January 21, 2026 • 29 mins
Sean opens hour two by recapping the presidents Davos speech criticizing Europe and Canada and underscoring Greenland's strategic importance. John Solomon of JustTheNews.com joins to detail documents alleging the FBI paid anti-Trump Sedition Hunters as informants in the January 6 and Arctic Frost probes, raising concerns about bureau rules and Director Chris Wray's leadership. He also shares a letter he obtained from Attorney General Pam Bondi to Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison stating the Justice Department may seek sanctions over a move to block ICE, as Sean cites the Constitutions Supremacy Clause. The show tracks Capitol Hill developments as House Oversight moves toward contempt referrals involving Bill and Hillary Clinton, with Sean saying there is bipartisan support, while contrasting that with the prosecutions of Steve Bannon and Peter Navarro. Callers weigh in on U.S.- Greenland negotiations and Denmark's treatment of Greenlanders, and Sean highlights a recent FBI Top Ten fugitive arrest noted by Kash Patel.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Our two Sean Hannity Show toll free numbers eight hundred
and nine to four one Sean, if you want to
be a part of the program. Uh, we'll get back
to the President his speech in Davos, and he just
laid out how weak, empathetic and impotent Europe is in
Canada is and and really the geopolitical importance as we
(00:21):
have laid out its history in great length and detail
on this program of Greenland and just how you know,
Europe is collapsing under its own weight from woke policies,
open borders and you know, horrible you know, economic policies
and radical redistribution policies and socialism and it's just collapsing.
Speaker 2 (00:44):
So we'll get back to that.
Speaker 1 (00:46):
Last night on Hannity, we had the FBI Director Cash Battel.
Now Cash Betel was able to announce that, uh, this
is now in one year, they got five the fifth
person on the FBI's ten most wanted fugitive list, more
than the entire previous four years combined. That's how good
(01:10):
a job that the FBI is doing. In this particular case.
You know, they announced the arrest of this individual, this
Alejandro Rosalius Castillo, been arrested in Mexico, and he had
been wanted in twenty sixteen for the murder of a
former coworker in North Carolina. They found this guy working
(01:30):
in coworker in Mexico. Anyway, that's just part of what
he's been able to accomplish. Our friend John Solomon, justinnews
dot com founder editor in chief, chief investigative reporter, had
a great article out today how Biden's FBI paid anti
Trump edition hunters as informants in J six and the
(01:53):
Arctic frost probes. And that's just part of what's going
on right now. The House Oversight Committee, James Comer is
daring Democrats to advance Clinton contempt of Congress resolutions or
be exposed for being hypocrites. Remember what they did to
Peter Navarro, Remember what they did to Steve Bannon, and
they a lot of other people not only got referrals,
(02:14):
but you know, had to fight the court system exhaustively.
And I don't care how many times Clinton spokesperson lashes
out at Comer over the Epstein probe, but you know,
we have pictures of him in hot tubs and swimming
pools with all of these girls that were pals of
(02:36):
Jeffrey Epstein and the Democrats all wanted to make this
about Donald Trump. Donald Trump threw Jeffrey Epstein out of
mar A Lago spectacularly, in a loud fashion, publicly humiliated
this guy. And you know, when you're in a country
club or any type of club environment, to do that,
if somebody had anything that would be damning against you,
(03:00):
probably wouldn't do it because you know that they'd be
retribution anyway. John Solomon Shostinnews dot com, Sir, welcome back.
You've been working hard. A lot of shoe leather you
keep wearing out every day.
Speaker 3 (03:10):
We got a little break of news for you. Attorney
General Pam Bondi sent a letter. We obtained this letter
to state Minnesota state Attorney General Keith Ellison saying the
Justice Department may seek legal sanctions against your law license.
So the top law enforcement official Minnesota may have his
law license targeted by the Justice Department. Why Because Keith
(03:33):
Ellison filed emotion saying the ICE is not allowed to
operate on Minnesota soil, so you got to throw them out.
Obviously that's not true. There's a supremacy cause in the
United States Constitution that's pretty clear that the Feds can
do things like this. Pambody is saying, this is so frivolous,
We're probably going to file sanctions against your law license.
A new and sort of more aggressive posture by this
(03:55):
Justice Department as it starts to crack down on the
insanity of Minnesota. Copy the letter is up just to
do that.
Speaker 1 (04:01):
Company well, great work as always. You know, I keep
quoting the supremacy clause, and federal laws, as this is constitutional,
are enforced. The jurisdiction lies with the federal government. Ice
agents are federal officials, just like states can prosecute federal
officials that are are involved in incidents in the line
(04:26):
of duty. As long as it's in the line of duty.
That jurisdiction again lies federally. It doesn't lie with the
states because they wanted to go after this officer who
in self defense had a car accelerated towards him. Was
defending himself and that renee good case. Yeah, tragedy, but
don't accelerate your car in the direction of a law
(04:48):
enforcement official. That lesson you can learn. Let's talk about
all this money.
Speaker 3 (04:53):
Now.
Speaker 2 (04:53):
We know that, for example, a lot of people have
been spied on.
Speaker 1 (04:56):
And we have both spent a lot of time covering
that story, broken a lot of news on it. But
now it runs deeper. Now now we're getting into Okay,
money's being paid to people by the FBI in Arctic
frosts and other investigations, and how widespread is this? And
you know tomorrow, I understand that Jack Smith's going to
(05:17):
testify publicly. I assume he's going to be asked about
all of it.
Speaker 3 (05:21):
Yeah, he certainly will. And this is an important development
because it takes us back to all the work you
and I did, Sean on Russia collusion. We've proved the
Christopher steel Sower this was a British MI six agent,
so he had foreign ties, foreign influence on the Justice Department.
He was paid by the Hillary Clinton campaign, and he
was telling the news media in violation of his confidential
(05:43):
human source agreement, that he was working for the FBI,
which you're not supposed to do in your informant source.
And Chris Ray takes over the FBI and says, all right,
that was a really bad episode. Is not going to
happen again. We're going to make sure that we don't
hire confidential foreign sources that have foreign ties, political biases,
and are going to lab that their an informant when
we're paying them well lead into a very good job atent.
(06:05):
What we have now learned from new documents that Cash
Bettel has dug up that just the news has obtained
that are going to be sent to Congress in the
next several weeks, that the Biden era FBI, on Chris
Ray's watch, made on more than one hundred thousand it
looks like about one hundred and fifty thousand dollars in
payments to informants who were members of an anonymous group
(06:27):
of text loots known as the Sedition Hunters. Now why
is that important? Sedition Hunters were overtly anti Trump, anti conservative.
The FBI's own documents showed that they had foreign ties.
In fact, the work they were doing for the FBI
was actually being done overseas with facial recognition software in
Great Britain that apparently was trying to identify who were
(06:48):
some of the January sixth defendants and what were people
doing around the Capitol that day. The third and perhaps
most trumpling thing is that this sort of work the
FBI could easily have done itself. The FBI as contractors
who do facial recognition software. By the way, there are
laws governing when you can and can't use it against
an American citizen. In this case, the FBI, according to
(07:10):
cash Brotel in his own words, ran over the FBI's
operations manual, did not follow its rules. It picked an
anti Trump group, it picked a group with foreign ties,
and it picked a group doing work that probably should
have been done through federal contracting. But we never knew
about it because the FBI treated it as a confidential
human source, and they hit it from the Congress, they
(07:31):
hit it from the American people. And then here's the
fourth thing. That's just like Christopher Steele two point zero.
This group was bragging it was working with the FBI
on its social media, doing exactly what Christopher Steele got
fired for. If you're a confident human source, you're not
supposed to talk about your relationship with the FBI. So
all of Chris Ray's promises after Christopher Steel broken, according
(07:52):
to cash Brotel in this particular arrangement.
Speaker 1 (07:55):
How come we never hear much about Chris Ray because
a lot of these deeds, a lot of these investigations
have having under his watch. And we only seem to
hear about Comy as bad as Komy was. You know,
the one thing that we had hoped, and we discussed
this at the time, is that Ray would return the
FBI to its one former greatness as the greatest law
(08:17):
enforcement agency in the world. Not only did he not
do so, he seems to have kind of been able
to push and distance himself from all the bad stuff
that was going on. And nobody ever seems to pay
attention to his role in all of this.
Speaker 2 (08:31):
Why is that.
Speaker 3 (08:32):
Such a very important point here? And you're one hundred
percent right about it. Chris Ray's watch, one could argue,
was more consequential and more damaging to the FBI that
even James Comby could. Comby was only in for a
couple hours years Ray was seven years on Ray's watch.
We now have really significant evidence that they were targeting Catholics.
(08:53):
On Ray's watch, they were screening FBI agents and deciding
whether they got security currences based on whether they supported
President Trump or whether they were a Second Amendment advocates.
If you were a pro Trump Second Amendment advocate, you
had a high risk of having your security clearance pulled
by the FBI. That's not just my reporting. It was
two years ago, but the Inspector General the Justice Department
(09:16):
confirmed that on Chris Ray's watch, they raided mar Lago,
even though the FBI's own agent said they didn't have
probable cause, they didn't meet the standard for a raid
a search warrant. On Chris Ray's watch, they launched artic Frost,
which was like an anchor dragging the ocean looking for
any evidence and hopes they could find something on Donald
Trump and his supporters, And on Chris Ray's watch, now
(09:38):
we know they did. At Christopher Steele two point zero,
they hired a confidential human sources that had a foreign tie,
had an anti Trump bias, And we're doing work that
probably should have been done by the FBI, and we're
bragging about the work, even though confidential human source agreements
require that you don't brag about it. That is Chris
Ray's legacy, and you were one hundred percent right. Congress
(09:58):
has been silent about leadership, but it is increasingly clear
some of the worst things in the FBI's record book
occurred on his watch.
Speaker 1 (10:08):
Well, I think that you know, eventually, we're going to
probably get there. I just don't know when. All right,
quick break right back more with the founder, editor in chief,
chief investigative reporter justinews dot com, John Solomon, your calls
on the other side, eight hundred and nine foot one, Sean,
if you want to be a part of the program.
If you missed the president's speech in Davos, I mean
(10:28):
it was it was.
Speaker 2 (10:31):
It was rocket and rolling.
Speaker 1 (10:32):
It was hardcore in your face, but also gracious in
a lot of ways. But anyway, we'll get to that speech.
Speaker 2 (10:42):
You don't want to miss it.
Speaker 1 (10:43):
I know most of you were busy this morning when
he was giving it, but it was a classic Trump's speech,
maybe one of the best foreign speeches he's ever given,
putting europe allies on notice about how weak, pathetic, feckless
they are and how they're destroying their own countries.
Speaker 2 (11:00):
And he's not wrong.
Speaker 1 (11:01):
That's all coming up straight ahead, all right, we get
to you now, our friend, John Solomon, Founder, editor in chief,
chief investigative reporter of justinnews dot com.
Speaker 2 (11:09):
What is the latest if you go back?
Speaker 1 (11:12):
And I know Peter Navarro, for example, really well, and
Peter Navarro felt that it was an issue, a constitutional issue,
executive privilege, and I agree with His point is that
no advisor to the president is ever going to be
free to tell the president what they really think if
they're going to one day have to be questioned by
(11:32):
Congress and answer those questions. Now, what's amazing in the
Banning case and the Navarro case is both could have
gone before Congress and they could have pled the fifth
and they could have walked out of there and they
wouldn't have been a referral, and they never would have
gone to jail, And both of them decided not to
do that. They decided to stand on principle. In both cases,
(11:54):
they went to jail. The Clintons were faced with the
same choice. They were subpoenaed by Congress. They failed to
show up. Now there's a criminal referral. And Democrats so
that they were the ones calling for Navarro's head and
everybody else's head. You know where are they now when
it comes to the Clinton's because they did the exact
same thing.
Speaker 3 (12:13):
Yeah, Well, listen, we're going to find out whether Democrats
are hypocrats or not tomorrow on this issue, because there'll
be a House floor vote.
Speaker 2 (12:20):
Is that a trick question?
Speaker 3 (12:23):
Well, listen, James Comber told me this week that he
feels confident that some Democrats are going to cross over
and join with Republicans and be consistent. That's not all
of them, but there could be some. That's unusual for
James Comber to make a prediction like that, so he
knows something that isn't public it. But here's the difference
between what Peter Navarro and Steve vannim we're protesting and
(12:45):
what Bill Clinton's protesting. They had legitimate concerns, as you
so eloquently laid out, about executive privilege. They were trying
to protect and until the issue was resolved, they wanted
to protect the privilege because once you talk about it,
you eviscerated the privilege. You can't go back. They didn't
get a fair run through the court system. They got
wrung up, they went to jail. Bill Clinton and Hillary
(13:06):
Clinton are going to refuse to testify about something that
does not involve President Trump, a President Clinton's presidential powers.
This was a private relationship, a private relationship with a
private citizen when he was not president. And still they
want to avoid talking to Congress. They don't have that
executive privileged claim, they don't have the other legal issues
(13:27):
are there. They're simply saying we don't talk. We're sick
of Congress. We don't Basically, their argument is we're sick
of you and we don't want to deal with anymore.
We're done with you. That's going to make it a
lot easier for some Democrats to crossover because the respect
for Congress is just not there, and they don't have
a legal or privileged argument. They're simply trying to get
out of doing something that every citizen probably has to
(13:48):
do when called upon. So I think the Democrats are
going to have a tough day tomorrow. I think there'll
be some defections, not a lot, but some. The Republicans
do look like they have the votes, and so Bill
Clinton will be facing a criminal referral by inner time
tomorrow night.
Speaker 1 (14:01):
Well, I would imagine that if we have equal application
of our laws, then they would face the same fate
as Peter Navarro, in the same fate as Steve Bannon.
But am I wrong in assuming that that would happen.
Speaker 3 (14:12):
We'll have to see. I mean, this will be a
big test for the Pambody Justice Department. This will be
a big test for the judges in the US District
Court in Washington, d c that had no problem dispatching
Bannon and Navarro to prison, putting Peter navarroa leg irons,
will they do the same thing to a Democrats. These
things are going to be tested. It starts with Fanbody.
(14:34):
I think she'll authorize the prosecution, and then it'll depend
on how jurors in DC look at it and how
a judge looks at it. But this will test our system,
and I think a lot of people have enormous doubt
about whether we have the same justice system we had
twenty years ago. And I understand the polling on that
is real. This is a moment where judges and jurors
(14:56):
in blue cities are going to have to show whether
they believe in the Constitution or whether the to put
their politics first.
Speaker 2 (15:01):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (15:01):
By the way, John, we just found out that there
was a bipartisan agreement to hold them in contempt the court.
So we'll wait, watch and see whether or not the
Navarro Baton treatment happens to the Clintons. All right, John
Solomon just thenews dot com. He's the founder, editor in
chief and chief investigative reporter. As always, John, appreciate your time,
your great work. Thank you, sir for sharing it with us.
(15:23):
All right, let's get to our busy phones, shall we?
Let us say hi to John is in Brooklyn and
New York. John, Hi, how are you here? You have
maybe two feet of snow headed your way. I'm so
sorry right now where I am in Florida, the Free
State of Florida.
Speaker 2 (15:39):
You really want to know what the temperature is.
Speaker 4 (15:41):
I'm gonna get a seventy something.
Speaker 1 (15:44):
Seventy seventy two degrees, a little overcast, but seventy two. Yeah,
very nice, nice cool breeze feels good.
Speaker 4 (15:54):
For the record, it is slash, no doubt about that.
Speaker 3 (15:56):
Sauce.
Speaker 1 (15:57):
Okay, you're from Brooklyn, of course you gotta say sauce right,
say you're.
Speaker 4 (16:01):
From Long Island. You were saying sauce not too long ago.
Speaker 1 (16:04):
I worked hard to eliminate the sources, the coffees, the talk,
how you doings, and all that in my vernacular, considering
remember I left, I'd left New York five years in
Rhode Island, although they have their own accent. I lived
five years in California, two years in Alabama, four years
in Georgia, then went back to New York when Fox
(16:26):
went on the air, and now I'm in my third
year down in the Free State of Florida. Thank god
I got out when I did. And I know you
probably wish you could be down here with me.
Speaker 4 (16:35):
I absolutely love Florida, and the media training has done
a great.
Speaker 3 (16:39):
Job getting rid of your accent.
Speaker 4 (16:40):
I love it.
Speaker 2 (16:41):
I didn't. I didn't get any media training.
Speaker 1 (16:43):
I just finally one day I heard a tape of
myself and I said, oh my god, do I talk
like that? And I realized I do, And I just
worked on it a little bitch.
Speaker 4 (16:53):
That's a fair point. I wanted to chat about Greenland.
If you have a minute, I do so you my
thought on this, and you're spot on when you tell
every one of your guests. Haven't we all seen how
the president negotiates? We know that, right, He thoughts from
the most extreme position and he works his way back,
and you think that everybody would kind of get that
by now. I think that that particular tactic has served
(17:15):
him well and his work well, even for the country
when he's in the role as president for a long time.
This particular, this particular transaction, I've said from the beginning
back in twenty nineteen, strikes me more as an m
and a transaction. I think this particular transaction could have
been handled better by sending over a team of investment
bankings lived by Jamie Diamond and the correct M and
(17:35):
a lawyers. That's right lawyers, the right M and a
law team. And if it was handled in a bespoke
private way, I think it could have been done a
lot more effectively. This seems to be a case of
US ambition in public against European stubbornness. I think in
this particular instance, he's going to have to find an
off wrap.
Speaker 3 (17:53):
Now.
Speaker 4 (17:53):
We laid it out today by saying that he wasn't
going to attack Greenland, which makes everybody feel better, But
at the end of the day, I think this could
have been handled.
Speaker 3 (18:00):
In a bespoke private way.
Speaker 4 (18:02):
Not to mention that this has to get done through
Congress anyway, unless they're going to do through the budget process,
in which case you're going to need a super majority
of sixty votes in the Senate, which you're not going
to get. So this has hair on it in a
variety of ways. And again, even if he solved all
of that and then got it into Congress, unless you're
doing it through budget reconciliation, I don't know what you
(18:22):
get in the votes from Democrats that you need to anyway.
Speaker 1 (18:24):
Well, I'm telling you right now, I don't think he
did it the wrong way. I was saying, since this
issue of Greenland came up, if you were paying attention
to what I was saying on radio and TV, I said,
this is you would think after eleven years, people would
understand how Trump works.
Speaker 2 (18:42):
And you get it. I get it.
Speaker 1 (18:44):
The left they just you know, bubble them fizz like
Alca Seltzer and give off energy and they freak out
and everything he says, But that is his moo. You
think they'd figure it out by now. Look, if I
had to venture my best guess what's going to happen next? Okay,
for example, made in a lot of news the other
(19:04):
night on TV when I said I'd get to give
everyone in Greenland one hundred grand and maybe a piece
of the action. In terms of the minerals, the President
addressed the rarer minerals as he said, you know, it's
way underground, and there's maybe one month a year that
you're even able to attempt to extract them. It's not
about minerals. It's about the security of really the United
(19:25):
States and the security of Europe. They would be the
biggest beneficiaries of America partnering with Greenland. I'm going to
make a prediction, Donald J. Trump, art of the deal,
is going to make an offer that they can't refuse.
I think he's going to make them a very, very
very generous offer. Remember, Denmark has treated the people of Greenland,
(19:51):
fifty six thousand plus of them horribly. And you know,
the per capita income is about sixty gram which includes
ten thousand dollars annually in welfare payments from Denmark. As
the President rightly pointed out today, you know, Denmark collapsed
in about six hours when the Nazis came after them.
(20:13):
NATO is dead without the United States and the power
and might of the US military. And you know, for
them to be you know, so so reactive, reluctant, resistant,
and stupid. And I love the President lecturing all of
Europe on how they are destroying themselves with immigration policies,
(20:34):
climate policies, their their their economic policies, their adaptation of socialism,
their lack of requirement of assimilation. I mean, you know,
Sharia courts in Great Britain, no go zones, and parts
of Europe is insane. They are collapsing because of their politics.
(20:55):
They need the United States more than ever. A strong
United States in Greenland makes the world a better, safer,
more secure place. Now, the President said he's not going
to invade. I could have told you that, you know,
when it first came up, and I did without saying it.
Now I'm telling you what the next step is going
(21:16):
to be. He's going to make them a very very
generous offer where if I had to guess, at the
end of the day, every Greenlander is going to be
a millionaire, if not multi millionaires, and I think that
would be a good deal for the US.
Speaker 2 (21:34):
That's my prediction. Let's see if I'm right.
Speaker 4 (21:37):
Yeah, if we land in a good spot, then you know,
the ends justify the means that it's strange for me
to see Europe in Canada for a line in the
ice to say that the United States cannot have any
you know, territorial rights over Greenland. It makes no sense
why they obviously we don't want a military invasion, but
to come out and say essentially that there's no scenario
whether the U can be controlling Greenland, that makes no sense.
(22:00):
But you know, again, I would say this was an
M and A deal, and it could have been handled
differently from the beginning. And I hope you don't want
the President to lose faith by.
Speaker 3 (22:08):
The end of it.
Speaker 1 (22:09):
Well, let's see what happens. Is going to be very
very interesting to watch, I'll tell you that. But I
loved it. It was so iconoclassic. What the President did today
was great. Listen, James and Alabama. James High, how are
you glad you called?
Speaker 5 (22:25):
I'm a Canadian PhD student. I grew up in Canada.
I've been here for three and a half years.
Speaker 1 (22:31):
Well, welcome aboard. We're glad you're here. We like our
friends in Canada. I think you have horrible leadership there,
and I think the President's right about Canada too. Canada
would have no defense for the US, and I don't
think they're very appreciative, to be very honest, generally speaking,
as a country.
Speaker 5 (22:47):
Okay, I don't really have anything to say with that.
The reason I'm calling in is I wanted to start
by agreeing with you about what you said on yesterday's program,
what Denmark did to indigenous women in Greenland for reproduction
reproductive coercion. Do you remember you talking.
Speaker 1 (23:04):
About this yes, Well, what happened is is that Danish
doctors without the knowledge or consent of women native Greenlanders,
if you will, inserted unbeknownst to them. I d's in
them and only it took till December of twenty twenty
(23:27):
four until they acknowledged and apologize for it. And frankly,
it's repulsive and the way that you know, for example,
I read stories about people from Greenland that go to
visit Denmark and they're treated horribly.
Speaker 2 (23:41):
They're not welcome. It's terrible.
Speaker 1 (23:44):
And the United States I think would welcome people from
Greenland with open arms. We'd love to have We'd love
to partner with them. I'd love to partner with them.
I think it would be in their best interest to
partners with us.
Speaker 5 (23:55):
Yeah. So really the reason that I'm calling in is is,
you know, I believe that was an atrocity, and that's
a full stop from me. I'm genuinely so grateful that
I have been given the opportunity to study in the
United States, especially in the Deep South. I mean, it's
(24:15):
it's been an incredible experience. Culturally, it has been difficult
for someone who grew up on the West Coast on
Vancouver Island, And if you don't know where that is,
it's above Seattle and next to Vancouver. So I grew
up on, you know, a liberal hippie island. I spent
six years in Toronto. And you know, I'm an academic
(24:38):
and I'm also someone that listens broadly across the political
spectrum because I believe societies work better if we can
understand each other rather than talk past each other. So
when it comes to you know, my liberal where do
I fit? I mean, Sean, I listened to your show
(25:00):
just as much as I listened to crooked media CNN, NBC,
Fox News and Newsmax. And that is because I do
not want to live in a cultural vacuum. I don't
want to sit there and nod my head and say yes, dad, yes, good.
Do you understand what I'm saying?
Speaker 3 (25:17):
No?
Speaker 1 (25:17):
Way, I mean, okay, so you're open minded, but you've
got to admit that you get way more truth from
me than any of the other outlets that you mentioned.
Speaker 5 (25:25):
Well, I I mean, whether it's BBC or Al Jazeera,
I end up performing my own opinion.
Speaker 2 (25:31):
No, I'm listen.
Speaker 1 (25:32):
I'm going to give you a list of areas where
I've been right you are you interested? How Come I
got Richard Jewel right and the rest of the media
got it wrong? How Come I got Duke Lacrosse right?
How Come I got Uva right? How Come I got
Ferguson Missouri right? How Come I got issues in involving
Freddie Graham Baltimore and Trayvon Martin and George Zimmerman wright?
(25:54):
How is it that I can predict that, as I
did on election Day, that Donald Trump was gonna win
every swing state? What am I getting right? How was
I right way before anybody else? On Joe Biden's cognitive decline,
on Obama's radical associations, on the deep state, on the
Russia collusion hoax, on FISA warrants.
Speaker 2 (26:15):
I mean, I'm not I'm not patting.
Speaker 1 (26:17):
Myself on the back, but we take a lot of
pride in getting things right on this program because that's
my job. It's not pride, it's just my responsibility. Why
do you think I'm right in there?
Speaker 2 (26:27):
Wrong a lot?
Speaker 5 (26:28):
So I want to go back to the Richard Jewel
thing because this directly aligned with what I study here
at the University of Alabama, which is the threat security
and the surveillance of the modern Olympiad, and one of
my chapters is on terrorism, and I have a full
chapter on Richard Jewell where he was a scapegoat and
(26:51):
he was treated very poorly, and he in fact he
had died I believe, before they actually caught the real bomber,
and he wasn't never he'd never really had a life
after that. So I agree with you one hundred percent there.
What I want to talk to you about is, you
(27:13):
know we talked right.
Speaker 2 (27:15):
You're taken too long to get to the point. What
is your point?
Speaker 5 (27:18):
My point is that I would love to see you know,
if you're going to be talking about forced coercion sterilization
as an atrocity in Greenland, then it also is an
atrocity in North America. The United States. Federal investigations have
documented serious content failures involving Native women in America from
(27:41):
the nineteen sixties to the nineteen seventies. We also know
about the Tuskegee experiments. Canada is not immune to this.
There were legalized eugenics programs and more recent findings involved
the coerce sterilization of Indigenous women. I was in British
Columbia when they found mass graves of children buried at
(28:08):
sites of schools were in by the Catholic trusts.
Speaker 1 (28:12):
Look, so, so many countries have their original sin. We
all know that. And you know the beauty of America's system,
our constitutional Republic, and our framers and our founders as imperfect,
there's may be some of them more. There's no such
thing as a perfect person. We've all sinned and fallen
short of the glory of God. Right, But the beauty
(28:33):
of our system is is that it had it laid
out a path to right wrongs, correct injustices, and America
to get right on the right path. And throughout our
history we have proven over and over and over again
that the genius of our framers and founders has played
(28:56):
out exactly that way. That's their genius. Look, I'm just
out of time. I know we could talk all day.
I do appreciate your call. Good luck at the University
of Alabama. I'm sure you're gonna have a great time
there and beautiful Tuscaloosa. All right, quick break right back.
We'll continue. When we come back, we'll head to Davos.
Our friend Mark Morano is there. We'll get to that
(29:16):
and much more as we continue
Our two Sean Hannity Show toll free numbers eight hundred
and nine to four one Sean, if you want to
be a part of the program. Uh, we'll get back
to the President his speech in Davos, and he just
laid out how weak, empathetic and impotent Europe is in
Canada is and and really the geopolitical importance as we
(00:21):
have laid out its history in great length and detail
on this program of Greenland and just how you know,
Europe is collapsing under its own weight from woke policies,
open borders and you know, horrible you know, economic policies
and radical redistribution policies and socialism and it's just collapsing.
Speaker 2 (00:44):
So we'll get back to that.
Speaker 1 (00:46):
Last night on Hannity, we had the FBI Director Cash Battel.
Now Cash Betel was able to announce that, uh, this
is now in one year, they got five the fifth
person on the FBI's ten most wanted fugitive list, more
than the entire previous four years combined. That's how good
(01:10):
a job that the FBI is doing. In this particular case.
You know, they announced the arrest of this individual, this
Alejandro Rosalius Castillo, been arrested in Mexico, and he had
been wanted in twenty sixteen for the murder of a
former coworker in North Carolina. They found this guy working
(01:30):
in coworker in Mexico. Anyway, that's just part of what
he's been able to accomplish. Our friend John Solomon, justinnews
dot com founder editor in chief, chief investigative reporter, had
a great article out today how Biden's FBI paid anti
Trump edition hunters as informants in J six and the
(01:53):
Arctic frost probes. And that's just part of what's going
on right now. The House Oversight Committee, James Comer is
daring Democrats to advance Clinton contempt of Congress resolutions or
be exposed for being hypocrites. Remember what they did to
Peter Navarro, Remember what they did to Steve Bannon, and
they a lot of other people not only got referrals,
(02:14):
but you know, had to fight the court system exhaustively.
And I don't care how many times Clinton spokesperson lashes
out at Comer over the Epstein probe, but you know,
we have pictures of him in hot tubs and swimming
pools with all of these girls that were pals of
(02:36):
Jeffrey Epstein and the Democrats all wanted to make this
about Donald Trump. Donald Trump threw Jeffrey Epstein out of
mar A Lago spectacularly, in a loud fashion, publicly humiliated
this guy. And you know, when you're in a country
club or any type of club environment, to do that,
if somebody had anything that would be damning against you,
(03:00):
probably wouldn't do it because you know that they'd be
retribution anyway. John Solomon Shostinnews dot com, Sir, welcome back.
You've been working hard. A lot of shoe leather you
keep wearing out every day.
Speaker 3 (03:10):
We got a little break of news for you. Attorney
General Pam Bondi sent a letter. We obtained this letter
to state Minnesota state Attorney General Keith Ellison saying the
Justice Department may seek legal sanctions against your law license.
So the top law enforcement official Minnesota may have his
law license targeted by the Justice Department. Why Because Keith
(03:33):
Ellison filed emotion saying the ICE is not allowed to
operate on Minnesota soil, so you got to throw them out.
Obviously that's not true. There's a supremacy cause in the
United States Constitution that's pretty clear that the Feds can
do things like this. Pambody is saying, this is so frivolous,
We're probably going to file sanctions against your law license.
A new and sort of more aggressive posture by this
(03:55):
Justice Department as it starts to crack down on the
insanity of Minnesota. Copy the letter is up just to
do that.
Speaker 1 (04:01):
Company well, great work as always. You know, I keep
quoting the supremacy clause, and federal laws, as this is constitutional,
are enforced. The jurisdiction lies with the federal government. Ice
agents are federal officials, just like states can prosecute federal
officials that are are involved in incidents in the line
(04:26):
of duty. As long as it's in the line of duty.
That jurisdiction again lies federally. It doesn't lie with the
states because they wanted to go after this officer who
in self defense had a car accelerated towards him. Was
defending himself and that renee good case. Yeah, tragedy, but
don't accelerate your car in the direction of a law
(04:48):
enforcement official. That lesson you can learn. Let's talk about
all this money.
Speaker 3 (04:53):
Now.
Speaker 2 (04:53):
We know that, for example, a lot of people have
been spied on.
Speaker 1 (04:56):
And we have both spent a lot of time covering
that story, broken a lot of news on it. But
now it runs deeper. Now now we're getting into Okay,
money's being paid to people by the FBI in Arctic
frosts and other investigations, and how widespread is this? And
you know tomorrow, I understand that Jack Smith's going to
(05:17):
testify publicly. I assume he's going to be asked about
all of it.
Speaker 3 (05:21):
Yeah, he certainly will. And this is an important development
because it takes us back to all the work you
and I did, Sean on Russia collusion. We've proved the
Christopher steel Sower this was a British MI six agent,
so he had foreign ties, foreign influence on the Justice Department.
He was paid by the Hillary Clinton campaign, and he
was telling the news media in violation of his confidential
(05:43):
human source agreement, that he was working for the FBI,
which you're not supposed to do in your informant source.
And Chris Ray takes over the FBI and says, all right,
that was a really bad episode. Is not going to
happen again. We're going to make sure that we don't
hire confidential foreign sources that have foreign ties, political biases,
and are going to lab that their an informant when
we're paying them well lead into a very good job atent.
(06:05):
What we have now learned from new documents that Cash
Bettel has dug up that just the news has obtained
that are going to be sent to Congress in the
next several weeks, that the Biden era FBI, on Chris
Ray's watch, made on more than one hundred thousand it
looks like about one hundred and fifty thousand dollars in
payments to informants who were members of an anonymous group
(06:27):
of text loots known as the Sedition Hunters. Now why
is that important? Sedition Hunters were overtly anti Trump, anti conservative.
The FBI's own documents showed that they had foreign ties.
In fact, the work they were doing for the FBI
was actually being done overseas with facial recognition software in
Great Britain that apparently was trying to identify who were
(06:48):
some of the January sixth defendants and what were people
doing around the Capitol that day. The third and perhaps
most trumpling thing is that this sort of work the
FBI could easily have done itself. The FBI as contractors
who do facial recognition software. By the way, there are
laws governing when you can and can't use it against
an American citizen. In this case, the FBI, according to
(07:10):
cash Brotel in his own words, ran over the FBI's
operations manual, did not follow its rules. It picked an
anti Trump group, it picked a group with foreign ties,
and it picked a group doing work that probably should
have been done through federal contracting. But we never knew
about it because the FBI treated it as a confidential
human source, and they hit it from the Congress, they
(07:31):
hit it from the American people. And then here's the
fourth thing. That's just like Christopher Steele two point zero.
This group was bragging it was working with the FBI
on its social media, doing exactly what Christopher Steele got
fired for. If you're a confident human source, you're not
supposed to talk about your relationship with the FBI. So
all of Chris Ray's promises after Christopher Steel broken, according
(07:52):
to cash Brotel in this particular arrangement.
Speaker 1 (07:55):
How come we never hear much about Chris Ray because
a lot of these deeds, a lot of these investigations
have having under his watch. And we only seem to
hear about Comy as bad as Komy was. You know,
the one thing that we had hoped, and we discussed
this at the time, is that Ray would return the
FBI to its one former greatness as the greatest law
(08:17):
enforcement agency in the world. Not only did he not
do so, he seems to have kind of been able
to push and distance himself from all the bad stuff
that was going on. And nobody ever seems to pay
attention to his role in all of this.
Speaker 2 (08:31):
Why is that.
Speaker 3 (08:32):
Such a very important point here? And you're one hundred
percent right about it. Chris Ray's watch, one could argue,
was more consequential and more damaging to the FBI that
even James Comby could. Comby was only in for a
couple hours years Ray was seven years on Ray's watch.
We now have really significant evidence that they were targeting Catholics.
(08:53):
On Ray's watch, they were screening FBI agents and deciding
whether they got security currences based on whether they supported
President Trump or whether they were a Second Amendment advocates.
If you were a pro Trump Second Amendment advocate, you
had a high risk of having your security clearance pulled
by the FBI. That's not just my reporting. It was
two years ago, but the Inspector General the Justice Department
(09:16):
confirmed that on Chris Ray's watch, they raided mar Lago,
even though the FBI's own agent said they didn't have
probable cause, they didn't meet the standard for a raid
a search warrant. On Chris Ray's watch, they launched artic Frost,
which was like an anchor dragging the ocean looking for
any evidence and hopes they could find something on Donald
Trump and his supporters, And on Chris Ray's watch, now
(09:38):
we know they did. At Christopher Steele two point zero,
they hired a confidential human sources that had a foreign tie,
had an anti Trump bias, And we're doing work that
probably should have been done by the FBI, and we're
bragging about the work, even though confidential human source agreements
require that you don't brag about it. That is Chris
Ray's legacy, and you were one hundred percent right. Congress
(09:58):
has been silent about leadership, but it is increasingly clear
some of the worst things in the FBI's record book
occurred on his watch.
Speaker 1 (10:08):
Well, I think that you know, eventually, we're going to
probably get there. I just don't know when. All right,
quick break right back more with the founder, editor in chief,
chief investigative reporter justinews dot com, John Solomon, your calls
on the other side, eight hundred and nine foot one, Sean,
if you want to be a part of the program.
If you missed the president's speech in Davos, I mean
(10:28):
it was it was.
Speaker 2 (10:31):
It was rocket and rolling.
Speaker 1 (10:32):
It was hardcore in your face, but also gracious in
a lot of ways. But anyway, we'll get to that speech.
Speaker 2 (10:42):
You don't want to miss it.
Speaker 1 (10:43):
I know most of you were busy this morning when
he was giving it, but it was a classic Trump's speech,
maybe one of the best foreign speeches he's ever given,
putting europe allies on notice about how weak, pathetic, feckless
they are and how they're destroying their own countries.
Speaker 2 (11:00):
And he's not wrong.
Speaker 1 (11:01):
That's all coming up straight ahead, all right, we get
to you now, our friend, John Solomon, Founder, editor in chief,
chief investigative reporter of justinnews dot com.
Speaker 2 (11:09):
What is the latest if you go back?
Speaker 1 (11:12):
And I know Peter Navarro, for example, really well, and
Peter Navarro felt that it was an issue, a constitutional issue,
executive privilege, and I agree with His point is that
no advisor to the president is ever going to be
free to tell the president what they really think if
they're going to one day have to be questioned by
(11:32):
Congress and answer those questions. Now, what's amazing in the
Banning case and the Navarro case is both could have
gone before Congress and they could have pled the fifth
and they could have walked out of there and they
wouldn't have been a referral, and they never would have
gone to jail, And both of them decided not to
do that. They decided to stand on principle. In both cases,
(11:54):
they went to jail. The Clintons were faced with the
same choice. They were subpoenaed by Congress. They failed to
show up. Now there's a criminal referral. And Democrats so
that they were the ones calling for Navarro's head and
everybody else's head. You know where are they now when
it comes to the Clinton's because they did the exact
same thing.
Speaker 3 (12:13):
Yeah, Well, listen, we're going to find out whether Democrats
are hypocrats or not tomorrow on this issue, because there'll
be a House floor vote.
Speaker 2 (12:20):
Is that a trick question?
Speaker 3 (12:23):
Well, listen, James Comber told me this week that he
feels confident that some Democrats are going to cross over
and join with Republicans and be consistent. That's not all
of them, but there could be some. That's unusual for
James Comber to make a prediction like that, so he
knows something that isn't public it. But here's the difference
between what Peter Navarro and Steve vannim we're protesting and
(12:45):
what Bill Clinton's protesting. They had legitimate concerns, as you
so eloquently laid out, about executive privilege. They were trying
to protect and until the issue was resolved, they wanted
to protect the privilege because once you talk about it,
you eviscerated the privilege. You can't go back. They didn't
get a fair run through the court system. They got
wrung up, they went to jail. Bill Clinton and Hillary
(13:06):
Clinton are going to refuse to testify about something that
does not involve President Trump, a President Clinton's presidential powers.
This was a private relationship, a private relationship with a
private citizen when he was not president. And still they
want to avoid talking to Congress. They don't have that
executive privileged claim, they don't have the other legal issues
(13:27):
are there. They're simply saying we don't talk. We're sick
of Congress. We don't Basically, their argument is we're sick
of you and we don't want to deal with anymore.
We're done with you. That's going to make it a
lot easier for some Democrats to crossover because the respect
for Congress is just not there, and they don't have
a legal or privileged argument. They're simply trying to get
out of doing something that every citizen probably has to
(13:48):
do when called upon. So I think the Democrats are
going to have a tough day tomorrow. I think there'll
be some defections, not a lot, but some. The Republicans
do look like they have the votes, and so Bill
Clinton will be facing a criminal referral by inner time
tomorrow night.
Speaker 1 (14:01):
Well, I would imagine that if we have equal application
of our laws, then they would face the same fate
as Peter Navarro, in the same fate as Steve Bannon.
But am I wrong in assuming that that would happen.
Speaker 3 (14:12):
We'll have to see. I mean, this will be a
big test for the Pambody Justice Department. This will be
a big test for the judges in the US District
Court in Washington, d c that had no problem dispatching
Bannon and Navarro to prison, putting Peter navarroa leg irons,
will they do the same thing to a Democrats. These
things are going to be tested. It starts with Fanbody.
(14:34):
I think she'll authorize the prosecution, and then it'll depend
on how jurors in DC look at it and how
a judge looks at it. But this will test our system,
and I think a lot of people have enormous doubt
about whether we have the same justice system we had
twenty years ago. And I understand the polling on that
is real. This is a moment where judges and jurors
(14:56):
in blue cities are going to have to show whether
they believe in the Constitution or whether the to put
their politics first.
Speaker 2 (15:01):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (15:01):
By the way, John, we just found out that there
was a bipartisan agreement to hold them in contempt the court.
So we'll wait, watch and see whether or not the
Navarro Baton treatment happens to the Clintons. All right, John
Solomon just thenews dot com. He's the founder, editor in
chief and chief investigative reporter. As always, John, appreciate your time,
your great work. Thank you, sir for sharing it with us.
(15:23):
All right, let's get to our busy phones, shall we?
Let us say hi to John is in Brooklyn and
New York. John, Hi, how are you here? You have
maybe two feet of snow headed your way. I'm so
sorry right now where I am in Florida, the Free
State of Florida.
Speaker 2 (15:39):
You really want to know what the temperature is.
Speaker 4 (15:41):
I'm gonna get a seventy something.
Speaker 1 (15:44):
Seventy seventy two degrees, a little overcast, but seventy two. Yeah,
very nice, nice cool breeze feels good.
Speaker 4 (15:54):
For the record, it is slash, no doubt about that.
Speaker 3 (15:56):
Sauce.
Speaker 1 (15:57):
Okay, you're from Brooklyn, of course you gotta say sauce right,
say you're.
Speaker 4 (16:01):
From Long Island. You were saying sauce not too long ago.
Speaker 1 (16:04):
I worked hard to eliminate the sources, the coffees, the talk,
how you doings, and all that in my vernacular, considering
remember I left, I'd left New York five years in
Rhode Island, although they have their own accent. I lived
five years in California, two years in Alabama, four years
in Georgia, then went back to New York when Fox
(16:26):
went on the air, and now I'm in my third
year down in the Free State of Florida. Thank god
I got out when I did. And I know you
probably wish you could be down here with me.
Speaker 4 (16:35):
I absolutely love Florida, and the media training has done
a great.
Speaker 3 (16:39):
Job getting rid of your accent.
Speaker 4 (16:40):
I love it.
Speaker 2 (16:41):
I didn't. I didn't get any media training.
Speaker 1 (16:43):
I just finally one day I heard a tape of
myself and I said, oh my god, do I talk
like that? And I realized I do, And I just
worked on it a little bitch.
Speaker 4 (16:53):
That's a fair point. I wanted to chat about Greenland.
If you have a minute, I do so you my
thought on this, and you're spot on when you tell
every one of your guests. Haven't we all seen how
the president negotiates? We know that, right, He thoughts from
the most extreme position and he works his way back,
and you think that everybody would kind of get that
by now. I think that that particular tactic has served
(17:15):
him well and his work well, even for the country
when he's in the role as president for a long time.
This particular, this particular transaction, I've said from the beginning
back in twenty nineteen, strikes me more as an m
and a transaction. I think this particular transaction could have
been handled better by sending over a team of investment
bankings lived by Jamie Diamond and the correct M and
(17:35):
a lawyers. That's right lawyers, the right M and a
law team. And if it was handled in a bespoke
private way, I think it could have been done a
lot more effectively. This seems to be a case of
US ambition in public against European stubbornness. I think in
this particular instance, he's going to have to find an
off wrap.
Speaker 3 (17:53):
Now.
Speaker 4 (17:53):
We laid it out today by saying that he wasn't
going to attack Greenland, which makes everybody feel better, But
at the end of the day, I think this could
have been handled.
Speaker 3 (18:00):
In a bespoke private way.
Speaker 4 (18:02):
Not to mention that this has to get done through
Congress anyway, unless they're going to do through the budget process,
in which case you're going to need a super majority
of sixty votes in the Senate, which you're not going
to get. So this has hair on it in a
variety of ways. And again, even if he solved all
of that and then got it into Congress, unless you're
doing it through budget reconciliation, I don't know what you
(18:22):
get in the votes from Democrats that you need to anyway.
Speaker 1 (18:24):
Well, I'm telling you right now, I don't think he
did it the wrong way. I was saying, since this
issue of Greenland came up, if you were paying attention
to what I was saying on radio and TV, I said,
this is you would think after eleven years, people would
understand how Trump works.
Speaker 2 (18:42):
And you get it. I get it.
Speaker 1 (18:44):
The left they just you know, bubble them fizz like
Alca Seltzer and give off energy and they freak out
and everything he says, But that is his moo. You
think they'd figure it out by now. Look, if I
had to venture my best guess what's going to happen next? Okay,
for example, made in a lot of news the other
(19:04):
night on TV when I said I'd get to give
everyone in Greenland one hundred grand and maybe a piece
of the action. In terms of the minerals, the President
addressed the rarer minerals as he said, you know, it's
way underground, and there's maybe one month a year that
you're even able to attempt to extract them. It's not
about minerals. It's about the security of really the United
(19:25):
States and the security of Europe. They would be the
biggest beneficiaries of America partnering with Greenland. I'm going to
make a prediction, Donald J. Trump, art of the deal,
is going to make an offer that they can't refuse.
I think he's going to make them a very, very
very generous offer. Remember, Denmark has treated the people of Greenland,
(19:51):
fifty six thousand plus of them horribly. And you know,
the per capita income is about sixty gram which includes
ten thousand dollars annually in welfare payments from Denmark. As
the President rightly pointed out today, you know, Denmark collapsed
in about six hours when the Nazis came after them.
(20:13):
NATO is dead without the United States and the power
and might of the US military. And you know, for
them to be you know, so so reactive, reluctant, resistant,
and stupid. And I love the President lecturing all of
Europe on how they are destroying themselves with immigration policies,
(20:34):
climate policies, their their their economic policies, their adaptation of socialism,
their lack of requirement of assimilation. I mean, you know,
Sharia courts in Great Britain, no go zones, and parts
of Europe is insane. They are collapsing because of their politics.
(20:55):
They need the United States more than ever. A strong
United States in Greenland makes the world a better, safer,
more secure place. Now, the President said he's not going
to invade. I could have told you that, you know,
when it first came up, and I did without saying it.
Now I'm telling you what the next step is going
(21:16):
to be. He's going to make them a very very
generous offer where if I had to guess, at the
end of the day, every Greenlander is going to be
a millionaire, if not multi millionaires, and I think that
would be a good deal for the US.
Speaker 2 (21:34):
That's my prediction. Let's see if I'm right.
Speaker 4 (21:37):
Yeah, if we land in a good spot, then you know,
the ends justify the means that it's strange for me
to see Europe in Canada for a line in the
ice to say that the United States cannot have any
you know, territorial rights over Greenland. It makes no sense
why they obviously we don't want a military invasion, but
to come out and say essentially that there's no scenario
whether the U can be controlling Greenland, that makes no sense.
(22:00):
But you know, again, I would say this was an
M and A deal, and it could have been handled
differently from the beginning. And I hope you don't want
the President to lose faith by.
Speaker 3 (22:08):
The end of it.
Speaker 1 (22:09):
Well, let's see what happens. Is going to be very
very interesting to watch, I'll tell you that. But I
loved it. It was so iconoclassic. What the President did today
was great. Listen, James and Alabama. James High, how are
you glad you called?
Speaker 5 (22:25):
I'm a Canadian PhD student. I grew up in Canada.
I've been here for three and a half years.
Speaker 1 (22:31):
Well, welcome aboard. We're glad you're here. We like our
friends in Canada. I think you have horrible leadership there,
and I think the President's right about Canada too. Canada
would have no defense for the US, and I don't
think they're very appreciative, to be very honest, generally speaking,
as a country.
Speaker 5 (22:47):
Okay, I don't really have anything to say with that.
The reason I'm calling in is I wanted to start
by agreeing with you about what you said on yesterday's program,
what Denmark did to indigenous women in Greenland for reproduction
reproductive coercion. Do you remember you talking.
Speaker 1 (23:04):
About this yes, Well, what happened is is that Danish
doctors without the knowledge or consent of women native Greenlanders,
if you will, inserted unbeknownst to them. I d's in
them and only it took till December of twenty twenty
(23:27):
four until they acknowledged and apologize for it. And frankly,
it's repulsive and the way that you know, for example,
I read stories about people from Greenland that go to
visit Denmark and they're treated horribly.
Speaker 2 (23:41):
They're not welcome. It's terrible.
Speaker 1 (23:44):
And the United States I think would welcome people from
Greenland with open arms. We'd love to have We'd love
to partner with them. I'd love to partner with them.
I think it would be in their best interest to
partners with us.
Speaker 5 (23:55):
Yeah. So really the reason that I'm calling in is is,
you know, I believe that was an atrocity, and that's
a full stop from me. I'm genuinely so grateful that
I have been given the opportunity to study in the
United States, especially in the Deep South. I mean, it's
(24:15):
it's been an incredible experience. Culturally, it has been difficult
for someone who grew up on the West Coast on
Vancouver Island, And if you don't know where that is,
it's above Seattle and next to Vancouver. So I grew
up on, you know, a liberal hippie island. I spent
six years in Toronto. And you know, I'm an academic
(24:38):
and I'm also someone that listens broadly across the political
spectrum because I believe societies work better if we can
understand each other rather than talk past each other. So
when it comes to you know, my liberal where do
I fit? I mean, Sean, I listened to your show
(25:00):
just as much as I listened to crooked media CNN, NBC,
Fox News and Newsmax. And that is because I do
not want to live in a cultural vacuum. I don't
want to sit there and nod my head and say yes, dad, yes, good.
Do you understand what I'm saying?
Speaker 3 (25:17):
No?
Speaker 1 (25:17):
Way, I mean, okay, so you're open minded, but you've
got to admit that you get way more truth from
me than any of the other outlets that you mentioned.
Speaker 5 (25:25):
Well, I I mean, whether it's BBC or Al Jazeera,
I end up performing my own opinion.
Speaker 2 (25:31):
No, I'm listen.
Speaker 1 (25:32):
I'm going to give you a list of areas where
I've been right you are you interested? How Come I
got Richard Jewel right and the rest of the media
got it wrong? How Come I got Duke Lacrosse right?
How Come I got Uva right? How Come I got
Ferguson Missouri right? How Come I got issues in involving
Freddie Graham Baltimore and Trayvon Martin and George Zimmerman wright?
(25:54):
How is it that I can predict that, as I
did on election Day, that Donald Trump was gonna win
every swing state? What am I getting right? How was
I right way before anybody else? On Joe Biden's cognitive decline,
on Obama's radical associations, on the deep state, on the
Russia collusion hoax, on FISA warrants.
Speaker 2 (26:15):
I mean, I'm not I'm not patting.
Speaker 1 (26:17):
Myself on the back, but we take a lot of
pride in getting things right on this program because that's
my job. It's not pride, it's just my responsibility. Why
do you think I'm right in there?
Speaker 2 (26:27):
Wrong a lot?
Speaker 5 (26:28):
So I want to go back to the Richard Jewel
thing because this directly aligned with what I study here
at the University of Alabama, which is the threat security
and the surveillance of the modern Olympiad, and one of
my chapters is on terrorism, and I have a full
chapter on Richard Jewell where he was a scapegoat and
(26:51):
he was treated very poorly, and he in fact he
had died I believe, before they actually caught the real bomber,
and he wasn't never he'd never really had a life
after that. So I agree with you one hundred percent there.
What I want to talk to you about is, you
(27:13):
know we talked right.
Speaker 2 (27:15):
You're taken too long to get to the point. What
is your point?
Speaker 5 (27:18):
My point is that I would love to see you know,
if you're going to be talking about forced coercion sterilization
as an atrocity in Greenland, then it also is an
atrocity in North America. The United States. Federal investigations have
documented serious content failures involving Native women in America from
(27:41):
the nineteen sixties to the nineteen seventies. We also know
about the Tuskegee experiments. Canada is not immune to this.
There were legalized eugenics programs and more recent findings involved
the coerce sterilization of Indigenous women. I was in British
Columbia when they found mass graves of children buried at
(28:08):
sites of schools were in by the Catholic trusts.
Speaker 1 (28:12):
Look, so, so many countries have their original sin. We
all know that. And you know the beauty of America's system,
our constitutional Republic, and our framers and our founders as imperfect,
there's may be some of them more. There's no such
thing as a perfect person. We've all sinned and fallen
short of the glory of God. Right, But the beauty
(28:33):
of our system is is that it had it laid
out a path to right wrongs, correct injustices, and America
to get right on the right path. And throughout our
history we have proven over and over and over again
that the genius of our framers and founders has played
(28:56):
out exactly that way. That's their genius. Look, I'm just
out of time. I know we could talk all day.
I do appreciate your call. Good luck at the University
of Alabama. I'm sure you're gonna have a great time
there and beautiful Tuscaloosa. All right, quick break right back.
We'll continue. When we come back, we'll head to Davos.
Our friend Mark Morano is there. We'll get to that
(29:16):
and much more as we continue
The Sean Hannity Show News
Host
Sean Hannity
Popular Podcasts
Two Guys, Five Rings: Matt, Bowen & The Olympics
Two Guys (Bowen Yang and Matt Rogers). Five Rings (you know, from the Olympics logo). One essential podcast for the 2026 Milan-Cortina Winter Olympics. Bowen Yang (SNL, Wicked) and Matt Rogers (Palm Royale, No Good Deed) of Las Culturistas are back for a second season of Two Guys, Five Rings, a collaboration with NBC Sports and iHeartRadio. In this 15-episode event, Bowen and Matt discuss the top storylines, obsess over Italian culture, and find out what really goes on in the Olympic Village.
iHeartOlympics: The Latest
Listen to the latest news from the 2026 Winter Olympics.
Milan Cortina Winter Olympics
The 2026 Winter Olympics in Milan Cortina are here and have everyone talking. iHeartPodcasts is buzzing with content in honor of the XXV Winter Olympics We’re bringing you episodes from a variety of iHeartPodcast shows to help you keep up with the action. Follow Milan Cortina Winter Olympics so you don’t miss any coverage of the 2026 Winter Olympics, and if you like what you hear, be sure to follow each Podcast in the feed for more great content from iHeartPodcasts.