#19 | MH370 Solved: Full Evidence Review | Hard Truths

MH370 is solved. I present a full breakdown of the leaked military videos, satellite footage, and insider testimony that expose the truth behind the disappearance of Malaysia Airlines Flight 370. Was this an advanced military operation? Why has the US government remained silent? Watch the full evidence review and decide for yourself.

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Malagion three times zero contacted to zero dismal Niners.

Speaker 2 (00:09):
Breaking news tonight, a Malaysia Airlines flight with two hundred
and thirty nine people on board, including four Americans, has
gone missing.

Speaker 1 (00:48):
I remembered the line from the into scripture of the
Batabadgitavish new.

Speaker 3 (00:57):
He was trying to.

Speaker 1 (00:58):
Persuade the prince that he should do his duty, and
we impressed him.

Speaker 3 (01:06):
Takes on multi armed form and says now I am
become death, the destroyer of worlds.

Speaker 1 (01:20):
Thank you everybody for being here with me tonight. Tonight
we are going to go straight into the evidence and
then I will address questions at the end. So please
hold your questions to the end. Tonight, on the anniversary
of Malaysian Airlines Flight three seven zero, I have updated
the list of all evidence in the case of my

(01:40):
investigation for the last year and a half in collaboration
with MH three seventy X, the organization that I started
to research the MH three seven zero videos. The only
thing I want to say before we begin, so this
is one clear is I am not scamming anyone or
promote vading this idea because it's popular or for it

(02:03):
to make money. For me, I one hundred percent believe
the videos are real. Anyone claiming anything to the contrary
should be considered a bad faith actor. The weight of
evidence that the videos are authentic is overwhelming, beyond really
any reasonable doubt. So the plan here is to go

(02:27):
through that evidence right now with you guys, and hopefully
convince the more people. So in the description of wherever
you're watching or listening to this, you can find a
link to this document. Right here there we go, and

(02:58):
this document is the updated evidence link, and we start
straight away with the videos. If you're watching this in
video format, you can watch the videos right now on
the screen. There are two leaked military videos that first
appeared on a tiny YouTube channel in twenty fourteen and
only gained popularity in August of twenty twenty three on

(03:20):
the subreddit UFOs. That's where I found the videos. That's
where this all began. The first video archive satellite video
called satellite video Airliner and UFOs. There's an archive link.
It's from a YouTube channel called regicided on. In the description,
it says received March twelve, twenty fourteen, uploaded May nineteenth,

(03:45):
twenty fourteen. At least that was the published date, and
then it says source protected in the metadata of this video.
Even though it doesn't say MH three seven is there
anywhere in the description. In the metadata, it actually does
say both flight three seven zero and Malaysia Airlines. So
we know one hundred percent this video is connected to

(04:07):
MH three seven zero just based on the timeline alone. Now,
the second video that came out after this is a
drone video, and this one says UAV captures Airliner and UFOs.
This is also the oldest version is also from regicideed on,

(04:30):
but this video is uploaded a few weeks later. In
the description, it says receive June fifth, twenty fourteen, uploaded
or published June twelfth, twenty fourteen, so there's a lag
between they received it and when they uploaded it. According
to the story of the videos, video shows airliner being

(04:51):
followed by three unidentified spherical objects for a short time,
then Airliner and ORBS vanish. This appears to be alt
angle to previously submitted sat footage, and then there was
a link there to the satooage, which now does not
exist on the internet anymore. So. I also it's important

(05:12):
to point out here as well that regicided a non
made a Twitter account three days after the video is published.
The first video first videos published May nineteenth, May twenty second,
regicided a no On makes a Twitter account. We found

(05:32):
the Twitter account and their posts, and on May twenty
second they say please spread this video before it's pulled,
with presumably a link to the video, and they tag
a bunch of people and they tag MH three seven
zero in there as well, and then you can see
June thirteenth, one day after they published it, or possibly

(05:55):
the same day based on time zones alt angle of
the airliner abductions received with a link. So if somebody
was faking this, it's pretty odd like it was regisied
and On involved on this. If regisided On is not
involved in these videos being produced as fakes, then it's

(06:17):
hard to understand how they could be fake at all,
given the story of regisied On being the first person
to have them on the internet. As far as we
can tell, and the story registered On is telling here
is pretty clear source protected, please spread this before it's pulled,

(06:37):
And just to be clear, there's also alternate sources, but
they all post state regisied and On. But important to
point out the Vimeo link if you translated into English,
says that regicided No was arguing for the validity of
the videos with the other people. So it seems like

(06:57):
everything goes back to registered on. Now details about these videos?
Why are these videos so important? Well, right away, the
evidence is absolutely overwhelming. In the bottom left corner, we
can see it, says NROL twenty two. This was the
first launch of the space based infrared system known as SIBBERS.

(07:21):
We've probably heard about it, talked about it on Joe
Rogan in two thousand and six, and we can clearly
see coordinates after the satellite designation. Now spoiler, we've determined
that this is a relay satellite because of its millennial orbit,
and that's exactly what we need because that first video
we saw is not simply a satellite video. It's something

(07:44):
that we're going to find out is called whammy footage
that takes fuse data from multiple sensors through relay satellites
and beams it to ground based computers so it can
produce basically a Google Video playback of the entire planet,
this ultimate DVR of the entire world. Now there's a

(08:05):
link in here to Sibber's video in this document where
you can actually watch how these satellites are scanning the
whole planet and then imagine how they would take that
censor data and send it to ground based computers to
produce essentially the video that you're seeing here of three
seven zero. Their coordinates the coordinates are the absolute smoking gun,

(08:31):
absolute undeniable smoking gun. The coordinates indicate the Nicobar Islands
a straight shot from the last military radar points straight shot.
You can see from the image here where I superimpose
the radar the satellite coordinates over this image from a

(08:56):
blog that had the actual picture from the Light Hotel
of Malaysian military radar ploted over a Google Earth map.
You can see how close it is. There's no chance
of this being a coincidence. The fact that they have
it here in a straight line means that what happened

(09:16):
is the plane kept going It kept going straight, and
then what we see happen in those videos is what
happened into the plane. The coordinates are not tracking the
plane because they don't change as the plane moves. They
only change when the person moves the screen the Whammy footage.

(09:37):
That's how the system works. They can just move it around.
But when they move it around, it changes the coordinates.
So the actual coordinates of the plane, the coordance in
the video are not the plane. It's just somewhere nearby.
It could be a huge area from what we looked up.
It could be anywhere. It could be even one hundred
kilometers or more. Also very important to point out that

(10:03):
the satellite video is a screen recording of a window. Again,
absolute smoking gun, undeniable proof. We can see the cursor
come on the screen from off the screen. If you're
on a computer, you've ever used the computer before, you
would know this indicates that somebody has a window open,

(10:26):
no question, undeniable. The cursor goes off the screen on
multiple sides. This is a window on a much larger screen.
They're recording the actual window. When they move the perspective around,
they're moving the perspective around in the window. The screen
recording is recording the window. You can tell you can

(10:50):
watch them move it around. They're using like a middle
mouse to cold down click and then move around the perspective,
but they're still within the window with the cursor. This
is impossible to fake. Far far too detailed. There's more
details to come here as well, but I just wanted

(11:10):
to point that out again. The satellite video is six
frames per second. This is consistent with all the capabilities
of WHAMMY technology, which when I've researched it recently, is
anywhere between two and ten frames per second. So the
satellite video being six frames per second is exactly within

(11:34):
that capability for spot military spy capabilities. Six frames per
second that you're seeing if you're watching this on your
screen right now, and then here you can see as
well that we found online researching it. That's exactly consistent

(11:56):
with what we're seeing here. High scene coverage, high resolution,
low frame rate, an example of WAMI sensor which is
probably not as becau as the military on There're two hurts,
one hundred and fifty megapixels seen, coverage at least ten
kilometers squared. My guess is it's much bigger than that.

(12:16):
Wammy fuses data from multiple sources and relaze it. Now,
I also want to point out that the clouds in
that video move and evolve. Hold on, and there's actually
a moment where the smoke is displacing the orbs. So

(12:42):
if you click on the link, I've actually uploaded a
clip of it, and you can see here that you
can see or the the orb is displaced by the smoke.
Here you can see the accurate fluid dynamics slowed it
down and played it over multiple times. It's easier to
see in the color amp or changed version, but if
you look at the original you will be able to
see it in the original as well. We've checked this.

(13:03):
There may be other times where it happens. This is
the most noticeable time. This detail would require a level
of visual effects that is hard to imagine would be
being used. Okay, now this zapp accurately illuminates the clouds

(13:27):
in three dimensions. This is another detail that is undeniable.
You can even see the light reflect off the nearby cloud.
You can see it reflecting off the cloud. Naturally, anyone
who's done visual effects would know that how difficult this
would be to pull off, and to pull it off perfectly.

(13:48):
The way that we see it in two videos from
two different angles just adds a level of depth that
shows it. This cannot be a picture that we're looking at.
This is not two dimension what we're looking at. What
we're looking at has depth that means it's three dimension.
This rules out so many visual effects arguments, including most

(14:12):
of the debunk attempts that have been attempted on these videos,
do not consider the fact that this must be a
three dimensional environment. Factually speaking, must be Satellite USA two
two nine was at the right location at the right
time with his sister satellite right overhead, and there's a

(14:34):
link here you can actually watch the recreated flight path.
We searched through it and search where satellites were and
found that there's one right at the right time to
be beaming data to be able to produce what we've
got going on in the video. The drone is a
General Atomics MQ variant. It's either m Q nine, MQ

(14:57):
one c MQ twenty. Avenger actually came up, which I
believe is controlled by the Navy. Very difficult to tell.
They all look almost identical. The thermal drone camera has
similar capabilities to a Westcam MX twenty. There's a link
here as well if you want to watch and see
you can tell it's got the same high resolution, smooth

(15:17):
motion capabilities. When you're watching the drone video, there's actually
accurate camera shake as the drone As the camera operator
zooms in, you can see it in the beginning of
the video, and input delay real input delay from the

(15:38):
camera operator as well. So just a couple more details
to point out. You can see that the thermal is
a literal perfect overlay on just actually MH three seven zero.
It's a real picture of the missing plane, so pretty
much a perfect match. As I say, both videos are nighttime,

(16:03):
proven proven by the fact that there are no shadows
anywhere or directional lighting anywhere on any of the clouds.
Extremely important to point that out. There are no shadows
anywhere in the video, and there's no directional lighting anywhere
in any of the clouds. It's nighttime in the videos.

(16:27):
A lot of people try to claim that it's daytime,
and I'm just I want to say that our capabilities
allow nighttime to look like daytime, especially in the computer
generated DVR playback. The proximity of the drone and the
multiple sensors recording the plane indicates that this was a

(16:48):
military operation. Everybody keeps asking why was it recording. The
answer to that is so simple, because it's an operation.
It's the only reason why they were re recording in
those videos, the only one. It's an operation. Let that

(17:11):
sink in because I found the leaker of the videos.
I found the leaker of the videos. Let me just
let that sink in everybody who's listening right now. I
found the leaker of the videos just through hard ass
work myself in twenty twenty three October of twenty twenty three.

(17:35):
That date is important. Remember that in October of twenty
twenty three, I went public saying I found the leaker.
It has to be this guy. He checks all the boxes.
He was on one of the a wax that night
during the operation. Has to be. He must have had
an emotional reaction to see that and leak those videos

(17:55):
like quickly to Regisi Nonsen, like he leaked them like
a years later. He leaked at four days after. According
to regisided On, he cropped the HUD data in the drone,
and he cropped a satellite video the way he was
tracking the plane so that we couldn't see the drone
or potentially other assets that were in the area. There's
probably more. He might have thought he was looking at

(18:19):
UFOs or aliens like a lot of people do when
they're looking at that, only to be later revealed to
him that it was actually our technology. This is just hypothetical,
but it matches the psychological profile of what might have
happened for this week now. He was assigned the VPU
two Wizard Special Projects Squadron in February of twenty fourteen.

(18:40):
They do black operations. Okay, so we've already nailed the
guy like right place, right time, right squadron. Right. That
should be enough already. But there's more. He was an
aviator lieutenant commander on the P eight Poseidon and locking
Martin ethan EP three e aries two spy planes. These

(19:03):
planes fuse collected intelligence for battlefield situational awareness. His role
was to relay that battlefield situational awareness aka video and
stuff to upper command. Lynn's lawyer was quoted saying the
investigation into him began April second, twenty fourteen. That's a
month after the plane disappeared. That's three two to three

(19:26):
weeks after registered and unclaimed to oversee the videos. In
May of twenty fourteen, Lynn accidentally left two flight manifests
in his flight suit from a deployment that included search
and rescue code names. So two months after Image three
seven zero disappears, he gets caught with flight manifest He's
not supposed to have that have search and rescue code
names on them. What other It could only be M

(19:51):
seventeen hadn't even happened yet at that point, That can
only be MH three seven zero. Defense argued the classified
information in question was available on the internet. I couldn't
even believe I read this in an open news article.

(20:13):
The Defense argued the classified information in question was available
on the internet. And he was a Navy liaison to
US Congress, meaning he was privy to the Navy's black
program portfolio, all the black projects they had to get
approved for Congress. Quietly, that was his job. So he

(20:36):
was almost certainly exposed to this technology. What he leaked
was so big it triggered a national security alert at
the highest levels. Okay, so the reason why they were
trying to come down on him as a spy. They

(20:57):
were trying to come down on him as a spi
because he triggered this you're alert. So they were trying
to say that he was a spy. But the problem
was they had to admit there was no evidence did
he ever exchanged any information with anyone from China? So
what does that mean? If we add that up, that
means he leaked something on the internet. Right, if you

(21:18):
didn't leak anything to our adversary, who do you leak
it to? Oh, the public? It had to have been
leaked to the In fact, the defense admitted it. The
defense admitted it. The defense admitted they leaked it to
the public. Right here, he got abused. They forced him

(21:39):
into pre trial detainment under questionable circumstances, and he got
abused by the goon squad, held in pre trial detainment
for over three hundred days. Why because the military was
afraid that he was going to commit gray mail. Where
the defendant says I'm just gonna blurt out national security
information to CNA or during the trial, or you just

(22:02):
charged me for less scary stuff, he must add something
real serious that he didn't want people to know about, like, hmm,
I leaked the H three seven zero videos. The United
States government took the plane with some orbs. The judge
said he had a dangerous pattern of disclosure of classified information,
but didn't point to any disclosures of classified information to

(22:27):
support that argument. It's weird, almost like there was only
one big thing and that couldn't really show that took
a plea deal, got a nine year sentence after the
plea deal, after they threw away the espionage charges after that,

(22:47):
still got nine years with three years suspended because he
worked with the NCIS and the FBI, probably to clean
up the leak of the H three seven zero videos
and make sure that it never went public. That would
be my guess for why he got three years shaved off.
He appealed in his twenty nineteen appeal, stating that his

(23:11):
sentence was too harsh, and the judge specifically argued that
what he did was extremely serious. I've never seen a
case like this ever that you could even compare to.
I dare anyone out there to find one that is
as odd as this. It can only point to something
like the MH three seven zero videos. When I foyaed

(23:35):
the NCIS, they rejected my foya in total to be
kept secret in the interest of national defense or foreign policy.
In total, they won't give me anything about it. But
someone got in touch with Lynn's lawyer, Larry Younger, and
they proved it by posting a voicemail from Younger too

(24:00):
them trying to get back in touch with them for
having missed their phone call. And the same day they
posted the voicemail They posted that they had the conversation
with Younger and asked about satellite video kind of covertly,
and that Larry Younger said that the FED set brought

(24:20):
satellite video into the case. If that statement can be corroborated,
game over. He's the guy, why, because no one on
this planet even knew we had satellite video unless you
were already in black operations or you have been following me.
I'm the guy that's been promoting that we have the

(24:41):
satellite video capability through the research that I make three
seventy X is done. There is nobody else that's been
saying that we even predate the claims that were made
in the November UFO hearing where it was finally admitted
by Tim Galladett and Michael Schellenberger that the government has
satellite video of UFOs, which would imply that we have

(25:02):
salite video capabilities. So the first time it's ever publicly
been stated, and we already proved it before that. So
the fact that there's satellite video being brought into Edward
Lynn's case proves beyond any shadow of a doubt that
he must be the guy. But there's one more thing

(25:24):
that's not on here. I revealed his name in October
of twenty twenty three, publicly started saying his name on
all the podcasts that he was the guy that leaked
the videos and hopes that he would reach out to
me and talk to me and do the right thing
and say that he was the guy that leaked it
and come forward and be a whistleblower. And in response,

(25:47):
not only did he not reach out to me, and
I know he got the message because I reached out
to the law firm that represented him in October. He
legally changed his name December twenty ninth, twenty twenty three,
two two and a half months after I started publicly
saying his name on podcast Instead of reaching out to me,

(26:11):
he filed for a name change request from Edward Sea
Lynn to Edward James Soriah. And it's interesting because when
I reached out to his company and left a message
that I'm sure got to him that he was my
heroes what I wanted them to say. They all knew
him as Edward Lynn, meaning he was not ashamed of

(26:33):
being Edward Lynn. Everybody knows him as Edward Lynn is
Eddie Lynn, So why would he put a name change request?
And after he'd already got on our prison, he'd been working,
had already started his own company. Everything's going fine, there's
no reason to change your name. And then all of
a sudden, the guy says, you leaked these crazy videos,
and it's saying Edward Sea Lynn leaked H three seven

(26:54):
zero videos, and now all of a sudden changes his name.
Lawyer won't respond phone calls or voicemail messages. I want.
All I'm asking for is confirmation of the statement he's
already made to somebody else. Edward Lynn won't respond. Family

(27:14):
members won't respond. This is the behavior of guilty people,
beyond any shadow of a doubt. Beyond any shadow of
a doubt. This is not a joke. This is not
a game. What I'm telling you right now is one
real how to proceed. I don't know. We're in unsharded territories.
I'm doing my best here as just a normal random

(27:35):
guy that came across this information. Is clearly uncovered something
just absolutely huge huge. So now the story of MH
three seven zero. So this is a combination of what

(27:56):
I think happened to the plane, and then some of
the arguments for some the other planes are on the
plane So there are two lengths here to the flight
path video and flight path explain our video if you
want to see both the flight path and understand it visually.
And then my short explainer video is a little bit outdated,
but still pretty accurate in terms of what I think happened.

(28:17):
So first most important part is the plane didn't crash
in the South Indian Ocean. No debris field found. Plane
would have exploded. That thousands of pieces, whether or not
I had fuel in there or not, hidden in the
ocean from the sky. It's a massive, massive plane of
Bowing triple seven. We did the most expensive search in
history and didn't find anything above or below water. Let

(28:40):
me make that clear. The search didn't find anything. Nothing. Ever,
in eleven years, no black boxes were found, despite that
they can produce signal below signal depths of twenty thousand feet.
There's no problem that it wasn't below the signal depths
of the black boxes. They found nothing. Ever, none of

(29:01):
the four redundant emergency transponder beacons activated. They only activate
on crash. None of them activated. The argument people make is, oh, well,
it was like a They must the pilot must have
just decided to like somehow perfectly land the plane on
the ocean without triggering the ELTs. It's like it's just

(29:23):
a continual like more and more excuses they have to
be made for this, like tortured logic to try to
continue to believe that somehow this plane went down to
the South Indian Ocean. SOCAS system, the sound surveillance system
by the Navy would have heard it, just like they
heard the titan sub pop where the Navy said nothing
for five days when the sub popped off the next

(29:44):
of the Titanic, so that system one thousand percent so
system would have heard Malaysian airlines crashing into the ocean.
Doesn't matter where it literally anywhere on the planet, they
would have heard it. It's a system they've had since
like the fifties. There's a Cardiff University scientist I think
paper that found no strong candidate signal acoustic detections. They

(30:07):
even compared other historical situations, did the math for the
mass of the plane under different speeds going into the ocean,
and under all of those circumstances, both hydroacoustic systems within
range should have heard the plane hit in the ocean.
Neither of them did. The only acoustic dection when they
tried to torture themselves into was over almost an hour

(30:29):
after the plane would have ran out of fuel, which guys,
planes don't fly without fuel, so can't possibly be that
one either right off the bat, So no acoustic detection
that so we have absolute scientific proof that the plane
didn't crash in the South Indian Ocean. There's scientific proof.
It's just a matter of people don't want to accept it.
That's the reality of the situation, even after just no

(30:51):
results after eleven years. Scientific proof that they're wrong doesn't matter,
just people refuse to admit that they couldn't possibly that
they've been lied to. I also want to point out
that in the location where the plane supposedly was lost
from radar, there's still five radars in range. This isn't

(31:12):
a joke either. This is from the Royal Aeronautical Society
twenty nineteen report. You can find on YouTube. Five radars
in range. Still what I feel like I'm taking crazy pills.
So we're just gonna pretend like the plane was lost
from radar when there's no way it possibly could have
been lost from radar where they're claiming it does not

(31:37):
feel like a very very very important fact, undeniable fact.
Look at all the radars in range there. The excuse
is India and Thailand just haven't said anything, and we're
just gonna ignore that they haven't said anything. And Indonesia
just says they were just off that night. Sorry, they

(31:57):
were just off. I'm not kidding. That's their literal excuse.
What Okay. So there's multiple radars as well that would
have seen the plane, like Jorn this gingerly operational radar
network in Australia, Diego, Garcia, Coco Islands, Pine Gap. I mean,

(32:19):
these have radar systems. They are going to see rit
planes for like thousands of miles. They're called over the horizon.
There's also no witnesses that saw the plane, even though
they claimed the plane crashed in the morning hours on
an active shipping route in the South Indian Ocean. So
there's no witnesses either. And now there's one more fact

(32:42):
I want to point out as well. A lot of
people say, well, the ocean is really big. Realize, like
they've at people, it's not a situation where they don't
think they know where it is. They think they know
exactly where the plane is. It is just not there.
This isn't a situation where the plane could be anywhere.
It's not. They're like, oh, we have these satellite pings.

(33:02):
If you believe these satellite pings are real, then we
know almost exactly where the plane is. We just have
to search this arc. And they've been searching that arc
for eleven years and found nothing. So there's nowhere else
for the plane to go. The arc is where the
plane runs out of fuel. That's it. Game over. Nowhere

(33:24):
else for it to be. Let that sink thing. I
want to say it one more time. It's super important.
There's nowhere else for the plane to be. For when
people say the ocean is really big, you say they've
searched everywhere the plane could possibly be. There is nowhere
else for it to be. The only conclusion that can
be made is that the plane never went in the

(33:47):
South Indian Ocean, and the evidence that led us to
that conclusion must be phony only conclusion that can be made.
I don't want to make a conclusion like that, but
we must make it because the evidence of it is overwhelming.

(34:08):
I also want to point out that nineteen families of
the victims signed a statement saying that they could call
the victim's phones for up to four days after the
plane disappeared, which is not contrary to the one guy
that they got to go on every major station and
make up the lie that that happens. They literally just
got the same exact guy to go on every single

(34:29):
mainstream media news. If you don't believe me, go check.
I couldn't believe it when I saw Jeff kit Kagan
is his name. Every single one had the same guy
come on and say, yeah, phones still ring all the
time when there's no power, when they're on the bottom
of the ocean or whatever. I couldn't believe they had
the same guy. And they have the link that I
posted in this clip is the actual video of the

(34:50):
guy calling. For like a second or two, you can
actually see a video of the guy calling crazy man. Okay,
So the plane didn't crash inside to the ocean. We
just we have to conclude that, regardless of what we
want to believe about MH three seven zero, we have
to conclude the plane didn't crash in the South Indian Ocean.
There's just no evidence that it did none at all.

(35:12):
And then people will say, well, but what about the debris,
didn't they didn't somebody find some debris, not the official search.
Random people in twenty fifteen, about a year after the
plane disappeared, started finding debris and saying, wait, is this
from MHS three seven zero and where were they? Were

(35:34):
they in Australia where all the drift models showed that
the debris should wash ashore in western Australia. No, they
were in Africa, Africa. So people start searching around Africa.
Sure enough, more people start finding debris from MHS three
seven zero in Africa, but not not like close to Australia,

(35:55):
like in like Tanzania, South Africa, way way too far
away from where they were searching. But it makes sense
because what did I just say in the previous statement.
The plane didn't crash in the South Indian Ocean. So
now that we're seeing debris wash ashore in Africa, we
should be asking the question, wait, where did the plane

(36:19):
actually go? Huh? So when you look at the debris
that they claim to have found as well, the amount
of debris that was found does not even approve the
plane crashed. This main cabin interior panel that everybody's probably
looking at right here is not what CNN is making

(36:40):
it look to be no piece that was that big.
The largest piece was the flap, which you can see
in the middle of your screen. That was the largest
piece found, the flap, And look at how tiny it
is compared to the size of the wing. You can
fly a plane without a flap and land the plane
without a flap. There was not even enough evidence, enough

(37:03):
debris found to even remotely claim that the proofs of
plane crashed. You can just see it with your eyes.
Only three confirmed pieces, and the confirmed pieces did not
use unique serial numbers. This is important to point out
for the conspiracy theorists. This is a factual statement. The

(37:24):
confirmed pieces did not use unique serial numbers. The unique
cereal plate was missing from the flat. I'm seriously missing.
They used part numbers, which I would argue most people
argue easily could be forged, change messed around with. However,
I do believe this debris is from MH three to

(37:45):
seven zero. I do believe that. I just believe that
the South Indian Ocean narrative cannot possibly be correct. There's
just no evidence for it. So MH three seven zero
ended up. Whatever ended up means somewhere closer to Africa,
not in the South Indian Ocean somewhere closer to Africa. Now,

(38:06):
there's some really amazing charts here that show the ocean
currents which cannot be changed, not yet at least, And
you can see that there's no way that the debris
can be from the location where they've been searching. The
ocean currents flow to the east. And you can also
see how absurd it is to think that our last

(38:27):
location of the plane is somewhere in the Malacca Straits,
but that for some reason we're searching about as far
away as possible from that location in the middle of nowhere.
Like you couldn't come up with a better story for like,
just go search in the middle of nowhere, just down
the block over there, just keep searching. You just search
in the middle of nowhere instead of the smart places,

(38:48):
which would be like hmm, does the perpetrator have any
hideouts nearby? Right? Like does the perpetrator who could have
pulled this off have any hideouts or what we would
call military base? That was just vernacular. Oh, I'll look
at this dot here I put called Diego Garcia. Look

(39:08):
at the location of the debris relative to the ocean currents,
relative to the island of Diego or of the Maldives
in the US military base of Diego, Garcia. Look at
that location that looks like are I'm not an oceanographer

(39:29):
or whatever the shit you have to be, but it
looks like a pretty solid match to where I would
imagine DeBrito drift from Diego, Garcia to Africa in the year.
Now there's another this at This model is my favorite
model that I've ever seen in actual life ever, because
there's a model out there you can find if you
guys just google, like there's the most common one you

(39:52):
find that's got like blue, green, pink and red and
it looks like spaghetti strings. This was done before they
found they need debris, and these are the best ones
because the only models you can believe are ones that
have no bias in them. And with this model, they
found right away that all the debris would have washed
ashore in Western Australia, like all of it, like even

(40:13):
in two years. It wouldn't have made it to the
Reunion Islands, not even in two years. And they found
the debris just a little bit after one year. So
a little bit after one year, this debris is like
still near Australia so they found and then they tried
to like wreckcon this after the fact, which is just
hilarious is what they do, right when they try to

(40:34):
lie they said, no, it's it like that. People will
just literally with no substantiation whatsoever, just claim no, it's
consistent with my models. No it's not. I can see
the model right there. It says, right there, no chance
within the time period we found could that debris have
washed ashore in the Reunion Islands and that's the closest
location any debris was found. Not possible. You can see

(40:55):
it right there. All the debris, the vast, vast majority
of it, ninety five ninety nine percent of it should
have been washing ashore in Western Australia. Crazy right, Okay.
It's also physically impossible for the debris to have drifted,
just based on the maps I was showing you before,

(41:16):
from the location to like South Africa. Just physically not possible,
no matter what you think, no matter which direction you think,
the ocean currents go, couldn't make it too far away.
The barnacles on the flap only showed four months of growth,
but it had to been in the water for over
a year. And then there was growth on the area
they claimed was exposed to the air. This is how

(41:38):
they were arguing that the flat was able to somehow
defy the laws of physics. They claimed that, oh no,
it was just it was exposed, so it was like
blowing like a sail. But there was barnacles along the
edge that was supposedly out of the water, So that
doesn't work. That means it had to be underwater. That
means you can't use that excuse. Their answer to that,

(42:00):
no answer, They don't say anything. This is another huge
piece of point on there's actually two pieces that have
clear one undeniable burn marks on them with the honeycomb
pattern of a Boeing aircraft. Meaning there's not really any
other people that have pieces that look like this, and

(42:23):
it was found in the same time period on you know,
in the ocean, and you can just see the burn
marks on it. You can even see the heat damage
on that in the circle part in the top right.
You explain that that burn damage without some type of
fire right, hard to imagine, especially if you're trying to
claim that it was like us. They flew the plane

(42:45):
for eight hours and then just smoothly landed into the water.
Well why am I seeing burn damage on this piece
of the debris that you're telling me is from the plane.
And there's another piece as well that I don't have
a link to on here, but you can find all
the debris. There's more. This one was just a little
bit more clear that you know, anybody can just tell
what fire damage looks like. There was also a Boeing

(43:08):
Triple seven fire suppression bottle that washed up in the
Mall Deeps just two weeks March twenty fifth after the
plane disappeared. Some people have tried to claim this is
from some other thing. It's a perfect match to a
Boweing Triple seven fire supresson device, no doubt whatsoever. It
can only have washed ashore if it's empty, and it

(43:29):
even has a serial number that you can even see
on there, or at least a partial serial number. This
was just ignored and said that it's not connected without
ever even being looked into. Nobody ever even looked into it,
which to me would imply a cover up, because why
would you not look into a piece of evidence because
you've already decided that you don't want to look into it,
and you can't look into it now. I also point

(43:51):
out that I Foyer requested this fire suppression bottle to
the NSA and the CIA, and by one of them
I got rejected, or buy both of them, but I
got one of them. I got rejected in a way
that they have it. They just they refused to give
me the evidence. So why would they have evidence about
a buoyant triple seven fire depression bttle because they know

(44:12):
it's connected to MH three seven zero, simple as that.
So what does that lead us to? Fire scenario? Fire scenario?
This was the underlooked scenario of MH three seven zero
that ended up being true. And it's a little embarrassing
that more people didn't go with the scenario because there

(44:33):
were multiple articles I found out there by multiple different people,
by multiple experts, claiming that it was almost certainly a fire,
some of them before it was even revealed that there
were lithium ion batteries in the cargo with the plane,
not just a few, but a lot, five hundred pounds
of them, four hundred and eighty seven to be exact.
Now in the MH three seven zero, but in the

(44:54):
drone video we can see a heat signature in the
belly of the plane. One of the first things people
pointed out was fire. And the weird part was I
didn't even consider the fire event back then. I didn't
even know there were people considering it. So when people
said fire, I, initially as the lead investigator, I actually
dismissed it. It wasn't until a couple months later, in
October of twenty twenty three as well, that I found

(45:17):
Catherine T's sighting that were supporting the fire event, and
I went, wait a minute, and started looking into it
and realized it probably really was a fire. So we
had four hundred and eighty seven pounds of lifting my
own batteries assembled that day in a really sketchy way.
I might add, if you just go look at the

(45:37):
official report by the ATSB, and they missed two security screenings.
I mean, that's a recipe for disaster. Two of the
palettes of batteries that were safely unsafely packaged, clearly just
looking at the pictures, packaging and cardboard were in the

(45:58):
forward cargo bay next to the electronics bay. And this
is basically exactly what happened to UPS Flight six. This
is what former Director uh Security Director of the FAA,
Billy Vincent told me in a personal conversation with I
had with him that he already found the articles where

(46:19):
he was already implying this before they knew about the batteries,
and he said, this is pretty much what happened in
the UPS flight six. When I spoke to him about
where the batteries were, what have you, he said, I'm
one hundred percent sure it was a fire. He was
one hundred percent convinced that was fire. Mike McKay saw
a witness saw m a street cents You're on fire
for a few seconds when it got dark. This was

(46:40):
early in the morning, right at the exact same time
the plane went dark, which would indicate that the fire
would cause an electrical fire that damaged the electronics bay.
There were then fishermen ten minutes later off the coast
that her that saw the plane flying low going back
the other way towards Malaysia. And then after the plane

(47:03):
goes over to Malaysia, goes over Penang and doesn't land
a Penang for whatever reason. It goes out into the ocean,
and then Catherine t in the middle of nowhere out
in the ocean sees the glowing orange plane flying low
no navigation lights with smoke, dark smoke coming around the
back of it at around eighteen forty UTC in the

(47:27):
Nicobar Islands, and she has multiple blog posts over the years.
She's always stuck by her sighting, her and what she
claims she saw. And I spoke to her personally as well,
and absolutely believe that she doesn't a single dishonest thought
or bone in her. She sounds like a person who's
just telling it like she saw it. She saw something

(47:48):
absolutely incredible that night, so she sees the plane in
that area, and her sighting corroborates the videos because we
see the smoke coming off the plane in the videos,
and we see the plane flying low in the videos
because of the clouds, we can tell it's flying low.
So it's perfectly consistent with her siting, but not just

(48:10):
her sighting. Also a only reported in the China Times
a May Day intercepted from MH three seven zero to
the US Navy by China of the plane disintegrating and
attempting an emergency landing. And they even give a time
the time two forty three am. That's eighteen forty three UTC.

(48:39):
That's within three minutes of Catherine T's sighting. That's within
three minutes of when we plotted the plane would be
near those coordinates, just finding having the plan going straight.
So we have three sources of corroboration. Two videos military

(48:59):
videos perfect sync with location of them that we can
figure out the time Catherine T's sighting of seeing the
smoke coming out the plane and the glowing the orange
with the fire. And then we also have an intercepted
communication that implies the US Navy is responsible. If they
were communicating with the plane, they're the ones responsible. If
they're the ones filming the videos, they're the ones responsible.

(49:22):
I mean, it clearly implicates the United States Navy. And
here it is. I'm just gonna read it out. In addition,
the US Embassy in China said that at two forty
three am, the US military based U Taypo, Thailand, monitored
emergency SOS signal from Malaysian Airlines flight three seven zero,
in which the pilot of the plane called that the
cabin was about to disintegrate and that they wanted to

(49:44):
make an emergency landing. The US Army in Thailand has
provided this signal to the Malaysian side. What the actual hell?
What what the actual hell? It was only a few
investigators talking about this early on, and no one talks
about it since you watch anybody's YouTube video about this

(50:06):
other than mine, and you're not going to hear them
mention this. I mean, why are we just ignoring the
fact that there was an intercepted May Day call of
the plane on fire? What are you kidding me? Do
I need more evidence that the plane was on fire? Okay,
you need more? Here's more. What were they saying the
day the plane disappeared March eighth? When the plane disappears,

(50:27):
what was the first thing they said? Usually the first
thing they say is not going to be covered up yet,
right because they're reacting emotional and they're just trying to
get information out. Then then they have to start stop
giving information out and start coming up with a cover story.
So what did they say? Right away? They say, Soubang
Air Traffic Control lost contact at two forty a m.

(50:51):
What you're claiming you lost contact the same time Catherine
T saw the plane within three minutes of the call.
Is the time you're saying you lost contact with the plane.
And then they had to change that later on they
had to back away from it and say, no, just kidding,
we actually We lost contact way earlier than that. We

(51:12):
lost contact at one thirty, not not two forty. We
just we just forgot what time it was. You need
more evidence. Why did they change the time? Why did
they change the time of the last communication of the plane?

(51:32):
We know why. So the videos explain why we didn't
find a burnt up plane. You say, Okay, if it
was a fire, clearly it's a fire. I mean, that's
look at how much evidence there is obviously a fire.
Why do we not find a burnt up plane? This
is an important point to make for a lot of
the theories out there. Where's the plane? Well, when you

(51:58):
watch the videos, you can tell we didn't find a
burnt up plane somewhere, least somewhere where. Keep in mind,
the plane's not gonna be able to stand on fire
for eight hours now. Billy Vincent actually tried to argue
with me that it could stand on fire for many hours.
But we've got a may day call. This sounds like
this was a desperate situation. The videos indicate that this

(52:18):
plane was about to go down, so you know this
was on its last legs because of this fire. It
was not going to last that long. So we searched everywhere.
The plane would have gone down if it was a fire.
That's the problem. But the videos come into play, and
now we're watching something abnormal. Now we're watching something really

(52:39):
really abnormal, And now we have to throw out all
of our orthodox thinking. We have to be heterodox thinkers now.
And we have to remember that energy is neither created
nor destroyed. And a Boeing Triple seven is an extremely
massive object, two hundred and thirty nine people on board.

(53:02):
So if this was being turned into a bomb of
some sort, we should be seeing a massive mushroom cloud here.
It can't just be getting annihilated unless there's just completely
changing the laws of physics. And some people would say, well,
are you saying it was teleported? Yes, And then they
would say, well, doesn't that break the laws of physics? No, Actually, surprisingly,

(53:27):
teleportation does not break the laws of physics. It's just
not accepted at the moment. Wormholes are what we would
call teleportation, and a wormhole at the quantum level er
equals EPR is known as quantum entanglement. And there is

(53:47):
this notion that quantum entanglement at the quantum level is
basically little wormholes, and that then the answer would be,
all we have to do is make a wormhole at
the large scale, and then if we do that, we
now achieved what we would call teleportation, which is to
really actually simplify it faster than light travel from the
person who's looking at that thing. When you demystify it,

(54:12):
it's not as magical sounding and a lot more plausible.
And if you think that that's outlandish, well, you know what,
it is a little bit outlandish. Not going to lie
to you. But at the same time, you look at
how little we've progressed from a propulsion and engineering perspective
in the last fifty to seventy years, and ask yourself

(54:36):
why and if that's really the case, and if it
imagine that if we were actually advancing, where would we
be and what would we have. I think that everything
lines up kind of nicely towards Yeah, we've just been
hiding our progress in those areas. So this was a
US Navy operation, probably the CIA involved as well. I'm

(54:58):
not too picky. Blame whichever military organizations you want, but
this isn't just like a rogue band of people or
what have you. I've considered those scenarios of rogue you know,
Wakanda scenarios, what have you. Nah, This is just listen.
This is the US Military, the US Military Drome, General
Thomas Jerrome, US Navy. It's over the water. The guy
who leaked the videos is Navy. I mean everyone's pointing

(55:22):
to the Navy. So here's a picture that we made
that shows where the plane would be getting teleported. Now,
I want to point out this technology we see here.
This is just me giving you my kind of off
the wall opinion on this. I don't think this technology
is I think they figured this technology out and they've
been advancing it, but I think it has a long

(55:43):
way to go. And we're not talking about teleporting people
to Xenu or to the to the Sun or something
like that. Yet. We're talking about like local short distance teleportation.
And that's what I think they did here. I think
they did some sort of a short hop from the
location where the plane was in the Nicobar Islands west

(56:04):
somewhere over here near the Maldives, and then they that
somehow I think, put out the fire, which seems weird,
but when you actually look at the physics, you realize
that like this teleportation would be an endothermic event where
it absorbs energy. And the weird thing about the lithium
ion batteries is that the only reason why they're unstoppable
is because they have so much energy packed into them.

(56:27):
So if somehow that zapp sucks the energy out of
the batteries, the plane is just fine. I mean, if
it was fine before it, it's not going to keep
burning up anymore. So it's like, one of the first
thoughts I had about this was like, that would be
like a really weird way to save the plane. Like,
imagine the weirdest way ever to save the plane is
like put some orbs on it to like put the
fire that puts the batteries fire out. Like that would

(56:49):
almost seem like you set the fire just to put
it out yourself, you know, like it's way too convenient,
Like why would you you know, how could you have
that planned? Don't worry, We're gonna get to that. So
the motive then, Okay, why would the US do something
like this, which they did. They did do this shit.
They did this shit. Nobody believes it, but they did
this shit. The answer is the free scale semi conductor engineers.

(57:12):
I mean, if you assume that they did do it,
then the free scale semi conductor engineers are undeniably the
reason why you got twenty people on the plane, all
from the same company. They're all sitting next to each other.
Some of them even have their family with them, but
they're going to like a one week trip overseas. Seems
really bizarre. It breaks policies, all company policies of like

(57:34):
that have like intellectual property like this would this would
break the policy that would say you shouldn't allow these
people to all be on the same flight. And it's shot.
Nine or eight of them are Chinese nationals and the
company works has contracts with US Aerospace and defense. They
also and this was incredible, Like I literally could never

(57:55):
have imagined there would be this much incriminating evidence that
points to the semiconductor people being the guy. There's a
two thousand and five NSA security report about this company
and a couple other companies, but mainly this company about
how they were advancing towards room temperature superconductive microchips, which
guys as nowadays, it's funny how much like the times

(58:16):
have changed so much in the last twenty years or
even the last ten years, where now people like when
I talk about room temperature, super microchips. People are immediately
thinking like, oh, quantum computers, AI stuff like that. Yes, yes,
so yes, we know that's the shit, right, that's the
that's the jam. So we have these people on board
the plane, okay, and they had just launched a major

(58:39):
initiative serving the RF power needs for US aerospace and defense.
So what are the possible narratives so I will not
get offend it if people are pushing narratives that actually
fit the evidence, actually don't get in offended at all,
but that primarily I prefer ones that would prefer this.
So one is counter espionage. You're preventing defectors from going

(59:00):
to China with intellectual property. This could be a spy
or spy kind of situation. In fact, I think that's
what it is. Could be a show force USA versus
China versus Russia, some kind of shadow arms race to
develop ORB technology. Maybe it's the UFO technology, alien technology,
Atlantean technology. Who knows who cares, but maybe that's going
on in that case. This is like a who's your

(59:22):
daddy moment? Like we're so far beyond where you're at,
Like you got to look over your shoulder every time,
every time you do anything. This is like a moment
where you do something like this to tell them like
we know everything you know, and we know that we
own you. We own you, bitch. That's basically why you
would do something like this. It could, though, also be

(59:42):
a rescue operation. That plane was doomed. Landing in the
ocean is going to break that plane apart. I don't
care what some of these people try to claim about
how it was just perfectly land the plane in the ocean.
Boeing Triple seven, no bowing triple seven is gonna rip up.
Do you guys just see that plane Alaska or Canada
like hit the hit the ice and then flipped over

(01:00:04):
and the wings broke off, like the moment one of
your wings hits anything. It's the wings are gonna crack
off and that plane's gonna do a barrel roll and
crack in half. Anyone's saying a otherwise, it just has
not seen planes in aerodynamics. So this plane was doomed.
So maybe there was a VIP passenger that called in
their rescue me button they get out of for jail

(01:00:26):
free card. They just said save me. I don't know.
I mean, it's pretty weird that they and also the
fact that it could have put out the fire. It's
just it seems very organized, like too organized, like way
too organized. Actually it could also been an experiment. You know.
If this technology is relatively new and they generally know

(01:00:46):
what it does, you know, maybe they thought, Okay, well,
here's the perfect opportunity to use it. We're gonna kill
these people anyway, or whatever we plan to do to them,
you know, might as well zap them with some orbs
and see if they come out the other side, or
like hills have eyes type people, or if they you know,
are okay, or maybe they come back with mustaches from
the bizarro dimension. Who knows. Maybe it's alien technology and

(01:01:10):
we have to text it out before we use it
on the aliens, or something that we're gonna fight. I
don't know. Once again, I don't care what the answer is.
I just want us to admit that we, the United
States Navy, did this to the plane, because clearly they did.
Now I want to point out everybody was blaming the
United States for some reason, United the world ignores this

(01:01:30):
like everyone just acts like nobody knows who did it.
Everyone's blaming the United States except for the United States, everyone, Russia.
The gru report claims the United States Navy diverted the plane.
China Times is saying that the US Navy had communications
with m H three seven zero, clearly implicating the US Navy.

(01:01:57):
The Prime Minister of Malaysia Maati, the most respected prime
minister ever Malaysian's history. Who's prime minister right before this
happened and after this happened, and he had a guy
in between his time that came in and said the
plane win in the South Indi the ocean, and then
that guy went to prison for being a criminal. And

(01:02:19):
then the other prime minister came back again and he
said that the CIA did it. So Malaysians prime minister
said the CIA did it because they did do it,
because they did do it, because they clearly did it.
Because he's like, of course they've saw the plane. You're
an idiot if you think the United States government doesn't

(01:02:41):
know exactly what happened to MH three seven zero. They
know exactly what happened. I'm not talking about vaguely. They
know exactly what happened and why it happened and everything.
And anybody claiming the United States government doesn't know has
not been paying attention, has not looked at the Foyer
request or the stack of Foyer rejections that I have
from every agency in the United States about MH three

(01:03:02):
seven to zero. And if they were not involved, there'd
be no reason for the level of secrecy involved in
this plane. Okay. It was also reported that Malaysia was
given information by the United States on condition that they
not reveal it, which is probably that we orbed the

(01:03:24):
plane away and they can't talk about it. China leaked
satellite imagery onto the Internet. They leaked satellite imagery on
in there on March twelfth, four days after the plane
goes away. They leak imagery on the Internet that looks
really similar to what we're seeing in the satellite video.

(01:03:46):
It just looks like it's further away, like it's not
as good resolution, and it's a still image as opposed
to a video, but it looks like three objects spinning
around something else with low altitude cumulus clouds. Pretty unusual
that China just leaked these internet images on the Internet
and had people think like, oh, it's a debris field somewhere,
and then they searched there was no debris field, So

(01:04:07):
what was this what was this all about. It looks
like this is a message to the United States intelligence
agencies saying we'd know what you did, we know you're responsible,
and we can corroborate that. Why Because China hacked the
Malaysian government of Marsi nine three days prior, and they
stole the crisis meeting minute notes and classified info about
M three seven zero. So they stole most likely the

(01:04:28):
classified communications between MH three seven zero and the United
States Navy. United States Navy was in communication with the
plane and they had they classified those communications, and China
stole them. And so China knew one that the United
States Navy was responsible. And this was them saying we
know what you did. The French father on the Netflix

(01:04:53):
documentary was told that there were two American A wax
spy planes in the area and the mayor Americans know
what happened. Everybody was saying the Americans did it. Everybody.
Edward C. Lynn, US Navy Special operator, US Navy implied

(01:05:15):
even the US Navy was saying they did it, or
the US military was saying they did it. I couldn't
believe this. Here's even a quote confirmed Sibbers provided data
to the intelligence community to help solve the mystery of
Malaysian Airlines Flight three seven zero. This is the art
of what we do, says Colonel Mike Jackson, four hundred
and sixtieth Operation Group Commander at Buckley, Officials at the

(01:05:38):
four underd and fifty of space Wing, that's actually where
the space wing is confirmed that SIBBERS provided technical data
to the intelligence community to help solve the mystery of
Malaysian Airlines Flight three seven zero, which disappeared over the
Indian Ocean March fourteenth, twenty fourteenth. Who is there any
about there? Still don't think that the United States knows

(01:05:58):
what happened on the plane. Everybody says the United States
did it, including the United States literally admitting that their
Sibber system knows what happened to the plane. And we're
looking at leaked, possibly SIBBERS video of the plane recorded
by the United States intelligence agencies. I'm actually a little
bit surprised that it's this hard to convince people at

(01:06:20):
this point. Doesn't that like beyond any shadow of a
possible doubt, like case closed, what else is there to
even discover? So the cover up? Obviously the United States
did it, No question so can we show how they proved?
Can we prove the lie? Yeah, we improved the lie

(01:06:42):
as well. Oh this isn't the thing, okay, So there's
some interesting facts about the plane, about the cover up here.
So the satellite coordinat it could only be the nick
of our islands because the videos pre date the whole

(01:07:05):
South Indian Ocean narrative. The videos say they were received
March twelfth March twelve, twenty fourteen, but the South Indian
Ocean narrative was not even developed March thirteenth till March thirteenth,
And when and who pushed that? Unnamed US officials aka
intelligence officials started leaking information to the media on March

(01:07:29):
thirteenth that Mia Street seven and zero flew into the
South Indian Ocean. Now, not only are we implicating the
US military, but they're the ones who spread the fake
story that the plane winning the South Indian Ocean. They're
the ones who sent us the wrong location. Why are
we believing the people that literally everybody said was responsible.

(01:07:53):
It's like going to the killer and asking where the
bodies are at. There's not going to send you to
the real location. The real locations dieve Garcia by the way,
we're going to get to it in a minute. That's
where the plane went. So the White House was calling
Malaysia every day. Again, there's no reason for the White
House to be calling Malaysia every day. You leave that

(01:08:13):
to your state department. There was one adult American on
board the plane. Would why would the White House be
calling every day? And you'd think, oh, because they care
so much? Then why was that? President Obama's first press
conference about MGHS three seven zero wasn't until ten days
later on March seventeenth. I think it was March seventeenth,
maybe March nineteenth. He waited ten days to talk about

(01:08:37):
MH three seven zero. Why because he had to wait
till the cover story was built. Why didn't Why didn't
Obama talk about the missing plane the next day? He
was like, I would have expected a press conference literally
on March eighth about the plane disappearing. Instead he waited
ten days to even discuss it. And then after that

(01:08:58):
he went to Malaysia for the first time any president
has gone to Malaysian over fifty years. Obama goes to
Malaysia the next month in April, and he gets a
couple sound bites about MH three seven zero, but barely

(01:09:19):
discusses it and never discusses MH three seven zero publicly
ever again, Go check it. I couldn't believe it, I
asked AI. I looked to myself. President Obama never discussed
MH three seven zero ever again after he visited Malaysia
in August in April, at least not in any public way,

(01:09:39):
in any serious way. I mean, if you couldn't ask
for a perfect lineup to incriminate the United States, and
they're exacting exactly how you would act if you were
the person who was the person who perpetuated the crime,
perpetrated to the crime, and then was covering it up,

(01:10:01):
also pointing out that Rolls Royce was silent even though
they have two engines that transmit data independently, and that
these engine data should have been transmitting, but that data
has never been revealed publicly. Why because the data would
show what really happened to the plane and they couldn't
allow that to happen. There were Cope Tiger and Cobra

(01:10:22):
gold exercises that had just begun and ended that were
happening in the exact area, and Cope Tiger's operations that
year with search and rescue, which corroborates the search and
rescue code names from Edward c Lynn's flight manifests that
he was caught with. So actually the literal cope tiger

(01:10:44):
themed that year with search and rescue. So there's no
way all of the US Navy assets would have been
in the area because there was military exercises going on
right there in the area where we had the coordinates happening,
So the assets were there. You've got the right time
for it to happen. And this also proves as well,
the US knows what happened. You're not going to have
a rogue bowing Triple seven flying past US military exercises

(01:11:08):
and I'm not see it makes no sense they as
Matthias Chang said, it's like flying into the heart of
the storm. You're going to like the exact wrong way
to take a plane. The Minister of Defense admitted that
he was in contact with the US about spy satellites
in the region. If you don't believe me, well.

Speaker 3 (01:11:33):
Regions he received data from.

Speaker 1 (01:11:46):
So yes, they were in touch with the United States,
and yes they had received data from Rolls Royce which
has never been made publicly available. Once again, all I'm
doing is showing the receipts from the publicly available press conferences.
You can find them out there now. The Minister of
Defense also said that they knew the plane was not hostile,
which means they had communications with the plane that they

(01:12:08):
have not revealed. This is so important because I've just
told you that there was United States military communications with
the plane, that they must have been classified, and that
China probably stole those communications. Well, we have the military,
the number one official in Malaysia related to the case.
The Minister of Defense literally admits they knew the plane
was not hostile. This is only possible if they had

(01:12:31):
communications with the plane that they have not revealed. Otherwise,
if you did not have communications with the plane, you
could never rule out a pilot rogue pilot or a
hijacking scenario. Those both require communications to confirm. So let's
listen to him in his own words.

Speaker 2 (01:12:50):
Don send digits up. If you have conceded earlier that
you knew very early in the morning the plane was missing,
there was four and a half hours time in which to.

Speaker 4 (01:12:58):
Resort commercial it was from our airspace. We're not at
war with anybody.

Speaker 1 (01:13:06):
If it doesn't answer, go up.

Speaker 2 (01:13:08):
In hindsight, would you agree that we wouldn't be in
the situation we are now, which is.

Speaker 4 (01:13:14):
I don't so, I don't think that speculatives. Even if
we send it back, Are you going to say that
we're going to shoot it down?

Speaker 1 (01:13:21):
No, Jesus said that, not me.

Speaker 4 (01:13:25):
I'm asking you.

Speaker 1 (01:13:26):
Why is he asking? So?

Speaker 4 (01:13:28):
If you're not going to it's not going to shoot
it down, what's the point of sending it.

Speaker 2 (01:13:31):
Up to see where it's going?

Speaker 4 (01:13:33):
Well, to see that going you need a fight for that,
apparently with you, But military procedures.

Speaker 1 (01:13:40):
The radars are all off.

Speaker 4 (01:13:41):
Apparently it should it down. You'll be the first to say,
how can you shoot down a commercial airline with fourteen nationals?
Half of them Chinese have been a worst position? Probably?

Speaker 2 (01:13:54):
Why shoot it down there? If it's not hostile?

Speaker 4 (01:13:56):
But the Americans would?

Speaker 1 (01:14:00):
Why that weird statement at the end about what the
Americans would do? Creepiest thing I've ever heard. I've never
seen a more guilty person ever in my life. It's
not incompetence. It was maliciousness, absolute maliciousness. Why not send
up the plane? He says, Right at the beginning, they
knew it was a commercial airliner and not hostile. How

(01:14:22):
do you know that the ACR system wasn't turned on,
it was not on flight radar, but you knew it
was a commercial plane and it wasn't hostile. Why that's incredible.
He's either Misscleo the psychic or they had communications with
the plane. It's a very simple fact that can't be denied.
And it's one of the things that you won't see

(01:14:42):
any of the other investigators bring up because they can't
really deal with evidence that goes against their preconceived notions
about what they think happened to the plane, even when
it's undeniable. There's no other interpretation. There's no other interpretation
from what he's saying. Their interpretation is basically everything they'd
disagree with is a lie or fake or whatever they
needed to be bizarre. Okay, now there's even more stuff

(01:15:13):
that implicates the United States. I can't believe how much
there is. Uh. There's a clip of Florence to Changing,
who did a lot of on the boots on the
ground research shout out to her. Nephew of the pilot
was told that his uncle was collateral damage. Now, the

(01:15:33):
only situation that people I've ever heard people use the
word collateral damage is when the government is killing people.
Is there any other situation when people are referred to
as collateral damage. I'm pretty sure it's only when the
government is killing people. So this would imply it was
a government operation that happened to the plane. The former

(01:15:55):
head of Indonesian Police was told quote unquote what really
happened to MHD seven zero, which implies there's a real story,
and then there's a story that's being told to the public.
So once again, these are like people who are officials
that were in the know, just telling the truth, and
nobody wants to believe them when they tell the truth.
They only want to believe the fictional story that's being

(01:16:16):
told in the media. And then just to add this
on there, weirdly, there's two Iranian fake passengers who are
using stolen passports, traveling together and change their appearance to
look like the people in the passports, and they were
just dismissed in one day after the plane disappeared. As well.

(01:16:36):
They were just refugees, like going to they were trying
to go to Amsterdam, but they were going to Beijing
for reasons of you know whatever. What we're just gonna
gloss over that a plane disappeared and there's like two
people from a let's say, adversarial country to the United
States that are fake passengers on stolen passports. Okay, I

(01:17:00):
guess we'll just we'll ignore that. If they were operatives,
they would be exactly what we'd be looking for. I'll
just leave it at that. Now, where'd the plane go?
It went to Diego Garcia. Why to go to Diego Garcia.
It's the only place for the plane to go. It's
the only place. Everybody was saying, including Mark du Gain
who's a famous author and got a lot of heat
for it, and some people claim that he was told

(01:17:24):
to like stop looking into it. Catherine t the witness,
she also and I think it was her twenty eighteen
blog posts I have a link to above, says I
think she said. She now agrees the plane went to
Diego Garcia, and every other conspiracy theory out there was
saying the plane was remote controlled there or whatever. I
think it was Field McConnell's saying that. And why because
Diego Garcia is like a NASA landing strip, perfect location.

(01:17:46):
There's got to be underground stuff there. There was a
Maldives sighting at a small island in the early early
morning hours, where a bunch of islanders saw the plane
and the red and white strip of Malayian Airlines flying
south towards the Garcia. The pilot had Diego Garcia in
a simulator for some weird reason, even though it's not
open to commercial aircrafts. And then there was a no

(01:18:08):
departures from Diego Garcia for seventy two hours after March eighth,
which is pretty damned suspicious. Wait, so there's just gonna
be no departures for three days after the plane lands there,
which is probably what happened. I mean, that's pretty convenient,
pretty incriminating. Oh and in case you wanted the logs, well,
the flight logs were just all destroyed by water damage

(01:18:30):
in July of twenty fourteen. If you don't believe me,
go look it up. I absolutely can't. You could not
make this story up. The Diego Garcia flight logs were
destroyed by water damage in July of twenty fourteen, just
a few months after m three seven zero. What a coincidence?
What ah? Too bad? Would have been convenient to have

(01:18:50):
those flight logs, but they were just too shame twenty fourteen.
We didn't have computers in twenty fourteen. Guys, it was
the Stone Ages in twenty fourteen. You know, everything was
still on paper in twenty fourteen. I know that I
worked on paper. It has underground facilities with black vault
Foyer request showing that it may be a CIA black

(01:19:11):
site AKA that has like prisoners on there. There was
a message from Philip Wood posted on four Chan saying
that he's held captive. But there's just a black picture.
But the EXIF data in the picture has coordinates placing
it in Diego, Garcia, where they think that they have
these CIA black site prisons. Which is like, Man, if

(01:19:34):
you were coming up with a story about where the
plane went, you couldn't be more on the nose. Well,
it went to a military black the US military operation
went to a U secret US military base. It's more
secret than Area fifty one that no one's allowed to
go to that. If you wash ashore there, like some
refugees did a few years ago, you're not allowed to leave. Ever,

(01:19:55):
they were stranded there for three years, like they finally
were legally forced to allow them to leave. And if
you go work at Diego Garcia. You have to take
like a two year deal and you're not allowed to
communicate with anyone outside your life for two years, like
you can't have communications outside the base. There were actually

(01:20:15):
a weird situation where there were photos on Facebook that
look vaguely similar to the crew. This was in like
twenty twenty or twenty twenty one. So for the people
that want to know what happened to the people, I
don't know. They're probably not alive. If they are, then
maybe they're living on Diego Garcia. That's if you want

(01:20:36):
to dream and be very optimistic. My view is that everybody,
if not clo if almost everybody, if not everybody, succumbed
to the smoke from the fire because people don't realize
how dangerous. Maybe even the US government didn't realize how
dangerous lithium ion battery smoke was back then. It's one
inhalation and game over. Like that's how dangerous and toxic

(01:20:58):
that smoke is. So I personally don't think that anybody
could have survived even to the get to the point
where the plane was being zapped, except for like the pilot,
because the pilot has the special hood that's like the
the one that can last for like several hours, compared
to like, you're the shitty thing that comes from the
sky that you're just you're done. If that's all you've got,
the thing that comes from the top of the plane, Okay,

(01:21:21):
we've only got a few more things to go through here. Also,
just want to point out that there is this ground
based electric optical deep space surveillance system that's got a
site at Diego Garcia. So they've got some pretty advanced
stuff in Diego Garcia that they're covering up there. Maybe
not anymore now that it's been exposed, but they did.

(01:21:44):
Now the Inmersat pings, the only the most theories are
based on this idea that the plane flew in the
South Indian Ocean, and it's all based on ten rows
from Inmersat that were never corroborated by anybody. And when
I say corroborated I mean by like a different I
don't mean corroborated by like we both looked through the

(01:22:04):
same shitty data and came to the same shitty conclusion.
I mean like somebody else has data that corroborates your data.
That's how data works. If you don't understand that concept,
then like they, I guess you're not an expert. I
guess I'm a database expert, because this is actually my
real job that I've have twenty years of experience on

(01:22:25):
is databases like this. Now, I could fake these ten
rows on an Xcel spreadsheet in five minutes. If you
gave me what I needed to know, I could fake
it in about five minutes. It's actually just straight up
trivial to fake these ten rows in XCEL spreadsheet, and
these ten rows in this XL spreadsheet here represent I
think six hours five five hours of flight time, five

(01:22:49):
hours of flight time. This is all we've got. This
is the only reason why everyone who thinks the plane
one in the South Indian Ocean, this is the only
evidence they have. This what you see highlighted in green
right there, and you can see quite clearly if you
were to look at the whole data set, there's a
massive deviation when it gets to this area in green.

(01:23:12):
When it gets this area and green, all of a sudden,
the way that the satellite's pinion changes entirely. It goes
from pinging like sporadically like every like fifteen to twenty
five minutes to only pinging every hour on the hour
like or not every hour on the hour, but every hour,
like exactly one hour from the last hour plus a

(01:23:34):
couple seconds. It's like, why is it so different? All
of a sudden I asked the investigators who literally came
up with the model and reviewed this. They couldn't answer
the question. They couldn't answer that basic, basic question about
data that anybody that hasn't done any database work ever,
or with any relational databases, which are basically excels price,

(01:23:57):
you should be able to answer super simple question. That's
how easy it is to lie to people. Ten rows
on an Excel spreadsheet that my seven year old nephew
could fake. It took the US government like ten weeks
to fake this. They didn't release this data until May

(01:24:17):
twenty seventh, twenty fourteen. The MAA Street seven zero videos
had already been on the internet for over a week.
They had already been published on the internet on YouTube.
People were watching them for a week and this hadn't
even been released yet. So we're thinking somebody couldn't fake
ten rows on spreadsheet, but they faked two magic two

(01:24:39):
videos and perfect synchronization of the US military telling the
perfect story of what really happened tom A Street seven
zero is incredible to me how people who call themselves
skeptics don't apply to skepticism to the people who are
presenting that they want to believe. Skeptics should look at
this and go this doesn't make any sense. What happened here?

(01:25:00):
Why is this data all of a sudden change here
at the exact moment where right above this you see
what time does this say right before the green right
before this data changes, What time does it say? Eighteen
forty UTC. Wow, that's the exact same time Sue Bang
Air Traffic Control lost contact with the plane the same

(01:25:20):
day the plane disappeared. That is one hell of a coincidence.
Chat the exact same moment that Sue Bang air Traffic
Control says they lost contact with the plane, the same
moment we're seeing the plane in two videos filmed by
the US military, All of a sudden that that same
time the data changes in the satellite data For the

(01:25:47):
people saying yatzi, yes, YATSI, why I formally called out
Inersat for fraud Absolutely no question. This data is fraudulent, fake, spoofed.
Whatever did to it to make it? I don't know
what they did. That's not a mystrey seven zero. If
it is, then the methodology that was used to determine

(01:26:09):
the win in the south the ocean, and then that's
flawed or fake whatever. Something about this is fake clearly,
and it looks to me like somebody just fudged ten
rows on an Xcel spreadsheet. That's my professional opinion as
somebody that's worked on databases for twenty years. I can
write SQL data and update statements, and I can write

(01:26:29):
multi table queries that are relatively extensive. Okay, Now, the
rogue pilot theory the number one theory at the moment,
and this was not the number one theory at the
time the plane disappeared. The rogue pilot theory was considered

(01:26:49):
like three percent or less. Basically, nobody thought that it
was possible because there was nothing indicating it. It's not
like they didn't leave any notes. There was no manifesto,
nothing to indicate that they did it or anything like that. Nothing.
There was no evidence for it. He had eighteen thousand
flight hours and everyone stood up for him, including officials,
the wife, co workers. Everybody said he was an awesome guy.

(01:27:10):
He would never do it. Florence d' Changy even got
access to his medical records. His family was so adamant
they gave his medical records to Florence to Changy to
prove that his mental psych screening was all perfect. The
flight path contra indicates a suicide route. A suicide route
is not going to go back to the nearest airport.

(01:27:33):
Suicide route's going to go in a random ass direction
because you don't care. You're also not like a lot
of people have argued that the plane was going between
radar zones. That's not how that works at all. But
if you were a suicide of pilot, you don't care
about radar zones. If somebody comes up and shoots on
your plane, you don't care because you're gonna take the
plane down anyway in a suicidal pilot scenario. I also

(01:27:56):
want to point out real quickly as well that the
are argument that people make that like the pilot was
avoiding radar doesn't actually make any sense at all. So
when when people like mentor pilot, I think is the
biggest one who promoted this misinformation, and he should apologize

(01:28:17):
honestly for being so horribly wrong in his analysis. I mean,
I think he's probably in normal situations a decent guy.
But his MA Streets of Misserve video is complete garbage.
And he promoted this myth that like the pilot turned
off the system to avoid radar. But here's the thing.
You can't avoid radar that way. Radar is gonna see

(01:28:38):
you anyway. And if your argument is, oh, well, they
weren't in your zone, well you're telling me that they
turned themselves off from flight radar. So yes, if I
see an unidentified object on radar, you're gonna report it.
In fact, that's the only thing you're looking for if
you're looking at the radar is you're looking for unidentified

(01:28:58):
objects that are not on the flight tracker. And the
whole argument being made is that the plane went dark
off the flight tracker. So you've got a plane on
your radar off the flight tracker. You don't give a
shit if it's technically in Malaysia's zone. If you're Thailand,
we don't care about that. You're seeing an unidentified object

(01:29:20):
on your radar. It might be coming for you, it
might be coming from one of your buildings or your towns.
So that argument is really dumb, and it's contraindicated by
itself if you were trying to avoid radar, you wouldn't
turn off the A car system. You would leave it on.
You would leave the ACR system on. So it looks

(01:29:40):
like you're just having an emergency event when you're actually
hijacking the plane. The last thing you want to do
is bring attention to yourself by turning the system off
that's tracking you. If you do that, then everybody's gonna
be looking for you on your radars, and they're gonna
see you because spoil alert. Civilian airliners don't have stealth capabilities.

(01:30:14):
That's a good clip. Okay. The German Wings pilot in
twenty fifteen who uh took that plane down. He locked
the co pilot out and he didn't go on a
joy ride for eight hours. He crashed the plane in

(01:30:36):
under ten minutes. He basically just flew it directly into
a mountain. That's what you do when you're a suicidal pilot.
You cannot lock people out of the cockpit for eight hours.
This myth where he's gonna like go super high, knock
everybody out and all this bullshit. No, not in a

(01:30:57):
boweing triple seven. And what's gonna happen is someone going
to break through one of the panels, or they're gonna
get through the door or whatever, they're gonna get to you.
That's what happens in a high tension situation, where all
of a sudden you're locking people out and doing some
crazy shit to the plane. So that's not what happened
with MH three seven zero. Now the simulator data. Now,

(01:31:22):
Jeff Wise, I believe, in New York Magazine was the
first one to promote the misinformation that I still hear
spread out of there all the day. So do your
best to fight this misinformation that the simulator route was
being practiced by the pilot. This is couldn't be more fake,
could not be more fake. Jeff Wise spread it because
he's the biggest source of misinformation about m A three
seven zero. That's not being me being mean. That's just

(01:31:45):
a factual statement. Jeff Wise has to live with the
decisions that he's made in his life, and writing that
article that claimed that the pilot was practicing the simulator
data was super fake. It was wrong. He should feel
bad for doing it, and he should apologize for doing it,
because here you go, this is an actual route of
the simulator data over the top of various real flights

(01:32:08):
of one to five to zero that was from Jetta
or from qual Import to Jedta. You can see it's
a direct match. He was actually scheduled to fly this
route February fourth, two days before he was practicedor two
days after he was practicing it. So no, he was
not practicing the simulator data the route that was all fake.

(01:32:28):
He was literally just practicing the route that he was
scheduled to fly. This is not this is not the
route MHS three seven zero took that we're looking at
here either. This is also not the route MHE three
seven zero took. I just want to point that out too,
because this is just probably the biggest point I should
point out from this year is that Jeff Wise literally
just made up a complete fiction where a non matching

(01:32:51):
route he claimed matched what happened to M three seven
zero not even remotely close, complete fiction, completely just from
whole cloth. Jeff Wise invented a completely fake narrative that
did contraindicated by reality, and the FBI and officials corrected it.

(01:33:13):
And yet people still to this day, ten years later,
still believe that the misinformation that Jeff Wise intentionally spread
about M ah three seven zero. Honestly, Jeff Wise is
the last person on the planet that should ever, ever,
ever talk to anybody else about misinformation. Like literally, he's
the worst offender. Okay, So there you go, And just

(01:33:36):
here's a direct quote from the officials, just in case
anybody really is still trying to spread this myth. So
the people that are out there pushing this shit that
the pilot did it, you gotta just start coming to
accept reality. There's no evidence the pilot did it. We
have examined the pilot and the first officer, and we
are quite satisfied with their background, their training, and their

(01:33:57):
mental health. We are not of the opinion that it
could have been an event committed by the pilot. Simple
as that. Now, let me just add hoc real and
point out that a lot for a lot of people,
the problem is they don't have an inner monologue. They
don't have the ability to think for themselves. And for
those people, they need there to be a normal explanation

(01:34:20):
for what happened in this plane. There must be in
their minds, because in their reality, their reality is so
plain and fake that there is no room for an
extraordinary thing to occur. There's no room for a narrative
outside what they're told to believe to happen. And so
for those people, they have to ignore all of this
because they need there to be some plane Jane explanation

(01:34:42):
for where this plane went. But there is not. There
is not one of those explanations. It is, in fact,
we've ruled them out all out tonight conclusively. The plane
didn't go to the South Indian Ocean, didn't crash in
the ocean at all. The debris contry indicates the entire
search effort. The debris doesn't even prove the plane crashed.

(01:35:07):
We have no evidence for the plane even crashing, no
conclusive evidence. And this is what the family members were
also saying. At some point, people have to go back
and go like, why am I believing the things that
I'm choosing to believe. All that I did was come

(01:35:27):
into this whole situation with no biases. I had no biases.
I had an open mind, although I didn't I didn't
believe that we had magic orbs or any of that.
But I came in with no biases, and it took
a look at a fresh look at all the evidence
with you know, an unbiased perspective, and the story that
you're hearing tonight is what I concluded based on the evidence,

(01:35:48):
all the evidence that's out there, not just like a
cherry picking of the evidence like you see in a
lot of these YouTube videos, but the total totality of
the evidence, even evidence that people don't want to believe. Now,
some of the other scenarios, like to shoot down and
the emergency event scenarios that I here discuss some cases,
the problem with those is the same problem with the

(01:36:08):
fire emergency event without the orbs, where's the plane? Where's
the debris field? If a plane was shot down in
the sky, the debris is gonna shatter over tens of miles.
People are gonna be picking it up in their backyards.
There's no way you could cover up a debris a
Boeing Triple seven and two hundred and thirty nine people

(01:36:29):
exploding over somewhere. There'd be people YouTube videos of plane
blowing up in the sky. Even emergency events don't make
any sense if it was some kind of fire. We
need the videos to be real because we can't otherwise
explain where the plane went up, where the plane went down,
where is it? Then plane was on fire, it can't

(01:36:50):
fly forever where to go. And there's other variations on
these theories as well. People have claimed that they've seen
debris in the water when they're not. They're just you know,
there's that mind I forget what that psychology term is,
where they just imagine seeing stuff when they're not seeing it.
So there are no real legitimate other competing theories. It

(01:37:10):
had to be a state sponsored operation and all the
states involved, including the United States. We're blaming the United
States saying that they know now quickly the science. Okay,
I readid the science just simplified it. Just let's just
simplify it. Zero point energy number one. That's the number

(01:37:31):
one discovery that we can conclude from the videos. Zero
point energy is real. It's the missing link in physics.
It explains mass, inertia, gravity, dark energy, and dark matter,
just all the things that we don't understand. It turns
out explains them all. Some examples, if you want to read,
would be plank ether hypothesis by fried Wart Winterberg. A

(01:37:52):
beautiful theory. And the beauty of the zero point energy
in the ether hypothesis is that this theory in science
sits directly on top of our current perspective of physics
and cosmology. And when I say that, I mean that
you can add this vacuum energy in and it doesn't
change anything about our reality at all. So physics still works.

(01:38:12):
We don't have to rewrite everything. Bravo sweet. And then
of course the OG, the final boss, the King of
gatekeep disclosure hal put off in space time metric engineering,
that's one of the DRDs. And then gravity is a
zero point fluctuation force. These are two of my favorite
papers ever that explain how you can manipulate space time

(01:38:36):
and why gravity is not a fundamental force but in
fact just an induced pressure effect based on relative energy
densities of zero point energy, meaning the energy densities are
like the way the peaks and the valleys of the
amount of energy in space time. Okay, space time engineering.

(01:38:56):
So some of the best papers about space time engineering
traversible wormholes, stargates and negative Energy by Eric W. Davis
this is one of the duds. And warp Drives, Dark
Energy Manipulation of Extra Dimensions by also Eric W. Davis.
These papers basically explain how we can produce negative energy
and make warp drives and wormholes, and how you can

(01:39:17):
survive a wormhole, and they actually corroborate what we see
in the videos in terms of a release of photons
happening and like this umbra effect that we see occur
in the videos. So those are extremely important to understand
how warp drives are not just fiction. That like the
number one physicists that works with the government on Black

(01:39:39):
Projects is writing papers explaining exactly how to produce negative energy,
while all the mainstream academics are going negative energy is
an exotic substance. Meanwhile, this guy's going, no, it's a
pressure effect, and here's how we can make a negative
pressure effect. It's a negative energy and this is how
we then can make warp drive. Well, that's quite the
shift between academia and the Black Project physicists. Maybe we

(01:40:02):
should go with the Black Project physicists on this one.
And then my favorite guy, Salvator Pais, US Navy engineer,
says that I'm probably gonna get myself killed if I
keep pushing this, But you know what, we don't care.
Salvator Paise, his patents are one hundred percent real, one
thousand percent real. He deserves the credit for his patents,
specifically in this case, high energy electromagnetic field generator. This

(01:40:25):
is how we can produce electromagnetic field intensities that are
not believed to be possible under normal circumstances. The way
this is possible is via the ether. If you add
in the ether, if you say that space time is
not empty, then it opens the door to now achieving
energy densities that are beyond what conventional physics thought was possible.
And this allows us to get to points where we

(01:40:46):
can get up towards the Swinger limit where now spacetime
reality breaks down, aka, we produce a wormhole. Simple right.
And then his other patent, my favorite one actually is
the gravity high frequency gravitational Waves Generator, where we learn
that there is a relationship between high frequencies and manipulating gravity,
manipulating the zero point energy, and that once we do this,

(01:41:09):
it opens the door to everything you see in Star Trek,
warp drives, wormholes. You know. It also points out that
quantum effects at the macroscopic scale are what we're doing,
and we're achieving it via superconductivity. If you listen to
Salvage for Payise, it's all about cold plasmas, non equilibrium plasmas,

(01:41:30):
and the way that we are breaking through the ultra
violet catastrophe. Where we would say that you can't amplify
energy beyond this limit, is that we are breaking equilibrium
that only applies for equilibrium thermodynamics. This is why Salvator
Paies quotes Eliah Pregagene. Why because Elia Pregagene did his

(01:41:54):
work on non equilibrium thermodynamics. If you break something into
a non equilibrium thermon state and then stabilize it in
that form, you can go beyond what we think is possible.
Right now, Now, how do you do that? I'm gonna
tell you exactly how to do that. You create your
non equilibrium cold plasma ball manipulated of bi magnetic fields,

(01:42:20):
and you pull the electrons from the ions. So you
have your electrons all combined over here, and we see
them as the yellow little shape you shape in there,
the fusion shape, and you separate them and then you
get them stuck that way, and now you've got a
huge energy density ball. That's how you do it. And

(01:42:42):
then you take those huge energy density balls and you
jam them together just like you would a couple of magnets.
And what happens, well, if you get too much energy,
too much force, apparently you rip through space time. Now,
if you want more papers about those concepts as opposed
to me just explaining it to you, I recommend the

(01:43:04):
following four papers on non equilibrium plasmas. Vortex motion can
be used to stabilize ball the plasma. As I mentioned,
this is mentioned in multiple papers, so you can read.
There's several EVO papers by Ken Shoulders on exotic vacuum objects,
which are these cold plasmas. My favorite one is probably
permittivity transitions, which discusses how the plasma basically manipulates space

(01:43:26):
time and how you're manipulating the permiability and primitivity of
space time, which is how we can start to do
impossible things that are we would call free energy force,
free time harmonic plasmoids by Jack the Chamkin. We actually
just found out that he replied to somebody on Reddit
last year. He's like eighty five, eighty six, maybe even

(01:43:48):
eighty seven. Now he wrote a paper. This paper is
all about how to stabilize your plasma ball using vortex's
That's basically what this this pulp paper is basically about
how to make a ball plasma and make it stabilized
crazy and then of course ball lightning study by once
again Eric W. Davis shows up again. This ball lightning

(01:44:11):
study has a normal ass name like ball lightning study.
It's actually all about uh like coherent stabilized plasmas and
how to extract energy from them, like their applications of
the plasmas wild. They always give them weird names because
then nobody will ever look at them than I did.

(01:44:32):
And then cold fusion. Okay, so cold fusion? Why are
Why is cold fusion related? Because the heat signatures of
the orbs that that that yellow shape, that tesla shape
that we see, that's that's a fusion. Go look at
the Department of Energies website and fusion. You see that
exact same heat signature. It's a very distinct heat signature

(01:44:53):
of fusion, the hotter parts of the electrons the colder
parts of the ions. And then read Salvatorpius is plasma
a confusion pression or plasma compression fusion device. Where his
equations seven eighty nine talk about amplifying energy, and this
is where I mentioned the ultraviolet catastrophe that says, well,
you can't really amplify it beyond a certain degree. And

(01:45:15):
what salvat or pais is saying here is yes you can,
and this is the thing that would get me killed.
And I'm just gonna say is that we can amplify
energy beyond what the ultraviolet catastrophe thinks, and we do
it by conditioning the vacuum conditional possibilities. How do we
get around it. We change the conditions, we change the

(01:45:37):
permeability and primitivity of free space, and then we can
amplify energy infinitely, infinite energy. Free energy is one hundred
percent possible and real, but it also is probably gonna
lead to the end of the world. Spoiler alert. Okay,
I'm not gonna go through all this. Oh maybe through

(01:45:58):
attleb this so the debunk stuff, people who say the
videos are fake, whatever, I do separate stuff going through
all the debunk stuff. But I just want to point
out we had one hundred and fifty thousand dollars bounty.
No one ever came forward with any evidence that they
made the videos. You would have to have better VFX
skills than people who did, Like top Gun Maverick. There's
a really funny comment on redd early on about like
all the requirements that somebody would have had just to

(01:46:20):
like get the engineering of the planes scaled down correctly.
Like even just doing that is like a movie magic
that people have to do. Lead editor of Marvel's Studios
Jeffrey Ford, early on, I think it was with Total
Disclosure podcast he was friends with Jeffrey Ford. Jeffrey Ford
reviewed it said it would take like four to six

(01:46:42):
months with today's level of technology. And this is again
pointing out that you have to have a storyboard, like
you're presenting this narrative of a fire on board the
plane and all this stuff in the videos, Like this
isn't a situation where you just are like, oh, I'm
just going to add a goofy looking UFO to this video. No,
this is like a whole thing. To make these videos,

(01:47:02):
you'd have to have better understanding of physics than most
PhDs do. And then just as a joke, you'd have
to understand now not to use low quality nineties video
game effects or how you'd have to know how to
turn a two dimensional cloud picture. One of the big
debunks is that there's a cloud. They claim that there's
cloud pictures, but the problem is that the videos predate
the pictures, so they have a big issue with that.

(01:47:24):
There's no actual evidence the pictures predate the videos. In fact,
there's the evidence says that they posted the videos by
like two years. And it doesn't matter anyway, because you
can't use two dimensional cloud pictures to make a three
dimensional environment, which we've already proven is required for the videos,
so it's undeniable the videos are real. All the de
bunk attempts to date have fallen woefully short. This includes

(01:47:46):
the VFX comparison where people have claimed that this nineties
video game. If you think there's a nineties video game
effect in the videos, I showed at the beginning of
this like, I don't really know what to tell you,
but I will go ahead and show you here that
we took an exact overlay of that effect into the video,

(01:48:07):
like frame by frame, and you can see it right
here on your screen, full screen, and very clearly you
can see whoever told you these things were the same
lie to you. The only frame that's similar is this one,
and it's clearly not a perfect match. In fact, the
middle isn't even close to the same. The middle in
this graphic is some kind of weird plasma ball with

(01:48:30):
things sticking out of it, and the background is like
a morphous black blob. They so they got like one
partial match on one edge and then claimed the whole
thing matches. But then the next frame it's not even
This frame is not even close the same, and the
next frame after that again not even remotely similar. In fact,
that's it. And then the problem is there's even more

(01:48:51):
frames now in the visual effect that there's no frames
left in the actual in the real video. So the
number of frames in the graphic seven, but the total
number of frames in the video is only four, so
they have three extra frames also, So this stock effect
was conclusively not used in this video. No one changed

(01:49:13):
it all around to get it to match. That's not
how stock effects work. The point of the stock effect
is you put the stock effect in there and that's over.
And we can prove that too, because this stock effect
was used in major motion pictures and it was never edited.
It was used in Anchorman, it was used in Starship Troopers,
it was used in Eastbounding Down. It was using majors.

(01:49:34):
None of them ever changed it. Eastbound and Down made
a goal, it angled it slightly. That was it. So
it's one hundred percent proven. That's not in the videos.
Any other debunks that are worth addressing two more things
I'll show real quick. One is the clip of the

(01:49:59):
Clouds movie, just because so many people are insistent that
the clouds still move. Oh wait, that didn't work. So
if you're now, if you're just listening to this, I'm
showing a video that was made that speeds up the clouds.
It speeds up the video and shows a portion of it.
There's even a longer version where people went through different

(01:50:22):
segments and show that all the different segments show evolving clouds.
You just have to speed it up to see it
because the clouds aren't moving very much. There probably wasn't
very much win that night, and but you can see
the evolution of the clouds, which is not Some people
try to claim it's some kind of like displacement map.
I don't think they know what displacement maps are, because

(01:50:43):
this is not displacement that we're looking at. We're looking
at evolving. Evolving means changes and doesn't go back. Displacement
map is just a distortion effect, and this is not
a distortion effect. You're seeing something change and not go
back to where it was before. So that's it's significant
to point out those facts as well. Then you can
see it quite clearly there. And then I just want

(01:51:13):
to point out for people because for the cloud thing
as well, because a lot of people got hung up
on the cloud song, which admittedly you know, they they
tried their hardest to make the videos go away and
it was pretty extensive. But we do have confirmation that
the photographer who claimed to take photos he did. He

(01:51:34):
was on a flight to Japan. I mean he got
he at least has a ticket for it. The problem
is the pictures that they were claiming were used in
the Sili video were not taken from that from that flight.
That's the issue. It seems like they were just inserted
into an existing set of photos that already existed on
the internet, and the photographer didn't know because he couldn't

(01:51:54):
tell the difference. You couldn't tell his own photos. You're
not he taken thousands of photos, right, So you just
insert some photos into an exist and set the photographer
would never never know, And this is why he couldn't
even recognize the photos in question on the website. He
couldn't even recognize the photos. And so what I want
to point out first of all at two things. One
is that there is proof that the photos that he

(01:52:17):
uploaded from his Japan flight were on the Internet before
twenty fourteen. I'm trying to figure out how to do
this now, Okay, this is how you do it now, Okay, sorry,
here you go. So this picture right here is it

(01:52:41):
showing it? What is going on here? Oh? I don't know.
It says, oh there it is. Okay, Streamyard, get your
shit together. So this picture right here shows the web
arc and this is one of the photos from the

(01:53:02):
Japan flight that shows it was on the web archive.
So it shows the photos in question did get archived
prior to twenty fourteen. And yet none of the photos
claimed to be used in the m Stree seven zero
videos are anywhere on the archive prior to videos. In fact,
the first time the pictures in question were ever seen

(01:53:22):
anywhere on the Internet by any of the ar And
this also proves that the website was being crawled by Google,
so you can't claim that the website wasn't being crawled.
This picture right here proves that the photos that Jonas had,
that the real photos Jonahs had, were already uploaded. The
real ones, the fake photos in question, the ones that
were supposedly that we're argued to be used in the

(01:53:45):
Mah Street seven zero videos were not uploaded until twenty sixteen.
This is a super important fact to point out. It's
not deniable because it's just a factual argument. We can
just look at the evidence again. You can look at
the evidence. Evidence doesn't lie here. It is right here,
you're looking at it. These are the images that were

(01:54:06):
supposedly used in ME three seven zero videos. You can
see at the top of your screen. The first ever
time they were archived was March twenty fourth, two thousy
sixty and they were archived multiple times in that period,
which proves they weren't on the internet before that. They
didn't just magically get missed for five years. They were there,

(01:54:31):
They're just not there in twenty fourteen. They only appeared
in twenty sixteen. That was the first time, right there.
So anybody tries to claim that images were used to
make the videos, you can claim one, no, they weren't.
There's no possible way two dimensional photograph photos of clouds

(01:54:51):
could be used to make the three dimensional environment that
was required to make these videos. And two, the cloud
images in question posted the videos by over two years.
Simple as that, if anyone has any contrary evidence, and
if you point that out, generally debunkers go into a

(01:55:11):
fit because there is no there is no counter there
is no counter effects. Speak for themselves. Okay, let's do
some super chats. Guys. Thank you very much for listening
and I appreciate it, especially everybody listening on audio. Thank
you guys very much for listening to the All Solid
Evidence review stream. I hope that you know the world
comes to understand that these videos are really what happened

(01:55:33):
to the plane. I think it will take a while.
It's obviously a lot to take in, but I think
that that evidence is overwhelming. If you want to help,
the best thing you can do is push on the
United States government to tell the world what they know
about the missing airliner. They know what to happens to
the plane. Even if you don't believe the videos are real,
you have to accept the United States government knows what
happened to the plane, no question, no doubt. The reason

(01:55:55):
why people don't want to accept that is because then
when they do, they realize that it means the videos
of must be real. Right. Okay, thank you very much
for these super chats. I had to time. Mark Scott,
thank you brother, appreciate you. You've been you're on fire.
Oh wow, and the huge one knocking down doors with
hard work. Piece of the families, Yes, and so piece
to the families. Also, the families probably don't The families

(01:56:17):
probably don't believe this or accept this either, admittedly, but
they never told me to stop, so I would think
it was my scenario. Even if it was somebody who
was going the crazy scenario, if it was me, I
would still be fine with it, because shit, nothing else
is working, nothing else is working. We haven't found anything
in the South Indian Ocean. Might as well push on people
who look at Diego Garcia truth Teller eighty six. Thank you,

(01:56:39):
rip Ocean Infinity and Malaysia should pay Ashton thirty five million. Yes,
since he solved the mystery. Yeah, they apparently just signed
it today, but they've already been searching and quick update
they are still searching again. But they aren't going to
find anything, as I've already told you. And if you've
reviewed this evidence that you know they're not going to
find anything in the South Indian Ocean. You know they're not. Yeah,
And even the people who say, oh, they're going to

(01:56:59):
plan something, No, they're not think about all the effort
it would go through to like plant believable debris at
this point in the game that doesn't float and all
all the bodies all it's never gonna happen. They're just
not gonna find anything. And thank you again for that
truth Teller, for that other donation, rabbit Hole, thank you
keep this up. And the CIA is going to bring
back the dart gun for your ass. Watch Cornhole. Brother. Honestly,

(01:57:22):
I don't even care, man, I don't even care. I
just don't want to live in a world that's a
lie anymore, you know. I just want them to be
like one true thing on this world. It seems like
everything is fake. Academics just big fraud. Media is just
full of shit, governments just committing black operations and hiding
civilization technology. I just want one true thing just to

(01:57:42):
be pleased on this planet. Lone Wolf, thank you very
much for that donation. What if the CIA produced all
this so this was another thing? What if the CI
did this is like when you think this is like
what I call hitting on nineteen. You're hitting on nineteen here.
You're thinking way too much into it, right, You're like,
how can they be SCIA into a like, think about
how elaborate. So you made a plan to siop somebody

(01:58:05):
into believing the fake plan using fake videos, Like, it's
just way, way too complicated, and what's the end goal.
The main reason why this is not true despite the
logic that I just threw at you, is that who's
implicated in the video? Oh, the United States military? So
would the CIA if they're doing this, would they implicate themselves? No,

(01:58:30):
that wouldn't be an image of a General Atomics drone.
That would be an image of some Chinese drone or
an Iranian drone. If they were sy opping us, They're
not gonna blame themselves. They're gonna have to be a
video of China's aapping the plane because then the disinformation is, oh,
look what China did to it, and look what Iran
did to it. Now we're gonna go to war with Iran.
The way the videos play out, it's only blames them.

(01:58:51):
And if the CIA did produce it, then the media
would be like trying to spotlight me. CNN would be
having me come on and promote this theory or what
have you, right, because they would want this psyop to
get out there. In fact, As I mentioned in my
last dream, no mainstream media has ever even reached out

(01:59:11):
to me before, even though I've gone on over one
hundred podcasts detailed explaining the evidence, the psychology of my
understanding of the case and the leaker and all this stuff.
Despite all that fame, if you want to call attention,
maybe mainstreaming has never reached out. That's what tells me
the CIA that I'm right over the target, and this

(01:59:32):
is a situation with the CIA doesn't want this out
as opposed to wanted it out. Good question, though, and
this is honestly, I don't mean to be rude, but
this is the dumbest argument that I hear out there
is that we're trying to convince other countries that we
have technology that we don't have. That's not a thing
that exists. That's not a thing that exists. I think

(01:59:54):
people usually when they make this just fault, terrible, terrible argument,
usually they try to say that, oh, well, during the
Manhattan Project, we tried to spread disinfo to like throw
people off. That's a complete that's sabotage. It's claiming that
we have magical technology that we don't have that doesn't work.
If you don't have it, then it just is not
a threat. And if you're gonna do some elaborate show

(02:00:16):
to try to convince people, this isn't how you do it.
You like leak it covertly to people, not in a
public display now with a real airliner that's really missing. No,
we actually just did it. We actually just did that
to the plane. That's the story that makes sense, not
the story that it's a reverse orn a who know,

(02:00:36):
super sigh up against me like sorry, Like a lot
of you guys though, you just you go way too down,
far down the rabbit hole because you need there to
need to be always be another layer to everything. For
some people there always needs to be another layer. In
some cases there can be, but discern critical thinking requires
you to understand when to stop. That's what critical thinking.
Is there evidence that there's another layer to it. No,

(02:00:59):
if the evidence is just you making it up in
your head, that a story that's not evidence. Simple as that,
that's how you did. That's how it works. So thank
you for those donations though, and again I'm not trying
to be rude, but I think it's important to educate
people on that critical thinking works both ways. One is
don't be too blue pilled, but also don't believe that
there's always another layer to everything, and everything must be

(02:01:20):
a distraction from everything else. Like that's where you just
your way to. You're doing the same thing the blue
pill people are doing, just on the opposite spectrum, end
of the spectrum. Mark Scott, Wow, thank you brother, huge donations.
Appreciate you man the best. And then lastly, V have
you heard of thunderstorm General? Yes, I have. I've spoken
about it several times. It's not doing what we're talking

(02:01:42):
about here, It's not anywhere near what we're talking about
here is basically a more efficient carburetor is what has
been told to me, but still neat and still could
be relevant. I do want to talk to Randall Carlson
about that. Okay, any last questions before we close out tonight,
guys from the audience. I'm just looking through see if
I can find any Did I miss anything big that

(02:02:05):
people don't know? Where did the plane go and what
happened to the people. I think I explained where I
think that the plane went and what happened to people.
But again, the only people that can tell us to
answer these questions about why you would do this. Why
we record this. What actually happened for sure is the
US military, the people that did it. Those are the
people we should be asking the questions. I want to

(02:02:26):
know they answer those questions too. I want Edward Lynn
to tell me he probably knows the answer right. Truth
teller says, if all flights pre water instruction tells you
your c community is the flotation device where all the
floating is. This is another good point. There's a thousand
pounds of flotation devices missing, and that's just some of

(02:02:47):
the stuff that floated. It floats. None was ever found.
The point being we just need to use basic logic,
basic critical thinking capabilities. Part of the reason why so
many people are afraid talk to me about m A
three seven zero to have a contentious conversation is because
I bring up points like this and they'll just look

(02:03:07):
like fools because there is no counterpoints to something like that.
Counterpoint is the oceans really big? It's absurd. You're gonna
get destroyed in a live conversation with making arguments like that.
And then one tact hundred. Thank you very much man.
You guys have been going on fire. I appreciate you guys.
Donations you guys. Thank you m A three seventy X.

(02:03:29):
You guys are awesome. Yeah, there was another. I deleted
this from the story because there's it got really weird
about what plane was where. But there is another plane
from a Shell company that was disassembled. I can't find
out which of the two models it possibly was. But
the reason why I mainly deleted is because I think
the debris is from m AH three seven zero. I

(02:03:50):
just think that they tore the plane apart and threw
some of it in the water, or when the plane
was landing at Diegorcia, it was like coming apart and
someone was falling in you know, the Western Indian Ocean.
That's what I think hapened. So that's why I got
read of that. But if you believe the debris was
fake and that they faked all that debris, not all
that debris, only a few pieces, then in that scenario,

(02:04:11):
there is another plane that got decommissioned like way too early.
There's actually two other planes, but it's hard to tell
which one got decommissioned at the right time. So good
question on that one though as well. That was from
McLean Okay, but yeah, those are great questions. Actually, guys, Okay, guys,

(02:04:38):
I think that's gonna be it for tonight. Thank you
for joining me on this live stream and on this
special edition of the Heart Trews Podcast on the m
A three seven zero eleven year anniversary, reviewing the all
evidence that shows that the m A three seven zero
videos are undeniably real. I understand the aversion. I understand
people don't like me. I understand that people don't want
this to be real and it's too far out there.
But I'm sorry, it is real. It just is. I'm

(02:05:00):
I'm just a normal guy living my day to day,
still doing my nine to five and healthcare. It just
bringing you this information because I think it's important that
people know the truth. That's it. That's the only reason
not getting rich and famous off this, not being invited
on Joe Rogan, just doing it. Hope you guys enjoy it.
Have a great night, guys, We'll talk soon. Peace out.
I'm h three seventy X Love you guys.