Will Walmart Incident Lead to Reform?

And who (else) is to blame for this?  A judge?  The laws?  Walmart?  We also talk today about Trump's turnaround on FISA, jury duty, AI KISS, and more.

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
This is Nebraska's Morning News with Jim Rose, Lucy Chapman,
Craig Evans, and Courtney Donahoe. I am Scott Vorhees. We're
all here hanging out with you on news radio eleven
ten KFAB that's where you usually find us. Yesterday, the
family of the three year old boy in the incident

(00:21):
at the walmart the day before did get a chance
to meet with the media. And as you heard Craig
Evans report a moment ago, the young man Kyler Siler.
How are we pronouncing his name? I've heard both. Now
let's settle on Kyler. Okay, let's go with Kyler. Has

(00:42):
was in pretty good spirits, kind of goofing around with
the cameras and and you know, obviously knew that he
had a big gash in the sight of his head,
and we'll know that for the rest of his life,
but it seems like he's already on some level moving
past it. And the details that we heard from some

(01:02):
bystanders from this incident were repeated yesterday, and that was
he didn't cry during this experience, and when a woman
had cut him on the hand and the side of
the head, and everything's going crazy and the officers shooting
at this woman. He didn't cry, the dad said. The

(01:24):
only time he cried is when later. Now he's at
the hospital, the parents are rushing over there to be
with their kid, and the dad said that Kyler only
cried once when he had to go into surgery because
he was going to be separated from his father. We
also learned that Kyler has five siblings, scary news for

(01:47):
all of them, and they're all taking this a lot
harder than this three year old as well. But the
police had mentioned even in the report and in talking
to the parents, and they said, this kid is uh,
he's he's nails, dude. He went through the whole process

(02:09):
and wasn't freaking out or anything like that, which maybe
contributed to the situation not being any worse for him.
If he had been fighting back or anything like, if
he'd been acting like anyone else in that situation, it
could have been much much worse. It's not like he

(02:30):
is completely shaking it off.

Speaker 2 (02:32):
Though.

Speaker 1 (02:34):
Mom told the media yesterday that you know that I
guess tot's see, this happened on Tuesday, so it was
yesterday morning. He he didn't want to go play outside.
He said, I don't want to go outside. It's scary.
And the mom obviously was taking that one pretty hard.

(02:55):
It sounds like that's something that he will get over.
But I think about the mom. She lives in Lincoln,
and then here comes to the hospital, given a call saying, yeah,
we have your son here and trying to explain. And
when you first hear the news, like, all right, your
son's in the hospital, it's hard to process. I imagine
anything that happens after that point, Right, you.

Speaker 3 (03:16):
Really don't think about anything other than getting into the
space shuttle, you know, Columbia and heading off to.

Speaker 1 (03:21):
Especially when this mom was in Lincoln. Right, So now
you've got nearly an hour's drive you're trying to process.

Speaker 4 (03:29):
Wait, what it was rough?

Speaker 3 (03:33):
We're also finding out that the individual who was sort
of with the little boy was a friend of the father.
It's a woman, and she was a friend because the
father was apparently applying for a job somewhere.

Speaker 4 (03:45):
Yeah, and mom.

Speaker 3 (03:47):
Was in Lincoln, as you mentioned, and so a family
friend was with the little boy and the Walmart Yeah,
and this is this is a little bit disconcerting, and
it's gonna hurt Walmart. Why it was possible for a
deranged schizophrenic with a gigantic knife to confront somebody with
a shopping cart and a three year old in the

(04:09):
back of the store and march them through the store
through the front door with nothing happening is a little
bit confusing and disconcerting to me, and I suspect the
rest of the community as well. Where you mean to
tell me that this crazy woman was able to essentially
coerce this woman into walking out of the store with

(04:32):
the shopping cart and the three year old in the
front of the cart, through the entire store and into
the parking lot and nothing happened.

Speaker 1 (04:41):
Jim, what is it that you want to have happen
in this situation? What do you think should have happened?

Speaker 3 (04:46):
I believe that Walmart should have had security in the building.
I believe that Walmart is a trillion dollar company. Maybe
not a trillion, it's a multi billion dollar company, and
they ought to be able to pay seventy five or
eighty grand a year to have a security cop there
during major shopping hours in every store across the country

(05:06):
nine o'clock in the morning on Tuesday. Sure, absolutely, I
think that's good business for them. This is a again, very,
very successful. It's the number one retailer in the world.
I don't know if Amazon qualifies in the same category,
but it's certainly one of the biggest, if not the
biggest foot trafficked retailer in the world. They ought to

(05:26):
be able to provide some security in their stores. But
the other thing that strikes me is what were the
other people in the store doing. Now, we do have
a good samaritan who happened upon the scene. Her name
is Mitchell, and she was quoted in the paper as look,
I encountered these people in the parking lot, and apparently

(05:49):
she was able to talk to the late miss Guzman
long enough before she started turning this little boy into
a rotisserie chicken. She was able to talk to her
long enough to let the cops get there. It took
the cops nine minutes from the call, the emergency call
to get to that Walmart at seventy second in Pine Street.

Speaker 4 (06:08):
Are we sure about that timeline?

Speaker 3 (06:10):
Yes, in the story that I read nine minutes, but
that's not bad. That's nine minutes is pretty good, I think.

Speaker 4 (06:18):
So.

Speaker 3 (06:18):
She was able to say, hey, man, take me, don't
hurt the kid, and this slowed the whole process down
before the cops got there and put four hot ones
into Miss Guzman. See, I thought you were saying that
one of the employees at Walmart should have intervened to jumped.

Speaker 4 (06:33):
Down on the way there.

Speaker 3 (06:34):
Now, I always at Walmart they're not trained to do that,
But what about other people? What about the US is
I wouldn't there. I wouldn't blame anyone for doing that.
I mean we could all sit there and think about
you're a Walmart, you know, look at pants and you
look over there. I mean many of us would have
a hard time processing what the heck was going on
at this? Is this some weird TikTok challenge video?

Speaker 4 (06:56):
Someone's doing? What is happening there here? There's that?

Speaker 1 (07:00):
I mean, most of us wouldn't have any idea. And
as far as the employees of Walmart go, they're not
going to intervene. You can't even find an employee at
any department store. Anytime I go any place, I'm like,
I got to ask someone a question.

Speaker 4 (07:15):
Is there anyone here people in the blue smocks?

Speaker 3 (07:19):
But no, the employees at Walmart are not trained to
intervene in terrorist situations, which essentially is what this was.
But I was surprised that we didn't have just ordinary
run of the mill citizens doing something. If you will
see videos from time to time of people on airplanes
who stand up and take care of somebody who was behaving,

(07:42):
like you know, Niami Gousmat right, there's no doubt in
my mind about that. That said, again, it's not necessarily
Walmart's legal responsibility.

Speaker 4 (07:55):
To do this, but it would be wise to do this.

Speaker 1 (07:57):
I'm sure they'll have those conversations. When you had an
employee of this store talking to the media that day saying, oh, yeah,
people shoplift from here all the time. How is that possible?

Speaker 3 (08:09):
Oh, they have these they have these sort of tunnels
walk through you know.

Speaker 1 (08:14):
Well, have you been in a store where someone just
walks out, you know, the alarms go off, the employees
look over and look at each other. Yeah, they just
look at each other and shrug.

Speaker 4 (08:24):
I've done that. There was a home.

Speaker 1 (08:27):
Warehouse superstore where someone walked out with a weed whacker
in a box. The alarms go off, and I and
I'm checking out, and I asked the person. I said,
I don't think that person paid for that, And she goes, yeah,
happens all the time. And they they called the police.
The police ended up getting there right on the scene
and pulling them over down the road. I was watching
the whole thing.

Speaker 3 (08:47):
And all this means the story that Scott Boor He's
just conveyed, which is absolutely commonplace. All this means, because
this little crime goes without any attention, is it drives
in employers away. It says, you know, this store that
we have at seventy second in Pine Street, too much shoplifting,
too many people wielding knives and slicing up three year olds.

(09:09):
We're going to close that thing down, which means all
the people who work.

Speaker 4 (09:13):
There are out of a job.

Speaker 3 (09:14):
The property taxes that we collected from the place start
to seep, and the necessary services, whether it's food or
prescription medication for people in that neighborhood go away. I
don't know that we're at that point yet, but we
are not moving in the right direction. It's moving this direction.
He eleven to ten kfab certified Transmission Sports Free with

(09:35):
Jim Rose. All fired up here on a Wednesday. Good
all right, Scott, It's Thursday, by the way. Then on
Thursday too, Yes, more transfer portal news Scott V. He's
paying attention. This is important. Creighton adds another D one guard.
He is BJ Davis starter at San Diego State last
season defensive specialist. Nebraska continues to shop discriminately, hosting guys

(09:57):
no new official transfers since the hour forward Sam orm
who came in from Belmont two weeks ago. Baseball games
Casey Royals offense got lost somewhere got beat by the
Tigers again two to one.

Speaker 4 (10:10):
Lost the series.

Speaker 3 (10:11):
Manager Macquataro is reduced to commenting on all most home
runs by Vinnie Pasgentino.

Speaker 4 (10:16):
Vinnie squares a ball up. You know that's a little
bit polled more. You know this game can be cruel.
And he hits that ball to right field. It's long gone.
We have a lead, but didn't work out that way.

Speaker 3 (10:27):
That's three losses in a row for Kansas City. But
the good news is there are only three games out
of first place. Scoreboard. American League Boston nine to five
over the Twins. Yankees beat the Angels five to four,
Tampa Bay eight, White Sox three A six, Texas five.
National League Pittsburgh, the Cubs, Cincinnati, Atlanta and the Dodgers
got wins. The Los Angeles in the League game went
over the Mets eight to two. Inter League played Padres seven,

(10:48):
Seattle six, Houston three, and the Rockies won Milwaukee, Saint Louis, Arizona.
They all got victories Omaha six, Indianapolis four. Huscar volleyball
on our old friends from the Evil Empire will play
this fall. Negotiations are almost done to have the Huskers
and Texas tee off. When we were last forced to
share the same court with them, they were beating us

(11:09):
in the national title game between Texas and Nebraska nine
national titles. Date and time to be announced. They should
do this in Pinnacobak Arena to make more money. University
Board of Regents meets in eight days. It's big day.
They will vote to approve or not the next phase
of the two billion dollar project, health hospital on the
uns MC campus and the football stadium. Apparently the last

(11:34):
two athletic directors down there stopped maintaining the place, so
current athletic director Troy dan And says, we not only
need to retrofit Grandma, but fix leaking pipes and crumbling
concrete too, So let me go find six hundred million
to do the job. It would be a five phase
project which would include, but not be limited to, more suites,

(11:54):
more club seats, restaurants, bars, a new grass field, and
anything else that will allow the athletic department to make
money outside of football games. From what vein of gold
will the six hundred million come? Dan And is telling
people he can raise one hundred and fifty million from
rich people. The rest will be bonded out and paid
back over time from athletic department revenues, which means concessions, tickets,

(12:18):
and everything else. Fans have other questions like, if we
can find six hundred million for a stadium, why can't
we find another twenty million for players sports? His news
on Nebraska's News, Weather and Traffic station.

Speaker 1 (12:29):
Do you want to hear Omaha happenings in news with
a fun and random twist? Well, look no further, listen
and subscribe to the Every Songer podcast on the iHeartRadio
app Ye no new Emery podcast yet. This week he's
on jury duty. After I told him when he said
last week, he says, Hey, I've got to be called
in for jury duty on Monday morning. I'm like, they're
not going to take you. You're going to check a

(12:50):
website on Sunday night, they're going to tell you, don't
worry about it, and even if you do show up
on Monday morning, they're going to send you home. And
so it's Thursday and he's still on jury due. So
I'm not a great predictor of things. I'm Scott forhees.
I'm here reacting mostly Jim Rose, Lucy Chapman, Craig Evans
here as well. This is Nebraska's morning news news radio

(13:11):
eleven ten kfab. Would you ever want to serve on
a jury, Lucy? Or have you ever done that?

Speaker 4 (13:17):
I've been called three times, never used.

Speaker 1 (13:20):
I've only been called once and it was the same
thing the night before. It's like, ah, we don't need you. Yeah,
I was on a jury. I was even the jury foreman.
I'm surprised you didn't put on the ropes and said,
hang on, judge about it.

Speaker 4 (13:31):
I'll handle this. I go in it. Guy looks guilty. Judge,
you're really screwing this up here. Let me take over. Yeah.

Speaker 3 (13:37):
I was just probably ten fifteen years ago downtown. Had
to do with the car accident. One a little more
cash for a car accident. Yeah, and uh so I
sat there was a great experience as every American should
do it.

Speaker 4 (13:51):
I want to. I'll do it. You're volunteering, Yeah, I'll
do it every day. I got time in the afternoon.

Speaker 1 (13:58):
Now, Omaha New Soccer Stadium got a little bit closer
to reality this week. Jim Rose is shaking his head
over there. Well, you didn't appreciate the city Council's vote here.
It was a unanimous vote. I think everyone wants this.
I think the Republicans have checked out. They've run up
the white flag.

Speaker 3 (14:15):
I think Brinker's think in Congress now he doesn't want
to alienate anybody downtown, although he at least asked some
questions during the meeting.

Speaker 1 (14:22):
Well, if the Republicans on the Omaha City Council all
voted against this, you know what happens. It's still passing, right,
But at least you're you're representing your constituents. It's it's
a downtown economic development project, and I'm all in favor
of downtown economic development projects, including the streetcar.

Speaker 3 (14:44):
My problem you are francing. Yeah, no, I've said that
from the beginning. I think the street car is a
great idea. I do not like the financing model. You
just don't want to pay for it. No, I want
to pay for it, but I don't want to be
the only guy paying for it. That's the difference. All
of these project have merit. They all you got to
take risks to be successful. I'm good with that. I

(15:05):
say share the risk. And Union Omaha, which is going
to be the primary tenant, and I'm a soccer fan
and they play great soccer, and soccer fans are very passionate,
and that's great. They're going to be the primary tenant here.
The city's going to own a stadium, but they're going
to be the tenant. They get all the money from
the facility, they get all the money from those events,

(15:25):
and they're only putting in fifteen percent of the investment.
No bank would ever do that. Now, if Rose was
in charge, it'd be you know what, Union Omaha, mister Green,
multi millionaire. I'm in favor of this. I'm with you
on this. But you're going to pay for half of it.
And we're going to get half the money from the
events until the bonds are paid off, and then you

(15:46):
get all of it, Okay, until all the debt is paid.
We get half the revenue from the events, and you're
paying for half of this. So it's a one hundred
and forty million dollar deal. You show us the check
for seventy million, and we're up like a carnival ride.

Speaker 4 (16:00):
Says here.

Speaker 1 (16:01):
The entire project will cost three hundred and thirty million dollars.
This is the that's the entertainment, retail housing in this area.
What are we doing for entertainment down there that we
don't have other places across the street downtown Midtown.

Speaker 3 (16:16):
That's my concern, and that is we we really believe
that this is going to drive a bunch of people
into downtown to work, play and live. And maybe it will,
and the street car is the same construct. Maybe it will,
but the numbers just don't match, and the numbers that
they are forecasting cannot be reliable. We're talking occupation taxes. Okay,

(16:39):
you know what an occupation taxes you do? I'm asking
the question rhetorically. Occupation taxes is Okay, you're down there.
You pay extra tax for being down there, for living
down there, for working down there and buying stuff down there.
Turnback taxes. Those are taxes that are newly generated from
this district that go to the project. Well, don't have

(17:00):
any stores down there, now, who's going to put a store.
All of these questions should not be deal killers. What
they should be is deal mitigators.

Speaker 1 (17:09):
That turnback tax that is, that's a state approval thing, right,
it has.

Speaker 3 (17:13):
To be approved by the state. But the turnback taxes
are in a viscinity of the project. Now here's the
other thing that nobody's asking, okay, and that is the dirt. Now,
this is eleven acres of Union Pacific property down there
off eleventh in Iizard Street, right as you get on
Avid Drive head to the airport. Okay, the Union Pacific
Railroad has had this thing for one hundred and fifty years.

(17:36):
You mean to tell me that that dirt is okay environmentally.
Now there's ten million dollars in the budget in the
event of environmental remediation. Well, ten million dollars could be
a drop in the bucket really to ensure that the
dirt is okay for us to sit on for two
hours watching a soccer game. Now, Union Pacific is going

(17:56):
to buy its property back. We have that property that
used to be the old one All Street Tower property
where Up's building once was before they built their new one.
They're gonna buy that back, so the city gets that
money and then the city's gonna turn around and spend
that money by buying the Union Pacific property.

Speaker 4 (18:10):
That's dirty dirt.

Speaker 3 (18:11):
And again, how about let's before anybody commits to something,
let's do an environmental study on that dirt.

Speaker 4 (18:19):
They did that years ago, not on that dirt.

Speaker 1 (18:21):
Well, I mean across the street at Chi they did
all here's what they at the baseball stadium, they did
all that stuff.

Speaker 4 (18:27):
Now.

Speaker 1 (18:28):
I know that there's been a bit more industrial stuff
happening there just north of there, but it is the
street so bad that we can't pave over it.

Speaker 3 (18:35):
And we don't know play soccer on it. Here's what
happened with Chi. I'm not gonna be down there eating
the dirt, but you don't know about the impacts of
toxic chemicals in dirt that have been in there for
a long time.

Speaker 4 (18:47):
Now.

Speaker 3 (18:48):
You talked about the Chi Center, incently the Quest Center.
That was the Osarco plant, which was a pretty nasty
industrial epicenter. They had to put nine feet of they
had to sew it up like a big burrito, all
the bad they had to bring it. They took out
nine feet of dirt, put in new dirt, and then

(19:09):
put a gigantic concrete shell around.

Speaker 4 (19:12):
That nine feet. It's a lot of count that's it.

Speaker 3 (19:16):
That's the only way we could get away with putting
the Chi Center where it is now.

Speaker 4 (19:20):
I don't think that the dirt is that bad where
the up is.

Speaker 3 (19:23):
But I gotta tell you, we don't have answers to
these questions, and yet we're making commitments, and I think
that's bad governance.

Speaker 1 (19:32):
You're the only one complaining about in the city Council
voted seven to nine.

Speaker 4 (19:35):
Get it.

Speaker 2 (19:36):
Kiss is set to launch the first of their avatar
shows feature Kiss hits, new songs by the band, and
three D versions of the group's members. The shows will
launch sometime in twenty twenty eight. I'm Craig Evan, It's
more news at the top of the hour at news
Radio eleven ten kfab.

Speaker 1 (19:56):
If there's any band that could get away with doing
a show of just avatars, I don't imagine that would
be Kiss. Those Kiss avatars were made for loving you baby?

Speaker 4 (20:10):
Really? Is that where you're going to stay? Yes? Well
they were.

Speaker 1 (20:19):
I still think one of the funniest things in the
history of Family Guy, which has a million funny things,
was Brian the Dog buys a giant Humby, and he's
always a huge lib and he needs to be solar
powered this and environmentally friendly that, but he has to
drive a Humby and he likes the power. So he's

(20:40):
driving this giant gas guzzling hummer and he's going from
radio station to radio station, and in this particular vehicle,
every station plays is playing Lick It Up by Kiss,
and it's at different points in the song. As he
goes from me, he's like five different stations that are
all playing Lick It Up by Kiss. I thought that
was so all right. Hi, I'm Scott Vorhees. There's Lucy Chapman,

(21:05):
and this is Nebraska's morning news. Craig Evans here, Jim
Rose with sports brief in just a moment all on
news radio eleven.

Speaker 4 (21:13):
To ten KFAB.

Speaker 1 (21:15):
We have a story here that says young workers are
intentionally sabotaging their company's AI plans so AI doesn't.

Speaker 4 (21:25):
Take their jobs. Good for them?

Speaker 1 (21:28):
Yeah, you know how you could do that? Show up
to work right, do a good job. Yeah, I know
it's asking an awful lot. First you show up for
the job interview, which a lot of young would be
employees don't do. And then when you get hired, you

(21:48):
show up on your first day, and then you give
it a good effort, and you show up every day
reasonably on time, wearing mostly pants, and then your company
will be less likely to replace you with artificial intelligence.

Speaker 4 (22:03):
What is the story?

Speaker 1 (22:03):
Actually, what are they doing?

Speaker 3 (22:07):
I'm over here taking notes, So what are they doing?

Speaker 1 (22:10):
They're entering the sabotage, According to Fortune magazine, entails entering
this thing keeps clicking off here. It concludes entering proprietary
information into public AI tools and using unapproved AI tools.

Speaker 4 (22:28):
I don't even know what this means.

Speaker 3 (22:30):
Did you say it keeps clicking off?

Speaker 4 (22:32):
Maybe they're sabotage.

Speaker 2 (22:34):
Yeah.

Speaker 1 (22:34):
I keep reading this and the window keeps going away.
AI is like, don't read this, don't tell people about it.
Other employees have admitted tampering with performance reviews or intentionally
generating see it went away again, intentionally generating low output
work to make AI appear less effective. So the bosses say, hey,

(22:57):
we need to have streamline this with AI, and the
employees say, I'll get right on it. They don't do anything,
and they come back and say, yeah, we tried, but
it was it just didn't work. It was real slow
it was doing the wrong stuff. We lost several clients.

Speaker 4 (23:13):
Don't you feel bad about exposing them?

Speaker 1 (23:17):
No, because it's the bosses who are asking them to
do this. Yeah, and then the bosses are getting the
information back, and so you stereotypically, you've got an older
boss with gray hair, you know, someone like me who's
going to a younger gay. It goes to a younger
employee and says, all right, we need to do some

(23:38):
AI because I read in Fortune magazine that AI would
be really good for this. All right, boss, And then
the old boss comes back, how's that AI working? It
didn't work. Well, I don't know anything about it, So
I trust the twenty one year old I just hired
to run this entire division. Well, I guess we'll keep
trying with humans. Then I'm Scott Forhees walkming back to

(23:58):
the program. Frequent contributor Fox News Radio's Eben Brown. Here,
we have a PISA fight in Congress, and the president
wants this now. He's the one who's been saying for
years that the Obama administration and Lion James call Me
and the rest used Faiza to go against his campaign.

Speaker 4 (24:17):
This is back in twenty fifteen. Evan, what's going on here?

Speaker 5 (24:21):
So this is about the Phis Law, and very specifically
section seven oh two, which authorizes the foreign intelligence gathering
and has sometimes been used excuse me, to you know,
inadvertently sometimes collect data or intelligence on Americans if they
happen to be in contact with subjects of foreign surveillance.

(24:45):
This is what had led to, you know, President Trump
claiming that Trump Tower was being spied upon and whatnot.
This is due to expire next week, and if there
is no extension, it does put a real crimp on
our intelligence agencies abilities to do the foreign surveillance that
they often need to do to try to prevent terrorist

(25:06):
attacks and whatnot. But the holdouts in passing an extension
are from the Republican side, and there are people that
want to build in protections for American citizens, meaning a
lot of it having to do with how this data
is retained and about getting a court to issue a
warrant if that information is going to be used against

(25:29):
a US citizen in any way. President Trump surprisingly wants
to see this bill pass clean without these reforms, to
have it last eighteen months, to sort of not deal
with it now. And this is really turning into a
political test because there are some Republicans digging in their heels,
and without them, they can't pass the bill. This is

(25:52):
such a slim Republican majority that if they lose two votes,
they lose a bill. They can't pass anything without asking
Democrats for help, and they don't want to do that, obviously,
And so this is really a test for Speaker Johnson
and the President to try to rally these Republicans to
their side on this one. Then you have to wonder
how they'll do that.

Speaker 1 (26:11):
Yeah, I'm checking with the House Democrats here to see
if they want to help out President Trump. It turns
out they don't.

Speaker 4 (26:17):
They do not.

Speaker 1 (26:18):
Yeah, So this is the this is the Republican Freedom
Caucus that says we need to get a warrant before
we start issuing surveillance against people here in America.

Speaker 4 (26:29):
But we're already.

Speaker 1 (26:30):
I think we're going to hear this, Evan, and perhaps
Fox News is reporting some of it. I heard one
on Fox News this morning. I bet the administration is
going to start giving us a lot of details about
people in this country on some maybe funny student visa
or something like that. Getting women's underwear from the Chinese

(26:51):
government and it turns out the contents of that package
isn't women's underwear, it is a biological agent, which, by
the way, is a story out there this morning.

Speaker 3 (27:01):
I don't know how familiar you are with that, but
I bet they're going to say, you know, it's because
of FISA warrants that were able to sniff some of
this stuff out. This guy had ebola sent to his door.

Speaker 5 (27:12):
Well, that might be a way that FAIZA is used
and used properly, and I think most people are really
okay with that. The question is what happens if an
American citizen who has rights, even if they are perhaps
engaged in an active of terrorism or whatnot, they do
have rights, you know, rights of the accused as American citizens,
and so how do we protect those rights? How do

(27:34):
we protect their constitutional rights about you know, against searches,
you know, unnecessary searches and seizures and all of that stuff.
So perhaps maybe, and of course the problem is that
the data gathered by these FIZA seven h two investigations
are all recorded and cataloged and digitized and are searchable.
So imagine a law enforcement or intelligence apparatus just simply

(27:58):
being able to search your name can call up a
bunch of your activity logs and then go after you
after the fact if they want to try to pursue
you for some kind of crimes, and they can do
that currently without a warrant.

Speaker 1 (28:12):
I imagine they're doing that if they want to. Anyway,
I just hope they're entertained by whatever they find, either
for me or you. Evan Brown, appreciate the time. Thank
you as always. You're welcome from Fox News Radio here
on news Radio eleven ten kfab. I think the Republicans
and the Freedom Caucus, they're certainly asking the right questions
on this, but Americans have always said, I don't want

(28:33):
to be surveilled, we shouldn't do any of this, and
then we all watch twenty four and go get them,
Jack Bauer, get them. You know, some of these guys
I'm talking about CIA, FBI, Homeland Security, some of these
guys they are going after really bad guys, like the
person I just described. We just got this student here
on the Chinese student visa who had a package labeled

(28:54):
women's underwear sent by the Chinese government to his doorstep.
Turns out it wasn't women underwear, it was the Ebola virus.
To be sorry not Abola e Coli virus to be
unleashed here in the Midwest, and they're gonna say, see,
if we don't have the ability to surveil bad guys,
then then we're all gonna get e coal. I I

(29:16):
don't know. I like I say all the time about
these people.

Speaker 3 (29:19):
There's a sweet spot between too much and not enough.

Speaker 1 (29:22):
Yeah, I always say this about these people. I hope
they know what they're doing. They're in charge. At a
conversation to start off the program an hour and a
half ago, about how the family of this kid, Kyler,
who a three year old, who was with a friend
of the fathers, they went to Walmart seventy second Street
in Omaha on Tuesday morning, and that's when this lady,

(29:43):
armed with a knife that she picked up at Walmart, decided,
I need to harass and take a couple of slices
off of that kid, and marched the caretaker and the
shopping cart right down the aisle of Walmart and out
the door of police showed up, and we know what
happened next. The woman did take a couple of swipes

(30:04):
at this kid. He's got a pretty bad cut on
his head and on his hand, But he is mending
and he is an absolute trooper, much more so than
any of us would have been in that situation. I'm
not sure how, Jim, how do you think you'd react
as suddenly this woman came up to you at Walmart
and cut you in the head. Do you think you

(30:24):
would just sit there and not cry?

Speaker 3 (30:26):
Or well, if it were me in the year twenty
twenty six, she wouldn't get any closer than what a
nine milimeter would allow.

Speaker 1 (30:34):
But to play along, you're tough guy. I definitely would cry. Yeah,
you're crying about it now.

Speaker 4 (30:41):
I'd squeal like a stuck pig. Yeah. I can see
a tear in your eye right now. I would cry
if she got to me with that knife.

Speaker 2 (30:47):
Yeah.

Speaker 1 (30:48):
I definitely put yourself then in these shoes. Because the
family met with the media yesterday, kid is doing it
better than can be expected with all of this as
of today.

Speaker 4 (30:58):
Yeah, and.

Speaker 3 (31:01):
Apparently he doesn't like to go outside anymore. His mom
says he used to love to play outside, but this
morning he said, I don't want to go outside.

Speaker 1 (31:09):
It's too dangerous out there. That was less than twenty
four hours after this happened. Hopefully that will this trauma
will subside, right, But what about the trauma for the
mom she went on social media. Someone should have restrained her,
They should have boxed her out from going on social media.
She said on Tuesday night. She eventually had to stop

(31:29):
going on social media because of all the people telling
the Bamaha police, you shouldn't have shot this woman. Why
didn't you use a taser? Put yourself in her shoes? Well,
not only do you see that image of a woman.
We've seen this picture, the woman with the knife raised
and there's her son. This isn't some kid we don't know,
that's her son in the shopping cart and the gun

(31:52):
trained on the woman.

Speaker 4 (31:54):
She's shot.

Speaker 1 (31:55):
You're thankful, the whole situation is still very thankful. The
brain and then you see someone going why they have
to shoot her?

Speaker 3 (32:04):
Well, that explains this to me, Scott. I don't know
these people who have chimed in on social media, but
my first inclination is they're very liberal.

Speaker 4 (32:13):
Number one.

Speaker 3 (32:13):
Number two, they've never had kids, they probably won't ever
have kids, and they don't like kids. If you have
a child, if you're a parent of a child, even
if that child is thirty years old, there is a
genetic physiological reaction inside of you that says I will
do anything I can to protect that child. That's just

(32:36):
the nature of being one, especially a mother, okay who
carried it for nine months. So anybody who would suggest
to the mother of this little boy, well, how dare
you think that way? I would say, it's time for
you to lie down, It's time for you to up
the prescription and stay off social media, or go have

(32:56):
a kid and get back to me. I don't know
how in the community of Omaha, and you know how
small this city is, it's all like you meet from someone.

Speaker 1 (33:06):
From one million in the world. It is, it's like, hey,
where'd you go to high school? Why didn't you graduated?
I know that guy? Do you know so and so?
Is always how that goes? How you would in this
community post on there and go I don't know why
cops had to had to had to shoot this woman.
Why couldn't they have shot the knife out of her hand?
Why couldn't they shot in the movies, shot off her

(33:28):
pinky toe or something like that. Why couldn't a mental
health counselor talk her down? If I'm this kid's why
would anyone these look any discussion. Point is is fair game.
I'm fine with all of that, But on social media
where this family, where this kid's five older siblings are
going to see all of this, and you're on there

(33:49):
going why'd they have to, you know, shoot her?

Speaker 4 (33:51):
Why couldn't they have used a taser? It's a stupid question.

Speaker 1 (33:54):
Police will tell you that they use tasers on people
all the time, and sometimes the tasers have no effen.
You can still swing a knife after getting tanged sometimes
if you're in a case like this woman was.

Speaker 4 (34:05):
Which is out of her mind.

Speaker 3 (34:06):
Also, if they use a taser, it might tase the
little kid, okay, which could kill the little kid. That
it's a stupid question from a stupid person, or a
series of stupid people, or a stupid question from somebody
who's never had kids. But I gotta tell you, you
talk about you talk about a hero. This lady Rs. Mitchell,
who was in the parking lot and kind of confronted him.

(34:30):
By the looks of things, for got reports she got involved.
She stepped in and said what are you doing? And
this is a schizophrenic, a violent schizophrenic who has a
knife that can kill someone in an instant. Either miss Mitchell.
Certainly the little boy. She delayed this long enough for

(34:50):
the cops to get there. If she doesn't, then a
couple of things could have possibly happened. Number One, she
takes the kid away in a car, we don't know
what happens then, or she kills the kid right there
in the parking lot. So miss Mitchell Ris Mitchell, and
she took the shirt that she had just bought from
Walmart that she was gonna wear at a job interview
and use that to bind up the little boy's wounds,

(35:12):
which again was just remarkably heroic. And so there are
a lot of people like that, but you know that.
And yesterday, full disclosure, Yesterday I was pretty upset with
the judge. And I don't know who it is. I
think I've narrowed it down. I've seen a name. Yeah,
I don't know. I don't want to say that name
because it may not be true. And we do know

(35:33):
that there is there is a percentage of us out
there who take out our frustrations on judges.

Speaker 1 (35:38):
A lot of people emailing yesterday all mad about this judge.
Why was this woman two years ago?

Speaker 4 (35:43):
Judge? This judge on the river?

Speaker 1 (35:45):
Well, I mean this is something people should be outraged about,
and that is two years ago. She takes a swing
at her dad with a knife, lights him on, tries
to light him on fire, goes down to the local church,
try takes a swing at a priest with a knife,
tries to set the church on fire. And then the
way the people see it is a judge said, oh,

(36:07):
you know, not guilty by reason of insanity.

Speaker 4 (36:09):
Let her go.

Speaker 1 (36:10):
And she's just out walking around for a couple of
years until she takes a knife and does this thing
at the walmart the other day, and people are like.

Speaker 4 (36:16):
Who is this judge? That was one of them.

Speaker 1 (36:19):
I think I know who the judge is, but I
was saying yesterday it could be this judge really didn't
have a lot of parameters to go outside of them
to do anything more meaningful here. And that's the problem,
more though than the judge's prerogative here.

Speaker 4 (36:34):
It is true, and that's one of the reasons.

Speaker 3 (36:36):
And I kind of popped off about the judge myself
because I thought it's stayed to Nebraska. This is a
law and order stay. We have to have really strict
laws about this. This is some liberal judge, but it's
very probable that this judge says, this sucks that I
got a call, you know, because the laws in Nebraska
are very, very soft when it comes to the scope
of what a mental patient. And I got some education

(36:59):
on this from law enforcement and some legislative people yesterday.
In the state of Nebraska, what qualifies as a dangerous
individual who's been diagnostically declared mentally unstable is very very soft.
And to Kathleen Couth's credit, this is the state senator
who's really done a great job with public safety. She

(37:20):
actually sponsored a bill in this last legislative session that
would greatly close those gaps and say, look, if you've
done something and you're mentally we got to find a
way to lock you up or restrict you. That bill
didn't get out of committee this year. She'll probably bring
it back next year. But the thing is, Scott, this
happens all the time in this country. You have mentally

(37:41):
deranged people who go out and violently attack people and
destroy property.

Speaker 4 (37:47):
But it takes a case like this, or it takes
a case.

Speaker 3 (37:51):
Like Robert Hawkins that is so outrageous and so pushes
the bounds of reality that without the action isn't taken
so hopefully a three year old little boy who came
this close to getting his throat slashed in a parking
lot in broad daylight will compel people to say, all right, enough,

(38:13):
we have to do more.

Speaker 1 (38:14):
There are any number of things you could look at
over the years and say, why didn't it happen after this?
Why But because we haven't had it happen, or people
just assumed, well, obviously if someone does something like try
and you'll kill her dad and said dad on fire
and then go down to the church and set it
on fire, obviously she's gonna be locked away. Well, now
you know that's not the case, and we can change it.

(38:35):
Let's call it Kyler's law. Yeah, change it. Love having
you hang out with us. On news radio eleven ten KFAB,
they took a poll on something related to the president,
and it turns out about half the country don't like it.
By the ways, that's every poll on everything related to
the president of the United States. I don't know if
anyone's heard the news, but about half the country doesn't

(38:58):
like anything the president. Donald Trump could come out today
on True Social today it's and and say it's Thursday,
and people like, oh that liar, it's Friday Eve. At best,
it's overtime Wednesday, it's not Thursday because Trump said so.

Speaker 3 (39:13):
Well, it's fifty percent of the country, but one percent
of the congressional Democrats, I'm sorry, ninety nine percent. John
Fetterman's the only one. Yeah, well, yeah, he's the only
one that doesn't hate Trump. He's the only one that
doesn't hate Trump. I don't like Trump, but it doesn't
hate Trump certainly.

Speaker 1 (39:26):
And there are some Republicans who aren't doing all Trump's
business and marching orders. We talked about an hour ago
with Fox News radios Evan Brown. Some Republicans are holding
up Trump saying we need to have this warrantless surveillance,
the phizes stuff, because there's a lot of bad guys
out there and we're trying to get them. And there
are some Republicans saying, I don't know. You were the

(39:48):
one that said you didn't like PISA before, but you
like it now that you're the president. Makes me nervous.
President wanted to sign one hundred dollars bills. Turns out
half of the country says, I don't want Donald Trump's
name on my money. Fine, give it to me. We'll
take it. And by the way, as all this is
going on, we're less than a week away from that

(40:10):
two weeks term that President Trump gave Iran. He said,
all right, you guys bought yourself two weeks. But if
you guys don't sign a piece of deal or whatever
that says you're not going to have nuclear weapons, then
we're going to blow you guys to Kingdom. Come, well,
that's coming up here in next week. Does anyone really
think that we're going to go in there and just

(40:32):
nuke Iran because they didn't in two weeks decide to
go against fifty years of regime rule there. They wanted
to blow Israel in America off the map.

Speaker 3 (40:42):
Yeah, you know, you can't really pay any attention to
what the president says or what he writes on truth social.

Speaker 4 (40:48):
Well you just blew the entire radio show. Well, no,
that's all we do.

Speaker 3 (40:53):
But you can follow his actions. His actions are very telling.
But he goes on social media for the marketplace, on
social media to calm the markets and say we're making progress.
I mean, this is why he does these interviews, these
long form interviews. He just reminds people don't worry. The
war will be over soon. Don't worry. The market will
be back to where it needs to be. Don't worry

(41:13):
interest rates are going to go down. Don't worry inflation
is going to go We did it the first Trump administration, going.

Speaker 4 (41:20):
To do it again. He does that.

Speaker 3 (41:21):
Still Wall Street is calm because one of the things
that worries Trump about the midterms is if people say,
wait a minute, I was here with my four to
oh one K plan a year ago, Now I'm down here.

Speaker 4 (41:33):
He can't tolerate that.

Speaker 3 (41:35):
And even though people talk about gas prices, I say, well,
what about healthcare price has been Nobody wants to talk
about that. So he does this as a means for
a short term fix on the pain and suffering of
the marketplace. But yeah, on Wednesday, that's the deadline. Wednesday's
the two week deadline. If they don't have a deal
with the Iranians to give up their nuclear program, turn

(41:57):
over the uranium, turn over the yellow invite the inspectors
in to go anywhere they want and open up the straits,
he's gonna start bombing them again. And he knows that
the market could take a hit if that happens. Look,
the S and P is at an all time high.
The Nasdaq hit an all time high.

Speaker 1 (42:14):
And they're going up here today in the pre trading
twenty fifteen minutes or so before the market opens. But
you know, taco will be trending next week if the
president doesn't do anything that's that's taco. Trump always chickens
out tac.

Speaker 4 (42:28):
Oh, No, well he doesn't. No, he's utiates.

Speaker 1 (42:32):
He's laid waste just about everything iron can do, and
he's just trying to get them to say, all right,
I don't know who's in charge, get in your wheelchair
or get your little crutch and come up to the
negotiating table and say, all right, fine, you guys win.
We're not going to try and develop nuclear weapons, and
we're not going to bomb any oil tankers going through
the straight of Home. Horn moves and then Trump goes, great,

(42:54):
let's help you rebuild. Do you guys want a casino?
Do you like golf? Do you want a golf course?
We can do Trump International Tour run right here. It'd
be great. The Live Tour can stop over there. You
guys will love it. No one everyone will be talking
about like golf.

Speaker 3 (43:05):
Hey, you guys like golf, You gotta tell But there's
more to it. It's the nuclear question. Iran has been
very very and we know this. We've been following the news.
You know this, I know this, we all know this.
They've said, we're not gonna give that up. And the
President says, yeah, you are. We can live with about
anything else. We can live with you funding the hou Thies,

(43:28):
we can live with you funding ams. We don't like it,
but we can live with it. What we can't live
with is you doing ballistic missiles and a nuclear weapon.

Speaker 4 (43:36):
So that's it. And uh, I don't know.

Speaker 3 (43:40):
I think they're up to ten thousand troops that are
in the region. Will they go on shore? Trump says,
I don't know, they might, It's up to them. And
Nixon used to do this very very effectively. He would
let people think, I'm half crazy. I might drop a
nuke on North Vietnam. You just never know. And Trump's
the same way. He doesn't speak with clarity because that's

(44:03):
a negotiating weapon.

Speaker 4 (44:05):
The question of what he'll do is just as powerful. Oh, yes,
what he does.

Speaker 1 (44:09):
Either Trump actually is half crazy or he just wants
them to think he wants them to think either way.

Speaker 4 (44:15):
Nixon wasn't crazy. He was a crook, but he wasn't
crazy either way.

Speaker 1 (44:18):
We're going towards the same ends here, which is to
keep these maniacs from having a nuclear weapon. I would
like to see the president say, all right, we'll let
you guys enrich uranium, but you have to do it
at the Vatican.

Speaker 4 (44:28):
Ah.

Speaker 3 (44:29):
Well, and again the frustrating thing to most of the
people who know this and recognize this, and it's most
people over the age of fifty, they will tell you
that it might be bad now, but if a nuclear
bomb goes off somewhere in the world. And I had
an email from a super liberal yesterday who said, this

(44:50):
has Okay, Hey, if this happens, let me tell you
what will happen. If a nuclear bomb goes off anywhere
in the world. The American stock market will go down
fifty percent. If that happens. You think you got financial
problems now, you think the price of gas is high,
Now it'll go to twelve dollars a gallon in California

(45:12):
and seven dollars a gallon in Omaha. You don't quite
appreciate the impact of a nuclear weapon in the hands
of a terrorist state.

Speaker 1 (45:22):
Yeah, go ahead and say that again, except this time
actually care about the humans who would be eviscerated in
the attack, and not your four oh one K and
what you'd pay at the pump.

Speaker 3 (45:31):
But again, say that first, and then those are people
are only thinking about themselves.

Speaker 4 (45:36):
That's what you just said. They are there will go well.

Speaker 3 (45:39):
Wait a minute, I hate Trump, and my gas prices
are up and food prices are up, and I only
got a seven percent raise.

Speaker 1 (45:46):
This year TMZ, which is ambush paparazzi, and I hate
that stuff. I don't go to the website. They had
a TV show for a while, maybe they still do,
but I'll give them credit on this one. They finally
now tapped into where America is these days, and where

(46:07):
we are is we don't care about celebrities. And after all,
most of the celebrities are putting all their stuff out
there on social media, and they're literally putting their stuff
out there on social media, and most Americans would care
less about whatever Taylor Swift or whatever. They want to
know what Lindsey Graham is up to. And so TMZ

(46:30):
has now got ambush style paparazzi in Washington, d C.
Chasing around members of Congress and trying to get them
to say something stupid, or see a picture of them
being all pervy with a lobbyist or something like that.
One of them was out there fighting with Ted Cruz
the other day. He'll be a favorite target of TMZ.

(46:55):
They were trying to They say, Hey, Ted, pick aside
the Pope, the President, pick pick a side. Cruz says
both of them speak for themselves and accused TMZ of
trying to drag him into a fight between the President
and the Pope. Hey, Senator, that's where all of America
is on everything anymore. They don't want TMZ going after

(47:16):
the lead singer of the whatever pop band is kay
popping its way to the top of the charts. They
want to know, Hey, Lindsey Graham, what do you think
about this bit? And so now TMZ is all in
on politics because that's where the American people are right now,
which is weird. We've all picked sides.

Speaker 3 (47:32):
Jim Winn, you know that when we were growing up,
did you ever hear anyone, whether we were like teenagers
or our parents, really ever say a whole heck of
a lot about taking politics personally?

Speaker 2 (47:44):
No?

Speaker 4 (47:44):
Never did.

Speaker 3 (47:45):
I mean, I grew up in a house of Democrats,
and they were New Deal Democrats. They were Harry Truman,
Edmund Muskie Democrats, JFK Democrats. The Democrat Party under John F.
Kennedy bears absolutely zero semblance to the Democrat Party today.

Speaker 1 (48:02):
And when you see young people today, you have to
have the right stuff on your social media otherwise, oh,
we know what you're all about. And don't you dare
say anything positive about Charlie Kirk otherwise, you know. And
so that's where all that is now. I didn't I
apparently knew. We had a guy come to speak to
my school. I had to say, now, what's his name?

(48:24):
Bob carry Yeah, okay, let's listen to him for a
little bit.

Speaker 3 (48:27):
You've never had two more austere financial governors in the
history of the state that Bob Kerrey and ultimately US
Senator Ed Zarinsky these were and Jim Exon. These guys
vetoed spending bills like you wouldn't believe. Uh, But that's
because they approached the job very differently. And the social

(48:48):
issues did not govern the Democrat Party for many, many
years like it does today. You know, they didn't worry
about gays and homosexuals and transgender people, and DEI and
BLF they said, Look, my job as governor of Nebraska
or as president of the United States is to look
at the country and what's in its best interest.

Speaker 2 (49:06):
Yeah.

Speaker 4 (49:06):
Now they're worried about both gays and homosexual all of
the above. Yeah, both of them.

Speaker 1 (49:11):
Now you name it animal, vegetable, or mineral. This is
news Radio eleven ten kfab. Do you guys know anyone
who went through this, which is an increasing number of
people in America. You had two people seem to be
happily married or maybe just resigned to well this. I

(49:31):
guess this is what we're doing. And sometimes it's a
distinction without a difference. I guess if I mean from
across the street. What's the line from this new HBO
show that I don't know if I want to say
the acronym on the air, but the line is everyone
looks normal from across the street. So you see this
couple and they seem to be doing fine, and then

(49:54):
you notice a change. She has been using a rapid
amount of weight for whatever reason. Maybe it was diet
and exercise, or maybe it's some of the various diet
drugs and injections that are available on the market that
cause people to lose all their body weight immediately, and

(50:18):
then suddenly she is out buying new clothes and she
seems a little different, and the next thing you know,
you don't see her or him anymore. Because the amount
of divorces tied to ozempic right now, and like drugs,
is going through the roof. I don't know what is

(50:41):
more responsible for divorce. Facebook back in the twenty tens,
when people are like, all right, well what is this Facebook?
And they reconnect with their old high school girlfriend or whatever.
Facebook was responsible for a lot of divorces, and now
some of these GLP ones are responsible for a lot
of divorces. I know someone who's been through it.

Speaker 4 (51:02):
Because of that.

Speaker 3 (51:04):
I know somebody who got divorced because of viagra. Viagra
allowed guys to hop the corral thinking okay, now I'm
in the game.

Speaker 1 (51:14):
Well I think you need more than viagra. I think
you also need the opportunity or willing they look, they
go looking for it as well. It does act as
a bit of a divining rod to find it.

Speaker 4 (51:24):
Yes, it does.

Speaker 3 (51:26):
So you're talking about drugs that are causing people to
make poor choices, Well, I'm talking about how people suddenly
and they kill a lot better about themselves than confidence
level is up. They're willing to take a few swings
of the bat and once in a while they hit
the ball.

Speaker 1 (51:41):
Basically, it comes down to this. I mean, you've been
married for a long time. I've been married for a
long time. Lucy's been married for years long time. If
any of our spouses suddenly take a slightly different direction,
whether it's their health, their appearance, whatever, are we doing
enough as spouses for them to take us with them

(52:03):
on that journey or are we all just are they
one step further away from realizing, you know what I
can do better than that person.

Speaker 3 (52:13):
You know, I wish, I wish I could tell you
I'm not a marriage and family counselor they would know
the answer to those questions.

Speaker 5 (52:20):
You know.

Speaker 3 (52:20):
Look, it's the human condition is hard to track. Everybody's
a little different and what causes one group to behave
a certain.

Speaker 4 (52:30):
Way maybe very different from the other group.

Speaker 3 (52:32):
But I think if you put the other person number one,
or at least close to number one most of the time,
I think you're in pretty good shape.

Speaker 4 (52:39):
Yeah.

Speaker 1 (52:39):
Well, if if you're with someone and you think, no,
wait a second, if she suddenly loses thirty pounds. How
am I doing over here? She starts losing weight and
it yeah, suddenly you got to step up your game, man.

Speaker 3 (52:54):
Well, Doctor Laura used to talk about that all the
time when she'd get a phone call from some lady
who is unhappy with her husband, and you know, she's thinking,
it's just not he doesn't show any interest in me anymore.
And he's always talking about I don't know what he's
doing online, but he's always talking about his high school days.
She'd say, well, what do you look like? And they'd go,

(53:17):
what do you mean it? Well, do you work out?
Do you walk every day? Do you watch your die?

Speaker 4 (53:22):
Well?

Speaker 1 (53:23):
No?

Speaker 3 (53:24):
And they well, maybe if you would make yourself a
little more attractive, he might notice. And uh, and I
used to find that God, how does that go over
with these women? But they keep listening and they keep asking,
Oh my gosh. She would ask that all and in
her books she would say, you know ten stupid things
things women do to screw up their lives, and one
of them.

Speaker 4 (53:44):
Is let yourself go.

Speaker 1 (53:45):
I missed the Doctor Laura show simply because you'd have
at least once an hour a woman would call up
there and say Hi, Doctor Laura. I am my kid's mom.
I listen to you every single day. I had never
miss a word of anything you say. I'm such a
big fan. I have all your books. Anyway, here's my
question of my various babies daddies. You know, one of

(54:06):
them wants to bring another person into this relationship, and
should I let him?

Speaker 4 (54:10):
You know, like, how in the world have you been
listening to me? You haven't abided by anything I've ever said.
You already know the answer to this question.

Speaker 3 (54:18):
You needed at least one beheading every half hour to
stay listening to the Doctor Lorras show. But yeah, yeah,
they'd say. Okay, So I'm with my boyfriend. We've had
three kids together, and I'm I wonder when's he gonna
ask me to marry him?

Speaker 1 (54:31):
Yeah, as soon as Doctor Laura. And she's like, my fiance,
you gotta ring a date. You got to ringing a date.
I talked to them. He's stun paid.

Speaker 4 (54:39):
Horror.

Speaker 1 (54:39):
I turned my radio up, going all here we go,
Doctor Laura is gonna get one here