Patriot Confederation with Glenneda Zuiderveld

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:04):
Every Patriot has an obligation to question authority. Those who
are honest are not concerned with your watchful vigilance, and
those with integrity are not concerned with your discernment. Every
American is obligated to voice their concerns and stand up
for their freedoms and liberties.

Speaker 2 (00:22):
One nation under God, indivisible with liberty and justice for all.

Speaker 1 (00:31):
Ladies and gentlemen. We are the men in the arena.
We are the Patriot Confederation.

Speaker 3 (00:38):
We will live back then from buying.

Speaker 4 (00:42):
We're unfeed American.

Speaker 5 (00:58):
All right, Ladies and gentlemen, Welcome to Confederation for the
twelfth of May. And it's starting to get hot here.
I'm your host, Dad Billy from twind Falls, Idaho, joined
as always by John Grovenor out of Nashaua in New Hampshire.
How's it going up there, New England? Brother, it's going Billy.

Speaker 2 (01:16):
You know, everything's good up here in New England. Just
trying to get these UH inspection car inspections done here.
They're still fighting that battle, but all's good here, man.
I'm just wondering about.

Speaker 4 (01:26):
DC there with that reflecting pool.

Speaker 2 (01:28):
Some people just need to stay out of the court
and let get out of Trump's way and let them
get business done, because that pool is gonna look awesome
when he's done.

Speaker 5 (01:37):
How about that ballroom in the U the upcoming UFC wow.
By the way, the UFC tickets one point five million
dollars for that card at the White House?

Speaker 2 (01:51):
Oh yeah card? What do you mean by that card?
The fight card to get in and see the fight? Yes,
per see, Yes, one point five million dollars. Well, you
know I was gonna go. I was all set to
go if it was one point four million dollars, I
was all in. Well one point fi just got out
of my range. Man, just got out of my range.

Speaker 4 (02:12):
I'm so disappointed.

Speaker 6 (02:15):
Oh boy.

Speaker 5 (02:16):
Anyway, joining us this week, and I'm going to say
probably is the most important show that we're having, at
least on the Idaho side for this year. I want
to welcome Senator Glennita Zeiderfeld District twenty four.

Speaker 6 (02:33):
Thank you very much for joining us. How are you.

Speaker 3 (02:36):
I'm doing well, and thank you Billy and John for
inviting me on. It's been a crazy, crazy time, but
we're holding strong and not going to give up.

Speaker 6 (02:46):
We are only one week away.

Speaker 3 (02:49):
Yes, yeah, fo days.

Speaker 4 (02:53):
Wait a minute, six days, right, six days. Oh I
saw a timer here.

Speaker 2 (02:57):
Oh yeah, there is six days, twenty one hours, twenty
six minutes in seventeen seconds.

Speaker 3 (03:02):
We can do it. We can do it. Anybody can
do anything for six days. Right.

Speaker 4 (03:09):
Well, oh I'm not hold my breath on that.

Speaker 5 (03:13):
I love the Lord created there everything in seven days, so.

Speaker 3 (03:18):
Or six because he rested on the seventh.

Speaker 5 (03:20):
That's right, that's right, yes, yes, So yeah, the the midterms,
I mean some of it's a clown show, oh boy,
I mean, and I mean it is a clown show
as we have seen. I mean, I don't know what
what's what's the other side trying to throw at us?

(03:41):
But let's start out with what they're throwing at you, Glenita,
which is when I saw that video from you about
a month ago. That was heartbreaking that.

Speaker 6 (03:52):
I mean, so.

Speaker 5 (03:56):
It's one thing that they're going to have. They're gonna
have Brent rain run against you. I mean, you got
to have an opponent. Can't blame him for running. And
they're throwing millions of dollars behind his campaign.

Speaker 6 (04:08):
I know that much. But they're going after your livelihood because.

Speaker 5 (04:14):
And they told your husband, wait, we got to pull
the plug on doing business with you because of the
way your wife votes my politics.

Speaker 3 (04:24):
Yeah, and so just kind of give a little bit
of background there. You know, we've been involved in the
egg and dairy industry for over thirty plus years and
that's always where we've made our income. But to get
it all started, I've always been, i guess, an enemy
of the governor and the lieutenant governor. They worked really

(04:47):
hard to try to defeat me last time. Governor actually
put one hundred thousand dollars towards my race from him.
You know. Of course, they go from pack and then
it goes to another pack, and then that pack, you know,
spends against the those that they want out. And the
reason why they're wanting me out is because I am
for transparency, I'm for accountability. I work hard for the people.

(05:12):
I don't go there. I'm not there for the lobbyists.
I'm not there for UH to do the bidding of
the governor. We're separate branches. You know, we make the
laws and he can decide if he wants to veto
or pass them totally up to him. But you know,
they they're starting to blend the lines here, and just
the fact that he is getting behind my challenger, and

(05:34):
from what I've heard is they actually asked him to
run because he is the Twin Falls County commissioner and
they make you know, about six digits compared to our
little you know, thirty thousand dollars, and so they did
ask him to run. And then and then with the
dairy industry, the Idaho darium Is Association, they've always been

(05:57):
a little bit you know, putting pressure on. But I
haven't I haven't passed any bill. I did one resolution
that I was playing my second year in to send
a message to DC that we want you to take
care of our borders and basically to impeach Joe Biden
at that time, and so it wasn't to their benefit.

(06:18):
But I haven't come up with anything else. I support
other things, but we haven't even received anything in the
Senate this year, didn't even get out of committee. And
yet they don't like my politics, you know. And a
lot of it is, you know, because the illegal immigration
and that being their main primary workforce that they have.

(06:40):
And then now they're saying, well, it's just not about that.
It's actually you know, she's not about water, she's not
about farming, and that's the furthest from the truth.

Speaker 5 (06:48):
You know that I've been to your house runs and
you're not about farming.

Speaker 3 (06:55):
Yeah, And I grew up my family took a lot
of this land that the dairies are now on. My
dad took out of sagebrush and put into farmland. And
so we've always been about farming. But again a lot
of it is because I would vote no against you know,
some money. And it wasn't that we didn't want to
spend the money on lock work for projects. There's just

(07:15):
no accountability there. You know, we're sitting on about four
hundred almost a half a billion dollars for water infrastructure projects.
That's been some of it's been there for fifteen years.
So this new thirty million dollars, we were wanting it
to be one time. We were wanting to be you know,
have an audit and have a sunshine date. You know,

(07:36):
if you're going to take this thirty million, we want
to see where it's going to be used. We don't
want it sitting in an account because we do have
some serious water issues and so it has nothing to do.
You know, if people really would take the time to
call me, and that's interesting thing. They all have my
phone number, not once called me, not one to hear
my side of the store. They just want to believe

(07:57):
the propaganda of the governor and lieutenant governor.

Speaker 2 (08:00):
Unfortunately that's how things go. But I'm kind of curious
here because they want you to spend thirty million dollars
of Idaho's money. Correct, Yeah, And did they come up
with a solution how they're going to reimburse that money,
or how that money is going to be equitable for
Idaho or they just want Idaho to fund their business.

Speaker 3 (08:18):
Well, it's not for the dairyman. It's for our aquifer projects.
So it actually benefits all of the state of Idaho
and trying to help replenish our aquifer because in our
valley that we live in Magic Valley, it's high desert
and we don't have a lot of water. We count
on the aquifer and our canal system, and so that

(08:38):
money is going to help with the water infrastructure projects.
Have no problem with that. It's just that we want
to make sure it's accountable and we're using it wisely.
And so I think about twenty six million of it
was used to line some of our canals and I
have reached out to some of our agencies to help

(08:58):
me get the information on how exactly that was spent,
because I think twenty six million is kind of high
for lining canals. So but that's the part of the
accountability that we're looking for. It's not saying that we
want to keep that from them, but are you doing
it wisely? Because I have exposed over one hundred million
dollars of waste, broad and abuse in other areas, and

(09:21):
so there shouldn't be any problem with us asking that.
And then if you have a problem with us asking us,
then you know that that's a problem in itself.

Speaker 2 (09:29):
Absolutely, they do understand it takes time to develop these things.
You don't just do this overnight, right, you know, like I.

Speaker 3 (09:35):
Was saying too, we have a good four hundred almost
half a billion dollars just sitting in accounts for projects
to be done that can't they they start them and
haven't been able to finish, or they can't start them
at all. A lot of it had to do with
federal strings, you know, the DQ and a lot of
other issues, and that's not helping us. We do have

(09:58):
water issues. We need to be able to get those done.
And then some of the projects you know, we have
a good sixty million going to Anderson Dam that's just
sitting there. But Anderson has never reached full capacity. And
right now, of course, we're in a drought. So is
that sixty million really wise using that to raise the
dam another six ten feet or can we use those

(10:21):
in other areas that could actually help us get through
this drought.

Speaker 6 (10:27):
Yes.

Speaker 5 (10:28):
I've been given some thought too when it comes to
this immigration issue. And of course, one of the many
things I keep hearing is, oh, these these illegals are
doing the jobs that Americans don't want to do, which
is true, But we have legal immigrants coming into this

(10:48):
country from South Africa who have some of the best
agricultural knowledge that you'll ever see. So I think that
problem can be remedied if we can offer some of
those jobs to those people who are coming over legally
and really know, they know their way around the farm.

Speaker 3 (11:10):
And you know, and they do hire a lot of them,
and you know, I probably would have to say maybe
sixty percent, maybe seventy percent of their workforce is illegal.
And I'm going to be a little cautious there. You know,
it's closed in that vicinity, and you know, part of
the problem is Yeah, they say they they will do

(11:31):
the jobs that Americans don't want to do. That has
been a problem the government has created itself because a
lot of people, why work when you can get so
many handouts from the government where you don't have to work,
And so of course they don't want to do that.
And if they were ever to give the illegals amnesty
now they're Americans, are they still going to want to

(11:53):
do the work because Americans don't want to do the work, right,
So are we creating another problem?

Speaker 5 (11:59):
Well, when it comes to the ones from South Africa,
I can guarantee you uh there, they've got a lot
of pride in their in their heritage and they're not
going to go that route that I can promise you.

Speaker 3 (12:13):
Yeah.

Speaker 5 (12:13):
The gender the next generation is questionable because of what's
being taught in schools and whatnot.

Speaker 3 (12:24):
Yeah, and you know and again too, it's not really
you know, it's a motivation problem we have. We have
stripped a lot of motivation from a lot of people.
When when you're hungry and you need to roof over
your head, it's amazing the jobs that you'll do to
make sure that you're feeding your family. But when we
keep on opening up where they can get welfare, they

(12:44):
can get Medicaid, they can get all these these government
programs that kind of removes the motivation for people to work,
which creates a workforce problem. And so it just kind
of we've created a long sure and to fix it,
it's going to take a lot of discipline and obedience

(13:05):
and some really difficult decisions.

Speaker 5 (13:08):
Yes, well, let's pause right here because we got we're
at the first quarter. Got to take our first break.
But there's a lot of rabbit holes we can go
down in that conversation, and with the time we have,
we got to be selective. So with that said, we'll
be back in about a minute and a half. All right,

(13:32):
ladies and gentlemen, we are back once again. We're joined
by Senator Glenda Ziyderbeld District twenty four. Here in the
Gym State. And by the way, there's there's something you've
been saying that has caught my ear and has been
had me doing a lot of thinking and should and
should have other Idahoans, at least the like minded Idahoans concerned,

(13:56):
and that is the Gym State Ice.

Speaker 3 (14:02):
Yes, that's what I call it. The Jym State. Heights
and personally, I think we're one election away, maybe two,
and they if you look at how they took over
Colorado and the other states, we're repeating the exact same
thing over and over, and we're so focused in fighting

(14:22):
within the Republican Party and primaries that we are not
seeing that the Democrats are out there. They have more
people running in Idaho than I can ever remember over
I think one hundred of them have signed up to
run for races all over the state, and then they
have possibly two I haven't checked on the marijuana initiative,

(14:45):
but I do believe that they have the abortion initiative
and that's going to bring out their voters. And so
in the general there's some areas that we might lose
some seats because they're working and taking some ground and
we're we're getting caught up in a lot of infighting,
and so we'll see what happens.

Speaker 5 (15:09):
Yes, Yes, And of course I was talking about this
last week with Jose Sanchez, and that's voter integrity, and
after what I saw it four years ago in Pocatello,
you know, with the between Jake Stevens and Nate Roberts, it,

(15:31):
you know, I really you know, voter fraud is right
here in the state.

Speaker 6 (15:33):
Of Idaho too. It happened.

Speaker 5 (15:35):
I I mean, I don't I can't prove it, but
I'm pretty convinced that Jake Stevens was robbed in that
in that election because he was pretty well ahead in
the polls before they decided to close down and then
resume counting at like three o'clock in the morning, and
then come five to six o'clock in the morning, Nate
Roberts has declared the winner.

Speaker 6 (15:56):
And of course what's.

Speaker 5 (15:58):
He he He's a socialist from Oregon and was really
trying to push planned parenthood over Pocatello and Idaho falls
in the Blackfoot areas.

Speaker 6 (16:11):
You know.

Speaker 5 (16:12):
Luckily he was voted out a couple of years ago
by somebody who's doing an okay job. She can use
some improvements in the way she votes, but she's doing
a lot better job than he did, that's for sure.

Speaker 3 (16:26):
Absolutely. You know what's so interesting too, when you think
of that race in eastern Idaho, it's highly LDS and
you would think they were more conservative. You know, I'm always,
you know, shocked that Democrats even win in eastern Idaho.
But again, it's a college town so that probably has
a lot to do with it. But I would think

(16:48):
that because of the conservative lds that is there, they
would you know win in the atlantslide getting you know,
the conservative Republicans you know elected there. But that's not
the case in and on the election integrity, you know,
a lot of things have changed since COVID. I can

(17:09):
remember where a lot of our races we would find
out before the ten o'clock news, and now there's times
a couple of elections in Jerome was one of them,
we didn't even hear the results until like three o'clock
in the morning or the next day, and then of
course then they're like, oh my goodness, there's some more
you know, another box that we didn't see, and it

(17:30):
was just we have never had that in the history
of Idaho. We're still small enough that we actually can
hand count, and many of my counties, you know, Gooding
County and Canvas County, they still you know, do it
by hand or with the machine, but not electronically. And
we're still even with twin falls, we're still small enough
that we could do a handcount. And there's a lot

(17:52):
of people that would love to volunteer and go through
that process to make sure that they're safe. And I
don't know why any and wouldn't want to do that.

Speaker 5 (18:03):
Well, of course that I stated with with Jose last week.
You know that the ballots we use here, yes they're
paper ballots, but they got a barcode on them, and
that you know what's the next step after that, a
dominion machine.

Speaker 3 (18:22):
Well, we did get the in Twin Falls. They did
apply for a grount we call it the Zuckerbucks, and
they did get some of that money here in Twin Falls.
And they have the machines that when you go in
there and you put all your information. They had the
little like iPad that you go in there and sign

(18:42):
your name to and then they print out your ballot.
And so we're getting more and more electronic. And then
they always promise that they're not connected to the Internet. Well,
you don't have to be connected to the internet for
it to have Internet. I mean, you look at our phones,
you look at look at the iPads, and so I
think that is just a silly thing to say, because

(19:06):
we know better, We know that devices can ben't connected
to the Internet.

Speaker 5 (19:13):
Well, I got to say that it may be questionable
when I voted in two thousand and eight and twenty
twelve because I was living in Las Vegas at that
time for both of those elections, and those were dominion machines.
Back two thousand and four, I was living in Renos,
So those twelve years, I was living in the state

(19:34):
of Nevada. And yeah, two thousand and four, of course
I voted for that globalist George W. Bush, you know,
And so I don't think that I think that my
vote was valid there because Bush did when Nevada that year.
But also, you know, they I'm hearing the rumors of

(19:56):
Hammer and Scorecard possibly being active made it a lot
earlier than what we what we really think, you know,
And so did I really vote for Did I really
vote for John McCain in two thousand and eight, Did
I really vote for Mitt Romney in twenty twelve? You know, Yeah,

(20:19):
that's what I chose. I know what I chose. But
how did it default is the question?

Speaker 3 (20:26):
You know, we'll never really know. But hopefully, you know,
I still like to be optimistic and hopeful that Idaho
isn't there, but a lot of things that have happened
the last couple campaigns it makes you start to wonder
and question a lot of the things that are happening there.

(20:48):
And that's the other thing is they don't like to
be questioned in the moment. You don't like to be
questioned or be or even just listening to your constituents
about their voting and their their vote. That's a problem.
You should always be open to hearing them and doing
everything you can to ease your mind that the elections
are safe. Not just take my word for it, but

(21:10):
let me do whatever I can to ease your mind.

Speaker 5 (21:15):
John, how is it as far as voting in your
neck of the woods?

Speaker 6 (21:21):
Are you on paper? Are you on a machine right now? Oh?

Speaker 2 (21:24):
Well, just standard voting. Just to let your paper little
color in the bubble and slide it in a machine
that will register all the bubbles you colored in and
give you your count.

Speaker 6 (21:34):
Yes, yes, you know.

Speaker 5 (21:35):
What's great to see two years ago is how ranked
choice voting was not just rejected here in Idaho, but
they also had an initiative in Oregon, whereas Portland has
ranked choice voting, but they wanted to give it to
the rest of the state, and they said, no, we
don't want it. We're talking a blue Oregon did not

(21:58):
want ranked choice voting. And you know, we've heard the
stories that Alaska is trying to get rid of it,
but also main I guess they're getting sick of it too.
They have ranked choice voting, whether they're in the primaries
and the generals, and you know, and.

Speaker 3 (22:15):
That's part of what I was talking about, the Jim
State heist. That's what they're trying to do and what's
crazy here in Idaho. So I carried a bill on
the Senate side that said that Idaho rejects ranked choice voting.
We will not have ranked choice voting. The very next election,
they got the signatures to put it on our ballot,
the Prop one initiative. Crazy how many Republicans were fighting

(22:40):
and here in Twin Falls, a lot of our precinct
committeemen and people, you know, even our elected officials at
that time, they were pushing for Prop one for the
ranked choice voting. And so people are always thinking, Okay,
we're majority Republicans. It was your Republicans that we're trying
to turn our stay into a California or Colorado. And

(23:03):
it was and it's your third and fourth generation idaho
Its because I know a lot of them that wanted
to have this ranked choice voting, and so it just
people need to wake up and make sure that they
you know, sometimes the truth is a hard pill to swallow,
but we have to make sure that we're knowing the truth.
And it wasn't It wouldn't have been the Democrats that
got us the ranked choice voting. If if it would

(23:26):
have had passed, it would have been the Republicans. They
did it, you know.

Speaker 5 (23:31):
And another problem with rank choice voting is when you
look at the ballot and how many pages long is it?
There are actually people who said forget this and walked
out without voting because they didn't have time to fill
out that whole ballot or they had to go to work.

(23:54):
You know, they got it was just way too confusing
for him.

Speaker 3 (23:59):
So you're a new voter, or if you're an older
voter and it's confusing, and you know, it makes them
lose you know, trust in the system for one, and
then they just get discouraged and say it doesn't matter,
which you know, that's we should never have that attitude.
But you know a lot of people out there have
that attitude.

Speaker 5 (24:17):
Well, I mean, if they got to I mean, and
that's time consuming too. If they got to go to
work within the next half hour. They don't have time
to fill out a fifteen page book.

Speaker 6 (24:28):
It's ridiculous.

Speaker 3 (24:30):
Yeah, and maybe you don't want to vote for all
of them. Maybe you just you have your one person
that you just want to vote for.

Speaker 4 (24:36):
So you can still do that, can't you. You can
still vote for your one person.

Speaker 3 (24:40):
I think so. I think so. But there was some
confusion that they said that you had to fill out
all the dots. But I think here in Idaho, if
it would have passed, you could have just filled out one.

Speaker 4 (24:53):
Don't they still have a write in? Or do they
not have that in Idaho?

Speaker 3 (24:57):
No, Well you have to if you're going to do
a write in, you have to file with the Secretary
of State to be a rite in. So it's not
I mean, you could write somebody's name in that they
like you to register that you're going to be a
rite in.

Speaker 6 (25:12):
You know what.

Speaker 5 (25:13):
I'm so glad you said that, Glennita, because John will
have to look into this because Stacy Lawton was a
ride in in the last election that he won. And
if you don't know who Stacy Lawton was is that's
the first transgender to ever be elected to office and

(25:34):
now is sitting in jail for child pornography.

Speaker 4 (25:39):
Yeah, bluck eye on New Hampshire.

Speaker 3 (25:41):
You know. And each state may be different because each
state has different election loss.

Speaker 5 (25:46):
So yeah, yes, yes, So here we are. Now we're
at the bottom of the hour. This hour is going
to go. I knew it was going to go quickly
as it is, so we're going to take our bottom
of the hour break and we'll be back in about
two minutes. All right, ladies and gentlemen, we are back

(26:07):
once again, joined by Senator Glennita Zeyderveld District twenty four.
If you don't know, that's basically the outer areas of
where I live. So she's not exactly my senator, but
her good friend Josh Cole is and he does a
darn good job too, and which kind of brings me

(26:29):
my next question. I mean, towards the last election, you
stated that the government governor doesn't like you very much,
doesn't like Christy Zito very much. And then I just
could not help but think when you all won, and
then and Josh wins. You know, I'm thinking, what is

(26:49):
the governor going to think of this when when it
comes time to go to Boise because he's really not
going to be happy.

Speaker 4 (26:56):
Now, yeah, they.

Speaker 3 (26:58):
Were not very happy. But you know what, no matter what,
Senator Cole, he is a statesman. People need to be
watching him. His principles and integrity and just the way
he carries himself. He's very impressive for a young man.
He is a statesman.

Speaker 6 (27:20):
You know.

Speaker 5 (27:21):
I mentioned Chris Dudley, who's running for governor in the
state of Oregon. Like I said, he's a former NBA player.

Speaker 6 (27:29):
I mean, he's almost seven feet tall.

Speaker 5 (27:31):
And his his slogan is standing Tall. But when I
hear standing tall, I immediately think of Josh.

Speaker 3 (27:40):
Yeah, he stands pretty tall too, you know. And it's
interesting because he speaks very on point and direct, and
a lot of them are a little bit intimidated, you know.
I think a lot by his youth, but you know
about his principles and then just how he stands firm
on so many But it's interesting to see the reaction

(28:03):
of a lot of other senators when he gets up
to speak. He gets them all worked up sometimes. You know.

Speaker 5 (28:13):
When I announced the Bearded Patriots endorsement for Josh a
few weeks ago, and I posted all over social media
as I always do. Somebody else on one of the
other social media websites commented that it's good to have
young guys like Josh in office because they're uncorrupted.

Speaker 3 (28:37):
Well, and you know, and it's really good because we
have a lot of young men in there. You look
at Representative House Settler and Representative Lovett, and then even
some of the new ones coming up, William Massaller that
is running, and there's some other young ones Senator Josh
Kaiser who beat up the pro tem Chuck Winder last time.

(29:00):
These are all young men and it needs to they
need to be the ones getting in there because it's
their future. And I think it's time for some of those.
If you're over seventy and there's a young man that
would like to take up and run for these positions,
I think if you're over seventy, maybe you can just
step aside and maybe mentor because they need to be

(29:23):
making the decisions for their future, not people that are
on the other side of the hill. You know, we're Yes,
it's just my opinion on that.

Speaker 6 (29:33):
Yeah, I believe.

Speaker 5 (29:34):
Yeah, I mean I know that Josh Josh is a
millennial because I saw his birthdate, you know.

Speaker 3 (29:44):
Yeah, they just turned twenty nine or is he thirty now?

Speaker 5 (29:47):
I think he's thirty, Yeah, thirty. He was twenty eight
when he was elected into office.

Speaker 3 (29:54):
Yeah.

Speaker 5 (29:54):
And then of course, yeah, like you mentioned, you mentioned
Clint David and William Mustoler and all of them. I mean, yeah,
I think they're They're a little bit older than Josh,
but they're young. They're younger than the rest of us,
jen Ex.

Speaker 3 (30:11):
We're all under fifty. And that's where it needs to be.
We need to allow you, we need to pass out
the toon on and let them start making some decisions
for their future. And again not saying that you have
to quit being involved in your government, just be more
of that mentorship, you know, do some discipleship.

Speaker 5 (30:31):
And and you make a good point there, Gldita, because
you know, there's there's somebody in the Supreme Court that
I like a lot, but I'm looking at him, I think,
and I think you need to retire and enjoy what's
time you got left, go fetching or something. And that's
Clarence Thomas. I like him a lot, but I think
he's getting too old to be there.

Speaker 3 (30:51):
Yeah, and why not go and find somebody that you
can mentor because you are older, and allow them to
to have that experience of on the job training basis
where you have that experience, you know, teach them and
help them to learn and give them some of that
history that you have. And a lot of them just

(31:13):
don't want to give that up. But I think it's
very important. If you're going to pass that on and
we want the next generation to have the freedoms that
we have, we need to allow them to get in
there and have that again, that history that we have
that you can still share that and you don't have
to be in the seat to do that. And I
think that is wise and we need to do that

(31:35):
instead of wanting to control it until the day you die.
Why don't you, you know, disciple somebody and say this
is you know how it works. This is some of
the history, because there is a lot of history that
you need to know when you get up there. You know,
why do we do what we did? You need to
have some of that history and then allow them to

(31:55):
actually grow and start making decisions, like I said, for
their future.

Speaker 5 (32:01):
Yes, and also, uh, John, I will forward this to
you when I find it. But this is actually pretty
funny and at the same time, pathetic. Last week you
posted on social media somebody who gave you a call,
some idiot, like just to describe it, John let me

(32:24):
either hear had a crazy Joe moment.

Speaker 4 (32:27):
I'm confused. Are you saying I posted something on social media?

Speaker 3 (32:31):
I no, oh, no, I posted something on social media.
So after I came public because when they came after
my husband's job and they were colluding, they wrote a
letter saying that they colluded with our employer and with
other dairymen because they didn't like our politics, and that

(32:51):
we're probably gonna lose even more work. And it was
almost like a threat, like if she doesn't stop doing
what she's doing, then you're gonna lose more. And we did.
We lost two more daarries. But I've been naming names,
and I thought, you know, I don't have anything else
to lose, and if you're going to do what you're doing,
then people are going to know about it. And I'm
just not going to be standing down from any of that.

(33:13):
And so we did a different bunch of different interviews.
The Washington Post did an article, and of course that's
more national, and so I've been getting a lot of
phone calls, emails, I didn't even I don't share half
of them what's coming at me. But when this gentleman

(33:34):
called me up, he made it sound like he was
wanting to talk to my husband, and I'm like, oh,
you have the wrong number, and so then when all
of a sudden he realized it was me, then he
just started calling me every name under the book. And
so I ran over real quick and to record it
because I thought these people are getting a little crazy.

(33:56):
I want to make sure I can send it to
the Idaho State Police. Even though it was, you know,
a block to number, I thought I need to have
it on record, and I you know, again, I just
people need to realize that if they're going to call
and they're going to do stuff like that, that you're
going to be exposed. I think a lot of times
we keep things quiet and we don't share exactly what

(34:19):
happens and the retaliation that we get, and then they
wonder why a lot of their representatives get up there
and cave to a lot of things because of all
these different pressures, you know. And so basically that's why
I recorded it and I put it out there, but
it was also sent to the Idaha Estate Police to
make sure, hopefully they don't get super crazy.

Speaker 6 (34:41):
You know, Oh, of course you have to do that.

Speaker 5 (34:44):
As for me, though, I'm for one thing that if
I have somebody harassing me like that and they're trying
to get me to stop whatever it is I'm doing,
it doesn't intimidate me. It makes me want to achieve
my goal even more. You know.

Speaker 3 (35:02):
That's That's where I'm at. If I, my husband and I,
if we were to cave into these pressures, then how
is that really different than any other country that went
to communists? Really? You know, how is that different? You know,
before World War or two with Germany, they put pressures
on a lot of your farmers and different people to

(35:24):
basically do their propaganda. And so we can't allow these
pressures to come at us because then we're not actually
representing people if we allow the pressures to change us
from upholding our oath. Because there's fifty five thousand people
in my district, not just a handful of lobbyists or

(35:44):
you know, there's a lot of people. And if they
really want to know, one of the number one top
issues in my district and probably in the state is
the illegal immigration. And I always want to make sure
that people understand. I'm not against immigration. My in laws
came over on the with the sponsorship program. They're immigrants.

(36:04):
There's a right way to do it, but it's the
illegal immigration because they're breaking the law. The people that
are bringing them over are breaking the law, and the
people that are hiring them are breaking the law, and
we are if we're going to allow that law to
be broken, then pretty soon we'll be a country without laws,
will be lawlessness, and so we have to have those
conversations and so that that is just kind of the pressures.

(36:27):
I even had some businesses that, you know, because it's
campaign season, and we put up our signs at a
couple of businesses and a couple of different individuals, and
they end up taking our signs down because of the
pressure they were now putting on them too, because they're
just anti Glenita, they're just anti me, so.

Speaker 2 (36:53):
Right, so now they're trying to basically anti social proof
you are are to swaye people against you. But honestly,
this sounds like a circumstance where people feel desperation because,
as you said that, you've already lost a couple of
dairy farms due to the circumstance. I assume it's due
to the circumstances that you're talking about with the water
and uh so it seems to immigration.

Speaker 3 (37:16):
Yeah, it's mostly to do with the illegal immigration. They're
just adding on the water now, so it's kind of
a so they can say it's not just about illegal immigration.
But for the last four years that I've been in there,
there's been some talk and pressure, you know, where we
were concerned. They just finally followed through.

Speaker 2 (37:35):
So basically the illegal immigration thing, though, is a federal issue,
and you're supporting the federal issue. It's happening whether you
support it or don't support it, it's happening anyway. It's
not like you're out there policing these people. It's not
like you're out there picking up illegal immigrants and saying, hey,
you know what, get in the van. You're going back
to whatever country you came from. You're just saying that

(37:56):
Trump's not wrong, and he's not. So there is the
issue I hear here is there's a whole bunch of
people in business that developed a dependency on something illegal,
and they have an inability to figure out a solution
to their problem. They're not stepping up as business leaders
within their own businesses.

Speaker 3 (38:12):
Yeah, and you know, and there's a lot of pressure
in our state because they're illegal. They're not paying for
all the benefits and everything that you would do with
a citizen. And when you look at our total amount
of money, and this is an estimated number, we spend
about four hundred and five million in Idaho alone on
illegal immigration. And that has to do with our hospitals,

(38:36):
our correction facilities, education and so the area is when
they say they work on the dairy or on the farm,
if they get hurt, they just go to the hospital
and the hospital takes care of them because you know,
they're about not causing harm and they're going to take
care of that person. So we had an incident here

(38:57):
in Jerome a bunch of years back and one of
their workers illegal was crushed by some machinery. Went to
the hospital. End up costing Jerome about three hundred and
seventy five thousand dollars just for that one incident alone.
So it wasn't because you know, and there was no
responsibility to the one that employed them, ended up being

(39:18):
the all the taxpayers had to take care of that.
And so that's part of the problem that's where you
start getting a lot of people that are getting frustrated
with a lot of the dairies is because they're not
held to the same accountability as maybe somebody else who
was hiring legals compared to the illegals. And that's some

(39:39):
of the issues that we're dealing with here.

Speaker 4 (39:41):
Yep.

Speaker 2 (39:43):
Legals don't fall under ocean protection, do they because nobody
knows they're there, so there's nothing there for them to
protect them from abuses. I think is trying to get
us to a break.

Speaker 5 (39:52):
Well not quite just yet. Yeah, we're going to get
to that. But there's one other issue too that I've
spoke of before, and Glendy and I don't know if
you remember this, but this is before you were in office.
In fact, it was ten years ago where.

Speaker 6 (40:07):
We had that.

Speaker 5 (40:08):
You know, we have our own issues with crime. It's
heard of as much. But the little girl at Fawnbrook
Apartments who was cornered and beaten up and urinated on
by those Somali immigrants and no charges, nothing, They were
just moved out, put somewhere else where they could repeat that.

Speaker 3 (40:33):
I know, and I think very few people know. I've
actually said in every single court hearing with the family.
I know every ugly detail of that situation. And you know,
we do have a lot of those issues with our
refugee programs. And again, they can come into America, they
get a card to help them get assimilated. That once

(40:53):
they come in, we don't really know where they go.
After they've worked at maybe a dairy or a large
you know, factory or something, they can move on and
we don't know where they go. And so that, you know,
that is is a big problem as well.

Speaker 6 (41:11):
Yes, oh, one other thing.

Speaker 3 (41:13):
Oh, I can bring it up afterwards.

Speaker 5 (41:15):
Yeah, Well we'll be back in about a minute and
a half. So this's our final break and we'll be
back to wrap things up. All right, ladies and gentlemen,
save that date July eleventh and twelfth, Red Bill Expo
in Las Vegas. If you can't get your tickets and
be there at the A. Hearn Convention Center, then by

(41:37):
all means tune in and it's absolutely free to catch
the live stream. And they're starting to fill out the
card a little bit more. That's Alex Newman is going
to be there, Michelle Melndez, Michael Yawn, doctor Lee Merritt.
It's going to be an exciting weekend. I can't wait.

Speaker 3 (41:58):
Yes, we had Alex Newman and Lee Merritt here when
we began our Magic Value Liberty Alliance. We did that
Freedom Fest out at the Speedway. I don't know if
you were there, but we took our guest speakers there.

Speaker 5 (42:15):
Yes, yes, Alex Newman has not missed a Red Pill
event yet. He's been at every single one of them
that g. Edward Griffin has put on. So he's like,
he's a very very well known figure out there. And
of course it was just kind of surprising that, you know,

(42:36):
I interviewed him at the Red Pill in Salt Lake
City and then I saw him again two years later
in South Dakota, and he knew exactly who I was,
and was he eager to speak with me, and plus,
you know, he's him and I have a mutual friend,
a mutual friend of John's as well, and Colonel Chris Wyatt.

(42:56):
As a matter of fact, I tried to get the
Colonel to come out to the Backyard Bash, but he
was last September, but he was kind of busy with
the South African immigrants that had been coming in and
you know, and.

Speaker 3 (43:10):
I tried to get Alex to come to the Backyard
Bash as well, but the dates didn't work out for him,
but I'll keep trying. So we became good friends through
through all of the different things that we've done. But anyway,
I was wanting to continue on with another incident that
I happened here in Twin Falls. With our illegal immigration problems,
please so with the corrections. You know, we were talking

(43:32):
about that it costs money for the hospitals, education and corrections.
So a while back, and you'll remember this when we
had two illegal immigrants that went into the tent shop
and shot and killed people because of that, and so
that's another area that when we have this illegal immigration,

(43:52):
you know, we're dealing with you know, killings and crime
and sex trafficking, drug trafficking. So it costs a lot
of money to have our illegal immigrants. And there has
to be a way that we can try to figure
out our you know, the workforce prom problem that we're
having with that. And I've had those discussions with the Derriman.

(44:14):
I always talk about the sponsorship program about bringing that
back and something that we could do within our state.
And so there's always been those those conversations I don't
know why all of a sudden they decided that they
were going to come after me in such a big way.
I think it's because I'm it's I'm a favorite of

(44:38):
the people. I'm a grassroots girl, so they you know,
and I've always been that way. I'm about serving the people.
I call myself the people, Senator, and I think that
maybe they're trying to do that because they're afraid that
I'm going to win again and so they're putting on
other pressure.

Speaker 5 (44:55):
Well, another thing about you, too, is I think Senator
Zudo is she's just so well known also for being
the advocate of the Second Amendment that she is. I
don't know, you know, she's she's for other things too,
not just that. But she's very well known for being
a Second Amendment advocate. But it's not so well known

(45:17):
with you.

Speaker 3 (45:17):
But you are too, yeah, you know, because she's been
in for about ten years. She's been in for a
long time, and I try to help her this year
with standyard Ground. We couldn't get it past Senator Guthrie's
office this year, and it did get finally to get
a bill hearing or a bill number, but that was

(45:39):
as far as that went on the standard ground that
she she is a fighter, she is a sweetheart of
the Second Amendment, and I got her six, so I
got her back.

Speaker 5 (45:49):
Yes, yes, And one thing, you know, some of these
people that you know, they're they're all for the immigration
and all that. One thing they need to get through
their heads is they can defund the police all they want,
but they do not want us, the citizens, to be
our own police because if it comes to that, we

(46:12):
don't take prisoners for trial.

Speaker 3 (46:14):
Right and you know, and I don't think that we'll
ever defund the police or you know, I just don't
see that because that's the other thing that they think
that I'm wanting to defund the police, and we don't
defund anything. We don't And you know, do we give
them the extras that they're wanting. Now, we'll vote against
the enhancements, but that's not defunding the police because we

(46:37):
need them. We need to have that security where they
can come in and take care. But also the best
defense is being the Second Amendment. You know that you're
you're the best line of defense. They're not going to
get there in time if something's happening, So you know,
it needs to be a good partnership there.

Speaker 5 (47:00):
South Africa is a perfect example of that when you
think of what goes on on a farm in South
Africa because they say their government is telling them that
they can't have guns, but they can't use guns. And
there's one farmer in South Africa who had his his
assailant was jamming a screwdriver in his ear. He managed,

(47:22):
he managed to grab the pistol and shoot his assailant
before it got to his brain and he really suffered,
but not what what happened next? That farmer is in
jail for first degree pre meditated murder.

Speaker 3 (47:39):
How can it be premeditated when he's defending.

Speaker 6 (47:41):
Himself because because.

Speaker 3 (47:45):
Because the government decided that.

Speaker 6 (47:47):
The government decides.

Speaker 5 (47:48):
Yeah there, I mean there's something I I want to say,
but I really shouldn't. I got to keep my mouth yet,
you know there. But I think I think anybody who's
anybody can figure that out.

Speaker 3 (47:58):
Absolutely. Yeah, But you know what, we need to get
to the point where we just say the truth. We
shouldn't be afraid to hold anything back, because that's that's
kind of where we're at as a country. Is there,
you I don't know, gas lighting and bullying and whatever
to keep us from speaking the truth. And I'm thinking,
if you can't handle the truth, then don't listen.

Speaker 5 (48:20):
And I'm sick and tired. You said the right word,
gas lighting. And what am I getting in my mailbox
every day? I'm getting gas lighting? I mean, I thank
god yesterday I got a I got a card from
Senator Cole and from David. But from the rest, you know,
it's it's usually Sherry Vom or Casey Swintson. You know,

(48:44):
I can't say anything against Casey because he hasn't even
held office, but the fact that he's getting you know,
he's endorsed by the big corporations is enough. Plus why
would I want to vote out Josh. He's proven him.

Speaker 3 (49:01):
Yeah. And you know that's the thing too with a
lot of these you know, follow the money and look
at them, and to think that these people are going
to be getting thousands of dollars to their campaign and
that they're not going to expect something from them. That's
pretty naive of us to think that, you know, they
they're giving money because you know, I don't hope, I

(49:22):
do hope powers giving money because they're expecting something from them.
You have the twin falls canal company who is now
endorsing them, and you have all these because they're expecting
something from them, and so who are they really going
to be representing. Are they going to be protecting the
government or are they going to be protecting the people
from the government.

Speaker 5 (49:44):
Well, I'm glad you mentioned Twin Falls Canal because something's
going to happen tomorrow. So keep an eye on my
social media now. To say it out loud, it's not
going to be a surprise. I'm going to meet Sierra
Clark and her and I are going to have a
photo op at Twin Falls Canal.

Speaker 3 (50:02):
Oh I will I will be watching. I will definitely
ill you guys.

Speaker 5 (50:10):
Yeah, I have not met se her in person yet,
but tomorrow will be the day. And yeah, we just
we just her and I talked to seeing all these
photo ops are like, let's meet and do one of
our own right in front of that building there, Even
though I realized that's kind of a mockery, but you know,
it's good. H in a way, it's our message to

(50:30):
get people to go out and vote, and we're going
to you know, push to vote for the right people
and you know what.

Speaker 3 (50:35):
Your citizens, and that's you know, you pay. Everybody's like, well,
they don't take taxes. Well I'm like, well they do
take taxes, because I've seen that in appropriations. Yeah, there's
a lot of it. We pay so Tom and I
pay it for our water to the Twin Falls Canal
Company and nothing like paying your bill. And you can't
go find somebody else to do that business for you,

(50:56):
like the dairyman say, oh, it's free market, we have
that right to take our business. Well, here you have
the Twin Falls Canal Company. We can't take our business
anywhere else. And so that's a bit that's a problem.
So it just you know, the politics is ugly. I
always tell there's a difference. Get involved in your government.

(51:19):
That is our responsibility and our duty the politics. You
can choose to either get caught up in the mud
and the mud slinging and the ugliness of politics, or
you can try to stay focused on the government and
doing what you're supposed to be doing. And that's where
I'm at. I'm trying to stay focused on because I'm
still the current sitting Senator until December, regardless the outcome,

(51:43):
and so I have a responsibility to make sure that
I'm doing the job. There and so I'm going to
be focusing on the government making sure that they're accountable
to the people. I'm not going to grow the government
because we're already the largest sole employer in the state
of Idaho. I'm not going to grow that. That's unsustainable.
And then, okay, now you're seeing the problems with that.
Then they're the sole and the state is the largest

(52:06):
sole employer. Who do you think they're going to vote for.
They're going to vote for somebody that, regardless if we
have the money or not, is going to keep them
employed and keep taxing the people that don't work for
the government. And so we're just in a bad way
that and I'm not going to keep growing that. I'm
going to try to be self sufficient. We are, like
I said, separate branches of the government. We can bring

(52:28):
the bills, let the bills be heard, let them be debated.
We don't do that anymore. And if the governor, you know,
doesn't like it, well, then he can veto it. You know,
we need to stop protecting him from having to veto something.
Let the people see what he's betwing, and then we
can try to override it. And if we can't override it,
then people can see what their legislators are doing. We

(52:49):
need to start operating in the open, and we don't
do that a lot. And that's one of my pet
peeves is we are If you read the Declaration of Independence,
I think it's like the fourth Grievance, and it talks
about out that they would pull them away to places
that were uncomfortable and unseen, away from the people, to
put pressure on them to do the jobs that the

(53:09):
powers that be wanted them to do. And that's what
we're doing here in Idaho. They pull us away from
what you can see, and then all you have to
do is believe what we're saying to you instead of
actually seeing how we're voting and how we're debating. And
that's where, like you know, Dog's returning development, we're the
very grievances in our Declaration of Independence. We're doing that

(53:29):
on a state level, and I'm pretty sure we're doing
it in the federal level.

Speaker 5 (53:33):
Absolutely well, Glenita, this has been a remarkable conversation. I
really appreciate your time, you know, And yeah, one week
from today, Idaho, let's make the right decisions when we
step into into the polls, when we fill out our balance.

(53:54):
Let's make the right decisions. Yes, And g Anita's work
speaks for itself. And I couldn't be happier to have
her in office ever since she won in twenty twenty two.

Speaker 3 (54:11):
And I will keep fighting. And if this is a
proof of what's been happening to me, I will sacrifice
my life, my fortune, and my sacred honor. And so
far I think I've proven that, and I've proven to
be a true conservative. You can just go look at
my voting record. I am the top conservative Republican and
the GOP. I am the one that has voted the

(54:33):
least times with the Democrats in all of the state
of Idaho. So that's a proven record there too. And
so if you want me to go there and continue
to fight for you and fight for your freedoms, your
tax dollars, your children's and your rights, send me. I'm
a fighter. I will go do that. So vote on
May nineteenth, and God bless everybody go out there and

(54:57):
be informed.

Speaker 5 (54:59):
Well, God bless you, Glenita, and uh not only that,
you know with the tough times that you and your
husband are forced to endure, you also have our prayers too.

Speaker 3 (55:11):
Thank you so much. I always say, it doesn't get easier,
it just get stronger.

Speaker 6 (55:15):
Exactly.

Speaker 5 (55:18):
For next week, John, we got oh boy, even though
it'll yeah, it'll be an election day here and Idaho
at least for the primaries. But next week we're finally
gonna have a guest who's from outside Idaho. It's been
a while since we've had one, but it's gonna be
it's gonna be kind of a dark subject. We're gonna

(55:38):
be speaking with Nick Bryant, who's of course he's one
of the writers behind Epstein Justice. And I think that
should tell you how dark it's gonna get.

Speaker 2 (55:49):
That sounds like a good one that this was, This
was a good show man, this went fast. Well, yeah,
that sounds like it's going to be interesting.

Speaker 6 (55:56):
Yes.

Speaker 5 (55:57):
So once again, Glinda, God bless you and thank you
very much for your time.

Speaker 3 (56:01):
Thank you, gentlemen, you have a great evening.

Speaker 5 (56:03):
You too well, and ladies and gentlemen, thank you very
much for tuning into Patriot Confederation. God save the Republic
of the United States of America.

Speaker 3 (56:15):
We will live back then from bank, we're Unna feeding America.