Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:01):
Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio, the George
Washington Broadcast Center, Jack Armstrong, Joe, Katty arm.
Speaker 2 (00:10):
Strong, and Jetty and He Armstrong and Yetty.
Speaker 3 (00:24):
Duncan has begun offering a limited edition spiked Pumpkin spice
ice latte, which is six percent alcohol by volume. Big deal,
I've been making those for years, said teachers.
Speaker 4 (00:39):
Wow, a new turn for the milkshake people claim as
a coffee drink.
Speaker 2 (00:44):
Put a little booze in it.
Speaker 1 (00:45):
There you go, right right hey, And then an allusion
to teachers having to drink to get through the day.
Speaker 2 (00:55):
Coming up.
Speaker 4 (00:55):
I just came across this. So CNN had oh Harris
representative on, and to their credit, they said, so, Kamala
Harris doesn't have anything any scheduled today on our website,
any event, So is there a reason why she can't
do an interview? And then gobbledygook word salid, gobbledygook woods
word salid, And then they press them on it again
(01:15):
and it's it's pretty good looking forward to hearing that.
I'll stay tuned for sure. I hope that's a growing trend.
Why can't she do an interview today? We're planning we're
gonna try to plan one by the end of three
weeks from now. Why can't she just walk out and
do it today like every other presidential candidate.
Speaker 1 (01:33):
We're sitting here right now, can we talk to her
on the phone for ten minutes?
Speaker 2 (01:37):
Yeah? Yeah, it's well, it's obvious what's going on. But
more on that to come. I am.
Speaker 1 (01:45):
I feel like I need to caution everybody that in
the fight against DEEI and racist policies, masquerading is wokeness,
the neo Marxism that's trying to tear the system down
and turn down Western soation.
Speaker 2 (02:01):
A lot of us are aware of it.
Speaker 1 (02:02):
We've had some victories in court, getting like John Deere
to end their DEI programs. There have been a number
of victories on college campuses, at least smallest victories.
Speaker 2 (02:14):
But again to paraphrase Churchill, this is not.
Speaker 1 (02:17):
The beginning of the end. This is just the end
of the beginning. Because a lot of this touch stuff
is marching forward. It's becoming more common in academia, in medicine,
which is really troubling, which is you know, thick with
academia honestly for obvious reasons. And in education, did I
(02:37):
say that already. But for instance, and I'd love to
spend more time on this, but the Journal of the
American College of Radiology, to their credit, did a little
experiment where they prepared a bunch of mock applications for
residency programs for radiologists, which is a fairly small specialty
(02:57):
in medicine, and they made sure that all of the
hard academics achievements, excuse me, were extremely similar with all
the applicants, and all they changed were their extra curriculars.
Some had LGBTQ Pride Alliance, others had Young Republicans, Some
(03:18):
had Bible studies, others had like lefty environmental clubs and
that sort of thing. An absolutely huge disparity in who
got the better residency spots huge prejudice toward liberal politics
in the world of radiology, because partly because the you know,
(03:45):
the the residency is quasi academic, and so the extent
to which there is capture of academia by these woke Marxists,
we have well to speak in to that. They would understand,
we have an infection so severe we're not sure we
(04:05):
can solve it. This patient may die of sepsis. It's
a serious issue. But that isn't actually the main thing
I wanted to talk about. Quote a National Review yesterday,
a great, great article about the rise of the completely
wrong expert. Whether it's Kimberlay Crenshaw claiming that black women
make up a third of the killings of police when
(04:26):
it's actually zero point nine percent, it's not thirty three percent,
it's actually one thirty seventh of what she claimed, which
is just insane. And then they named check ibramex, Kendy
and the mumbo jumbo that these people have been selling,
(04:46):
that people have been buying about racial resentment, implicit bias,
stereotype threat, whiteness and what is whiteness and how.
Speaker 2 (04:54):
To get rid of whiteness.
Speaker 1 (04:55):
We could go on and on these programs, but I
found this so interesting, all leading up to this big
poll recently of the American national elections studies. I could
get into the methodology, but it's a thorough study of
thousands of people how racial groups rate each other. Asians
(05:20):
about sixty seven percent say have a their mean rating
of whites. That's what we're talking about. Do you do
you think more or less these are nice people or
not nice people? Do you like white people? Do you
not like white people.
Speaker 4 (05:32):
Okay, like or don't like, nice or not? Because I
was wondering what a way I'm rating them on their
hotness or foot speed. No, it's just a general impression
of you know, when I talk to you about Asian people,
do they have overall a positive feeling for them or negative?
So let's see Asians sixty seven positive for white people.
(05:54):
Two thirds of Asians say I'm up with the whites. Okay,
it's like seventy one percent on black folks cool the
Asians the Asians. Likewise, Hispanics seventy percent positive. Asians themselves
view Asians about eighty percent positive.
Speaker 2 (06:10):
Asians say up with Asians? And who can blame them?
Speaker 4 (06:15):
Of Asians who don't like Asians, that's kind of interesting,
I think.
Speaker 2 (06:20):
I don't know. You'd have to ask an Asian who
doesn't like other Asians. I don't know. Honestly, it's an
interesting question.
Speaker 1 (06:27):
It might have to do with second or third generation
Americans as opposed to like old school tiger mom, kill
yourself for academic achievement attitudes.
Speaker 2 (06:36):
I don't know.
Speaker 1 (06:37):
As a wild guess, I don't know. Let's see among
Hispanic people. Hispanic people are similar about sixty six percent
say yeah, white people are fine or that's the that's
the that's the median. So white people are well into
the positive area with sixty just under two thirds. Hispanic
people are are pretty comfy with the black folks about
(06:57):
seventy three percent. Hispanic people really like Hispanic people eighty percent,
just like the Asians.
Speaker 4 (07:03):
Wow, so races tend to four out of five people
tend to like their own race.
Speaker 1 (07:07):
Yeah, yeah, Asians though, let's see Hispanic people substantially fewer
like Asians than like themselves.
Speaker 2 (07:15):
That's down to seventy three percent.
Speaker 1 (07:16):
But you know, so it's it's plus or minus seven
to eight ten percent. Black folks, let's talk about black folks.
Black folks only like, are only like sixty two percent
down with the white people.
Speaker 2 (07:27):
That's the lowest ratings, sixty two percent, much different from
sixty seven.
Speaker 1 (07:33):
So you go, how do black people feel about black people?
It's eighty seven percent. Okay, black people are really down
with black folks, but it's substantially less. They don't like
the Hispanic people nearly enough, nearly as much as like
seventy two percent, and then Asian people it's down even
further to about sixty six percent. Again, so it's a
variation between like eighty seven and sixty two percent, And
(07:57):
that's the most striking one.
Speaker 2 (07:59):
Oh, we haven't ad about white people.
Speaker 4 (08:02):
The I don't like white people. I'm a white person.
I don't like white people. Think they smell funny. I
don't like their food. The way they dance is ridiculous.
Speaker 2 (08:10):
They're lazy white people.
Speaker 1 (08:13):
Clearly, according to the narrative, white people are the most
racist and.
Speaker 2 (08:16):
Intolerant group on Earth.
Speaker 1 (08:19):
The reality is white people like white people about seventy
one percent. They like black people seventy percent, they like
Hispanic people seventy percent, they like Asian people seventy percent.
White people's impression of the other races is they seem
fine to me. I don't spend a lot of time
thinking about it.
Speaker 4 (08:40):
I never think about it, certainly, not as a group
that doesn't make any sense whatsoever.
Speaker 2 (08:45):
Well, it's what's the word racist? True? That exactly that.
Speaker 4 (08:50):
Maybe that's the reason I think it's interesting that we
I'm white and Joe's white, that we have the lowest
percentage of like ourselves.
Speaker 2 (09:01):
So about a third of us don't like white people.
Speaker 4 (09:05):
Oh, white people, that's interesting well, I think since you're
taught in college to not like yourself or yeah, be
ashamed of yourself.
Speaker 1 (09:13):
Well, yeah, that's an excellent point, and I just think
it jives with the other results in that white people
are like, I don't know, mostly positive, I guess, And
it all ends up the same. What do you think
of black people? I don't know, mostly positive.
Speaker 2 (09:28):
I guess. How about the Hispanics?
Speaker 1 (09:30):
Surely you've got an opinion on those people, and the
answer is, I don't know, mostly positive, I guess. Now
the WOK would argue, well, that's because you have white
privilege and you don't have to think about race.
Speaker 2 (09:44):
You don't have to think about the race, how it
affects everything.
Speaker 1 (09:47):
Blah blah blah blah blah. Yeah that would be true
if it were true. But it's not true, is the thing.
Speaker 2 (09:54):
So I just I thought that was an interesting result.
I think.
Speaker 1 (10:01):
I'd like to know what role liberal white women play
in all of all of this.
Speaker 2 (10:11):
I don't know.
Speaker 1 (10:11):
I don't want to draw too much from this or
leap to too many conclusions, but the idea that white
people think about race all the time is absurd.
Speaker 2 (10:19):
Yeah, well I rarely do, but.
Speaker 4 (10:23):
Hispanics Asians and black people are not going to college
and being taught, or grade school in high school for
that matter, are not being taught that their race is inherently.
Speaker 1 (10:31):
Bad right right, In fact, quite the opposite. Just a
hell of a notion. Say it out loud, I'm white
and I'm proud. See that'll get you like your career
ended because it sounds like some sort we've been told, Well,
that's an awful characteristic to have.
Speaker 2 (10:47):
Blah blah blah blah blah.
Speaker 1 (10:48):
This madness will probably never end, but it's certainly worth
fighting against in whatever institutions, schools, universities, companies that you
hold dear, and all DEI programs immediately wherever they.
Speaker 4 (11:00):
Coming up with story. Joe mocked me from mentioning yesterday
and again I will mock that they may have finally
solved the flying.
Speaker 2 (11:09):
Car problem been.
Speaker 1 (11:13):
Promising to that had a flashback to third grade to
me hearing the same crap.
Speaker 4 (11:17):
They've been promising this since I was a little kid.
It will happen someday, and maybe that day is now.
I can explain what the pegasus is and how close
they are, among other things on the ways stay with us.
Speaker 5 (11:31):
Voters can't stop talking about how much older Tim Walls
looks than Kamala Harris, even though, and this news may
shock you, at sixty, Walls is just six months older
than Harris. Walls has heard your cruel jabs at his
appearance in America, and he has blamed the stress of his
high school teaching career, where he supervised the lunch room
for twenty years, adding, you do not leave that job
(11:54):
with a full head of hair.
Speaker 2 (11:56):
Trust me, it's true. Now, He's right. You do not
leave that job. No one leaves that.
Speaker 5 (12:03):
Job with a full head of hair because lunch room
bullies steal your hair and use it to tie up
the asthma kids.
Speaker 4 (12:13):
God, I did some supervising the lunch room last year
at my son's junior high because it's a school where
your parents volunteer for stuff like that, and that is
a more stressful job than you would think.
Speaker 2 (12:27):
Oh, I don't doubt it. I found it, like it
really stressed me out every time. Is this something else
I can volunteer to do that's not so stressful. You know,
that's a charming thing for old Walls to say.
Speaker 1 (12:38):
But now that I've realized, the charming old coach is
a wolf in sheep's clothing.
Speaker 2 (12:42):
It's a little less charming.
Speaker 4 (12:45):
A couple of stories shore that will probably be mocked
and are probably stupid. But first of all, Pegas this
is a revolutionary hybrid flying car. It might be the
first flying car that actually works. It can travel on
the highway and fly up to three hours.
Speaker 1 (12:59):
All right, here's my annoying objection to the story. That's
not a flying car. It's a driving helicopter. Wow, that
is a that is slicing it thin on your objections
to flying cars. So you designed a helicopter that can
drive for a little while.
Speaker 2 (13:16):
Who cares.
Speaker 4 (13:17):
The Pegasus E is a hybrid multi mobile vehicle and
one of the first of it's kind to be put
in a press, put into place several successful tests. You'd
almost have to be a helicopter of some sort instead
of a plane for this to work, because we can't
be taken off on runways and landing on runways. We
need to be able to come straight down and go
(13:37):
straight up. Yeah, I think for it to ever work. Right,
It's an electric car with a range of three hundred
miles and the ability to reach a speed of seventy
five miles an hour. Which is fast as most of
the time, and it also has propellers and able to
take off and fly at a maximum speed.
Speaker 2 (13:51):
Of one hundred miles an hour.
Speaker 4 (13:52):
Sure, as an amateur pilot, I'm gonna fly this thing
around at one hundred miles an hour with a bunch
of other people in the sky and things will be fine.
Has a range of about three hours for that two
maximum multitude of six thousand feet, that's over a mile
in the air. Of course, anything over like one hundred
feet you will reach maximum speed anyway.
Speaker 6 (14:11):
But on the way down you mean, yeah, on the
way down if you were to fall, yes, Well, they
never in any of these stories about drone deliveries or
flying cars ever get into the how you would manage
the airspace, because to me, that seems like the biggest complication.
Speaker 4 (14:30):
Flying cars could work great if I'm the only one
that has one, but if a whole bunch of us
have them, what are the lanes going to be or
who gets to take off when? Or how's I just
can't even imagine that ever being workable.
Speaker 2 (14:44):
We have a.
Speaker 1 (14:45):
Longtime listener who is an air traffic controller and has
talked about that that's not an easy gig and the
patterns at airports are well established. Everybody knows what the
approach pattern is and you know which runway or you're
using that sort of thing. If it's just willy nilly
in a city, you're right, there's a logistical nightmare.
Speaker 2 (15:06):
Along with drones delivering packages.
Speaker 4 (15:08):
It's just I really actually think it's impossible to make
work in reality. But maybe I'm missing something on that.
Should I do this, I'll do this headline. Frequent intense
nightmares could be alerting you to this problem. Do you
know what the problem is? Feeling lonely? If you have
frequent intense nightmares, it might because it be because you're
(15:31):
lonely and it's just your psyche kind of reacting in
terror to the lack of the lack of intimacy. I
don't mean physically, like, uh, I don't mean that intimacy.
I mean, you know, yeah, closes.
Speaker 1 (15:47):
With another human being, right, yeah, So thanks for that
illustration of intimacy. By the way, that's one of the
finer moments of the Armstrong and Getty Show's history. I
couldn't holy oh.
Speaker 4 (15:58):
I described what I meant discussing a couple of sounds.
Speaker 2 (16:02):
Mind, I think it was time saving. Actually, you knew
exactly what I was talking about. It's insulting, and then
Katie's disgusted.
Speaker 6 (16:09):
I assume, Well, no, I was grateful for it because
I didn't know what he was talking about without the
uh atap to it.
Speaker 2 (16:14):
Yeah, that really brought it home, didn't it? Really? Shakespeare
over here? Yeah?
Speaker 1 (16:21):
Hey, you know what's funny, Judy and I had near
identical dreams last night, both of us with that idiotic
uh you're you're trying to accomplish something, but you run
into impediment after impediment dreams.
Speaker 2 (16:32):
Oh yeah, I think everybody has those.
Speaker 1 (16:34):
Trying to program your navigation but the keys don't work,
and then the websites down, and then your phone melts
in your hand or whatever weird surrealistic dream thing happens
to happen.
Speaker 2 (16:44):
But what does that dream? You're about to go on
a vacation.
Speaker 4 (16:48):
We used to have dream mandless son, They say all
kinds of Oh not crock it, Oh boy, dropping, I
almost dropped it.
Speaker 2 (16:54):
You know, you've probably ought to go back to grunting
like a like a beast.
Speaker 4 (16:58):
Yeah, stick with that, Okay, I want to my favorite
New York Post headline before we have to take a break.
Janet Jackson reveals she's related to Samuel L.
Speaker 2 (17:05):
Jackson.
Speaker 4 (17:08):
Wow, that's fantastic news. CNN comes in for a kicking.
Speaker 2 (17:12):
Next Armstrong and Geeddy.
Speaker 4 (17:17):
Thank you for the Miss Jackson if you're nasty as
I was mocking the New York Post headline, Janet Jackson
reveals she's related.
Speaker 2 (17:25):
To to Samuel Jackson. She revealed finally, thank God, silence.
Speaker 4 (17:34):
So I don't know if these clips are about to
play fit together at all. Actually I don't think they do.
They're all about the presidential election. I guess so from
that category, and I just found them all interesting. Here's
Nicky Haley, who finished second to Donald Trump a distant second.
It wasn't much more contest, but her commenting on Trump's
campaign so far in the State of the Race yesterday
when she was on Fox.
Speaker 7 (17:54):
The Republican Party needs to make a serious shift here.
And the first thing is the Republican Party Donald Trump.
People here at Fox quit complaining that she's not giving
an interview. You don't need an interview from Kamala Harris.
We need him to win. But you got to go
(18:15):
out and do the work. And the one thing Republicans
have to stop. Don't quit whining about her. I want
this campaign to win, but the campaign is not going
to win. Talking about crowd sizes, it's not going to win.
Talking about what race Kamala Harris is, it's not going
to win. Talking about whether she's dumb. You can't win
on those things. The American people are smart. Treat them
(18:36):
like they're smart.
Speaker 4 (18:37):
I think she's right about all of those, except for
the her not doing an interview. I think that should
be hammered all the time, constantly. Yeah, I agree, her
point was partly that, look.
Speaker 1 (18:48):
She's already told us who she is hammer that, which
is not a bad point. But I think, yeah, the
fact that she's hiding from the media, from debates, from
the rest of it, that's absolutely legit.
Speaker 4 (19:00):
Also on the topic of the election and coverage of
the election and all that sort of thing. A comment
that occurred on Stephen Colbert. This guest is from Caitlin
Collins CNN QT.
Speaker 2 (19:14):
Which one is she.
Speaker 1 (19:17):
Dark, haired, thin and pretty that differentiature from.
Speaker 4 (19:22):
The exactly anyway she's on Colbert the other night.
Speaker 8 (19:27):
Trump has kind of been thrown on his heels by this,
and he's not really sure how to go after Vice
President Harris he knew his attack lines on President Biden.
He really has struggled with to how to go after
someone who's twenty years younger than him, who is a.
Speaker 2 (19:41):
Different gender, a different race.
Speaker 8 (19:43):
It's kind of been this moment where he has not
been able to coalesce around a single attack line.
Speaker 5 (19:49):
I know you guys are objective over there that you
just report the news as it is.
Speaker 2 (19:54):
Oh, I know a CNN makes it, and I know
that's supposed to be a lab line.
Speaker 9 (19:58):
I wasn't supposed to be, but I guess it is.
Speaker 5 (20:02):
What what I what I wanted to ask is that?
Speaker 2 (20:04):
But you guys wow? Yeah, so unprompted.
Speaker 4 (20:09):
The audience laughs at the idea of CNN being objective, right,
and that's the cold Bear audience, right, And both she
and Steven they kept their dignity all right, but they're like,
it was that supposed to be a laugh line?
Speaker 2 (20:25):
No, it wasn't supposed to be the yes.
Speaker 10 (20:30):
Uh.
Speaker 6 (20:31):
Caitlin Collins is the one that did the interview with
Donald Trump and he went, man, you are a nasty woman.
Speaker 2 (20:37):
Yeah. That was a couple of years back. That was
a few years back.
Speaker 4 (20:40):
Yeah, yeah, boy, if I if I'm running CNN and
I think they are trying to be more objective. They went,
you know, partisan hardcore for years and that didn't work,
and they're in the basement, and I think they're trying
to rebrand is more objective, which they got rid of
a lot of their hosts that had no chance of
(21:03):
being more objective. But anyway, man, if I'm running that
place and I hear that Colbert thing, I think, I think, God,
we've got a serious branding problem. People found that laughable
to even imply that were objective.
Speaker 1 (21:16):
Well, it's either a serious branding problem and or a
serious reality problem. Yeah, and it's not a mystery. The
newsrooms of America. Excuse me, you're right repeating on me.
Speaker 2 (21:30):
What are you gonna do?
Speaker 1 (21:31):
But the newsrooms of America are like ninety four percent
Democrat at this point. Well, the CNN is multiples more
objective than MSNBC. Oh, sure so, But nobody had ever
even tried to make that claim about MSNBC though.
Speaker 2 (21:47):
No.
Speaker 4 (21:48):
And then different topic, and this is to CNN's credit.
This one a guy in there interviewing a flack for
the Harris campaign, and his point is she doesn't have
anything on the schedule.
Speaker 2 (22:02):
Why can't she do an interview?
Speaker 9 (22:04):
What's on the vice president's schedule.
Speaker 11 (22:06):
Today while she's traveling and talking to voters and getting
her message out there to the American people, something that
she's been doing from the very start of this campaign
and something that she certainly did when she was president.
Biden's running mate is vice president. But look, you just
mentioned the spece she's going to be giving.
Speaker 9 (22:20):
An event in the I was asking about today, and
I don't think she's got any campaign events on the
schedule today, does she.
Speaker 11 (22:27):
Well, she and Governor Walls have been traveling across the country.
They hit nearly every battleground state last week.
Speaker 9 (22:33):
The reason I was asking about today is because it
seems like she has time if she wanted to do
an interview with a member of the media or do
a news conference. Correct, there does appear to be that
time if she wanted.
Speaker 11 (22:44):
Well, look, she's taking her message directly to voters, and
just because she doesn't have anything an interview schedule on
her public schedule doesn't mean that she's not taking your
message directly to voters.
Speaker 4 (22:55):
Yeah, I think Nikki Haley's wrong about ignoring this. I
think it's growing when a CNN host is doing is
pressing the flack that way. I mean a lot of
the CNN audience is they're not Trump supporters, and they're
seeing that and thinking that kind of b SI the
you know, non campaign, why I can't do an interview day? Well,
they're they're they're they're speaking directly to voters and battleground
(23:18):
states last week, right.
Speaker 1 (23:21):
And again, while I see Nikki Haley's point, if you
were to take a completely non partisan look at this
and say what is good, what is normal, what is
proper for a candidate running for office in an open society,
there's just no argument to me. No, what's best is
that they just put out the occasional statement and never
(23:42):
endor any questions from the free media. No sane person
would ever argue that. So, you know, the opposite, obviously
was what he was saying, when's she going to do
an interview? That's perfectly legitimate.
Speaker 4 (23:53):
Well, Trump did an hour ten the other day with
almost entirely hostile media, as he has done many, many,
many many times through his career. Nobody was scared of
putting Barack Obama out there to answer questions at any
point of any day. It could have been two in
the morning, you know, walking out of his driveway. He
could have answered any questions. Same with George W. Bush,
Bill Clinton, lots of Romney, lots of different candidates, but
(24:17):
not Harris.
Speaker 1 (24:20):
And as I've pointed out before, it is especially necessary
and important since you have an unvetted candidate who didn't
go through the primary process, which is a long and
grueling series of interviews, debates, arguments. I was just asking
Michael if he could bring me back because we had
(24:41):
one yesterday, we dug up another. Kamala Harris.
Speaker 4 (24:44):
Yeah, yeah, Kamala Harris responding to her when she was
named borders on the border was still a mess.
Speaker 2 (24:51):
And how come you haven't visited?
Speaker 12 (24:52):
Would you call the border secure? The border is secure,
your confident is border secure?
Speaker 7 (24:59):
We have.
Speaker 10 (25:01):
A secure border, and that that is a priority for
any nation, including hours in our administration.
Speaker 1 (25:09):
I mean, that's complete nonsense. Yes, it's not even good
bull crab. No, right, I mean, if it were bull crap,
I mean, that's one thing, but that's politics. But it's
like utterly unskillful bull crab. And that's why they're not
letting her sit down. Is she going to be able
to pull this off. No, all the way to November.
Speaker 2 (25:33):
Well, I don't know.
Speaker 1 (25:34):
No, at the point where in the you know, the
end of the second week of August, you have CNN
humiliating her top campaign flax on the air.
Speaker 2 (25:44):
The drum beats are getting loud.
Speaker 4 (25:45):
Well, here's how the way I handle it if I'm
her people, because this is building, and it is going
to build to the point that there's such an audience
for whatever interview she finally gives that you're gonna be
able to make a deal with. You go to Stephanopolis,
you go to Lester Holt, you go to Chuck Todd there,
whoever you go to, and you say, look, guaranteed fifteen
(26:06):
million viewers, if not twice that.
Speaker 2 (26:09):
But here's the five questions, yes or no, we need
right and you agree.
Speaker 4 (26:14):
You find somebody that agrees to it because they want
the eyeballs, the ratings.
Speaker 1 (26:20):
Then they tried desperately to keep it under wraps that
they made that agreement. Yeah, that's what I expect to
happen there.
Speaker 4 (26:27):
I don't I can't imagine that she's going to sit
down and do an interview where she doesn't know what
the subject matter is or what the questions are going
to be.
Speaker 1 (26:34):
Yeah, well, gosh, that is such a probe to me
herself as a so called journalist.
Speaker 2 (26:40):
If you agree to that, she might.
Speaker 4 (26:42):
Be the worst at speaking off the cuff of any
major politician in history. I can't come up with anybody
who's even close to the category.
Speaker 2 (26:52):
She is gone. Now, yeah, yeah, you're right. Well, they're right.
Speaker 4 (26:56):
Is a border and it's Can I hear that again,
because it's just it's amazing.
Speaker 12 (27:01):
Would you call the border secure?
Speaker 2 (27:03):
The border is secure?
Speaker 12 (27:04):
You're confident this border secure?
Speaker 2 (27:07):
We have.
Speaker 10 (27:10):
A secure border, and that that is a priority for
any nation, including hours in our administration.
Speaker 1 (27:18):
That's not saying anything, dear well, she opened with the
opposite of what everybody knew was true, that the border secure.
Speaker 4 (27:24):
So you're kind of in a bad position there. You're
gonna have to do some serious tap dancing.
Speaker 2 (27:30):
No doubt, the border.
Speaker 4 (27:31):
Is secure in that any nation has a secure border.
What the hell are you talking about?
Speaker 2 (27:40):
Business.
Speaker 1 (27:41):
The corollary to the Joe Getty axiom of people don't
offer up stupid arguments because they're keeping their good ones
for tomorrow is that campaigns don't hide their candidates because
the candidate is so awesome they might blind everybody. They're
so incredible. We're just gonna wait till about a week
before they election. We're gonna unleash their incredible awesomeness on everybody, and.
Speaker 2 (28:03):
We'll win in Alasta.
Speaker 1 (28:04):
We don't want to embarrass the other side. No, there's
only one reason you hide a candidate. It's because you're
running a ninnye.
Speaker 2 (28:11):
Yeah, and.
Speaker 4 (28:13):
It's I suppose it's possible she's smart and deep and
just isn't glib. I know people like that. Uh, it's
tough if you're a politician. But I don't think that's
the case. I don't think she has good, uh connective
(28:34):
thoughts on a lot of these topics, and.
Speaker 2 (28:38):
Well she's horrible at it. So well, oh that's the moment.
Speaker 4 (28:42):
I think it could be practically Biden debate level overnight
change in the polls if she ever has to do
a real interview.
Speaker 2 (28:52):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (28:52):
Yeah, particularly with a even a like great B level
skeptical interviewer or again on the debate stage for instance.
Speaker 2 (29:00):
And I'm bringing this up for a reason.
Speaker 1 (29:02):
Ask her, why is it appropriate that air conditioner repairment
and cashiers are paying off the college loans of graduate students,
Why is that appropriate?
Speaker 2 (29:12):
The reason I bring that up? And this got no attention.
Speaker 1 (29:15):
The Eighth Circuit Court just struck down the latest loan
forgiveness scheme, just spanked it, said you can't do this, wow,
and wrapped the administration for canceling debt in defiance of
a lower court order.
Speaker 2 (29:29):
Love to hear explain that. And that's.
Speaker 4 (29:33):
A topic that they're on the wrong side of. But
there's so many So how often did you meet with
the president? You say you were the last person in
the room all the time, and you're an active vice president.
Speaker 2 (29:44):
How often did you meet with the president in person?
Speaker 4 (29:46):
She's gonna make some wild claim multiple times a week wherever?
Why didn't you let the American people know that he
was suffering from some level of dementia like we saw
at the debate. Then she's going to claim she never
saw that. Nobody's gonna believe it.
Speaker 1 (30:03):
The president is cojin. You're confident the president is coaching.
The president is cogin in that cogency is something that
all presidents must strive for.
Speaker 2 (30:15):
And that time is every day.
Speaker 4 (30:19):
Exactly unburdened by what has been We got more on
the ways they here.
Speaker 2 (30:28):
The Democratic Party is a unified party right now, very determined,
very knit together in one cause, and that has to help,
and that.
Speaker 12 (30:38):
Feeling will will be obvious. I think to people who
watch the convention.
Speaker 4 (30:43):
That's David Axelrod, who is a running the campaign for
Barack Obama back in the day.
Speaker 1 (30:49):
If you were to feed David Axelrod truth sim or
maybe just a couple of martinis, he would probably tell you, yeah,
like eighty percent of my job is a bull crap.
I mean, it's a frightening dumb people, or a lying
to people or promising the things they'll never have.
Speaker 2 (31:05):
That's what politics is. Boy, wait, gop that he's slapped me.
Speaker 1 (31:08):
Back and forth across the face. Great example of that.
The Hue and Cry About Project twenty twenty five. I'm
sure were aware of the fact that virtually all of
the center left to the far left got together to
describe the Heritage Foundation's little think tank publications, not little
as nine hundred pages, but as regressive, weird, and authoritarian,
(31:30):
and they actually created a bunch of stuff that wasn't
in there at all and tried to sell people on
the fact that it was just a bizarre and terrifying
documentary i'd totalitarian right wing control. I'd tried to. I'd
changed the word try to did for a big side population. Yeah,
they're substantially successful in that. What is Project twenty five.
(31:53):
It's a giant project of a bunch of walks, some
of them formerly some soon to be in government, academics
the rest of it. Some of their major proposals included
increasing the oversight of the Department of Justice and the FBI,
eliminating the Department of Education, unfettering American energy production as
a way to reduce prices and boost the economy, ousting
those obstructionist partisans and partisans in the federal bureaucracy who may,
(32:18):
again as they have through the years, attempted to prevent
the duly elected president from realizing his mandate and instituting
his policies, throwing a huge problem in government, throwing single
moms in jail that's not actually in there, also securing
the border and ounting illegal aliens, and finally banning men
from participating in women's sports. But again it was portrayed
as a crazy Nazi effort to take over the country.
Speaker 2 (32:40):
Here's what's really interesting.
Speaker 1 (32:44):
There was a large poll done of Americans in all
of the swing states. Asking them what they thought about
the various Project twenty twenty five policy proposals, Bolsters discovered
that respondents were largely on board with what had otherwise
been presented as fringe and authoritarian.
Speaker 2 (33:00):
Oh, for instance, you want to get rid of the Department.
I'm sorry, that doesn't help.
Speaker 1 (33:05):
So you ask them, are you up for eliminating the
Department of Education? Moving control and funding of education from
DC bureaucrats to parents in state and local governments.
Speaker 2 (33:14):
That wins forty nine to forty one.
Speaker 4 (33:16):
Well, I'm fine with that. One ten were unsure. Yeah,
that's not in there, or is in there? That's not it?
Speaker 1 (33:22):
That is in that hundred percent all of this stuff
are These are the major proposals of Project twenty twenty
five that are actually in there.
Speaker 2 (33:30):
Let's see.
Speaker 1 (33:33):
Respondents where asked whether they support an increasing accountability and
oversight of the FBI and the DOJ in the interests
of de weaponizing the federal government.
Speaker 2 (33:41):
That won sixty two to twenty five.
Speaker 1 (33:44):
Wow. Wow, even higher in Pennsylvania, by the way, seventy percent,
So they're on board. Should we build a wall to
secure the US border sixty two percent positive? Super majorities
in every one of the eight states supported the proposition
that businesses needed to verify their employees as legal American residents.
Supermajority's opposition never exceeded seventeen percent to show a single state.
Speaker 4 (34:07):
So in the swing states, dang, near two out of
three voters want to build a wall.
Speaker 1 (34:13):
Yes, wild, yeah, let's see other project. Twenty twenty five frightening,
terrifying Nazi proposals were similarly this overwhelming support. This is
making me mad.
Speaker 4 (34:26):
Donald Trump, please never mention a crowd size again. Always
mention Kamala Harris wants to give free healthcare to illegals
and make her that day, deny it and explain her
new position.
Speaker 1 (34:43):
God, dang it, you're wasting your breath, but you're right.
You're one hundred percent right. How about sending American troops
and equipment to the southern border to confront the drug
cartels and secure the border? Seventy to twenty four Yes,
seventy to twenty four wow.
Speaker 12 (34:57):
Yes.
Speaker 1 (34:59):
Seventy three percents fondens, including eighty one percent Montana, supported
cutting illegal aliens off all government payments seventy three to
twenty Wow. Sixty two percent said they supported expanding oil
and gas drilling on federal lands to increase fossil fuel production.
Speaker 2 (35:13):
Sixty two percent.
Speaker 4 (35:16):
Got to make that cruality. Your candidate has got to
make the case. Chase, it's there, it's right for the
picking
Speaker 2 (35:24):
Armstrong and Getty