Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Giants are getting the All Star Game in twenty twenty eight.
You know what, let's test our next guest baseball knowledge. Oh,
let's keep it right here. Giants are getting the game
in twenty twenty eight. What the team is hosting the
All Star Game next season? Twenty twenty seven. I don't
you know what? If you were a real baseball man,
you'd know the answer to this question. I don't know
(00:20):
the answer to that question, Dick.
Speaker 2 (00:21):
Who's getting the All Star Game next year? Milwaukee?
Speaker 1 (00:25):
Nope, I know it. It's the Chicago Cups. Knew it
because I just looked it up. That's how I knew it.
I would not expect you to know something like that.
That is just pure baseball minutia. You were way bigger
than that.
Speaker 3 (00:39):
I do remember that because they had just put lights
up at Ridley Field, and they like celebrated that by
having an All Star game, right, and they hadn't had lights,
hadn't seen many night games. And if I remember, Gary
Carter had a huge game under the lights of Wrigley
for an All Star was like.
Speaker 1 (00:57):
The eighties, right when they finally decided to put lights
over over Wrigley Field. Well, I'll tell you what somebody
may want to turn on the lights with the Mariner offense. Dude,
Holy moly, I mean obviously, uh, they scored a few
runs in Game two of you know, against the Yankees,
but if not for Weston Wilson, Man, they would have
been shut out again. And who knows, we still may
be playing. Give us just the take on this from
(01:19):
fifty thousand feet right. I mean, you were the first
one on this radio station to bravely put your cajones
out there, your career in the line.
Speaker 2 (01:31):
You did. I didn't realize I did.
Speaker 1 (01:33):
Maybe Rich Moore called me in the office and said,
he doesn't know this, but that doesn't work.
Speaker 2 (01:37):
Man. He may be out of here. So what do
you think? What the hell is going on up there? Man?
Going on?
Speaker 3 (01:43):
I don't know. I don't know what to tell you
at this stage. Grossly underachieved. They can't hit. I don't
think they're managed well. Cal Raley has had the worst
season after a great season probably in the history of sports.
Speaker 2 (01:59):
Crazy.
Speaker 3 (02:00):
I mean not just baseball. I mean there's never been
a bigger decline one year from the other. I mean
he's hitting He was hitting one fifty nine at one point.
Do you realize what the lowest batting average for a
qualifying hitter in Major League Baseball is.
Speaker 1 (02:16):
Jared Duran two two is like forty points behind him, right.
Speaker 3 (02:20):
Hey, there's like forty points between Jared and Duran the
one hundred and fifty first batting average in baseball and
the ninety third versus the worst batting average of qualified
hitters and Cal Rawley. Same difference, same difference. Yeah. Plus,
he's not even playing good defense. It's affected as defense.
It's affected as abs challenging, which he's been terrible at
(02:43):
since he was great at the beginning of the year.
Parada was great. Yesterday, Parida was great. Garver was good,
great at it was the one redeeming quality that he had.
But he's not even good to that anymore. I mean,
he's just questioning everything he does as a baseball player
right now. It's like he's like paralyzed. So that certainly
is a major contributor. It's just been terrible. I mean,
(03:05):
they've just played bad baseball for four and a half months,
and who can who would have predicted it other than
somebody that is just completely sour on this team all
the time. Who could have predicted that? Because believe me,
Vegas didn't. National pundits didn't. I certainly didn't. You guys didn't.
(03:25):
I mean, it just is, yeah, I mean, the New
York Mets probably have the worst team in the National League,
with the second highest payroll in the sport, and yet
who does everyone at MLB network say has the most
disappointing season this year?
Speaker 2 (03:40):
The Mariners, Right, I mean it's crazy.
Speaker 4 (03:42):
So we were discussing earlier in the show about this
weekend and if it even matters, I mean, Softy's holding
out some hope Jackson are like, I'm moving on to
other things. So does this does this series even matter?
Speaker 3 (03:55):
Well, yes, of course, if they sweep, they're completely back
in it sees and they can. They've beaten the Astros
seven out of eight games this year, so they're certainly
capable of it. And obviously you saw their pitching, and
they don't seem to be intimidated all by facing this
Astros team anymore, which I think once upon a time
they were. So yeah, it matters. I mean I'm on
(04:19):
the other side of the fence. I don't think it's
going to happen, but they certainly have a chance. I mean,
you sweep this weekend. You're within two with thirty seven
games to go. That is completely doable. Plus you've given
yourself all the momentum, real momentum, tangible momentum, not a
three run homer by Cole Young late, or a dom
Canzone three run homer late, or a brawl followed by
(04:41):
a Cold Emerson home run, you know, spark of momentum.
That's like real tangible momentum. We just took the soul
out of the team that was five games up on us,
and now we're just two games back. Now you only
win two out of three, and that's if you win
the series. You only gain one game out of that.
Not enough, and that's probably not enough. I said a
(05:01):
few times this morning, and I'm not sure one hundred
percent believe it, but we had the conversation andrews Hurst
and I this morning. Sweep or die? Is that what
this weekend is? Do you have to sweep the Astros
in order for this not to be over? That's probably
taking it too far, but it does emphasize how important
it is to have success in Houston.
Speaker 1 (05:23):
Yeah, who do we have after Houston? Is it Milwaukee?
After Milwaukee? Okay, so Houston's got the Angels and the
A's after us. They need to sweep this series because
of our schedule versus their schedule.
Speaker 2 (05:37):
I schedule gets soft in September, right, it.
Speaker 1 (05:39):
Does, but in the immediate though, Philadelphia, Chicago, Milwaukee while
the Astros are playing the Angels and A's the next
six So my point is this is that if they
lose two out of three, and let's say they lose
a game and they're six out and then we go
to Milwaukee and they go to LA to take on
(06:01):
the Angels, that could be.
Speaker 2 (06:02):
Eight out by Wednesday of next week. So I am.
Speaker 1 (06:06):
My point is, guys, you're not going to get a
lot of opportunities to directly impact this and you have
a chance this week.
Speaker 2 (06:12):
Got to take advantage of that. That's it.
Speaker 3 (06:13):
I mean, there's a reason we had the conversation sweep
or die. It feels that important, and not just to
win two out of three. I think you you may
have to think there's a very good chance that you
have to sweep Houston this weekend. Let me let me
go back to the cal thing this for a second,
because I don't want to get too far away from that.
Because Dick and I talked about this on the year
of the year. They asked, Dick.
Speaker 1 (06:33):
If col ends the year, the Way's playing now, and
then he starts next year, the Way's playing now.
Speaker 2 (06:38):
What do we do?
Speaker 1 (06:39):
He's already eighty five million dollars. Are we gonna bench
Cal Rawley at some point? Is Kyle Rawley get taken
out of the lineup and demoted at some point? What
how do you handle cal if he's a one trick
pony that just can't do his trick anymore.
Speaker 3 (06:56):
I really don't even want to think about it. It
would just be the most startling transformation in my eleven
years here for sure. I mean, like I said, this
is historic decline. This is not just one of the
great drop offs in baseball history. This might be the
greatest drop off from one season to the next in
(07:17):
the history of sports. I even heard the conversation today,
should he just be benched this year at least for
a while? I don't think they would ever do that.
I think you're committed to him for this season. For
the start of next season. I mean, he'd have to
be doing this exact same thing next year, Like if
(07:38):
he gets up to two ten and can hit thirty homers,
and at least have that much confidence where his leadership
comes back, and his defense comes back, and his pitch
calling and his challenging all comes back. He brings enough
intangibles to the field that if he can just give
you back the defense and the handling of the pitching staff,
(07:59):
then he can be an asset to this baseball team.
But obviously we got the taste for sixty homers now,
like fifteen's not gonna cut it, So he'd have to.
I think he'd have to be as bad as he
is this year. And I just can't imagine he's going
to be hitting one fifty nine by on June first
(08:20):
next year. I just can't imagine it.
Speaker 5 (08:22):
But you know, yeah, I never know anything's gonna happen.
Speaker 4 (08:25):
I mean, you saw a one hundred out of one
hundred cal rally for a season, and you're seeing a
zero out of one hundred cal Rawley this year. I mean,
maybe it's not close to fifty next year, but it's
I mean, it's gotta be somewhere in the twenty thirty
forty versus zero. I would I would think Chuck Powells, well,
let's put it this.
Speaker 3 (08:43):
Way, You're not gonna You're not gonna acquire a catcher
this offseason, right, No matter how bad he was this year,
he's your guy going into next season. I'm sure no
one in the history of sports is gonna train like
Cayl Rawley's gonna train this offseason. Probably we wrourk his
body a little bit, see a shrink. Probably go see
a shrink. Maybe get a you know, a different girlfriend,
(09:04):
Maybe get a different car.
Speaker 2 (09:05):
I don't know, something to like, just change the entire
voodoo of his life right now during his.
Speaker 1 (09:11):
Name Shrink now known as Jerry Shrink, the dumper, Jerry Raley.
But that's the thing, is that Dick and I said
the same Sugarmo did in the first fine whatever, all
of us thought, well, there's no way this will continue
all year. You know, when he comes off the il,
he'll be fine. None of it's happening.
Speaker 4 (09:31):
He's just just as bad. Chuck Palell joining us a
chuck man. I know he's been put on the injured list,
but let's face it, Colt Emerson was demoted.
Speaker 5 (09:40):
Was that the right move?
Speaker 2 (09:42):
Yes?
Speaker 3 (09:43):
And yet I mean the reaction to this, I just
think is all wrong by so many people. There is
no extreme reaction to this. A rookie shortstop who basically
just reached puberty, who has all the ability to be
an excellent player in this league. And I think still
Will was not playing well. He was inside his own
(10:05):
head on both sides of the ball. And if you
have visions of trying to track down the Houston Astros,
you couldn't continue with cold Emerson playing shortstop. But the
idea that this is going to destroy his confidence, no way.
This is a very mature young player. And what we're
going to see next year is what Cole Young did
this year from a year ago. Remember Cole Young was
(10:26):
not on our playoff.
Speaker 2 (10:27):
Roster life right right, Hey?
Speaker 3 (10:28):
He played so bad down the stretch that they couldn't
play him in the playoffs. And look what he's done
this year. Well, I think cold Emerson is going to
have the same sort of season next year that Cole
Young had this year. He learned some lessons, grow from it,
mature from it, a little physical maturity, and he's going
to be fine. I also don't think I mean I
(10:50):
was here.
Speaker 2 (10:51):
I was here.
Speaker 3 (10:52):
I did the Rainiers game when he played here on
a Friday and got called up that weekend. I'll just
tell you as I was driving away, because that was
my first chance to see cold Emerson play nine games.
Very impressed with his defense. But I drove away.
Speaker 2 (11:05):
You're thinking he's not ready. He's not ready yet.
Speaker 3 (11:08):
And yet JP Crawford's defense was so bad, and it
was bad. Don't let the Mariners fool you. It was terrible.
Speaker 2 (11:14):
I mean C. J.
Speaker 3 (11:15):
Abrams was like the only shortstop in the sport whose
metrics were worse than JP Crawford's as a defensive shortstop range,
lack of arm strength, and cold Emerson did bring that
to the table for a while. He had upgraded our
shortstop position. But he's a rookie. I mean, Mike Trout
struggled his rookie year. Not everybody's Ken Griffy Jr. And
(11:38):
even he didn't hit the ground running as you remember
as a rookie. So it's the right move to take
him down. He's not playing well on either side of
the ball. His confidence is shot, the league's adjusted to him,
they're toying with him at this point, and he needs
a break from it all and to reboot a little
(11:59):
bit in the meantime. Another reason that you couldn't make
this move earlier. Who else is gonna play shortstop?
Speaker 2 (12:06):
Right?
Speaker 3 (12:06):
I mean Leo Rebos on Colt Emerson's worst day this year,
he was ten times better than.
Speaker 2 (12:12):
Leo Revos's pregnancy.
Speaker 3 (12:13):
Leo Revos has been atrocious for the Mariners this year.
And then the other option is Rock Roden, who they're
calling up. And he's a feisty I heard your interview
with Ryan Bliss. That's how I describe him. He's a
dirt bag. He's a feisty guy. They'll probably put the
ball in play a little bit more, but he's not
gonna go up and save the day for us. But
right now, it was better for the team and better
(12:36):
for Colt to not let him suffer and agonize and
fail at baseball for the first time his entire life
at the major league level. He needed to be replaced,
and that's the move.
Speaker 1 (12:46):
Yeah, well, chuck Pal's with us. It's just I'm just
kind of I'm chuckling inside.
Speaker 2 (12:50):
A little bit here.
Speaker 1 (12:50):
Yeah, synonyms chuckling, because we're talking about the least terrible
option right at shortstop.
Speaker 2 (12:58):
J Colt Emerson.
Speaker 3 (13:00):
He's done.
Speaker 2 (13:00):
He's done, it's done.
Speaker 3 (13:01):
He's about What about first?
Speaker 5 (13:03):
What about Cole Young?
Speaker 4 (13:04):
Joe Shian was on with Ian yesterday and said, what
about Cole Young at shortstop?
Speaker 5 (13:07):
He's an excellent second baseman.
Speaker 3 (13:09):
Who Well, the only problem is I have a good
second baseman, right, and then I'm gonna move him. Now
you're not doing to a weaker position that he hadn't
played a while. I think he can hold down short,
but then I've weakened second base, and that's probably gonna
be Donovan. And Donovan's actually playing better at third than
West and Wilson, and I got to put West and
Wilson at third. So now if Weeken second and third,
(13:29):
to give Cole Young the nod over Brock Roden, so
I'm at least want to feel good about second base
and feel better about third base and will make things work.
Speaker 1 (13:39):
Sure, you just got done talking about how great Cole
Young's been. Why would you want to mess with his mojo?
Leave him there? He's having great success at second base.
I mean, he's hitting the ball, he's doing fine. Let
the kid be. But you know, guys, my problem with
this is, all of a sudden.
Speaker 3 (13:52):
If you would have brought up Bliss instead of Roden,
could put second and then a short But that's not
the Cole Young and Roden is out playing Ryan and
I love Ryan.
Speaker 1 (14:01):
If Cole Young is the future at second base, then
he's the second that's his job. Stop messing around with everybody.
This is what this team does. It's what this franchise does. Literally,
it's it's almost in their mo that they can't just
let something be right. We have a great five man rotation,
Let's make it a six man rotation.
Speaker 2 (14:21):
We have a great starting pitcher.
Speaker 1 (14:23):
Let's make a piggyback and let's limit how much time
this guy goes and then you know what, on the
day of the pig a back or the day before,
let's change our mind and let's do something those do
you guys see the idiocy here with this? How how
just maniacal this is to start doing things like that.
My problem is that all of a sudden, you've got
for a team that was was at seven or eight
outs by the way, e eight outs away from the
(14:44):
World Series.
Speaker 2 (14:45):
Now they got a lot of holes.
Speaker 1 (14:46):
Man over the offseason, left field, right field, third base, DH,
what's gonna happen there?
Speaker 2 (14:53):
What's gonna happen with them? Can zones finding right? I'm
excited about can zoning right full time right fielder every
single day.
Speaker 3 (15:01):
Yeah, okay, made big leaps this year and still could
make another leap next.
Speaker 1 (15:04):
And they've only got four holes instead of five. How's
that sound holes? They've got holes? So, like, what's what's
a Rosarina's future look like? Is Donovan really going to
be your third basement?
Speaker 3 (15:14):
Probably not, Probably gonna be super utility next year? Right,
you're gonna trade one of your starting pitchers for a bat?
Speaker 2 (15:21):
Is Josh Naylor gonna bounce back?
Speaker 3 (15:23):
I mean he should, I mean his track record, but
his track record says he shouldn't have been as bad
as he was this year. I mean that's just part
of this. Like, I mean, you can't predict things in baseball.
Baseball's crazy, you know.
Speaker 1 (15:34):
It's really funny for a guy that's pretty positive right now,
more positive than most on this Mariner chances this year.
I'm very negative for being as positive as I am
about the.
Speaker 3 (15:43):
Astrogative, very negative about the future.
Speaker 2 (15:50):
Annoyed by how many I thought, we're.
Speaker 3 (15:52):
Annoyed that we have to start thinking about the future.
Speaker 2 (15:55):
Yes, I thought we were off and running.
Speaker 1 (15:57):
Yeah, you know, I thought we were good, you know,
I and I've told Dick I thought the Donovan trade
was a good one. I thought the Refschneider signing was
a good one. I thought the career final was a
good one. And they just haven't worked. And all of
a sudden we thought we were like, Okay, now we
got a team of you know, maybe twenty of twenty
six guys.
Speaker 2 (16:12):
Are good to go, a couple of button No. Now,
all of a.
Speaker 1 (16:14):
Sudden, we got a ton of places we got to
look at. Are we trading and starting pitching? What's gonna
happen with Kirby anyway? Hancock, Sloan Anderson?
Speaker 2 (16:21):
What the hell?
Speaker 3 (16:22):
I mean?
Speaker 1 (16:22):
Oh my god? Man, So I just my question to
you is this, before you run, you'd have to shake
up the offense, right for sure?
Speaker 3 (16:29):
I like Kevin Sidzer a lot, and I know Edgar's
I mean we're talking about not firing Dan. They're going
to fire Edgar, right, I mean, there's no way after
this offensive season that you can keep those guys. They
obviously are not getting.
Speaker 2 (16:40):
Sure to them. Well, what about Jerry? What about Jerry?
Speaker 1 (16:43):
I wouldn't is there what do you have to see
where you would say Jerry has taken this team as
far as he can take it. We need someone else
to take us to that next step.
Speaker 3 (16:55):
Well, a lot of my analysis of that is how
I feel.
Speaker 2 (17:00):
Well, of course that's why I'm asking you. Well, that's
what I'm saying.
Speaker 3 (17:03):
But no, no, no, because a lot of people will
say at the beginning of the season the roster's fine,
and then it turns out not fine, and then they
blame Jerry. I just don't operate that way if I
think the roster's fine and should get the job done
and then they don't get the job done. Am I
gonna go back and say Jerry was stupid for signing.
Speaker 2 (17:20):
Ros But you didn't say you were wrong. You thought
the roster was yes, and you were wrong. I was wrong.
Speaker 3 (17:26):
So maybe so, But but I I don't know. I mean,
you take the evidence. Rob Refschneider crushes left. Let me
give you an example. Let me give you an example.
How crazy this year is. So we add ref Sneyder
in the off season. His one niche is to hit lefties.
He can't hit lefties. And we've added four times, We've
had four times. We just traded for Taylor Ward, who
(17:49):
let the league in walks.
Speaker 2 (17:50):
I can't walk.
Speaker 3 (17:51):
He has not walked since he's been with us, and
I don't. I don't see Taylor Ward chasing pitches. I
don't see him being reckless at the plate. Since Taylor
Ward walk machine has joined the Mariners, no pitcher has
thrown him a ball. It's amazing, Like, how crazy is
that that you get the league's leader in walks? He
(18:12):
was the leagus leaguer in walks one day and then
the next day can't get a walk for a week
and a half. Do you explain some of them? I mean,
it's baseball. Everybody says they hate get here in the phrase,
well that's baseball, but it's true. It's just a weird thing.
And then this season for the Mariners has just taken
(18:33):
the cake. I mean, it's hard to explain it all.
I don't think that they have any choice but to
count on cal Rawley bouncing back, Josh Naylor bouncing back,
and there's a good chance I think that they will.
Speaker 2 (18:46):
I mean, did they just die as baseball.
Speaker 3 (18:48):
Players since last season? I have a hard time believing that.
Speaker 1 (18:52):
Yeah, maybe that is what happened and we don't even
know it. This guy here is dead, Yeah, cross him off.
Speaker 3 (18:58):
Then maybe cal sold is sold to the devil for
one great season.
Speaker 2 (19:02):
I don't all right, anything else you want to offer me?
Speaker 4 (19:06):
Well, well, I mean can you give me Can you
give me thirty seconds on Terry and Arnold?
Speaker 2 (19:11):
Yeah?
Speaker 3 (19:12):
Oh, I wouldn't have done it. I just think things
are going way too well and you've built a great
culture here. I don't think he's that good of a player.
If he was that good of a player, the Lions
would have given it more time. Like the Lions, as
soon as that story broke, they already knew it.
Speaker 2 (19:33):
Cut him right.
Speaker 3 (19:34):
They were already having issues, the Detroit Lions, who for
two years. The reason that they didn't go as far
as they wanted to go is because they lost like
a thousand defensive.
Speaker 2 (19:44):
Backs to injury last year, right, two years in a row.
Speaker 3 (19:48):
Why on earth would the Lions not give it a
little more time to see if maybe the the the
charges are exaggerated. They got rid of him. I don't
I don't think we needed him, And I don't know
why you would bring any kind of negativity to such
a positive, heavenly place, positive football, right, got it all right?
Speaker 2 (20:11):
Man dead?
Speaker 3 (20:13):
Cross him off the prior he Millan, what's going do
you want your takes?
Speaker 2 (20:19):
Oh? The terrible tech.
Speaker 3 (20:20):
Ye.
Speaker 1 (20:20):
Yeah, Chuck, what's your take on the Mariners and the
Astros game tonight?
Speaker 3 (20:25):
I think the Mariners are gonna win.
Speaker 2 (20:27):
Oh geez, well, I'll tell you we all.
Speaker 5 (20:29):
Have their head up their ass and that's a lousy take.
Speaker 1 (20:31):
All right, good stuff, seven o'clock tonight in the am, Right,
all right, good job, all right, Chuck Powell. Well, so
we'll get a break. We're gonna hear a little bit
from Mike McDonald. Chuck doesn't like it. I don't think
Millan likes it either, and we're gonna talk to him
at five. By the way, Well here from McDonald on
the Terry and Arnold signing.
Speaker 2 (20:47):
Next, Now back does Suffian did.
Speaker 6 (20:52):
Brought to you by Emerald Queen Casino, bringing you the
best in live music, entertainment, dining, in gaming. Whether it's
your favorite game, food, concerts, MMA, or professional boxing, it's
all at Emerald Queen Casino, Always entertaining. For more info,
visit Emerald Queen dot com.
Speaker 1 (21:10):
All right, here we go Friday Afternoon Life from Cheeney Stadium.
Mariner's saying that Colin Emerson's going on the IL with
a left wrist injury. Dick as opposed to going to
Tacoma because the injury was bothering him more than he
was letting on by the way, says the Mariner, So
he was maybe hiding it a little bit. I mean
you could see that absolutely, you want to stay up,
(21:32):
wants to stay there, doesn't want to go disappoint anybody,
and hides the injury and all that stuff.
Speaker 2 (21:37):
So, uh, he's going on the IL for a while.
We'll see.
Speaker 1 (21:40):
I'm curious what happens when the IL stint is over, right,
does he come back to the major leagues or does
he then go back down to Triple A.
Speaker 4 (21:47):
Well, you you don't have much Triple A left. What
he got like two and a half weeks left.
Speaker 2 (21:53):
Early September, right, Yeah, I would.
Speaker 5 (21:55):
Say, here's what I would do.
Speaker 4 (21:56):
I would have him finished the season in Tacoma and
then bring him up when the Koma see over, and
that would give him an extra I don't know, eight
ten games a A, get the swing backed, feel good
about yourself, and then get.
Speaker 1 (22:07):
Back because remember, remember this is not like it was
back in the day when you could bring up as
many guys as you want. September, right, you'll get what
two guys is that, right.
Speaker 4 (22:15):
Well, he would definitely be one of the two though,
right if he was if he was playing well.
Speaker 1 (22:19):
Right, but if you went well and then you I mean,
but he would he would not come up as a
call up. He would just come up to take whoever
was on the roster in place, right, like a Royo Montes,
Sloan Anderson whatever. But yeah, the last the last Rainy
Years game is I believe it's early September. Actually, you
know what, it's September twentieth. It's two weeks before the
(22:40):
baseball regular season ends. So yeah, you got you got
what you got five weeks five weeks left in the
Rainer season, so a little more time. Mike McDonald Terry
and Arnold. Uh, the Seahawks have they officially signed him?
Speaker 2 (22:53):
By the way, is that like seen?
Speaker 5 (22:55):
I have not seen an official announcement.
Speaker 1 (22:57):
So this is a little unique right in that Mike
McDonald's talking about a guy that they haven't even signed yet.
How often does that happen there's no contract yet, that's
a good question. This isn't official, but they're still talking
about it. Here's Mike McDonald on the Terry and Arnold situation.
Speaker 7 (23:17):
I think it was an opportunity to bring on a
player that we felt strongly about during the draft process,
and we also understand that it's a serious situation with
a legal matter that's you know, there's a process behind it,
so we respect that and that's how we'll operate too,
and just letting that process play out and let the
(23:39):
league decide if and when, you know, his return to
play is a more just kind of.
Speaker 8 (23:44):
Understand that that's at play, but there's also an.
Speaker 7 (23:46):
Opportunity to bring him in and give Hi an opportunity
to earn a position here.
Speaker 8 (23:51):
But uh, you know, we really we feel, we feel
really strongly about.
Speaker 7 (23:55):
Our locker room and our team, and we had a
great visit with Terry on Obviously we knew him going
throughout the process, and I reference to the folks that
have been in his corner throughout the whole process as well,
and you know, we respect those people, and you know,
we're not going to ignore those folks that we that
we really respect and have a strong opinion about it
as well. So kind of when you put all those
things together, it felt like it was a good opportunity
(24:17):
for the team.
Speaker 2 (24:18):
Would he be here, but when he would, he'll be
ele played preach.
Speaker 7 (24:21):
Well, the timetable right now is being worked out, so's
he's visited to my to my understanding, he's visited quite
a few teams, eight plus maybe ten plus teams. So
we're working through that on when's the best time for
him to come in. But we have an agreement with him,
and uh.
Speaker 8 (24:37):
We'll see. But I just really don't know what, you know,
how we're going to do it.
Speaker 3 (24:42):
What you learn about the legal process might just make
think now is the time to sign him and they'll
be available to play.
Speaker 7 (24:47):
And I I'm I do not have like the specifics
on the dates and things like that. All I know
is that he has he's a there's an availability if
if the league lets.
Speaker 8 (24:59):
Him happen that he can play.
Speaker 7 (25:00):
So in terms of when that happens and how that
goes down, it's just kind of to me, it's like
it's just it's part of that process, you know, So
like what the facts of the case, all those things
about the comments of what happened, it's it's not, uh,
it's not our responsibility to have a comment on that,
nor can we. So I think we just have to
understand that there's a process of play and we're gonna
(25:21):
let it play out.
Speaker 2 (25:24):
How much did you look into the criminal allegations to
feel comfortable they need could sign up?
Speaker 7 (25:27):
Well, for us to comment on that right now is
not our place, nor should we. So again, it's a
it's a serious situation.
Speaker 8 (25:35):
We understand that. But to make any comment further.
Speaker 7 (25:38):
Is is uh not the not the time or place
right now.
Speaker 1 (25:42):
Yeah, I just don't know if I've heard them talk
like that about a player that technically hasn't signed a
contract yet, right which is I'm fine with that.
Speaker 2 (25:48):
I'm not saying it's bad.
Speaker 1 (25:49):
I mean, it's just unique, I guess, you know, for
them from a pr perspective to do that. But yeah,
I mean it's obviously out there. You know, he's he's
saying they have an agreement with him and all that,
and you know, look, I mean, I I don't have
any problem with this. I understand why some people would.
I don't agree with the high risk, high reward portion
of this whole thing. Uh, he's gonna have to come
(26:10):
in here, he's gonna have to earn a spot behind
guys like Iggy and pritch It. By the way, they're
not gonna pay him a lot of money. Dick you
wouldn't think they're gonna pay him a lot of money.
And if things get sideways with him in his legal situation,
then you just say goodbye.
Speaker 2 (26:24):
That's it.
Speaker 1 (26:25):
So I don't see them allowing this to get to
a point where it f's up their culture. I think
that's been a lot of people's take that this is
a tight knit locker room, a great culture.
Speaker 2 (26:36):
Why would you want to bring in this guy to
mess with that?
Speaker 1 (26:38):
I mean, look, I understand there's the accusation about what
he did off the field, which is a big deal,
and I want to just pooh poo that. But from
a locker room perspective, is this a bad guy?
Speaker 4 (26:48):
Is cancer locker They've got assistant coaches that worked with
him at A recruited him in Alabama. I've got Jalen Milroe,
who can say Scott nothing, but yeah, who can Jalen
Milroe says nothing about great things about this guy. He
wasn't a problem in the Lions locker room, so like,
why should it be a problem in the Seahawks locker
U I don't think he will be. My take is,
(27:11):
what is the worst possible scenario for the football team.
He comes in, he comes in he's a bad player
slash bad dude.
Speaker 5 (27:21):
And he's gone. That's the worst case scenario, and long
term it doesn't.
Speaker 1 (27:28):
I don't think it does. You're not giving him a contract.
This is not like Percy Harvin when you gave Percy
Harvin a bunch of money, traded some first round draft picks,
and the guy was a sugar Nuh right, I mean
that's not what we're talking about, right that, that's not
what that is at all. I mean, if if they
were committing huge dollars to him and draft capital to
get Terry on Arnold, then I would say, all right,
that's probably way too big of a risk, way too
(27:50):
big of a risk. I think it's low risk, high reward.
I think it's the exact opposite. I would never say
high risk high reward. I think it's low risk, high reward.
The guy's gonna be buried in the depth chart when
he shows up here. He's gonna have to show he
deserves to play. He's gonna have to behave himself, he's
gonna have to stay out of trouble, all that stuff.
(28:11):
I mean, Actually, if you're worried about a guy being
a malcontent and being you know, a bad egg, for example,
on or off the field, This might be the best
time to get him.
Speaker 5 (28:21):
M hmm. Literally, was was there any when he said that?
Speaker 4 (28:25):
You know, he's been talked to eight to ten teams, right,
we have an agreement. We don't know when he was
gonna sign. Was there any of you that was like, man,
do you think he's gonna get stolen by somebody else
and he'll back off the agreement with the Seahawks.
Speaker 1 (28:38):
I'm gonna tell he signs a deal. It's possible. I mean,
there's I don't think so.
Speaker 2 (28:42):
I'm not worried about that, but it is possible.
Speaker 4 (28:44):
There was just a little bit of me going, well,
what if what if some other team just came in
and said, you know what, we're gonna give you a
two year contract right now?
Speaker 1 (28:51):
Yeah, you know what, and Dick, if that happens, okay whatever.
Speaker 5 (28:54):
Yeah, it's like not like demand. He doesn't mean that
signed yet.
Speaker 1 (28:58):
I'm not gonna write I'm not gonna I'm not gonna
worry about losing the guy. I mean, you know, I
think the Hawks are gonna be just fine without him.
I think they'll be just fine with him. I mean,
I just you know, could he come in and give
him a little bit of an edge at corner? Uh
maybe when they play the Rams and you know, teams
like that. Yeah, But I mean to me, it's it's
kind of a nothing burger as far as a risk
(29:19):
is concerned. I don't understand why somebody would sit around
and say this is a huge Like I even saw
Chase Daniel tweeted that out. This is a high risk.
High what's the risk?
Speaker 2 (29:29):
Honestly? Like, what is.
Speaker 1 (29:30):
The from a tangible perspective? I mean, I don't know, Jackson.
You want to play the other side here, you want
to play the contrarian from a tangible perspective, what is
the risk?
Speaker 9 (29:39):
What is the resk Let's let's let's let's just throw
this out there, right, is that he signs with the
Seahawks and he's doing well and something with the case
gets brought up or something happens and he ends up
being a total negative.
Speaker 2 (29:55):
And that's the concern, that's the consent.
Speaker 1 (29:59):
The concern is that he comes to Seattle and he
ends up starting for you, and he ends up playing
a big role in your defense and he's out and
then all of a sudden, all of a sudden, he's
got to go right.
Speaker 5 (30:11):
Styt he's helping your team win.
Speaker 1 (30:15):
Or if you're counting on him for a big role
and he ends up filling a big role and then
all of a sudden you lose the guy. That is
a slight concern, But I would hope that at that
point in time, this thing's been resolved with him off
the field.
Speaker 2 (30:30):
So I don't I.
Speaker 1 (30:31):
Don't ever want to lose guys that I'm all of
a sudden counting on, you know, like, man, you know
we weren't really gonna count on you, and now we are,
and now you've got to leave the team. That sucks
because the guy behind you is all pissed off and
butt hurt, and you know we've been running our defense
a certain way and now we can't. I'm trying to
think of an analogy or an example of where something
like that happened in Seattle. I'm sure there's something, if
we put our brains together, that would be the one concern, Jackson.
(30:54):
And if this guy ends up coming in here kicking
ass for you and then all of a sudden he's
got to leave, right But I don't know, man, I mean,
can he help you win games in the interim, Yeah, probably.
Is he that great a corner? Is he worth all
this hubbub?
Speaker 2 (31:09):
Maybe not.
Speaker 1 (31:09):
We'll talk to hew at five about that on ninety
three three KJRFM