April 14, 2026 • 31 mins
In this hour, Sean Hannity dives deeper into the widening Eric Swalwell scandal, spotlighting new interviews, new accusations, and growing calls for accountability as more women come forward with disturbing claims. Joined by younger conservative voices, Hannity frames the story as a test of whether powerful Democrats will finally be held to the same standard they demanded of others during the height of the #MeToo era. The result is a sharp, high-intensity hour focused on political hypocrisy, sexual misconduct allegations, and the possible legal downfall of one of the left’s most recognizable media figures.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Listen
Watch
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Power two, Sean Hannity Show, Toll free. It's eight hundred
and ninety four one Sean, if you want to be
a part of the program. We have a lot of
news coming out as it relates to mister Fang Fang Swaalwell.
New video, by the way, just release shows the accused
rapist now partying with quote you'll love this Linda yacht girls.
(00:21):
The people on the boat were told to keep hush
hush about Swalwell being on the trip, but anyway, a
bleary eyed Swalwell and a robe during a blowout trip
on a yacht off of San Trope with a bevy
of young women. I mean, this guy is a perve
at the top level. Everybody listening to this program has
women in their life that they care about. And if
(00:43):
you look at any of these issues through the prism
of how would you want your daughter, your girlfriend, your spouse,
your mother treated, it takes on a whole different meeting,
doesn't it. Let me play Swalwell's accuser former staffer who
alleges that Swalwell basically sexually assaulted her in this in
(01:04):
twenty twenty four, and here's what she said.
Speaker 2 (01:07):
You don't remember anything, I remember the next day. I
can see flashes of that evening, of him on top
of me, me pushing him off, him grabbing me. It
was a lot more aggressive.
Speaker 3 (01:23):
It was aggressive. Did you say no?
Speaker 2 (01:25):
Yes, I said no, I said I in my flash
that I can recall, I was pushing him off of me,
saying no.
Speaker 4 (01:34):
And what did he do?
Speaker 2 (01:36):
He didn't stop.
Speaker 1 (01:37):
I want to play one more clip, and then we've
got a panel that we're going to discuss this with
a kind of jaw dropping moment as Swalwell accuser spills
it all on national TV and just says, outright, he
raped me and he choked me. Listen to this.
Speaker 5 (01:55):
I knew he was married at the time, and that
his wife was pregnant. He was my friend. On the
third occasion, I believe he drugged my drink. I only
had one glass of wine. We were supposed to go
(02:15):
to a political event, and he said he needed to
get paperwork from his hotel room. When I arrived at
his hotel room, I was already incapacitated and I couldn't
move my arms are my body. He raped me and
(02:36):
he choked me. And while he was choking me, I
lost consciousness and I thought I died, I did not
consent to any sexual activity.
Speaker 1 (02:49):
All right, here to weigh in on this, we welcome
back to the program. Isabelle Brown hosted The isabel Brown
Show on The Daily Wire. Also, Catalina Lauf is a
political commentator through of the forthcoming book By the Way,
Time to Choose Reclaiming Liberty from the Swamp. Thank you
both for being with us. You know, Isabella, as I
think about this, it's kind of hard to wrap my
(03:12):
arms around this one thing. And that is so many
people apparently knew about this. This was this was common
knowledge in California among politicians, around people in the community.
And how did it stay under wraps for this law?
Speaker 3 (03:29):
Sean, you painted a picture of this so beautifully there
with just how truly horrific these allegations really are. And
the extra layer of horror that I think the American
people are struggling to reconcile with is the fact that
this was very well known and an open secret, not
just in California, as you mentioned, but here in Washington, DC,
(03:50):
where I live on Capitol Hill. CNN was reporting back
in twenty seventeen that more than half a dozen female
staffers on Capitol Hill had spoken to them about a
California congressman who they deemed to be very creepy and
constantly advancing his way into personal sexual relationships with female staffers.
(04:11):
This was nearly a decade ago that CNN was reporting
on this. And I can't tell you how many posts
I've seen on social media in the last forty eight
hours from journalists, from other politicians, from people in high
positions of power and influence here in Washington, who said, yeah,
I knew about it, and someone came and told me
about it. But what could I have done. I'm not
a journalist, I'm not law enforcement. Maybe I am a journalist,
(04:34):
but that wasn't my beat, so it wasn't my place
to report on it. It seems to me there is
a disgusting double standard of law enforcement when you look
at how the political left is now responding to this
in the wake of these allegations becoming a whole lot
more public. Why did no one seek to protect these
women and prevent more victims from being victimized by such
(04:55):
a depraved individual.
Speaker 1 (04:57):
You know, the magnitude is breathtaking in term of he's
a known figure, and I mean, this is the worst
of the worst behavior. You know, Catalina, let me go
to you. He raped me, he choked me. While he
was choking me, I lost consciousness. I thought I had died.
I believed he drugged my drink. I had only one
(05:18):
glass of wine. I did not consent to any sexual activity.
He was married at the time, and his wife was pregnant,
and he said he needed to get paperwork from his
hotel room. And when I arrived to his hotel room,
I was already incapacitated. I couldn't move my arms or
my body.
Speaker 6 (05:34):
Wow, Sean, it was incredibly disturbing to have to see that.
But you know what an amazing point of bravery that
these women are finally stepping forward. And to Isabelle's point,
in many of these cases, it would never come to
light if it hadn't been for that. But I am
glad to finally see the Democratic Party holding one of
(05:58):
their own accountable. You know, for years it's been believe
all women until it's someone in their own party, and
so at least now we're seeing some consistency in some principle.
But that doesn't take away the fact that this was
known and many women had stepped forward you know, almost
(06:18):
a decade ago. But imagine if these women didn't come forward.
Now you know this Eric Swalla could have possibly been
the next governor of California and the fact that he
was that close to assuming an executive position of power
in the United States is so scary to think about.
(06:39):
But this is what happened across the board. And you know,
Republican or Democrat. You know, I've got to give a
lot of credit to Congresswoman on A Polina Luna too,
who said, look, this isn't about politics, this is about
doing what's right. It doesn't matter again, Republican or Democrat.
If you have serious issues, documented incidences, or rest, you know,
especially in involving staff, you need to be held accountable.
Speaker 1 (07:03):
You know, nobody seems to want to, Isabelle use the
word rape. What we just heard is an allegation of rape.
Speaker 3 (07:10):
It is, and it ought to be treated with the
furiousness and direct attention that it possibly can from law
enforcement agencies, but also more culturally, from the political apparatus too.
You know, I'm old enough to remember now at the
ripe age of twenty eight years old, that virtually every
single year we hear this word tossed around as a
political allegation. We remember it in the Brett Kavanaugh hearings.
(07:34):
I certainly have heard it thrown around a whole lot
related to the Epstein files and previous allegations that have
been deeply investigated by law enforcement and deemed to not
be credible in terms of a lot of these tips
that you've seen released in these declassified documents from the DOJ.
I hope and I pray that politicians in Washington, whatever
side of the aisle they're on, take this allegation and
(07:56):
the many that are accompanying it very very seriously, and
we treat it with the fullest extent possible in terms
of prosecutorial next steps from the Department of Justice or
whoever else needs to be involved. I worry, though, that
we've heard that word deluded so much in our postmodern
culture and in the era of me too, with so
many false allegations that people have become somewhat numb to it.
(08:20):
Don't listen to these stories and brush it off as
yet another political, crazy thing happening in Washington, DC. These
are very real crimes. They are very serious accusations and allegations,
and they deserve to be investigated with the fullest extent
of law enforcement.
Speaker 1 (08:35):
You know, Catalina. I mean, there is in most cases
a fine line. This seems very clear cut to me.
You have allegation after allegation after allegation, I mean the
most brutal allegations that any woman could ever make against
any man.
Speaker 7 (08:53):
You know.
Speaker 1 (08:54):
Compare that to, for example, the Capitol case. I mean,
it was dubious from the very beginning. It was a
political play by the Democrats. They overplayed their hands. And
I'll never forget one of the people testifying, well, there
was a line outside this room, and among the people
lined up to take turns and rape this woman that
(09:16):
was clearly intoxicated was Justice Kavanaugh. And then that emerged
into well I saw him near a line, but he
was not in the line. And then it was well
I saw him pouring drinks for women, but no, I
never saw him pour a drink for a woman, And
there was never any there there in that particular case.
And look at what an allegation, a false allegation can
(09:39):
do to somebody's life. I mean, this man was broken
when he was given his testimony.
Speaker 6 (09:45):
You're absolutely right, Sean, and it's infuriating of what they
put Justice Kavanaugh and his family.
Speaker 7 (09:50):
Through during and Clarence Thomas for that matter.
Speaker 6 (09:53):
And Clarence Thomas, and they use the same playbook over
and over again on that. And to your point, it
was allegations, it was scant evidence, and there they tried
to ruin his life. And here you actually have. You
have videos, you have evidence, you have highly detailed reports,
you have the police getting involved. You have so much
(10:15):
here now, and you know, and to your point Sean earlier,
this could be anybody's daughter, wife, you know, being in
politics as a young female, it's a calling, it's a
career to most, you know, women that want to get involved.
And here you're subjected in these cases where there are
(10:37):
real scummy people like the Eric Swallows of the world,
in these positions of power, using their power to to
do these things against women, and in some cases you're
not even believed. And again, you know, I hope to
Isabelle's point too, that this is carefully examined through and
(10:58):
through and that this guy, guys, you know, is hold
the accountable to the highest the sense of the law.
You know, everybody is innocent until proven guilty. But there's
so much here that needs to be fully investigated.
Speaker 7 (11:13):
Yeah, I totally agree. How do you think this ends,
is Abell?
Speaker 1 (11:17):
I absolutely can see him spending the rest of his
life in jail at this point. However, Haaveat, it's Alvin
Bragg and New York bringing the first charges against him.
Speaker 7 (11:26):
I have no faith in him.
Speaker 3 (11:28):
Yeah, I think we're right to be skeptical about our
faith in that particular prosecutorial process. That said, if these
allegations are deemed to be credible and this results in
a guilty conviction, he of course deserves to spend the
rest of his life in prison. It's been very difficult
for me, as a young woman in politics over the
past several years to see how many of these states
(11:48):
like New York, like California, and many others not treating
sexual assaults seriously. In fact, violent rapists are being let
out of prison early. I live in Virginia today. In
Virginia is currently attempting to reduce or eliminate mandatory minimum
sentences for crimes like rape and sexual assault, as well
as child pornography distribution, and many other heinous crimes that
(12:12):
are destroying society. So I think it's odd lived in
a society that says, we treat this so seriously, but
you're also watching a lot of these people dilute what
this crime actually means.
Speaker 1 (12:22):
All right, quick break more with Isabelle Brown and Catalina
lof on the other side, as we discuss the seriousness
now multiple women accusations of rape against mister fang Fang
Eric Swolwell. It's not a question of whether he's going
to run for governor. That's off the table, or he's
going to stay a member of Congress. That's off the table.
The question is will he have jail time? Will he
(12:44):
be convicted? Based on the testimony of all these women,
I don't see how he's not convicted, and then it's
a matter of how much time in Jelly gets more
on the other side as we continue, than your calls
coming up eight hundred and ninety four one, Sean, as
we continue.
Speaker 8 (13:03):
Thanks for listening to Sean Hannity.
Speaker 1 (13:33):
All right, we continue now with Isabelle Brown and Cataline
Allowfa with us discussing mister fang Fang Eric Swalwell more accusations.
And we're not just talking about sexual assault here. We
are talking about rape. I hesitate to ask this question,
but because you're you're in this political environment, do you
find most people are very respectful or not?
Speaker 6 (13:56):
Catalina, You know, I think when it comes down to
it's partially is is the media and the culture, you know,
to Isabelle's point first and foremost, when you have what
happened to Brett Kavanaugh, you know, over time, when this
is a real rape, you know, when there's evidence, when
there's real things, you don't want it to be diluted.
You don't want the seriousness of what happens to females
(14:17):
in politics, especially staffers. You know, I hear countless stories
of you know, former members and members you know, having
sort of these issues with staffords, and none of it
comes to light. And so I'm grateful that you have
women again, like you know, congresswomen on Napoulina, Luna and
others who are finally stepping forward and using their platforms
(14:38):
and their leadership to uncover this, because for too long
this has been going on. And so I do believe
that there's respects for women, but there needs to be
more women out there in positions that have platforms that
are that are speaking out against this, because if not,
it will be covered up. You know, the congressional slush fund.
(14:59):
All this stuff will be totally put under the rug
and under the table unless you take this seriously, unless
people are held accountable.
Speaker 1 (15:07):
By the way, that's lush fund for people that don't
know what you're referring to. That is taxpayer dollars that
have been used to pay off people that make allegations. Again,
their allegations doesn't necessarily mean they're true. However, they're using
taxpayer money to pay people off with a non disclosure agreement.
Any such deals that are made, and they have every
(15:29):
right to make them ought to be paid for with
their money, not with our money.
Speaker 7 (15:34):
Anyway.
Speaker 1 (15:35):
I appreciate both of you, respect both of you a lot.
You're very powerful emerging voices for young conservatives, and I
admire both of both of you for what you do.
Thank you for being with us.
Speaker 3 (15:45):
Thank you, Sean.
Speaker 6 (15:46):
Thanks Sean so much.
Speaker 1 (16:05):
Be sure to check in as soon as you get
to your car after work for breaking information you need
to know about.
Speaker 7 (16:12):
This is the Sean Hannity Show.
Speaker 1 (16:16):
All right, I see Zorn Marxist COMMI Mom, Donnie, you're
gonna open up the first government run grocery store in
New York City. You know the ironic part of all
of this. Grocery stores do not have big profit margins.
Speaker 7 (16:30):
Did you know that, Linda. They are very small profit margins,
very tiny.
Speaker 9 (16:35):
Yeah, it's not an easy business. The food business is
never an easy business, whether it's restaurants or grocery stores.
Speaker 1 (16:41):
I mean, it's such a good point, and it's just
frustrating to me because you would think, now, for example,
you can look at John Customatidis. He's the owner of
what Cristidi's and what's the other big Chainey owns that
one too in New York City. I've been to these
grocery stores. They're really well stocked. He takes really good care,
(17:02):
but and he's got wealthy. However, he's providing a service
for people. Now, they're going to spend thirty million dollars
in East Harlem to build out this grocery store. And
we don't need to waste thirty million dollars for a
government run grocery store when you can buy everything you
want at the local grocery store or they have Bodega's
(17:22):
pretty much on every corner in New York City. Anyway,
his Marxist Zoron Kami Mamdani talking about it, we.
Speaker 4 (17:29):
Are building a brand new store on city owned land
currently sitting empty in East Harlem, a neighborhood where nearly
forty percent of households receive public assistance or SNAP in
the past year.
Speaker 1 (17:45):
I don't know how do we ever survive all these years?
The government that bankrupted Social Security, Medicare, that runs the
worst schools, especially in New York City. Every Obamacare promise
made was never kept, is now going to provide a
better grocery store than one that is in the public sector. No,
that's not really how it's going to end up profit
(18:07):
margins after all cost taxes expenses for the grocery industry
ranges from one to three percent, Okay, And it's not
like they're overcharging people, they're just not.
Speaker 7 (18:21):
I don't know.
Speaker 1 (18:21):
I love grocery shopping. The last thing I want is
a government run anything. All right, to our busy phones.
Carl is in North Carolina on the Sean Hannity Show.
Speaker 7 (18:29):
Carl, how are you doing?
Speaker 8 (18:32):
Great?
Speaker 10 (18:32):
Sean?
Speaker 8 (18:32):
I hope you are too well. Speaking of Eric swallwell,
as egregious and horrible as the crime of rape is,
the case could be made that preason is even worse,
because you know, We've seen what happened with Peedo Joe
and his son Humper. We're tied up with CZP and
(18:53):
Diane Feinstein with her chauffeur and so forth. And so
he definitely needs to be prosecuted, tried for the rape accusations,
but also for treason as well. It's the only crime.
Speaker 1 (19:08):
Let me tell you, I watched these interviews of these women.
Make of these accusations any objective part of law, any
jury listening to this, I can't see any jury acquitting him.
Speaker 7 (19:21):
I just can't. They come off as too credible.
Speaker 8 (19:24):
Yes, and and yeah. So in addition to that, perhaps
he should receive a life sentence or or worse for
the obvious crime of treason that he's guilty of. It's
the only crime mentioned in the constitution. I'm involved with
the Christian organization that will be enforcing the constitution, but
(19:45):
Katie asked me not to promote anything, but it's it's
it's the highest law and needs to be enforced, and
so he needs to probably be tried for for both offenses.
Speaker 1 (19:57):
Well, I want to tell you something now. If I
had to look at him my crystal ball today and
predict Fang Fang's future, mister Frank Fang's future. I would
say that he's probably done living as a freeman in
pretty short order.
Speaker 7 (20:12):
That's my guess, absolutely.
Speaker 1 (20:14):
Although Alvin Bragg could always give him a sweetheart deal,
which would which would infuriate me and rightly infuriate all
the victims of his This has all the markings of
Harvey Weinstein to me, anyway, appreciate you call Carl Glad
you're out there, my friend. Eight hundred and nine four one,
Shawn our number, Dan, California. Gavin Newsom's Newsom's Marxist utopia.
(20:38):
By the way, do you have any idea what Gavin's
doing today? Because he's never at work. No idea, no
no worth the idea. What's going on?
Speaker 10 (20:47):
Yeah? How you doing? I just want to say thank
you for all your work and my comments a little
bit different than what you're focused on today. But everybody's
talking about the nuclear warhead that Iran's trying to get
a hold of. They're saying they got sixty enrich uranium,
they could probably, you know, get close to making ten
nuclear warheads. Well, how come nobody's talking about the atom
(21:11):
bombs that they can make. It only takes twenty percent
of enriched uranium to make a dirty bomb like the
type that you know we originally used forty years ago.
So if they can, if they're looking for a.
Speaker 1 (21:26):
Dirty bomb, has been in the forefront of my mind.
We've discussed it, it's been brought up, it's not been
the it's not been the major focus of our discussion.
But you know, leaving enriched uranium there is very scary,
and I would prefer that we get it. I'd prefer
that they voluntarily hand it over. I'd prefer you know,
(21:47):
as I said at the beginning of the show today,
I think that the President is kind of waiting them
out and letting him know that he's serious and that
they're going to suffer severe consequences. Look, he can destroy
the country of Iran in about two hours, maybe maybe less.
He could just wipe out carg Island and their ability
(22:08):
and destroy their entire economy with it.
Speaker 7 (22:11):
He could do that. He's trying.
Speaker 1 (22:14):
He's showing great personal restraint by doing what he's doing.
It would be very blunt for Donald Trump. This is
this is restraint, and he's doing it for the Iranian people.
If you want to know the truth, we'll see how
this plays out. But he's got multiple options on the
table right now. He's going to try and starve off
any income production for the Iranians. Let them know there's
(22:35):
a severe price to pay, privately telling them I could
wipe you out permanently in terms of any ability to
make money, and hopefully that'll wake them up. Hopefully the
reality of what he's threatening would wake them up. So far,
they just you know, they cling to their indoctrinated radicalism
and you know, obviously missing the fact that the top
(22:58):
three tier leadership above them has been wiped out too.
But we'll see, time will tell, We'll know very quickly.
This is not going to go on longer than you think.
It's not going to go on as long as people think, well.
Speaker 10 (23:09):
I'm encouraged by what he's doing, it's amount of time.
I'm just still concerned because if they can do ten
nuclear warhead, they can probably do a lot more than that.
As far as the dirty bombs and slipping somewhere, I
just you know, hoping it never happens. But yeah, God
blessed on the President.
Speaker 1 (23:27):
I don't want to give away too many secrets, but
major cities across our country are more than prepared if
any radioactive material enters the area. That's all I'm going
to say. I don't want to go into too much detail.
It has been written about. I'm not disclosing anything that's
top secret. But there are strategic plans in place, and
(23:48):
there are contingencies in place in this country because though
that would be the type of weapon, if you're talking
about a dirty bomb, that would need to be brought
in and gotten into the country. I don't think that's
an easy you think to do. Although there's a lot
of shipping, a lot of ships that come in and out,
and by the way, we have made provisions on that front.
Two without giving away too much operational detail. Again, it's
(24:11):
all being made public. I'm not giving away any nation
of our nation's secrets. All right, appreciate it. Quick break
right back to our busy phones. It's toll free eight
hundred and nine four one. If you want to be
a part of the program as we continue.
Speaker 3 (24:31):
You know here at the Sean Hannity Show, we want
to thrive et, economy, border security, and protection of our children.
Speaker 8 (24:40):
Now what else can we come up with?
Speaker 1 (24:43):
Pitch off the left cheapen It lots right here for
all the latest news and information. I'm back to our
(25:18):
busy phones eight hundred and ninety four one, Sean. If
you want to join us, Tracy's in Texas. God bless Texas. Tracy. Hi,
how are you?
Speaker 2 (25:26):
Hi?
Speaker 5 (25:26):
Sean?
Speaker 3 (25:27):
How are you?
Speaker 11 (25:27):
I'm so excited to talk to you today.
Speaker 7 (25:29):
Well, I'm excited you called. What's going on?
Speaker 11 (25:33):
Well, I'm going to be honest, and it's hard for
me to say, but I'm a little upset with you
and I love you enough to give you the feedback
that I need to give you.
Speaker 1 (25:41):
Oh, good grief, this is a tough love moment. Go ahead,
hit me with it. Go ahead, I can handle it.
Speaker 11 (25:46):
Okay, I know you can. Now Listen in the news,
it's been all about Popolio popolo popolo. And I have
been a devout Catholic here in Texas all my life
until a couple of weeks ago, and I just want
to ask you what the platform you have? What about
our pope, Sean? What about our pope? You know I've
become a recent convert to Linda Tyrianism, and I want
(26:08):
to hear from you about Flinda.
Speaker 7 (26:12):
Okay, So I am.
Speaker 1 (26:14):
I was raised Catholic, I went to Catholic School twelve
years and I'm saying this. You probably have heard me
say this, but for those that haven't, the Catholic Mass
is beautiful to me. Everything about it's perfect. I have
major issues with the Catholic churches, which is why I
am a non denominational Christian. Now, that is how I
(26:34):
describe myself. And I go to I usually go to
church every Sunday, not everyone, but most Sundays. And my
faith is more important to me at this point in
my life than ever I have gone. I've done a
very deep dive into understanding the Old Testament more more
because of my study of the New Testament has been
pretty exhaustive over the years. And I want to be
(26:56):
a better person every day. Okay, you're talking about Linda Arrianism,
which is Linda thinks that he doesn't have to follow
the instructions of our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ and
his instructions the one prayer he gave his apostles, the
Lord's Prayer, and it says, you know, I won't give
the hope of forgive us as we forgive those that
(27:17):
trespass against us. Right, And Linda thinks that she's going
to go go to the pearly gates and negotiate with
God himself and say, well, you made me, and I
didn't have to follow the instructions that your son gave us,
that you gave us when you were you know, you know,
on earth and sacrificing yourself as reconciliation to God the Father. Okay,
(27:42):
she thinks she can negotiate, and she thinks that, well,
may I quote to you, Matthew.
Speaker 9 (27:49):
Wait, she wants to talk about what I was saying.
I would love to hear her interpretation, because I believe
in interpretation.
Speaker 1 (27:55):
Because I'm about to give you a checkmate of Linda.
She's about to be destroyed here.
Speaker 9 (28:00):
Let the caller have them moment go ahead before I
destroy your Go ahead, Glinda.
Speaker 11 (28:04):
Thank you, Linda, thank you so much. It's just that
I feel like you are trying to paraphrase and put
words into her mouth, and that's that's not what she's saying.
She's not going against Jesus.
Speaker 7 (28:20):
Say excuse me.
Speaker 1 (28:22):
She said that that she does not believe that she
has to follow Uh forgive us our trespasses as we forgive.
He says, she's gonna cling to her hate list, and
she has said in her own words that when she
gets to the pearly Gates, she plans on reminding God
the Father that he made her and that therefore he's
(28:45):
responsible for her hatred.
Speaker 7 (28:48):
She said all of that. Linda, is there? Am? I am?
I miscarried.
Speaker 9 (28:51):
I think Tracy was in the middle of a sentence.
I'm just asking for a friend, Tracy.
Speaker 1 (28:55):
No, I want to know, did you she's saying that
you didn't say that? Did you not say everything I
just said?
Speaker 9 (29:00):
I did not say everything you just said.
Speaker 7 (29:02):
You hear what you want to hear fake news?
Speaker 11 (29:04):
Lead Amen, Linda, Amen, And whether you like it or not, Seanie,
this is a revival that is sweeping the land. I
don't know the latest numbers, but a lot of people
are becoming Lenditarians, a lot of.
Speaker 9 (29:19):
Us Linditarianism for every.
Speaker 1 (29:22):
Amount of Let me ask you this, Tracy, and let
me read to you Matthew if I may, Matthew six
fourteen and fifteen, Okay, For if you forgive other people
when they sin against you, your heavenly father will also
forgive you. But if you do not forgive others their sins,
your father will not forgive your sins. Check Mate. That
(29:47):
is a direct, direct quote, Tracy.
Speaker 9 (29:51):
I just want to say, while we are out of time,
I'll see you in church on Sunday, looking forward to it.
Speaker 11 (29:57):
Thank you, Thank you, Pope, thank you.
Speaker 7 (30:01):
Wait, Tracy, is that not a checkmate moment?
Speaker 9 (30:05):
She's calling me the pope?
Speaker 7 (30:06):
I think you lost.
Speaker 11 (30:08):
You can talk to our deacons about the theological weed.
Speaker 1 (30:12):
Does that not say that if you want forgiveness, you
have to forgive others. But if you do not forgive
others their sins, your father will not forgive your sins.
Speaker 7 (30:21):
Is that straightforward enough for you?
Speaker 9 (30:23):
Yeah, But they gotta repent, they got to rebuke, they
gotta do it the right way. It's implied. I'm not
adding words. I am understanding the words you're saying.
Speaker 7 (30:35):
You're making up your own bib. I'm not.
Speaker 9 (30:39):
I don't have that much time to write.
Speaker 7 (30:40):
Promise all right.
Speaker 1 (30:43):
Lindaitarian, which is paganism in another form,
Power two, Sean Hannity Show, Toll free. It's eight hundred
and ninety four one Sean, if you want to be
a part of the program. We have a lot of
news coming out as it relates to mister Fang Fang Swaalwell.
New video, by the way, just release shows the accused
rapist now partying with quote you'll love this Linda yacht girls.
(00:21):
The people on the boat were told to keep hush
hush about Swalwell being on the trip, but anyway, a
bleary eyed Swalwell and a robe during a blowout trip
on a yacht off of San Trope with a bevy
of young women. I mean, this guy is a perve
at the top level. Everybody listening to this program has
women in their life that they care about. And if
(00:43):
you look at any of these issues through the prism
of how would you want your daughter, your girlfriend, your spouse,
your mother treated, it takes on a whole different meeting,
doesn't it. Let me play Swalwell's accuser former staffer who
alleges that Swalwell basically sexually assaulted her in this in
(01:04):
twenty twenty four, and here's what she said.
Speaker 2 (01:07):
You don't remember anything, I remember the next day. I
can see flashes of that evening, of him on top
of me, me pushing him off, him grabbing me. It
was a lot more aggressive.
Speaker 3 (01:23):
It was aggressive. Did you say no?
Speaker 2 (01:25):
Yes, I said no, I said I in my flash
that I can recall, I was pushing him off of me,
saying no.
Speaker 4 (01:34):
And what did he do?
Speaker 2 (01:36):
He didn't stop.
Speaker 1 (01:37):
I want to play one more clip, and then we've
got a panel that we're going to discuss this with
a kind of jaw dropping moment as Swalwell accuser spills
it all on national TV and just says, outright, he
raped me and he choked me. Listen to this.
Speaker 5 (01:55):
I knew he was married at the time, and that
his wife was pregnant. He was my friend. On the
third occasion, I believe he drugged my drink. I only
had one glass of wine. We were supposed to go
(02:15):
to a political event, and he said he needed to
get paperwork from his hotel room. When I arrived at
his hotel room, I was already incapacitated and I couldn't
move my arms are my body. He raped me and
(02:36):
he choked me. And while he was choking me, I
lost consciousness and I thought I died, I did not
consent to any sexual activity.
Speaker 1 (02:49):
All right, here to weigh in on this, we welcome
back to the program. Isabelle Brown hosted The isabel Brown
Show on The Daily Wire. Also, Catalina Lauf is a
political commentator through of the forthcoming book By the Way,
Time to Choose Reclaiming Liberty from the Swamp. Thank you
both for being with us. You know, Isabella, as I
think about this, it's kind of hard to wrap my
(03:12):
arms around this one thing. And that is so many
people apparently knew about this. This was this was common
knowledge in California among politicians, around people in the community.
And how did it stay under wraps for this law?
Speaker 3 (03:29):
Sean, you painted a picture of this so beautifully there
with just how truly horrific these allegations really are. And
the extra layer of horror that I think the American
people are struggling to reconcile with is the fact that
this was very well known and an open secret, not
just in California, as you mentioned, but here in Washington, DC,
(03:50):
where I live on Capitol Hill. CNN was reporting back
in twenty seventeen that more than half a dozen female
staffers on Capitol Hill had spoken to them about a
California congressman who they deemed to be very creepy and
constantly advancing his way into personal sexual relationships with female staffers.
(04:11):
This was nearly a decade ago that CNN was reporting
on this. And I can't tell you how many posts
I've seen on social media in the last forty eight
hours from journalists, from other politicians, from people in high
positions of power and influence here in Washington, who said, yeah,
I knew about it, and someone came and told me
about it. But what could I have done. I'm not
a journalist, I'm not law enforcement. Maybe I am a journalist,
(04:34):
but that wasn't my beat, so it wasn't my place
to report on it. It seems to me there is
a disgusting double standard of law enforcement when you look
at how the political left is now responding to this
in the wake of these allegations becoming a whole lot
more public. Why did no one seek to protect these
women and prevent more victims from being victimized by such
(04:55):
a depraved individual.
Speaker 1 (04:57):
You know, the magnitude is breathtaking in term of he's
a known figure, and I mean, this is the worst
of the worst behavior. You know, Catalina, let me go
to you. He raped me, he choked me. While he
was choking me, I lost consciousness. I thought I had died.
I believed he drugged my drink. I had only one
(05:18):
glass of wine. I did not consent to any sexual activity.
He was married at the time, and his wife was pregnant,
and he said he needed to get paperwork from his
hotel room. And when I arrived to his hotel room,
I was already incapacitated. I couldn't move my arms or
my body.
Speaker 6 (05:34):
Wow, Sean, it was incredibly disturbing to have to see that.
But you know what an amazing point of bravery that
these women are finally stepping forward. And to Isabelle's point,
in many of these cases, it would never come to
light if it hadn't been for that. But I am
glad to finally see the Democratic Party holding one of
(05:58):
their own accountable. You know, for years it's been believe
all women until it's someone in their own party, and
so at least now we're seeing some consistency in some principle.
But that doesn't take away the fact that this was
known and many women had stepped forward you know, almost
(06:18):
a decade ago. But imagine if these women didn't come forward.
Now you know this Eric Swalla could have possibly been
the next governor of California and the fact that he
was that close to assuming an executive position of power
in the United States is so scary to think about.
(06:39):
But this is what happened across the board. And you know,
Republican or Democrat. You know, I've got to give a
lot of credit to Congresswoman on A Polina Luna too,
who said, look, this isn't about politics, this is about
doing what's right. It doesn't matter again, Republican or Democrat.
If you have serious issues, documented incidences, or rest, you know,
especially in involving staff, you need to be held accountable.
Speaker 1 (07:03):
You know, nobody seems to want to, Isabelle use the
word rape. What we just heard is an allegation of rape.
Speaker 3 (07:10):
It is, and it ought to be treated with the
furiousness and direct attention that it possibly can from law
enforcement agencies, but also more culturally, from the political apparatus too.
You know, I'm old enough to remember now at the
ripe age of twenty eight years old, that virtually every
single year we hear this word tossed around as a
political allegation. We remember it in the Brett Kavanaugh hearings.
(07:34):
I certainly have heard it thrown around a whole lot
related to the Epstein files and previous allegations that have
been deeply investigated by law enforcement and deemed to not
be credible in terms of a lot of these tips
that you've seen released in these declassified documents from the DOJ.
I hope and I pray that politicians in Washington, whatever
side of the aisle they're on, take this allegation and
(07:56):
the many that are accompanying it very very seriously, and
we treat it with the fullest extent possible in terms
of prosecutorial next steps from the Department of Justice or
whoever else needs to be involved. I worry, though, that
we've heard that word deluded so much in our postmodern
culture and in the era of me too, with so
many false allegations that people have become somewhat numb to it.
(08:20):
Don't listen to these stories and brush it off as
yet another political, crazy thing happening in Washington, DC. These
are very real crimes. They are very serious accusations and allegations,
and they deserve to be investigated with the fullest extent
of law enforcement.
Speaker 1 (08:35):
You know, Catalina. I mean, there is in most cases
a fine line. This seems very clear cut to me.
You have allegation after allegation after allegation, I mean the
most brutal allegations that any woman could ever make against
any man.
Speaker 7 (08:53):
You know.
Speaker 1 (08:54):
Compare that to, for example, the Capitol case. I mean,
it was dubious from the very beginning. It was a
political play by the Democrats. They overplayed their hands. And
I'll never forget one of the people testifying, well, there
was a line outside this room, and among the people
lined up to take turns and rape this woman that
(09:16):
was clearly intoxicated was Justice Kavanaugh. And then that emerged
into well I saw him near a line, but he
was not in the line. And then it was well
I saw him pouring drinks for women, but no, I
never saw him pour a drink for a woman, And
there was never any there there in that particular case.
And look at what an allegation, a false allegation can
(09:39):
do to somebody's life. I mean, this man was broken
when he was given his testimony.
Speaker 6 (09:45):
You're absolutely right, Sean, and it's infuriating of what they
put Justice Kavanaugh and his family.
Speaker 7 (09:50):
Through during and Clarence Thomas for that matter.
Speaker 6 (09:53):
And Clarence Thomas, and they use the same playbook over
and over again on that. And to your point, it
was allegations, it was scant evidence, and there they tried
to ruin his life. And here you actually have. You
have videos, you have evidence, you have highly detailed reports,
you have the police getting involved. You have so much
(10:15):
here now, and you know, and to your point Sean earlier,
this could be anybody's daughter, wife, you know, being in
politics as a young female, it's a calling, it's a
career to most, you know, women that want to get involved.
And here you're subjected in these cases where there are
(10:37):
real scummy people like the Eric Swallows of the world,
in these positions of power, using their power to to
do these things against women, and in some cases you're
not even believed. And again, you know, I hope to
Isabelle's point too, that this is carefully examined through and
(10:58):
through and that this guy, guys, you know, is hold
the accountable to the highest the sense of the law.
You know, everybody is innocent until proven guilty. But there's
so much here that needs to be fully investigated.
Speaker 7 (11:13):
Yeah, I totally agree. How do you think this ends,
is Abell?
Speaker 1 (11:17):
I absolutely can see him spending the rest of his
life in jail at this point. However, Haaveat, it's Alvin
Bragg and New York bringing the first charges against him.
Speaker 7 (11:26):
I have no faith in him.
Speaker 3 (11:28):
Yeah, I think we're right to be skeptical about our
faith in that particular prosecutorial process. That said, if these
allegations are deemed to be credible and this results in
a guilty conviction, he of course deserves to spend the
rest of his life in prison. It's been very difficult
for me, as a young woman in politics over the
past several years to see how many of these states
(11:48):
like New York, like California, and many others not treating
sexual assaults seriously. In fact, violent rapists are being let
out of prison early. I live in Virginia today. In
Virginia is currently attempting to reduce or eliminate mandatory minimum
sentences for crimes like rape and sexual assault, as well
as child pornography distribution, and many other heinous crimes that
(12:12):
are destroying society. So I think it's odd lived in
a society that says, we treat this so seriously, but
you're also watching a lot of these people dilute what
this crime actually means.
Speaker 1 (12:22):
All right, quick break more with Isabelle Brown and Catalina
lof on the other side, as we discuss the seriousness
now multiple women accusations of rape against mister fang Fang
Eric Swolwell. It's not a question of whether he's going
to run for governor. That's off the table, or he's
going to stay a member of Congress. That's off the table.
The question is will he have jail time? Will he
(12:44):
be convicted? Based on the testimony of all these women,
I don't see how he's not convicted, and then it's
a matter of how much time in Jelly gets more
on the other side as we continue, than your calls
coming up eight hundred and ninety four one, Sean, as
we continue.
Speaker 8 (13:03):
Thanks for listening to Sean Hannity.
Speaker 1 (13:33):
All right, we continue now with Isabelle Brown and Cataline
Allowfa with us discussing mister fang Fang Eric Swalwell more accusations.
And we're not just talking about sexual assault here. We
are talking about rape. I hesitate to ask this question,
but because you're you're in this political environment, do you
find most people are very respectful or not?
Speaker 6 (13:56):
Catalina, You know, I think when it comes down to
it's partially is is the media and the culture, you know,
to Isabelle's point first and foremost, when you have what
happened to Brett Kavanaugh, you know, over time, when this
is a real rape, you know, when there's evidence, when
there's real things, you don't want it to be diluted.
You don't want the seriousness of what happens to females
(14:17):
in politics, especially staffers. You know, I hear countless stories
of you know, former members and members you know, having
sort of these issues with staffords, and none of it
comes to light. And so I'm grateful that you have
women again, like you know, congresswomen on Napoulina, Luna and
others who are finally stepping forward and using their platforms
(14:38):
and their leadership to uncover this, because for too long
this has been going on. And so I do believe
that there's respects for women, but there needs to be
more women out there in positions that have platforms that
are that are speaking out against this, because if not,
it will be covered up. You know, the congressional slush fund.
(14:59):
All this stuff will be totally put under the rug
and under the table unless you take this seriously, unless
people are held accountable.
Speaker 1 (15:07):
By the way, that's lush fund for people that don't
know what you're referring to. That is taxpayer dollars that
have been used to pay off people that make allegations. Again,
their allegations doesn't necessarily mean they're true. However, they're using
taxpayer money to pay people off with a non disclosure agreement.
Any such deals that are made, and they have every
(15:29):
right to make them ought to be paid for with
their money, not with our money.
Speaker 7 (15:34):
Anyway.
Speaker 1 (15:35):
I appreciate both of you, respect both of you a lot.
You're very powerful emerging voices for young conservatives, and I
admire both of both of you for what you do.
Thank you for being with us.
Speaker 3 (15:45):
Thank you, Sean.
Speaker 6 (15:46):
Thanks Sean so much.
Speaker 1 (16:05):
Be sure to check in as soon as you get
to your car after work for breaking information you need
to know about.
Speaker 7 (16:12):
This is the Sean Hannity Show.
Speaker 1 (16:16):
All right, I see Zorn Marxist COMMI Mom, Donnie, you're
gonna open up the first government run grocery store in
New York City. You know the ironic part of all
of this. Grocery stores do not have big profit margins.
Speaker 7 (16:30):
Did you know that, Linda. They are very small profit margins,
very tiny.
Speaker 9 (16:35):
Yeah, it's not an easy business. The food business is
never an easy business, whether it's restaurants or grocery stores.
Speaker 1 (16:41):
I mean, it's such a good point, and it's just
frustrating to me because you would think, now, for example,
you can look at John Customatidis. He's the owner of
what Cristidi's and what's the other big Chainey owns that
one too in New York City. I've been to these
grocery stores. They're really well stocked. He takes really good care,
(17:02):
but and he's got wealthy. However, he's providing a service
for people. Now, they're going to spend thirty million dollars
in East Harlem to build out this grocery store. And
we don't need to waste thirty million dollars for a
government run grocery store when you can buy everything you
want at the local grocery store or they have Bodega's
(17:22):
pretty much on every corner in New York City. Anyway,
his Marxist Zoron Kami Mamdani talking about it, we.
Speaker 4 (17:29):
Are building a brand new store on city owned land
currently sitting empty in East Harlem, a neighborhood where nearly
forty percent of households receive public assistance or SNAP in
the past year.
Speaker 1 (17:45):
I don't know how do we ever survive all these years?
The government that bankrupted Social Security, Medicare, that runs the
worst schools, especially in New York City. Every Obamacare promise
made was never kept, is now going to provide a
better grocery store than one that is in the public sector. No,
that's not really how it's going to end up profit
(18:07):
margins after all cost taxes expenses for the grocery industry
ranges from one to three percent, Okay, And it's not
like they're overcharging people, they're just not.
Speaker 7 (18:21):
I don't know.
Speaker 1 (18:21):
I love grocery shopping. The last thing I want is
a government run anything. All right, to our busy phones.
Carl is in North Carolina on the Sean Hannity Show.
Speaker 7 (18:29):
Carl, how are you doing?
Speaker 8 (18:32):
Great?
Speaker 10 (18:32):
Sean?
Speaker 8 (18:32):
I hope you are too well. Speaking of Eric swallwell,
as egregious and horrible as the crime of rape is,
the case could be made that preason is even worse,
because you know, We've seen what happened with Peedo Joe
and his son Humper. We're tied up with CZP and
(18:53):
Diane Feinstein with her chauffeur and so forth. And so
he definitely needs to be prosecuted, tried for the rape accusations,
but also for treason as well. It's the only crime.
Speaker 1 (19:08):
Let me tell you, I watched these interviews of these women.
Make of these accusations any objective part of law, any
jury listening to this, I can't see any jury acquitting him.
Speaker 7 (19:21):
I just can't. They come off as too credible.
Speaker 8 (19:24):
Yes, and and yeah. So in addition to that, perhaps
he should receive a life sentence or or worse for
the obvious crime of treason that he's guilty of. It's
the only crime mentioned in the constitution. I'm involved with
the Christian organization that will be enforcing the constitution, but
(19:45):
Katie asked me not to promote anything, but it's it's
it's the highest law and needs to be enforced, and
so he needs to probably be tried for for both offenses.
Speaker 1 (19:57):
Well, I want to tell you something now. If I
had to look at him my crystal ball today and
predict Fang Fang's future, mister Frank Fang's future. I would
say that he's probably done living as a freeman in
pretty short order.
Speaker 7 (20:12):
That's my guess, absolutely.
Speaker 1 (20:14):
Although Alvin Bragg could always give him a sweetheart deal,
which would which would infuriate me and rightly infuriate all
the victims of his This has all the markings of
Harvey Weinstein to me, anyway, appreciate you call Carl Glad
you're out there, my friend. Eight hundred and nine four one,
Shawn our number, Dan, California. Gavin Newsom's Newsom's Marxist utopia.
(20:38):
By the way, do you have any idea what Gavin's
doing today? Because he's never at work. No idea, no
no worth the idea. What's going on?
Speaker 10 (20:47):
Yeah? How you doing? I just want to say thank
you for all your work and my comments a little
bit different than what you're focused on today. But everybody's
talking about the nuclear warhead that Iran's trying to get
a hold of. They're saying they got sixty enrich uranium,
they could probably, you know, get close to making ten
nuclear warheads. Well, how come nobody's talking about the atom
(21:11):
bombs that they can make. It only takes twenty percent
of enriched uranium to make a dirty bomb like the
type that you know we originally used forty years ago.
So if they can, if they're looking for a.
Speaker 1 (21:26):
Dirty bomb, has been in the forefront of my mind.
We've discussed it, it's been brought up, it's not been
the it's not been the major focus of our discussion.
But you know, leaving enriched uranium there is very scary,
and I would prefer that we get it. I'd prefer
that they voluntarily hand it over. I'd prefer you know,
(21:47):
as I said at the beginning of the show today,
I think that the President is kind of waiting them
out and letting him know that he's serious and that
they're going to suffer severe consequences. Look, he can destroy
the country of Iran in about two hours, maybe maybe less.
He could just wipe out carg Island and their ability
(22:08):
and destroy their entire economy with it.
Speaker 7 (22:11):
He could do that. He's trying.
Speaker 1 (22:14):
He's showing great personal restraint by doing what he's doing.
It would be very blunt for Donald Trump. This is
this is restraint, and he's doing it for the Iranian people.
If you want to know the truth, we'll see how
this plays out. But he's got multiple options on the
table right now. He's going to try and starve off
any income production for the Iranians. Let them know there's
(22:35):
a severe price to pay, privately telling them I could
wipe you out permanently in terms of any ability to
make money, and hopefully that'll wake them up. Hopefully the
reality of what he's threatening would wake them up. So far,
they just you know, they cling to their indoctrinated radicalism
and you know, obviously missing the fact that the top
(22:58):
three tier leadership above them has been wiped out too.
But we'll see, time will tell, We'll know very quickly.
This is not going to go on longer than you think.
It's not going to go on as long as people think, well.
Speaker 10 (23:09):
I'm encouraged by what he's doing, it's amount of time.
I'm just still concerned because if they can do ten
nuclear warhead, they can probably do a lot more than that.
As far as the dirty bombs and slipping somewhere, I
just you know, hoping it never happens. But yeah, God
blessed on the President.
Speaker 1 (23:27):
I don't want to give away too many secrets, but
major cities across our country are more than prepared if
any radioactive material enters the area. That's all I'm going
to say. I don't want to go into too much detail.
It has been written about. I'm not disclosing anything that's
top secret. But there are strategic plans in place, and
(23:48):
there are contingencies in place in this country because though
that would be the type of weapon, if you're talking
about a dirty bomb, that would need to be brought
in and gotten into the country. I don't think that's
an easy you think to do. Although there's a lot
of shipping, a lot of ships that come in and out,
and by the way, we have made provisions on that front.
Two without giving away too much operational detail. Again, it's
(24:11):
all being made public. I'm not giving away any nation
of our nation's secrets. All right, appreciate it. Quick break
right back to our busy phones. It's toll free eight
hundred and nine four one. If you want to be
a part of the program as we continue.
Speaker 3 (24:31):
You know here at the Sean Hannity Show, we want
to thrive et, economy, border security, and protection of our children.
Speaker 8 (24:40):
Now what else can we come up with?
Speaker 1 (24:43):
Pitch off the left cheapen It lots right here for
all the latest news and information. I'm back to our
(25:18):
busy phones eight hundred and ninety four one, Sean. If
you want to join us, Tracy's in Texas. God bless Texas. Tracy. Hi,
how are you?
Speaker 2 (25:26):
Hi?
Speaker 5 (25:26):
Sean?
Speaker 3 (25:27):
How are you?
Speaker 11 (25:27):
I'm so excited to talk to you today.
Speaker 7 (25:29):
Well, I'm excited you called. What's going on?
Speaker 11 (25:33):
Well, I'm going to be honest, and it's hard for
me to say, but I'm a little upset with you
and I love you enough to give you the feedback
that I need to give you.
Speaker 1 (25:41):
Oh, good grief, this is a tough love moment. Go ahead,
hit me with it. Go ahead, I can handle it.
Speaker 11 (25:46):
Okay, I know you can. Now Listen in the news,
it's been all about Popolio popolo popolo. And I have
been a devout Catholic here in Texas all my life
until a couple of weeks ago, and I just want
to ask you what the platform you have? What about
our pope, Sean? What about our pope? You know I've
become a recent convert to Linda Tyrianism, and I want
(26:08):
to hear from you about Flinda.
Speaker 7 (26:12):
Okay, So I am.
Speaker 1 (26:14):
I was raised Catholic, I went to Catholic School twelve
years and I'm saying this. You probably have heard me
say this, but for those that haven't, the Catholic Mass
is beautiful to me. Everything about it's perfect. I have
major issues with the Catholic churches, which is why I
am a non denominational Christian. Now, that is how I
(26:34):
describe myself. And I go to I usually go to
church every Sunday, not everyone, but most Sundays. And my
faith is more important to me at this point in
my life than ever I have gone. I've done a
very deep dive into understanding the Old Testament more more
because of my study of the New Testament has been
pretty exhaustive over the years. And I want to be
(26:56):
a better person every day. Okay, you're talking about Linda Arrianism,
which is Linda thinks that he doesn't have to follow
the instructions of our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ and
his instructions the one prayer he gave his apostles, the
Lord's Prayer, and it says, you know, I won't give
the hope of forgive us as we forgive those that
(27:17):
trespass against us. Right, And Linda thinks that she's going
to go go to the pearly gates and negotiate with
God himself and say, well, you made me, and I
didn't have to follow the instructions that your son gave us,
that you gave us when you were you know, you know,
on earth and sacrificing yourself as reconciliation to God the Father. Okay,
(27:42):
she thinks she can negotiate, and she thinks that, well,
may I quote to you, Matthew.
Speaker 9 (27:49):
Wait, she wants to talk about what I was saying.
I would love to hear her interpretation, because I believe
in interpretation.
Speaker 1 (27:55):
Because I'm about to give you a checkmate of Linda.
She's about to be destroyed here.
Speaker 9 (28:00):
Let the caller have them moment go ahead before I
destroy your Go ahead, Glinda.
Speaker 11 (28:04):
Thank you, Linda, thank you so much. It's just that
I feel like you are trying to paraphrase and put
words into her mouth, and that's that's not what she's saying.
She's not going against Jesus.
Speaker 7 (28:20):
Say excuse me.
Speaker 1 (28:22):
She said that that she does not believe that she
has to follow Uh forgive us our trespasses as we forgive.
He says, she's gonna cling to her hate list, and
she has said in her own words that when she
gets to the pearly Gates, she plans on reminding God
the Father that he made her and that therefore he's
(28:45):
responsible for her hatred.
Speaker 7 (28:48):
She said all of that. Linda, is there? Am? I am?
I miscarried.
Speaker 9 (28:51):
I think Tracy was in the middle of a sentence.
I'm just asking for a friend, Tracy.
Speaker 1 (28:55):
No, I want to know, did you she's saying that
you didn't say that? Did you not say everything I
just said?
Speaker 9 (29:00):
I did not say everything you just said.
Speaker 7 (29:02):
You hear what you want to hear fake news?
Speaker 11 (29:04):
Lead Amen, Linda, Amen, And whether you like it or not, Seanie,
this is a revival that is sweeping the land. I
don't know the latest numbers, but a lot of people
are becoming Lenditarians, a lot of.
Speaker 9 (29:19):
Us Linditarianism for every.
Speaker 1 (29:22):
Amount of Let me ask you this, Tracy, and let
me read to you Matthew if I may, Matthew six
fourteen and fifteen, Okay, For if you forgive other people
when they sin against you, your heavenly father will also
forgive you. But if you do not forgive others their sins,
your father will not forgive your sins. Check Mate. That
(29:47):
is a direct, direct quote, Tracy.
Speaker 9 (29:51):
I just want to say, while we are out of time,
I'll see you in church on Sunday, looking forward to it.
Speaker 11 (29:57):
Thank you, Thank you, Pope, thank you.
Speaker 7 (30:01):
Wait, Tracy, is that not a checkmate moment?
Speaker 9 (30:05):
She's calling me the pope?
Speaker 7 (30:06):
I think you lost.
Speaker 11 (30:08):
You can talk to our deacons about the theological weed.
Speaker 1 (30:12):
Does that not say that if you want forgiveness, you
have to forgive others. But if you do not forgive
others their sins, your father will not forgive your sins.
Speaker 7 (30:21):
Is that straightforward enough for you?
Speaker 9 (30:23):
Yeah, But they gotta repent, they got to rebuke, they
gotta do it the right way. It's implied. I'm not
adding words. I am understanding the words you're saying.
Speaker 7 (30:35):
You're making up your own bib. I'm not.
Speaker 9 (30:39):
I don't have that much time to write.
Speaker 7 (30:40):
Promise all right.
Speaker 1 (30:43):
Lindaitarian, which is paganism in another form,
The Sean Hannity Show News
Host
Sean Hannity
Popular Podcasts
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
The Breakfast Club
The World's Most Dangerous Morning Show, The Breakfast Club, With DJ Envy, Jess Hilarious, And Charlamagne Tha God!
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.