July 1, 2025 • 30 mins
Sean Hannity is joined by Chris Hahn, host of The Aggressive Progressive Podcast and former aide to Senator Chuck Schumer, for a spirited debate over one of New York’s most controversial political figures — Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani. With Mamdani’s radical proposals and refusal to condemn anti‑Israel rhetoric, some are calling him the progressive movement’s version of Donald Trump. Is that a fair comparison?
Chris Hahn shares the left’s perspective on Mamdani’s rise, while Hannity challenges what he sees as a dangerous shift in Democratic priorities. It’s a fiery, no‑holds‑barred exchange on ideology, hypocrisy, and the future of American politics.
Follow Sean and Our Guests on Social Media:
Sean Hannity:
Facebook: facebook.com/SeanHannity
X (Twitter): x.com/seanhannity
Truth Social: truthsocial.com/@SeanHannity
Chris Hahn
Facebook: facebook.com/ChrisHahnNY/
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
All right, News Roundup and information Overload hour toll free
(00:03):
are numbers eight hundred and ninety four one Sean. If
you want to be a part of the program, as
I have said many, many times, the radicals that run
New York City and places like Los Angeles and Chicago
and San Francisco and other places around the country, these
deep blue states and cities the most radical people there.
(00:26):
Now you have, according to Polymarket as of yesterday, I
have in checked today seventy six percent chance that Zoran
Marxist Mondami is going to be the next mayor of
New York City. Here's mom Donni explaining why Palestine is
part of his politics.
Speaker 2 (00:44):
Listen, this is how we defeat the occupation.
Speaker 3 (00:49):
Style.
Speaker 1 (00:52):
So the third holy grail of taboos in American politics.
You have socialism, you have.
Speaker 2 (00:57):
Islam, and then you have Palestine, and you are really
going for the trifecta. Let's go. Let's go tell me
why is palasan a part of your politics. When you
grow up as someone, especially in the Third World, you
have a very different understanding of the Palace in the struggle.
It is one that is framed in terms of empathy
and solidarity.
Speaker 1 (01:17):
What part of what happened October seventh? What part of
tens and hundreds of thousands of rockets fired into Israel
by enemies in Gaza and Lebanon and the Huti Rebels
and the Iranians does he not understand October seventh? That
would be the equivalent if you extrapolate out the population
of Israel compared to the US of forty thousand dead
(01:39):
Americans in a day. We lost two thy nine hundred
and seventy seven on nine to eleven and oh one.
I'm not sure what part of murder and rape and
kidnapping and torture and beheading people like Marxist Mondani don't
seem to understand, is Mandani? You know, Taxing wider neighborhoods.
Speaker 4 (02:02):
We went on your website and realized there's a policy
proposal that says your plan, and I'm going to quote
it for folks, is to shift the tax burden from
overtaxed homeowners and the outer boroughs to more expensive homes
in richer and wider neighborhoods. Explain why you are bringing
race into your tax proposal.
Speaker 5 (02:21):
That is just a description of what we see right now.
It's not driven by race. It's more of an assessment
of what neighborhoods are being under taxed versus overtaxed. We've
seen time and again that this is a property tax
system that is inequitable.
Speaker 1 (02:34):
Then why bring up race If it's not about race,
you're making it about race, you know. Then him saying
clearly not a capitalist, but a Marxist that I don't
think we should have billionaires. This is going to be
great for New York City's economy, not really. Florida is
going to see growth like they've never seen before if
this guy gets elected.
Speaker 6 (02:55):
Listen, I don't think that we should have billionaires because, frankly,
it is so much money in a moment of such inequality,
and ultimately, what we need more of is equality across
our city and across our state and across our country.
Speaker 1 (03:08):
Two each according to their need from aage, according to
their ability, and as determined by the big hand of government.
That is, by definition, Marxism, communism, statism, call it whatever
you want. And he even went as far as to
give the textbook definition, the dictionary definition for socialism, and
(03:32):
that is seizing the means of production.
Speaker 7 (03:34):
Listen, we have to continue to elect more socialists and
we have to ensure that we are unapologetic about our socialism.
It's very critical for all of us to remember what
it is that we are fighting for and to remember
that our agenda is an agenda that must not be
dictated by calculus but by conviction. And what I mean
(03:55):
by that is that the many things that we believe,
some of them are already popular in this moment right now,
right If we're talking about the cancelation of student debt,
if we're talking about Medicare for all, you know, these
are issues which have the groundswallow popular support across this country.
But then there are also other issues that we firmly
believe in, whether it's BDS right or whether it's the
(04:17):
end goal of season the means of production, where we
do not have the same level of support at this.
Speaker 1 (04:23):
Period moment end goal to seize the means of production. Anyway,
this is a return appearance. It's been a while. Chris
Han is the host of the ever so popular and
growing Chris Han Show and an acolyte disciple of Chucky Schumer.
(04:45):
You missed me? How are you? How many affiliates are
you up to?
Speaker 6 (04:47):
Now?
Speaker 3 (04:47):
I do miss you. I'm on a lot of affiliates
right now. I don't know how many.
Speaker 1 (04:51):
And it's the about how many? Is it ten twenty thirty?
Speaker 3 (04:56):
It's probably in between twenty and thirty somewhere like that.
Speaker 1 (04:59):
I'm more up to where up to about seven sixty
or seven seventy something like that. Racy be hooking.
Speaker 3 (05:04):
You should be hooking your brother up and tagging me
onto your shows, man, so that I could you know,
crossing door.
Speaker 1 (05:10):
Let me ask you a question. If I ask you,
Chris Han, are you against racism? What would you say?
Speaker 3 (05:15):
I am one hundred percent against racism and.
Speaker 1 (05:17):
You're against anti semitism one hundred percent?
Speaker 3 (05:20):
Right, I'm happy to do it.
Speaker 1 (05:21):
You and I, You and I. This may be a
rare moment of solidarity. We get along, Okay. Is it
hard to condemn the global antifada?
Speaker 3 (05:31):
It is not hard to condemn the global antipada. First
you to understand what that means, which I don't know
that this thirty three year old does.
Speaker 1 (05:39):
Oh. I think he does know what it means. If
you listen to all the other comments that he has made,
he knows damn well what it means. And you know,
holy war is part of it, and it is scary.
Do you think that anyone should promote a policy that
taxes one race more than another race? What do you
(05:59):
call what would Chris Han called that? Because I have
a word in my mind. What I if I would
isolate out one race over another, what would you call that?
Chris Han?
Speaker 3 (06:10):
I suggest that a lot of politicians that don't think
they're going to win.
Speaker 1 (06:17):
And Okay, he won and he's at the polymarket as
him at seventy six percent chances of yesterday to win
the general. What do you call it when you isolate
out and want to tax one race higher than another race.
I think there's an easy word to describe that.
Speaker 3 (06:32):
I would say that that's race bait taxation, which I
don't race based text.
Speaker 1 (06:36):
No, no, no, no, I think you're I think you're no, no,
you're you're trying to uh, you're trying to water it down.
What do you what do you really call it?
Speaker 3 (06:46):
I I don't like it? Is what I call it?
Speaker 1 (06:48):
What if a politician said that they want to tax
African Americans more than others? What would you call that?
Speaker 3 (06:54):
Yeah? I think we would have the same problem with that.
Speaker 1 (06:57):
What would you call it? Come on, help me out here?
Speaker 3 (07:00):
Is we'd call it a race.
Speaker 1 (07:01):
Thank you, ding ding ding ding ding. Jeopardy Now our
double jeopardy question. Are you ready?
Speaker 3 (07:07):
But wait, hold on a second. Everybody is counting out
my former radio partner Curtis Leewa in this election, and
I think if he tightens it up a little bit,
it's going to be a little closer than you think,
especially if it's a four person race.
Speaker 1 (07:19):
Oh we'll see. I mean, I would think that Eric
Adams and Cuomo, who stayed in this would shocked. I
think a lot of people and Marxist Donnie, I think
that that might create a lane for Curtis, no doubt
about it. And I think Curtis Curtis would institute the
policies of Rudy when Rudy was married. Do you agree
with that?
Speaker 3 (07:39):
I think some of them, and maybe some of them
in a better way. O. Curtis is not as dumb
as people think he is. He's very smart. I've spent
a lot of time.
Speaker 1 (07:46):
Nobody thinks Curtis is dumb. He's been a long time friend.
Don't say that about my friend.
Speaker 3 (07:51):
He's my friend too. I've known him forever and I
worked with him for years, and I think his policies
are a little bit more in line with what traditional
New Yorkers think than people think. And I think that
counting him out at this point in time, especially if
Cuomos days in. I think if Culomos days in, he
has a real lane. He got twenty eight point five
percent four years ago Curtis did. And I know that
(08:12):
because I was the first person to talk to him
after he lost on the radio U and he kept
saying at thirty and I reminded him he was twenty
eight point five. Well, if he could turn that twenty
eight point point five and to the thirty two percent,
he could win in a four man race. If he
could turn into thirty four percent, he has a chance
in the three man race.
Speaker 1 (08:28):
So I totally agree with you, and I think that's very,
very possible, even though Democrats out number of Republicans nine
to one. Well, there, let me ask you the hard question,
because now I'm going to go straight to the heart
of it. What is Chucky Schumer and Jerry Nadler and
people like that, other prominent New Yorkers. Did Chuck Schumer
(08:48):
and Jerry Nadler did they endorse Mom Donnie?
Speaker 3 (08:53):
I didn't see an endorsement. I think they saw an
acknowledgement that he won the primary and he won, an
acknowledgement and acknowledgement that he won the primary, and he
won it in a similar way that Trump won his primary.
It was a populist campaign that was very popular, that
got a lot of people excited. It didn't look you
went down a road about statements he made that most
people don't know. And when he campaigned, he campaigned on
(09:16):
things like lowering prices. Sounded a lot like Trump in
twenty twenty four. I think that the squishy mission middle
voted for Trump because he said he was going to
get down prices. And by the way, he didn't have
to give a plan, neither did Trump. He just wanted
people want to know that the person who they're going
to vote for cares about the issues they care about
and they're going to try to fix it. And I
think he took on all comers. He won on a
lot of different types of broadcasts. I think he ran
(09:38):
a very successful campaign. I reached out to people on
the Clombo campaign the beginning of June, saying, what are
you guys doing? You're running Elliott Spitzer's failed comeback for
comproller campaign and this guy is coming up on you
and he's going to pass you because he's exciting and
young and hip, and you're staying in your bunker like
Harris did against against Trump and twenty twenty four. It
(10:00):
just doesn't work. You've got when you're running for public office,
you need to appear in public.
Speaker 1 (10:03):
All right, quick break, we'll come back Chuck Schumer's former disciple,
our friend Chris Hahn of the Chris Han Show. More
with him on the other side than we'll get to
your calls coming up straight ahead. Eight hundred nine foot
one shown as we continue. Chris Han is with us,
host of his own podcast, and he's on a couple
of radio stations around the country, and we appreciate him
(10:26):
being back with us. Friend of Chuck Schumer, do you
not think that this is a now a big problem,
Like I know a lot of people in your party
have just scratching their heads and they're wondering why they
lost against Donald Trump, for example. Right, Okay, anyway, by
the way, Chuck Schumer did call and he did congratulate
(10:49):
Mom Donnie on social media. I've known Mom Donnie since
we've worked together, et cetera. Et cetera. He ran an
impressive campaign connected with New Yorker's about affordability, fairness, and opportunity.
Where is he? Where is his criticism about the issues
we just discussed. Why isn't Chuck Schum I'm going to
tell you what the answer is. I'm not even going
(11:09):
to ask you because you're too close to him and
you're not gonna want to hear it. Chuck Schumer is
afraid of Mom, Donnie. He's afraid of AOC. He has
a seventeen percent approval rating your friend, and AOC would
wipe the floor with him, according to recent polls in
a primary in New York, and he would lose. So
(11:30):
Chuck Schumer I don't think likes Mandami in his heart,
but doesn't have the courage of his convictions to go
out there and say it. And you're gonna tell me
I'm wrong, but you know, deep down in your heart,
I am dead on accurate.
Speaker 3 (11:43):
I think that in a campaign Trump, Chuck Humor would
be any comer.
Speaker 1 (11:47):
For his wrong You're wrong, all right, then put your
money where your mouth is. If AOC primaries him, I'll
take that bet, all right.
Speaker 3 (11:56):
Steak dinner, baby, You're.
Speaker 1 (11:58):
On you're now bigger.
Speaker 3 (11:59):
Wanted to hurt on Long Islandman? Uh, I don't.
Speaker 1 (12:04):
I don't go back to New York. I'm not welcome
in New York anymore.
Speaker 6 (12:07):
Hurt.
Speaker 3 (12:07):
That might hurt me, it won't hurt you.
Speaker 1 (12:10):
Well, the thing is okay. He wants to not only freeze,
rent and seize buildings if the teams it necessary, raised
property taxes, corporate taxes. He wants to quote tax the
rich at record levels. Uh. You do you believe in
replacing police with social workers? Because that's what he wants
to do. Do you believe in free buses and and
(12:31):
government operated grocery stores? Do you think that we should
have free child care so we can indoctrinate kids but
from the moment they're born.
Speaker 3 (12:40):
Uh?
Speaker 1 (12:40):
Do you think that you know, each new parent should get,
you know, a goodie bag with us with resources, diapers,
baby wipes. Do you think that you do what's.
Speaker 3 (12:51):
Wrong with giving what is wrong with giving childcare to people?
What is wrong with nothing? One?
Speaker 1 (12:55):
Why don't why don't you? Why don't you? Why don't
you Democrats get together and generously donated if you see
a need.
Speaker 3 (13:01):
Tax deductions for all sorts of things in this country.
Speaker 1 (13:03):
We give break I give if I'd give donations all
the time, I don't talk about it, but if I
see somebody in need, I absolutely give them money.
Speaker 3 (13:09):
Winners and losers in our tax policy all over the place.
Why can't parents and renters and people that take the bus,
why can't they be winners? And here's the point you're
missing about mom Domi and about Trump. They appealed to
what people were caring about at the moment, and it
still seems to be the affordability issue which Trump appealed
to in twenty twenty four. It's the same campaign. These
(13:31):
are very similar campaigns. I've compared Mondami favorably to Trump
and to Trump's campaigns. This is the future of campaigning.
With Chuck Schumer and with other traditional Democrats need to
understand that going forward, you can't just talk about the
policies that you passed and the accomplishments you've had, because
if that was the case, Clomo would be running from marrying.
Now you had a lot of accomplishments in this pak.
Speaker 1 (13:52):
Last question, well, you got to do it.
Speaker 3 (13:54):
You got to you got to focus on what people
care about at the time, and you've got to say, look,
this is what I care about.
Speaker 1 (13:58):
Right, So here's where we are. You're supporting mom DOMI.
You got the squad, you got aoc, you got Grandpa Bernie,
you know. And now you have Democrats on record voting
to champion the rights of men to play women's sports
in Chuck Schumer Senate. Then you had the Senate last
night or the early this morning vote for the largest
(14:19):
tax increase in history. They didn't stand up for working
men and women and cut tax on tips in overtime
they did. They allowed the border to be invaded over
the last four years, and Democrats lied about it. That
allowed in terrorists and murderers and rapists and cartel and
gang members. You have a party that's against energy dominance,
(14:41):
your party that literally allowed our military to be depleted
and our strategic oil reserves to be depleted. I mean,
do you not understand why you lost when you had
a candidate that wants, you know, taxpayer funded sex change
operations for illegals.
Speaker 3 (14:59):
I don't think you under stan Sean. I don't think
any of that matters right now. You're a party that
just voted to take away health in charts for fourteen
million people.
Speaker 1 (15:06):
I'm not true Hack. No, No, they put in a
work requirement, so you have to tell the truth. I'll
tell you what. Stay right there, I'm gonna I'm gonna
hold over Chris Han. This is the biggest opportunity for
a real radio audience in his life. I'm going to
give him a chance. And I have one remaining question
for you, Okay, on the other side, all right, I
didn't want to rush you off the air, Chris Han.
(15:27):
I kid him because, uh, Chris is actually a pretty
good guy for a liberal, but he's crazy and he's
Are you still best for bff with Chucky?
Speaker 3 (15:35):
I wouldn't say I'm bff, but I am still part
of this humor family without a doubt.
Speaker 1 (15:39):
Okay, I bet he wasn't said when I left town?
Did he make any comments to you, like I'm so
glad he left a couple of years ago?
Speaker 3 (15:45):
Oh, he called me up. He said, you know, Chuck
so and Hannity left down Christopher, what's going from this place?
Speaker 1 (15:53):
That's pretty good? Did he really call you or no?
Speaker 3 (15:55):
No, but he called me every day for six years
when I worked for him, So you never forget the
freaking voice.
Speaker 1 (16:00):
That is funny. Chuck doesn't seem to like me. He's
never come on my show. He doesn't like he doesn't
like me. I don't dislike the guy. But here's the
here's the fundamental problem for Chuck, and you're just denying
the reality of it. So you have Marxist Mondani win
this mayor mayoral race. You have AOC who might primary Chuck.
(16:21):
We'll see what happens. You have this radicalism and this
is this is what happened in the last election. Your party,
the Democratic Party, you had a candidate that supports that. Well,
first of all, that was part of an administration that
lied and said the borders were closed and the borders
were secure. We have known terrorists, murderers, rapist, cartel members,
(16:42):
gang all came in under Biden and Harris. And she
wants as part of the open border mentality, she wanted
taxpayer funded sex change operations for illegals and for convicts.
Her running mate wanted, uh, taxpayer funded college tuition for illegals.
Speaker 3 (16:59):
Uh.
Speaker 1 (16:59):
Then of course he wanted gender affirming care without Bretto consent,
this guy, and then he wanted to put tampons in
Great school boys bathrooms. If that makes it, you know,
if that's your policy and now you've got a guy
that wants to replace police with social workers, wants to
tax white people more than people of other races. This
(17:20):
is a guy that wants to freeze rent, raise taxes
on everybody, offer everything is free, free free across the board,
and promote the trans agenda, raise the minimum wage to
thirty bucks. Then he wants to eliminate all guns in
New York and swears that he's going to fight ice
(17:42):
and deportation. And I'm just trying to understand if you
and Chuck realize that you can't win on these platforms,
that your party has become way more extreme than it's
ever been. Do you see that reality. I'll let you
have the last word.
Speaker 3 (18:00):
Well, there was a lot to what you just said there,
but here's the reality. The reality is nobody could win
when you're drilling down into small components of people. You
need broad based appeals. That's why Trump won, That's why
Mondami won. If he wins in November, that is going
to be why he wins, because he appealed to a
(18:21):
broad base of people, across demographics, across party lines, across
you know, wealth.
Speaker 1 (18:27):
Respectfully, you're not addressing where your party is championing the
rights of men to play women's sports, putting the rights
of the illegals like Abrego Garcia over the safety of others.
Address the real.
Speaker 3 (18:40):
Issues the party, the Democratic Party needs to focus on
core issues. They need to come up with them four
core values that they stand for that appeal broadly. You're
talking about issues that appeal very narrowly, that have been
blown up out of proportion, I think successfully by challenges
(19:01):
to Democrats. But Democrats can can push back on that
with broad popular.
Speaker 1 (19:07):
Mom Donnie is the embodiment of all these radical policies.
He's doubling down and taking it further global antifata.
Speaker 3 (19:16):
Oh great, Yeah, well look, I mean, you know, a
lot of the policies of the right were unpopular and
then Trump doubled down on them and said, here's why
they're popular.
Speaker 1 (19:25):
Which which policy was unpopular with Trump?
Speaker 3 (19:28):
I don't know, rounding up people that are making your
bagels in the morning.
Speaker 1 (19:32):
And nobody nobody's no, they're trying to They're they're deporting
people like in Los Angeles they were arresting child molesters, murderers,
gang members, and and other violent criminals. Don't do you
do you think that Harris and Biden did the right thing,
but with open borders and chucks that by that idly
Bien did nothing. Do you think that was the right call.
Speaker 3 (19:53):
I think that there was a very sick There was
a piece of legislation that would have solved this problem
that Trump stopped because he.
Speaker 1 (20:00):
Oh Trump, Trump wasn't in office. This is Biden's policy.
Speaker 3 (20:04):
Stopped the bill.
Speaker 1 (20:07):
Okay, but Trump has proven you don't need legislation. His
policies have not been codified into law. He just put
out presidential directors, which Biden could have done.
Speaker 3 (20:17):
Yeah, and I remember being on your show when Obama
was president and you rallying against that kind of action
by a president. I remember it.
Speaker 1 (20:26):
Actually actually no, that's not true. But we'll go back
and we'll listen to the tape. Look, but you're trying
to avoid my question. These are this is now your party.
Your party lied to the American people for four years
and said the borders closed, the borders secure. They lied
in said inflation as transitory. They lied and said that
(20:48):
Joe was not cognitively impaired. When did you notice a
cognitive impairment?
Speaker 3 (20:55):
Well, look, I wasn't in a campaign.
Speaker 1 (20:57):
Budd and ask you if you're in the campaign. I'm
not in the camp pain. And I started reporting on
it in twenty nineteen. When did you first notice?
Speaker 3 (21:04):
Let me tell you, I've been on your show a
few times during the Biden administration, and I didn't reach
out to people inside and I was given the run
around too.
Speaker 1 (21:10):
And when did you first notice it?
Speaker 3 (21:12):
I first started thinking about it in like twenty nineteen,
and I started saying not twenty nineteen, twenty twenty two.
I started thinking it in that regardless of what is
going on here, didn't think you would run again. And
then when we saw the disastrous debate, I was one
of the first people to say, get this guy out
of here. But again.
Speaker 1 (21:29):
And do you think that running a candidate that supports
taxpayer funded sex change operations for illegals was a good idea?
Speaker 3 (21:36):
That was a Trump administration policy? And that clip was, well,
that was not.
Speaker 1 (21:41):
A Trump administration policy. Nobody had a sex change operation.
She's on She's on tape saying she supported it. Find
that with Trump never not happening.
Speaker 3 (21:51):
That tape was made in twenty nineteen when.
Speaker 1 (21:54):
Trump was you think Tim Walls was was a good
choice supporting tampon's in Greade school boys bathrooms.
Speaker 3 (22:04):
I don't think the policy was to put it in
boys bathrooms. I think it's a blunt it was No.
Speaker 1 (22:08):
And taxpayer funded tuition for illegals. Was that a good policy?
Speaker 3 (22:12):
I think tax I think having tuition for college for
people who get ahead or here who are dreamers, I
think that's something American support.
Speaker 1 (22:18):
No for illegal immigrants, people that didn't respect our laws,
border and sovereignty.
Speaker 3 (22:23):
He were doing it for dreamers, who people actually if
you pull them, want to see them stay here. And
they were okay.
Speaker 1 (22:30):
So you're avoiding the question why couldn't Why couldn't members
of your party stand for the family of Lake and
Riley when President Trump gave a speech, a joint session speech,
Why couldn't they stand for the for the mother Alexis Nungary,
who we've interviewed on this show, the lost her twelve
year old little daughter to Biden Harris illegals that brutally
(22:54):
raped and murdered her. Why didn't your party stand for them? Yeah? Look,
I think they should have stand for them, and you
think they should have. You don't think that? Doesn't that
show a lack of heart, soul? And a conscience.
Speaker 3 (23:06):
I think when somebody loses a loved one, you want
to respect them and have emparticular But your party didn't.
Speaker 1 (23:12):
What does that tell you about your party? You're friends
with these people?
Speaker 3 (23:16):
Again, Elections are about appealing to broad bases of people,
broad groups of people, not bases.
Speaker 1 (23:22):
I should say, you're giving me cliches and platitudes. Why
didn't your party stand? And why don't you just say?
It was a disgraceful moment for my party.
Speaker 3 (23:31):
I said they should have stand, Sean, did you not
hear me? I said it, yeah. I mean you reception
bad in Texas or wherever you are today. I mean
it's in New York, were here, but it is. It
is something they should have done. Why they didn't, I
don't know. I don't answer for them, but what I
would suggest is they don't give their opponents these openings
(23:55):
and they just stick to a to a mantra of
issues that are broad issues.
Speaker 1 (24:00):
I'm gonna make two predictions. Onden is Chuck Schumer will
not have the courage to condemn Mom Donnie. And two,
if he is primaried by AOC, he will lose, and
he will lose spectacularly.
Speaker 3 (24:14):
I don't know.
Speaker 1 (24:15):
I'm a former New York. I don't even go back
to New York. I have not been to Rothmans in
two years. Do you know that?
Speaker 3 (24:21):
Oh, you know you'll be coming next year or two
years from now after the primary, when you're buying a stake.
Speaker 1 (24:26):
No, no, I'm never going back.
Speaker 3 (24:28):
And you know you love Rothmans. Just come back. I'll
give you a pass.
Speaker 1 (24:32):
I love Rothmans. The guys that are from Rothmans are
building a place not far from me. Well, then you know,
like every other New York company, they're getting out, and
if you were smart, you get out too.
Speaker 3 (24:43):
You could send your jet for me and I'll have
dinner with you at Rothmans in Texas.
Speaker 1 (24:47):
Wherever you are is a typical liberal. You want something
for free. I'm not paying for your plane. Fair.
Speaker 3 (24:51):
I'm gonna lose the bat, so of course I want it.
You can even here. I'll come there. But you know,
if I've come in there, you're flying mes.
Speaker 1 (25:00):
You and I both know to deep in Chuck Schumer's hard.
He knows that this is crackpot stuff. I know he
knows it because he's never advocated this crap in his life.
I've never really liked him, but I don't think he's
a total nut job like the squad. I don't, and
I think that, you know, unfortunately he's getting more extreme.
But the thing is he fears his party now more
(25:23):
than ever. Chuck Schumer is afraid. And rather than just
do the honorable thing and just realize this party doesn't
represent my values anymore and just you know, let his
turn run out and let somebody else take over, he's
going to try and fight it out, and it's not
going to be pretty for him.
Speaker 3 (25:41):
We'll see, Sean, We'll see maybe that catching New York.
Speaker 1 (25:46):
No, never, I'm not not in happening, not coming back.
I am gone told my house. I don't have a
I don't have a house there.
Speaker 3 (25:55):
I got a spare room. You can crash here.
Speaker 1 (25:58):
No, I'd rather forget it. It's I get a free
hotel room on at Roosevelt Hotel. That's the city. They'll
give it to you. You'll stay closed, Lindicals, they closed.
Speaker 3 (26:10):
You'll fit in perfectly.
Speaker 1 (26:13):
Uh. You got to admit the case against your party
is weak. Just admit it, and you just admit we're
in a bad spot right now. You're right handed. We've
been taken over by radicals. We got to refocus our attention.
We got to get back to bread and butter issues.
But here's your The problem is, you can't with Jasmin
Crockett and AOC and mom Donnie the Marxist. You can't.
(26:35):
You can't. You cannot recover Kamala Harris, Tim Timmy Tampon, Tim,
you can't recover from that.
Speaker 3 (26:43):
I just said we got to get back to bread
and butter issues. You know, I didn't say bread and butter.
Speaker 1 (26:48):
But yeah, why don't you just support Trump and suck
it up? Go ahead and say I support Trump's policy.
Speaker 3 (26:53):
Support Trump. I don't hate Trump, but I'm not going
to support Trump.
Speaker 1 (26:57):
I don't like everyone on your party hates Trump. Nobody
they all hate him.
Speaker 3 (27:04):
I think hate is not worth it. I don't like
hating anyone.
Speaker 1 (27:08):
Yeah, why did they lie about the value? You know,
I can go through the chapter and verse. They they
had no problem with all of the law fair and
the weaponization against him.
Speaker 3 (27:19):
Seems like he's doing a little lawfare of his own
right now, don't you think? No, Oh no, you don't know.
You don't think he's your rest of the congresswoman in
New Jersey was warranted?
Speaker 1 (27:30):
You don't think that that. First of all, Donald Trump
did not make that decision. Are you saying that it's
perfectly acceptable for a congresswoman, as the allegation goes, is
interfering with the police, law enforcement and doing their job.
You think that's acceptable. Is that part of your defund
dismantle no bail law mentality?
Speaker 3 (27:50):
I think she was doing her job, and I think.
Speaker 1 (27:53):
That disrupting, disrupting law enforcement. I mean they were interfering
in their in their work. It's called obstruction.
Speaker 3 (28:01):
Where I grew up, Congress last time I checked, the
Constitution says Congress is going to be a check of
balance on the presidency. And that means you get to
visit federal You can.
Speaker 1 (28:09):
Check and balance all you want, but you can't you
can't interfere in law enforcement in the middle of an operation.
Speaker 3 (28:15):
There was no operation going on. They were going.
Speaker 1 (28:17):
Actually was you're wrong.
Speaker 3 (28:19):
Okay, Well, let's see what the court says. But it
seems like a little law fair there. Seems like a
little law fair against the Attorney general in New York.
Seems like that's going on right now. So if they
really think that it was law fair, maybe they wouldn't
engage in law do you think.
Speaker 1 (28:35):
An attorney general should run in any state on a
platform to go after one man, one organization, and one
family the way that the attorney general in New York
did with quote the phrase I'm going to get Trump.
Is that acceptable to you?
Speaker 3 (28:52):
I think if there is evidence of a crime.
Speaker 1 (28:55):
I'm going to get Trump. I'm gonna so I'll become
attorney general on a platform I'm going to get Chris Han.
Speaker 3 (29:02):
Now, look, I think it's I think no one is
above the laws.
Speaker 1 (29:04):
And I don't think what and what law did Trump break?
Speaker 6 (29:07):
Oh?
Speaker 3 (29:07):
He was convicted.
Speaker 1 (29:09):
He was convicted of what What was the conviction about?
It was? It was Trump. First of all, the charges
were a novel legal theory. This you know the statute
of limitations had run out. You know that it was
a legal nda. It was paid for as a legal expense,
and it was done by a lawyer. Listen, Chris Han,
(29:30):
The Chris Han Show. Appreciate your time, Chris. Good to
catch up with you, and God bless you. If you're
down on Florida, let me know when you're freezing up
there in the winter time, give me a call.
Speaker 3 (29:38):
I will I'll tuck you sud eight nine.
Speaker 1 (29:42):
Rep Things up for today. We're going to cover probably
tomorrow considering the jury and the Diddy trial. They did
come to verdicts on every count but won the rico charge,
so the judge sent him home for the day and
wants them to keep deliberating. But we'll have that probably tomorrow.
Also the latest on the Big Beautiful Bill and the House.
Tonight on Hannity, we have Governor Ron de Santis, Christy
(30:04):
Nomley were with the presidents today, Alligator Alcatraz, Mike Johnson
on the Big Beautiful Bill, break, Jared on the Diddy Trial.
All coming up nine Eastern Hannaday. I'm Foxy. Then back
here tomorrow. Thank you for making the show possible.
All right, News Roundup and information Overload hour toll free
(00:03):
are numbers eight hundred and ninety four one Sean. If
you want to be a part of the program, as
I have said many, many times, the radicals that run
New York City and places like Los Angeles and Chicago
and San Francisco and other places around the country, these
deep blue states and cities the most radical people there.
(00:26):
Now you have, according to Polymarket as of yesterday, I
have in checked today seventy six percent chance that Zoran
Marxist Mondami is going to be the next mayor of
New York City. Here's mom Donni explaining why Palestine is
part of his politics.
Speaker 2 (00:44):
Listen, this is how we defeat the occupation.
Speaker 3 (00:49):
Style.
Speaker 1 (00:52):
So the third holy grail of taboos in American politics.
You have socialism, you have.
Speaker 2 (00:57):
Islam, and then you have Palestine, and you are really
going for the trifecta. Let's go. Let's go tell me
why is palasan a part of your politics. When you
grow up as someone, especially in the Third World, you
have a very different understanding of the Palace in the struggle.
It is one that is framed in terms of empathy
and solidarity.
Speaker 1 (01:17):
What part of what happened October seventh? What part of
tens and hundreds of thousands of rockets fired into Israel
by enemies in Gaza and Lebanon and the Huti Rebels
and the Iranians does he not understand October seventh? That
would be the equivalent if you extrapolate out the population
of Israel compared to the US of forty thousand dead
(01:39):
Americans in a day. We lost two thy nine hundred
and seventy seven on nine to eleven and oh one.
I'm not sure what part of murder and rape and
kidnapping and torture and beheading people like Marxist Mondani don't
seem to understand, is Mandani? You know, Taxing wider neighborhoods.
Speaker 4 (02:02):
We went on your website and realized there's a policy
proposal that says your plan, and I'm going to quote
it for folks, is to shift the tax burden from
overtaxed homeowners and the outer boroughs to more expensive homes
in richer and wider neighborhoods. Explain why you are bringing
race into your tax proposal.
Speaker 5 (02:21):
That is just a description of what we see right now.
It's not driven by race. It's more of an assessment
of what neighborhoods are being under taxed versus overtaxed. We've
seen time and again that this is a property tax
system that is inequitable.
Speaker 1 (02:34):
Then why bring up race If it's not about race,
you're making it about race, you know. Then him saying
clearly not a capitalist, but a Marxist that I don't
think we should have billionaires. This is going to be
great for New York City's economy, not really. Florida is
going to see growth like they've never seen before if
this guy gets elected.
Speaker 6 (02:55):
Listen, I don't think that we should have billionaires because, frankly,
it is so much money in a moment of such inequality,
and ultimately, what we need more of is equality across
our city and across our state and across our country.
Speaker 1 (03:08):
Two each according to their need from aage, according to
their ability, and as determined by the big hand of government.
That is, by definition, Marxism, communism, statism, call it whatever
you want. And he even went as far as to
give the textbook definition, the dictionary definition for socialism, and
(03:32):
that is seizing the means of production.
Speaker 7 (03:34):
Listen, we have to continue to elect more socialists and
we have to ensure that we are unapologetic about our socialism.
It's very critical for all of us to remember what
it is that we are fighting for and to remember
that our agenda is an agenda that must not be
dictated by calculus but by conviction. And what I mean
(03:55):
by that is that the many things that we believe,
some of them are already popular in this moment right now,
right If we're talking about the cancelation of student debt,
if we're talking about Medicare for all, you know, these
are issues which have the groundswallow popular support across this country.
But then there are also other issues that we firmly
believe in, whether it's BDS right or whether it's the
(04:17):
end goal of season the means of production, where we
do not have the same level of support at this.
Speaker 1 (04:23):
Period moment end goal to seize the means of production. Anyway,
this is a return appearance. It's been a while. Chris
Han is the host of the ever so popular and
growing Chris Han Show and an acolyte disciple of Chucky Schumer.
(04:45):
You missed me? How are you? How many affiliates are
you up to?
Speaker 6 (04:47):
Now?
Speaker 3 (04:47):
I do miss you. I'm on a lot of affiliates
right now. I don't know how many.
Speaker 1 (04:51):
And it's the about how many? Is it ten twenty thirty?
Speaker 3 (04:56):
It's probably in between twenty and thirty somewhere like that.
Speaker 1 (04:59):
I'm more up to where up to about seven sixty
or seven seventy something like that. Racy be hooking.
Speaker 3 (05:04):
You should be hooking your brother up and tagging me
onto your shows, man, so that I could you know,
crossing door.
Speaker 1 (05:10):
Let me ask you a question. If I ask you,
Chris Han, are you against racism? What would you say?
Speaker 3 (05:15):
I am one hundred percent against racism and.
Speaker 1 (05:17):
You're against anti semitism one hundred percent?
Speaker 3 (05:20):
Right, I'm happy to do it.
Speaker 1 (05:21):
You and I, You and I. This may be a
rare moment of solidarity. We get along, Okay. Is it
hard to condemn the global antifada?
Speaker 3 (05:31):
It is not hard to condemn the global antipada. First
you to understand what that means, which I don't know
that this thirty three year old does.
Speaker 1 (05:39):
Oh. I think he does know what it means. If
you listen to all the other comments that he has made,
he knows damn well what it means. And you know,
holy war is part of it, and it is scary.
Do you think that anyone should promote a policy that
taxes one race more than another race? What do you
(05:59):
call what would Chris Han called that? Because I have
a word in my mind. What I if I would
isolate out one race over another, what would you call that?
Chris Han?
Speaker 3 (06:10):
I suggest that a lot of politicians that don't think
they're going to win.
Speaker 1 (06:17):
And Okay, he won and he's at the polymarket as
him at seventy six percent chances of yesterday to win
the general. What do you call it when you isolate
out and want to tax one race higher than another race.
I think there's an easy word to describe that.
Speaker 3 (06:32):
I would say that that's race bait taxation, which I
don't race based text.
Speaker 1 (06:36):
No, no, no, no, I think you're I think you're no, no,
you're you're trying to uh, you're trying to water it down.
What do you what do you really call it?
Speaker 3 (06:46):
I I don't like it? Is what I call it?
Speaker 1 (06:48):
What if a politician said that they want to tax
African Americans more than others? What would you call that?
Speaker 3 (06:54):
Yeah? I think we would have the same problem with that.
Speaker 1 (06:57):
What would you call it? Come on, help me out here?
Speaker 3 (07:00):
Is we'd call it a race.
Speaker 1 (07:01):
Thank you, ding ding ding ding ding. Jeopardy Now our
double jeopardy question. Are you ready?
Speaker 3 (07:07):
But wait, hold on a second. Everybody is counting out
my former radio partner Curtis Leewa in this election, and
I think if he tightens it up a little bit,
it's going to be a little closer than you think,
especially if it's a four person race.
Speaker 1 (07:19):
Oh we'll see. I mean, I would think that Eric
Adams and Cuomo, who stayed in this would shocked. I
think a lot of people and Marxist Donnie, I think
that that might create a lane for Curtis, no doubt
about it. And I think Curtis Curtis would institute the
policies of Rudy when Rudy was married. Do you agree
with that?
Speaker 3 (07:39):
I think some of them, and maybe some of them
in a better way. O. Curtis is not as dumb
as people think he is. He's very smart. I've spent
a lot of time.
Speaker 1 (07:46):
Nobody thinks Curtis is dumb. He's been a long time friend.
Don't say that about my friend.
Speaker 3 (07:51):
He's my friend too. I've known him forever and I
worked with him for years, and I think his policies
are a little bit more in line with what traditional
New Yorkers think than people think. And I think that
counting him out at this point in time, especially if
Cuomos days in. I think if Culomos days in, he
has a real lane. He got twenty eight point five
percent four years ago Curtis did. And I know that
(08:12):
because I was the first person to talk to him
after he lost on the radio U and he kept
saying at thirty and I reminded him he was twenty
eight point five. Well, if he could turn that twenty
eight point point five and to the thirty two percent,
he could win in a four man race. If he
could turn into thirty four percent, he has a chance
in the three man race.
Speaker 1 (08:28):
So I totally agree with you, and I think that's very,
very possible, even though Democrats out number of Republicans nine
to one. Well, there, let me ask you the hard question,
because now I'm going to go straight to the heart
of it. What is Chucky Schumer and Jerry Nadler and
people like that, other prominent New Yorkers. Did Chuck Schumer
(08:48):
and Jerry Nadler did they endorse Mom Donnie?
Speaker 3 (08:53):
I didn't see an endorsement. I think they saw an
acknowledgement that he won the primary and he won, an
acknowledgement and acknowledgement that he won the primary, and he
won it in a similar way that Trump won his primary.
It was a populist campaign that was very popular, that
got a lot of people excited. It didn't look you
went down a road about statements he made that most
people don't know. And when he campaigned, he campaigned on
(09:16):
things like lowering prices. Sounded a lot like Trump in
twenty twenty four. I think that the squishy mission middle
voted for Trump because he said he was going to
get down prices. And by the way, he didn't have
to give a plan, neither did Trump. He just wanted
people want to know that the person who they're going
to vote for cares about the issues they care about
and they're going to try to fix it. And I
think he took on all comers. He won on a
lot of different types of broadcasts. I think he ran
(09:38):
a very successful campaign. I reached out to people on
the Clombo campaign the beginning of June, saying, what are
you guys doing? You're running Elliott Spitzer's failed comeback for
comproller campaign and this guy is coming up on you
and he's going to pass you because he's exciting and
young and hip, and you're staying in your bunker like
Harris did against against Trump and twenty twenty four. It
(10:00):
just doesn't work. You've got when you're running for public office,
you need to appear in public.
Speaker 1 (10:03):
All right, quick break, we'll come back Chuck Schumer's former disciple,
our friend Chris Hahn of the Chris Han Show. More
with him on the other side than we'll get to
your calls coming up straight ahead. Eight hundred nine foot
one shown as we continue. Chris Han is with us,
host of his own podcast, and he's on a couple
of radio stations around the country, and we appreciate him
(10:26):
being back with us. Friend of Chuck Schumer, do you
not think that this is a now a big problem,
Like I know a lot of people in your party
have just scratching their heads and they're wondering why they
lost against Donald Trump, for example. Right, Okay, anyway, by
the way, Chuck Schumer did call and he did congratulate
(10:49):
Mom Donnie on social media. I've known Mom Donnie since
we've worked together, et cetera. Et cetera. He ran an
impressive campaign connected with New Yorker's about affordability, fairness, and opportunity.
Where is he? Where is his criticism about the issues
we just discussed. Why isn't Chuck Schum I'm going to
tell you what the answer is. I'm not even going
(11:09):
to ask you because you're too close to him and
you're not gonna want to hear it. Chuck Schumer is
afraid of Mom, Donnie. He's afraid of AOC. He has
a seventeen percent approval rating your friend, and AOC would
wipe the floor with him, according to recent polls in
a primary in New York, and he would lose. So
(11:30):
Chuck Schumer I don't think likes Mandami in his heart,
but doesn't have the courage of his convictions to go
out there and say it. And you're gonna tell me
I'm wrong, but you know, deep down in your heart,
I am dead on accurate.
Speaker 3 (11:43):
I think that in a campaign Trump, Chuck Humor would
be any comer.
Speaker 1 (11:47):
For his wrong You're wrong, all right, then put your
money where your mouth is. If AOC primaries him, I'll
take that bet, all right.
Speaker 3 (11:56):
Steak dinner, baby, You're.
Speaker 1 (11:58):
On you're now bigger.
Speaker 3 (11:59):
Wanted to hurt on Long Islandman? Uh, I don't.
Speaker 1 (12:04):
I don't go back to New York. I'm not welcome
in New York anymore.
Speaker 6 (12:07):
Hurt.
Speaker 3 (12:07):
That might hurt me, it won't hurt you.
Speaker 1 (12:10):
Well, the thing is okay. He wants to not only freeze,
rent and seize buildings if the teams it necessary, raised
property taxes, corporate taxes. He wants to quote tax the
rich at record levels. Uh. You do you believe in
replacing police with social workers? Because that's what he wants
to do. Do you believe in free buses and and
(12:31):
government operated grocery stores? Do you think that we should
have free child care so we can indoctrinate kids but
from the moment they're born.
Speaker 3 (12:40):
Uh?
Speaker 1 (12:40):
Do you think that you know, each new parent should get,
you know, a goodie bag with us with resources, diapers,
baby wipes. Do you think that you do what's.
Speaker 3 (12:51):
Wrong with giving what is wrong with giving childcare to people?
What is wrong with nothing? One?
Speaker 1 (12:55):
Why don't why don't you? Why don't you? Why don't
you Democrats get together and generously donated if you see
a need.
Speaker 3 (13:01):
Tax deductions for all sorts of things in this country.
Speaker 1 (13:03):
We give break I give if I'd give donations all
the time, I don't talk about it, but if I
see somebody in need, I absolutely give them money.
Speaker 3 (13:09):
Winners and losers in our tax policy all over the place.
Why can't parents and renters and people that take the bus,
why can't they be winners? And here's the point you're
missing about mom Domi and about Trump. They appealed to
what people were caring about at the moment, and it
still seems to be the affordability issue which Trump appealed
to in twenty twenty four. It's the same campaign. These
(13:31):
are very similar campaigns. I've compared Mondami favorably to Trump
and to Trump's campaigns. This is the future of campaigning.
With Chuck Schumer and with other traditional Democrats need to
understand that going forward, you can't just talk about the
policies that you passed and the accomplishments you've had, because
if that was the case, Clomo would be running from marrying.
Now you had a lot of accomplishments in this pak.
Speaker 1 (13:52):
Last question, well, you got to do it.
Speaker 3 (13:54):
You got to you got to focus on what people
care about at the time, and you've got to say, look,
this is what I care about.
Speaker 1 (13:58):
Right, So here's where we are. You're supporting mom DOMI.
You got the squad, you got aoc, you got Grandpa Bernie,
you know. And now you have Democrats on record voting
to champion the rights of men to play women's sports
in Chuck Schumer Senate. Then you had the Senate last
night or the early this morning vote for the largest
(14:19):
tax increase in history. They didn't stand up for working
men and women and cut tax on tips in overtime
they did. They allowed the border to be invaded over
the last four years, and Democrats lied about it. That
allowed in terrorists and murderers and rapists and cartel and
gang members. You have a party that's against energy dominance,
(14:41):
your party that literally allowed our military to be depleted
and our strategic oil reserves to be depleted. I mean,
do you not understand why you lost when you had
a candidate that wants, you know, taxpayer funded sex change
operations for illegals.
Speaker 3 (14:59):
I don't think you under stan Sean. I don't think
any of that matters right now. You're a party that
just voted to take away health in charts for fourteen
million people.
Speaker 1 (15:06):
I'm not true Hack. No, No, they put in a
work requirement, so you have to tell the truth. I'll
tell you what. Stay right there, I'm gonna I'm gonna
hold over Chris Han. This is the biggest opportunity for
a real radio audience in his life. I'm going to
give him a chance. And I have one remaining question
for you, Okay, on the other side, all right, I
didn't want to rush you off the air, Chris Han.
(15:27):
I kid him because, uh, Chris is actually a pretty
good guy for a liberal, but he's crazy and he's
Are you still best for bff with Chucky?
Speaker 3 (15:35):
I wouldn't say I'm bff, but I am still part
of this humor family without a doubt.
Speaker 1 (15:39):
Okay, I bet he wasn't said when I left town?
Did he make any comments to you, like I'm so
glad he left a couple of years ago?
Speaker 3 (15:45):
Oh, he called me up. He said, you know, Chuck
so and Hannity left down Christopher, what's going from this place?
Speaker 1 (15:53):
That's pretty good? Did he really call you or no?
Speaker 3 (15:55):
No, but he called me every day for six years
when I worked for him, So you never forget the
freaking voice.
Speaker 1 (16:00):
That is funny. Chuck doesn't seem to like me. He's
never come on my show. He doesn't like he doesn't
like me. I don't dislike the guy. But here's the
here's the fundamental problem for Chuck, and you're just denying
the reality of it. So you have Marxist Mondani win
this mayor mayoral race. You have AOC who might primary Chuck.
(16:21):
We'll see what happens. You have this radicalism and this
is this is what happened in the last election. Your party,
the Democratic Party, you had a candidate that supports that. Well,
first of all, that was part of an administration that
lied and said the borders were closed and the borders
were secure. We have known terrorists, murderers, rapist, cartel members,
(16:42):
gang all came in under Biden and Harris. And she
wants as part of the open border mentality, she wanted
taxpayer funded sex change operations for illegals and for convicts.
Her running mate wanted, uh, taxpayer funded college tuition for illegals.
Speaker 3 (16:59):
Uh.
Speaker 1 (16:59):
Then of course he wanted gender affirming care without Bretto consent,
this guy, and then he wanted to put tampons in
Great school boys bathrooms. If that makes it, you know,
if that's your policy and now you've got a guy
that wants to replace police with social workers, wants to
tax white people more than people of other races. This
(17:20):
is a guy that wants to freeze rent, raise taxes
on everybody, offer everything is free, free free across the board,
and promote the trans agenda, raise the minimum wage to
thirty bucks. Then he wants to eliminate all guns in
New York and swears that he's going to fight ice
(17:42):
and deportation. And I'm just trying to understand if you
and Chuck realize that you can't win on these platforms,
that your party has become way more extreme than it's
ever been. Do you see that reality. I'll let you
have the last word.
Speaker 3 (18:00):
Well, there was a lot to what you just said there,
but here's the reality. The reality is nobody could win
when you're drilling down into small components of people. You
need broad based appeals. That's why Trump won, That's why
Mondami won. If he wins in November, that is going
to be why he wins, because he appealed to a
(18:21):
broad base of people, across demographics, across party lines, across
you know, wealth.
Speaker 1 (18:27):
Respectfully, you're not addressing where your party is championing the
rights of men to play women's sports, putting the rights
of the illegals like Abrego Garcia over the safety of others.
Address the real.
Speaker 3 (18:40):
Issues the party, the Democratic Party needs to focus on
core issues. They need to come up with them four
core values that they stand for that appeal broadly. You're
talking about issues that appeal very narrowly, that have been
blown up out of proportion, I think successfully by challenges
(19:01):
to Democrats. But Democrats can can push back on that
with broad popular.
Speaker 1 (19:07):
Mom Donnie is the embodiment of all these radical policies.
He's doubling down and taking it further global antifata.
Speaker 3 (19:16):
Oh great, Yeah, well look, I mean, you know, a
lot of the policies of the right were unpopular and
then Trump doubled down on them and said, here's why
they're popular.
Speaker 1 (19:25):
Which which policy was unpopular with Trump?
Speaker 3 (19:28):
I don't know, rounding up people that are making your
bagels in the morning.
Speaker 1 (19:32):
And nobody nobody's no, they're trying to They're they're deporting
people like in Los Angeles they were arresting child molesters, murderers,
gang members, and and other violent criminals. Don't do you
do you think that Harris and Biden did the right thing,
but with open borders and chucks that by that idly
Bien did nothing. Do you think that was the right call.
Speaker 3 (19:53):
I think that there was a very sick There was
a piece of legislation that would have solved this problem
that Trump stopped because he.
Speaker 1 (20:00):
Oh Trump, Trump wasn't in office. This is Biden's policy.
Speaker 3 (20:04):
Stopped the bill.
Speaker 1 (20:07):
Okay, but Trump has proven you don't need legislation. His
policies have not been codified into law. He just put
out presidential directors, which Biden could have done.
Speaker 3 (20:17):
Yeah, and I remember being on your show when Obama
was president and you rallying against that kind of action
by a president. I remember it.
Speaker 1 (20:26):
Actually actually no, that's not true. But we'll go back
and we'll listen to the tape. Look, but you're trying
to avoid my question. These are this is now your party.
Your party lied to the American people for four years
and said the borders closed, the borders secure. They lied
in said inflation as transitory. They lied and said that
(20:48):
Joe was not cognitively impaired. When did you notice a
cognitive impairment?
Speaker 3 (20:55):
Well, look, I wasn't in a campaign.
Speaker 1 (20:57):
Budd and ask you if you're in the campaign. I'm
not in the camp pain. And I started reporting on
it in twenty nineteen. When did you first notice?
Speaker 3 (21:04):
Let me tell you, I've been on your show a
few times during the Biden administration, and I didn't reach
out to people inside and I was given the run
around too.
Speaker 1 (21:10):
And when did you first notice it?
Speaker 3 (21:12):
I first started thinking about it in like twenty nineteen,
and I started saying not twenty nineteen, twenty twenty two.
I started thinking it in that regardless of what is
going on here, didn't think you would run again. And
then when we saw the disastrous debate, I was one
of the first people to say, get this guy out
of here. But again.
Speaker 1 (21:29):
And do you think that running a candidate that supports
taxpayer funded sex change operations for illegals was a good idea?
Speaker 3 (21:36):
That was a Trump administration policy? And that clip was, well,
that was not.
Speaker 1 (21:41):
A Trump administration policy. Nobody had a sex change operation.
She's on She's on tape saying she supported it. Find
that with Trump never not happening.
Speaker 3 (21:51):
That tape was made in twenty nineteen when.
Speaker 1 (21:54):
Trump was you think Tim Walls was was a good
choice supporting tampon's in Greade school boys bathrooms.
Speaker 3 (22:04):
I don't think the policy was to put it in
boys bathrooms. I think it's a blunt it was No.
Speaker 1 (22:08):
And taxpayer funded tuition for illegals. Was that a good policy?
Speaker 3 (22:12):
I think tax I think having tuition for college for
people who get ahead or here who are dreamers, I
think that's something American support.
Speaker 1 (22:18):
No for illegal immigrants, people that didn't respect our laws,
border and sovereignty.
Speaker 3 (22:23):
He were doing it for dreamers, who people actually if
you pull them, want to see them stay here. And
they were okay.
Speaker 1 (22:30):
So you're avoiding the question why couldn't Why couldn't members
of your party stand for the family of Lake and
Riley when President Trump gave a speech, a joint session speech,
Why couldn't they stand for the for the mother Alexis Nungary,
who we've interviewed on this show, the lost her twelve
year old little daughter to Biden Harris illegals that brutally
(22:54):
raped and murdered her. Why didn't your party stand for them? Yeah? Look,
I think they should have stand for them, and you
think they should have. You don't think that? Doesn't that
show a lack of heart, soul? And a conscience.
Speaker 3 (23:06):
I think when somebody loses a loved one, you want
to respect them and have emparticular But your party didn't.
Speaker 1 (23:12):
What does that tell you about your party? You're friends
with these people?
Speaker 3 (23:16):
Again, Elections are about appealing to broad bases of people,
broad groups of people, not bases.
Speaker 1 (23:22):
I should say, you're giving me cliches and platitudes. Why
didn't your party stand? And why don't you just say?
It was a disgraceful moment for my party.
Speaker 3 (23:31):
I said they should have stand, Sean, did you not
hear me? I said it, yeah. I mean you reception
bad in Texas or wherever you are today. I mean
it's in New York, were here, but it is. It
is something they should have done. Why they didn't, I
don't know. I don't answer for them, but what I
would suggest is they don't give their opponents these openings
(23:55):
and they just stick to a to a mantra of
issues that are broad issues.
Speaker 1 (24:00):
I'm gonna make two predictions. Onden is Chuck Schumer will
not have the courage to condemn Mom Donnie. And two,
if he is primaried by AOC, he will lose, and
he will lose spectacularly.
Speaker 3 (24:14):
I don't know.
Speaker 1 (24:15):
I'm a former New York. I don't even go back
to New York. I have not been to Rothmans in
two years. Do you know that?
Speaker 3 (24:21):
Oh, you know you'll be coming next year or two
years from now after the primary, when you're buying a stake.
Speaker 1 (24:26):
No, no, I'm never going back.
Speaker 3 (24:28):
And you know you love Rothmans. Just come back. I'll
give you a pass.
Speaker 1 (24:32):
I love Rothmans. The guys that are from Rothmans are
building a place not far from me. Well, then you know,
like every other New York company, they're getting out, and
if you were smart, you get out too.
Speaker 3 (24:43):
You could send your jet for me and I'll have
dinner with you at Rothmans in Texas.
Speaker 1 (24:47):
Wherever you are is a typical liberal. You want something
for free. I'm not paying for your plane. Fair.
Speaker 3 (24:51):
I'm gonna lose the bat, so of course I want it.
You can even here. I'll come there. But you know,
if I've come in there, you're flying mes.
Speaker 1 (25:00):
You and I both know to deep in Chuck Schumer's hard.
He knows that this is crackpot stuff. I know he
knows it because he's never advocated this crap in his life.
I've never really liked him, but I don't think he's
a total nut job like the squad. I don't, and
I think that, you know, unfortunately he's getting more extreme.
But the thing is he fears his party now more
(25:23):
than ever. Chuck Schumer is afraid. And rather than just
do the honorable thing and just realize this party doesn't
represent my values anymore and just you know, let his
turn run out and let somebody else take over, he's
going to try and fight it out, and it's not
going to be pretty for him.
Speaker 3 (25:41):
We'll see, Sean, We'll see maybe that catching New York.
Speaker 1 (25:46):
No, never, I'm not not in happening, not coming back.
I am gone told my house. I don't have a
I don't have a house there.
Speaker 3 (25:55):
I got a spare room. You can crash here.
Speaker 1 (25:58):
No, I'd rather forget it. It's I get a free
hotel room on at Roosevelt Hotel. That's the city. They'll
give it to you. You'll stay closed, Lindicals, they closed.
Speaker 3 (26:10):
You'll fit in perfectly.
Speaker 1 (26:13):
Uh. You got to admit the case against your party
is weak. Just admit it, and you just admit we're
in a bad spot right now. You're right handed. We've
been taken over by radicals. We got to refocus our attention.
We got to get back to bread and butter issues.
But here's your The problem is, you can't with Jasmin
Crockett and AOC and mom Donnie the Marxist. You can't.
(26:35):
You can't. You cannot recover Kamala Harris, Tim Timmy Tampon, Tim,
you can't recover from that.
Speaker 3 (26:43):
I just said we got to get back to bread
and butter issues. You know, I didn't say bread and butter.
Speaker 1 (26:48):
But yeah, why don't you just support Trump and suck
it up? Go ahead and say I support Trump's policy.
Speaker 3 (26:53):
Support Trump. I don't hate Trump, but I'm not going
to support Trump.
Speaker 1 (26:57):
I don't like everyone on your party hates Trump. Nobody
they all hate him.
Speaker 3 (27:04):
I think hate is not worth it. I don't like
hating anyone.
Speaker 1 (27:08):
Yeah, why did they lie about the value? You know,
I can go through the chapter and verse. They they
had no problem with all of the law fair and
the weaponization against him.
Speaker 3 (27:19):
Seems like he's doing a little lawfare of his own
right now, don't you think? No, Oh no, you don't know.
You don't think he's your rest of the congresswoman in
New Jersey was warranted?
Speaker 1 (27:30):
You don't think that that. First of all, Donald Trump
did not make that decision. Are you saying that it's
perfectly acceptable for a congresswoman, as the allegation goes, is
interfering with the police, law enforcement and doing their job.
You think that's acceptable. Is that part of your defund
dismantle no bail law mentality?
Speaker 3 (27:50):
I think she was doing her job, and I think.
Speaker 1 (27:53):
That disrupting, disrupting law enforcement. I mean they were interfering
in their in their work. It's called obstruction.
Speaker 3 (28:01):
Where I grew up, Congress last time I checked, the
Constitution says Congress is going to be a check of
balance on the presidency. And that means you get to
visit federal You can.
Speaker 1 (28:09):
Check and balance all you want, but you can't you
can't interfere in law enforcement in the middle of an operation.
Speaker 3 (28:15):
There was no operation going on. They were going.
Speaker 1 (28:17):
Actually was you're wrong.
Speaker 3 (28:19):
Okay, Well, let's see what the court says. But it
seems like a little law fair there. Seems like a
little law fair against the Attorney general in New York.
Seems like that's going on right now. So if they
really think that it was law fair, maybe they wouldn't
engage in law do you think.
Speaker 1 (28:35):
An attorney general should run in any state on a
platform to go after one man, one organization, and one
family the way that the attorney general in New York
did with quote the phrase I'm going to get Trump.
Is that acceptable to you?
Speaker 3 (28:52):
I think if there is evidence of a crime.
Speaker 1 (28:55):
I'm going to get Trump. I'm gonna so I'll become
attorney general on a platform I'm going to get Chris Han.
Speaker 3 (29:02):
Now, look, I think it's I think no one is
above the laws.
Speaker 1 (29:04):
And I don't think what and what law did Trump break?
Speaker 6 (29:07):
Oh?
Speaker 3 (29:07):
He was convicted.
Speaker 1 (29:09):
He was convicted of what What was the conviction about?
It was? It was Trump. First of all, the charges
were a novel legal theory. This you know the statute
of limitations had run out. You know that it was
a legal nda. It was paid for as a legal expense,
and it was done by a lawyer. Listen, Chris Han,
(29:30):
The Chris Han Show. Appreciate your time, Chris. Good to
catch up with you, and God bless you. If you're
down on Florida, let me know when you're freezing up
there in the winter time, give me a call.
Speaker 3 (29:38):
I will I'll tuck you sud eight nine.
Speaker 1 (29:42):
Rep Things up for today. We're going to cover probably
tomorrow considering the jury and the Diddy trial. They did
come to verdicts on every count but won the rico charge,
so the judge sent him home for the day and
wants them to keep deliberating. But we'll have that probably tomorrow.
Also the latest on the Big Beautiful Bill and the House.
Tonight on Hannity, we have Governor Ron de Santis, Christy
(30:04):
Nomley were with the presidents today, Alligator Alcatraz, Mike Johnson
on the Big Beautiful Bill, break, Jared on the Diddy Trial.
All coming up nine Eastern Hannaday. I'm Foxy. Then back
here tomorrow. Thank you for making the show possible.
The Sean Hannity Show News
Host
Sean Hannity
Popular Podcasts
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.