Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Phone number eight eight eight nine three four seven eight
(00:02):
seven before you want to be on this show. That's
how you make it happen. Coming up on the show today.
The next worst idea I've ever heard of, just political politics, gamesmanship.
But we will, you know, we'll make a little lemonade
from it. I have some ideas, but it is just Rosson.
(00:25):
Were just talking before the show, this absolute insanity of
the naacp out here demanding that kids kids, man and
fans for that matter. But let's talk about the kids.
Kids coming out of high school, many coming out of
you know, these are not rich kids, most of them.
(00:47):
And in many cases these are kids who are very
not rich, but who have a gift and a work
ethic to go out and just be an absolute freak
of nature, man gifted with size. Some not though able
to go and especially now with how nil money works.
(01:08):
Get recruited to a D one school, get an opportunity
to uh sorry sneeze here in a moment, get an
opportunity to go out and prove yourself and maybe parlay
even that experience as a college athlete to a professional athlete.
And in all cases, uh get the bag. As the
(01:29):
kids say, right, because now, I mean now we have
people who are literally like not coming out of college
because you don't know where you're gonna get drafted. You
may play for league minimum if you're on the CUSP,
but maybe at some of these schools you're getting paid
I don't know, two million dollars a.
Speaker 2 (01:46):
Year in nil money.
Speaker 1 (01:49):
Life changing and if you're responsible with it, it could
be life changing for you and your next generation. Man
and the NAA who has butt hurt over the idea
that maybe I don't know, ten of their congressional members
(02:09):
will have to actually compete for their districts, if in
fact they even want to run, because we're not doing
racially racial districts anymore. And so this is the new protest,
all right.
Speaker 2 (02:21):
You can't.
Speaker 1 (02:22):
What you want to do is you don't want to
go to any of the schools in any of the
states that are doing that.
Speaker 2 (02:27):
Oh so you mean.
Speaker 1 (02:29):
The SEC, the ACC. Yeah, yeah, you definitely wouldn't want
to go to any of those schools. If you're a
college athlete, basketball, football, whatever. It may be some of
the best athletic programs in the nation, some of the
and the ones and the ones that will likely get
you to that next level, if you're able to prove
(02:51):
yourself so that you know ten people who basically had
their job written for them and can keep their jobs.
And by the way, they don't care about any of
you own In many cases they're not even in the states,
the States necessarily they're even calling for a boycott. And oh,
(03:15):
by the way, they keep saying it'll be this percentage
of Black members of Congress. No, it would be that
percentage of members of the Black cong Congressional Caucus, an
organization that doesn't allow Republican members. Because if you add
it in the black Republicans who are not in these
(03:36):
racially gerrymandered districts, I would point out, who's the guy
in Florida Hunt or what?
Speaker 2 (03:43):
I think?
Speaker 1 (03:43):
He's one of the whitest, oldest districts in the nation, man,
and voters elected him, just to dude. The sheer stupidity
of this proposal is absolutely staggering.
Speaker 2 (03:59):
Here we go.
Speaker 3 (04:01):
In this moment when black representation is under intact. It
is important for the CBC to keep in their tradition
of being the moral of the Congress, but the morald
of conscious of this country. No representation, no revenue, no
one black should be on a plan field of institutions
that's living off of our labor, and yet in states
(04:24):
that are seeking to reinstitute a sharecropping reality, Ah yeah,
it is not the responsibility Ross.
Speaker 1 (04:33):
When's the last time you talked to anyone who was
a sharecropper? You're met a sharecropper? You know, I don't
think I have you never run into a sharecropper. I
even grew up in an agricultural environment, not a lot
of sharecropping going on.
Speaker 2 (04:47):
I mean, maybe maybe I'm not asking the right questions.
Speaker 1 (04:50):
Now, we had people least acreage for our falfa from
us one of our neighbors, just because we have more
water on there. But that doesn't count where you're saying
you were asking questions.
Speaker 2 (04:59):
Or yeah, maybe it's my fault.
Speaker 1 (05:02):
Yeah no, that's that's you. You're a little introverted. People
hear us on the radio that don't realize, Yeah, hang out,
so maybe maybe they're sharecroppers listening.
Speaker 2 (05:10):
You can you can fill me in anyway.
Speaker 1 (05:11):
Go ahead, mister NAACP dude who's basically doing this to fundraise,
Let's just be honest. Continue with your next bad idea of.
Speaker 3 (05:21):
Black America to whole individuals who should know better, accountable
for doing better. As soon as the United States Congress
stand united to ensure our constitution represent all of us,
we will be a better nation as a result. NAACP
(05:41):
This morning inside of Daddy with the CBC, we are
calling on athletes who are coming out of high school
not to attend any state funded schools of states that
have moved to minimize our right to vote, to minimize
our ability to elect Kennedy's of our choice.
Speaker 1 (06:02):
How are you based it?
Speaker 3 (06:03):
Are seeking to create a sharecropp in reality? All right,
for Missouri or Mississippi, Okay, whether that state is South Carolina, Georgia, Alabama, Louisiana, Texas,
or Florida.
Speaker 1 (06:16):
So the entirety of the SEC and half the acc.
Speaker 2 (06:23):
Just the audascic.
Speaker 1 (06:24):
Can you imagine you are one of you got accepted,
that you got recruited, Let me use the word you
got recruited to go play at Alabama or Georgia or
LSU for that matter. And this guy is like, not
you need to go to the University of Vermont or
not even pick it on you.
Speaker 2 (06:43):
My buddy went University of Vermont.
Speaker 1 (06:44):
But you get the point, right, your your athletic prowess
and your athletic talents are going to be on display
on arguably the biggest stage in the world.
Speaker 2 (06:54):
You know, within.
Speaker 1 (06:56):
SEC football or ACC basketball, I guess for committed to
Duke or UNC or State or whatever it is. They're like, nah, nah,
wouldn't I I don't know whether in a University of
New Hampshire be better.
Speaker 2 (07:13):
It's just so dumby. It's willing to sacrifice the future
of these kids for a political party that doesn't care
about them at all.
Speaker 1 (07:18):
Yes, to make money, by the way, because again, make
make no bones about it. This is fundraising, this is
everything's on fire. We just need money. We need more money, Send.
Speaker 2 (07:27):
Us more money.
Speaker 1 (07:28):
And again, nobody's ability to vote is impacted. Every single
one of your black constituents or of the the black
individuals that you're addressing that live in these districts can
still go cast a ballot.
Speaker 2 (07:44):
Man.
Speaker 1 (07:46):
I know, it's crazy.
Speaker 3 (07:48):
Fifty five percent of all African Americans who lived in
a former Confederate South, but the fifty percent of us
who live in the former Confederate South, we will not
tolerate a Confederate mentality on our labor, on our ability
to contribute and our ability to be uh to to
have representation.
Speaker 1 (08:07):
Oh yeah. I would also point this out, Ross, I
don't know, have you ever you ever met anyone who
lives in the uh Confederate side whatever.
Speaker 2 (08:15):
That's the forum, Like what century is this dude living in? Right? Yeah?
Speaker 1 (08:20):
But I was gonna point out you ever met a
black person who also is a fan of one of
the local sports college teams?
Speaker 4 (08:26):
I have?
Speaker 2 (08:27):
Oh wow, But like these schools are going to be like, oh, well,
so and so is it gonna come here because of
redistricting or something stupid. So we're gonna gonna fill it.
They're gonna fill the slot with somebody else, and they're
gonna go into success. Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 1 (08:39):
And again the ability the because most of these student
athletes will never go to the NFL, will never go
to the NBA. It's just the numbers. But we live,
we live in a very unique time right now where
even if that doesn't happen, you could feasibly be set
up for life if you're smart about it. Because you're young,
you got so much. I understand you're young and you're
(09:01):
not maybe this financial, but some people are, do you know.
I watched an interview the other day with remember Ocho Cinco,
Remember the wide receiver play Ocho Cinco. The guy was
a bit of a menace right between him and tarall Owens.
There was the back and forth with all the little
cute games. And so I watched him being interviewed. Do
(09:23):
you know that the dude was the cheapest person you
ever met. He had this mindset where he's just like,
I'm squirreling all this money away. And reportedly he saved
eighty percent of all of the money's he earned, and
he had a couple of big contracts with fly Coach,
wouldn't buy food at airports, but like he set for life. Dude,
(09:46):
you get that mindset when you're twenty two, coming out
of the coming out of college. You got five million
dollars squirreled away, and you got a world of compound
interest in front of you. That's an opportunity, man. I
know it's cliche. You know what my favorite thing is
whenever they talk to these athletes who finally get paid,
what's the first thing they go out and do a
(10:07):
lot of them? What's the first thing they go out
and do, Go buy all my house? How many times
have you heard a pro athlete, like, ah, what'd you
do with my first thing?
Speaker 2 (10:17):
About my mom? A house? Right?
Speaker 1 (10:19):
Because a lot of these kids are coming from really
tough situation.
Speaker 2 (10:21):
I grew up.
Speaker 1 (10:22):
I grew up in a single parent home most of
most of my formative years. Is not easy. My mom struggled, dude.
The ability to buy our house would.
Speaker 2 (10:30):
Have been amazing.
Speaker 1 (10:33):
And you want to take all this away from them
so that you can fundraise and you can wind and complain.
Speaker 3 (10:38):
In this moment, Yes, our democracy is in crisis.
Speaker 2 (10:42):
Is according to you.
Speaker 3 (10:45):
This is about true representation and for the end.
Speaker 1 (10:49):
But it's not about true representation.
Speaker 2 (10:51):
It's not.
Speaker 1 (10:53):
It's it's altered. It's manufactured with racial jerrymandering.
Speaker 3 (11:00):
We will fight with all we have in solidarity with
the Congressional Black call is to ensure that we have representation,
or if we don't, we will withhold the talent that
that that play on the football field or on the
basketball court be the med or female.
Speaker 1 (11:18):
In this moment, this is the most selfish asque I've
ever heard, and I can't I can't fathom even though
they are political animals right in the sense that inblas
it's what it is. And yet you know a few
(11:38):
of you sitting at a table couldn't go. Man, The
only people getting harmed here are are primarily getting harmed
here would be young.
Speaker 2 (11:46):
Black athletes.
Speaker 1 (11:48):
Who would get less on nil money or none at all,
who would have less opportunity. And let's not forget that
part of that opportunity, even though it kind of gets
pushed to the side nowadays with the money that's in
college sports. One of the other opportunities is a college diploma.
Go get a degree. Go get a degree at.
Speaker 2 (12:13):
You know so many great schools.
Speaker 1 (12:15):
Go get a degree at Clemson, Go get a degree
at the University of Georgia. As much as it pains
me to say it, do that. Get a degree at Duke.
I hear those are pretty helpful. And uh, you know,
put yourself in a put yourself in a position where
you blow that hamstring out or whatever we were talking
about the other day.
Speaker 2 (12:36):
That it's okay, man, because.
Speaker 1 (12:38):
Now you've also you've also been provided this thing which
can earn you money. I know, not all college degrees do,
and that notoriety. Let me let me tell you the
guys who played on the national champion NC State men's
basketball team for Jim valvano I mentioned this the other day.
Most of these guys always doing events. Whenever they go
(13:02):
somewhere and people recognize them.
Speaker 2 (13:04):
That it's it's there.
Speaker 1 (13:05):
I always say there's like five of them that always
are three or four. I should say it's one of them.
I haven't seen it in a while, but is at a
lot of these charity golf tournament's just riding high and like,
that's got to be great. Man, This this thing you
did and people respected so much, and you want to
take all of that opportunity away from him.
Speaker 2 (13:28):
It's just evil. Man.
Speaker 1 (13:29):
All right, let me grab a call here, Yes, Mike,
what's up?
Speaker 5 (13:33):
How you doing, Casey?
Speaker 2 (13:35):
I'm good for it.
Speaker 6 (13:37):
Hey.
Speaker 5 (13:38):
I'd like to know what this guy would say to
the parents if that school Georgia, Alabama, Florida, whoever they're
talking about and stuff, gave that athlete a free ride,
free education to play football there, and those parents cannot
afford to send their kid to college because they are
they don't have a lot of money to be able
(13:59):
to do it. And now this guy, is this clown,
is telling that parent, those parents that your kid should
reject a free education, all to push some BS agenda.
Speaker 1 (14:10):
And again, not just education. Financial security is a thing
that is attainable in college.
Speaker 2 (14:17):
Now.
Speaker 5 (14:18):
Yeah, to me, I've been I've been completely against that
from the get go. Basically, these kids are making millions
of dollars the reality of college yet sure, I know
what the reality I know is. I just think it's crazy,
that's all. And their bouncing between schools like ping pong balls. Now, basically,
whoever offers in the biggest nil contract.
Speaker 1 (14:39):
Did you see a guy that LSU just recruited for basketball,
who who previously played for the Pacers and the Celtics.
That's where we are right now. He's gonna play ls.
Speaker 5 (14:50):
They've got a professional, they got a they've got they
got an next professional going back to college and playing.
Speaker 7 (14:55):
Ball for him.
Speaker 2 (14:56):
Yeah. Yeah, man, that's crazy.
Speaker 5 (14:59):
I I thought once, I thought once you declared for
the pros and stuff like that, you were ineligible.
Speaker 1 (15:07):
I think it comes down to eligible eligibility remaining.
Speaker 2 (15:12):
Now I admit I don't.
Speaker 1 (15:13):
And by the way, this is why they're trying to
put this bill together, right, to provide some parody within
college sports, kind of rein it in as it's quickly
getting out of control, and part of the NAACP's pledge
is to not support that bill, to just sell that
that they're withholding their votes from that, which is.
Speaker 5 (15:33):
I just want to know what the cloud's gonna tell
his how this clown is gonna basically get it across
to the parents over here. You either you got to
stick by me over here to ignore the free ride
that your kids to get.
Speaker 1 (15:45):
I don't think he's mad enough to have that conversation
with that person. Yeah, I gotta, I gotta let you
go him up against the clock. I don't think this
guy's man enough to have that conversation in person. This
is a stunt, this is fundraising, this is stupidity. Now
I have a counterpropos I feel like, if you really
want to do this, we could do so in a
way that is less injurious to college athletes, you know,
(16:08):
the ones, the ones that haven't made it yet. It's
all filly in on those details. In the interest of compromise,
we'll do that coming up here on the CACODA radio program.
Speaker 2 (16:18):
Please.
Speaker 1 (16:18):
Stupid press conference just today by the head of the
NAACP's name is Derek Johnson, and he's decided they got
to fight back because not going to have racial jerrymanderin anymore,
and he's come up with an ingenious plan. Allow him
to recap in.
Speaker 3 (16:38):
This moment when black representation is under intact, it is
important for the CBC to keep in their tradition of
being the moral of the Congress, but the morald of
conscious of this country. No representation, no revenue, No one
Black should be on a planned field of institutions that's
living off of our labor and in states that are
(17:02):
seeking to reinstitute a sharecropping reality. It is not the
responsibility of Black America to whole individuals who should know
better accountable for doing better. As soon as the United
States Congress stand united to ensure our constitution represent all
(17:26):
of us, we will be a better nation as a result.
NAACP this morning Inside of Daddy went to CBC. We
are calling on athletes who are coming out of high
school not to attend any state funded schools of states
that have moved to minimize our right to vote, to
(17:48):
minimize our ability to elect kendidates of our choice.
Speaker 1 (17:52):
So basically, yeah, so if you're if you're a student athlete,
you're coming in, you can't go to Let's see most
of the s schools, most of the ACC schools, as
some sort of show of solidarity. And here's the problem
with that. Not only is it the dumbest thing ever,
and you're asking, you're asking essentially these kids in some cases,
(18:13):
to toss their future away, or at least the best
opportunity for a future, so that you can, I guess,
keep funding your organization and complaining about stuff. And please,
for the love of God, the NAACP, the modern version
of it, does not represent the conscious of this country,
and God help us if it did. It is a
(18:35):
it is a hyperpartisan organization and in many cases has
long abdicated the actual virtuous things that it may have
once stood for so that you can get snakes like
Derek Johnson in there. So here's my proposal. But I'm
gonna meet you halfway here.
Speaker 8 (18:51):
Bro.
Speaker 1 (18:53):
I forget the student athletes. They haven't even had a chance,
man Like, they haven't even.
Speaker 2 (18:57):
Had a chance.
Speaker 1 (18:59):
But pro athletes have. So I think what needs to
happen is if you are a you know, a pro
pro football player. Let's just go with football, and you're
really really good, but unfortunately you happen to reside in
one of these states. You know, basically all the other states.
(19:22):
What you need to do is demand a trade or
whatever to a non red area. I'm thinking best examples. Ross,
tell me what you think, perhaps New York State that
would work, State of Minnesota. In fact, those two will
be fine. We'll just go with those two. And so
(19:43):
you need to go play for those teams at league
minimum if necessary. Right, you want to make a statement here.
Speaker 2 (19:49):
Yeah, I was hesitant about this idea first, but now
I think it's a good idea. But yeah, I want
to clarify if we're talking New York, I mean, like
real New York teams in New York. Yeah, yeah, yeah,
We're play in New York. Yeah, none of this border
crossing stuff. We're going to play in New Jersey, you know.
Speaker 1 (20:06):
Yeah, which is almost a purple state. You want to
stay away from that. Yeah, So you'll have to pick
just one of the NFL teams that plays in the
state of New York.
Speaker 2 (20:17):
I believe there is one.
Speaker 1 (20:20):
You'll have to look it up.
Speaker 2 (20:23):
One of the West, I believe, Yeah, the western part
of the state. Yeah, that'd be good. Yeah.
Speaker 1 (20:27):
So if you're you know, if you're a future Hall
of Fame shut down corner or a you know, a
gifted running back with four point one, you know, forty times.
Speaker 2 (20:40):
There's something along these lines.
Speaker 1 (20:41):
I think I think it's necessary as part of the
solidarity there that you you get yourself to one of
those two teams and again adapting your your salary to
whatever is necessary, so that the cap is you got
to fight the man, you know, and this is how
you can do it right here. So that would be
(21:02):
my compromise. Uh, you let me know how that goes, Yes, okay.
Speaker 9 (21:09):
Good morning. Just wanted to say that, you know, the
the NAACP has not done anything that I could point
to this achievement in my in the last ten years.
All they do is agitate. They try to you know,
drum up support through basically treating the people that they
(21:29):
want to support them is if they're stupids and if
they can't think for themselves, and you know, every time
they open their mouth, they're insulting the people that they
need the recruit to keep them going. And it's just
to me that it's very frustrating that that people continue
to volve for it. There's what have they done, Lacy,
(21:53):
I mean, what what have they done for that college,
that profential college, athlete the NFL that's been around for
a few years.
Speaker 4 (22:02):
What's going on?
Speaker 9 (22:04):
What's your faults on it?
Speaker 4 (22:06):
What do you think?
Speaker 9 (22:06):
What do you think they should be doing?
Speaker 1 (22:08):
Yeah, I dude, I don't know, but I think it's
a it's a pervasive attitude, and not just in this sense.
I think that I think that politicians or uh you know,
political animals as I say, uh, you know, with the
on the periphery.
Speaker 2 (22:21):
You may not be elected, but are part of these organizations.
Speaker 1 (22:24):
I think that they believe everyone that they lord over
is dumb and it's a really bad look. And I
can give you an in fact, let me give you
another example. Thank you for the call there, sir, I appreciate.
Let me give you another example. Let me place some
audio from this is a North Carolina state senator. Her
name is val Applewhite. Okay, So she represents She's a
(22:45):
Democrat who represents what Cumberland County and maybe some other party.
I'm sure other parts too, but primarily Cumberland County.
Speaker 2 (22:54):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (22:54):
Let me look here, Yeah, District nineteen, Cumberland.
Speaker 2 (22:56):
Okay.
Speaker 1 (22:58):
So one of the discussions there having at the North
Carolina Legislature is the idea of perhaps putting together a
constitutional amendment that would then go to voters, and it
would lock the high end of the income tax bracket
at three point five going forward. Now, I would point
out that most people don't pay that much, but there
(23:22):
are a lot of folks out there who really really
are salivating over what they're watching watching going on in
states like Washington and New York and states like California,
that they really really would love the opportunity to raise
your state income tax. First they'd say, I was going
to raise it on billionaires, but we only have so
(23:43):
many of those. Then it would be one hundred millionaires,
then millionaires, and you know how it would go, and
then they would achieve their dream of being, you know,
people charged seven percent on top of whatever they're paying
federally so that they can waste it at the state level.
Speaker 2 (23:58):
And then you get the California model there.
Speaker 1 (24:01):
So this is as part of the discussion as she's
chatting with let me be clear here who she's talking with,
Senator Michael Lee. Okay, So, Val apple White is giving
her argument why it would be a bad idea to
cap the state income tax at three and a half percent,
(24:24):
and to do so, she has to make an assumption
that a bunch of people are too stupid to really
understand what's going on here.
Speaker 2 (24:31):
It's so insulting.
Speaker 8 (24:33):
Here we go.
Speaker 6 (24:33):
So what you're saying is that the average mom who's
taking kids to school every day understands the implications of
this constitutional amendment thoroughly understands.
Speaker 5 (24:46):
This m.
Speaker 1 (24:48):
The difference between three and a half and seven percent?
Speaker 8 (24:51):
Is that?
Speaker 1 (24:53):
Is that what you think women with kids can't understand
the difference there?
Speaker 10 (24:58):
I give that mom.
Speaker 11 (25:00):
The credit that she deserves to see that the top
rate is no longer going to be seven percent, and
it's going to be three and a half percent, and
that with the way things have been going for the
last few years and prices going up and everybody feeling
the strain, I think that mom is going to be
thankful that the top rate can't be seven percent then
it's going to be three and a half percent.
Speaker 1 (25:20):
And so I give the.
Speaker 11 (25:21):
Voters a lot of credit when it comes to things
like these. And maybe that's just me, but I trust them.
Speaker 1 (25:28):
How how insulting?
Speaker 2 (25:31):
Man?
Speaker 1 (25:32):
Let me at ross? Is your wife up?
Speaker 6 (25:34):
Is she?
Speaker 1 (25:34):
I'm assuming she's up already?
Speaker 12 (25:35):
Right?
Speaker 2 (25:36):
Sorry?
Speaker 1 (25:37):
Yeah, Sin, it's about four Okay, all right, can you
text her and make sure you use really small world words? Apparently,
would you see if she knows the difference between three
and a half and then the number seven?
Speaker 2 (25:48):
You know, I'm not going to do that.
Speaker 1 (25:50):
Okay, You're going to assume that she knows that because
people are able to tell the difference between those two
because val apple, and how does that work for women
without kids? Why would you specifically go women with kids?
I would argue that women with kids are probably gonna
be far more cognizant of being able to keep an
(26:10):
additional three and a half percent of their income as
it aids in paying household bills. What are we doing here?
And again, is it only women with kids? Is there
some hormonal change or they're not able to tell the
difference between three and a half and seven percent. I'm
not a lady doctor. I don't knows and hormones. And
I want to say lady doctor, I mean a doctor
(26:31):
treats ladies, not a lady who's a doctor. Inconceivable? Right, Oh,
somebody needs three and a half secs or something. You
give them seven CC's, they're dead, man?
Speaker 2 (26:40):
What are you gonna do? I mean, the only possibility
would be, you know, people that don't pay taxes. If
you if you don't pay taxes or you've never paid taxes,
then maybe that doesn't mean much to you because you
don't have to care about it. But most people who
have to pay bills and have to survive are well
aware of what those numbers mean.
Speaker 1 (26:55):
Yes, three and a half percent, man, that's no joke.
I mean, you know, think about what that repers. Let's
say that the house whole household income coming in is
one thousand dollars three percent of that's not jump change.
Plus you guys are just gonna waste it all right,
(27:16):
let me grab another call here, Yes, Jamal, what's up?
Speaker 4 (27:20):
Well, Casey, you know, just to let you know my wife,
you know, and Rosses met her before blacking and a
sustain and my wife was the one who introduced me
to something called a consumption tax. Move away from all
income tax and we go to a consumption tax. So
my wife, a black woman, Oh, she understands what it is.
But case I just want to say this, Yes, Casey,
(27:44):
she doesn't guess what she likes voter ride d if
she wants to cut all the dead people off the
voter road. What we're gonna do in double act black
women a black woman, Casey, When an n double acpeople
crack like this, people start really being exposed to how
false phony and state the NAACP is and what they
(28:06):
crying about. I don't know if you remember this case,
because I don't know if you're old. I don't know
how old y'all.
Speaker 8 (28:10):
Kid.
Speaker 4 (28:11):
I keep forgetting sometimes, but Casey, back in the early eighties,
they rolled, they raised the SAT scores, and all these
black coaches, John Thompson, I forget his name, we used
to coach for the Temple all all came out. They're
saying that if you raised the SAT scores, it was
(28:33):
gonna hurt black athletes as always hurting. Somebody said, hold up,
you mean to tell me braising the SAT scores inner
college it's gonna hurt people, And you know what, a
big backlash came out because we found out there were
athletes who couldn't even read in the NBA Darryl Dawkins,
we found out they can read. So now we found
(28:54):
out that, oh, it's not about representation, it's about Democrat representation.
And all these Republicans who like Thomas Massey, who been
sitting here saying we can't remove these districts. Oh, it's
not about Democrat district it's not about black representation. It's
(29:17):
about Democrat keeping their power. And if you look at
these districts that was drawn and they called black districts,
how old are these so called black districts. Oh, that's right,
they're pre Civil rights era. So the Democrat Party is
(29:38):
upholding the jurymandering their old cells, their old ditsycrat cells
created because that's the area that black people had to
live in. So once again, the Democrat Party is showing
you who they weren't who they are. They're going back
(29:59):
using max where they put Brack bolt it to live
in the fifties and the forties and the sixties, which
are now quote unquote black district Oh you put us
there through red rolling and all the racism. You said,
that's while we're in the small areas.
Speaker 2 (30:21):
Yeah, well this goes back.
Speaker 1 (30:23):
Yeah, this goes back to nineteen specifically, as it goes
it pertains to the Districts Voting Rights Act was passed
I believe in nineteen sixty five. And so and thanks
for the call there, Jamal. So yeah, yeah, this has
been going on for you know what, nearly seventy years.
(30:44):
That's what we're talking about here. So uh, anyway, here's
the other thing too. They'll find it. Rosz never talking
about the soft year. Here's what they'll find. They'll find
an example, and it will be an example that is
is skirting the tree, right, because you know, let's face it,
what does everyone do now in college sports? Right, we're
(31:05):
gonna transfer. So she got some kids that are playing
their sixth school this year. I don't know how that
math works, but they are. So they'll find. What they'll
find is they'll find somebody who may have committed to
one of these you know, to Texas.
Speaker 2 (31:18):
All right.
Speaker 1 (31:19):
Let me just use this as an example, right, because
Texas is on their list, all right, they committed to Texas. However,
it's becoming clear that they're not gonna start at Texas.
They really want to be a starter. I understand that,
and so they'll transfer to Indiana or to Michigan right
where they may get a starting position. And then this
(31:41):
guy can swoop in and go see see he gets it,
and it's like, uh, dude, was transfer in anyway. Plus,
we're about to start summer workouts. I think what next week,
this week, I think this week a lot of schools.
Speaker 2 (31:56):
It depends on how your scheduling works.
Speaker 1 (31:58):
We're gonna start summer work, so there's gonna be opportunities
for these leftist reporters to ask these college athletes questions.
And you know they're gonna harass him about this crap.
You know, some guys expecting questions about how he's coming
back from his his knee injury last year and how
he's feeling better than never, and that's what he wants
(32:18):
to talk about. And now he's got a do or don't,
a Q and A with some stupid leftist reporter going,
why are you continuing to play for this evil school
of sharecropping or whatever the hell it is? And then
some college athlete has to sit there and deal with that.
That's what you've prompted, that's what you've decided we're gonna
(32:41):
do here. And I'm sorry, just no, no, no, no,
all right eight eight eight nine three four seven eight
seven four. But they will raise money on it, fear not.
They will definitely raise money. And it's funny brought up
Thomas Massa. You see Thomas mass he got cooked yesterday.
(33:01):
But at least he knows who done it, and that's
what's important. We'll share that with you.
Speaker 2 (33:06):
Coming up.
Speaker 1 (33:07):
Reminder at eighth five, Congressman brad Not will join us.
Got lots to get into with him today is I
will run this by him, see what he thinks of
this fun I bet he's got probably some opinions there,
plus lots more to get to. It was another big
audio piece I had up here.
Speaker 2 (33:34):
Oh yeah, a.
Speaker 1 (33:35):
Little update on elon Omar.
Speaker 2 (33:37):
That's what the other thing was.
Speaker 1 (33:38):
So we got all sorts of fun stuff phone number
eight eight eight nine three four seven eight seven four.
You want to opine on this story or any of
the others we're going to get into. And we have
uncovered a grandiose conspiracy to murder Ross. That's how I'm
reading it. And it's just so ironic that we have
(33:59):
this story couple with the discussion we were having yesterday.
I'll lay it all out for you coming up here
on the CaCO Day radio program one hour from now.
We'll chat with Congressman brad Not as we do every
other week. So I've got a few things to get
into with him. I am just I just saw this story, man.
(34:19):
I cannot even imagine having to deal with this, and
clearly it doesn't look like law enforcement believes him too.
So now you're dealing with You're dealing with the problem
I'm going to lay out for you that this poor
guy's dealing with. But then you're also you have to
couple that with law enforcement and won't do anything, and
in fact, they'll they'll arrest you. I guess which does
(34:40):
maybe get you to safety?
Speaker 2 (34:42):
I don't know.
Speaker 1 (34:43):
Randolph County, West Virginia. According to authorities, they received a
series of nine to one one calls, basically one right
after another from a man identified as Clinton Wayne Kneelin,
who reported that he was at his and then all
of a sudden, he is under attack by zombies, ghosts,
(35:07):
and a UFO, all at once, all at the same time.
Speaker 2 (35:11):
Wow, that is brutal.
Speaker 1 (35:12):
Can you like, how do you even triage that?
Speaker 6 (35:16):
Like?
Speaker 1 (35:16):
You know what I'm saying, like order of operation? Who
do you come back? Who do you fight first?
Speaker 2 (35:21):
See? My initial thought is you'd have to take on
the zombies first because you don't want them to infect
or reanimate the other things. But then that doesn't even
work either, because you know, in order for it to
be a zombie, you would have to be a carbon
based life for him. And maybe the aliens are just
made of like tech.
Speaker 1 (35:36):
Oh maybe the aliens could respond like liquid terminatory, Oh yes,
or rebuild themselves like the board. Yeah, they are going
to be the most advanced technologically. And then I think
you got to bring that in where zombies are just mindless,
you know what I'm saying.
Speaker 2 (35:51):
How do you even deal with the ghosts though? Because
could the ghost have to bring them back to life?
What if the ghosts were to possess the zombies like
a poltergeist.
Speaker 1 (35:59):
Oh my gosh, or a or a lizard. Person possessed
by a ghost equally is terrifying.
Speaker 7 (36:06):
Man.
Speaker 1 (36:07):
So what happened? Well, eventually deputy showed up saying that
they were unable to locate any zombies, ghosts or aliens.
Did it ross? How hard do you think they looked.
Speaker 2 (36:19):
Before? Even asked me? Said they weren't even trying.
Speaker 1 (36:22):
No, no, they show up. Now, he didn't do himself
any favors, according to deputies when they did show up.
He also claimed to be a law enforcement officer from Louisiana.
Speaker 2 (36:35):
And there's no record of that.
Speaker 1 (36:38):
So now he's also charged with in addition, a misuse
of nine to one one impersonating a law enforcement officer,
which is a bit of a problematic charge up there
in West Virginia. And again, no ghost, zombies, or aliens
are said to have been apprehended or repelled or anything. So, man,
that's to get the trifecta all attack in your.
Speaker 2 (37:00):
House at once.
Speaker 1 (37:02):
I was Hollywood not thought to do this movie yet.
Now are the ghosts are ghosts of former humans? Or
are they ghosts of aliens? Like forced ghosts?
Speaker 2 (37:17):
Now, they're some saying like an alien couldn't have a
ghost because they don't have souls. Right, They're saying a
lot of people, Yeah, the alien grays are interested in
humans because humans have souls which are specific to us
because we were made by God. Right, Yeah, so that
they couldn't be ghosts, Okay, so they would, all.
Speaker 1 (37:36):
Right, that's there's one theory out there.
Speaker 9 (37:38):
Right.
Speaker 2 (37:39):
I'm just saying, I'm well versed on many issues.
Speaker 1 (37:43):
That's why I'm asking you. This is why I brought
this to you. I'm like, if anyone just gotta understand
what's going on here, maybe it's ros.
Speaker 2 (37:49):
And which aliens are they? Are they? The like I said,
the grays. Are they the Reptilians? Are they the insectoids?
Are they the Nordics? We don't know.
Speaker 1 (37:58):
The Borg possibly do the Borg has souls?
Speaker 2 (38:02):
They have just one, right, they would because they were
formally human, right and then they but they really share
it as hey, yeah, but then they became commies. Mm
hmmm hm. Yes.
Speaker 1 (38:12):
And by the way, doesn't say aliens, it says UFO.
So maybe he didn't specify. Maybe he never saw the aliens,
he just saw the craft.
Speaker 2 (38:20):
So the zombies were on the ground, the ghosts were
around the perimeter, and the UFO was above. Yes, surround,
You're surrounded? Yes, yes, yes, yes, yeah. The fact that
this man survived is amazing. Good on him, except for
the part where now he's caught these charges which probably
aren't going to go well for him. Did they But
going back to your last point, did did they even
(38:41):
bring out did they have an EVP? Did they?
Speaker 1 (38:44):
Do you think small County depp or Sheriff's Department in
rural West Virginia has one of those? Definitely not cost prohibitive, man,
So no, I bet I probably don't have one of those.
I'm I'm more concerned with what the look like because
not all craft are created equal.
Speaker 5 (39:02):
Right.
Speaker 1 (39:03):
If you see the craft from Independence Day, right, that's
bad hovering over your house.
Speaker 2 (39:08):
Yeah, but dude, that blue light is so pretty. I
just want to stare at it with a sign.
Speaker 1 (39:11):
Yeah you should. You should totally just stare at it.
Nothing could go wrong. But if it's I don't know
the craft from Flight of the Navigator, I'm in I'm like,
I want to talk to Peewee, so I'm not calling
nine to one.
Speaker 2 (39:22):
May Maybe that's part of their plan though, because they
know that we have a love for Paul Rubins and
we see that ship, we're gonna be like, well, I
need to go up in there. And then they got you.
Speaker 1 (39:32):
Yeah, well look it's a hell of a way to go.
I would argue, which, now would you Let's say that
one of these three groups was successful in quote getting you,
which of the three would you prefer? Let's see, because
the Zombies is going to be pretty quick.
Speaker 2 (39:49):
I mean, you know, I'm not going I'm not on
team Zombie. That does not well.
Speaker 1 (39:52):
But I'm just saying, if if you have to pick
a way to go of the three, I almost feel
like Zombies is the best one because it would be
the quickest. It would be the quickest. Whereas with ghosts,
depending on which kind of ghosts you're dealing with, they
can they can essentially drag you to hell right eternal
damnation of your soul or.
Speaker 2 (40:11):
I don't know if they're now we're talking demons, because
ghosts would just be sort of like in a they're
sort of trapped here. They keep guy in the underworld.
Speaker 1 (40:20):
You ever see a conjuring they're not good guys?
Speaker 2 (40:22):
Well, yeah, I mean, but that's that would say there's
a difference between like a like a demon and a ghost.
I'm not messing with no demons.
Speaker 1 (40:28):
Okay, Wow, can you imagine if this guy had been
facing all four ghosts, demons, aliens, and zombies.
Speaker 2 (40:37):
I mean, just give them the Presidential Metal Medal of
Freedom at this point.
Speaker 1 (40:41):
And then with the aliens, like you know, they may
just take you up there and probe you for a
whole bud.
Speaker 2 (40:46):
Once again, let's not paint with broad strokes. You're like,
you know, they it depends on which race of alien
it is. Now the Grays, Yes, you're they're gonna probe you.
Bad news. You're gonna get probed.
Speaker 1 (40:57):
Yeah, you're gonna get probed a whole bunch. Plus even
if you're done probing, they'll put you in that goopod, right.
Speaker 2 (41:03):
Yeah, the gooppod. But the insect has no reason for
the probing because they have mental you know, telepathy.
Speaker 1 (41:10):
Yes, yes, so this is well documented. Yeah yeah so,
but yeah, I'm goopod until they finally get around to
eating you or insta zombie.
Speaker 2 (41:22):
I don't know.
Speaker 1 (41:22):
Lots of choices out there, So there you go. It's
one update che on what's going on up in West
virgin By the way, what if fact this county is
the county where Booger Hole is.
Speaker 2 (41:32):
Oh really yeah no, one of the aliens came down.
They're like, let's go Booger Hold. No way to check
that out. I gotta see this. Oh that's great.
Speaker 1 (41:45):
So uh yeah, however bad your day goes today, at
least you're not what this guy had to deal with,
and I think that's what's really important.
Speaker 5 (41:52):
All right.
Speaker 1 (41:53):
Heading a little further west, we had to Thomas massey Land.
They're in Kenucky where yesterday Massey was defeated. It's a
very interesting turnout too. So he was defeated. Obviously, he's
been battling with Trump there's a lot of people who
are really really into Thomas Massey. There's another slice that
(42:14):
were into him, and then there's a group that just
hates him. And admittedly, I you know, he has a
higher profile just because he's in the news battling with
Trump and whatnot, But for a very long time people
saw him as kind of this quirky, libertarian minded dude.
I think there's good argument that he has definitely his
(42:38):
personality has changed. Again, I'm not one of his voters,
but the fact remains that even though he was optioned
on some of this stuff six years ago, back in
twenty twenty, remember he was already like, yeah, you know,
Trump's a bad dude, he had already voted to impeach him.
Thomas Massey absolutely demolished his primary opponent and then one reelection.
(43:03):
So while things have changed, they haven't changed that much.
And and by the way, you have to get to
the sixty five an older bracket to actually start seeing
age demos that are Massy lost. But the turnout of
older voters is just so overwhelming, especially in a primary
situation where the numbers don't have to be as high
(43:25):
that it cost him reelection. But Luckily, luckily, after the
after the results were in, he came to the podium
and he was able to give it a think and
figure out what may have went wrong here. Let's let's
see who he thinks may have cost him the election.
But I would have come out sooner, but I had
(43:46):
to call my opponent and concede, and it took a
while to find ed Gal Ryan and tel aviv.
Speaker 7 (43:54):
Ah.
Speaker 8 (43:56):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (43:56):
Yeah, the Jews, That's that's what it was. Uh, I'm again,
I am staggered every day with the amount of just
just crazy blade. Now people will say, well, he's talking
about donations from like APAC to his opponent there, I
(44:18):
would argue that I find it interesting that among a
couple of the the Islamic groups, you have an A
plus record, And I wonder if it's maybe because some
of the statements that he makes. I don't know, but yeah,
he figured out that that's what cost him the election.
So yeah, it was it was good to see him
(44:38):
taking responsibility for maybe this perception because they did pulling
within his district that he really doesn't represent the people
of Kentucky anymore. And when your constituents start thinking that
you're getting too big for your bridges and and really.
Speaker 2 (44:53):
Not listening to him.
Speaker 1 (44:54):
This is a lot of times this is this is
the result, and especially when you align yourself with lunatics
like this woman in Texas, Marine Galiendo, who is running
in a Democrat primary for a one of these newer
districts in San Antonio. It's likely going to be a
(45:16):
red district, but maybe maybe not, at least one of
the closer ones. She crazy. She by the way, do
you know what her day job is. She's a sex therapist,
hands on kind. So anyway, so's she made herself a
pretty interesting little campaign promise. Tell me if you think
(45:38):
that this is problematic. According to Galiando's website, she is
committed to turning Carnes Ice Detention Center. So, by the way,
this would be the detention center where Antifa went to
go shoot that Ice officer that they just got convicted
over and they end up shooting them in the neck.
So anyway, she is pledging to turn the ICE attention center,
(46:00):
which against it's in San Antonio, south of there, actually
right on the border, to turn it into and I
want to quote here because it's that crazy, a prison
for Zionists and former Ice officers. And she also says
that her facility will include a castration processing center. Good,
(46:24):
so you're pledging to open a secure, locked in facility
where you're going to stick Zionists and castrate them. Shouldn't
that be problematic? Shouldn't openly campaign on your website and
(46:44):
on your social media? She posted a big thing on Instagram.
I'm looking at a screenshot of it here. That's wild
to me that you you could literally run on, Hey,
I'm gonna build a concentration camp on on your platform page.
Who does that? I mean a dude in Germany like
(47:06):
one hundred years ago, but right he didn't have a
page per se because you know, no Internet.
Speaker 2 (47:14):
It does seem like a crazy platform stance A little bit,
a little there.
Speaker 1 (47:19):
It's not just the quiet part out loud, it's the
that's the loud part right in your face, man, just wild.
Galindo has accused her runoff opponent, and again she's running.
This is Democrat on Democrat violence.
Speaker 2 (47:36):
Here.
Speaker 1 (47:38):
Who is the public information officer for Bexter County or
whatever you say that stupid county down there. His name
is Johnny Garcia of participating in a human trafficking conspiracy
orchestrated by billionaire Zionist Jews. Okay, then, beyond the attacks
(47:59):
on Garcia, Galiendo has also continue to promote the narrative
that a cabal of Jewish Zionists control Hollywood, the media,
and most of the local San Antonio politicians. What does
she say here, I'm not gonna read all this garbage.
(48:20):
You get you get the sense of this. So yeah,
that's what she's campaigning on. That's what she wants your
vote for, and is unabashed about it. Absolute looney tunes.
All right, coming up on the show, we got weed
on planes. That seems like a good idea. All right, there,
more trouble in, more trouble in Kansas City. Man, they're
(48:45):
gonna have NFL is gonna have to do something, probably
something pretty drastic to rain this in.
Speaker 2 (48:50):
So we'll get to that.
Speaker 1 (48:52):
And a controversy surrounding the North Carolina State Fair, which
I don't admit to know the math here, But maybe
there's somebody listening who does do a has a booth
at the fair or works you know, like food service,
or can shed a little more light on this, because I,
again I don't pretend to know the math. So we
(49:13):
will give you the details of that coming up here
on the Cacoday radio program. So they had an interesting
little panel discussion going. It's Katie Turre shows not that
impressive in and of herself, but she's got you know, basically,
she's got the little panel there. Everyone's on the left.
(49:33):
I guess maybe not Okay, So they have one guy
who's kind of the token not on the left, but
I'm not familiar with who he is. But I just
want you to listen to this panel of reportedly educated
people who understand what words mean and should be somewhat
familiar with our founding documents because I am absolutely screaming
(49:55):
at my TV watching this crap. Are you ready? It's
gonna hurt your brain. I'm just warning you. Okay, you've
been warned.
Speaker 2 (50:02):
Here we go.
Speaker 13 (50:03):
What about this passage from Mike Johnson declaring that our
rights do not derive from government, They come from you,
our creator and heavenly Father. Is this him putting God
over the Declaration of Independence?
Speaker 1 (50:24):
It's not over yet, Little doses, Little doses. Okay, all right,
So now you've referenced, so I know you know the document.
So this should be an easy discussion because it should be. Well,
that's what it says. That should be the totality of it.
(50:49):
If you look at the Declaration of Independence, it says,
and I'm going to read the full quote to you because.
Speaker 2 (50:56):
This is how stupid this is.
Speaker 1 (50:57):
It says, we hold these truths to be self evident,
that all men are created equal, that they are endowed
by their creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these
are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. That's what
it says. So I'm going to restart this. So you're
(51:20):
doing an entire panel discussion based on wanting to go
after the Speaker of the House for basically quoting the
Declaration of Independence.
Speaker 13 (51:31):
What about this passage from Mike Johnson declaring that our
rights do not derive from government, They come from you,
our creator and heavenly Father. Is this him putting God
over the Declaration of Independence?
Speaker 12 (51:48):
Okay, well, you know, I actually think that idea is
not wholly uncommon. I mean, the idea that we have
certain inalienable rights that come from God can be read
in a fly benign way, which is basically.
Speaker 2 (52:01):
That we have innate human rights, that our.
Speaker 12 (52:05):
Constitution and our government, our democratic government, are meant to
codify right. That idea is not totally abnormal. I think
that the thing that you know might alarm some people
is some of the rhetoric that we heard at this rally,
that we are in a spiritual battle right, that the
forces of good and evil are at work here, and
(52:28):
that partisan politics is injected directly into the spiritual biblical rhetoric.
We have heard that for the last couple of years.
It's been ratcheted up more and more, especially since Donald
Trump lost in twenty twenty, and it can lead to
some pretty dangerous places if it's not Captain Shock.
Speaker 1 (52:47):
Well, yeah, okay, not anymore from these people again, this whole,
this whole thing. Tur's point is, well, how are these
rights not derived from government? Because that was by design,
That was the whole point. The whole point was We're
not gonna sit here and wait for the king to
(53:09):
tell us what we can and can't do, what we
can and can't say, what we can and can't believe.
We're done with that. We're done with it to the
point where we are going to literally write it into
the declarative document to go ahead and get the ball
rolling on this stuff. They wrote it in there because
(53:30):
they recognize that these most basic rights of life, liberty
in the pursuit of happiness are not something that men
can bestow upon you. In fact, that's why when you
then get into the Constitution, it's written in a way
not to provide for it, but to protect against government
taking it from you and forcing you to do things.
Speaker 2 (53:53):
This is civics one oh, one man.
Speaker 1 (53:56):
And here's the other part.
Speaker 2 (53:59):
I don't know if you know this.
Speaker 1 (54:01):
That whole spiritual battle thing. A lot of people believe that.
And it's not just in modern politics. A lot of
people would tell you that. They would argue that we've
been in a spiritual battle since the conceptualization and and
and and the establishment of religion, especially within the Christian faith.
(54:21):
I don't know if you know this. If you look
in the Bible, there's a few stories about the battle
of good versus evil.
Speaker 5 (54:27):
Ross.
Speaker 1 (54:28):
Did you see any of those when you were when
you were thumbing through that last last year?
Speaker 2 (54:31):
You know I did?
Speaker 1 (54:32):
Yeah, yeah, But none in the desert, right right, there
was none.
Speaker 2 (54:36):
There's never any other again, you know there was some
of the desert, yes, oh was there? Okay?
Speaker 1 (54:41):
All right, well that's so weird, but not when it
comes to God asking you to, I don't know, sacrifice
your child, right right, that's not a Again, these are
these are spiritual things. You're you're taking it into the
modern politics. But also I just watched a Keem Jeffreys
yesterday say that his only goal is to quote destroy
(55:02):
the spirits of people on the right, So that seems
pretty badly.
Speaker 2 (55:08):
I don't know.
Speaker 1 (55:09):
And yes, people are going to look at politics just
like they look at every other aspect of their life.
Many people are going to look at it through a
through a religious lens because that's their set of beliefs.
That is their pursuit of happiness and liberty and life.
That's that's one of the ways in which they achieve it.
Speaker 2 (55:30):
Like this is basic.
Speaker 1 (55:32):
So I don't I don't even understand the premise of
the discussion here because you quoted Mike Johnson as saying
almost exactly the same thing, but he added three words
his who he feels who he feels is his Creator.
That was also that was also the brilliance of the
Founding Fathers writing it in that way because in this
(55:56):
in this case, yes, we understand what creator means to
most of the found Fathers However, you don't have to
prescribe to their form of religion or non religion for
that matter, to go ahead and recognize that this means
you too. If you're part of this club, if you
want to be a part of this country, if you
want to be able to achieve these things and live
(56:18):
within this noble experiment which grew the greatest superpower to
ever ever be known on this earth. Is that we're
going to recognize your ability to do it, because we
in government are not in a position, at least not
supposed to be in a position to stop you from
doing those things. Does those rights precede the establishment of
(56:39):
this country, the establishment.
Speaker 2 (56:40):
Of all the countries?
Speaker 1 (56:44):
That's what that says. That's what Mike Johnson quoted. That's
what your butd heurd over, And that is wild, all right,
real quick, And I'm just curious, does anybody is anybody
who's listening to you? Are you a vendor or have
you worked with ven as part of the North Carolina
State Fair? Okay, I'm curious, especially I want to know
(57:07):
if you're the person who has the Italian sausage booth there,
because Ross and I would really like to get to
know you so we can you know sample those?
Speaker 5 (57:16):
Is that your go to?
Speaker 1 (57:17):
Are you an Italian? The big Italians sausage?
Speaker 2 (57:20):
Yeah, when we did go there, yes, or the giant.
Speaker 1 (57:23):
Turcula guy, if you're out there listening, we'd love to
talk to you. So apparently vendors are upset because in
the past, the North Carolina State Fair has has charged
a flat rate per foot of frontage. So if you,
you know, let's say you get a ten foot wide booth,
one hundred and eighty dollars per foot? Now is you
(57:44):
pay eighteen hundred dollars and that that's good for you know,
eleven days at the fair. However, the fair this year
is changing into a model that other states use. Specifically,
the vendors will now instead of just paying a one
time fee, they will also have a required license fee
which will assess fifteen percent of gross sales after sales
(58:07):
tax is deducted in lieu of the flat rate fee.
And apparently a bunch of the vendors are super upset
over this. So I don't how much does one of
those food booths make. That's the part in this story
which I thought would be very very helpful. And by
the way, that's not unusual. In other states like Colorado
(58:27):
it's twenty five percent. I was nineteen and a half.
Virginia is like twenty percent. So you know, states do
it a few different ways. We do have one of
the larger state fairs in North Carolina. Clearly you've seen
that if you've been there. So I don't know what
does one of those food booths make over the course
of the fair, because here's the thing on eighteen hundred
(58:51):
dollars and it's eleven day fairs, so you basically you
can take it back down to under one hundred and
fifty dollars a day. I have to think that you're
especially when the f just you know, banging out there.
Speaker 2 (59:02):
It's full.
Speaker 1 (59:02):
I'm getting this attacked by strollers because there's a gazillion
of them. For some reason, the lines to get to
a lot of those food boots, especially the stuff that's
candy deep friede that looks just like a license to
print money. So I don't know the answer to that.
But again, if somebody has a little inside knowledge, I'm
curious how much those food boosts make because I feel
(59:26):
like it's got to be a bunch. I don't know
exactly what margins are and everything, and it's going to
vary depending on you know, what you're selling. With that
being said, it sounds it sounds like my theory is
that Paar's doing this because they realize there's a lot
more revenue to be grabbed here, and I think that's
what's irritating people. So anyway, phone number eight eight eight
(59:48):
nine three four seven eight seven four. Speaking of fair food,
rased Agic is an enthusiast. I'm assuming from the Weather Channel,
what's your fair food go to? Well, the sausage and
Pepper's Yeah, all right, yeah, that's the good stuff.
Speaker 2 (01:00:03):
Man.
Speaker 10 (01:00:03):
Yeah, unlest I was there walking out from a concert
and not only one, I had two. Oh no, they're
walked out and then fried dough if they have it
done right. So I'm like, the yeah, we do. We
do the fried dough and the rings. We make the
rings of dough and then we put powder on them
after frime with my family. And you don't see him
(01:00:24):
done that way at the fair, but still they do
it pretty well. At least I haven't seen it in
a lot of places I go.
Speaker 1 (01:00:28):
But so so, the Minnesota State Fair.
Speaker 2 (01:00:30):
Is huge, huge, huge, huge huge.
Speaker 1 (01:00:33):
In fact, it's so big that all of the media
outlets we have permanent little houses on the fair grounds
and we move our entire broadcast operation. So when I
was with iHeart Minneapolis, I would do ten days broadcasting
at well, you know, we of the weekdays broadcasting out there,
and we were set up right across from the cheese
(01:00:54):
curd guy.
Speaker 2 (01:00:58):
You could gain fifty.
Speaker 1 (01:00:59):
Pounds doing a week of broadcasting, right and they have
they do have one good cheese curd guy. Well they
have a he's got two different boosts there at the
North Carolina State fairst So I still get my fix,
but we do need more cheese curds because, yeah, cheese
curds and the Italian the Italian sausage.
Speaker 10 (01:01:17):
I'm setting. Yeah, it's yeah, And you know you can't
go more. I don't like to go more than one
day because you end up with a lot of cheese curds.
Speaker 2 (01:01:25):
And yeah, well that was the problem right then.
Speaker 1 (01:01:28):
And then the problem is too when they see you
broadcasting out there, what do the vendors do. They lit
up a big bucket of cheese curds and then they
bring it over right because they want the guys on
the radio to talk about it. So now you're surrounded
by like twenty different fair foods. You can't move, plus
more doing morning radio out there. The only people that
are really walking around are you know, like the FFA
(01:01:51):
kids doing the walk of shame right right, trying to
get back to wherever their housing is before they get
caught been out all night doing god knows well knows
right anyway, exactly, all right, Van, So yeah, it would
not be a good day to be walking around out
an affair though.
Speaker 2 (01:02:07):
Nope, and did it again.
Speaker 10 (01:02:08):
Yesterday ninety seven was a record in Raleigh low nineties
triad where it was not a record again, So ninety
seven hottest day at RDU in the month of May
on record. So the heat one more day and all
the guidance has been about a degree or too shy
of actual high temperatures that have been realized. So the
(01:02:30):
guidances ninety five today, I'm going ninety six and a
tie for the record again, so let's see how that
works out. A lot of sunshine, so that's at least
for Raleigh to try, it had probably be about ninety
two or ninety three. That's been the difference the last
couple of days. A few degrees and then we'll start
getting into the wet weather tomorrow. A few showers thunder
showers around Friday, Saturday, Sunday, Monday. Just put all the
(01:02:51):
days together, good chances of getting some scattered showers and thundershowers.
Friday's going to be a cooler day in the mid
upper seventies, but I think for the holiday weekend we're
at least mild, little mid eighties across the area. Now,
if you are heading to the beaches, outer Banks, maybe Hilton,
head down to the South Carolina beaches, whatever it is
mid Atlantic, there's actually less of a chance of rain
(01:03:13):
toward the coast. There is an upper level low sitting
out over the western Atlantic, but the rain chances over
the weekend just stand to be a little bit less,
little left coverage, believe it or not, but still some
as you head toward the beaches.
Speaker 1 (01:03:26):
Okay, all right, thank you sir, appreciate it. We'll chat
here in an hour. That's a raised agic from the
Weather Channel. All right, So I mentioned I mentioned, oh good,
all right, so we got somebody on the State fairboos,
so we'll grab your call. And I also mentioned there's
a little elon Omar update that's some audio for you.
Speaker 2 (01:03:43):
We'll do it next. Hang on again.
Speaker 1 (01:03:44):
I'm just looking at the story, and the North Carolina
State Fair wants to change the fee that vendors pay
from one hundred and eighty dollars per foot, so ten
foot truck eighteen hundred dollars. That would be the fee
you paid to instead capturing fifteen percent of what they
sell post tax. I would point out, so that's somewhat helpful,
(01:04:05):
but take fifteen percent of it. But the problem is,
I don't know how much money these booths make. I'm
just assuming that the reason people are grumbling is because
they probably make more than that. Now they're going to
have to pay more and that could impact the ability
of some boosts to participate. All right, Terry, what's up?
Speaker 6 (01:04:22):
Hi? Eric?
Speaker 7 (01:04:23):
Good morning guys. So I don't know exactly how this
compares to state fairs, but my parents had a catering
business for many, many years, and we used to have
a booth at the Central Pennsylvania Festival of the Arts
in State College, Okay, and opening bid opening bid for
certain areas was twenty grand. So what they would do
(01:04:44):
is they'd put those up for bid, and you could
make multiple bids as they kept going up depending upon
the prime spot. But I mean my parents would end
up making you know, one hundred and seventy five, two
hundred thousand dollars during the length.
Speaker 8 (01:04:59):
Of the arts.
Speaker 1 (01:05:00):
How long is so many days?
Speaker 2 (01:05:02):
Would that be? How many days?
Speaker 5 (01:05:04):
Five?
Speaker 7 (01:05:04):
Five days?
Speaker 8 (01:05:06):
Five days?
Speaker 7 (01:05:08):
And they would offer a barbecue beef, barbecue beef sandwich
or barbecue pork sandwich, fares and a drink for five
seventy five and they're.
Speaker 1 (01:05:17):
Still making that amount of profit. Wow, that is good
for them.
Speaker 7 (01:05:20):
I mean yeah, I mean the volume was correct, incredible.
I mean we were cooking off you know, sixty seventy
top rounds, you know, just for five days.
Speaker 1 (01:05:31):
Yeah, yeah, this is this is it was just yeah,
this is this is why I felt that they should
And thanks for the call there, sir. I'm just up
against the clark. This is why they should have included
the you know that that amount of information or that
little piece of information and I get And by the way,
he's probably screaming people screaming right now. The guy who's
selling the deep fried oreos isn't making one hundred and
(01:05:53):
eighty thousand profits. I don't know a lot of the
smaller bodies probably not so at that point, isn't a percentage,
But I don't know. Brad not joining us this morning.
Speaker 2 (01:06:05):
How you doing, sir, Hey, good morning, Casey.
Speaker 8 (01:06:08):
I'm doing well. Thank you.
Speaker 1 (01:06:10):
Before I hit on a couple of the stories of
the day, I want to go back to last week
and you were you run a committee that was questioning
a dude who seems like and these are my words,
one of the most loathsome individuals I have watched it.
Pick apart that of course is Stephen Descano, who is
(01:06:31):
what county attorney up in Fairfax County up there in Virginia.
And it was a wild hearing. Also, do you normally
tell people to shut up like that they're in here
or be quiet.
Speaker 2 (01:06:41):
Because like, dude, that thing was crazy.
Speaker 5 (01:06:45):
Yeah.
Speaker 8 (01:06:46):
I usually don't. And uh, for you, I can tell
you I lost my my my cool a little bit.
But uh, I'm a I'm a former prosecutor. And the
hearing was to expose the sanctuary jurisdictions in the country
and Stee Discano is one of the paradigm examples of it.
And the Democrats they say, we just don't want to
do federal enforcement. But what these guys are doing Casey
(01:07:09):
is much more cynical. Steve Discano received almost a million
dollars from George Soros. He has a policy in his
office that essentially says, if you're an illegal alien, you
will not be deported. And if that means dismissing a
case against a murderer or in the case that I
was asking about, a pedophile, we will dismiss the charges
(01:07:32):
or reduce the charges so that ICE will not be alerted.
And the statistics from Fairfax County are just just harrowing.
I mean, murders, rapes, property crimes, child sex crimes, all
of them have been furthered and are increasing because of
this policy. Yet he remains on that course, and he's
(01:07:54):
not alone unfortunately.
Speaker 1 (01:07:56):
Yeah, this is the thing that is so interesting to
me because this, this Soros DA's thing is a thing
you know, it gets people will couch you. Is conspiracy, No,
and in fact, arguably, arguably, if you want to push
your politics, it was a pretty smart thing to do,
even though I don't like the results, because you get
(01:08:17):
more bang for your buck with these DA races, and
you can control on this case, what happens to a
four year old girl where a guy's facing up to
life in prison, and then this guy's coming in and going, well,
we have to take this into account, and now you
have this wrong child.
Speaker 2 (01:08:34):
You have a.
Speaker 1 (01:08:34):
Sweetheart plea deal that even a Democrat judge wouldn't touch.
Speaker 2 (01:08:38):
And and he smug about it.
Speaker 1 (01:08:41):
That's the part. It's not just him, it's his there's
a bunch of him all over the country. And my
question is how do you combat it because he doesn't
seem apologetic at all.
Speaker 8 (01:08:51):
No, no, just for contact. You hit the nail on
the head. This was a convicted pedophile who broke into
somebody's home, pulled a four year old girl out of
her bed, and was hoping to either rape, murder or both.
The mother was awakened by the girl screams that prompted
the perpetrator to drop the child and leave, and the
(01:09:11):
court said, this is an unbelievable danger to the community.
We must keep him in custody and Discano cut the
guy loose. He dismissed all charges, let him walk out
of jail. The victim's grandmother called ice, who picked him
up and had him deported. And Casey, the sad part
about it is there are certain jurisdictions in our country
(01:09:34):
that feel good about what Discano is doing. I don't
know if it's Trump de rangement. I don't know if
it's if it's just an a moral far left vein
of politics in our country. But you know, like I said,
they're Discana is all over the country, whether it's elements
of Charlotte, whether we have Chicago, Illinois, Manhattan, the whole
(01:09:55):
state of California, with very few exceptions. This type of
of suicidal empathy is really taking the far left mainstream
of the Democratic Party and it has to stop. And
for me personally, I'm very bullish that if we continue
to expose it that the political ramifications will take care
(01:10:16):
of themselves. But when you have an unchecked narrative that
conservative row law enforcement policies are bad and empathetic and
soft on crime policies are good, people get caught up
into that current. But they have real world consequences like
the ones that we discussed in that hearing, and when
people hear it, they usually tilt the other direction.
Speaker 5 (01:10:39):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (01:10:39):
By the way, I don't want to leave out the
part two where the four year old had bruises all
around her butt and section. So God only knows he.
Speaker 8 (01:10:49):
Should have been I'll go ahead and say it, Casey,
this individual should have been executed. He comes into the
country illegally, and he prays on children, broke into a
home at four am. That is, that is a parent's
worst nightmare. And if you cannot be safe in your
own home, much less of public space, then we don't
have we don't have any rights. And uh, this was
(01:11:11):
a repeat offender, and uh he was a sick person.
He was an evil person. And what Discano did just
it amplified and enabled that. And I just didn't have
any patients for it. And I hope the voters in
Fairfax County will lose their patients.
Speaker 5 (01:11:28):
For it as well.
Speaker 1 (01:11:29):
I don't know, man, I think the people in Fairfax. Look,
Fairfax County carried this governor into office there in Virginia largely,
and her goal is to further remove your ability to
defend your four year old at four am, right by
limiting the ability to have certain firearms.
Speaker 8 (01:11:45):
So, oh yeah, Multi, it's very cynical. But I'll say,
you keep you keep giving far left democrats their way,
and you take what was once heaven and it becomes hell.
I mean, look at look at California and look at
what's going on in the govern race. Look at what's
going on in the mayor's race in Los Angeles. Despite
all of the institutional build up in California to protect
(01:12:08):
the Democratic Party, even the most far left state, the
voters are seeing this.
Speaker 5 (01:12:14):
Does not work.
Speaker 8 (01:12:16):
Overtaxed, over regulated, letting people out of jail, no law enforcement,
politically correct nonsense, top to bottom, dei everywhere, and it
has caused that state to plummet. I think the same
thing could happen in Virginia. And if Abigail Stanberger keeps
going the way she's gonna she's saying she's going to go,
I think that she'll turn Virginia into California, and the
(01:12:38):
voters do not want that.
Speaker 1 (01:12:40):
I want to ask you something that's more. It's less
I guess about, you know, individual votes and things like that,
but it's something that I see, especially in election season.
We had a couple of stories talking about this this morning,
and that is the simple inclusion of stuff that sounds
pretty ample semitic, and it's not locked just into one party.
(01:13:03):
I would point out. I'll give you an example. So
we have a woman running in Texas for the new district.
They created there in San Antonio on the Democrat side,
and she is openly advocating on her website to turn
an ice facility into a lock up facility for Zionists
with a castration center.
Speaker 2 (01:13:23):
So that's fun.
Speaker 1 (01:13:24):
And Thomas Massey, when he was, you know, talking after
he lost his election yesterday, said he would have been
out sooner but he couldn't find the guy who was
running against because he was in Tel Aviv, which is
clearly a reference to the fact that he thinks he
was undone by Zionist or Jews or whatever's going on
up there. I think most people find this shocking, this sentiment,
(01:13:47):
especially more shocking in the halls of Congress. Is this
a growing problem? Is this how people talk in private
between you guys? Help me understand this? How this is socializable?
Speaker 8 (01:14:00):
Well, the short answer is, casey, yes.
Speaker 5 (01:14:01):
It is a growing problem.
Speaker 8 (01:14:02):
And I think the problem has been there for some time,
and uh, it's it's festering and become more open now. Unfortunately,
you know, anti Semitism has always been present. I mean,
if you go back to the Old Testament and you
read if you read that, you read the New Testament,
same thing. It's it's a vein of very problematic philosophies
(01:14:24):
and sentiments. And uh, it's on the right and the left,
without any question. And one of the beautiful things about
our system of government is it was built upon the individual.
And if they're individuals who who cross lines, who act inappropriately,
hold them to account. But you cannot go after an
entire faith, and entire race, and entire country and make
(01:14:48):
them out to be some sort of of opaque evil
force that must be eliminated in full. And that is
becoming increasingly accepted. And we have a we just have
a very very wrong propulsion to try to go down
the deepest, darkest rabbit holes of conspiracies. And again, when
we get away from the individual focus, what conduct did
(01:15:10):
people partake in individually, we really start to go down
a slippery slope. And that's that's when we're.
Speaker 1 (01:15:17):
On currently pretty troubling little press conference yesterday by the
head of the NAACP. His name is Derek Johnson, who,
by the way, this might be the worst bad idea
I've heard in a long time congressman who is over
basically the elimination of the Voting Rights Act, but more
specifically racial Gerrymander District is apoplectic.
Speaker 2 (01:15:39):
He wants to do something.
Speaker 1 (01:15:40):
He is now calling on I'm not going to play
the whole audio, but he's calling on high school students
of color who have committed to colleges in basically the South,
basically SEC and acc Land to de commit from those
schools as a form of protest over the fact that
what ten or twelve of their members districts are getting
(01:16:01):
bored so to speak, amazing, it's wild times. But also
he says that the NUALEACP will actively work against what
is the name of this the Score Act, which is
a bill you guys are working on up there, and
you know obviously as a person who represents North Carolina
when it comes to college sports, right, that's the big deal.
(01:16:23):
So do we need the NAACP. Do you support that act?
And how insane? And ask, by the way, when that
might be the only financial security that a lot of
these students are able to achieve because of the money
that is in college sports now, and you want to
politicize this for a bunch of seventeen and eighteen year olds,
(01:16:45):
So talk to me about this.
Speaker 8 (01:16:47):
Yeah. The is in reference to a Supreme Court decision
that essentially outlawed race based jerry mandering, and racial discrimination
is once again outlawed in the United States, and the
Democrats have lost their minds because they believe it gives
(01:17:08):
them a strong advantage. But I just want to point
out that one of the Supreme Court justices who wrote
this opinion overturning the use of racial discrimination was a
black man, Clarence Thomas. There are several members in majority
minority districts who are white on the Democratic side. There
(01:17:29):
are members on the Republican side, Casey who are black
that represent majority white districts. I'm talking about Burgess Owens,
I'm talking about Wesley Hunt and.
Speaker 1 (01:17:40):
Joined the Congressional Black Caucus, which is the most ironical.
Speaker 8 (01:17:43):
I was talking to Byron Donalds about that, and Byron
Donalds made a joke. He said, it seems like my
Democrat friends have forgotten that I'm black, and they have
declined his offer to join the uh, their caucus over
and over and over again because they don't. It's not
it's not a racial issue. It is an ideology issue,
(01:18:06):
and uh, you know, it's one of those things. The
Voting Rights Act was implemented to prevent obstruction to voting
it was not invented to make racial discrimination more prevalent.
And the Supreme Court said, you cannot discriminate based on race.
You can't say I want an all white district. You
can't say I want an all black district. And a
(01:18:28):
court certainly cannot do that. And that's the whole issue.
And the NAACP has long removed itself from constructive dialogue
and urging individuals to remove themselves from from universities. Uh
in a in a course that includes higher education. That's
about as as kind of productive as any instruction I
(01:18:49):
can imagine. And I would just say shame on that
man for encouraging young people to do something so detrimental.
Go to college, work hard, become educated, engage in the
body politic, engage in debate, and we'll all be better
for it. That's what that's what the decision essentially encourage
folks to do. Don't rest on this vestige of pass discrimination.
(01:19:12):
Get in the game, put your ideas out there, and
let's see what happens.
Speaker 5 (01:19:16):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (01:19:17):
And by the way, too, when you hear the NAACP
or Hakeem Jeffries quote, well, we're going to lose x
percentage of black Congress congressmen and women. What he means
is as a as a percentage of members of the
Black Congressional Caucus. So what the so that any Republican
black person is not counted in that. So they're again
(01:19:37):
they're just fudging the numbers.
Speaker 8 (01:19:38):
But one more let me let me just reiterate one
more time, Casey, that they do not allow Wesley Hunt
Burgess Owens. They do not allow conservative Hispanics, blacks whoever,
from from the House Republican side to join these caucuses.
It's not about any type of race. It's only about
(01:19:59):
ideology and is particularly odious if you ask me about it.
Speaker 1 (01:20:04):
Yesterday the Vice President was asked and just full disclosure.
Congressman not sits on an ethics committee situation. So I'm
not going to get in specifics of the individual case.
I don't know if you guys are investigating elon Omar
or not, but what Genie Mans talked about is at
an immigration level, you know, and as somebody who's from
(01:20:26):
Minnesota or lived in Minnesota many years, the story of
how of the fraud that was committed with the people
basically lying and pretending to be married or married couples
or bringing orphans and presenting them as children. There's so
much craziness. Elon Omar is accused of essentially for marrying
her brother. Whether it's true or not, I don't know.
(01:20:46):
But we have a process because she's a naturalized citizen.
If in fact she did do that called denaturalization. So
without just on her specific case, could you fathom a
situation where a member of Congress could couldfusibly be denaturalized
if in fact they meet the requirements of the statute?
(01:21:06):
Are you comfortable something like that? I got about a minute.
Speaker 8 (01:21:09):
Well, I'll say this if it's If it's as potentially
off putting as that, I do support an investigation. I
don't want to prejudge it. But if the elements are met,
you can't have people fraudulently entering the country, fraudulently entering
the Congress, having access to top secret information to enrich
your home country. This is not a pariahs state. So
(01:21:31):
I support the investigation. Let's get the facts on the table.
Let's get the facts tightly applied to the law, and
let's see what happens. I mean, if she broke the law,
there should be consequences for it. If it's at that level,
because this is not some immaterial, immaterial issue. So I
support looking.
Speaker 1 (01:21:50):
Into it, okay, all right, yeah, and do the whole
thing would be just crazy. I mean you would have
to admit that. But and it would also require the
you know, Trump administration has to follow through and you know.
Speaker 2 (01:22:00):
You're dealing with judges and who knows. But we'll leave
it there for the day.
Speaker 1 (01:22:03):
So let's get back to yelling at Fairfax County Attorneys
and we'll chat in a couple of weeks.
Speaker 2 (01:22:07):
Sir, thank you.
Speaker 1 (01:22:09):
All right, there you go, Congressman brad Not, and we
will be right back. I mentioned it to the congressman there,
and that is this this insane NAACP thing, and we
talked about at the beginning of the show. But I
just want to play the audio for anyone joining us
a little later so you can understand how stupid this
whole thing is. How how you want again, you want
(01:22:32):
student athletes entering college who may have who may have
you know, realized the dream right and got recruited by
an LSU or an Alabama or a UNC or you
know whatever it is, to forego the ability to go
there play put themselves on display, perhaps parlay it into
(01:22:55):
a pro career. But at the very least, just due
to the way things are in college sports have the ability,
if they're good, to essentially build up all the money they,
if budgeted properly, could ever need. Did any of these
students come from not rich families? And you're the NAACP,
(01:23:19):
so butt heard over not getting to racially gerrymanneder districts
is asking them just to throw that away, throw away
that opportunity.
Speaker 2 (01:23:30):
How dare you?
Speaker 1 (01:23:31):
Here's Derek Johnson in this moment when.
Speaker 3 (01:23:33):
Black representation is under attact, it is important for the
CBC to keep in their tradition of being the moral
of the Congress, but the moral of conscious of this country.
No representation, no revenue, No one Black should be on
a plan field of institutions that's living off of our labor.
(01:23:54):
And yet in states that are seeking to reinstitute a
sharecropping reality sharecropping, it is not the responsibility of Black
America to whole individuals who should know better accountable for
doing better. As soon as the United States Congress stand
(01:24:17):
united to ensure our constitution represent all of us, we
will be a better nation as a result. NAACP this
morning inside of Daddy went to CBC. We are calling
on athletes who are coming out of high school not
to attend any state funded schools of states that have
(01:24:38):
moved to minimize our right to vote, to minimize our
ability to elect kendidates of our choice.
Speaker 1 (01:24:46):
None of them, by the way, none of those things
have been minimized. You still vote for the candidate of
your choice. Zero people are stopping you. Your ability to
vote again not a problem.
Speaker 2 (01:25:00):
And you don't even want to.
Speaker 1 (01:25:02):
You don't want to have any skin in the game here.
You want these athletes to do your bidding for you,
and you're asking them again. You're dealing with SEC right
in the world of college football. I know it's not
the end all be all, but if you get recruited
and are able to excel in an SEC program, you
(01:25:24):
make more money doing that than I'll probably make my
entire life. And I don't begrudge you that, even though
I kind of hate the current state of college football.
It's the reality there. And this is what you're asking
them to give up because you're not able to plug
and play members in racially gerrymanned districts.
Speaker 2 (01:25:41):
Just what an ask?
Speaker 1 (01:25:43):
What an absolute ask? By this piece of garbage man.
Speaker 2 (01:25:48):
All right.
Speaker 1 (01:25:49):
I also got to play the JD Vance audio because
I didn't quite get to it. So this is what
I was asking Congressman, not about it, and I want
to explain the process to you too. But let's go
ahead and hear the Q and A with Vice President
Vance yesterday. I going to ask you about the Anti
Fraud task course.
Speaker 11 (01:26:05):
You previously mentioned that Ilhan Omar seemed to have committed
immigration fraud.
Speaker 1 (01:26:09):
Are do you anticipate an indictment against her, an indictment
related to that situation.
Speaker 14 (01:26:15):
Yes, So we're gonna I don't want to prejudge an investigation.
I mean, you read the things about elan Omar and
about you know, who she married and whether she didn't
marry this person or that person.
Speaker 2 (01:26:25):
It certainly seems like something.
Speaker 14 (01:26:26):
Fishy is there. But everybody's entitled to equal justice under
the laws. So we're gonna investigate it. We're going to
take a look at it. If we think that there's
a crime, we're going to prosecute that crime. And that's
something the Department of Justice is looking at right now.
Speaker 1 (01:26:39):
Okay, And that's good, right because again, that whole thing
and I don't know, maybe just because I watched the
Somali fraud, the immigration fraud that was going on up
in Minnesota when I was working up there, and I
will reiterate, it goes so far, so much further. Right,
It isn't just this idea that elon Omar may have
(01:27:00):
literally married her brother and then most importantly misrepresented which,
by the way, according to the statute is a key element.
It's called concealment or willful misrepresentation, meaning that an individual
deliberately lied hit important information such as disqualifying criminal record,
prior deportations order, or misrepresented facts during the naturalization of
(01:27:24):
visa processes, which that would be you also had and
it's heart It was heartbreaking, and I'll bring this up
every time because people need to understand how the system
was getting manipulated. You would have family unit preferences for
the Somali this this immigration program within the Somali community
(01:27:47):
for their placement in Minnesota, which I believe has the
largest population in the US. And they realized on the
ground in Somalia, which is very hard to get documentation
on anybody anyway, they realized that there was preferential treatment
being given to family units. So what would happen was
you would have people who were not family units, who
(01:28:10):
for the purpose of manipulating the program, would present or
they would get married for the purpose of it, which
is the thing we've heard of, right, you know, like
somebody would marry somebody'd get him a green card here
in the US. But it was far darker than that,
because they also would literally have kids orphans. Orphan kids
(01:28:33):
have come on and present as their children, and then
when they got to Minneapolis, you would have sometimes these
kids abandoned and then they set up a couple very
probably problematic moss there where Somali kids, not even kids
who were born in the US to immigrants. Samali parents
(01:28:54):
started to disappear, but all these stories in the news.
Speaker 2 (01:28:59):
I went through years of this up in Minneapolis.
Speaker 1 (01:29:01):
They would disappear, and then we found out that they
had been recruited within these moss or these Islamic centers
in the Five Points area of Minneapolis, which is kind
of the Somali area there, and they had been recruited
by Al Shabab to go and fight and die in
several instances for a terrorist organization operating in a country
(01:29:25):
that they themselves had never been to. But who had
family heritage there. This is a lot of really really
dark stuff. And the statue that I just read you
is part of what is known as the denaturalization process,
and elon Omar is very much eligible.
Speaker 8 (01:29:44):
This.
Speaker 1 (01:29:45):
Only the law only applies to naturalized citizens. Okay, so
birthright citizenship cannot be involuntarily revoked according to this law.
But elon Omar is a naturalized citizen and if she
in fact committed fraud that that seems to read exactly
what the statute says here, she should be eligible for this.
(01:30:07):
The problem is, I don't think the GOP has the
stones to do it. Not really, I don't think, because
like it would get real real. Can you imagine the
panels on the view on CNN or MSNBC if they
(01:30:28):
not only removed this woman from Congress but sent her
back to Somalia because they were able to prove she
in fact did do this thing pending you know, the
investigation here. And trust me, a lot of people have
been investigating this a long time, especially up in Minnesota.
The guys from the power Line blog were really kind
(01:30:48):
of first in on this. Several others who have got
who have gathered an immense amount of evidence, immense amount
of evidence, and I would hope that the DJ has access,
But I just I don't don't know if I can't
even imagine what that news cycle would look like, And
I just don't know that they'd be they one would
(01:31:09):
have the will to do it, but even if they did,
wouldn't get the process gummed up by a bunch of
commie you know, judges.
Speaker 2 (01:31:16):
And lawyers and activist groups.
Speaker 1 (01:31:20):
But if she did, I'd hope they follow through with it.
Depositor right back there in Samala imagining and he sent
back to Somalia, oh man, and they'd be like, well,
she's rich.
Speaker 8 (01:31:33):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (01:31:33):
I think probably the people in Somalia know she's rich too,
And I don't know that would bode well for and
you heard of the whole pirate problem they got over there.
So it's a wild story. So we'll keep following it.
But it is the first acknowledgment by the administration that
this investigation has gone, not just in Congress that's its
own thing, but specifically into the DOJ.
Speaker 2 (01:31:57):
And we're very curious to see where it goes.
Speaker 1 (01:31:59):
All right, eight forty four Ray Stagic is here to
try to break records at your expense.
Speaker 10 (01:32:05):
So yeah, we do so far this week too, and
Raleigh haven't managed yet at the triad, but still low
nineties there made even upper nineties ninety seven yesterday and
Raleigh so sorry triad.
Speaker 2 (01:32:19):
Oh yeah, may temperature real, Yeah.
Speaker 10 (01:32:22):
They're really upset, right, and maybe more today. I think
the record's ninety six. I'm going for just ninety six
or near ninety six. What's the difference, right, A couple
degrees low nineties, try it about ninety two or ninety three.
Still ninety degree day tomorrow, mid upper eighties, close to
ninety again, the triad probably stays in the eighties, but
the shower thundershower chances do go up tomorrow and then
(01:32:45):
again for Friday and the weekend. So let me scattered around.
My best advice for the holiday weekend is you're outdoors,
just keep it out of radar, keep an eye on
the forecast. I'm not going to say we'll have widespread
severe weather, but a stronger storm or two, maybe some
heavier fall at times, but there will be hours of
dry weather. Maybe Tomorrow and Friday. We can hone in
(01:33:06):
on which of the three holiday weekend days may actually
end up being the let's say less hot ones or
less wet ones. There might be a couple there where
you have more hours of dry than you will wet.
Either way, I don't think any of the three days
is going to be a complete washout.
Speaker 1 (01:33:23):
Okay, all right, I appreciate it, sir. We'll chat tomorrow
and we'll come back with Bloomberg News next.
Speaker 15 (01:33:28):
Hang on, Hey, good morning, Casey. You know, a lot
of Meta employees, thousands in fact, got a rude awakening
from the company today. They got an email at about
four in the morning saying that their job had been eliminated.
Stafford being encouraged to work from home today. While the
company cuts roughly eight thousand rolls globally, that's about ten
percent of its workforce. And these cuts come as more
tech companies like Meta cut costs and shift their focus
(01:33:51):
to AI. As we head into midterms, a new study
by Forum AI has found that the four major artificial
intelligence chatbots Open ai is Chat, GP, Alphabet's Google, Gemini
Anthropics Claude, and Xai's groc are struggling to fairly and
accurately answer questions about elections and geopolitics. Researchers asked the
(01:34:11):
four chatbots thousands of questions about a wide range of
topics politics, healthcare, foreign affairs, and they found that answers
about elections specifically failed on accuracy, bias, or source selection
ninety percent of the time. A third of answers about
elections actually contained at least one factual error. Grok was
the most egregious offender. AI playing into this as well.
(01:34:33):
Tinder's now working on a big redesign, more AI features
and virtual group dating after launching live events just two
months ago in an effort to discourage endless swiping, but
apparently this didn't resonate with gen z users, who make
up more than fifty percent of under thirties on the app.
Tinder is also working on a virtual speed dating tool
now and testing a chemistry feature that'll use AI to
(01:34:54):
help match people. Has Bro's canceled the publishing deal with
independent studio giants Skull in a year after announcing it,
which means the Dungeons and Dragon's action adventure game that
they were working on is also getting scrapped. It didn't
exactly say why, but Hasbro has been focusing more on
video games in recent years and indicated that it does
want to cut costs lots of golfers and golf fans
(01:35:17):
in the Raleigh area. So this is big Saudi Arabia
now pulling support for live golf amid widening budget deficits
and economic pressure from the war in Iran. It's looking
for new funds, but if it doesn't get it, it
has started to lay the groundwork for a potential bankruptcy filing.
The Golf League has cost an estimated five billion dollars
over four years, including nearly ninety million in prize money
(01:35:38):
for John Rahm alone. Targets Turnaround got a big lift
after posting its best comparable sales growth in four years
and boosting its outlook. The retailer has been struggling to
revive growth after a pandemic fueld boom and boycotts that
it suffered after it got rid of its DEI policies,
and finally, Casey stocks pointing to a higher open today
on Wall Street as traders weight earnings from Nvidia, The
(01:36:01):
company set to report today after closing and give a
much anticipated update on the state of the AI economy,
with sales expected to grow eighty percent.
Speaker 1 (01:36:11):
Yeah, that's crazy, I mean, what a time for that company.
Thus making it impossible for me to give memory for
my computer. But all right, Monica, I appreciate the update
this morning.
Speaker 2 (01:36:20):
I have a good one you too. See you Casey yep?
Speaker 1 (01:36:23):
Are you Monica Ricks from Bloomberg News joining us here
on the show. You know it's crazy. I saw this
story yesterday afternoon. After yesterday morning on the show, we
had talked about how there's a secret plan to I
don't know, destroy Ross's car by having continuous construction on
the small slice of Atlantic Avenue by the station where
(01:36:45):
they fixed the road, and then they unfixed the road,
and now there's giant manhole parts sticking up.
Speaker 2 (01:36:50):
A woman in New York.
Speaker 1 (01:36:52):
Fell into a manhole and died. Fifty six year old
Danika Goosich plummeted fifteen feet into after an uncovered utility
hole on East fifty second Street and Fifth Avenue. She
got she parked her car, got out. I guess was
just backing away from the car because it's kind of
sitting in the middle of the street there. Never clocked it.
(01:37:15):
Fell in by Sanders say. She could hear her screaming
that she was dying. Unfortunately they were unable to rescue her.
The open conetison maintenance oul was just feet away from
her SUV's door. What how horrible?
Speaker 5 (01:37:31):
Man?
Speaker 1 (01:37:32):
How horrible? And then like and then nobody, I'm sure
we'll take response a bit like did the did the
workers not cover it? Did crackheads steal it to sell
it for something?
Speaker 2 (01:37:41):
I don't know?
Speaker 1 (01:37:43):
The incident is under investigation and a lot of questions remain,
including why was the man hole uncovered? So there's that
ross the ones attacking you are at least covered, right
attacking your vehicle, I should say I think those are covered,
even if they are sticking eight inch above the grade,
thus trying to destroy the bottom of the vehicle there.
But yeah, what an absolutely horrific story. And then finally this,
(01:38:09):
oh you know what, Actually, I'm gonna have to get
to that tomorrow because there's some audio that I just
saw that I want to play as part of it.
So there is a crazy BBC story where they're like
they're trying to normalize men in Afghanistan selling their young
daughters to other old men as some sort of survival thing.
It's the whole thing is gross, but the way that
(01:38:31):
it's presented, Man, is this more of this suicidal empathy? Like,
at no point do they ask them. They're like, okay,
well if you got it, because they said they have
to sell those girls because they need money or their
family will starve.
Speaker 2 (01:38:42):
And I'm like the why, But.
Speaker 1 (01:38:43):
How come no reporter goes, well, if that's the case,
because they're either selling them for marriage, they're selling them
for labor, why aren't you selling any of your boys?
What's going on with that? But they never really get
into that. So we'll detail all that for you tomorrow.