April 10, 2026 • 28 mins
In this hour, Sean Hannity highlights what he calls the stunning hypocrisy of Democrats on Iran, using past comments from Chuck Schumer and Joe Biden to show how dramatically their positions have shifted. He frames the current conflict as the direct result of failed diplomacy, weak enforcement, and years of empowering a regime that cannot be trusted. With guest James Robbins, Hannity examines the breakdown of the ceasefire, Iran’s negotiating tactics, and why he believes President Trump is fully prepared to resume force if diplomacy collapses. The conversation also turns to NATO, with a heavy focus on allies that Hannity says obstructed American operations while still relying on U.S. defense. This episode is a hard-hitting look at Iran, the legacy of the Obama nuclear deal, and the growing fracture between America and parts of Europe.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Listen
Watch
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Our two Sean Hannity Show toll free. It's eight hundred
and nine point one Sean. If you want to be
a part of the program. It is stunning, but not shocking.
We point this out all the time, and that is
how democrats, all of them, constantly change their points of view.
Let me play a clip of well he's leader, well,
(00:21):
minority leader of name only Chucky Schumer criticizing Obama's nuclear deal.
Speaker 2 (00:26):
Listen to this, I asked, are we better off with
the agreement that we have before us or without? In
the first ten years of the deal, there are serious
weaknesses in the agreement. First, inspections are not anywhere anytime.
The potential delay of as many as twenty four days
before we can inspect undeclared suspicious sites is troubling. It
(00:49):
is true that declared sites will be monitored. That is
one of the positives of this deal. But if Iran
is going to cheat, it will not be at a
declared site with the eyes of the world watching. It
will be at a non designated site. And if Iran
is trying to cheat, it will certainly delay the inspection
process as long as possible. Even more troubling is the
(01:10):
fact that the US cannot demand inspections unilaterally. We require
of the majority of the eight member Joint Commission, assuming
that China, Russia, Iran will not cooperate, inspections would require
the votes of all three European members of the P
five plus one, as well as the EU representative. It
(01:30):
is a reasonable fear. Once the Europeans become entangled in
lucrative economic relations with Iran, they may not want to
rock the vote by voting to allow inspections.
Speaker 1 (01:42):
Well, that's Chuck Schumer just trashing the idiotic, imbecilic Iranian
deal by Obama. That's the one that allowed you know,
billions of dollars in cash and of the currency to
be dropped off of the mullows in Iran so they
can build out their nuclear program, build out that ballistic
missile program, and fullmentara around the world. Thank you for
(02:05):
funding all of that terrorism. Then I got a clip
of Joe Biden nineteen eighty eight saying that he would
reduce commitments to NATO if they don't do more. Oh,
Donald Trump says it. The world is ending it.
Speaker 3 (02:19):
Germany, if you're unwilling to reflate your market and take
on your responsibility and the rest of the world as
a world leader. Why are we the only ones that
have that responsibility? Why are we the only economic engine?
We are clearly the biggest. We can say that to
the Germans and our friends in Europe. We're all in this.
NATO's important. We stick with NATO. But I'm not sure
(02:40):
we need two hundred and eighty nine thousand American troops
at the cost of total cost of one hundred and
two billion dollars. If you had everything up, maybe you
should do more now. If you want to open up
your markets, if you're willing to help aggravate alleviate Third
World debt, if you'll step in and help Mexico, if
you'll step in and help Nigeria like we are, then
we can play.
Speaker 4 (03:01):
Then we could play anyway.
Speaker 1 (03:02):
James Robins, special Assistant to Defense Secretary of Rumsfeld Institute
of World Politics, joins us. All right, so we have
these talks coming up this weekend. You know, I forget
the hypocrisy because it is on a level that is
breathtaking to me, and it doesn't seem to you know,
it doesn't seem to register with many people out there.
(03:24):
Why the president needed to act the way he did
with Midnight Hammer and now epic Fury. And the President
can't win for losing because bridges and infrastructure they are
considered military targets, legitimate military targets throughout the history of warfare.
So if in fact the President went through with infrastructure
(03:44):
and bridge day, then he'd be a war criminal. And
if the President says, okay, there seems to be a
path to maybe a peace deal before I go down
that road, and I'd rather not for the sake of
the Iranium people, and we'd have a negotiated settlement, which
I'm dubious of, to be very honest, especially with the
way the Iranians are acting right now. But you know what,
(04:07):
he's giving piece a chance. It seems like the Iranians
want to do everything they can do to blow up
the ceasefire before it even gets started.
Speaker 5 (04:14):
Oh well, you're absolutely right, Sean, and from the democratic
side of the least have statesmen on their side. And
now it's just talking points. I mean, when you were
playing Chuck Schumer there, if you did that without context,
no one would know who that was. With all of
the very important points making about why the JCPOA was
a terrible, terrible deal, and it only made Iran even
(04:38):
more capable of developing nuclear weapons. And now President Trump
is he's kind of in a bind with respect to
the opposition because on the one hand, they said, oh,
he's going to start like Armageddon with power Point and
Bridge day, and then when he decides no, will negotiate,
they say, aha, he chickened out. So yeah, he's kind
(04:58):
of with respect the opposition, and you just can't take
them seriously if you're looking for guidance on how to
actually solve the problem. All they want to do is
score points.
Speaker 1 (05:09):
All right, So here's where we are with this now.
The President put on truth that the Iranians don't seem
to realize they have no cards other than short term
extortion of the world by using international waterways. The only
reason they're alive today is to negotiate. You put that out.
He said, they're doing a very poor job. This honorable,
(05:30):
some would say, of allowing oil to go through the
straight of hormones. This is not the agreement that we have.
And the President's kind of making it clear going into
tomorrow that they've not lived up to their part of
the agreement as it is now, and that would mean
to me signal to me that the President's you know,
(05:50):
more than ready to move forward with the previous plan,
and that is to obliterate the country and then take
whatever enriched uranium we need and make sure the straight
of Hormus is open, prevent them from fomenting terror in
the region, and of course, you know, put limits on
their capacity to build out ballistic missiles with a longer range.
I think that those are the main goals that are left,
(06:12):
and then pretty much the job would be done, wouldn't it.
Speaker 5 (06:15):
Well, yes, and I hope the President is ready to
reignite force because these negotiations.
Speaker 6 (06:21):
Aren't going to wink.
Speaker 4 (06:22):
Well, by the way, do you doubt that at all
that he's willing.
Speaker 5 (06:26):
No, I don't doubt it one bit, and the Iranians
shouldn't doubt it either. But from their perspective, what they
see is they have this rest period, this ceasefire, when
number one, they can try to reload if their friends
in Russia and China can get some more arms to them.
But number two, they see negotiation as kind of a
level playing field. They know they can't fight us on
(06:47):
the battlefield, but at the negotiating table they are used
to winning I mean, if you look at the history,
the Iranians have frequently eaten our lunch, not necessarily with
Donald Trump and his team, but it's their perspective going
in and if they're alive, they think that they're winning.
So they're going to try everything they can do to
use this negotiation session as a form of political warfare.
(07:10):
And we already see them moving the goalposts, you know,
saying well, hey, Lebanon was supposed to be part of it,
and now saying that we have to release the frozen funds.
That's something they have been demanding ever since President Carter,
and I mean that's something you do at the end
of the negotiation, not at the beginning. But they're saying, hey,
we won't even talk to you unless you unfreeze our assets.
Well that's not going to happen. But it's typical of
(07:32):
how they play this negotiation game. They frontload what they want.
And if you look at what Israel and Hamas how
they negotiated again, you know, there are ceasefires, these fires
broke down, there was more wild demands from Hamas. Meanwhile,
gaz is being turned into rubble, but Hamas didn't care.
And it's going to be the same with the Iranians.
(07:52):
They're just going to keep with their maximalist demands and
just use it for politics.
Speaker 1 (07:57):
Well, they now issued and the demands from the Iranian
parliament speaker I think underscore the tenuous nature of these
talks that will take place tomorrow, and two of the
measures agreed upon between the parties have yet to be implemented,
the ceasefire and Lebanon and release of Iran's blocked assets
prior to the commencement and negotiations. Now also, you know
(08:19):
they're demanding the ceasefire in Lebanon. Meanwhile, they have been
attacking other Gulf nations, so it seems tenuous at best.
I'm not even sure if we'll get through tomorrow before
the bombing begins again myself.
Speaker 5 (08:34):
You know, you're probably right. I mean, there really really
isn't a ceasefire because Iran is attacking their neighbors, they
have been attacking Israel. They're making this demand about Lebanon.
I mean, people should understand Lebanon is a separate peace process,
that's a whole different diplomatic tract. That war is not
part of this war, but the Iranians are making it
(08:54):
a part of this war because it's just something they
want and to say that, well, you haven't implemented their
ten points. The ten points are just the starting point
for talks. That's not the end point of what we have.
Speaker 1 (09:05):
By the way, the ten points is there ten points,
there's fifteen points that President Trump gave them. The ten
points they gave us ended up in the trash can.
Speaker 5 (09:15):
Oh absolutely, But they're still sticking to it because as
far as they're concerned, we not only have to like
talk about the ten points, we have to implement the
ten points. Well we could as easily say hey, you
have to implement our fifteen points or we're not going
to talk to you. But they see us as being
the ones who want to have negotiations right now, and
they're going to keep playing that politically, saying, well, the
(09:38):
United States cave to global pressure, The United States caved
in because of the disruption of the energy market and
so forth. So again they're coming at this from a
perspective that they're the ones with leverage, not us.
Speaker 4 (09:51):
How is this going to end?
Speaker 1 (09:52):
I mean, and how's it going to end with our
relationship with NATO countries more specifically Spain and France. You know,
we have cures Starmer, Neville, Chamberlain, Starmer blaming the US
and putin for sky high oil prices. They have been
utterly completely missing in action, useless, and I've got to
(10:13):
imagine that NATO as we know it will will not
look anything like it does today when this is said
and done.
Speaker 4 (10:19):
Am I wrong?
Speaker 5 (10:21):
No, You're absolutely right. The Europeans didn't read the room.
I mean, it's one thing to say that NATO is
not going to get involved in this as an entity
because it's out of area and it's not really a
NATO thing. Okay, Fine, they can argue that even though Turkey,
a NATO member, was attacked, you know, with Iranian missiles.
But fine, let's say that. But then to say that
(10:43):
the United States can't use bases, that the United States
can't have overfly rights, in other words, impeding what we
want to do. So it's not just they're not cooperating,
they're actually getting in the way. Remember the Britons. The
British even tried to make us not use Diego Garcia
for stating our bombers. So they've really they've really screwed
(11:04):
up politically because there's already talk, you know, from Trump
and people in the Republican Party saying we don't need
this much of a commitment to NATO, and they've played
right into those hands. So yes, if they want to
destroy NATO, they've done a great job at it.
Speaker 1 (11:18):
Well, I mean, I think that the US, frankly, would
be better off spending the money on our own national security.
We pay what two thirds of the freight for NATO.
It seems to me that they have allowed in a
constituency that is at odds with their very own culture
and moras in society, and that they want to live
(11:40):
separate and apart, but yet they still have a say
and an impact on the electoral process there, and it
seems like they may be afraid to alienate what is
now a growing part of their population.
Speaker 4 (11:52):
Is that is that far FETs? Not my part?
Speaker 5 (11:55):
Oh, not far fetched at all. I think that at
the recent NATO meeting where the United States was asking
a very pertinent question, if we're defending Europe, what exactly
are we defending? What direction is Europe going? We know
the past, and yes, why we defend it during the
Cold War, But where is Europe now? Where is it headed?
And is it really an American interest to spend so
(12:18):
much money to defend the Europe of the future, because
the Europe of the future may look nothing like the
Europe of the past. And really these are hard questions
Europeans have to ask themselves. But in this particular case,
where it's the United States that were in the Middle East,
and you have these left wing governments of certain NATO countries,
and again some NATO countries want to support us, but
(12:40):
the larger countries don't. And it's in part because, like
you say, they have these constituencies at home that they
don't want to make angry because they'll have riots in
the streets, and they're more sensitive to that than trying
to maintain a relationship with the world's greatest superpower.
Speaker 4 (12:56):
Oh.
Speaker 1 (12:56):
I just think it's short sighted and fullish on their part,
and I think that they really know not what they
do here, because in the end, I think they are
weak as a continent, that weak as individual countries. Yeah,
some of them have nuclear weapons, but I'm not sure
that the former Soviet Union or Vladimir Putin and Russia
(13:17):
are particularly afraid of any country in Western Europe at
this particular point in time. They've also made the other
big mistake of becoming reliant on energy, the lifeblood of
every nation's economy. As evidence, remember if you remember back
in the day, then Chancellor Merkel was handed a white
flag as surrendered by Donald Trump after making a multi
(13:39):
multi billion dollar deal for energy with Putin. And the
whole purpose, or one of the larger purposes of NATO
has been to protect Europe from the threat of Russia.
I mean, how stupid is she was she at the time?
Speaker 5 (13:52):
Oh, very stupid. The president his first term when he
was trying to have a liquified natural gas ship to
Germany and they decided to go with Russia, and then
we saw what happened in Ukraine. The President's absolutely right,
where the Europeans should be buying their energy from the
Western Hemisphere, from the US and maybe also from Canada,
and not buy it from people they can't rely on
(14:13):
like Russia or state sponsors of terror like Iran. Energy
is one of our biggest national assets in terms of
shaping the global environment. President Trump is smart enough, wise
enough to recognize that that we need to, as he said, drill, baby, drill,
but just push energy out as an instrument of national
policy and strategy. Then we can gain a lot more
(14:36):
influence around the world, and country should recognize that that
the US is a great place to get energy. You
can get all you want and you don't have to
deal with these other people. So why Merkle did that?
I mean, who knows. I mean, it was just one
of the worst strategic moves ever.
Speaker 1 (14:52):
I appreciate you being with us. James Robbins come back
off in a voice of reason eight hundred and nine
point one. Sean, if you want to be a part
of the program, I'm your calls coming up straight ahead.
All right, did you see that Kamala Harris is trying
to do a bizarre impression of President Trump.
Speaker 4 (15:07):
Let's listen.
Speaker 7 (15:08):
Well, he's pulled back because you know, the way that
he's thinking of foreign policy, it seems, is when he
talks about America, first it's to withdraw from these relationships
and these connections, and then he kind of read acts
like a mob boss. So then he's kind of legal, well,
(15:30):
you know, you take Eastern Europe.
Speaker 8 (15:36):
And I'll take the Western Hemisphere, and then you.
Speaker 6 (15:39):
Over you get Asia.
Speaker 4 (15:42):
And we'll just divide it up.
Speaker 7 (15:45):
Right, instead of understanding historically America has always been about
our global leadership imperfect though we have been.
Speaker 1 (15:53):
I have no words for how dumb she is. I
really don't. She's maybe the dumbest humor being out there.
Speaker 8 (15:59):
You know, it's really said. The poor people in the
audience that are laughing just at.
Speaker 4 (16:03):
An audience sheer pity.
Speaker 8 (16:06):
They pity her. It's embarrassing.
Speaker 1 (16:08):
Baby James brought me a comment that people that somebody
thought I was being too harsh making fun of your
New York accent and then saying, you know you still
have some remnants of yours. I'm like, oh you do,
thank you. It's beautiful, absolutely, especially when I'm trying.
Speaker 8 (16:24):
But you're tired, exactly when you're tired, becomes very angry.
Sometimes when you're very.
Speaker 1 (16:29):
Angry, there's only one reason that I would ever be
very angry, and that's because you try to purposely make
me angry.
Speaker 4 (16:37):
Exactly.
Speaker 8 (16:37):
That's why I know what happens.
Speaker 4 (16:39):
I'm hosting. I am.
Speaker 1 (16:41):
I'm the MC of the Fox News Patriot Awards last year,
and I did a joke, and the joke is I
can't keep up with all the added letters to LGBT,
lb G t Q, lgbt Q plus lb G two
P LGBT q plus I an A and yesterday you
had to send me with the I in the A
(17:02):
meant And I'm like, okay, why don't we just do
a B C D E F G H I j
K element op. I said that on stage as a joke.
Then you've got this Canadian MP saying, you know, giving
a new list that I never heard of?
Speaker 4 (17:17):
Did you hear of this list?
Speaker 1 (17:19):
MMI WGT s l gbtq q I A plus. Now,
who the hell is supposed to remember that? Why don't
we just say plus and end it there? And then
everybody's included? Plus everyone included? And never mind the Golden rule,
(17:40):
love God with all your heart, mind and soul, and
your neighbor as yourself. Why not go there? Anyway?
Speaker 4 (17:45):
Just listen to this idiot.
Speaker 9 (17:47):
When the budget was released, I was shocked to find
out that the Prime Minister Carney is cutting seven billion
dollars between Indigenous Services Canada and Crown Indigenous Relations zero
dollars to deal with the ongoing genocide of MMIWG two
s l g b t QQIA plus.
Speaker 1 (18:08):
Oh my word, what was a joke by me is
now a reality? How insane is this?
Speaker 8 (18:15):
Honestly?
Speaker 1 (18:16):
I mean they did they truly expect every person in
their woke, DEI crazy world to understand what those letters
mean and to remember them.
Speaker 8 (18:28):
They're zero point four percent of the population. I could
give a rip less second of all. If they're not
willing to address the amount of attacks happening by their
own Alphabet city people, then I don't really give a
rip about that either. Stop talking about how you need money,
to talk about who you want to sleep with and
how you want to dress. Nobody cares. Go do what
you want to do. Go get a job, Go live
(18:49):
your life the way you have decided to live it.
Why do we need to allocate funds to you? I'm
so sick and tired of seeing a guy in a
tutu trying to use the bathroom next to me and
my daughter, and I'm so supposed to be okay with it. Oh,
on top of it, I got to use taxpayer dollars
to make you feel okay about the fact that you're
wearing a two two.
Speaker 4 (19:04):
Nobody cares.
Speaker 6 (19:05):
Move on.
Speaker 1 (19:05):
Love God with all your heart, mind, body, and soul,
and your neighbors, yourself except don't follow the the Linda Bible.
What is what does Ethan called it? He actually has
a name for it, which is it's okay.
Speaker 8 (19:18):
What is it called, Jason saying it to me?
Speaker 1 (19:22):
Darien, the Lindarian version. Forget the King James version. Go
with the Lindarian version, which allows people, I think circumvan
most people circumvo the words of Jesus. Forgive us as
we forgive others, forgive those.
Speaker 8 (19:37):
I'm not forgiving the guy in the two two in
the stole next to me. Sorry, not a thing, not
doing it. He's standing up. I'm sitting down. I got
a problem with that. Get out of the bathroom. Stop
asking me for money. You want to dress up, you want.
Speaker 1 (19:52):
To be something to give us trespasses as we forgive
those that trespass against what's so hard?
Speaker 8 (19:57):
Ask your audience see if they agree.
Speaker 1 (19:59):
No, I'm not now, Oh no, no, no calls on this.
I don't want to deal with it. All right, Let's
get to Rick in the Free State of Florida, my
free state.
Speaker 4 (20:07):
What's up, Rick? How are you? Happy Friday? Sir?
Speaker 10 (20:11):
Happy Friday to you. Thank you for taking my call,
and thank you for everything to do.
Speaker 6 (20:14):
And you really need to get Linda on TV one.
Speaker 10 (20:16):
Of these days.
Speaker 4 (20:17):
But I need to get Linda on Why.
Speaker 10 (20:19):
On the TV show.
Speaker 6 (20:20):
One of these days, I.
Speaker 1 (20:22):
Think Linda on the pod one day may work out.
I think we could make that happen. That would be interesting.
Speaker 10 (20:27):
So yeah, my thought is that, you know, the behavior
of NATO kind of militates for the United States to
take Greenland. You know, at the end of the day,
like it or not, the US is an empire in
the vein of historical empires, and it needs to be
able to project force and to the extent that NATO
(20:48):
the deal that you know, the United States protects them
in exchange at the very least for the ability to
project force, at the very least for logistical support for
whatever it may need, and that's being denied. There really
is really need to rethink the force production mechanism of
the US employees, including rebasing from Spain to Malta, maybe
(21:11):
taking over Greenland, and other aspects of the geography of
the Glibble.
Speaker 1 (21:16):
When this conflict is over, I can I can say
with a pretty high degree of certainty there's going to
be a reconfiguration of NATO as it's currently formed. And
I frankly I want no part of Spain, I want,
but no part of France. I want no part of
Great Britain Italy to be determined.
Speaker 6 (21:37):
Uh.
Speaker 1 (21:37):
The Eastern Bloc countries like Poland are far more reliable.
We'll see where the Germans, you know, fall in all
of this. They need us, We don't need them. We
pay the bulk of money is to protect them. Their
conduct has been atrocious and I know President Trump well
enough to know that he's not finished with this whole issue.
We'll see, We're gonna watch.
Speaker 6 (21:56):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (21:57):
Nine is a number if you want to be a
part of the program. Back to our busy phones. It's
toll free eight hundred ninety four one sean if you
want to be a part of the program. Roger, North Carolina,
Happy Friday, Roger, thank you, Thank.
Speaker 4 (22:13):
You, longtime listener.
Speaker 10 (22:15):
Man, excited to talk to you.
Speaker 1 (22:17):
Thank you, my friend, glad you called Happy Friday, Happy
WEEKA Yeah, Man, I.
Speaker 10 (22:22):
Wanted to talk to you about two things. First of all,
I want to kind of harp on Linda a little bit.
Speaker 6 (22:28):
She's forgetting one of the most important things about forgiveness.
Speaker 10 (22:31):
God commands us to love all people, and that's the
hardest part. It's not the forgiveness part, it's the love part.
Speaker 1 (22:36):
Well, forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those that
trespass against us. Now, Linda's explanation is is that she's
going to get to the par league gates and start
negotiating with God and say, well, you made me, and
then God's going to answer and say yeah, but I
also gave you directions to follow, and there was no
more clear direction than you know, forgive us our treuspasses,
(22:59):
as we forgive those that trespass against us.
Speaker 4 (23:02):
And you wanted to rewrite what I said, absolutely right,
and on top, thank you, thank yousils Well.
Speaker 10 (23:08):
The apostles asked how many times must I forgive? And
Jesus quoted.
Speaker 4 (23:12):
Seven to seventy times seven, right.
Speaker 10 (23:14):
Which is not an actual number, but he literally means forever.
Speaker 1 (23:18):
Endless, endless forgiveness. And by the way, which I have
to do with Linda every day, endless forgiveness, endless, it
never stops. But I can't anymore. This is driving me nuts. Roger,
thank you, you have a great week nd.
Speaker 8 (23:35):
What poor Roger.
Speaker 4 (23:37):
Or Roger nothing?
Speaker 1 (23:38):
I mean, He's Roger to you straight, but you're so
stubborn you won't listen.
Speaker 8 (23:42):
He's talking about now arguing.
Speaker 1 (23:44):
With Jesus the Bible, everything at a core tenant of Christianity.
Speaker 4 (23:48):
And by the way, I applaud.
Speaker 1 (23:50):
Your embracing of your Christian faith. It's just you don't
get to rewrite the rules that you don't like.
Speaker 4 (23:57):
That's it.
Speaker 8 (23:57):
I had a meeting last night at my church and
I sold my priest and we were talking and I said,
you know, father, I got to tell you something. I
really don't like the Pope. I don't like him at all.
He's not on my a list.
Speaker 4 (24:07):
And he just busting That's why I'm not a Catholic.
Speaker 8 (24:11):
Well, I am a Catholic, so it's awkward for me.
Speaker 1 (24:13):
But you know, the Pope made his statement. Did you
see the pope statement?
Speaker 4 (24:17):
Now?
Speaker 8 (24:17):
If you hear everything, I hate watch him. It's terrible.
Speaker 4 (24:22):
You hate watching him. I hate the Pope.
Speaker 8 (24:24):
Oh, I hate watch him. Get it like, I hate
what he says. So I hate watch him, like I
gotta know what he says because I gotta know, But
I hate watch him. It's like I'm just watching it
because I know it's going to tick me off.
Speaker 1 (24:35):
Okay, he doesn't want any conflict anywhere, and he was
talking about violence, and I'm like, have you even read
the Bible. Have you read the conflicts, the wars that
were that the Israeli people that were they were empowered
by God to defeat their enemies.
Speaker 4 (24:52):
Did you never?
Speaker 1 (24:52):
Did you ever hear the story about David slaying Goliath
through the power of God with a slingshot against this
massive giant, or the conflicts and the wars of King
Saul and so on and so forth, and frankly, all
throughout Israel's history they've been, you know, surrounded by enemies,
but as God's chosen people, they against all odds keep winning.
Speaker 4 (25:17):
Pretty amazing. Uh.
Speaker 1 (25:19):
Anyway, Mitch and Georgia. Mitch, you're on the Sean Hennity Show.
Speaker 6 (25:24):
Sean, it's pleasure to talk with you. I've been listening
a long time. I appreciate you, but I do have
a little bit I disagree with you, greatly, specifically about
the accent. So yeah, I grew up I am a
gen xer, okay, and I grew up watching things like
(25:50):
First of well, my example is my cousin Benny. Okay,
by the.
Speaker 4 (25:54):
Way, one of the greatest movies of all time.
Speaker 6 (25:57):
Absolutely something's wrong with you if you hadn't seen it.
But when you get to that part towards the end
of the movie when Marissa to May is sitting on
that stand and you know that you know the line
when she says the phrase, no, there's more. I don't
(26:18):
care who you are.
Speaker 1 (26:21):
It's hilarious at that moment, you know, no, there's more.
I can tell you more about well, you know it
would be you know three point one four top dead center.
Speaker 6 (26:34):
Right exactly saying this was none of.
Speaker 4 (26:39):
That, all right.
Speaker 1 (26:41):
But you know, for the people that have taken this
a little too seriously, we you chill out. I mean, Linda,
we're just having fun. I actually lived my cousin visit Vinnie,
because when I went to Alabama and I was a
local host in Alabama and then later in Georgia, where
you are, I did have a thicker New York accent
at the time. I still have it. It does come out,
(27:03):
especially when I'm tired or mad. I mean, Linda pisses
me off. However, you know, it actually put me on
the map in Alabama because I stood out like a
sore thumb. Sew Sewan New York Coffee Talk Radio, Welcome
to Talk Radio seven seventy w VNN. I mean, it
was hilarious and but It kind of made me kind
(27:26):
of you know, people tuned in because like, who's this
crazy guy from New York And it put me on
the map. And anyway, I ended up being uh, you know,
a little you know locally, you know, in a small pond.
I was a little famous as a result of it.
So it worked out well for me. Anyway, Mitch, appreciate you.
I'm definitely more Southern in my values through and through.
(27:48):
That part is true. But I'm a Floridian also, through
and through.
Our two Sean Hannity Show toll free. It's eight hundred
and nine point one Sean. If you want to be
a part of the program. It is stunning, but not shocking.
We point this out all the time, and that is
how democrats, all of them, constantly change their points of view.
Let me play a clip of well he's leader, well,
(00:21):
minority leader of name only Chucky Schumer criticizing Obama's nuclear deal.
Speaker 2 (00:26):
Listen to this, I asked, are we better off with
the agreement that we have before us or without? In
the first ten years of the deal, there are serious
weaknesses in the agreement. First, inspections are not anywhere anytime.
The potential delay of as many as twenty four days
before we can inspect undeclared suspicious sites is troubling. It
(00:49):
is true that declared sites will be monitored. That is
one of the positives of this deal. But if Iran
is going to cheat, it will not be at a
declared site with the eyes of the world watching. It
will be at a non designated site. And if Iran
is trying to cheat, it will certainly delay the inspection
process as long as possible. Even more troubling is the
(01:10):
fact that the US cannot demand inspections unilaterally. We require
of the majority of the eight member Joint Commission, assuming
that China, Russia, Iran will not cooperate, inspections would require
the votes of all three European members of the P
five plus one, as well as the EU representative. It
(01:30):
is a reasonable fear. Once the Europeans become entangled in
lucrative economic relations with Iran, they may not want to
rock the vote by voting to allow inspections.
Speaker 1 (01:42):
Well, that's Chuck Schumer just trashing the idiotic, imbecilic Iranian
deal by Obama. That's the one that allowed you know,
billions of dollars in cash and of the currency to
be dropped off of the mullows in Iran so they
can build out their nuclear program, build out that ballistic
missile program, and fullmentara around the world. Thank you for
(02:05):
funding all of that terrorism. Then I got a clip
of Joe Biden nineteen eighty eight saying that he would
reduce commitments to NATO if they don't do more. Oh,
Donald Trump says it. The world is ending it.
Speaker 3 (02:19):
Germany, if you're unwilling to reflate your market and take
on your responsibility and the rest of the world as
a world leader. Why are we the only ones that
have that responsibility? Why are we the only economic engine?
We are clearly the biggest. We can say that to
the Germans and our friends in Europe. We're all in this.
NATO's important. We stick with NATO. But I'm not sure
(02:40):
we need two hundred and eighty nine thousand American troops
at the cost of total cost of one hundred and
two billion dollars. If you had everything up, maybe you
should do more now. If you want to open up
your markets, if you're willing to help aggravate alleviate Third
World debt, if you'll step in and help Mexico, if
you'll step in and help Nigeria like we are, then
we can play.
Speaker 4 (03:01):
Then we could play anyway.
Speaker 1 (03:02):
James Robins, special Assistant to Defense Secretary of Rumsfeld Institute
of World Politics, joins us. All right, so we have
these talks coming up this weekend. You know, I forget
the hypocrisy because it is on a level that is
breathtaking to me, and it doesn't seem to you know,
it doesn't seem to register with many people out there.
(03:24):
Why the president needed to act the way he did
with Midnight Hammer and now epic Fury. And the President
can't win for losing because bridges and infrastructure they are
considered military targets, legitimate military targets throughout the history of warfare.
So if in fact the President went through with infrastructure
(03:44):
and bridge day, then he'd be a war criminal. And
if the President says, okay, there seems to be a
path to maybe a peace deal before I go down
that road, and I'd rather not for the sake of
the Iranium people, and we'd have a negotiated settlement, which
I'm dubious of, to be very honest, especially with the
way the Iranians are acting right now. But you know what,
(04:07):
he's giving piece a chance. It seems like the Iranians
want to do everything they can do to blow up
the ceasefire before it even gets started.
Speaker 5 (04:14):
Oh well, you're absolutely right, Sean, and from the democratic
side of the least have statesmen on their side. And
now it's just talking points. I mean, when you were
playing Chuck Schumer there, if you did that without context,
no one would know who that was. With all of
the very important points making about why the JCPOA was
a terrible, terrible deal, and it only made Iran even
(04:38):
more capable of developing nuclear weapons. And now President Trump
is he's kind of in a bind with respect to
the opposition because on the one hand, they said, oh,
he's going to start like Armageddon with power Point and
Bridge day, and then when he decides no, will negotiate,
they say, aha, he chickened out. So yeah, he's kind
(04:58):
of with respect the opposition, and you just can't take
them seriously if you're looking for guidance on how to
actually solve the problem. All they want to do is
score points.
Speaker 1 (05:09):
All right, So here's where we are with this now.
The President put on truth that the Iranians don't seem
to realize they have no cards other than short term
extortion of the world by using international waterways. The only
reason they're alive today is to negotiate. You put that out.
He said, they're doing a very poor job. This honorable,
(05:30):
some would say, of allowing oil to go through the
straight of hormones. This is not the agreement that we have.
And the President's kind of making it clear going into
tomorrow that they've not lived up to their part of
the agreement as it is now, and that would mean
to me signal to me that the President's you know,
(05:50):
more than ready to move forward with the previous plan,
and that is to obliterate the country and then take
whatever enriched uranium we need and make sure the straight
of Hormus is open, prevent them from fomenting terror in
the region, and of course, you know, put limits on
their capacity to build out ballistic missiles with a longer range.
I think that those are the main goals that are left,
(06:12):
and then pretty much the job would be done, wouldn't it.
Speaker 5 (06:15):
Well, yes, and I hope the President is ready to
reignite force because these negotiations.
Speaker 6 (06:21):
Aren't going to wink.
Speaker 4 (06:22):
Well, by the way, do you doubt that at all
that he's willing.
Speaker 5 (06:26):
No, I don't doubt it one bit, and the Iranians
shouldn't doubt it either. But from their perspective, what they
see is they have this rest period, this ceasefire, when
number one, they can try to reload if their friends
in Russia and China can get some more arms to them.
But number two, they see negotiation as kind of a
level playing field. They know they can't fight us on
(06:47):
the battlefield, but at the negotiating table they are used
to winning I mean, if you look at the history,
the Iranians have frequently eaten our lunch, not necessarily with
Donald Trump and his team, but it's their perspective going
in and if they're alive, they think that they're winning.
So they're going to try everything they can do to
use this negotiation session as a form of political warfare.
(07:10):
And we already see them moving the goalposts, you know,
saying well, hey, Lebanon was supposed to be part of it,
and now saying that we have to release the frozen funds.
That's something they have been demanding ever since President Carter,
and I mean that's something you do at the end
of the negotiation, not at the beginning. But they're saying, hey,
we won't even talk to you unless you unfreeze our assets.
Well that's not going to happen. But it's typical of
(07:32):
how they play this negotiation game. They frontload what they want.
And if you look at what Israel and Hamas how
they negotiated again, you know, there are ceasefires, these fires
broke down, there was more wild demands from Hamas. Meanwhile,
gaz is being turned into rubble, but Hamas didn't care.
And it's going to be the same with the Iranians.
(07:52):
They're just going to keep with their maximalist demands and
just use it for politics.
Speaker 1 (07:57):
Well, they now issued and the demands from the Iranian
parliament speaker I think underscore the tenuous nature of these
talks that will take place tomorrow, and two of the
measures agreed upon between the parties have yet to be implemented,
the ceasefire and Lebanon and release of Iran's blocked assets
prior to the commencement and negotiations. Now also, you know
(08:19):
they're demanding the ceasefire in Lebanon. Meanwhile, they have been
attacking other Gulf nations, so it seems tenuous at best.
I'm not even sure if we'll get through tomorrow before
the bombing begins again myself.
Speaker 5 (08:34):
You know, you're probably right. I mean, there really really
isn't a ceasefire because Iran is attacking their neighbors, they
have been attacking Israel. They're making this demand about Lebanon.
I mean, people should understand Lebanon is a separate peace process,
that's a whole different diplomatic tract. That war is not
part of this war, but the Iranians are making it
(08:54):
a part of this war because it's just something they
want and to say that, well, you haven't implemented their
ten points. The ten points are just the starting point
for talks. That's not the end point of what we have.
Speaker 1 (09:05):
By the way, the ten points is there ten points,
there's fifteen points that President Trump gave them. The ten
points they gave us ended up in the trash can.
Speaker 5 (09:15):
Oh absolutely, But they're still sticking to it because as
far as they're concerned, we not only have to like
talk about the ten points, we have to implement the
ten points. Well we could as easily say hey, you
have to implement our fifteen points or we're not going
to talk to you. But they see us as being
the ones who want to have negotiations right now, and
they're going to keep playing that politically, saying, well, the
(09:38):
United States cave to global pressure, The United States caved
in because of the disruption of the energy market and
so forth. So again they're coming at this from a
perspective that they're the ones with leverage, not us.
Speaker 4 (09:51):
How is this going to end?
Speaker 1 (09:52):
I mean, and how's it going to end with our
relationship with NATO countries more specifically Spain and France. You know,
we have cures Starmer, Neville, Chamberlain, Starmer blaming the US
and putin for sky high oil prices. They have been
utterly completely missing in action, useless, and I've got to
(10:13):
imagine that NATO as we know it will will not
look anything like it does today when this is said
and done.
Speaker 4 (10:19):
Am I wrong?
Speaker 5 (10:21):
No, You're absolutely right. The Europeans didn't read the room.
I mean, it's one thing to say that NATO is
not going to get involved in this as an entity
because it's out of area and it's not really a
NATO thing. Okay, Fine, they can argue that even though Turkey,
a NATO member, was attacked, you know, with Iranian missiles.
But fine, let's say that. But then to say that
(10:43):
the United States can't use bases, that the United States
can't have overfly rights, in other words, impeding what we
want to do. So it's not just they're not cooperating,
they're actually getting in the way. Remember the Britons. The
British even tried to make us not use Diego Garcia
for stating our bombers. So they've really they've really screwed
(11:04):
up politically because there's already talk, you know, from Trump
and people in the Republican Party saying we don't need
this much of a commitment to NATO, and they've played
right into those hands. So yes, if they want to
destroy NATO, they've done a great job at it.
Speaker 1 (11:18):
Well, I mean, I think that the US, frankly, would
be better off spending the money on our own national security.
We pay what two thirds of the freight for NATO.
It seems to me that they have allowed in a
constituency that is at odds with their very own culture
and moras in society, and that they want to live
(11:40):
separate and apart, but yet they still have a say
and an impact on the electoral process there, and it
seems like they may be afraid to alienate what is
now a growing part of their population.
Speaker 4 (11:52):
Is that is that far FETs? Not my part?
Speaker 5 (11:55):
Oh, not far fetched at all. I think that at
the recent NATO meeting where the United States was asking
a very pertinent question, if we're defending Europe, what exactly
are we defending? What direction is Europe going? We know
the past, and yes, why we defend it during the
Cold War, But where is Europe now? Where is it headed?
And is it really an American interest to spend so
(12:18):
much money to defend the Europe of the future, because
the Europe of the future may look nothing like the
Europe of the past. And really these are hard questions
Europeans have to ask themselves. But in this particular case,
where it's the United States that were in the Middle East,
and you have these left wing governments of certain NATO countries,
and again some NATO countries want to support us, but
(12:40):
the larger countries don't. And it's in part because, like
you say, they have these constituencies at home that they
don't want to make angry because they'll have riots in
the streets, and they're more sensitive to that than trying
to maintain a relationship with the world's greatest superpower.
Speaker 4 (12:56):
Oh.
Speaker 1 (12:56):
I just think it's short sighted and fullish on their part,
and I think that they really know not what they
do here, because in the end, I think they are
weak as a continent, that weak as individual countries. Yeah,
some of them have nuclear weapons, but I'm not sure
that the former Soviet Union or Vladimir Putin and Russia
(13:17):
are particularly afraid of any country in Western Europe at
this particular point in time. They've also made the other
big mistake of becoming reliant on energy, the lifeblood of
every nation's economy. As evidence, remember if you remember back
in the day, then Chancellor Merkel was handed a white
flag as surrendered by Donald Trump after making a multi
(13:39):
multi billion dollar deal for energy with Putin. And the
whole purpose, or one of the larger purposes of NATO
has been to protect Europe from the threat of Russia.
I mean, how stupid is she was she at the time?
Speaker 5 (13:52):
Oh, very stupid. The president his first term when he
was trying to have a liquified natural gas ship to
Germany and they decided to go with Russia, and then
we saw what happened in Ukraine. The President's absolutely right,
where the Europeans should be buying their energy from the
Western Hemisphere, from the US and maybe also from Canada,
and not buy it from people they can't rely on
(14:13):
like Russia or state sponsors of terror like Iran. Energy
is one of our biggest national assets in terms of
shaping the global environment. President Trump is smart enough, wise
enough to recognize that that we need to, as he said, drill, baby, drill,
but just push energy out as an instrument of national
policy and strategy. Then we can gain a lot more
(14:36):
influence around the world, and country should recognize that that
the US is a great place to get energy. You
can get all you want and you don't have to
deal with these other people. So why Merkle did that?
I mean, who knows. I mean, it was just one
of the worst strategic moves ever.
Speaker 1 (14:52):
I appreciate you being with us. James Robbins come back
off in a voice of reason eight hundred and nine
point one. Sean, if you want to be a part
of the program, I'm your calls coming up straight ahead.
All right, did you see that Kamala Harris is trying
to do a bizarre impression of President Trump.
Speaker 4 (15:07):
Let's listen.
Speaker 7 (15:08):
Well, he's pulled back because you know, the way that
he's thinking of foreign policy, it seems, is when he
talks about America, first it's to withdraw from these relationships
and these connections, and then he kind of read acts
like a mob boss. So then he's kind of legal, well,
(15:30):
you know, you take Eastern Europe.
Speaker 8 (15:36):
And I'll take the Western Hemisphere, and then you.
Speaker 6 (15:39):
Over you get Asia.
Speaker 4 (15:42):
And we'll just divide it up.
Speaker 7 (15:45):
Right, instead of understanding historically America has always been about
our global leadership imperfect though we have been.
Speaker 1 (15:53):
I have no words for how dumb she is. I
really don't. She's maybe the dumbest humor being out there.
Speaker 8 (15:59):
You know, it's really said. The poor people in the
audience that are laughing just at.
Speaker 4 (16:03):
An audience sheer pity.
Speaker 8 (16:06):
They pity her. It's embarrassing.
Speaker 1 (16:08):
Baby James brought me a comment that people that somebody
thought I was being too harsh making fun of your
New York accent and then saying, you know you still
have some remnants of yours. I'm like, oh you do,
thank you. It's beautiful, absolutely, especially when I'm trying.
Speaker 8 (16:24):
But you're tired, exactly when you're tired, becomes very angry.
Sometimes when you're very.
Speaker 1 (16:29):
Angry, there's only one reason that I would ever be
very angry, and that's because you try to purposely make
me angry.
Speaker 4 (16:37):
Exactly.
Speaker 8 (16:37):
That's why I know what happens.
Speaker 4 (16:39):
I'm hosting. I am.
Speaker 1 (16:41):
I'm the MC of the Fox News Patriot Awards last year,
and I did a joke, and the joke is I
can't keep up with all the added letters to LGBT,
lb G t Q, lgbt Q plus lb G two
P LGBT q plus I an A and yesterday you
had to send me with the I in the A
(17:02):
meant And I'm like, okay, why don't we just do
a B C D E F G H I j
K element op. I said that on stage as a joke.
Then you've got this Canadian MP saying, you know, giving
a new list that I never heard of?
Speaker 4 (17:17):
Did you hear of this list?
Speaker 1 (17:19):
MMI WGT s l gbtq q I A plus. Now,
who the hell is supposed to remember that? Why don't
we just say plus and end it there? And then
everybody's included? Plus everyone included? And never mind the Golden rule,
(17:40):
love God with all your heart, mind and soul, and
your neighbor as yourself. Why not go there? Anyway?
Speaker 4 (17:45):
Just listen to this idiot.
Speaker 9 (17:47):
When the budget was released, I was shocked to find
out that the Prime Minister Carney is cutting seven billion
dollars between Indigenous Services Canada and Crown Indigenous Relations zero
dollars to deal with the ongoing genocide of MMIWG two
s l g b t QQIA plus.
Speaker 1 (18:08):
Oh my word, what was a joke by me is
now a reality? How insane is this?
Speaker 8 (18:15):
Honestly?
Speaker 1 (18:16):
I mean they did they truly expect every person in
their woke, DEI crazy world to understand what those letters
mean and to remember them.
Speaker 8 (18:28):
They're zero point four percent of the population. I could
give a rip less second of all. If they're not
willing to address the amount of attacks happening by their
own Alphabet city people, then I don't really give a
rip about that either. Stop talking about how you need money,
to talk about who you want to sleep with and
how you want to dress. Nobody cares. Go do what
you want to do. Go get a job, Go live
(18:49):
your life the way you have decided to live it.
Why do we need to allocate funds to you? I'm
so sick and tired of seeing a guy in a
tutu trying to use the bathroom next to me and
my daughter, and I'm so supposed to be okay with it. Oh,
on top of it, I got to use taxpayer dollars
to make you feel okay about the fact that you're
wearing a two two.
Speaker 4 (19:04):
Nobody cares.
Speaker 6 (19:05):
Move on.
Speaker 1 (19:05):
Love God with all your heart, mind, body, and soul,
and your neighbors, yourself except don't follow the the Linda Bible.
What is what does Ethan called it? He actually has
a name for it, which is it's okay.
Speaker 8 (19:18):
What is it called, Jason saying it to me?
Speaker 1 (19:22):
Darien, the Lindarian version. Forget the King James version. Go
with the Lindarian version, which allows people, I think circumvan
most people circumvo the words of Jesus. Forgive us as
we forgive others, forgive those.
Speaker 8 (19:37):
I'm not forgiving the guy in the two two in
the stole next to me. Sorry, not a thing, not
doing it. He's standing up. I'm sitting down. I got
a problem with that. Get out of the bathroom. Stop
asking me for money. You want to dress up, you want.
Speaker 1 (19:52):
To be something to give us trespasses as we forgive
those that trespass against what's so hard?
Speaker 8 (19:57):
Ask your audience see if they agree.
Speaker 1 (19:59):
No, I'm not now, Oh no, no, no calls on this.
I don't want to deal with it. All right, Let's
get to Rick in the Free State of Florida, my
free state.
Speaker 4 (20:07):
What's up, Rick? How are you? Happy Friday? Sir?
Speaker 10 (20:11):
Happy Friday to you. Thank you for taking my call,
and thank you for everything to do.
Speaker 6 (20:14):
And you really need to get Linda on TV one.
Speaker 10 (20:16):
Of these days.
Speaker 4 (20:17):
But I need to get Linda on Why.
Speaker 10 (20:19):
On the TV show.
Speaker 6 (20:20):
One of these days, I.
Speaker 1 (20:22):
Think Linda on the pod one day may work out.
I think we could make that happen. That would be interesting.
Speaker 10 (20:27):
So yeah, my thought is that, you know, the behavior
of NATO kind of militates for the United States to
take Greenland. You know, at the end of the day,
like it or not, the US is an empire in
the vein of historical empires, and it needs to be
able to project force and to the extent that NATO
(20:48):
the deal that you know, the United States protects them
in exchange at the very least for the ability to
project force, at the very least for logistical support for
whatever it may need, and that's being denied. There really
is really need to rethink the force production mechanism of
the US employees, including rebasing from Spain to Malta, maybe
(21:11):
taking over Greenland, and other aspects of the geography of
the Glibble.
Speaker 1 (21:16):
When this conflict is over, I can I can say
with a pretty high degree of certainty there's going to
be a reconfiguration of NATO as it's currently formed. And
I frankly I want no part of Spain, I want,
but no part of France. I want no part of
Great Britain Italy to be determined.
Speaker 6 (21:37):
Uh.
Speaker 1 (21:37):
The Eastern Bloc countries like Poland are far more reliable.
We'll see where the Germans, you know, fall in all
of this. They need us, We don't need them. We
pay the bulk of money is to protect them. Their
conduct has been atrocious and I know President Trump well
enough to know that he's not finished with this whole issue.
We'll see, We're gonna watch.
Speaker 6 (21:56):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (21:57):
Nine is a number if you want to be a
part of the program. Back to our busy phones. It's
toll free eight hundred ninety four one sean if you
want to be a part of the program. Roger, North Carolina,
Happy Friday, Roger, thank you, Thank.
Speaker 4 (22:13):
You, longtime listener.
Speaker 10 (22:15):
Man, excited to talk to you.
Speaker 1 (22:17):
Thank you, my friend, glad you called Happy Friday, Happy
WEEKA Yeah, Man, I.
Speaker 10 (22:22):
Wanted to talk to you about two things. First of all,
I want to kind of harp on Linda a little bit.
Speaker 6 (22:28):
She's forgetting one of the most important things about forgiveness.
Speaker 10 (22:31):
God commands us to love all people, and that's the
hardest part. It's not the forgiveness part, it's the love part.
Speaker 1 (22:36):
Well, forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those that
trespass against us. Now, Linda's explanation is is that she's
going to get to the par league gates and start
negotiating with God and say, well, you made me, and
then God's going to answer and say yeah, but I
also gave you directions to follow, and there was no
more clear direction than you know, forgive us our treuspasses,
(22:59):
as we forgive those that trespass against us.
Speaker 4 (23:02):
And you wanted to rewrite what I said, absolutely right,
and on top, thank you, thank yousils Well.
Speaker 10 (23:08):
The apostles asked how many times must I forgive? And
Jesus quoted.
Speaker 4 (23:12):
Seven to seventy times seven, right.
Speaker 10 (23:14):
Which is not an actual number, but he literally means forever.
Speaker 1 (23:18):
Endless, endless forgiveness. And by the way, which I have
to do with Linda every day, endless forgiveness, endless, it
never stops. But I can't anymore. This is driving me nuts. Roger,
thank you, you have a great week nd.
Speaker 8 (23:35):
What poor Roger.
Speaker 4 (23:37):
Or Roger nothing?
Speaker 1 (23:38):
I mean, He's Roger to you straight, but you're so
stubborn you won't listen.
Speaker 8 (23:42):
He's talking about now arguing.
Speaker 1 (23:44):
With Jesus the Bible, everything at a core tenant of Christianity.
Speaker 4 (23:48):
And by the way, I applaud.
Speaker 1 (23:50):
Your embracing of your Christian faith. It's just you don't
get to rewrite the rules that you don't like.
Speaker 4 (23:57):
That's it.
Speaker 8 (23:57):
I had a meeting last night at my church and
I sold my priest and we were talking and I said,
you know, father, I got to tell you something. I
really don't like the Pope. I don't like him at all.
He's not on my a list.
Speaker 4 (24:07):
And he just busting That's why I'm not a Catholic.
Speaker 8 (24:11):
Well, I am a Catholic, so it's awkward for me.
Speaker 1 (24:13):
But you know, the Pope made his statement. Did you
see the pope statement?
Speaker 4 (24:17):
Now?
Speaker 8 (24:17):
If you hear everything, I hate watch him. It's terrible.
Speaker 4 (24:22):
You hate watching him. I hate the Pope.
Speaker 8 (24:24):
Oh, I hate watch him. Get it like, I hate
what he says. So I hate watch him, like I
gotta know what he says because I gotta know, But
I hate watch him. It's like I'm just watching it
because I know it's going to tick me off.
Speaker 1 (24:35):
Okay, he doesn't want any conflict anywhere, and he was
talking about violence, and I'm like, have you even read
the Bible. Have you read the conflicts, the wars that
were that the Israeli people that were they were empowered
by God to defeat their enemies.
Speaker 4 (24:52):
Did you never?
Speaker 1 (24:52):
Did you ever hear the story about David slaying Goliath
through the power of God with a slingshot against this
massive giant, or the conflicts and the wars of King
Saul and so on and so forth, and frankly, all
throughout Israel's history they've been, you know, surrounded by enemies,
but as God's chosen people, they against all odds keep winning.
Speaker 4 (25:17):
Pretty amazing. Uh.
Speaker 1 (25:19):
Anyway, Mitch and Georgia. Mitch, you're on the Sean Hennity Show.
Speaker 6 (25:24):
Sean, it's pleasure to talk with you. I've been listening
a long time. I appreciate you, but I do have
a little bit I disagree with you, greatly, specifically about
the accent. So yeah, I grew up I am a
gen xer, okay, and I grew up watching things like
(25:50):
First of well, my example is my cousin Benny. Okay,
by the.
Speaker 4 (25:54):
Way, one of the greatest movies of all time.
Speaker 6 (25:57):
Absolutely something's wrong with you if you hadn't seen it.
But when you get to that part towards the end
of the movie when Marissa to May is sitting on
that stand and you know that you know the line
when she says the phrase, no, there's more. I don't
(26:18):
care who you are.
Speaker 1 (26:21):
It's hilarious at that moment, you know, no, there's more.
I can tell you more about well, you know it
would be you know three point one four top dead center.
Speaker 6 (26:34):
Right exactly saying this was none of.
Speaker 4 (26:39):
That, all right.
Speaker 1 (26:41):
But you know, for the people that have taken this
a little too seriously, we you chill out. I mean, Linda,
we're just having fun. I actually lived my cousin visit Vinnie,
because when I went to Alabama and I was a
local host in Alabama and then later in Georgia, where
you are, I did have a thicker New York accent
at the time. I still have it. It does come out,
(27:03):
especially when I'm tired or mad. I mean, Linda pisses
me off. However, you know, it actually put me on
the map in Alabama because I stood out like a
sore thumb. Sew Sewan New York Coffee Talk Radio, Welcome
to Talk Radio seven seventy w VNN. I mean, it
was hilarious and but It kind of made me kind
(27:26):
of you know, people tuned in because like, who's this
crazy guy from New York And it put me on
the map. And anyway, I ended up being uh, you know,
a little you know locally, you know, in a small pond.
I was a little famous as a result of it.
So it worked out well for me. Anyway, Mitch, appreciate you.
I'm definitely more Southern in my values through and through.
(27:48):
That part is true. But I'm a Floridian also, through
and through.
The Sean Hannity Show News
Host
Sean Hannity
Popular Podcasts
Hey Jonas!
Hey Jonas! The official Jonas Brothers podcast. Hosted by Kevin, Joe, and Nick Jonas. It’s the Jonas Brothers you know... musicians, actors, and well, yes, brothers. Now, they’re sharing another side of themselves in the playful, intimate, and irreverent way only they can. Spend time with the Jonas Brothers here and stay a little bit longer for deep conversations like never before.
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com