February 10, 2026 • 14 mins
In this conversation, we cover the overwhelming media coverage of the missing persons case involving Nancy Guthrie, and just how little attention is given to other missing individuals. The discussion shifts to the political climate in the UK, highlighting issues such as social media censorship and the handling of grooming gangs. We also get into the rights in the context of the SAVE Act, why is ANYONE in opposition to voter ID laws? Again, where is the common sense? We need accountability across the board, voting - crime - sexual predators, you name it.
@LyndaMick
@RogueRecap
roguerecap.com
RapeEpsteingroominggangsguthriepsyop
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:02):
Welcome to the rogue recap. Hot takes, cold facts, and
zero respect for the official narrative. Sit back, roll your eyes,
and let's recap rogue style. What's up, guys. It is Tuesday,
February tenth, and the news cycle is just unfathomable. Right now.
(00:26):
We are hyper focused in the mainstream media on this
missing person's case with Nancy Gusri, which is Savannah Guthrie
of The Today Show's mom, and while I'm really sorry
and sad and all the things that her mom is missing,
(00:48):
this wall to wall coverage is frightening. Number one, So
many people go missing every single day. You know, children, baby,
these moms, dads, brothers, sisters, cousins, friends, dogs, you name it,
just taken off the street by horrible people and we
(01:08):
never see them again. You know, I remember growing up
and seeing kids on the sides of milk cart ands,
like that's a real thing. And they give you those
projections of what the kids you know might look like
because they've been looking for them for ten years and
they never get any help, they never get any coverage,
they never get anything. You know, it's they just become
a part of the missing person search and never to
(01:29):
be heard from again, and it's terrifying.
Speaker 2 (01:32):
You know.
Speaker 1 (01:32):
It's the reason why when my kids were little, you know,
I was such a lunatic when we would go out.
I still am pretty much. Oh. I mean, I'm eyes
open because I just don't trust anybody or anything. But
I really struggled with this coverage, like, I'm really sorry
that this happened to your mom, But I don't know
why the whole world has to watch it. And I
(01:53):
think what's even more frightening is that people are watching it.
They're glued to it like it's a show, Like you're
watching this show and there's I mean it's every channel.
It's the liberal channels, it's the Republican channels, it's the
podcasts and the social media, and it's just like minute
(02:14):
to minute. I mean, every single news outlet online has
an updated blog that has minute to minute updates, but
there's nothing to update, there's nothing to say, and I'm
just like, Okay, well there's kids missing in that same
town that haven't gotten a lick of coverage. And I
get it, you know, she's a celebrities mother, but I
(02:35):
don't know, this just feels like too far from me, Like,
you know, I pray for anybody who loses a loved
one and is on a search to recover them and
find them. I can't even imagine what that feels like.
But this wall to wall coverage is weird. I don't know.
That's just my humble opinion and in other news, and
(02:56):
it's not going to be a long one tonight, guys.
I just I just wanted to touch base on a
couple of things. Last night. We did the half hour
show with Peter mcklevan and we've got part two of
that tomorrow. And the reason that I bring that up
is number one, it was a fantastic interview. Peter mcklevin,
if you're not familiar with him, hosts the Hearts of
Oak podcast and worked with Lord Pearson, who's a member
(03:19):
of the UK Parliament. Just an incredible human being, very
versed and living in the UK. Truly understands what it
is to be in sort of this big brother utopia
that got going on over there. It is scary. They
are arresting people for social media posts or putting them
(03:39):
in jail for two and three and four and five years,
and then they have these Pakistani grooming gangs running around
raping little girls and you got Keir Starmer. Now officially
tonight just gave the okay for them to destroy all
of the records because in discovery and in talking to
the victims during the rape inquiry, which is currently being
(04:01):
held by the Member of Parliament by the name of
Rupert Lowe, it's all these Muslim Pakistani guys. So they're like, oh,
it's islamophobia. I'm like, whoa, We'll wait a minute. Just
because the guys that rape them are Muslim doesn't mean
that you, as the victim, have islamophobia. Because you tell
the court that the guy who raped you is a
(04:23):
Pakistani Muslim, I'm like, how is that islamophobia? These are
just the facts of the case. If you're being attacked
by somebody and you describe them, because that's typically what
they say when you go into the police. I need
a description of the assailant. I needed a description of
the purp so that we can go out and look
for them, right, And that's what's happening right now in
(04:44):
this wall to wall coverage and Nancy gutherriin nobody knows
who the hell he is. But in the UK right
now they're saying absolutely not we don't want that. That's wrong,
and we're going to stop it right now. And this
just feeds into Islamophobia. It's not Islamophobia, it's called reality.
Young girls, as young some of them as five, six
and seven have been horrifically raped. Even the singer Duffy
(05:08):
came out and said that she was kidnapped and held
against her well and raped by a group, a grooming gang.
I mean, it's not like people of some sort of
you know, they're noteworthy, and they're telling you that it's happening.
You're talking to families on the street and they can't
even keep these animals out of their houses. They're climbing
(05:29):
into the windows. And you have, unfortunately a demographic in
the UK now where members of Parliament sitting on their
local legislative councils, et cetera, are Muslims, and so they
are siding with the Pakistanis even if they're guilty, because
they have an agenda. It's very similar to what's happening
(05:52):
in America right now. We have this effort with the
Save Act that we've talked about a bunch of times,
and it looks like Thune might actually be trying to
nuke the filibuster and get rid of the zombie filibuster.
And I mean, it would be amazing if it actually happened.
But then you have people like Dick Durbin and Chuck
Schumer and Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski who are saying no,
(06:17):
Why are.
Speaker 2 (06:17):
You saying no?
Speaker 1 (06:19):
What? What part of you need to show ID to
get in? You mean literally, you need to show ID
to get into some of these assholes and their campaign
financing events. They make you sign away your life before
you go in there, but they want you to vote
in the elections without ID. I mean, it's our most
sacred rite of citizens. It's it's such common sense. And
(06:43):
I think that's the theme of the show tonight. Right
We're looking at things and they don't make sense anymore.
It's like one giant sigh up of bullshit where you're
trying to make heads and tails of something and then
you realize, I can't because it does work the math
at mathin as my kids would say. And so when
(07:05):
we're looking at people that are going up against the
Save Act and you say to them, why don't you
want the Save Act? Don't you think that people who
are coming to vote, should show ID and should say
who they are so that we can protect our voting
rights and protect and make sure we have a fair election.
Well no, because it's really hard for people to get ID.
(07:25):
What Okay? Well, then I guess all of you guys
are prejudiced and racist and you don't want people to
come to your campaign events because all of those things
require ID. All of the people that are going to
the bars, you know, you guys are racist against all
the other people who can't get into the bar because
they don't know how to get an ID. And all
you people who drive cars, I mean, you get what
(07:46):
I'm saying, Like you start to get down the slippery slope.
And I'm wondering why when people ask the question of
those individuals that are in opposition to things like the
Save Act, they don't say things like that, Well, are
you saying that people that are black? Are you saying
that women? Are you saying people that come here as
legal immigrants and go through our citizen process are unable
(08:07):
to get an ID? Is that what you're saying? Are
you saying they're less than us, that they can't figure
that out? I guarantee you they're not going to have
an answer, just like we don't have an answer right
now to why we're still redacting things in the Epstein files.
Why are we redacting things in the Epstein files if
we're releasing three million documents, which is I mean, the
(08:30):
fact that there's even that many files in there is
really shocking. And I have definitely read some things in
the past week. I know you guys have two and
I'm like, you gotta be kidding me. I mean, there
was one thing today where Epstein is going back and
forth with this guy and he actually wrote, where do
you take your victims? Not the young girls, not women,
(08:54):
nothing like. He didn't use any code words. He literally said,
where do you take your victims? For? And OBGYN visit?
And they were going back and forth about the obgyn
that Jeffrey Epstein used and how he used to keep
them in business. I'm like, guys, and the name of
the person, we don't know who it is. There's all
kinds of redactions. What are we redacting? Are do we
(09:16):
really need to protect somebody who's using the word victim?
Speaker 2 (09:20):
You know they.
Speaker 1 (09:20):
Released today this guy who heads up Victoria's secret. I
guess that shouldn't be a shock but he's like the
one name they released, you know, and that he was
part of it. And so all of these people are
stepping down from their positions. You know, you have the
Royal family now finally acknowledging the Prince Andrew scandal and
distancing themselves from that. You have various CEOs and people
that sit on boards as chairmen and members and such
(09:42):
stepping down. But no, he's going to jail. I'm like,
this is the common sense part of what's happening that
makes me go hmm. So the Department of Justice releases
all these files, but then we don't release the names
of people who we know have raped children on an
island where they were drugged and abducted and held against
(10:04):
their will.
Speaker 2 (10:06):
This is I mean, I can't even make heads or
tails of it. It's so odd that we're still protecting them.
Even in the release, We're still protecting them. And that,
to me, is the point that we need to be raising. That,
to me, is the question we need to be asking.
What do we have to do to get the reactions.
(10:27):
It's kind of like when we were talking about the
slush fund in Congress and we never got the answers.
Millions of taxpayer dollars have been used to pay off
victims of sexual assault at the hands of elected members
of the House and Senate. So these people who have.
Speaker 1 (10:50):
Assaulted people that either worked for them, staffers, people that
worked on the hill, whatever it is, and then they
came after these members, and instead of making it right
and coming forward and putting them in jail, they got
a payoff because they want to keep their seats. So
people that are there to enact, enforce, and legislate on
(11:12):
our behalf and make sure that the laws are upheld
are currently part of a payoff scheme. I would think
that anybody who knows that they're one of the people
that had to take some money from taxpayers and use
it for you know, hush money, if you will, are
probably pretty easy to sway to get people to do things,
which would definitely explain a lot of the non common
(11:35):
sense things we're seeing loud and clear all the time
on Capitol Hill. When you see a Republican member and
you're going, what are you doing? Why are you there?
If you want to be a Democrat, please go b one,
but get the hell out of our party. It is
so toxic to me to see people call themselves republican
(11:55):
and do the most Democrat type things. If you want
to be on the left side of the aisle, please
go there. We're fine, we don't mind. We would rather
be able to look ourselves in the mirror and know
that we have honest people representing us than deal with
the constant lies and the two faced ness. At least
that's how I feel. But I am really at my
(12:16):
end with things that just don't make sense. Whether it's
protecting pedophiles, whether it's lying about Islamophobia to cover up
Pakistani men that are raping thousands of young British white
women all over that country, or we're talking about what's
happening with the Save Act and why people would vote
(12:37):
against having a fair and free election that is protected
by id All these things sound so simple, and yet
we just can't get the right things done, and we
can't get the right people in the right place at
the right time to make sure that all of these
things are being done properly. So tomorrow we're going to
(12:58):
have part two of Peter Mind. He's going to be
on and we're going to wrap up our segment on
the rape Inquiry, which is actually wrapping up in the
UK this week and talk a little bit more about
the trial and these brave individuals who are coming forward
who have zero, zero support from Parliament, and just hear
(13:20):
a little bit more about what's going on there. We
hope that you will check us out at rogue Recap
at Lindamick rogue recap dot com. We've got a newsletter
now too. We'd love you to sign up for it
and we will see you here tomorrow. Everybody, have a
good night, stay safe,
Welcome to the rogue recap. Hot takes, cold facts, and
zero respect for the official narrative. Sit back, roll your eyes,
and let's recap rogue style. What's up, guys. It is Tuesday,
February tenth, and the news cycle is just unfathomable. Right now.
(00:26):
We are hyper focused in the mainstream media on this
missing person's case with Nancy Gusri, which is Savannah Guthrie
of The Today Show's mom, and while I'm really sorry
and sad and all the things that her mom is missing,
(00:48):
this wall to wall coverage is frightening. Number one, So
many people go missing every single day. You know, children, baby,
these moms, dads, brothers, sisters, cousins, friends, dogs, you name it,
just taken off the street by horrible people and we
(01:08):
never see them again. You know, I remember growing up
and seeing kids on the sides of milk cart ands,
like that's a real thing. And they give you those
projections of what the kids you know might look like
because they've been looking for them for ten years and
they never get any help, they never get any coverage,
they never get anything. You know, it's they just become
a part of the missing person search and never to
(01:29):
be heard from again, and it's terrifying.
Speaker 2 (01:32):
You know.
Speaker 1 (01:32):
It's the reason why when my kids were little, you know,
I was such a lunatic when we would go out.
I still am pretty much. Oh. I mean, I'm eyes
open because I just don't trust anybody or anything. But
I really struggled with this coverage, like, I'm really sorry
that this happened to your mom, But I don't know
why the whole world has to watch it. And I
(01:53):
think what's even more frightening is that people are watching it.
They're glued to it like it's a show, Like you're
watching this show and there's I mean it's every channel.
It's the liberal channels, it's the Republican channels, it's the
podcasts and the social media, and it's just like minute
(02:14):
to minute. I mean, every single news outlet online has
an updated blog that has minute to minute updates, but
there's nothing to update, there's nothing to say, and I'm
just like, Okay, well there's kids missing in that same
town that haven't gotten a lick of coverage. And I
get it, you know, she's a celebrities mother, but I
(02:35):
don't know, this just feels like too far from me, Like,
you know, I pray for anybody who loses a loved
one and is on a search to recover them and
find them. I can't even imagine what that feels like.
But this wall to wall coverage is weird. I don't know.
That's just my humble opinion and in other news, and
(02:56):
it's not going to be a long one tonight, guys.
I just I just wanted to touch base on a
couple of things. Last night. We did the half hour
show with Peter mcklevan and we've got part two of
that tomorrow. And the reason that I bring that up
is number one, it was a fantastic interview. Peter mcklevin,
if you're not familiar with him, hosts the Hearts of
Oak podcast and worked with Lord Pearson, who's a member
(03:19):
of the UK Parliament. Just an incredible human being, very
versed and living in the UK. Truly understands what it
is to be in sort of this big brother utopia
that got going on over there. It is scary. They
are arresting people for social media posts or putting them
(03:39):
in jail for two and three and four and five years,
and then they have these Pakistani grooming gangs running around
raping little girls and you got Keir Starmer. Now officially
tonight just gave the okay for them to destroy all
of the records because in discovery and in talking to
the victims during the rape inquiry, which is currently being
(04:01):
held by the Member of Parliament by the name of
Rupert Lowe, it's all these Muslim Pakistani guys. So they're like, oh,
it's islamophobia. I'm like, whoa, We'll wait a minute. Just
because the guys that rape them are Muslim doesn't mean
that you, as the victim, have islamophobia. Because you tell
the court that the guy who raped you is a
(04:23):
Pakistani Muslim, I'm like, how is that islamophobia? These are
just the facts of the case. If you're being attacked
by somebody and you describe them, because that's typically what
they say when you go into the police. I need
a description of the assailant. I needed a description of
the purp so that we can go out and look
for them, right, And that's what's happening right now in
(04:44):
this wall to wall coverage and Nancy gutherriin nobody knows
who the hell he is. But in the UK right
now they're saying absolutely not we don't want that. That's wrong,
and we're going to stop it right now. And this
just feeds into Islamophobia. It's not Islamophobia, it's called reality.
Young girls, as young some of them as five, six
and seven have been horrifically raped. Even the singer Duffy
(05:08):
came out and said that she was kidnapped and held
against her well and raped by a group, a grooming gang.
I mean, it's not like people of some sort of
you know, they're noteworthy, and they're telling you that it's happening.
You're talking to families on the street and they can't
even keep these animals out of their houses. They're climbing
(05:29):
into the windows. And you have, unfortunately a demographic in
the UK now where members of Parliament sitting on their
local legislative councils, et cetera, are Muslims, and so they
are siding with the Pakistanis even if they're guilty, because
they have an agenda. It's very similar to what's happening
(05:52):
in America right now. We have this effort with the
Save Act that we've talked about a bunch of times,
and it looks like Thune might actually be trying to
nuke the filibuster and get rid of the zombie filibuster.
And I mean, it would be amazing if it actually happened.
But then you have people like Dick Durbin and Chuck
Schumer and Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski who are saying no,
(06:17):
Why are.
Speaker 2 (06:17):
You saying no?
Speaker 1 (06:19):
What? What part of you need to show ID to
get in? You mean literally, you need to show ID
to get into some of these assholes and their campaign
financing events. They make you sign away your life before
you go in there, but they want you to vote
in the elections without ID. I mean, it's our most
sacred rite of citizens. It's it's such common sense. And
(06:43):
I think that's the theme of the show tonight. Right
We're looking at things and they don't make sense anymore.
It's like one giant sigh up of bullshit where you're
trying to make heads and tails of something and then
you realize, I can't because it does work the math
at mathin as my kids would say. And so when
(07:05):
we're looking at people that are going up against the
Save Act and you say to them, why don't you
want the Save Act? Don't you think that people who
are coming to vote, should show ID and should say
who they are so that we can protect our voting
rights and protect and make sure we have a fair election.
Well no, because it's really hard for people to get ID.
(07:25):
What Okay? Well, then I guess all of you guys
are prejudiced and racist and you don't want people to
come to your campaign events because all of those things
require ID. All of the people that are going to
the bars, you know, you guys are racist against all
the other people who can't get into the bar because
they don't know how to get an ID. And all
you people who drive cars, I mean, you get what
(07:46):
I'm saying, Like you start to get down the slippery slope.
And I'm wondering why when people ask the question of
those individuals that are in opposition to things like the
Save Act, they don't say things like that, Well, are
you saying that people that are black? Are you saying
that women? Are you saying people that come here as
legal immigrants and go through our citizen process are unable
(08:07):
to get an ID? Is that what you're saying? Are
you saying they're less than us, that they can't figure
that out? I guarantee you they're not going to have
an answer, just like we don't have an answer right
now to why we're still redacting things in the Epstein files.
Why are we redacting things in the Epstein files if
we're releasing three million documents, which is I mean, the
(08:30):
fact that there's even that many files in there is
really shocking. And I have definitely read some things in
the past week. I know you guys have two and
I'm like, you gotta be kidding me. I mean, there
was one thing today where Epstein is going back and
forth with this guy and he actually wrote, where do
you take your victims? Not the young girls, not women,
(08:54):
nothing like. He didn't use any code words. He literally said,
where do you take your victims? For? And OBGYN visit?
And they were going back and forth about the obgyn
that Jeffrey Epstein used and how he used to keep
them in business. I'm like, guys, and the name of
the person, we don't know who it is. There's all
kinds of redactions. What are we redacting? Are do we
(09:16):
really need to protect somebody who's using the word victim?
Speaker 2 (09:20):
You know they.
Speaker 1 (09:20):
Released today this guy who heads up Victoria's secret. I
guess that shouldn't be a shock but he's like the
one name they released, you know, and that he was
part of it. And so all of these people are
stepping down from their positions. You know, you have the
Royal family now finally acknowledging the Prince Andrew scandal and
distancing themselves from that. You have various CEOs and people
that sit on boards as chairmen and members and such
(09:42):
stepping down. But no, he's going to jail. I'm like,
this is the common sense part of what's happening that
makes me go hmm. So the Department of Justice releases
all these files, but then we don't release the names
of people who we know have raped children on an
island where they were drugged and abducted and held against
(10:04):
their will.
Speaker 2 (10:06):
This is I mean, I can't even make heads or
tails of it. It's so odd that we're still protecting them.
Even in the release, We're still protecting them. And that,
to me, is the point that we need to be raising. That,
to me, is the question we need to be asking.
What do we have to do to get the reactions.
(10:27):
It's kind of like when we were talking about the
slush fund in Congress and we never got the answers.
Millions of taxpayer dollars have been used to pay off
victims of sexual assault at the hands of elected members
of the House and Senate. So these people who have.
Speaker 1 (10:50):
Assaulted people that either worked for them, staffers, people that
worked on the hill, whatever it is, and then they
came after these members, and instead of making it right
and coming forward and putting them in jail, they got
a payoff because they want to keep their seats. So
people that are there to enact, enforce, and legislate on
(11:12):
our behalf and make sure that the laws are upheld
are currently part of a payoff scheme. I would think
that anybody who knows that they're one of the people
that had to take some money from taxpayers and use
it for you know, hush money, if you will, are
probably pretty easy to sway to get people to do things,
which would definitely explain a lot of the non common
(11:35):
sense things we're seeing loud and clear all the time
on Capitol Hill. When you see a Republican member and
you're going, what are you doing? Why are you there?
If you want to be a Democrat, please go b one,
but get the hell out of our party. It is
so toxic to me to see people call themselves republican
(11:55):
and do the most Democrat type things. If you want
to be on the left side of the aisle, please
go there. We're fine, we don't mind. We would rather
be able to look ourselves in the mirror and know
that we have honest people representing us than deal with
the constant lies and the two faced ness. At least
that's how I feel. But I am really at my
(12:16):
end with things that just don't make sense. Whether it's
protecting pedophiles, whether it's lying about Islamophobia to cover up
Pakistani men that are raping thousands of young British white
women all over that country, or we're talking about what's
happening with the Save Act and why people would vote
(12:37):
against having a fair and free election that is protected
by id All these things sound so simple, and yet
we just can't get the right things done, and we
can't get the right people in the right place at
the right time to make sure that all of these
things are being done properly. So tomorrow we're going to
(12:58):
have part two of Peter Mind. He's going to be
on and we're going to wrap up our segment on
the rape Inquiry, which is actually wrapping up in the
UK this week and talk a little bit more about
the trial and these brave individuals who are coming forward
who have zero, zero support from Parliament, and just hear
(13:20):
a little bit more about what's going on there. We
hope that you will check us out at rogue Recap
at Lindamick rogue recap dot com. We've got a newsletter
now too. We'd love you to sign up for it
and we will see you here tomorrow. Everybody, have a
good night, stay safe,
The Sean Hannity Show News
Host
Sean Hannity
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com