August 13, 2026 • 35 mins
Hour Four of A&G features...
- More from the emotional teacher who'd kids can't write...
- Michigan Senatorial candidate Abdul El-Sayed's previous comments on Islam revealed...
- A Gender Bending Madness Update...
- Final Thoughts (and a call-back to Hour One)
Stupid Should Hurt: https://www.armstrongandgetty.com/
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Listen
Watch
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:02):
Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio, the George
Washington Broadcast Center, Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty.
Speaker 2 (00:10):
Armstrong and Getty and now he Armstrong and Getty.
Speaker 3 (00:26):
Baby Doon, thanks for being here. Coming up major gender
Bend a madness update. First, though, to continue on what
we were talking about last hour, played some audio of
a teacher, Texas teacher named Darius Cooks who posted online
and he's fighting back tears. He's teaching seniors in high school.
(00:49):
They had an assignment where they just had to read
two paragraphs and write a sentence about it. And he
gave them like most of the sentence and then just say,
just just finish the rest of it. The for words
that need you know, need to be tacked on, just
go ahead, and a lot of his students, many of
(01:11):
the most of them, couldn't even complete a single sentence.
Speaker 4 (01:17):
Mister Cooks goes on, this is only.
Speaker 5 (01:20):
Day two, and I have fingures who simply cannot read and.
Speaker 4 (01:32):
Cannot write them.
Speaker 6 (01:34):
They cannot write, They can reason, they have the ability
to defend their reasoning if it's talking to their homeboy,
but applying that to a written text too paragraphs.
Speaker 4 (01:51):
And they couldn't do it.
Speaker 5 (01:54):
Our young black men, our young brown man, are young
black girls, and our young girl.
Speaker 3 (02:09):
Oh god, oh boy. There are a lot of teachers
who are heroes. They're my favorite people in the world.
Love you teachers. As I've made clear many times, I've
I've begun to hate teachers' unions, I mean more and more,
and government schools because to a large extent, because of
(02:34):
the iron Law of bureaucracy, which I paraphrase all the time.
But I'm going to go back to Jerry Parnell's actually
actual his words and picture how this applies to schools
government schools. Parnell's Iron Law bureaucracy states that in any
bureaucratic organization, there will be two kinds of people. First,
(02:56):
there will be those who are devoted to the goals
of the organization. Examples are dedicated classroom teachers in an
educational bureaucracy, many of the engineers and launch technicians and
scientists at NASA, for instance, or even some agricultural scientists
and advisors in the former Soviet Union in their collective
farming administration. They were devoted to the goals of we'll
(03:20):
just stick to education, educating kids and giving them the
tools to live a happy life. Okay, that's the first
kind of people. Secondly, there will be those dedicated to
the organization itself. Examples are the many of the administrators
in the education system, many professors of education, teachers'.
Speaker 4 (03:40):
Union and officials, etc.
Speaker 3 (03:43):
The Iron Law Bureaucracy states that in every case, the
second group will gain and keep control of the organization.
It will write the rules and control promotions within the organizations.
And what inevitably happens is that over time the organization
(04:04):
will become more and more about protecting the organization and
its own needs as opposed to the goal it originally
was designed to fulfill. And we are absolutely seeing that
in government schools. I don't think I don't think you
could conceivably deny of it, deny it rather unless you
are profiting from it.
Speaker 4 (04:25):
Anyway.
Speaker 3 (04:25):
You know, God bless mister Cooks. Oh you know, there's
another story I want to get to. There's this program
that Trump administration started that it has to do a
school choice and if your governor opts in, there's a
(04:46):
tax deduction for donations to a scholarship fund that kids
up to like middle income, pretty good middle income can
use to attend private schools, charter schools, alternate schools, that
sort of thing, and anybody who's not involved in teachers
(05:10):
union says, wow, this is a great opportunity. I mean,
it's really really helping kids. And the stats are undeniable,
just one hundred percent undeniable, that it really really helps kids,
helps kids learn, especially kids who are not being served
by government schools. There are quite a few states, including California,
all blue states, all blue states, that have said no,
(05:33):
we don't want this free federal government money that will
help our kids, because the teachers unions told us we
got to say no. And that's the only reason they're
saying no. Even in your New York Times, your lefty
publications have said, wow, this is a great opportunity. But
the teachers unions owe to own the state house. In
a lot of blue states, I think Wisconsin said no,
(05:56):
California is saying no. There's a short list in New York. Actually,
oh Illinois, which is also so mobbed up, said no.
New York said hell, yes please, to Kathy Hochel's credit,
a phrase you won't hear come out of my mouth
very often.
Speaker 4 (06:11):
So they're taking the money.
Speaker 3 (06:12):
But plenty of states aren't merely in service to the teachers'
unions at the expense of the children. That's all you
need to know. I want to get to Michigan Democratic
Senate nominee Abdul al Sayid dedicated Islammunist in a couple
of minutes, and don't want to rush through it.
Speaker 4 (06:32):
Though.
Speaker 3 (06:33):
Oh here's some good news. I like this story. It
starts with sadness, but doesn't end with it. So fellow
by the name of Brett Bonner was a surfman.
Speaker 4 (06:56):
He is one of.
Speaker 3 (06:58):
The crews of Coastguard guys and gals in rescue boats
who work and train in heavy crashing seas to save lives.
They're called surfmen, and their work is among the most
challenging and dangerous jobs in the service in the military. Remember,
the Coastguard is part of our military, and by God,
(07:18):
they deserve the respect that they're doue. But the surfmen
take a beating from the ocean because they train, and
they train, and then they do the rescue missions. And
many veterans experience headaches, memory lapses, anxiety attacks, nightmares, mood swings,
(07:39):
cognitive problems that are symptoms of brain injury. It's much
like active duty other branches of the military. Folks who
have traumatic brain injury. It's like NFL players. It's the
same stuff, says the surfman named Aaron Harris. A twenty
foot wave breaking on you is like being in a
car crash. If you're out training in surf, that's like
(08:00):
twenty car accidents a day, and the surfmen are alone. Essentially,
the Coast Guard has no regular testing protocol for brain injuries.
It delivers no formal briefings on the dangers of rounding waves.
At the website it maintains on brain injuries is more
than ten years old, and it's fairly useless. All right,
Here's where it gets really sad than not so, said
(08:22):
Brett Bonner was a surfman. He saved hundreds of lives
in twenty one years of driving rescue boats. He then
developed post traumatic stress disorder during his service and then
his life. His life unraveled. He had all those brain
symptoms we were just talking about until ordering it to
drive through is overwhelming.
Speaker 4 (08:43):
He paranoid.
Speaker 3 (08:43):
He was sure his father in law, who lived next door,
was out to get him. He punched him over a
minor disagreement and in February of last year, he shot himself.
His wife and four children saw it happen. Okay, He
left no note. His brain had gone compmpletely bad on him.
His oldest child, Kaylee, is now eighteen years old.
Speaker 4 (09:06):
What did she do.
Speaker 3 (09:09):
With her father's death? She did something absolutely remarkable. She
wanted to understand what had happened to her dad and
whether it had anything to do with his work in
the Cruel and unrelenting surf So she decided to send
questionnaires to as many surfmen as she could locate, and
(09:31):
sent it out to many many surfmen. Asked thirty six
questions about their time and their service and their health
during and after it. This is an eighteen year old
young woman who lost her dad. Nearly eighty active and
retired surfmen responded in the vast majority of reported symptoms
similar to her dad's. They had headache, sleeplessness, their sleeplessness,
(09:51):
their memories were shot, anxiety stalked them. Their mood swings
were hard and troubling, some were getting worse. There are
all sorts of quotes. So he wrote up the results
of her study. Is a senior high school research project
it earned her an a by God, it ought to,
and she is going to share her findings with the Coastguard.
And it's in the early days, and where it goes
(10:14):
from here is unclear. I hope Pete Hegsath and the
right congress people and the right senators get hold of
this and do the right thing. We need people doing
this dangerous work, but we need to know everything we
possibly can about it and what it does to the
brave people who do it, and see how we can
help them before, during, and after. So anyway, I'm telling
(10:36):
you if I'm probably not the only one who's getting
a little choked up. Eighteen year old Kaylee Bonner is
an unbelievable American. It's terrible how she's suffered. But let's
do the right thing. Buyer in fact, Hanson make a note.
I'd like to reach out to Kaylee and see if
(10:58):
we can can follow up with her. That's a beautiful
thing from sadness. That's some real beauty and some real courage.
Good for you, Kayley, much more to come stay with us.
Speaker 1 (11:15):
Just say it exists, but does it have a right to.
Speaker 7 (11:17):
I didn't say that. I just said the question of
Israel's existence is not a question. I'm not I'm not
gonna play this gotcha game about whether or not it
has a right to exist. The question ultimately is about
whether or not we want a politics that dignifies. We're
not going to play the gotcha game. But you're not
going to say you think Israel has a right.
Speaker 4 (11:32):
Well, well my question, you know, Casey.
Speaker 7 (11:34):
I think the question we all that ought to ask
is does everybody have equal rights to peace, to Ignindians,
health determination. That's Jewish, Israelis and Palestinians. And to me,
the folks who should answer what the ultimate piece there
looks like should be Jewish, Israelis and Palestinians. I want
my tax dollars spent here in Michigan.
Speaker 4 (11:50):
Boy, that abdul l said is really clever. He is.
Speaker 3 (11:54):
Uh, he's a villain, but he's a good one. He's
the Democratic nominee for these Senate of the United States
of America, and he is an Islamist. He once declared
his sacred obligation that's a quote, to follow Sharia law
in every aspect of his life until he meets his
maker on the day he dies, which would be fine
if he just practiced Islam as a personal faith. Like
(12:17):
you know, he's a Lutheran, he's a Catholic, he's a Muslim, whatever.
Speaker 4 (12:20):
But no, it's he.
Speaker 3 (12:22):
Means Islam as the law of the government and of
life and everything.
Speaker 4 (12:27):
It covers everything in fundamentalist.
Speaker 3 (12:30):
Islam, he said, and I quote Ultimately, the question is
when I die and stand before God and go through
everything I did in my life, I don't want to
say I did it the easy way instead of the
Sharia compliant way, not because of fear, but because of
obligation and Sharia or Islamic religious loss that strict rules
(12:50):
for living that include harsh restrictions on women, and of
course the chopping off hands and the rest of it.
It's also it's a system of finance and government and
how God and structured. I mean, for instance, you can't
pay your earn interest, and folks get around that by
getting special halal approved mortgages that essentially tack on to
(13:13):
the principle what you would pay an interest anyway, but
it's not called interest. So it seems a little odd
to me. But al said has embraced his status as
a Muslim man because the Muslim vote is significant in Michigan,
(13:33):
it's the only reason he got elected, or he got nominated,
I should say. But the progressive Democrat they call him
in the Free Beacon, and I think he's pretending to
be progressive. I think at his heart he's in is Lombist.
It's always interesting when the Red Green alliance kind of
melds together into I guess that would be brown and
(13:55):
the Islamists are are touting leftism, you know, Marxism anyway.
In October of twenty five, for example, l said told
Religion News Service that his faith quote orientced me to
try and be a better person and to treat all people,
all people with dignity and humanity and respect. That's a
beautiful thing. And if he was sincere, I would appreciate that.
Speaker 4 (14:15):
But he's bristled.
Speaker 3 (14:16):
When pressed on the topic of sharia law during his
failed campaign from Michigan governor, he denied ever saying he
was Sharia compliant during an interview with a with Laura Lumer,
who's a strong critic of Islam, before cutting the interview
short and scolding his staff or not stopping it sooner.
She was just calling him on things he'd actually said
on the record. He rejected allegations that he intended to
(14:38):
subvert the constitution implement sharia law, but a documentary about
his twenty eighteen gubernatorial bid shows him telling the filmmakers
not to shoot a bookshelf in his home that contained
the Quran, which is perfectly fine and controversial works about Islam,
including cutting the Fuse, a twenty ten book that argued
that suicidal terrorism is driven by foreign military occupation, not
(15:02):
Islamic extremism. His private bookshelf, who he ordered them that
he ordered them not to show, also contained a copy
of a thematic commentary on the Koran written by Muslim
Brotherhood member Sheik Muhammad al Gazzali, who said, quote, the
refusal of implementation of Shariah is apostasy, which means it's
(15:24):
a mortal sin against God. In Islam, Apostates and converts
should be killed Fundamentalist Islam eh and this guy who
wrote that book testified in defense of thirteen Islamic terrorists
who had gunned down an Egyptian professor who called for
what what would make it justifiable to murder a guy?
(15:52):
And one of Alsaid's favorite authors justified that the Egyptian
professor called for the operation of church and state in Egypt.
Al Gazzali testified at the ninety three trial that the
same professor was, without doubt an infidel, and so most
(16:12):
Islamic scholars would agree that such apostates should be killed,
but that he personally believes the professor should have received
the life sentence instead. You're going to want to not
get things, oh, l Sayed said to the documentary. Guys,
you're gonna want to not get these things in the shot.
We're trying to keep it secular. Okay, we're trying to
(16:33):
keep this shot secular.
Speaker 4 (16:35):
Wow.
Speaker 3 (16:36):
Wow, Okay, keep an eye on the guy. We're onya
speaking of radicalism. A really important and really encouraging gender
bending madness update coming up in a couple of minutes.
Speaker 4 (16:51):
We'll get to that.
Speaker 3 (16:54):
The other funny part of l said is that he
claims to be a socialist. He's got tens of thousands
of dollars worth of watches, he owns property on three continents,
he's a landlord in three different countries. He and his
wife are filthy rich, but he wants socialism where he
makes everybody else look like a socialist. Okay, pretty typical,
(17:15):
martacam If you can't stay tuned, grab a podcast, Armstrong
and Getty on demand.
Speaker 4 (17:20):
Are Strong and Getty.
Speaker 3 (17:23):
Glad you're here. Let's not waste any time. Let's get
right to a gender bending Madness update.
Speaker 8 (17:28):
So I kept hearing about this thing called.
Speaker 2 (17:34):
The Loco.
Speaker 4 (17:36):
We're a brave world.
Speaker 3 (17:43):
Bridging a couple of topics, we begin our gender bending
Madness update with Chase, who is a female high school
teacher teaching advanced world history in New York City.
Speaker 4 (17:54):
Here's day one a class.
Speaker 5 (17:55):
My name is.
Speaker 8 (17:56):
Chase, and I am a bunch non binary high school teacher,
and this is my plan for back.
Speaker 1 (18:00):
To school this year.
Speaker 8 (18:02):
The first thing I'm doing this year is I'm just
going by Chase, no missus, mister or mix, like just Chase.
And I did it last year and it went great
and none of my students cared at all. None of
the administration cared at all.
Speaker 4 (18:15):
The third thing.
Speaker 8 (18:15):
I'm doing this year is a pronoun lesson. I'm doing
it day one. I just tell my students that I'm
non binary. I use them pronouns, and what non binary
means to me is that I'm not really.
Speaker 4 (18:26):
A boy or a girl.
Speaker 8 (18:27):
I'm kind of just doing my own thing. I am
excited for back to school.
Speaker 3 (18:33):
And in previous segments we are discussing the tragedy that
kids can't read and write and do math in school.
Interrelated Sorry, Okay, so let's get on to the really
important stuff.
Speaker 4 (18:44):
The Trump administration this week.
Speaker 3 (18:48):
Barred federal medicaid dollars from being used to fund cruel
experiments on confused children. Now I'm going to read it
from the New York Times. Administration barred federal medicaid dollars
from being used to provide gender transition medication and surgery
to transgender adolescents.
Speaker 4 (19:08):
Yeah.
Speaker 3 (19:08):
I never ever use the term gender transition because they
mix the word gender and sex, which really are the
same thing. They pretend they're not, except when it's convenient
to pretend they are. And the idea that a confused
twelve year old boy can become a confused twelve year
old girl is ludicrous.
Speaker 4 (19:27):
They mentioned.
Speaker 3 (19:27):
The treatments are already banned in most Republican led states,
which has been the topic of front international debate among
health authorities. Not really, not anymore, just in the woke US.
Europe has gone screaming in the other direction. They mentioned
in the New York Times, most major medical societies in
the US, including the American Academy of Pediatrics, which is
utterly corrupt and has been captured by radical leftists, continue
(19:51):
to support medical gender transition for young people who experienced
mark distress over their gender identity. It's absolutely obscene and
will be looked upon as a terrible, terrible thing in
the very near future by virtually everybody. They mentioned that
the Department of Health and Human Services and report last
(20:11):
year concluded that the risk of gender transition treatments up
a sex change experiments on children, which includes drugs that
block puberty hormone therapies and in rare cases, rarer cases,
surgeries outweigh any benefits. That's because they do according to
every responsible study that's been done anywhere on Earth, and
(20:31):
the report prioritized psychotherapy for adolescents who are so confused
they want sex changes. Well, of course you're going to
give them psychotherapy, and what's the last thing you're gonna
do mutilate them for the rest of their lives. So
let's build some evidence to support the arguments I'm making.
(20:52):
And don't worry, We're gonna do a bit of a weave,
but we're gonna get back to the thread.
Speaker 4 (20:56):
Trust me.
Speaker 3 (20:58):
This is a a tweet from a voter in Wisconsin
who just before the primary the other day said he's
a hard No. I think it's on Francesca Hong, because Hong,
the super progressive DSA chick, voted against a bill that
(21:19):
made it illegal for teachers to groom their students for
sexual purposes. And it was all based on a thirty
year old teacher who was messaging a thirteen year old
every day for six months talking about how he wanted
them to be together. She had a nice body, he
was jealous when she talked to the other boys. He
sent provocetive pictures of himself, and when the cops arrested
(21:40):
him went to charge him, they realized nothing he did
was actually illegal. He didn't make sexual contact contact and
no obscene pictures were or explicit pictures were exchanged. But
he was actively trying to groom a child for sex,
and there was no law forbidding his contact his conduct.
So in Wisconsin they came up with a law in
the state Assembly, drafting a bipartisan bill that made her
(22:02):
a felony to engage in any course of conduct clearly
and obviously intended to seduce her Laura child into engaging
in sexual acts, etc. Pasted one ninety three to six,
and Hong was against it, one of the very few
people who vote against it. They were all super progressives.
A few months later, the first person was charged under
the law. He was a thirty six year old man
who met a developmentally disabled sixteen year old in a
(22:23):
public park when she was thirteen. Specifically, she had down syndrome,
and spent the next three years trying to manipulate her
into running away from home so he could make her
in his liveing sex life, that is, and he was
charged with felonies and to recap Earlier this year, Hong
was one of only six people to vote against that bill.
(22:44):
Why in the world would you vote against that bill?
Speaker 4 (22:49):
Huh? Moving along.
Speaker 3 (22:52):
W path, which is going to come up again, is
that World Health organism that has convinced so many people
that if a kid is confused about their sex, you
have to give them hormones or other drugs or surgeries.
And they cited a couple of tiny studies that have
(23:14):
been completely discredited over and over again, but they've kept
on pushing it.
Speaker 4 (23:21):
Well.
Speaker 3 (23:22):
At the heart of that organization is a philosophy from
the sixties, especially about how all sexual practices are normal
and including transgenderism and sex with children. And in fact
(23:44):
there's a Norwegian bondage discipline sado masochism activist name a
Savine Skid or Skide celebrated gay rights activists and other things.
In Oslo, he lobbied the World Health Organation to remove
various fetishes and sadomasochism and stuff from psychiatric diagnosis. And
(24:07):
there he is in his dungeon arguing that that was
it should not be seen as a problem, it was
perfectly normal.
Speaker 4 (24:15):
And he and his cohort went on to found w PATH.
Speaker 3 (24:24):
And those guys defended NAMBLA, the North American Man Boy
Love Association. They defended child porn. They were in favor
of showing children porn and you know, similar stuff of
that ilk and the next step in the uh oh.
(24:45):
And the guy who coined the term cisgender was another
one of this. Kabali's a German sexologist.
Speaker 4 (24:53):
He was.
Speaker 3 (24:54):
He also claimed there's nothing wrong with pedophilia. So the
crowd that came up with gender bending anything goes sex
with anybody, that they're also really in a pedophilia and
that is why you are starting to hear on the
fringes of the left the term minor attracted individuals. They're
trying to get rid of the term pedophile, an usher
(25:18):
in minor attracted individuals. They're trying to normalize sex with kids.
And there is I have pages or receipts of these
people and what they've said. We don't have time for it.
You got to trust me, or I can retweet some
of it that was on Twitter. Moving along though, to
the wpath people, Wesley Yang writes about this a lot right.
(25:41):
It was always a desperate con It was never real,
it was never true. Well informed people have understood this
for more than a decade. But now the institution upon
which the charade of scientific authority across American institutions relying
on is said so itself in court.
Speaker 4 (25:55):
It was a con order.
Speaker 3 (25:57):
It was a con orders of magnitude worse than Jason Arday,
that's that Cambridge guy. Because it implicated nearly every organ
of scientific and medical consensus in a conspiracy until the
most brazen lie ever told by those institutions at the
largest scale any such lie has ever been told. And
because on the basis of this lie, tens of thousands
of confused people, including children, were medically harmed in pursuit
(26:18):
of a delusion that can never be true. And what
he's talking about is that w Path has conceded in
court that it's standards of care which has been quoted. Friends,
because I've been in this space for a while looking
into it. Their standards of care have been quoted many
thousands of times in the New York Times, the Alphabet Networks, CNN,
you know, everywhere, certainly in your woke politics.
Speaker 4 (26:43):
And the transcript from the court.
Speaker 3 (26:46):
Room talks about the statements made in this piece of
evidence are opinion and not the conclusion of scientific research.
W Path engages in this significant medical debate by publishing
academic and clinical guidelines for healthcare providers for the vision
(27:08):
of transgender healthcare. Plaintiffs acknowledge that there are parties on
both sides of this medical debate, and w Path is
on one side of the debate and provides guidelines blah
blah blah transgender healthcare. The Supreme Court has recently Okay,
so it's long, but it gets to we're expressing our
(27:28):
opinion on the research that we have seen, and they
are no longer even claiming that it is supportable, scientifically
valid and peer reviewed research. They're just saying we saw
it and we formed an opinion. It's a significance, kind
(27:49):
of obscure and in the weeds, but a significant confession.
And finally, this is an editorial by James Eller and
the Wall Street Journal. Trump should act against Colorado's transgender
subsidies because state funded counseling is encouraging children to try
to change their sexual expression sex change experiments. Call a
(28:13):
gender affirming care. If you must, I will not. But
he writes the trial the child transgenderism craze has begun
to receive largely thanks to legal, financial, and political pressure
from the Trump administration. That is true, but I think
it's also start to fade because it was a social
contagion among adolescents, particularly adolescent girls, very much like anorexia
in the eighties and nineties. It still exists, but in
(28:34):
a fraction of the numbers it used to, as I
show in a new report for Do No Harm. That's
the association of medical professionals who have understood how sick
this is and are fighting against it. State and federal
taxpayers have long been co opted into encouraging boys and
girls to try to become something they aren't and can
never be. Through public funding for state education and healthcare programs,
(28:55):
taxpayers are unwittingly complicit and physically harming vulnerable children, for instance, Colorado.
Speaker 4 (29:02):
The focus of his report.
Speaker 3 (29:03):
He says I spent the past year submitting open records
requests to state agencies, universities, and youth health programs. Perhaps
the most concerning thing I found is the state's Eyematter program,
which uses taxpayer money to provide no cost mental health
counseling for children. It's about eleven million dollars a year
in federal money. Much of Imatter's work is unobjectionable, it's fine,
(29:27):
But the four hundred and sixty nine gender affirming care
therapy sessions it provided between twenty twenty one to twenty
twenty four aren't. Forty six of those sessions involved children
six to nine years old, and the sessions were provided
to children five or younger and forty to children with
special needs. And he just got the records through twenty
(29:48):
twenty four. It's still active and state funded, meaning these
numbers are probably much much higher. But the majority of
these therapy sessions have the orientation that we are going
to affirm what you say about gender identity. They make
it clear that no parent or guardian consent is required,
(30:08):
that this will be just between us, because sometimes you
need to talk to someone else. And the orientation of
the actual counseling is unmistakably pro this. So you've got
federally funded counseling convincing confused children that yes, you are transgender,
(30:32):
and the web of taxpayer money has gone un scene
over or shadowed that he writes by more obviously egregious
state laws. And it's continuing on and targeting confused little
kids something that never existed.
Speaker 4 (30:51):
Just a few years ago.
Speaker 3 (30:53):
And now if you dare say this is wrong, you
get a branded a transphobe or whatever. Got to keep
fighting against this. It's all about the confused kids and
the activists who are trying to twist their minds.
Speaker 4 (31:05):
It's a gender bending madness. Update.
Speaker 3 (31:10):
Jack is going to check in next we'll finish Strong
Armstrong no time to lose. Final segment of the show,
and we're joined by vacationing co host Jack Armstrong from
somewhere in the frozen North, Jack, where are you?
Speaker 1 (31:29):
What's up the sea? Was angry that day. My friends,
I am on a boat. I'm on a boat. We
are on a boat. We're on a boat. Our van
is on a boat to Vancouver Island. That's what we're doing.
We're on a boat.
Speaker 4 (31:42):
Fantastic. What's the plan on Vancouver Island? Nature? Hangout? Hang
out and.
Speaker 1 (31:50):
If nobody's ever been there, just hurt a for the
first time, well regularly people after doing a Canadian accent
attempting to you say a I only far was only
a once, just a little bit of.
Speaker 3 (32:02):
Go wow, your connection is absolutely horrible. Sorry, you're the
seafaring life is difficult and your connection is iffy. You've
heard a I'm sure you've heard people say oot though, right.
Speaker 4 (32:16):
Yes, I've heard some boots. Yes, I'm I'm sorry, a
couple of stories and hoots. No, a's yeah.
Speaker 3 (32:24):
My buddy Gordy the Canadian is definitely an oot guy
and an occasional a guy, and he's a hockey player,
so he wants to fight you a lot.
Speaker 4 (32:35):
But it's fine. So you'll be rejoining us on Monday, correct.
Speaker 1 (32:39):
Yeah, tomorrow, I will be a landlubber and I will
be able to call into the show and I will
have more time, so I will do that tomorrow morning.
Speaker 3 (32:45):
Excellent, Well that would be delightful. Meanwhile, you and the
boys enjoy the vacation. Enjoy Vancouver Island. I just sailed
past it on my cruise.
Speaker 4 (32:54):
I didn't get a chance to spend a ton of time,
but it's it's.
Speaker 3 (32:57):
A beautiful place. Jack from Lord everybody wasn't that exciting? Oh?
Is Jack still around? Having about participating final thoughts?
Speaker 4 (33:08):
Well, there's Jack Canner's Joe, It's time the show. Katie
Green and Michael Langel looks Stabby the clown really a radio.
So let's say their final thoughts.
Speaker 2 (33:20):
People where they have to go?
Speaker 3 (33:22):
Oh, here's your host for final thoughts. Me let's get
a final thought from everybody on the crew. Michael lines
Low lead us off.
Speaker 4 (33:28):
That's Unfortunately I had a little bit.
Speaker 3 (33:29):
I was gonna say, how you carry the show, Joe,
and oh my gosh, I forgot that Jack was still
on the line. But yeah, sorry, I always see the
real talent, Katie. Katie Green has our final thought for us?
What's what's on your mind?
Speaker 2 (33:43):
Uh?
Speaker 3 (33:43):
A little van turned three months yesterday and I have
not had an in and out burger since I was pregnant.
Speaker 4 (33:48):
So I'm going to in and out.
Speaker 3 (33:49):
Today, go get it, enjoy that fantastic Jack from the Road.
Speaker 4 (33:53):
Do you have a final thought?
Speaker 3 (33:55):
He's not there. His final thought is have a great day, everybody,
Greetings from Canada. My final thought is, yeah, it's been
kind of interesting and weird and fun doing the solo
version of the show, just like when I'm on vacation
in Jack does it. We'll be back together soon enough.
(34:17):
Thanks for either a putting up with it or be
enjoying it.
Speaker 4 (34:22):
It's a chance to.
Speaker 3 (34:23):
Explore different ideas in different ways. But we'll be back
to normal on Monday, and I'm looking forward to that
for a couple of reasons, including the fact.
Speaker 4 (34:30):
That it's way easier.
Speaker 3 (34:33):
Armstrong and Getty wrapping up grueling four hour workday.
Speaker 4 (34:37):
So many people who thanks so a little time.
Speaker 3 (34:38):
Good Armstrong e geddy dot com for the outlining strums
a note mail bag at armstrong e geddy dot.
Speaker 4 (34:42):
Com pick up some swag. We will see you later.
God bless America. I'm Strong and Getti.
Speaker 2 (35:00):
Love the day.
Speaker 4 (35:04):
It's called an eclipse.
Speaker 2 (35:07):
It means it's time to party.
Speaker 4 (35:12):
You gotta embrace your retire mind. Compile yourself and make
some time for it to is a lost lock though love,
so she won't mind.
Speaker 2 (35:26):
It is live, Armstrong and Jenny
Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio, the George
Washington Broadcast Center, Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty.
Speaker 2 (00:10):
Armstrong and Getty and now he Armstrong and Getty.
Speaker 3 (00:26):
Baby Doon, thanks for being here. Coming up major gender
Bend a madness update. First, though, to continue on what
we were talking about last hour, played some audio of
a teacher, Texas teacher named Darius Cooks who posted online
and he's fighting back tears. He's teaching seniors in high school.
(00:49):
They had an assignment where they just had to read
two paragraphs and write a sentence about it. And he
gave them like most of the sentence and then just say,
just just finish the rest of it. The for words
that need you know, need to be tacked on, just
go ahead, and a lot of his students, many of
(01:11):
the most of them, couldn't even complete a single sentence.
Speaker 4 (01:17):
Mister Cooks goes on, this is only.
Speaker 5 (01:20):
Day two, and I have fingures who simply cannot read and.
Speaker 4 (01:32):
Cannot write them.
Speaker 6 (01:34):
They cannot write, They can reason, they have the ability
to defend their reasoning if it's talking to their homeboy,
but applying that to a written text too paragraphs.
Speaker 4 (01:51):
And they couldn't do it.
Speaker 5 (01:54):
Our young black men, our young brown man, are young
black girls, and our young girl.
Speaker 3 (02:09):
Oh god, oh boy. There are a lot of teachers
who are heroes. They're my favorite people in the world.
Love you teachers. As I've made clear many times, I've
I've begun to hate teachers' unions, I mean more and more,
and government schools because to a large extent, because of
(02:34):
the iron Law of bureaucracy, which I paraphrase all the time.
But I'm going to go back to Jerry Parnell's actually
actual his words and picture how this applies to schools
government schools. Parnell's Iron Law bureaucracy states that in any
bureaucratic organization, there will be two kinds of people. First,
(02:56):
there will be those who are devoted to the goals
of the organization. Examples are dedicated classroom teachers in an
educational bureaucracy, many of the engineers and launch technicians and
scientists at NASA, for instance, or even some agricultural scientists
and advisors in the former Soviet Union in their collective
farming administration. They were devoted to the goals of we'll
(03:20):
just stick to education, educating kids and giving them the
tools to live a happy life. Okay, that's the first
kind of people. Secondly, there will be those dedicated to
the organization itself. Examples are the many of the administrators
in the education system, many professors of education, teachers'.
Speaker 4 (03:40):
Union and officials, etc.
Speaker 3 (03:43):
The Iron Law Bureaucracy states that in every case, the
second group will gain and keep control of the organization.
It will write the rules and control promotions within the organizations.
And what inevitably happens is that over time the organization
(04:04):
will become more and more about protecting the organization and
its own needs as opposed to the goal it originally
was designed to fulfill. And we are absolutely seeing that
in government schools. I don't think I don't think you
could conceivably deny of it, deny it rather unless you
are profiting from it.
Speaker 4 (04:25):
Anyway.
Speaker 3 (04:25):
You know, God bless mister Cooks. Oh you know, there's
another story I want to get to. There's this program
that Trump administration started that it has to do a
school choice and if your governor opts in, there's a
(04:46):
tax deduction for donations to a scholarship fund that kids
up to like middle income, pretty good middle income can
use to attend private schools, charter schools, alternate schools, that
sort of thing, and anybody who's not involved in teachers
(05:10):
union says, wow, this is a great opportunity. I mean,
it's really really helping kids. And the stats are undeniable,
just one hundred percent undeniable, that it really really helps kids,
helps kids learn, especially kids who are not being served
by government schools. There are quite a few states, including California,
all blue states, all blue states, that have said no,
(05:33):
we don't want this free federal government money that will
help our kids, because the teachers unions told us we
got to say no. And that's the only reason they're
saying no. Even in your New York Times, your lefty
publications have said, wow, this is a great opportunity. But
the teachers unions owe to own the state house. In
a lot of blue states, I think Wisconsin said no,
(05:56):
California is saying no. There's a short list in New York. Actually,
oh Illinois, which is also so mobbed up, said no.
New York said hell, yes please, to Kathy Hochel's credit,
a phrase you won't hear come out of my mouth
very often.
Speaker 4 (06:11):
So they're taking the money.
Speaker 3 (06:12):
But plenty of states aren't merely in service to the teachers'
unions at the expense of the children. That's all you
need to know. I want to get to Michigan Democratic
Senate nominee Abdul al Sayid dedicated Islammunist in a couple
of minutes, and don't want to rush through it.
Speaker 4 (06:32):
Though.
Speaker 3 (06:33):
Oh here's some good news. I like this story. It
starts with sadness, but doesn't end with it. So fellow
by the name of Brett Bonner was a surfman.
Speaker 4 (06:56):
He is one of.
Speaker 3 (06:58):
The crews of Coastguard guys and gals in rescue boats
who work and train in heavy crashing seas to save lives.
They're called surfmen, and their work is among the most
challenging and dangerous jobs in the service in the military. Remember,
the Coastguard is part of our military, and by God,
(07:18):
they deserve the respect that they're doue. But the surfmen
take a beating from the ocean because they train, and
they train, and then they do the rescue missions. And
many veterans experience headaches, memory lapses, anxiety attacks, nightmares, mood swings,
(07:39):
cognitive problems that are symptoms of brain injury. It's much
like active duty other branches of the military. Folks who
have traumatic brain injury. It's like NFL players. It's the
same stuff, says the surfman named Aaron Harris. A twenty
foot wave breaking on you is like being in a
car crash. If you're out training in surf, that's like
(08:00):
twenty car accidents a day, and the surfmen are alone. Essentially,
the Coast Guard has no regular testing protocol for brain injuries.
It delivers no formal briefings on the dangers of rounding waves.
At the website it maintains on brain injuries is more
than ten years old, and it's fairly useless. All right,
Here's where it gets really sad than not so, said
(08:22):
Brett Bonner was a surfman. He saved hundreds of lives
in twenty one years of driving rescue boats. He then
developed post traumatic stress disorder during his service and then
his life. His life unraveled. He had all those brain
symptoms we were just talking about until ordering it to
drive through is overwhelming.
Speaker 4 (08:43):
He paranoid.
Speaker 3 (08:43):
He was sure his father in law, who lived next door,
was out to get him. He punched him over a
minor disagreement and in February of last year, he shot himself.
His wife and four children saw it happen. Okay, He
left no note. His brain had gone compmpletely bad on him.
His oldest child, Kaylee, is now eighteen years old.
Speaker 4 (09:06):
What did she do.
Speaker 3 (09:09):
With her father's death? She did something absolutely remarkable. She
wanted to understand what had happened to her dad and
whether it had anything to do with his work in
the Cruel and unrelenting surf So she decided to send
questionnaires to as many surfmen as she could locate, and
(09:31):
sent it out to many many surfmen. Asked thirty six
questions about their time and their service and their health
during and after it. This is an eighteen year old
young woman who lost her dad. Nearly eighty active and
retired surfmen responded in the vast majority of reported symptoms
similar to her dad's. They had headache, sleeplessness, their sleeplessness,
(09:51):
their memories were shot, anxiety stalked them. Their mood swings
were hard and troubling, some were getting worse. There are
all sorts of quotes. So he wrote up the results
of her study. Is a senior high school research project
it earned her an a by God, it ought to,
and she is going to share her findings with the Coastguard.
And it's in the early days, and where it goes
(10:14):
from here is unclear. I hope Pete Hegsath and the
right congress people and the right senators get hold of
this and do the right thing. We need people doing
this dangerous work, but we need to know everything we
possibly can about it and what it does to the
brave people who do it, and see how we can
help them before, during, and after. So anyway, I'm telling
(10:36):
you if I'm probably not the only one who's getting
a little choked up. Eighteen year old Kaylee Bonner is
an unbelievable American. It's terrible how she's suffered. But let's
do the right thing. Buyer in fact, Hanson make a note.
I'd like to reach out to Kaylee and see if
(10:58):
we can can follow up with her. That's a beautiful
thing from sadness. That's some real beauty and some real courage.
Good for you, Kayley, much more to come stay with us.
Speaker 1 (11:15):
Just say it exists, but does it have a right to.
Speaker 7 (11:17):
I didn't say that. I just said the question of
Israel's existence is not a question. I'm not I'm not
gonna play this gotcha game about whether or not it
has a right to exist. The question ultimately is about
whether or not we want a politics that dignifies. We're
not going to play the gotcha game. But you're not
going to say you think Israel has a right.
Speaker 4 (11:32):
Well, well my question, you know, Casey.
Speaker 7 (11:34):
I think the question we all that ought to ask
is does everybody have equal rights to peace, to Ignindians,
health determination. That's Jewish, Israelis and Palestinians. And to me,
the folks who should answer what the ultimate piece there
looks like should be Jewish, Israelis and Palestinians. I want
my tax dollars spent here in Michigan.
Speaker 4 (11:50):
Boy, that abdul l said is really clever. He is.
Speaker 3 (11:54):
Uh, he's a villain, but he's a good one. He's
the Democratic nominee for these Senate of the United States
of America, and he is an Islamist. He once declared
his sacred obligation that's a quote, to follow Sharia law
in every aspect of his life until he meets his
maker on the day he dies, which would be fine
if he just practiced Islam as a personal faith. Like
(12:17):
you know, he's a Lutheran, he's a Catholic, he's a Muslim, whatever.
Speaker 4 (12:20):
But no, it's he.
Speaker 3 (12:22):
Means Islam as the law of the government and of
life and everything.
Speaker 4 (12:27):
It covers everything in fundamentalist.
Speaker 3 (12:30):
Islam, he said, and I quote Ultimately, the question is
when I die and stand before God and go through
everything I did in my life, I don't want to
say I did it the easy way instead of the
Sharia compliant way, not because of fear, but because of
obligation and Sharia or Islamic religious loss that strict rules
(12:50):
for living that include harsh restrictions on women, and of
course the chopping off hands and the rest of it.
It's also it's a system of finance and government and
how God and structured. I mean, for instance, you can't
pay your earn interest, and folks get around that by
getting special halal approved mortgages that essentially tack on to
(13:13):
the principle what you would pay an interest anyway, but
it's not called interest. So it seems a little odd
to me. But al said has embraced his status as
a Muslim man because the Muslim vote is significant in Michigan,
(13:33):
it's the only reason he got elected, or he got nominated,
I should say. But the progressive Democrat they call him
in the Free Beacon, and I think he's pretending to
be progressive. I think at his heart he's in is Lombist.
It's always interesting when the Red Green alliance kind of
melds together into I guess that would be brown and
(13:55):
the Islamists are are touting leftism, you know, Marxism anyway.
In October of twenty five, for example, l said told
Religion News Service that his faith quote orientced me to
try and be a better person and to treat all people,
all people with dignity and humanity and respect. That's a
beautiful thing. And if he was sincere, I would appreciate that.
Speaker 4 (14:15):
But he's bristled.
Speaker 3 (14:16):
When pressed on the topic of sharia law during his
failed campaign from Michigan governor, he denied ever saying he
was Sharia compliant during an interview with a with Laura Lumer,
who's a strong critic of Islam, before cutting the interview
short and scolding his staff or not stopping it sooner.
She was just calling him on things he'd actually said
on the record. He rejected allegations that he intended to
(14:38):
subvert the constitution implement sharia law, but a documentary about
his twenty eighteen gubernatorial bid shows him telling the filmmakers
not to shoot a bookshelf in his home that contained
the Quran, which is perfectly fine and controversial works about Islam,
including cutting the Fuse, a twenty ten book that argued
that suicidal terrorism is driven by foreign military occupation, not
(15:02):
Islamic extremism. His private bookshelf, who he ordered them that
he ordered them not to show, also contained a copy
of a thematic commentary on the Koran written by Muslim
Brotherhood member Sheik Muhammad al Gazzali, who said, quote, the
refusal of implementation of Shariah is apostasy, which means it's
(15:24):
a mortal sin against God. In Islam, Apostates and converts
should be killed Fundamentalist Islam eh and this guy who
wrote that book testified in defense of thirteen Islamic terrorists
who had gunned down an Egyptian professor who called for
what what would make it justifiable to murder a guy?
(15:52):
And one of Alsaid's favorite authors justified that the Egyptian
professor called for the operation of church and state in Egypt.
Al Gazzali testified at the ninety three trial that the
same professor was, without doubt an infidel, and so most
(16:12):
Islamic scholars would agree that such apostates should be killed,
but that he personally believes the professor should have received
the life sentence instead. You're going to want to not
get things, oh, l Sayed said to the documentary. Guys,
you're gonna want to not get these things in the shot.
We're trying to keep it secular. Okay, we're trying to
(16:33):
keep this shot secular.
Speaker 4 (16:35):
Wow.
Speaker 3 (16:36):
Wow, Okay, keep an eye on the guy. We're onya
speaking of radicalism. A really important and really encouraging gender
bending madness update coming up in a couple of minutes.
Speaker 4 (16:51):
We'll get to that.
Speaker 3 (16:54):
The other funny part of l said is that he
claims to be a socialist. He's got tens of thousands
of dollars worth of watches, he owns property on three continents,
he's a landlord in three different countries. He and his
wife are filthy rich, but he wants socialism where he
makes everybody else look like a socialist. Okay, pretty typical,
(17:15):
martacam If you can't stay tuned, grab a podcast, Armstrong
and Getty on demand.
Speaker 4 (17:20):
Are Strong and Getty.
Speaker 3 (17:23):
Glad you're here. Let's not waste any time. Let's get
right to a gender bending Madness update.
Speaker 8 (17:28):
So I kept hearing about this thing called.
Speaker 2 (17:34):
The Loco.
Speaker 4 (17:36):
We're a brave world.
Speaker 3 (17:43):
Bridging a couple of topics, we begin our gender bending
Madness update with Chase, who is a female high school
teacher teaching advanced world history in New York City.
Speaker 4 (17:54):
Here's day one a class.
Speaker 5 (17:55):
My name is.
Speaker 8 (17:56):
Chase, and I am a bunch non binary high school teacher,
and this is my plan for back.
Speaker 1 (18:00):
To school this year.
Speaker 8 (18:02):
The first thing I'm doing this year is I'm just
going by Chase, no missus, mister or mix, like just Chase.
And I did it last year and it went great
and none of my students cared at all. None of
the administration cared at all.
Speaker 4 (18:15):
The third thing.
Speaker 8 (18:15):
I'm doing this year is a pronoun lesson. I'm doing
it day one. I just tell my students that I'm
non binary. I use them pronouns, and what non binary
means to me is that I'm not really.
Speaker 4 (18:26):
A boy or a girl.
Speaker 8 (18:27):
I'm kind of just doing my own thing. I am
excited for back to school.
Speaker 3 (18:33):
And in previous segments we are discussing the tragedy that
kids can't read and write and do math in school.
Interrelated Sorry, Okay, so let's get on to the really
important stuff.
Speaker 4 (18:44):
The Trump administration this week.
Speaker 3 (18:48):
Barred federal medicaid dollars from being used to fund cruel
experiments on confused children. Now I'm going to read it
from the New York Times. Administration barred federal medicaid dollars
from being used to provide gender transition medication and surgery
to transgender adolescents.
Speaker 4 (19:08):
Yeah.
Speaker 3 (19:08):
I never ever use the term gender transition because they
mix the word gender and sex, which really are the
same thing. They pretend they're not, except when it's convenient
to pretend they are. And the idea that a confused
twelve year old boy can become a confused twelve year
old girl is ludicrous.
Speaker 4 (19:27):
They mentioned.
Speaker 3 (19:27):
The treatments are already banned in most Republican led states,
which has been the topic of front international debate among
health authorities. Not really, not anymore, just in the woke US.
Europe has gone screaming in the other direction. They mentioned
in the New York Times, most major medical societies in
the US, including the American Academy of Pediatrics, which is
utterly corrupt and has been captured by radical leftists, continue
(19:51):
to support medical gender transition for young people who experienced
mark distress over their gender identity. It's absolutely obscene and
will be looked upon as a terrible, terrible thing in
the very near future by virtually everybody. They mentioned that
the Department of Health and Human Services and report last
(20:11):
year concluded that the risk of gender transition treatments up
a sex change experiments on children, which includes drugs that
block puberty hormone therapies and in rare cases, rarer cases,
surgeries outweigh any benefits. That's because they do according to
every responsible study that's been done anywhere on Earth, and
(20:31):
the report prioritized psychotherapy for adolescents who are so confused
they want sex changes. Well, of course you're going to
give them psychotherapy, and what's the last thing you're gonna
do mutilate them for the rest of their lives. So
let's build some evidence to support the arguments I'm making.
(20:52):
And don't worry, We're gonna do a bit of a weave,
but we're gonna get back to the thread.
Speaker 4 (20:56):
Trust me.
Speaker 3 (20:58):
This is a a tweet from a voter in Wisconsin
who just before the primary the other day said he's
a hard No. I think it's on Francesca Hong, because Hong,
the super progressive DSA chick, voted against a bill that
(21:19):
made it illegal for teachers to groom their students for
sexual purposes. And it was all based on a thirty
year old teacher who was messaging a thirteen year old
every day for six months talking about how he wanted
them to be together. She had a nice body, he
was jealous when she talked to the other boys. He
sent provocetive pictures of himself, and when the cops arrested
(21:40):
him went to charge him, they realized nothing he did
was actually illegal. He didn't make sexual contact contact and
no obscene pictures were or explicit pictures were exchanged. But
he was actively trying to groom a child for sex,
and there was no law forbidding his contact his conduct.
So in Wisconsin they came up with a law in
the state Assembly, drafting a bipartisan bill that made her
(22:02):
a felony to engage in any course of conduct clearly
and obviously intended to seduce her Laura child into engaging
in sexual acts, etc. Pasted one ninety three to six,
and Hong was against it, one of the very few
people who vote against it. They were all super progressives.
A few months later, the first person was charged under
the law. He was a thirty six year old man
who met a developmentally disabled sixteen year old in a
(22:23):
public park when she was thirteen. Specifically, she had down syndrome,
and spent the next three years trying to manipulate her
into running away from home so he could make her
in his liveing sex life, that is, and he was
charged with felonies and to recap Earlier this year, Hong
was one of only six people to vote against that bill.
(22:44):
Why in the world would you vote against that bill?
Speaker 4 (22:49):
Huh? Moving along.
Speaker 3 (22:52):
W path, which is going to come up again, is
that World Health organism that has convinced so many people
that if a kid is confused about their sex, you
have to give them hormones or other drugs or surgeries.
And they cited a couple of tiny studies that have
(23:14):
been completely discredited over and over again, but they've kept
on pushing it.
Speaker 4 (23:21):
Well.
Speaker 3 (23:22):
At the heart of that organization is a philosophy from
the sixties, especially about how all sexual practices are normal
and including transgenderism and sex with children. And in fact
(23:44):
there's a Norwegian bondage discipline sado masochism activist name a
Savine Skid or Skide celebrated gay rights activists and other things.
In Oslo, he lobbied the World Health Organation to remove
various fetishes and sadomasochism and stuff from psychiatric diagnosis. And
(24:07):
there he is in his dungeon arguing that that was
it should not be seen as a problem, it was
perfectly normal.
Speaker 4 (24:15):
And he and his cohort went on to found w PATH.
Speaker 3 (24:24):
And those guys defended NAMBLA, the North American Man Boy
Love Association. They defended child porn. They were in favor
of showing children porn and you know, similar stuff of
that ilk and the next step in the uh oh.
(24:45):
And the guy who coined the term cisgender was another
one of this. Kabali's a German sexologist.
Speaker 4 (24:53):
He was.
Speaker 3 (24:54):
He also claimed there's nothing wrong with pedophilia. So the
crowd that came up with gender bending anything goes sex
with anybody, that they're also really in a pedophilia and
that is why you are starting to hear on the
fringes of the left the term minor attracted individuals. They're
trying to get rid of the term pedophile, an usher
(25:18):
in minor attracted individuals. They're trying to normalize sex with kids.
And there is I have pages or receipts of these
people and what they've said. We don't have time for it.
You got to trust me, or I can retweet some
of it that was on Twitter. Moving along though, to
the wpath people, Wesley Yang writes about this a lot right.
(25:41):
It was always a desperate con It was never real,
it was never true. Well informed people have understood this
for more than a decade. But now the institution upon
which the charade of scientific authority across American institutions relying
on is said so itself in court.
Speaker 4 (25:55):
It was a con order.
Speaker 3 (25:57):
It was a con orders of magnitude worse than Jason Arday,
that's that Cambridge guy. Because it implicated nearly every organ
of scientific and medical consensus in a conspiracy until the
most brazen lie ever told by those institutions at the
largest scale any such lie has ever been told. And
because on the basis of this lie, tens of thousands
of confused people, including children, were medically harmed in pursuit
(26:18):
of a delusion that can never be true. And what
he's talking about is that w Path has conceded in
court that it's standards of care which has been quoted. Friends,
because I've been in this space for a while looking
into it. Their standards of care have been quoted many
thousands of times in the New York Times, the Alphabet Networks, CNN,
you know, everywhere, certainly in your woke politics.
Speaker 4 (26:43):
And the transcript from the court.
Speaker 3 (26:46):
Room talks about the statements made in this piece of
evidence are opinion and not the conclusion of scientific research.
W Path engages in this significant medical debate by publishing
academic and clinical guidelines for healthcare providers for the vision
(27:08):
of transgender healthcare. Plaintiffs acknowledge that there are parties on
both sides of this medical debate, and w Path is
on one side of the debate and provides guidelines blah
blah blah transgender healthcare. The Supreme Court has recently Okay,
so it's long, but it gets to we're expressing our
(27:28):
opinion on the research that we have seen, and they
are no longer even claiming that it is supportable, scientifically
valid and peer reviewed research. They're just saying we saw
it and we formed an opinion. It's a significance, kind
(27:49):
of obscure and in the weeds, but a significant confession.
And finally, this is an editorial by James Eller and
the Wall Street Journal. Trump should act against Colorado's transgender
subsidies because state funded counseling is encouraging children to try
to change their sexual expression sex change experiments. Call a
(28:13):
gender affirming care. If you must, I will not. But
he writes the trial the child transgenderism craze has begun
to receive largely thanks to legal, financial, and political pressure
from the Trump administration. That is true, but I think
it's also start to fade because it was a social
contagion among adolescents, particularly adolescent girls, very much like anorexia
in the eighties and nineties. It still exists, but in
(28:34):
a fraction of the numbers it used to, as I
show in a new report for Do No Harm. That's
the association of medical professionals who have understood how sick
this is and are fighting against it. State and federal
taxpayers have long been co opted into encouraging boys and
girls to try to become something they aren't and can
never be. Through public funding for state education and healthcare programs,
(28:55):
taxpayers are unwittingly complicit and physically harming vulnerable children, for instance, Colorado.
Speaker 4 (29:02):
The focus of his report.
Speaker 3 (29:03):
He says I spent the past year submitting open records
requests to state agencies, universities, and youth health programs. Perhaps
the most concerning thing I found is the state's Eyematter program,
which uses taxpayer money to provide no cost mental health
counseling for children. It's about eleven million dollars a year
in federal money. Much of Imatter's work is unobjectionable, it's fine,
(29:27):
But the four hundred and sixty nine gender affirming care
therapy sessions it provided between twenty twenty one to twenty
twenty four aren't. Forty six of those sessions involved children
six to nine years old, and the sessions were provided
to children five or younger and forty to children with
special needs. And he just got the records through twenty
(29:48):
twenty four. It's still active and state funded, meaning these
numbers are probably much much higher. But the majority of
these therapy sessions have the orientation that we are going
to affirm what you say about gender identity. They make
it clear that no parent or guardian consent is required,
(30:08):
that this will be just between us, because sometimes you
need to talk to someone else. And the orientation of
the actual counseling is unmistakably pro this. So you've got
federally funded counseling convincing confused children that yes, you are transgender,
(30:32):
and the web of taxpayer money has gone un scene
over or shadowed that he writes by more obviously egregious
state laws. And it's continuing on and targeting confused little
kids something that never existed.
Speaker 4 (30:51):
Just a few years ago.
Speaker 3 (30:53):
And now if you dare say this is wrong, you
get a branded a transphobe or whatever. Got to keep
fighting against this. It's all about the confused kids and
the activists who are trying to twist their minds.
Speaker 4 (31:05):
It's a gender bending madness. Update.
Speaker 3 (31:10):
Jack is going to check in next we'll finish Strong
Armstrong no time to lose. Final segment of the show,
and we're joined by vacationing co host Jack Armstrong from
somewhere in the frozen North, Jack, where are you?
Speaker 1 (31:29):
What's up the sea? Was angry that day. My friends,
I am on a boat. I'm on a boat. We
are on a boat. We're on a boat. Our van
is on a boat to Vancouver Island. That's what we're doing.
We're on a boat.
Speaker 4 (31:42):
Fantastic. What's the plan on Vancouver Island? Nature? Hangout? Hang
out and.
Speaker 1 (31:50):
If nobody's ever been there, just hurt a for the
first time, well regularly people after doing a Canadian accent
attempting to you say a I only far was only
a once, just a little bit of.
Speaker 3 (32:02):
Go wow, your connection is absolutely horrible. Sorry, you're the
seafaring life is difficult and your connection is iffy. You've
heard a I'm sure you've heard people say oot though, right.
Speaker 4 (32:16):
Yes, I've heard some boots. Yes, I'm I'm sorry, a
couple of stories and hoots. No, a's yeah.
Speaker 3 (32:24):
My buddy Gordy the Canadian is definitely an oot guy
and an occasional a guy, and he's a hockey player,
so he wants to fight you a lot.
Speaker 4 (32:35):
But it's fine. So you'll be rejoining us on Monday, correct.
Speaker 1 (32:39):
Yeah, tomorrow, I will be a landlubber and I will
be able to call into the show and I will
have more time, so I will do that tomorrow morning.
Speaker 3 (32:45):
Excellent, Well that would be delightful. Meanwhile, you and the
boys enjoy the vacation. Enjoy Vancouver Island. I just sailed
past it on my cruise.
Speaker 4 (32:54):
I didn't get a chance to spend a ton of time,
but it's it's.
Speaker 3 (32:57):
A beautiful place. Jack from Lord everybody wasn't that exciting? Oh?
Is Jack still around? Having about participating final thoughts?
Speaker 4 (33:08):
Well, there's Jack Canner's Joe, It's time the show. Katie
Green and Michael Langel looks Stabby the clown really a radio.
So let's say their final thoughts.
Speaker 2 (33:20):
People where they have to go?
Speaker 3 (33:22):
Oh, here's your host for final thoughts. Me let's get
a final thought from everybody on the crew. Michael lines
Low lead us off.
Speaker 4 (33:28):
That's Unfortunately I had a little bit.
Speaker 3 (33:29):
I was gonna say, how you carry the show, Joe,
and oh my gosh, I forgot that Jack was still
on the line. But yeah, sorry, I always see the
real talent, Katie. Katie Green has our final thought for us?
What's what's on your mind?
Speaker 2 (33:43):
Uh?
Speaker 3 (33:43):
A little van turned three months yesterday and I have
not had an in and out burger since I was pregnant.
Speaker 4 (33:48):
So I'm going to in and out.
Speaker 3 (33:49):
Today, go get it, enjoy that fantastic Jack from the Road.
Speaker 4 (33:53):
Do you have a final thought?
Speaker 3 (33:55):
He's not there. His final thought is have a great day, everybody,
Greetings from Canada. My final thought is, yeah, it's been
kind of interesting and weird and fun doing the solo
version of the show, just like when I'm on vacation
in Jack does it. We'll be back together soon enough.
(34:17):
Thanks for either a putting up with it or be
enjoying it.
Speaker 4 (34:22):
It's a chance to.
Speaker 3 (34:23):
Explore different ideas in different ways. But we'll be back
to normal on Monday, and I'm looking forward to that
for a couple of reasons, including the fact.
Speaker 4 (34:30):
That it's way easier.
Speaker 3 (34:33):
Armstrong and Getty wrapping up grueling four hour workday.
Speaker 4 (34:37):
So many people who thanks so a little time.
Speaker 3 (34:38):
Good Armstrong e geddy dot com for the outlining strums
a note mail bag at armstrong e geddy dot.
Speaker 4 (34:42):
Com pick up some swag. We will see you later.
God bless America. I'm Strong and Getti.
Speaker 2 (35:00):
Love the day.
Speaker 4 (35:04):
It's called an eclipse.
Speaker 2 (35:07):
It means it's time to party.
Speaker 4 (35:12):
You gotta embrace your retire mind. Compile yourself and make
some time for it to is a lost lock though love,
so she won't mind.
Speaker 2 (35:26):
It is live, Armstrong and Jenny
Hosts And Creators
Joe Getty
Jack Armstrong
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Betrayal Weekly
Betrayal Weekly is back for a new season. Every Thursday, Betrayal Weekly shares first-hand accounts of broken trust, shocking deceptions, and the trail of destruction they leave behind. Hosted by Andrea Gunning, this weekly ongoing series digs into real-life stories of betrayal and the aftermath. From stories of double lives to dark discoveries, these are cautionary tales and accounts of resilience against all odds. From the producers of the critically acclaimed Betrayal series, Betrayal Weekly drops new episodes every Thursday. If you would like to share your story, you can reach out to the Betrayal Team by emailing them at betrayalpod@gmail.com and follow us on Instagram at @betrayalpod and @glasspodcasts. Please join our Substack for additional exclusive content, curated book recommendations, and community discussions. Sign up FREE by clicking this link Beyond Betrayal Substack. Join our community dedicated to truth, resilience, and healing. Your voice matters! Be a part of our Betrayal journey on Substack.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com