August 6, 2026 • 29 mins
Newly declassified documents are providing fresh details about the investigations surrounding Donald Trump and allegations of Russian collusion. Investigative journalist John Solomon and Fox News legal analyst Greg Jarrett join Sean to examine previously undisclosed records, the origins of post-Comey FBI investigations and whether the new material could lead to legal accountability. They discuss statutes of limitations, potential conspiracy theories of prosecution and documents that had remained hidden for years. EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin also joins the program to discuss the Trump administration’s deregulatory agenda, energy policy and changes at the EPA. Later, callers weigh in on socialism and communism, including one listener sharing his family’s firsthand experience living under communist rule in East Germany.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Listen
Watch
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Two Sean Hannity Show. Right down a toll free telephone
number if you want to be a part of the program.
It's eight hundred nine four one Seawn if you want
to be a part of the program. So we now
have a massive declassification underway from the White House. Now
we've had Dan Bongino on the program. We've had Cash
but Tell on the program, John Solomon, Greg Jarrett. We've
done a lot of analysis. We've talked about these burn
(00:23):
bags that were discovered in a room that nobody even
knew existed, kind of like a I don't know one
of these safe rooms that people have in their houses,
et cetera. And you know, for example, Dan Bongino actually
thinks that somebody left this information purposely, didn't burn information
that they wanted to bury. But a lot of this information,
(00:43):
these are government documents that are being declassified and we're
learning a lot. We had on John Solomon yesterday to
talk about it. We have John joining us along with
Greg Jarrett. In just a second, let me take you
back in time, and this is Rod Rosenstein.
Speaker 2 (00:59):
I believe it was what.
Speaker 1 (01:00):
Twenty eighteen in May saying people in the Department of
Justice that did wrong with PISA warrants will face consequences. Ironically,
he signed one of the four PISA warrants. Remember, the
bulk of that information came from what they were warned
not to trust the unverifiable because it was all bunk
and false. Hillary Clinton bought and paid for dirty Russian dossier.
Speaker 2 (01:23):
Here's what he said at the time.
Speaker 3 (01:24):
The way we operate in the Department of Justice, if
we can accuse somebody of wrongdoing, we have to have
admissible evidence and credible witnesses. We need to prepare to
prove our case in court, and we have to fix
our signature to the charging document. That's something that not
everybody appreciates. There's a lot of talk about PISA applications,
and many people that I see talking about it seem
(01:45):
not to recognize what a FISA applicat. A FISA application
is actually a warrant, just like a search warrant. In
order to get a PISA search warrant, you need an
affidavid signed by a career federal law enforcement officer who
swears that the information in the affidavid is true and
correct to the best of his knowledge and belief. And
(02:06):
that's the way we operate and if it's wrong. Sometimes
it is. If you find out there's anything incorrect in there,
that person is going to face consequences.
Speaker 1 (02:14):
That personal phase. Well, he's one of the people that
signed one of the four warrants. Call me himself signed
three of them. Now we had John Solomon on yesterday
again more declassified documents that after call mey was fired,
that there was an effort. Now I've got to take
you back to November of twenty sixteen. Remember, career professional
(02:36):
intelligence officials. They came up with a presidential daily briefing.
In it they had made the determination that there was
no Russia collusion or interference in the twenty sixteen election.
Then a big meeting in the White House under Barack Obama,
and that was December eighth, twenty sixteen. In that meeting
(02:57):
he had Clapper and Brennan and Biden and Obama maybe others.
And in that meeting they didn't like the assessment of
career professional intelligence people. So they made the decision then
that they were going to not listen to it and
do another assessment that fit their agenda, thus setting the
stage for what became three years of Russia Russia, Russia Russia,
(03:20):
A collusion that was always false.
Speaker 4 (03:23):
Listen, We're about to find out if the new president
of our country is going to do what Russia wants
once he's commander in chief of the US military.
Speaker 2 (03:31):
I think he's afraid of the president of Russia.
Speaker 5 (03:33):
Why well, I think we can speculate us to why
that the Russians may have something on him personally.
Speaker 1 (03:39):
So we have to wait till the hammer and sickle
is on the American flag before we stand up to
this guy.
Speaker 5 (03:44):
If it turns out that Donald Trump stole the election,
that he conspired with the Russians to undermine our democracy, and.
Speaker 1 (03:52):
I'm obsessed with how many fingers the hand of Russia
had in Trump world.
Speaker 4 (03:56):
Donald Trump is either an agent of Russia or he's
a useful idiot.
Speaker 2 (04:01):
And that was the media narrative just running.
Speaker 1 (04:04):
You know, they are just an extension of the deep
state anyway. John Solomon, Founder, investigative reporter, editor in chief
Justinnews dot Com. Greg Jarrett, Fox News legal analyst, New
York Times bestselling author. He wrote two books on the
issue with Russia collusion. John, let's start with the news.
I mean, like all of it, it gets confusing, and
(04:25):
then there's a level of frustration that I and the
audience have is because we did unpeel every layer of
the onion, all the information and evidence was there, nobody
ever gets held accountable.
Speaker 4 (04:34):
Yeah, listen, I think this is a very important moment
because what's happening because of the President's creation of this
task force is we're able to get to documents that
have been denied us for nine and ten years. Now,
you're now going on ten years from the launch. This
month or last month was a ten year anniversity the
launch across by hurricane. For the first time, we're getting
(04:55):
to the documents that the deep state, the bureaucrats, the
politically motivated people in government who created a WEAPONI system
didn't want us to see. That evidence becoming public creates
a roadmap for prosecutors to go. You prosecutors can't prosecute
things they don't know about. And I think what's really
remarkable now is the evidence coming out.
Speaker 1 (05:15):
And then but I got to stop in this sense,
and then Greg will weigh in. It hasn't the statute
of limitations passed unless they build those massive grand conspiracy case.
Speaker 4 (05:26):
That's exactly what we've no doubt most of the crimes
are on the five year statutes expired years ago, way
when Joe Biden was president. But the opportunity now is
to show that this was a wash rinspat wash Rins,
repeat cycle of violating President Trump's civil liberties and then
let a prosecutor see if they can convince the grandeura
to do that or roll up shop. But the first
(05:47):
thing that starts with is you have to get to
the evidence that we didn't know existed. So what happened
in Watergate happened in Whitewater. Remember when we did Whitewater
years ago that some of the stuff was from the
eighties in Larkansas. We were able to get to it
and that ltimately led to a special prosecutor in prosecutions.
Right now we're in the evidence execation moment and we're
(06:07):
getting things that we were long denied. It's worse than
we thought, you know, all the things that Greg and
I and you have wrote about and talked about, it's
actually worse.
Speaker 5 (06:14):
We now know it's worse.
Speaker 4 (06:16):
And then the prosecutors will take that evidence. The Congress
will take that evidence of the side, whether they're going
to hand out accountability or not. But this is a
great moment it's a moment of transparency. Unlike anytime in
the last endears, we're getting things in real time that
we were denied for nine and ten years.
Speaker 2 (06:32):
What do you make of all of this?
Speaker 1 (06:33):
Greg, And you know the question I've been asked so often,
and I know both of you have been asked it
as well. And you've been incredible partners in really doing
a lot of the legwork and exposing all of this.
And I'm grateful to both of you. But for the
people that say to all of us, you know, when, when, when,
when is accountability coming? I don't know what your answer is,
(06:57):
but I don't really have a good answer.
Speaker 6 (07:00):
Well I don't either. Let me first say, you know,
congratulations and thanks to John Solomon's intrepid digging, who has
uncovered you know how the FBI managed to bury in
hide this secret investigation of Trump for almost a decade
(07:21):
code named Oxford coma misspelling the first word, probably to
try to avoid computer searches on FOYA demands. So it
started with Crossfire Hurricane, which was conjured up by Hillary
Clinton and then adopted by Comy and his lackeys at
(07:42):
the FBI to try to stop Trump from getting elected.
When it failed, they doubled down and tried to use
it to drive him from office. And when Comy was
fired by Trump legitimately so then they launched this other
secret Oxford Comma investigation. It's amazing to me they managed
(08:07):
to bury and hide it for almost a decade. Now,
as to your question about potential charges, I would begin
with conspiracy to commit an offense or to fraud the
US the statutes eighteen USC. Three seventy one, But I
think the more important statutes are two forty one and
(08:29):
two forty two, which is conspiracy against rights and deprivation
of rights under color of law. That's exactly with these
malevolent and corrupt people at the FBI and to some
extent the DOJ we're doing. Other possibilities would include faulse
statements or perjury, obstruction of justice, mail or wire fraud.
(08:50):
I think all of those things are being considered by
the US Attorney's Office in South Florida. Joe Degenev seems
to be in charge of that pro But I think,
and John will tell you this, he has been getting
not just pushback from Democrats, but I think from people
(09:11):
in the United States Senate. As John was reporting, Tom Cotton,
John Thune and some others to hand over some critical
transcripts that would be useful to the grand jury in Florida.
So it's an uphill climb, but it can be done.
Speaker 1 (09:33):
A right quick break more with John Solomon Justinnews dot
com and Greg Jarrett Fox News legal analysts on the
other side. All right, we continue with Greg Jarrett John
Solomon now newly released declassified documents on top of everything
(09:53):
we've reported for years on this program about this phony
Russia collusion narrative. John, let's talk about you know, we
knew all of this ahead of the time in many ways, but.
Speaker 2 (10:05):
Now we're learning more, we're learning new things. We're learning.
Speaker 1 (10:08):
You know that there was a specific title given to
an operation just days after James Comy, according to these
d classified documents, and again you could see him on
your website, just the News dot com. You go to
White House dot gov and people can then make their
own determination on this. But these new documents show that
(10:29):
immediately after Comy was fired, I believe it was May
of twenty seventeen that they start up again with another investigation,
you know, was Russia involved with Donald Trump?
Speaker 4 (10:42):
It is such an important moment now, because as we
got this evidence piecemeal over the last decade, the most
extreme things, the things that showed the potential for criminality
or for abuse, were redacted or they were left off
the chart. We knew that President Trump was being instigated
for the last decade for probable construction, and then ultimately
(11:04):
Muller declared him, so we're not going to charge him.
What we didn't know was the predicate for that was
the idea that he was working at the behest of
Vladimir Putin to fire that. What we didn't know is
the person who would have gotten that information and approved
that investigation and then thrown it over the defense. His
name was Rod rosen Sein. He's the man who knew
(11:24):
why James Comy was really fired. He wrote the memo
firing James Comy. He didn't write in his memo President
Trump ordered me to fire James Comy because he Vladimir
Putin asked him to do it. He wrote in his memo,
James Comy should be fired because he broke Justice Department
regulations in the way he handled the Hillary Clinton email case.
So think about this. He just created that leads to
(11:47):
the Mueller appointment. That says Donald Trump fired James Comy
in our belief because he was acting at Russia's behest
at the time that is issued, the time Muller's appointed,
we don't know this. The FBI already knew there was
no Russia collusion all the evidence I put in the
story yesterday. They knew that Komi was fired for cause,
(12:08):
and they knew that there was never going to be
an evidence that Comy's firing was tied to anything having
to do with Russia. It had everything to do with
his performance. The IG would later conclude that this stuff
was the stuff that was kept secret. And for a
prosecutor today who's trying to build a conspiracy case, that
people knew what they were doing was wrong. Multiple people
(12:30):
were working together to create a fake investigation to potentially
violate Donald Trump's cimilebrities over a decade time Washerin's repeat cycle.
This is a sort of evidence that makes it possible
to look at as a conspiracy. Doesn't mean a grand
jury well indict, but this level of insanity concusing the
sitting president of firing someone because Russia told him to
(12:50):
do so without a shread of evidence, that's where you
can really build a conspiracy case.
Speaker 2 (12:56):
Well, it certainly sounds like one.
Speaker 1 (12:57):
And you know, I mean, Cash is such a good
record at the FBI right now. I mean, I mean,
he's shattering every record in terms of arrests of bad
people that you know, it just wasn't being done under
the previous FBI, and that in and of itself is frustrating.
(13:18):
I would have hoped Director Ray after Comy would have,
you know, cleaned up Greg Jarrett, what is and what
should be the greatest law enforcement agency in the entire world,
which it once was, Yeah, but it.
Speaker 6 (13:31):
Was ruined by James Comy and you know the whole
gang at the FBI. You know, they adopted Hillary scheme
to smear Trump with the fiction that he colluded Russia,
knowing all the while that it was bogus and simply
made up. That didn't stop them from using it as
(13:52):
a pretext. And then when that wasn't going so well, now,
according to John's excellent porting, they undertake this other second
counterintelligence probe to conjure up even more bogus evidence with
the exact same theme. Oh, firing Comy as a Trump
(14:14):
rush of plot. They knew it wasn't they knew it
wasn't obstruction, and in point of fact, in both my books,
I explained in great detail how it can't even come
close to obstruction of justice. It was legally preposterous, and
yet they did it, which I think just underscores the
(14:38):
malevolence and corruption that infected the FBI. And it didn't end,
you know, with James Comy. When Christopher Ray took over,
he was, you know, Comy light in a you know
better Brooks brother sued and a little bit slippier, slipperier
than Komy. But you know, he had an obligation to
(15:01):
disclose a lot of this information and he didn't do it.
Speaker 1 (15:05):
All right, I appreciate both of you. You know, you
have been unbelievably you know, unrelenting in getting the truth
out to the American people. I hope we I hope
they're able to follow through. I'm not sure. I kind
of agree with Dan bongin know how the country, this
great democratic republic, survives of all of this corruption took place.
Speaker 2 (15:24):
And nobody gets held accountable myself, Thank you both.
Speaker 1 (15:29):
Good friendly Zelden is with us epa administrator and he's
building one of the most impactful records to be honest,
under the EPA. I got to point out one thing
about lee Zelden that many need to know as well.
We've had Bruce Blakeman on the show. This may be
New York's last chance to ever save itself from the
insanity of these DSA Mamdani AOC. You know, Hakeem, Jeffries,
(15:54):
Chucky Schumer crazies. And I mean that the same thing
out in California. I mean, honestly, if you elect a
liberal in California, it's probably over there too.
Speaker 2 (16:06):
But anyway, that's up to you.
Speaker 1 (16:07):
You will live with in the government you deserve at
the end of the day. But he's done a phenomenal
job and it's kind of been underreported. For example, we've
had the largest deregulatory action in American history. The Trump
EPAS rescinded the two thousand and nine Endangerment Finding, ending
the Obama Biden ev mandates and saving and estimated that's
(16:29):
saving you one point three trillion dollars. It sounds like,
you know, pretty large amount of money for people. Also,
the EPAS helped truckers and farmers. Epas fixed to the
heavy duty rules and regulations that eliminate DFA de ratements.
That standard rigs and tractors mid job and estimated twelve
(16:50):
billion dollars in savings. That's six thousand dollars per truck
on average. And you know, while keeping nearly ninety percent
of the reductions in place, they have many other historical
things that they've done.
Speaker 2 (17:03):
Lee have done a great job. I know you're working hard.
Speaker 1 (17:06):
And you also helped Republicans save the US House because
you did so well in the last election in New
York State that you were able to help carry across
the finish line a number of marginal Republican congressmen that
helped give the majority to Republicans there.
Speaker 2 (17:23):
I give you all the credit for that.
Speaker 5 (17:25):
Well, Sean's great to be with you. And in that
race in twenty twenty two, what a lot of people
across the country saw, and you know well from your
experience in New York, is that while New York City
is just so heavily concentrated with Democrats, the rest of
the state has a lot of purple and red districts.
And we ended up with a House Republican delegation out
(17:48):
of New York coming out of that election, which was
the largest in a very long time. We had about
four or five members who would have barely lost and
said they barely won, and you ended up with a
balance of power for the last two years of Joe
Biden's presidency, and that was a blue state of New
(18:10):
York doing that to provide that balance. But also, as
you know, too many people have permanently fled New York.
They're not looking back. They're enjoying life in places like
Florida and Texas and the Carolinas and Tennessee. They stuck
it out as long as they could. But seeing New
York leaders taking that state in the wrong direction, they
(18:32):
said enough is enough, and they're taking their money and
in their pursuit of freedom and safety elsewhere and very
happy with life somewhere other than New York. So that's
an unfortunate reality. But it's great to be on you
to talk to you about our work at EPA, working
with President Trump, getting stuff done at Trump speed and
being able to for the history books. We've were punching
(18:54):
over the finish line. More deregulation in one year and
entire federal government have done in the has to cross
all agencies combined across entire presidencies. That's how much of
a mess we inherited, and at Trump's speed, we've been
fixing it.
Speaker 1 (19:09):
Well, it's pretty amazing. What else do you think people
need to know? Because you know, I see the decline
of Europe. I talk about it all the time, and
I look at four basic factors that has resulted in
this precipitous decline. I'm not sure if you can even
save Europe at this point. But one is they have
neglected national security, national defense, both as individual countries and
(19:30):
collectively as NATO allies or so called allies. Number two,
they have adopted radical climate alarmism. Number three, radical socialism
has also been adopted. Number four is they have you know,
unfettered illegal immigration with no demands of assimilation. That's where
Sharia courts come in in Great Britain, that's where. And
(19:53):
they have no go zones in France and other countries
in Europe. I don't know how they fix this. And
we see what's happening in Spain right now.
Speaker 5 (19:59):
Yeah, then you people here in our own country who
look to places like that and they come up with
the bright idea of saying, oh, we should make in
the United States more like that. There are fortunately people
who are in power. President Trump and JD. Vance come
to mind of individuals who look at the European model
and say, well, maybe our country, believing in American exceptionalism,
(20:23):
should be the best version of itself and not seeking
to emulate these disasters of models that were witnessing over
in Europe. But unfortunately, there are others in pursuit of power,
and they have a very different view of what the
future of this country should look like. You brought up
the climate alarmism. I mean, we came in in an
agency where the belief was that in order to protect
(20:45):
the environment that you'd have to suffocate out of existence
entire sectors of our economy, especially our energy economy, And
we're proving that you can choose both. And every single
day we're on the job, I'm limiting my power. I'm
limiting my power to the best reading of the law,
limiting my power in a way that limits whoever follows
me in this position afterwards. And my message to Congress
(21:07):
and others who might not be happy with that is,
if you have a problem with what I'm doing, then
change the law. But no longer we can have agency
heads getting creative, giving themselves power that Congress hasn't done
inside of statute. So we can get the environmental wins,
we can help grow the economy. We can be responsible
(21:29):
Steward's at tax dollars. We could be accountable to the people.
We could be transparent to the public. And that is
the type of model that should be coming out of
an agency like EPA, as opposed to having bureaucrats who
are very like, very much like those in charge of Europe,
who want to take that climate alarmatism to a level
(21:49):
where jobs end up getting cut. You have people who
are paying more for their energy, they're losing consumer choice
and what type of vehicle to own, and all of
those costs and impacts and brownouts and blackouts to come
with it. So, yeah, this is a This is one
of those key moments where hopefully common sense prevails.
Speaker 2 (22:10):
Well, I appreciate all the work you're doing.
Speaker 1 (22:11):
I think unfortunately it's under reported because there's always so
much other news. But I want to give you a
lot of props. And you're a friend and you're doing
a great job. We appreciate you being on and updating us.
Leez Eldon, thank you, my friend.
Speaker 4 (22:24):
Thanks an.
Speaker 2 (22:24):
Back to our phones.
Speaker 5 (22:25):
We go.
Speaker 1 (22:26):
Let's say Hi to Eduardo. He is in my free
state of Florida. What's up, ed Water, how are you?
Speaker 7 (22:32):
Yeah, good afternoon, Sean, Thank you for taking my car. Yeah.
I got to comment on mister Tullerico and that Michael
Ducac is tank in the moment, fake truck. What a joke.
And I really hope Latino's are not going to fall
for him because he's a talent. He's going to think, Well,
I speak Spanish too, and you know I can you know,
(22:53):
I dig you guys, and I see what you're going
through with I pretty ridiculous. I hope they don't fother
because then I watched the span News and it's very
anti Trump on both of the Spanish news. It's ridiculous,
and we got to call them out.
Speaker 1 (23:07):
Well, I get reports from friends of mine that are
bilingual or speak Spanish and they tell me all the
time that you can't believe how things are reported on
some of these channels. Did have a good idea about it. Yeah,
it is what it is.
Speaker 2 (23:22):
I mean, the media.
Speaker 1 (23:23):
One of the reasons I'm so grateful to have this
radio show and my TV show and to have now
this new podcast.
Speaker 2 (23:32):
By the way, we.
Speaker 1 (23:32):
Did drop an unbelievable podcast with Perez Hilton. You know,
after what happened the other night, I can't believe it.
I mean, he was he had actually reached out to
people he felt he hurt.
Speaker 2 (23:42):
He found God.
Speaker 1 (23:43):
He you know, his whole life story, his whole life changed,
and so I'm not really sure what's going on. My
prayers are with him, but you know it reached out
to people he felt he hurt. He used to be
very aggressive in terms of celebrity reporting, et cetera. But
you know, I'm only I'm only telling you that if
it's not for talk radio, Fox News and the podcasters
(24:06):
that have common sense, there are some that are just
off the wall, be selective who you listen to, I'm
telling you you don't get the message. And it is Yeah,
I'm grateful that we still have free speech, but when
you go over their agenda in all of it's, you know,
all of their details, it is scary to me and
(24:27):
to everybody to our busy phones eight hundred and nine
four one Sean, if you want to join us, let's
say hi to Eric. He's in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
the home of John Frederman.
Speaker 2 (24:39):
What's up, Eric, how are you.
Speaker 8 (24:40):
Hey, Sean, how are you.
Speaker 2 (24:41):
I'm good. What's going on?
Speaker 7 (24:43):
Oh man?
Speaker 8 (24:44):
I used to listen to you when we both had
dark hair. That's how long I've been listening to you.
Speaker 5 (24:49):
Well.
Speaker 2 (24:49):
I appreciate it. Thank you. Hey, listen.
Speaker 1 (24:53):
I can't do this job without you, and I don't
thank this audience enough.
Speaker 2 (24:57):
So thank you.
Speaker 8 (24:57):
Yep, you're welcome. You're doing a great job. I just
wanted to let you know. What worries me is these
young people who are signing onto this socialism and communism.
They've never spoke to anyone who actually lived it. What
they're doing is they're listening to what their professors are
saying and what their friends are saying. My mother and
my grandfather and uncle, they lived under communism, and everything
(25:21):
I'm gonna tell you is actually from their mouth. I didn't.
Speaker 7 (25:23):
I'm not.
Speaker 8 (25:23):
It's not secondhand knowledge or anything like that. When the
Communists came from Germany, and when the Communists first came
into East Germany and they took over these villages, we
owned a farm and we owned an electric motor factory,
and both very successful.
Speaker 5 (25:41):
You know.
Speaker 8 (25:41):
Obviously during the war years, you know, you know, farming
and that was important. But it was always successful. And
the first thing they did they took everybody's farm from
them and they no longer owned that farm. And what
happened the farmers had to actually work on everyone else's farm,
and the government, the communists told them what to grow,
(26:01):
even if it didn't even grow there. They said you
need to grow this, and they said it doesn't work.
So that was the first big problem. And then they
had a meeting with everybody and they said, look, you know,
everything's gonna be better. Everyone's gonna be happy, everyone's going
to be fed. My grandmother would say she would go
down to the store to buy food, and it wasn't like,
you know how Sean like we go when we go down,
(26:23):
we'll go, hey, I'm gonna go buy a couple of steaks.
I'm gonna go buy this, and that we know what
we're gonna get. In her case, it was let's just
see what's there.
Speaker 1 (26:30):
You know, No, it's it is pretty remarkable what people
don't know about communism. You know, I maybe maybe I'm
too flippant in the way that I described this, and
as much as okay, whatever form name manifestation, I kind
of say the same thing in one way or the other.
They make all these lofty promises that will never be fulfilled,
(26:51):
as evidenced by you know, horrible government schools in our country.
The Obamacare promises the lock box for social security. The
border's closed, the border is secure when it's wide open.
Joe is not a cognitive mess. I mean we get
lied to COVID, We get lied to by our government
all the time. And I guess you know what's frustrating
is is once you give this power in the name
(27:15):
of false security and promises that will never be fulfilled,
you end up every time, every time it's been tried,
but the same results, more poverty, broken promises, a loss
of freedom because you empowered this group of bureaucrats and
they're in this for powered. They're not in this for you,
(27:36):
but you've empowered them to confiscate the wealth of hardworking
people and give it to you in the name of
all of this security. I'll never have to worry about
my kid's childcare. I'll never have to worry. I'll have
a government guaranteed job, government guaranteed health care, government guaranteed retirement,
government guaranteed guaranteed guarant healthy food, on and on. They
(27:56):
can't possibly do it. Their history is one of failure
after failure after failure. Why would anyone trust them?
Speaker 2 (28:04):
Last word, right, my.
Speaker 8 (28:05):
Grandmother said, and this is from a woman who lived
under communism. She said, under communism, you do not live,
you exist a miserable existence. That is the difference. Because
they ended up here in America. And my grandfather, he
had the tallest flag pole with the biggest American flag
in the neighborhood, and he would spout patriotism all the time,
(28:28):
how great America is. And and my grandmother said that,
she goes, you don't live under communism, you exist of
miserable existence.
Speaker 2 (28:36):
It's all true. And I have met people.
Speaker 1 (28:39):
You know, the Cuban American community in Miami is one
of the greatest communities you can learn from because they
escaped communism in Castro and the revolution and the property
confiscation and the murder and the mayhem and the death
and the poverty, all those false promises caused. You learn
so much from people that lived it. Anyway, I appreciate
(29:00):
you being with us, appreciate you calling my friend God
bless you. Glad you are here. And in freedom. I'd
like freedom around the world to be honest nity. You
like war, No, I don't like war. I prefer no war.
Two Sean Hannity Show. Right down a toll free telephone
number if you want to be a part of the program.
It's eight hundred nine four one Seawn if you want
to be a part of the program. So we now
have a massive declassification underway from the White House. Now
we've had Dan Bongino on the program. We've had Cash
but Tell on the program, John Solomon, Greg Jarrett. We've
done a lot of analysis. We've talked about these burn
(00:23):
bags that were discovered in a room that nobody even
knew existed, kind of like a I don't know one
of these safe rooms that people have in their houses,
et cetera. And you know, for example, Dan Bongino actually
thinks that somebody left this information purposely, didn't burn information
that they wanted to bury. But a lot of this information,
(00:43):
these are government documents that are being declassified and we're
learning a lot. We had on John Solomon yesterday to
talk about it. We have John joining us along with
Greg Jarrett. In just a second, let me take you
back in time, and this is Rod Rosenstein.
Speaker 2 (00:59):
I believe it was what.
Speaker 1 (01:00):
Twenty eighteen in May saying people in the Department of
Justice that did wrong with PISA warrants will face consequences. Ironically,
he signed one of the four PISA warrants. Remember, the
bulk of that information came from what they were warned
not to trust the unverifiable because it was all bunk
and false. Hillary Clinton bought and paid for dirty Russian dossier.
Speaker 2 (01:23):
Here's what he said at the time.
Speaker 3 (01:24):
The way we operate in the Department of Justice, if
we can accuse somebody of wrongdoing, we have to have
admissible evidence and credible witnesses. We need to prepare to
prove our case in court, and we have to fix
our signature to the charging document. That's something that not
everybody appreciates. There's a lot of talk about PISA applications,
and many people that I see talking about it seem
(01:45):
not to recognize what a FISA applicat. A FISA application
is actually a warrant, just like a search warrant. In
order to get a PISA search warrant, you need an
affidavid signed by a career federal law enforcement officer who
swears that the information in the affidavid is true and
correct to the best of his knowledge and belief. And
(02:06):
that's the way we operate and if it's wrong. Sometimes
it is. If you find out there's anything incorrect in there,
that person is going to face consequences.
Speaker 1 (02:14):
That personal phase. Well, he's one of the people that
signed one of the four warrants. Call me himself signed
three of them. Now we had John Solomon on yesterday
again more declassified documents that after call mey was fired,
that there was an effort. Now I've got to take
you back to November of twenty sixteen. Remember, career professional
(02:36):
intelligence officials. They came up with a presidential daily briefing.
In it they had made the determination that there was
no Russia collusion or interference in the twenty sixteen election.
Then a big meeting in the White House under Barack Obama,
and that was December eighth, twenty sixteen. In that meeting
(02:57):
he had Clapper and Brennan and Biden and Obama maybe others.
And in that meeting they didn't like the assessment of
career professional intelligence people. So they made the decision then
that they were going to not listen to it and
do another assessment that fit their agenda, thus setting the
stage for what became three years of Russia Russia, Russia Russia,
(03:20):
A collusion that was always false.
Speaker 4 (03:23):
Listen, We're about to find out if the new president
of our country is going to do what Russia wants
once he's commander in chief of the US military.
Speaker 2 (03:31):
I think he's afraid of the president of Russia.
Speaker 5 (03:33):
Why well, I think we can speculate us to why
that the Russians may have something on him personally.
Speaker 1 (03:39):
So we have to wait till the hammer and sickle
is on the American flag before we stand up to
this guy.
Speaker 5 (03:44):
If it turns out that Donald Trump stole the election,
that he conspired with the Russians to undermine our democracy, and.
Speaker 1 (03:52):
I'm obsessed with how many fingers the hand of Russia
had in Trump world.
Speaker 4 (03:56):
Donald Trump is either an agent of Russia or he's
a useful idiot.
Speaker 2 (04:01):
And that was the media narrative just running.
Speaker 1 (04:04):
You know, they are just an extension of the deep
state anyway. John Solomon, Founder, investigative reporter, editor in chief
Justinnews dot Com. Greg Jarrett, Fox News legal analyst, New
York Times bestselling author. He wrote two books on the
issue with Russia collusion. John, let's start with the news.
I mean, like all of it, it gets confusing, and
(04:25):
then there's a level of frustration that I and the
audience have is because we did unpeel every layer of
the onion, all the information and evidence was there, nobody
ever gets held accountable.
Speaker 4 (04:34):
Yeah, listen, I think this is a very important moment
because what's happening because of the President's creation of this
task force is we're able to get to documents that
have been denied us for nine and ten years. Now,
you're now going on ten years from the launch. This
month or last month was a ten year anniversity the
launch across by hurricane. For the first time, we're getting
(04:55):
to the documents that the deep state, the bureaucrats, the
politically motivated people in government who created a WEAPONI system
didn't want us to see. That evidence becoming public creates
a roadmap for prosecutors to go. You prosecutors can't prosecute
things they don't know about. And I think what's really
remarkable now is the evidence coming out.
Speaker 1 (05:15):
And then but I got to stop in this sense,
and then Greg will weigh in. It hasn't the statute
of limitations passed unless they build those massive grand conspiracy case.
Speaker 4 (05:26):
That's exactly what we've no doubt most of the crimes
are on the five year statutes expired years ago, way
when Joe Biden was president. But the opportunity now is
to show that this was a wash rinspat wash Rins,
repeat cycle of violating President Trump's civil liberties and then
let a prosecutor see if they can convince the grandeura
to do that or roll up shop. But the first
(05:47):
thing that starts with is you have to get to
the evidence that we didn't know existed. So what happened
in Watergate happened in Whitewater. Remember when we did Whitewater
years ago that some of the stuff was from the
eighties in Larkansas. We were able to get to it
and that ltimately led to a special prosecutor in prosecutions.
Right now we're in the evidence execation moment and we're
(06:07):
getting things that we were long denied. It's worse than
we thought, you know, all the things that Greg and
I and you have wrote about and talked about, it's
actually worse.
Speaker 5 (06:14):
We now know it's worse.
Speaker 4 (06:16):
And then the prosecutors will take that evidence. The Congress
will take that evidence of the side, whether they're going
to hand out accountability or not. But this is a
great moment it's a moment of transparency. Unlike anytime in
the last endears, we're getting things in real time that
we were denied for nine and ten years.
Speaker 2 (06:32):
What do you make of all of this?
Speaker 1 (06:33):
Greg, And you know the question I've been asked so often,
and I know both of you have been asked it
as well. And you've been incredible partners in really doing
a lot of the legwork and exposing all of this.
And I'm grateful to both of you. But for the
people that say to all of us, you know, when, when, when,
when is accountability coming? I don't know what your answer is,
(06:57):
but I don't really have a good answer.
Speaker 6 (07:00):
Well I don't either. Let me first say, you know,
congratulations and thanks to John Solomon's intrepid digging, who has
uncovered you know how the FBI managed to bury in
hide this secret investigation of Trump for almost a decade
(07:21):
code named Oxford coma misspelling the first word, probably to
try to avoid computer searches on FOYA demands. So it
started with Crossfire Hurricane, which was conjured up by Hillary
Clinton and then adopted by Comy and his lackeys at
(07:42):
the FBI to try to stop Trump from getting elected.
When it failed, they doubled down and tried to use
it to drive him from office. And when Comy was
fired by Trump legitimately so then they launched this other
secret Oxford Comma investigation. It's amazing to me they managed
(08:07):
to bury and hide it for almost a decade. Now,
as to your question about potential charges, I would begin
with conspiracy to commit an offense or to fraud the
US the statutes eighteen USC. Three seventy one, But I
think the more important statutes are two forty one and
(08:29):
two forty two, which is conspiracy against rights and deprivation
of rights under color of law. That's exactly with these
malevolent and corrupt people at the FBI and to some
extent the DOJ we're doing. Other possibilities would include faulse
statements or perjury, obstruction of justice, mail or wire fraud.
(08:50):
I think all of those things are being considered by
the US Attorney's Office in South Florida. Joe Degenev seems
to be in charge of that pro But I think,
and John will tell you this, he has been getting
not just pushback from Democrats, but I think from people
(09:11):
in the United States Senate. As John was reporting, Tom Cotton,
John Thune and some others to hand over some critical
transcripts that would be useful to the grand jury in Florida.
So it's an uphill climb, but it can be done.
Speaker 1 (09:33):
A right quick break more with John Solomon Justinnews dot
com and Greg Jarrett Fox News legal analysts on the
other side. All right, we continue with Greg Jarrett John
Solomon now newly released declassified documents on top of everything
(09:53):
we've reported for years on this program about this phony
Russia collusion narrative. John, let's talk about you know, we
knew all of this ahead of the time in many ways, but.
Speaker 2 (10:05):
Now we're learning more, we're learning new things. We're learning.
Speaker 1 (10:08):
You know that there was a specific title given to
an operation just days after James Comy, according to these
d classified documents, and again you could see him on
your website, just the News dot com. You go to
White House dot gov and people can then make their
own determination on this. But these new documents show that
(10:29):
immediately after Comy was fired, I believe it was May
of twenty seventeen that they start up again with another investigation,
you know, was Russia involved with Donald Trump?
Speaker 4 (10:42):
It is such an important moment now, because as we
got this evidence piecemeal over the last decade, the most
extreme things, the things that showed the potential for criminality
or for abuse, were redacted or they were left off
the chart. We knew that President Trump was being instigated
for the last decade for probable construction, and then ultimately
(11:04):
Muller declared him, so we're not going to charge him.
What we didn't know was the predicate for that was
the idea that he was working at the behest of
Vladimir Putin to fire that. What we didn't know is
the person who would have gotten that information and approved
that investigation and then thrown it over the defense. His
name was Rod rosen Sein. He's the man who knew
(11:24):
why James Comy was really fired. He wrote the memo
firing James Comy. He didn't write in his memo President
Trump ordered me to fire James Comy because he Vladimir
Putin asked him to do it. He wrote in his memo,
James Comy should be fired because he broke Justice Department
regulations in the way he handled the Hillary Clinton email case.
So think about this. He just created that leads to
(11:47):
the Mueller appointment. That says Donald Trump fired James Comy
in our belief because he was acting at Russia's behest
at the time that is issued, the time Muller's appointed,
we don't know this. The FBI already knew there was
no Russia collusion all the evidence I put in the
story yesterday. They knew that Komi was fired for cause,
(12:08):
and they knew that there was never going to be
an evidence that Comy's firing was tied to anything having
to do with Russia. It had everything to do with
his performance. The IG would later conclude that this stuff
was the stuff that was kept secret. And for a
prosecutor today who's trying to build a conspiracy case, that
people knew what they were doing was wrong. Multiple people
(12:30):
were working together to create a fake investigation to potentially
violate Donald Trump's cimilebrities over a decade time Washerin's repeat cycle.
This is a sort of evidence that makes it possible
to look at as a conspiracy. Doesn't mean a grand
jury well indict, but this level of insanity concusing the
sitting president of firing someone because Russia told him to
(12:50):
do so without a shread of evidence, that's where you
can really build a conspiracy case.
Speaker 2 (12:56):
Well, it certainly sounds like one.
Speaker 1 (12:57):
And you know, I mean, Cash is such a good
record at the FBI right now. I mean, I mean,
he's shattering every record in terms of arrests of bad
people that you know, it just wasn't being done under
the previous FBI, and that in and of itself is frustrating.
(13:18):
I would have hoped Director Ray after Comy would have,
you know, cleaned up Greg Jarrett, what is and what
should be the greatest law enforcement agency in the entire world,
which it once was, Yeah, but it.
Speaker 6 (13:31):
Was ruined by James Comy and you know the whole
gang at the FBI. You know, they adopted Hillary scheme
to smear Trump with the fiction that he colluded Russia,
knowing all the while that it was bogus and simply
made up. That didn't stop them from using it as
(13:52):
a pretext. And then when that wasn't going so well, now,
according to John's excellent porting, they undertake this other second
counterintelligence probe to conjure up even more bogus evidence with
the exact same theme. Oh, firing Comy as a Trump
(14:14):
rush of plot. They knew it wasn't they knew it
wasn't obstruction, and in point of fact, in both my books,
I explained in great detail how it can't even come
close to obstruction of justice. It was legally preposterous, and
yet they did it, which I think just underscores the
(14:38):
malevolence and corruption that infected the FBI. And it didn't end,
you know, with James Comy. When Christopher Ray took over,
he was, you know, Comy light in a you know
better Brooks brother sued and a little bit slippier, slipperier
than Komy. But you know, he had an obligation to
(15:01):
disclose a lot of this information and he didn't do it.
Speaker 1 (15:05):
All right, I appreciate both of you. You know, you
have been unbelievably you know, unrelenting in getting the truth
out to the American people. I hope we I hope
they're able to follow through. I'm not sure. I kind
of agree with Dan bongin know how the country, this
great democratic republic, survives of all of this corruption took place.
Speaker 2 (15:24):
And nobody gets held accountable myself, Thank you both.
Speaker 1 (15:29):
Good friendly Zelden is with us epa administrator and he's
building one of the most impactful records to be honest,
under the EPA. I got to point out one thing
about lee Zelden that many need to know as well.
We've had Bruce Blakeman on the show. This may be
New York's last chance to ever save itself from the
insanity of these DSA Mamdani AOC. You know, Hakeem, Jeffries,
(15:54):
Chucky Schumer crazies. And I mean that the same thing
out in California. I mean, honestly, if you elect a
liberal in California, it's probably over there too.
Speaker 2 (16:06):
But anyway, that's up to you.
Speaker 1 (16:07):
You will live with in the government you deserve at
the end of the day. But he's done a phenomenal
job and it's kind of been underreported. For example, we've
had the largest deregulatory action in American history. The Trump
EPAS rescinded the two thousand and nine Endangerment Finding, ending
the Obama Biden ev mandates and saving and estimated that's
(16:29):
saving you one point three trillion dollars. It sounds like,
you know, pretty large amount of money for people. Also,
the EPAS helped truckers and farmers. Epas fixed to the
heavy duty rules and regulations that eliminate DFA de ratements.
That standard rigs and tractors mid job and estimated twelve
(16:50):
billion dollars in savings. That's six thousand dollars per truck
on average. And you know, while keeping nearly ninety percent
of the reductions in place, they have many other historical
things that they've done.
Speaker 2 (17:03):
Lee have done a great job. I know you're working hard.
Speaker 1 (17:06):
And you also helped Republicans save the US House because
you did so well in the last election in New
York State that you were able to help carry across
the finish line a number of marginal Republican congressmen that
helped give the majority to Republicans there.
Speaker 2 (17:23):
I give you all the credit for that.
Speaker 5 (17:25):
Well, Sean's great to be with you. And in that
race in twenty twenty two, what a lot of people
across the country saw, and you know well from your
experience in New York, is that while New York City
is just so heavily concentrated with Democrats, the rest of
the state has a lot of purple and red districts.
And we ended up with a House Republican delegation out
(17:48):
of New York coming out of that election, which was
the largest in a very long time. We had about
four or five members who would have barely lost and
said they barely won, and you ended up with a
balance of power for the last two years of Joe
Biden's presidency, and that was a blue state of New
(18:10):
York doing that to provide that balance. But also, as
you know, too many people have permanently fled New York.
They're not looking back. They're enjoying life in places like
Florida and Texas and the Carolinas and Tennessee. They stuck
it out as long as they could. But seeing New
York leaders taking that state in the wrong direction, they
(18:32):
said enough is enough, and they're taking their money and
in their pursuit of freedom and safety elsewhere and very
happy with life somewhere other than New York. So that's
an unfortunate reality. But it's great to be on you
to talk to you about our work at EPA, working
with President Trump, getting stuff done at Trump speed and
being able to for the history books. We've were punching
(18:54):
over the finish line. More deregulation in one year and
entire federal government have done in the has to cross
all agencies combined across entire presidencies. That's how much of
a mess we inherited, and at Trump's speed, we've been
fixing it.
Speaker 1 (19:09):
Well, it's pretty amazing. What else do you think people
need to know? Because you know, I see the decline
of Europe. I talk about it all the time, and
I look at four basic factors that has resulted in
this precipitous decline. I'm not sure if you can even
save Europe at this point. But one is they have
neglected national security, national defense, both as individual countries and
(19:30):
collectively as NATO allies or so called allies. Number two,
they have adopted radical climate alarmism. Number three, radical socialism
has also been adopted. Number four is they have you know,
unfettered illegal immigration with no demands of assimilation. That's where
Sharia courts come in in Great Britain, that's where. And
(19:53):
they have no go zones in France and other countries
in Europe. I don't know how they fix this. And
we see what's happening in Spain right now.
Speaker 5 (19:59):
Yeah, then you people here in our own country who
look to places like that and they come up with
the bright idea of saying, oh, we should make in
the United States more like that. There are fortunately people
who are in power. President Trump and JD. Vance come
to mind of individuals who look at the European model
and say, well, maybe our country, believing in American exceptionalism,
(20:23):
should be the best version of itself and not seeking
to emulate these disasters of models that were witnessing over
in Europe. But unfortunately, there are others in pursuit of power,
and they have a very different view of what the
future of this country should look like. You brought up
the climate alarmism. I mean, we came in in an
agency where the belief was that in order to protect
(20:45):
the environment that you'd have to suffocate out of existence
entire sectors of our economy, especially our energy economy, And
we're proving that you can choose both. And every single
day we're on the job, I'm limiting my power. I'm
limiting my power to the best reading of the law,
limiting my power in a way that limits whoever follows
me in this position afterwards. And my message to Congress
(21:07):
and others who might not be happy with that is,
if you have a problem with what I'm doing, then
change the law. But no longer we can have agency
heads getting creative, giving themselves power that Congress hasn't done
inside of statute. So we can get the environmental wins,
we can help grow the economy. We can be responsible
(21:29):
Steward's at tax dollars. We could be accountable to the people.
We could be transparent to the public. And that is
the type of model that should be coming out of
an agency like EPA, as opposed to having bureaucrats who
are very like, very much like those in charge of Europe,
who want to take that climate alarmatism to a level
(21:49):
where jobs end up getting cut. You have people who
are paying more for their energy, they're losing consumer choice
and what type of vehicle to own, and all of
those costs and impacts and brownouts and blackouts to come
with it. So, yeah, this is a This is one
of those key moments where hopefully common sense prevails.
Speaker 2 (22:10):
Well, I appreciate all the work you're doing.
Speaker 1 (22:11):
I think unfortunately it's under reported because there's always so
much other news. But I want to give you a
lot of props. And you're a friend and you're doing
a great job. We appreciate you being on and updating us.
Leez Eldon, thank you, my friend.
Speaker 4 (22:24):
Thanks an.
Speaker 2 (22:24):
Back to our phones.
Speaker 5 (22:25):
We go.
Speaker 1 (22:26):
Let's say Hi to Eduardo. He is in my free
state of Florida. What's up, ed Water, how are you?
Speaker 7 (22:32):
Yeah, good afternoon, Sean, Thank you for taking my car. Yeah.
I got to comment on mister Tullerico and that Michael
Ducac is tank in the moment, fake truck. What a joke.
And I really hope Latino's are not going to fall
for him because he's a talent. He's going to think, Well,
I speak Spanish too, and you know I can you know,
(22:53):
I dig you guys, and I see what you're going
through with I pretty ridiculous. I hope they don't fother
because then I watched the span News and it's very
anti Trump on both of the Spanish news. It's ridiculous,
and we got to call them out.
Speaker 1 (23:07):
Well, I get reports from friends of mine that are
bilingual or speak Spanish and they tell me all the
time that you can't believe how things are reported on
some of these channels. Did have a good idea about it. Yeah,
it is what it is.
Speaker 2 (23:22):
I mean, the media.
Speaker 1 (23:23):
One of the reasons I'm so grateful to have this
radio show and my TV show and to have now
this new podcast.
Speaker 2 (23:32):
By the way, we.
Speaker 1 (23:32):
Did drop an unbelievable podcast with Perez Hilton. You know,
after what happened the other night, I can't believe it.
I mean, he was he had actually reached out to
people he felt he hurt.
Speaker 2 (23:42):
He found God.
Speaker 1 (23:43):
He you know, his whole life story, his whole life changed,
and so I'm not really sure what's going on. My
prayers are with him, but you know it reached out
to people he felt he hurt. He used to be
very aggressive in terms of celebrity reporting, et cetera. But
you know, I'm only I'm only telling you that if
it's not for talk radio, Fox News and the podcasters
(24:06):
that have common sense, there are some that are just
off the wall, be selective who you listen to, I'm
telling you you don't get the message. And it is Yeah,
I'm grateful that we still have free speech, but when
you go over their agenda in all of it's, you know,
all of their details, it is scary to me and
(24:27):
to everybody to our busy phones eight hundred and nine
four one Sean, if you want to join us, let's
say hi to Eric. He's in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
the home of John Frederman.
Speaker 2 (24:39):
What's up, Eric, how are you.
Speaker 8 (24:40):
Hey, Sean, how are you.
Speaker 2 (24:41):
I'm good. What's going on?
Speaker 7 (24:43):
Oh man?
Speaker 8 (24:44):
I used to listen to you when we both had
dark hair. That's how long I've been listening to you.
Speaker 5 (24:49):
Well.
Speaker 2 (24:49):
I appreciate it. Thank you. Hey, listen.
Speaker 1 (24:53):
I can't do this job without you, and I don't
thank this audience enough.
Speaker 2 (24:57):
So thank you.
Speaker 8 (24:57):
Yep, you're welcome. You're doing a great job. I just
wanted to let you know. What worries me is these
young people who are signing onto this socialism and communism.
They've never spoke to anyone who actually lived it. What
they're doing is they're listening to what their professors are
saying and what their friends are saying. My mother and
my grandfather and uncle, they lived under communism, and everything
(25:21):
I'm gonna tell you is actually from their mouth. I didn't.
Speaker 7 (25:23):
I'm not.
Speaker 8 (25:23):
It's not secondhand knowledge or anything like that. When the
Communists came from Germany, and when the Communists first came
into East Germany and they took over these villages, we
owned a farm and we owned an electric motor factory,
and both very successful.
Speaker 5 (25:41):
You know.
Speaker 8 (25:41):
Obviously during the war years, you know, you know, farming
and that was important. But it was always successful. And
the first thing they did they took everybody's farm from
them and they no longer owned that farm. And what
happened the farmers had to actually work on everyone else's farm,
and the government, the communists told them what to grow,
(26:01):
even if it didn't even grow there. They said you
need to grow this, and they said it doesn't work.
So that was the first big problem. And then they
had a meeting with everybody and they said, look, you know,
everything's gonna be better. Everyone's gonna be happy, everyone's going
to be fed. My grandmother would say she would go
down to the store to buy food, and it wasn't like,
you know how Sean like we go when we go down,
(26:23):
we'll go, hey, I'm gonna go buy a couple of steaks.
I'm gonna go buy this, and that we know what
we're gonna get. In her case, it was let's just
see what's there.
Speaker 1 (26:30):
You know, No, it's it is pretty remarkable what people
don't know about communism. You know, I maybe maybe I'm
too flippant in the way that I described this, and
as much as okay, whatever form name manifestation, I kind
of say the same thing in one way or the other.
They make all these lofty promises that will never be fulfilled,
(26:51):
as evidenced by you know, horrible government schools in our country.
The Obamacare promises the lock box for social security. The
border's closed, the border is secure when it's wide open.
Joe is not a cognitive mess. I mean we get
lied to COVID, We get lied to by our government
all the time. And I guess you know what's frustrating
is is once you give this power in the name
(27:15):
of false security and promises that will never be fulfilled,
you end up every time, every time it's been tried,
but the same results, more poverty, broken promises, a loss
of freedom because you empowered this group of bureaucrats and
they're in this for powered. They're not in this for you,
(27:36):
but you've empowered them to confiscate the wealth of hardworking
people and give it to you in the name of
all of this security. I'll never have to worry about
my kid's childcare. I'll never have to worry. I'll have
a government guaranteed job, government guaranteed health care, government guaranteed retirement,
government guaranteed guaranteed guarant healthy food, on and on. They
(27:56):
can't possibly do it. Their history is one of failure
after failure after failure. Why would anyone trust them?
Speaker 2 (28:04):
Last word, right, my.
Speaker 8 (28:05):
Grandmother said, and this is from a woman who lived
under communism. She said, under communism, you do not live,
you exist a miserable existence. That is the difference. Because
they ended up here in America. And my grandfather, he
had the tallest flag pole with the biggest American flag
in the neighborhood, and he would spout patriotism all the time,
(28:28):
how great America is. And and my grandmother said that,
she goes, you don't live under communism, you exist of
miserable existence.
Speaker 2 (28:36):
It's all true. And I have met people.
Speaker 1 (28:39):
You know, the Cuban American community in Miami is one
of the greatest communities you can learn from because they
escaped communism in Castro and the revolution and the property
confiscation and the murder and the mayhem and the death
and the poverty, all those false promises caused. You learn
so much from people that lived it. Anyway, I appreciate
(29:00):
you being with us, appreciate you calling my friend God
bless you. Glad you are here. And in freedom. I'd
like freedom around the world to be honest nity. You
like war, No, I don't like war. I prefer no war.
The Sean Hannity Show News
Host
Sean Hannity
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by Audiochuck Media Company.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com