Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:02):
Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio, the George
Washington Broadcast Center, Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty.
Speaker 2 (00:11):
Armstrong and Jetty and now he.
Speaker 1 (00:16):
Armstrong and Getty.
Speaker 2 (00:27):
Bad news, good news.
Speaker 1 (00:29):
The bad news is our friend Josh Rogan woke up
feeling just absolutely awful today and could not come through
with the conversation we were looking forward to about Washington
mobilizing to deal with the threat of Chinese AI. I've
got some other AI stuff. Maybe we can squeeze that
in later on. So Josh will not be joining us,
which is too bad. Brilliant guy.
Speaker 2 (00:50):
Interesting.
Speaker 1 (00:51):
Don't always agree with them, but sometimes those are my
favorite people because they make me think anyway. I expressed
a bit of frustration towards the end of last hour
that we would not be able to continue the discussion
about how to defeat democratic socialists other than just calling
them commis. So we will be able to get to
that in a second. But first, the geniuses at the
(01:12):
Babylon b what would happen if we abolish prisons and
defund the police.
Speaker 2 (01:17):
Hi, I'm your social worker. I'm just here to check
if you decided to stop robbing and raping and murdering. No,
I think I'm going to keep doing that. Rat someone
is breaking into my house.
Speaker 1 (01:33):
That sounds awful.
Speaker 2 (01:34):
We can mail you a pamphlet on dealing with the
trauma pamphlet.
Speaker 3 (01:37):
It's free.
Speaker 2 (01:38):
Oh okay, sure send it.
Speaker 4 (01:40):
Crime is down one hundred percent now that the government
is no longer tracking crime, since it can't do anything
substantial about it. So true, for killing all those people,
We're giving you the harshest sentence we.
Speaker 2 (01:51):
Can, which is to ask you not to do it again. Please,
don't do it again. Yeah, that's pretty good. That's pretty good.
And anybody with a lick of sense gets that.
Speaker 1 (02:04):
Sometimes I feel like I'm studying giraffes when I look
at human beings. Wait a minute, their ideology can blind
them to what is obviously happening all around them. That's
a crazy behavior, huh. Anyway, So Karl Rove, he's no
favorite of Maga.
Speaker 2 (02:22):
I get that. Not that we're just we're independent around here.
I'm nothing.
Speaker 1 (02:27):
Labels are for soup cans, you know, cut your own
course through life in politics. But anyway, but he's a
hell of a good political analyst. Sometimes the's wrong, sometimes
it's right. Stuff business, but he was talking about how
to actually defeat the DSA lunatics, and Trump swung and
missed in Vegas. He's just, oh my god, not only
(02:48):
you know, he just said they're trying to destroy the country.
They're communists. These are communists. Okay, yeah, pretty much, but
that's not gonna win the argument. And then, and this
is not about Trump bashing. I'm just getting increasingly frustrated.
He was going on about how we're bringing prices down
more than ever and the bad numbers are fake polls,
(03:13):
and oh my god, no, you're not bringing prices down.
Speaker 2 (03:18):
People go to the grocery store, they get.
Speaker 1 (03:19):
Gas every day. Stop it, stop it, stop it. So
here's how to actually defeat the DSA. It's seven points
from Karl Rove.
Speaker 2 (03:27):
I agree with most of them. First, don't gaslight the voters.
Speaker 1 (03:32):
The President claimed in Vegas that he produced the greatest
down economy we've ever had so far, with the cost
of rent, groceries and other staples coming down very fast.
They're not coming down at all, they're going up. The
rate at which they're rising is less. But don't gaslight voters.
It never ever works. Biden tried, and we go fought
(03:53):
at him right, Okay, So don't do that. Second, screaming
communist won't win additional votes. Instead, use the Democrats candidate's
own words and policies. Remember that blockbuster Trump twenty twenty four.
They them add with footage of Kamala Harris endorsing transgender
surgery for convicts. Make Democrats eat anything they say that's extreme.
Speaker 2 (04:15):
Use their words.
Speaker 1 (04:18):
Third, don't let Democrats get it away with disavowing past
outrageous positions. Do we have the idiot AOC Michael the
short version, it doesn't matter.
Speaker 2 (04:30):
Woke one was crazy?
Speaker 3 (04:32):
I have a local city councilman that has this.
Speaker 5 (04:37):
Saying woke one was crazy.
Speaker 1 (04:42):
Yeah, don't let Democrats get away with that. Point out
how convenient their changes are. Ask when and why they
change their minds, like we were talking about yesterday, raised
out suggesting that they're untrustworthy and nothing keeps them from
reverting to those extreme views. It's talking about a column
Charlie Cook wrote, and yeah, he pointed out the same thing.
When did you change your mind? Why did you change
(05:05):
your mind? What did you get wrong? Why did you
punish people who disagree to you with you at the time?
What would you say to them? Now, they weren't eleven
years old when they said those things. They were grown
ass adults in office. Make them answer for it. Fourth,
(05:25):
don't let Democrats escape from dangerous associations if someone like
Hassan Piker campaigned for them or another Democrat on the
state ticket. Make every Democrat defend every terrible comment mister
Piker has made. Ask why Democrats would ever associate with
someone like that. They always do that to Republicans. The
media always does that to Republicans. But of course, you know,
(05:50):
the media treats Democrats differently. But how let's the playing
field we play on. We've still got to win. You
can cry and whine and I will, uh, but then
you have to go out and win. It's like I
always told my soccer players, because they'd come back and
bitch about, you know, one team getting away with fouls
and stuff like that, and I would tell them, the
rules are what the ref is calling today.
Speaker 2 (06:11):
You got to adapt.
Speaker 1 (06:12):
And yeah, the media is an utterly biased referee quote
unquote referee. They're terrible, but you got to understand the
playing field and win anyway. All right, Going on with
carlro Fifth, Republicans, especially those running against candidates endorsed by
the DSA or opponents who share their state ticket with
DSA back Democrats. They must explain why the DSA's agenda
(06:36):
won't work and will hurt voters. The DSA doesn't want
Americans to have a landlord or a mortgage. That logically means,
for instance, the government would assign your housing, and you
couldn't accumulate wealth by buying a home and letting it
grow in value. The government will handle all that. Explain
that to people briefly, but explain it. Sixth, force normal
(06:58):
Democrats to disa DSA policies. Yes, that gives some Democrats
an opportunity to say I won't abolish ice or defund
the police or close prisons, but that could discourage some
of their left wing supporters from turning out. Make them
say they won't do the crazy ass lefty stuff, because
then they're twenty four year old women's studies majors. Affluent
(07:23):
communist idiots won't come out and vote.
Speaker 2 (07:28):
It's hardball politics, but it works.
Speaker 1 (07:31):
Finally, Republicans can't simply run on having done a good
job last year or last term whatever. They must show
concrete plans to make things better next year. There's practically
none of that. In the President's hour plus Las Vegas speech.
Near its end, he spent thirty nine seconds on a
new healthcare plan and one minute on the Save Act.
(07:54):
Not nearly enough. Republican candidates that better offer more fresh
ideas and spend plenty of time on them. Mister Trump's
yelling communist gets headlines, but it won't convert swing voters,
and it drowns out the messages Republicans need to win.
There's a better way. Let's be strategic. Let's call them out,
Let's make them answer for their crap. Not let anybody
(08:15):
get away with Look. I said things in the past,
My thinking has evolved.
Speaker 2 (08:21):
Dude.
Speaker 1 (08:22):
That was two and a half years ago, and you
ended people's careers for disagreeing with you at the time.
You can't get away with woke one was crazy, ha
ha ha.
Speaker 2 (08:33):
Don't let them get away with that, bastards. The polar
opposite of the thinking of.
Speaker 1 (08:43):
Your social major affluent twits embracing revolution space is you right.
Speaker 2 (08:54):
Hard worker, savor, smart, practical.
Speaker 1 (08:57):
There's no way you're going to talk about your money
and your future with somebody who doesn't get that. So
we'd like to introduce you to blue Collar Dollar. At
blue Collar Dollar, they do get it. They're building a
place where hardworking people can share values and financial dreams
with advisors who talk with you, not at you. Practical people, Americans,
hard workers. If you save five hundred thousand dollars or more,
we invite you to call blue Collar Dollar for a
(09:19):
no cost consultation, no pretension, no old money stuff. There's
no obligation if you don't like what you hear, no
harm done. From your mobile phone doll pound two to
fifty and when prompted say blue Collar Dollar again. That's
dial pound two fifty on your mobile phone. When you're
prompted to use the keywords blue collar Dollar, they'll connect
you right away.
Speaker 2 (09:38):
There's no obligation.
Speaker 1 (09:40):
Advisory service is offered through TEALENTLLC, SEC registered investment advisor.
Marketing is done by its affiliated company, Blue Collar Dollar,
ll C. Registration as an investment advisor does not apply
a certain level of skill training. For more important disclosures,
visit Bluecollar Dollar dot com.
Speaker 3 (09:57):
Uh.
Speaker 1 (09:57):
Speaking of progressives in their plans, Michael, give us the
the one and only, the poofed up, the pretty, the creepy,
the completely phony, Gavin Newsom and clip number sixteen.
Speaker 4 (10:10):
It's time for a national billionaire's tax and a new
social contract.
Speaker 2 (10:15):
Think about this.
Speaker 4 (10:16):
Just ten percent of people, ten percent of people in
this country owned two thirds of the wealth.
Speaker 1 (10:23):
You know, Gavy boy, you are desperate for that woke
leftist college vote, and you're going about it in a
pretty smart way. Campaigning with l Sie, the communist Islamist
who wants to impost your real law. You figure you
can take care of him after the fight. Yeah, how
that going around in seventy nine. But yeah, he's plainly
(10:45):
doing that, and you know it'll probably work for him
at least for a while. The divorce between ideology and reality.
That's that's the thing Gavin Newsom must cultivate because this
record in California has been so incredibly miserable. I mean,
it's it's unspeakably miserable.
Speaker 4 (11:07):
Were all human, We all fall short sometimes, it's.
Speaker 2 (11:10):
A fair point, Kevin.
Speaker 1 (11:13):
Folks around the country think they know how insane California is.
You've got an idea, but you don't quite. It's it's
worse than you think it's. It's more wasteful than you think,
it's more junkie strewn than you think.
Speaker 2 (11:27):
It's still incredibly.
Speaker 1 (11:28):
Beautiful and vital, and there are a lot of great,
sane people in California. But you know, if you lose
every election, say fifty five forty five ten points, is
a landslide, and you got forty five percent of the population, normal,
hard working, sane getting screwed all the time.
Speaker 2 (11:50):
That's California.
Speaker 1 (11:51):
That's a good description in California. How that turns around.
Nobody knows, all right, something completely different coming up in
a moment or two.
Speaker 2 (11:59):
Stay with us.
Speaker 1 (12:08):
That nearly thirty pounds of raw beef is being recalled
after officials realized it entered the US without being inspected.
Speaker 2 (12:15):
Yeah, we got issues with let us helppenos and beef.
Speaker 3 (12:18):
Man.
Speaker 4 (12:18):
You know it's bad when the healthiest thing in the
Taco bell menu is mountain dew.
Speaker 2 (12:24):
Oh, I was speaking of beef. That's one thing.
Speaker 1 (12:28):
Veg Vegan says that you got to give it up
because it aids climate change. New York Times with the
story extreme weather brings fierce winds and gentle hugs to
sesame straight.
Speaker 2 (12:41):
That's right.
Speaker 1 (12:42):
An episode that aired, I think it was this week
or maybe last week, focused on the dangerous effects of
climate change without mentioning.
Speaker 2 (12:50):
Climate change for the little ones.
Speaker 1 (12:53):
No place is safe from climate change these days, not
even Sesame Street, where sunny days used to sweep the
clouds away. This is in the New York Times and
puts this as an just an un unambiguous wonderful thing,
writes about this is a great thing. On Monday, a
(13:14):
fierce storm tore through the set of the fifty seven
year old children's show, knocking over lampposts, blowing out windows,
and scattering debris around Oscar of the Grouch's trash can.
The fictional cloudburst was part of a special episode Storm
on Sesame Street, created to help children make sense of
the extreme weather that's become increasingly common across the world
as the planet worms. I hate this so much. Number one,
(13:39):
the kids can't freak and read. Teach them the ab
season one two threes not progressive politics.
Speaker 2 (13:44):
Number two.
Speaker 1 (13:45):
You see the stats of little kids who are indoctrinated
into the climate change things as young as kindergarten and
then have this terrible climate anxiety because Gretititunberg can vince
them with help from you know, her ilk, that we're
all going to die. And these kids are terrified.
Speaker 2 (14:07):
Blah blah blah blah blah blah.
Speaker 1 (14:11):
Kids, take off your sweater and put on shorts. It's
going to be okay. And yeah, the world is warming.
It's warmed and cooled and warmed and cooled and warmed
and cooled, and mankind might have something to do with
it this time, but it has. Committing economic suicide to
make a meaningless gesture is absolutely idiotic. But here's the thing,
(14:31):
And I know I sound obsessive, but it's because it's true.
You remember James Lindsay yesterday talking about on the last
page of the Communist Manifesto, Karl Marx said communism will
aid every uprising around the world if it's an uprising
against the status quo and the powers that be, all
(14:52):
of them, no matter if it's transgenders in the WNBA
or you know, or or whatever, you know, gay rights,
or fighting back against the British government in you know,
in some foreign land or whatever. Just we'll aid in
every single fight. And climate change is absolutely one of those,
(15:14):
because it's bent on tearing down the status quo and
bringing in a new.
Speaker 2 (15:20):
Future, which will be a Marxist future.
Speaker 1 (15:22):
But anyway, so yeah, you got to got to get
the kids easy, got to indoctrinate them young. So great
sesame Street terrifying the kids about climate change.
Speaker 2 (15:33):
And I thought this is very very interesting.
Speaker 1 (15:37):
As smoke from Canadian wildfires poured into American cities last month,
the headlines poured out equally fast.
Speaker 2 (15:43):
Most blamed climate change.
Speaker 1 (15:44):
Canada's public broadcaster informed readers that the Smoky Skies had
quote only one true fix, stop burning fossil fuels. But
the headlines seem to have missed the most remarkable fact
about the wildfires. Canada is having a below average fire year.
In fact, the entire world is on track to a
record low an area burned, which is how they always
(16:07):
measure this stuff. Ottawa's own tally, released a July ninth,
that's the Canadian capital, showed one point four million hectars
burned use acres, less than a third of the four
point six million hectars burned by the same date last year.
Tucked into the quick facts of the government's press release,
beneath the ministerial quotes about climate change driving ever more
(16:29):
severe disasters, was the quiet admission that wildfire activity remains
below the five year average. That's understating it satellite data
weekly updated by the European Union confirmed that Canada's total
area burned by just the other day.
Speaker 2 (16:44):
It was below the twenty twelve to twenty.
Speaker 1 (16:47):
Five average the EU uses as a baseline, and the
statistical good news keeps coming. The US, this year's remained
below its twenty twelve to twenty twenty five half the average,
with its most recent measurement twenty percent below average.
Speaker 2 (16:58):
As of August the.
Speaker 1 (17:00):
Fifth, North America and South America are at record low
burns since twenty twelve. Every continent around the globe this
year is burning lest some much less than usual, and
they go through Oceania, the Europe, Asia, Africa, which is
not to say next year might not be worse.
Speaker 2 (17:21):
I mean it might be. I don't know.
Speaker 1 (17:24):
But in the never ending drum beat that this is
caused by climate change, Gavin Newsom is still saying that
about the Palisades fire in California that was set by
a leftist, it's leftist political violence. It's not climate change.
And yes, the climate is changing, but these people are
so obsessed with convincing you that that means we have
(17:44):
to overthrow everything in change society. They can't even admit
when yeah, it's super smoky in some parts of the
country temporarily, but it's actually a really down year for wildfires.
These people they either gosh, they don't know, or they
don't mind lying, or once again, their ideology has just
completely blinded their ability to perceive the truth. Thank you,
(18:09):
Al Gore. Yeah, I tell you who's bull LESSU a
great perspective on AI and its dangers and opportunities coming up.
Mundani wants to Amazon to go to the team stairs.
A lot to talk about and got to get to
that story about China and it's sending thousands of people
over to have fake, paid for marriages with American citizens,
(18:34):
and the weird way that the Justice Department addressed it yesterday.
They didn't even bring up national security. It is like
it was just an immigration problem, which I don't get.
Speaker 2 (18:46):
Anyway.
Speaker 1 (18:47):
That and a whole bunch of stuff. Looking forward to
kicking off our number three with Craig Gottwalls. Craig the
healthcare guru, who's going to talk about, well, a couple
of different topics to help us understand where our healthcare
system is really going wacky.
Speaker 2 (19:03):
And why it's so expensive. So stay tuned for that.
Speaker 1 (19:06):
If you can, or if you don't, get a Gravit
Fire podcast Armstrong and getting on demand. So a report
here from CBS News Tony Dakoppel, and Tony is by
far the least obnoxiously progressive of the news anchors.
Speaker 2 (19:21):
He's a product of.
Speaker 1 (19:24):
New York News, though, And if you can spend your.
Speaker 2 (19:30):
Career in an environment.
Speaker 1 (19:35):
And not be affected by that environment, you're a very
very strong person. Even like a sane conservative, moderate person
in that cauldron of progressivism is going to start to
pick up some really bad habits and start to drift
in the way that lefties drift where they think AOC's mainstream.
Speaker 2 (19:58):
For instance, when she's not not even close.
Speaker 1 (20:01):
So in this report and the story itself is unbelievable,
but I have one major major gripe with I think
twenty Dakoppel says it, but go ahead and roll. Jason
Allen on CBS Michael.
Speaker 4 (20:15):
Alaskan nurse mcketta West has turned to doctors in Texas
to try to save the newborn child she carried for
a California couple.
Speaker 3 (20:23):
It was scary to think that something might be wrong
and that I may be the one that's not able
to make a decision about the treatment.
Speaker 4 (20:35):
Wes spoke about the unusual surrogacy situation with Live Action,
an anti abortion rights organization, So that.
Speaker 2 (20:42):
Was Jason Allen the reporter.
Speaker 1 (20:44):
Live Action is an anti abortion rights organization.
Speaker 2 (20:51):
Do you catch it?
Speaker 1 (20:53):
An anti abortion rights organization, not an anti abortion organization.
If I am against murder, say, and folks who believe
abortion is murder have a case to be made, maybe
you reject it, but it's a case. But if I'm
(21:15):
against you know, standard, I don't like my neighbors, so
I shoot him in the belly and kill him. If
I'm against murder, am I against murder rights? There are
radical leftists who think shoplifting is justified. You're looting it back,
you're anti capitalist. So if I'm anti theft, am I
anti theft rights? Or am I just anti theft? That
(21:40):
was a real tell from a woke reporter on CBS.
Barry Weis is doing a good job trying to straighten
that outfit out. But watch that crap, would you? Anyway,
back to the story, which is absolutely fascinating, a little
bit more insight before we analyze.
Speaker 4 (21:57):
Her pregnancy was on track for twenty weeks until doctors
diagnosed a rare and severe heart defect in the baby,
who she's calling Gabriel. After learning of the defect, Wes
says the parents, Nauching Gilkaar and omar Amed, asked her
to schedule an abortion. Parents with medical prerogative is something
experts say is a common clause in the surrogacy contract
(22:17):
she had signed. Instead, Wes decided to find treatment in
Dallas for the child after birth. Texas Attorney General Ken
Passton stepped in to insure it this week, securing in
an emergency order to make sure doctors provide life saving care.
Speaker 1 (22:31):
My understanding is that the arrangements are being made for
him to receive that surgery.
Speaker 2 (22:37):
One more clip.
Speaker 4 (22:39):
Courts in Alaska, at California, and Texas are considering the case,
but for now, Texas law governs the welfare of the child.
According to Professor Rachel Rebuschez.
Speaker 5 (22:49):
It's a complicated situation where we're looking at intended parents
who ultimately and probably will be the parents, but because
of Texas intervention, will not necessarily get to make this
decision about what happens immediately after birth.
Speaker 1 (23:07):
All right, here's what you need to understand. The gal
the surrogate mom is from Alaska. The contract for surrogacy
was signed. I believe in California and the adoptive the
surrogate parents, for all I know, I think it's probably
their egg and sperm, and so biologically it's their child.
(23:27):
But the folks who are going to raise the child
are in California. And then the surrogate mom took refuge
in Texas. So that's why those three states are looking
at this. So you didn't get this from the news
report because they papered over the important parts and used
acceptable dialogue for woke lefty journalists who all believe in
(23:50):
abortion on demand.
Speaker 2 (23:52):
Here's the story.
Speaker 1 (23:54):
Unborn baby diagnosed with a serious heart condition.
Speaker 2 (23:58):
It is treatable.
Speaker 1 (24:01):
It takes something like three surgeries in the first two
weeks or so of the baby's life. So it's a serious,
serious problem. And it's not like they can give the
kid an injection and it'll be fine. It's a serious problem.
But gosh, I know, it would be easier if I
(24:22):
could just use terms like mom and dad. So sponsors
of the surrogacy find out about the heart condition and
say abort the baby, kill a kid. And my views
(24:42):
on abortion actually I'm not going to go into them
in detail, but they're more nuanced than you might think
for practical reasons. But like Bill Clinton, oddly, I want
abortions to be as rare as possible. Having studied fetal,
neurological and physical development obsessively when my wife was pregnant
(25:06):
with our first child, Kate, I, the idea that a fetus,
an unborn human is not a baby, quote unquote is
hilarious to me. It might not be a baby that's
quite ready for the world, but what is it. Is
(25:28):
it a loaf of bread, Is it a head of lettuce?
Is it the designated hitter rule? Is it the planet Jupiter? No,
it's a friggin' baby anyway. Having said that, so sponsor
mom and dad say no, abort the kid, and surrogate
mom says, I'm not gonna have this baby inside me
(25:49):
dispatched by a surgeon.
Speaker 2 (25:53):
Maybe she knows what actually happens in an abortion and is.
Speaker 1 (25:56):
Sickened by it, so she says, Nope, ain't happening and
goes to Texas, where she knows the sympathies of the
folks and the laws and the government are with the
unborn baby and so the baby was just born the
(26:16):
other day and the treatment has begun as mandated by
Texas law and Ken Paxton, who I'm not a fan
of at all, but he's pretty strong on this stuff,
and now sponsoring mom and dad, having said abort the baby,
are now saying our kid, we ought to be in
(26:39):
charge of.
Speaker 2 (26:39):
The medical decisions.
Speaker 1 (26:42):
And the nice professor lady at the end, she does
have a point in that.
Speaker 2 (26:48):
Where the hell do we go from here?
Speaker 1 (26:51):
Surrogacy is a thing, as the kids say, there's a contract,
there are laws governing it, and they're pretty you know,
pretty well respected and recognized by the courts. It is
their kid to raise. But my god, what a Disney
(27:14):
moral dilemma. You said kill it, like a couple of
months ago, I went precisely was the diagnosis? I don't
remember because I want to be accurate on this. But you,
having said no, dispatch the kid not too long ago,
(27:38):
are now back in charge of his care.
Speaker 2 (27:41):
Hi, krumba, this is tough.
Speaker 1 (27:48):
So if Gabriel the little fella does eventually leave the hospital,
god bless him, because there's no it's not one hundred
percent that this treatment works.
Speaker 2 (27:57):
The little fella has a bad heart.
Speaker 1 (28:04):
If he does eventually leave the hospital, it's not immediately
clear what the legal outcome will be. While a separate
court order is phibiting the sponsor mom from currently seeing
the baby, West, that's I think the surrogate would consider
taking the child if the court permits. According to her attorney,
(28:24):
she wants to raise the baby now. I think West's
legal team believes the termination clause within the surrogacy contract,
while standard, is offensive to state and federal law. According
to the Dallas Morning News, that is, if the sponsor
mom and dad say you abort this baby, you got
to abort it. That's what it says in the contract.
(28:45):
I'm telling you that is unholy. But the lawyer for
the surrogate mom, miss West, says the law doesn't permit
hitman contract, and this is a hitman contract. The California
who are now a California couple who are suing the
surrogate mom. We're slated to appear in Dallas County Court.
(29:08):
Let's see in about twelve days. So well keep our
eye on this one. Where does this go? Is this
a Supreme Court type case? If surrogate mom, having signed
a civil contract, has come to believe as many women
(29:32):
do when they're pregnant. Everything I thought about abortion is wrong.
And again I'm not telling you what to think. Maybe
you think differently. We can still be friends. A lot
of people have a different set of ideas on this,
and it's an incredibly important and passionate topic. And I'm
a libertarian, so I don't want the government telling me
(29:52):
what to do unless it's absolutely necessary. And I get
that if you are pregnant and the government is telling
you what to do, it's a conundrum. It is not
easy for a lot of people to sort this out.
And I am not judgmental. I have my beliefs, but
I'm not judgmental be on a certain point. Okay, I
am judgmental, but just not be on a certain point.
(30:14):
But you've signed a civil contract, but you have come
to believe to your soul that fulfilling that contract is murder.
Can the courts and the authorities enforce a hitman contract?
From the perspective of the woman carrying the baby? Oh my,
(30:37):
this one is not over. We're going to be hearing
about it for a while. Meanwhile, prayers are with the
little fella and the ingenious medical care that we have here.
In America, and certainly hope the little fellas all right.
Speaking of healthcare, Craig the healthcare guru coming up in
a little while. Got some news the US scrimmaged against
Ukraine and we lost bad.
Speaker 2 (31:00):
Tell you about it in a minute.
Speaker 1 (31:09):
Rosio o'donald claims she got hit on by a handsome
man after her facelift. Now was this before or after
his seeing eye dog licked her hand? Oh no, wait now,
Rosy o'donald jokes, really, Greg, come on, come on, mor
(31:29):
yes please. Oh she's obnoxious and terrible. But I wish
we had more time for this. I always wish we
had more time for everything. If you've fallen for Russian
propaganda online or whatever, and you think Putin's a good
guy in Russia, is the hope of Christianity or some
horse s and your anti Ukraine, it's so much harder
(31:50):
to fool people than to get them to admit they've
been fooled. I beg you reconsider anyway. So Putin visited
in person some Russian held islands that Japan calls their own.
The Soviets grabbed him at the very very end of
World War Two in Japan, said for.
Speaker 2 (32:08):
A very long time. Those are been ours for one
hundred years.
Speaker 1 (32:10):
They're Japanese, so their in disputes the sort of thing
that really riles up countries. But Putin himself showed up
to show ownership of one of these islands and solidified
the relationship between Russia, China and North Korea and made
it clear to Japan that you're on the wrong side.
You're with the Americans, and we are going to squeeze
(32:32):
you hard. And it was very belligerent, and the battle
lines are being drawn and holy count On a similar topic,
US and Ukrainian forces went head to head in an
exercise and Ukraine whooped our butts with their drone warfare.
This is a good thing. This is an excellent thing.
(32:55):
The subhead to this piece, by Alistair MacDonald and a
couple other folks in the Journals says that Battlefield Drill
shows Pentagon hasn't fully absorbed lessons of Russia's war. And
that's true as far as it goes. But that's the point.
That's what they're doing there. So you know, I made
a joke senior year of high school. I was m
seing the athletic awards thing and our baseball team that
(33:19):
year was not great, and I made a joke about
we had I think it was something like nine wins
and fifteen valuable learning experiences. And this was a valuable
learning experience for the US forces.
Speaker 2 (33:33):
Thank you, gladys So.
Speaker 1 (33:37):
US troops faced off against Ukrainian drone operators in a
military exercise in Germany, and it did not go well
for the Americans. The Ukrainian drone units easily spotted and
defeated US troops and armored vehicles on rotation from Fort
Hood in Texas.
Speaker 2 (33:50):
Shout out to everybody at Fort Hood.
Speaker 1 (33:52):
The exercise coupled with US casualties, and Iran showed that
American and I'm sorry US casualties thanks to the Iranians
show American vulnerablebility to drones. Years after our military made
uncrude systems and essential part of warfare, we're really the
leader in long range drones and big expensive drones, encounter
drone technology, you know, Patriots systems, THAD systems, that sort
(34:15):
of thing, but close quarterlike battlefield stuff. We have so
so much to learn. The drubbing in Germany, quoting the
piece now conveyed lessons from Ukraine focused on the Short
Range Battlefield Drones exercise held in April and May, and
now they're talking about it more openly tested the visiting
troops ability to operate and defend against the proliferation of
(34:35):
smaller front line drones that have dominated the conflict between
Russia and Ukraine. And they're run precisely so that forces
can experience realistic combat conditions and figure out what are
we good at, what are we not good at, and
what do we need to learn. And Ukraine has been
incredibly helpful in this, incredibly helpful. They are an important
(34:57):
ally and we ought to be backing them against the
evils of the new Soviet Union. British and Swedish exercises
have also resulted in easy Ukrainian triumphs. We and all
of our friends are learning and the Air Force General
Alex Grenkowych, who's NATO's top military leader, said, look, you
can't get training like this in the US. The change
(35:18):
is remarkable and we're learning volumes to.
Speaker 2 (35:22):
Summarize what he said.
Speaker 1 (35:23):
Basically, it is said Eliot Cohen scolear AT's a Center
for Strategic and International Studies, said it is vital that
the US military master that and thus far. Unfortunately that
doesn't seem to be the case. Just all of our
techniques involve our armored vehicles that kick up dust, and
the drone spotters or the drones and the guys who
(35:43):
operate them can see what we're doing very very easily
and smash up our vehicles and kill our guys.
Speaker 2 (35:52):
And so we learned quickly what wasn't working very well.
Speaker 1 (35:57):
And then the Ukrainians switched teams memes midway through and said,
all right, here's how you use the drone technology offensively.
Here's how you use the counter drone stuff. Here's how
you scatter your forces, here's how you conceal yourself, here's
how you use electronics to stimy the drones. It was
like drone warfare grad school and super important and super effective.
(36:21):
So I'm glad we're doing this. There's a lot of
learning to do, but go get them, fellas, and be humble,
be willing to learn.
Speaker 2 (36:28):
Craig the healthcare Guru coming up next. Always interesting.
Speaker 3 (36:31):
Stay with us, Armstrong and Getty