Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Good morning, and thank you very much for spending so
much time with us. We absolutely are honored by your
presence here on news Radio eleven ten kfab especially me,
I am Scott Vorhees. Lucy Chapman is right there. She's
I say, mildly honored, but she's across two different radio stations,
(00:21):
and she's won so many awards and accolades that she
honestly doesn't care anymore. But me, I'm a hack and
an tell people that, even though I've been doing this
for thirty years, still fledgling and amateur. So I am
honored to have anyone spend any time with this radio program.
(00:42):
Don't tell people.
Speaker 2 (00:43):
What but I haven't won any awards?
Speaker 1 (00:46):
No, I said, you have won countless award.
Speaker 2 (00:48):
No, but I haven't won a single award.
Speaker 1 (00:50):
No, because you won several. Oh, you haven't won a
single one. You've won several. I've given you most of them.
Speaker 2 (00:57):
Yeah, that's true. Well, my name's not even on him.
You just wrote it on there with a sharpie.
Speaker 1 (01:03):
I crossed out someone else's name and put yours on there.
Omaha World, Harold has a story here that's sure to
make some sphincter's pucker has to do with a and
it's not the world Harold that did it, it's the
they're passing along. Researchers have said, hey, good news. We've
(01:23):
identified a possible link between things that mothers to be
are taking when their baby is in utero that suddenly
then lead to an increased risk of autism. And people
are like nope or yeah, see why. And it's so
(01:51):
I have to always find the humor in something, and
sometimes it's harder to do that. But in this one,
it's not not only what these researchers are saying. They're like, look,
we six million medical records of moms and babies. So
it's not like we just got a wild hair and
(02:12):
said ask Shirley over there what she took six million
medical records and they found that there are fifteen prescription
drugs as well as I mean, it's everything from high
blood pressure and cholesterol medication to drugs for anti anxiety,
(02:35):
antipsychotic drugs, antidepressant and sometimes especially if you're taking more
than one of these things, it does tend to lead
to a higher risk of autism. And then as they
go over these details, the Dean and director of the
unmc monroe Meyer Institute. The senior author of the study,
(02:56):
doctor Mernix at UNMC, says, this has nothing to do
with politics. This is science. Well, doctor Mehernick, I don't
know if you've noticed, but there is no science anymore.
There is only that which comports with what we want
to believe politically, and that's true of everything, the results
(03:18):
of an election, the results of your research study, whether
or not the head of some chicken restaurant approves of
gay marriage. It's all politics. But then the question is
what should be done about this. I'll tell you some
of the details, and all of this is in the
(03:39):
Omaha World Herald. I'm not going to read the entire article.
I don't read so good. Many of these drugs are
among the most commonly prescribed drugs in the United States,
four hundred million annual prescriptions. So when you suddenly say, well,
I'm having a baby, are you then supposed to go
(04:02):
to your doctor and say, I saw in the newspaper
or I heard on the AM radio that sometimes when
I'm taking anti anxiety and antidipress and drugs also stuff
to control my high blood pressure and cholesterol, it turns
out my kid might have a higher risk of autism,
and they say, yeah, they study did show that. And
then they're saying, well, should I stop taking these things? Well,
(04:24):
you know, we don't really, Okay, so what are we
supposed to do with this information? Not me, I think
I'm done bringing kids into this world, contributing to bringing
kids into this world. I think I don't know the
weekend's coming up. But the study says, we're not saying
(04:50):
the drugs are unsafe. We're stressing that pregnant women taking
these medications should not stop taking them without consulting with
their healthcare without consulting with their health care provider. Well,
your healthcare providers got their own political acts to grind.
Says suddenly stopping essential medications could prove more harmful than
(05:12):
the increased risk of autism. And then there are people saying, well,
wait a second, why are you saying, why are you
saying we need to get rid of autism? Like, well,
we're not even saying that they're autistic. Kids are unique
and special and beloved in their own way. And the
spectrum is such that you'll meet some people and you'll
(05:34):
immediately go, I think that person's autistic. And you'll meet
other people kids and adults and they'll say, yeah, I'm
on the spectrum and you go, huh, I didn't get that,
and it's all you know, there are people with autism
who have a hard time taking care of themselves, and
there are people with autism who are elon musk. That's
why it's called a spectrum, not a pinpoint. So there's
(05:59):
no particular link. That's saying, all right, if you're having
a baby and you take this and that, your kids, definitely,
But they are saying that it is an increased risk,
so much so that especially if you take more than
one of these medications, and there are some who take
(06:20):
four or more drugs, and it does put it into
a much higher percentage risk. And I'm sure there'll be people,
and by people, I mean Lucy Chapman who is saying,
what about the food that we're eating that wasn't part
of this study. You can talk to Secretary Kennedy about
all of that. But UNMC is passing along saying it's
(06:41):
a possible link here between prenatal prescriptions for commonly used
medications and an increased risk of autism among those babies
who were in utero while mom is taking antipsychotics. And
also even though I don't want to be psychotic, but
I also don't want to have high cholesterol. So now
(07:06):
what happens in this study is you get people of
all different political persuasions yelling either yeah, here, here, and
no one should take anything, or this is horrible. Why
are they saying they're gonna make moms feel bad? And
in the midst of all of this, you have moms
of kids with autism who are maybe not particularly political,
(07:27):
because amazingly there are a lot of people who aren't
particularly political. None of them have social media accounts. They've
just stayed away from all that. They're the ones who
at the office when someone brings up Trump just kind
of run over and go, I think the toner is
low on this printer, and they stay away from it.
There are people who shy away from some of the
(07:48):
political stuff. Some of them are moms, and some of
these moms have kids with autism, and they're the ones
who are looking going, did I do something wrong? It
because of something that I did that made my kid
have autism? I'll point out, yes, there is an increased
(08:09):
risk of you taking things that were prescribed by a
doctor that you didn't know led to an increased risk
that may have contributed to your kid being autistic. But
there are also six million mom and baby medical records
checked here. There are also the overwhelming majority of these
(08:30):
kids who are autistic their moms didn't take any of
these medications. So it's an increase risk. But it's not like, yeah,
we looked at the study. It turns out if you
take any of this stuff, your kid is a much
better chance of being autistic. For those moms who didn't
take any of these medications, none of their kids are autistic.
(08:50):
That's not the case. That's not what this study shows.
My point of bringing this up is I think all
of this is very interesting, especially with the political ramifications
of it, and the real big issue is whether or
not people are going to be allowed to ask these questions,
(09:12):
delve deeper into this and should we then take it
to other things, whether it's medications, whether it's that which
is in the food, whether it's vaccines. Are people going
to then say, all right, let's take this study even further?
And I wonder if we even get this study if
(09:34):
not for the Trump administration and Health and Human Services
Director RFK Junior saying we are going to ask these questions.
We are going to delve into these links. However, uncomfortable
some of these details might be. I think that the
American people owe it. We owe it to the American
people to try and answer their questions, approve or disprove.
(09:56):
And people are like, but you already have you your answer,
You already know, and you're gonna try and push whatever
findings into the answer that you think you already have.
You don't think other Health and Human Services or CDC
directors had the exact same feelings on the other side
of the political spectrum, which goes back to the study
(10:19):
author from UNMC saying, this isn't politics, it's science. Wrong.
It's all politics. Everything from medication you're taking with a baby,
to what that street light is doing down there, to
what happened how come I'm paying more for groceries and
(10:40):
I seem to be getting less in groceries. It's all politics.
All these people that say, like, I don't get involved
in politics, but you're an idiot. You got to get
at least somewhat involved. Do you ever go to one
of the meetings there the like a school, what's the
word I'm looking a teacher, a parent, teacher conference. Who
(11:00):
are these people? Do you ever go to a parent
teacher conference? Big time politics. It's all politics now, and uh,
that's that's for babies. Let's go to the other end
of the age spectrum. And a column in the New
York Times this week that says, old people, I love you,
(11:23):
but it's time for you to go. Wait like wait what?
And how old does someone have to be before they're
considered old? Because my gray hair would suggest that maybe
I might be in this. I'll tell you what this
is all about. And just a moment, Scott Byes, this
is news radio eleven ten kfab She's Lucy Chapman. She's
(11:45):
right over there, see her, Lucy. Poke your head up.
Say hi to the nice people.
Speaker 2 (11:50):
Hello to the nice people.
Speaker 1 (11:52):
I'm Scott Vorhees.
Speaker 2 (11:53):
I don't know where that came from. Yeah, no, I
so much doubt Abby.
Speaker 1 (11:57):
I want you to speak in a British accent and
for the rest of the next thirty seconds, and then
we can't take it anymore. Agism is awful and should
be rooted out, says Samuel Moyne, columnist with the New
York Times, and then proceeds to talk about how we
really need to practice more agism in this country and
(12:20):
root out the old people from controlling everything. The column
here says that a jerrintocratic society. I don't know if
I'm saying that correctly. It seems to be a word
that he just made up having to do with that again,
jer untocratic as in gerontology, older people, senior citizens, and
(12:49):
therefore a jar antocratic society is a word that he
seems to be a phrase he's using to suggest it's
old people who are running everything. It says, it's a
societ in which the old control ever more power and wealth,
leading to over representation and political life and unequal power
(13:11):
in social life. Got a book coming out, jern to
Gerontocracy will say it that way in America, arguing that
senior citizens collectively wheeled outsize power thanks to a slew
of factors. And you know what these factors are. I'll
(13:32):
use the words that Sam is using in a moment,
But you know what the you know what what I'm
getting from all this is and this is so awful,
and I'm glad that he's exposing it. There are people
who have been born and raised with work ethic, and
then they use that work ethic to do the best
(13:55):
that they could in school and then take a job,
do the best they could at that job, move up
in the job, put money away for retirement, and not
outlive their means by spending on things that they didn't need,
so they would someday be able to have wealth that
would accumulate. They put it into the stock market, they
put it into retirement accounts, they put it into real estate,
(14:18):
and then some of them even began to own their
own businesses and they employed other people. And it turns
out that that wealth does tend to grow. And then therefore,
when you're older and you've worked your entire life and
you've made smart decisions, it turns out you have more
wealth and you do own property, more so than a
twenty three year old who has no hope of moving
(14:39):
out of mom and dad's place ever in the history
of ever. And this author is saying, that's strong. What
we need to have is a little bit of spread
the wealth and the power and try and take away
some of the power from these old people with all
their money and all their Yeah, you don't have to
make up a word word and gerontocracy, we already have
(15:02):
a word for this. Communism, which is having an ever
increasing foothold in America, especially but not limited to young people.
He's arguing that seniors collectively wheeled their outsized power. Oh yeah,
(15:23):
that's another thing they do. You know what these old
people do. The young people don't do They vote? The
nerve of these people. When can we get rid of
all these old people? Can we throw them in the
harbor like that tea in Boston? Oh, it turns out
they can swim. They learned to swim. Who taught them
(15:46):
how to swim? Look, they're just swimming back. Yeah. They
dominate low turnout elections by voting. This is the whiniest
thing in my NPRB April first wet dream I couldn't
conceive of. But I'm going to write down some notes.
We're going to do this next year is April First Guy.
(16:08):
Samuel Moyne, author writing in a New York Times opinion piece,
that old people have too much wealth to and exhibit
too much power in this.
Speaker 2 (16:16):
Country, and he wants to kill them.
Speaker 1 (16:17):
Oh we need No, he doesn't say we need to
kill him, we need to just do something about it.
Speaker 2 (16:22):
But he makes no suggestions on.
Speaker 1 (16:24):
What he he urges policies that push power and resources
away from seniors, you know, like medicare now to he
wants to push that power and resources downwards. So it's
age caps for whether it's politicians or judges, structural voting
(16:48):
voting reforms that what you have a like, hey, if
you're too old, If if you're going straight from getting
a Grand Slam dinner at four fifteen pm, yes to
go to vote. You are too old to vote? If
(17:09):
you if your buddy texts you Friday night at eight
thirty and says, hey, you should come hang out. A
few people showed up here after this thing, and we're
going to be here for a little bit. You should
come out. And you're like, it's eight thirty, I've already
in bed, I've had my pajamas on for an hour
and a half. Then you're too old to vote?
Speaker 2 (17:28):
How old is this guy?
Speaker 1 (17:30):
I don't know.
Speaker 2 (17:31):
I'm sure we don't.
Speaker 1 (17:32):
Know eighty one. I don't know how old he is,
all right, I'm guessing he's probably young.
Speaker 2 (17:38):
Didn't justin Timberlake make a movie about this where nobody
got over the age of thirty, did he? Yeah, it's
a good movie though.
Speaker 1 (17:45):
Actually with acclaim.
Speaker 2 (17:48):
Remember it was on They had like a tattoo on
their wrist, justin Timberlake. Yeah, the singer.
Speaker 1 (17:54):
Yeah, that does sound familiar. I didn't see it. Let's
see here structural voting reforms, a lower voting age. Oh yeah,
because our sixteen year olds are so bright. Yeah, let's
let me tell you about sixteen year olds. I have
one in my house.
Speaker 2 (18:15):
Can you imagine your so voting?
Speaker 1 (18:16):
Yeah, it's okay. He's my son. So, my son who's
been told a bazillion times clean up after yourself. When
you take, you know, a plate and a cup somewhere
in the house, and then you come back in the
room where you got the plate and the cup from
the kitchen. When you leave that room and you drink
and eat whatever was in these items, and then you
(18:38):
come back to the kitchen without the plate and the cup.
Something that's gone terribly wrong. The plate and the cup
are now out there someplace, someplace they shouldn't be. They
need to come back with you, and then they need
to go in the dishwasher, not on the counter above
the dishwasher. Sometimes it'd be like, oh fun, and then
you'll put it near the dish washer. No, it's a
(19:01):
real easy. You just pull the thing open and put
the thing. He last night, I made the mistake of
checking to see how clean his room was. Eyes, my eyes.
I just stuck my head in there. And then when
he got back from basketball practice last night, I pulled
(19:23):
him over because he's like, I'm gonna do this. I'm
gonna do that. I'm gonna I said. I came over.
I said, son, you're not gonna do anything until you
clean your Oh yeah, oh yeah I was. I was
gonna do that, sure, sure you were. You know why
he won't do any of these things. I don't because
he's dumber than a bag of hair, just like his
(19:44):
old man. And we're gonna let him.
Speaker 2 (19:47):
Vote, please don't.
Speaker 1 (19:51):
Yeah, older Americans have too much influence because they vote.
They have too much money and too much property. You
know why, because they they've been working since they were
probably thirteen or fourteen years old.
Speaker 2 (20:05):
Can confirm except that the other part where I have
too much money and too much real estate, I can't
confirm that, but I can confirm working since.
Speaker 1 (20:15):
Oh yeah, but if you have some money and a property,
you're doing better than those people who aren't working. They've
now graduated with their degree in underwater philosophy, weaving, and
they can't get a job, and that's all someone else's
probably Donald Trump's fault, and someone's got to do something. Well,
guess what. You know what the funniest thing about this is,
(20:37):
you know who's not going to buy this guy's book.
The young people he's trying to influence. They don't read.
But nice, try loser, Yeah, nice try, young loser. You
whipper snapper, you jack an ape, gutter snipe. Damn kids.
(20:59):
Scott back to the other end of the spectrum. What
if you say, all right, all this stuff sounds scary,
I don't want to bring a child into this world,
not this world dangerous. Trump's gonna kill us all or
there's not gonna be a job for my kid or
what Okay, you're gonna even have a problem with that,
(21:23):
because did you know that the president's war in Iran
might lead to more children? It turns out the world's
biggest maker of condoms not the maker of the world's
biggest condoms, the biggest maker they make the most condoms.
Speaker 2 (21:45):
Is there one what the maker of the biggest condoms.
Speaker 1 (21:50):
That's that's a conversation. We're gonna have that conversation. I
got this slated for three and a half weeks from now,
so I don't want to get into that today because
I can't anyway. The world's biggest condom maker says the
war in Iran is poised to make condoms more expensive.
(22:11):
A company out of Malaysia, Oh, no, wonder they always
end up crashing into the ocean. It's a group called Carricks.
It's like a condom for Karen's Carricks, which turns out
more than five billion condoms a year. Let's see here
(22:34):
those would be It's Trojan not in here, Yeah, it
is Trojan. Other ones. I can't think of any other anyway.
They say the war in Iran has pushed up costs
for key materials for these propylactics, specifically rubber and night
(22:55):
Night Trial. Night Trial, wasn't that James Brown song?
Speaker 2 (23:01):
I think it was an HBO series.
Speaker 1 (23:02):
Oh and then there you know the foil packaging, the
silicone oil, all that stuff, all the key materials for this.
And they say, when the costs go up twenty to
thirty percent, we can't get the materials, so we can't
make as many of these and no more free ones,
(23:23):
and we have no choice but to transfer the costs
right now to the customers. Yeah, so what what are
you going to do? I mean, if you need one
of these? Uh, there are some options yet, student health
and them talking about every thing from your local college
to probably depending on the teacher, your local third grade
classroom probably has a whole fish bowl full of these.
(23:44):
You can just grab a handful for free. So there's
one option. If you have a rubber glove, that's five
right there you have. If you have a rubber glove
and some scissors, it's five condoms.
Speaker 2 (24:01):
Somebody's going to try that. You can't say that stuff.
People will try it. Do not try this at home?
Well there anywhere else for that?
Speaker 1 (24:12):
Another what about the break room at the office. Here's
another place you can get it. If you know some
guy in their you know, mid forties through about sixty
years old, chances are probably pretty good that we still
have one in a wallet. Probably good because you never know.
(24:34):
I put it in there in nineteen ninety three because
I heard that some kid in my school met a
girl who was into that kind of thing, and like, well,
I know, I'm only fifteen years old, but you never know,
and you gotta be ready it's what we learned is
boy scouts.
Speaker 2 (24:54):
You learned that in boys.
Speaker 1 (24:56):
Mostly not tying, but it was just the creed. You know,
you got to be ready, be prepared. So you put
that in the wallet, and then you get the ring
around the wallet, and then that stays in there, and
then someday when you might need it, you're like wait, wait, wait,
I got it, and you pull that dusty and it
just disintegrates. And that's why we have children. Oh there's
(25:21):
one other way that you cannot bring again into this world.
Don't have unprotected with the if you don't want to,
all right, so and then maybe this, maybe this would happen.
You know what's funny to so many people is how
(25:43):
careful they were when they were younger, Like I can't
get pregnant, I don't want to have a baby, I
don't want to I'm not ready to be a father,
all these different things, and so you were incredibly careful.
Me I I wasn't as careful as I wanted to be,
but by virtue of my looks and personality, it turns
out there weren't a lot.
Speaker 2 (26:04):
Of not necessarily, yeah, there weren't a lot of options.
Speaker 1 (26:07):
But for other people like they were always so nervous
and so careful. I'm not ready to be a parent.
And then you do everything the right way. You end
up getting married, and you decide that it's time to
plan for build a nest and plan for a family,
and then you try and bring a baby into this
world and it doesn't work, and you're like, well, if
(26:30):
I'd known that, I would have been an absolute oh
back in the anyway, Be that as it may. A
couple in Florida, congratulations to them. They used in vitro fertilization.
They have the same thing. They were having a hard
time bringing a baby into the world naturally. So they said,
all right, look, we're going to use science here. And
(26:50):
so we got the retrieval of the egg and everything
else that needs to go in there, and we put
it in here, and we froze this, and then we
went and said, okay, it's time for us to bring
a baby into this world. And they went back to
the clinic and they said absolutely, and they fertilized the
egg and now we have an embryo, and the embryo
is implanted, and a certain number of months later, here's
(27:13):
a baby. And the white couple looked at the baby
and said, this baby looks Asian, looks really really Asian.
And we're not like, well, maybe there's one of your parents.
And they're like, nope, we are. We are the whites.
It's our last name, it's who we are. Like, there's
(27:34):
no one whiter. My middle name is Wonderbread. We're the
whitest people. This is a this is a specifically, it
looks like a South Asian baby. Like, that's weird that
you would see that. And so they checked into it
and they said, all right, funny, funny, you're gonna laugh.
We implanted the wrong embryo.
Speaker 2 (27:57):
Yeah, no, kidding, somebody's having a payday.
Speaker 1 (28:00):
Yeah. And then they're like, well we had three in there.
So they go back to the families here and they're like,
I wonder whose kid this is. Let's see here the Nichols.
Now maybe not Jackson's, probably not Wang's.
Speaker 2 (28:16):
Ooh.
Speaker 1 (28:17):
So it turns out they found the parents who'd done
the same process to freeze the embryo or whatever. And
what do you do? I mean, you've this is this
is the big.
Speaker 2 (28:33):
Did the other couples have babies?
Speaker 1 (28:36):
Not not yet I don't think so. So now what
what do you do you just had this baby. It's
not your baby, but you just had it. It's their baby,
and now you're basically a surrogate to this couple's child.
Speaker 2 (28:52):
Over here, I say, you give the baby to the
the genetic biological parents, because clearly they want a baby.
They were there also.
Speaker 1 (29:01):
At some point. Well it not necessarily. Sometimes it's like
I want the option.
Speaker 2 (29:06):
Oh yeah, down the road back.
Speaker 1 (29:09):
Maybe they didn't. Yeah, that's that's the other thing. But
if they say, I mean, how do you go about
getting that phone call? I think we have your baby.
We don't have a baby. Now they did a mix
up and it turns out my wife just gave birth
to your baby. Do you want it? Like, show me
a picture, Show.
Speaker 2 (29:30):
Me a picture.
Speaker 1 (29:30):
Yeah, what's it looked like?
Speaker 2 (29:32):
It's like adopting a puppy. I don't know. Is it cute?
Speaker 1 (29:35):
Yeah? I wantn't you raise a little bit and house
break it because we're not ready for a baby. But
we'll take a good.
Speaker 2 (29:43):
Take a teenager, Yeah right, toddler, Maybe.
Speaker 1 (29:46):
Tell you what, whyn't you hold on to that baby
for us? And maybe if we end up having a baby,
we'll have your baby. We can negotiate a trade somewhere
down the line, or.
Speaker 2 (29:56):
If they both get paid because this obviously this clinic
screwed up both of them, then everybody's happy. The couple
can take the baby.
Speaker 1 (30:08):
No not, I mean not everyone.
Speaker 2 (30:10):
I mean you're never going to be.
Speaker 1 (30:11):
A money baby doesn't replace a baby baby. Anyway, last night,
when I saw my son's bedroom, you will take it
a check. I'd have traded him for five bucks.
Speaker 2 (30:23):
I'm talking about a baby that you haven't bonded with,
that is not genetically your baby.
Speaker 1 (30:29):
As soon as you find out congratulations, you're pregnant. You
have bonded with that baby.
Speaker 2 (30:33):
Well, there you have it. Then why are we talking
about it?
Speaker 1 (30:37):
I just you know, this is excruciating. I don't know
why you think it's so funny. Notice how I throw
her under the bus after making all those comments.
Speaker 2 (30:46):
Yeah, daily, all.
Speaker 1 (30:48):
Right, speaking of different colored babies, Michael Jackson movie is
coming out and people are mad about it. I'll tell
you why. Next. Scott Voice Radio eleven, tig Kia Baby
Lucy pulled a punch in that last segment, But it's okay,
Lucy because Darryl jumped in the inbox on the mix
(31:12):
up of the babies. Darryl said, I know what the
other couple said. I want my baby back, baby back,
baby back, baby back, baby back, baby back, baby back.
I want my baby back, baby back, baby back, baby back,
baby back.
Speaker 2 (31:24):
Do you want your.
Speaker 1 (31:26):
Do you want your baby back, baby back, baby back? Baby?
You know what they named that kid?
Speaker 2 (31:31):
Baby back bob a cue songs, Carolina Honey.
Speaker 1 (31:38):
It is one of the greatest commercials of all time.
I don't know why they don't do that. Yeah, that's
my Carolina Honey. Right there, that's Lucy Chapman. Hello, hr
I'll meet with you right after the show. I just
mean she's saucy, is it what?
Speaker 2 (31:53):
It's not getting anything better?
Speaker 1 (31:56):
You wait in twenty twenty six, I can't call you
a saucy little.
Speaker 2 (32:00):
I don't think you could ever do that.
Speaker 1 (32:01):
What can I What can I say about the jam
was a to What can I say about Jean Stother?
Speaker 2 (32:07):
There is a time when you could say it and
maybe get away with it, but there was never a
time that you could actually say it that you know
anybody would appreciate it.
Speaker 1 (32:15):
I tell you what you got, spunk, toots, you got moxie.
I like it. I'm Scott Vorhees and uh, we'll have
a new host here tomorrow. I knew Michael Jackson movies
coming out and I can't wait to see it. Scott,
can't you say anything right? Well, I can't. I'm a
I'm a gen xer. I was born in this I
was born in nineteen seventy six and now celebrating two
(32:37):
hundred and fifty years of America this year, which means
that I get to celebrate fifty years of Vorhees later
this year. I tell you what, it's a big year.
But you know, when you when you're born in nineteen
seventy six, that means you're in approximately first grade when
Michael Jackson's Thriller album was the biggest thing in the world.
That's an impressionable age. And I I listened to that
(33:04):
album constantly. And you know what, I still do love
Michael Jackson. Now. I know that there have been some accusations.
I've heard heard some accusations. Well, there's a movie coming
out called Michael and it's sanctioned by the Michael Jackson estate.
It stars his nephew who looks and sings and dances
(33:28):
just like him. Who is it is? It Jermaine's kid, Tito, Marlon.
How many Jackson's can you name? Five? LaToya, Janet, Jackie.
Speaker 2 (33:41):
LaToya Janet, Michael, Tito, Tito, give me a t.
Speaker 1 (33:47):
Shue and Jimmy Jimmy Jackson.
Speaker 2 (33:51):
Oh wait, that's Jimmy Osmond.
Speaker 1 (33:52):
Okay, is he the one that just died. No, it
was one of the other ones, one of.
Speaker 2 (33:57):
The Osmons his name and I can't think of it now.
Speaker 1 (34:00):
Wasn't our friend Donnie anyway? Yeah, so it's it's from
the Michael Jackson the state and people who have had
a chance to see this movie say they didn't address
any of the accusations in it. Oh you think.
Speaker 2 (34:15):
This was supposed to be a nice, happy movie.
Speaker 1 (34:18):
Yeah, I wanted to. I thought I wanted a.
Speaker 2 (34:20):
Real abuse and all that at the beginning of his life.
Speaker 1 (34:22):
Hey, I wanted him to come Clinton, right, Yeah, very happy. Well,
if it comes from the Jackson estate, it might certainly
hint that Joe was a little tough on those boys,
tough on those boys out of Gary, Indiana. But they're like,
oh no, I wanted to see all the horrible accusations
and him like Bubbles the chimp going up going, Hey,
(34:44):
Mike you got to lay off, and you're like, I
lay off when you lay off. So I but I
can't wait to see it. It's a they say. It's
just basically a Michael Jackson jukebox and a lot of fun.
I'm in
Good morning, and thank you very much for spending so
much time with us. We absolutely are honored by your
presence here on news Radio eleven ten kfab especially me,
I am Scott Vorhees. Lucy Chapman is right there. She's
I say, mildly honored, but she's across two different radio stations,
(00:21):
and she's won so many awards and accolades that she
honestly doesn't care anymore. But me, I'm a hack and
an tell people that, even though I've been doing this
for thirty years, still fledgling and amateur. So I am
honored to have anyone spend any time with this radio program.
(00:42):
Don't tell people.
Speaker 2 (00:43):
What but I haven't won any awards?
Speaker 1 (00:46):
No, I said, you have won countless award.
Speaker 2 (00:48):
No, but I haven't won a single award.
Speaker 1 (00:50):
No, because you won several. Oh, you haven't won a
single one. You've won several. I've given you most of them.
Speaker 2 (00:57):
Yeah, that's true. Well, my name's not even on him.
You just wrote it on there with a sharpie.
Speaker 1 (01:03):
I crossed out someone else's name and put yours on there.
Omaha World, Harold has a story here that's sure to
make some sphincter's pucker has to do with a and
it's not the world Harold that did it, it's the
they're passing along. Researchers have said, hey, good news. We've
(01:23):
identified a possible link between things that mothers to be
are taking when their baby is in utero that suddenly
then lead to an increased risk of autism. And people
are like nope or yeah, see why. And it's so
(01:51):
I have to always find the humor in something, and
sometimes it's harder to do that. But in this one,
it's not not only what these researchers are saying. They're like, look,
we six million medical records of moms and babies. So
it's not like we just got a wild hair and
(02:12):
said ask Shirley over there what she took six million
medical records and they found that there are fifteen prescription
drugs as well as I mean, it's everything from high
blood pressure and cholesterol medication to drugs for anti anxiety,
(02:35):
antipsychotic drugs, antidepressant and sometimes especially if you're taking more
than one of these things, it does tend to lead
to a higher risk of autism. And then as they
go over these details, the Dean and director of the
unmc monroe Meyer Institute. The senior author of the study,
(02:56):
doctor Mernix at UNMC, says, this has nothing to do
with politics. This is science. Well, doctor Mehernick, I don't
know if you've noticed, but there is no science anymore.
There is only that which comports with what we want
to believe politically, and that's true of everything, the results
(03:18):
of an election, the results of your research study, whether
or not the head of some chicken restaurant approves of
gay marriage. It's all politics. But then the question is
what should be done about this. I'll tell you some
of the details, and all of this is in the
(03:39):
Omaha World Herald. I'm not going to read the entire article.
I don't read so good. Many of these drugs are
among the most commonly prescribed drugs in the United States,
four hundred million annual prescriptions. So when you suddenly say, well,
I'm having a baby, are you then supposed to go
(04:02):
to your doctor and say, I saw in the newspaper
or I heard on the AM radio that sometimes when
I'm taking anti anxiety and antidipress and drugs also stuff
to control my high blood pressure and cholesterol, it turns
out my kid might have a higher risk of autism,
and they say, yeah, they study did show that. And
then they're saying, well, should I stop taking these things? Well,
(04:24):
you know, we don't really, Okay, so what are we
supposed to do with this information? Not me, I think
I'm done bringing kids into this world, contributing to bringing
kids into this world. I think I don't know the
weekend's coming up. But the study says, we're not saying
(04:50):
the drugs are unsafe. We're stressing that pregnant women taking
these medications should not stop taking them without consulting with
their healthcare without consulting with their health care provider. Well,
your healthcare providers got their own political acts to grind.
Says suddenly stopping essential medications could prove more harmful than
(05:12):
the increased risk of autism. And then there are people saying, well,
wait a second, why are you saying, why are you
saying we need to get rid of autism? Like, well,
we're not even saying that they're autistic. Kids are unique
and special and beloved in their own way. And the
spectrum is such that you'll meet some people and you'll
(05:34):
immediately go, I think that person's autistic. And you'll meet
other people kids and adults and they'll say, yeah, I'm
on the spectrum and you go, huh, I didn't get that,
and it's all you know, there are people with autism
who have a hard time taking care of themselves, and
there are people with autism who are elon musk. That's
why it's called a spectrum, not a pinpoint. So there's
(05:59):
no particular link. That's saying, all right, if you're having
a baby and you take this and that, your kids, definitely,
But they are saying that it is an increased risk,
so much so that especially if you take more than
one of these medications, and there are some who take
(06:20):
four or more drugs, and it does put it into
a much higher percentage risk. And I'm sure there'll be people,
and by people, I mean Lucy Chapman who is saying,
what about the food that we're eating that wasn't part
of this study. You can talk to Secretary Kennedy about
all of that. But UNMC is passing along saying it's
(06:41):
a possible link here between prenatal prescriptions for commonly used
medications and an increased risk of autism among those babies
who were in utero while mom is taking antipsychotics. And
also even though I don't want to be psychotic, but
I also don't want to have high cholesterol. So now
(07:06):
what happens in this study is you get people of
all different political persuasions yelling either yeah, here, here, and
no one should take anything, or this is horrible. Why
are they saying they're gonna make moms feel bad? And
in the midst of all of this, you have moms
of kids with autism who are maybe not particularly political,
(07:27):
because amazingly there are a lot of people who aren't
particularly political. None of them have social media accounts. They've
just stayed away from all that. They're the ones who
at the office when someone brings up Trump just kind
of run over and go, I think the toner is
low on this printer, and they stay away from it.
There are people who shy away from some of the
(07:48):
political stuff. Some of them are moms, and some of
these moms have kids with autism, and they're the ones
who are looking going, did I do something wrong? It
because of something that I did that made my kid
have autism? I'll point out, yes, there is an increased
(08:09):
risk of you taking things that were prescribed by a
doctor that you didn't know led to an increased risk
that may have contributed to your kid being autistic. But
there are also six million mom and baby medical records
checked here. There are also the overwhelming majority of these
(08:30):
kids who are autistic their moms didn't take any of
these medications. So it's an increase risk. But it's not like, yeah,
we looked at the study. It turns out if you
take any of this stuff, your kid is a much
better chance of being autistic. For those moms who didn't
take any of these medications, none of their kids are autistic.
(08:50):
That's not the case. That's not what this study shows.
My point of bringing this up is I think all
of this is very interesting, especially with the political ramifications
of it, and the real big issue is whether or
not people are going to be allowed to ask these questions,
(09:12):
delve deeper into this and should we then take it
to other things, whether it's medications, whether it's that which
is in the food, whether it's vaccines. Are people going
to then say, all right, let's take this study even further?
And I wonder if we even get this study if
(09:34):
not for the Trump administration and Health and Human Services
Director RFK Junior saying we are going to ask these questions.
We are going to delve into these links. However, uncomfortable
some of these details might be. I think that the
American people owe it. We owe it to the American
people to try and answer their questions, approve or disprove.
(09:56):
And people are like, but you already have you your answer,
You already know, and you're gonna try and push whatever
findings into the answer that you think you already have.
You don't think other Health and Human Services or CDC
directors had the exact same feelings on the other side
of the political spectrum, which goes back to the study
(10:19):
author from UNMC saying, this isn't politics, it's science. Wrong.
It's all politics. Everything from medication you're taking with a baby,
to what that street light is doing down there, to
what happened how come I'm paying more for groceries and
(10:40):
I seem to be getting less in groceries. It's all politics.
All these people that say, like, I don't get involved
in politics, but you're an idiot. You got to get
at least somewhat involved. Do you ever go to one
of the meetings there the like a school, what's the
word I'm looking a teacher, a parent, teacher conference. Who
(11:00):
are these people? Do you ever go to a parent
teacher conference? Big time politics. It's all politics now, and uh,
that's that's for babies. Let's go to the other end
of the age spectrum. And a column in the New
York Times this week that says, old people, I love you,
(11:23):
but it's time for you to go. Wait like wait what?
And how old does someone have to be before they're
considered old? Because my gray hair would suggest that maybe
I might be in this. I'll tell you what this
is all about. And just a moment, Scott Byes, this
is news radio eleven ten kfab She's Lucy Chapman. She's
(11:45):
right over there, see her, Lucy. Poke your head up.
Say hi to the nice people.
Speaker 2 (11:50):
Hello to the nice people.
Speaker 1 (11:52):
I'm Scott Vorhees.
Speaker 2 (11:53):
I don't know where that came from. Yeah, no, I
so much doubt Abby.
Speaker 1 (11:57):
I want you to speak in a British accent and
for the rest of the next thirty seconds, and then
we can't take it anymore. Agism is awful and should
be rooted out, says Samuel Moyne, columnist with the New
York Times, and then proceeds to talk about how we
really need to practice more agism in this country and
(12:20):
root out the old people from controlling everything. The column
here says that a jerrintocratic society. I don't know if
I'm saying that correctly. It seems to be a word
that he just made up having to do with that again,
jer untocratic as in gerontology, older people, senior citizens, and
(12:49):
therefore a jar antocratic society is a word that he
seems to be a phrase he's using to suggest it's
old people who are running everything. It says, it's a
societ in which the old control ever more power and wealth,
leading to over representation and political life and unequal power
(13:11):
in social life. Got a book coming out, jern to
Gerontocracy will say it that way in America, arguing that
senior citizens collectively wheeled outsize power thanks to a slew
of factors. And you know what these factors are. I'll
(13:32):
use the words that Sam is using in a moment,
But you know what the you know what what I'm
getting from all this is and this is so awful,
and I'm glad that he's exposing it. There are people
who have been born and raised with work ethic, and
then they use that work ethic to do the best
(13:55):
that they could in school and then take a job,
do the best they could at that job, move up
in the job, put money away for retirement, and not
outlive their means by spending on things that they didn't need,
so they would someday be able to have wealth that
would accumulate. They put it into the stock market, they
put it into retirement accounts, they put it into real estate,
(14:18):
and then some of them even began to own their
own businesses and they employed other people. And it turns
out that that wealth does tend to grow. And then therefore,
when you're older and you've worked your entire life and
you've made smart decisions, it turns out you have more
wealth and you do own property, more so than a
twenty three year old who has no hope of moving
(14:39):
out of mom and dad's place ever in the history
of ever. And this author is saying, that's strong. What
we need to have is a little bit of spread
the wealth and the power and try and take away
some of the power from these old people with all
their money and all their Yeah, you don't have to
make up a word word and gerontocracy, we already have
(15:02):
a word for this. Communism, which is having an ever
increasing foothold in America, especially but not limited to young people.
He's arguing that seniors collectively wheeled their outsized power. Oh yeah,
(15:23):
that's another thing they do. You know what these old
people do. The young people don't do They vote? The
nerve of these people. When can we get rid of
all these old people? Can we throw them in the
harbor like that tea in Boston? Oh, it turns out
they can swim. They learned to swim. Who taught them
(15:46):
how to swim? Look, they're just swimming back. Yeah. They
dominate low turnout elections by voting. This is the whiniest
thing in my NPRB April first wet dream I couldn't
conceive of. But I'm going to write down some notes.
We're going to do this next year is April First Guy.
(16:08):
Samuel Moyne, author writing in a New York Times opinion piece,
that old people have too much wealth to and exhibit
too much power in this.
Speaker 2 (16:16):
Country, and he wants to kill them.
Speaker 1 (16:17):
Oh we need No, he doesn't say we need to
kill him, we need to just do something about it.
Speaker 2 (16:22):
But he makes no suggestions on.
Speaker 1 (16:24):
What he he urges policies that push power and resources
away from seniors, you know, like medicare now to he
wants to push that power and resources downwards. So it's
age caps for whether it's politicians or judges, structural voting
(16:48):
voting reforms that what you have a like, hey, if
you're too old, If if you're going straight from getting
a Grand Slam dinner at four fifteen pm, yes to
go to vote. You are too old to vote? If
(17:09):
you if your buddy texts you Friday night at eight
thirty and says, hey, you should come hang out. A
few people showed up here after this thing, and we're
going to be here for a little bit. You should
come out. And you're like, it's eight thirty, I've already
in bed, I've had my pajamas on for an hour
and a half. Then you're too old to vote?
Speaker 2 (17:28):
How old is this guy?
Speaker 1 (17:30):
I don't know.
Speaker 2 (17:31):
I'm sure we don't.
Speaker 1 (17:32):
Know eighty one. I don't know how old he is,
all right, I'm guessing he's probably young.
Speaker 2 (17:38):
Didn't justin Timberlake make a movie about this where nobody
got over the age of thirty, did he? Yeah, it's
a good movie though.
Speaker 1 (17:45):
Actually with acclaim.
Speaker 2 (17:48):
Remember it was on They had like a tattoo on
their wrist, justin Timberlake. Yeah, the singer.
Speaker 1 (17:54):
Yeah, that does sound familiar. I didn't see it. Let's
see here structural voting reforms, a lower voting age. Oh yeah,
because our sixteen year olds are so bright. Yeah, let's
let me tell you about sixteen year olds. I have
one in my house.
Speaker 2 (18:15):
Can you imagine your so voting?
Speaker 1 (18:16):
Yeah, it's okay. He's my son. So, my son who's
been told a bazillion times clean up after yourself. When
you take, you know, a plate and a cup somewhere
in the house, and then you come back in the
room where you got the plate and the cup from
the kitchen. When you leave that room and you drink
and eat whatever was in these items, and then you
(18:38):
come back to the kitchen without the plate and the cup.
Something that's gone terribly wrong. The plate and the cup
are now out there someplace, someplace they shouldn't be. They
need to come back with you, and then they need
to go in the dishwasher, not on the counter above
the dishwasher. Sometimes it'd be like, oh fun, and then
you'll put it near the dish washer. No, it's a
(19:01):
real easy. You just pull the thing open and put
the thing. He last night, I made the mistake of
checking to see how clean his room was. Eyes, my eyes.
I just stuck my head in there. And then when
he got back from basketball practice last night, I pulled
(19:23):
him over because he's like, I'm gonna do this. I'm
gonna do that. I'm gonna I said. I came over.
I said, son, you're not gonna do anything until you
clean your Oh yeah, oh yeah I was. I was
gonna do that, sure, sure you were. You know why
he won't do any of these things. I don't because
he's dumber than a bag of hair, just like his
(19:44):
old man. And we're gonna let him.
Speaker 2 (19:47):
Vote, please don't.
Speaker 1 (19:51):
Yeah, older Americans have too much influence because they vote.
They have too much money and too much property. You
know why, because they they've been working since they were
probably thirteen or fourteen years old.
Speaker 2 (20:05):
Can confirm except that the other part where I have
too much money and too much real estate, I can't
confirm that, but I can confirm working since.
Speaker 1 (20:15):
Oh yeah, but if you have some money and a property,
you're doing better than those people who aren't working. They've
now graduated with their degree in underwater philosophy, weaving, and
they can't get a job, and that's all someone else's
probably Donald Trump's fault, and someone's got to do something. Well,
guess what. You know what the funniest thing about this is,
(20:37):
you know who's not going to buy this guy's book.
The young people he's trying to influence. They don't read.
But nice, try loser, Yeah, nice try, young loser. You
whipper snapper, you jack an ape, gutter snipe. Damn kids.
(20:59):
Scott back to the other end of the spectrum. What
if you say, all right, all this stuff sounds scary,
I don't want to bring a child into this world,
not this world dangerous. Trump's gonna kill us all or
there's not gonna be a job for my kid or
what Okay, you're gonna even have a problem with that,
(21:23):
because did you know that the president's war in Iran
might lead to more children? It turns out the world's
biggest maker of condoms not the maker of the world's
biggest condoms, the biggest maker they make the most condoms.
Speaker 2 (21:45):
Is there one what the maker of the biggest condoms.
Speaker 1 (21:50):
That's that's a conversation. We're gonna have that conversation. I
got this slated for three and a half weeks from now,
so I don't want to get into that today because
I can't anyway. The world's biggest condom maker says the
war in Iran is poised to make condoms more expensive.
(22:11):
A company out of Malaysia, Oh, no, wonder they always
end up crashing into the ocean. It's a group called Carricks.
It's like a condom for Karen's Carricks, which turns out
more than five billion condoms a year. Let's see here
(22:34):
those would be It's Trojan not in here, Yeah, it
is Trojan. Other ones. I can't think of any other anyway.
They say the war in Iran has pushed up costs
for key materials for these propylactics, specifically rubber and night
(22:55):
Night Trial. Night Trial, wasn't that James Brown song?
Speaker 2 (23:01):
I think it was an HBO series.
Speaker 1 (23:02):
Oh and then there you know the foil packaging, the
silicone oil, all that stuff, all the key materials for this.
And they say, when the costs go up twenty to
thirty percent, we can't get the materials, so we can't
make as many of these and no more free ones,
(23:23):
and we have no choice but to transfer the costs
right now to the customers. Yeah, so what what are
you going to do? I mean, if you need one
of these? Uh, there are some options yet, student health
and them talking about every thing from your local college
to probably depending on the teacher, your local third grade
classroom probably has a whole fish bowl full of these.
(23:44):
You can just grab a handful for free. So there's
one option. If you have a rubber glove, that's five
right there you have. If you have a rubber glove
and some scissors, it's five condoms.
Speaker 2 (24:01):
Somebody's going to try that. You can't say that stuff.
People will try it. Do not try this at home?
Well there anywhere else for that?
Speaker 1 (24:12):
Another what about the break room at the office. Here's
another place you can get it. If you know some
guy in their you know, mid forties through about sixty
years old, chances are probably pretty good that we still
have one in a wallet. Probably good because you never know.
(24:34):
I put it in there in nineteen ninety three because
I heard that some kid in my school met a
girl who was into that kind of thing, and like, well,
I know, I'm only fifteen years old, but you never know,
and you gotta be ready it's what we learned is
boy scouts.
Speaker 2 (24:54):
You learned that in boys.
Speaker 1 (24:56):
Mostly not tying, but it was just the creed. You know,
you got to be ready, be prepared. So you put
that in the wallet, and then you get the ring
around the wallet, and then that stays in there, and
then someday when you might need it, you're like wait, wait, wait,
I got it, and you pull that dusty and it
just disintegrates. And that's why we have children. Oh there's
(25:21):
one other way that you cannot bring again into this world.
Don't have unprotected with the if you don't want to,
all right, so and then maybe this, maybe this would happen.
You know what's funny to so many people is how
(25:43):
careful they were when they were younger, Like I can't
get pregnant, I don't want to have a baby, I
don't want to I'm not ready to be a father,
all these different things, and so you were incredibly careful.
Me I I wasn't as careful as I wanted to be,
but by virtue of my looks and personality, it turns
out there weren't a lot.
Speaker 2 (26:04):
Of not necessarily, yeah, there weren't a lot of options.
Speaker 1 (26:07):
But for other people like they were always so nervous
and so careful. I'm not ready to be a parent.
And then you do everything the right way. You end
up getting married, and you decide that it's time to
plan for build a nest and plan for a family,
and then you try and bring a baby into this
world and it doesn't work, and you're like, well, if
(26:30):
I'd known that, I would have been an absolute oh
back in the anyway, Be that as it may. A
couple in Florida, congratulations to them. They used in vitro fertilization.
They have the same thing. They were having a hard
time bringing a baby into the world naturally. So they said,
all right, look, we're going to use science here. And
(26:50):
so we got the retrieval of the egg and everything
else that needs to go in there, and we put
it in here, and we froze this, and then we
went and said, okay, it's time for us to bring
a baby into this world. And they went back to
the clinic and they said absolutely, and they fertilized the
egg and now we have an embryo, and the embryo
is implanted, and a certain number of months later, here's
(27:13):
a baby. And the white couple looked at the baby
and said, this baby looks Asian, looks really really Asian.
And we're not like, well, maybe there's one of your parents.
And they're like, nope, we are. We are the whites.
It's our last name, it's who we are. Like, there's
(27:34):
no one whiter. My middle name is Wonderbread. We're the
whitest people. This is a this is a specifically, it
looks like a South Asian baby. Like, that's weird that
you would see that. And so they checked into it
and they said, all right, funny, funny, you're gonna laugh.
We implanted the wrong embryo.
Speaker 2 (27:57):
Yeah, no, kidding, somebody's having a payday.
Speaker 1 (28:00):
Yeah. And then they're like, well we had three in there.
So they go back to the families here and they're like,
I wonder whose kid this is. Let's see here the Nichols.
Now maybe not Jackson's, probably not Wang's.
Speaker 2 (28:16):
Ooh.
Speaker 1 (28:17):
So it turns out they found the parents who'd done
the same process to freeze the embryo or whatever. And
what do you do? I mean, you've this is this
is the big.
Speaker 2 (28:33):
Did the other couples have babies?
Speaker 1 (28:36):
Not not yet I don't think so. So now what
what do you do you just had this baby. It's
not your baby, but you just had it. It's their baby,
and now you're basically a surrogate to this couple's child.
Speaker 2 (28:52):
Over here, I say, you give the baby to the
the genetic biological parents, because clearly they want a baby.
They were there also.
Speaker 1 (29:01):
At some point. Well it not necessarily. Sometimes it's like
I want the option.
Speaker 2 (29:06):
Oh yeah, down the road back.
Speaker 1 (29:09):
Maybe they didn't. Yeah, that's that's the other thing. But
if they say, I mean, how do you go about
getting that phone call? I think we have your baby.
We don't have a baby. Now they did a mix
up and it turns out my wife just gave birth
to your baby. Do you want it? Like, show me
a picture, Show.
Speaker 2 (29:30):
Me a picture.
Speaker 1 (29:30):
Yeah, what's it looked like?
Speaker 2 (29:32):
It's like adopting a puppy. I don't know. Is it cute?
Speaker 1 (29:35):
Yeah? I wantn't you raise a little bit and house
break it because we're not ready for a baby. But
we'll take a good.
Speaker 2 (29:43):
Take a teenager, Yeah right, toddler, Maybe.
Speaker 1 (29:46):
Tell you what, whyn't you hold on to that baby
for us? And maybe if we end up having a baby,
we'll have your baby. We can negotiate a trade somewhere
down the line, or.
Speaker 2 (29:56):
If they both get paid because this obviously this clinic
screwed up both of them, then everybody's happy. The couple
can take the baby.
Speaker 1 (30:08):
No not, I mean not everyone.
Speaker 2 (30:10):
I mean you're never going to be.
Speaker 1 (30:11):
A money baby doesn't replace a baby baby. Anyway, last night,
when I saw my son's bedroom, you will take it
a check. I'd have traded him for five bucks.
Speaker 2 (30:23):
I'm talking about a baby that you haven't bonded with,
that is not genetically your baby.
Speaker 1 (30:29):
As soon as you find out congratulations, you're pregnant. You
have bonded with that baby.
Speaker 2 (30:33):
Well, there you have it. Then why are we talking
about it?
Speaker 1 (30:37):
I just you know, this is excruciating. I don't know
why you think it's so funny. Notice how I throw
her under the bus after making all those comments.
Speaker 2 (30:46):
Yeah, daily, all.
Speaker 1 (30:48):
Right, speaking of different colored babies, Michael Jackson movie is
coming out and people are mad about it. I'll tell
you why. Next. Scott Voice Radio eleven, tig Kia Baby
Lucy pulled a punch in that last segment, But it's okay,
Lucy because Darryl jumped in the inbox on the mix
(31:12):
up of the babies. Darryl said, I know what the
other couple said. I want my baby back, baby back,
baby back, baby back, baby back, baby back, baby back.
I want my baby back, baby back, baby back, baby back,
baby back.
Speaker 2 (31:24):
Do you want your.
Speaker 1 (31:26):
Do you want your baby back, baby back, baby back? Baby?
You know what they named that kid?
Speaker 2 (31:31):
Baby back bob a cue songs, Carolina Honey.
Speaker 1 (31:38):
It is one of the greatest commercials of all time.
I don't know why they don't do that. Yeah, that's
my Carolina Honey. Right there, that's Lucy Chapman. Hello, hr
I'll meet with you right after the show. I just
mean she's saucy, is it what?
Speaker 2 (31:53):
It's not getting anything better?
Speaker 1 (31:56):
You wait in twenty twenty six, I can't call you
a saucy little.
Speaker 2 (32:00):
I don't think you could ever do that.
Speaker 1 (32:01):
What can I What can I say about the jam
was a to What can I say about Jean Stother?
Speaker 2 (32:07):
There is a time when you could say it and
maybe get away with it, but there was never a
time that you could actually say it that you know
anybody would appreciate it.
Speaker 1 (32:15):
I tell you what you got, spunk, toots, you got moxie.
I like it. I'm Scott Vorhees and uh, we'll have
a new host here tomorrow. I knew Michael Jackson movies
coming out and I can't wait to see it. Scott,
can't you say anything right? Well, I can't. I'm a
I'm a gen xer. I was born in this I
was born in nineteen seventy six and now celebrating two
(32:37):
hundred and fifty years of America this year, which means
that I get to celebrate fifty years of Vorhees later
this year. I tell you what, it's a big year.
But you know, when you when you're born in nineteen
seventy six, that means you're in approximately first grade when
Michael Jackson's Thriller album was the biggest thing in the world.
That's an impressionable age. And I I listened to that
(33:04):
album constantly. And you know what, I still do love
Michael Jackson. Now. I know that there have been some accusations.
I've heard heard some accusations. Well, there's a movie coming
out called Michael and it's sanctioned by the Michael Jackson estate.
It stars his nephew who looks and sings and dances
(33:28):
just like him. Who is it is? It Jermaine's kid, Tito, Marlon.
How many Jackson's can you name? Five? LaToya, Janet, Jackie.
Speaker 2 (33:41):
LaToya Janet, Michael, Tito, Tito, give me a t.
Speaker 1 (33:47):
Shue and Jimmy Jimmy Jackson.
Speaker 2 (33:51):
Oh wait, that's Jimmy Osmond.
Speaker 1 (33:52):
Okay, is he the one that just died. No, it
was one of the other ones, one of.
Speaker 2 (33:57):
The Osmons his name and I can't think of it now.
Speaker 1 (34:00):
Wasn't our friend Donnie anyway? Yeah, so it's it's from
the Michael Jackson the state and people who have had
a chance to see this movie say they didn't address
any of the accusations in it. Oh you think.
Speaker 2 (34:15):
This was supposed to be a nice, happy movie.
Speaker 1 (34:18):
Yeah, I wanted to. I thought I wanted a.
Speaker 2 (34:20):
Real abuse and all that at the beginning of his life.
Speaker 1 (34:22):
Hey, I wanted him to come Clinton, right, Yeah, very happy. Well,
if it comes from the Jackson estate, it might certainly
hint that Joe was a little tough on those boys,
tough on those boys out of Gary, Indiana. But they're like,
oh no, I wanted to see all the horrible accusations
and him like Bubbles the chimp going up going, Hey,
(34:44):
Mike you got to lay off, and you're like, I
lay off when you lay off. So I but I
can't wait to see it. It's a they say. It's
just basically a Michael Jackson jukebox and a lot of fun.
I'm in
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Hey Jonas!
Hey Jonas! The official Jonas Brothers podcast. Hosted by Kevin, Joe, and Nick Jonas. It’s the Jonas Brothers you know... musicians, actors, and well, yes, brothers. Now, they’re sharing another side of themselves in the playful, intimate, and irreverent way only they can. Spend time with the Jonas Brothers here and stay a little bit longer for deep conversations like never before.
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by Audiochuck Media Company.