Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
All right, glad you with us say, a busy, big
breaking newsday pretty much all over the place. We now
have a ratcheting up in the conflict of battle that
seems to be emerging with a rand. As Secretary of
State Mike Pompeo is in Saudi Arabia, the coalition seems real.
The Saudi's doubted apparently for a short period of time,
(00:23):
the idea that the Iranians were responsible, that is no
longer in doubt. We'll get to that. We have the
Israeli elections. They have the most screwed up system. If
you think swinging, hanging, dip boled, pimpled chads were bad,
I mean it is that much worse in Israel for
a lot of different factors. And it's like a stalemate
(00:45):
every time they now have an election. There's only so
many times you can keep asking people to go back
to vote. What is the outcome of that nobody knows
at this hour. As but it does look like, you know,
the right block coalition, as the Prime Minister has said,
just not that long ago, rock solid and would give
(01:06):
them not quite the sixty one seats that they need
for the majority and the Connesset, but the fact that
the Blue and White Party would need on this with
Marny Benny Gantz that they would need okay, the Arab coalition.
Well that's twelve Cannesset seats. And then you have this
(01:27):
this odd ball Lieberman who is just out there causing trouble.
He was the one after BB won the last election
in April and had a governing coalition, except this guy
said I don't want BB all right, so now he won't.
He's now stated repeatedly, well he's not going to align
with the Arab coalition. That means okay, Bread and Blue
doesn't have a coalition now they all want a unity
(01:48):
government where they all today go back and forth. Can's
BB prime minister? It's I whoever heard of a system
like this? It's so ridiculously messed up, but it is
what it is, and that's a parliamentary system them and
you've got all these smaller parties and everybody and every
party has a specific agenda and to thread that needle
is beyond ridiculous in a multitude of ways. So we'll
(02:12):
get to that. We have a lot of twenty twenty
news today, including Jimmy Carter saying Biden and Bernie are
too old to be president. Oh problem. Then we've got
the latest in the Kavanaugh case. Oh, all of a
sudden just came out of nowhere. Yeah, the Democrats are
now backing down as it relates to the New York
Times Kavanaugh smear and the Kavanaugh lie. We'll get to
(02:36):
all of that. I want to start first. I mean,
this is pretty This is a really amazing moment. I
think when you look at the Democrats and what they
tried to do in their love and their passion and
their commitment to all things impeaching Donald Trump. So Corey
Lewandowski goes back before the committee yesterday of yes, mister
(02:58):
crazy impeachment. We don't all the reason yet, but we
know we'll do it one day. And that would be,
of course, Jerry Nadler, the congressman in New York. Now,
what's so funny about Nadler is you know, if he
cared about and the Democrats on the committee cared about obstruction,
well they would have looked at Hillary and the subpoena
emails deleted and bleach bit and busted devices, removal of
(03:19):
sim card. That would have been obstruction. If they cared
about Russian interference. Well, they probably would have looked a
little bit at Oh, let's see, maybe the dirty Russian
dossier that two and a half years late the New
York Times that devoted an entire newsroom to one story, Russia, Russia,
Russia Trump Trump Trump collusion, collusion. I hope we impeach him.
I hope we impeach him. Yeah, Well, they now recognize
(03:41):
that dirty dossier was in fact likely Russian disinformation from
the beginning a side note of mere unimportance, I guess.
But the lie that's been told the American people. People
do need to know the truth, and the truth in
that case would be that, yeah, it was Russian disinformation.
But that means that the Russians who gave the false
information to Christopher Steele knowing it was going to Hillary
(04:03):
Clinton to help her campaign. That sounds to me like
the Russians were looking to sew discord and strongly supported
Hillary's run for the presidency. In other words, the opposite
of what it is that you've heard from the media.
Now then we've got so we're at this point where
they don't care about Russian interference, they don't care about
(04:25):
Ukrainian interference, they don't care about Russian interference if it
can be tied to Donald Trump. They don't care about
election interference in general, or they would care about the
evidence Ukraine is offering us of how they tried to
help rig the election for Hillary Clinton and they were
interfering in our elections. If they cared about obstruction, they'd
(04:48):
be all over the bleach bit, the Hammers and de Lesians.
If they cared about the rule of law, they would
have been all over the Espionage Act and top secret
classified information on reserver. If they cared about, for example,
Justice Kavan all the way they all claim. And the Ibelievers, well,
they'd be I believing all over the place about the
Lieutenant governor, the Commonwealth Virginia and the yeah, very credible
(05:12):
to me allegations made by two women, one rape and
one violent sexual assault. But no I believer is interestingly enough,
which means this is all about politics to them, This
is all about selective moral outrage. And this is why
this coming election in twenty twenty probably matters more than anything.
(05:34):
I'm gonna tell you something. They don't care. This is
a mob, a mob mentality. That's why I call it
the media mob. They're never gonna stop. They don't want
to get the truth to you, we the people. They
don't care about that. And they wake up and it's
every single second of every hour of every day. You know,
(05:56):
they still Corey Lewandowski is brought back yesterday. Democrats, pundits,
leftists and the media, they are apoplectic. Rick Wilson when
one of these fake news conspiracy channels, if you can't
you Democrats can't handle Corey Lewandowski, Well, how could they
proceed with impeachment? Or you know, the worst dumbest lawyer
(06:18):
on television that works for fake news CNN, Jeffrey Tubin.
Trump orders to Lewandowski are clear evidence of obstruction. Corey
knew it, you know. And then the Democrats themselves, you know,
Corey Lewandowski erupts when he's on fake news CNN and
he's asked, you know, questioning his lying to the press
or you're a journalist or you're talking hand Okay. He's
(06:40):
answered that pretty cleverly in my view, and he said, yeah, well,
they lie on the media all the time, so I
don't have any problems you know, saying what I feel
I need to say politically, because that's what they're that's
the game they're playing, which is an interesting take. Well,
when I'm under oath, I tell the truth anyway, several
instances you know now that we now maybe need to
hold them in contempt or what about you know Lewandowski
(07:02):
and Mueller Report after he admits he didn't read it,
so he's asking them the whole time, can you show
me where that is, sir? And the Muller report, because
he's there to talk about that, and they had that
agreement one time. That was it. I'll discuss the issues
in the Mueller Report, nothing more. And I mean you'll
look at this, and I am telling you the the
incredible lack of ability of Democrats to take on Corey
(07:26):
Lewandowski ran rings around them. Here's some of this from yesterday.
The White House's obstruction of Congress strangers across nearly every
committee and ritually every investigation of the administration. We had
mister Muller here, how a long day of it. Judging
by all accounts, he didn't go realal. This has been
more obstruction of Congress by this administration. And you followed
(07:47):
their instructions and you're doing just exactly what they thought
you'd do. You're a loyal soldier. The president is falsely
accused of cluding with a foreign state to impact the election.
Jim call me when we depose him. At that very table,
said after ten months of investigation, we didn't have a thing.
Bob Mueller gets named special counsel. He weighs thirty million
dollars a taxpayer money twenty two months investigation. He said
(08:10):
at that table just a few weeks ago, and gives
the same dark answer. But these guys over here, they
don't care. The president can hid behind you any longer time.
If you should be here to be telling the truth,
the truth will set you name American people. I yeel
back the time of the general Lady has expired. The
witness man answer the question. I don't believe there was
(08:32):
a question, Congressman, very well, yes there was again, Congress
when I recognize that the privilege is not mine. But
I'd asked by the White House to I'm just glad
be happy to answer your question, or you can just
have a conversation by yourself. But if you'd like to
ask me a question out, I'll be happy. I am
just want to continue. The reason has been don't ask
me a question time. This is a house judiciary, not
a house party. Are you the hitman, the bad man,
(08:53):
the lookout, or all of the above? I think I'm
a good looking man. Actually, are you ashamed of the
words that you wrote down? President Swallowell. I'm very happy
of what I've written, but you're welcome to read if
you'd like them. I mean, it is devastating. They had
no idea from the opening minutes when Kory Lewandowski said,
(09:13):
where in the Mueller report does that appear? Sir is
I'm not asking you in them? I said, well, you
just referred to it. Can you show me to you know,
so I can you have a better recall what it
is that you're asking. And then of course Nadler that
has to struggle, and then he had to get a
copy of the Muller Report. I mean, it was a
comedy of errors if it wasn't. On the other hand,
(09:34):
so serious because from you know, watching this yesterday, Corey
Lewandowski's making mincemeat out of Nadler in company. I mean,
I bet Nadler wishes he chose somebody else, and nobody else,
by the way, is coming because everybody else has been
all this time, all this effort literally going into every
(09:56):
aspect of this. Between hearings, Korey Lewandowski has been to
that committee twice, he's been to the Senate committee, has
been spent fifteen hours with Robert Muller's group, and Lewandowski
just slammed them as Trump paters, criticized the House Judiciary
Committee Democrats making him appear before they're a panel again
in an impeachment hearing that quickly descended into total, an
(10:18):
utter chaos, and he brightly pointed out, we've spent over
three years, forty million dollars in these investigations, and he
says it's now clear the investigation was populated by many
Trump paters who had their own agenda or to try
to take down a duly elected president of the United States.
This is not what they thought they were getting yesterday.
And of the Democrats, he said, at one point, I
(10:40):
think they just hate this president more than they love
this country. Ouch and Lewandowski, well, the first witness, but
the others are saying, no thanks, we're not coming back again. Well,
now the Democrats, they're now hitting the panic button because
there are some Democrats, at least forty or fifty of them,
that are looking at the twenty twenty elections thinking their
(11:00):
political futures are hanging in the balance because they actually
are Democrats, a lot of them in Trump won districts.
Donald Trump at the top of the ballot, they fear
means that, okay, their opponent is hopefully going to be
pulled in by a wave of Donald Trump. So you
know that's the real news. You got this Democrat Anthony Berndici,
(11:21):
I think is his name, from New York. You know,
he took his concerns right to you know, speaker and
name only Pelosi, and he said to Politico, it's frustrating
for me, someone coming from a district that was one
of the districts that helped get us into the majority,
having so much focus on things like impeachment or other
issues that are divisive. We should be focusing on the
(11:42):
kitchen table issues, he said, claiming that he and other
freshman Democrats that agree with him that the agenda of
the Democratic Party does not match their voter concerns. Their
internal polling Now reports that fifty four percent of voters
but the Democratic Party said that the Democrats were more
(12:03):
focused on impeachment than any other policy, and only ten
percent of voters believe that impeachment should be their focus,
and Democrats frustrated by a lack of clarity because of
the impeachment process. They're never going to get it in
the Senate, just like even Dick Durbin sas stop with
Justice Cavanol, you're not going to get it here either.
You know, they don't know what they're doing it. It
(12:25):
was an epic fail yesterday with Corey against Corey Lewandowski.
One point, he actually just heard it there trolling Eric Swalwell. Yes,
President swall because because his campaign lasted like twenty seconds
and it descends into disarray. Nadler considering now holding Corey
Lewandowski in contempt. Look, that's why nobody in their right
(12:48):
mind should ever go before these committees anymore. They've all testified,
they've all given, you know, hours and hours of their
lives to these committees and to the special Counsel. And
then if you answer the questions and they don't like
the way you answer them, they are the sole arbiter
whether they get to say you lied and then they
(13:09):
get to charge you. Remember, if you're a comy and
you'll lie, it doesn't matter if you're McCabe and you'll lie.
It doesn't matter if your Hillary and you obstruct justice.
It doesn't matter if your Hillary and you have top
secret classified information on a private server in violation of
the Espionage Act and subsequent subsections. It doesn't matter. He's
now considering holding former Trump campaign manager Corey Lewandowski in contempt. Well,
(13:32):
that means the next time anybody goes before these committees,
the words I plead the fifth invoked the fifth because
you don't have to incriminate yourself. And God forbid, if
you just happen to say one little litsy bitsy thing
that didn't match exactly what you said one of the
other fourteen times you've been there, well then they're gonna
say perjury, and then then you got that mess in
(13:54):
your life as you roll along. You want to know
how sick the rage psychosis Trump insanity has gotten. Now
we've had Madonna, you know, she thinks an awful lot
about blowing up the Trump White House. Johnny Depp, Well,
when's the last time an actor has killed a president?
In imagining himself as the next John Wilkes Booth? And
(14:15):
now over there at Conspiracy TV MSNBC, I'm sure nothing
will happen. They have a panelist openly fantasizing about carrying
out a terrorist attack on a Trump owned apartment building.
And by the way, they're the same people who complained
that Donald Trump's rhetoric inspires violence. And the Daily Caller
points out MSNBC Conspiracy Channel panelist actually MSDNC revealed he
(14:40):
fantasizes about plowing his car into Trump Plaza every single
time he drives past it. This is just hours after
a car crashed into the center in Neuroschelle. Anyway, you
have the panelist executive editor of Above the Law tweeting
Wednesday morning that he always thinks about driving his car
(15:00):
into Trump Plaza. Well, I guess he's on the right network,
isn't he? All right? Twenty five to the top of
the hour. Back to Israel for a second here, So
what you have is basically a tie, that's the only
way to describe it. And what you have is the
need of either the Left Block or the Right Block
getting the sixty one votes creating a coalition that would
(15:25):
be a governing coalition, and it's challenging. It looks like
Prime Minister Netanyahu's Right Block lead is one over the
Left Block. But the Left block is also assuming in
all of this that they would partner with the Arab Coalition,
which is about twelve Knesset seats. And the bottom line
(15:48):
is Rivlin will announce a final counts. Nine of the
vote is in the votes they're waiting for the military
vote that tend to favor Lakud. That is good for
bb and either Gans or Bibe will be given a
mandate to former government. I don't think one can be
formed by either by Gans, but I do think Bbe.
Now what's happened here is you've got one guy, Lieberman,
(16:13):
that is that basically holding up the entire works. And
the main reason for this is his own personal ambition
from what I can tell, and Lieberman basically he wants
to be prime minister. He's afraid that once Bbe gets
another term, he's going to be there another five or
ten years. He's now already over the summer he became
the longest serving prime minister, who just passed the record
(16:36):
of Bengorian after the forty eight partition plan as again
the longest serving prime minister in Israeli history. But he's
the right guy at the right place at the right time,
especially with things heating up with Iran. So his goal
has been and the reason that BB won last time
was trying to form a government. The reason he stopped
(16:57):
it was, from my take, his own personal ambition, because
the only way he'd ever get to be prime minister
is with some kind of deal because his support is
you know what, twelve seats, that's it, not a lot more.
And so he's forming with Cans and the and the Liberal.
The problem is he also has said publicly will not
form any coalition government with the Arab coalition. But now
(17:20):
that means okay, here we are, and he's going to
push for a unity government where they change in and out,
up and down. It's I'll tell you what it is.
The It is the most most screwed up system I've
ever seen, and it happens pretty much now every election.
And but we'll see, we'll wait, we'll watch and hope
(17:41):
for the best in that particular case we do have.
I don't even know what to make of this because
it's so funny. I mean, we got more news out
of our good friend. I guess you just can't make
this up. Ronald McDaniel just pointed out that Joe Biden
said his tax credit will put seven hundred and twenty
million women back in the workforce. Listen to what I'm saying, Sleepy, creepy,
(18:04):
crazy Joe three zero three three zero. He says his
tax credit will put seven hundred and twenty million women
back into the workforce. Now, the problem is America's population.
There's only about three and thirty million of us, So
he's a mess. We'll talk with phil O'Reilly about the
race coming up as well at the top of the
(18:26):
next hour. And in other news, Politico has an interesting
piece out left wing voter enthusiasm clearly shifting towards Elizabeth Barren,
the other socialist, and fear is growing among Bernie backers
that his recent slide in the polls is irreversible. Now
there's a lot of finger pointing going on Bernie Sanders
fiercest supporters, a sound in the alarm that the campaign
(18:48):
is bogged down by disorganization, personality, clashes for communication between
state operations, national headquarters. And after a pair of setbacks
this week, the acrimony of his half in New Hampshire
on Sunday and the loss of the Working Family's Party
endorsement to Elizabeth Warren, a day later on. Now, Sanders
allies and former aids are worried that recent disappointments are
(19:11):
not one off stumbles, but rather well more evidence of
a larger problem in his crazy bid for the White House.
And the concerns are particularly acute in his neighboring state,
New Hampshire. But it's also Elizabeth Warren's neighboring state. But
don't worry, Joe three three three is telling everybody his
campaign that he doesn't need to win Iowa or New
(19:32):
Hampshire and he'll be in great shape. That's not true anyway.
The Warriors for Standers comes as they enter a crucial phase,
which is after Labor Day. Voters now begin to tune
in to an election and begin to make up their
minds and expectations for standers or sky high because remember,
in New Hampshire, he defeated Hillary Clinton in twenty sixteen
(19:53):
by twenty two percentage points. And Political spoke with about
a dozen current former Sanders advisers allies, many of whom
declined to discuss internal dynamics on the record for fear
of retribution. But since Sunday, campaign staffers have been calling
members of the Steering Committee asking them not to speak
to the media because stories about the internal shake up
(20:14):
were being published. Anyway, there's usually a grant of truth
when you start to see these stories. In other words,
the finger pointing has begun. That's probably just the beginning
of this. Jimmy Carter has weighed in, and it's not
good for Joe three h three three oh. He's just
week shy of being ninety five years old, and he
(20:35):
said he doesn't believe that he could have managed the
presidency at eighty and then went on to say, talking
about Biden seventy six, Bernie seventy eight, each of that
would turn eighty during their terms of elected. I hope
there's an age limit, he said, answering a question. And
he said, if I were eighty years old, if I
was fifteen years younger, I don't believe I can undertake
(20:56):
the duties that I experienced when I was president. Yeah,
but we have seven twenty million women will be back
in the workforce thanks to Joe three h three three oh.
Another new poll shows Andrew Yang actually beating Kamala Harris
in California. That's a big number. Emerson Pole Andrew Yang
(21:16):
getting some traction there and so beating even the senator
of that state. That's our state, California. Anyway. Yang was
at seven percent, slight edge over Kamala Harris. How far
she has fallen six percent among Democratic primary voters. When
you donate money to a presidential campaign, what happens? The
politician spends the money on TV ads and consultants, and
(21:39):
you hope it works out. It's time to trust ourselves
more than our politicians. That's why I'm going to do
something unprecedented tonight. My campaign will now give a freedom
dividend of one thousand dollars a month for an entire
year to ten American families. Someone watching this at home
right now. If you believe that you can solve your
own problems better than any politician, go to Yang twenty
(22:02):
dot com and tell us how one thousand dollars a
month will help you do just that. This is how
we will get our country working for us again, the
American people. Wow, listen, this party is off the rails.
This is not a party. And we went through all
of the money and the cost you know in the
(22:24):
recent days. It is expensive, it is unsustainable, it can
never happen. If it does happen, We're in deep trouble
because we don't have ninety three trillion dollars to spend
on the Green New Deal, and if we spend it, well,
that means that we will be bankrupt. And none of
(22:45):
that is going to be good. By the way, there's
going to be a Republican debate sort of. It's gonna
host two Republican debates Business Insider today. Okay, nobody's gonna
watch and nobody cares. You got Let's see Joe Walsh.
I've known, nobody knows who Joe Walsh is. Joe Walsh
thinks he's well known now that he's made the Sunday
(23:05):
Circuit and embarrassed himself. I mean, Joe Walsh is a
walking train wreck. I mean literally, Yeah, I said all
these stupid things, but yeah, I'm still running anyway. Nobody
remembers Bill Weldon in a nice guy. I've met him
over the years. He's smart. He's not going to be president,
and either is anybody else that wants to get into
(23:27):
this race. It's not gonna happen, and I don't care
how many other people get in. And it's Trump is
now ninety percent approval rating among his own base so
that's a pretty good deal. By the way, the President
blitz into California out of fifteen million dollar fundraiser, irritating
celebrities and activists out there, wealthy Republicans, and just the
(23:47):
span of two days. That's a lot of money in
two days. By the way, a Casio Cortez is flexing
against the Democratic leadership by endorsing an incumbent's primary challenger. Whoop,
c Daisy. I guess saoc is the real speaker of
the House, Pelosi speaker in name only, which I've been saying.
And Trump, you know, is now going after Okay, well
(24:08):
look at all the homelessness in Los Angeles and San Francisco.
Well we need to fix that too. So you've got
a situation. You got Biden now being told by Jimmy
Carter that he and Bernie are too old to be president.
That's not a good situation for them. You got Democratic
senators now preparing to revolt if Bernie or Warren wins
(24:28):
the nomination. Now they got bigger problems. Now it looks
like quote Senate Democrats privately warning that if Bernie or
Elizabeth Warren win the nomination, they would likely face opposition
from fellow Democrats to some of their biggest proposals. In
other words, there's some common sense among Democrats, sort of
(24:50):
like Dick Durbin telling everybody is liberal and leftist as
he is. Yeah, this impeachment idea of Kavanaugh is a
dumb idea. It's really stupid. Now, Biden does lead the
twenty twenty field, but you're seeing this now in every poll,
and that is that Warren's support is growing, and it's
growing fairly significantly. Biden leads the overall horse race from
(25:12):
thirty one percent Democratic primary voters, but Warren's now at
twenty five. She's nearly up to the margin of error.
Bernie down to fourteen. He got Mayor Peked Buddha Judge.
Buddha Judge is at seven percent, Kamala five percent. Yikes,
this is a mess. Then you got al Sharpton. Everyone's
been kissing Al Sharpton's ring looking for his endorsement. They
(25:35):
gave a fiery speech about the race and said it
was time to stop pitting old against young and that
he preferred older candidates to anyone imposed on us by
new liberals who are progressive on everything. But race sounds
like a shot at the squad to me anyway. The
speech was at the weekend's Congressional Black Caucus Foundation Phoenix
(25:55):
Awards dinner. He laid out the stakes for the presidential race,
called for an end so the backbiting in fighting. We're
fighting today though the worst form of racism and bigotry
that we've seen since the eighteen hundreds, fling out Donald
Trump and going on from there, but then also destroy
some of the Democratic candidates who are bad on race.
(26:16):
We're not looking for quote better slave masters. I think
he still works at the Conspiracy Channel MSDNC. Dick Morris
had an interesting piece, Mandatory Medicare will doom the Democrats.
I'm not sure, but it could. Elizabeth Warren railing against lobbyists,
but record shows she received big nonations from them, and
(26:39):
Elizabeth Warren failed to stand up a low income Harvard
employees during a two thousand and nine layoff. Of course,
she was using, you know, the issue of her ancestry
to claim minority status at the time. She was a
Native American ancestry test missed one thousand, twenty four. Not true,
(27:01):
fake news on the Iranian issue, all right. Pompeo's now
meeting with the Saudis. The Saudis now have analyzed our
photos and they now have concluded that the Iranian missile
debris was found in Saudi Arabias from the Iranians. And
so now I would assume that there's some type of
(27:23):
plan strategy being on board. But Hillary's VP running mate,
Senator Tim Kane, blamed America for provoking the Iranian bombing
on and the attack on the Saudi oil fields. It's
our fault. Really, you're gonna blame Trump for that too.
Why because he's not trying to bribe them with one
hundred and fifty billion dollars in cash and other currencies.
(27:46):
Why because he won't sign on to a deal that
would allow the Iranians in ten years to get the
nuclear weapons anyway, in spite of thee hundred and fifty billion,
the fact that that deal that never allowed US inspectors,
that deal that didn't allow anywhere, any place, any time inspections.
(28:06):
The president now, with his sanctions, we now forty percent inflation,
and what you see is the population now rising up.
And do we really care what you know? Francis Macrone says,
or Merkel has to say, I don't care what any
of them think, but I will tell you that if
(28:27):
the United States, look, why does the United States need
maybe to consider involvement. How many more drones are we
going to let them shoot out of the sky. Let's
look at other issues involved here. Okay, Well, we're energy
independent for the first time in seventy five years thanks
to the President, and we now are the world's largest
oil producer. That means the Straits of Horror Moves are
(28:48):
well strategically of little importance to us personally. We had
John Hoffmeister, former CEO of Shell Oil, on yesterday. Yeah,
he said, we have two hundred plus years of energy
and counting and we'll probably find more. But more importantly,
if we can now outproduce Russia, will bring Russia to
their knees. We don't need oil from the Middle East
from countries that hate our guts. The Straits of Hormuz
(29:11):
are less strategically important than ever before, those narrow straits.
So what the Iranians do there is not our business
except the free flow of oil at market prices. Well,
that means that if they're able to disrupt that, meaning
the Iranians, that's going to impact the entire global economy
and more directly, that's going to impact those that still
(29:33):
rely on that oil, not us, and that means that's
going to impact their economies because it's the lifeblood of
every economy. And then from there, we've got to decide
if we're gonna let the Iranian mulls pull that off.
I don't think we should, and I don't think we will.
All Right, we got a lot to get to. We
got a lot to get to. Bill O'Reilly at the
top of the next hour, we're going to look at
(29:54):
talk to General Jack Keane what's likely to happen with Iran.
We're putting more guys behind bars that are fighting in
our military, in large part due to the rules of
engagement of Obama. It is a national disgrace that we
have people that work in air conditioned offices that are
(30:15):
determining the fate of guys on the battlefield, that have
to make split second decisions. All of these cases, from
my perspective, need to be reviewed. Well. There's going to
be a push to get that to happen. Important thanks
to the work we've done on this show and Linda
going down eleven Worth and Eddie Gallagher's case, and Clinton
(30:36):
Rance's case and others. That is, Obama reportedly told Joe
Biden directly, quote, you don't have to do this, Joe,
you really don't. That is not a joke, that is
a natural fact. I think Biden looked unsteady at many points.
Play the radio, make sure the television. Excuse me, make
sure you have the record player on at night. He's
(30:58):
not the most polish speaker the president thing my friend
for Vermont thanks that watching his long winding answers that
don't really make sense and recent debates has also raised
the question as to whether that has gotten worse and
whether he is up for this. The fact is that
the bills as the president that excuse me, the future
president here, because there's a lot of people who are
concerned about Joe Biden's ability to carry the ball all
(31:21):
the way across the end line without fumbling. Go to
Joe three three oh. He looked kind of unsteady and
almost deer in the headlights. So what are we doing?
What's going on right now? He's not that good at this.
I mean, he's clearly not. That's Toronto candidate thinking on
his feet away my times thought myself, I think there
are some concerns, and they've been may've been expressed by
(31:45):
Democrats themselves. Four kids are just as bright and just
as tall as white kids. Over whether Joe Biden is
equipped to withstand a very grueling campaign, we choose truth
over facts. I'm not going nuts. Are definitely moments where
you listen to Joe Biden and you had just wonder,
this is the United States of America. We've acted together.
(32:09):
We have never, never, never been unable to overcome whatever
the problem was. If you agree with me, go to
Joe three oh three three oh and help me in
this fight. Thank you very much. All Right, there it is.
That is the new Republican And again, sleepy, creepy crazy
Joe three oh three three oh. Now he's taken a
(32:33):
bigger hit in the polls leads in one warm, creeping
up daily Bill O'Reilly joins US fifteen number one best
selling books. Next week he releases is new book entitled
The United States of Trump, How the President Really Sees
America aaront to be a bestseller. You can get it
(32:54):
on Amazon dot com now Hannity dot com. If you
like mister O'Reilly, sir, how are you welcome back to
the program good. I want everybody to go to Bill
O three three billow which but it means nothing the
whole thing. I think Vermont's beautiful this time of year.
(33:14):
While you're in New Hampshire. We take truth over facts.
I don't know which my favorite is. But you I
didn't even know. Apparently you send out on Billoreilly dot
com Bill's Message of the Day. I'm like, is this
like a Bible message? No, it's about Joe Biden. Why
is Joe Biden leading? It's the way to get your
day starting off right. Give you a little wisdom, um,
(33:36):
to take into the officer, into school wherever you want
to do so. I see Biden a lot differently than
you do Um and other people who believe that the
Obama administration was appalling and all that. I see Biden
as a figurehead. I don't see him as a politician
(33:59):
who has the fire in the belly to do anything.
So his whole life he has been basically in federal government,
elected in Delaware, and then Obama basically chose him to
because there was a little bit of nervousness about Obama's
inexperience and he wasn't an old hand. He needed somebody
(34:22):
to guide him through the labyrinth at his Washington and
that's why Biden got But Biden himself, even if he
were elected president, which is possible, wouldn't run the country.
And people should understand that he would pick people to
run the country for him. So it's exactly the opposite
of Trump, who absolutely runs every part of the Trump
(34:46):
administration is nothing that he doesn't run. Biden be a
one hundred and eighty degrees opposite of that. You see. Look,
I know some people said, well, we need to see
your medical records. I'm like, I don't really need to
see his medical records. I actually believe in the space
of probably some people, I don't care about seeing anybody's
medical records. When Hillary Clinton was at ground zero and
(35:06):
she collapsed, yeah we needed an explanation what happened there?
And I know people didn't like it because I played
it and I'm like, this is a full on collapse.
Why did she collapse? And you know I heard different
stories at the time. I just that doesn't look good
if a presidential candidate it collapses. Now, that can be dehydration,
little things like that. I get it. But I just
(35:27):
look at Biden, Bill and I see a guy that's
aged twenty years since he left office. I think that
Biden is every bit his seventy six years. Well, I
think that he keeps himself physically in decent shape. But certainly,
certainly he's not at the level of Hannity and O'Reilly
when it comes to analyzing at least one of us.
(35:50):
At least the Hannity part's true on that case. I'm working.
You don't even you don't do any exercise, do you?
But put that on? No, that's a that's a total Okay,
what do you do? What? What kind of exercise do
you do? I'm a pool guy, I'm a former lifeguard. Okay,
how how many days a week do you swim? I
try to get in there five days a week. Okay,
Now how many laps will you do? It depends how
(36:12):
lazy I am? But how do you see me? I
got the same waste that I had when I was
playing college football. Yeah, I'm not so sure I buy that,
but I'll go along with that. Do you want me to?
But I'm not buy it. Um, you know, I'm not
going to open his weight watching a holistic tour. I
don't need that, And I'm in decent shape. But anyway, Biden,
(36:36):
see to see what people have to decide, what Americans
really have to decide, was what kind of leader do
you want? Um, do you want, you know, a descendant
of Fidel Castro? Well, then you vote for Warren or Sanders.
Do you want somebody who's a figurehead, then you vote
for Joe Biden. Do you want a guy who's like
(36:56):
crazed to run the government, then you vote for Trump.
That's the leadership quotation. Now we're facing you see, look,
I think that it's so bad. And I look, I
know that was it Julian Castro in that last debate.
Now you thought the last debate was important, I can
play it the greatest ticks from that debate, and I
can tell you when I play him, he did not
(37:18):
because the expectations now are so low. I thought he
sounded again confused, confounded. You're talking about Biden now, right,
and but it's Julian Castro. And then after the debate,
Cory Book are saying, yeah, his age, he's not there.
So they're making those sim to say, I mean he's
the front runner. Look, Biden didn't do anything at the
(37:40):
debate to disqualify himself. Therefore it was a win for
him because you're exactly right. The expectations are so low.
I mean, it's I'm standing here. You know, Barack Obama
and Bill Clinton were both formidable politicians. Whether you like
them or not, they were both. They are both very
(38:03):
intelligent men, and they're quick on their feet. You don't
have anybody close to that this time around. Now. Hillary Clinton,
she wasn't quick on her feet, and she had all
kinds of baggage that she dragged along with her on
a campaign trail, which is why she didn't ignite. But
the Democratic Party has nothing, nothing, at this juncture close
(38:26):
to what they have had the past fifteen years, and
anybody Democrat, Republican, liberal, conservative has to acknowledge that. So
therefore they're going into this election with a big deficit.
You see. But I think you're I think what you're
saying is predicated on a belief that Joe Biden and
(38:46):
maybe there's some truth to it, but I think that
truth is evaporating very quickly. That he is the quote
moderate that he's trying to portray himself within this primary race,
I don't see it. He's bought into the New Green Deal,
he says he's going to spend a couple of trillion
dollars on it. I guess that he still is a
believer in Obamacare. He'll say anything. He'll Biden will say
(39:10):
anything to get elected. Do you really believe that? Joe
Biden goes home to Delaware and looks at his wife,
doctor Jill, and goes, hey, I think we're all going
to die in ten years because of global warming. No,
I don't know. He doesn't. But he's saying he'll spend
up to two trillion dollars on this nonsense. That's a
lot of money, though he isn't. As soon as he
(39:30):
is elected, if he is all right, Biden will go
into the Oval office and do absolutely nothing, absolutely not.
I agree with that too. He won't. I don't think
he has the capacity to do it. He looks so tired.
It's not part of who he is now. He's going
to have people on his staff that are going to
be pushing him, and they're going to be able to
(39:51):
get certain things in front of him that he'll do.
But he's not. He's not Elizabeth Warren. Elizard Warren's frightening,
which she would do to this country would be to
collapse the entire economy of the United States of America,
and that would lead to a worldwide depression. There was
violence last night at the Beverly Hills Hotel in Los
(40:13):
Angeles between pro and anti Trump people. There was violence,
there was a flag burned that Believe me when I
tell you, if this country goes into a depression or
a severe recession, there's going to be violence in the streets.
It's a It is a scary proposition. But I think
things are so politically divided right now that and you
(40:34):
see the left. I mean, look at the New York
Times Bill this week. You would think that they are embarrassed.
They're not, because that is the Democratic Party and the
pressure that's a Democratic party. Oh absolutely put the crazy
looney left at twenty five. But they control the media,
which is why you hear from them so much. But Bill,
look at Nancy Pelosi. She's not considered left wing enough.
(40:57):
She's a left wing San Francisco Liberal. You just made
a point for me, Hannity. But he doesn't. She's telling
the naddlers, but she's the moderate Ocasio cortez Is of
the world is shut up. She's telling them to shut up.
Will you missing my point? If she's the moderate and
that party is hardcore left. She's not a moderate, Bill, No,
(41:17):
she isn't a moderate, that's for sure. But she's a
practical politician, all right. She doesn't want to blow up
the US economy because she understands it's the end of
her party. Look what the New York Times and CNN
and MSNBC have done. What they have done is destroy
the institution of journalism in America. You you agree with
(41:37):
me on that, right? I don't think, But Bill I
said no, seven, Journalism in America is dead. These networks
have been biased at times in post of viment, so
so journalism in America is dead because of the Trump
hatred that has corrupted the process. The same thing is
going to happen to the Democratic Party if I say
(41:58):
one thing though, to go this far out? All right,
quick break Moore with Bill O'Reilly. Bill O'Reilly dot com
is all things O'Reilly, all right, As we continue, Bill O'Reilly.
One week from today, by the way, or one week
from yesterday, is new book will be out The United
States of Trump, How Trump, How the President really sees America.
You can find it on his website, Amazon dot com,
(42:18):
Hannity dot com. I was hanging out there like I
always am, on the tallest tree, up at the very top,
the little twig, and hanging on to the leaf that
stayed there from last fall. And I did it with
the deep state story that we have now been proven right,
timing again on that the media ignored. And then in
(42:38):
OH seven, I was doing a vetting a Barack Obama
as you know that nobody else was doing. I had.
I had new Gingrich telling me my career is gonna
end over it if I keep it up because I
was pushing too hard, but I was right. Let me
ask you something now. I'm really glad you brought that up.
So I need your prediction. McCabe gonna get indicted. I
(43:00):
think when when the Fiser report comes out and the
Dorham Report comes out, because there'll be two big ones.
Those are the two big ones. Are they're going to
have one on leaking. I don't see any scenario under
which James Comey and guys like Andrew McCabe and Peter Struck,
(43:21):
and probably with the Dorham Report, guys like Clapper and Brennan,
but especially the first three are not indicted or I
don't see how it doesn't happy indicted? Did Jenniva thinks
that too? Joe did? Jenniva? I very astute on it,
as you know he thinks that too. Now let me
ask you a second follow up question. One last caveat
on that though, Bill, we have to assume here that
(43:44):
they don't shred the constitution, that we don't have a
dual justice system, but they'll go after their own department,
and that we don't have large that and I'm assuming
we have equal justice and equal application of our laws.
But with Hillary, we've learned that's not true. But go ahead,
But Trump is in charge of justice, as he got
to say. You know, Trump's out of this. Trump's not
involved in any of this. But Barr works for Trump
(44:06):
and the attorney Jones to make a call. The President
is not going to involve himself in this issue. I
can tell you right now, no, But Barr works for him,
and bar are going to make a call. So if
those if mccab and called me, the top FBI guys
are indicted on felony charges, all right, does that shift
(44:27):
the election to Trump? I think listen, regardless, let me
say it in a different way because I do believe
that will happen, and I stand by that prediction with
the caveat that I have, But and I really believe
because the evidence is overwhelming. It's incontrovertible. Just like Hillary
had a rigged investigation and she did obstruct justice, incontrovertible
Russian Russian dossier that was never vetted and verified, was
(44:49):
presented as verified, and they were warned ahead of time.
So that's premeditated fraud on the court. Now, the specific
answer to your question is does it impact the tw
twenty election. Yep, there's no doubt that the entire story
that me and my ensemble cast have chipped away up
for two and a half to three years, every detail
(45:11):
will be proven. So far, we've not been wrong. If
I'm wrong, I'll say so. I know for a fact
it all happened. There's no ambiguity anymore. Bill that happened, right,
So yes, the answers. When the American people hear that story,
I think, well, it will impact the race. Okay, I
gotta run, But on two things that we will continue
in the weeks to come. Joe is the radical, extreme Democrat.
(45:36):
He can't I know you're giving him a little bit
more of a pass than I think he deserves. I
don't think he will have the capacity in this current environment.
There's no moderate Democrats left. He will have to push
hard left the entire way. The second thing is is
that I do believe that they've got a problem, that
they have lost any sight of what is what is
(45:59):
doable in the country, and their rage is now driving them.
But I gotta roll Bill O'Reilly. Next week, by the way,
we're doing the first interview for your book, The United
States of Trump, How the President really sees America. Bill
O'Reilly dot com, Hannity dot com, Amazon dot com. Thank you,
sir for being with us. All right, looking forward to
with John. Thank you all right, twenty five now till
the top of the hour, eight hundred nine for one
(46:21):
seawn if you want to be a part of the program.
So we have our friends friends of this program, Congressman
Louie Golmer to Texas and Duncan Hunter of California. So
both of them traveled to Leavenworth Prison yesterday to meet
with soldiers that are convicted of murder in combat zones. Now,
we have highlighted many of these instances where these guys
(46:45):
that are on a battlefield, and of course the handcuffs
that were put on them and the rules of engagement,
insanity of the Obama years, and Clinton Lorentz's name comes
to mind. I mean, there's a guy that takes over
a platoon and or enough the week before, two weeks
prior to this incident that he sent them eleven Worth. Well,
(47:06):
there was an attack on that platoon and they lost
the platoon leader, and they lost a bunch of other
people because a bunch of guys terrorists that were on motorcycles. Yeah,
they were basically suicide bombers on those motorcycles. So Clinton
la rans find himself taking over that very specific platoon
and lo and behold, the checkpoint is violated and two
(47:27):
guys on a motorcycle are coming right at the platoon.
Now he's got to make the split sycond decision. Well,
do I assume that they're they're you know, not part
of any terrorist organization. Can I assume that they're not
going to do what happened two weeks ago? He made
the decision to defend his platoon. And it's amazing how
people can second gas guys that are in combat, you know,
(47:50):
from the comfort of their offices and their air conditioned
military courtrooms. It's ridiculous to me. And then, of course
other instances have taken place as well. Now, the case
of Clint Lorance, well we later found out well they
didn't have i eeds then, but we did find their
DNA on IEDs after the fact. That case should be
(48:11):
reopened immediately. Anyway, Also joining Congressman Duncan Hunter and Louie
Gomert on this trip with Sergeant Derek Millery's a military
adviser to Congressional Justice for Warriors caucused and in twenty eleven,
Miller was convicted of murder sentenced to life in prison
for shooting and killing a Taliban operative who grabbed Derek's
(48:32):
gun during an interrogation after having lost eight years of
his life at levin Worth, who was finally paroled on
May twentieth. So my attitude is, Okay, we don't have
the will to do it and fight a traditional war anymore.
That's fine, but we better developed the next generation of
weaponry so we can push buttons in Tampa, Florida and
beat back like we beat back the caliphate in Syria.
(48:54):
Isis anyway, they all join us right now, Louie. Good
to talk to you, Duncan, good to talk to you.
Sergeant good to talk to you as well. Well. Sean,
thank you for having us on. But you know, of
course Duncan had fought over there for us. He had
seen injustice as occurred, so he was already on this.
But what got me onto this issue was you and
(49:17):
Lauren and Linda and I started hearing from all about
folks that have been unfairly treated, and you know, having
sentenced people to prison before as a felony judge, I
just can't stand the thought of the kind of injustices
that we were hearing. And so that's what started this
(49:39):
caucus that that concerned Duncan and I had and Derek
Miller that you mentioned you you outlined his case so well.
But you know I test when I testified before the
parole board for Derek, they said, well, he'd have to
have a job, and I said, well, he's had three
offers and if he didn't want those, I'll hire him
at my office. And Derek is working with us, he
(50:02):
has been helping us zero in on cases of terrible injustice.
But it comes back to you like a fire over
this issue. And thank you so much for doing so well.
Let me go to Sergeant Derek Miller's sergeant, you spend
eight years in prison, so you know very well what
I'm talking about here, am I is what I'm saying
(50:24):
true that during the Obama years rules of engagement you
had handcuffs on you, and that you're not able with
sending you to war and then we're not allowing you
to do your job. You're absolutely correct, and that's the
sentiment that is going on throughout the military. These soldiers
are being asked to be in place an impossible situations
where they're making split second life first death decisions for
(50:45):
themselves and their brothers and sisters in arms. And when
they go into these courtrooms there is this such misconduct
with evidence not being disclosed, being tampered with, an unlawful
command influence and confine men up here on Capitol Hill
or just as adamant about defending the freedoms, the Constitution
and the soldiers themselves. Is amazing. And that's why I'm
(51:08):
so grateful to Congressman congres Duncan Hunter for Sardinis Caucus
and Congressman Hunter, you you served yourself. Is there anything
I'm saying here. That's wrong. Do you not agree with
me that that we give up on these wars? We
politicize them, and then we have to ask, well, why
are we asking our sons and daughters to fight them now?
If if you're going to go to war, we should
go to war, and hell should have not have no
(51:30):
fury like the American military going in and utterly destroying somebody.
If you want to mess with us, and then we
should not stay there, and we shouldn't try to help
if the help is not wanted. But one of the
bigger issues with what happened with Gallagher and Derek and
Clint la Rants and Tom Hatley in these cases we're
going to show to the President of the United States
(51:51):
and say hey, we believe in these guys, is the
prosecutorial misconduct. The system in the military is completely real
to go against the warfighter. One of these guys had
nurses in his jury, so you're supposed to be judged
by a jury of your peers. If I'm a military person,
I don't want a stockbroker and a teacher and a
(52:13):
stay at home mom looking at my combat case. I
also don't want colonels that are nurses or dentists looking
at my case either, I want to be judged by
my peers, people that have been in the same situation
that I had, had seen the same thing, had walked
the same streets, and know what I went through. None
of these guys are being judged like that. In Eddie
Gallagher's cases, his lawyers told me if they didn't have
(52:35):
Marines in that jury, he would have lost anyway, even
with all the president I'm going to tell you something
about the Gallagher case because I was following it. We
talked about it, and I remember Bernie Kerry was active
in fighting for his defense. And I said, Bernie, look
at how they're writing this up in the newspaper, that
you've got seven Navy seals turning on one guy. I said,
(52:56):
I've never heard of that before. But when you get
to the bottom of it, they never expected the other
guy was going to say, no, I'm the one that
actually did it. They could have actually figured that out
ahead of time. But no, they have to put this
guy in solitary confinement. And if it weren't for President Trump,
he would still probably be incarcerated. Such an outrage, and
in the addition that people already mentioned Duncan mentioned the
(53:19):
first sergeant Hatley. I mean, this poor guy. He was
going to give an Article fifteen non judicial punishment to
a staff sergeant who didn't want it that he had
hit a lieutenant in the chest. This first sergeant was
charged with four counts of murder based on what the
staff sergeant said. There were never anybody's recovered. The CID
(53:43):
went through the community trying to find if anybody was missing.
Nobody was missing. There no names, no bodies, no forensic
evidence whatsoever. And yet he's already done what eleven years
or so in prison for premeditated murder. It's an outrage.
But as we've heard though, President Obama on down made
(54:05):
clear they wanted people punished so that we could look
good to Karzai and others in Afghanistan, that we punished
our soldiers and were really friendly to the Afghans. That's nuts.
Let me give another case, because I know what you
guys are trying to do here, and that you want
constructive changes to the Uniform Code of Military Justice. And
(54:27):
I think Sergeant Miller is correct and that we ought
to have those that actually know what the hell they're
talking about and have lived in these situations and having
had made similar split second decisions, I think they may
be better peers than people in a comfortable office that
has no knowledge of any real combat. But you know,
(54:48):
look at the case of Officer Hatley, Army's Master Sergeant,
served nearly eleven years of a twenty five year sentence
eleven worth. He was convicted of killing four detainees and
a war zone and a rack during a routine patrol
and No. Seven and the Army Criminal Investigation Command did
not find one shred of physical or forensic evidence to
suggest that any men were missing, much less killed. There
(55:10):
were no bodies, no brass, no evidence of any crime. Additionally,
they conducted extensive interviews with the family members of the
detained men who started who stated that no one from
their family was missing. They conducted interviews with neighbors of
surrounding areas. They stated no one from their neighborhood was missing.
They interviewed the man who owned a farm where the
(55:31):
bodies were allegedly disposed of, and he stated he had
no knowledge of any killings or heard about anyone being killed.
The only evidence was from compelled statements from a couple
of soldiers who claimed that four men of Middle Eastern
descent were killed. Okay, this guy served twenty years in
the Army, you know, with an otherwise outstanding an excellent
(55:51):
record as a military two Bronze Stars, Army Commendation, Medal
of Valor, I mean a ranger tab and much more.
How do we do that? Ley? John Hatley is the
tip of the spear. He is exactly what you envision
when you think of a US Army soldier. And the
fact that he was railroaded like this shows that the
prosecution came in with a narrative and they forced those
(56:14):
younger soldiers, threatened them with the prosecution of life in prison.
I just print off affidavit from one of the witnesses
who said I received a twenty five year or twenty
year agreement off paper to testify against John Hatley, and
that is why I did what I did. Yep. It's scary.
It's scary that they will push whatever narrative they need
to to get that win at the expense of the song.
(56:36):
Not about winning in this case, the only ones we
should be concerned about winning over are the enemy. Anyway,
I'm glad you're all are putting us together. Sergeant, Thank you.
Congressman Golmert, thank you. Congressman Hunter, thank you, And if
we can help in any future endeavors to get innocent
guys out eleven more, let us know what you say.
Thanks so much, Sean. All right, as we continue, let's
(56:57):
hit the phones. Eight hundred and nine f one. Sean,
you want to be a part of the program. Let's
say hi to David North Carolina. David, Hi, how are
you welcome to the program? Pretty good? John? How are
you doing? I'm good, sir. What's going on? So you
are my leading authority and trusted source of a lot
of pressure? Yeah, all right, go ahead. I want to
(57:18):
know is it true that Trump is actually going to
declassify the five application and the Bruce War three or two,
and he's gonna declassify the unredacted Peter Struck, Lisa Page, McCabe,
and Comy text messages are like, are we gonna get
to see some of that? Remember the President gave all
of that information and the ability to unredact to the
(57:41):
Attorney General barr h. My take is, and I think
actually a good decision by the President that he has
handed it off to a capable law enforcement professional and
prosecutor by the name of Bill Barr. Do I think
we're going to see a lot of this and see
it sooner than later. Absolutely, I don't think we get
through October no way without seeing the IG report on
(58:05):
FA abuse. Here are the facts as we know them. Okay,
Were James Comey signed the first FISA application? All right?
James Comey, He was involved, along with Struck and others
in the cover up of Hillary Clinton's crimes, the ESPIONAJ
Act violation. Even Comey j Five, twenty sixteen admitted that
(58:25):
that's true. They had top secret classified information on the server.
That's we would go to jail for that. Then we
know that Hillary obstructed we would go took jail for that.
Now we go to the FISA application. We know on
at least three I can confirm three separate instances in
which Comey, the DOJ, the FBI under Obama were warned
(58:46):
that the dossier was unverified. And we also know when
the FBI finally got around to their spreadsheet looking into
the dossier, that they determined ninety plus percent of it
they could prove is not true, but likely one hundred
percent of it was true, so they didn't do it beforehand,
because if they concluded that months after they signed the
initial couple of warrants, that would mean that they never
(59:09):
verified anything. But they did swear, you know, as law
enforcement professionals, that it was verified. So that would be
premeditated fraud. And remember Andrew McCabe's statement, no dossier, no
FISA application, they wouldn't have gotten it, and they were
denied once. So the answer is premeditated fraud on the
FISI court. These are the facts at this point. Nothing
(59:29):
that I just said to you was in dispute. The
evidence exists. We've presented it to everybody. So now you're
asking me, well, what will bar do if we have
a constitutional republic still, Hillary will in fact phase consequences
for the Espionage Act violations and subsections similarly obstruction and yeah,
(59:50):
those that's signed on too, after multiple warnings. The premeditated
fraud on the FISA court, Yeah, they would be tried
and well, first indicted, tried, and I believe the evidence
would convict. That's my humble belief. But everyone has presumed innocent,
so the evidence is not in dispute. We've been right.
(01:00:11):
We nailed the story. We nailed at a thousand percent
the evidence is now borne out. Everything we've said is true.
So and then I think the second part of the
story is going to be the Durham Report, which will
probably be more devastating than even the Horowitz Report. Does
that answer your question, yes, but it does prompt a
follow up of if there aren't federal indictments, how do
we make America? Just again, you don't, all right, fair enough,
(01:00:35):
you don't. It would be a very very tragic, sad
day if they don't have the courage, with a mountain
of evidence like this to do their job. I am
hopeful that people that respect the constitution, the rule of
law in this country and want to preserve it for
future generations, that they'll do their job. I think the
(01:00:58):
case is so overlaming that they're not going to get
away with trying to protect their own anyway. I hope
that helps you stay right here for our final news
round up and information overload in the final hour of
the Sean Hannity Show. So, then, even if we do
have complete confidence in the Intel community's conclusion that the
(01:01:22):
Iranians were the ones that struck these Saudi oil fields,
and we find out over the next few weeks that
they in fact, do have compelling evidence. Does that still
justify the United States going to war with Iran taking
military action against Iran because of strikes they made against
(01:01:42):
Saudi Arabia. No, I absolutely do not believe, Joe, that
that would be in the interest of the United States
to go to war with Iran on behalf of an
attack on Saudi oil infrastructure. It strikes me as a
very bad idea. And the reality, Joe is, we are
where we are because of what Trump has done in
the last couple of years. This wis the predictable consequence
(01:02:02):
of pulling out of a nuclear deal that was working,
of escalating the sanctions on Ron over the objections of
all of our closest allies who wre with us in
that process, particularly the Europeans, of keeping threat upon threat
on the Ringians at the same time that we backed
and open ended Saudi war in Yemen against the Hooties.
It has killed tens of thousands of people than a
(01:02:24):
rand today I did. We'll be adding some very significant
sanctions onto a RANT, and we'll be announcing it over
the next forty eight hours. Will be a further announcement
that Iran, are you looking at a military strike. You'll
see what happens. What are the option with the remit
end that you're considering you didn't rand with the very
(01:02:47):
happy Well, there are many options, as you know, Phil,
there are many options, and there's the ultimate option, and
there are options a lot less than that. And we'll
see we're in a very powerful position, or right now
we're in a very very powerful position. I say, the
ultimate option meeting go in the war. No, I'm not
talking about I'm not talking about that ultimate option. As
(01:03:10):
to Iran, I'm hoping that Secretary Pumpel can pull together
a coalition that will act in a fashion to change
Iran's behavior. I support the idea of working on a
regional coalition. I would like to see the President go
to the UN and make the case that Iran's behavior
is an act of war against Saudi Arabian must be
(01:03:31):
dealt with firmly. Whether or not the United Nations would respond,
I don't know. As to Iran itself, I appreciate the
effort of the President to be measured when it came
to the drone attack. But the point I'm trying to
make is not what I think, it's what the Iranians think.
And clearly they have not gotten the message. This attack
(01:03:54):
on the ore refinery by any reasonable definition, as an
act of war, it is an attacking the world economy,
systability of the old markets throughout the world. And in
addition to attacking a refinery in Saudi Arabia, the Iranians
are increasing in enrichment, putting them closer to a bomb.
Should a military strike be on the table right now
(01:04:16):
as an option against Iran by the US specifically, Congressman,
or do you think now Congress has the constitutional right
to declare war? The President doesn't have it, Secretary of
State doesn't have it, and Saudi Arabia certainly doesn't have it.
I think we need to make sure that the American
(01:04:36):
people understand that this administration that lies about whether maps
or crowd sizes cannot be trusted to give us the
full information we need to be able to make a
decision whether we should be going to war or not
with Iran. We are not in a position to think
about another endless war, and I really hope that my
(01:04:59):
colleagues in Congress are going to pressure this administration to
take a step back and figure out how we use
diplomacy in the escalating this situation. All right, twenty five
to the top of the hour, Congresswoman Omar advocating, Oh, no,
we can't strike back. We can't do a thing. Okay,
they're gonna shoot our drones out of the air. They're
(01:05:19):
gonna take one tanker after another hostage and where, and
we're going to allow them to disrupt on the narrow
straits or horn moves the free flow of oil at
market prices, which will impact the world economy and everybody
else in the free world because the lfeblood of every
economy's energy oil gas. We're gonna let the Iranian mullus
(01:05:42):
stop that. Oh and it's Trump's fault because he accelerated
the sanctions against Duran. No, Donald Trump and I don't
really care what McCrone or Merkel have to say about
the Iranians because they were part of that idiotic Obama
Biden deal which gave one hundred fifty billion in cash
and other currencies to the Iranian mullahs that chant death
(01:06:04):
to America, death to Israel. Want to wipe Israel in
the US off the map. The deal that would allow
the Iranians anyway in ten years, it expires to produce
nuclear weapons. It doesn't stop them the deal that wouldn't
allow any US inspectors in the deal where you don't
have anywhere, any place, any time inspection, so the Iranians
(01:06:28):
can hide from everybody what they're really doing, which is
what they're doing. So the idea we will do nothing
is ridiculous. The idea that this is Trump's fault, well,
there might be some truth to the fact that Donald
Trump's not appeasing him them like others have and trying
to bribe his way towards a better relationship with Mullah's.
(01:06:49):
I pretty much believe in a convert or die sick
philosophy that have no problem you wiping Israel or the
US off the map. And it's now a matter of
under standing real evil in our time. And because of
the economic pressure, well, the Iranian economy is blowing up,
and yeah, hopefully at some point we might see people
(01:07:11):
within Iran move to rightly overthrow the Mullahs and hopefully
come back to the world community with better relationships. And
we're not going to allow radical Mullahs with nuclear weapons
to possibly perpetrate a holocaust in modern day because that radicalism, well,
that would justify the sick use of nuclear weapons. That's
(01:07:34):
a bad idea anyway, joining us now, General Jack Keane,
retired four star Chairman of the Institute for the Study
of War, Fox News senior strategic analysts anything about what
I just stated in this situation that is not true, sir, Now,
I totally agree with your summary there. I mean, the
(01:07:55):
American people have to understand the significance of what just occurred.
It's not only an attack on the largest oil fields
in the Middle East and an attack on one of
our allies, Saudi Arabia. It is, as you suggested, an
attack on the stability of the world's economy. And since
(01:08:18):
nineteen forty five, the United States has had as a
core national interest to maintain and safeguard the flow of
Middle East oil because it helps to stabilize and support
the world's economy, which is somewhat dependent on it. And
for that reason we must respond. The Iranians have conducted
(01:08:43):
an engregious act of war on the world's economy, and
as such, they are challenging who is going to control
the Middle East oil flow? And that is national interest US.
And for those who are set this is about Saudi Arabia,
it certainly it is, but it's more than that. This
(01:09:04):
is about the world's economy, and as such, I think
a couple of things we got to do. One, fixed
the air defenses in Saudi Arabia and other places because
the Iranians will not give up and disrupting this whole flow.
Second thing, go to the un I out the declassified
evidence of what has happened and get international support for
(01:09:27):
what the Iranians have done, increased sanctions, and then begin
to build a coalition to conduct the retaliatory strike. Now, Sean,
if we're going to deduct the retaliatory's trial US, we
cannot let this stand, or else they will continue to disrupt.
The strike is not at all out war against Iran's military,
(01:09:49):
but it is a limited attack. But let me caveat it.
It has got to be sufficient enough to impose cost
on the Iranians to deter them from future disruption activities.
And it impacted a new least oil flow, and I'm
got some concern here. It's also what I'm hearing from
(01:10:11):
my sources in the Pentagon that we may be repeating
the mistake we made in Syria after the chemical attack
during a Trump administration when we did not conduct a
strong attack to deter Aside from you, well, the President
did the second time, and then the President did wipe
out the Caliphate in Syria by literally working backwards town
(01:10:35):
city after city and driving them out of Syria for
the most part. That's not my point. My point is this,
the Pentagon painted the pictures to the President that had
so much flourish strike, and they pushed him to an
option that was weak and it did not deter Assan
from conducting another chemical attack. I believe the Penagon doing
(01:11:00):
much of that. My sources again right now presenting options
to the President that the option to deter sufficient enough
cost on the Iranians. They're exaggerating the risk associated with
those options in terms of this will lead to all
out war. The Iranians will begin to attack all of
our bases in the Middle East. I think that's an
(01:11:21):
exaggerated assumption, and we've got to make certain it's limited,
to be sure it's not all out war on Iran's military,
but a sufficient enough The President is not going to
get us into an all out war. We won't sign
on for that. But the President, I believe the strategy
that we did see successfully unfold in Syria. Would be
the same strategy with Iran, perhaps with more difficulties, as
(01:11:45):
I think it's obvious their military capabilities are greater. They
have their cut forces, they have their revolutionary Guard. You know,
if we're gonna look at it in just a very
narrow self interest type of way, a lot of people say, well,
what do we care. You know, because of the President's policies,
we are now the world's number one producer in energy
(01:12:07):
oil and gas. We're number one. No country outproduces us.
Because of the President's policies. Number two, we're energy independent
for the first time in seventy five years. You know,
we have the CEO of Shell Oil on the show yesterday,
John Hopminster. We have we have enough oil gas cold
for two hundred plus years. We don't need far in oil.
That's not what is at play here. The straits or
(01:12:28):
horn moves al. There'll always be a geopolitical component, national
security component, only because well, a large enough percentage of
the world's energy passes through those narrow straits. Problem is
and the reason the US would have to get involved
in this, and the only reason is because if the
(01:12:49):
world economy, if there is a disruption in the free
flow of oil at market prices. That means the people
we do business with that that means they are going
to be negatively impacted. That involved then that now the
consequence of such as the United States gets hit by proxy,
not because we need the oil now. I do believe general,
(01:13:12):
that we have a situation where the US is real
the Saudiast much as I don't look like their human
rights record, the Egyptians, General LCC, King Abdullah of Jordan,
and the Emirates, they have now created a coalition to
fight back against Iranian hegemony. And I think united the
Iranians have no shot. What do you think, No, that's true.
(01:13:34):
I mean this administration has gone into the Middle East
as early as July twenty seventeen, and the President said,
I stand with you against the number one strategic threat
in the Middle East, and that is Iran, and I
will be with you. We tried to stitch together a
formal alliance called the Middle East Strategic Alliance, and we
haven't been able to put together that formal alliance, but
(01:13:55):
nonetheless there is an informal alliance against against the Irani
I don't disagree with anything you just said, Sean. I
want to make my point so the audience understands clearly
what I'm saying. If the President had to do it again,
I know for a fact he would have hit a
sad stronger on the first attack as a result, on
(01:14:16):
the chemical attack, he would not have selected the option
that the president that the Pentagon is recommending. I fear
that they will push an option on him again and
exaggerates the risk. But yet it's not going to be
tough enough to deter them. That is my message. Listen,
I just think the look, you can't shoot out American
drones out of the sky and then not be consequences.
(01:14:38):
You can't take you know, piracy on the high seas
and literally hijacking all of these tankers. You can't get
away with that, blowing up the Saudi oil refinery areas,
cutting their production, and half that has to be answered.
I did see that you wrote a piece that the
(01:14:58):
Saudis are not totally convinced ya. Well, who would they
then suspect, considering the Yemeny rebels are fighting a war
due to the Iranians were fighting a proxy war and
providing all of this, providing all the weapon ry to
attack Saudi Arabia no, they are convinced now they finished
the forensics on the weapons that were that that attack them.
(01:15:21):
They've gone to all twenty plus points of impact and
they're all Iranian weapons. We have shown them the evidence
of the points of origin in Iran from where the
attacks have come from, and then we have showed them
some other much more classified things that demonstrate that the
Irans have unequivocally conducted, plan and executed this attack. The
(01:15:45):
Saudis on board. One of their senior generals said this
morning in Saudi Arabia at their time that this is
their nine to eleven and they must respond. So no
doubt that they're with us. This is no lack of
spine on their part. They will participate with us, and
I'm going to be very willing participants. They lack the
(01:16:05):
capability that we have to be sure. And nonetheless that yeah,
obviously going to participate, and I hope others do as well.
I appreciate your insight, General as always, thank you for
being with us. We'll be watching, we'll be monitoring daily.
Eight hundred nine four one sean is our number. You
want to be a part of the program, all right?
Twenty five to the top of the hour. All right,
we've had a lot to get to today. Obviously, the
result set of Israel, as we have outlined for you,
(01:16:29):
and the coalition seems to be one boat ahead of
the left wing coalition, very tight calls for unity government,
but it seems like the Conservatives of a line behind
the Prime minister, which would be a good thing. They
have the single most screwed up system I've ever seen
in the world. There's no other explanation for this. All right,
(01:16:49):
let's get to our phones. Rich Houston, Texas, which I
understand is being pounded with two feet of waters are true,
it is in certain sections that primarily to the south
and east of the city right now, and hopefully everybody
tries to stay dry enough, but it's not nearly as
that is what we had heard. So that was the
(01:17:09):
good news. Okay, So what's on your mind today, Sean.
I've been in the energy business primarily my whole career,
and I had been in oil and gas. I actually
tried to call you one time from Williston, North Dakota.
I saw a sign showing seventeen dollars an hour to
be a door greader at Walmart, which I thought was
just amazing at the time. Since that point, I actually
(01:17:30):
left the oil and gas and I'm in the renewable side.
Most of my time is out on the winnie turban
end of it, and I wanted to call to let
you know there are significant problems in the renewables, specifically
on wind and solar, both sides, and I would like
to bring everyone's attention. Last year in the Midwest, they
(01:17:52):
had a horrific event in the wintertime which basically shut
down all of your renewables. So also and all wind
just basically stopped because you have this tremendous cold front
which came in and lasted an extended period of time.
And I've talked about this with some of the renewable
people who sit on the boards, and they say, yeah,
(01:18:13):
the dirty little sacret is we cannot do without fossil
fuels for literally as long as we can see it
in the distant future, because we don't have any way
to be able to protect ourselves. So we've got states
like Iowa the next year or through twenty twenty will
be wind driven wind generated power, which is fantastic, but
(01:18:35):
God forbid if they get a cold snap and shuts
everything down and then In addition to that, they have issues.
For instance, blades. Now, these blades are about ninety meters long.
I mean there are significant blades that are turning in
the wind, as you can imagine. And they've had significant problems.
And that's one of the big things going on right
now is repair of some of the older units have
(01:18:56):
been out there for ten and twelve years. They're actually
having to replace blades due to fault. So it's something
we all said, I'm want to say this, and you
would know better than I, so look, and you're right.
I remember reporting on the Walmart greeter seventeen bucks an
hour not a bad not a bad salary because and
you can confirm we add people. I said on the
(01:19:18):
ear innocently one day, I said, if I was out
of work, I wasn't making enough money, and I'd go
to North Dakota, or I'd go to Texas and they're
training truck drivers and how to do it, and they're
offering eighty grand a year to start and then as
much overtime as you can take. And to me, that
would be transformative if I'm making forty forty five grand
(01:19:38):
a year and low and behold the next thing I know,
people are calling me saying, yeah, I just did what
you said, you know, six months ago, and I'm here
in North Dakota and you were right, and it's working
out great now. That we had Hopmeister on yesterday and
he's the former CEO of Shell, and he says, we
have two hundred plus years minimum of natural gas, oil coal,
that we can be energy independent now the number one
(01:20:00):
producer of energy worldwide. It is the single greatest hope
for our safety and security. We won't depend on nations
in the Middle East that hate us for the lifeblood
of our economy. The Straits of hor moves and what
the Iranians do in this very very narrow passageway with
(01:20:20):
a large percentage of the world's daily need for energy,
if they control it well, won't impact us, except that
it impacts the free flow of oil at market prices,
and that if our allies and friends get hurt, well,
the world economy gets hurt. We're not going to let
them get away with that. But more importantly, the American
(01:20:42):
people will raise their standard of living because we're talking
about now career jobs, a career trajectory two, three, four
times when people would otherwise be making and that is
the single greatest opportunity we have to forever for the
next two decades, grow our economy and for the working
people this country. I love it. For the country and
our security, I love it. Why don't we do it?
(01:21:04):
That's the question rich Well Sean, I'd like to kind
of follow up on that because I'm want to tell
you one of the most unused markets currently in fossil
fuels is natural gas. And to use a kind of
the thought of Taboon Pickens of all people who recently
passed away to Boon's was a big proponent for natural gas.
(01:21:27):
If you were to fly into Williston, North Dakota and
going at night, you'll notice all the flares where they're
gasing off the flares. They do that because there's basically
no way to collect it and move it. And it's
it's a huge untapped natural resource. And people say, well,
why would you burn it off. It's because there's no pipeline.
(01:21:48):
Imagine that there's no way to collect it. You can't
you can't put it in the tank and take it
from truck from area to area. If that could be
used and utilized in a proper way, we would be
absolutely completely and very cleanly energy independent, and I mean
totally upon our own and then be able to sell
(01:22:09):
so much that we wouldn't be having a discussion about renewables.
We have it. We have renewable natural gas is a
renewable energy. People don't look at it. It's absolutely it's
also clean burning. Why does why don't we look I'll
never understand for the life of me. In New York upstate,
New York really now for a couple of decades has
(01:22:30):
been financially depressed. The single greatest boom the state of
New York could ever have is literally natural gas. Pennsylvania
is doing it with great success and great prosperity. People
in Pennsylvania are making a lot more money than they
used to make. We could in New York can be
doing this, but because of environmental extremism and radical left
(01:22:52):
wing policies, they won't allow fracking in New York state. Okay,
then people continue to leave New York State. I'll give
it the last word. Yes, yes, it's absolutely true. And
if you look at that, it's known as the U
to come play very well known tremendous reserves. The state
of New York has faltered in their way of instead
of taking advantage of it. They let everybody go south
(01:23:15):
to Pennsylvania, down into West Virginia and now into Ohio
where they are making best use of it. So even
if you look at some of the major players in
that area, where do you think the jobs are going
to go? Where do you think drilling is going? And
then beyond that, look at what happens. It becomes feedstock
for other things. So when you look at companies like Shell,
where did they just put in a multi billion dollar
(01:23:36):
new factory. They put it in Ohio. They put it
as close as they could to their natural resource. It
just makes common sense. Anyway. I appreciate it, Rich and
thanks for all you do and all the people that
provide our energy. Every day we take, you know, like
everything else I think we take for granted everything we
have in this country. It would raise the standard of
living of every American. And it's right under our feet.
(01:24:00):
You know what is it? Go back to the Beverly
Hillbilly's you know, Texas Gold. What did they say that thing?
Texas to Texas t that's for Americans, that's our those
are our resources all right back to our phones. As
we say hi to Jeff in New York, Jeff, how
are you the all New AM seven ten w R.
(01:24:22):
Good afternoon, Thank you. Yeah. So I was listening to that.
It makes me think so much as an environmental engineering
business forever and fracking and the renewables that he was
speaking of. The one secret I thought nobody ever talks
about is that it's all subsidized by the government because
it doesn't make it's not efficient like oil and gases.
It's crazy that way. But the reason why I called
(01:24:42):
was I ran the question I have for you. My
dad's been in the air for for forty years. It
says I've been in there for fifty years since he's retired,
and still tells me what to do. But the Iranian
or the Saudi Arabia has our f fifteens. I believe
they have the S twenty two. They've trained with us forever.
If we have proof positive, why are we not giving
them the intelligence? Let them go over there and take
(01:25:04):
care of their own problems with Iran and wipe out
the Iranian Air Force completely. Look, because I don't think
the Saudi Arabia Number one, we don't want a war
with the Saudis and the Iranians and probably not trying
to burst your bubble here, but I had to guess
the Iranians would probably win that war. Here's the problem.
Look at the geography. Look how close we are now
(01:25:25):
to Israel and Egypt and Jordan. You know, the one
little thing that's been happening that nobody's noticing is the
Israelis with the United States. That's Trump, Benett and Yahoo. Well,
they now have a moment in history that had not
existed before, and that is that the Egyptians are with
us Elcisi and we have Abdullah and Jordan and whatever
(01:25:46):
you think about MBS, I'm not a fan, and I'm
not a fan of Saudi Arabian in the treatment of women, gays, Lesbians, Christians,
and Jews. But there's an alliance against Iranian hegemony. The
problem with you know, like Tulsi Gabbard saying something like,
you know, we're basically a puppet of the Saudis. That's
not it at all. We don't need anything from the
(01:26:07):
Saudis like we once did. We don't need their oil anymore.
We can be energy independent. That is a huge plus
for US. That is a national security coup for US.
But the free flow of oil at market prices matters
to us because if other countries are impacted with the
lifeblood of our economy now being cut off by the
Iranian Mullah's, well, that impacts the world economy. And there's
(01:26:30):
too much interconnection now that we can't be in a
situation like that without our involvement. And if it's the
US and it's the Saudis and the Israelis and the
Egyptians and Jordanians, yeah, I don't think Iran is going
to take all of them on because they'll be obliterated.
And Trump is not going to send in forces. You're
gonna bomb the living hell out of them. That's what
he's gonna do. And I think locked and loaded is
(01:26:53):
a telegraph that's that's pretty much the strategy. That's what's
going to happen. I understand why we have to use
US air force. Why can't we let our friends, who's
actually their country do it for themselves. We've trained them,
we've given them everything they need. I just gave you
the answer. I don't think the Saudis can do it alone.
My answer is I don't think they can do it alone.
And now you're risking a conflict because the Iranians already
(01:27:14):
fighting a proxy war with the yem Andy rebels. You're
now risking something that could turn into a disaster in
the region. And you gotta be a little ahead of
the curve here, and you got to prevent that from happening,
you know. And look, if I had to bet sometime,
probably sooner than later, the Iranians arena. They're gonna suffer
the consequences for their actions lately shooting out a drone,
(01:27:35):
taking these tankers hostage, and the piracy in this narrow waterway,
and now attacking the Saudi facilities. I'm telling you it's
this isn't going to end well for them, all right,
Thank you, Thank you appreciated. Eight hundred nine four one,
Sean Tolfree telephone number. You want to be a part
of the program, John Minnesota next Sean Hannity Show, It's up.
John's to you, sir. I listened to you all the time.
(01:27:59):
I'm called about these new red flag laws and the
war on our Second Amendment really kind of upsets me.
And any support from Trump on these Second Amendment policies,
I won't vote for them. Look, I don't I don't
think red flag laws are I think they're a non starter.
That's my opinion that after seeing, watching, hearing the President
(01:28:22):
and what he's saying and what he's saying publicly, I think, look,
there's there's Look at all the recent shootings, they're not
one of them that I know of that would have
been triggered this way. For example, even the background check issue. Yeah,
they got it, and there was nothing that was going
to stop these people from getting guns. And I don't
think it's more gun laws that we need now. I
(01:28:43):
think we can do more. I mean, the President actually
is proposing something as it relates to, you know, the
homelessness and the mental illness. President proposed it proposed a
federal homeless Task Force for LA and San Francisco. If
somebody's mentally ill and drug addicted, you know, there's no
telling what those people are going to do in terms
of harming innocent people and to protect people. Yeah, people
(01:29:04):
are gonna need guns, but more importantly, got to keep
guns out of the hands of those that are mentally ill.
There's no stronger support of the Second Amendment than me. Now,
maybe they would add the trade the gun show, Maybe
they close up quote the loophole hole that everyone talks
about I don't see that it's impacted any of the
shootings that I can recall now I don't have them
(01:29:25):
all in my head. In other words, that you need
a background check there, but I think you're gonna have
instantaneous background checks. I don't have a problem with the
background check. I do have a problem with people with
mental illness at getting a hold of guns. I also
have a problem when people are not trained in the
safety and use of a firearm that you know. People
ask me all the time, well, you're into guns. I'm like, yeah, well,
(01:29:46):
I've been shooting him in some ten I'm more of
a pistol guy than a rifle guy. And they'll ask,
what kind of gun do you do? I get a
r or an ak and they start throwing out these
names that they've heard an oozy, I've had that question
ask to me. My answer is, well, what gun do
you want to be trained in the use of. One
of the greatest things that does exist in this country,
the USCCA, their advertisers, the NRA, these groups people that
(01:30:09):
are gun enthusiasts. They are so more than willing to
teach you how to be a responsible and safe gun owner.
I urge anybody. If you're gonna get a gun for protection,
take lessons, learn how to fire it. Every range in
the country has people that will be more than willing
to share a lifetime of knowledge with you so you
(01:30:31):
can be a responsible gun owner. Does that make sense?
I'll give you the last word. Yeah. I'm glad you
brought up mental health. I'm actually a mental health professional.
But you know, there is a problem when when you
talk about people selling guns, you know, buy a gun
and then they sell it to their friend. You know,
that's a lot of how these things are happening after
(01:30:52):
two month. I mean, let me ask you this. If
you're at a gun show and you want to buy
a gun, would you care if they did an instant
background check on you? No, I wouldn't. I wouldn't either,
Thank you. All right, that's gonna wrap things up for today.
All right. Big breaking news deep state, Mark Meadows, Sarah Carter,
Joe degenevav Victoria Tunsing, Greg Jarrett, also Jeff Lord, Dan Bongino,
(01:31:12):
Matt Gates, and the issue of the slander and smear
and attempt to impeach even Justice Kavanaugh, doctor Geena Loud
and carry Severino. It's all coming up tonight, nine Eastern Hannity,
Fox News. We'll see you then, Thanks for being with us.
Back here tomorrow