Speaker 1 (28:46):
Do you agree they have.
Speaker 4 (28:48):
Deep rooted anger, deep rooted unforgiveness, something that's festering inside
of them that causes it to be lashed out on
individuals that are of the innocent.
Speaker 7 (28:58):
Linda, you're listening to this very important kola. This Cala
has given you all the information you need to have
a better life.
Speaker 8 (29:06):
He has a beautiful interpretation. God bless him.
Speaker 7 (29:09):
And yeah, but you don't agree with it Scriptural, well,
she wants to claim she wants to hang on to
her anger and then she thinks she can negotiate with
God when she goes to heaven because God made her,
and God didn't say directly to forgive others as we forgive,
like ignoring the Lord's prayer.
Speaker 4 (29:27):
The best thing to do, Linda, Why don't you go
somewhere by yourself, real quiet and talk to God through
the Holy Spirit and ask him tell me what is
your real take on this matter? And I promise you
he'll let you know that you're harboring way more inside
you than you ought to, that there's a beautiful person
inside of you that wants to come out once you
(29:47):
let go of whatever garbage you're holding on to. Amen.
Speaker 1 (29:51):
Amen, Well, I talked to him last night.
Speaker 8 (29:53):
He told me to read Luke Rebuke and Repent, So
that's why I talked about it.
Speaker 1 (29:57):
There's nothing wrong with rebuking.
Speaker 7 (29:58):
It doesn't contradict what Matthew says, which is if you
don't forgive others, that you won't be forgiven.
Speaker 3 (30:04):
No.
Speaker 4 (30:04):
But review comes in when you actually see something coming
at you that is of the devil or instead of
the dark, and you say, I bind you in the
name of Jesus, I condemn you back to the place
of hell. Where you belong and you don't come near
me and my family in Jesus name, that's a clear review.
Speaker 1 (30:20):
Listen.
Speaker 7 (30:21):
I would just say I'm going to finalize this discussion
with this, and Scott, you've been a great, great caller.
Or if Linda was talking to she'd say you're what
a good caller? No, she'd probably is mad at you
right now. But I would just say, Linda, you have
made incredible strides with your faith your spirituality. It's been
pretty impressive actually, and I'm giving you all the props
(30:42):
in the world. I think there's one little added step here,
and that is and if to bring it back to
a serious point, I think the hate list that you
have in your life, which you are clinging to like
manner from heaven, no pun intended intended. I think it
would be in your best interest to give it up.
But that's got to be on your time. And I
(31:03):
think what God just offered you is a suggestion to
spend quiet time and ask the Lord if you should
hang on to a hate list. I think the answer
is going to come back. Nah, let it go. Okay,
quiet there.
Speaker 1 (31:16):
You said you.
Speaker 8 (31:17):
Wanted it to be the end, so I didn't say anything.
Speaker 1 (31:20):
I'll give you the last word, go.
Speaker 8 (31:23):
Rebuke, repent.
Speaker 1 (31:23):
I'm not consider doing that. All right, we're would you
consider doing that? How's that?
Speaker 8 (31:30):
Absolutely not? Nope, not forgiving you. You're a bad person.
You murder, you rape, you pillage.
Speaker 3 (31:36):
Nop.
Speaker 7 (31:37):
Sorry, I'm not saying you have to like him. I'm saying,
but don't hate him.
Speaker 8 (31:40):
I hate him.
Speaker 7 (31:41):
Back to our busy phones, Jay and Canada. Next Sean
Hannity Show.
Speaker 6 (31:45):
Hello, good afternoon, mister Hannity. All I can say is,
oh my god, it's awesome to talk to you, and
miss Linda. I love her accents, so.
Speaker 1 (31:57):
Keep going.
Speaker 6 (31:59):
Hey, class, recognize a class. What can I say? I
want to just talk about a little bit about this
thing with the Pope and with Trump. I need your
wisdom on this. I know they've been saying all these
wacky social stuff and those commentaries, but one thing I'm
really confused about is that for conless years now, there's
been tens of thousands of Christians all over the world persecuted, murdered.
(32:24):
Church has been burned down. Even North America we're having
churches burned down. But unless I've missed it, from the
Vatican and a number of popes, there's been radio silence.
What's going on? I don't get it.
Speaker 7 (32:36):
I don't understand why. Look, I'm not happy with the
Catholic Church's reaction even in World War Two. I mean,
there were some things that they did, they helped out
on a humanitarian level, but they were not loud enough
in rebuking the Nazis as I think, or I was
(32:57):
outspoken as I think they should have been. But the
Pope to be so outspoken against quote, this war, but
to remain silent about the forty thousand people that were
slaughtered by the Iranians or by the God knows how
many people that were slain by radical Islamic terrorism fomented
by the Iranians, or the horrors of October seventh, or
(33:21):
any of the other atrocities, or the way they treat
their human rights record, which is abysmo. That silence I
find deafening. And the fact that this pope decided to
go against the man that is defeating the number one
state sponsor of terrorism, I respectfully would argue that the
(33:42):
Pope's priorities are screwed up and wrong. I also think
that the Church needs a little introspection itself in terms
of its institutionalized corruption. They have not to my satisfaction,
which is why I'm not a Catholic anymore. I love
the Catholic Mass, went to Catholic schools twelve years, studied
the by will, study theology, studied Latin. I can tell
(34:03):
you that I'm very disappointed because the priests knew about it,
the parishes knew about it, the bishops knew about it,
the cardinals knew about it. Rome knew about it, and
they did nothing but cover it up. And they've never
come to grips fully with the magnitude of corruption within
the church. And I think to this day they're still
impacted by their failure. And I think it was institutionalized.
(34:26):
And you know that to me is a what does
the Bible say if you want to chastise somebody, you know,
take take this stuy out of your own eye first,
or whatever they call it.
Speaker 1 (34:35):
Let they say, what's that line about?
Speaker 7 (34:38):
You know, before you want to rebuke your brother, to
use Linda's words, you know, make sure you look at
yourself first. What is it a log out of your
own eye? Thank you, Uncle James. Eight hundred and nine
four one. Shawn is on number if you want to
be a part of the program. This discussion is officially over.
Linda done.
Speaker 1 (34:57):
Okay, boss, Okay, Boss.
Speaker 7 (35:00):
Listen. It's been said that moving for a lot, and
it's true. I know a lot of people. Moving is
one of the biggest stresses in life. Not a big
deal to me. I've moved so many times in my life.
It doesn't have to be. And I'm here to tell
you that after being a part of a ton of
moves of my life and also somebody that likes to
invest in real estate, finding the right real estate agents
with real Estate Options Now, it's really going to make
(35:22):
a difference for you. It's really about getting the right
person now. They can help you sell your current home
and help you find your next home, and they can
make it stress free for you. When you hire the
right lawyer, you let them do their work. When you
hire the right realtor, let them do their job now.
Whether it's a cash offer, buying your next home before
you sell your current home, or renting your current home,
(35:44):
They're going to give you options and then you can
make the best decision for you. Just go to real
Estate options Now dot com. That's real Estate options Now
dot com. When you go to that website. You are
only a few clicks away from getting your current home
handled and settled into your next movie. Let them do
the work for you. Get the stress work with the best.
(36:04):
That's real Estate Options Now dot Com.
Speaker 5 (36:12):
Man for America.
Speaker 4 (36:14):
Sean Hannity telling the truth at mainstream media likes diide.
Speaker 7 (36:20):
Sean Hannity, all right, that's gonna wrap things up at
(36:51):
Today Hannity Tonight, nine Eastern on the Fox News Channel.
In spite of reports the embargo, the blockade is holding
by the President. We'll have the latest updates. We'll check
in with General Keith Kellogg. Also, the latest out of
mister Fang Fang is his arrest imminent now with more
(37:12):
accuses coming out every hour of every day. Larry Elder,
Tommy Laryn, Alibeth Stucky, Lawrence Jones, nine Eastern, say you
DVR Hannity on Fox. We'll see you then back here tomorrow.
Thank you for making this show possible.
Well, well, come in.
Speaker 2 (00:12):
Your city.
Speaker 1 (00:15):
Way saying you are conscious.
Speaker 3 (00:18):
Sound will be.
Speaker 4 (00:22):
Let tell.
Speaker 3 (00:25):
And if you want a little banging a yin, I
come along. We can't let a country black belt.
Speaker 5 (00:31):
Or extort the world, because that's what they're doing.
Speaker 3 (00:35):
They're really black belting the world. We're not going to
let that happen. That this person who clearly is unhinged
and who I think the twenty forth Amendment was written
with Donald Trump's in mind.
Speaker 4 (00:44):
A lot has been said about me today through anonymous allegations.
Speaker 3 (00:47):
I thought it was important that you see and hear
from me directly.
Speaker 2 (00:50):
I have certainly made mistakes and judgment in my past.
Speaker 5 (00:54):
Freedom is back in style. Welcome to the revolution.
Speaker 3 (01:00):
Ye away.
Speaker 2 (01:00):
I'm coming to your site.
Speaker 1 (01:05):
A way out against and sane You a conscious.
Speaker 2 (01:08):
Son, Sean Hennity show more me.
Speaker 6 (01:13):
I'm the scenes.
Speaker 5 (01:14):
Information on freaking news and more bold inspired solutions for America.
Stay right here for our final news round up and
Information Overload.
Speaker 7 (01:25):
All right news round up in Information Overload hour. Here's
our tot free number. It's eight hundred and nine to
four one, Sean. If you want to be a part
of the program, we have dropped a podcast with Greg
Jarrett and John Solomon.
Speaker 1 (01:35):
We just dropped it abound ten o'clock this.
Speaker 7 (01:37):
Morning, and we now know from the FBI Director Cash Bettel,
former ag Pambondi, that there is an investigation that is
very real going into the possibility of a grand conspiracy
against Donald Trump that has gone on for eleven years.
There is information in here that is as far as
(02:00):
I'm concerned, the evidence is overwhelming. The evidence is incontrovertible.
We have spent years on radio and TV covering these issues,
you know, starting with James Comy, and no reasonable prosecutor
would prosecute, including Hillary Clinton, you know, bleach Bit and
classified information on servers leading up to the dirty Russian
(02:24):
disinformation dossier, which was then used as the basis but
not one, but four FISA warrant applications, even though it
was not only unverified but unverifiable, you know. Then immediately
following the twenty sixteen elections, the next thing that we
know is that the rank and file, career, top level
(02:46):
intelligence community officials determined that there was no Russian interference.
There's a big meeting at the White House. Obama's there,
Biden's there, Clapper's there, Brennan's there and they have a
meeting in Barack Obama apparently didn't like the results of
that intel assessment, so they order another intelligence community assessment.
(03:09):
They came to a very different conclusion. Is this all
part of an effort to get Trump? You know, followed
by everything that would happen, especially thirty four indictments when
you have a novel legal theory that you turn into,
you know, federal crimes never should have happened. Everything else
that they did, legal non disclosure agreement. I mean, it
(03:31):
was this was a method of insanity. But one of
the other issues of weaponization was the issue of the
very very innocuous phone call that Donald Trump had with
with Zolensky that led to the first impeachment. Now we're learning,
thanks to Tulsi Gabbard and the d and I the
(03:53):
Director of National Intelligence, we are learning that a lot
of things that they knew that we didn't know from
the beginning. The so called whistleblower was a registered Democrat.
The so called whistleblower had spent years working with Joe Biden.
The so called whistleblower wasn't even on that perfect phone
(04:14):
call between Trump and Zelensky, as it was often referred to,
and now we have Cash Bettel confirming that, in fact,
he is investigating this as a conspiracy. Now, are all
of the people It's one of the questions I get
asked most often by people, you know, are all of
these people that have now spent eleven years from the
moment Donald Trump came down that escalator until he became
(04:38):
president in twenty seventeen until now, has there been pop
ranking officials within our government that have abused power, that
have weaponized the Department of Justice all in an effort
to destroy Donald J.
Speaker 1 (04:52):
Trump?
Speaker 7 (04:52):
And the answer that I come to the conclusion, I
come to the conclusion I think our next guest comes
to is absolutely positively. Yet anyway, the person that has
been breaking down all of this new information is John Solomon.
He's the founder, creator, editor in chief, chief investigative reporter
Justinnews dot com. He's on my new podcast. You can
watch the video podcast on YouTube just look for Hanging
(05:17):
Out with Me Sean Hannity and take a look at it.
I think this is the most definitive, informative, you know,
brand conspiracy breakdown of anybody in the media. Because we
have covered this story exhaustively for all of these years. Anyway,
welcome back, John Solomon.
Speaker 3 (05:33):
Ten years. It's hard to believe it's been going on
ten years with that podcast was a blast. The studio
is amazing. Hanging out with you and Greg was one
of my favorite moments in a long time. It was
such a fun time.
Speaker 7 (05:44):
Because the topic has gets so complicated, we couldn't even
have a cocktail on the set, which I do offer
most of my other guests.
Speaker 1 (05:51):
I apologize for that.
Speaker 6 (05:52):
That.
Speaker 7 (05:54):
Oh, if you would have known, it would have changed
how you feel? What have changed how you felt?
Speaker 3 (05:58):
Exactly?
Speaker 7 (05:59):
All right, I'll let you break down this latest chapter
and what Paulsey Gabbard has concluded, what John Ratcliffe has confirmed,
and what now Cash Bottello is looking into.
Speaker 3 (06:11):
Yeah, listen, it's so important. What Cashi? What Tulci just did?
Telsea Gabbard gave us documents that had been kept from
the American public, from even the Gang of Eight and
others in Congress for a long time because it showed
that the Ukraine impeachment ramp up was just like the
Russia collusion ramp up. Biased intelligence officers promote a hearsay
(06:36):
evidence that isn't corroborated, and they injected into the system
and try to take down Donald Trump. And by the way,
it starts, just a few months after Donald Trump's cleared
of Russia collusion, the same intelligence community goes back to
the same dirty tricks. It's a wash, rinse, repeat cycle.
And if this evidence had been made public, I've talked
(06:57):
a lot of people in the last couple of days,
including defense law for President Trump like Alan Dershowitz, and
impeachment managers like Mark Meadows and Devin Nunez and John Radcliffe.
All of them said, if this evidence had been surfaced
at the time the allegations were made, it would have
undercut impeachment. Impeachment might not have even occurred. Why because
(07:18):
we now know the chief accuser, the guy that goes
with a whistleblower complaint, and I put that whistleblower in
air quotes, is got a bias. He's a registered Democrat.
He had worked for Joe Biden, specifically on Ukraine prosecutor corruption,
the very issue that President Trump was asking Ukraine to
look into. He only had hearsay evidence, he had nothing
(07:42):
he knew firsthand. And most importantly, he had given a falsehood,
total falsehood to the Intelligence Committee when he forwarded his complaint.
Those are very important credibility issues that normally would be
turned over by the government to the defense as required
by but in the case of impeachment, it was kept secret.
(08:02):
They used classification to hide this, much like they used
classification to hide the lies about Carter Page and George
Papadopolis and the bogus Russia collusion, the Steel DA State
Washburn's repeat again and again. Alan Dershowitz actually said last
night that the president actually has a good case now
to go to the trial judge for impeachment. By the way,
(08:24):
that was the Chief Justice of the United States, John Roberts,
and or Congress and say you should vacate, you should
expund from the record the impeachment vote of the House
in twenty nineteen because the impeachment prosecutors, the government cheated
the president, didn't give him a fair trial, didn't let
him confront his accusers with very damning evidence about their credibility.
(08:49):
That's how big a deal this is. If this was
a criminal court, and by the way, impeachment was run
like a criminal court, they agreed to the same rules
as the federal court system. A judge would have thrown
out a conviction, thrown out the case immediately upon learning
this evidence withheld, Alan Dershowitz thinks the president's ever been
done before in American history, could possibly do that, and
(09:09):
he'd be on very solid ground based on what Tulsa
Gabbett just made public.
Speaker 1 (09:13):
I mean, I guess.
Speaker 7 (09:15):
And we go into this in the podcast, and again
I urge people, if you've not seen Hanging Out with
Me Sean Hannity, you can find it where you find
your video podcast, because we really go into a lot
of depth and we cover eleven years worth of material,
and then we tie it all together because this is
a very real investigation. Like, for example, there's been a
(09:35):
lot of chatter that John Brennan is about to be indicted.
I've heard this now going on for weeks. I assume
you probably hear the same chatter.
Speaker 3 (09:45):
Yeah, there's a reason for it. It is very rare
for a grand jury and federal prosecutors to go to
Congress and say, would you please send us a certified
transcript of an interaction with a witness. The government would
have had the on certified ones for a long time
when grand jury asked for that, and they did do that.
The Senate in the House, we're both asked us and
(10:06):
certified transcripts to the grand jury. It usually means they're
getting close to making an indictment and they want to
make it on the official record of Congress, not something
that they read the newspaper on a website. That's why
so much has been there's been that much attention on
John Brennan. We know that Jim Jordan referred him to
lying for lying and obstructing Congress in twenty three. The
intelligence community also did that Tulca Gabbard and John Ratcliffe.
(10:30):
There's a reason for it. His testimony and his own
emails are in direct conflict. What he said about using
the Steele dass and the intelligence community assessment and what
actually happened appeared to be in direct conflict. That's how
someone usually gets charged with lying to Congress or obstructing Congress,
which is the two charges that John Brennan has been
referred to. Meanwhile, there's been some new recent activity about
(10:53):
James Comey, the former FBI director. Some new evidence of
my sources tell me that have come up from the NSA,
the National Security Agency, about information and what was testified
to what was known during Russia collusion that is putting
a focal point on him, and I would be keeping
an eye on both of those guys this month. I
think there's a lot of activity and we could see decisions. Again,
(11:15):
they're presumed innocent, but I do think there's a lot
of activities that suggest charges could be forthcoming.
Speaker 7 (11:21):
All Right, quick breakball with the founder, editor in chief,
chief investigative reporter justinnews dot com, John Solomon. On the
other side, eight hundred and nine four one. Sean our
number if you want to be a part of the
program as we continue, when.
Speaker 5 (11:39):
Fake news gives you lies, Annity supplies the truth. Sean
Annity is on right now.
Speaker 7 (12:15):
All right, we continue with John Solomon. He is the founder,
editor in chief, chief investigative reporter for justinews dot com.
Let me go back to what you suggested with Professor Dershowitz,
who's a smart lawyer in so many different ways, and
he talked about going to the Supreme Court and vacating
this impeachment, which I think they'd have a very very
(12:36):
strong legal standing in a strong legal case to make happen,
especially in light of this new information released by Tulsea
Gabbard and you know, who's the director of National Intelligence.
I like the idea. Here's the problem. John Roberts is
in charge of the judges that preside over the Pfizer Court.
Speaker 1 (12:55):
Is that correct?
Speaker 3 (12:56):
Yeah? Absolutely? As the chief Justice, he is the chief
disciplinary of everyone who wears a black robe in the
federal court system.
Speaker 7 (13:02):
So here's my question. So when we discovered that people
knowingly lied to a pfisor court and provided as the
bulk of information, you know, Hillary Clinton's dirty Russian disinformation dossier,
and that they were all warned in advance that they
should not use it, starting with Bruce or himself, which
(13:25):
is ironic considering his wife Nelly were profusion gps. But
the fact that they were warned repeatedly that this was
a political document that should not be used, and they
used it anyway, how come he never held these judges accountable?
Or how come he never held the people that signed
those warrants accountable? Wouldn't that have been in his purview?
Speaker 3 (13:47):
Well, the people who signed the warrants or executive branch,
so those who would have to be held accountable by
the Justice Department. And I would make a good argument
that the Trump won Justice Department and the Biden Department
with on what should have been more serious charges in
what we now know is a very orchestrated effort to
mislead the Vice of Court. There hasn't been any substantial
(14:07):
evidence that the judges knew they were signing a false warrant,
but I do think they were rubber stamping things. They
didn't put enough diligence into it, They didn't ask enough questions.
There was a reason when the first and second pis
of warrants came in and say, hey, you told me
you thought you were going to get this done the
first one. Why do I need a second warrant? They
don't do that right, just say a rubber stamp. Go on.
(14:29):
I think that is something that's begun to change. I've
been talking to prosecutors who say the price of court
judges are much more aggressive. Are you sure we need this?
What you promised me this would happen. So we may
have changed a little bit of the culture in the
Vice ofp Court because of what we exposed and the
outrage that we've rightly been able to generate over what
(14:49):
really was a lack system that trampled many civil liberties,
particularly people like Carter Page and President Trump and George Poppadopolis.
I want to point you to something that just happened.
The DC Court of Appeals, which is one of the
most prominent DC federal appeals courts. It's the one that
oversees the nation's capital. Judges. Tonight they today they slap
(15:11):
down Judge James Bodseburg. He's been I think the poster
child for Republicans of what they think is an activist judge. Today,
the second the DC Court of Appeals agreed that Judge
Boseburg overstepped his authority, abused his discretion. Those are their words,
not mine, in trying to block and order a contempt
(15:32):
investigation of Donald Trump over some immigration issues. That is
a rear rebuke. You don't see that happen very many
And I think we're seeing now that the court system,
which usually would give the benefit of the to the
of doubt to the judges, are starting to look at
these judges saying you're looking more like those partisan intelligence
officers and those partisan FBI agents, and we're not going
(15:54):
to let you get away with that. I think today
is ruling by the second by the DC District Court
of Appeal is a big warning sign to any judge
who wants to step out and exercise their political beliefs
that they're going to get slapped down. And that's something
that could This ruling could definitely get up to the
Supreme Court and catch Justice Chief Justice John Roberts. This
(16:16):
was a very tough ruling on Judge Bursberg, saying you
had no right to do this. This was not the
work of a judge. That doesn't happen very often in
the court system.
Speaker 7 (16:25):
John Solomon, editor and chief founder and chief investigative reporter
justinnews dot com, Sir, thank you for being with us.
We appreciate you more than you know. Great work. And
by the way, if you want to see the podcast
video pod, it's on YouTube, and we go into the
whole eleven year Grand Conspiracy and is it possible now
a lot of these people will be held accountable. We
(16:47):
examine it in great, great detail with Greg Jarrett and
John Solomon. Anyway, listen, I'm a proud partner with our
friends at American for Prosperity. They have a new program
it's called One Small Step. It's a one Small Step
in initiative because this is about the future of the
greatest country God gave man the country we all love,
and there is a growing chorus out there to try
(17:09):
to rewrite America's story and telling our founding principles, you know, oh,
telling people that these principles are outdated and flawed or
something to even apologize for.
Speaker 1 (17:19):
No, they're not.
Speaker 7 (17:21):
This is the greatest constitutional republic in history. This is
a country that was built on dignity, freedom, our constitution,
opportunity for all, the rule of law, limited government, greater freedom,
civic duty, a blueprint for keeping America strong for future generations. Now,
one small step is about action, not a slogan, not
(17:43):
a hashtag. Freedom doesn't defend itself. As Reagan said, freedom
is but one generation away from extinction, and so to
preserve it, it depends on people like you stepping up. Now,
here's what you need to do. Go to a two
point fifty tool case dot com a the number two
fifty toolkit dot com, slash Hannity and sign up, and
(18:06):
then every month you're going to get a toolkit with
very clear, simple ways to take action in your community
with your lawmakers, all in defense of your freedoms and
your rights. This is about more than an anniversary America's
two hundred and fiftieth is an inflection point. We either
recommit to what has made us the greatest country on
Earth or we lose it. It's that simple, take one
(18:27):
small step, be a part of something that actually matters.
A two fifty toolkit is simple to get. Go to
a the number two fifty toolkit dot com slash Hannity
a the number two fifty toolkit dot com slash Hannity
Today paid.
Speaker 2 (18:42):
For by Americans for prosperity.
Speaker 1 (19:16):
Standing up for what's right with America. We're back on
the Sean Hannity Show.
Speaker 7 (19:23):
Hey, if you're a business owner, I want you to
pay very close attention. You probably have experienced the unbelievable
bureaucracy just to open the doors of your business and
get started, especially when it comes to insurance. What you
need to open the doors, how much you need, what
insurances you need, what's in the insurance you're actually buying,
(19:44):
and how many agents are you actually dealing with. It's
worse than the healthcare system. Well, I've got an answer
for you, and you can get back to running your
business very quickly thanks to a new super Sure insurance agency.
It's one agent for all the insurance you need to
run your business. Now, I've sat with these guys for
hours and what they showed me absolutely blew me away.
(20:06):
They have AI software. Now what they will do for
you for free is they're going to take every insurance
policy your business has and they're going to run it
through their AI software program, and you're going to get
a full report, in plain English, exactly what your insurance covers,
what it doesn't cover, what they suggest.
Speaker 1 (20:26):
You need, what you may have that you don't need.
Speaker 7 (20:29):
And if you go to supershot dot com, they will
do all of that for you, all that analysis for
you for free, with no obligation.
Speaker 1 (20:37):
It's simple.
Speaker 7 (20:38):
Just go to supershort dot com and you have nothing
to lose to get the information. Nobody's ever read the
fine print of any insurance policy. I promise you how
many people all of a sudden you want to file
a claim and you find out, oh, that's not covered.
That has happened to more people than I can count
that I know. Anyway, it's one super agency. Let's super
(21:00):
sure handle the insurance and give it to you in
a way that anyone can understand and comprehend and know
the insurance that you have that you're paying for go
to supersuore dot com. That's supersure dot com today.
Speaker 8 (21:14):
Paid for it by super Shore Insurance Agency LLC, a
license insurance agency.
Speaker 7 (21:18):
I just want to remind Linda before we go to
our busy phones here and Tracy from Texas, who you know,
is buying into Linda Terianism, which is insanity to me. Now,
Linda's take is is that you know the Lord's prayer
which says, forgive us as we forgive those that trust,
forgive us our treuspasses, as we forgive those that trespass
(21:39):
against us, very clear, but give them father, they know
not what they do. Linda is saying, well, first they
gotta they've gotta ask for forgiveness. No, they don't. You
should forgive anyway, seventy times seven. The Lord is very
clear in the Bible about it. And I found a
quote that I wish that I'd used from the beginning
because it would have put this whole issue to rest,
because I got sick and tired of talking about it
(22:01):
for the last week and a half. And this is
from Matthew. Matthew six fourteen and fifteen for if you
forgive other people when they sin, against you, Your heavenly
father will also forgive you. But if you do not
forgive others their sins, your father will not forgive you
your sins. Linda has argued that when she gets to
(22:22):
the Pearly Gates, she's going to remind God that God
created her, and that God knew what he was creating
when he made her, and that that somehow rationalizes the
fact that she did not follow the Lord's prayer with
its literal meaning, which is to forgive us as we forgive.
(22:44):
Very very clear. Now I have more scripture to back
it up. It can't be any more clear. If you
do not forgive others their sins, your Father will not
forgive you your sins, which means your hate list is
not complying with biblical with biblical text as it is written.
Speaker 1 (23:01):
I'll give you the last word. This is the last
word on this.
Speaker 8 (23:05):
Jesus said it best in Luke seventeen, chapters one through four.
To forgive someone without rebuke does not give them their
chance to repent. And it's like letting a child do
whatever they want without them ever knowing what was wrong,
and then saying, Okay, we forgive them. They're confused, so
if God never rebuked.
Speaker 1 (23:25):
Does is all of this in? Luke? No, I want
you to read the exact chapters.
Speaker 8 (23:30):
One through four.
Speaker 1 (23:32):
Read it.
Speaker 8 (23:32):
I'm not reading chapters one through four. This is not CCD.
This is me telling you that.
Speaker 7 (23:38):
I don't want perverted and distorted. You absolutely distort.
Speaker 1 (23:45):
This is the text.
Speaker 8 (23:46):
This is the text, the one line. First of all,
I'm not copying down the whole Bible. I took down
one line the whole chapters. I look for it. I said,
you know, I know I'm not crazy, and I know
that God doesn't want me walking around forgiving the swallowells
and the murderers.
Speaker 1 (24:01):
And let me ask you, this is not what God wants.
What are you quoting again, Luke?
Speaker 8 (24:07):
What Luke seventeen chapters one through four. To forgive someone
without a rebuke and thereby their chance to repent is
like allowing a child to do whatever they want without
them ever knowing what they did wrong, and then saying
I forgive you. You have to rebuke, you have to repent,
you have to come to me and then we'll talk.
(24:27):
I'm not just walking around saying I forgive you because
I don't. That's not honest.
Speaker 1 (24:31):
Let me read I don't forget.
Speaker 7 (24:32):
We'll text, call things, will call. People to stumble are
bound to come. But woe to anyone through whom they come.
It would be better for them to be thrown into
the sea with a millstone tied around their neck than
to cause one of these little ones to stumble. So
watch yourselves. If your brother or sister sins against you,
(24:53):
rebuke them, and if they repent, forgive them. Even if
they sin against you seven times in a day and
seven times come back to you saying I repent, you
must forgive them now again. I go to Matthew six
fourteen and fifteen.
Speaker 8 (25:10):
I'm so sorry. What what was that right there? What
were the words? I just want to watch.
Speaker 4 (25:14):
I heard.
Speaker 1 (25:16):
What you can't not. No, they're not mutually exclusive. No no, no.
In other words, you have to acknowledge it says.
Speaker 8 (25:24):
Rebuke and repent.
Speaker 1 (25:26):
You can't just walk around.
Speaker 8 (25:27):
Forgiven people that don't even want it.
Speaker 1 (25:30):
No, you're guilty of sin.
Speaker 8 (25:31):
I'm not forgiving you.
Speaker 1 (25:33):
Oh I need I won't pay the time. That's different,
all right? Can I can I finish the sentence? Sure?
Because what you're saying is not contradict what it says
in Matthew.
Speaker 8 (25:43):
Okay, reach me, no problem.
Speaker 1 (25:45):
I have no problem rebuking. I have not.
Speaker 8 (25:48):
I been saying, rebuking and repent for three days.
Speaker 1 (25:50):
You had a big probuke.
Speaker 7 (25:52):
No, I have a problem with you saying that you're
going to go to the pearlygue gates and you're going
to talk to God and you're going to say, well,
you made me, God, you made me, and you know
what I was like when you made me. And you know,
all of a sudden, you know I have my hate
list because these people didn't ask me to forgive them.
That would contradict Matthew six fourteen and fifteen. If you
(26:16):
believe against you, your heavenly Father will forgive you. But
if you do not forgive others their sins, your father
will not forgive your sins. Forgive us as we forgive,
very straightforward.
Speaker 8 (26:31):
Right, but my sins. When I do something wrong, as
you well know, I always say, you know what, I'm sorry.
Speaker 3 (26:38):
That was my fault.
Speaker 8 (26:39):
I'd screw that up. I didn't mean to do that. YadA, YadA, YadA.
Speaker 1 (26:41):
You know it's true. I come to you all words.
I'm sorry, barely ever have come out of this woman's
I'm very fortunate.
Speaker 8 (26:47):
I don't have to say it that much because I'm
not walking around doing the wrong thing, Thank God, I'm
trying to do the right thing pretty much all the time.
Speaker 7 (26:55):
Got in Florida. I give up this. This discussion is
now forever blocked. What's up, Scott?
Speaker 1 (27:01):
How are you?
Speaker 4 (27:03):
Hey? Sean? Thanks for letting me be part of the show.
This is so great and such a privilege. I've been
a great fan of yours for a long long time,
and this cover thank you is right up my alley,
kind of off part for what I wanted to call about,
forgiveness is all about us because we have well. When
you forgive people, you open yourself up to the blessing
(27:26):
to the Lord without carrying the weight of non forgiveness
inside of you. So forgiven people is what you do
for yourself to keep a high place with your relationship
with the Lord.
Speaker 1 (27:37):
Listen, there have been.
Speaker 7 (27:40):
The most destructive emotion that exists in mankind. In my
humble opinion, this is not biblical. Is the emotion of anger,
and your anger towards others hurts you more than it
does the other people. I have learned that the hard
way in my life. There have been times I've withheld
(28:02):
forgiveness of my life and I've had to do a
deep dive and realize that that it hurts me more
than it does them. If that makes any sense. It's
not a cliche. It is just a fact. And if
you're consumed with anger, you're hurting yourself in life. If
you're consume with impatience, you're hurting yourself in life. You
(28:24):
know what, if I talk to young people about their
dating life, for example, like I talked to my kids,
I would say that if you run into somebody that
has a horrible temper, run don't walk away, because I
think a temper is one of the worst attributes you
can have.
Speaker 1 (28:46):
Do you agree they have.
Speaker 4 (28:48):
Deep rooted anger, deep rooted unforgiveness, something that's festering inside
of them that causes it to be lashed out on
individuals that are of the innocent.
Speaker 7 (28:58):
Linda, you're listening to this very important kola. This Cala
has given you all the information you need to have
a better life.
Speaker 8 (29:06):
He has a beautiful interpretation. God bless him.
Speaker 7 (29:09):
And yeah, but you don't agree with it Scriptural, well,
she wants to claim she wants to hang on to
her anger and then she thinks she can negotiate with
God when she goes to heaven because God made her,
and God didn't say directly to forgive others as we forgive,
like ignoring the Lord's prayer.
Speaker 4 (29:27):
The best thing to do, Linda, Why don't you go
somewhere by yourself, real quiet and talk to God through
the Holy Spirit and ask him tell me what is
your real take on this matter? And I promise you
he'll let you know that you're harboring way more inside
you than you ought to, that there's a beautiful person
inside of you that wants to come out once you
(29:47):
let go of whatever garbage you're holding on to. Amen.
Speaker 1 (29:51):
Amen, Well, I talked to him last night.
Speaker 8 (29:53):
He told me to read Luke Rebuke and Repent, So
that's why I talked about it.
Speaker 1 (29:57):
There's nothing wrong with rebuking.
Speaker 7 (29:58):
It doesn't contradict what Matthew says, which is if you
don't forgive others, that you won't be forgiven.
Speaker 3 (30:04):
No.
Speaker 4 (30:04):
But review comes in when you actually see something coming
at you that is of the devil or instead of
the dark, and you say, I bind you in the
name of Jesus, I condemn you back to the place
of hell. Where you belong and you don't come near
me and my family in Jesus name, that's a clear review.
Speaker 1 (30:20):
Listen.
Speaker 7 (30:21):
I would just say I'm going to finalize this discussion
with this, and Scott, you've been a great, great caller.
Or if Linda was talking to she'd say you're what
a good caller? No, she'd probably is mad at you
right now. But I would just say, Linda, you have
made incredible strides with your faith your spirituality. It's been
pretty impressive actually, and I'm giving you all the props
(30:42):
in the world. I think there's one little added step here,
and that is and if to bring it back to
a serious point, I think the hate list that you
have in your life, which you are clinging to like
manner from heaven, no pun intended intended. I think it
would be in your best interest to give it up.
But that's got to be on your time. And I
(31:03):
think what God just offered you is a suggestion to
spend quiet time and ask the Lord if you should
hang on to a hate list. I think the answer
is going to come back. Nah, let it go. Okay,
quiet there.
Speaker 1 (31:16):
You said you.
Speaker 8 (31:17):
Wanted it to be the end, so I didn't say anything.
Speaker 1 (31:20):
I'll give you the last word, go.
Speaker 8 (31:23):
Rebuke, repent.
Speaker 1 (31:23):
I'm not consider doing that. All right, we're would you
consider doing that? How's that?
Speaker 8 (31:30):
Absolutely not? Nope, not forgiving you. You're a bad person.
You murder, you rape, you pillage.
Speaker 3 (31:36):
Nop.
Speaker 7 (31:37):
Sorry, I'm not saying you have to like him. I'm saying,
but don't hate him.
Speaker 8 (31:40):
I hate him.
Speaker 7 (31:41):
Back to our busy phones, Jay and Canada. Next Sean
Hannity Show.
Speaker 6 (31:45):
Hello, good afternoon, mister Hannity. All I can say is,
oh my god, it's awesome to talk to you, and
miss Linda. I love her accents, so.
Speaker 1 (31:57):
Keep going.
Speaker 6 (31:59):
Hey, class, recognize a class. What can I say? I
want to just talk about a little bit about this
thing with the Pope and with Trump. I need your
wisdom on this. I know they've been saying all these
wacky social stuff and those commentaries, but one thing I'm
really confused about is that for conless years now, there's
been tens of thousands of Christians all over the world persecuted, murdered.
(32:24):
Church has been burned down. Even North America we're having
churches burned down. But unless I've missed it, from the
Vatican and a number of popes, there's been radio silence.
What's going on? I don't get it.
Speaker 7 (32:36):
I don't understand why. Look, I'm not happy with the
Catholic Church's reaction even in World War Two. I mean,
there were some things that they did, they helped out
on a humanitarian level, but they were not loud enough
in rebuking the Nazis as I think, or I was
(32:57):
outspoken as I think they should have been. But the
Pope to be so outspoken against quote, this war, but
to remain silent about the forty thousand people that were
slaughtered by the Iranians or by the God knows how
many people that were slain by radical Islamic terrorism fomented
by the Iranians, or the horrors of October seventh, or
(33:21):
any of the other atrocities, or the way they treat
their human rights record, which is abysmo. That silence I
find deafening. And the fact that this pope decided to
go against the man that is defeating the number one
state sponsor of terrorism, I respectfully would argue that the
(33:42):
Pope's priorities are screwed up and wrong. I also think
that the Church needs a little introspection itself in terms
of its institutionalized corruption. They have not to my satisfaction,
which is why I'm not a Catholic anymore. I love
the Catholic Mass, went to Catholic schools twelve years, studied
the by will, study theology, studied Latin. I can tell
(34:03):
you that I'm very disappointed because the priests knew about it,
the parishes knew about it, the bishops knew about it,
the cardinals knew about it. Rome knew about it, and
they did nothing but cover it up. And they've never
come to grips fully with the magnitude of corruption within
the church. And I think to this day they're still
impacted by their failure. And I think it was institutionalized.
(34:26):
And you know that to me is a what does
the Bible say if you want to chastise somebody, you know,
take take this stuy out of your own eye first,
or whatever they call it.
Speaker 1 (34:35):
Let they say, what's that line about?
Speaker 7 (34:38):
You know, before you want to rebuke your brother, to
use Linda's words, you know, make sure you look at
yourself first. What is it a log out of your
own eye? Thank you, Uncle James. Eight hundred and nine
four one. Shawn is on number if you want to
be a part of the program. This discussion is officially over.
Linda done.
Speaker 1 (34:57):
Okay, boss, Okay, Boss.
Speaker 7 (35:00):
Listen. It's been said that moving for a lot, and
it's true. I know a lot of people. Moving is
one of the biggest stresses in life. Not a big
deal to me. I've moved so many times in my life.
It doesn't have to be. And I'm here to tell
you that after being a part of a ton of
moves of my life and also somebody that likes to
invest in real estate, finding the right real estate agents
with real Estate Options Now, it's really going to make
(35:22):
a difference for you. It's really about getting the right
person now. They can help you sell your current home
and help you find your next home, and they can
make it stress free for you. When you hire the
right lawyer, you let them do their work. When you
hire the right realtor, let them do their job now.
Whether it's a cash offer, buying your next home before
you sell your current home, or renting your current home,
(35:44):
They're going to give you options and then you can
make the best decision for you. Just go to real
Estate options Now dot com. That's real Estate options Now
dot com. When you go to that website. You are
only a few clicks away from getting your current home
handled and settled into your next movie. Let them do
the work for you. Get the stress work with the best.
(36:04):
That's real Estate Options Now dot Com.
Speaker 5 (36:12):
Man for America.
Speaker 4 (36:14):
Sean Hannity telling the truth at mainstream media likes diide.
Speaker 7 (36:20):
Sean Hannity, all right, that's gonna wrap things up at
(36:51):
Today Hannity Tonight, nine Eastern on the Fox News Channel.
In spite of reports the embargo, the blockade is holding
by the President. We'll have the latest updates. We'll check
in with General Keith Kellogg. Also, the latest out of
mister Fang Fang is his arrest imminent now with more
(37:12):
accuses coming out every hour of every day. Larry Elder,
Tommy Laryn, Alibeth Stucky, Lawrence Jones, nine Eastern, say you
DVR Hannity on Fox. We'll see you then back here tomorrow.
Thank you for making this show possible.
The Sean Hannity Show News
Host
Sean Hannity
Popular Podcasts
Hey Jonas!
Hey Jonas! The official Jonas Brothers podcast. Hosted by Kevin, Joe, and Nick Jonas. It’s the Jonas Brothers you know... musicians, actors, and well, yes, brothers. Now, they’re sharing another side of themselves in the playful, intimate, and irreverent way only they can. Spend time with the Jonas Brothers here and stay a little bit longer for deep conversations like never before.
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com