The Common Sense Conservatives

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:01):
Welcome to the Common Sense Conservatives, a political discussion group
about current events and other government related matters every Wednesday
evening from seven to eight pm right here on WUSMN
fifteen ninety AM, WUSMN ninety five point three FM and
streaming live on WUSMN dot Live. Making sense of the
inverted reality we are subject to every day, The Common

(00:24):
Sense Conservatives like here to help bring you back to reality. Now,
your hosts, Chris Wyatt, Todd McKinley.

Speaker 2 (00:30):
And John Golovin. Hello everybody, and welcome to the Common
Sense Conservatives. Gentlemen. I have been a little bit under
the weather today, so we're going to see how this
show goes. But it is my lead tonight, and so
for so far my voice is holding up. So with
that being said, Todd, how are you doing over there
in Tennessee?

Speaker 3 (00:47):
Oh, not bad. John, just hanging in here, just making
it happen.

Speaker 4 (00:51):
Man.

Speaker 3 (00:51):
Just getting into some different podcasts these days. That's what
I'm working on, trying to find podcasts that I haven't
listened to. That's about it at the moment.

Speaker 2 (01:00):
Oh, you're branching out a little bit, trying to get
more acquainted with what's out there. Yeah, that's that's actually
go ahead.

Speaker 3 (01:06):
I'm actually listening to a few things that are on
the left just to kind of see what they're talking about.
You know, it's like, you know, you always hear the
same same mold echo chamber, you know, what's going on
on the right. I'm like, well, what the heck are
they talking about? So I'm listening to some of that stuff,
So just to kind of know what your enemy's talking about.

Speaker 2 (01:22):
I guess right, Oh yeah, absolutely, man. I follow people
on Facebook, you know, are our US senators and representatives
here in New Hampshire, so that I could see the
stuff they say. I'll keep it clean and say it
like that instead of making light of them. But sometimes
they do say some things that make me kind wonder
what they're thinking, you know, like passing complaining about Trump

(01:44):
and what Trump is doing. I'm like, what are you
going to do about it? I mean, you're not in
a position to stop him. So if you're just saying
it on Facebook, you're whining about it, it's not going anywhere.
But uh, you think there'd be more important matters they
could be talking about. But at the same time, Chris,
all things going to Pennsylvania better.

Speaker 4 (01:59):
Than going in D We see, we just had the
House representatives betray America and leave his vulnerable to nuclear
attack by voting to pass with four Republican betrayers with
the Democrats to pass the War Powers Resolution to force
the President to withdraw US troops from Middle East.

Speaker 5 (02:13):
So better than DC.

Speaker 2 (02:16):
So they're trying to force Trump out of Iran? Is
that what you're trying to say?

Speaker 5 (02:20):
Yep, exactly, So not a surprise, not a surprise.

Speaker 3 (02:24):
So you say it passed the House? Is that what
you're saying? And of course onto the Senate or what
are we looking at now?

Speaker 4 (02:30):
Six minutes before we went live at two fifteen to
two eight vote to rebuke to President Trump and his
policy for Iran. So it will now go to the Senate.
But they have I think, fifteen days in order to
vote on this. If they don't, then it falls, so
hold it off fifteen days, then it disappears. I don't
know if the President has the authority to veto it.
You would think he would, but I don't know how Allegedly.

(02:51):
I think the legislation's unconstitutional, and I've always said that,
so it will set up a legal challenge and Trump
is not going to take the troops out of there, no.

Speaker 2 (02:59):
No resolution. I don't think he gets to I don't
think he goes to his desk if I'm not miss
unless I'm mistaken.

Speaker 4 (03:07):
Well, how can you sign a law into existence when
the Constitution gives executive branch to be to any law
that Congress passes. How can that be constitutionals? So that
that's what I'm saying. So I think this is setting
up a potential mess. Uh, it's gonna be legal one
but anyway, bottom line, Trump is not going to take
troops out of there.

Speaker 3 (03:23):
Right yeah? What could it be a situation where it
allows Congress not to fund troops over there, forcing him
to bring them back or something like that maybe, or
or just a wait and see.

Speaker 4 (03:33):
Well that's the way they normally control things for the
for the purse strings. But I mean, it's so easy
to use existing funds for operations that it may be frustrating,
but it won't stop him from doing he needs to.

Speaker 3 (03:44):
Do, right, right, yeah, moving it from different funds or whatever,
and then of course tell Congress, well you have to
fund this over here.

Speaker 5 (03:51):
Right Yeah. I look, this is is not really not
really good.

Speaker 4 (03:57):
It's it's it's This shows dissension in America, and it
just encourages the Iranian theocracy terrorists to continue to do
what they're doing because, as far as they can see,
the America's in disarray and they're not going to fight against us.
We need unity at times like this, And of course
the Democrats erupted in applause and joy. They are so
mentally deranged in their hatred of Donald Trump that they

(04:17):
will destroy this country just to get Donald Trump.

Speaker 5 (04:20):
It's just disgraceful.

Speaker 2 (04:21):
So to answer the question, Chris, you got joint resolution,
concurrent resolution, and simple resolutions. The simple resolution can and
concurrent resolution both do not require the presidential signature. However,
those do not become law. Those are probably for the
purpose like policy within.

Speaker 5 (04:34):
The Their resolutions are not last, yes, they're not built.

Speaker 2 (04:37):
Joint resolutions, on the other hand, do require the presidential signature,
and this must be what we're talking about.

Speaker 4 (04:44):
I don't know the full text of the nineteen seventy
three War Powers Act, but what I've read of it,
it's always struck me as unconstitutional.

Speaker 5 (04:52):
So we'll have to see. But again, Trump is not
going to withdraw.

Speaker 4 (04:56):
But the problem is that if he doesn't do that
then he looks like he's running rogue and this sets
up problems for Republicans running in the fall.

Speaker 3 (05:02):
Right yeah, So if he does withdrawal, he can twist
it and say, hey, now all of a sudden, the
ron is going to be new clear and it's a Democrats.
So now all of a sudden, Uh, Democrats are basically
going to have to answer for the kurfuff. Well not
not Trump at this point. Right.

Speaker 4 (05:17):
Well, look, it's it's just this is just not good.
I mean, we need country to be together, and it's
not the case.

Speaker 2 (05:24):
Oh we've we've we haven't been there in a long time.

Speaker 3 (05:27):
Right yeah, but but right now the forces are vulnerable
right now out there, especially you know, who knows what
could pop off and and you know, if they decided
to do some massive drone strike, missile strike something like that,
you can bet American service members and our allies, whoever
they may be, could could be potentially harmed or killed, uh,
and something like that. That's why you need to fund them.
Why they're there for crying out loud, debate, debate the

(05:48):
issue here on Capitol Hill, debate it during your campaigns
or whatever. But you got to fund and back them
for crying a lot. If not, you're leading lambs to
the slaughter here.

Speaker 4 (05:56):
So this, this answers my point right here, this this
paragrapher here. Congress has historically deployed concurrent resolutions to express
its position on an issue without requiring presidential approval because
it's resolution. The Supreme Court in nineteen eighty three held
that in order for congressional action to have binding legal effect,
which is what I just stated, they must go through
the standard legislative process, including being presented to the President
to be signed in law, at which point he can

(06:18):
veto it. They need two third signatures and both bodies.

Speaker 5 (06:21):
Over at his veto.

Speaker 4 (06:22):
There's no way that they will get two third signatures
in the House or seven. So this is more effort
to divide this country and show dissension here while we've
got these theocrats murdering people left and right in Iran.

Speaker 5 (06:35):
And this is beyond frustrating for me.

Speaker 4 (06:38):
These people hate America so much, they should be focused
on ending this nuclear threat. They are so stupid they
do not understand how close Iran has been. And it
doesn't take an intercontinentilistic missile to reach America. It takes
a cargo ship, a container ship with a nuclear device
inside it. Didn't we see this movie the Sum of
All fears? The worst talking came through the paintings.

Speaker 5 (07:00):
That's right, the worst.

Speaker 4 (07:01):
Freaking Tom Clancy movie ever with with what's his name there? Yeah,
not exactly the best Jack Ryan to say. At least
their beneflect wasn't.

Speaker 2 (07:08):
I think. I think there's still thing is regular. There's
still such thing as dirty bombs too, right, Like suitcase.

Speaker 5 (07:14):
That's that's what that was. That's you gotta watch. You've
got to watch the movies.

Speaker 3 (07:20):
Something.

Speaker 5 (07:21):
Can you believe he hasn't watched that terrible movie? Now?

Speaker 3 (07:24):
Terrible? But what I like about it because at the
beginning they're they're doing a training exercise at Mountweather. I'm like,
I've been there, been there many times, many exercises, many
classes up at Mountweather.

Speaker 2 (07:36):
Uh.

Speaker 3 (07:36):
And also the nay I'm like, I've been on the
nay many times. Yeah, that's cool, they got that right,
you know. I love it. So that's why I love
the movie. But also I love it Ryan. Shoot him,
shoot him before he figures out what I'm talking about, Ryan,
you know.

Speaker 4 (07:51):
Yeah, like it was Look, I'm sorry, beneflec is is
Jack Ryan.

Speaker 5 (07:55):
It wasn't biable.

Speaker 4 (07:56):
No, doesn't the missions the guy who does it now
for whatever the things are that used to be in
the office whatever. Yeah, I can't watch that, but he's
much more believable than than Beneflex was. Look, I mean,
Harrison Ford is a leftist whacked doodle, but Harrison Ford
is Jack Ryan. Sorry, although I must say that, I
must say that the one time he's actually a good actor.

Speaker 5 (08:17):
What's his name there?

Speaker 4 (08:18):
You know, the guy who murdered the the the person
the prop gun there.

Speaker 5 (08:23):
Ali. Yeah, he did a great job with Great October.
That was fantastic. Was a great Jack Ryan in that one. Yep.

Speaker 3 (08:32):
And of course the adversarya was Sean Connery, so that
also made it great too.

Speaker 5 (08:36):
So yeah, made the.

Speaker 3 (08:37):
Russians palatable by having Sean Connery isn't Russian.

Speaker 4 (08:40):
Sean Connery is in a strange Estonian submarine commander was
a very interesting cast.

Speaker 3 (08:45):
Yeah don't.

Speaker 5 (08:48):
That's right?

Speaker 4 (08:48):
Yeah, but seriously, look, this is going nowhere. All it
does is show dissension, and it gives the media fodder
for how America is divided when we're not divided. The
Democrats don't represent America at best. The represent one and
of that one third, half of those people are.

Speaker 5 (09:02):
The lunatic fringe. It's quite obvious. I mean, you know.

Speaker 4 (09:05):
So George Floyd spends forty five minutes disobeying the orders
of police officers to exit his vehicle after passing counterfeit
currency in a shop. That's why they're called the other
black man in the vehicle. When the police asked him
that next to the vehicle, Dena hunts up, he did so.

Speaker 5 (09:19):
He walked away that day.

Speaker 4 (09:20):
But George Floyd, high on fentanyl, was obstructionist with the cops.
He came out an Hispanic, an Asian, and a white
officer president the scene, and they called it white supremacy
because he died. The autopsy from the corner says the
cause of death was not a choke hold. The cause
of death was a fentanyl overdose. That's why he died. Yet,

(09:41):
Derek Chauvin sits in prison and America was burned left
and right by a bunch of radical black supremacists and
racists in this country who are white. Meanwhile, Daniel Penny
is false arrested for saving people's lives on the New
York subway. We have Donald Trump nearly murdered. We have
this Ukrainian refugee stab by a black murderer. We have

(10:01):
all these race related since where white Americans are the
victims of these crimes. Now we have the situation in
England where that guy was stabbed in the cops stood around,
let him bleed to death. All of this and are
our city's burning. Are people destroying public infrastructure? No, white
lives just don't matter. That's the bottom line, right, because we're.

Speaker 2 (10:22):
Not destroying public infrastructure.

Speaker 3 (10:26):
So real quick, I want to shift gears, and I
know I'm not the lead. Here are you guys watching
the election in California? The gubernatory election and the LA elections?

Speaker 4 (10:35):
Oh do you be the one where it's now almost
twenty one hours since the polls have closed, the only
have fifty two percent of the vote counted while they're
busy faking ballots in the background so they can steal
the election for Tom Steier and push Steve Hilton from
first to third.

Speaker 5 (10:50):
Oh that election, Yes, I'm watching that, Todd right.

Speaker 3 (10:53):
You know what's so funny is and I was watching
how many people Florida have, how many ballots or cast
in Florida and how almost you know, I don't say instantaneously,
but within minutes to an hour or so after Pol's closing.
You have results in Florida, many millions of ballots. But California,
what they do? They wait? And I heard it on
it It was a New LA reporter today said, Oh,

(11:14):
you know, reason is, we have just so many voters,
so it just takes a while to vote count the votes.
You know, nothing to be get alarmed about. I'm like,
there is something to be alarmed about. They want to
know how many votes that they need to manufacture, Like
you just said, that's why it's alarming that they haven't
got them counted well.

Speaker 5 (11:27):
And I've just got an update.

Speaker 4 (11:28):
It went to fifty five percent of the votes and
Steve Hilton has lost zero point two percent of the
vote Besarah gain point one is Tom started game point
one to catch up to him. It's top two finishers
go on to the November election, regardless of party. And
right now, Steve Hilton has a four hundred thousand vote
that should be insurmountable based on the number of votes left.

(11:49):
That's over Tom Steinron third place over Xavier Bessera. He
has one hundred and seven thousand. That was a lead
that Besara had sixty eighty thousand lead on Hilton last
night with twenty seven percent of the voting, and Hilton surpassed
him as the vote came in from the Pacific Coast districts.
He was close enough it closed the gap, and then
he passed him overnight, and now he's ahead by one

(12:10):
hundred and seven thousand votes. Now, remember that Donald Trump
on election Night in twenty twenty was seven hundred and
sixty seven thousand votes ahead of Joe Biden in Pennsylvania.
They shut the county down and magically, the next day
that seven hundred and sixty seven thousand vote was gone
and Trump was trailing by two hundred plus thousand votes.

(12:32):
That means nine hundred thousand votes changed overnight. Now they
claimed that was from the mail in ballots, but the
number of mail in ballots weren't sufficient to match that change.

Speaker 5 (12:41):
When Pennsylvania was stolen.

Speaker 3 (12:43):
Right, and that was stolen a point blank, I mean,
how do you come back from seven hundred and some
thousand down. There's nothing many ballots that are out there.

Speaker 5 (12:52):
You know.

Speaker 3 (12:52):
At the same time, a number of those ballots would
likely have gone to Trump anyway, just by basic math.

Speaker 5 (12:58):
Right.

Speaker 4 (12:59):
Well, the deal was that, as I recall, it was
like thirty seven percent of those who asked for mail
and ballot were register Republicans and I think like fifty
something were Democrats, so the rest were independents. The thing
is is that in order for that to change, the
numbers of votes would have had to be one point two
million votes. That's shifted. There's just no way. It's just

(13:19):
insane what happened there. And then they.

Speaker 5 (13:22):
Said, well, you know Trump lost all the cases. No,
Trump didn't have any cases.

Speaker 4 (13:25):
Those are cases filed by the Republican Party and others,
and the court illigently said they didn't have standing and
that's how those cases were dismissed.

Speaker 5 (13:33):
So it's just it's unbelievable. I'm just looking up a
psidential vote totals.

Speaker 3 (13:37):
Right, Yeah, So basically you're you're saying that they didn't
say that there was nothing going on here. Basically, you
just they said they didn't have standing to bring the
case anyway. They didn't rule on anything.

Speaker 5 (13:48):
No, they dismissed the case.

Speaker 4 (13:49):
All those cases, not because there was no merit to them,
because they said they understaying.

Speaker 5 (13:53):
So Trump lost the election by less.

Speaker 4 (13:57):
Than one hundred thousand votes three million, four and five
fifty eight thousand, the three many, three hundred and seventy
seven thousand. Now that is out of six less than
seven million ballots casts. Well there were, there was a
shift of over one point two million ballots overnight.

Speaker 5 (14:13):
That's impossible. That would have meant that Joe Biden got
over eighty nine.

Speaker 4 (14:16):
Percent of all the mail in ballots when thirty percent
of the voters are Republican, ostensibly the majority of them
going to vote for Trump.

Speaker 5 (14:23):
That's just the way things go. But this was clearly
an election.

Speaker 4 (14:26):
And guess who the the attorney general was in twenty
twenty one.

Speaker 3 (14:30):
Guess, oh is that er? What was it? Besara?

Speaker 2 (14:35):
Was he?

Speaker 5 (14:36):
Who?

Speaker 4 (14:36):
No, no, no, it's Pennsylvania Josha Oh yeah, Shapiro, Yeah, yeah, yeah,
the current who is now the governor.

Speaker 5 (14:42):
He's now the governor.

Speaker 4 (14:43):
We had jos Shapiro, had Kelly Buchfar with Secretary of State,
and we had Tom Wolfe, who was the corrupt governor
of the same man that got thousands of our elderly parents, grandparents, aunts,
and uncles dead because he stuck COVID positive patients in
our nursing homes killing over eighty ninety thousand senior citizens
in the state.

Speaker 5 (15:00):
He's yet to be called account for his crimes. That's
why I ran for the legislature.

Speaker 4 (15:03):
I was going to introduce legislation and make sure the
press heard about it, to strip him.

Speaker 5 (15:06):
Of his immunity and make him pay for culpable manslaughter.

Speaker 3 (15:11):
Anyway, right, absolutely, so, one of the viewers here says,
does does it's alleged that Iran has already has a
nuclear weapon?

Speaker 5 (15:21):
What?

Speaker 3 (15:21):
What do you what do you think about that? Do
you think they already have weapons or weapons capability?

Speaker 5 (15:25):
They're close. I don't know if they have one, but
they're very close.

Speaker 3 (15:29):
Okay, gotcha. Let's see here. Also, somebody's asking about the
new d N. I if there's any thoughts, you have
any thoughts on that intelligence.

Speaker 5 (15:39):
Or or you want to hold off now I can
talk about that.

Speaker 4 (15:42):
I mean, it's it's it's John's show, but he's learned
of the weather. So I'll let you rote with this.

Speaker 5 (15:45):
I mean, if John's okay with it, I listen. I'm
happy to wait on that.

Speaker 4 (15:49):
You know, I've said for a long time that Telsey
Gabber was ill equipped and not the right person to
be the Director of National Intelligence. Never let she never
led a team of more than four people on the
civil affairs team.

Speaker 5 (15:59):
I mean nothing. She's run a corporation.

Speaker 4 (16:01):
She's never been a battalion commander or a division commander.
Never never run anything, just been you know, elected office
from Hawaii and ran a soil affairs I'm embellosing slightly,
but that's pretty much just no background whatsoever the intelligence community,
no background in leadership of strategic organizations. Yet she was
appointed to position, and I think we've seen some staff
foods and intelligence community that could have been avoided. Although

(16:22):
she's done a fair job, I'll give her credit. Now,
this guy who works in housing, he's coming in to
be the DNI, has no experience at this level. We're
talking about a global workforce of tens of thousands of people,
including clandestine services, and tens of billions one hundred billion
dollars almost hundred dollars year in revenue or expenditures. And

(16:43):
this is a force that works with intelligence. This is
this guy is ill equipped to do this. Look, I'm
not the person that says you have to be an
expert in something. I've said this before. My example is
always is going back to IBM and when John Akers
was replaced by lou Gersner. Lou Gersler came in the
early nineteen nineties and took over IBM. When he took over,
the people who didn't know much about lu Gershner, and
I wasn't one of them, because I studied lu Gershner

(17:05):
as a young man. He was at American Express as
vice president. Brilliant guy did a lot there to increase
revenue of transition from a charge card company to a
credit card company as well. And then he went to
RGR and Abisco and he ran then the Bisco the
food section there with no experience the food industry, and
he made it profitable. After that ridiculous KKR co co
Cravits and Roberts you know, leveraged buyout and he did

(17:27):
amazing work with both of them.

Speaker 5 (17:28):
He was brought an IBM with.

Speaker 4 (17:29):
No IT experience whatsoever. He probably knew how to turn
on a computer, that was it. People said this is
a disaster frive M.

Speaker 5 (17:35):
I said, no, it's not. This is a leader who.

Speaker 4 (17:38):
Understands he doesn't have to have the experience. He will
get that as he goes forward. He needs smart people
around him and he knows how to pick the right people.
And that's exactly look at today. IBM now is training.
Back then it was training for like you know, the
equivalent a split base about seven dollars a share, maybe
eight ten dollars share. Now it's at three hundred and
twenty seven dollars a share. The company is amazing, and

(18:00):
there's been Sam Palmsino came after him, and then they
had a couple now an Indian guy there. Anyway, the
point is that you don't have to be a subs
matter expert to be successful. This guy, I'm not convinced
has any of the skills to make the intelligence community work.
Making intelligi committy work is not like making IBM work.
It's not like making caterpillar work. It's not like me,
you know, rescuing you know, Papa John's or something like that.

(18:22):
This is very different, very different, and I don't think
he has the gravitaster skills do it. I'm very concerned
about our National Intelligence Committee now, and I think the
CIA will revert back to its role when the Director
of Central Intelligence was technically in charge all the intelligence
Commute but didn't really run it, and they'll just do
their own damn thing.

Speaker 5 (18:38):
I look for the CIA to go rogue. Now that's
just my thoughts.

Speaker 3 (18:41):
No, wow, there you go. Yeah, back in the day,
you had what it's called a DCI Director of Central
Intelligence who was also the director of the Central Intelligence Agency.
So it's all had it essentially, and that's.

Speaker 5 (18:51):
Under the nineteen forty seven National Defense.

Speaker 3 (18:53):
Act that yeah, yeah, correct, created the Air Force.

Speaker 4 (18:58):
Yeah, it sure did. And then that was the premise
for creating the National Security Agency in.

Speaker 5 (19:02):
Nineteen fifty two.

Speaker 3 (19:04):
Right, good deal.

Speaker 4 (19:05):
So I don't think that this is a good choice,
but I'm happy to be proven wrong because our national
security matters.

Speaker 5 (19:10):
So I hope I'm wrong.

Speaker 3 (19:13):
Now for sure. John, How are you doing there? You're
doing okay?

Speaker 2 (19:16):
Yeah, man, I'm doing I'm doing all right, you know,
hold my own and but yeah, you guys got stuff
to talk about. It's fine if you roll with things.
I mean, you get a good role going and stuff
and all. I mean, I'm learning things from you right now.

Speaker 3 (19:27):
So yeah, So here's something that I've also been seeing
on some of these podcasts. Again, you know, some of
it's news clips some of us you know, lefty news whatever,
And I just like to know what to talk about
Trump's health as a concern. What are you what are
your thoughts on his health? I think he's had four
physicals this year already, which I mean you had a
certain age in a high pressure job. I mean, hey,

(19:48):
let's keep an eye on him for sure, make sure
he's okay. What do you think they're making hay out
of nothing or you know they're exaggerating his health concerns.

Speaker 4 (19:57):
What do you think, of course they're exaggerating. I mean,
the guy has got more energy than thirty five year olds.

Speaker 5 (20:02):
He's like the energizer bunny. Listen.

Speaker 4 (20:06):
He's eighty years old in eleven days, eleven days, and
he maintains a pace that most people could even couldn't
hold a candle to. He can walk up a flight
of stairs to get on and down a flight of
stairs get off of the Air Force one. Unlike Joe Biden,
he doesn't need a teleprompter. He doesn't step on the
wrong spot. Even though six inches of tape mark an
X where he's supposed to stand. He knows where he's

(20:27):
supposed to stand. There's no tape for Trump.

Speaker 5 (20:29):
Listen. You know, has he dozed off in a few meetings? Yeah?
Have I dozed off few meetings.

Speaker 4 (20:33):
Yeah, yeah, even my thirties, I dozed off because some
people are just boring anyway, But.

Speaker 5 (20:40):
This is all nonsense. This is all nonsense.

Speaker 4 (20:43):
If it isn't Rush a collusion, it's his health. They
try the crap at the same time. Round, what Trump
does need to do is loose some weight. That's one
thing he has to do. But I need loose some
weight too, So I'm much to speak. But the bottom
line is that this is nonsense. You know, Trump is
healthier than Biden was. He's probably don't.

Speaker 5 (21:01):
I don't know. He's healthier than Obama, but that's it
might have been because Obama.

Speaker 4 (21:05):
Clandestinely still smoked that nasty, disgusting habit that he had,
So so.

Speaker 5 (21:10):
He's not as healthy as George Bush was.

Speaker 4 (21:12):
But George Bush was sure. He was thirty years as junior.
He was in his fifties when he's president.

Speaker 5 (21:17):
So anyway, this is nonsense.

Speaker 3 (21:20):
Yeah Bush forty three w Bush he ran and he
rode a mountain bike like a son of a gun,
and down in Crawford. He forget what the club was called,
something like the something about one hundred degrees whatever. It
had to be over one hundred degrees for so many days,
and you can go out biking or running with him
or whatever, and he'd have you out there and he'd
give you a T shirt and all this stuff afterwards.
And everybody that I worked with came back every time

(21:43):
with something, you know, and I'm like, son of a gun,
I'm like, I don't travel for the president, so I
can't go down there and do that. You know, like, well,
maybe you can get the vice president to go down there.
You could run out there and do that. I'm like,
I don't think that's going to happen. I don't think
Cheney likes hot weather like that, so that'll never happen.

Speaker 4 (21:57):
So yeah, yeah, no, it's uh, look, it's all just
nonsense with with this thing with Trump's health. I mean,
you should expect there should be some issues. The concern
he has to be cognitive issues. Ronald Reagan was younger
and was already suffer from Alzheimer's right in his last
two years of a second term.

Speaker 5 (22:16):
Trump is nowhere near that. Now.

Speaker 4 (22:18):
Trump's administration spans twelve years. Even though it's just two terms,
twelve years, we are now in the year ten, and
he's sharp as attack, you know, Reagan wasn't there after
six years at a younger age because his brain was
failing him. Joe Biden's brain failed him the moment he
became a center in nineteen seventy two. So you know,
he had a much longer period of cognitive stupidity.

Speaker 3 (22:40):
Yeah, so it was just normal for Joe Biden. They're like, no,
that's just Joe. He's not no cognitive cline. It's him.

Speaker 5 (22:46):
And look how they covered it up.

Speaker 4 (22:48):
You know, there's nothing wrong with the president. He didn't
even sign the damn documents. They're all being declared illegal,
null and void. These parts are going to go wiped
out because an auto pen signed it.

Speaker 3 (22:56):
The guy had no idea.

Speaker 4 (22:57):
Who is that?

Speaker 5 (22:57):
You know? I mean, I love the stories about you know,
Corn pop Man.

Speaker 3 (23:00):
He was a bad dude.

Speaker 5 (23:02):
Yeah, no, little black kids used to play with the
hairs of my leg.

Speaker 3 (23:06):
Yeah.

Speaker 5 (23:07):
You know, you can go to.

Speaker 4 (23:08):
Seven eleven in Delaware unless you have a slight Indian accent.
Oh that's not racist, No, no, I guess Yeah.

Speaker 3 (23:16):
Anyway, Yeah, I remember riding uh the what is it,
I don't know if he is he a cello or whatever? Right,
riding the train basically out the Delaware up the door
and him reading classified documents, and it's like, here we are.
It's myself, the mile aid, and of course the physician
and the nurse traveling trying to create a buffer around him,

(23:38):
trying to create distance between the other passengers who are
all looking over the shoulder. What's he reading now? Mind you,
if they had a camera like I have here in
my hand, an iPhone fourteen or whatever that we have
now seventeen's, they'd be able to zoom right in. But
back then it was a little quick, crappy flipbones. So
I was tasked by the melee just kind of stand
up behind him to block people being able to read
documents as he's reading them, and I'm like, can you

(23:59):
not tell him just put them down? He's like, I've
asked him to, and he goes and he said, quote,
these are all friends of mine on here. It's not
a big deal. And I'm like, son of a gun
reading classified documents and he said that.

Speaker 5 (24:11):
So yeah, a lot of that guy is just a clown.
You know.

Speaker 4 (24:14):
Here's what we were talking about California earlier. I just
want to go back there very quickly. Here, so they're
doing exactly what they said. Last night the leftist news
outlets were moaning that they.

Speaker 5 (24:24):
Had to find votes.

Speaker 4 (24:25):
Remember that Trump, they got to find votes, and they
called him a criminal because well, they are finding the votes.
In Los Angeles Karen Bass, who last night was leading
thirty four to Spencer Pratt with thirty one point seven
or something like that, close when they had fifty percent.
Now we're sixty three percent of the vote. And look
at the shift here, she's at thirty five percent. Now
she's gone up and Nitha Rahman has also gone up.

(24:47):
So this is going to be run off of the
top two finished with Spencer Pratt gone from thirty one
percent down to twenty nine point nine and the gap
is closed to just thirty seven thout less than thirty
seven thousand votes between. I don't think she's overtake him,
but the Democrats are busy, I don't know, filling out
forms or filling out ballots or whatever they do in
stuffing box right now they're trying to five the votes.

(25:07):
It is disgraceful that a day later we're only a
sixty three percent of those count in Los Angeles. How
is this possible? How do we have third world countries?
In Africa that don't have electricity. They have more secure,
more reliable, and quicker results from their elections than we
can get from the state of California.

Speaker 5 (25:23):
It shows you just how badly democrats.

Speaker 4 (25:25):
We didn't have these problems in nineteen eighty when Republicans
ran in the state, nineteen eighty four when Reagan won
the state, when nineteen eighty eight, when George Bush Senior.

Speaker 5 (25:33):
Won the state.

Speaker 4 (25:34):
These problems started when Democrats took over the state in
their earlyineteen nineties, and they've gotten worse.

Speaker 5 (25:38):
It's embarrassing.

Speaker 4 (25:39):
The Third world is better equipped to handle elections than California.

Speaker 2 (25:44):
I think most elections they win, they're accounting votes, especially
in a federal election. It does take days to actually
make the count, but they call it because they're reaching
a point that you're shaking your head. No, Chris, evidently
I'm on the wrong path there.

Speaker 4 (26:00):
No, No, I get what you're saying, county votes, but no,
this is precincts reporting in. Only sixty three percent of
the precincts have reported in. That's the problem. How are
precincts not reporting their vote totals in? You know, you're right,
it does take days account absentee ballots. But it's been
complicated by this fraudulent mail in ballot garbage. But the
point here is that this is easily achieved. If a

(26:22):
country that has no electricity and is in a desert
can do this the next day, why can California not
do it?

Speaker 5 (26:29):
Because it's corrupt. All process is corrupted.

Speaker 2 (26:31):
Yeah, no, you make a point there. I mean, if
the precincts aren't reporting in by now, they should already
have their tellies oh that evening. So yeah, they should
have already made their reports, and it's just a matter
of the state doing its thing.

Speaker 4 (26:44):
Yeah, one hundred percent. Now, I wasn't disagreeing with you.
I'm just shaking my head, like I can't believe that
they can't get this done. That was my shaking my
head there.

Speaker 2 (26:50):
Oh right.

Speaker 3 (26:51):
Also, Republicans defy Johnson to advance Democrat back Ukraine aid
I guess. There was a two eighteen to two h
four vote, So they're going to send an AID I
guess to Ukraine. That happened today as well anywhere.

Speaker 2 (27:05):
So I did want to get you on something else, Chris.
I'm looking at a lot of people complaining about this one.
I see this on social media, and this would be
more I think you can answer this better than I
or Todd could. Obviously, is the Israeli Military Integration or
the NDAA they're working on now, and so it looks

(27:26):
like it involves a lot of technology and resources and
stuff that we're integrating a lot of Israel with the
United States, and there are a lot of people having issues
with it. Some of those were listed as section two
two four would acquire the US Defense Secretary to appoint
an executive asion, a single official according military cooperation between
the US and Israel that isn't so much like an issue.
The work would cover joint research and development, the share

(27:48):
production of weapons, and the linking of military systems and data,
and a concern of the new section of the law
in the National Defense Authorization Act would give Israel unprecedented
access to American technology and what force the United States
military to integrate israel defense technologies into our own critical
military supply chain, given Israel incredible leverage over America's own

(28:10):
defense defense priorities. Now, before you go off complete in total,
I'll tell you that was Josh Paul they were quoting
on that one.

Speaker 4 (28:17):
So okay, So first off, The problem I had with
this is the misrepresentation not by you, but by the
media what the term means.

Speaker 5 (28:25):
They're using integration.

Speaker 4 (28:26):
What was reported the media is that US and Israeli
militaryes are integrating.

Speaker 5 (28:30):
They're not.

Speaker 4 (28:32):
We're not subjecting the eighty second Airborne the eighteenth air
Airborne Corps to working.

Speaker 5 (28:37):
Through Israeli defense structures. That is not happening. The misuse
of the term integration.

Speaker 4 (28:41):
What it is is defense cooperation in the technological sector.

Speaker 5 (28:45):
Now they're concerned about Israel having leverage over us.

Speaker 4 (28:47):
Have they noticed that ninety percent of the microprocessors that
go in this Stell fighter come from Taiwan. You want
to talk about leverage over our country Taiwan. Without Taiwan
and Japan.

Speaker 5 (28:58):
We couldn't fly our advanced stell fighters or launched many
of our missiles because we've outsourced all of our microprocessors
to those countries. There are exceptions PCs, you know, and
graphics cards.

Speaker 4 (29:08):
Now, but the things that we rely on for the
zero point and for the location for the precision bombing
come from Timewan.

Speaker 5 (29:16):
They're worried about Israel having leverage over us. What a joke.

Speaker 4 (29:19):
That is an absolute joke, Yes, will have cooperation. I
think people are ignorant the fact that we didn't have
UAVs drones. That technology came from Israel. I know because
I was there on the ground floor in nineteen eighty
nine nineteen ninety when we were building the Pioneer at
Fortwo chuk Arizona and doing it with advice and expertise

(29:41):
and assistance from the IDF, because they have been using
drones starting in the nineteen seventies, testing and using the eighties,
so this has been going on for decades. This is
to me a red herring. It's something to pay attention to,
but it's not what they're making out to be. They're
making it out to be as if we're going to
be tied to Israel. We are not tied to Israel.

Speaker 5 (29:58):
We are more.

Speaker 4 (29:59):
Tied and dependent on Taiwan and Japan than we are
at Israel, and that's not going to change anytime soon.

Speaker 5 (30:04):
So that's my take on it.

Speaker 4 (30:06):
I think this is a lot of people stirring upot
not knowing what they're talking about. There is legitimate concerns here,
but there's bigger concerns about being dependent on Canada and
Taiwan and Japan for example.

Speaker 2 (30:18):
Yeah, No, I definitely see a lot of coming from
uh what do we call these now these I call
it from the turncoat media. But I see people that
follow the sort of rhetoric and now all of a
suddenly they're they're, you know, bellowing on social media about
how they're selling us out to Israel. I'm so sick
and tired of hearing, because they're not selling us out

(30:38):
to Israel. Israel has no control of the president. The
President's not wrapped around his little finger. In fact, if
I'm not mistaken, the President of the United States of
America just recently said that not in Yahoo is f
dash dash dash dash dash dash crazy. So I mean,
in fact, pretty much chewed the guy out.

Speaker 5 (30:58):
He told him that it's telephone call.

Speaker 2 (31:00):
Yes, chewed them up in more ways than one during
the whole conversation. Wasn't just that there was other things
going on where Nettan Yah who was I mean, do
you think that net and Yah who kind of gets
us into trouble because of our policies and stuff, that
he's dragging us into circumstances, or do you think that
nat Yahoo just is kind of getting a little off
the edge and going places he shouldn't be going, because

(31:21):
evidently Trump wasn't happy with them all regarding such matters.

Speaker 4 (31:24):
As has Bla well, the reason he was unhappy is
because the Israelers are defending themselves and it's allowing Iran
to have an excuse to murder civilians in Kuwait and
in the AE in places like that, then once again
violating the seas far Just bomb the stotup. Enough of this,
I'm done with it. It's time Seal Team six dealt the force.
Drop them in, round these clowns up, put them on

(31:46):
the little black helicopters, fly them out, and let's have
some war crimes trials in the meantime. Bomb the living
daylights out of the IRGC and just get this over with.

Speaker 5 (31:55):
Just get this over.

Speaker 4 (31:56):
Land on carg Island, take over the facility, shut down
the oil production net, exportation, and this theocracy will starve
death in a matter of days. I Rair Banks and
take all the dollars that are hidden in their basement
out of there, take them back.

Speaker 2 (32:08):
I think what people don't realize is Iran just bombed
a Kuwaiti airport.

Speaker 5 (32:15):
The airport, the airport in Kuwait City. Yes, yeah, and
murdered a civilian.

Speaker 2 (32:19):
Yes, people died and sixty three people were injured. This
is a violation of international law. You're not supposed to
be bombing citizens are populated areas.

Speaker 4 (32:31):
That is not legitimate military target. There are no US
military aircraft flying from there. It's not being used to
attack Iran. This is This is a rogue state. And
the fact that members of Congress side with them, this
is disgusting. These are the same people who probably thought
it was appropriate for things like affirmative action, a racist
piece of legislation that discriminated against majority Americans and led

(32:53):
to decades of acrimony, racial acrimony, and led to decades
of failure by those who profited from it, most who
were prepared to go to university or take on garbage jobs,
or handed to them that they weren't qualified for all
the name of fixing a pass wrong. You don't fix
pass wrongs with present and future wrongs. You fix pass
wrongs by putting resources to correct the deficiency that's been

(33:14):
there forever. That's what you do. You do not give
people artificial vantage. And it's the same thing here. These
people do not care about America. They will try to
hamper the administration from stopping a war that Iran started.

Speaker 5 (33:27):
In nineteen seventy nine.

Speaker 4 (33:29):
Which Carter ignored, Reagan ignored, Bush ignored, Clinton ignored, Bush ignored,
Obama ignored.

Speaker 5 (33:36):
Trump ignored. Not so much. He did go after an
a little bit, Biden ignored.

Speaker 4 (33:40):
And now here we are, nearly five decades later, finally
returning fire against a rogue regime which is murdered thousands
of American service members and civilians and sponsored chaos and
carnage in Lebanon with Hesbelah, in.

Speaker 5 (33:54):
Gazua and with Hamas, and in Yemen with the Hooties.
At a minimum.

Speaker 4 (33:59):
It is time for these people to be removed from
humanity because they're anti human.

Speaker 5 (34:04):
And enough of this pussy funny. I'm done with it.

Speaker 4 (34:06):
Trump, start launch right now. Where's the button? Push the button,
Give me the button, give me the button. Who's got
the football?

Speaker 3 (34:13):
That was football?

Speaker 2 (34:14):
That would be you. Who's got the football?

Speaker 5 (34:17):
Bro?

Speaker 3 (34:18):
You must know I'm a middle aid somewhere.

Speaker 5 (34:22):
I think I left it in the Starbucks.

Speaker 3 (34:24):
No right, yeah, no, But anyway, the Senate people were
talking about in the comments here, obviously one hundred members
majority is fifty three that's Republicans, fifty Republicans, forty seven.
In the minority, it's forty five Dems, two independents, and
over in the House there's a majority of two eighteen,
two seventeen Republicans, one independent causes with the Republicans, and
then two hundred and twelve Dems and five vacancies in

(34:47):
the House as of right now. So of course the
entire House will be up this uh, this coming November uh,
and a third of the Senate will be up this November.
So yeah, anything can happen at this point.

Speaker 5 (34:58):
Though, well, the Democrats saw have much of a chance
to take the Senate. They think.

Speaker 3 (35:02):
They don't think so.

Speaker 4 (35:03):
In fact, even the New York Times, to be honest,
it says, here's the subject came out an hour ago.
The narrow path to Democratic Senate runs through a very
red states.

Speaker 5 (35:12):
Democrats cheer there is a way, even as new worries emerge.

Speaker 4 (35:15):
Over where the grand Platner can flip a main seat,
Republicans make confident they'll prevail in Texas, Iowa, and Alaska.

Speaker 5 (35:21):
So it's not a path that the Democrats have a
good chance.

Speaker 4 (35:24):
They have a better shot to take in the House,
but that has been handicapped because the Supreme Court keeps
overturning racist laws that make for artificial, fake districts to
guarantee that we have black representatives as it creating black districts,
which is unconstitutional. It's not equal protection under the fourteenth Amendment.
So the Senate is not going unless they collapse. It's
not going to happen. The House is possible, but I

(35:46):
think that the jerrymandering is going to prevent their vent.

Speaker 5 (35:48):
By the way, Ashley hints it from a distance, quite
a hotty there the people and iowall vote for just
because she's a houghty. Trust me, I used to live
there anyway.

Speaker 2 (36:02):
There you know, all the hotties, and I was that
what you're saying.

Speaker 5 (36:05):
No, I don't know the houddies, and I I just
know how people in iowall vote. Man right now, But seriously, what.

Speaker 4 (36:10):
About this wacka doodo on Texas actually thinking that Tall
Rico is going to pass Ted Cruz.

Speaker 5 (36:14):
I mean, give me a break.

Speaker 4 (36:15):
Tall Rico says, there's like, you know, he's got these
weird ideas about God. You know, in a state full
of Baptists and even Muslims who are conservative you think
he's gonna it's gonna pass.

Speaker 5 (36:23):
Catholics, No way, never gonna happen. And then he's all this,
you know, you know, these six genders and all that stuff.
This this guy is running from all of his wackadoo
to leftist stuff. People like that have no morals, they
have no principles. They will say whatever they have to
say to get elected.

Speaker 4 (36:38):
They will do whatever they have to do to get elected,
and then they'll collect their paycheck and run their mouths.
That's all they'll do. That's exactly what this guy will do.
That's exactly what Warnick did in Georgia. That's exactly what
Osof did in Virginia, now Virginia, in Georgia. Warnick and
Osof did in Georgia just to get elected. They said
whatever they had to and they did nothing.

Speaker 5 (36:55):
In the Senate. They're both Democrats, neither one of them
should be in office.

Speaker 4 (36:58):
But we had feckless publican candidates in the name of
Purdue and Kelly Lofer, both useless losers who cost us
two sentence heats and control of the Senate because they
can't campaign to save their way. Rich privets, little turds
who don't know how to do their job.

Speaker 5 (37:13):
Oh, I'm sorry? Did I did? I? Did I mumble? There?
Did I not clearly state my view on Kelly Lofer
and on Purdue? I think? So?

Speaker 3 (37:20):
Yeah?

Speaker 5 (37:21):
So what what?

Speaker 3 (37:22):
What are you guys seeing up that way with Graham
platn Er over over in Maine?

Speaker 5 (37:25):
What? What?

Speaker 2 (37:26):
A what?

Speaker 3 (37:27):
Another?

Speaker 4 (37:27):
That guy is?

Speaker 3 (37:28):
Right?

Speaker 4 (37:28):
Yeah, that's the one where they thought they were gonna
get that seat from, you know, the Democrat who pretends
to be Republican, Susan Collins.

Speaker 5 (37:34):
But that ain't gonna happen either.

Speaker 3 (37:36):
Now, Yeah, she's she's gonna she's gonna walk right back
into that because she was.

Speaker 4 (37:40):
Stuck with her and Lisa Murkowski for the foreseeable future.

Speaker 3 (37:43):
Right, yeah, but you know, but but they know how
to speak, to speak, to talk to talk and walk
the walk. They know what people she knows what people
may want. I think she's right in line with them.
I don't think they're gonna dump her for this guy.
He's a punkins, It's what I what I'm what I'm
seeing right, just a bully.

Speaker 5 (38:01):
He seems like a whackydodle.

Speaker 2 (38:02):
Yeah, I'm not sure about this guy. I got I
got to look up it seems to me. I heard
somebody was running against her, and I heard something about him,
but I don't remember.

Speaker 3 (38:11):
There's something like some posts on social media going back
to like three or something, when he joined the Marines,
he's like all gung ho about signing up or something
like that, you know, fighting wars, and then all of
a sudden, now in his campaign where he's saying, like
you voted to send me to war, it's like you
signed up to go to war there, guy.

Speaker 2 (38:29):
Oh geez, that's a typical politician.

Speaker 4 (38:33):
Right, yeah, let me address a little chat stuff coming
in here. Okay, So price is down to day one.
Any idiot that actually believe the prices would drop on
day one of the Trump administration is brain dead. Doesn't
deserve the right to vote. Obviously, it takes time for
price to coming down. Remember, ten days after Trump came over,
they blamed him for nine dollars a cart and er
a dozen for achs. Right that way, because sixty million
hens were slaughtered bogusly for fake ay Avian influenza by

(38:59):
the Iden regime, intentially driving up the price to sabotage Trump. Yeah,
they killed sixty million hens with no reason whatsoever. Those
prices come back down. It's dollar ninety nine two dollars
nine nine cents for a dozen. Now, Russia war and
in a day one. Anyone who thought the Russia wars
going in a day one was deluding themselves. No new wars.
There are no new wars. Trump hasn't started a new wars.
Iran started this war in nineteen seventy nine. So no

(39:21):
new wars, no norse. Why did he say, you get
elected only? Why did he say to get elected? Do
you live in the real world?

Speaker 5 (39:27):
Friend? Do you live in reality? You? Actually?

Speaker 3 (39:30):
I mean?

Speaker 4 (39:30):
Did you wake up in the morning on the same planet,
the same existence, the same universe the rest of us
are on?

Speaker 5 (39:35):
Why did he say it? Trump is a politician. He
got away with the first time. Sad.

Speaker 4 (39:37):
I'm not a politician, but clearly he's a politician in
his second term as president at twelve years in running
for office. Come on, man, come on, as Joey'd say,
come on, let me stiff your hair.

Speaker 5 (39:46):
Are you serious? Yeah, come on, man, come on? Why
did he say it to get elected? Why else? Yeah?

Speaker 2 (39:53):
I don't know. A lot of people are accusing Trump
for doing things that he's really not. Heavily involved with
or Pellunteer or he's invested into Pellanteering. A lot of
people saying, well, he's invested in Volunteer and he's doing
things to benefit from his investments. And I don't exactly
think that's right. And I don't know if you know
about this or not, Chris, you might know something about
detachment to a one executive innovation corps.

Speaker 5 (40:15):
Yeah, what about it?

Speaker 2 (40:16):
A lot of people think that that's a Trump move,
is what they think, and they're accusing him of setting
up private sector into the US military. So basically they
take four tech guys, one from Pellanteer, one from Meta,
one from I forgot the other two. But the point is,
and they give him a rank of lieutenant colonel. They
did have to go do some training, but they bypassed

(40:39):
basic training. They bypassed all the other ranks and got
a rank in the reserve, not in the full time
military status. They're required putting like one hundred hours a
year or something like that into this one hundred and
twenty hours a year or something some to that effect.
So basically their advisors for technology and AI to help
the defense system. And a lot of people are saying, well,

(40:59):
Trump did it's like, if you go back and look
at it, it actually was something that the Pentagon was
looking at in twenty twenty three under Biden. It just
won't effect last year under Trump.

Speaker 4 (41:10):
So as far as that goes a little news flash
for people that are buying into this controversy. First off,
officers do not attend basic training. We do not go
to basic training any service. We have a commissioning source
in ROTC. You go to Advanced Camp, which is a
six week camp. And trust me, advanced camp ain't basic training.
I've been to basic training. I've been to Advanced Camp.
It's a cake while compared to it, and those who

(41:32):
go to Officer candid school that's a lot harder. That's
like three months long. But we have a long history
of direct commission. In fact, in the Civil War most
of our officers were direct commission. They're usually politicians whore
influential and that's why they became the lieutenant colonels and
the colonels.

Speaker 3 (41:46):
Right people with money armies.

Speaker 4 (41:49):
They bought themselves a commission. You could buy comission at
one point for the US military. So there is a
long tradition. Our attorneys are normally direct commission people. Go
to law school and they come in either as a
first lieutenant as a captain right away. Most of our physicians,
our doctors are direct commission.

Speaker 5 (42:04):
They don't take you a.

Speaker 4 (42:04):
Little charm school. It's a couple weeks. You know to
how to put your rank on, what a salute means.
It's not basic training. So taking people in the technology
sector and doing the same thing for a critical field
like we do for dentists, doctors, lawyers, chaplains, there's no different.

Speaker 5 (42:20):
The problem with.

Speaker 4 (42:21):
People that don't know Jack squad about the military or
how functions. They run their mouth and make up stories
to try to distract people from reality. This is to me,
just like the story about US militaries integrating with the Israelis.

Speaker 5 (42:32):
No, we're not. That's the wrong verb you use.

Speaker 4 (42:35):
US military or DARPA specifically is working with the Israelis,
just like they're working with the Taiwanese and Japanese on
advanced defense things. That's where the cooperation comes in this case.
Here people know what they're talking about. I don't have
a problem with someone being appointed as a major lieutenant
colonel direct commission, and whether they're a reserve or not
doesn't matter because the reserve officers come on active duty.

(42:56):
The vast majority of Army officers when they start their
careers are reserved own officer. I was an exception. West
Pointers are all regular Army when they get commission. They're
automatically in the end strength of the regular Army, which
is small for commissioned officers, only a few tens of
thousands or eighteen thousand something like that. The rest are
reserve officers brought on active duty for periods of time.
When I came on actiuty, I had earned that, but

(43:17):
I don't get it immediately. I have to wait until
they approve it, because that's good to Congress to say
he's a regular Army.

Speaker 5 (43:22):
So I got approved for commission.

Speaker 4 (43:23):
I came on as a reserve officer for about six
months while that process went on, while politicians ran their mouths,
and they finally signed it, and then in February of
nineteen ninety, I was a regular Army officer. And that's
a limited number of people who are regular army, and
that's what I was for the rest of my career.
So these are people that don't know what they're talking about.
Buying large and you know, I don't have a problem
with that. I don't think Todd is a problem with

(43:45):
if the only people that can help us with AI
are people that we get to come to our cause
and work with us by giving me a direct commission
as a lieutenant colonel or a major.

Speaker 5 (43:54):
If they're younger, I have no problem with that. They're
not on a command track.

Speaker 4 (43:57):
They're not going to be committee anythinker, just like warrant officers.

Speaker 5 (44:01):
So that's my position on that, Todd, John.

Speaker 3 (44:04):
No, that's that's about it.

Speaker 5 (44:06):
The most.

Speaker 3 (44:06):
The most you may may see these people as if
you you know, happen to be where they work, like
in a hospital, a clinic like you talked about, or
or at some sort of facility where they where they
train people or I don't know, fixed repair things like
that and get people ready to deploy. They're not gonna
be commanding people in combat. They're not gonna be there
whenever stuff starts to blow up. I mean, you're not

(44:27):
gonna be looking to them like, hey, lead us out
of this. They're gonna be like, I don't know how, No,
you're not gonna be looking to them. They're not gonna
be there. They're there to fill up fill the role
and plus we get it a lot cheaper than if
we had to contract somebody to do it. You get
actually for the HOSCO.

Speaker 4 (44:41):
We also get them out of the Uniform Code of
Military Justice, so we can persolutely. There's no double jeopardy.
You could be prosecuted for murder or for treason in
the military. They'd be prosecuting the staying Corey as well.
So it has a lot of the answers. So Tom,
let me ask you this question. How many times have
you been to Jefferson Provy Ground, Tool Army Deep in
Utah or Aberdeen Creeving Ground.

Speaker 5 (45:02):
Have you been in any of those places?

Speaker 3 (45:03):
At Aberdeen? That's about it. My brother was stationed at Aberdeen.
But that's that's yeah, that was just like one time
in and out.

Speaker 4 (45:10):
You know, those are the places you're going to see
people like that, or they're gonna get Space Command, or
they're going to be you know, somewhere like that.

Speaker 5 (45:17):
Look, it's it's it's it's once again, this is a
red herring because what I was it.

Speaker 3 (45:22):
We were at Vandenburg. This was several years ago with
pants and I was advancing pints and my site was
the launch facility and all that and so walking around
there and seeing all these you know, field grade officers
in this and that, I'm like, man, it's it's almost
like the Pentagon. It's overload, and they're all just like
hey jaed, hey jaed. Bopop up, you know, and it's like,
these aren't people out out in the field leading troops.
These guys are looking for the defect, looking for the

(45:44):
launch button, things like that, you know. But they're they're
performing a very professional role that we need. And if
you if it costs, you know, put pin on a
major or lieutenant colonel. I'm okay with that because we
get them for a fraction of the cost.

Speaker 4 (45:56):
Well, yeah, and a major cost eighty nine thousand dollars
a year plus all. But let's say at quarter mayon
the total costs, what is it going to cost us
hire executives in the AI field who don't wear the
uniform aren't subject to the u CMJ. We can't send
that wherever we want with orders. We just have to
hope that they cooperate with us from Silicon Valley or
from Cambridge, Massachusetts. You know, I don't think people get

(46:18):
the importance of this. Plus, you know, being part of
a team in the uniform is a commitment and it's
just awesome. So again, John, these people, I don't know
where they get this stuff from, but they really don't
know much about our government or about how things work.

Speaker 5 (46:29):
And I just dismissed that.

Speaker 2 (46:31):
That's why I'm looking at things. I see what people
are saying on social media, and I have not served,
and I know the two of you have, and you
would have greater insight than I would. So instead of
me trying to explain things on social media and being
inept about it, I feel I bring it to the
show and now we get.

Speaker 5 (46:50):
A great idea. So let me ask Todd, because Todd
was enlisted his whole career.

Speaker 4 (46:53):
I was enlisted then a commission officer, and so Todd,
anything I just explained about the way those officers are
brought on or what happens.

Speaker 5 (47:00):
Is there anything you think I misstate or you disagree with.

Speaker 3 (47:02):
I think you're probably spot on. I mean, if you
miss something it was an audest mistake.

Speaker 2 (47:07):
I'm telling you got to realize your civilian life. No,
he was the colonel by You can't tell.

Speaker 4 (47:13):
My command authority on this show, Oh my goodness.

Speaker 5 (47:20):
Yeah.

Speaker 4 (47:21):
No, if it was a little disturbing. He said, if
you miss something, it wasn't wasn't intentional. It makes it
sound like I did miss something.

Speaker 3 (47:26):
No, no, I've said if you did, and I happen
to know.

Speaker 5 (47:29):
You know, okay.

Speaker 2 (47:30):
Chris is usually spot on. I mean, he knows his
business when he talks about something, he's pretty reliable.

Speaker 4 (47:36):
Well, tell that to the people that didn't vote for
me two years ago.

Speaker 3 (47:40):
What I'm talking about.

Speaker 2 (47:41):
Although if you disagree with me on AI data centers,
I might get a little edgy. I'm not sure. I
may may get a little edgy.

Speaker 3 (47:46):
I don't look up me.

Speaker 4 (47:47):
This is so there has been a study were recently
released about who's behind this. There is big money behind
stopping these data centers. And guess where it's coming from.
I want to take a guess where it's coming from.

Speaker 2 (47:58):
Oh yeah, no I don't. I'd rather just know.

Speaker 5 (48:03):
China.

Speaker 2 (48:04):
Oh imagine who Who's probably ahead of us because they're
using a lot of these data centers to operate their
cities and stuff, and.

Speaker 4 (48:10):
Well, they're sabotage in an industrial base. They're committing industrial espionage.
They're stealing our secrets when it comes to AI graphics.
Things like that, polymers, all this advance robotics. They've got
thousands of spies. We just got the the al was
not Alta Edina. What's Arcadia mayor confessed and she took
a guilty plea for spying for China, being an agent
of a foreign government.

Speaker 5 (48:30):
She was the mayor of Arcadia. Isn't that where the
fire was? Out there? Real close to it in Los Angeles,
right somewhere out there?

Speaker 2 (48:37):
Bring up Chris research facilities in.

Speaker 3 (48:40):
That area or anything.

Speaker 5 (48:44):
I'm not somewhere near the What were saying, why do
you glad I brought up John? Sorry?

Speaker 2 (48:47):
No, well, I'm glad you bring it up because you
know we knew Operation mocking Bird. We know Operation mocking
Bird was real. It was genuine. It was something the
government did to manipulate the way people think by controlling
news agencies and a lot of conspiracy theorist or people
that recognize these conspiracies say wow, what a terrible thing.
They get on board with it, and they rarely about it.
Do they never stop to think, even though we've been

(49:10):
told about the manipulations in social media, do they never
stop to think they're being played in social media to
manipulate the way they think to sway public opinion against officials.

Speaker 4 (49:20):
Well, quite frankly, the way people behave them on social media,
I don't think anybody needs to be swayed. I think
the intelligence quotion has been greatly diminished across the planet
as a consequence of things like Twitter and other social
media like Facebook. It's shocking to me how people respond
there with no reason, no forethought, no analysis. The lack
of critical thinking skills is shocking for me. And that

(49:42):
extends every aspect of society from people. I have someone
that I know who I had a good relationship with,
and I received an email on account that I only
use to set up elections because they'd helped with elections,
and they sent me a nasty email earlier this year
in January saying what the hell is wrong with with
the Donald Trump? You know, trying to because this person

(50:02):
comes from Denmark originally came to America and basically sent
me this really nasty email blaming me, like you know,
and I did it. I did respond because I didn't
see it because I don't check that account. But twice
a year when I set out message for elections, that's
not and the person who did it has my personal
email account and my phone number and lives three hundred
meters for my house and couldn't bother knock my door

(50:24):
or call me or send me a text message, but
sent me an account out seat so three days later
because in a response sent me a nasty, profane message
chewing me out for not responding.

Speaker 5 (50:34):
Well, I guess you know. It blew me off.

Speaker 4 (50:35):
And then I find it months later when I'm trying
to set up for the election just recently, and I'm like,
I'm sorry, what was this about?

Speaker 5 (50:41):
Yeah?

Speaker 4 (50:42):
I mean, this is a rational person who's smart, who's
making high six figure income, has.

Speaker 5 (50:48):
A beautiful house three times beside my house, and.

Speaker 4 (50:50):
A lovely, lovely situation immigrant this country is very successful.
And his discourse was founded on emotion about.

Speaker 5 (50:59):
Something to do with or that I have nothing do with,
and blame me for something Donald Trump did.

Speaker 4 (51:03):
This is irrational. Look, he could have written me and said, hey,
you know, or call me, what do you think of this?
I think this is crazy? What is Trump up to?
But you know I have nothing to do with Trump administration?
Why would you presume I would back the Greenland thing?

Speaker 5 (51:14):
I do? I would have invaded a long time ago,
but that's just me.

Speaker 3 (51:16):
Well you want to be vice boy, that's do you
at an angle?

Speaker 5 (51:19):
That's right, I love no, but be the emotional response Todd.
The way people behave they're like like petulant children.

Speaker 2 (51:27):
Yeah, they that is an issue. People got to stop
being emotional thinkers and get on board with critical thinking,
logic and reasoning. That would help a lot. Ladies and gentlemen,
we're gonna take a Top of the Hour break and
we'll be back with you in about five to six minutes.
Don't go nowhere. Just enjoy the advertisements and the news.

(51:56):
All right, ladies and gentlemen, If you're just now tuning on,
tuning in, you're listening to comments sense conservatives right here
WSMN fifteen ninety ninety five point three on your FM dial.
We're just having an open panel discussion here with Chris
Todd myself, and you want to make sure you catch

(52:20):
us next week when we have doctor Dan stock on.
He's going to talk to us about the Citizens Council
on Legislature Accountability. Uh, so we don't want to miss
that one. It's gonna be a good one, you know, gentlemen.
We had we had doctor stock on before when he
was talking previously when he was talking to us about
accountable care organizations, and he'd stood up in Indiana against

(52:43):
the school board and things like that, and he got
highly criticized for what he had done as far as
and he's an immunologist, and so when he was talking
about the spicy cough as Chris likes to call it
thanks to YouTube, so he he was highly criticized for
or speaking about something he's an expert in, which I
think is kind of interesting that so many people who

(53:05):
don't understand immunology are going to criticize one guy who's
an expert speaking to us about immunology and trying to
steer us in the right direction. So he will be
on next week, and Todd, you have the lead then.
So yeah, we look forward to that conversation with him.

Speaker 3 (53:20):
That was good. Look forward to what we.

Speaker 2 (53:22):
Got up next to. Oh so se microphone.

Speaker 3 (53:27):
Do you guys see that the Texas Secretary of State
is resigning next month? According to Newsmax, the top election
official in Texas will leave her post next month. Jane
Nelson announced her resignation this week, effective Friday July seventeenth,
months before the twenty twenty six midterm elections, which will
feature a marquee US Senate race between text Attorney General

(53:48):
Ken Paxton and we're a Republican and state Representative James
tall Rico, a Democrat. Interesting, I'm just wondering what prompted
the resignation or I mean, what's the deal there? Just
don't want the responsibility or want to get out of
the way before the election. Lets the mouth jump in there.
I don't know, kind of kind of odd.

Speaker 4 (54:08):
It's a good question. I don't know what her reasoning
for it is. I haven't heard anything, so it's hard.

Speaker 3 (54:13):
To just just announced, I believe by Newsmax there. So
just reading out the headline there in the top paragraph
just just interesting. You know, you have you have such
a heated Senate race coming up, you know, and they're
going to be looking to you, you know, to kind
of make sure that that's run smoothly, and you're gonna
step away from it, you know, just months as everybody's
gearing up. You know. I don't want to say it's suspect,

(54:36):
but it is kind of like, man, timing is everything, right.

Speaker 4 (54:41):
Yeah, it's an odd time to happen, but we've seen
stranger things in politics. So yeah, sometimes there's something behind
it we learned later on that somebody did something wrong
or inappropriate. Sometimes we find out like what Tulsa Gabbert,
husband's got cancer, you know, things happened. So and then
with dam Bondy, we're not happy there. But now we
find out Pam Bondy, you know, had cancer.

Speaker 2 (55:00):
So I mean, you know, we were being told that
she got she got canned, and I don't think that
that's the case concerned.

Speaker 3 (55:09):
And Trump didn't make it seem as if she was
being canned like that, like she's fired, get her out
of here, you know, And and we went Tulsia gabertt
it wasn't like that either. It was like, oh, she's
gonna leave. And then all of a sudden everybody started
saying it's because he's unhappy, and maybe that is part
of it. Perhaps, But at the same time you find
out there are health crist issues at stake here.

Speaker 4 (55:28):
So we don't always have the full picture, right, I mean,
you know, so hard to say.

Speaker 3 (55:35):
Yeah, I mean we can. We can comment on what
do you think in the moment based on up to
date information. You know, you can give your opinion on that,
and that's kind of what we do here. We never
say this is a matter of fact. We say this
is what I think, this is my thoughts on this,
and that's kind of where where we go from from there. Right, Yeah,
that's a fair point. We give our opinions. Basically, we're
not saying everything that we say is matter of fact one,

(55:55):
but we do our best.

Speaker 2 (55:59):
Makes the disclaimer the views in the opinions.

Speaker 3 (56:02):
Or I'm helping out. They put our picture on the
wall downstairs, by the way, I'm helping out to the
station now.

Speaker 2 (56:10):
Yeah, I was trying to open up with that picture
and as a cover and you know, on our on
our social media side of things, and for some reason
it was transparent so everybody could see us. So I'd
change it to something else. I don't know why that's
happening with this platform, but it's.

Speaker 3 (56:28):
Happening, right, interesting. Yeah, it's a good look. It's a
good photo. I like it. And I looked at the
all the other shows that are on there as well,
so they look pretty good. They did a really great job.

Speaker 2 (56:39):
Yeah, I thought Georgia. Yeah, he was in here and
you guys uploaded your or sent me your images to
give him, and he whipped that out in no time.
I don't know what kind of uh program he's using
for that, but software or whatever. But yeah, that's a's
a pretty good job. I think the pictures all look
nice here in the studio. I don't know if people
ever get a chance to come up here and see

(57:00):
the inside of the studio, but yeah, we got a
whole wall of show host on the on the in
the studio here in the green room.

Speaker 5 (57:07):
Right, as long as it's the wall of fame and
not the wall of shame.

Speaker 2 (57:11):
Well, so far nobody's told us we did anything to
shame ourselves.

Speaker 3 (57:15):
So now for sure, you know, you know. Ws MAN
has been on the air since March ninth, nineteen fifty eight.

Speaker 2 (57:22):
By the way, it's a very old radio station, and yeah,
very cool.

Speaker 3 (57:27):
It's moved a couple of times on the air here
for sure.

Speaker 2 (57:30):
Absolutely. Yeah. So I know Trump's birthday. And the reason
why I know is not because I'm a great, big
fan exactly, though I do. I do approve a lot
of what Trump does and appreciate his hard works and
his efforts. Was it June fourteenth?

Speaker 4 (57:49):
That was a thirteen fourteenth, fourteenth day? It's the Army's birthday,
it's his birthday.

Speaker 2 (57:54):
So in honor of Trump's birthday, the No Kings Protest
is going to be happy. That's the other word is
as American approaches it's two hundred fifty anniversary, we have
a choice about what story we tell. We can let
strong man politics and corruption define the moment, or we
can make the story of America about people coming together

(58:14):
across race, background, identity, belief and community, defend our rights
and build our future rooted in the people's power. On
June fourteenth, we rise up when we sing out, we
keep organized. Now, I thought Trump was the candidate running.
I got a little bit of background noise here, but
I thought Trump. I thought Trump was the candidate running.
And is the president doing the ending of corruption? Run

(58:35):
doing corruption in Washington, d C. That I missed something there.
I mean, do we need the No King's Protest to
fight against corruption when they got a whole administration doing it?

Speaker 5 (58:44):
No?

Speaker 3 (58:46):
You know, you got a reflecting pull that's costing how
many millions of dollars? But how many millions did it
cost Obama? How many millions does it cost us in
losing water annually? You know, all that all that garbage
that's in there. It's horrible. You know, it's what he's
going to do to it going to last, you know,
my entire lifetime. Probably not nothing. Ever, does I mean

(59:07):
it's out in the elements for kind of allowed. But
is it going to be better than what it was?
I think it probably will be, and I hope it does.
If it doesn't, you know, hey, you know, I'll eat
my words. Not a big deal. But it needed to
be fixed regardless, right.

Speaker 2 (59:20):
With the leakage alone, it needed to repair.

Speaker 3 (59:22):
It needed to be repaired regardless, right.

Speaker 2 (59:24):
But it's now it's getting questionable. Will it'll be ready
by July fourth because of all the repair?

Speaker 3 (59:29):
So so what if it's not ready? But if it's
done right, you know, did we not save a lot
of money for the taxpayers that you know a good deal?

Speaker 2 (59:37):
Well? No, you're right, You're right. It needed to be done.
It would just be fortunate because he was planning it
in repair for the July fourth holiday at the same time,
so for the celebrasion, because he does have things going on.
Do believe on the fourteenth, we're gonna have a UFC
fight right there at the White House to putting up
the cage and everything there. The South Lawn and of

(59:59):
course he's people here, no Kings protest are you know,
they want to they want to have a kumbaiau over here.
You know, they want to have sing along. I don't
know who's putting on the concerts and stuff and who's
going to be there, but yeah, they got this group
sing along stuff going on on the President's birthday. It's like,
is this like a back way of celebrating the President's birthday?
I mean, you know, kumbai on over here and carrying on.

(01:00:19):
I mean, what's going on here? I mean passive aggressive
birthday party or what?

Speaker 3 (01:00:23):
What's yeah happy birthday? Yeah.

Speaker 4 (01:00:29):
Well, look, as I said, Trump's birthday and the Flag
Day and the Army's birthday all up here on the
same day. It's when the United States Army was found
in seventeen seventy five on June fourteenth.

Speaker 5 (01:00:40):
So look, it's it's it's gonna be a big deal.
I mean, you know, this is huge. This.

Speaker 4 (01:00:45):
Uh, we have the turn fifteth anniversary of our nation
coming up here, and it's strange how few people are
even paying attention to this. You know, I mentioned this
when I did videos for Memorial and I said, you know,
when we were kids. The bi centenda was everywhere. It
was on cereal boxes, it was on commercials all the time.
We saw billboards, banners everywhere he went. It was about

(01:01:06):
the bi centennial. Every body onto it. Now I have
to struggle remind people that this is fifty the anniversary
of the greatest country in human history.

Speaker 5 (01:01:14):
They just don't seem to care. It's distressing to me.

Speaker 2 (01:01:17):
No, I I was last year. I was pumping it
all up. Remember I'm gonna go. Yeah, like that nineteen
seventy six with by centennial year and everything was just hot, hot,
hot for America. Everybody was like, there was no division.
I don't remember I was, I was probably eight, but
that was riding a huffy bike, yeah, or within those
flimsy fiberglass skateboard you know.

Speaker 3 (01:01:38):
Yeah, Huffey bikes.

Speaker 2 (01:01:39):
Oh jeez, the banana seats. Yeah, with the with the
high rise backrest thing in the back. Yeah, I mean
we were. We were riding our bipedal choppers.

Speaker 3 (01:01:50):
Choppers. I love it.

Speaker 2 (01:01:51):
Yeah. So uh yeah, No, it was. It was a
fun year. I mean there was just a lot of
enthusiasm for the United States and for the country and
the everything advertised on television had to do with America
and Uncle Sam and and yeah, we're in division right now,
you know, we're dealing with I dubbed it his political
warfare when we first started doing this show. I think
it's an apt way to describe it. I think that's

(01:02:14):
what this is. I think the left has created a
lot of political warfare. They use lawfare in it. Everything
they've done is attack Trump and make their accusations against
Trump based on things that they themselves are willing to
do or already have done.

Speaker 4 (01:02:30):
Right, yeah, yeah, Look, I can't argue with your conclusions
about a being warfare. I mean, these people don't love America.

Speaker 5 (01:02:37):
That's about money.

Speaker 4 (01:02:38):
Look, these things should be discussed in private, but they
rushed to the podium. They pull this crap all the time,
just like when they said Trump called you know, Africa
crap ole countries. That's not what Trump said, But they
didn't care. They just rust out the podium and ran
their mouths from a private conversation that was classified because
they just don't care.

Speaker 3 (01:02:57):
Nope, right, absolutely, for sure. It's funny is the number
of the things that Trump does and says, and it's like, yeah,
I could possibly get on board with you, But the
alternative is you, guys, the Democrats. It's like you're the alternative.
That's why I can't get on board with anything that
you say, none of it crazy, even stuff that Trump
says that I'm like, yeah, I probably would have said

(01:03:18):
that or would have done that. But at the same time,
I'm not going to go out and rebuke everything that
he says because I'm like, he's more rational than you are.
The Democrats, far far more rational, no doubt about that.

Speaker 2 (01:03:30):
My goodness, amazing, he's amazing. Actually the plan he's executed
as of yet, you know, I know that. It's obviously
in those four years he had time off, he's been
working with the Republican Party and together they have strategized
a plan for his return. And this is why he's
just so effective, because they already knew what they were
going to do once he gets into office, how they

(01:03:50):
were going to effectuate what it is they needed to
do to write this country, to bring this country back
where it should be as opposed to and funny thing
about it is a lot of his policies, I mean,
as conservatives in the old days, I mean jobs for America.
I guess conservatives were never against jobs. It was just
more or less. Oh, they didn't support unions and things
like that the way the left did.

Speaker 4 (01:04:11):
But well, look, it's the funny thing is now the
left has claimed the mantle of working labor, of the
middle class man. That's what they've been hanging their hat
on for seventy years, hundred years.

Speaker 5 (01:04:25):
Guess who supports who?

Speaker 4 (01:04:26):
Now, union workers, doc workers, automobile workers.

Speaker 5 (01:04:31):
They support Trump and he's completely flipped the script.

Speaker 4 (01:04:34):
And the left is just a bunch of blue bloods
and pink haired lunatics with freaking cow piercing through their
nose like their livestock, and they just it's completely flipped.
The left has lost its mind and they've lost the
middle class. And Trump has gained the middle class. And
that's why Republicans do so well because he has the
middle class.

Speaker 2 (01:04:52):
So do you feel like the left was trying to diminish?
I mean, this is what most people most people's take
on it is the left has been working for a
long time not to diminish the United States, reduce its
value and bringing it to a third world like loving
a playing field instead of bringing everybody up to your level.
Is bringing the United States down to like third world level.

Speaker 4 (01:05:12):
Oh, they definitely want to bring America down. They don't
really care. It's just shameful. It's you know how people
we self so self loathing and work against their own
self interest is beyond me.

Speaker 5 (01:05:21):
But it happens all the time.

Speaker 4 (01:05:23):
And now they they tell these lies about America, about
evil Americas and all the things we've never done.

Speaker 5 (01:05:27):
They blame us for it. It's just it's just really sad,
you know.

Speaker 3 (01:05:33):
No, absolutely, well. We got somebody asking about how can
a jet the government spent so much money on retrofitting
be transferred the Presidential Library instead of being kept and
used talking about the Air Force one aircraft that was
a gift by what what? What? What country?

Speaker 5 (01:05:50):
Was it again? From all time?

Speaker 3 (01:05:53):
Yeah? Ohm on, thank you? Yeah yeah, correct. So essentially
what you have right now with with one aircraft SAM
two eight thousand a VC twenty five Alpha, which is
used as Air Force one, commonly referred to as Air
Force one. It's one of the seven forty seven two
hundred models it came on. His first flight was during
Reagan's time in office nineteen eighty seven. George H. W.
Bush forty one was the first to fly on it.

(01:06:16):
So now you got to think from the late late
eighties early nineties, that aircraft's been flying and it's served
what seven presidents. Now it's time to basically get rid
of that one. We have two new aircraft that are
supposed to be coming on VC twenty five Bravos and
then SAM two nine thousand will also go out of
service as well and be replaced. But those two new

(01:06:37):
aircraft aren't quite ready yet. And I think this aircraft
from moment is a band aid fix, if you will,
because the two aircraft that are that are flying right
now should have been retired several years ago at this point.
So whenever those two new aircrafte don't get on board,
essentially that's all you need to cover the Presidency's two aircraft,
the eighty ninth Airlifts, White House, Military Office and of

(01:06:58):
course President of Air Group. That's what they'll tell you
is two aircraft essentially to cover the presidency. So you
won't need those three aircraft. You'll retire two eight and
two nine thousand, and this new aircraft from a man
that's that's coming on board, it won't it won't be
needed in the fleet, so you can retire it and
It's essentially what will happen is either the Air Force
will maintain one of them as a as a museum piece,
and they what they'll do they offer them up to

(01:07:20):
other presidential libraries that they want one. And mind you,
it's on loan to them. It's still Air Force property,
by the way, So just so just so everybody knows
kind of how that works. And I hope that answered
the question in the comments there anyway.

Speaker 4 (01:07:34):
No, I'm sure that's that's I mean, if people want
to see aircraft that are mothballed in the museum, the
best place on the planet that I've discovered is Ripe Patterson.

Speaker 5 (01:07:44):
Air Force Base.

Speaker 3 (01:07:44):
Oh Baby.

Speaker 4 (01:07:45):
Yes, the museum there is unbelievable. And all of those
were operational aircraft, I mean most of them when they
were brought into there, they were retired. That's what happens aircraft,
and they're historical, so you keep them and you preserve them.

Speaker 5 (01:07:56):
You know.

Speaker 4 (01:07:57):
I tell you, if you ever find yourself in dateon, Ohio,
you owe it yourself to go to right Patterson Air
Force Base and visit that museum set aside an entire day.
I rushed through it when I was a student there
at a course, and I should have spent more time
there at a crappy phone, at crappy pictures.

Speaker 5 (01:08:12):
And I'm gonna have to go back to dating gist
to this that museum again. It's just it's unbelievable. It is.

Speaker 4 (01:08:16):
It is the best collection of aircraft on the planet,
better than any place I've ever been.

Speaker 5 (01:08:20):
And it's just amazing.

Speaker 3 (01:08:21):
Yeah. And there's a golf Stream in there. That's a
that's a former Blue and White aircraft. Everybody knows what
a Blue and White ist as part of the President
of Air grew up eighty nine airlift. It's also used
as Air Force one on occasion. Uh, you know, you
have second second day if other people use it. But
a golf Stream aircraft, and I have flown on that aircraft.
I'm like, Man, a museum piece that I've flown on.

(01:08:41):
That's kind of wild. That's weird. That is yeah, a
very weird.

Speaker 4 (01:08:45):
Yeah.

Speaker 2 (01:08:46):
How does that make you feel about your rage? Todd?

Speaker 5 (01:08:50):
Now?

Speaker 3 (01:08:50):
I guess, right, very cool. And of course they have
you know, I think it's Kennedy's Air Force one, right
two six thousands there, the one they brought him back
on is at right, Patterson and then two seven thousand.
Is the one over at the Reagan Air Museum, by
the way.

Speaker 4 (01:09:07):
Yeah, no, it sounds about right. Yeah, No, it's uh,
look at that. That's just that's just an amazing museum,
the one I told you about. It is just it's
something else, something else. They themselves to go there.

Speaker 3 (01:09:19):
And they have box Car there, which is the second
nuke was dropped by box car, and it's right there
in the museum. And it's funny. I was walking around.
I'm like, I'll walk right up to it and I'm like,
this looks like one that dropped the nuke. And I
look at the name on the side, I'm like, it
is the one that dropped the nuke. Box car right there?

Speaker 2 (01:09:34):
What was a glowing at night?

Speaker 3 (01:09:36):
No, the city, the city that they dropped it on,
but it's still glowing a little bit.

Speaker 2 (01:09:41):
Maybe probably that's last thousands of years, right, tens of
thousands saw the radiation poison or the radiation.

Speaker 3 (01:09:49):
Yeah. I don't know how what yield those those were.
And of course I think a lot of prevailing winds
pushed a lot of that out to see, so that's
that helped a lot.

Speaker 2 (01:09:57):
That's like, that's like Fukushima, right, they had that nuclear meltdown,
and I'm just wondering how well is the seafood in
Japan after that. I mean, I haven't heard of any
Japanese people being born with the extra limbs or anything.

Speaker 3 (01:10:08):
But the ocean takes a lot of radiation on a
daily basis. Anyway, it can absorb a lot. The ocean can.
I don't know how contamidated it is right around Japan,
but the ocean can can. It can take a lot,
of course, the way it's disseminated around the globe, but
it kind of evens out a little bit. Yeah.

Speaker 2 (01:10:24):
So actually over here in the United States, we're all like,
yeah to comingight off the coast of the well wherever, right,
And I'm kind of wondering how much of that radiation
just kind of migrated over and hit our western shores
right that they don't talk about. But I don't know.
You're right, the ocean is big, and it can absorb
a lot of radiation and impart and the way this.

Speaker 3 (01:10:43):
Planet man, the way Mother nature is, the way it
can regenerate itself. I mean, you know, humans can could
leave the Earth tomorrow and it forget about us in time.
It'd be like we were never here.

Speaker 2 (01:10:54):
Would just take back over the concrete, would throw it
just grows.

Speaker 3 (01:10:57):
It would be like we were never here.

Speaker 2 (01:10:59):
Yeah, but there's there's remnants of civilizations from thousands of
I mean, they're finding pyramids and stuff out in the
forest where it's overgrown over these pyramids and they exist.
They can they could recognize them and see what they are.
Technical difficulty, what's this?

Speaker 3 (01:11:17):
Do not disclose that information? Oh I'm kiddy, I'm kiddy. Yeah.

Speaker 2 (01:11:21):
No, they they actually have found things, you know, civilizations,
They found civilizations that were buried underground. It's like, how
does it how does it get underground? I wonder? But
then I was seeing something on YouTube or something. Somebody
had a channel where they were talking about they actually
used to bury their civilization and they come back and
dig it up later. I guess when they felt like
they were going to be attacked. So I don't know
where this was exactly, but they think that a whole

(01:11:44):
civilization of people would do that. They would bury their
homes or whatever their living quarters and come back for
it later.

Speaker 3 (01:11:50):
Right, Well, maybe if they maybe if they migrate move
different places, maybe they want to come back to that
and not have anybody establish a residency, if you will,
while they're gone. The early I guess what do you
call them? Squatters? I guess they wanted to prevent that, right.

Speaker 2 (01:12:03):
Well, I think there were people just lacking a defense
and that was their best defense.

Speaker 5 (01:12:09):
Mom times, sometimes by the nature helps you out.

Speaker 4 (01:12:11):
Remember POMPEII took care of What.

Speaker 2 (01:12:14):
A horrible tragedy that must have been.

Speaker 5 (01:12:16):
It must have been horrific.

Speaker 4 (01:12:17):
Can you imagine that the lava falling of people that
their their their bodies frozen in.

Speaker 3 (01:12:22):
Better preserved one was Herculaneum, which was nearby. Herculaneum is
apparently better preserved but lesser known. Oh yeah, Herculanean also
also destroyed by the same volcano.

Speaker 2 (01:12:34):
Huh interesting Yeah, apparently migrat and lived next to a
live bolcan. What just sacrifice people to the gods?

Speaker 5 (01:12:43):
Right?

Speaker 3 (01:12:43):
Well, now we got a nice military base right there,
right the Chinzes. Is it right right near there?

Speaker 5 (01:12:47):
No? No, no, that's Naples.

Speaker 4 (01:12:50):
Sorry, yeah, sorry, Yeah, the chances is on the the
chanes up north. That's where I was at. Thankfully, No,
that's not in the shadow of volcano. It helps out, Okay,
all right, but.

Speaker 2 (01:13:03):
We did have our Mount Saint Helens didn't we they
were in the eighties, but it was nowhere near what
Pompeii was.

Speaker 4 (01:13:10):
Oh no, Mount Poundcay Hells was a walk in the
park compared to what happened in Pompeii.

Speaker 2 (01:13:14):
Did a lot of devastation when it went out from
my understanding flat and a lot of forest and trees.

Speaker 3 (01:13:18):
And there was no people, no villages right around the
bottom the people.

Speaker 2 (01:13:23):
There were people living out in that area that they
they got out of there with with the exception of
a couple of reluctant few that decided that was their
home and they were going to stay no matter what,
and that they made a choice.

Speaker 3 (01:13:37):
Right Oh yeah, yep.

Speaker 5 (01:13:40):
No, it's people make those choices all the time. You know.
They're not always good choices, you know.

Speaker 2 (01:13:45):
No, well it doesn't seem like a good choice, but
I guess they just didn't want to be what's the
word for it. They didn't want to change, you know,
they knew their home was going and they just didn't
want to have to start their lives over. Some of
them were older people and they were just like, you
know what, this is it, this is it. I'm done.

Speaker 4 (01:14:03):
Yeah, some people that's it reminds me of that not
not the armor GEDD And what was the other one
that was similar that those two movies? Deep Impact? Was
that the one yeah, where the father stands with his
daughter on the beach in Virginia just waits to be
wiped out because he's like, I've lived my life right.

Speaker 2 (01:14:21):
I don't think she was done.

Speaker 5 (01:14:22):
But I'm headed for the Rockies. I'm sorry.

Speaker 2 (01:14:25):
Yeah, but no, somebody else, why why do I over here?
On your your I think your YouTube channel, Chris So. Yeah,
he's asking about the recent asteroids, sunning booms and the
solar fo I don't think those were asteroids. I think
those were meteorites.

Speaker 5 (01:14:37):
Media.

Speaker 4 (01:14:38):
There was a meteor that that hit the earth surface
over Massachusetts and broke up and it costs so booms
all the place.

Speaker 5 (01:14:44):
That's correct.

Speaker 2 (01:14:45):
Last week I was, I was here. I don't know
why I didn't hear it, but they were start talking, mogle.
Why didn't I hear big boom? Maybe because I grew
up in Florida with the shuttle coming in all the time.

Speaker 3 (01:14:55):
I just may not went.

Speaker 2 (01:14:58):
Over your where you're at though, you know, well, no,
it supposedly was over towards New Hampshire in Massachusetts. From
my understanding, but it was supposed to have been heard
in New Hampshire and as far down as Rhode Island.
I don't know why Main's not mentioned because it was
heard in New Hampshire. There's parts of Mains that should
probably have heard it too.

Speaker 3 (01:15:20):
Right or right, So anybody find where it had already
go out to see how far did it go out?

Speaker 2 (01:15:27):
Their claiming blew up like forty miles above the atmosphere
at one point in time, and it looked to me
like it got pretty close. I've seen this happen before,
you know, this isn't anything new. I've had time when
I was walking to my truck at two o'clock in
the morning and I see this green light shooting across
the s yeah, and you hear this big boom in
the atmosphere. You know, you could hear it go off,

(01:15:48):
and that's just everything in the center of it heating
up and stuff like that to the point it just
let loose. But it is kind of fascinating when you
see something like that. No harm done. I mean, it's
not like somebody said, why do they go find it?
It's like because it probably blew up into pieces and
most of it's in the ocean now if it's not
all of it.

Speaker 3 (01:16:09):
That's what I was saying. Did any any piece of
anything be found? I mean likely not. I mean if
you find anything, it'll be years and years from now
somebody will find something maybe. So there's maybe.

Speaker 2 (01:16:19):
People that find little pieces of they can identify with
meteorite from way back when or whatever. And yeah, to
go hunting for it is I'm looking for a needle, haystack.
You're not finding anything.

Speaker 4 (01:16:30):
Well, you know, it's intertually because they've gone out in
Ethiopia in place like Molly where it's desert, and they've
they've taken teams, they've fanned out and they've looked for
the remnants when they have these and I remember one
in Ethiopia particular, and they found they found chunks of
these things.

Speaker 5 (01:16:42):
They found several pounds of it. It's amazing how much
this stuff survives all the way to the surface of
the earth.

Speaker 4 (01:16:47):
And of course if it lands in the deserts, just
hitting sand, you know, which gives so it kind of survives.

Speaker 5 (01:16:52):
A lot better. But yeah, that's fascinating stuff.

Speaker 2 (01:16:54):
It's going to disrupt the sand. We might see patterns
and be able to locate it a lot easier too.
It reminds me of Homer Simpson. Everybody was crowded into
the panic room and Homer was standing out there watching
it con and also does is little little tiny rock
bounces to his speed. He's like, oh cool, picks up it,
juggling this hot rock.

Speaker 4 (01:17:14):
Hot rock makes me think of Japan where they have
those things, you.

Speaker 2 (01:17:18):
Know, hot rocks. Yeah, but those are different. Those are
volcanic activity where the kids have to wear helmets and
they got shelters and stuff you can run to if
you have a volcanic or eruption. And yeah, it's interesting
how people have to survive in certain environments.

Speaker 4 (01:17:38):
The world is crazy. Indeed, let me check into that
California racetome. I'm curious, guys, and see if we've updated
any more. Yep, and Tom Steyer and Besarah both game
one tenth of percent on Steve Hilton, but only fourteen
thousand more votes that come in for Steve Hilton, but
he still leads by one hundred and four thousand votes

(01:17:59):
over Wow.

Speaker 3 (01:18:02):
You keep counting and wondering. It's like, at what point
are they gonna figure out how they can justify overtaking him.
You know, like, oh, we just happened to find this
trunch of a very big Democrat district nobody voted Republican. Yeah, nonsense.

Speaker 4 (01:18:16):
Look at all these ballots we found under the table
here in Atlanta, right yeah, all of.

Speaker 3 (01:18:20):
A sudden, but nothing to see here. Trump's deranged. You know,
that's stupid, ridiculous.

Speaker 2 (01:18:28):
Aren't they still investigating Fulton County? I think they've been. Yeah,
it's funny.

Speaker 3 (01:18:32):
It's like it's funny as when Trump said, you know,
find the ballots, they were like, oh, he said makeup ballots.
He's like, no, he just said find ballots when a
Democrat said find ballots, and it's like, oh, it's okay
for him for them to do it. But the Democrats
says it's They also say, makeup ballots if you need to.
That's what they're also saying.

Speaker 2 (01:18:51):
When Trump had that meeting with the secretary in Georgia there,
I forget his name. I listened to the entirety of that,
and at the very end he says, all we want
is the truth. That's what we want. We want, right
part They always omitted or failed to say or recognize
that he was just saying we want the truth.

Speaker 5 (01:19:11):
Yeah, but that's not how they dress it up.

Speaker 4 (01:19:13):
Look, I mean I have some lunatic who he's obsessed
with me. I think she's got mental illness. You know,
she's a stalker. She keeps stealing my content from YouTube
and making videos. She plays it, and she did one
here where back in February. She must have went and
trolled all my night shows. And back in February, I
was talking about dogs urinating defecating in my front yard
and people not picking it up and.

Speaker 5 (01:19:35):
How annoying it.

Speaker 4 (01:19:36):
This is step in that when you're mowing the lawns,
I'm you know, seeing there joking. I'm like, you know, ge'ez,
I just I just poisoned the little buggers if it
wasn't against the law.

Speaker 5 (01:19:44):
So she takes that, makes a video it says he
kills puppies and he kills dogs. Oh, could you be
a subscriber. You've got to subscribe from his channel. This
is the character. This is this his character.

Speaker 3 (01:19:56):
Oh my goodness. So anyway, there there are people out there,
there's a lot of them. There's a lot of them.

Speaker 4 (01:20:05):
I had no idea because you and I served in uniform,
and if people are idiots. They're gone. You get rid
of them, you kick them out, you don't have to
deal with this stuff. But I never knew how many nasty, nasty,
nasty people.

Speaker 5 (01:20:18):
There are in the Savilian world.

Speaker 4 (01:20:20):
They have no compunction about lying, they have no compunction
about underhead and nasty things.

Speaker 5 (01:20:23):
They'll do anything.

Speaker 4 (01:20:24):
It's just I'm just I tell you that was not
that I'm naive, But I got to tell you, Todd,
that was a big shock being in the civilian world
out of uniform, because we don't tolerate that.

Speaker 5 (01:20:34):
People are gone. I don't get punished for you.

Speaker 3 (01:20:37):
No, but you know, we got people here in Tennessee
where I'm at. You know that just you know, because
they're an elected offers, they think they can do whatever
they want to and get away with it. And we're
going to be addressed in that very soon locally. Anyway,
I won't get into that until a little bit down
the road. It'll be interesting for you, for sure, people
abusing their authority, their elected position to benefitnitarily. But I'll

(01:21:01):
talk about that sometime down the road.

Speaker 5 (01:21:04):
Now, there's a lot of that goes on.

Speaker 4 (01:21:05):
I mean, that's I think that's why a lot of
people enter politics, either you know, because they've got an ego,
or they do it so that they know they're going
to get access.

Speaker 5 (01:21:12):
Once you leave, you can make money.

Speaker 4 (01:21:14):
As a consultant or you or if you're just crooked
and a pathological person, you can do this while you're
in office, you know. I mean, look at Nancy Pelosi.
She's worth one two hundred million dollars. Now she wasn't
worth jack swat So she's be a member of Congress.

Speaker 5 (01:21:27):
And how does that happen.

Speaker 3 (01:21:28):
Visa yep, yep, Oh yeah, you're bought and paid for
for sure. A lot of them are, you know. And
as funny as they say they're going to reform healthcare,
fix the healthcare and reinsurance industry, meanwhile, how many millions
or how many hundreds of thousands of dollars did most
members take from healthcare and big farm and all this stuff?

(01:21:48):
You know, you're not going to reform what who's paying you?

Speaker 2 (01:21:52):
Are you saying? They use knock options on the side.

Speaker 3 (01:21:55):
Now, whatever they get, they get a lot of information
on the side, and they can buy a lot of shares,
that's for sure.

Speaker 2 (01:22:02):
Going on. They would never do that. Pelosi would never say,
why can't we have insider trading? Why is it a
little legal? Why do we have to have the stockcast?
She would never do that, right, guy, remember doing that?

Speaker 3 (01:22:14):
But she did being in being in Congress. You know
it's so expensive, so you need to make a little
bit more money, right, little supplemental income called insider trading.
It is.

Speaker 2 (01:22:26):
You got to question that, though you do have I
don't know how it works with interns and stuff. But
DC's an expensive place to live. And if you're making
one hundreds five thousand dollars a year, you got a
home in your home state, and you got to have
a place to stay in d C. Now, I've heard
of congressmen saying, I'm not renting a place or buying
a place because it's too expensive. I'll sleep in the
office if I have to. I don't know how many
have done it, and we're genuine about.

Speaker 3 (01:22:46):
Doing There are some that do that, very few, by
the way, but there are a number who do do that.
But you also have some that will, you know, that
rent a place and that I each have a room.
So you'll have several members of Congress living one like
town home basically, and some of some of them even
bunk up in the same room.

Speaker 2 (01:23:06):
Is that safe for policy decisions?

Speaker 3 (01:23:10):
Well, you got to think they're you're you're They're only
there like during the week, so they're there just crashing
and most of times they're in their office or some
dinner this and that or some event they go there
to crash and then they're they're they're back home on
the weekends. Usually by Thursday afternoon they're they're on a
plane or they're landing at home somewhere.

Speaker 2 (01:23:25):
Yeah, Thursday is kind of like their Friday, isn't it.
I mean they leave their staff behind for Friday, and
if you go into Friday, you're meeting with their staff members.

Speaker 3 (01:23:33):
And usually they're flying back in or coming back in
on a Monday, so usually Mondays or short days and
Thursdays or your short day, so Tuesday Wednesday, you're doing stuff.

Speaker 2 (01:23:42):
You know, basically you're describing members, you're describing our members
of Congress is basically just shacking up. It's kind of
it's kind of humorous when you think about this. They're
just like they're shocking up in DC to check them out.

Speaker 3 (01:23:54):
Now, it's a full time legislature, so technically outside of
whenever they're in recess, they could be partentually there at
any point, so you know, it's not like a state
legislature that's there for a few months and then they're
out for the rest of the year. For eight months
of the year they're out. So anyway, there's a little
bit of difference.

Speaker 4 (01:24:12):
Yeah, most state legislatures are part time. Pennsylvania is one
of these exceptions. And they pay you too, Yeah, sadly
is right.

Speaker 2 (01:24:20):
I think New Hampshire doesn't pay you at all, whether
they give you they give you a stipend or something
like that.

Speaker 4 (01:24:25):
So how do you find out who really wants to
serve the people and who just wants to make money?

Speaker 2 (01:24:29):
Yeah right, Yeah, Well some people want position and that's
one way of getting eating.

Speaker 5 (01:24:34):
They want to pad their cvs. What it is.

Speaker 2 (01:24:36):
Well, if you don't, if you don't have the means
to support yourself independently, you're probably not going to do
well on the state legislature. I don't know.

Speaker 4 (01:24:43):
Well, I mean Alexander, cause Cortez has done well at
the national level.

Speaker 5 (01:24:45):
She can't support yourself.

Speaker 2 (01:24:48):
Well, she got that eat the rich dress she wears.

Speaker 5 (01:24:51):
And you know, yeah she's eating something all right.

Speaker 2 (01:24:55):
Yeah, maybe she's a vegetarian.

Speaker 3 (01:24:59):
I don't. All right. So according to Fox just just
broke maybe twenty minutes ago, US securious Israel eleven and ceasefire.
Major diplomatic break there. According to Fox News, they'll.

Speaker 5 (01:25:09):
Get you excited, they'll break you.

Speaker 3 (01:25:12):
Yes, see how long that that holds long enough to
read it? Perhaps? I don't know, we'll see. Yeah, So
what do you think is going to happen there?

Speaker 4 (01:25:21):
What?

Speaker 3 (01:25:21):
What's what's? What are your thoughts on that conflict? There?
Is it, you know, tied to US Iran? Or is
this going to be a completely separate thing altogether?

Speaker 4 (01:25:30):
As far as I'm concerned, it's nothing to do with Iran.
But the of course that's my view, that's not Tehran's view.
They are trying to they're trying to link the two things.
They're not linked. The Israelis have every right to defend
themselves against sacks from abroad, so I would not collect
this two together. But Iran wants to play the games
like it. It means the same thing. So we'll see
where it goes from here.

Speaker 3 (01:25:50):
Oh absolutely, I was just curious what your thoughts on
that one. Yeah, Tehran is the grassman straws, I mean
for sure, But what does a victory look like for
the US. I mean, what, what what's the least amount
that we could walk away and say this is a
victory without completely destroying their entire country.

Speaker 4 (01:26:08):
Well, I think four hundred plus kilograms of enriched uranium
delivered to US would be a good start.

Speaker 2 (01:26:15):
That was my first thought. That's what Trump. We're not
done until we get the richd uranium and the problem
they're it.

Speaker 3 (01:26:23):
That has to be number one. And I like that's
how you led with that's number one.

Speaker 2 (01:26:27):
I just want to see regime change over there. It's
just it's time for them to be stopped, because they're
not going to stop unless something happens. And we talked
about this before with the IRS r GC and that
they're they're the strong point there right now, and with
them in place, that their their philosophies are an apocalyptic

(01:26:49):
mindset and America is a great Satan and so as
far as they're concerned, you know, and that's why they've
attacked US for forty seven years. They stay view US
as a evil entity and they preach this, as Chris
described as a theocracy. And as long as they have
that mindset, they're never going to stop. They'll find ways
to hide what it is they're doing in enrich uranium anyway.

(01:27:10):
So if we don't eradicate this now, we're going to
be dealing with this probably twenty years from now, if not.

Speaker 5 (01:27:16):
Sooner, probably sooner. Yeah, and in a very bad way.

Speaker 4 (01:27:20):
Can you imagine a suitcase bomb nuclear radiation falling in Baltimore.
It would radiate Philadelphia, Harrisburg, New York, d C. Baltimore,
the Eastern Shore, Wilmington, Delaware. There'd be parts of the
eastern United States would be uninhabitable. We'd have to move
the National Capitol out to the Rockies. It's just it's
unbelievable that people actually, oh my gosh, they ignore this threat.

(01:27:46):
They pretend it isn't real. They put their head in
the sands. They're like frickin' Ostrich.

Speaker 2 (01:27:49):
How do you know. I know you're restricted on how
freely you can speak about things as in a former
intelligence officer, but how close do you think we've been
to these circumstances in the I know the FEDS always,
you know, intelligence, they monitor these things closely, but have
there not been circumstances where it was getting very close,
like something devastating could have happened.

Speaker 4 (01:28:10):
Well, that was the premise for this attack. Now, I mean,
if the government can be believed they were within two
weeks of having uranium riched well enough that they can
actually put it in a weapon.

Speaker 5 (01:28:20):
Now, that doesn't mean to have weapon in two weeks.

Speaker 4 (01:28:21):
That means that they would have they would have the capability,
and they'd have to build themselves, you know, or the
rocket deliver it. So but the point is, you don't
even a rocket delivered. You just stick the stuff, like
I said, you know, on a cargo ship and a container,
and you floated across the Atlantic till you get to us,
and then you blow it up.

Speaker 5 (01:28:38):
You don't even have to dock it.

Speaker 4 (01:28:39):
Sure, just do it in the harbor, right, that's right,
pretty scary. But people want to put their heads in
sands pretend like this is not a big deal.

Speaker 5 (01:28:48):
It is a big deal. It is a big deal.

Speaker 2 (01:28:53):
Yeah, it's kind of concerning on people are easily swayed
not to think about things like this or take these
things into consideration. It's like you said earlier here, we
only know what the surface, what goes on in DC,
what the president's looking at, what he's evaluating. He's not
given us a briefing. He's not telling us all the
details about what's going on. We're really basically at his trust.

(01:29:13):
You know. We put a lot of trust in him
to do the right things. And I think that we
picked the wise president this time around. It was very
concerning the previous administration.

Speaker 4 (01:29:24):
Yeah, for sure, I thought we picked the vice president
before too. But then apparently he didn't win in twenty
twenty according to the government.

Speaker 2 (01:29:32):
Well, this is true, this is true.

Speaker 3 (01:29:36):
But now what's funny is now whenever you know these
you know, kevinet secretaries and agency heads go to DC
to testifyhim in front of the Senator, House, you know, committee, whatever,
they're always asking him the question did Donald Trump win
twenty twenty? Like, why do you need this person to
admit it to validate your existence in Congress? I mean,
they don't need to admit anything to you. They're there

(01:29:58):
to testify on agriculture sub these or whatever. Why do
they need to talk about the twenty twenty election admit
something to you? It boggles them all.

Speaker 4 (01:30:06):
It's meant to undermine the credibility of the person is testifying,
because they're going to say that you believe in that,
then you know, you believe anything.

Speaker 5 (01:30:12):
It's just nonsense.

Speaker 4 (01:30:13):
Of course, they're just liars. They know what happened in
twenty twenty. I only want it doesn't change reality.

Speaker 2 (01:30:18):
Yeah, but Tod's credit, Yeah, because it sacrifices his own
credibility for asking because they're way off topic, right, But
I love that answers.

Speaker 4 (01:30:26):
Did you see the exchange between Marco Rubio and what's
her name from Nevada the Center? She tried to try
to blame him and he just destroyed her. I mean
absolutely destroyed her.

Speaker 5 (01:30:36):
It was comic.

Speaker 3 (01:30:36):
Rubio is a beast, know.

Speaker 4 (01:30:39):
Me, and I sold him short, you know, little Marco.
I didn't, And I wasn't impressed because it was tea
party guys. Suposedly, I wasn't deppressed with his time as
a center. But I got to say, the dude is
switched on as secretary of state. He's the best secretary
of State we've had in a long time.

Speaker 2 (01:30:52):
So what is this South Africa losing their seats at
the United Nations, Chris or is this just a certain
thing these gentleman's talking about? The comment is Zimbabwe has
been chosen over South Africa. That said, as a non
permanent member in the UN Security Council for two years
come twenty twenty.

Speaker 5 (01:31:08):
No, that's that's a mistake.

Speaker 4 (01:31:10):
The ten seats on the Security Council rotate every two years.
South Africa's two years are up and so they're leaving. Yeah,
so they get a two year seat on there, So
it's time for another African country.

Speaker 5 (01:31:20):
They're not they're not. They're not doing it over them.

Speaker 4 (01:31:22):
They're just taking a seat that South Africa has been
occupyed for the past couple of years.

Speaker 5 (01:31:26):
That's all that is.

Speaker 2 (01:31:26):
Oh, okay, so it goes on rotation.

Speaker 3 (01:31:29):
Standard standard housekeeper, I guess yeah.

Speaker 4 (01:31:32):
I mean it's just a rotation. I mean, the other
ten member Security councils don't mean anything. It's the five
permanent security members that matter. And that's where it starts
and that's where it ends.

Speaker 2 (01:31:40):
Well, I'm glad why do why approves of Rubio? Rubio
has really worked his butt off, hasn't he. I mean
he's been a working man in the office.

Speaker 4 (01:31:48):
Not only has he worked his tail off, he has
been spot on his analysis, his commentary. It's just the guys. Look,
I was not a Mark Ruby fan. I'm I'm I've
come around. I'm impressed and it's you know, and he
just has it. He delivers it from the hip and
you know, he doesn't need this any of this nonsense
from people who need all this stuff put in front
of him.

Speaker 5 (01:32:07):
The guy is just brilliant, brilliant.

Speaker 2 (01:32:10):
Yeah, a lot of people are chatting down Junior for
for forty eight and uh so a lot of people
looking at Advance. And I like Vance just fine. But
if it comes down to Vance and Rubio, I I
don't know, man, I'm thinking of Rubio one hundred.

Speaker 4 (01:32:25):
No, I don't need to hesitate on that. I've not
been impressed by. Vance is a good number two. I
don't know if he's the guy to lead it top
of the ticket. If we don't get someone else coming
up should be Rubio, right.

Speaker 3 (01:32:34):
And Advance is young enough that even if let's say
he wanted if Rubio got it and he wanted to
keep Vance around for another go around, I mean, heck,
another two terms of vice president. I mean, imagine three
straight terms of vice president. You're the strong, you're strong
at that point, or if you're not, you got to
go right. I mean, I'm not saying that's how it's
going to play out, just just a thought.

Speaker 5 (01:32:57):
Yeah, no, I hear you, I hear you a hundred percent.
Look gets uh again.

Speaker 4 (01:33:01):
Vance is not my choice right now. If if I
had a choice, somebody replaced Donald Trump, it'ld be Mark
or Rubio.

Speaker 5 (01:33:06):
There's no question about it. That's just where I said.

Speaker 2 (01:33:10):
Yeah, it's funny watch me standing next to Trump when
Trump's talking to the media, and he just looks so intense.
You know, he does very intense, look like, look, guys,
we got business stake here. I'm really just wanted to
get out.

Speaker 3 (01:33:20):
Of here right Well.

Speaker 4 (01:33:21):
The one thing I have an issue with with with
Rubio is not an issue with Ribo.

Speaker 5 (01:33:26):
It's with Trump.

Speaker 4 (01:33:26):
He shouldn't be the National Security Advisor and the Secretary
of State. You need to get someone in there that
is doing the job. It's very frustrating to see this.
So I don't know why Trump and now you know,
it's some of these things he picks just make my
shake my head anyway, just saying.

Speaker 2 (01:33:40):
I just want to know why, why do why? Why?
Why do you feel like Trump's not for America. I'm
kind of curious on that one because it seems to
me everything he's doing is bettering this country.

Speaker 4 (01:33:53):
Yeah, you're talking about one of the viewers on my program. Yeah,
he's just being provocative. He's not not thinking this through.
So I mean, it's.

Speaker 2 (01:34:00):
Understand I get the impression he's a younger.

Speaker 4 (01:34:04):
I don't know if he's the young guy, but I
do know that he's not really thinking this through. It's
like all the people that accused Trump of starting a war.
He didn't start the war. Ron did he ignored the
war when he pressed the first time. This time he's not.
Every other pred president's ignored it. It's a grievous lost
for America. So many of our service members are dead
because we didn't take this threat seriously for forty seven years.

Speaker 2 (01:34:26):
So his reasoning is that he is for the rich
and his friends. It's obvious. But truth of the matter
is Trump brings up a good point. Do you want
to pick somebody who can get the job done or
you want to just go to the SBA and hire
subcontractor who may or may not be able to fulfill
the job. And when you're trying to do things at
this level, you need exceptionally competent people to get tasked done.

(01:34:48):
And that's where he's drawing from. I don't know I
don't have a problem with where he's drawing from. A
lot of people are concerned about volunteer and stuff like that,
But volunteer has proven themselves way back in what the
Georgie W. Bush administration. They've been added a long time.

Speaker 5 (01:35:02):
Their competent, well I would hope they're competent. Yeah.

Speaker 3 (01:35:10):
So anyway, Darius Stone says, here, omg does Gandalf have
rugby balls on his shelf? A man of culture? Meaning you, colonel,
are Gandolf? In this situation you got you're a man
of culture because you have two rugby balls up there.
I love it. Well, that's that's high culture. I love it.

Speaker 4 (01:35:28):
Why you should mention that, because here on the floor
taking off the shelf for books is my twenty eighteen
San Francisco Seven's Tournament fanball, go, my twenty twenty two
Seven's World Cup, and Cape Town fan ball, my twenty
twenty five Women's Rugby World Cup fan ball from England,

(01:35:50):
and a full size official twenty twenty five Women's Rugby
World Cup ball from England.

Speaker 3 (01:35:55):
Nice.

Speaker 5 (01:35:56):
Yeah, And just as you know.

Speaker 4 (01:35:57):
Even though I hate the beautiful game, because this is
so beautif what's so corrupt?

Speaker 5 (01:36:01):
I do have a fanball for the twenty twenty six
F four World Cup, which is about to kick off there.
It is so.

Speaker 2 (01:36:07):
Anyway, who's that? Who's that rugby player?

Speaker 5 (01:36:09):
Man?

Speaker 2 (01:36:09):
She gained so much international fame from being a guy.
I can't think of her name. It's like L L
A N or something is her first name.

Speaker 5 (01:36:18):
I'm not sure who that is.

Speaker 3 (01:36:20):
Oh, Darius corrects me. He says, no, Gundolf. It's more
clever than Gandalf. Okay, I'm not sure who Gundolf is.

Speaker 2 (01:36:27):
But hey, all right, I think you tended to playoff
Gandalf Gundolf as any firearms?

Speaker 4 (01:36:33):
Yeah, I think that's what's going on there.

Speaker 2 (01:36:38):
Are you known for your firearms over there? Chris Well,
I think.

Speaker 5 (01:36:40):
A lot of people think that.

Speaker 4 (01:36:41):
I have several gun safs and about one hundred and
fifty weapons in my house.

Speaker 5 (01:36:45):
They're off by a couple.

Speaker 2 (01:36:51):
Twenty two's right.

Speaker 5 (01:36:53):
Yeah, I don't count all my glocks. They're just mandatory.

Speaker 2 (01:36:57):
Oh, speaking of glocks, who is it? What state is
it that wants to is a Maryland wants to ban
glocks now, they're trying to illegalize them because they can
be modified.

Speaker 4 (01:37:08):
I think that we just need to ban politicians from Maryland,
and we'll solve a lot of our promises.

Speaker 2 (01:37:13):
Right Yeah. Yeah, it's kind of like we were talking
about here last night with Billy and Tim about is
an organ that wants to ban hunting now, you know,
protecting animals rights and people don't need to hunt and
you go to the store and get your food. And
so my take out of it is, yeah, if you

(01:37:34):
ban hunting, the only one thing that left ever agreed
upon was you have a right to go hunting. So
you need rifles for hunting. And if they ban hunting,
then I guess you don't need rifles according to them, right, Yeah,
how do they have anything to do with protecting animals?

Speaker 4 (01:37:50):
I think it's now it has to do with making people,
just make people bend your will to do what you want.
So it's just look, it's these these leftists, they just
got to be in charge of everything.

Speaker 5 (01:38:02):
They just can't help themselves.

Speaker 4 (01:38:04):
So anyway, but hey, before you go any for this,
I just want to say something very quickly here. Congratulations
to my Las Vegas gold Knights on the Road Carolina
last night Raleigh winning five to four in regular time.

Speaker 5 (01:38:17):
It was awesome.

Speaker 4 (01:38:18):
Won a great start to the Stanley Cup Finals and
the third time in nine years since they came to
existence Vegas Gold Knight's Final sell to the Stanley Cup Final.
They lost unfortunately forty two to the Capitols the first
time around in their first season. Then they won a
couple of years ago in twenty twenty three. Now they're
back again and they're looking pretty good. But if they
take a second win in Carolina this I think the
thing will pretty much all be over. But right now

(01:38:40):
they just have the upper hand. But Carolina is tough.
That's a fast team, and they skate on the ice.
Looks like they've got rockets under their skates. So Vegas
needs to stand on top of their skates and take
this thing home.

Speaker 5 (01:38:51):
Be so great to see them win this thing again.
I would love to see that.

Speaker 3 (01:38:55):
Absolutely interesting for sure. So you gonna win. Whin's the
next game?

Speaker 4 (01:39:01):
It should be tomorrow if I'm not mistaken.

Speaker 5 (01:39:03):
I haven't loved because it was last night.

Speaker 4 (01:39:04):
So it's two days each of the games when they
start out two days apart. So yep, But five to
four last night an epic game. What what a shot
was tomash Hertel who scored which is like three minutes
and twenty seconds left in the game was a beautiful
noteing up behind the back sort of pass to him
and he just slotted it right in there.

Speaker 5 (01:39:23):
It was great stuff to see. It was a good game.

Speaker 4 (01:39:25):
I mean, I mean, I'm sure that the that the
Carolina Hurricanes fans weren't too happy.

Speaker 5 (01:39:29):
About saying it was a good game, but I imagine that.
I mean they really, they really were. It was really
a good game.

Speaker 3 (01:39:34):
So anyway, good deal, good deal.

Speaker 4 (01:39:39):
You should check on the California stats again.

Speaker 5 (01:39:41):
Here we go.

Speaker 3 (01:39:41):
Yeah, let's see, we see where we're at there. Now
I'm interested.

Speaker 4 (01:39:43):
So I we're up to all of fifty six percent
of the votes. How embarrassing for these people. How embarrassing.
Nearly twenty four hours since the five million votes are in,
so that means gonna be about ten million votes probably
when this is over.

Speaker 5 (01:39:54):
But Steve Hilton maintains his lead.

Speaker 4 (01:39:57):
But now it's down to one hundred and eight thousand votes,
still maintaining that lead.

Speaker 5 (01:40:01):
Let me check in on Karen Bass.

Speaker 4 (01:40:03):
It's funny because Karen Bass is being listened as the winner,
but she has to go through a runoff, so she
didn't give fifty percent anyway, But Yeah, Spencer Pratt is
in second place, so we'll see what happens there as
it goes forward.

Speaker 3 (01:40:16):
Yeah, I mean with everything that goes on in California
and in LA for crying out loud, it's like, why
would you not try something different, go away from these
standard old democrats who have led you dry and ruined
you for crying out loud. And you talk about, you know, drought,
and California's in all this drought. It's like it's water
management in most situations. Let I've listened to scientists and
of course, talking about the podcast I've been listening to,

(01:40:38):
I've listened to a number of scientists talk about how
it's you know, the most precipitation of all the states
is in California, and it's just ninety percent of it
just pushed out to the oceans and then and it's gone.
They don't capture any of it to use properly. And
I think I think that's a big problem that they
have in southern California. Yeah, they have a lot of
people there, for sure, it's a big drain on it.
But if you're mismanaging it from from get go, I mean,

(01:40:59):
you're you're not going to have any for the influx
of people or the outflux of people, whatever the case
may be. Millions of people that are suffering from crying
out loud in southern California. Try something different, vote something,
Vote differently, and if it doesn't work out, you can
always go back for crying out loud. It's not going
to be worse, I can tell you that.

Speaker 4 (01:41:16):
Well, at the bottom of line is that California doesn't
manage its water resources. Well, that is a major problem.
So you've hit that one spot on the head. Yeah,
there's no question that's the case. It's a shame, but
it's the reality. But they're far from alone. You look
at Cape Town in South Africa. They also screw their
water resources. You know, they lose nearly forty percent of
their water through leaky pipes. Because it'll do proper pipe

(01:41:37):
maintenance and repair.

Speaker 3 (01:41:38):
So I mentioned here that they have some major water leaks.
I guess maybe somewhere in South Africa, I couldn't remember.

Speaker 5 (01:41:43):
Well, that's what I'm talking about.

Speaker 4 (01:41:44):
It's it's something to thirty seven forty percent of the
water never even gets to the consumer, it's wasted. Then
they have no gray water reuse policy. You know, like
you take the partially straight filter water that's not you know,
sanitized from the consumption, but you can use it to
water lawns, you can use it and things like that.
They have no grey water policy reused on that. And
that's so a few years ago there was talk about

(01:42:05):
how Cape Down has this day zero, they're going to
run out of water, and that reservoirs were all trained
and it's all because of global warming.

Speaker 5 (01:42:12):
No, it's not.

Speaker 4 (01:42:12):
It's because in nineteen hundred there were five hundred thousand
people in Cape townk area using water.

Speaker 5 (01:42:17):
Now there's five million plus.

Speaker 4 (01:42:19):
And in nineteen ten, the consumption water per capital as
much lower it was there was no industrialization like we
have now, and so the per capita consumption water is
exponentially higher now and they have never taken that into account.
So they're trying to act like the reason for reason
for all this is because of global climate change.

Speaker 5 (01:42:37):
That played a small role.

Speaker 4 (01:42:38):
It's human action and inaction that caused most of the
trouble when it came to the day zero for Cape Down.
But you know that doesn't matter. They just they got
a narrative. They're going to tell their narrative and suckers
will fall for it, you know.

Speaker 2 (01:42:50):
So surely somebody here brought up wasn't California Republican state
was a good then economically. I think California used to
be a standout state at one point.

Speaker 3 (01:43:00):
Yeah, that's why so many people moved out there, and
they got to the law. They got this idea of
La la land and everybody's you know, fun in the sun.
Everybody's a movie star, you know, and everybody somebod else
can pick up the tab. It went south on them
pretty quick.

Speaker 2 (01:43:13):
I mean, people, California is a large state. It's largely
populated and basically could run as a country all on
its own. I mean, with its economy and stuff. It's
pretty strong, or it was, but it's depleting now since
the dims have taken over, it's been depleting. People are
leaving California. Major corporations are leaving California trying to get
away from there. Nonsense laws and regulations.

Speaker 4 (01:43:36):
Well, the problem is that they're going to place like
Texas and Tennessee and bringing their screwed up ideas with them.

Speaker 3 (01:43:42):
That's true. Yeah, that's true. That is a problem though. Yeah,
you're right, that is a major problem.

Speaker 5 (01:43:47):
You can't.

Speaker 4 (01:43:48):
You can't flee someplace and then bring the same stupid
ideas to that place. It really doesn't solve any problems.
It just brings no to somewhere else that doesn't deserve
to have your mess coming from elsewhere.

Speaker 2 (01:43:59):
That's why we say, don't mess up New Hampshire, you know,
leave whatever you're leaving in mass Massachusetts.

Speaker 5 (01:44:05):
Yeah, that's good.

Speaker 3 (01:44:06):
I love it. Don't mess it up?

Speaker 2 (01:44:07):
That was Kelly Ayott's a campaign slogan, was it.

Speaker 5 (01:44:11):
Now?

Speaker 3 (01:44:11):
That's pretty good clever.

Speaker 4 (01:44:13):
Yeah, anybody heard from our friend a retired general there.

Speaker 2 (01:44:18):
No, he's basically he just silent. He's living his life,
he's living his best life and just doesn't want anything
to do with it anymore.

Speaker 4 (01:44:26):
Feel I don't blame Don Buldock, you know, it's uh.
You know, I got a sour taste in my mouth
running and he ran a much higher stage than I did.
I think Todd has had a sour taste in his
math in the mouth in the past too. When it
comes to what's going on with politics, it can be
very frustrated, disappointing.

Speaker 2 (01:44:44):
Unfortunately, people can be very fickle and turn on you
if they don't exactly get exactly what you want. There's
some groups of people that wanted don to do like
election recounts and stuff like that. I don't think they
understood the cost of doing that. But then some people claim, well,
they had the money and the funds, but you still
have have to have a close enough election.

Speaker 5 (01:45:01):
To get close enough to warrant that.

Speaker 2 (01:45:04):
No, I don't think it was, and so they just
didn't seem to understand and kind of turned on them.
But just to say, ladies and gentlemen, that's that's the
end of our show tonight. We hope you got something
out of it and enjoyed it. Don't forget to catch
us next week when we have doctor Dan stock com.
Remember vote, vote right, get it right, because we need
to keep New Hampshire conservative. Good Night all