October 27, 2025 • 37 mins
Episode Three: The House of Cards Collapses Episode Three chronicles the October twenty three, twenty twenty five morning when the FBI arrested thirty four people across eleven states, including Trail Blazers coach Chauncey Billups, Heat guard Terry Rozier, and former player Damon Jones. The episode reveals two intertwined conspiracies: one using insider NBA information to manipulate prop bets across seven games, another involving Mafia-backed poker games rigged with X-ray tables and marked cards. The investigation exposes how the NBA cleared Rozier eighteen months earlier despite red flags, revealing the league's investigative failures and conflict of interest when billions in gambling revenue are at stake. The episode concludes by examining whether professional basketball can survive its gambling addiction or if the profit-integrity conflict is fundamentally irresolvable.
Click here to browse handpicked Amazon finds inspired by this podcast series!
https://amzn.to/42YoQGI
This content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI
Click here to browse handpicked Amazon finds inspired by this podcast series!
https://amzn.to/42YoQGI
This content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Hello, I'm Miles Mercer. This is episode three titled The
House of Cards Collapses. I'm an artificial intelligence, which means
I can look at this disaster with cold, analytical clarity
while you're still processing the shock. Sometimes that distance is
exactly what you need to see the full picture. In
our first episode, we traced gambling's long history in basketball,
(00:22):
from college point shaving scandals through the tem Donahie affair.
In our second episode, we watched as legalized sports betting
transform from a prohibited activity into a multi billion dollar
industry practically overnight, and we followed the case of Johntay Porter,
whose scheme should have been the warning that stopped everything. Now,
in this final episode, we're going to examine what happened
(00:44):
when the warning was ignored. We're going to look at
the October twenty twenty five arrests that revealed the true
scope of the corruption, and we're going to ask the
hardest question of all. Can professional basketball survive its gambling addiction?
Or have we reached the point where the sport and
the betting on it are so intertwined that they can't
be separated. The morning of October twenty third, twenty twenty
(01:07):
five started like any other morning for most basketball fans.
The NBA season had just begun. The Portland Trailblazers had
played their season opener the night before, losing to the
Minnesota Timberwolves. The Miami Heat were in Orlando preparing for
their own season opener against the Magic that evening. Chauncey Billups,
the Trailblazers head coach and a Hall of Fame player,
(01:28):
was probably reviewing film and preparing for the next game.
Terry Rosier, the Heat guard, was probably at the team
hotel doing his morning routine. It was a normal Wednesday
in the NBA, and then everything exploded. The FBI announced
that thirty four people had been arrested across eleven states
as part of two related investigations into illegal gambling operations
(01:50):
connected to the NBA. Among those arrested were three prominent
basketball figures. Chauncey Billups was taken into custody in Portland.
Terry Rosier was arrested at his hotel in Orlando. Damon Jones,
a former player and assistant coach, was also arrested. All
three were charged with serious federal crimes related to gambling
conspiracies the league immediately placed Billups and Rosier on administrative leave,
(02:13):
and FBI Director Cash Bettel held a press conference that
sent shockwaves through the sports world. Patel did not mince words.
Let's not mince words. He said, this is the insider
Tredy saga for the NBA. That's what this is. He
described the investigation as involving tens of millions of dollars,
connections to four major organized crime families, and fraud that
was mind boggling in its scope. Federal prosecutors stood alongside
(02:37):
him and laid out the basics of what they had uncovered.
Two separate but related criminal conspiracies, one involving the use
of insider information to manipulate sports bets on NBA games,
the other involving rig poker games where high tech cheating
technology was used to steal millions from victims. And linking
it all together were current and former NBA players and
(02:58):
coaches who had either participate, paid directly, or had been
used by organized crime to facilitate the schemes. The sports
betting conspiracy was the one that struck at the heart
of basketball's integrity. According to the indictment unsealed that day,
a network of conspirators had used non public information about
NBA players and teams to place bets on at least
seven games between March twenty twenty three and March twenty
(03:21):
twenty four. The information they used included details about whether
specific players would sit out upcoming games, when players would
leave games early claiming injury or illness, and other inside
knowledge that would affect game outcomes or player performances. In
at least three of these seven games, players had intentionally
removed themselves from contests to benefit the gambler's bets. This
(03:43):
wasn't just about sharing information. This was about active manipulation
of games. Terry Rozier was at the center of the
sports betting scheme. Federal prosecutors alleged that, while playing for
the Charlotte Hornets, Rosier had provided advanced notice to conspirators
about his playing status. If he knew he was going
to sit out a game, he would tell them before
that information became public. If he was planning to leave
(04:06):
a game early, they would know in advance. This information
was extraordinarily valuable because it allowed the conspirators to bet
on the under for Rosier's player props with near certainty
that the bets would win. A player who doesn't play
or who only plays a few minutes obviously won't hit
the over on his points, rebounds, or assists props. The
(04:26):
conspirators allegedly made hundreds of thousands of dollars from this scheme,
but Rosier wasn't the only player involved. The indictment referenced
other unnamed individuals, including someone described as co Conspirator eight.
This person was identified as a resident of Oregon, someone
who had been an NBA player from approximately nineteen ninety
seven through twenty fourteen, and who had been a coach
(04:48):
since at lee twenty twenty one. The indictment alleged that
co Conspirator eight had told another defendant before the information
was public, that the Trailblazers would be sitting their best
players in a game on in March twenty third. This
conversation allegedly led to bets against the Blazers totaling more
than one hundred thousand dollars. The description of co Conspirator eight,
(05:09):
while not explicitly naming anyone, pointed strongly towards someone connected
to the Portland Trail Blazers organization. The timing, the location,
the career timeline. All the details seemed to fit with
Chauncey Billups, though he was not directly charged in the
sports betting conspiracy. The indictment was carefully worded, protecting some
identities while making clear that the conspiracy went beyond just
(05:31):
the name defendants. Another game highlighted in the indictment involved
the Orlando Magic On April sixth, twenty twenty three. An
unnamed person who is described as at times an NBA
player and who lived in Florida had allegedly conspired with
others to leverage his relationship with a Magic starter. The
conspirator learned before the public that the team planned to
(05:51):
rest some of its best players. Again, this information was
used to place large bets against the Magic, betting it
without their best players, they would underperform or lose. The
pattern was consistent across all seven games mentioned in the indictment.
Someone with inside access to NBA information would learn something
before it became public. That person would share the information
(06:14):
with professional gamblers. The gamblers would place large bets, often
through multiple accounts to avoid detection. The bets would win,
the profits would be split, and everyone involved would make
money while corrupting the integrity of the games. Federal prosecutors
emphasized that the conspirators had used friendships and long standing
relationships with NBA players and coaches to obtain this information.
(06:37):
In at least one case, they had allegedly threatened the
player into providing information by leveraging the player's pre existing
gambling debts. This detail was particularly chilling because it showed
how the gambling culture within the NBA, the poker games
on team planes, the casual betting that everyone knew about
but nobody wanted to address, created vulnerabilities that criminal organizations
(06:58):
could exploit. The player who owed money from a card
game was a player who could be pressured into sharing
information or manipulating his own performance. The connection to the
Johnte Porter case was explicit. Two of the people charged
in the October twenty twenty five indictment, Almar Alwadi, and
someone named Hennan, had also been conspirators in the Porter case.
(07:19):
They had been involved in the scheme where Porter deliberately
underperformed in games so that bets on his unders would win. Now,
they were revealed to be part of a much larger
operation involving multiple players across multiple teams over multiple seasons.
Porter's case hadn't been an isolated incident. It had been
one small piece of a sprawling conspiracy. The second indictment,
(07:41):
the poker case, was almost more audacious in its brazenness.
This scheme involved using celebrities, specifically current and former NBA players,
to lure wealthy marks into participating in high stakes poker
games that were completely rigged. Chauncey Billups and Damon Jones
were both charged in this conspiracy. They were accused of
(08:01):
functioning is what the indictment called face cards, celebrities whose
presence would attract rich people who wanted the experience of
playing poker with famous athletes. Once the marks were seated
at the table, the games were rigged using technology that
would seem like something out of a casino heist movie.
According to prosecutors, the conspirators used shuffling machines that could
read the cards in the deck. They used poker chip
(08:24):
trays with hidden cameras that could see players whole cards.
They used special contact lenses and glasses that allowed the
cheaters to read cards that had been marked with invisible ink. And,
in the most sophisticated setup, they used what prosecutors called
an X ray table that could read cards lying face
down on the table surface. With all this technology and play,
the house or the designated cheater at the table knew
(08:46):
everyone's cards at all times. The games weren't poker, They
were theft disguised as poker. The mafia families were allegedly
taking a percentage of the winnings and were also involved
in collecting from people who lost money and couldn't pay.
You showed up to play poker with Chauncey Billups, lost
fifty thousand dollars and then couldn't pay, you weren't just
dealing with some random game organizers. You were dealing with
(09:09):
organized crime figures who had very effective methods of debt collection.
The indictment alleged at this poker operation had been running
for an extended period and had stolen millions of dollars
from victims who thought they were playing in legitimate games.
Billips and Jones were charged with conspiracy to commit wire
fraud and money laundering in addition to the gambling related charges.
These were serious federal crimes carrying potentially lengthy prison sentences.
(09:33):
Both men denied the allegations through their attorneys. Rosier's lawyer
Jim Trusty issued a statement strongly disputing the accusations and
said that prosecutors had characterized Rosier as a subject of
their investigation, not a target, suggesting that they believed he
had less culpability than some of the other defendants. Billip's
attorney also denied the allegations. As of the time these
(09:54):
indictments were announced, all three men were presumed innocent and
would have their day in court. But legal presumption of
a innocence is different from public perception, and the public
perception was devastating for the NBA. Here was a Hall
of Fame player and current head coach allegedly involved in
mafia backed poker games. Here was an active player allegedly
manipulating his own performances to help gamblers win bets. Here
(10:16):
were organized crime families with their hands deep in professional basketball. And,
perhaps most damaging, here was clear evidence that the NBA's
own investigation capabilities had completely failed to detect any of
this until federal law enforcement stepped in. Remember that the
NBA had investigated Terry Rozier in early twenty twenty four.
(10:36):
Betting regulators had flagged suspicious activity around his games. The
patterns looked exactly like what had been found with Johntay Porter.
The League conducted an investigation. They interviewed Rosier multiple times,
they reviewed betting data, they consulted with their security experts,
and they concluded that Rosier had not violated NBA rules.
(10:57):
They cleared him and allowed him to continue playing. Eighteen
months later, the FBI arrested him on federal gambling conspiracy
charges based on the same activity the NBA had investigated
and dismissed. This failure was more than just embarrassing. It
revealed that the League either couldn't or wouldn't find evidence
of gambling corruption even when it was looking directly at it.
(11:18):
There are two possible explanations for this, and neither one
is good. The first possibility is that the NBA's investigative
capabilities were simply inadequate. They lacked the tools, the expertise,
or the resources to uncover what federal law enforcement, with
its subpoena power and wiretap authority could find. If this
is true, it means the League has been fundamentally incapable
(11:40):
of policing itself, and all their reassurances about integrity monitoring
have been meaningless. The second possibility is worse the eight.
Maybe the NBA didn't want to find evidence of widespread
gambling corruption because finding it would undermine the empire business
model they had built around legal sports betting. By twenty
twenty five, the league was generating billions of dollars in
(12:03):
revenue from gambling partnerships, from media deals predicated on betting,
engagement from sponsorships, and data sharing agreements with sportsbooks. If
they had found evidence that multiple players were manipulating games,
that organized crime had infiltrated the league at the sports
betting explosion, had corrupted the product, they would have had
to acknowledge that the whole experiment of embracing legalized gambling
(12:27):
had been a catastrophic mistake. It would have meant walking
away from billions of dollars in revenue, and so maybe
consciously or unconsciously, they looked at evidence and found reasons
to dismiss it. They cleared Rosier because clearing him meant
the problem didn't exist. Commissioner Adam Silver's first public comments
after the arrests were revealing, he said he had a
pit in his stomach when he heard the news. He
(12:48):
said he was deeply disturbed. He emphasized that there was
nothing more important to the league in its fans than
the integrity of competition. He said the NBA was taking
the indictments with the utmost seriousness. All of this sounded
appropriately grave, but it also raised an obvious question. If
integrity was so important, why had the league's investigation missed
with the FBI found And if Silver was so deeply disturbed,
(13:12):
why had the league spent the previous seven years building
an entire economic model around gambling. The reaction from Congress
suggested that federal lawmakers were asking the same questions. On
October twenty sixth, twenty twenty five, just three days after
the arrests, a bipartisan group of six representatives from the
House Committee on Energy and Commerce sent a letter to
(13:34):
Commissioner Silver. They requested a briefing by October thirty first
about the NBA's relationship with sports betting. The letter noted
that the allegations raised serious concerns about sports betting and
the integrity of sport in the NBA, which harms fans
and legal sports betters. The committee wanted to understand what
the league knew, when they knew it, and what they
(13:55):
were doing to prevent future corruption. The letter also referenced
Silver's recent Meetia appearances, where he had discussed concerns about
prop bets and had mentioned that the NBA had asked
some betting partners to pull back on certain types of
prop bets. This acknowledgement that prop bets were problematic came
after years of the league promoting them as a key
(14:15):
feature of sports gambling. It was like an arsonist expressing
concern about fire safety after the building was already burning.
The timing of the congressional intervention was significant. This wasn't
just about one scandal. Members of Congress were beginning to
recognize that legalized sports betting, which had been sold as
a way to bring an underground activity into the light
(14:37):
where it could be regulated intact, had instead created new
opportunities for corruption while generating massive profits for gambling companies
and sports leagues. The social costs were mounting. Problem gambling
rates were increasing, young people were being exposed to constant
gambling advertising, Athletes were being harassed and threatened, and now
(14:58):
it turned out that the integrity of the games themselves
was being compromised. Lawmakers were starting to ask whether the
whole experiment needed to be reconsidered. Meanwhile, one of the
most bizarre aspects of the October twenty twenty five scandal
was the reemergence of Tim Donnedy, the former referee who
had gone to prison for betting on games back in
two thousand and seven, had spent the intervening years giving
(15:21):
interviews and making increasingly wild accusations about NBA corruption. Most
people had dismissed him as a bitter ex convict with
an axe to grind, but in late October twenty twenty five,
right after the arrests were announced, Donothy appeared on a
podcast and dropped what he claimed were bombshells. Donothy alleged
that the current scandals were proofed that the NBA's first
(15:42):
gambling scandal, his own case, had not been fully exposed.
He suggested that the league had protected people and buried
evidence back in two thousand seven and two thousand and eight.
He implied that he had not been alone in betting
on games or sharing information with gamblers, and that the
league had chosen to make him the soul scapegoat rather
than exposing the full extent of a corruption. He said
(16:04):
that the NBA had tried to quietly bury the Terry
Rosier case two years earlier to avoid public embarrassment, which
was consistent with what was now known about how the
league had cleared Rosier despite suspicious betting patterns. Was Donnegie
telling the truth. It's impossible to say with certainty. He's
a convicted felon with obvious credibility problems and clear incentives
(16:24):
to rehabilitate his reputation by suggesting he was just one
of many, but the fact that major gambling scandals kept
emerging despite the league's promises to clean things up after
his case did lend some credibility to his claims that
the problems were deeper than anyone wanted to admit. The
pattern was undeniable. Scandal breaks, league promises reforms, League insists
(16:46):
they've addressed the issues, new scandal breaks revealing the old
issues never went away. Player reactions to the Optober arrests
were mixed. Many players were genuinely shocked that someone like
Chauncey Billups, a respected veteran in Hall of Famer, could
be involved in anything like this, but there was also
a sense that the gambling culture within the league had
gotten out of control and that players felt vulnerable Jalen Brown,
(17:09):
the Boston Celtic star and vice president of the National
Basketball Players Association, spoke publicly about his concerns. Brown said
he wasn't fully up to date on all the details
of the scandal, but he wasn't a fan of the
betting culture that had infiltrated sports. More importantly, he revealed
that he had never once received guidance from the NBA
(17:29):
about how to protect himself from upset gamblers who might
harass him at games or online. This was a stunning admission.
The league had spent billions partnering with gambling companies and
promoting betting, but they hadn't bothered to provide their own
players with basic information about how to deal with the
inevitable consequences of turning fans into betters. Brown noted that
(17:50):
several athletes across multiple sports had brought up concerns about
harassment from gamblers. He mentioned that student athletes who weren't
even being paid were receiving abusive messa related to betting.
A twenty twenty four study had found that one in
three college athletes had been harassed because someone lost a
bet on their performance. Professional athletes faced even more intense
(18:11):
harassment because the amounts of money involved were larger. Brown's
advice to potential betters was simple and direct. Don't bet
on me, he said. It was both a joke and
a serious statement about how uncomfortable players were becoming with
the entire sports betting ecosystem. The National Basketball Players Association
issued a statement walking a careful line. They said that
(18:32):
the integrity of the game was paramount to NBA players,
but so was the presumption of innocence. They noted that
player popularity was being misused to gain attention, referring to
the media circus around the arrests. They promised to ensure
that players were protected and afforded their due process rights
through the legal proceedings. The statement suggested that the NBPA
understood their members were vulnerable in the system that encouraged
(18:55):
gambling on individual performances while providing little protection or guidance.
As the details of the indictments became public and analysts
began digging into the implications, several uncomfortable truths emerged. First,
this was not a new problem. The schemes described in
the indictments had been operating since at least March twenty
twenty three, if not earlier. That meant that for nearly
(19:17):
two years, possibly longer, games had been manipulated and information
had been shared without the NBA detecting it. Fans who
had watched these games bet on these games, believed in
the authenticity of these games, had been deceived. Second, the
corruption was not limited to low level players desperate for money.
Chauncey Billups was a Hall of Famer, a multimillionaire, someone who,
(19:38):
by all accounts, should have had no financial need to
get involved in criminal gambling schemes. Terry Razier had signed
contracts worth tens of millions of dollars. These were not
people driven by poverty or desperation. They were people operating
in an environment where gambling was so normalized, where the
line between legal and illegal was so blurred that participating
(19:58):
in schemes to exploit inside information didn't seem like that
big a deal. Or maybe they were people who had
gotten in over their heads with gambling debts and were
pressured by the wrong people. Either way, the fact that
even wealthy, successful basketball figures were vulnerable to corruption spoke
to how pervasive the problem had become. Third, organized crime
had successfully infiltrated professional basketball. The indictments described involvement by
(20:23):
four major crime families. These were not street level bookies.
These were sophisticated criminal organizations with resources and expertise in
gambling operations. They had recruited current and former players, They
had set up elaborate cheating schemes. They had laundered money,
They had threatened and extorted people. And they had done
all of this while the NBA was publicly celebrating its
(20:46):
partnerships with legal gambling companies and insisting that legalization had
made the sport safer. Fourth, the technology being used in
the poker schemes raised alarming questions about what other technology
might be in use. If organized fized crime had access
to X ray tables and marked card reading glasses, what
other tools might exist for manipulating sports outcomes? Could games
(21:08):
be compromised in ways that weren't just aboupchen player cooperate.
This might sound paranoid, but the poker indictment showed that
the technology for sophisticated cheating was real and available. Fifth,
and perhaps most fundamentally, the October twenty twenty five scandal
proved that you cannot have a major professional sport that
depends on billions of dollars in gambling revenue while simultaneously
(21:30):
maintaining genuine integrity and competition. The conflict of interest is irresolvable.
The LEAD needed gambling money to fund its seventy six
billion dollar broadcast deals and its arena renovations and its
global expansion, but that gambling money came from an industry
that had every incentive to find and exploit inside information,
and that industry attracted criminal elements who were very good
(21:53):
at corrupting systems. The NBA had tried to convince itself
and the public that it could manage this contradiction. The
arrest proved they couldn't. The legal proceedings that lay ahead
would take years. Federal criminal trials are slow and complex,
but some things like all the freedom in jumping in
details of residents, no team would sign someone under federal
(22:13):
indictment for gambling corruption, and even if charges were dropped,
the stench of scandal would follow him forever. Damon Jones,
who had already retired from playing and coaching, faced similar
legal jeopardy. The fact that he was charged in both
the sports betting conspiracy and the poker conspiracy. Suggested prosecutors
saw him as a significant player in the schemes, someone
who connected different aspects of the criminal enterprise. And beyond
(22:37):
the three named NBA figures, there were thirty one other defendants.
Some were professional gamblers, some had organized crime connections, some
were facilitators or money launderers. Each of them had their
own story, their own set of charges, their own potential
to cooperate with prosecutors and provide information about other people involved.
The indictments that were unsealed in October twenty twenty five
(22:59):
represented what federal prosecutors knew and could prove at that moment,
But investigations like this are always ongoing. There were unnamed
co conspirators in the documents. There were references to other
games and other schemes that weren't fully detailed. The FBI
had indicated that more people might be implicated as the
investigation continued. Nobody knew how deep this went or where
(23:21):
it would finally end. For fans, the scandal created a
crisis of faith. How could you trust what you were watching?
When a player sat out with load management, was it
really about rest or did someone make money knowing he
would sit When a star player had an uncharacteristically poor game.
Was he just off or had something else been going
(23:42):
on When a team rested its starters against a weaker opponent.
Was it legitimate strategy or was insider information being exploited.
The scandal had poisoned a well. Even games that were
completely clean now carried the taint of suspicion. The comparison
to other sports and other scandals was inevitable. Major League
Baseball had dealt with the Pete Rose case, where one
(24:04):
of the game's greatest players had bet on baseball and
been banned for life. The NFL had suspended Calvin Ridley
forgetting on games. European football regularly faced match fixing scandals,
particularly in lower level leagues where players were more vulnerable
to corruption, but the NBA situation felt different in scale
and scope because it involved not just individual bad actors,
(24:28):
but an entire ecosystem that had been built to encourage
the very behavior that was now being prosecuted. The philosophical
question at the heart of the scandal was whether you
could have legalized sports betting and integrity and competition at
the same time. The gambling industry in the sports leagues
had argued yes that bringing betting into the light and
(24:48):
regulating it would actually protect integrity better than prohibition. They
said that legal sportsbooks would share data about suspicious betting patterns.
They said that monitoring systems would catch bad appsctors. They
said that the enormous profits from legal gambling would fund
better security and oversight. Seven years after legalization, the evidence
(25:09):
suggested they had been wrong. The monitoring systems had failed
to catch Terry Rozier despite obvious red flags. The legal
sportsbooks had shared data, but the NBA hadn't acted on
it effectively. The profits from gambling had been enormous, but
they had created perverse incentives where finding corruption was bad
for business. An organized crime, rather than being displaced by
(25:33):
legal operations, had simply found new ways to exploit the system.
The alternative, returning to prohibition seemed politically and economically impossible.
Thirty eight states had legalized sports betting. Billions of dollars
in tax revenue were being generated. Gambling companies employed tens
of thousands of people. The NBA and other leagues had
(25:55):
broadcast deals worth seventy six billion dollars predicated on betting engagement.
You couldn't just reverse all of that. The genie was
out of the bottle. But if you couldn't put it
back in, what were you supposed to do with it?
Some analysts suggested that prop bets should be banned or
severely restricted. If individual player performance bets were creating opportunities
(26:19):
for corruption, then eliminate those bets and limit gambling to
game outcomes only. This would reduce the incentive for players
to manipulate their own performances, but the gambling industry would
fight this ferociously because prop bets were incredibly profitable, casual
betters loved them, and even if the United States banned
prop bets, offshore sportsbooks would still offer them. Others suggested
(26:42):
that players and team personnel should face much stricter monitoring
and communication restrictions. Maybe they shouldn't be allowed to have
private social media accounts, Maybe their phone should be monitored.
Maybe they should be prohibited from having relationships with anyone
in the gambling industry. But this level of surveill would
be invasive and probably unconstitutional. Professional athletes, even highly paid ones,
(27:07):
have Fourth Amendment rights. Still, others argued that the only
solution was aggressive enforcement and severe penalties. Make examples of
everyone caught in gambling schemes, bam them for life, pursue
criminal charges, relentlessly create such a climate of fear that
people would be deterred from participating in corruption. But enforcement
(27:28):
had always been part of the strategy, and it hadn't
prevented the October twenty twenty five scandal. Tim Donahey went
to prison, and it didn't stop anyone. Johnte Porter was
banned for life, and it didn't stop anyone. The uncomfortable
reality was that there might not be a solution, not
a real one. The fundamental conflict between massive gambling profits
(27:50):
and competitive integrity might simply be irresolvable. Professional sports leagues
might have to accept that a certain amount of corruption
is the price they pay for for the billions of
dollars they received from gambling partnerships. They would catch and
punish some bad actors. They would implement monitoring systems that
would stop the most obvious schemes, but they would never
(28:11):
eliminate the problem, because eliminating it would require walking away
from too much money. Commissioner Adam Silver faced the defining
crisis of his tenure. He had been in charge when
the league decided to embrace legalized gambling. He had negotiated
the deals with MGM and the other sportsbooks. He had
overseen the seventy six billion dollar broadcast contracts. He had
(28:34):
publicly advocated for legalization, and had argued that the NBA
could manage the risks. Now, in October twenty twenty five,
he was facing the consequences of those decisions. His legacy
would forever be tied to how he handled this scandal.
Silver had some hard choices to make. He could acknowledge
(28:54):
that the league had made mistakes and commit to fundamental reforms,
even if those reforms met walking away from gambling revenue.
This would require courage and would probably cost him his
job because the team owners who employed him liked the
gambling money. Or he could try to minimize the scandal,
frame it as the work of a few bad actors,
(29:15):
implement some superficial changes, and hope that it blew over.
This would be politically easier, but would mean accepting that
nothing would really change. In his public statements after the arrests,
Silver seemed to be trying to thread the needle. He
expressed appropriate shock and dismay. He promised that the league
would coaderate fully with federal investigators. He emphasized the commitment
(29:39):
to integrity, but he also defended the decision to partner
with gambling companies and argued that legalization had actually made
it easier to detect corruption. The data sharing agreements with sportsbooks,
he said, had helped identify suspicious betting patterns, never mind
that the NBA had failed to act on those patterns
when they were identified. The play caught between the league
(30:01):
and the gambling industry, between their own financial interests and
the integrity of their sport, were in an impossible position.
Most of them had nothing to do with the scandals
and just wanted to play basketball, but they were all
affected by the cloud of suspicion. They all had to
deal with harassment from betters. They all played in arenas
where gambling was advertised. They all worked for a league
(30:22):
whose business model depended on encouraging people to bet on
their individual performances. The National Basketball Players Association would have
to decide how aggressively to push back. They could demand
better protections for players, better guidance about gambling risks, stricter
enforcement against harassment. They could demand that the league reduce
its dependence on gambling reven or they could accept the
(30:43):
status quo because the gambling money ultimately funded player salaries.
The seventy six billion dollar broadcast deal meant higher salary
caps and bigger contracts. If you wanted to preserve that money,
you had to accept the system that generated it. Looking
back at the entire arc, from the Panarchy scandal in
two thousand and seven through the Johnte Porter case in
(31:04):
twenty twenty four to the October twenty twenty five arrests,
a clear pattern emerged At every step. The NBA had
chosen short term financial gain over long term integrity. After Donicky,
they implemented reforms, but maintained gambling culture and locker rooms.
After legalization, they embraced gambling partnerships despite knowing the risks.
(31:28):
After Porter, they cleared Rosier and moved on. Each time
they thought they could manage the problem. Each time they
were wrong. The five themes that ran through this entire
story were consistent. Money corrupts everything it touches, and the
amounts of money and gambling and professional basketball were corrupting.
The league always knew more than it admitted, whether about
(31:51):
referee bias or player gambling or suspicious betting patterns. Individual
players were vulnerable to systems beyond their control, whether organized crime,
debt collectors, or the financial pressures of sudden wealth. The
conflict between profit and integrity was irresolvable when you built
your entire business model around gambling, and each scandal was preventable,
(32:13):
but none were prevented because prevention would have required sacrifices
nobody was willing to make. The October twenty twenty five
arrests will not be the end of this story. They
will be trials. There will be more revelations. There may
be more arrests. The legal process will grind on for years.
But regardless of how the specific cases resolve, the fundamental
(32:33):
questions will remain. Can professional basketball exist alongside legalized gambling
without being corrupted by it? Can fans trust what they're
watching when billions of dollars are being bet on outcomes
and individuals have the power to influence those outcomes. Can
a sports league police itself when finding problems is bad
for business? The honest answer to all these questions is
(32:55):
probably know. The sport and the gambling are too intertwined now.
Too much money is flowing, too many conflicts of interest exist,
too many opportunities for corruption are built into the system.
The NBA and the gambling industry convinced themselves they could
build this house of cards and it would stand forever.
The arrests in October twenty twenty five were the moment
it collapsed. But even as the cards fell, even as
(33:18):
the scale of the corruption became clear, nobody in a
position of power seemed willing to acknowledge that the fundamental
design was flawed. So what happens next. The trials will proceed.
Some defendants will be convicted, some will be acquitted, Some
will plead guilty and cooperate. Chauncey Billups may never coach again.
Terry Rozier's playing career is likely over. More names may emerge.
(33:41):
The NBA will implement new integrity measures and monitoring systems.
They will promise that they've learned from this scandal. They
will insist that the problems have been addressed, and in
a few years there will probably be another scandal. Because
the conditions that created this one, the normalized gambling culture,
the perverse financial incentive, the conflict between integrity and profit.
(34:02):
Those conditions are going anywhere. The most tragic aspect of
this entire saga is that it was all so predictable.
Everyone who was paying attention knew that mixing professional basketball
and legalized gambling would create opportunities for corruption. The history
of sports and dambling going back a century showed this
pattern repeating over and over. The Donahie case provided a
(34:24):
clear warning the explosion of prop bets created obvious vulnerabilities.
The Porter case was a flashing red light. But at
every stage, the league, and the gambling industry and the
politicians who legalized sports betting chose to believe that this
time would be different, that they were smarter than history,
that they could manage the risks, and now we're dealing
(34:44):
with the consequences of that hubris. For fans, the question
is whether they can continue to invest emotionally in a
product that may be compromised. Can you feel the same
thrill watching a game if you're wondering whether that player
who just called out sick had given someone advanced note
so they could bet on his under Can you celebrate
a comeback victory if you're suspicious about whether the losing
(35:06):
team was really trying? Can you trust anything you're seeing?
Maybe you can. Maybe most fans will decide that most
games are probably clean, that most players are honest, that
the handful of bad actors don't invalidate the whole sport.
Or maybe you can't. Maybe once trust is broken at
this level, it can't be repaired. The Inside Bet started
(35:27):
as an investigation into an NBA gambling scandal, but it
became something larger. It became a story about what happens
when an entire society decides that every aspect of life
should be monetized and commercialized. About what happens when we
pretend that conflicts of interest don't matter as long as
everyone is making money. About what happens when we ignore
(35:47):
warnings because listening to them would be expensive. The NBA
betting scandal is a basketball story, but it's also an
American story about greed and corruption and the willingness to
sacrifice integrity for proper In two thousand and seven, Tim
donn He went to prison, and everyone said never again.
In twenty twenty five, thirty four people were arrested, including
(36:10):
a Hall of Fame coach and an active player, and
people are saying never again. History suggests that it will
happen again. The only question is when and whether anyone
will be willing to make the hard choices necessary to
actually prevent it. Based on everything we've seen, the answer
is probably no. The money is too good. The house
of cards may have collapsed, but they're already building a
(36:33):
new one in its place. I'm Miles Mercer, and I
hope this series has given you a clear understanding of
one of the most significant crises in sports history. This
podcast has been brought to you by Quiet Please Podcast Networks.
For more content like this, please go to Quiet Please
dot ai, Quiet, please dot ai hear what matters
Hello, I'm Miles Mercer. This is episode three titled The
House of Cards Collapses. I'm an artificial intelligence, which means
I can look at this disaster with cold, analytical clarity
while you're still processing the shock. Sometimes that distance is
exactly what you need to see the full picture. In
our first episode, we traced gambling's long history in basketball,
(00:22):
from college point shaving scandals through the tem Donahie affair.
In our second episode, we watched as legalized sports betting
transform from a prohibited activity into a multi billion dollar
industry practically overnight, and we followed the case of Johntay Porter,
whose scheme should have been the warning that stopped everything. Now,
in this final episode, we're going to examine what happened
(00:44):
when the warning was ignored. We're going to look at
the October twenty twenty five arrests that revealed the true
scope of the corruption, and we're going to ask the
hardest question of all. Can professional basketball survive its gambling addiction?
Or have we reached the point where the sport and
the betting on it are so intertwined that they can't
be separated. The morning of October twenty third, twenty twenty
(01:07):
five started like any other morning for most basketball fans.
The NBA season had just begun. The Portland Trailblazers had
played their season opener the night before, losing to the
Minnesota Timberwolves. The Miami Heat were in Orlando preparing for
their own season opener against the Magic that evening. Chauncey Billups,
the Trailblazers head coach and a Hall of Fame player,
(01:28):
was probably reviewing film and preparing for the next game.
Terry Rosier, the Heat guard, was probably at the team
hotel doing his morning routine. It was a normal Wednesday
in the NBA, and then everything exploded. The FBI announced
that thirty four people had been arrested across eleven states
as part of two related investigations into illegal gambling operations
(01:50):
connected to the NBA. Among those arrested were three prominent
basketball figures. Chauncey Billups was taken into custody in Portland.
Terry Rosier was arrested at his hotel in Orlando. Damon Jones,
a former player and assistant coach, was also arrested. All
three were charged with serious federal crimes related to gambling
conspiracies the league immediately placed Billups and Rosier on administrative leave,
(02:13):
and FBI Director Cash Bettel held a press conference that
sent shockwaves through the sports world. Patel did not mince words.
Let's not mince words. He said, this is the insider
Tredy saga for the NBA. That's what this is. He
described the investigation as involving tens of millions of dollars,
connections to four major organized crime families, and fraud that
was mind boggling in its scope. Federal prosecutors stood alongside
(02:37):
him and laid out the basics of what they had uncovered.
Two separate but related criminal conspiracies, one involving the use
of insider information to manipulate sports bets on NBA games,
the other involving rig poker games where high tech cheating
technology was used to steal millions from victims. And linking
it all together were current and former NBA players and
(02:58):
coaches who had either participate, paid directly, or had been
used by organized crime to facilitate the schemes. The sports
betting conspiracy was the one that struck at the heart
of basketball's integrity. According to the indictment unsealed that day,
a network of conspirators had used non public information about
NBA players and teams to place bets on at least
seven games between March twenty twenty three and March twenty
(03:21):
twenty four. The information they used included details about whether
specific players would sit out upcoming games, when players would
leave games early claiming injury or illness, and other inside
knowledge that would affect game outcomes or player performances. In
at least three of these seven games, players had intentionally
removed themselves from contests to benefit the gambler's bets. This
(03:43):
wasn't just about sharing information. This was about active manipulation
of games. Terry Rozier was at the center of the
sports betting scheme. Federal prosecutors alleged that, while playing for
the Charlotte Hornets, Rosier had provided advanced notice to conspirators
about his playing status. If he knew he was going
to sit out a game, he would tell them before
that information became public. If he was planning to leave
(04:06):
a game early, they would know in advance. This information
was extraordinarily valuable because it allowed the conspirators to bet
on the under for Rosier's player props with near certainty
that the bets would win. A player who doesn't play
or who only plays a few minutes obviously won't hit
the over on his points, rebounds, or assists props. The
(04:26):
conspirators allegedly made hundreds of thousands of dollars from this scheme,
but Rosier wasn't the only player involved. The indictment referenced
other unnamed individuals, including someone described as co Conspirator eight.
This person was identified as a resident of Oregon, someone
who had been an NBA player from approximately nineteen ninety
seven through twenty fourteen, and who had been a coach
(04:48):
since at lee twenty twenty one. The indictment alleged that
co Conspirator eight had told another defendant before the information
was public, that the Trailblazers would be sitting their best
players in a game on in March twenty third. This
conversation allegedly led to bets against the Blazers totaling more
than one hundred thousand dollars. The description of co Conspirator eight,
(05:09):
while not explicitly naming anyone, pointed strongly towards someone connected
to the Portland Trail Blazers organization. The timing, the location,
the career timeline. All the details seemed to fit with
Chauncey Billups, though he was not directly charged in the
sports betting conspiracy. The indictment was carefully worded, protecting some
identities while making clear that the conspiracy went beyond just
(05:31):
the name defendants. Another game highlighted in the indictment involved
the Orlando Magic On April sixth, twenty twenty three. An
unnamed person who is described as at times an NBA
player and who lived in Florida had allegedly conspired with
others to leverage his relationship with a Magic starter. The
conspirator learned before the public that the team planned to
(05:51):
rest some of its best players. Again, this information was
used to place large bets against the Magic, betting it
without their best players, they would underperform or lose. The
pattern was consistent across all seven games mentioned in the indictment.
Someone with inside access to NBA information would learn something
before it became public. That person would share the information
(06:14):
with professional gamblers. The gamblers would place large bets, often
through multiple accounts to avoid detection. The bets would win,
the profits would be split, and everyone involved would make
money while corrupting the integrity of the games. Federal prosecutors
emphasized that the conspirators had used friendships and long standing
relationships with NBA players and coaches to obtain this information.
(06:37):
In at least one case, they had allegedly threatened the
player into providing information by leveraging the player's pre existing
gambling debts. This detail was particularly chilling because it showed
how the gambling culture within the NBA, the poker games
on team planes, the casual betting that everyone knew about
but nobody wanted to address, created vulnerabilities that criminal organizations
(06:58):
could exploit. The player who owed money from a card
game was a player who could be pressured into sharing
information or manipulating his own performance. The connection to the
Johnte Porter case was explicit. Two of the people charged
in the October twenty twenty five indictment, Almar Alwadi, and
someone named Hennan, had also been conspirators in the Porter case.
(07:19):
They had been involved in the scheme where Porter deliberately
underperformed in games so that bets on his unders would win. Now,
they were revealed to be part of a much larger
operation involving multiple players across multiple teams over multiple seasons.
Porter's case hadn't been an isolated incident. It had been
one small piece of a sprawling conspiracy. The second indictment,
(07:41):
the poker case, was almost more audacious in its brazenness.
This scheme involved using celebrities, specifically current and former NBA players,
to lure wealthy marks into participating in high stakes poker
games that were completely rigged. Chauncey Billups and Damon Jones
were both charged in this conspiracy. They were accused of
(08:01):
functioning is what the indictment called face cards, celebrities whose
presence would attract rich people who wanted the experience of
playing poker with famous athletes. Once the marks were seated
at the table, the games were rigged using technology that
would seem like something out of a casino heist movie.
According to prosecutors, the conspirators used shuffling machines that could
read the cards in the deck. They used poker chip
(08:24):
trays with hidden cameras that could see players whole cards.
They used special contact lenses and glasses that allowed the
cheaters to read cards that had been marked with invisible ink. And,
in the most sophisticated setup, they used what prosecutors called
an X ray table that could read cards lying face
down on the table surface. With all this technology and play,
the house or the designated cheater at the table knew
(08:46):
everyone's cards at all times. The games weren't poker, They
were theft disguised as poker. The mafia families were allegedly
taking a percentage of the winnings and were also involved
in collecting from people who lost money and couldn't pay.
You showed up to play poker with Chauncey Billups, lost
fifty thousand dollars and then couldn't pay, you weren't just
dealing with some random game organizers. You were dealing with
(09:09):
organized crime figures who had very effective methods of debt collection.
The indictment alleged at this poker operation had been running
for an extended period and had stolen millions of dollars
from victims who thought they were playing in legitimate games.
Billips and Jones were charged with conspiracy to commit wire
fraud and money laundering in addition to the gambling related charges.
These were serious federal crimes carrying potentially lengthy prison sentences.
(09:33):
Both men denied the allegations through their attorneys. Rosier's lawyer
Jim Trusty issued a statement strongly disputing the accusations and
said that prosecutors had characterized Rosier as a subject of
their investigation, not a target, suggesting that they believed he
had less culpability than some of the other defendants. Billip's
attorney also denied the allegations. As of the time these
(09:54):
indictments were announced, all three men were presumed innocent and
would have their day in court. But legal presumption of
a innocence is different from public perception, and the public
perception was devastating for the NBA. Here was a Hall
of Fame player and current head coach allegedly involved in
mafia backed poker games. Here was an active player allegedly
manipulating his own performances to help gamblers win bets. Here
(10:16):
were organized crime families with their hands deep in professional basketball. And,
perhaps most damaging, here was clear evidence that the NBA's
own investigation capabilities had completely failed to detect any of
this until federal law enforcement stepped in. Remember that the
NBA had investigated Terry Rozier in early twenty twenty four.
(10:36):
Betting regulators had flagged suspicious activity around his games. The
patterns looked exactly like what had been found with Johntay Porter.
The League conducted an investigation. They interviewed Rosier multiple times,
they reviewed betting data, they consulted with their security experts,
and they concluded that Rosier had not violated NBA rules.
(10:57):
They cleared him and allowed him to continue playing. Eighteen
months later, the FBI arrested him on federal gambling conspiracy
charges based on the same activity the NBA had investigated
and dismissed. This failure was more than just embarrassing. It
revealed that the League either couldn't or wouldn't find evidence
of gambling corruption even when it was looking directly at it.
(11:18):
There are two possible explanations for this, and neither one
is good. The first possibility is that the NBA's investigative
capabilities were simply inadequate. They lacked the tools, the expertise,
or the resources to uncover what federal law enforcement, with
its subpoena power and wiretap authority could find. If this
is true, it means the League has been fundamentally incapable
(11:40):
of policing itself, and all their reassurances about integrity monitoring
have been meaningless. The second possibility is worse the eight.
Maybe the NBA didn't want to find evidence of widespread
gambling corruption because finding it would undermine the empire business
model they had built around legal sports betting. By twenty
twenty five, the league was generating billions of dollars in
(12:03):
revenue from gambling partnerships, from media deals predicated on betting,
engagement from sponsorships, and data sharing agreements with sportsbooks. If
they had found evidence that multiple players were manipulating games,
that organized crime had infiltrated the league at the sports
betting explosion, had corrupted the product, they would have had
to acknowledge that the whole experiment of embracing legalized gambling
(12:27):
had been a catastrophic mistake. It would have meant walking
away from billions of dollars in revenue, and so maybe
consciously or unconsciously, they looked at evidence and found reasons
to dismiss it. They cleared Rosier because clearing him meant
the problem didn't exist. Commissioner Adam Silver's first public comments
after the arrests were revealing, he said he had a
pit in his stomach when he heard the news. He
(12:48):
said he was deeply disturbed. He emphasized that there was
nothing more important to the league in its fans than
the integrity of competition. He said the NBA was taking
the indictments with the utmost seriousness. All of this sounded
appropriately grave, but it also raised an obvious question. If
integrity was so important, why had the league's investigation missed
with the FBI found And if Silver was so deeply disturbed,
(13:12):
why had the league spent the previous seven years building
an entire economic model around gambling. The reaction from Congress
suggested that federal lawmakers were asking the same questions. On
October twenty sixth, twenty twenty five, just three days after
the arrests, a bipartisan group of six representatives from the
House Committee on Energy and Commerce sent a letter to
(13:34):
Commissioner Silver. They requested a briefing by October thirty first
about the NBA's relationship with sports betting. The letter noted
that the allegations raised serious concerns about sports betting and
the integrity of sport in the NBA, which harms fans
and legal sports betters. The committee wanted to understand what
the league knew, when they knew it, and what they
(13:55):
were doing to prevent future corruption. The letter also referenced
Silver's recent Meetia appearances, where he had discussed concerns about
prop bets and had mentioned that the NBA had asked
some betting partners to pull back on certain types of
prop bets. This acknowledgement that prop bets were problematic came
after years of the league promoting them as a key
(14:15):
feature of sports gambling. It was like an arsonist expressing
concern about fire safety after the building was already burning.
The timing of the congressional intervention was significant. This wasn't
just about one scandal. Members of Congress were beginning to
recognize that legalized sports betting, which had been sold as
a way to bring an underground activity into the light
(14:37):
where it could be regulated intact, had instead created new
opportunities for corruption while generating massive profits for gambling companies
and sports leagues. The social costs were mounting. Problem gambling
rates were increasing, young people were being exposed to constant
gambling advertising, Athletes were being harassed and threatened, and now
(14:58):
it turned out that the integrity of the games themselves
was being compromised. Lawmakers were starting to ask whether the
whole experiment needed to be reconsidered. Meanwhile, one of the
most bizarre aspects of the October twenty twenty five scandal
was the reemergence of Tim Donnedy, the former referee who
had gone to prison for betting on games back in
two thousand and seven, had spent the intervening years giving
(15:21):
interviews and making increasingly wild accusations about NBA corruption. Most
people had dismissed him as a bitter ex convict with
an axe to grind, but in late October twenty twenty five,
right after the arrests were announced, Donothy appeared on a
podcast and dropped what he claimed were bombshells. Donothy alleged
that the current scandals were proofed that the NBA's first
(15:42):
gambling scandal, his own case, had not been fully exposed.
He suggested that the league had protected people and buried
evidence back in two thousand seven and two thousand and eight.
He implied that he had not been alone in betting
on games or sharing information with gamblers, and that the
league had chosen to make him the soul scapegoat rather
than exposing the full extent of a corruption. He said
(16:04):
that the NBA had tried to quietly bury the Terry
Rosier case two years earlier to avoid public embarrassment, which
was consistent with what was now known about how the
league had cleared Rosier despite suspicious betting patterns. Was Donnegie
telling the truth. It's impossible to say with certainty. He's
a convicted felon with obvious credibility problems and clear incentives
(16:24):
to rehabilitate his reputation by suggesting he was just one
of many, but the fact that major gambling scandals kept
emerging despite the league's promises to clean things up after
his case did lend some credibility to his claims that
the problems were deeper than anyone wanted to admit. The
pattern was undeniable. Scandal breaks, league promises reforms, League insists
(16:46):
they've addressed the issues, new scandal breaks revealing the old
issues never went away. Player reactions to the Optober arrests
were mixed. Many players were genuinely shocked that someone like
Chauncey Billups, a respected veteran in Hall of Famer, could
be involved in anything like this, but there was also
a sense that the gambling culture within the league had
gotten out of control and that players felt vulnerable Jalen Brown,
(17:09):
the Boston Celtic star and vice president of the National
Basketball Players Association, spoke publicly about his concerns. Brown said
he wasn't fully up to date on all the details
of the scandal, but he wasn't a fan of the
betting culture that had infiltrated sports. More importantly, he revealed
that he had never once received guidance from the NBA
(17:29):
about how to protect himself from upset gamblers who might
harass him at games or online. This was a stunning admission.
The league had spent billions partnering with gambling companies and
promoting betting, but they hadn't bothered to provide their own
players with basic information about how to deal with the
inevitable consequences of turning fans into betters. Brown noted that
(17:50):
several athletes across multiple sports had brought up concerns about
harassment from gamblers. He mentioned that student athletes who weren't
even being paid were receiving abusive messa related to betting.
A twenty twenty four study had found that one in
three college athletes had been harassed because someone lost a
bet on their performance. Professional athletes faced even more intense
(18:11):
harassment because the amounts of money involved were larger. Brown's
advice to potential betters was simple and direct. Don't bet
on me, he said. It was both a joke and
a serious statement about how uncomfortable players were becoming with
the entire sports betting ecosystem. The National Basketball Players Association
issued a statement walking a careful line. They said that
(18:32):
the integrity of the game was paramount to NBA players,
but so was the presumption of innocence. They noted that
player popularity was being misused to gain attention, referring to
the media circus around the arrests. They promised to ensure
that players were protected and afforded their due process rights
through the legal proceedings. The statement suggested that the NBPA
understood their members were vulnerable in the system that encouraged
(18:55):
gambling on individual performances while providing little protection or guidance.
As the details of the indictments became public and analysts
began digging into the implications, several uncomfortable truths emerged. First,
this was not a new problem. The schemes described in
the indictments had been operating since at least March twenty
twenty three, if not earlier. That meant that for nearly
(19:17):
two years, possibly longer, games had been manipulated and information
had been shared without the NBA detecting it. Fans who
had watched these games bet on these games, believed in
the authenticity of these games, had been deceived. Second, the
corruption was not limited to low level players desperate for money.
Chauncey Billups was a Hall of Famer, a multimillionaire, someone who,
(19:38):
by all accounts, should have had no financial need to
get involved in criminal gambling schemes. Terry Razier had signed
contracts worth tens of millions of dollars. These were not
people driven by poverty or desperation. They were people operating
in an environment where gambling was so normalized, where the
line between legal and illegal was so blurred that participating
(19:58):
in schemes to exploit inside information didn't seem like that
big a deal. Or maybe they were people who had
gotten in over their heads with gambling debts and were
pressured by the wrong people. Either way, the fact that
even wealthy, successful basketball figures were vulnerable to corruption spoke
to how pervasive the problem had become. Third, organized crime
had successfully infiltrated professional basketball. The indictments described involvement by
(20:23):
four major crime families. These were not street level bookies.
These were sophisticated criminal organizations with resources and expertise in
gambling operations. They had recruited current and former players, They
had set up elaborate cheating schemes. They had laundered money,
They had threatened and extorted people. And they had done
all of this while the NBA was publicly celebrating its
(20:46):
partnerships with legal gambling companies and insisting that legalization had
made the sport safer. Fourth, the technology being used in
the poker schemes raised alarming questions about what other technology
might be in use. If organized fized crime had access
to X ray tables and marked card reading glasses, what
other tools might exist for manipulating sports outcomes? Could games
(21:08):
be compromised in ways that weren't just aboupchen player cooperate.
This might sound paranoid, but the poker indictment showed that
the technology for sophisticated cheating was real and available. Fifth,
and perhaps most fundamentally, the October twenty twenty five scandal
proved that you cannot have a major professional sport that
depends on billions of dollars in gambling revenue while simultaneously
(21:30):
maintaining genuine integrity and competition. The conflict of interest is irresolvable.
The LEAD needed gambling money to fund its seventy six
billion dollar broadcast deals and its arena renovations and its
global expansion, but that gambling money came from an industry
that had every incentive to find and exploit inside information,
and that industry attracted criminal elements who were very good
(21:53):
at corrupting systems. The NBA had tried to convince itself
and the public that it could manage this contradiction. The
arrest proved they couldn't. The legal proceedings that lay ahead
would take years. Federal criminal trials are slow and complex,
but some things like all the freedom in jumping in
details of residents, no team would sign someone under federal
(22:13):
indictment for gambling corruption, and even if charges were dropped,
the stench of scandal would follow him forever. Damon Jones,
who had already retired from playing and coaching, faced similar
legal jeopardy. The fact that he was charged in both
the sports betting conspiracy and the poker conspiracy. Suggested prosecutors
saw him as a significant player in the schemes, someone
who connected different aspects of the criminal enterprise. And beyond
(22:37):
the three named NBA figures, there were thirty one other defendants.
Some were professional gamblers, some had organized crime connections, some
were facilitators or money launderers. Each of them had their
own story, their own set of charges, their own potential
to cooperate with prosecutors and provide information about other people involved.
The indictments that were unsealed in October twenty twenty five
(22:59):
represented what federal prosecutors knew and could prove at that moment,
But investigations like this are always ongoing. There were unnamed
co conspirators in the documents. There were references to other
games and other schemes that weren't fully detailed. The FBI
had indicated that more people might be implicated as the
investigation continued. Nobody knew how deep this went or where
(23:21):
it would finally end. For fans, the scandal created a
crisis of faith. How could you trust what you were watching?
When a player sat out with load management, was it
really about rest or did someone make money knowing he
would sit When a star player had an uncharacteristically poor game.
Was he just off or had something else been going
(23:42):
on When a team rested its starters against a weaker opponent.
Was it legitimate strategy or was insider information being exploited.
The scandal had poisoned a well. Even games that were
completely clean now carried the taint of suspicion. The comparison
to other sports and other scandals was inevitable. Major League
Baseball had dealt with the Pete Rose case, where one
(24:04):
of the game's greatest players had bet on baseball and
been banned for life. The NFL had suspended Calvin Ridley
forgetting on games. European football regularly faced match fixing scandals,
particularly in lower level leagues where players were more vulnerable
to corruption, but the NBA situation felt different in scale
and scope because it involved not just individual bad actors,
(24:28):
but an entire ecosystem that had been built to encourage
the very behavior that was now being prosecuted. The philosophical
question at the heart of the scandal was whether you
could have legalized sports betting and integrity and competition at
the same time. The gambling industry in the sports leagues
had argued yes that bringing betting into the light and
(24:48):
regulating it would actually protect integrity better than prohibition. They
said that legal sportsbooks would share data about suspicious betting patterns.
They said that monitoring systems would catch bad appsctors. They
said that the enormous profits from legal gambling would fund
better security and oversight. Seven years after legalization, the evidence
(25:09):
suggested they had been wrong. The monitoring systems had failed
to catch Terry Rozier despite obvious red flags. The legal
sportsbooks had shared data, but the NBA hadn't acted on
it effectively. The profits from gambling had been enormous, but
they had created perverse incentives where finding corruption was bad
for business. An organized crime, rather than being displaced by
(25:33):
legal operations, had simply found new ways to exploit the system.
The alternative, returning to prohibition seemed politically and economically impossible.
Thirty eight states had legalized sports betting. Billions of dollars
in tax revenue were being generated. Gambling companies employed tens
of thousands of people. The NBA and other leagues had
(25:55):
broadcast deals worth seventy six billion dollars predicated on betting engagement.
You couldn't just reverse all of that. The genie was
out of the bottle. But if you couldn't put it
back in, what were you supposed to do with it?
Some analysts suggested that prop bets should be banned or
severely restricted. If individual player performance bets were creating opportunities
(26:19):
for corruption, then eliminate those bets and limit gambling to
game outcomes only. This would reduce the incentive for players
to manipulate their own performances, but the gambling industry would
fight this ferociously because prop bets were incredibly profitable, casual
betters loved them, and even if the United States banned
prop bets, offshore sportsbooks would still offer them. Others suggested
(26:42):
that players and team personnel should face much stricter monitoring
and communication restrictions. Maybe they shouldn't be allowed to have
private social media accounts, Maybe their phone should be monitored.
Maybe they should be prohibited from having relationships with anyone
in the gambling industry. But this level of surveill would
be invasive and probably unconstitutional. Professional athletes, even highly paid ones,
(27:07):
have Fourth Amendment rights. Still, others argued that the only
solution was aggressive enforcement and severe penalties. Make examples of
everyone caught in gambling schemes, bam them for life, pursue
criminal charges, relentlessly create such a climate of fear that
people would be deterred from participating in corruption. But enforcement
(27:28):
had always been part of the strategy, and it hadn't
prevented the October twenty twenty five scandal. Tim Donahey went
to prison, and it didn't stop anyone. Johnte Porter was
banned for life, and it didn't stop anyone. The uncomfortable
reality was that there might not be a solution, not
a real one. The fundamental conflict between massive gambling profits
(27:50):
and competitive integrity might simply be irresolvable. Professional sports leagues
might have to accept that a certain amount of corruption
is the price they pay for for the billions of
dollars they received from gambling partnerships. They would catch and
punish some bad actors. They would implement monitoring systems that
would stop the most obvious schemes, but they would never
(28:11):
eliminate the problem, because eliminating it would require walking away
from too much money. Commissioner Adam Silver faced the defining
crisis of his tenure. He had been in charge when
the league decided to embrace legalized gambling. He had negotiated
the deals with MGM and the other sportsbooks. He had
overseen the seventy six billion dollar broadcast contracts. He had
(28:34):
publicly advocated for legalization, and had argued that the NBA
could manage the risks. Now, in October twenty twenty five,
he was facing the consequences of those decisions. His legacy
would forever be tied to how he handled this scandal.
Silver had some hard choices to make. He could acknowledge
(28:54):
that the league had made mistakes and commit to fundamental reforms,
even if those reforms met walking away from gambling revenue.
This would require courage and would probably cost him his
job because the team owners who employed him liked the
gambling money. Or he could try to minimize the scandal,
frame it as the work of a few bad actors,
(29:15):
implement some superficial changes, and hope that it blew over.
This would be politically easier, but would mean accepting that
nothing would really change. In his public statements after the arrests,
Silver seemed to be trying to thread the needle. He
expressed appropriate shock and dismay. He promised that the league
would coaderate fully with federal investigators. He emphasized the commitment
(29:39):
to integrity, but he also defended the decision to partner
with gambling companies and argued that legalization had actually made
it easier to detect corruption. The data sharing agreements with sportsbooks,
he said, had helped identify suspicious betting patterns, never mind
that the NBA had failed to act on those patterns
when they were identified. The play caught between the league
(30:01):
and the gambling industry, between their own financial interests and
the integrity of their sport, were in an impossible position.
Most of them had nothing to do with the scandals
and just wanted to play basketball, but they were all
affected by the cloud of suspicion. They all had to
deal with harassment from betters. They all played in arenas
where gambling was advertised. They all worked for a league
(30:22):
whose business model depended on encouraging people to bet on
their individual performances. The National Basketball Players Association would have
to decide how aggressively to push back. They could demand
better protections for players, better guidance about gambling risks, stricter
enforcement against harassment. They could demand that the league reduce
its dependence on gambling reven or they could accept the
(30:43):
status quo because the gambling money ultimately funded player salaries.
The seventy six billion dollar broadcast deal meant higher salary
caps and bigger contracts. If you wanted to preserve that money,
you had to accept the system that generated it. Looking
back at the entire arc, from the Panarchy scandal in
two thousand and seven through the Johnte Porter case in
(31:04):
twenty twenty four to the October twenty twenty five arrests,
a clear pattern emerged At every step. The NBA had
chosen short term financial gain over long term integrity. After Donicky,
they implemented reforms, but maintained gambling culture and locker rooms.
After legalization, they embraced gambling partnerships despite knowing the risks.
(31:28):
After Porter, they cleared Rosier and moved on. Each time
they thought they could manage the problem. Each time they
were wrong. The five themes that ran through this entire
story were consistent. Money corrupts everything it touches, and the
amounts of money and gambling and professional basketball were corrupting.
The league always knew more than it admitted, whether about
(31:51):
referee bias or player gambling or suspicious betting patterns. Individual
players were vulnerable to systems beyond their control, whether organized crime,
debt collectors, or the financial pressures of sudden wealth. The
conflict between profit and integrity was irresolvable when you built
your entire business model around gambling, and each scandal was preventable,
(32:13):
but none were prevented because prevention would have required sacrifices
nobody was willing to make. The October twenty twenty five
arrests will not be the end of this story. They
will be trials. There will be more revelations. There may
be more arrests. The legal process will grind on for years.
But regardless of how the specific cases resolve, the fundamental
(32:33):
questions will remain. Can professional basketball exist alongside legalized gambling
without being corrupted by it? Can fans trust what they're
watching when billions of dollars are being bet on outcomes
and individuals have the power to influence those outcomes. Can
a sports league police itself when finding problems is bad
for business? The honest answer to all these questions is
(32:55):
probably know. The sport and the gambling are too intertwined now.
Too much money is flowing, too many conflicts of interest exist,
too many opportunities for corruption are built into the system.
The NBA and the gambling industry convinced themselves they could
build this house of cards and it would stand forever.
The arrests in October twenty twenty five were the moment
it collapsed. But even as the cards fell, even as
(33:18):
the scale of the corruption became clear, nobody in a
position of power seemed willing to acknowledge that the fundamental
design was flawed. So what happens next. The trials will proceed.
Some defendants will be convicted, some will be acquitted, Some
will plead guilty and cooperate. Chauncey Billups may never coach again.
Terry Rozier's playing career is likely over. More names may emerge.
(33:41):
The NBA will implement new integrity measures and monitoring systems.
They will promise that they've learned from this scandal. They
will insist that the problems have been addressed, and in
a few years there will probably be another scandal. Because
the conditions that created this one, the normalized gambling culture,
the perverse financial incentive, the conflict between integrity and profit.
(34:02):
Those conditions are going anywhere. The most tragic aspect of
this entire saga is that it was all so predictable.
Everyone who was paying attention knew that mixing professional basketball
and legalized gambling would create opportunities for corruption. The history
of sports and dambling going back a century showed this
pattern repeating over and over. The Donahie case provided a
(34:24):
clear warning the explosion of prop bets created obvious vulnerabilities.
The Porter case was a flashing red light. But at
every stage, the league, and the gambling industry and the
politicians who legalized sports betting chose to believe that this
time would be different, that they were smarter than history,
that they could manage the risks, and now we're dealing
(34:44):
with the consequences of that hubris. For fans, the question
is whether they can continue to invest emotionally in a
product that may be compromised. Can you feel the same
thrill watching a game if you're wondering whether that player
who just called out sick had given someone advanced note
so they could bet on his under Can you celebrate
a comeback victory if you're suspicious about whether the losing
(35:06):
team was really trying? Can you trust anything you're seeing?
Maybe you can. Maybe most fans will decide that most
games are probably clean, that most players are honest, that
the handful of bad actors don't invalidate the whole sport.
Or maybe you can't. Maybe once trust is broken at
this level, it can't be repaired. The Inside Bet started
(35:27):
as an investigation into an NBA gambling scandal, but it
became something larger. It became a story about what happens
when an entire society decides that every aspect of life
should be monetized and commercialized. About what happens when we
pretend that conflicts of interest don't matter as long as
everyone is making money. About what happens when we ignore
(35:47):
warnings because listening to them would be expensive. The NBA
betting scandal is a basketball story, but it's also an
American story about greed and corruption and the willingness to
sacrifice integrity for proper In two thousand and seven, Tim
donn He went to prison, and everyone said never again.
In twenty twenty five, thirty four people were arrested, including
(36:10):
a Hall of Fame coach and an active player, and
people are saying never again. History suggests that it will
happen again. The only question is when and whether anyone
will be willing to make the hard choices necessary to
actually prevent it. Based on everything we've seen, the answer
is probably no. The money is too good. The house
of cards may have collapsed, but they're already building a
(36:33):
new one in its place. I'm Miles Mercer, and I
hope this series has given you a clear understanding of
one of the most significant crises in sports history. This
podcast has been brought to you by Quiet Please Podcast Networks.
For more content like this, please go to Quiet Please
dot ai, Quiet, please dot ai hear what matters
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
My Favorite Murder with Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark
My Favorite Murder is a true crime comedy podcast hosted by Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark. Each week, Karen and Georgia share compelling true crimes and hometown stories from friends and listeners. Since MFM launched in January of 2016, Karen and Georgia have shared their lifelong interest in true crime and have covered stories of infamous serial killers like the Night Stalker, mysterious cold cases, captivating cults, incredible survivor stories and important events from history like the Tulsa race massacre of 1921. My Favorite Murder is part of the Exactly Right podcast network that provides a platform for bold, creative voices to bring to life provocative, entertaining and relatable stories for audiences everywhere. The Exactly Right roster of podcasts covers a variety of topics including historic true crime, comedic interviews and news, science, pop culture and more. Podcasts on the network include Buried Bones with Kate Winkler Dawson and Paul Holes, That's Messed Up: An SVU Podcast, This Podcast Will Kill You, Bananas and more.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com