Rise For Liberty with Kyle Sinclair

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:12):
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a
little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin
said it, well, if they come for our liberty, we

(00:39):
give them hell.

Speaker 2 (00:47):
Freedom of speech.

Speaker 3 (00:50):
He is a principal pillar of a free government.

Speaker 1 (00:55):
When this support is taken away.

Speaker 3 (00:59):
The constitution of a free society is dissolve, and cheering.

Speaker 4 (01:05):
Is erected on its ruins.

Speaker 3 (01:07):
Republics and limited monarchies derived their strength and figure from
a popular examination into the action of the magistrates on
George Washington had come for our freedom gone fine, we
won't trade our liberty for life. Come for our freedom.

Speaker 5 (01:32):
You can kiss your goodbye.

Speaker 1 (01:41):
Malicious certainly an object of primary importance.

Speaker 3 (01:48):
Whether view in reference to the national security, to the
satisfaction of the community, to.

Speaker 1 (01:56):
The preservation of order.

Speaker 3 (02:00):
In connection with this, the establishment of competent magazines and narsenos,
and the fortification of such places as some peculiarly important
and vulnerable naturally present themselves to consideration.

Speaker 4 (02:20):
George Washington had it right, Come for.

Speaker 3 (02:24):
Freedom a Goneif we won't trade our libuity for lie,
come our freedom.

Speaker 5 (02:32):
You can kiss your good eye.

Speaker 2 (02:40):
The tree of liberty.

Speaker 1 (02:43):
Must be refreshed.

Speaker 2 (02:45):
From time to time.

Speaker 3 (02:49):
With the blood of patriots and tyrants. When tyranny becomes along.

Speaker 5 (02:59):
Reel you, it becomes duty. The patriots should never tolerate
the erosion of rights. The Patriot Act? What's wrong?

Speaker 6 (03:20):
COVID?

Speaker 5 (03:22):
What's Derney? J Six was a setup?

Speaker 4 (03:39):
All right? Hello, ladies and gentlemen, welcome to Rise for
Liberty with John groven Or Shawan Mitchell, and our guest
tonight with us is Kyle Saint Clair. Gentlemen, how you
doing doing awesome? So what do we got going on here? Sean?
What do you got on your mind?

Speaker 6 (04:01):
Oh, let's get out on a couple of things. Just
this week, Hole, they passed a the Supreme Court past
it brokers would be aliable for us using illegal doub
the alien drivers. They're gonna start kicking that back on them. Now,
what's your thoughts on that?

Speaker 2 (04:24):
Yeah, that's a tough one. I think knowledge just within
your guys industry, the truck in industry, but just in
the whole. I mean, AI is massive, The race for
AI is huge. The data centers are involved in it.
I mean it's at a federal level of President Trumpet's
at an international level. I mean Yeah, I is just
absolutely fascinating, intriguing. You know, Elon Musk is talking about

(04:48):
the next five years. It is unreal some of the
stuff that's going on right that's on a macro level,
micro level. You know, it applies with you guys. You know,
I'm I'm still not a huge fan of autonomous vehicles,
and whether that's the trucking industry or even in the
personal recreational use. I think there's still a lot that
they need to do to fix it. We've got to

(05:10):
have a lot of regulations around it, you know. I know,
been on Your Guys podcasting off and on for years,
but no trucking uh transportation people down here in Texas
that I mean, they struggle with him. It's a it's
a big deal. So I'm not a huge fan of
where it's at right now personally, But I mean, what
do you what are your guys thoughts on the Supreme

(05:30):
Court ruling on it?

Speaker 6 (05:34):
Well, personally myself, I don't think AI has a business
being in a trucking in a truck whatsoever. I mean,
I just I don't I'm not for it. I know
they're doing tests down in your area right now, between
Houston and san Antonio. But I'm just not a big
fan of it.

Speaker 2 (05:55):
Yeah. The thing about John.

Speaker 4 (05:59):
Well, the think about artificial intelligence, Well, it has its uses,
and we can see some good use As far as
artificial intelligence, it always comes down to how we're going
to utilize it as a society or as a people
in society. And we're giving a lot of control to
large corporations, so we have a lot of concerns about that.
And putting an artificial intelligence into an audible bill or

(06:19):
a truck as you're put in two minds at the controls, right,
So if this thing has the capability of taking over
who's driving? Is it me or is it it Are
we going to be fighting each other for the controls
over this vehicle or is it going to do the
driving or am I going to do the driving? So
it kind of kind of comes down to an issue
of I like to be in control. I like to

(06:40):
know that I have the controls at my disposal and
things are happening the way I designed them to happen,
or I expect them to happen, or I want them
to happen. So have an artificial intelligence and vehicles, to me,
is just erroneous it's uncalled for. People lose their sense
of independence, they lose their sense of control, and they
lose their dignity when you think about it, unless you

(07:01):
plan on taking a nap driving down the road while
the car does all the driving or something, or the
vehicle does all the driving, I don't think it's uh,
I don't. I don't think that would be a good
idea either, right, because now you're asleep at the switch.

Speaker 6 (07:12):
So uh.

Speaker 4 (07:13):
And that's what's going to happen. Once vehicles start doing
their own driving, then they're going to cause people to
not be prepared for when something is happening when they
do to take over controls. Truck drivers would no longer
be properly trained if they have all controls taken over,
and when they need to take over controls, how do
they maneuver our truck if they're if they're if they're

(07:34):
out of practice.

Speaker 2 (07:37):
Yeah, yeah, it's interesting. I mean on the personal recreational use, right,
my wife has a a car that has the self driving.
It's not the Tesla Kui where you have to you're
completely independent, but it's pretty it's pretty crazy going down
the freeway and throwing that thing on and you don't
touch the brakes, the wheel, the gas or anything. I mean,
it's it's crazy what is going on with technology advance

(08:00):
in the industry and automotive. But truck is a whole
different story, especially when it comes to the safety hazard, right,
I mean, the rigs. I just don't know how you
would get away from the human element of being involved
being in the truck and driving. I just don't know,

(08:21):
safety wise, just I just don't I don't conceptually get
how companies can do it. What I am watching on
the federal national level is what President Trump is talking
about doing basically a moratorium on states having any control.
So it's all going to be federal for like ten
years where the states can't make their own rights. So

(08:43):
that's kind of intriguing what I'm watching going on right
now too with that. But there's just some national level
race for AI, and they're saying whichever country gets AI
the fastest. I think it's ADI is what they called it.
You know, that's that's gonna be superpower of the next generation.
And so I don't know, I'm very curious where America

(09:06):
is going to be in that race.

Speaker 4 (09:08):
You're talking about Artificial general intelligence AGI is the next
level GI self recursive self improving or recursive self improving
gonna be some very very incredible technologies. Yeah, the thing
about it is is we don't know what to expect
from these things. We're getting a lot of warnings for
people like the godfather of AI, Jeffrey Hinting himself, is saying, hey, listen,

(09:30):
you guys are going way too fast or out of
control with this stuff. We don't fully understand what it
is people have created yet, and they're looking at things
going you know, we have concerns. We have people right
now trying to worry about if the things they even
have consciousness or not. Now I don't believe they do
or anything. And I'm not trying to advocate saying AI
has consciousness, but there are a lot of people with concerns.
To the point you got the California Institute of Machine

(09:52):
Consciousness trying to make decisions whether they can make it
determine all this determination. So they created what's called a transform.

Speaker 2 (10:00):
Right.

Speaker 4 (10:00):
The transformer acts like the brain of the artificial intelligence.
And from my understanding, they understand maybe about three percent
of how this transformer actually works. They know the math,
they know what they designed they know when they executed it,
when they put it into use, that it works, but
it far exceeded their expectations. So anw they're looking a going, well,
what exactly is going on with this thing? So they

(10:21):
don't have a full grasp or understanding what it is
they created, to the point that the California Institute of
Machine Consciousness wants to create what's called a translator so
they can watch this thing in real time as a transfer,
to watch it in real time as it's working, trying
to make decisions on how it's working, why it's working,
what process is going through to get a greater understanding

(10:42):
of it. But even then, if it's a translator, do
we even know what we're still? Do we know what
we're looking at? So it's kind of pretty bold and
very complicating. So we're kind of it's kind of like
a kid playing with fire, right, he might set the
whole forest on fire, or he just might burn a
few matches, you don't know.

Speaker 2 (11:00):
Yeah, I think it's going to have further implications on
every aspect. Right. My background is healthcare. I just went
to a healthcare AI conference last week and same thing
talking about it, the legal ramifications, what physicians are doing,
how hospitals are implementing it. So it's a it is
a extremely hot topic. There's no way around it. On

(11:21):
this I heard Tucker talking to Kevin O'Leary. Kevin O'Leary
is part of one of the largest AI data centers
in the nation, which is going in the state of
Utah right now, and it's huge, and you know, talking
about is it going to take away jobs? And you know,

(11:41):
Kevin o'larry is like, no, it's not. We don't know
what jobs it's going to create yet, right the implications
of the positive side of it too, But then you know,
I hear a lot about the water, the data, the
energy usage that's coming on. So I'm I'm following it
very closely on a federal level and some state stuff.
But you know, it's going to have major impacts across

(12:02):
every industry, even people like I remember, you know, two
years ago, having conversation with doctors about AI and healthcare,
and then all of a sudden, now here we are
it's like full blown where you have a physician getting
an m d and a AI together. So there's a
school here in San Antonio, utsa health science center that
is doing that. So it's interesting impacts on that. So

(12:25):
I don't know, nobody knows the future of it.

Speaker 4 (12:28):
Well, the thing of it is, Kyle, they never decided
if it's going to displace workers or not displaced a
place workers. The expectation is it's going to displace a
lot of workers, and there's going to be low entry
level jobs, you know, because Elon Musk is now working
on robotics very strongly, and I think within next year
he's going to pump out about a million robots. He's

(12:48):
got this optimum three I think it is, and so
he's planning on maybe I think next year, pumping about
a million of those out that are going to be
consumed by a commerce. So you're gonna have people in
warehouses and stuff like that losing their jobs because we're
being replaced by robotics and in these regards, and these
things can multitasking, they can do various different tasks where

(13:09):
and I imagine people can train for multitask too. But
the point is is ultimately his goal is to reach
the production levels of ten million of these bots a year.
Ten million time say five Okay, it's fifty million bots
in entering the workforce. Taking away jobs in robotics. So

(13:29):
you're combining what AI technologies like these data centers and
stuff may consume for the things they're going to do.
But you're also got the robotics entering. And that's just
one organization or one business entering the workforce with ten
million bots a year. Imagine when China starts producing them
and all these other nations start or organizations start producing

(13:51):
them and plugging the markets with that. I mean, it
could be very dystopic.

Speaker 2 (13:58):
Oh, it is, it is, right, but I would say
on the flip side, positive side of it, Right, you
cannot go to Mars, which is what Elon Musk wants
to do without bots, right, the boring company, the bot
company SpaceX, right, all the stuff that he is doing,

(14:18):
you can't do it without the bots. And that's the
next step for him to be able to take us
to the next planet. And it's fascinating to see, it's
fascinating to watch what's happening, and this is part of it.
There's no way around it that it will be the
consumers on the regular side that will allow him to
advance civilization to another planet. There's no way around it.

(14:39):
I don't know if it will happen in our lifetime.
I have a pretty good idea that it probably will
because of how fast AI is advancing and technology is
advancing very quickly. The problem is in America, can we
sustain that type of growth and advancement where that's needed
because of several factors of our debt, crippling debt, the
economic status people, and just everything that I can talk

(15:02):
about forever on. So I'm fascinated to see what's going on.

Speaker 4 (15:07):
Mm hmm, yeah, John, you are getting ready to say something.
We kind of pushed you aside.

Speaker 6 (15:12):
Well, AI's already cut. AI's already starting to come up
and lower job protection. I know a lady right now
just lost her job at Amazon. She was working customer service.
Now they're turning everything over to AI. So how soon
before it starts trickling up to the fact that you're

(15:36):
gonna have a lot of jobs out there that are
not going to be available very soon.

Speaker 2 (15:41):
Well up, yeah, but imagine even lawyers, right, lawyers are
also going to be I mean you can if you
can search the web and find what you need and
help prep right, do stuff within minutes. Right, even lawyers starts,
you're gonna start seeing some of that stuff. There's gonna
be a lot of impact on a lot of industries

(16:02):
with AI, including trucking, including healthcare. Right, So I think
we're going to see a massive upset and a lot
of stuff. But with that comes as the same thing
when you saw the Industrial revolution. It's the same thing
when you saw you know, airplanes. I mean, everybody starts shifting,
and I think AI you'll see a lot of people
shift and a lot of areas. So I think it

(16:23):
will create a lot of opportunities. It's going to hurt
for a lot of people, and you see a lot
of opportunities.

Speaker 4 (16:28):
So what do you think about preparation. See, this is
the problem I have. Too many people are on social
media crying about the loss of jobs that we're facing.
And we're talking about five years from now. We should
start noticing something. Five years after that we should really
see the impacts of us. We're talking about ten years
down the road when we're going to see the heavy
impacts of displacement. So I'm thinking, you know what if

(16:50):
we were to like they come out, for an example,
they come out with this new law that all these
trucks from twenty twenty seven on have to manufacturer with
AI in them, and they're gonna read your manners and stuff,
and if you look like you're too sleepy, distracted, drunk,
it's not gonna allow you to drive a vehicle. And
so I'm thinking to myself, how many people like myself

(17:11):
to say a twenty ten Dodge Ram I got sitting
up the dyveway. Isn't that hard to refurbish? And what
if we created a whole new marketplace when we were
refurbishing older vehicles like they were new vehicles again, I mean,
would we create a new form of economy taking upon
ourselves as communities and working and driving this and maybe
even getting glending set up and established where we can

(17:33):
get loans for these things and pretty much basically sticking
the big finger out there to the corporations that are
screwing us with this.

Speaker 2 (17:41):
Yeah, I think you're gonna see stuff like that. There's
a funny video I think I saw it on TikTok,
which was a guy's getting attacked. He jumps into his
truck and then his heart is elevated and his voice
is fluctuating and it won't start right, and he's trying
to get out of like a tornado or something like that,
and that's it's funny. It's conceptual, right, you get everybody

(18:03):
makes the point, but I mean the concepts are still there,
and I think there's a lot of bad side to
advancement technologies, especially when you have government oversight and involvement
on the way we act and the way we live.
I mean, we're not too far off with stuff like that.
What's going on in China. We have a social a
social credit score, right, based off of how you perform

(18:26):
in your daily task and what you did and what
you didn't do. So that's not I don't I don't
believe in that. My concern is and I've shared this
in the past. I don't know if John, if you've
been part of it. My concern is that every there's
a book called the Changing World Order, and every countryy uh,
going back in the history has every has always changed

(18:47):
at two hundred and fifty years, America is at two
hundred and fifture, right, and so the next advancement technology
has a huge impact on the increase. But it's also
talks about every decline of every super Powler's a ten
year period to decline always is a world war and
then the rise of the next superpower. I mean, there's

(19:08):
a lot of factors that go with it. But you know,
if it is China, which it might be the next superpower,
I don't know who else would be. But you know,
their view of how they run their country is so
different than how America runs our country, and we've got
a lot of issues.

Speaker 4 (19:26):
But so there's a video out there. I don't know
if you've ever seen it today, I said, Sean a
copy of the video or link to it on YouTube,
and it hasn't got a whole tremendous amount of hits,
but they did this video basically what's going on in
China with these data centers and how they're using data
centers to run smart cities. So now they're going to
control the flow traffic, they're going to control how you

(19:48):
use energy resources, you know, such as in buildings and
stuff office buildings that might adjust the air temperatures and
things accordingly to its occupancy, so you lose control over
having your temperature set the way want to set. And
they told us this for years, Kyle. I mean you
go ten years back, fifteen years back, and they said,
one day they're going to have smart appliances in your
home and they're doing that that connected the internet, and

(20:10):
they know exactly how much water you're using to wash
your clothes every day, at what times of the day
you're washing your clothes, the same thing you dishwashing other things.
So they're monitoring your consumption. They'll be able to control
how much you consume. Well, China's already doing all this.
They even got surveillance set up so it does facial
recognition and it tracks when you leave your house or
apartment bing you're being popped right there. Okay, John left

(20:33):
his house at three pm this evening and we've seen
him pop up over here in the street at three
oh five, and so it tracks everywhere you go, complete
and total monitoring system. These are smart cities, so they've
got smart cars, they got smartphones, they got smart appliances,
smart homes, smart cities, and smart meters out there on
your guests and water and electrical and so they're creating

(20:57):
the surveillance state with all this, and this is already
happening in China, like ten cities. I think they've already
done this in China and some ways have benefits society. Yes,
they're saying they can control traffic for emergency vehicles. So
they say that because they can do so, that the
heart attack survival rate has increased significantly because the amount

(21:17):
of time, you know, the twenty minutes it used to
take to get a patient to the hospital now is
reduced down to five to ten. And so you can
see benefits to it and say, oh wow, that's kind
of amazing. But at the same time, you give up
all your liberties, all your privacy, and you have no
autonomy and this type of lifestyle. And that's the problem
I have with this is if they developed the data

(21:38):
centers are developing now. And you remember Joe Biden when
he was saying, hey, you know, everybody in every rural
area in America needs to have Wi Fi. Everybody deserves
Wi Fi. You're going to need it for communication purposes,
for work purposes. I don't think he was really thinking
about we, the people, the individuals. I think he was
thinking about smaller data centers where people put in rural

(21:59):
areas for the same purposes. They want to control every
aspect of everybody's life in this country.

Speaker 2 (22:06):
Yeah, I think there's no doubt about that. Right. It
reminds me of Reagan's nine serious words that you can
hear somebody say is I'm from the federal government. I'm
here to help, right, Yeah, And I do believe there's
some of that aspect going on with our government. I
do believe obviously in other countries going on too. And

(22:26):
so where do we go as a nation? Civilization is
a country that's trying to progress in advancement and technology,
trying to be the top and the best at a
race for AI right now is the question to be
President Trump seems to be betting heavy on this, and
even as far as his trip to China this last week,

(22:48):
right with eighteen different CEOs of companies from America. I
did a lot of research and study on that. That
was anywhere from eleven to thirteen trillion dollars roughly about
forty five percent of our GDP from those eighteen CEOs
and companies that traveled to China. I mean, it is
an ungodly amount. And it was about trade, and it

(23:09):
was about oil and gas, and it was about tech
and chips and a lot of issue or a lot
of things involved in that. So you know what I mean.
I mean, we we've got advance of a civilization, But
when you say enough is enough? And when does an
impact to your daily life and giving up freedoms to
be able to do that exactly?

Speaker 4 (23:28):
You know, what was it? Ben Franklin said, he who
gives up freedoms for a little bit of security deserved
either of both. No way you get either one. You know,
he said, you'll lose both, nor do you deserve it?
But something to that. I'm paraphrasing a little bit obviously,
but you get the point.

Speaker 2 (23:46):
Yeah, Yeah, I don't know. Hey, guy is a tough one.
But I mean, we need to continue talking, we need
to continue pushing going slow. The problem is it's advancing
so fast and so aggressive that I don't know where
I don't know. I mean I heard numbers that China's
putting on a nuclear power plant every two to three months,

(24:08):
and we haven't built one in decades. And it takes
us five to six years for us to be able
to build a nuclear plant. So I mean, it's a
it's a big deal. When it comes to just energy consumption.
I've been watching closely water. We're in a massive drought.
I think last number I heard was like one hundred
and sixty year drought. Hoover Dam's about to go offline.

(24:28):
I mean, there's a lot We've got a lot of
sixty percent of America's in a water drought so or
shortage in America, and so we've we've got a lot
of stuff going on that for me keeps going back
to that two hundred and fifty year. They're changing world order.
So I don't know.

Speaker 4 (24:45):
I think I think that it's the standard, the two
hundred and fifty year. I think that's a standard. But
didn't roam last six hundred years five six hundred years
before it fell. I mean, there there are there are
nations that have lasted more than the two hundred and
fifty years. I do believe, yep. So I think I
think with Trump, I think you're right. I think we

(25:06):
were failing as a nation, and I think with Trump
coming up, that's one of the reasons I always supported
Trump is because he never said he was against global order.
What he said was he's going to make sure that,
you know, the United States of America was first among
everybody else in the global order, that we were taking
care of first in the global order. And that's what
he's setting out to do.

Speaker 2 (25:27):
But yeah, yeah, one hundredersent, I think I think the
make America greatest his stance when he ran on this term,
and I'm glad he did, and he got us out
of you know, the EU and getting out of NATO
and getting out of you know, all these horrible deals
that Biden put us back in, and we got right
though the calls I was, I was a huge supporter
of the reciprocal tariffs. I think the Supreme Court hundred

(25:50):
percent got that wrong. I've supported President Trump when he
talked about Monroe Doctrine and Venezuela and the three hundred
and three billion barrels of oil reserve going after than
for the raw materials going after. I ran one hundred
percent support of that. I understand what he's going after,
Frustraight or Hamuth, you know, and the oil production. I'm

(26:11):
grateful that he's going after China and putting them in
their place and bringing back material. I mean, I think,
if anything, to save this country. And I was just
on the radio on Monday of this week and it's
the same thing talking about that very thing that the
only product that backs our currency right now is the

(26:31):
petro dollar oil. That's the only thing. We have, no
other commodity that protects our reserve currency being the number
one reserve currency in the world. And Trump knew that
and understands that very clearly. And so it is a
superpower because of it continues for America to be the
superpower to continue to stay our debt, which we are
thirty nine trillion dollars in debt, two tillion dollars death say,

(26:51):
with the tillion dollars of interest every single year. So
it's a it's a major problem in this country that's
causing us a fail. And if anybody's going to stop
that for the trajectory of this country, it will be
President Trump. There's nobody else that I think could have
done and did what he is doing. And no matter
if just about a year and a half.

Speaker 4 (27:11):
Yeah, absolutely, he's been knocking out of the ballpark. He
come in with a plan. I have a feeling that
four years we sub was I kind of feel like
it was a blessing in a way because that four
years I think Trump had his team together and he
was strategizing everything so when he could enter the White
House again, he could execute a plan from day one
and just steamroll it. And that's what he's been doing.

Speaker 2 (27:34):
Yep. I agree, there's a lot of people that are
mad at him. I don't know why. I don't get it.
I've been a stamp supporter of it, and I see
very clearly what he is doing to protect this country,
not only just for America now, but it's for generations
to come, particularly for my kids, my grandkids.

Speaker 4 (27:49):
So there's two reasons why people are upset with Trump.
One is the Epstein files, which I think is being
a little overly sensitive. While I understand their concerns. We
all wanted to see something more come from it, but
let's not throw the baby out with the bathwater, right.
And the other one is and that's not to minimize
the victims or anything involved in the Epstein files, I
don't mean it that way. But the other one is

(28:12):
is the data centers. Trump is for technology, expresses that,
and we see the as I described earlier about the
control issues with data centers coming down the pike. I
think a lot of people see it. They feel like
we're going to be displaced workers from it. We're living
in a state of hopelessness because of it. And then
Trump just puts out this executive order saying that he

(28:33):
wants federal regulatory agencies to make sure, whatever way necessary
that they pre am state law from regulating AI SO
and some regards. We're kind of seeing the favoritism towards corporations.
And if you're like I am, you probably feel like
this country, our government is in a state of corporate capture,
meaning that we have a captured regulatory agencies, we have

(28:55):
a captured Congress, and we possibly have a captured executive
branch depending on who in office, and so we're very
well corporate controlled.

Speaker 2 (29:04):
I think, yeah, I mean there's no way around it.
I mean, the economic is economy is what spurs this country, right,
There's no way around it. And I mean you've got
to have that mixture belt. The problem is that the
rich get richer, the poor get poor, and you squeeze
the middle class, right, And that's where we're at as

(29:25):
a nation too. Our economic status is significantly changing the
middle class. It's harder to be middle class to fight
against the home. The dollars stretched thinner. Right, you got
two people working, if you're married, you got two people
working just to have a decent lifestyle. You know, the
cost of oil and gas particularly is a big topic

(29:48):
an issue across this nation that people are fighting against
I drive a diesel and you know it cost me
one hundred and seventy six dollars in my personal truck
just to fill that up. I know you guys spend
hundreds and hundreds of dollars to fill your your rigs up.
So you know there's a lot of a lot of
stuff that uh uh that's that's causing people anks against

(30:09):
uh against President Trump. I think Trump is pissed off
at Iran's taken longer uh than expected and and uh,
you know, gave them the ultimatum this week and to
see what Marco Rubio can come back with on Iran.

Speaker 6 (30:24):
It's going to stretch this out as long as they
can because for the simple fact they don't know how
to sit down and negotiate.

Speaker 2 (30:30):
Kyle, Well, they don't they and they could care less.
They say one thing in the meeting and turn around
to do a complete opposite. I mean they just bod
and and Trump I think is having none of it.
And uh, I hope they get their act together. They're
probably not going to. They're prideful brunch of people and
nation and radical uh Islams are running that country, so

(30:54):
you know, I think they're going to struggle as a nation. Uh.
What's interesting is watching countries like UAE and Saudi Arabia
supporting Israel going after Iran. So I don't know. I mean,
this is a tense time and a tough one.

Speaker 6 (31:09):
It is well and I did really stop about it
look at it at this point, I want to make
real quick if you stop and look at it, the
people or Iran, we're pretty much doctored in the same
way that they were during World War Two with Hitler.
The Jews were the bad this was a bad culture.
And Iran they're being told the same thing. The United

(31:31):
States is a bad thing. No matter what aid we
can give them, we're still bad.

Speaker 2 (31:40):
Yeah. I mean they chanted for fifty forty seven years
dead to America, right, and they've always said that people
that are like, all right, bullshit, I ran if they
had any nuclear capability would have executed and gone after America.
They've said it, they don't. They hate America. So then
that alone, I mean, it's it's it's crazy what's going

(32:03):
on with that. But I do think this is this
is definitely to your point, John Corporation Lead oil and Gas,
lead and UH reserve currency for America lead as well
as making sure rand is.

Speaker 4 (32:17):
Not ability absolutely and to say that, you know, it's
not to be against corporations, but we just see that
laws are being passed without the consent of the people anymore.
And it's concerning now as far as Iran goes. One
of the issues I think people are overlooking with iron
is they have an apocalyptic mindset and we are the

(32:39):
great Satan to them, so is Israel. So when we're
going to battle with them, they think they're going to
battle with Satan. You know, you understand what I'm saying.
They think they're fighting the Great Satan and they're gonna
be these glorious victors against the Great Satan, like all
that is gonna lead them to victory or something. And
I think that's I think we're overlooking that sometimes when
we view them that that is the mindset. So they

(33:01):
don't want to make deals.

Speaker 2 (33:04):
Yep, no, I agree. I think I don't think they
have any intention to make it do at all at all.
I think there's zero intention. Is very clearly as we
bomb their leadership, the next one came on said and
said and did very similar and they bombed, We bombed them,
killed them. So yeah, I don't think there's any intention.
I'm grateful for what Marco Rubio has done. I think
he's been a brilliant Secretary of State and a great

(33:27):
advocate for President Trump and for America, and personally, I
think he'll probably be our next president because of what
his capabilities and what he's able to do. So yeah,
you know, we'll see, We'll see. I mean, I'm talking
with a couple of generals that advised me when I
ran for Congress that I still talk with and keep
tabs on what's going on with Iran and several other

(33:49):
international conflicts.

Speaker 4 (33:52):
Hmm. Yeah. Marco Rubio all is working his butt off,
and it shows that man is a workhorse. Of all
the people on the end the Trump administration, I think
he's the one that looks like he's really just carrying
the load, you know what I mean. I'm not saying
that the others aren't doing their jobs. I'm not trying
to criticize them, but you just see Marco Rubio standing
by Trump, and he just looks like he's focused. His

(34:14):
head's in the game.

Speaker 2 (34:15):
Oh yeah, I mean yeah, and he's been prepped and
led and you know, involvement on multiple things, especially recently,
as recent as the Senate there's so you know, and
you're talking about Epstein files, and I mean there are
people within Trump's administration. I'm glad that they've been fired. Unfortunately,
Pam Bonnie, I think was was god awful as a

(34:36):
as the DOJ do not like what she did. I
remember there's a couple of ranking senders came through San
Antono and asked the same thing, When the hell is
President Trump going to fire Pam BONDI she hasn't done anything,
absolutely nothing in the year year she was there. And
I'm you know, I met Christy Noum, but I personally

(34:58):
know Mark Wayne Mullins for the DHS secretary, so that
he's got some really good cabinet picks, and I'm grateful
they're working their butts off for him and for this nation.

Speaker 4 (35:07):
Yeah, yeah, I like, I like. I thought Mark Wayne
Mullens should have been his first pick to begin with. Yeah,
I think he's a good worker.

Speaker 2 (35:16):
Yep, I think he'll do good. And it's all it's
already clearly changing. So but I got it. I got
an event go ahead, Sean.

Speaker 6 (35:25):
I was gonna say, kind of went toe to toe
with Bernie didn't.

Speaker 2 (35:28):
He who's that.

Speaker 6 (35:32):
Mark Wayne?

Speaker 2 (35:34):
Oh yeah, that's funny.

Speaker 4 (35:35):
No, that wasn't Bernie was Brian. He was going to
to Doe with O'Brien and Bernie's over there.

Speaker 2 (35:40):
You knucked that off.

Speaker 4 (35:41):
You stopped that right now, You stopped that. That is
not that is not congressional.

Speaker 2 (35:47):
Yeah, no, I was.

Speaker 6 (35:49):
I was a refirmed where he told Bernie, I don't
care about your opinion. Yeah, you've been in my office.
You've been in this office as long as I've been alive,
and you still can't fix it.

Speaker 4 (36:00):
Oh oh yeah, I know what you're talking about now.

Speaker 2 (36:04):
Mark Wayne's a fighter. I text him off and on
pretty regular. He's a good dude. I've known him for
about half a decade personally, so he's a great knew
when he was in Congress and then obviously in the Senate.
Now DHS.

Speaker 4 (36:16):
So well, Kyle, you know since you don't so well,
we we always look for guests on the show. I mean,
just pit us up. I know that.

Speaker 2 (36:27):
Hey, guys, extremely extremely extremely busy.

Speaker 4 (36:30):
I understand.

Speaker 2 (36:30):
I'm sure he's got twenty two agencies and thousands of employees.

Speaker 6 (36:35):
So yeah, yeah, we get him for the Maybe we
ought to get him, pointed to the FMCSA too.

Speaker 4 (36:43):
Is that Mark Wayne? Yeah, oh yeah, he tear that up.

Speaker 2 (36:51):
Well, I appreciate you guys having me on. I got
to run to my next event. I got Tim Paxton
in town here in San Antonio running for attorney general
or excuse me, running for a Senate He just got
Trump's endorsement this week. But he's in, He's in talent,
so I'm gonna go to his event.

Speaker 4 (37:09):
He was, I do I do like that? I like
and he kicked but as a g of Texas, he
kicked a lot of but he was good. He was solid.

Speaker 2 (37:18):
Yeah.

Speaker 6 (37:18):
Uh, very quick on that subject, Kyle. Some people are
giving Trump criticism for picking Ken. What's your thoughts.

Speaker 2 (37:28):
Yeah, I mean I know both Ken Paxton. I've used
him to sue Bear County. I know Cender Corn really well.
He's helped me with multiple congressional careers. I got an
active d O J excuse me, do o W Department
of War for you request. And I'm using congressional career
from Corn and so I know both of them, use
both of them. Talk with both of them. You know,

(37:50):
forty years in the Senate corning is is a long
time too. And and I think the fresh blood is
always good. I mean, there's some several downfalls to center
Cornn that hurt him, going back obviously to the gun
laws that the red flag laws that Biden put him
on and crazy Mitch McConnell. You know, I keep saying,

(38:13):
if I was in corn and shoes and Mitch McConnell
came up to me as one of two US senders
in the state of Texas and you asked me to
write red flag laws on guns, I would have given
you the big bird. And I was at a state
convention in twenty twenty two when literally Cornyn got booed
off the stage and Texans have never, never forgotten it.
And here we are in twenty twenty six and he's

(38:34):
in the fight of his life for his career. But
you know, I think he's a decent cent in all regards.
But yeah, I don't know. I think the shift is
changing and that MAGA is strong. Trump's endorsements are ninety
five percent success rate on winnability, and I think Paxson's
going to pull this out. So my personal opinion.

Speaker 4 (38:56):
Well, like I say, he's done great for Texas, so
there's no reason he isn't going to sweep this one.

Speaker 2 (39:04):
Yeah, I don't know about sweet, but I think I
think he will pull it out.

Speaker 6 (39:07):
Yeah, Thomas Massy found out the hard way.

Speaker 2 (39:11):
Well, Yeah, that one's kind of intriguing to me. I've
been watching that one. That one's not just trump back.
That one is a pac putting in thirty five million dollars,
one of the most expensive races. So that that one's
kind of intrig very intriguing to me on that one.
But uh, that's the topic for another day.

Speaker 4 (39:31):
Come, i'mble gonna cause you to be late for your appointment.
We got you all held up here.

Speaker 2 (39:37):
We can keep talking. But I appreciate you guys time
and and look forward to the next time being on
the show.

Speaker 6 (39:42):
Oh well, we always appreciate you coming on with us.

Speaker 2 (39:45):
Kyle. Yeah, thank you guys. God bless you guys, and
have a great day.

Speaker 4 (39:49):
Thank you, God bless you with a brother.

Speaker 2 (39:52):
Bye bye.

Speaker 6 (39:55):
Well John, we kind of learned a little bit night,
didn't we.

Speaker 4 (39:58):
Yeah, we did a little bit. Uh, as always, that's
what this is all about.

Speaker 6 (40:03):
Man.

Speaker 4 (40:03):
Bring some people in here, have some good conversation and
hopefully we all learned something together.

Speaker 6 (40:10):
Well, you know, I was gonna bring it up, but
Kyle had to go and that was kind of trivial.
But I'm waiting to see how the lawsuit goes against Tesla.

Speaker 4 (40:21):
Which lawsuit is this, I'm not sure I'm familiar with it.

Speaker 6 (40:24):
Well, it's gonna be coming real soon. So apparently a
guy decided to test Elon's theory that his that so
called trucky he could float. Oh, I got the idea
and ran it into the damn water.

Speaker 4 (40:43):
He drove it into a lake just to see if Yeah,
what was the term they used for that. Yeah, it's
basically floating rafting or something like that. You got in
trouble for that too, for my understanding. But it did float,
didn't it.

Speaker 6 (40:55):
Well, yeah, he had to climb out the damn past
or window. But yeah, I'm from from the door up.
It was floating.

Speaker 4 (41:04):
That way. Hey, you know what, I don't see how
he can sue Tesla for it, but he got himself
in a heap of trouble. I think might have been
the town's drinking water.

Speaker 6 (41:13):
You know.

Speaker 4 (41:13):
Kyle brought up that this country's suffering a lot of
droughts in various areas, and Texas be one of them.
Texas have a lot of problems in a lot of
various areas. But if I'm not mistaken, Seoan, we are
in an El Nino year, and that should be a
year of a lot of rainfall and water. Hopefully people

(41:34):
will benefit from that if it is. If we do
hit a lot of rain and have a lot of
rainfall this year, exceptional mounths, hopefully that'll pull a lot
of people out. Like he's talking about the Hoover Dam
shutting down and stuff. We were talking to another gentleman
from New Braunfels, Texas yesterday, and they have the same
problem there there. He's talking about the lake is just depleted.

Speaker 6 (41:56):
Well, and you know, if you stop look a lot
of your water, it's gonna start receiving a lot more.
But we also had a lot of rainess last week too.

Speaker 4 (42:05):
Yeah, we've been getting some certain areas. Yeah. Sometimes you
get those desert areas or those high plane high areas
and they don't get it as much.

Speaker 6 (42:15):
You know.

Speaker 4 (42:16):
I don't know if it's the way the wind drives,
the weather around it or something, or I mean, the
the environment or what goes on.

Speaker 6 (42:24):
I mean, just two weeks ago it snowed again up
and the cascades out in Washington, So eventually some of
that water is going to drain down too.

Speaker 4 (42:33):
If it melts, and might just stay that way all year.

Speaker 6 (42:38):
Yeah, there's wishful thinking. Uh, But I mean, all in
all that, there's a lot of things that Kyle brought
up tonight. The one main thing that concerns me is
again with autonomy and the simple fact that I got
a feeling somebody is willing trying to grow up too fast,

(42:58):
too soon.

Speaker 4 (43:00):
They are there, they talk about to be in a race.
I was a sinner Shaheens. I was talking to her
office with Ted, and I brought that up with them,
about the fact that cybersecurity is an issue. It's a
big issue in fact, so the Winds was hacked for
nine months, and I'm like, you're sitting there trying to
drive all this technology, including autonomy, and you're shoving it

(43:20):
down our throats, but it's creating a lot of vulnerabilities.
I think, don't you think that we should be slowing
this down? And he goes, no, we got to win
the race against China. If you look at China, I
think we've already lost that race a long time ago.
They stole so much technology from US, so much information, data,
priet proprietary information, and now they're using it and looking
at them having they're communists, bro. I mean they can

(43:43):
just pretty much snap their fingers or people do what
they're told to do because they're communists. People don't have
rights in China. Well we got here in the United
States bureaucracy, we're not going to move as fast.

Speaker 6 (43:55):
Well, and to bring up a very very quick scenario,
you know, it wasn't that. It was quite a while ago.
Indianapolis got the panand Games. Everybody's all excited in Indiana.
Indianapolis got the panand Games. Of course, I still think
when Castro was walking down Washington Street, somebody should have

(44:15):
got smart. But I'll leave it at that. Uh. Then
they get the Super Bowl. They're all happy about that,
and then they want another one back to back. Uh.
I call that a little bit of greed and trying
to grow up too soon. Because now they brought in Yeah,
they brought in a generated revenue, but now they're taking

(44:41):
their time fixing other things that should have been fixed
because they weren't prepared for all this. So when this
big city puts on something like that, yeah, you're gonna
bring in revenue, and you're gonna want to, but you're
not preparing yourself for what the outcome will be. And
that's what that happens when you grow up too fast
too soon.

Speaker 4 (45:02):
Yeah, yeah, uh yeah, projections. I was looking at here
not too long ago. I think I was pitting the
mark pretty good. We should be seeing something about five years,
we should be seeing something's more significant. And you know,
but Chris wasn't wrong last night when we were arguing
about it. AI by itself with the data centers and stuff.
There's gonna be some job growth in various areas. If

(45:24):
you're trained in those jobs and educated in those jobs,
you might see. Getting retooled for those jobs may take time.
You know. They turn around and say, well, you know,
we're gonna display struck drivers, but we'll retool you. What's
that mean, You'll retool me?

Speaker 6 (45:37):
You know?

Speaker 4 (45:37):
And according to the Department of Transportation under Elaine Chow
with their AV three point zero is they're gonna use
the Department of Labor to make sure that drivers are
retooled for other jobs. Are they paying for this education?
Do I have to pay for this education? Getting close
to retirement age and you like this is going way.
I'm not yet ready to retire, but I don't exactly

(45:58):
need two years of education just to work two more
years or four more years, right, it's ridiculous. And what
do you two years while you're getting educated.

Speaker 6 (46:07):
That's my whole point right there is you know, I'm
sixty one. I don't know how much longer I'm God
left in me to drive. So okay, let's say it's
sixty three. They're going to side to retool me. What
am I going to be doing? Am I gonna take
Kevin the Rutherford's idea and say, welcome to Walmart?

Speaker 4 (46:27):
Is that what Kevin says? Welcome to a Walmart?

Speaker 6 (46:29):
That's what Kevin said, Well, you can be a Walmart greater.
Welcome to Walmart.

Speaker 4 (46:34):
So Kevin's not in favor of AI either, I take it.

Speaker 6 (46:38):
Well, I don't know about in favor of AI, of
course I do. I will say this much. I had
a good time with Kevin once, and Kevin couldn't exactly
explain to me what he gave back to Trucky, but
that he takes the cured diabetes. So I guess he
feels it was like he done something.

Speaker 4 (47:01):
Yeah, he sells his He sells his wares on his shows,
and he works his advertisement right into his shows. You know,
he's got people call in talking about these kid or
diet things he sells and stuff, and fifteen to twenty
minutes worth of basically infomercial spot for him that he's
just created himself. That looks like it's supposed to be
part of the show. It's really just an infomercial.

Speaker 6 (47:23):
Well, and that would you get into a subject like
with Kevin, you you cannot. He will do everything he
can to delete or to go around the actual question.
My question to him was pretty simple, what have you
gave back to trucky? In other words, what have you

(47:45):
done to benefit the industry? You cure diabetes? Gee, I
know a couple of doctors that would love to talk
to you. One we've had on the show.

Speaker 4 (47:57):
Yeah several times.

Speaker 6 (48:01):
Uh, you've always running around selling some damn product. So again,
once again, like you said, it was just basically he's
selling the snake oil. But in the long run of things,
to Sai, it's just I worry about several things, even

(48:25):
if they do get it accomplished, and what's gonna end
up happening when that unit breaks down? Out on the road.

Speaker 4 (48:35):
There's autonomous trucks, but they got their flashing lights on
the cab of the truck to twirl around and warn
people that they're broke down because they can't put out triangles,
which is probably okay because I've seen some of these
people that break down and they put out their triangles.
They put about reverse order. So instead of starting at
the driver's side ten feet and go one hundred feet
out to the center of the trailer, and then go

(48:55):
one hundred feet out to the left side the passenger's
side of the trailer, so he's kind of dirgging traffic
away from your truck. They do it just the opposite,
like they're trying to diruct traffic right to the ass
end of the trailer. I'm like, how is that effectual?
How does that even work? Who touched that ship?

Speaker 6 (49:11):
Well, you'd be surprised what some people do.

Speaker 4 (49:15):
So, but yeah, the AI thing they make, I don't know,
definitely ces they is supposed to be a safe safety
until some corporation comes along goes, well, we can't put
out triangles if we don't have drivers. Maybe you need drivers,
bro No, Well, it's just a safe to have a
beacon light flesh and on the tractor on each side.
And it's like, come on, man, that's nonsense.

Speaker 6 (49:35):
Well, and today I even passed two different trucking companies.
They've got camera sticking out offside the driver's store.

Speaker 4 (49:45):
Yep, they got them shooting on the.

Speaker 6 (49:50):
And I mean, you're you're taking a lot away from
the driver. You really are. I mean anymore, you really
don't have you don't even have a gear anymore. You
can't get a truck with the manual in it.

Speaker 4 (50:08):
No, because everything's going to AI. They had to make
them automatic so that they can do AI trucks because
they I trucks can't shift gear selectors. They don't manually
shift trucks. Uh. So yeah, they went with automatic. Yeah
it's nuts. I had a thought here around.

Speaker 6 (50:27):
But it's also from what I understand. By putting in automatic,
the engine and the transmission are supposed to learn how
you drive.

Speaker 4 (50:40):
Yeah, they said that's what the eled was for too.
We don't know how drivers drive, the travel times like that,
so they got the data for the for the autonomous vehicles.
So basically, I call legalized slavery a legislative slavery. Right,
they legislate that you have to use electronic logging device,
therefore you have to buy it. They get you to

(51:01):
pay for an electronic logging device monthly, and then they
collect all the data you signed away, the proprietary data
off that you're giving them, so they own it now
and they can sell the data and make money off
it and or utilize it in other ways. And I'm going,
isn't that what slavery is? You force me to purchase
something and I have to pay for it off from
my labor, so basically by law, because as mandated that

(51:23):
I have to use it in order to work and
make a living. It's like capturing somebody's work, right, that's
enslaving people for money.

Speaker 6 (51:32):
Well, and I brought up a simple even, I brought
up a simple ideaology even with a couple of congressman
or senators. So if I'm a carpenter and I know
I need a hammer, and you tell me I'm gonna
have to buy a hammer, that's one thing. But then
you tell me I have to buy a specific hammer, Well,

(51:55):
why am I buying one guy's product when the other
product that works just as good. See, now you're forcing
me to make decisions, And you did that when you
put implemented DLD on the owner operator and the independent driver,
because now you're forcing them to buy your product that
that company provides.

Speaker 4 (52:15):
Yeah, buy from the company's store.

Speaker 6 (52:18):
That's what you did. Oh, let's go back to the
days of depression.

Speaker 4 (52:23):
Yeah, we got your labor, and we'll take the pay
we give you and sell you the products you need
to buy.

Speaker 6 (52:31):
Well, of course, and then of course, actually when they
want to sell you, even something as simple as load locks,
they're usually five to ten dollars higher.

Speaker 4 (52:41):
No way they're making a profit.

Speaker 6 (52:44):
But what really gives me anymore is these lumper services
because a lot of companies went to this, went to
relay or other ways of paying for things. But then
they charge you this convenience feet which is usually a
standard ten dollars.

Speaker 4 (53:05):
But the convenience you fee cover for the fact they're there.

Speaker 6 (53:10):
Yeah, well, for the fact is that you used relay.
But if you use an EFS check, they won't take
that anymore. A lot of places won't do that anymore.

Speaker 4 (53:19):
Oh.

Speaker 6 (53:21):
Then there's a lot of places won't even take cash anymore.

Speaker 4 (53:28):
So they want you to use their checks that they
supply and charge you ten dollars for using it.

Speaker 6 (53:36):
Well, there's even some places that they'll charge you an
extra five. I go to one place in Jacksonville, and
they charge you five dollars every time you get an
EFS check from them.

Speaker 4 (53:47):
M I thought they gave those away for free, but
I thought EFS biled them.

Speaker 6 (53:56):
Well yeah, but I mean again, they charge you five
dollars if you want to use one of their EFS checks.
And when the drivers find out I have them, they're
willing to come up and give it to me versus
giving it to them, which I tell them I only
have one or two lefts. So because I'm not going
to be selling my checks, I need those. Yeah, I

(54:19):
would say, So we got five dollars for the check,
and then we got ten dollars for the convenience fee
because you used relay, So fifteen dollars just went out
that really shouldn't have needed to go out.

Speaker 2 (54:32):
Yeah.

Speaker 4 (54:32):
They find ways to build you for money anyway they can.
That's just life, I guess. But this nickel and diamond
stuff is pretty much wearing people down, isn't it.

Speaker 6 (54:45):
I mean, I'll say this much about the truck stop
I'm at tonight, I'm at the Ta and Mankato when
they first opened this up, every parking lot was paid parking.
Every parking lot in here was paid parking. I've seen
a sign tonight now it says it's free parking if
you get over seventy gallons of fuel.

Speaker 4 (55:10):
I thought that's how it was supposed to be. We
used to get free showers, free coffee. About fifty gallons
or more. Got your free shower, and they got your
free parking, and they got your free coffee. Now now
you're lucky to get the free parking.

Speaker 6 (55:23):
Huh, Well, you're lucky to get the free coffee too. Yeah.

Speaker 4 (55:28):
A lot of places don't give those out anymore.

Speaker 6 (55:31):
But yet though, I've been to some of the places
up here in the north, in the north and even
out west, and they're well, coffee so you got to
see you later?

Speaker 4 (55:47):
What do you mean?

Speaker 6 (55:49):
I mean, that's just well, I mean you walk in
the morning, you can get your car, You go man
with your own coffee cup, You fill it up, You
tell them that's all you had. They'll tell you see
you lea.

Speaker 4 (55:58):
Oh yeah yeah, since it's your cup, they don't have
to count for it.

Speaker 6 (56:03):
Yeah, right, they don't have to counsel that cup. So
but I mean, there's a lot of places that are anymore.
They're just they want every damn little nickel and dime
they can get.

Speaker 4 (56:22):
Problem is, you're only making nickels and you can't get
pennies anymore.

Speaker 6 (56:26):
So no, but they've been rounding those off to the
nearest penny. Now the nearest nickel hole, because yeah, they've
been rouning that off too. I mean anything anymore, it's
becoming a racket.

Speaker 2 (56:46):
John.

Speaker 4 (56:49):
It is a lot of starving people out there in
the world. They just can't seem to make enough. But
what are you gonna do? You know, what's it is?
What is so they can't.

Speaker 6 (57:01):
Well? And again you're back to damned if you do
and damned if you don't.

Speaker 4 (57:07):
I had a guy tried to leave me off the
bus one time in New York. So he goes, hey, man,
I think you over there where you got to meet
up with your next ride and stuff like, you know,
when you're relaying, and he wants to walk me around
the bus terminal right back to almost where I started
to get a tip. I'm looking, I'm going, what's going on, bro?
I mean, seriously, well, you know people usually tip for this.

(57:28):
I'm like, dude, I started right over there, like ten
feet away. I guy, just walk ten feet I didn't
have to walk through the whole terminal. Well, anything to
make a dollar, I guess, yeah, crazy.

Speaker 6 (57:43):
Maybe, well today's society, Maybe you can do a battle
on TikTok.

Speaker 4 (57:47):
John, Yeah, maybe you can throw your hat in your
hand and hold it out there in the street too,
stand in the street corner. Maybe people just thoughtoboautically drop money.

Speaker 6 (58:00):
I watched one guy. I watched one guy tonight battle
on tick ok. All he could get was forty nine cents.

Speaker 4 (58:07):
Damn. Yeah, I'm good on that sort of stuff. I
don't I don't need to try to make money that way.
But it is eight o'clock, Sewan. I think you got
to go deliver some ice cream or something, don't you.

Speaker 6 (58:19):
Yeah, well it's seven o'clock here, so I've still got
an hour and a half before i can show up.

Speaker 4 (58:23):
But oh, you said that earlier.

Speaker 6 (58:28):
Yeah, I still got an hour and a half. But yeah,
the eight thirty, this load will be at Walmart.

Speaker 4 (58:34):
Oh.

Speaker 6 (58:37):
Contributing to the man, Listen to learned ladies and gentlemen,
in case they never told you your two worst loads.
Ice cream in French fries they are suicidal loads.

Speaker 4 (58:51):
What you calling them now?

Speaker 6 (58:54):
They are always been suicidal loads.

Speaker 4 (58:56):
What he's saying is he really and there's too much
to eat?

Speaker 6 (59:01):
Oh well it don't have Neo Polton.

Speaker 4 (59:04):
In it, John, Oh okay, well forget it then, so.

Speaker 6 (59:07):
They don't have to worry about me touch Yeah, they
don't have to worry about me touching it.

Speaker 4 (59:10):
You know that pistachio ice cream never gets touched.

Speaker 6 (59:15):
I'll never touch that either. But yeah, yeah, of course
I had some woman that tell me today that she
didn't know what Neo Poulton was.

Speaker 4 (59:25):
No jeez. All right, man, well we're at our hour mark,
so we probably should cut out of here anyway.

Speaker 6 (59:35):
Well, thank you all for listening tonight. Then listen to
this by a podcast. We appreciate it. We should be
on again next week seven o'clock Eastern Standard time. John,
take us out.

Speaker 4 (59:48):
All right, ladies and gentlemen, that's our bit for tonight.
We hope you got something out of it, uh, something good.
And uh if you didn't learn anything something, then maybe
you're just a little bit entertained. I don't know, but uh,
be good and if you can't be good, we'll be
good at it. And we are gone,