The Common Sense Conservatives

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:01):
Welcome to the Common Sense Conservatives, a political discussion group
about current events and other government related matters, every Wednesday
evening from seven to eight pm right here on WUSMN
fifteen ninety AM, WUSMN ninety five point three FM and
streaming live on WUSMN dot Live. Making sense of the
inverted reality we are subject to you every day. The

(00:24):
common Sense Conservatives are here to help bring you back
to your reality.

Speaker 2 (00:28):
Now.

Speaker 1 (00:28):
Your host's Wyatt, Todd McKinley and John Golovin.

Speaker 3 (00:33):
Well, that was kind of weird. There wasn't a John
as odd sound went out there. It's almost if the
microphone got choked off there. Hey doing tonight, John.

Speaker 2 (00:40):
I'm doing well. Chris. I'm not sure what you're referring
to about the microphone getting choked off.

Speaker 3 (00:45):
Oh no, the sound there at the end, it was
kind of just did that. Maybe it was a glitch
of my end, but amaze, what sounded like what went
out of the air just kind of went funky. But
that's all right. People don't tune into here the opening.
They tune into here. What we've got to say. Oh,
I hope that's why.

Speaker 2 (01:00):
They tune If indeed we have something to say, what
are we talking about tonight?

Speaker 3 (01:03):
I wonder, well, I'm sure we'll get into that just
a second. But Todd will be with us in the
second hour. I believe correct.

Speaker 2 (01:09):
That's what he said. He has got a very important
board meeting tonight or school board meeting, and so he
could not make it this first hour, but he plans
on meeting here for the second hour.

Speaker 3 (01:18):
Did you see that last night? It was John Corning
going down. We've had Massy go down, we had Bill
Cassidy go down. Now Corning is down. Being against Trump
seems to be a very bad position this year in
Republican primaries.

Speaker 2 (01:33):
I think people better wake up if they want to
keep their seats. But it's probably too late for a
lot of people. But yeah, Trump is running. I think
I heard somebody say ninety five percent ratio one people.
He points a finger too and say vote for that guy.
And that's what people do. I think people want to
see the Trump agenda come to fruition, you know. I
think Trump's doing a good job putting America first, and

(01:54):
I think a lot of people misunderstand what exactly that means.
You know, I think they think the traditional America First
as in isolationism from way back in the late nineteenth century,
early twentieth century. And that's not what Trump really meant,
is it, Chris. I mean what he really meant was
he's going to put America first in the global order
of things.

Speaker 3 (02:12):
Yeah, no, America should be first in everything. But that
doesn't mean we're America above all else or neglect of everything.
That's the misnomer that a lot of these people hear.
They think that America. Making America great again means at
the expense everywhere else. Now it means putting America first
the priorities here. For instance, why have we taken in
millions of people who refuse to become part of our country,

(02:32):
bifurcates society, create little hobbles and divide us on language
and faith, and then hate America. That's just stupid. That's
what Europe did in Europe is gone. Now. Trump has
said we shouldn't be doing that, and he's right. He's
the first president to have the audacity and the nads
to stand up and say, hey, we need to take
care of ourselves first, then we can take care of
the world. He didn't really say we can take on

(02:53):
the world, but we need to take care of ourselves first.
But what's implied there is that America comes first. All
decisions should be done on the base of how it
benefits Americans and America first and foremost. And that's the
way it should be. Every state should work in their
own self interested They don't, they're going to die.

Speaker 2 (03:09):
Yeah, that's basically right. He That's exactly what he said,
you know, I mean, and think about it. He's trying
to He wants to create an equal playing field in
certain regards. He's telling members of NATO or NATAL members.
He's saying, hey, step it up, become equals this way.
Don't expect us to step down. You guys, bring yourselves
up to our level. And you know, he'd rather see
people rise than the America fall.

Speaker 3 (03:31):
But you know, the best part of last night with
the most exciting part of me. As much as I
find registercting and Jerryman being reprehensible and immoral, it was
very satisfying to see the disgusting vow racist al Green
finally trumped out of Congress. Now, his replacement is also
left as progressive, but he's much younger. But al Green
has been there forever, and it's time that this fossil,
this arrogant, racist blowhard is gone. I'm so happy to

(03:54):
see him no longer in Congress. He is such a
vile repulse of human being.

Speaker 2 (03:58):
Yeah, politicized everything he did. He didn't do anything for
the greater good of the country. He just did. Uh,
he just politicized everything. I do have a phone call
coming in. Maybe I should grab that.

Speaker 3 (04:11):
Yeah, go ahead. I don't have a problem with with
him politicizing things, but I do have a problem with
racializing everything. And that's what the man did. Everything he
did was racialized, and so good riddance to him. And
it's nice to see him no longer there. So let's
just see something re quickly here. Just what if other
people are picking up that sound. I'm picking up some
feedback or some static on the on the board. There

(04:32):
someone else picking up out there listening to the program
and watching the program. I wonder. Yeah, So the problem
with al Greed wasn't politicizing things. It was racializing things.
He racialized everything. So for al Greed, it's all about race.
Seohn struggles with his headphones.

Speaker 2 (04:47):
He's back, Hey, headphones, So I do I do have
a caller on the line when we get a chance.

Speaker 3 (04:53):
Sure, what's the call about it?

Speaker 2 (04:56):
It's a good call.

Speaker 3 (04:57):
Okay, we'll take the call. Let's take the call.

Speaker 2 (04:59):
He wants to talk a little bit about what went
on in his state. I do believe. Hey, Billy, we
do have you open. I can't hear you there, Billy.
Oh hang on.

Speaker 4 (05:14):
There, can you hear me?

Speaker 3 (05:16):
I needed all screener there, Billy.

Speaker 4 (05:20):
Yes, indeed, I hope you guys are having a good evening.

Speaker 2 (05:24):
We are, man, and I think you've got a breaking
up our day, right, tell us some good news out
of Idaho.

Speaker 4 (05:30):
I wish I could give good news out of Idaho.
But now we had our primary voting about a week
ago yesterday, and sadly, very very sadly, we handed the
keys to the kingdom over to the wolves. A lot

(05:51):
of people around this area don't get it. Chris. I'd
like to get your take on this when I'm done explaining.
But we lost a lot of really good conservatives within
our legislative and our Senate. And just to bring you

(06:14):
to the beginning of it, I couldn't go on YouTube
without getting ads from from the candidates that were with
the Idaho Liberty Pack, which were basically the Rhinos, I'm
getting I'm just about every video I click on, I'm
getting ads from them. Then this one woman named Sherry Bohmer,

(06:37):
who was running against my friend David Levitt. She gets
up on she knows the YouTube video saying that David's
hiring people from Illinois to go knock on doors for him,
which number one, there ain't no law against that. But
number two, she's backed up by millions of dollars. Her
campaigns funded by big corporation, and he's his campaigns funded

(07:05):
by donations from the from the citizens. So you know
that's an automatic why right there. I knew she was
lying about that, but you know, so they the Rhinos
had had so much money backed up behind them, you know.
And of course, uh Brad Little's and our governor is

(07:26):
endorsing them, and he's he's fell and disgusting himself. But
so so comes the primaries, and I'm looking at the
results and I see that our good candidates are losing,
and I'm starting to get upset. And of course, yeah,

(07:49):
like my good friend Glenita Zeiderfeld had lost, Josh Cole
had lost, you know, and they they had excellent scores
with the jo On Bird Society and the Idaho Freedom Foundation.
And they were voted in by rhinos. That were they
were voted out by rhinos. Excuse me that the course

(08:11):
endorsed by the president backed up by millions of dollars. Then,
then this is the part that gets me. You know,
it wasn't the fact that.

Speaker 3 (08:22):
It was.

Speaker 4 (08:25):
It was all the money and everything that backed them
up that did play a part in it. But only
sixteen percent. And Chris, you've been here to Twin Falls,
only sixteen percent of the population of this town showed
up to vote. Only sixteen percent. So we didn't. We

(08:48):
didn't just lose. We didn't. We did more than fourth it.
We rolled over and died. We got way too comfortable
thinking our incumbents, who who valued Ida, Idahoan's freedoms and
all that, would win, we didn't have to vote for
them or whatever, thinking that the primaries were nothing, when
the primaries of the real battleground for this state. So

(09:13):
I don't know this should be a lesson for other
states that haven't had their primary yet.

Speaker 2 (09:19):
I think you're making my point, Billy. I keep telling
people is very very important to get out there and vote.
Conservatives have to get out there and vote and vote
for the right people. And during a midterm election, people
tend to, like you said, sixteen percent is very low,
and you know, we get a better turnout, we'll probably
get better votes for the right candidates and try to

(09:40):
keep the momentum going that we've got going right now.

Speaker 4 (09:44):
Yeah, I mean, you know, it's and it seems to
be the fact too that even though we got this,
there's this sixteen percent that showed up to vote, which
means a lot of people who were supporting the other
side they didn't get up and vote either. But it's
like those that were endorsed by the rhinos, they were
prepared and our side was not.

Speaker 3 (10:07):
What is the nature of primaries here in Pennsylvania Judge
of Elections, we had fourteen percent turnout on election day.
Normally it's three Republicans to every Democrat that shows up
in our district, and on election day for primary it
was about one to one, and not because there are
a lot of Democrats, because there are so few Republicans

(10:27):
and the only race was competitive was in the Democratic primary,
So it's not surprising. The problem here is that and
this is just the bottom line here for candidates in
a primary it's up to that candidate to get their
voters out and whoever they can get on their team
because the party is not going to do it for them.
The Republican Party has proven to be feckless and it
only cares about national politics and local politics when it

(10:49):
puts things in their pocket. I mean, I've experienced that,
Todd has experienced that running for office. We've seen just
how dishonest the Republican Party can be at the local level.
They're no different than Democrats. And if you are a conservative,
you're going to have you out and fight for yourself
because unless you're known nationally, you're not going to get
that support. So in a primary, if you if you
want to get out there and you want you want

(11:09):
to stay in office, or you want to get re elected,
you want to you want to elect the first time,
you got to have a good ground game. And I
knocked on three thousand doors two years ago to no avail.
Still came at a distant third in that race.

Speaker 4 (11:21):
Yes, and there's one other thing I'm going to tell
you about to before I go. As I was speaking
with a friend of mine, him and I both agreed
that two years ago the incumbent Linda Hartton had to go.
I mean, she's a reckless spender, and she also supports
inappropriate material available to children in our public libraries and

(11:46):
things like that, yet she claims to be a conservative.
So him and I talked. We said, yeah, we agree,
she's got to go. You know, him and I both
voted for Josh Cole. Josh Cole got voted in two
years ago and did well then. Just his opponent to
this go around was a gentleman by the name of
Casey Swinson. I don't know much about Casey. I can't

(12:09):
tell you anything about him except that his family is
pretty fairly wealthy, who owns a shade of stores around
here called Swinson's Market, and I know that they're Mormon lds. Well,
I talked to my same friend and he said, well, yeah,
I had to vote out Josh because Mormons have to

(12:32):
stick together. So he voted for Casey Swinson just because
Casey's a Mormon. And I said, you voted for him
based on your faith when we already had a good
when we had a good senator in there, and you
voted him out just because a Mormon was running against him.
So if Linda Hartgan had been a Mormon, would you

(12:54):
had voted for her? You know? And then the conversation
got nasty because he accuse me of the very same
thing because the man who's running for governor, Mark Fitzpatrick,
Kim and I share the same face. And yes, I
voted for Mark Fitzpatrick, but not based on face, because
I voted for Mark because hey, Brad Little's doing a

(13:15):
horrible job. So I learned right then and there that
there's some religious cabals, especially the Mormons around here.

Speaker 2 (13:25):
Sometimes that sort of thing does happen. One of the
things you're not mentioning, Billy, is some of the citing
factors too behind us because a lot of people do
they not vote with their emotions. I know you've had.
I think about sixty percent of the country right now
is in a drought and there's been a lot of
struggles there in Idaho for water, and people started blaming
some of these.

Speaker 4 (13:47):
Oh, oh, that's because of gas lighting, John, That's what
that was. They're saying, you know that these conservatives that
are doing a great job with our freedom are saying
that they don't don't care about water rights. In fact,
that it's they completely lied about them. You know, you
and you get these political mailers, and for the first

(14:10):
few months it wasn't for you know, they didn't say
vote for me because I can do this for you. No,
they were totally trashy our incumbents that we had that
were doing a good job and telling lies about them.

Speaker 2 (14:26):
Well, Glenida was she was holding back on some of
the infrastructure for the water and according to her, what
she said was she didn't want pork barreling in it.
She said, we'll take care of the water. Yeah, that's
well and fine, but we weren't going to let people
just inflate the spending to benefit, you know, things that
not related to building that infrastructure.

Speaker 4 (14:49):
And also they say that Josh and Glennada and all
them didn't back the Blue The fact on that one
was some nobody wanted to give the Idaho State Police
like an eight hundred million dollar raise out of the budget,
you know, and they said at the cost of the taxpayer,

(15:11):
absolutely not. You know that they voted to give him
like the eight percent raise, but not that much much
higher rates. So because they voted to spend less money,
they don't back the Blue which that doesn't make any
sense to me.

Speaker 2 (15:26):
No, right, they were doing what conservatives do. They were
working on responsible spending, physical responsibility, and they got wrongfully
accused of things. You know, I mean, they were looking
up for all the taxpayer's interests, is what they were
trying to do. They weren't going to overinflate people's wages,
they weren't going to allow people to take advantage of

(15:47):
spending when to come to like we said, what the
infrastructure getting a better water table to them water in
And yeah.

Speaker 4 (15:57):
I mean, and then there's the fact of the purpose
was raised every member of the House and Senate last year,
and which was a fort raise and and Glenada, Josh
and David and all of them voted no on that.
And they came forth and said that families are already

(16:18):
hurting right now, why should we take more away from them?
We don't need to do this, And of course they
got they started gaslighting them over that.

Speaker 2 (16:31):
Yeah, I think Chris has a good point on that.
You know, they basically they get out campaign, they got
out spent, they dominated the media outlets, and they used
typical emotional peel tactics and played on people's fears. And
that's what it sounds like to me. And we see
this a lot during the campaigns, and this is why

(16:52):
it's important. You know what point you're really bringing up here,
I think is important to reflect upon. It's important to
be a critical thinker doing campaigns. It's important to take
that rationalization in that manipulation is a part of political
campaigning and these people have no scruples.

Speaker 4 (17:09):
Yes, yes, exactly exactly. But the one thing that hurt
us is the is the outcome of the only sixteen percent.
And like I said, Chris has been out here to
this city. He knows. I mean, it's not gigantic, but
it's a fairly decent size area, and only sixteen percent

(17:31):
of this population showed up to vote. That is pathetic.

Speaker 2 (17:35):
That's a pretty low turnout.

Speaker 3 (17:37):
Well, I have to admit as a candidate, I don't
mind low turnout as long as it's for me. I mean,
if fifty thousand people show up, I've got to get
twenty five thousand and one. If three thousand show up,
I just need fifteen oh one.

Speaker 4 (17:52):
I mean, but if we would have had at least
maybe up to thirty percent of the population who supported
these candidates that we had in office, we would have retained,
no doubt in my mind, because what was it two
years ago? It was up to sixty percent. They showed
up for the primary six two years ago, and they won,

(18:15):
and now they and now they just got too comfortable,
I think.

Speaker 2 (18:19):
So when they run again, well, you got two year
terms over there for state reps.

Speaker 4 (18:24):
Yeah, yeah, they're for state reps. Yet every two years,
yeah they yeah, so I've been asked to run by
five people so far.

Speaker 2 (18:34):
So they'll be eligible to run again in two years
when they see that the people that you know, replace
them are failing to do an adequate job.

Speaker 4 (18:42):
Right, Oh, let's hope. So then again, who knows. Some
some people get that, you know, whereas Idahole Freedom Foundation
isn't gonna lie about their freedom and spending index, you know,
they're they find ways. Well yeah, they theyow was to
take away some of your freedom for this, for this

(19:03):
very purpose. And people like, okay, I understand, you.

Speaker 5 (19:06):
Know, so you have some idiots like that, yeah, ben
Benjamin Franklin said it, well, right, uh, you give up freedoms,
if you give up liberty for a little bit of
security you deserve you have or deserve either.

Speaker 4 (19:20):
That was Thomas Jefferson was Benjamin Franklin I was it.

Speaker 2 (19:26):
I'm pretty sure.

Speaker 4 (19:28):
Well it was one of the founding fathers. Mind you,
we both know that they must.

Speaker 2 (19:33):
They will have said at different times, but Benjamin Franklin's
accredited for it as far as I know.

Speaker 4 (19:38):
Yes, anyway, I will let you guys continue. I just
wanted to share that information.

Speaker 2 (19:43):
All right, man, thank you for calling it.

Speaker 4 (19:46):
You bet.

Speaker 3 (19:49):
Well. It sounds like Billy's a bit upset about the
outcome there in the primaries in Idaho, a lot of
conservatives that went down and defeat, but across the rest
of the country that is not how it went went
very well. The Maga crown some really interesting things, although
one thing insisting chip Roy was defeated in Texas in
his runoff. That was a little surprise to me, chip Roy,

(20:10):
but that's because he cuts against Trump, because he's an
ultra conservative, and when the Republicans try to compromise, he
was unwilling to compromise, and so it cost him and
so he's been taken out. He's been taken out. Chip
Roy is defeated, so a little bit of surprising. Now.
One thing I want to talk about tonight here, John,
is I've never gotten to the concept of paying property taxes.

(20:33):
I mean to me, that's just your slave to the state.
I mean, how can you possibly have your property taken
by the state when you don't pay property tax. I mean,
it's ridiculous. You should pay it once when you buy it,
and if you sell it, you know you can sell
you know, capital game to pay a capital against tax,
but owning property, you shouldn't be taxed on it. That's immoral.
Florida's Governor Ron DeSantis is introducing legislation is the Florida

(20:56):
Legislature to do away with property tax. Meanwhile, well in
New York, Kathy holkl and the demon Rats have just
given Zoran the more end just what he wants. They've
put a pad to tear tax on luxury residences and
they're going to fleece millionaires and billionaires out of another
five hundred million dollars a year. Of course, they need
like six billion to balance their budget out, so this

(21:17):
is just going to drive wealthy people out of the city.
Stupid people should wear signs.

Speaker 2 (21:21):
John Uh yeah. I look, she's the same governor who's
begging the millionaires and billionaires to come back to New
York State after they ran them ole. When she said,
we need you, we need your taxes. How do you
beg people to come back after you tax them out
of the state and tell them you need their taxes.
It's ridiculousness. I mean, did they actually listen to themselves
talk Sometimes?

Speaker 3 (21:40):
No, they're so stupid. There's no common sense anything they do.
The hypocrisy is rank. It's just comical. But as I said,
DeSantis wants to eliminate property tax for homeowners. You pay
it when you buy it, and that's it. I think
it's fascinating. So tax is something that you own repeatedly,
which is a property tax, is the worst way to
do taxation. Also, I've always allway argued it's in moral.

(22:01):
He said, you pay all these taxes to acquire that property.
Then year after year you're just having read a check
just for the proge of being able to maintain ownership
on something this supposed to years. And that's the point
I'm making here, is that you know, it's ridiculous. I
could pay off my mortgage and if I don't come
up with ten thousand dollars a year, my home could
be confiscated. What is that That that's like a head tax?
That's what is this? Jim crow Era, Are we just

(22:23):
taking people's property? This is ridiculous. I've never liked it some.

Speaker 2 (22:26):
Of the beasts. Since you bring that up. You know,
some people pray on elderly people for that, because if
elderly people can't afford their taxes, they'll go in and
pay their taxes. And when they start paying their taxes,
they have ownership over their home. Now, I don't know
how it works as far as when they perish, do
they get to take possession of the property or does
it go into a state They just get paid back

(22:47):
with interest, but they paid. Various states may have various
different laws in it. But I've heard of people basically
taking people's homes that way.

Speaker 3 (22:55):
Yeah, I've heard of something similar. But I mean, the
bottom line here is that, you know, property taxes are
frankly and moral, but it's how we've been paying for
education for centuries now, well over century, and it's going
to be hard to get rid of. But I would
love to get rid of property tax here. I mean,
it's just it's it's wrong. I mean, it's like, you know,
in Washington State they make you pay property tax in
Arizona on your vehicle every year. What kind of crap
is that.

Speaker 2 (23:15):
New Hampshire does too. We pay property taxes on our vehicles,
so as far as home ownership goes, you pay property taxes.
And the purpose of praying property taxes is to pay
for services. Right, your house catches fire, you hope the
fire department shows up. Somebody's trying to rub your house.
You're hoping you call the police. They will show up
at least rite a report. Hopefully you've defended your home
to the best your ability before they arrive. But if

(23:35):
you didn't, you didn't, I don't know what to say.
Maybe they can assist you once they get there. But
the point is we're paying for services. So what's the alternative, Chris,
That's that's the question here. If you don't want to
pay property tax how do we raise the funds to
pay for the service? Because I don't really want to
get rid of the law enforcement in the fire department.

Speaker 3 (23:53):
Well, my taxes aren't really paying for that. They're paying
for a school district keeps yeps building new school after
new school after new school for one end. You know,
I don't get to build a new house because someone's
give me their money. It's ridiculous. No, you're fifteen years old.
They're building brand new schools.

Speaker 2 (24:10):
Then they burned through money for education and it's highly abused.
You know what we were talking about earlier about responsible
spending with the people's money, and I feel sometimes these
schools can be very wasteful. So I don't want to
overly criticize the schools, but they're very expensive. And when
you're seeing a bill, you know, they're talking about millions

(24:31):
of dollars to repair a roof on a school. Come
up on your on your annual vote, you know, when
you're going and vote, and they're putting it up for
public vote, and you're looking at the costs that's going
this is atrocious, and but the roof needs to be
done one way or the other otherwise you're going to
suffer more damages and have higher repairs. But the point
is it's so darned expensive. We're paying about I think

(24:53):
in New Hampshire it's about sixty sixty one percent of
our taxes between the state and local taxes, just to
support the education system.

Speaker 3 (25:02):
Yeah, that's what I'm talking about. You know, it's crazy.
It's one of the viewers on my program comment and
said that I'm a conservative, less taxes, small government. Well,
we agree there this bunch of Republicans borrow too much
and spend too much. They're not Reagan Republicans. Reagan's not
a Reagan Republican. You're not very familiar with history. Reagan
tripled the federal deficit during his eight years in office,
from nine hundred and ninety five billion to three trillion dollars.

(25:25):
He tripled the deficit. You know, I'm a huge Reagan fan,
but people seem to forget that he was senile as
last two years in office and the Iran Contra affair,
as well as the Marine Corps barracks bombing in Beirut
in nineteen eighty three, and they forget that he tripled
the budget. And he's the one that started pressing into
giving criminal alien Vader's amnesty by granting three million illegal

(25:45):
criminals invade our country the right to stay in this
country and gain citizenship. A Reagan, while he was a
great president, is not the genius that people made him
out to be when it comes to things. He made
compromises that harmed this country to this day. That's the
bottom line. So I appreciate that that the viewer and
listener loves Reagan, but get your facts straight. Reagan tripled
the federal deficit. He also is the one who doubled

(26:07):
our rate of taxation so security. These are you know,
I mean if I was, if I was probably more
objective and not just so steeped and being in a
Reagan I because that's when I came of age, I
might turn on Reagan because he doubled taxation so security
and we're getting nothing back from it. He let millions
of criminal aliens into our country, tripled our deficits, started
us on a spendings breath that we haven't recovered from.

Speaker 4 (26:26):
You know.

Speaker 3 (26:26):
It's look, if you want to look at this critically,
there are a lot of things that didn't go well
under Reagan. So I'd be very careful about, you know,
throwing that stone out there. They're all spend thrifts, they
all spend money.

Speaker 2 (26:37):
No presidents one hundred percent that way. And Reagan, I
do believe, said something to the effect of not needing guns,
firearms or restrictions to firearms. Some of you would expect,
the true conservatives say, of course he did get shot too.

Speaker 3 (26:53):
Yeah, that's true.

Speaker 2 (26:55):
Pinkley clown, Yeah, all over, Jodie Fosse or some nonsense
like that. It was really weird stuff. Indeed, I don't
think he understood at the time that girl was never
calling him even if she even if he was of
somebody that could be of interest.

Speaker 3 (27:14):
Yeah, she kind of bats on the other side of
the fence.

Speaker 2 (27:17):
Yeah, that's what I'm getting at.

Speaker 3 (27:19):
Yeah. Now, one of my viewers from Minnesota said that
people were upset about propery tax going up every year.
People were able to make upgrade their houses that have
proper maintenance, often their pain loss. No people who don't
make any change their home or penalized these these authorities
specimply go out and revalue the homes to a ridiculous
value that no one will pay for it, and then
charge your taxes on what they claim it's worth. It's

(27:39):
utter nonsense. These people should not have the authority to
do that. It's just so messed up. It's it's the
property taxes immoral and it never should have come in.

Speaker 2 (27:47):
The ladies have caps, they can only charge a certain
percentage of interest every year, where other cities or towns
or whatever do not have those gaps, and they can
suffer terribly. In fact, I have relatives that have went
through that.

Speaker 3 (28:01):
Well, John, I mean, I've never lived in a state
where where like the communewealth of Pennsylvania, where the local
school district can raise your taxes without going to the voter.
You know, in any normal state, you have to go
the voter to raise taxes on mills for school funding. Here,
the school has the authority to raise our taxes and
they just raised them. They just raised them to maxim
out there, raised like over two percent per year. They're

(28:22):
allowed to raise without our consent. That's taxation without representation.

Speaker 2 (28:26):
I would have thought that had went through your state
legislator there, Chris, you're telling me the school board or
whoever in the school pretty much said, oh, we need
more money for programs. We're just going to decide more
taxes and just inform who the governor or somebody in
an authoritata position to say, this is what we decided
or how's that work.

Speaker 3 (28:45):
Look, I tell you what, We're gonna have a tax
revolt like California, had you actually here in Pennsylvania way
this is going. You know, there is some common sense
approaches to Pennsylvania. It comes taxation. And one of the
reasons why I didn't decide to live here, but I
got stuck here because the COVID scam. I couldn't move
over seat in retirement from the military, but I'm still
living here. And one of the reasons I stayed is
that there's no tax at the state level on my

(29:06):
retirement income, which is right. I mean, you worked your
whole life, You've already paid taxes and you shouldn't be
double tax on that. Again, so plus, most people in
your time to make far less and they can able
afford to pay those taxes, so that's a wise move.
And then we don't pay taxes on clothing because clothing
is necessity. But this property tax and allowing locations, plus
they have they have a head tax here. I have

(29:27):
to pay a per capita tax every adult in your house.
You have to. And then I think it's one for minors.
You have to pay so much money ever here to
the local county. And then there's it's just look it's
it's gets you award of it. We're still paying for
the Pennsyvan turnpike, which was paid off nearly one hundred
years ago. It was paid off eighty years ago. The
initial cost of it was paid off, and now we're
still paying and there aren't even people out there taking

(29:49):
tolls anymore. Now they charge you like seventy dollars a
drive across the state.

Speaker 2 (29:53):
It's out righteous one way. Tried driving an eighteen moller
across those state. It's expensive. But I thought that was
user funded. I mean, you mean to tell me that
they're still taxing you for an interstate that they charge
a toll on.

Speaker 3 (30:06):
Yeah, and on top of that, well it's a turnpike.
And on top of that, we have the second highest
gasoline tax in the country. We pay seventy eight cents
I think it is in total when you add the
sixteen cents of federal tax. So look, I mean they
just getch you left and right. All those taxes are there.
But you know what I mean, at least you can
make an argument for that you're using the roads. You
make an argument for some of these tax and fees.

(30:27):
But for taxing someone's property, that's just wrong. So you
have to have an income just to own your property,
which means you don't owe it. You're a slave to
the state. That's the bottom line.

Speaker 2 (30:36):
Here's the conflict though, that I see is you have
businesses they want to bring into their states, so they'll
lower taxes for businesses to draw attention to their state
and bring those businesses in, so they offset that by
charging higher taxes on residents. At least that's the way
I see it.

Speaker 3 (30:54):
Well, it depends on the situation. South Carolina did that
to bring in Mercedes, Benz and BMW to do manufacturing
on there at Alabama, So yeah, it just depends. But
the thing is is that again we've had this conversation before.
If I was in charge of the federal government, I
would eliminate the corporate tax just gone, just gone. It's
only a few hundred billion dollars a year, four six
hundred million dollars year out of eight trillion, nine trillion

(31:16):
dollar budget. That's nothing. Just cut back ten percent spending
by every executive branch agency and you've more than paid
for that three times over it just from the start.
So I would do that immediately, and that would be
a huge boon for America, and that would spark investment
and bring money back here, and companies would come and
settle in these other states. It wouldn't have to give
tax breaks because it just got a federal tax break,
and they saved you know, twenty was it twenty one percent?

(31:38):
Is the federal tax rate now? It used to be
thirty five percent, So yeah, that would be the first move.
And that's that's just going to generate so much money,
so much wealth and repatriot money. You know, when Trump
lowered the federal tax rate for corporations in the first term,
trillions of dollars of money parked and offshore accounts owned
by banks and buy chip manufacturers and car manufacturers all

(31:59):
flooded back into the county. And if we simply got
rid of that tax, we would be much more competitive.
In Canada, Canada cannot compete with US. Canada has a
twelve percent national income tax on businesses. Some of the
provinces tack on their own, so the highest is like
eighteen and that's still lower than our twenty one percent,
which used to be thirty five percent. There's a reason
why all our car manufacturing is in Ontario now, and
it's not because we like Canada. It's because their taxes

(32:20):
were lower, and so they stopped making cars in Detroit,
moved across the Great Lakes to Ontario because there was
no tariffs to bring it into the country, and they
basically outsourced all of our jobs to Canadians. So all
those people always try to play this game about racism
about outsourcing. No, we gave it to a bunch of
white Canadians. We gave our jobs up to then, not
just to brow Mexicans, but to white Canadians. So the
people play this race card need to pay attention. It's

(32:42):
about making America great again. And you do that by
on shoring jobs, on sharing investment, on sharing things. And
you do that by making taxes reasonable. A ten percent
flat taxes all Americans should be paying on their income
to the federal government. States are allowed to have income tax,
but then you have a reasonable not like New York
California where they fleece you. But Pennsylvania is a three
percent income tax. That is reasonable. I don't like paying it,

(33:04):
but it's reasonable. I think that's fair.

Speaker 2 (33:07):
Well, three three doesn't sound terribly bad compared to what
some places pay. Luckily, here in New Hampshire we managed
to keep up income tax out of the state. We
don't have sales tax. Although there's movements here in New
Hampshire to bring forth income tax and sales tax and
things like that. Their argument is it'll keep your property

(33:28):
taxes from going up. Well, I'm paying either way, just
gouging me either way. So how about we just do
some responsible building or planning or budgeting. But then you
find out, you know, an article comes out a while back,
going says New Hampshire's rates very high for physical responsibility
and spending. But what do we need all this extra
money for? Is it because of government? What do you

(33:50):
call it? Mandates? I mean there is a what's it
called for flexibility? Something? Mandate?

Speaker 3 (34:00):
Man?

Speaker 2 (34:01):
I lost it.

Speaker 3 (34:02):
Well, I can tell you that on this side, it's
certainly not for maintaining local incostruct infrastructure. The road that
leads just past the area that I live in is
like Magadishio. It's complete disaster. It hasn't been repaired or
hasn't been replaced in the entire time I've lived here.
It's a total mess. And it also there's no responsible growth.
It's out of control. We got six hundred and fifty
units of very expensive apartment complexes going in less than

(34:27):
half a mile from my house, and it's already created
a traffic snarl that was never here before. Those were
farm fields and now they've been stripped away to build
this stuff. The traffic volume, the irresponsible growth, and the
amount of tax money flooding into the township is just outrageous.
There are well over fifteen hundred additional houses built here
just in the past couple of houses, not apartments, just
in the past couple years. Each one of those houses

(34:47):
is valued at three hundred and a half a million
or more. That means they're all paying five thousand to
ten thousand dollars in property tax. And two thirds, if
not three quarters, of those are families that have no
children in the household. So they are making money handle
our fastiness township and not repairing our roads, not repairing
our services, not delivering services. And the school is taking
more money out of our pocket even though school rollment

(35:10):
is not even going anywhere. And all this money we
should be getting tax breaks with all the additional tax
revenuts come in. But what happens is like any bureaucrats,
the money comes in, they find a way to spend it. Well,
I have a way to spend money. You put me
in charge of government. I will reduce the cost of government.
We will deliver services efficiently effectively, and I will turn
the tax money to the taxpayer that is not needed

(35:31):
that's how you do business.

Speaker 6 (35:32):
But that's how politicians do I was referring to trying
to refer to early the Regulatory Flexibility Act to reduce
the cost of burdens on states and businesses every time
they create some sort of mandate requiring things like boat launch.

Speaker 2 (35:47):
I was sitting there and listen to Hudson the town meeting,
and they're talking about how, according to the EPA, we
have to upgrade their Robertson Pond with the boat launch
and this and that, and the millions of dollars we
have to spend because some sort of pollution come out
of Robertson Pond and go down the brook and to
because it runs down I think to the Merrimack River
or something to Massachusetts. But you know, so they make

(36:09):
these mandates that cost huge sums of money, and there's
a threshold in which when they make a mandate like this,
that they can only put the burden at a certain
amount of money. I forgot what all millions of dollars
it is at the current time. But so that they're
supposed to take these things into regard, but it doesn't
seem like the government does anything it's supposed to do.

Speaker 3 (36:33):
No, well, it rarely does what it's supposed to do.
That's for darn short. It's just uh, it's just frustrating. Anyway,
So New York is fleecing people out of five hundred
million dollars. It won't even address the problem. All it's
going to do is drive the wealthy out of the state.
And as you said, Hochele, is this this idiot who
begged wealthy New Yorkers to come back and now she's
just chasing them out of town.

Speaker 2 (36:52):
I think she said to this guy, oh Man, Yeah,
I was wondering what he was trying to say. You know,
he sounds like socialism. I'm going I was asking for
less tax sound like socialism just because communists do. It
doesn't mean that it's socialism or communism. Because you want
less taxes, well.

Speaker 3 (37:06):
I mean that that's that's us. I didn't mention it's
a silly argument that is being proposed here. You know,
less taxes is not communism, and communism is not about
less taxation. Communism is about fascist toutalitary and control, state
controlled everything. That's what communism is all about. Yeah, that's right. Yeah.
So anyway, now I just advised the person to do

(37:26):
something for their health. You know, we shouldn't be smoking smoking.
Crack cook came while watching the program. It's bad for
your health, and so he lights up a cigarette.

Speaker 2 (37:37):
That's fun Yeah, it gives you, gives you an emoji
of a cigarette. That's funny.

Speaker 4 (37:40):
Yeah.

Speaker 3 (37:40):
No, And look, I mean people come with non secretis
all the time. It's like the comment of the gentleman
earlier about you know, I'm a Reagan night and Reagan.
You know, Reagan didn't spend money. Reagan spent money like
a drunken sailor. We went from a three hundred to
a six hundred and fifty ship navy, which I had
no problem with. We have the single largest annual increase
in pay for the military. It was like twenty three
percent in one year. Reagan. I love what Reagan did.

(38:01):
I loved him building an as security in bankrupt the
Silvie Union. But unfortunately he buried us in debt too.
The numbers looked silly and trivial today when we have
forty three in a debt, but he took us from
less than a trillion dollars, broke the trillion dollar barrier
and took us to three trillion under him. So, I mean,
people like to be good revisionists, but they forget the history.
But the problem is I was there, I lived it,
and even if I hadn't, I'm a good historian and
know how to research and analyze data properly. Look, I

(38:23):
love Reagan, love the Reagan Revolution, but we're not going
to sit here in candy coat. What happened during the
Reagan years. He was senile in his last two years,
and it was deadly for this country. It cost us dearly.

Speaker 2 (38:33):
Yeah, yeah, I hate to think who was running the
country back then, but I got a pretty good idea.
A couple of names might pop up.

Speaker 3 (38:40):
He should have been president at seventy six. If he've
been president seventy sixth, the world would be completely different.
If Reagan had become president in seventy six inst instead
of Carter. We never would have had the Shah abandon
the way he was abandoned. We never would have seen
our embassy taken over. We never would have seen the
boycott the nineteen eight Olympics, We never would have seen
awful lot of stuff. The Soviets would have been I think,
very more reserved about whether they're going to invade Afghanistan

(39:02):
when they did in seventy nine, making a catastrophic, colossal
error for them and a catastrophic one for their future.
One of the reason why they went bankrupt wasn't just
because Reagan drove them bankruptcy. It's because they buried tens
of thousands of Russians who died in Afghanistan and spent
their fortune fighting a stupid war in Afghanistan. And unfortunately
we didn't learn a lesson from the Soviets, or from
the Brits, or from anyone else whos went to the

(39:23):
graveyard of Afghanistan.

Speaker 2 (39:27):
What are you saying there? Those backwoods Afghanis can hold
their own out there with a grill of warfare.

Speaker 3 (39:32):
No, it's not worth having, it's not worth being there.
There's nothing of any interest there unless they discover, you know,
you know, unobtainium or something like that, it's not worth
going Afghanistan.

Speaker 2 (39:43):
Well, from my understanding, there's a whole lot of just
we're giving up Afghanistan right. The China seems to have
found a whole lot of earth minerals there.

Speaker 3 (39:53):
Well, they can have them. I'd rather get my rare
earth minerals from somewhere else.

Speaker 2 (39:57):
Greenland past.

Speaker 3 (39:58):
Yeah, like Greenland. Well, look I am the Viceroy of Greenland.
Rumor has it?

Speaker 2 (40:03):
I think we have an image here of somewhere to
prove it.

Speaker 3 (40:08):
Yep. Anyway, Uh yeah, So it's uh, it's it's it's
it's unfortunate when people have revision is history and they
try to change what happened. I deal with it every
day in the case of South Africa, where black supremacists
in South Africa pretend that they know the history of
South Africa and they try to paint this picture that's
completely wrong and have to correct them. Unfortunately, people want
to vent through in histories. It's uh, it's a sad thing.

(40:28):
So historians are responsible for accurately capturing history and analyzing it. Unfortunately,
so many of their political operatives, the objective historians are
hard to find. It's really sad to see. But it's
even worse than the age of social media where everybody
is an expert on everything.

Speaker 2 (40:44):
Oh, whether they are or not.

Speaker 3 (40:46):
Oh that was my point.

Speaker 2 (40:49):
I just wanted to say it out loud, that's all.

Speaker 3 (40:51):
That's exactly my point. So Pam BONDI turns out she
had what thyroid cancer. That's a tough one. Yeah, so
you know, she got she got sacked, and maybe that's
one of the reasons she got sacked is because she
was ineffective because she was suffering from thyroid cancer. She
had surgery a few days back and she's recovering, and
now he's appointing her to an artificial intelligence panel. I mean,

(41:12):
you know, she's not well enough to the Attorney General,
but she can be on an AI panel for the
White House. I mean, you must love Pam Bonnie. I
don't understand that.

Speaker 2 (41:19):
Yeah, she was put into an advisory position. I guess maybe
that's why she was removed, and nobody said anything about
health and reasons. He just kind of like made it
look like she got fired or something.

Speaker 3 (41:32):
Yeah, it's it's well. I mean a lot of people
are upset with Pam Bondy not going after people and
the pace. And we've said this before in the program.
I'm not happy at the pace of going after the
people responsible for obstructing justice and for using the Constitution
against Americans and silencing their voices. The First Amendment rights
were crushed by the Biden regime, and I think the

(41:53):
people should be in jail for that. In the White House,
in the CDC, in the National Institutes for Health FALCI,
in every place you can possibly think of the government
and the FBI. What they were doing there was is unbelievable.
By the way, we found out, once again exactly right,
that the FBI did not have probable cause to get

(42:13):
a warrant to raid Trump's mar Lago residents. In fact,
the in house person, who is the attorney who's responsible
for that, was not consulted, the one is supposed to,
you know, weigh in on these when they go for
these warrants, and she was not consulted. And after they raided,
she wrote a letter in the FBI, and that has
been disclosed now to Congress. They've got that letter, and

(42:35):
it says that that this was inappropriate, that we should
not have done this. The president has to write and
the authority to declassify anything. If the President said he
declassified something, this declassified, which is exactly what I said
when this nonsense happened a few years ago. This effort
to get Trump, by these evil, evil turns in the
Democratic Party and the Republicans in Congress, they should all
be in jail. They should be in jail. This clown

(42:57):
James comy. He needs to be hounded until he winds
up and he jumpsuit because that's where he belongs. This
man tried to affect the coup against the president of
the United States that was successful in twenty twenty. There
were successful. Twenty twenty was a coup.

Speaker 2 (43:11):
Yeah, yeah, I agree. I think. I think you're right.
They need to be held accountable. It'd be nice to
see accountability for a change. You know, you don't. We don't.
We're it's not coming. We get to see that. If
at all somebody said something about Pam BONDI didn't open
up the investigation or reopen the investigation and the plan
while it's holding. One thing I know they're investigating quite

(43:34):
well is election fault of twenty twenty. And there's a
lot of people there that worked the elections in Georgia
or Fulton County, Georgia.

Speaker 3 (43:42):
Well, I think the problem is that we're now approaching
two years into the administration, well year and a half,
now approaching two years, and we want prosecutions. You know,
this can't drag out. We want prosecutions. There's a statute
limitations on crimes. That's why we can't go after Hillary Clinton.
Despite her violation the Espionage Act. What you mean, uh,
wipe the serve? What? What like? With a cloth?

Speaker 2 (44:02):
Oh yeah, she knew exactly what she was saying, smart Alec.

Speaker 3 (44:09):
Yeah. Unbelievable. Yeah, I know. The arrogance of the Clintons,
just the unbelievable arrogance of the unmitigated arrogance of them.
You know, I'd like to ask some people close to
them about what life is really like. In fact, I'm
gonna call the guy Vince Foster. Oh no, I'm sorry,
I can't call Vince Foster.

Speaker 2 (44:26):
Oh wonder why?

Speaker 3 (44:27):
Yeah, I wonder why? Anyway, And the list goes on
on people around him? What about that? Who was that
Seth Rich? Is that the kid that they they got
whacked that was covering the Clinton and other things.

Speaker 2 (44:38):
In or something like that. He was a whistleblower in
DC and psychology age or something. Yeah, and he shot
from behind or something or and they tried to make
it look like well conspiratively speaking, right, it was. It
was like a dry by shooting or something.

Speaker 3 (44:54):
And yeah, yep, these people need to be prosecuted. I
mean we saw you know, I remember back it's anyway, Obama,
the same thing with Obama. What was going on back then,
the abuse of the Foreigny Intelligence Surveillance Act to use
General Flynn as a predicate to spy on Carter Page

(45:16):
and on other members of the Trump team, making the
spurious and unfounded and ludicrous argument that they were spies
for they're working with the Seoul Union. The problem with
this is that Carter Page was a CIA asset. He
was an American business and former US naval officer who
was doing business in Russia and was a source being
debriefed by the CIA multiple times telling them about the

(45:39):
energy industry in Russia. That warrant is criminal and all
the people and James Comey signed off on that, car
Lisa Page and Peter Struck. Those people need the imprisoned.
They got those warrants on a fraudulent basis, because you
must on a fis a warrant disclosed if any of
the parties involved are agents of the US government. They

(45:59):
failed to that Carter Page was an agent of the
federal government, and then they used that to spy on him,
and that was a predicate to open the case against
General Flynn and against all these other people. It's unbelievable.
These people should be in prison, and no one's talking
about the same way. They've just moved on. I'm not
moving on because I supported defenders constitution for thirty six years,
not to have these turds abuse it in this fashion.

(46:21):
This is unacceptable, unacceptable. We must have these people put
in prison suits for their violation of the Constitution and
their suspension of American liberties. And they did the same
thing that Trump and I want them all in prison,
and you know what, I'll visit them and I'll bring
them flowers and I'll sit there and laugh at them.

Speaker 2 (46:37):
Somebody's asking, iceman's asking if there's anyone in higher restaurants
of government ever been held accountable and sent to jail.
I don't think all that accountability. But some of the
people in the Trump administration were attacked horribly and some
of them did go to jail, and I don't think
they were really guilty of anything. I think it was
definitely law fare that was happening between twenty twenty and
twenty twenty four.

Speaker 3 (46:58):
No, but there are members of Congress been convicted of
crimes and sent to prison. James Traffick cant from Ohio.
We also had the clown from Louisiana. Remember when we
had the the the hurricane down there and the big
one and they went to he went he wanted to
take the National Guard get him go back to his
house and he opened up the freezer and took out
stacks of cash. Didn't remember that, Yeah, yeah, yeah, he

(47:21):
was prosecuted for that. Funny Yeah, yeah, exactly, yeah, yeah, No,
it's no, there are members of governor who held accountable
and Nixon ultimately resigned and left office prematurely because of
the Watergate break in which he was responsible for. But yeah, no,
people are held accountable from time to time. We've had
former politicians convicted of crimes after the fact. Absolutely, No,

(47:45):
it's it's it's not often enough, but there there is.
There have been so many crimes. There are coups against
the American people perpetrated by the Democratic Party from twenty
sixteen until twenty twenty four that need to be prosecuted,
and it is high time that this administration and the
Justice Department starts spending time on that and going after
these people.

Speaker 2 (48:04):
Yeah. I agree, there's not enough of one that goes down.
So somebody says, if ram Paul will be one of
the ones that go down, But I think ram Paul
doesn't run again until twenty twenty eight.

Speaker 3 (48:15):
Yeah, I don't think he's running this year.

Speaker 2 (48:16):
So I don't know, because Trump will be running out
of office in twenty twenty eight, right, twenty twenty nine,
and so I don't know if it really will affect
him so badly. I know ram Paul has spoken out
pretty boldly against Trump, but by then that probably that
whole wave will probably probably have washed away. Ram Paul's
got pretty good standing power.

Speaker 3 (48:35):
He does. But ever since he was beating over the
head with a hammer, he's been a bit of ratic.

Speaker 2 (48:41):
Well, he's a little bit more libertarian than he is Republican,
I guess, And he's always been a little bit staunch
for liberty and responsibility and he's never been being uncompromise.
I don't think ram Paul is that far different than
he might be a little bit more erratic. I'm not
sure that I see what you're saying on that. But

(49:04):
he's always been outspoken. He was the uh, he was
the philibuster of Philibuster's.

Speaker 7 (49:10):
That guy.

Speaker 2 (49:10):
He could sit there all day long and filibuster not
even break a sweat.

Speaker 3 (49:16):
Yeah, the Louisiana congressman who famously hid cash ins freezers.
William J. Jefferson, a Democrat from the second Congressional District.
In August two thousand and five, agents raided his DC
home discovered ninety thousand dollars in cash divided in ten
thousand dollars increments wrapped in lumin foil concealed inside frozen
food containers, including Pillsbury pie crust and Boca Burger boxes.

(49:37):
The cash was part of one hundred thousand dollars bride
provided by an FBI informant, Lori Moody, as part of
corruption probe into his business practice stealings in Africa. He
was eventually convicted in twenty eleven counts of bribery, racketeering,
and money laundering. He was sentenced at thirteen years in prison,
but was released just a few years later in twenty
seventeen after several convictions were vacated by Supreme Court ruling
that narrowed the legal definition official acts in bribery cases.

(49:57):
What a crock, He's a criminal. Should have been in
prison and the Supreme Court let him out. Yeah, William
Jefferson not William Jefferson. Clinton just William Jefferson.

Speaker 2 (50:09):
Yeah, I don't mistake it.

Speaker 3 (50:10):
Yeah anyway, Well, at first hour, we had Billy Cohen
and expresses his frustration and anger about what happened in Idaho.
But I think that some people are frustrated by Corny's departure. Look,
I mean, I'm not a corn and hater, but you know,
the guy's been there for twenty four years. It's time
to move on. Paxton wasn't the best candidate to replace him.

(50:30):
It is interesting because Paxton has got a tarnished reputation
of his own, although many conservatives love what he did
as Attorney general in Texas, fighting to protect the Texas
border when the federal Grubert wouldn't do it under the
Biden regime. So I think it's a mixed bag. And
the Democrats think they're going to win now, but they're
a candidate loves transgender. He said, what do you love
beside your family? I love transgender. I don't think that's

(50:52):
a winning vote in Texas. I'm just saying, you know,
it's not really going to be something that works out
very well for him. I don't think that we have
much worry about with that Democrat, but who knows it's
a long time before the elections. We'll see, but I
really don't think that that guy is the one that's
gonna gonna, you know, unseat and take that Republican seat.
Texas will still have two Republican centers when this is
all over.

Speaker 2 (51:12):
In my view, I do I do like Ken paxt
to myself. I think he was very much aligned to
Trump when it was unpopular to be aligned with Trump.

Speaker 3 (51:24):
Well, breaking news, the United States military carried out new
strikes on Iran, targeting a site that posed a threat
to US forces. Commercial traffic also intercept the drones being
launched from Iran. And this just happened in the last
twenty minutes. So here we are the war that isn't
a war, the piece that isn't a piece.

Speaker 2 (51:41):
Yeah, yep, we hit the top of the hour.

Speaker 3 (51:44):
Bro see you in the next hour, folks, stick around.

Speaker 7 (52:05):
Broadcasting from two hundred Main Street and the beautiful and
historic Masonic Building. This is WSMN fifteen ninety AM and
WSMN ninety five point three FM, NASHAUA streaming live at
WSMN dot Live.

Speaker 3 (52:21):
Memorials of Distinction Gates in the Monument once again, always
good lead into our second hour here, John, you want
to tell you it's crazy some of the stuff that
actually happens out there. I remember the case of this
school principal in Iowa, an illegal alien who had stolen
socialcurity number and carried unauthorized firearms, including one in his
car on school property, three more in his home. He

(52:44):
had had a final deportation order. A Guyanese that run
around the country was a registered voter in Maryland, and
Maryland said, let's not jump to get, you know, conclusions
about this guy. Yet eight months ago, he's convicted and
he's still waiting sentencing, looking to give him thirty seven
months in the federal penitentiary. This guy is still on
the voter rolls in Maryland. They double checked again this

(53:06):
week and this Ian Roberts guy is still listed as
an authorized voter, a registered voter in Maryland, and they
refused to take him off the roles, even though he's
a convicted criminal who was awaiting his sentencing in federal court.
It's just it's unbelievable. But this is Maryland. Ian Roberts,
illegal immigrant facing prison for citizenship fraud, still on Maryland's
voter roles. And this guy wrote a book in prison,

(53:28):
and people are still hailing him, even though he has
defrauded people since at least the year two thousand and
eight when he was a principal and they was a
superintendent in Pennsylvania and in Iowa. Hired again and again
in illegal But when the cops went to get him
Immigration Customs Enforcement in Des Moines last September, he ran
away and they While some of the cops were chasing him,

(53:48):
the others went over to the vehicle and found a
loaded Glock nineteen and extended magazine with twenty nine more rounds,
three thousand dollars in cash, his Guyanese passport, a bogus
SO security card, and a copy of his May twenty
twenty five order of deportation. Another word, he was ready
to shoot the police, but they he couldn't get to
his car. He had three other weapons at home at
six hour p three twenty a Remington Bold axe rifle
and a Remington shotgun and plenty of ammunition. None of

(54:10):
them he's allowed to have because he's another alien who
had final deportation order. This coddling of criminals invade our
country in order to bifur cater society and take us
from majority population to plurality population is morally reprehensible.

Speaker 2 (54:23):
All right, So we got toded in on the call
inline Chris, Yeah, John, Hey Todd, you're you're live on
the air by the one.

Speaker 4 (54:30):
Oh good.

Speaker 8 (54:31):
Sorry I startedn't know that. Yeah, sorry, everybody. I just
wanted to call on real quick. I just got out
of a school board meeting that was it's it's not
scheduled usually at this time of the month, so he
was one of the special meetings I had to go to.
So I do apologize. I just wanted to call on
real quick and just wish you guys, hope you'll have
a great show everything like that, and I'll catch up
on it later on. And I appreciate you guys holding

(54:52):
on the four.

Speaker 2 (54:53):
Oh awesome. Man, So I think you're not going to
make it the second hour. This is it?

Speaker 8 (54:57):
No, No, not going to be able to do it.
Haul in real quick.

Speaker 2 (55:01):
All right. Well, we thank you for calling in and
checking in with us. Anything on your mind, particular, anything
going on in Tennessee you want to tell us about
or oh there's a.

Speaker 8 (55:08):
Lot, but what we can get into it maybe next week.

Speaker 2 (55:11):
All right, sounds good.

Speaker 4 (55:13):
Talk to you all.

Speaker 2 (55:14):
Right, talk to you later.

Speaker 3 (55:19):
No, that was short and sweet.

Speaker 2 (55:22):
Yeah, you got reach to the point, didn't he.

Speaker 3 (55:25):
Anyway? So this ian Robert Scott, can you believe this?
I mean, it's the cheek of people. This guy is
writing books in prison and people still defending him. He's
a criminal, and he's a convicted criminal, but they still
defend him. It's it's like that the idiot who assassinated
the healthcare executive in New York and man Joni, and
they always people like they're like Manson Clan followers. It's
just sick, it is.

Speaker 2 (55:46):
It's nuts people sense the logic has just gone out
the window. I don't understand it. You know, we have
laws for a reason, and they want to throw away
good laws that are meant to protect us in favor
for bad laws that do just the opposit is that
for us? You know, they don't do anything for us.
They wanted to protect people of breaking laws and committing
crimes and causing harm to innocent Americans.

Speaker 3 (56:08):
Yeah, a hundred percent. Now that's what it's all about.
These people hate America. Hey, here's a fascinating one for you, John,
Listen to this story. Hulblad, Security Secretary of Mark Wayne Mullen,
who just took over that job, said he's working on
a plan that would shut down international flights that landed
airports and sanctuary jurisdictions, a move to pressure anti ICE politicians.
Mister Mullikan from the idea, which he reportedly raised the

(56:29):
travel executives last week in an interview on Fox News'
is handy, and we're currently drawing up plans to say, listen,
these sanctuary cities where local radical left Democrats aren't allowing
us to our job enforced federals, then we shouldn't be
processing inter national flights into their cities either. Wow. This
would be amazing. That would mean that be devastating for
New York City. Laguardi would be shut down. They as

(56:52):
well as JFK. They couldn't take international flights because that's
a sanctuary city. LA couldn't take flights, Seattle couldn't take flights, BWI, Baltimore.
Your national couldn't take flights. Wow, Reagan National couldn't. This
would be devastating around the country and cause lots of
frustration consternation for your national travelers who would have to
pay the price for these cities failing to adhere. To

(57:15):
federal immigration law and that's unfortunate, but maybe it'll get
their attention. What do you think about that one, John,
I mean, can you imagine that if you want to
come here from say Germany to visit, and you plan
to go to LA for like the FIFA World Cup,
you can't land in LA. You'll have to land somewhere
else the United States, like Omaha that respects the rule
of law, and then pay for another flight to get
to Los Angeles.

Speaker 2 (57:35):
Domestically, Yeah, I'm not sure does he does he have
the authority to shut down their force that way.

Speaker 3 (57:42):
I mean, well, the transportation can do all kinds of things.
The Federal Aviation Administration belongs to them their response for
aviation safety. And it's not safe to have sanctuary cities
letting people come in this country illegally and then committing
crimes here. So I mean they probably have the authority
to do it, but it's fascinating. No one's ever floated
something like this before.

Speaker 2 (57:59):
It is my understanding, and I believe it was a
Scotis ruling, was it not, or some some court ruling
not that long ago. Actually they declared they do have
the right to put ice in airports.

Speaker 3 (58:10):
Oh, of course they have the right to put it
in there. The airports are under federal aviation authority, the
federal jurisdiction. Yeah, and so that's the case. But last
month The Atlantic reported that Mullen shared with airline and
travel executives. Not last month, this month, excuse me that
possible sites would include the Portland National Airport in Oregon, JFK,
Newark Liberty International Airport in New Jersey, and Washington Dulles

(58:31):
International Airport serving DC. That would be insane. That's going
to have a massive impact.

Speaker 2 (58:36):
Yeah, well you got to you gotta think about the
overall impact because you're talking about shutting down a lot
of business at the airports. But it's also going to
affect airlines that are running these flight lines that will
not no longer be able to run these flight lanes, right,
I mean maybe they can go out, but they can't
come in with I mean.

Speaker 3 (58:53):
Well, any city. I mean, look, these are lawless cities.
Los Angeles is one of them, and Newark, New Jersey,
is another one. New York City is another, Washington, d C.
Is another, and Virginia is another. These are lawless places
that give sanctuary. Look merriland gives driver's license out to
criminal alien invaders. They don't even have to prove with
they're front. They just let them know that they're illegal
and they give them license.

Speaker 2 (59:14):
I think what people need to understand the cities do
not hold sovereignty. States hold sovereignty. The United States government
holds sovereignty. Cities do not hold sovereignty. They can't just
nullify law. They can't just do whatever they want to do.
They are restricted to the law where a state maybe
they enforced, maybe they don't enforce federal law. It's up
to them because they do have sovereignty.

Speaker 3 (59:35):
Yeah, well, I'll tell you what. If we're going to
do this, I'm sure we'll wait until after the FIFA
World Cup.

Speaker 2 (59:40):
Yeah, Warner says, if that happens, that is I agree,
that is huge. That would be a big move, bold,
a very bold move. I don't think it's going to
affect Trump support. I think because most of us that
support Trump and are part of Mega if you will,
we're with the agenda, Well, I think I think the

(01:00:01):
agenda we want to see things cleaned up.

Speaker 4 (01:00:03):
There.

Speaker 2 (01:00:03):
There's a reason why we vet people into this country.
We just don't let people walk across the border because
diseases happen, and if people weren't vetted and checked for
diseases that we've eradicated, we're opening ourselves up to them.
We've seen that with bed bugs coming back in and
other things coming back in, what measles and other diseases
and stuff that have been showing up because Biden policies.

Speaker 3 (01:00:25):
Yeah. No, I think that this should be done. And
I think they should pick a couple sites that are
particularly egregious and use them for examples and see if
they knuckle under and threaten to expand it to other airports,
because it's going to cause chaos if you just do
it everywhere.

Speaker 2 (01:00:38):
I mean, yeah, now you're making.

Speaker 3 (01:00:42):
What they should do is pick Los Angeles and then
pick two other locations, but certainly Los Angeles, and then
I'd say probably Newark would be a good spot to
do it, or JFK and they just shut them down
no international flights until they stop being sanctuary cities.

Speaker 2 (01:00:56):
That makes sense, start start making examples of them and
saying if this is going to continue, we can spread this,
and people might be starting to wake up and say
we can't afford to have this happening. So yeah, you
got a point.

Speaker 3 (01:01:06):
Well, I mean, what could happen is it be a
boon for the Hudson Valley Airport that's just spright up
the Hudson Valley there. It used to be the old
Stuart air Base during the Second World War. That airport,
which has international traffic, would see a major boom because
flights that couldn't get in JFK would have to fly there.
It would be incommediate for them, but that would spark
all kinds of economic activity. There'd be shuttle services and
limos to go back to the city, transport, the train

(01:01:29):
system that goes back, and the hotels around the airport.
Stuart Airport would be amazing. Yeah, that would be something else.
I would love to see that. I'd love to see that.
I'd love to see them do it. It's about time
that we go after these illegal jurisdictions that are acting
as if they're independent entities, as if they're their own country.

Speaker 2 (01:01:47):
Yeah. Yeah, like we said, you can't just have people
walking in here and doing whatever they want to do.
We have processes for a reason. We need to stick
to it. And Trump's made the argument more than enough times.
If we're going to eradicate a lot of the drug
issues that we have that impacts our society sociably and
cost us a lot of you know, you're talking about
property taxes, Chris, and some of us cost us a
lot of money for rehab centers and stuff. People with

(01:02:10):
drug habits may not be able to afford these themselves,
and they want to They want to make these states sponsored.
And how do we afford this? You know, the first
thing we need to do is get rid of the
problem and closing off the border, stopping the drug flows
at the border, the human trafficking and at the border.
And if we can eliminate the drug problems, we can
eliminate the black arms trafficking problem, which now they don't
have to start complaining about taking away guns from everybody,

(01:02:32):
which is ridiculous anyway, unless that's their intention is let
it all go wild and they can say you, yes,
you over there, the American citizen, we got to take
your guns away because this jack Wagen is breaking laws.

Speaker 3 (01:02:44):
Jack Wagon, Yeah no, but Stewart is in Newburgh. I mean,
that would be that would be fantastic to see. I
wouldn't mind seeing that I flowed out of Stewart before
That's where I went out of to go to. That's
where I went to go to Northern Ireland for the
Women's Rugby World Cup in twenty seventeen. Yeah, that's the
place to.

Speaker 2 (01:03:00):
Go, Chris the World Traveler. Man, I've been to Canada.
I've been to the Mexican border, but didn't bother going across. Like,
I don't speak Spanish, I'm not going across that border.

Speaker 3 (01:03:11):
I've been to Mexico. You're not missing anything.

Speaker 2 (01:03:13):
Yeah, they just got entertainment spots, we'll call it that.
They often refer to as boys town over there, drinking
establishments that are controlled by cartels and stuff. And it's
not the scene I want to be in.

Speaker 3 (01:03:25):
Yeah, there's nothing of Mexico appeal street. I've already been
to see the Mayan ruins and that's all I need
to see. The Aztec's city is wiped out by the
by the Spanish, so that's so long there. There's not
really anything left for me to see. The House Democrats
have announced the bill to block Trump's arch. They're trying
to stop that arch and they're going to do their

(01:03:46):
best to do it. These are shameful people. They hate America.

Speaker 2 (01:03:49):
House Democrats what are we talking about, Because they're trying
to build the octagon at the White House for the.

Speaker 3 (01:03:55):
No No, No, the Trialfle Archie wants to build on
the man made island that's overlooking. It's between Arlington National
Cemetery and the Lincoln Memorial. On that little island there,
there's a roundabout that's there to circulate traffic and wants
to put it right in the middle of that. It's brilliant.
But today they announced legislation to block his two hundred
and fifty foot triumfle arch, which we be built on

(01:04:15):
parkland just inside Washington's boundaries and tower over nearby Arlington
National Cemetery. Access not inside Washington's bundies is in Virginia,
So I don't know how this inside Washington's boundaries unless
they consider that man made island part of DC. The
Washington Post has taken a look at this interview that
the legislation it will bar construction of an arch on
a small island of Trump seeks to build the project,
as well as prohibit the use of federal funds for

(01:04:37):
the project. Also prohibit construction of large arch or similar
structure other Washington area parkland unless the project received Congression approval.
But the problem that the Democrats have is that this
project's already been approved over one hundred years ago by Congress.
Congress approved it to build one hundred and sixty six
foot tall columns on the island, and Trump is simply
going to build one hundred and sixty six foot tall arch.

(01:04:59):
But then it's going to be on this pedestal, so
it takes up turn and fifty feet this pedestal and statuary,
so total height to turn at fifty feet. It's kind
of like the Arc de Triomph. It's just absolutely brilliant.
I can't wait to see it. I want it to
go up. And these people just hate America. Imagine if
these scumbags were in charge of America, we'd have no
Lincoln Memorial, we'd have no Washington Monument, nothing like that.
With the Jefferson More, it wouldn't exist. They wouldn't exist

(01:05:21):
because they hate America. There's actually some veterans who are
suing to block this, but they have no standing. This
is not part of Arlington National Cemetery, and they say
it blocks the view blocks of view. No, it doesn't.
I've been an Arcton National Cemetery I've never seen that
roundabout from the cemetery. You don't notice it. Now you'll
see the arch. I think that's beautiful. But these are

(01:05:41):
just hateful people. Hateful, hateful people. So I can't wait
to see this thing built. It's amazing, it's going to
be awesome.

Speaker 2 (01:05:48):
So you're telling me Trump's going forward anyway, sort of
like the reflecting pond. They can complain all they want to,
but that pond is getting done.

Speaker 3 (01:05:55):
Yeah, it's being painted right now. In fact, I'm looking
at a photograph of the whole thing from above and
where the arch is going to be. It's just going
to be monumental. It's amazing, you know, it's it's these
people are just nasty. You know. The mall people forget
in the nineteen thirties was cattle were grazing there. And
now we've turned into we've got the Lincoln Memorial, We've
got the Washington Monument on there, of course that's been

(01:06:15):
there longer than that, and it goes allway down to
the Capitol Building and the Smithsonian fences and on both sides.
We've turned it into one of the world's most popular
tourist destinations. And to reflect on the history of America
and these people just hate America. So I can't wait
for this thing to be built.

Speaker 2 (01:06:34):
Yeah, no, I agree, it's going to be pretty awesome.
I think I'm sure they must have some artist renditions
of it. I should look it up online and see
what it what it's going to look like, and.

Speaker 3 (01:06:44):
Yeah, I'll send you a link. It's it's shorter than
the Capital because you know, there's a I think there's
federal legislation. Nothing can be higher than the capital, and
the Washington Monument was an exception because it was already built.
But the Capital's turning eighty eight feet tall. That's why
DC doesn't have skyscrapers. Are all in northern Virginia. The
arch would be two hundred and fifty feet Lincolnmorials ninety
nine feet in the White House is sixty feet high
the North facade. So yeah, it will enhance the visual

(01:07:06):
experience at ARLT and National Cemetery, veterans, families of the fall,
and Americans like serving as a visual mind of the
notable sacrifice is born by so many Americans throughout our
turn fifty year history, said White House spokesman Davis Ingle. Yeah,
this is the purpose of it. Is to commemorate during
fifty the anniversary built, these dovestications would transform a small
plot of land between Lincoln Orial and Arlington National Cemetery
in to dominant new monument. Architects and historic preservationist to

(01:07:28):
have warned the plant arch, which would be more than
twice the height of the roughly one heart foot Lincoln
Morial and tower over nearby cemetery, would distort the intent
of existing memorials obstruction. Now it won't, it won't distort anything.
It's going to be great. It's going to be big,
it's going to be wonderful. And Trump is right. I'm
so sick of these people have no vision for DC.
This will be amazing triumphal arch and it's going to
be amazing. We deserve it. This is a triumphal country

(01:07:50):
and we should have it.

Speaker 2 (01:07:51):
So I think right now, is Trump not erecting a
octagon in the south lawn of the White House to
have you see fights?

Speaker 3 (01:08:02):
Not familiar with that, I believe. So.

Speaker 2 (01:08:05):
Somebody said some of it was very expensive to get
them tickets. I forgot what they quoted for ticket prices.
I'm like, wow, that's just a couple of dollars more
I can afford, but it was ridiculously high. And I'm
thinking to myself, it's the South Lawn, and I take
a trip to the Memorial and maybe I can view
up from the memorial and peak on on the fights
for free. Do like kids like the movie theaters? Remember
the kids of the movie theaters sitting in their own

(01:08:25):
backyards because we're close to the movie theaters, back the
drive in theaters back in the day with their little
AMFM radio with the batteries in it.

Speaker 3 (01:08:33):
Yeah, I do remember that. One of our viewers just said,
remember the Democratic National Committee one at Rainbow Street crossings.
Remember that they painted, they polluted the streets, painting rainbow
flags on at the District of Columbia. But we can't
have a triumph arts to celebrate turn fifty years of
this great nation. These people have twisted values, warped values.
It's unbelievable now. But that that arch is going to
be amazing and I can't wait for it to be done.

(01:08:55):
I haven't heard about the timeline is for building it.
I guess it's in commemoration sturing fifty, but it's obviously
won't be done in time for youth. If they say
haven't started construction yet.

Speaker 2 (01:09:04):
Yeah, did they put a timeline when they might break
ground on it?

Speaker 3 (01:09:07):
Or now they're going to give fourteen days notice that
I think they're required by law to do that fourteen
days notice before they start, So I will say.

Speaker 2 (01:09:14):
Well, it's already established by law anyway, So that's kind
of like a benefit. I mean, unless they're going to
come through with one of these. Well, Trump didn't file
the proper permits with the City of d C. And
they love to pull these little stunts in the City
of d C.

Speaker 3 (01:09:30):
Spare me my goodness.

Speaker 2 (01:09:32):
That is yeah, by Congress technically, but correct.

Speaker 3 (01:09:36):
They're not independent. It's a district of Columbia. It's federal territory.
They seem to forget that. That's why they don't have
representatives in Congress, and it burns their shorts. And my
answer is, don't live in d C. Live in Maryland, Virginia.

Speaker 2 (01:09:47):
Well, they passed the home Rule, which gives them the
ability to elect a mayor and run it like a city,
but still it's absolutely controlled by Congress regardless. Congress holds
authority in DC over the City of DC or the district.

Speaker 3 (01:10:01):
Yeah, they do. That's correct, and it seemed to be
lost on people valves or seems to forget that she's
the mayor. She seems to forget that her money comes
from Congress and we're the ones paying for her office
and her salary. She forgets that. And the District of
Columbia belongs to the people of America, not to District
of Columbia. That's what's also forgotten. It's federal territory that's
there for a reason. But there's something that's going on

(01:10:21):
that I warned people about over twenty years ago. As
a counter intelligence agent in the military. I warned the
military that ubiquitous surveillance was going to be a problem, Like,
what are you talking about? Well, now they're calling it
ubiquitous technical surveillance. I called it US. Now they call
it UTS. Now. This story came to light a few
years back, long after I predicted it was going to
be a problem, and I told peop about it repeatedly,

(01:10:41):
but nobody listened to me. I was just a junior
officer when I first brought this up, and the Internet
was relatively new, but I said that there's a challenge here.
We're going to be tracked by devices we carry. Back
then I was talking about mobile phones, and then we
later got sports tracking devices like garments, and was the
the fitbit that's right, which now belongs to Google Fitbit

(01:11:04):
and all these different things. I said, this is going
to be something attraction for movements. That data gets stored,
the data can be sold, and it can be purchased
by adversaries to determine where the US military is at,
where they're operating at. And sure enough, we had several
years ago in Afghanistan, malicious actors purchased the data from
the fitbit data and it showed where forces in Afghanistan

(01:11:26):
were running, the track they're running, so it has of
course the day timestamp, and also you know how many people,
so you can you can use that information extrapolate how
many people at that installation when they're there, when they're active, running,
when they're vulnerable, and so on and so forth. Along
with that and all these other things that people do,
you know, like you can track people's phones and when
they're turned off. This data is all freely available and

(01:11:46):
purchasable from organizations like Google and others, and now that
Google and Fitbit, that's going to be even easier to get.
So a Admiral Frank Bradley says that technology tracks are
driving or shopping or socializing exercise as can be weaponized. Well, duh,
Admiral Bradley, you probably didn't know that, But when you
were A three and I was an O three, you're

(01:12:07):
still in I warned people about this, but they didn't listen.
They didn't listen. But this is a major concern. The
extreme dangers posed by uts or a major priority for
the FBI, intelligence agencies, even immigration enforcement organizations. Agents could
accidentally reveal their movements before rady to an actor who
knows how to access and interp of the data exactly right.
And of course this is especially dangerous to special forces,

(01:12:27):
to the Navy Seals, to Delta Force. All of these people,
they carry these devices with them all over the world,
and there is no mechanism in place to protect that data.
For people who work for the military, this is a
real serious problem. In late twenty twenty four, a joint
investigation by wire the magazine and The Bible of Shagunfunk
and Netspolitique dot org, which are two German organizations at

(01:12:50):
broadcaster and a political organization, found the US companies legally
collecting digital advertising data from smartphones offer detailed insights into
the locations and daily routines of American to a personnel
station in Germany. Yeah, Russian soldiers fighting Ukraine have reportedly
given away their positions by using Tinder, which tracks uses locations.
The French newspaper Lamol reported that it could you locate

(01:13:10):
the aircraft carriers CHARLT call because a French sailor was
using the Strava fitness app to track daily runs. Wow,
this is what I warned people about. And so I
mean these these are not classified devices, but because the
data is tracked and the signal goes out, you are
at risk. And people don't realize this, and we're all
like that, we're always at risk. People just don't realize that.

Speaker 2 (01:13:31):
Well, there lies the issue, right, I mean, we all
have cell phones, we all have tracking devices one way
or another. They got it in your cars. You're paying
for the technology in your cars to be tracked with
GPS and stuff like that. In fact, that's how a
map quest or Google's when they tell you road patterns
and stuff like that can jet traffic congestions and routing.

(01:13:52):
That's what they're doing. They're using your data that you're
sending out out of your vehicle, and they're aggregating all
that information should make determinations about congestions and roads and
things like that and how to rout you. Yeah, you're
being tracked everywhere you go. We got smart cars, we
got smartphones, we got smart meters in our homes, we've
got smart appliances. You know, everything's going on the Internet

(01:14:14):
of things, and at some point in time, everything you
do in your life, they're just not gonna have any
privacy anymore. They're going to know how much water you using,
what time of day the water's being used, and at
some point in time, it's possible that they'll be able
to connect and control your water flow, shut it off
when they don't want you to use it, like say
prime times, or your electricity flow for brownouts and things

(01:14:34):
like that, if you're using too much electricity certain times
of the day or AC's running, and they're saying, well,
this particular house right here is using absorbitan mount this
particular time of day when we need to cut back
some and they can basically slow your electricity flow. This
is stuff nothing new. They've been talking about the stuff
for decades coming. It's just all been building up over time.
The Internet of Things has been here forever in a day,

(01:14:56):
and smart appliance has been coming up and building up
and getting better. They talk about fridges now that you
can pretty much look inside your fridge without open the door.
You can put there on your grocery list things like that.
Be at the grocery store, check your fridge for what's
in there, so you can make determinations of what you
may need to shop for while you're at the grocery store.
It sounds convenient, but there's a cost to convenience, and

(01:15:17):
that cost is privacy. You lose all sense of privacy
because anything on the Internet is hackable or findable in
the Internet of Things with showdown and search engine. It's
quite an interesting thing because that is what hackers use.
It's a for white hat hacking to secure things, but
also black hat hacking for robbing people of their wealth.

(01:15:40):
And so they do keep it there because they need
to be able to look for weaknesses and the Internet
to sure up things. So but black hat hackers do
access it.

Speaker 3 (01:15:51):
Well, that's true. That's people don't realize just how vulnerable
they are. And I like earlier today, I was talking
to someone and they're like, yeah, no, I don't. I don't.
I don't. I won't put my bank details in there.
And I'm like, hey, your bank details are on the internet.
You have nothing to say about that. If you have
a bank, your data is there, it's all out there,
and if it isn't protected adequately by the banks, then

(01:16:12):
you're compromised. I mean, I have Todd, and I know
he's gotten it, but I've gotten it like four times
where the Office of Management Budget has sent me a
letter telling me that my identity has been compromised because
the federal government didn't protect databases and people got into it.
I mean, fantously. We had the Romanians, the Chinese, and
the Iranians digging around their databases for people with top
secret and secret clearances for eighteen months before they even

(01:16:33):
realized that these people are in the database taking data.
So one day I'm waiting for mister Fuji to show
up on my door and go hello, Cornel Wyatt's we
want to know about this, or we're going to tell
people about you bounced to check in nineteen twenty seven seven.

Speaker 2 (01:16:47):
Yes, well that's really going far back though.

Speaker 3 (01:16:51):
Yeah, anyway, but hey, here's some big news. I mean,
I don't know if most Americans those big news, but
I know it's big news to me because these turds
nearly got me and a lot of people made her
lives miserable. A court in Germany and sentenced former Red
Army Faction member Daniella Cletta to thirteen years in prison
Wednesday for armed robberies carried out over the past three decades.
So finally justice today for the sixty seven year old

(01:17:12):
Cletta had been hiding in plain sight, living under a
fake name in the German capital for over three decades.
According to the Guardian. She was arrested at her Berlin
home in twenty twenty four and faced a fourteen month
trial after she was identified by an investigative journalists using
facial recognition software, talking about not being able to hide.
She was found guilty of accounts of aggravated robberies along
with the kidnapping for ransom and possession of military weapons

(01:17:32):
between nineteen ninety nine and twenty sixteen, according to The Guardian. Now,
the funny thing is that the Red Army Faction has
been dormant long before nineteen ninety nine, so what was
she doing when she was found? Officers unfailed to store
weapons for its identity documents of fake Bazukah wigs gold
in cash. She was the last female member of the
far left terrorist group Red Army faction was left as
protest movement that engaged in violent actions such as kidnappings,

(01:17:54):
murders and armed robberies. Prosecutor said Cleta was part of
the third generation of the group known as the Bottom
Minehoff Gang, which killed thirty five people between nineteen seventy
one and nineteen ninety one. She's also accused of politically
acting motivated attacks from whether the Red armufaction was still
active in the nineties, but those charges we dealt with later.
In Frankfort, the sixty seven year old German woman can
no longer be tried for membership in the terrorist group
since it ended over twenty years ago. The group just

(01:18:15):
banded nineteen ninety eight when they issued the final statement
declaring an end to urban girler warfare. Police are still
looking for two men who were suspected being her accomplice,
as investigators said they have found the men's DNA in
her apartment where she was arrested. Wow, boy, they shouldn't
hung out with her, so there you go. But because
like I said, they stopped being a terrorist group over
twenty years ago. They can't get her for being a
member that because it doesn't exist anymore. But they can't

(01:18:36):
get her for actions. And she's got thirteen years in
prison and she's still to face other terrorism related for kidnapping,
terrorsm cases. Good, the long arm of the law finally
got this scumbag Red Army faction. I hate them. I
remember they killed Alfred Harehouse in nineteen eighty nine. We
thought that they were done. But in nineteen eighty nine
they blew up as Mercedes in the Ritzy suburb outside

(01:18:56):
of Frankfort as he was going into work, just blew
it to Smithereens killed him. It's terrible.

Speaker 2 (01:19:02):
Yeah, it is nice to see him finally catching up.
It's a little a little light, but at least they
got him. Alan says that he uses armor Guard to
protect his devices. Uh yeah, pretty much. In this day
and age, you need something to protect your technology technologically.
Being on their barefoot, are just relying on Microsoft's what defender,

(01:19:23):
Windows Defender whatever it is, isn't quite adequate enough anymore.
The what are he called the VPNs work pretty good. Too,
I think to help hide your identity and stuff online.
One of the biggest things about hacking is they find
open what they call p i ds where they're they're

(01:19:45):
access points and stuff in your computers and stuff like that.
And if there's an open port, then that gives them
access to your computer. And sometimes it can happen. You
can have a port that's been left open that's not
being used for some reason. And I don't know what
they have as far as techn now, I'm not that
adepty technology that I can actually determine what is out

(01:20:06):
there for softwares to look for open ports and things
like that. Something that should dig into further. Considering that
I'm into this hacking thing and want to know more
about it because it's getting more complicated. The securities and
stuff and technology get way more complicated. So those listening
you might want to take it more seriously because it's
a growing thing.

Speaker 3 (01:20:28):
Oh, it's here and there's no way around it. And
AI is going to make it much easier for people
to be malicious. You can get a T to do
task in microseconds and what would take us hours to
do manually. Yep, it's just pretty scary. What's out there.
What can happen? Yeap bad stuff? Anyway, did you see
in New Jersey that a terrorist affiliated candidate is running?

(01:20:49):
Did you see that?

Speaker 2 (01:20:50):
No, Yeah, created candidate run. I guess there's nothing illegal
about it, but.

Speaker 3 (01:20:56):
Well, yes there is, but he's got no comment New Jersey.
And of course this Muslim terror related candidate is backed
by ilianomer of course, what else but New Jersey Democratic
House candidate Adam Hamaway worked for an al Qaeda linked
nonprofit in the nineteen nineties before international investigations led to
the closing of that nonprofit. In a nineteen ninety six interview,

(01:21:18):
he said that he passed out humanitarian supplies around Bosnia
two years earlier for the Benevolence International Foundation. And now
the outlet that reported this site of the archival store
from the Newark Star Ledger. The US government said, and
United Nations later identified the Illinois based foundation's clandestine funding
source for al Qaeda and the nine to eleven architect
Osama bin Laden. So he was raising money for Osama

(01:21:40):
bin Laden, whether you knew it or not, he was
affiliate with it, he said. I worked at Serio for
ten days and the rest of the time in Zanetsia,
a large regional center in central Bossia, now Humaway born
in Egypt, reported told the paper at the time, back
in ninety six, we went out to hospitals around the
area and in the mountains to check what supplies they need,
and we tried to deliver them. His campaign did not
respond to The Daily Caller News Foundation's request for common

(01:22:00):
He's received endorsements from high profile Muslims like Somali born
Minnesota representative Lean Omar, of Course, Vermont's communist Bernie Sanders,
and New York's brain Dead bartender Alexandri Coscortez. He previously
came under fire for his past associations with a convicted terrorist,
mastermind Shake Omar abdel Rahman, the Blind Shake, who was
worked He worked for him as a translator and testified

(01:22:22):
in his defense at nineteen ninety six trial in New
York Wow And when asked about the Blind Shake, he said,
he did speak about violence, things I think most people
disagree with and most people condemned, including myself, But it
wasn't the only thing he spoke about. Well that's enough
if you know so, I mean, if you've got a
convicted murder next to you, I'm not going to talk
to him because he speaks, you know, you know, fascinatingly

(01:22:44):
about world history. What an absolute idiot, these people, it's
just unbelievable, unbelievable.

Speaker 2 (01:22:50):
So he's saying he's an act of terrorist. Now he's
a known act.

Speaker 3 (01:22:53):
Of Now he is affiliated with terrorist groups, I mean
as terrorists related ties. I mean, the blind Shake doesn't
get any more terrorists than he gets. That guy's in prison,
you know, for his support for the nineteen ninety three
World Trade Center bombing. He was behind it, and this
guy was working for him, Then why isn't he in jail? Anyway,
his past ties extremists run deeper than previous acknowledge to

(01:23:14):
the Jewish Insiders Report. A two thousand and two federal
investigation found extensive communication between the Foundation that he was
involved with an Al Qaida financial transactions wreck, describing a
planned to steps at base for operations in Europe against
a Qaida's true enemy in the United States. The Democrat
dismissed his critics as bigot in the May seventh The
comments and the Inside of New Jersey towny his past
work as a doctor for the US and the Iraq
War and responder on nine eleven. As a Muslim, they're

(01:23:36):
always going to find something to attack. Dude, you work
for a terrorist organization. Of course we're going to attack it.
Give me a break. Yeah right, Well, Karen said that
she she stumbled onto a YouTube channel guy called Braxman,
who seems somewhat paranoid about PC and phones being hacked surveillance.
But listening to you, now, maybe he's not so crazy.

(01:23:58):
Reference proteculants privacy As a gentleman, I think many of
you know that I once upon a time worked in
the National Security Agency, and I was there when cyber
Command was founded. And I will tell you that you
need to be very careful. And it doesn't matter whether
you careful or not, you are at risk. You need
to be astute about your personal identifiable information, you know.
I mean there's simple things, you know. We get so
many things in the mailbox that come with our name,

(01:24:20):
our phone number address on it, for pre approved credit cards,
for you know, insurance for your utility lines and this,
that and the other. You can't just throw those things
in the bind People go through dumpsters and dig those
things out in landfills and they steal identities there goes
an ambulance out there. And so what I'm saying is
that you know that's stuff you need to open up
and look for your name and shred that stuff or
torch it. You know, don't burn your house down, but

(01:24:42):
you know, burn it in the safe location or shred that stuff.
You've got to be very careful here. I mean, people
don't shred their credit cards in ways that numbers can't
be assembled. I mean, quite frankly, I typically if I
have a credit card, if I don't burn it, which
I usually don't, I'll shred it. And if I can't
find a machine that will sred it little chunks, I'll
cut up multip pieces and I'll drop pieces in different

(01:25:02):
bins in different places. No one can ever possibly put
it back together. That's the kind of personal security you
got to think about here. You know, like when I
travel to South Africa, I don't announce them coming to
South Africa. I did that once upon a time when
many people didn't who I was. But now people know
who I am, and people make real threats, and so
you just you don't announce things in advance. You got
to be careful about your personal information because people will
use it. They're malicious people out there, and the people

(01:25:24):
you think of your friends, they aren't always your friends.
So be forewarned means be forearmed, and that's the smart
thing to do in the twenty first century. Otherwise, Skynut's
coming for.

Speaker 2 (01:25:34):
You, skyky Net. It's great.

Speaker 3 (01:25:39):
That's right, man. I You know, I tell you what
if a terminator comes from me, I wanted to look
like Summer Glou that's the terminator I want to come
after me, not Arnold Schwarzenegger.

Speaker 2 (01:25:47):
Well, they do talk about with machines and stuff like
that when you get into AI that when they're making decisions.
It's how you word things with me. You know, it's
all it's all programming and stuff, and if you don't
word it adequately, it could blow up in your face.

Speaker 3 (01:25:59):
You know.

Speaker 2 (01:25:59):
They talk about the possibilities of saying make the world
a safer place and stuff. You think, well, it's going
to make the world different place it might have it
might decide humans are making the world unsafe. Now you
got a old problem because it may go off of
eliminating humans.

Speaker 3 (01:26:14):
Yeah, no, one hundred percent. I can't disagree with that. Yeah.

Speaker 4 (01:26:18):
Yeah.

Speaker 3 (01:26:18):
One of my viewers just said opsec operational security. That's
something I preach all the time. You got to be
very careful about it. People need to you know. Look,
it's it's a dangerous world out there, and I think
a lot of people don't realize it. You know, it's
like watching your kids. It only takes a micro second
for you to not catch your kids. You know. You know,
they step away from me for a second. Next thing,
you know, some purv has got them or something happens

(01:26:39):
to them. It only takes a moment. I don't think
people really grasp just how serious things are in the world.
You got to be up on top of everything otherwise,
you know, crazy things happen.

Speaker 2 (01:26:49):
Yeah, I got a friend. He's watched this show several times.

Speaker 3 (01:26:52):
Then you know, wait wait, wait, okay, breaking news. You've
got a friend.

Speaker 2 (01:26:54):
Hold on, yeah, I actually believe it or not. Actually
got a friend, thought Chris Wise and my friend apparently,
But no, I do have this friend that's into technology.
He come up when we were kids. He decided to
go that rounde and it's quite done quite well for
himself for a living and a lot of contracting and
stuff and pretty big jobs, you know, and he will

(01:27:15):
not put his identity online, even on Facebook. He will
not put his true identity online at all whatsoever, for
these very reasons we're discussing.

Speaker 3 (01:27:24):
And I appreciate his approach and his concerns, but I'll
tell you what I can find him.

Speaker 2 (01:27:31):
He's somewhere because the government puts your identity online, so
he's got to be somewhere online. But he does what
he can to minimize his risk online, even as much
as Facebook. And you think about it, your intaker to
get sacrificed on Facebook. You don't know where that profile
picture you gave, you a really nice profile picture you did,
and you put it on Facebook. Well that looks nice.
Somebody else says, yeah, I think that looks nice too.

(01:27:53):
Maybe I'll take him download that and use it on
another account that you don't even know exist. And he's
going out there scamming people with your image.

Speaker 3 (01:28:00):
Well, have you ever applied? I mean, these are questions
we'll ask people. Okay, First, do you have a bank
account your compromise potentially, Do you have a credit card
your compromise potentially? Have you ever made a mortgage, you
ever bought a home? You potentially compromise all those records
in courthouses open to the public. Have you ever made
the mistake that many of us did because we were
told to do this back in the day, take your
d D two fourteen when to leave the military, to

(01:28:21):
the courthouse and registered and leave a copy there so
they always have it. Well, a lot of us did that,
and they never protected so screer numbers. Now many of
them are doing that for thirty forty years, they didn't
protect those screen umbers. Here a dentity could be stolen
simply by trolling veterans documents which are publicly available. Have
you ever bought a car, not alone, just bought a car, Well,
you make could be in jeopardy. Have you ever applied

(01:28:42):
for a job and submitted a resume, Well, yes, you
could be in jeopardy. All of these things are archived
and they're available digitally available. I mean, you don't have
to have a social media presence to be vulnerable on
social media, and to be vulnerable on the web. The
world runs on data, and data is a available either
legally freely or surreptitiously. The best you can do is

(01:29:05):
be cognizant of that and protect yourself with barriers and
other things. You know, that's one reason why, For instance,
I have I keep credit card receipts. You know, people
say you did this, not and do that, you purchased that,
and I didn't, you know. And now then I've got that,
you know, ubiquitous tracker of easy Pass in my car
because I got tired of paying seventy bucks across the state.
Now only pay thirty five bucks. I've got all those

(01:29:26):
records too, So you got to be really careful out there.
All this stuff is out there and people. That's like
it reminded me when I was in the UK few
years ago, I went to Old Yorvik Viking Yorvick, which
is the They had found the old settlement that the
Vikings had in York in England and the city was
built up on top of it. They were digging to
put some new building and they uncovered the original settlement

(01:29:47):
and a marketplace there, so they turned it into a museum.
I've been there previously. I was there on a recent
trip and I'm walking around. There's a lot of last
room before you go out of the underground. Last room
before you head back upstairs is a room full of
coins they dug up, you know, from the air and
there's Byzantine coins, and there's there's Roman coins, and there's
coins from England. Anyway. So I'm in there taking photographs

(01:30:07):
and a school group comes in with all these little kids.
And I spent eight or nine years old, and I'm
taking pictures and they came in. It's kind of annoying
for me, but I moved my camera a little higher
to make sure I didn't get the kids the pictures.
I don't want the kids in my picture. I want
the coins, not the kids. And this teacher comes there
and he says, you can't do that. I said, can't
do what? You can't take pictures? Of course, I can't
take pictures the museum. I paid you in here. No,
but you can't take pictures of children. I said, well,
first off, I was here. First, you brought these kids in.

(01:30:30):
I was taking pictures. Second, I'm not taking pictures kids,
and third, the kids are in public, so I'll take
any picture I want. Be gone. Yeah, it's really just
I mean, it's ridiculous. Be gone. You know you can't
you can't complain about someone recording you were filming you
in public. If you don't want to be recorded in public,

(01:30:50):
then don't be in public.

Speaker 2 (01:30:51):
There's a reason why people in the old days used
to dress when they went out. Some people actually dressed
when they got up, because you never know who's coming
to your front door. People like to be presentable. Nowadays
you got people running out there in the pajamas and
slippers going to the store and do some grocery shop
and it's like and then complain if you're being recorded.
That's some Yeah, that's not gonna fly.

Speaker 3 (01:31:11):
No. It reminds me that that Ron White, that old
Ron White story said, you know he's always drinking, got
that cigar when he does the show's good. I was
out in the club and I was drinking, and next
thing I knew, they three guys picked me up and
threw me out the door into the street, and I
got arrested for public intoxication, for drinking in public. And
I said, I wasn't drinking a public I was drinking

(01:31:33):
at the bar. Arrest them.

Speaker 2 (01:31:35):
Yeah, the question is is that really whiskey in his
glass tea or I.

Speaker 3 (01:31:43):
Think sweet tea. It looks a lot like whiskey. Who
knows Ron White, it probably is whiskey.

Speaker 2 (01:31:48):
But we got really whiskey, real whiskey in there. Knowing him.

Speaker 3 (01:31:52):
I was drinking at the bar. Arrest them. They threw
me a.

Speaker 2 (01:31:55):
Public old tator salad.

Speaker 3 (01:31:58):
Yeah, tator salad. My son is tater tot. He said.
He got arrested and they went they went on the wire.
Are you Ron tater salad White?

Speaker 4 (01:32:13):
Oh you got me, you.

Speaker 3 (01:32:15):
Got the old tater salad.

Speaker 2 (01:32:17):
We got you tat salad.

Speaker 3 (01:32:19):
My goodness, Ron White too. Funny man. I like. The
one I like is when he's flying, you know, on
a flight, a flight from Beaumont. They used to he said,
the world's shortest flight. It's like forty five seconds or something.
He was being kidding, but anyway, he said. He got
on a plane and we took off and one of
the engines failed, and the public said, we got an
engine problem. We're gonna land. And the guy next to

(01:32:40):
him says, can we make it? There went one engine
and something like that. He goes and he says, you
know what, we'll be the first on the scene of
the crash. Don't worry about it.

Speaker 2 (01:32:50):
You're not supposed to stay on the plane.

Speaker 3 (01:32:52):
That's right. We'll beat the emergency service to the scene accident. Yeah,
And he said he was, you know, he got on
a plane and he sat down. He was like seat
number seven, and the guy came out and said, excuse me,
I think you're sitting in my seat. And he looked
at his ticket and was sixteen. He goes. They numbered
them consecutively, four fives. You're back there. Oh my goodness,

(01:33:13):
Ron White, Ah, what a funny guy. Yeah. I remember
the Blue Collar Comedy Tour. That was pretty funny stuff.
I never got to go to the Blue Collar Comedy Tour,
but it did catch at Jeff Foxworthy comedy show up
in Scranton a few years back, or Wilsbury. He was
pretty good. But the Blue Comedy is really incredible.

Speaker 2 (01:33:31):
Yeah, I like call Jeff fox for he's a He's
a very intelligent comic. Most of them are, actually.

Speaker 3 (01:33:37):
Oh of course are. But my favorite is bill Ingvall.
Bill Ingvall's great. Here's that's right. You got Bill ing Vall,
Ron White, Larry the Cable Guy, and Jeff Foxworthy.

Speaker 2 (01:33:46):
Ron White was, you might be a redneck if Oh
that's Jeff Foxworthy. I'm sorry you got Jeff fox with
what I said, Ron White, Yeah, Jeff Foxworthy was you
might be a redneck if.

Speaker 3 (01:33:57):
Yeah. Yeah, he always had some pretty good ones for
that one. You know, it's funny because I mean, there's
a lot of a lot of truth in those those
jokes they tell.

Speaker 2 (01:34:05):
Yeah, that's what makes them so funny, and I like
when kids were laughing, but it's true.

Speaker 3 (01:34:11):
Yeah. Oh my goodness. So the Republican Party has buried
all of their nasty comments about Ken Paxton. The National
Senate re Election Committee has hidden everything. Yep. So the
National Republican SENATORI Committe quickly deleted several posts attacking Texas
Attorney General Kim Paxton after he won the Senate race

(01:34:33):
last night. So they removed a statement from July tenth,
which last year, which criticized Paxton's extra manital af fair
while married to Republican State Senator Angela Paxton. On the
page the website takes readers to a four or four
page who's a photograph former House Speaker Nanci Pelosi and
Senate Minority Leaderschuck Schumer in states, ye're as lost as
they are. And then they said there that what Paxton

(01:34:55):
has put his family through, his truly repulse on discussing
no one should have to endure what Angela Paxton had,
and we pray for her as she choose to stand
up herself and her family during this difficult time. That's
what in our sc Communicy director Johann Rodriguez said last year.
Another statement from July last year included the header Ken
Paxton's lives and competence keep piling up. That's also four
or four page. Now, yeah, interesting how the Republican National

(01:35:18):
Senate Committee is now covering up their attacks on Paxxton
from last year. It's just typical politics, though, I mean,
it's nothing new.

Speaker 2 (01:35:26):
The thing about it is is I'm not interested in
holding that Ken Paxton accountable in regards to his relationship
with his wife because I don't know the nature of
the relationship. You can sit there, like in the old
days and say, well, if he was, if he's a
man of infidelity, how's he going to treat the people
or something like that, And that's not uncommon, but we
see it so commonly in politics, and we don't know

(01:35:50):
the nature of the relationship. If it was just pure
infidelity and selfishness, or they really just were broke up,
broke apart, we don't really know. But I do know
the merits of his actions and his works as Attorney
General of Texas. So if I was a person in
Texas voting, I'd be looking at well, I favor I've
said that before, a favorite Kimpacston anyway, for the works

(01:36:11):
I've known he's done. He was a Trump supporter one
it wasn't cool to be a Trump supporter. He was
standing ground when Trump lost to twenty twenty or was
cheated from the twenty twenty election. He was the one
going after fraudulent voters for years to come after that.
He was the one point out in Texas where fraudulent
voting was actually happening. Well, the left was going no, no, no, no,

(01:36:33):
it's off fair. It's all fair. There was nothing illegal,
nothing fraudulent anywhere. It's all good. And you know they
wanted to sugarcoating, and Kim Paxson was the guy going, no,
we're not going to sugarcoat it.

Speaker 3 (01:36:45):
Yeah. No, Look, it's like when Dave Petres was the
director of the Central Intelligence Agency. They went after him
and he resigned because he was having a fair But
I mean that was not exactly state secret. He and
his wife were separated for some time for a few years,
and we're in the process of getting divorced. They didn't
have relationship anymore, and both of them were engaged with

(01:37:06):
other people. As I recall, and whatever the case is,
that was the basis for getting him. They just wanted
to get rid of petray Us.

Speaker 2 (01:37:12):
There was pressure around him and he took come to pressure,
so he resigned over it. Yeah that happened.

Speaker 3 (01:37:18):
Yeah, So apparently Tucker Carlson is telling people to stop
paying their credit cards.

Speaker 2 (01:37:25):
Yeah, oh okay, this is just like the let's not
pay our Texas until we get what we want movement.

Speaker 3 (01:37:32):
On Monday, he premiered a lengthy discussion with guest ethical
hacker Ryan Montgomery. While the talk touched on the Satanic
death cults and child predators on the internet, how do
we get the credit cards other foreigns preditation found Carlson
promoting people to stop paying their credit cards. After Montgomery
kicked off the discussion by pulling out his laptop and
showing the host how readily he was able to access
Carlson's history number, his signature of various licenses in multiple states,

(01:37:55):
and more cautions about freezing credit. Turned to the topic
of debt. It was on that subject that the guest
devised against spending money. Don't have which is good advice,
to which Carlson took something of a contract and he said,
I think people should just stop paying their credit cards.
I know no one else agrees with me. And oh,
you have a moral obligation. Really well, you have a
more obligation of not send credit card aplications to kids

(01:38:16):
in college. So this goes both ways. Just like blaming
the drug addict who never mentioned the dealer. Someone's selling
the fentanyl and that person is on the hook too. Look,
Tucker Carlson is turning out to be a complete buffoon.
I mean, this is ridiculous. Credit cards cards are not
the drug credit cards. The problem is not credit cards
being offered to people or being offered to college kids.
The problem is that school's not teaching financial responsibility and

(01:38:38):
financial literacy and parents not teaching their offspring what money
is and how money works, and how to use debt
to your advantage and how not to have debt. It's
not the credit card company's fault. This is ridiculous. But
Tucker Carlson is acting like a moron. It's really getting
irritating annoying. This guy promotes vaalemir plutin how he attacks
Trump and now he's telling people not to pay their
credit cards, and he just says it in to the

(01:38:59):
flip and way. He's got one hundred million viewers. It's
a disgrace. Yeah, Tucker Carlson needs to grow up.

Speaker 2 (01:39:04):
No, I can align with them. Sure, don't pay for
your credit cards after you pay them off. I mean,
what was he mean? You're just not gonna pay anymore.
You're not gonna pay what you wowe or I mean,
this doesn't even begin to make sense to me. Yeah, sure,
after you pay them off, then cancel your credit card,
don't pay anymore. If that's how you feel about, that's fine,
you can do that.

Speaker 3 (01:39:24):
Yeah, he's he's, he's he's I mean, I think he's
hit his head.

Speaker 2 (01:39:28):
Yeah, he said.

Speaker 3 (01:39:29):
No.

Speaker 2 (01:39:29):
He's somebody who wants to be relevant, and he's got
Tucker Carlson Network and he probably wants to grow it,
and he's trying to get on the fringe of things,
and so he's trying to find these things that people
There are a lot of people into conspiracy theories and
stuff now, and some of their conspiracy or conspiracy theories
make sense, and sometimes they're really not theories. They're just
conspiracies that they identify. That's fine too, you know, like

(01:39:52):
we talk about election fraud and things like that, but
some of these things are really out there, and I
think people like Carlson and Owen's trying to get on
the fringe of these kind of mindsets to gain a
larger audience. I think that's they think it's the place
to go, and they're getting more engaged with this anti
Israel nonsense, this Nick Falintas no white supremacy nonsense. And

(01:40:17):
it's hard for me to believe there's a white supremacist
came out of Chicago, Illinois. But hey, you know, maybe
there's one. I don't know. For some reason, I just
think the guy's a shill and he's just trying to
sway mega supporters away from Trump and trying to break
the movement.

Speaker 3 (01:40:32):
But well, it just makes you a question, you know,
how legitimate Tucker Crosson is. I mean, he's a shilled
for so many things. The guy who says outrageous things.
It's just he's looking for clickbait, that's all it is.
It's shame on him. Yes, you know, he was actually
I actually told people in January twenty twenty that he
was the best television host with the investigat journalists in

(01:40:53):
the world. I mean, because John Stossel wasn't around anymore
on the on broadcast media, but he was, and I said,
he's the best. And he told us about this town
in China call Wuhan where this outbreak has taking place.
Chinese government's covering it up and it could affect us here.
And he was reporting on the first week of January
before the government disclosed this stuff, you know. And I
said the time, and for a few months before that,
that he was the best in the world. But he is.

(01:41:14):
The guy is all about him. The ego is unbelievable,
and he doesn't care what he says. He's flipping. He's rich,
he's connected, he gets what he wants, and he behaves irresponsibly.
And so many these people do that. So annoying, absolutely
so annoying. Now, one of the viewers, my viewers use
the term or the phrase credits usury. That's factually incorrect.
Usury is for illegal credit interest rates, anything that exceeds

(01:41:35):
the legal limit. There are laws, and anything above them
is usury. Credit itself is not usuring. The fact that
you are loaning money. Also, credit's necessary because otherwise there's
no chance for upper mobility if you can only have
money to invest or build a business to take your
idea somewhere without being able to borrow money from people
or from institutions. You have to sit around to wait

(01:41:55):
thirty years to save enough money if you're even able
to do that, to make it happen. Credit is a
vital function of a function society, and it's important. But
you have to be financially literate in order to understand
credit and how to use it, and most people are not.

Speaker 2 (01:42:11):
Yeah, Allen's got a good point here. Two, he says
he has credit card. He's never had credit card debt
and still has like it because you're painting it off
every month. You're using it, but you're painting it off regularly. Yeah,
it don't increase your credit your score, your credit score.

Speaker 3 (01:42:27):
So well, your credit score will be fine if you
pay it off when you use it, as simple as that.

Speaker 2 (01:42:32):
But yeah, yeah, anyway, it probably improves your credit score
significantly when you're painted off in the timely manner, as
opposed to carrying the debt for too long a period
of time and racking up interest. Somebody says Tucker, uh,
Tucker kissed the ring and got fired, so he just
wants to watch it burn.

Speaker 3 (01:42:50):
I don't disagree with that statement. Yeah, that Tucker doesn't care.
I mean, what was the whole point of interviewing Vladimir Putin?
Was that about? Other than just getting one hundred million
people to watch his video? It certainly didn't add anything
to the body of knowledge. It was just propping in
and Putin sat there and spewed nonsense, it made no
sense whatsoever, and tried to reinvent Russian history. We all
know Russian history. It's brutal, it's bloody, it's horrible. The

(01:43:10):
Russians feel that they're always being attacked because they're always
being attacked, whether it's a Golden Horde, or it's Byzantium,
or it's Napoleon. They're always being attacked with the Nazis.
But you know what, the Russians had it coming in
some of those cases. And I forgot to mention that
the Vikings invaded and created the first Russian state, Kievan
russ was founded by the Vikings.

Speaker 2 (01:43:31):
Yep, a good looking blondes from.

Speaker 3 (01:43:35):
Yeah, well, I mean the Vikings went everywhere. They went
up and down the Visula. They were up and down
the Volga. They went to Constantinople, they formed the Vrangian Guard.
They even made it to Tunisia, North Africa. They were
in Sicily. They had kingdoms that were Viking kingdoms in Sicily.
They are the Normans. The Normans are the descendants of
Vikings who settled in the Celtic parts that were left

(01:43:56):
in France and Brittany and in Normandy. Yeah, so they
were real in Sicily.

Speaker 2 (01:44:01):
Man they were. They were getting down in the Italy
area when Rome was in power.

Speaker 3 (01:44:06):
And they were well and and and German tribes conquered Rome.
They burned Rome, they attacked and conquered it. Yep.

Speaker 2 (01:44:13):
Vikings were known for farming. They weren't just they weren't
just raiders. They were they were known for farming and
other things. So they would migrate into different parts of
the globe and basically set up home.

Speaker 3 (01:44:24):
Well they did. The Pharaohs, the Shetland Islands, the Orkneys,
the Greenland, Iceland and North America all settled and colonized
by Vikings with their own settlements. And then of course
they integrated all these other places. Yep, lots of reach.
The Vikings got all over pretty amazing, uh, there's the ambulance.
Apparently the emergency is over because it's headed back. I

(01:44:45):
don't know if the hospitals headed out there, but it's
sits the traffic light.

Speaker 2 (01:44:49):
Am I right, which you probably will.

Speaker 3 (01:44:50):
Okay, it's going to come by your right window right now.
There it goes, just went by, yep, yep.

Speaker 2 (01:44:57):
If it's going to the hospital, yeah, the hospitals down
that way.

Speaker 3 (01:45:00):
Okay, Well, it was going the other way to pick
some up lights on what maybe they treated someone. It
wasn't serious because the lights aren't on now.

Speaker 2 (01:45:09):
So yeah, that's what we do. Ladies and gentlemen. We
wonder the ambulance here on Main Street and Nashville, New
Hampshire is we're doing the show.

Speaker 3 (01:45:16):
Well, speaking of Nashua, John looks like I'll probably try
to come up that way in June sometime.

Speaker 2 (01:45:21):
Awesome, man, that'd be awesome man.

Speaker 3 (01:45:24):
All right, that's gonna do it. That's gonna do it
for this week, folks. Thanks for tuning in. Be sure
to get the like button if you're watching on social media.
If you're listening to us on the radio, which is
where we're at, tune in next week with us and
joining us for more discussion about what's happening in the
United States around the world. Common Sense, Get Service Todd
will be with us next week for John and Todd.
This is Christa's Central pensul saying stay frosty out there.