January 15, 2026 • 28 mins
Sean digs into reports that the U.S. may pursue acquiring Greenland, citing Arctic security and deterrence of Russia and China. He speaks with Florida Congressman Randy Fine about his bill to authorize steps toward a deal and a possible path to statehood, including his meeting with the ambassadors of Denmark and Greenland. They weigh statehood concerns, draw comparisons to Alaska, and discuss Greenland's natural resources. The hour also features Sean's broader national security concerns about Europe and immigration, plus a Senate exchange where Josh Hawley presses a physician on whether men can get pregnant. Sean then takes listener calls on California politics and fairness in women's sports.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
All right, now just round up in information Overload hour.
(00:02):
Here's our toll free telephone number. It's eight hundred ninety
four one Sean if you want to be a part
of the program. Now you know, we have a whole
history of presidents and America wanting to do this deal
as it relates to Greenland for a lot of different reasons.
I can give you the whole history of it. I mean,
(00:23):
I don't want to bore people on this program, but
I mean what Donald Trump is referring to is is
not new. And you can look at historical documents and
you can see that, oh, this has been in the
works and discussed and debated, you know, many many times
throughout history, going back over one hundred years. I can
give you you know, going back to the tenth century.
(00:45):
You know, Eric the Red originally from Norway, kicked out
of Iceland because he killed a couple of slaves belonging
to a neighbor that killed the neighbor in a dual
ban from Iceland, et cetera. Then Denmark. World War One,
nineteen seventeen, the US purchased the Danish West Indies from
Denmark for twenty five million dollars renamed that the US
Virgin Islands. We were afraid the Germans would do it
(01:07):
before we did. World War II, the US ambassador to
Denmark went rogue on the Danish government after Denmark was
invaded by the Nazi, saying that he represented the king.
He signed a deal with US allowing US to have
a bunch of bases in Greenland, acting in his mind
as the King's representative. So basically we took control then
of Iceland. During the Cold War, President Truman realized the
(01:29):
geopolitical importance of Greenland, sent Secretary of State at the time,
James Burns to negotiate the purchase of Greenland with his
Danish counterpart. Back in the day and how they controlled
the access to the North Atlantic, Truman was trying to
prevent that by acquiring Greenland. The US offered one hundred
million dollars the equivalent of two billion dollars today. The
(01:51):
Danes turned it down, mainly because they were afraid of
negative Russian repercussions or revenge. So we already had a
ton of bases there. You know, keep that in mind
that you know, are really controlled by US and Greenland together,
but putting all of that aside, This is not a
new cause. Knowing Donald Trump as well as I do,
(02:15):
I have a pretty good idea what he's thinking about.
And if Donald Trump sends his mind to something, he's serious.
Speaker 2 (02:21):
You know.
Speaker 1 (02:21):
At one point he said, well, we'll offer the fifty
seven thousand people that live in Greenland one hundred thousand
dollars each and incentivize them. You know, I could see
that number doubling and maybe going higher. So I think
it would be worth it from a geopolitical sense, not
letting Russia and China acquire it considering its location. Yeah,
I think it's smart geopolitically, especially with a weekend western
(02:44):
Europe and a week in NATO. Anyway, Congressman Randy Fine
from my free state of Florida is going to join
us in a second to talk about it. But here's
the president, you know, sparring, you know, with I guess
a member of the media mob, the legacy media mob
over the azure Greenland.
Speaker 3 (03:00):
It sounds like you were saying that you would potentially
acquire Greenland by force. That would be a NATO country
to the United Are you saying would.
Speaker 4 (03:09):
You If you don't, you're saying that you're telling me
that that's what I'm going to do. You don't know
what I'm going to do, so network doesn't know it.
Speaker 1 (03:19):
I think Caroline Levitt asked about it. Discussing the potential
purchase of Greenland.
Speaker 5 (03:24):
There have also been reports that the US could potentially
buy Greenland, is one.
Speaker 4 (03:28):
Potential option on the table.
Speaker 6 (03:30):
What would such an offer look like.
Speaker 7 (03:32):
Is there anything monetarily you could provide a detailed.
Speaker 3 (03:35):
Care Well, that's something that's currently being actively discussed by
the President and his national security team. And I would
point out that the acquisition of Greenland by the United
States is not a new idea. This is something that
presidents dating back to the eighteen hundreds have said is
advantageous for America's national security. The President has been very
open and clear with all of you and with the
(03:55):
world that he've used it in the best interests of
the United States to deter Russian and Chinese aggression in
the Arctic region. And so that's why his team is
currently talking about what a potential purchase would look like.
Speaker 4 (04:08):
Now.
Speaker 1 (04:09):
Secretary of State Mark or Rubio, Denmark and Greenland seem
open to further conversations After yesterday and a House Republican
Randy Fine of Florida's pushing for Greenland to become the
country's fifty first state, as the President now publicly is
pushing for Danish territory to come under US rule. He
introduced the bill Monday of this week, aiming at authorizing
(04:33):
the President to take whatever steps would be necessary to
acquire Greenland and set it on the pathway to becoming
part of the US. He joins US Now, Congressman, how
are you.
Speaker 8 (04:43):
I'm doing great, Jean, thanks for having me on today.
Speaker 1 (04:46):
All right, let's talk about your proposal. How you interpret
what the President is saying.
Speaker 8 (04:51):
Well, I support the president. He's made the obvious point
of the strategic importance to Greenland, which you covered over
the last few minutes, and I wanted to send a
message Greenland and Denmark that many of us in Congress
support the President, that we create the legal framework for
the President to negotiate and get done what he wants
to do. And it worked, I mean, within minutes of
me filing the bill, the ambassadors of Denmark and Greenland
(05:14):
asked for a meeting in my office, which they came
and had that afternoon, and I told them I support
the President and they need to sit down and work
out a deal with them. But we cannot let Greenland
end up in the hands of the Russians or the Chinese.
Speaker 1 (05:26):
Okay, now, of most of your colleagues in agreement or
most Republicans in agreement, I don't really care about the Democrats.
I mean, if Donald Trump came up with a cure
for cancer, they'd probably oppose that too, So I'm not
expecting help from Democrats. But does the Republican Caucus support it?
Speaker 8 (05:43):
I think many do. They understand the importance of this
strategic asset. It's not just the fact that Russian assets
would have to fly over Greenland to get to the
United States. It's the trade routes and the funny games
that China and Russia will play. And what I've said
to everyone is, look how great it's turned out for
Alaska to be part of the United States. They are
(06:04):
to our northwest, Greenland is the equivalent to our northeast,
and this would be a huge win for them as well.
So I think many of my colleagues are in a
wait and see mode. But I wanted to get things
lined up to make sure folks understand that we stand
behind Donald Trump as he gets the job done well.
Speaker 1 (06:21):
I love the idea of it. I think it would
be in the best interest of the people there. Let
me ask this question. My understanding and what I have
heard is the people of Greenland now I guess they
have rights to travel to Denmark. My understanding is Denmark
has not particularly been too accommodating or kind or nice
(06:44):
or good partners with the people in Greenland.
Speaker 4 (06:46):
Is that true?
Speaker 8 (06:47):
Well, this is true. So the poverty rate in Greenland,
it's far higher than it is in Denmark, and the
suicide rate is an order of magnitude higher than it
is in Denmark. And perhaps because they're so upset, den
Mark basically gave Greenland the right to secede. If the
fifty thousand people who live in Greenland want to vote
(07:07):
to become an independent country, or worse, want to vote
to become China or Russia, they can do that. Now
in the United States, fifty thousand people's a small town,
and we can't afford to let those folks get wooed
by the Russians or the Chinese. Because Greenland as close
to Russia as it is to us, we can't afford
for them to go in that direction. And that's why
(07:29):
what the president is doing is so important. But I
would note this is great for the people of Greenland
as well. Why would they not want to be part
of the richest, most powerful, most successful country in the
history of the world. They will be winners too.
Speaker 4 (07:45):
Well, I think that, And frankly they don't. They don't.
Speaker 1 (07:48):
They don't have the human resources to even tap into
the natural resources that I understand are pretty abundant in Greenland.
And I think they could. They could be a part
partnership opportunity that the people of Denmark I think have
been foolish and not coming to deal with. And that
is you know, it's sort of like Alaskans. You know,
(08:09):
they get it. If you're a citizen of Alaska, you
don't pay state income taxes. They actually pay you a
check if you live there full time because they share
the profits and the natural resources in the state of Alaska.
I can imagine, you know, a similar arrangement being made
with the people of Greenland, and the poverty rate at
that point would be zero and their standardup living would
(08:29):
go up dramatically higher. I'm not sure why anyone really
wants to live there anyways. Look, I live like you
in Florida, and I don't particularly love the cold weather.
Speaker 8 (08:38):
No, but but look, when we acquired Alaska, they called
it Seward's folly. They thought it was a bad idea,
and it has been an incredible good not only for
America but for the people that are in Alaska as well.
As we unleash all of the resources that are Alaska,
whether it's fishing, whether it's tourism, whether it's natural resources,
Greenland will experience the exact same thing if it becomes
(09:01):
part of the United States in the same way. By
the way that the Dutch East Indies are a lot
better off as part of America than they were as
part of Denmark, this will be good for them as well.
And so this is a winner for everyone, I guess
except for Democrats, who I probably want them to become
part of Russia or China, and it's bad for the
Russians and the Chinese. But for everyone else this is
(09:23):
a good idea.
Speaker 5 (09:24):
Well.
Speaker 1 (09:24):
The only part I might disagree with you on, gently, Congressman,
is the statehood part, because I'm very weird, you know,
Leary about.
Speaker 4 (09:35):
The possibility of two US senators.
Speaker 1 (09:38):
And maybe I don't know, like, for example, I know
that Democrats want Washington, d C. To become to get
statehood in Puerto Rico because they think politically that would
give them four US Senate seats, or the odds would
be much higher that they would get for US Senate seats.
Certainly in d C. It would be a slam dunk
to Democratic senators. So I think it's a bad idea.
(09:59):
But but certainly an agreement where you know, we are
full partners with them, I think would be win win
for everybody. And here's one of the other problems that
we're facing, and that is that I do believe that
we are looking at a very week in NATO. I
think that your Western European countries have let their guard
(10:20):
down severely. I think that you're seeing a cultural shift.
Look at places, for example, like Great Britain where they're
you know, they have eighty five Sharia courts, or you know,
places we have reported on in France that are called
quote no go zones, and you know, while they have
allowed unfedered immigration, they've not fostered assimilation or insisted on assimilation.
(10:42):
And you almost have separate societies within one society. And
I don't think that's good for anybody.
Speaker 8 (10:47):
John You're absolutely right, and as for your concern about statehood,
it's absolutely justified. My bill simply requires the President to
tell us what we would have to do if we
were to make it a state. Congress would still have
to make that decision, so this bill would not automatically
make Greenland a state. It still has to go through
that process, so don't worry. But as it relates to Europe,
(11:10):
you are absolutely correct. As Europe has chosen to import
so many mainstream Muslims who have really put Europe at risk.
The UK does not really represent what it used to anymore,
and you're more likely to be arrested for criticizing the
place than you are standing up for it. So I
don't think our allies are as good as they used
(11:31):
to be, and I think that's why we have to
be worrying about protecting ourselves.
Speaker 1 (11:35):
A right quick break right back, more on whether or
not America and Greenland can get together. Congressman Randy Fine
in Florida's with us, then we'll get to your calls
on the other side. Well, I we continue now, what's
going to happen? Good conversation. Apparently yesterday Secretary of State
Marco Rubio and Denmark and Greenland, and they seem open
to further conversations on the issue of Greenland, saying bye
(11:58):
bye to Denmark and hello you, but we continue Congress.
From Randy Fine of Florida's with us, I believe in
freedom of religion, and I don't care what religion people
adhere to. What I do care about are what is
radical Islam and radical Islamist and people with radical connections.
I mean, the most preventable national security disaster came in
(12:21):
the four years of Biden, Harris and Mayorcus. I mean,
we had people from over two hundred countries coming into
this country, including from countries with known terrorities. We have
known terrorists, we know are in this country, been confirmed
that they're in this country. Some have been removed, others
they hear, but we don't know where they are. On
top of murderers and rapists, other violent criminals, cartel members,
(12:44):
gang members, I mean, they have put this country at
great risk. Many Americans have died, many Americans have been
victims of violent crime. And I just worry that there's
not much vetting at all going on in Western Europe.
And I just don't see them as the once reliable
strong ally that we used to think of them as.
(13:05):
And I don't think Vladimir putincy is in that way either.
Speaker 8 (13:08):
You're one hundred percent right. And here's the challenge. Freedom
of religion is a sacrisanct value, but we have to
require that everyone believe in it. And when we extend
freedom of religion to religions that don't believe in a
freedom of religion, that's how we get ourselves in trouble.
And that's what's going on in Europe. We're letting people
(13:29):
in under the notion of freedom of religion, but then
they say, no, no, no, we don't want to let
you have freedom of religion. We're going to make you
do things our way. We're going to take advantage of
your values to impose our values on you. And that's
what's going on in Europe. And they're sticking their head
in the ground and not realizing what's going on. And
(13:51):
that's why the complexion of Europe may be fundamentally changed forever.
And if I think why, things like making sure we
can protect ourselves are even more important.
Speaker 1 (14:00):
I love the idea do we know what the natural
resources are there? My understanding is they have a lot
of rare earths. Is that true?
Speaker 5 (14:07):
They do.
Speaker 8 (14:07):
They have a ton of raw materials, which is you
would expect a small country like Denmark and a population
of fifty thousand people, they're not going to be able
to go and get them all. So in terms of
securing it is, twenty percent of the world's fresh water
is in Greenland's.
Speaker 1 (14:22):
Crazy, I mean, and there's so much we could do
to improve embtter the lives of the people there. And
I think a real serious discussion needs to be had,
and I think there's always a deal to be had.
Speaker 4 (14:34):
I really believe that.
Speaker 1 (14:35):
Anyway, I appreciate your time, Randy Fine, representative my Free
State of Florida. Thank you, sir, appreciate your work. Eight
hundred and nine four one, Shawn is a number you
want to be a part of the program, Linda, this
is not a trick question. And this actually happened. I mean,
we've had the two cases to states West Virginia, Idaho
(14:56):
case argued before the Supreme Court about whether men should
be able to play biological men should be able to
play women's sports anyway, So they had this Senate hearing
yesterday and Josh Hawley Missouri is asking a question of
a medical doctor. A doctor's name is doctor Nisha Verma,
(15:16):
and the question is can men get pregnant? During that exchange,
would you be able to answer that question?
Speaker 5 (15:23):
Oh?
Speaker 4 (15:24):
Yes, it's a very easy answer. It's not a hard
question for you, right, not a hard question anybody. I
think you could answer it.
Speaker 2 (15:33):
I think anyone in this wonderful audience could answer it.
Speaker 1 (15:36):
All right, I might ask everybody because this doctor had
a hard time answering the question. And the question was
first posed by my Senator Ashley Moody, and then Josh
Hawley asked the doctor, do you think men can get pregnant?
Speaker 6 (15:50):
Let's play it, doctor Verma.
Speaker 2 (15:52):
I wasn't sure I understood your answer to Senator Moody
A moment ago, do you think that men can get pregnant?
Speaker 7 (15:57):
I hesitated there because I wasn't sure where the conversation
was going or what the goal was. I mean, I
do take care of patients with different identities. I take
care of many women. I take care of people with
different identities, and so that's where I paused. I think, yeah,
I wasn't sure where you were going with that.
Speaker 6 (16:14):
Well, the goal is is the truth? So can men
get pregnant? Again?
Speaker 7 (16:18):
The reason I paused there is I'm not really sure
what the goal of the question.
Speaker 6 (16:23):
Goal is to establish a biological reality.
Speaker 2 (16:25):
You just said a moment ago that science and evidence
should control, not politics.
Speaker 6 (16:30):
So let's just test that proposition. Can men get pregnant?
Speaker 7 (16:34):
I take care of people with many identities?
Speaker 6 (16:36):
But can men get pregnant?
Speaker 7 (16:38):
Many women that can get pregnant? I do take care
of people that don't identify as women.
Speaker 6 (16:43):
Can can men get pregnant? Again?
Speaker 7 (16:47):
As I'm saying, let.
Speaker 2 (16:48):
Me just remind you you testified to a moment ago
science and evidence should control, not politics.
Speaker 6 (16:54):
So should can men get pregnant? You're a doctor, say.
Speaker 7 (16:58):
Science and evidence should guide medicine.
Speaker 2 (17:00):
I do science and evidence tell us that men can
get pregnant? Biological men? Can they get pregnant?
Speaker 7 (17:05):
I also think yes, No questions like this are a
political tool.
Speaker 6 (17:09):
No, yes, No. Questions are about the truth. Doctor.
Speaker 2 (17:11):
Let's not make a mockery of this proceeding. You're a doctor,
and you follow the science and the evidence. So I
just want to know, based on the science, can men
get pregnant?
Speaker 6 (17:21):
That's a yes or no question, it really is.
Speaker 7 (17:23):
I think I think you're trying to reduce the complexity
of a lot.
Speaker 6 (17:27):
I'm not.
Speaker 2 (17:27):
I'm trying to get it's not complex. I'm trying to
get to an answer, and I'm trying to test, frankly,
your veracity as a medical professional and as a scientist.
Speaker 6 (17:37):
Can men get pregnant?
Speaker 7 (17:38):
I think you're also conflating its extraordinary.
Speaker 2 (17:42):
No, No, I'm not conflating male and female. There're two
different things. There's biological men and there's biological women. And
I want to know can men get pregnant?
Speaker 7 (17:51):
What you were talking about is biology.
Speaker 6 (17:53):
You're not going to answer my question batological males. This
isn't hard, doctor. Can men get pregnant? Yes? Or no?
Speaker 7 (18:03):
I would be more than happy to have a conversation
with you that is not coming from a place of
trying to be polarized.
Speaker 4 (18:12):
You just can't make this up, you know.
Speaker 1 (18:15):
Josh Howley put on X spoiler alert, men cannot get pregnant?
Joe and the United Socialist Utopia California.
Speaker 4 (18:24):
What's up, Joe? How are you?
Speaker 9 (18:26):
Hey?
Speaker 6 (18:26):
Hello?
Speaker 9 (18:26):
Sean you I'm doing well. You know, I'm born.
Speaker 4 (18:30):
By the way, can men get pregnant? Biological men?
Speaker 9 (18:34):
I do not believe so that would be a no.
You know, definitely a no.
Speaker 5 (18:40):
Oh.
Speaker 1 (18:40):
Science and evidence, you know, should be should control nonpolitics.
You know, I would imagine that's an easy question to answer,
but okay, go ahead, what's on your mind?
Speaker 9 (18:50):
Well, I'll tell you. I'm born, raised, still live in California,
and I just want to let the rest of the
United States know that this Gavin Newsome who wants to
run for president, it looks like he's going to the
guy number one. I can't stand a liar. He is
a liar as well as you know what he uses
(19:12):
President Trump of and everything else. But yeah, he has
done nothing to improve the life of the average citizen
in California, absolutely nothing. He's approved legislation that's done nothing
but race taxes, take away our rights to free speech.
(19:35):
And you know, he just led this redistricting here in California.
There's only nine Republicans out of the fifty two of
US representatives, and he's just done everything he can in
it passed. They're going to redistrict and reduce the Republican
(19:57):
representation here in California, which just upsets me so much.
You know, I'm from northern California and if you ever
remember hearing that Hank Williams song that's a country boy
can't Survive, and.
Speaker 1 (20:15):
He talks, Thank william country boy can survive, country boy
will survive, the.
Speaker 9 (20:20):
Country boy will survive, and he talks about country boys
from North California and South Alabama and the little towns
all around this land. Well with Gavin Newsom just did.
He reduced our representation here in California by backing in.
(20:41):
The voters approved it, which is overwhelmingly Democrat here. He
just took away Northern California's representation. I'm sure you've heard
of the state of Jefferson, which I've never believed that
was going to happen. People in Northern California are so
upset that in the state legislature, which is super majority Republican,
(21:02):
the laws are that are passed and Gavin Newsom approves them.
It there's nothing but it just raise taxes. We have
the highest taxes overall, property taxes, sales taxes, you know,
you name whatever, taxes. We have a highest electricity rate,
and everything just keeps going.
Speaker 1 (21:22):
To have the highest income taxes, you have the highest
sales taxes, you have the highest gas taxes. You don't
have fire hydrants with water in them, and you have
empty reservoirs and areas that are known to have wildfires.
Speaker 4 (21:35):
You don't practice forestry. Now.
Speaker 1 (21:39):
I always come out against the billionaire tax, but everyone's
leaving anyway. You know it's interesting. You know you talk
about Hank Junior, and you know I can. I can
plow a field all day long. I can catch catfish
from dust till dawn. We make our own whiskey, our
own smoke too, and too many things these old boys
can't do. We grow tomatoes, made wine, and a country
(22:01):
boy can survive. Country folks can survive, and country folks
will survive.
Speaker 4 (22:08):
Yes, it as will.
Speaker 9 (22:09):
I agree with you. Northern California. California is a beautiful state.
Northern California. It is is rural, very rural agriculture. Then
it goes, you know, on down into the San Joaquin Valley.
People don't realize in California, if you took the Bay Area,
which is you know, all the counties around San Francisco
(22:31):
and Los Angeles and that fell into the ocean on
an earthquake, California would be overwhelmingly Republican. It's just those
population centers that control the rest of.
Speaker 4 (22:44):
Them looks like New York City.
Speaker 1 (22:46):
I mean, densely populated New York City will forever keep
that stay blue. I'm not confident that it's it's going
to go red and anytime soon. I know people have hope.
But here's the biggest problem you face. It's the same
one New York and New Jersey faces and Illinois faces.
Is people that would be maybe open to voting Republican
(23:10):
conservative have all left. And that's why, you know, in
the end redistricting, That's why Indiana infuriated me. They should have,
you know, gone forward and done redistricting there, and I
hope other states do.
Speaker 4 (23:21):
It to counter what Newsom's trying to pull off here.
Speaker 1 (23:23):
But I'm just telling you right now, I've written California off.
Now with that said, I take Gavin very seriously. All right,
last work good.
Speaker 9 (23:34):
They're tearing down damns here in California. We need water.
We've got like forty million people in this state. And
these boondoggles that they've had, We've had two reservoirs that
have not been built. To spend billions of dollars in
planning the fast rule.
Speaker 4 (23:51):
Why do you even stay? Let me ask you this question,
why do you stay.
Speaker 9 (23:55):
I My family's here. I'd like to say, I'm born and.
Speaker 4 (23:59):
Raised all Jet Blue. You can go visit them. Are
you kids older?
Speaker 9 (24:05):
My daughter is older. We got grandsons. They are the
workers now they're working. Yeah, my mother's here. So family,
you know, relatives.
Speaker 1 (24:15):
My wife listen. I'm I'm not going to dispute a
family decision. I mean, you do what's right for your family.
Speaker 4 (24:20):
I'm I mean.
Speaker 1 (24:21):
I stayed in New York much longer than I wanted
because of my family. Thank God. My kids are down
in Florida. They love it. I couldn't pay them to leave.
I honestly couldn't. They love it down here, and I
uh and the weather's perfect and it's as beautiful as California.
And I lived in California five years, lived in Santa Barbara.
I was the poorest person that lived there at the time.
I had no money at that point in my life.
(24:42):
Oh and that's when I started my radio career. And
you know, God has blessed me beyond what I deserve.
And work hard and keep your head down and h
and that's how you live life. But I got to
roll on. Joe appreciated Dave in my Free State of Florida.
What's up, Dave? How are you doing? Mister Hannity, Let
me ask you the question, can men get pregnant? Biological men?
Speaker 5 (25:03):
In my opinion, I have a wife, I've signed five
biological children.
Speaker 1 (25:09):
But I didn't ask you that. I'm going to beat
Josh Hawley to you. Can biological men get pregnant?
Speaker 5 (25:15):
No, sir?
Speaker 4 (25:16):
Okay, spoiler alert? What's on your mind?
Speaker 5 (25:18):
Okay? You were talking about this transgender thing, and I
have a comment that I want a question I want
to ask. But if I could ask this really quick,
make this comment really quick, please. I played high school
sports at Dover, New Hampshire. And the reason I want
to tell you this because I don't think people understand
the level of these college athlete women. They are exceptional athletes.
(25:40):
And to make the point, in high school, when I
was in senior high school, I ran with Kathy Skyroll,
who is I believe, a bronze medalist in the Olympics
for the marathon. I ran. She ran with the men
in a one mile race. I ran the mile, and
I ran a five to twelve mile. That's the fastest
mile I ever ran.
Speaker 4 (25:59):
That's not the that's a pretty that's a that's a
good number. It's a pretty strong number.
Speaker 5 (26:03):
And on my third lap she lapped me.
Speaker 4 (26:06):
She was that, you gotta be kidding me. That's embarrassing.
Not really. I mean, I'm a good athlete. I don't care.
Speaker 1 (26:13):
I applauded them because somebody has to work hard to
be that good.
Speaker 5 (26:18):
She was amazing. I couldn't. I'm coming around the third lab,
getting ready to start my fourth lab and she goes
flying by me like I'm standing still now I'm one
common I want to say is what if every single
women in sports today, college sports especially, and I guarantee
they have all the men in America supporting them, every
single time a man got up on the platform or
(26:38):
the track or wherever it was they were about to
start the competition, every single woman just walk off right there.
Just never do it again in time. It's got to work,
because it'd be competing against themselves.
Speaker 1 (26:50):
Listen, I'm just telling you this is not this should
not be a complicated issue. And you know, we've always
protected women's sports. That's what title Mind's always been about.
And if if there are that many biological men that
identify as women and they want to compete Okay, then
(27:11):
let's schools create a division for trans athletes to compete
against each other, to do it that way.
Speaker 4 (27:18):
But you know what it's not.
Speaker 1 (27:20):
It's a physical issue, biological issue, plain and simple. I
don't think it's that complicated. And the person that agrees
with me the most is Caitlyn Jenner. You know Caitlyn Jenner,
you know the Caathlon winner has She is a phenomenal golfer.
Today she didn't drive the ball, she told me nearly
three hundred yards and she's older now, but she's that
(27:44):
good an athlete. And she said, if I ever competed
in any women's tournaments, you know, she probably would win
them all, but she would never do it. And I
give her a lot of credit for just being so
open and honest about it. That's gonna wrap things up
at today full complete coverage of the utter madness of
(28:04):
the left as it relates to enforcement of our immigration
laws in this country. Also a analysis on the legal
side of it. Trey Goudi and Jonathan Turley. Christian McLaughlan
will join us tonight Alexa McAdams on the ground we'll
have a Hannity shootout with Congress Memora Oconna that ought
to get interesting. Also Greg Jared, Tom Cotton, Doctor Oz nine,
(28:25):
Eastern Hannity on Fox. We'll see you then back here tomorrow.
Thank you for making this show possible.
All right, now just round up in information Overload hour.
(00:02):
Here's our toll free telephone number. It's eight hundred ninety
four one Sean if you want to be a part
of the program. Now you know, we have a whole
history of presidents and America wanting to do this deal
as it relates to Greenland for a lot of different reasons.
I can give you the whole history of it. I mean,
(00:23):
I don't want to bore people on this program, but
I mean what Donald Trump is referring to is is
not new. And you can look at historical documents and
you can see that, oh, this has been in the
works and discussed and debated, you know, many many times
throughout history, going back over one hundred years. I can
give you you know, going back to the tenth century.
(00:45):
You know, Eric the Red originally from Norway, kicked out
of Iceland because he killed a couple of slaves belonging
to a neighbor that killed the neighbor in a dual
ban from Iceland, et cetera. Then Denmark. World War One,
nineteen seventeen, the US purchased the Danish West Indies from
Denmark for twenty five million dollars renamed that the US
Virgin Islands. We were afraid the Germans would do it
(01:07):
before we did. World War II, the US ambassador to
Denmark went rogue on the Danish government after Denmark was
invaded by the Nazi, saying that he represented the king.
He signed a deal with US allowing US to have
a bunch of bases in Greenland, acting in his mind
as the King's representative. So basically we took control then
of Iceland. During the Cold War, President Truman realized the
(01:29):
geopolitical importance of Greenland, sent Secretary of State at the time,
James Burns to negotiate the purchase of Greenland with his
Danish counterpart. Back in the day and how they controlled
the access to the North Atlantic, Truman was trying to
prevent that by acquiring Greenland. The US offered one hundred
million dollars the equivalent of two billion dollars today. The
(01:51):
Danes turned it down, mainly because they were afraid of
negative Russian repercussions or revenge. So we already had a
ton of bases there. You know, keep that in mind
that you know, are really controlled by US and Greenland together,
but putting all of that aside, This is not a
new cause. Knowing Donald Trump as well as I do,
(02:15):
I have a pretty good idea what he's thinking about.
And if Donald Trump sends his mind to something, he's serious.
Speaker 2 (02:21):
You know.
Speaker 1 (02:21):
At one point he said, well, we'll offer the fifty
seven thousand people that live in Greenland one hundred thousand
dollars each and incentivize them. You know, I could see
that number doubling and maybe going higher. So I think
it would be worth it from a geopolitical sense, not
letting Russia and China acquire it considering its location. Yeah,
I think it's smart geopolitically, especially with a weekend western
(02:44):
Europe and a week in NATO. Anyway, Congressman Randy Fine
from my free state of Florida is going to join
us in a second to talk about it. But here's
the president, you know, sparring, you know, with I guess
a member of the media mob, the legacy media mob
over the azure Greenland.
Speaker 3 (03:00):
It sounds like you were saying that you would potentially
acquire Greenland by force. That would be a NATO country
to the United Are you saying would.
Speaker 4 (03:09):
You If you don't, you're saying that you're telling me
that that's what I'm going to do. You don't know
what I'm going to do, so network doesn't know it.
Speaker 1 (03:19):
I think Caroline Levitt asked about it. Discussing the potential
purchase of Greenland.
Speaker 5 (03:24):
There have also been reports that the US could potentially
buy Greenland, is one.
Speaker 4 (03:28):
Potential option on the table.
Speaker 6 (03:30):
What would such an offer look like.
Speaker 7 (03:32):
Is there anything monetarily you could provide a detailed.
Speaker 3 (03:35):
Care Well, that's something that's currently being actively discussed by
the President and his national security team. And I would
point out that the acquisition of Greenland by the United
States is not a new idea. This is something that
presidents dating back to the eighteen hundreds have said is
advantageous for America's national security. The President has been very
open and clear with all of you and with the
(03:55):
world that he've used it in the best interests of
the United States to deter Russian and Chinese aggression in
the Arctic region. And so that's why his team is
currently talking about what a potential purchase would look like.
Speaker 4 (04:08):
Now.
Speaker 1 (04:09):
Secretary of State Mark or Rubio, Denmark and Greenland seem
open to further conversations After yesterday and a House Republican
Randy Fine of Florida's pushing for Greenland to become the
country's fifty first state, as the President now publicly is
pushing for Danish territory to come under US rule. He
introduced the bill Monday of this week, aiming at authorizing
(04:33):
the President to take whatever steps would be necessary to
acquire Greenland and set it on the pathway to becoming
part of the US. He joins US Now, Congressman, how
are you.
Speaker 8 (04:43):
I'm doing great, Jean, thanks for having me on today.
Speaker 1 (04:46):
All right, let's talk about your proposal. How you interpret
what the President is saying.
Speaker 8 (04:51):
Well, I support the president. He's made the obvious point
of the strategic importance to Greenland, which you covered over
the last few minutes, and I wanted to send a
message Greenland and Denmark that many of us in Congress
support the President, that we create the legal framework for
the President to negotiate and get done what he wants
to do. And it worked, I mean, within minutes of
me filing the bill, the ambassadors of Denmark and Greenland
(05:14):
asked for a meeting in my office, which they came
and had that afternoon, and I told them I support
the President and they need to sit down and work
out a deal with them. But we cannot let Greenland
end up in the hands of the Russians or the Chinese.
Speaker 1 (05:26):
Okay, now, of most of your colleagues in agreement or
most Republicans in agreement, I don't really care about the Democrats.
I mean, if Donald Trump came up with a cure
for cancer, they'd probably oppose that too, So I'm not
expecting help from Democrats. But does the Republican Caucus support it?
Speaker 8 (05:43):
I think many do. They understand the importance of this
strategic asset. It's not just the fact that Russian assets
would have to fly over Greenland to get to the
United States. It's the trade routes and the funny games
that China and Russia will play. And what I've said
to everyone is, look how great it's turned out for
Alaska to be part of the United States. They are
(06:04):
to our northwest, Greenland is the equivalent to our northeast,
and this would be a huge win for them as well.
So I think many of my colleagues are in a
wait and see mode. But I wanted to get things
lined up to make sure folks understand that we stand
behind Donald Trump as he gets the job done well.
Speaker 1 (06:21):
I love the idea of it. I think it would
be in the best interest of the people there. Let
me ask this question. My understanding and what I have
heard is the people of Greenland now I guess they
have rights to travel to Denmark. My understanding is Denmark
has not particularly been too accommodating or kind or nice
(06:44):
or good partners with the people in Greenland.
Speaker 4 (06:46):
Is that true?
Speaker 8 (06:47):
Well, this is true. So the poverty rate in Greenland,
it's far higher than it is in Denmark, and the
suicide rate is an order of magnitude higher than it
is in Denmark. And perhaps because they're so upset, den
Mark basically gave Greenland the right to secede. If the
fifty thousand people who live in Greenland want to vote
(07:07):
to become an independent country, or worse, want to vote
to become China or Russia, they can do that. Now
in the United States, fifty thousand people's a small town,
and we can't afford to let those folks get wooed
by the Russians or the Chinese. Because Greenland as close
to Russia as it is to us, we can't afford
for them to go in that direction. And that's why
(07:29):
what the president is doing is so important. But I
would note this is great for the people of Greenland
as well. Why would they not want to be part
of the richest, most powerful, most successful country in the
history of the world. They will be winners too.
Speaker 4 (07:45):
Well, I think that, And frankly they don't. They don't.
Speaker 1 (07:48):
They don't have the human resources to even tap into
the natural resources that I understand are pretty abundant in Greenland.
And I think they could. They could be a part
partnership opportunity that the people of Denmark I think have
been foolish and not coming to deal with. And that
is you know, it's sort of like Alaskans. You know,
(08:09):
they get it. If you're a citizen of Alaska, you
don't pay state income taxes. They actually pay you a
check if you live there full time because they share
the profits and the natural resources in the state of Alaska.
I can imagine, you know, a similar arrangement being made
with the people of Greenland, and the poverty rate at
that point would be zero and their standardup living would
(08:29):
go up dramatically higher. I'm not sure why anyone really
wants to live there anyways. Look, I live like you
in Florida, and I don't particularly love the cold weather.
Speaker 8 (08:38):
No, but but look, when we acquired Alaska, they called
it Seward's folly. They thought it was a bad idea,
and it has been an incredible good not only for
America but for the people that are in Alaska as well.
As we unleash all of the resources that are Alaska,
whether it's fishing, whether it's tourism, whether it's natural resources,
Greenland will experience the exact same thing if it becomes
(09:01):
part of the United States in the same way. By
the way that the Dutch East Indies are a lot
better off as part of America than they were as
part of Denmark, this will be good for them as well.
And so this is a winner for everyone, I guess
except for Democrats, who I probably want them to become
part of Russia or China, and it's bad for the
Russians and the Chinese. But for everyone else this is
(09:23):
a good idea.
Speaker 5 (09:24):
Well.
Speaker 1 (09:24):
The only part I might disagree with you on, gently, Congressman,
is the statehood part, because I'm very weird, you know,
Leary about.
Speaker 4 (09:35):
The possibility of two US senators.
Speaker 1 (09:38):
And maybe I don't know, like, for example, I know
that Democrats want Washington, d C. To become to get
statehood in Puerto Rico because they think politically that would
give them four US Senate seats, or the odds would
be much higher that they would get for US Senate seats.
Certainly in d C. It would be a slam dunk
to Democratic senators. So I think it's a bad idea.
(09:59):
But but certainly an agreement where you know, we are
full partners with them, I think would be win win
for everybody. And here's one of the other problems that
we're facing, and that is that I do believe that
we are looking at a very week in NATO. I
think that your Western European countries have let their guard
(10:20):
down severely. I think that you're seeing a cultural shift.
Look at places, for example, like Great Britain where they're
you know, they have eighty five Sharia courts, or you know,
places we have reported on in France that are called
quote no go zones, and you know, while they have
allowed unfedered immigration, they've not fostered assimilation or insisted on assimilation.
(10:42):
And you almost have separate societies within one society. And
I don't think that's good for anybody.
Speaker 8 (10:47):
John You're absolutely right, and as for your concern about statehood,
it's absolutely justified. My bill simply requires the President to
tell us what we would have to do if we
were to make it a state. Congress would still have
to make that decision, so this bill would not automatically
make Greenland a state. It still has to go through
that process, so don't worry. But as it relates to Europe,
(11:10):
you are absolutely correct. As Europe has chosen to import
so many mainstream Muslims who have really put Europe at risk.
The UK does not really represent what it used to anymore,
and you're more likely to be arrested for criticizing the
place than you are standing up for it. So I
don't think our allies are as good as they used
(11:31):
to be, and I think that's why we have to
be worrying about protecting ourselves.
Speaker 1 (11:35):
A right quick break right back, more on whether or
not America and Greenland can get together. Congressman Randy Fine
in Florida's with us, then we'll get to your calls
on the other side. Well, I we continue now, what's
going to happen? Good conversation. Apparently yesterday Secretary of State
Marco Rubio and Denmark and Greenland, and they seem open
to further conversations on the issue of Greenland, saying bye
(11:58):
bye to Denmark and hello you, but we continue Congress.
From Randy Fine of Florida's with us, I believe in
freedom of religion, and I don't care what religion people
adhere to. What I do care about are what is
radical Islam and radical Islamist and people with radical connections.
I mean, the most preventable national security disaster came in
(12:21):
the four years of Biden, Harris and Mayorcus. I mean,
we had people from over two hundred countries coming into
this country, including from countries with known terrorities. We have
known terrorists, we know are in this country, been confirmed
that they're in this country. Some have been removed, others
they hear, but we don't know where they are. On
top of murderers and rapists, other violent criminals, cartel members,
(12:44):
gang members, I mean, they have put this country at
great risk. Many Americans have died, many Americans have been
victims of violent crime. And I just worry that there's
not much vetting at all going on in Western Europe.
And I just don't see them as the once reliable
strong ally that we used to think of them as.
(13:05):
And I don't think Vladimir putincy is in that way either.
Speaker 8 (13:08):
You're one hundred percent right. And here's the challenge. Freedom
of religion is a sacrisanct value, but we have to
require that everyone believe in it. And when we extend
freedom of religion to religions that don't believe in a
freedom of religion, that's how we get ourselves in trouble.
And that's what's going on in Europe. We're letting people
(13:29):
in under the notion of freedom of religion, but then
they say, no, no, no, we don't want to let
you have freedom of religion. We're going to make you
do things our way. We're going to take advantage of
your values to impose our values on you. And that's
what's going on in Europe. And they're sticking their head
in the ground and not realizing what's going on. And
(13:51):
that's why the complexion of Europe may be fundamentally changed forever.
And if I think why, things like making sure we
can protect ourselves are even more important.
Speaker 1 (14:00):
I love the idea do we know what the natural
resources are there? My understanding is they have a lot
of rare earths. Is that true?
Speaker 5 (14:07):
They do.
Speaker 8 (14:07):
They have a ton of raw materials, which is you
would expect a small country like Denmark and a population
of fifty thousand people, they're not going to be able
to go and get them all. So in terms of
securing it is, twenty percent of the world's fresh water
is in Greenland's.
Speaker 1 (14:22):
Crazy, I mean, and there's so much we could do
to improve embtter the lives of the people there. And
I think a real serious discussion needs to be had,
and I think there's always a deal to be had.
Speaker 4 (14:34):
I really believe that.
Speaker 1 (14:35):
Anyway, I appreciate your time, Randy Fine, representative my Free
State of Florida. Thank you, sir, appreciate your work. Eight
hundred and nine four one, Shawn is a number you
want to be a part of the program, Linda, this
is not a trick question. And this actually happened. I mean,
we've had the two cases to states West Virginia, Idaho
(14:56):
case argued before the Supreme Court about whether men should
be able to play biological men should be able to
play women's sports anyway, So they had this Senate hearing
yesterday and Josh Hawley Missouri is asking a question of
a medical doctor. A doctor's name is doctor Nisha Verma,
(15:16):
and the question is can men get pregnant? During that exchange,
would you be able to answer that question?
Speaker 5 (15:23):
Oh?
Speaker 4 (15:24):
Yes, it's a very easy answer. It's not a hard
question for you, right, not a hard question anybody. I
think you could answer it.
Speaker 2 (15:33):
I think anyone in this wonderful audience could answer it.
Speaker 1 (15:36):
All right, I might ask everybody because this doctor had
a hard time answering the question. And the question was
first posed by my Senator Ashley Moody, and then Josh
Hawley asked the doctor, do you think men can get pregnant?
Speaker 6 (15:50):
Let's play it, doctor Verma.
Speaker 2 (15:52):
I wasn't sure I understood your answer to Senator Moody
A moment ago, do you think that men can get pregnant?
Speaker 7 (15:57):
I hesitated there because I wasn't sure where the conversation
was going or what the goal was. I mean, I
do take care of patients with different identities. I take
care of many women. I take care of people with
different identities, and so that's where I paused. I think, yeah,
I wasn't sure where you were going with that.
Speaker 6 (16:14):
Well, the goal is is the truth? So can men
get pregnant? Again?
Speaker 7 (16:18):
The reason I paused there is I'm not really sure
what the goal of the question.
Speaker 6 (16:23):
Goal is to establish a biological reality.
Speaker 2 (16:25):
You just said a moment ago that science and evidence
should control, not politics.
Speaker 6 (16:30):
So let's just test that proposition. Can men get pregnant?
Speaker 7 (16:34):
I take care of people with many identities?
Speaker 6 (16:36):
But can men get pregnant?
Speaker 7 (16:38):
Many women that can get pregnant? I do take care
of people that don't identify as women.
Speaker 6 (16:43):
Can can men get pregnant? Again?
Speaker 7 (16:47):
As I'm saying, let.
Speaker 2 (16:48):
Me just remind you you testified to a moment ago
science and evidence should control, not politics.
Speaker 6 (16:54):
So should can men get pregnant? You're a doctor, say.
Speaker 7 (16:58):
Science and evidence should guide medicine.
Speaker 2 (17:00):
I do science and evidence tell us that men can
get pregnant? Biological men? Can they get pregnant?
Speaker 7 (17:05):
I also think yes, No questions like this are a
political tool.
Speaker 6 (17:09):
No, yes, No. Questions are about the truth. Doctor.
Speaker 2 (17:11):
Let's not make a mockery of this proceeding. You're a doctor,
and you follow the science and the evidence. So I
just want to know, based on the science, can men
get pregnant?
Speaker 6 (17:21):
That's a yes or no question, it really is.
Speaker 7 (17:23):
I think I think you're trying to reduce the complexity
of a lot.
Speaker 6 (17:27):
I'm not.
Speaker 2 (17:27):
I'm trying to get it's not complex. I'm trying to
get to an answer, and I'm trying to test, frankly,
your veracity as a medical professional and as a scientist.
Speaker 6 (17:37):
Can men get pregnant?
Speaker 7 (17:38):
I think you're also conflating its extraordinary.
Speaker 2 (17:42):
No, No, I'm not conflating male and female. There're two
different things. There's biological men and there's biological women. And
I want to know can men get pregnant?
Speaker 7 (17:51):
What you were talking about is biology.
Speaker 6 (17:53):
You're not going to answer my question batological males. This
isn't hard, doctor. Can men get pregnant? Yes? Or no?
Speaker 7 (18:03):
I would be more than happy to have a conversation
with you that is not coming from a place of
trying to be polarized.
Speaker 4 (18:12):
You just can't make this up, you know.
Speaker 1 (18:15):
Josh Howley put on X spoiler alert, men cannot get pregnant?
Joe and the United Socialist Utopia California.
Speaker 4 (18:24):
What's up, Joe? How are you?
Speaker 9 (18:26):
Hey?
Speaker 6 (18:26):
Hello?
Speaker 9 (18:26):
Sean you I'm doing well. You know, I'm born.
Speaker 4 (18:30):
By the way, can men get pregnant? Biological men?
Speaker 9 (18:34):
I do not believe so that would be a no.
You know, definitely a no.
Speaker 5 (18:40):
Oh.
Speaker 1 (18:40):
Science and evidence, you know, should be should control nonpolitics.
You know, I would imagine that's an easy question to answer,
but okay, go ahead, what's on your mind?
Speaker 9 (18:50):
Well, I'll tell you. I'm born, raised, still live in California,
and I just want to let the rest of the
United States know that this Gavin Newsome who wants to
run for president, it looks like he's going to the
guy number one. I can't stand a liar. He is
a liar as well as you know what he uses
(19:12):
President Trump of and everything else. But yeah, he has
done nothing to improve the life of the average citizen
in California, absolutely nothing. He's approved legislation that's done nothing
but race taxes, take away our rights to free speech.
(19:35):
And you know, he just led this redistricting here in California.
There's only nine Republicans out of the fifty two of
US representatives, and he's just done everything he can in
it passed. They're going to redistrict and reduce the Republican
(19:57):
representation here in California, which just upsets me so much.
You know, I'm from northern California and if you ever
remember hearing that Hank Williams song that's a country boy
can't Survive, and.
Speaker 1 (20:15):
He talks, Thank william country boy can survive, country boy
will survive, the.
Speaker 9 (20:20):
Country boy will survive, and he talks about country boys
from North California and South Alabama and the little towns
all around this land. Well with Gavin Newsom just did.
He reduced our representation here in California by backing in.
(20:41):
The voters approved it, which is overwhelmingly Democrat here. He
just took away Northern California's representation. I'm sure you've heard
of the state of Jefferson, which I've never believed that
was going to happen. People in Northern California are so
upset that in the state legislature, which is super majority Republican,
(21:02):
the laws are that are passed and Gavin Newsom approves them.
It there's nothing but it just raise taxes. We have
the highest taxes overall, property taxes, sales taxes, you know,
you name whatever, taxes. We have a highest electricity rate,
and everything just keeps going.
Speaker 1 (21:22):
To have the highest income taxes, you have the highest
sales taxes, you have the highest gas taxes. You don't
have fire hydrants with water in them, and you have
empty reservoirs and areas that are known to have wildfires.
Speaker 4 (21:35):
You don't practice forestry. Now.
Speaker 1 (21:39):
I always come out against the billionaire tax, but everyone's
leaving anyway. You know it's interesting. You know you talk
about Hank Junior, and you know I can. I can
plow a field all day long. I can catch catfish
from dust till dawn. We make our own whiskey, our
own smoke too, and too many things these old boys
can't do. We grow tomatoes, made wine, and a country
(22:01):
boy can survive. Country folks can survive, and country folks
will survive.
Speaker 4 (22:08):
Yes, it as will.
Speaker 9 (22:09):
I agree with you. Northern California. California is a beautiful state.
Northern California. It is is rural, very rural agriculture. Then
it goes, you know, on down into the San Joaquin Valley.
People don't realize in California, if you took the Bay Area,
which is you know, all the counties around San Francisco
(22:31):
and Los Angeles and that fell into the ocean on
an earthquake, California would be overwhelmingly Republican. It's just those
population centers that control the rest of.
Speaker 4 (22:44):
Them looks like New York City.
Speaker 1 (22:46):
I mean, densely populated New York City will forever keep
that stay blue. I'm not confident that it's it's going
to go red and anytime soon. I know people have hope.
But here's the biggest problem you face. It's the same
one New York and New Jersey faces and Illinois faces.
Is people that would be maybe open to voting Republican
(23:10):
conservative have all left. And that's why, you know, in
the end redistricting, That's why Indiana infuriated me. They should have,
you know, gone forward and done redistricting there, and I
hope other states do.
Speaker 4 (23:21):
It to counter what Newsom's trying to pull off here.
Speaker 1 (23:23):
But I'm just telling you right now, I've written California off.
Now with that said, I take Gavin very seriously. All right,
last work good.
Speaker 9 (23:34):
They're tearing down damns here in California. We need water.
We've got like forty million people in this state. And
these boondoggles that they've had, We've had two reservoirs that
have not been built. To spend billions of dollars in
planning the fast rule.
Speaker 4 (23:51):
Why do you even stay? Let me ask you this question,
why do you stay.
Speaker 9 (23:55):
I My family's here. I'd like to say, I'm born and.
Speaker 4 (23:59):
Raised all Jet Blue. You can go visit them. Are
you kids older?
Speaker 9 (24:05):
My daughter is older. We got grandsons. They are the
workers now they're working. Yeah, my mother's here. So family,
you know, relatives.
Speaker 1 (24:15):
My wife listen. I'm I'm not going to dispute a
family decision. I mean, you do what's right for your family.
Speaker 4 (24:20):
I'm I mean.
Speaker 1 (24:21):
I stayed in New York much longer than I wanted
because of my family. Thank God. My kids are down
in Florida. They love it. I couldn't pay them to leave.
I honestly couldn't. They love it down here, and I
uh and the weather's perfect and it's as beautiful as California.
And I lived in California five years, lived in Santa Barbara.
I was the poorest person that lived there at the time.
I had no money at that point in my life.
(24:42):
Oh and that's when I started my radio career. And
you know, God has blessed me beyond what I deserve.
And work hard and keep your head down and h
and that's how you live life. But I got to
roll on. Joe appreciated Dave in my Free State of Florida.
What's up, Dave? How are you doing? Mister Hannity, Let
me ask you the question, can men get pregnant? Biological men?
Speaker 5 (25:03):
In my opinion, I have a wife, I've signed five
biological children.
Speaker 1 (25:09):
But I didn't ask you that. I'm going to beat
Josh Hawley to you. Can biological men get pregnant?
Speaker 5 (25:15):
No, sir?
Speaker 4 (25:16):
Okay, spoiler alert? What's on your mind?
Speaker 5 (25:18):
Okay? You were talking about this transgender thing, and I
have a comment that I want a question I want
to ask. But if I could ask this really quick,
make this comment really quick, please. I played high school
sports at Dover, New Hampshire. And the reason I want
to tell you this because I don't think people understand
the level of these college athlete women. They are exceptional athletes.
(25:40):
And to make the point, in high school, when I
was in senior high school, I ran with Kathy Skyroll,
who is I believe, a bronze medalist in the Olympics
for the marathon. I ran. She ran with the men
in a one mile race. I ran the mile, and
I ran a five to twelve mile. That's the fastest
mile I ever ran.
Speaker 4 (25:59):
That's not the that's a pretty that's a that's a
good number. It's a pretty strong number.
Speaker 5 (26:03):
And on my third lap she lapped me.
Speaker 4 (26:06):
She was that, you gotta be kidding me. That's embarrassing.
Not really. I mean, I'm a good athlete. I don't care.
Speaker 1 (26:13):
I applauded them because somebody has to work hard to
be that good.
Speaker 5 (26:18):
She was amazing. I couldn't. I'm coming around the third lab,
getting ready to start my fourth lab and she goes
flying by me like I'm standing still now I'm one
common I want to say is what if every single
women in sports today, college sports especially, and I guarantee
they have all the men in America supporting them, every
single time a man got up on the platform or
(26:38):
the track or wherever it was they were about to
start the competition, every single woman just walk off right there.
Just never do it again in time. It's got to work,
because it'd be competing against themselves.
Speaker 1 (26:50):
Listen, I'm just telling you this is not this should
not be a complicated issue. And you know, we've always
protected women's sports. That's what title Mind's always been about.
And if if there are that many biological men that
identify as women and they want to compete Okay, then
(27:11):
let's schools create a division for trans athletes to compete
against each other, to do it that way.
Speaker 4 (27:18):
But you know what it's not.
Speaker 1 (27:20):
It's a physical issue, biological issue, plain and simple. I
don't think it's that complicated. And the person that agrees
with me the most is Caitlyn Jenner. You know Caitlyn Jenner,
you know the Caathlon winner has She is a phenomenal golfer.
Today she didn't drive the ball, she told me nearly
three hundred yards and she's older now, but she's that
(27:44):
good an athlete. And she said, if I ever competed
in any women's tournaments, you know, she probably would win
them all, but she would never do it. And I
give her a lot of credit for just being so
open and honest about it. That's gonna wrap things up
at today full complete coverage of the utter madness of
(28:04):
the left as it relates to enforcement of our immigration
laws in this country. Also a analysis on the legal
side of it. Trey Goudi and Jonathan Turley. Christian McLaughlan
will join us tonight Alexa McAdams on the ground we'll
have a Hannity shootout with Congress Memora Oconna that ought
to get interesting. Also Greg Jared, Tom Cotton, Doctor Oz nine,
(28:25):
Eastern Hannity on Fox. We'll see you then back here tomorrow.
Thank you for making this show possible.
The Sean Hannity Show News
Host
Sean Hannity
Popular Podcasts
Two Guys, Five Rings: Matt, Bowen & The Olympics
Two Guys (Bowen Yang and Matt Rogers). Five Rings (you know, from the Olympics logo). One essential podcast for the 2026 Milan-Cortina Winter Olympics. Bowen Yang (SNL, Wicked) and Matt Rogers (Palm Royale, No Good Deed) of Las Culturistas are back for a second season of Two Guys, Five Rings, a collaboration with NBC Sports and iHeartRadio. In this 15-episode event, Bowen and Matt discuss the top storylines, obsess over Italian culture, and find out what really goes on in the Olympic Village.
iHeartOlympics: The Latest
Listen to the latest news from the 2026 Winter Olympics.
Milan Cortina Winter Olympics
The 2026 Winter Olympics in Milan Cortina are here and have everyone talking. iHeartPodcasts is buzzing with content in honor of the XXV Winter Olympics We’re bringing you episodes from a variety of iHeartPodcast shows to help you keep up with the action. Follow Milan Cortina Winter Olympics so you don’t miss any coverage of the 2026 Winter Olympics, and if you like what you hear, be sure to follow each Podcast in the feed for more great content from iHeartPodcasts.