February 5, 2026 • 30 mins
Sean Hannity breaks down the media and political double standard surrounding immigration enforcement, as ICE agents face growing threats while doing their jobs. Sean revisits past Democratic support for deportations under Barack Obama, contrasting it with today’s rhetoric that labels federal agents as Nazis and fascists. The show exposes how reckless political language fuels chaos, endangers law enforcement, and ignores real victims of violent crime tied to illegal immigration. Sean also addresses the ongoing border crisis and why accountability has disappeared in Washington. This hour pulls no punches in exposing hypocrisy and defending the rule of law.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Our two Sean Hennity Show. Toll free your numbers eight
hundred and nine point one, Shawn if you want to
be a part of the program. Washington Times reporting today
Chuck Schumer, who came Jeffries warning that Democrats will not
fund the Department of Homeland Security unless the Trump administration
reinstates Biden's immigration policies. Okay, that is that is not
(00:21):
going to happen. Democratic leaders have put out a list
of ten demands for ICE reforms. If they are going
to fund ICE, why would they want no mass for
ICE agents, especially in light of the increase of incidents
of attacks on ICE agents you know, upp a whopping
what thirteen hundred percent, the same with vehicular attacks on
(00:45):
ice that's up eighteen hundred percent, and threat level against
ICE agents up eight thousand percent. Why would they ever
want something like this, But that's one of their demands.
They've been docked and they're going after their families. They
are saying that ICE agents should constantly display their unique
ID number. You can tell an ICE agent when they're coming,
(01:08):
when they're working. I mean, it's not like people are
out there, you know, dressing up as ICE agents. We
haven't had any incidents. Okay, you can give in on
that one. Jeffries and Schumer are arguing that federal funds
should not be used to conduct immigration operations near sensitive locations. Okay,
(01:28):
there's no such thing. There should be no such thing
as a safe haven for people that don't obey our laws,
respect our laws, borders and sovereignty. Then it goes on
to say they want to uphold the use of forced standards. Well,
they already have that in place. That's for law all
law enforcement. And then they go on to say, by
(01:50):
the way, I'm not against them demanding body cams, which,
by the way, most of them already have. And and
they come up with ridiculous language, language like no parliamentary police.
There is no parliamentary police. This is ridiculous. Now, the
backstory behind all of this, and what's interesting about this
is Democrats in the Senate they're talking a big game
(02:11):
on ice behind closed doors. They are scared to death.
That's the backstory. Axios even had this today. It's not
about trying to enact immigration reform. They want to try
to turn this into a political issue without the damage
that is that they will likely incur. You know, if
there's a private caucus meeting, apparently Senate Democrats discussed how
(02:35):
to beat back GOP attempts to steer the debate over
ice into one about illegal immigration. And multiple sources familiar
told us about the meeting, and they are concerned that
Republicans are injecting rightly so, because it's all related the
Save Act, which would be voter ID You can't have
illegals voting and elections. They don't want election integrity measures,
(02:58):
and they don't want to hold sanctuary cities and states accountable. Uh,
And they're making that the That is the issue that
they fear. That is the pressure point that Republicans are
going to use anyway. Joining us now to discuss the
law as it relates to all of this, is Gene Hamilton,
president of American First Legal, explaining how they are going
(03:21):
to be helping icbpdhs uphold the law and defending them
against baseless claims brought by the left and their minions.
As we have pointed out many times, there's a lot
of astroturfing, a lot of these these so called spontaneous
protests or anything. But you have you know, these multi
billionaires that are funding a lot of the organization and
(03:45):
funding these mobs. Basically, it's rent a mob anyway. Geen Hamilton, welcome.
Speaker 2 (03:49):
Back, sir Jean, thank you for having me on.
Speaker 1 (03:51):
So the Democrats have one posture publicly, but behind closed doors,
all the reports are they're scared to death over the issue.
Speaker 2 (03:58):
Well, you know, this is classic on their point on
their part, which is to say, they are trying to
take one of the greatest strengths of President Trump and
the Republican Party impermanent, into one of the biggest vulnerabilities.
But they can't do it by taking on the issue
head on. They can't say, well, we don't want anyone
(04:19):
to actually get deported, we don't want open borders. Instead,
what they have to do is they have to manipulate,
and they have to create imagery of overreach by ICE
and by the federal government. And of course that's not
what ICE is doing. Ice is not overreaching. They're not
(04:40):
doing anything other than enforcing our immigration laws. But because
their ends are the destruction of this constitutional republic, their
ends are the destruction of Donald Trump's administration, they are
trying to use what they're doing right now on the
streets to convince people that somehow, some way. This is
(05:01):
the equivalent of you know, the modern civil rights movement,
and that every American across the United States is a
risk of being arrested, detained by ice, having their house
broken into, all these other types of things. They're just
complete and total garbage, garbage. All of it's garbage. All
of it's being done for nefarious political ends, and it
(05:23):
is not going to work, I don't think. But we
all have to do a lot between them and then
to stop their plans from capturing more and more Americans viewpoints.
Speaker 1 (05:35):
Now, there are some Democrats like David Axelrod Julian Epstein,
for example, who I used to debate many years ago
during the Clinton impeachment, former Chief Counsel for the House
Judiciary Democrats, and he wrote, you know, an article today
had showed up in the New York Post. The headline
is DEM's demented ice demands, and he went through the
(05:56):
list of of how Democrats you know, the list that
I just went through, and then you know, their basic
posture now is defund ice. And then he points out
this other demand that they want to require judicial warrants
to make an arrest, and that would saddle every federal
district court with an average of six thousand or more
(06:17):
warrant applications a year. And this if ICE kept up
the twenty twenty five pace, which is about seven hundred
thousand people illegal immigrants detained and ultimately deported, it would
be impossible. It would be a system over load the
likes of which we've never had, which basically plays into
the narrative anyway, which is they really want them to
(06:38):
stay illegally in the country, and they're the party that's
that's all in favor of providing voting rights. They don't
want the Save Act, they don't want proof of citizenship
for voting, and then all these sanctuary citizen states are
providing all these benefits, taxpayer funded benefits to illegals, and
it's bankrupting states like California.
Speaker 2 (07:00):
I couldn't set it better. Look, what these Democrats are
doing is they're being.
Speaker 3 (07:08):
It's hard to put.
Speaker 2 (07:09):
Into words to describe precisely how bad what it is
that they're doing here to our country. Because again Donald
Trump secured the border, Donald Trump's enforcing our immigration laws.
They know they can't take it on head on and
say we don't want illegal aliens to be deported, so
instead what they're trying to do is trying to raise
all these other issues. So, oh, we don't want ICE
(07:31):
agents to wear a mask, Oh we want them to
go get judicial warrants. They do all of these other
things thinking that the American people aren't going to notice that.
What they're actually trying to do is to grind immigration
enforcement to a halt, so they can let everyone say
that Joe Biden let into the country. Joe Biden let
(07:51):
over ten million people at least come into the country
during his administration. We already have illegal aliens here before then.
So instead of trying to take things head on, they lost.
In the one big beautiful bill last summer, ICE was funded.
They've got their staffing up, they're on the up and up.
Things are looking good. They know that they're on they're losing,
(08:13):
they're on their heels. But so what they have to
do now is come up with all these ridiculous things.
To your point, judicial warrants are not a thing in
civil immigration enforcement. They're not real. That's not how the
system has worked for decades. If they require judicial warrants,
it would grind the entire system to a complete halt,
which is what they want. They want to do it,
(08:36):
but they don't want accountability for actually doing so.
Speaker 1 (08:40):
Okay, so tell me what American First Legal is doing
to help out ice agents and enforcement agents as they
do their job and try to do their job. And
this is the frustrating part. I mean, they have arrested
the worst of the worst, thousands of murderers and rapists
and child molesters and gang members and other violent criminals.
(09:02):
They've they've arrested them, They've reported all of them, and
they you know, the thanks they get is being called
Nazis and Gestapo. And if people want to have a
disagreement over the two incidents in play, that's fine, and
they can be as critical as they want. They can
be Monday morning quarterbacks. They're not in the situation. It's
very hard to judge I think from a videotape. You know,
(09:26):
Alex Pretti, for example, is a great example. I still
to this day have a lot of questions about what
actually happened in that incident. I don't have as many
questions in the Renee good case, considering the agent involve
was hit and had internal bleeding. But they want to
take these isolated incidents and they want to turn it
(09:46):
into you know, like a mass killing, you know, and
the Nazi comparison is so obnoxious on so many levels,
and they have no qualms doing it, and they're all
doing it, yeah, Sean.
Speaker 2 (09:57):
So what we're doing is we've announced that we are
going to present ICE and CVP agents and officers with
respect to any civil claims that they may have against
people who violate their rights. Now, as a point of comparison,
just briefly here, the Department of Justice just announced the
arrest of somebody who was threatening ICE agents and officers today,
(10:21):
which was great, and that is a remedy that I
imagine that they will be pursuing swiftly and strongly in
every instance in which they can. But ICE agents and
officers don't just have the ability to or don't just
deserve the protection through criminal prosecution of people who threaten them.
They also have civil rights, just like any other American does.
(10:45):
They have the right not to be defined, they have
the right to not be illegally docked, they have the
right not to be assaulted. They have the right to
actually try to do their jobs. There's lots of federal
and state laws, things at common law that are at
issue here, and no one else has stepped up for
these ICE and CVP agents and officers. Over the decades,
(11:08):
this has been an ongoing, kind of progressively worse campaign
that the Left has been engaged in. Of course, it's
really flamed up now over the last year because of
Donald Trump's success and because of what the left is
trying to do here. So we are going to step
up and we're going to represent anybody who is an
(11:29):
ICE or CVP agent or officer who has had their
rights violated. We're happy to do it, and we look
forward to what the future is going to hold.
Speaker 1 (11:38):
All right, quick break, we'll come right back. We'll continue
more with Gene Hamilton. He is the president of American
First Legal. Then we'll get to your phone calls coming up.
Eight hundred nine foot one, Shawn is our number. If
you want to be a part of the program, find
(12:01):
a moment with Gene Hamilton. He's the president of American
First Legal and he's helping out ICE, CBP and DHS
agents in their effort to uphold the law of our country.
Couldn't be necessary, but it is. Is there any remedy
when somebody calls you a Nazi or Gestapo because that's slander.
To me, that's smearing. PRIs merchment at the highest level.
(12:24):
And I think you can make an argument that an
ice agent is not a public figure.
Speaker 2 (12:28):
Yeah, I mean, look, it's kind of that. It's going
to depend upon the context and precisely what said some
of the There will be a lot of argument about
ice age interopticers being public figures and the higher standard
that's attendant to that when you come to defamation law analysis.
But the point here that you're making, Sean is one correct,
(12:53):
which is people don't just get to lie with malice
or say you're a Nazi baby killer when there's no
basis in fact for doing that, and expect that they're
not going to be held accountable in some way or
another because what they're not, what they're it's more than
(13:14):
just that word. It's more than just that need. When
they use that term. We all know this now. But
when they use that term or they use that type
of language, they're trying to dehumanize the ice agent, the
CDP agent.
Speaker 1 (13:29):
Well, they're really doing more than that, aren't they. They're
inciting the mobs to engage in behavior. If you believe
somebody is a Nazi you feel justified in doing, you know,
by by doing anything necessary to stop them.
Speaker 2 (13:44):
One hundred percent, that spot on, Sean. That's exactly what
they're trying to do. And they don't care about the consequences.
They don't care. They know what they could lead to,
and they don't care. It's evil, it's sick. It must
be stopped. Look again, as you said earlier, people have
every right to criticize, to express disagreement, say that they
(14:04):
don't like immigration enforcement at all. That's totally fine. We're
not talking about that. We're talking about people who are
violating civil rights and civil liberties and putting a target
on the backs of our law enforcement in this country,
and we will not stand for it.
Speaker 1 (14:19):
I don't think we should have many ICE agents contact
that you are ready or no.
Speaker 2 (14:23):
Yes, we've been getting some inquiries already and we are engaging,
so stay tuned for more.
Speaker 1 (14:29):
All right now, people want to get in touch with
you if they work for ICE, DHS, how could they
get in touch with you?
Speaker 2 (14:34):
Absolutely, Sean, thank you. It's af legal dot org. There
is a contact us section and there's a form to
fill out there and that's all folks need to know.
So again, a f Legal dot Org and go to
the contact section and you will find a form to
fill out and our team will be right back in touch.
Speaker 1 (14:54):
Oh. The American people need to know this and it's
not being highlighted enough. Of my view, and that is
we have southern border apprehensions now at the lowest level
since nineteen seventy nineteen seventy's, it's pretty remarkable. Anyway, we
appreciate you being with us, Geene Hamilton, keep up the
(15:15):
good work, President of American First Legal. Thank you, sir,
eight hundred and nine point one. Shawn our number if
you want to be a part of the program, all right.
Our buddy Stephen A. Smith was on with Bill Maher.
I think Bill Maher was actually on with Steven am
I getting that right, London. I'm pretty sure it was
that way. But they were doing a podcast together and
both of them slamming Democrats. Now, okay, look at where
(15:39):
the Democrats stand. Defund dismantle, nobail, reimagine the police. Now
they want to defund ice, which is insane. Voted against
the largest tax cut in history, voted for the largest
tax increase in history. And of course they are climate alarmist,
religious cultists, and that means we'd be paying twice as
much for a gallon of gasoline that we're paying now
(16:01):
under President Trump. And I can keep going on and
on and on and now. They don't want simple integrity
measures in spite of the overwhelming eighty plus percent of
Americans and all demographics, including seventy one percent of Democrats,
that want voter ID, they don't want it, and they
have the likes of Tucky Schumer Jim Crow two point zero. No,
(16:22):
it's not Jim Crow two point zero. If you want
free and fair elections, it's simple. The fact that the
Democrats don't want them makes me very suspicious. I can
only think of, you know, nefarious intentions on their part
for not wanting voter ID, signature verification, gain to custody controls,
(16:45):
updated voter rolls, and partisan observers in every precinct in
the country, watching the voting all day, the vote counting
all night. Why would you be against any of that?
How is that unfair to anybody? In the end, you
end up with more confidence in the results and you
have integrity in the process. It's just simple, basic common sense. Anyway,
(17:09):
Democrats don't want that. They're calling it Jim Crow two
point zero. Here's Steven am Bell Maher Chuck Schumer called.
Speaker 4 (17:17):
What Trump's trying to do with the elections, he called
it Jim Crow two point zero.
Speaker 1 (17:21):
And what I guarded against.
Speaker 4 (17:23):
I said, you know, I've taken heat from the Democratic
Party from time to time. You certainly have, you know,
on numerous occasions. And I said, don't get trumpish, don't
engage in that kind of hyperbole, because we living in
the year twenty twenty six. And when you start bringing
up Jim Crow two point zho, you're trying to harken
back to a time that most people recognize. No, we're
(17:44):
not living in those times right now. Of course we've
got our troubles, but we're not doing don't do that
because that's playing right into Trump's hands.
Speaker 3 (17:52):
Was I writing saying that.
Speaker 5 (17:54):
Yes, And you're factually right, it's this thing that he's
trying to do with conceding elections that it's not primarily
a racial issue. Not everything is primarily a racial issue.
It has Rachel obertones, as does everything in this country.
But yes, you're right, it's foolish to make it about that.
(18:15):
And it's also foolish because Biden used that exact phrase
about voting in Georgia, and then they did poland after
that next election came up and even the black folks
said we had no problem voting. So you know, like
you say, don't engage in the kind of hyperbole that's
(18:35):
just going to bite you in the ass.
Speaker 1 (18:38):
I don't know what the Democrats are going to be
able to defend. You know, there are people out there
that are pessimistic about the midterms, and I'm just telling
you it's ten months away. Does cool you jets a
little bit? Just everyone needs to calm down. I know
everyone gets worked up during election years, and this is
the predictable type of hyperbole that you're going to get
(19:00):
from the left, But it's not going to win them
an election. Usually peace and prosperity drive elections, if I
am correct. Well, let's start with the Atlanta FED. If
they come out anywhere in the five percent range for
fourth quarter GDP growth, that is massive. We now have
trillions of dollars as we speak being infused into the economy.
(19:24):
Because of the trillions of dollars. President Trump got in
committed manufacturing dollars, and that's for semiconductor chips and pharmaceuticals
and automobiles and rare earths, Okay, high paying career jobs
coming online for the American people. Every American that works
for a living is seeing a drastic reduction in their
taxes thanks to the one big, beautiful bill. Americans also
(19:48):
that work in the service industry the heart and soul
of this country, hard working men and women. No tax
on tips, no tax on overtime. Seniors are benefiting from
no tax on Social Security credits. Voted against that. Every
American is benefiting from the lowest gas prices we've had
in five years. Because every product you buy at every
(20:08):
store you go to, you pay more when transportation costs
go up. Transportation costs now are dramatically lower. Manufacturing costs
are lower because energy prices are lower. Inflation is in check,
interest rates are coming down. Now there's a lag period,
and I would expect by the end of the second
(20:29):
quarter into the third quarter this year, this economy is
going to be humming like never before. So if peace
and prosperity drive elections. On the prosperity point of view,
I think that Americans is going to look at this.
I don't think most Americans want defund dismantled nobel. I
don't think they want defund ice. I don't think most
(20:51):
Americans want higher taxes. I don't think Americans want to
pay five dollars per gallon of gasoline. All right, let's
get to a busy phones eight hundred and ninety four one, Sean,
if you want to join us, Mike in Texas. God
bless Texas. Mike. How are you, sir, I'm great, Sean.
Speaker 3 (21:08):
God bless you. Thank you so much.
Speaker 1 (21:10):
God bless you, my friend. What's going on?
Speaker 3 (21:13):
Well, I'm a first time caller, but I'm a longtime listener.
And Sean, I've never met anybody in my life like
you that agrees with everything I stand for. So I
tip my hat to you. But I want to talk
a little bit about ice, and I want to talk
a little bit about Minnesota in particular. My heart goes
(21:35):
out to the vice agents and when we should be
buying them lunch and dinner every time we see them out.
We really should. They're up against insurmountable odds in Minnesota.
But I'd like to throw a curveball in here, just
I want your opinion on this. You believe these are
paid protesters in Minneapolis.
Speaker 1 (21:53):
We already know they're paid protesters. We know that billionaires
are funding a lot of what you're seeing on TV.
This is not an any way organic, It's just not
I would I mean, you could literally rent a mob.
Speaker 3 (22:05):
Now we've had two deaths and those are tragic, Sean
and I would never ever, ever make light of that.
But somebody put those people in harm's way. Where's Osha
at and all of this? Isn't that safety in the workplace?
Speaker 1 (22:22):
I think, I mean, in a lot of ways, I
think you're correct. I mean, look, if you get into.
Speaker 3 (22:29):
Paying these people, whoever's paying them, they've got some accountability here.
I was an employer. I owned a business, and if
I had a workplace incident OSA two thousand logs to
fill out. I had audits, I had investigations, and if
I was your fault, I had to fix it or
pay a fine.
Speaker 1 (22:49):
I'm telling you right now, And I've asked the FBI
Director on air Cash Betel, I've asked the Attorney General,
Pam BONDI if in fact, there's an investigation into who's
funding these protests that are endangering the lives of law enforcement,
there is an investigation into the money they have both
said so publicly. They have both said so in interviews
(23:11):
with me. Stay tuned, is what I'd have to say
to you, Mike. We appreciate you, man, God bless you.
Eight hundred and nine four one Sean. If you want
to be a part of the program, South Carolina, Catherine
is next day, Catherine. How are you glad you call?
Speaker 6 (23:24):
Yeah? Well, as I'm also a first time caller. And
here's another wrinkle on the paid protesters from the other side.
So as I understand that a lot of these protesters
are being paid, some of them quite well, and it's
cash and small amounts that might not be put on
a ten ninety nine. So are these people reporting them
(23:46):
on their tax returns? Maybe we can get them off
the streets for tax evasion like they got al capone.
Speaker 1 (23:52):
Oh think it's a bad idea at all. I mean, look,
I just think at the end of the day, if
you are organizing to law enforcement in harm's way, there
should be enough laws on the books because to me,
by its very definition, that is obstruction. To me by definition,
that is aiding in a betting and law breaking. When
(24:14):
you have an app that goes nationwide that discloses any
ice operation. You're endangering the lives of these officers by
removing the element of surprise, and it's simple to me, Okay,
you can't do that. If you do that, you're putting
their lives in jeopardy and there should be accountability for that.
Speaker 6 (24:32):
But they're having some trouble getting them off the streets
because they're just standing there blowing whistles. But if you
could actually start getting them for something illegal, like not
claiming the income they're getting on their tax returns, that
might discourage someone.
Speaker 1 (24:45):
The problem is, by the time you know, it becomes
tax season and they have to report it, I mean,
you know, whatever is happening is long over. I don't
think that's the best most efficient way to do it.
Speaker 6 (24:58):
If if they started getting people for this, people would
be a little more discouraged and you could get the
professional ones that make more money actually tax evasions of
federal selling with jail time.
Speaker 1 (25:11):
Yeah. I just think the better way is if they
are obstructing justice aiding in a betting. I think that's
a more logical way to go at it. I think secondarily,
you know, the billionaires, they're not stupid. They will fund
something innocuous and claim ignorance that the money is being
(25:32):
spent to run a mob, and it becomes very difficult
to prove in a quarter law, but beyond a reasonable doubt.
I mean, it's frustrating. Anyway, I do appreciate the call. Catherine,
God bless you. Right quick break right back to our
busy phones. Eight hundred and nine four one. Shawn is
on number. You want to be a part of the
program as we continue.
Speaker 7 (25:55):
The final hour roundup is next. You do not want
to miss it and stay tuned for the final hour
Free for all on the Sean Hannity Show.
Speaker 1 (26:32):
Back to our busy phones, Paul Free, It's eight hundred
and ninety four one, Shawn, if you want to be
a part of the program. Back to Texas. Mary next
Sean Hannity Show. What's up Mary? How are you glad
you called?
Speaker 8 (26:42):
I'm fine, Thank you. I just wanted to go back
to a few days ago. We're talked about the Super
Bowl and I'm on with Linda. I am boycotting the
Super Bowl halftime and I have not been watching the
game because disrespect for our US American patriotism. They just
(27:06):
not all the teams, not all the players. But it
started with the forty nine ers years ago, and if
they're if they're you know, doing that sort of flagrant halftime,
it's not okay.
Speaker 1 (27:25):
I really don't give a flying rip about the halftime show.
I care about the game. I think this year, especially
in the playoffs, you've you've had some of the most fascinating,
some of the closest, some of the best comebacks of
any football season I've seen. And it definitely is a
gladiator sport. Uh. Do I think they made a horrible
(27:48):
choice my opinion, Yeah, I wouldn't have been my choice.
But you know, during the halftime, so I can promise
you I will probably be cooking all of the food
Linda is not capable of making, because I am a
much better chef than she is.
Speaker 8 (28:04):
You know, I just I just disrespectful. I'm a very
big ad.
Speaker 1 (28:08):
By the way, do you know what teams are playing
this year?
Speaker 2 (28:11):
I do not, And I think Mary.
Speaker 1 (28:15):
I, then you're really not a football fan. I mean
you're like Linda, Linda, have you figured out what teams are?
Speaker 9 (28:21):
But that's not true. It's not that she's not a
football fan and that she said she's America. First, she
puts the NFL in the back burner, wear a balloon.
Speaker 1 (28:28):
No, you're making an excuse. How do you not know?
Is the season Supertrads? I'm fully aware of who's in
the super Bowl. No, you were not the other day
and you just got to say from Katie Oh Bolth,
that's total complete Adam schift. You're full of it.
Speaker 9 (28:42):
No, yes, after that show and that was to day.
Oh you looked it up after we do do research
on this show.
Speaker 1 (28:47):
You know, all right, so you looked it up, but
you didn't know when I asked you the first time,
you had no clue who was in the super Bowl.
Speaker 9 (28:54):
No, and I couldn't care less. Actually I could care less.
Let me rephrase that I could care a lot.
Speaker 1 (28:58):
Okay, I'm I'm fas fascinated by the matchup and by
the game, and I happen to be a friends the NFL.
Robert Craft is one of the nicest people that are
running that are very pro Israel. And that's one guy.
That's one guy. His team is in the Super Bowl.
I'm gonna watch and I'm going to cheer for his
(29:20):
team to win.
Speaker 9 (29:21):
You know what, if he was smart, he should start
another league that was Pro America.
Speaker 1 (29:25):
He'd make a kill okay. I love the Florida Panthers.
I don't watch a lot of their their intermissions between periods.
I mean, I'll watch some of the highlights, and then
you know, I end up doing other stuff and then
go back to the game when it starts, you know,
when the next period starts. How many periods in hockey
do you know? And stop looking around the room, you know?
(29:45):
Are you getting all your answers from Katie?
Speaker 5 (29:47):
No?
Speaker 1 (29:48):
Hockey is the one sport I know, all right? How many?
How many a little bit? How many periods in football?
How many periods of there are no periods in football?
There's four quarters? Oh, oh, you're welcome.
Speaker 9 (30:01):
How many periods in baseball except for the portal? That's
no good about baseball? I know there's nine innings and
that's it.
Speaker 1 (30:09):
You know nothing. Can you name one player in baseball today?
Speaker 9 (30:12):
No, not one that's a god's on his trip.
Speaker 1 (30:15):
Harper? My son has a Harper. And by the way,
your food, your cookie is nowhere near as good as mine.
We'll get to this later. You don't know anything about
the NFL. You didn't even know who's playing the Super Bowl.
I don't want to talk. I just know they suck.
That's all I need to know. Okay uh, I'm o Patriots,
That's all I'm saying. All Right, When you go grocery shopping,
look for greenberry cereal. Look for silver Palapasta sauce, the
(30:37):
official foods of the Sean Hennity Show.
Our two Sean Hennity Show. Toll free your numbers eight
hundred and nine point one, Shawn if you want to
be a part of the program. Washington Times reporting today
Chuck Schumer, who came Jeffries warning that Democrats will not
fund the Department of Homeland Security unless the Trump administration
reinstates Biden's immigration policies. Okay, that is that is not
(00:21):
going to happen. Democratic leaders have put out a list
of ten demands for ICE reforms. If they are going
to fund ICE, why would they want no mass for
ICE agents, especially in light of the increase of incidents
of attacks on ICE agents you know, upp a whopping
what thirteen hundred percent, the same with vehicular attacks on
(00:45):
ice that's up eighteen hundred percent, and threat level against
ICE agents up eight thousand percent. Why would they ever
want something like this, But that's one of their demands.
They've been docked and they're going after their families. They
are saying that ICE agents should constantly display their unique
ID number. You can tell an ICE agent when they're coming,
(01:08):
when they're working. I mean, it's not like people are
out there, you know, dressing up as ICE agents. We
haven't had any incidents. Okay, you can give in on
that one. Jeffries and Schumer are arguing that federal funds
should not be used to conduct immigration operations near sensitive locations. Okay,
(01:28):
there's no such thing. There should be no such thing
as a safe haven for people that don't obey our laws,
respect our laws, borders and sovereignty. Then it goes on
to say they want to uphold the use of forced standards. Well,
they already have that in place. That's for law all
law enforcement. And then they go on to say, by
(01:50):
the way, I'm not against them demanding body cams, which,
by the way, most of them already have. And and
they come up with ridiculous language, language like no parliamentary police.
There is no parliamentary police. This is ridiculous. Now, the
backstory behind all of this, and what's interesting about this
is Democrats in the Senate they're talking a big game
(02:11):
on ice behind closed doors. They are scared to death.
That's the backstory. Axios even had this today. It's not
about trying to enact immigration reform. They want to try
to turn this into a political issue without the damage
that is that they will likely incur. You know, if
there's a private caucus meeting, apparently Senate Democrats discussed how
(02:35):
to beat back GOP attempts to steer the debate over
ice into one about illegal immigration. And multiple sources familiar
told us about the meeting, and they are concerned that
Republicans are injecting rightly so, because it's all related the
Save Act, which would be voter ID You can't have
illegals voting and elections. They don't want election integrity measures,
(02:58):
and they don't want to hold sanctuary cities and states accountable. Uh,
And they're making that the That is the issue that
they fear. That is the pressure point that Republicans are
going to use anyway. Joining us now to discuss the
law as it relates to all of this, is Gene Hamilton,
president of American First Legal, explaining how they are going
(03:21):
to be helping icbpdhs uphold the law and defending them
against baseless claims brought by the left and their minions.
As we have pointed out many times, there's a lot
of astroturfing, a lot of these these so called spontaneous
protests or anything. But you have you know, these multi
billionaires that are funding a lot of the organization and
(03:45):
funding these mobs. Basically, it's rent a mob anyway. Geen Hamilton, welcome.
Speaker 2 (03:49):
Back, sir Jean, thank you for having me on.
Speaker 1 (03:51):
So the Democrats have one posture publicly, but behind closed doors,
all the reports are they're scared to death over the issue.
Speaker 2 (03:58):
Well, you know, this is classic on their point on
their part, which is to say, they are trying to
take one of the greatest strengths of President Trump and
the Republican Party impermanent, into one of the biggest vulnerabilities.
But they can't do it by taking on the issue
head on. They can't say, well, we don't want anyone
(04:19):
to actually get deported, we don't want open borders. Instead,
what they have to do is they have to manipulate,
and they have to create imagery of overreach by ICE
and by the federal government. And of course that's not
what ICE is doing. Ice is not overreaching. They're not
(04:40):
doing anything other than enforcing our immigration laws. But because
their ends are the destruction of this constitutional republic, their
ends are the destruction of Donald Trump's administration, they are
trying to use what they're doing right now on the
streets to convince people that somehow, some way. This is
(05:01):
the equivalent of you know, the modern civil rights movement,
and that every American across the United States is a
risk of being arrested, detained by ice, having their house
broken into, all these other types of things. They're just
complete and total garbage, garbage. All of it's garbage. All
of it's being done for nefarious political ends, and it
(05:23):
is not going to work, I don't think. But we
all have to do a lot between them and then
to stop their plans from capturing more and more Americans viewpoints.
Speaker 1 (05:35):
Now, there are some Democrats like David Axelrod Julian Epstein,
for example, who I used to debate many years ago
during the Clinton impeachment, former Chief Counsel for the House
Judiciary Democrats, and he wrote, you know, an article today
had showed up in the New York Post. The headline
is DEM's demented ice demands, and he went through the
(05:56):
list of of how Democrats you know, the list that
I just went through, and then you know, their basic
posture now is defund ice. And then he points out
this other demand that they want to require judicial warrants
to make an arrest, and that would saddle every federal
district court with an average of six thousand or more
(06:17):
warrant applications a year. And this if ICE kept up
the twenty twenty five pace, which is about seven hundred
thousand people illegal immigrants detained and ultimately deported, it would
be impossible. It would be a system over load the
likes of which we've never had, which basically plays into
the narrative anyway, which is they really want them to
(06:38):
stay illegally in the country, and they're the party that's
that's all in favor of providing voting rights. They don't
want the Save Act, they don't want proof of citizenship
for voting, and then all these sanctuary citizen states are
providing all these benefits, taxpayer funded benefits to illegals, and
it's bankrupting states like California.
Speaker 2 (07:00):
I couldn't set it better. Look, what these Democrats are
doing is they're being.
Speaker 3 (07:08):
It's hard to put.
Speaker 2 (07:09):
Into words to describe precisely how bad what it is
that they're doing here to our country. Because again Donald
Trump secured the border, Donald Trump's enforcing our immigration laws.
They know they can't take it on head on and
say we don't want illegal aliens to be deported, so
instead what they're trying to do is trying to raise
all these other issues. So, oh, we don't want ICE
(07:31):
agents to wear a mask, Oh we want them to
go get judicial warrants. They do all of these other
things thinking that the American people aren't going to notice that.
What they're actually trying to do is to grind immigration
enforcement to a halt, so they can let everyone say
that Joe Biden let into the country. Joe Biden let
(07:51):
over ten million people at least come into the country
during his administration. We already have illegal aliens here before then.
So instead of trying to take things head on, they lost.
In the one big beautiful bill last summer, ICE was funded.
They've got their staffing up, they're on the up and up.
Things are looking good. They know that they're on they're losing,
(08:13):
they're on their heels. But so what they have to
do now is come up with all these ridiculous things.
To your point, judicial warrants are not a thing in
civil immigration enforcement. They're not real. That's not how the
system has worked for decades. If they require judicial warrants,
it would grind the entire system to a complete halt,
which is what they want. They want to do it,
(08:36):
but they don't want accountability for actually doing so.
Speaker 1 (08:40):
Okay, so tell me what American First Legal is doing
to help out ice agents and enforcement agents as they
do their job and try to do their job. And
this is the frustrating part. I mean, they have arrested
the worst of the worst, thousands of murderers and rapists
and child molesters and gang members and other violent criminals.
(09:02):
They've they've arrested them, They've reported all of them, and
they you know, the thanks they get is being called
Nazis and Gestapo. And if people want to have a
disagreement over the two incidents in play, that's fine, and
they can be as critical as they want. They can
be Monday morning quarterbacks. They're not in the situation. It's
very hard to judge I think from a videotape. You know,
(09:26):
Alex Pretti, for example, is a great example. I still
to this day have a lot of questions about what
actually happened in that incident. I don't have as many
questions in the Renee good case, considering the agent involve
was hit and had internal bleeding. But they want to
take these isolated incidents and they want to turn it
(09:46):
into you know, like a mass killing, you know, and
the Nazi comparison is so obnoxious on so many levels,
and they have no qualms doing it, and they're all
doing it, yeah, Sean.
Speaker 2 (09:57):
So what we're doing is we've announced that we are
going to present ICE and CVP agents and officers with
respect to any civil claims that they may have against
people who violate their rights. Now, as a point of comparison,
just briefly here, the Department of Justice just announced the
arrest of somebody who was threatening ICE agents and officers today,
(10:21):
which was great, and that is a remedy that I
imagine that they will be pursuing swiftly and strongly in
every instance in which they can. But ICE agents and
officers don't just have the ability to or don't just
deserve the protection through criminal prosecution of people who threaten them.
They also have civil rights, just like any other American does.
(10:45):
They have the right not to be defined, they have
the right to not be illegally docked, they have the
right not to be assaulted. They have the right to
actually try to do their jobs. There's lots of federal
and state laws, things at common law that are at
issue here, and no one else has stepped up for
these ICE and CVP agents and officers. Over the decades,
(11:08):
this has been an ongoing, kind of progressively worse campaign
that the Left has been engaged in. Of course, it's
really flamed up now over the last year because of
Donald Trump's success and because of what the left is
trying to do here. So we are going to step
up and we're going to represent anybody who is an
(11:29):
ICE or CVP agent or officer who has had their
rights violated. We're happy to do it, and we look
forward to what the future is going to hold.
Speaker 1 (11:38):
All right, quick break, we'll come right back. We'll continue
more with Gene Hamilton. He is the president of American
First Legal. Then we'll get to your phone calls coming up.
Eight hundred nine foot one, Shawn is our number. If
you want to be a part of the program, find
(12:01):
a moment with Gene Hamilton. He's the president of American
First Legal and he's helping out ICE, CBP and DHS
agents in their effort to uphold the law of our country.
Couldn't be necessary, but it is. Is there any remedy
when somebody calls you a Nazi or Gestapo because that's slander.
To me, that's smearing. PRIs merchment at the highest level.
(12:24):
And I think you can make an argument that an
ice agent is not a public figure.
Speaker 2 (12:28):
Yeah, I mean, look, it's kind of that. It's going
to depend upon the context and precisely what said some
of the There will be a lot of argument about
ice age interopticers being public figures and the higher standard
that's attendant to that when you come to defamation law analysis.
But the point here that you're making, Sean is one correct,
(12:53):
which is people don't just get to lie with malice
or say you're a Nazi baby killer when there's no
basis in fact for doing that, and expect that they're
not going to be held accountable in some way or
another because what they're not, what they're it's more than
(13:14):
just that word. It's more than just that need. When
they use that term. We all know this now. But
when they use that term or they use that type
of language, they're trying to dehumanize the ice agent, the
CDP agent.
Speaker 1 (13:29):
Well, they're really doing more than that, aren't they. They're
inciting the mobs to engage in behavior. If you believe
somebody is a Nazi you feel justified in doing, you know,
by by doing anything necessary to stop them.
Speaker 2 (13:44):
One hundred percent, that spot on, Sean. That's exactly what
they're trying to do. And they don't care about the consequences.
They don't care. They know what they could lead to,
and they don't care. It's evil, it's sick. It must
be stopped. Look again, as you said earlier, people have
every right to criticize, to express disagreement, say that they
(14:04):
don't like immigration enforcement at all. That's totally fine. We're
not talking about that. We're talking about people who are
violating civil rights and civil liberties and putting a target
on the backs of our law enforcement in this country,
and we will not stand for it.
Speaker 1 (14:19):
I don't think we should have many ICE agents contact
that you are ready or no.
Speaker 2 (14:23):
Yes, we've been getting some inquiries already and we are engaging,
so stay tuned for more.
Speaker 1 (14:29):
All right now, people want to get in touch with
you if they work for ICE, DHS, how could they
get in touch with you?
Speaker 2 (14:34):
Absolutely, Sean, thank you. It's af legal dot org. There
is a contact us section and there's a form to
fill out there and that's all folks need to know.
So again, a f Legal dot Org and go to
the contact section and you will find a form to
fill out and our team will be right back in touch.
Speaker 1 (14:54):
Oh. The American people need to know this and it's
not being highlighted enough. Of my view, and that is
we have southern border apprehensions now at the lowest level
since nineteen seventy nineteen seventy's, it's pretty remarkable. Anyway, we
appreciate you being with us, Geene Hamilton, keep up the
(15:15):
good work, President of American First Legal. Thank you, sir,
eight hundred and nine point one. Shawn our number if
you want to be a part of the program, all right.
Our buddy Stephen A. Smith was on with Bill Maher.
I think Bill Maher was actually on with Steven am
I getting that right, London. I'm pretty sure it was
that way. But they were doing a podcast together and
both of them slamming Democrats. Now, okay, look at where
(15:39):
the Democrats stand. Defund dismantle, nobail, reimagine the police. Now
they want to defund ice, which is insane. Voted against
the largest tax cut in history, voted for the largest
tax increase in history. And of course they are climate alarmist,
religious cultists, and that means we'd be paying twice as
much for a gallon of gasoline that we're paying now
(16:01):
under President Trump. And I can keep going on and
on and on and now. They don't want simple integrity
measures in spite of the overwhelming eighty plus percent of
Americans and all demographics, including seventy one percent of Democrats,
that want voter ID, they don't want it, and they
have the likes of Tucky Schumer Jim Crow two point zero. No,
(16:22):
it's not Jim Crow two point zero. If you want
free and fair elections, it's simple. The fact that the
Democrats don't want them makes me very suspicious. I can
only think of, you know, nefarious intentions on their part
for not wanting voter ID, signature verification, gain to custody controls,
(16:45):
updated voter rolls, and partisan observers in every precinct in
the country, watching the voting all day, the vote counting
all night. Why would you be against any of that?
How is that unfair to anybody? In the end, you
end up with more confidence in the results and you
have integrity in the process. It's just simple, basic common sense. Anyway,
(17:09):
Democrats don't want that. They're calling it Jim Crow two
point zero. Here's Steven am Bell Maher Chuck Schumer called.
Speaker 4 (17:17):
What Trump's trying to do with the elections, he called
it Jim Crow two point zero.
Speaker 1 (17:21):
And what I guarded against.
Speaker 4 (17:23):
I said, you know, I've taken heat from the Democratic
Party from time to time. You certainly have, you know,
on numerous occasions. And I said, don't get trumpish, don't
engage in that kind of hyperbole, because we living in
the year twenty twenty six. And when you start bringing
up Jim Crow two point zho, you're trying to harken
back to a time that most people recognize. No, we're
(17:44):
not living in those times right now. Of course we've
got our troubles, but we're not doing don't do that
because that's playing right into Trump's hands.
Speaker 3 (17:52):
Was I writing saying that.
Speaker 5 (17:54):
Yes, And you're factually right, it's this thing that he's
trying to do with conceding elections that it's not primarily
a racial issue. Not everything is primarily a racial issue.
It has Rachel obertones, as does everything in this country.
But yes, you're right, it's foolish to make it about that.
(18:15):
And it's also foolish because Biden used that exact phrase
about voting in Georgia, and then they did poland after
that next election came up and even the black folks
said we had no problem voting. So you know, like
you say, don't engage in the kind of hyperbole that's
(18:35):
just going to bite you in the ass.
Speaker 1 (18:38):
I don't know what the Democrats are going to be
able to defend. You know, there are people out there
that are pessimistic about the midterms, and I'm just telling
you it's ten months away. Does cool you jets a
little bit? Just everyone needs to calm down. I know
everyone gets worked up during election years, and this is
the predictable type of hyperbole that you're going to get
(19:00):
from the left, But it's not going to win them
an election. Usually peace and prosperity drive elections, if I
am correct. Well, let's start with the Atlanta FED. If
they come out anywhere in the five percent range for
fourth quarter GDP growth, that is massive. We now have
trillions of dollars as we speak being infused into the economy.
(19:24):
Because of the trillions of dollars. President Trump got in
committed manufacturing dollars, and that's for semiconductor chips and pharmaceuticals
and automobiles and rare earths, Okay, high paying career jobs
coming online for the American people. Every American that works
for a living is seeing a drastic reduction in their
taxes thanks to the one big, beautiful bill. Americans also
(19:48):
that work in the service industry the heart and soul
of this country, hard working men and women. No tax
on tips, no tax on overtime. Seniors are benefiting from
no tax on Social Security credits. Voted against that. Every
American is benefiting from the lowest gas prices we've had
in five years. Because every product you buy at every
(20:08):
store you go to, you pay more when transportation costs
go up. Transportation costs now are dramatically lower. Manufacturing costs
are lower because energy prices are lower. Inflation is in check,
interest rates are coming down. Now there's a lag period,
and I would expect by the end of the second
(20:29):
quarter into the third quarter this year, this economy is
going to be humming like never before. So if peace
and prosperity drive elections. On the prosperity point of view,
I think that Americans is going to look at this.
I don't think most Americans want defund dismantled nobel. I
don't think they want defund ice. I don't think most
(20:51):
Americans want higher taxes. I don't think Americans want to
pay five dollars per gallon of gasoline. All right, let's
get to a busy phones eight hundred and ninety four one, Sean,
if you want to join us, Mike in Texas. God
bless Texas. Mike. How are you, sir, I'm great, Sean.
Speaker 3 (21:08):
God bless you. Thank you so much.
Speaker 1 (21:10):
God bless you, my friend. What's going on?
Speaker 3 (21:13):
Well, I'm a first time caller, but I'm a longtime listener.
And Sean, I've never met anybody in my life like
you that agrees with everything I stand for. So I
tip my hat to you. But I want to talk
a little bit about ice, and I want to talk
a little bit about Minnesota in particular. My heart goes
(21:35):
out to the vice agents and when we should be
buying them lunch and dinner every time we see them out.
We really should. They're up against insurmountable odds in Minnesota.
But I'd like to throw a curveball in here, just
I want your opinion on this. You believe these are
paid protesters in Minneapolis.
Speaker 1 (21:53):
We already know they're paid protesters. We know that billionaires
are funding a lot of what you're seeing on TV.
This is not an any way organic, It's just not
I would I mean, you could literally rent a mob.
Speaker 3 (22:05):
Now we've had two deaths and those are tragic, Sean
and I would never ever, ever make light of that.
But somebody put those people in harm's way. Where's Osha
at and all of this? Isn't that safety in the workplace?
Speaker 1 (22:22):
I think, I mean, in a lot of ways, I
think you're correct. I mean, look, if you get into.
Speaker 3 (22:29):
Paying these people, whoever's paying them, they've got some accountability here.
I was an employer. I owned a business, and if
I had a workplace incident OSA two thousand logs to
fill out. I had audits, I had investigations, and if
I was your fault, I had to fix it or
pay a fine.
Speaker 1 (22:49):
I'm telling you right now, And I've asked the FBI
Director on air Cash Betel, I've asked the Attorney General,
Pam BONDI if in fact, there's an investigation into who's
funding these protests that are endangering the lives of law enforcement,
there is an investigation into the money they have both
said so publicly. They have both said so in interviews
(23:11):
with me. Stay tuned, is what I'd have to say
to you, Mike. We appreciate you, man, God bless you.
Eight hundred and nine four one Sean. If you want
to be a part of the program, South Carolina, Catherine
is next day, Catherine. How are you glad you call?
Speaker 6 (23:24):
Yeah? Well, as I'm also a first time caller. And
here's another wrinkle on the paid protesters from the other side.
So as I understand that a lot of these protesters
are being paid, some of them quite well, and it's
cash and small amounts that might not be put on
a ten ninety nine. So are these people reporting them
(23:46):
on their tax returns? Maybe we can get them off
the streets for tax evasion like they got al capone.
Speaker 1 (23:52):
Oh think it's a bad idea at all. I mean, look,
I just think at the end of the day, if
you are organizing to law enforcement in harm's way, there
should be enough laws on the books because to me,
by its very definition, that is obstruction. To me by definition,
that is aiding in a betting and law breaking. When
(24:14):
you have an app that goes nationwide that discloses any
ice operation. You're endangering the lives of these officers by
removing the element of surprise, and it's simple to me, Okay,
you can't do that. If you do that, you're putting
their lives in jeopardy and there should be accountability for that.
Speaker 6 (24:32):
But they're having some trouble getting them off the streets
because they're just standing there blowing whistles. But if you
could actually start getting them for something illegal, like not
claiming the income they're getting on their tax returns, that
might discourage someone.
Speaker 1 (24:45):
The problem is, by the time you know, it becomes
tax season and they have to report it, I mean,
you know, whatever is happening is long over. I don't
think that's the best most efficient way to do it.
Speaker 6 (24:58):
If if they started getting people for this, people would
be a little more discouraged and you could get the
professional ones that make more money actually tax evasions of
federal selling with jail time.
Speaker 1 (25:11):
Yeah. I just think the better way is if they
are obstructing justice aiding in a betting. I think that's
a more logical way to go at it. I think secondarily,
you know, the billionaires, they're not stupid. They will fund
something innocuous and claim ignorance that the money is being
(25:32):
spent to run a mob, and it becomes very difficult
to prove in a quarter law, but beyond a reasonable doubt.
I mean, it's frustrating. Anyway, I do appreciate the call. Catherine,
God bless you. Right quick break right back to our
busy phones. Eight hundred and nine four one. Shawn is
on number. You want to be a part of the
program as we continue.
Speaker 7 (25:55):
The final hour roundup is next. You do not want
to miss it and stay tuned for the final hour
Free for all on the Sean Hannity Show.
Speaker 1 (26:32):
Back to our busy phones, Paul Free, It's eight hundred
and ninety four one, Shawn, if you want to be
a part of the program. Back to Texas. Mary next
Sean Hannity Show. What's up Mary? How are you glad
you called?
Speaker 8 (26:42):
I'm fine, Thank you. I just wanted to go back
to a few days ago. We're talked about the Super
Bowl and I'm on with Linda. I am boycotting the
Super Bowl halftime and I have not been watching the
game because disrespect for our US American patriotism. They just
(27:06):
not all the teams, not all the players. But it
started with the forty nine ers years ago, and if
they're if they're you know, doing that sort of flagrant halftime,
it's not okay.
Speaker 1 (27:25):
I really don't give a flying rip about the halftime show.
I care about the game. I think this year, especially
in the playoffs, you've you've had some of the most fascinating,
some of the closest, some of the best comebacks of
any football season I've seen. And it definitely is a
gladiator sport. Uh. Do I think they made a horrible
(27:48):
choice my opinion, Yeah, I wouldn't have been my choice.
But you know, during the halftime, so I can promise
you I will probably be cooking all of the food
Linda is not capable of making, because I am a
much better chef than she is.
Speaker 8 (28:04):
You know, I just I just disrespectful. I'm a very
big ad.
Speaker 1 (28:08):
By the way, do you know what teams are playing
this year?
Speaker 2 (28:11):
I do not, And I think Mary.
Speaker 1 (28:15):
I, then you're really not a football fan. I mean
you're like Linda, Linda, have you figured out what teams are?
Speaker 9 (28:21):
But that's not true. It's not that she's not a
football fan and that she said she's America. First, she
puts the NFL in the back burner, wear a balloon.
Speaker 1 (28:28):
No, you're making an excuse. How do you not know?
Is the season Supertrads? I'm fully aware of who's in
the super Bowl. No, you were not the other day
and you just got to say from Katie Oh Bolth,
that's total complete Adam schift. You're full of it.
Speaker 9 (28:42):
No, yes, after that show and that was to day.
Oh you looked it up after we do do research
on this show.
Speaker 1 (28:47):
You know, all right, so you looked it up, but
you didn't know when I asked you the first time,
you had no clue who was in the super Bowl.
Speaker 9 (28:54):
No, and I couldn't care less. Actually I could care less.
Let me rephrase that I could care a lot.
Speaker 1 (28:58):
Okay, I'm I'm fas fascinated by the matchup and by
the game, and I happen to be a friends the NFL.
Robert Craft is one of the nicest people that are
running that are very pro Israel. And that's one guy.
That's one guy. His team is in the Super Bowl.
I'm gonna watch and I'm going to cheer for his
(29:20):
team to win.
Speaker 9 (29:21):
You know what, if he was smart, he should start
another league that was Pro America.
Speaker 1 (29:25):
He'd make a kill okay. I love the Florida Panthers.
I don't watch a lot of their their intermissions between periods.
I mean, I'll watch some of the highlights, and then
you know, I end up doing other stuff and then
go back to the game when it starts, you know,
when the next period starts. How many periods in hockey
do you know? And stop looking around the room, you know?
(29:45):
Are you getting all your answers from Katie?
Speaker 5 (29:47):
No?
Speaker 1 (29:48):
Hockey is the one sport I know, all right? How many?
How many a little bit? How many periods in football?
How many periods of there are no periods in football?
There's four quarters? Oh, oh, you're welcome.
Speaker 9 (30:01):
How many periods in baseball except for the portal? That's
no good about baseball? I know there's nine innings and
that's it.
Speaker 1 (30:09):
You know nothing. Can you name one player in baseball today?
Speaker 9 (30:12):
No, not one that's a god's on his trip.
Speaker 1 (30:15):
Harper? My son has a Harper. And by the way,
your food, your cookie is nowhere near as good as mine.
We'll get to this later. You don't know anything about
the NFL. You didn't even know who's playing the Super Bowl.
I don't want to talk. I just know they suck.
That's all I need to know. Okay uh, I'm o Patriots,
That's all I'm saying. All Right, When you go grocery shopping,
look for greenberry cereal. Look for silver Palapasta sauce, the
(30:37):
official foods of the Sean Hennity Show.
The Sean Hannity Show News
Host
Sean Hannity
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com