Willie 5/29/26

Willie gets the latest on Iran from Newsnation's Leland Vittert. Then he talks to an author who says he was probed by aliens. Are schools still illegally making enrollment decisions based on race? Willie's guest says yes. But the Federalist Society's Sarah Parshall Perry says the issue goes deeper than that.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Great American Welcome to Karate after lean to Price, got
to quote reg Facebook picks off the night about five
forty Now real baseball teams from down a run of
great at Kan and Datebo and the World Pigeon staff
is not lined up for the next three games, but
who knows. And also fireworks Friday at the stadium and
more named after me the Great Americans, So get there early,
get there often. Should have had this great weather last

(00:21):
weekend for the taste, didn't happen. That's the way life
goes on. Let's continue. And of course Leland Vidert of
News Nation on every night and more. I'm now a
subscriber substack to Leland Viddert's War notes and Leland Leland Viddert,
welcome again to the Bill Cunningham Show. And first of all,
I guess we're almost beginning maybe not maybe are another

(00:43):
sixty days, shall we say cease fire. And it appears
that I've gone A White House official more or less
sent me what the deal is, and it's been released
to axios and other places. The key parts are of
the strait of her moves. I guess the straits of
Trump unrestricted removed within thirty days US blockade will be

(01:03):
left in Iran allowed to sell oil freely. Iran agrees
not to pursue nuclear weapon et cetera. Almost in the
last day or two, the leadership, so to speak of
Iran's come out and say, well that's not true, and
here we said and never never land. Do you have
any hope that eventually the Trumpster is going to agree
to this kind of an idea.

Speaker 2 (01:24):
Well, the Trumpster as you call him, would agree, I
think to what he has said he will agree to.
Why he keeps agreeing to these fanciful ideas that the
Iranians then make him a fool out of for saying
publicly agrees with something, and then, like Lucy and the football,

(01:45):
they go, oh, never mind, we didn't really mean that
is confounding to me. And I know that the White
House feels as though they're stuck between two bad decisions.
Bad decision number one is negoss going without any real
leverage because the Iranians are experts at playing out the
clock and having the kabuki dan. So well, we think

(02:09):
we agree to this, but we may not agree to that.
But we'll look at number one and number two. Their
option is to resume hostilities, which the American public widely
does not support. We can talk about why that is,
but they do not. And number two puts Republicans in
an increasingly difficult position going into the midterms. The Arabic

(02:31):
say is I have two choices, both of which are.

Speaker 1 (02:33):
Bitter, and the other issue. I'm told by a certain
White House official that communication is impossible. So you might
think you're talking to the new Ayatola. You're likely not
the Ietola, the one that's deformed and injured, has no
cell phone, no laptop. And so these individuals show up
in Pakistan where you've been. There's no war correspondent covering

(02:56):
the Middle East better than you've covered it for twenty
years because you've been there for years. They don't have
the authority and Islamabad to do anything because they got
to check back to the military leadership and the religious
leadership that don't communicate to each other. They're scared to
death of being killed by a missile, so they have
no communication devices and they use actually they use couriers.

(03:20):
And now they're putting tape over all the traffic cameras
and uh in Tehran because they're thinking they're being monitored,
which of course they are. They're scared to the death
of being killed, and so they don't communicate with the negotiators.
So how do you strike to strike to do communicate?

Speaker 2 (03:37):
Well, the negotiators want you to believe that what you
do is you put such overwhelming pressure militarily and economically
on who's ever left alive that they finally just cry
uncle number one. The other option, which is hard, is
to set the scene with military and economic pressure for

(04:03):
there to be real regime change. He had Scott Bessen
up there yesterday saying, well, we didn't have regime change,
but the regime has changed. I'm not sure who thought
sending him to the briefing the podium was a good idea,
but I digress. The fact remains that for forty seven years,
the Ironiance have chanted death to America. Donald Trump is

(04:23):
the only president who has ever stood up to them.
He should be applauded for that. But it is going
to take some additional work. And I think what happened
was is the President Trump was told this was going
to be quick, this was going to be easy, it
was going to define your legacy, on and on and on,
and then it didn't work out that way, and when

(04:43):
that happens, unfortunately sometimes Whinster Churchill said, when you're walking
through hell, keep going. The one thing you don't want
to do is stand around and go, well, maybe we
should go to the left, should we go to the right.
What do you think maybe we should give negotiations a chance.
Is six or seven weeks ago we had kept up
the bombing campag and he had kept his threat or promise,
whatever you want to call it, to exact the disproportional

(05:06):
amount of pain on the Iranians. We'd be done by now,
you know. For the for the most of the war,
the US military performed brilliantly at what they were ordered
to do. But what they were ordered to do was
to spare a major infrastructure, to not not significantly degrade
the Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guards, apparatus, and ability to make money.

(05:31):
There was a lot of things they were not allowed
to do. In retrospect that appears to have been a mistake.

Speaker 1 (05:37):
You say in your war notes, among other things, Today
laid bare President Trump's problems with Iran. Every day Trump's
hand gets weaker, every day we get closer to the midterms.
Every day America strains under high gas prices. Every day,
Iran's military re arms and rebuilds. Every day, the threat
of resuming the war seems less real every day under

(05:58):
the new agreement in the Straits or Hermus opening, Iran
gets stronger financially. This is a problem laid out that way.

Speaker 2 (06:05):
Whoever wrote that sounds pretty smart.

Speaker 1 (06:07):
Don't you think they'll not real? No, you do, because
you lay it out and think, okay, here we sit
and we thought, okay, we're about to agree. I guess
another sixty day of what? Sixty days of more? I
would have bombed them back to the Stone Age and
kept it going, kept it going and there's nothing left.
Then say okay, now what do you want to do?
But now they're rebuilding the military the Iranians gasoline prices

(06:27):
unlike the Great American I paid three dollars and ninety
eight cents a gallon two days ago for gasoline three
ninety at a gallon. I thought it was a mistake.
But nonetheless, most places like in California paying six and
seven dollars, Ohio, Kentucky in the inn among the lowest,
so gasoline prices go up. Most Americans don't know the
difference between Iran and Iraq don't know. They don't understand

(06:50):
that at all. The military simply by existing, they win
the war. And now Trump's going to agree to some
sixty day extension and then it's going to be quickly broken.
And so yes, you have these war notes thinking now
that everything you said and here is true. And that's why.
Is that why Trump's at thirty one percent.

Speaker 2 (07:09):
It's one of the reasons. The other reason is he
keeps telling everybody how high the stock market is. And
when you're trying to figure out whether you can pay
for gas or groceries at the end of the week,
you don't want to hear about how all the rich
guys are getting richer. That's another problem for President Trump
and for the White House. It is a difficult time,

(07:29):
unquestionably for this White House. And I think you're seen
for President Trump, who, when things aren't going well, looks
for easy wins. I think it's why on Saturday he
was all giddy that were ninety five percent of the
way there with a deal with Iran. It turns out

(07:50):
we all know where we were at, which is pretty
much nowhere is he He is trying to find ways
to get people excited, and it's why the weaponization fund goes.
And then we have a two hundred and fifty hour bill,
and then we have a ballroom, on and on all
things that make people who work for a living, who

(08:11):
are struggling, though, Does he really care about me? What
President Trump uses a win for him personally a lot
of times is not what the American people need is
a win right now?

Speaker 1 (08:24):
Yeah, you add up the recent events. The ballroom, I'm
not sure the status of it. Whenever there's a picture taken,
it looks like a construction site. I think there's a
toro against it. I'm not sure that two hundred and
fifty dollars bill. I think it's a great idea. I'll
get a few hundred of them, But I think most
Americans are going to say, I'm never going to have
a two hundred and fifty dollars bill with Trump's picture

(08:44):
on it. He talks about the one point seven billion
dollars compensation fund for January sixth to others, and I'm
thinking most people. And so it looks to some as
if the President is involved in four or five issues
unrelatable to the life of average Americans. Stock market again
at all time.

Speaker 3 (09:00):
Hi.

Speaker 1 (09:00):
Maybe that's why you have said in one of your
notes that Republicans are running the Democratic playbook. So, assuming
Trump is involved in acts of distraction because of what's
happening in Iran, maybe the Republicans are running the Democratic playbook.
What did you mean by that?

Speaker 2 (09:19):
So the Democratic playbook. In twenty twenty two, when Biden
was very unpopular for many of the same reasons Trump
is unpopular, the Democrats said, We're going to run the
mid terms based on how bad Republicans are. Right, So
enter herschel Walker, for example, in Georgia, these fundamentally flawed

(09:43):
Senate candidates Memon Ods and Doug Mastriano and Pennsylvania running
for Senate and governor, and we're going to win by
making the referendum about theidate, the Senate candidates, not about
the president. Right, All midterms are about a referendum. So therefore,

(10:03):
what you're going to watch over the next few months
and is what Republicans want, is this isn't going to
be about Donald Trump's agenda. It's going to be about
James tallerco in Texas and that he thinks they're six
genders and Jesus is non binary. It's going to be
You're gonna hear endlessly about ablu OUTSI ed in Michigan,
whose terrorist us would make Yasser Arafat blush or very happy,

(10:25):
depending on how you look at it. Graham Plattner in Maine,
the guy with the Nazi tattoos. I think North Carolina
has washed for Republicans because Roy Cooper. If you make
it a REFERENDU amun ROYD Cooper, who's a very popular
former governor in North Carolina. But the three seats that
Republicans absolutely need to win Texas, Michigan, and Maine, they

(10:47):
have been blessed by Democrats with horrible, horrible Democratic candidates.

Speaker 1 (10:52):
Well, we'll say about it. We'll say about am Duel,
We'll say about Platner, We'll say about tatar Rico.

Speaker 3 (10:58):
Uh.

Speaker 1 (10:58):
Trump allegedly is heading the situation room as we speak
to make a decision about whether or not to accept
the sixty day pause and action. I think we've been
in one for a long time. I'd be in a
straight state of shock if the straits or her moves
opened by the weekend, maybe tomorrow Saturday. I'd be shocked.
If the minds were removed within thirty days. I'd be

(11:19):
shocked if Iran allowed to be sell oil freely in
the world, they would agree not to pursue a nuclear weapon.
They're not going to agree to any of that, right
They're gonna say, no, we got Trump over.

Speaker 2 (11:32):
We agreed. They may agree to lots of things, and
then they'll renew on those agreements.

Speaker 1 (11:37):
Yeah, now what and then and then we're back. That's
that was my point. What about a month ago. Continue
the pressure on Iran until they're broken, until they can't
stand up, until okay, we can't take it anymore. Right
now by not losing their winning and Trump's trying to
rock in a hard place. If he starts bombing again,

(11:58):
it's gonna be maybe the w and at some point
the five Persian golf states are going to say, you
know what, we can't take it anymore, and they want
to be able to sell their oil. So that he's
now in a position to get pressure from the five
Persian golf states along with Asian interest. That big pow
wow with Jizhaoping didn't work out in any sense that

(12:18):
I'm aware of, and at this point we'll return to
rock in a hard place. Is that correct?

Speaker 2 (12:24):
Well? I think the Great American has America analyzed quite well.

Speaker 1 (12:29):
Let's move on to a topic B and I mentioned too,
off the air, more and more of those who have
gone to space, and more and more Air Force pilots.
And I watched a subcommittee hearing in which I had
a general of the Air Force more or less say
that we have been visited by aliens. And I'm looking
to this thing. I'm thinking, at some point we're going

(12:50):
to have some nineteen fifties drama where some alien's going
to land, maybe after the MMA fight concludes in about
two weeks on June fourteenth, and we're gonna have some
aliens saying I come here in peace. And I'm thinking,
does Leland Vinder, you're somewhat objective? Have we been visited
by aliens? Are the aliens mating with our women? And

(13:12):
do these things exist? Or am I in some alternative universe.
I have a guest on that talks about he's been probed.
I said, who's I've been probed too, but not by
an alien to my knowledge. This is kind of off,
but a little bit. It's a Friday, getting ready for
the weekend.

Speaker 2 (13:29):
I'm thinking, I think that I don't know I've can't
figure out. It's too early or too late in my
day for this, these visuals that are coming to mind.
I apologize to your listeners who are thinking about a
Skyline chili or a Raiders ice cream later. But what
I come back to when it comes back, when it
comes to aliens. Okay, the American government is not that good. Okay.

(13:53):
They couldn't keep secret to Trump's two hundred and fifty
dollars bill. No, but they couldn't keep some CIA guy
from signing out forty or fifty million dollars worth of
gold bars after they lied, after he lied to them
about whether he was in the in the Navy as
a pilot or not. And you think that over eighty
years they've been able to keep this secret through multiple
generations of government agencies.

Speaker 1 (14:15):
No, it's insane.

Speaker 2 (14:17):
No, it's trum. Trump can't keep a secret when he
goes to Walter Read Hospital.

Speaker 1 (14:21):
So proved.

Speaker 2 (14:24):
No. No, I mean you know, Bill, whatever it is
that you're thinking right now, I that's that's for you.
That's for you during whatever time you have for yourself.

Speaker 1 (14:35):
Lonely, lonely time, yeah, lonely time.

Speaker 2 (14:38):
Okay, Well, boy Friday comes at you quick here. It
was just a short week already. This This is what
I will say. Is there probably life somewhere out there? Yeah?
I just have never believed that the American government is
as good as the conspiracy theories about aliens would require
them to be, and in it they are. It would

(15:00):
actually make me feel better about the government.

Speaker 1 (15:03):
Well, according to my guest, name's Peterson. He recounts his
journey to Ramote Island in Patagonia, rumored by locals to
be a UFO landing base. I mean, if this happens,
if we go.

Speaker 2 (15:14):
So, Bill said Bill, Bill, Bill, what does this say
about if this guy is your guest? I don't know
what it says about your fellow guest. I used to
thought I was be pretty special. It was rare air
to be invited on the Bill Cunningham Show. And now
I share it with a guy who thinks he was
pro by aliens in some base in Patagonia.

Speaker 1 (15:33):
Correct. And I'm thinking, well, okay, okay, I'm watching these
Air Force generals and naval pilots saying they see they've
shot down some of these orbs over the South Pacific,
shooting down orbs, and a Patagonian landing base. Well, let's
let's leave it at that. I don't know what to say,
and uh, I don't either. I've come in peace to

(15:54):
serve humanity. Well we need I don't know, yes, Or
does Leond Vedder believe in the alien life is landed
on Earth?

Speaker 4 (16:05):
No?

Speaker 2 (16:07):
No, I should say, not that we know of.

Speaker 1 (16:10):
But it's possible.

Speaker 2 (16:13):
Well, it's possible that the Reds are gonna go to
the World Series bill.

Speaker 1 (16:16):
It's possible that the Knicks are gonna win the NBA title.
It's possible. It's possible the Spurs are win tomorrow. It's possible,
but it's not likely. But all right, let's leave it
at that. But have you done any topics on News
Nation about this, about UFO landings? I have.

Speaker 2 (16:34):
Look, I know there's a lot of people who love
talking about this, and you believe in it. I am
of the ilk that I care about my credibility more
than ratings.

Speaker 1 (16:44):
Not me, not me, not me. I'm just thinking I
want to live long enough to watch it. I want
to have the Michael Rennie landing somewhere around the White
House and somebody walk out like a robot down this.

Speaker 2 (17:00):
Have you ever noticed have you ever noticed it the aliens. Okay,
when they come, Bill, you think if they wanted to
show up here, Okay, if they're so good, they can
fly through all the galaxies and nobody sees them, and
they choose to land in Patagonia. If they if they
were so good, they could either remain hidden or okay,
they'd show up on the fourth of July and say hi.

(17:21):
By the way, I will be anchry in News Nation's
coverage on the fourth of July. We'll all find out together.

Speaker 1 (17:25):
Would you be shocked if you interviewed an alien remotely
from Patagonia from the White House? Would you be in
a state of shock and disbelief?

Speaker 2 (17:35):
I think there's a lot of bad things that would
happen before that we've gone to that part of life
that that chapter. There's many bad things before that have happened.

Speaker 1 (17:46):
All right, Well, let's see what happens once again. Leland Vetterer,
thanks for coming on the Bill Cunningham Show. I come
to serve humanity. Well done, Go in peace, my friend,
go in peace. Thank you, Leland Vetter, thank you very much.
Thank you. Well, let's continue with more. I think aliens exist,
I do, and I do think they're meeting with our women.

(18:07):
I do believe that that's why we have Democrats. But
let's continue with more. Bill Cunningham, News Radio seven hundreds WLWT. Again,
we never stop. We simply continue after one o'clock today,
and I want to thank Russ Jackson for this. We
have an expert on UFOs who claims that not only
are we visited by aliens, but there's an island off

(18:29):
the coast of Patagonia which is a landing area, has
been used the last couple of years as the landing
spot for numerous UFOs, and that sometime around Independence Day,
Will Smith style, we're going to have the visit made
public by the aliens around the White House on July
the fourth. So Independence Day movie might be not a

(18:50):
fiction but like a documentary. So my guest after one
o'clock has written a book about confronting aliens. He's been
probed by aliens, and he's going to tell you what
happened when he confronted aliens in Patagonia. That's a great island,
I guess. I'm not sure exactly where it is, but
it's somewhere out there, somewhere, And because it is so

(19:11):
obscure and so deep into the Pacific that aliens have
picked out as the landing spot to begin, not the invasion,
but the education of humankind. They're here to help. That'd
be a great idea if they can go through what
they have to go through to get here. We're like
a small marble and space. They must have technologies we
can't even imagine. It'd be like trying to teach my

(19:32):
dog the Schnarf mathematics. I can try, but it's not
going to work. And so the aliens are here to
help us do things better. I hope that's the case.
They don't want to eat us. You might recall Rod Serling,
of course, as Cincinnatian had a segment in which the
aliens came here to serve mankind, and the serving involved

(19:53):
either over easy or extra crispy. We were being eaten
by the aliens serving mankind, not a good sensual If
this happens, would you agree this is somewhat of a
big story. It'd be unbelievable. Maybe it is unbelievable, But
Pattygonia is the landing base and my guest after at
two o'clock, Indy Peterson is going to talk about his

(20:15):
encounter with life forms inside of an orb like that
thing in Las Vegas. So I have no idea what
to think about this, but let's hear what he has
to say. Plus, later on we scheduled an interview with
an expert from Defending Education dot org about what is
happening to the indoctrination of children in the public schools.
Before I get onto the issue about Donald Trump and Iran,

(20:37):
a couple other small items headline out of a variety.
CBS lost forty million dollars per year in Stephen Colbert
with Byron Allen. I watched the first show. I thought
it was somewhat funny, but not much. But CBS is
going to make fifteen million a year instead of losing
forty million. That's a fifty five million dollar whip. So

(20:58):
every year that Stephen Colbert was on, they lost about
forty million dollars. That's about rough say a million dollars
a week. They did that for years. I was Stephen
Colbert not being funny with low ratings. For example, on
a typical night, not when he concluded, I don't know
if you watched it, but I did not, he'd draw
maybe two million viewers, two million per night. Johnny Carson

(21:24):
in his prime was drawing about fifteen million with half
the population. But nonetheless his brand of comedy was only
entertaining to a few, and so CBS took some serious
hits because they canceled Stephen Colbert under the order supposedly
of Donald Trump, which was a bunch of bs. But nonetheless,
if you're in the business of making money, and CBS, ABC, NBC,

(21:48):
this sacred radio station, PBS, FOX nineteen, et cetera, CPO,
they're in the business of making money. And if they're
not making money on your show, you're gone. You may
not know it, but ratings and revenues are somewhat important
in the media. Like to the inquiry, advertising and readership

(22:11):
is kind of critical to what they do unless you
want to have Isvesta and Pravda paid for by the government,
also known as PBS actually producing content that the capitalistic system,
I think god we're in means that you choose what
you want to hear, what you want to read, what
you want to watch. And the American people for years

(22:34):
have said, we don't want to watch Stephen Colbert, it's
not funny anymore. And by the way, CBS kept losing
about a million dollars a week, and they kept doing
it for years. So at some point you got to say,
you know what, that ain't working. We're gonna quit losing
a million dollars a week. And his first on average,
his first few shows seemed like my Byron Allen has

(22:58):
about a million a million in viewers instead of two million,
And of course the liberal le f thinks that's a disaster. Well,
I don't care if I sell one chicken wing or
one thousand. What's important is making money, or at least
breaking even hopefully making money. Had this discussion with Ron Larkin,
the great Ron Larkin, of course, the greatest chicken in

(23:18):
the world. Ron's rus. And sometimes you want you want
to run a fifty percent food cost on an item.
For example, if Jeff Ruby Steakhouse sells a fancy steak
for eighty dollars and you run a fifty percent food costs,
that fifty percent food costs when you have thirty five
percent labor costs, maybe twenty percent of other fixed costs
controllable and non controllable. You might say, well, that's a

(23:40):
bad idea. But if you make fifty percent on a
steake worth eighty dollars. That means you're making forty dollars
if you have a thirty percent food cost an item,
but selling for ten dollars, you're making three dollars. You'd
rather sell the higher cost item. So you're in the
business of making money. If you did not listen. And
also here the advertisers that I endorse in others, we'd

(24:04):
have difficulty being on there. They'd find some other great
America to take my place. All of us are replaceable.
I think I'm important. I'm important, but I'm not indispensable.
The graveyard is filled with indispensable people. I get that,
no matter how great Marty Brenneman was and is as
a broadcaster. When he left the Reds in nineteen, Ovis said,

(24:25):
about five years ago, at twenty nineteen, the Reds kept
playing baseball and they went to the playoffs once. Of
course lost quickly, but nonetheless, all of us are important,
but none of us are indispensable. And so when you're
in the business of advertising, and then from advertising the revenues, etc.

(24:46):
I want listeners. TV wants viewers. They inquire once readers.
And if every week you're in business with a character
like Stephen Colbert and you lose a million dollars a week.
Is that good bad? Well, I would think it's enough.
It's bad, but you have to coin it as something
other than we have too many employees, too many costs,

(25:08):
we can't sell advertising, we're losing money. You got to go.
So Stephen Colbert is in a very envious position right now.
He's created this myth that he was fired because of
Donald Trump. As a consequence, who go to YouTube, make
a bunch of He'll make a boatload of money. The
last show with Paul McCartney. I saw it on YouTube.
It's amazing. The guy can still sing, was eighty four

(25:29):
years old. That's a different issue. But the reason Colbert
was canceled had nothing to do with Trump and everything
to do with the fact that we keep losing a
million dollars a week with this guy, and let's get
rid of them. And Byron Allen, I wish him well.
Headline CBS lost forty million dollars per year to produce
The Late Show with Stephen Colbert and now they're making

(25:50):
fifteen million a year. That's a fifty five million dollar whip.
You may not know it, but that's good. That's really good. Secondly,
before I talk about Trump. Secondly, I still support the
man greatly. By the way, this caught my eye. Juvenile's
facing charges required to join libraries. I said, I thought
this was anything I see online. I'm thinking, you know what,

(26:14):
that's fake news, that's AI, that's some sort of a hoax,
that's a meme, that's not real. Because the juvenile court
judges today, like Carrie Bloom, who's doing a terrible job
in juvenile court, and by the way, she's up for
election this November, does not think anyone who commits serious
crime should automatically be held accountable for the crimes they commit,

(26:36):
especially if you're a black male. She's a uber far left,
radical white female judge who does not believe that black
boys belong in jail. And you have to really try
hard to go to jail if you're in front of
Kerry Bloom, I mean really hard. So I got into
this and I pulled this, and I spoke to someone
to Fox nineteen who ran the story, and they say

(26:56):
it's real. I said, what a juvenile court judge with
arm robbers are going to make that kid get a
library card? Huh? To read the story here, it is
how many kind of juvenile court judge announced the quote
Summer of discovery. We're in discovery summer, which initiated on

(27:18):
Thursday yesterday, in which juveniles who have repeat offenses involving guns,
armed robberies, for example, have to obtain to get pre
trial release a library card. I said, why library card?
The court explained that every child facing every child, these

(27:42):
are sixteen and seventeen year old gangbangers with pants around
their knees, with weapons, holding people up or beating them
to death. The court explained that every child facing a
case will need to do these three things. One, get
a library card. Iliate in the Odyssey through Citidyes, you
got to learn. You gotta go to the library. Get

(28:02):
a card doesn't mean you have to go to the library.
It means you have to get a card. But you
can do anyway anyhow, right, just go get a cart. Two,
you have to obtain a membership at a YMCA or
Cincinnati Rec Center. That means you got to swim and
play basketball. And thirdly, bring a copy of the last

(28:23):
quarter grades to their next court hearing. Seventy one percent
of black males in the in Hamilton County. I'm sorry
the city of Cincinnati out Hamilton County are chronically absent.
They have no grades. So you have to get a
library card. You got to play basketball and give me
your report card and then you're released. I'm going what

(28:45):
arm robbers, rapists, burglars, like the UC incident in which
kids going to young adults going to get a pizza
ahead of crap beat out of them. Gotta get a
library card, goes on to say. The judge goes on
and say the following. The perception that crime increases in
summer because kids lack of structure is a valid concern.

(29:06):
We'll have to curb the initiative through this narrative in
our communities by educating and empowering kids in a way
that is required to monitor by the court. To get
a library card and play basketball makes me sick. That's
where we are in juvenile court today. And there's an

(29:27):
election this November in which Judge carry Bloom, an uber
far left radical judge who doesn't p people in jail
but gives them a library card, is up for reelection
and I run against a woman named Luken, and we'll
see what happens. And the one sure way to curtail

(29:47):
crime is to hold criminals accountable. Does this make sense
to you? In other words, if you commit a serious
crime like a rape. Carrie Bloom had a case a
few years ago that Joe Dieters told me about a
sixteen year old boy raped a thirteen year old and
of course that's serious, right Well, Judge Carrie Bloom required

(30:10):
the sixteen year old boy to apologize in person and
in writing to the rate victim, and then he was
set free. You gotta apologize under this system. Get the
library card, play basketball. You're good to go. All we
need to do is lock up the five hundred to
one thousand juveniles committing serious crime and the crime rate

(30:30):
will go down. Library cards aren't going to do it.
Swimming is not going to do it, Arts and crafts
are not going to do it. Basketball is not going
to do it. What's going to do it is you
commit a serious crime in this county. You're going to jail. Period.
End the story. Carry Bloom does not believe that she
believes in library cards and arts and craft basketball and swimming.

(30:55):
That'll take care of it. You got to be kidding me.
I thought it was a meme. I thought it was something.
It was a hoax. This is reality. So let's continue
with more. I haven't got to Trump yet and the
Iranian peace. I'll do that later. After one o'clock today,
we'll be a man who's been probed by aliens and
someone who has confronted Orbs and the characters inside in

(31:17):
island off Patagonia, which is a landing base for the
alien not the invasion force, but for the re education
campaign of humankind in order to serve humanity. Do you
believe Russ Jackson believes. I don't know if I believe
or not. I have my doubts, but nonetheless, I'm willing
to be educated. And if something happens around Independence Day

(31:41):
in the White House and Will Smith's there with Donald Trump,
you better grab your button, kiss it goodbye, because I
don't think the aliens are here to educate us. To
maybe here to eat us. That's a different issue. Let's
continue with more Trowlve fifty five Home of your Reds
to playing tonight big three game series with the Braves
in town. Plus we have our Friday night fireworks and

(32:01):
more and all good things are happening in Cincinnati. If
the Reds can win, I would take right now to
win one of the three games and say to out
with it. They win two out of three against this team,
that'd be a miracle. Then back at it. Bill Cunningham
The Great American Live with Alien Life Forms on News
Radio seven hundred. Wutow I by Bill cunning Him to

(32:24):
Great America. Let's continue now. Indy Peterson is a researcher
and author. His works include Sacrificing Humanity and if you
want to get that book, Sacrificing Humanity dot com is available.
And because of the hearings recently that I've watched, and
I more or less start to believe again than alien
life exists and has visited us. Because you have so

(32:45):
many naval pilots and aviators and also those who have
gone to space, we have first hand experiences that cannot
be explained. All it means is of the tens of thousands,
only one has to be right for the proposition to
be true. Peterson, welcome, I think for the first time
to the Bill Cunningham Show. And after the Congressional UAP hearings,

(33:06):
what did we learn new from those congressional hearings that
seem to indicate that we are being visited by alien life? Forms.

Speaker 5 (33:14):
Well, the hearings have been much more revealing than the
data dumps, which have shown nothing. But the three hearings
should have been the biggest news story of humankind.

Speaker 4 (33:27):
Relating to the origin of the species.

Speaker 5 (33:29):
And affecting our physics and our religion and everything.

Speaker 4 (33:34):
But they most.

Speaker 5 (33:35):
People didn't even know that they happened, and and most
people can't find them, the three congressional hearings. But in
those they revealed that number one UFOs exist, that we've
been reverse engineering them, that Roswell really happened, that there

(33:57):
are they've got alien bodies, and they called them by
a loge.

Speaker 4 (34:01):
And so all those.

Speaker 5 (34:02):
Things have been revealed in the congressional hearings. And what's
amazing is that both the sides, Republicans and Democrats, are
completely united in wanting disclosure on this, and so they've
been very revealing. I call it a Galileo moment where
suddenly we realized we're not the center of the universe,

(34:24):
and it changes everything.

Speaker 1 (34:26):
As far as the UFOs. Can you tell the American
people who testified at these hearings that have not been
well disseminated. Are these people that have shall I say, credibility?

Speaker 4 (34:38):
Oh? Definitely.

Speaker 5 (34:40):
For instance, the hearing that was hidden it for the
longest time, which is November thirteenth, twenty twenty four hearing.
I told friends about it, and they couldn't find it
for months. Unless you watched it live on c SPAN,
you couldn't find it. You can find it now. But
even initially when you searched AI, it would bring up

(35:04):
the other two hearings, but it wouldn't bring up that one.
That one was hosted by Representative Nancy Mace and it
had a stellar cast of Olympic class people retired around Mole.
Tim I can't pronounce his last name, gold dat PhD
us Navy. He's an oceanographer, so he knows all about

(35:26):
the USOS. Would go underwater at speeds that are physically
and are modern physics impossible and enter and at a
speed that would make every anything that's human life form
just jelly. And then so he was a now Navy
administrator of the National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration NOAH, and so

(35:53):
he testified on the USOS. And he's also a CEO
of a firm that deals with that. And Louise Alessandro,
who was head of the uh A tip Advanced Aerospace
Threat Identification Program.

Speaker 4 (36:13):
Anyway, there's a bunch of others.

Speaker 5 (36:15):
So there was it was a stellar cast and so
these were these were highly credible people, and they've been
trying to discredit them.

Speaker 4 (36:26):
There's two sides.

Speaker 5 (36:26):
There's a side that doesn't want disclosure because they're reverse
engineering this stuff and they've got power because of it,
and they want to maintain that power. So they're trying
to discredit people like uh, Louise and Alexando and and
Gruff and one of so one of them, one of

(36:48):
you know, some of these people were saying, well, Alessando
isn't even heading up this program, and uh and that's
all Boloney and and and then Harry Reid had to
write a letter saying, well, in fact, not only is
the on this a tip, but he's ahead of it.

Speaker 4 (37:12):
He's bleeding it.

Speaker 1 (37:14):
Look, Indy Peterson, can you tell me specifically. I've seen
video of Air Force pilots shooting out of the air
these orbs and they would have to get then go
down and see what is in the orb. What specifically
did these pilots say that they observed and what action
did they take?

Speaker 5 (37:35):
And in terms of the orbs, they they're they're confronting
pilots now, which is before these things were trying to
be unseen or because most of the sightings were between
the scientists like Bullet who documented.

Speaker 4 (37:54):
You know, when these things appear.

Speaker 5 (37:55):
They were showing up between one and three am on
week days, so they're trying to hide, not on weekends.

Speaker 4 (38:05):
In remote places.

Speaker 5 (38:07):
But now they're literally confronting our aircraft. Worse than confronting
our aircraft, far worst is they're confronting our launch LC's
launch controls sites. I personally interviewed missileers at the LC's
launch controls sites and in a minute man missiles where

(38:29):
in Montana mostly and they told me about these computer
glitches is what they were officially called. I used to
work at Google as a contractor, and computers do not glitch.
They either perform what they're programmed to do, or someone
takes them over. In this case, someone had taken them over,

(38:52):
and they're orbs that are taking them over. There's been
hundreds you asked a I got a a long discussion
with chat GPT on this, and initially you asked the question,
and it gives you the of the the normal official response,
and then when you ask more detailed questions.

Speaker 4 (39:14):
They'll give you the real answer.

Speaker 5 (39:16):
But chat GPT admitted, yes, there's been hundreds of these
encounters of UAPs at launch control sites. And I said, well,
how many of these have actually potentially.

Speaker 4 (39:32):
Could have caused a nuclear war?

Speaker 5 (39:35):
And chat he said, I had identified seven myself seven.

Speaker 1 (39:39):
And you have a part of your book, and this
is incredible. You recount your journey to a remote island
in Patagonia, rumored by locals to be a UFO base,
where you experienced unexplained phenomena firsthand, including close encounters with
mysterious orbs and polymorphous beans. Let's talk about your visit

(39:59):
to out Agonia.

Speaker 5 (40:02):
Okay, So when I when I was buying nine miles
of this island, it's the size of the nation state.
It's a national park down there in remote Patagonia. The
locals told me, you know, the the island you're trying
to buy property on is a known UFO base.

Speaker 4 (40:20):
And I had more than one tell me that, and
I laughed at.

Speaker 5 (40:23):
Them because I did not believe in UFOs, because nobody
could get a decent picture of one. And we learned
in in the Age of Disclosure documentary that just came out,
including our Secretary of State Rubio and NSA people and others.

Speaker 4 (40:40):
Quite a stellar cast in that as well.

Speaker 5 (40:43):
That the reason why is because they operate within a
space time continuum, and so you're shooting when you do
a picture through that, and thus it's it's glory anyway.

Speaker 4 (40:55):
So I didn't I did not.

Speaker 5 (40:56):
Believe in in UFOs at the time.

Speaker 4 (41:00):
I laughed at it.

Speaker 1 (41:01):
In fact, yes, now what now do you believe?

Speaker 5 (41:08):
Oh, definitely, I experienced them for ten myself.

Speaker 1 (41:11):
What happened?

Speaker 4 (41:12):
What happened, Well, it was a it.

Speaker 5 (41:14):
Was a series of events that proved that they were right.
That I believe now that the island is a UFO base.

Speaker 4 (41:22):
They're coming out of the ocean.

Speaker 5 (41:24):
So the first experience was when I witnessed right there,
directly across from the island, in one of the most
remote parts of the planet, the largest cattle mutilation in
South American history, where there are hundreds of cattle's cattle

(41:44):
and sheep mutilated in Patagonia. You can look it up
on ai uh and dozens in one single night, right
where I was.

Speaker 1 (41:56):
And why would aliens mutilate a sheep? Well, what's what's
the reason?

Speaker 5 (42:01):
Yeah, this this actually, this is very instructive because it
rules out all the other possibilities.

Speaker 4 (42:11):
Uh.

Speaker 5 (42:11):
Another a normal common explanation for cattle mutilation is well,
it's the government testing radiation or biologics or whatever on
on the cows. That's one explanation. Well, that's definitely ruled
out because the US military in the in the twenty
years I was down there, you knew, knew when they

(42:33):
were there. Their ship showed up and their guys would
in their short haircuts. The gringos would be in the Starbucks, uh,
sloping carma Macchiado's.

Speaker 4 (42:41):
You know, all the.

Speaker 5 (42:42):
Chili knew when they were there. They weren't there that year.
That's one the Chilean military was. I've never seen them
down in that region, the remote Patagonia, and their their
funds are quite low. And then any other explanation and
oh it's people, it's pranksters, it's satanists.

Speaker 4 (43:04):
All those are ruled out because this happened in.

Speaker 5 (43:06):
The Chilean winter, where a rainforest where you can't take
one step without your foot sinking and you know, an
inch or two into the muck, and so there's no tracks.
The other explanation, well, helicopters. Now you can rule that
out as well in this Patagonia region because we tried

(43:27):
to get a helicopter down there for a television show,
Big One, and we had a number of people working
on that too great lengths just to get one down there.

Speaker 4 (43:37):
So all those things are ruled out.

Speaker 5 (43:40):
And the people were in a panic because they were
seeing these orbs at the same time that the cattle mulation,
and so the Chilean government had to send SAG down
there to investigate this Service of Agriculture and it's the
government agency to investigate and try to calm all the

(44:03):
natives that were calm them down.

Speaker 4 (44:05):
They called it, they called it a mass hysteria.

Speaker 1 (44:08):
Yeah, well, when you encountered one of these alien life forms,
can you describe the American people what they look like?
Because I'm thinking about will Smith Independence Day and these
things were ugly and we got the two hundred and fiftieth.
I mean, if this thing lands on Independence Day at
the White House, now we got issues. So describe if

(44:29):
you can't, Indy Peterson, what do they look like? Do
they look like from the movie Independence Day? I mean
the physicality described the appearance.

Speaker 5 (44:38):
Okay, So the next occurrence that happened was when my
business partner and I were in the part of Patagonia
that it was nobody within one.

Speaker 4 (44:49):
Hundred miles of us.

Speaker 5 (44:51):
It's very near the island, and it's three in the morning,
long drive back on the commune hostraw on a dirt
road in the middle of absolute nowhere. It got tired,
pull over and first she saw my business partners, a woman,
and it's zipping around like bright angle turns and everything

(45:15):
and doing things that no physical craft could ever do.
And then this whole incident took about fifteen minutes. So
it rolls out ball lightning and the pies of electric effect.
Other explanations are ruled out. And plus it it showed
intelligence because we're watching it and it's like it sees

(45:39):
us watching it from afar, and it comes down.

Speaker 4 (45:42):
To where we are.

Speaker 5 (45:43):
And then it got closer and then went right to
the tree above us and then navigated the edge.

Speaker 4 (45:49):
The very intelligently navigated the edge between the tree and
the truck.

Speaker 1 (45:55):
Did they jump out of the orb? Did did the
aliens come out of the orb? What are the aliens
look like?

Speaker 5 (46:01):
So so they the the the orbs? I had one
of those come closer to my face than any.

Speaker 4 (46:11):
That I know of.

Speaker 5 (46:11):
At least there's two feet in front of my face,
so I could eat, I could see inside of it
and see what's what's literally closer than.

Speaker 4 (46:19):
Anyone that I know that live to tell it.

Speaker 5 (46:21):
Nolan the Stanford pathologist has and this came up in
the congressional hearings.

Speaker 4 (46:27):
Nancy Mace asked.

Speaker 5 (46:29):
The question, how is it that your government's denying that
these we have recovered craft, if they have people, if
we're paying people because they have been injured by recovered craft.
So that's a very very.

Speaker 1 (46:44):
But what do they look like? Do they look like aliens?
And they're like human beings? Are they like bugs that?

Speaker 4 (46:51):
Yeah, I gotta get to how how it first appeared.

Speaker 5 (46:55):
So it was like something out of Star Trek, these
these orbs. You look inside him, it's like a fusion
or some sort of electrical reaction going on inside this
ball of just churning inside energy.

Speaker 4 (47:10):
I mean, it's right find of space.

Speaker 5 (47:12):
You can see right inside of it, and something like
right out of Star Trek where they materialized from that object.
It started to materialize from that object. And this is
after fifteen full minutes of observing this, and then it
being in front of my face for a while. When
it started to materialize into a being, I did to

(47:35):
sit and wait around to see what kind of being
was coming out of it, because I'm getting.

Speaker 4 (47:41):
It gives you a fear.

Speaker 5 (47:42):
It gives you a fear that you far beyond anything.

Speaker 4 (47:46):
You've ever experienced in your life.

Speaker 5 (47:49):
And I drove that truck so fast my partner was screaming,
slow down, You're gonna kill us, Like I cannot run
something that goes that mock fourteen.

Speaker 1 (48:01):
Yep. Well, I'll tell you what we have here. All
the information is sacrificing humanity dot com. The book is there.
We've only scratched the surface. But I do believe UFOs exist.
I do believe at some point soon Trump's going to
release them all, maybe on Independence Day, and the truth
will be known. It's a Galileo moment, as you describe it,

(48:21):
but we have time constraints, gotta run, but sacrificing humanity
dot Com. Indy Peterson, the Aliens may have a base
in Patagonia and from there they're going to conquer the
world or do whatever. And once again, Indy Peterson, thanks
for coming on the Bill. Cunningham Show. We'll do it again,
thank you, Indy.

Speaker 4 (48:38):
All right, thank you much.

Speaker 1 (48:40):
I'll just continue with more aliens landing Patagonia. Not sure
where that is, but it's a base somewhere in the
Pacific where they're going to launch. Shall we say, more
inspections of humankind to serve humanity? Bill Cunningham, News Radio
seven hundred, Bill cunning in the Great American. Of course,

(49:04):
the last year and a half, anyway, we've been trying,
through the courts and through the presidency to end racial
discrimination or at least begin the process of stopping it in
the public education, also in the redistricting fight. And the
way to end discrimination is stop racial discrimination. And that
is not something the liberals ever will agree to, because

(49:24):
the party of racism from this eighteenth century through today
has been the Democratic Party, the slavery the ku klux Klan,
they're all Democrats. When the thirteenth and fourteenth and fifteenth
Amendment was passed, about ninety percent of Republicans voted to
eliminate race discrimination. That Democrats voted against it. And even
today when courts rule like Supreme Court rules you can't

(49:48):
practice race discrimination in public education, that doesn't stop Democrats
at all they continue with race discrimination. A great column
is up by Sarah Partiall Perry, Vice president and senior
legal fellow at Defending Education dot Org. I have the
website up now and also do no Harm And Sarah Perry,

(50:09):
welcome again to the Bill Cunningham Show and talk about
the race discrimination being practiced, hopefully not by the Democrats
in the state of Oregon and how it impacts the nation.
Give me a full report.

Speaker 3 (50:21):
Yeah, you know, we actually discovered some race discrimination transpiring
both in K through twelve schools and in higher education
in the state of Oregon, which means that unfortunately, many
of the universities and schools and administrators on the West
coast don't seem to be getting the message from the
Supreme Court on one First Street in Washington, DC on
the East coast, which is the way to stop race

(50:44):
discrimination is to stop discriminating on.

Speaker 4 (50:47):
The basis of race.

Speaker 3 (50:48):
They've made that clear in twenty twenty three and the
Students for faird Mission versus Harvard case and again in
the Louisiana versus Kalay case. Every time we see race
discrimination used, race as a category is inherently constitutionally suspect.
But what we discovered out in the state of Oregon
is that both in K through twelve and in higher education,

(51:10):
race is being used as a plus factor to determine
it exactly where state funds are being spent. I will
give you an example. The Oregon Department of Education requires
that sixty five percent of all charter school student bodies
be from a minority group in order to qualify for
a charter school equity grant. That means that schools that

(51:34):
are not majority minority are left out of the funding
equation that limits educational opportunity for all kids, not just
kids of certain skin colors. And the Higher Education Coordinating
Commission for Higher Education Institutions distributes funding to Oregon's public
universities according to the number of minority students who graduate.

(51:58):
So it's not just through twelve charter schools public charter schools,
it's also higher education public universities and colleges, both of
which are getting a plus up with taxpayer dollars depending
on exactly how many racially balanced students they have in
their particular population.

Speaker 1 (52:19):
So this is blatant race discrimination practiced by in this
case is State of Oregon, which is probably prevalent throughout
the entire nation because the Democrats won't give up on this,
and they instinctively believe that a black kid or black
female is inherently inferior to a white or an Asian
kid because the color of their skin, and therefore they

(52:40):
have racial quotas, and that is racist by itself. Now,
I would assume a minority is not perceived to be
an Asian kid? Is that fair to say that somehow
that doesn't count?

Speaker 3 (52:50):
And that is exactly it. Generally these are considered bipoc individuals, Black,
Indigenous or people of color, Asians, Jewish, and Barrantans. Whites
do not count for the purposes of these particular metrics.
And let's just talk about the money for a second.
The charter school grant program was allocated over four million

(53:11):
dollars from twenty twenty five to twenty twenty seven. Is
we're eight schools, and the Public University Fund manages over
one billion dollars for the same period, So we're talking
one point four billion dollars allocated for racially intensive school
programs in K through twelve and higher education during only

(53:34):
a two year span. That is a lot of taxpayer money.
That is allocated on the grounds of race, color, or
national origin, directly in violation of Title six of the
Civil Rights Act of nineteen sixty four.

Speaker 1 (53:48):
Well, just passed because the Republicans supported the Democrats did not.
And so the outcome you filed the lawsuit. Really you've
gone to the Civil Rights Division of the US Department
of Justice, and then they're going to investigate, then proceed
to court or not precede the court when these cases
get the court. Isn't it fair to say that the
Democrats lose every time when it comes to race discrimination.

(54:10):
You can't discriminate based upon race, and the Democrats know
they're doing it. When they do it, they ignore the courts.
So what do you do when small and large school
districts all over the country simply ignore it and simply
will do it anyway. And then I would anticipate through
running out the clock. But that I mean they know
Trump's out of office in the next two and a
half years, They'll be gone. They're running out the clock

(54:33):
to get the next Democrat. Then their Department of Justice
will overturn all these rules against race discrimination. Democrats will
keep practicing racism. Am I right about that?

Speaker 3 (54:44):
Or not no. I think you're absolutely right in fact
that this administration seems to be playing sort of a
form of wack and mole administratively with a lot of
these colleges and university. Remember that we are sort of
approaching a lane duck session for the Trump President, and
the administration only has so much time to be able
to accomplish its aims. They are working over time to

(55:06):
get those done. For example, we've seen right now now
new litigation against the Yale Medical School because the DOJ
has accused them of violating federal law by using race
based admission policies as well in violation of Supreme Court's
edict in the Students for Fair Admission case. But there
is only so much time to be able to effectuate
what this administration wants to do, and that is to

(55:28):
return the nation back to a color blind method of
administrating K through twelve and higher education program. It's how
it is always designed to be. That was the promise
of Brown versus Board of Education. That was the promise
of the Civil Rights Act of nineteen sixty four. We
saw a lot of the blue state governors hold out.
They wanted to maintain segregation in the deep South. There

(55:51):
were a series of litigation that followed that period of
American history, but it took having to fight these battles
one at a time, one after another, in every jurisdiction
in the country, to make sure all were aligned. Unfortunately,
I think the administrations has continually shown it is willing
to put the pedal to the metal to accomplish that

(56:14):
promise of colorblind educational quality. That's something our organization stands
and support of.

Speaker 1 (56:20):
Sarah Perry of Defending Education dot Org explain, I've read
about the Yale Medical School and which they turned down
more qualified applicants based upon race in order to make
sure that the medical schools represent maybe the population as
a whole, or represents some other goal. But explain what
Yale Medical School is doing to discriminate against students based

(56:43):
upon race, which is racism. But I'm sure in their
own sick left wing minds, they think they're doing the
Lord's work. But explain the Yale Medical School admission standards.

Speaker 3 (56:53):
Yeah, that's exactly right. In fact, some internal documents, training materials, communications,
all have indicated that there is an intense to continder
using race and admissions decisions, specifically for black and Hispanic students,
and much like Harvard University was doing in the twenty
twenty three case, they are using a metric where they

(57:13):
are giving plus factors additional waiting to individuals who happen
to be black or Hispanic, which disadvantages highly qualified, white,
Asian or other students who were explicitly denied admission on
the basis of their race. That doesn't just violate federal
civil rights law and federal constitutional law, it is immoral

(57:37):
at its core. When we look at individuals first on
the basis of the color of their skin, we are
doing violence to the promises of our founding documents, the
Declaration and the Constitution, and to the progenitors of the
civil rights movement. In fact, the Department of Justice has
cited a twenty twenty four admissions presentation. There was a

(57:57):
slide in that admissions presentation that is titled explicitly Admissions
post sotis, which was the staff's way of arguing how
to get around the twenty twenty three decision. So I
anticipate this is going to be a fight to the
finish between Yale and the Department of Justice.

Speaker 1 (58:16):
A couple of the related matters I see graduation ceremonies
have largely been concluded. There are many colleges that have
separate graduation ceremonies based upon race, in which especially elite
colleges have a separate You get your diploma at a
separate graduation based upon race, using public facilities. Your comments

(58:39):
on that.

Speaker 3 (58:42):
It is precisely the same thing packaged in a completely
different format. It is no less illegal than if you
are bringing in students or refusing students on the basis
of their skin color. Is a university? If a college
accept so much as a dollar of federal funding, regardless
of what whether they are public or private, they are

(59:02):
subject to the promises and the obligations of federal civil
rights law. And so if, for example, a private university
that accepts students on for example, a pell grant or
a stafford loan, or under any auspices of financial funding
for those students and then decides that they will separate
out graduation ceremonies or benefits or privileges based on an

(59:26):
individual's race, nationality, or ethnicity, that's a violation of not
only constitutional law, but federal civil rights law. Those two
are types of programs that our organization seeks to track
and identify and ultimately bring to the attention of the administration.

Speaker 1 (59:43):
So if a white student, an Asian student, a Hispanic
student wants to get a diploma and go to a
exclusively black graduation ceremony, they're prohibited, and that's illegal, but
it happens all the time. Another thing is race based dormitories.
Many elite colleges and others have dormitories based upon race.

(01:00:05):
Democrats love that in which blacks want to be separate
from whites. I can only imagine if white students got
together and said we want dormitories without any black students
in here, oh, hell will break loose. But when black
Americans say, I don't want to be around white people,
I want my own dormitory, and the college is provided
in that a violation.

Speaker 3 (01:00:27):
That's exactly it. And remember that the abomination of plus
versus ferguson that lie of separate but equal was overturned,
and brown versus Board of Education. You cannot separate people
buy skin color and then lie to them and tell
them that separate facilities are somehow their own form of equality.
In fact, that was precisely what did the Civil rights

(01:00:51):
movement forefathers were seeking to accomplish, was to break down
those rigid separations, those walls between one and another. This
bathroom for one individual, this bathroom for another, this lunch
counter for one individual, discounter for another. We are only
seeing increases now under the guise of diversity, equity or inclusion.

(01:01:14):
That is simply racism packaged with nicer language.

Speaker 1 (01:01:17):
So why does it happen so much? I'm watching, by
the way, the behavior of some of these students who
get their diplomas. I don't know if you've seen it
is disgusting. But nonetheless, when you have separate graduation ceremonies
or separate dormitories based upon race, that is per se illegal.
So why does it happen so much?

Speaker 3 (01:01:39):
I think because we've had too long an administration in
the Biden administration, specifically that likes to play fast and
loose with federal civil rights protections, and they were willing
to interpret and apply race based protection in a way
that favored one race or another. Well, that's not equality,
that's equity, and equity is unconstitution The quality is giving

(01:02:01):
everyone the same opportunity. Equity is waiting the scale so
that certain outcomes are guaranteed. That is not the color
line promise of the Constitution. But we've had too many
Democrats sitting in Capitol Hill, and we've had too much
violence from the Obama administration to the Biden administration done
to federal civil rights protection that utilized what we saw

(01:02:24):
as a societal event with George Floyd and afterwards that
turned race equality on its head, weighted the scales for
one group of individuals over another, and really fomented the
flames of what was not a fire in the United States.
There was no racial unrest to the degree that we've
seen in the wake of the administration's attempt to stir

(01:02:48):
the pot and to give us narratives an oppressor and oppressed,
victim and victor. Those are the kinds of ideologies that
unfortunately give us victim mentality and turn one group of
students against another. That is ultimately something that the organization
seeks to defeat.

Speaker 1 (01:03:06):
All right, Sarah, A couple of quick other issues. The
Constitution prohibits race discrimination. It does not prohibit politics, and
so with all the redistricting going on, it's about protecting
democratic districts, not protecting black representation. Because four or five
Congressional Republican blacks can't get in the Congressional Black Caucus.

(01:03:30):
They're black, they belong in it, but they're denied admission.
So the Congressional Black Caucus is practicing race discrimination against
a black person who happens to be a Republican. Isn't
that illegal?

Speaker 3 (01:03:43):
It absolutely is, And in fact, it has to make
you chuckle because you realize it is not skin color
for the sake of skin color, but it is skin
color for the sake of a preferred political ideology. And
so you are not allowed to be a member of
the Congressional Black Caucus, even if you are black yourself,
if you possess the wrong ideologies, which just goes to

(01:04:05):
show you that the individuals who are arguing for color blindness,
for race neutrality, or those individuals who are right thinking,
they are right leaning, and unfortunately that has sort of
the nomenclature of conservatism and republicanism. I wish that we're
a universal goal. I wish that we're a universal aim

(01:04:25):
for all of us, both in our elected offices and
all the way down through take through twelve, education and beyond.
But unfortunately it seems to be one political predilection over another.
And that's again something that we are very concerned with.

Speaker 1 (01:04:40):
So when the Congressional Black Caucus uses government facilities for meetings,
et cetera, and they practice race discrimination against Black Republicans,
maybe get on that one too, because this is read
history is not about race, it's about politics. It's about
protecting democratic districts. Steve co and the guy that represents

(01:05:01):
Memphis in the Congress is white and the Congressional Black
Caucus endorses him over a black female. You would think
that Congressional Black Caucus would want more blacks in the Congress,
just the opposite. The registering is all about protecting democratic districts,
not about protecting Black Americans.

Speaker 3 (01:05:22):
Correct, that's exactly it now and we've said that from
the beginning. This is really right about pushing your particular
left wing progressive ideology. And if you truly cared about
the cause of the Congressional Black caucaus, you wouldn't want
as many African American voices in that caucus as possible.
That unfortunately is not the case.

Speaker 1 (01:05:43):
Well, all about minute remaining, I wanted to talk to
you about stories out of Massachusetts and Virginia. Nine year
old girls are being invaded in their bathroom spaces and
their toilet spaces by a nine year old transgender, a
boy who claims to be a girl nine years old
nine year old boy and Carrie and Luis Rivera, the

(01:06:05):
parents of a third grade girl in Massachusetts, filed a
formal Title nine complaint two or three boys who are
nine years old identify as a girl nine years old,
and now the school district says the boys must be
in the girls' bathroom. Give me thirty seconds.

Speaker 3 (01:06:23):
Yeah, let me tell you, I am the mother of
three kids, and it does not surprise me that a
little hormonal nine year old boy wants to pretend he's
a girl to get a look at a girl and
a girl's bathroom. That is as old as time. And
I will tell you civil rights law exists to protect
equality and education that means women as well. We pass
Title line in the Education Amendments in nineteen seventy two

(01:06:45):
specifically to guarantee educational equality for girls and women. Their
spaces are being violated. And my guest is they already
have the administration's attention.

Speaker 1 (01:06:54):
Well, Sarah Parshall or Perry, I have your website up
Defending Education dot org. Let's have some more successes. Let's
stop the Democrats for being the racist they've always been,
and uh, we'll continue with more. Sarah, thanks for coming
on the Bill Cunningham Show. And you're a great American.

Speaker 4 (01:07:11):
Thank you very much, thanks for having me.

Speaker 1 (01:07:14):
God bless you. The party of racism continues, and those
are the Democrats. Bill Cunningham News Radio seven hundred list.

Speaker 2 (01:07:24):
It's got a lot of fire bran. It helps you
poop if you need the poop.

Speaker 5 (01:07:32):
Hello, bye, I'm broadcasting.

Speaker 1 (01:07:39):
Say the cuts her back. Rush Jackson has fixed everything.
I might I might have a couple of Jones Burgers
tonight for dinner. Sounds pretty good to me if you're
locked up, a little bit of onion rings, comment a crime,
go to jail, a coke, get some Sheriff Burgers and
guess what good now before you get into Campbell's soup.
Now we're right here, boy, Now what now? Would you

(01:08:02):
agree with me that if you're fifteen, sixteen, seventeen years old? Yeah,
rolling around with guns, breaking into cars, robbery, burglary, drug sales,
rape and run, Now maybe you got a problem. Yes,
Judge Kerrie Bloom, I thought it was a joke. I
talked to someone at Fox nineteen or nineteen stands for news. Okay,
juveniles facing criminal charges are now required to join a library.

(01:08:29):
What I know here? It is what hama? I guess
maybe get a library. Car didn't that midnight basketball doesn't
work anymore? Swimming basketball, arts and crafts library. The amity
got a juvenile court announced today a summer of discovery. Yeah,
they need to discover themselves down there. We're caring uh

(01:08:51):
juveniles with guns. Yeah. To obtain pre trial requirement release,
got to do three things that you ready to get released,
having beaten people up, pistol whipped them, rape, rob pilly,
breaking the card. Three things go ahead, right. Judge Carrie
Bloom says this one. She's the uber leftist. One obtain

(01:09:12):
a library card. Let's go to the library. Just get
a card. Number two, get a membership at our expense,
of course, to the YMCA or the rec center to
play basketball, swim a little bit of billiards. The number three.
Bring a copy of your last quarter grades to the

(01:09:34):
next quarter here to prove that you have not attended
school and you're flunking. So number one to get a
library card. Number two play basketball. The number three show
me your grades. How many people around here know where
their library is? They can't spell it much. Let's get there. So,
according to Judge carry Bloom, the goal is to be

(01:09:56):
a supportive adult, tackling the underlying issues that lead them
to court. So the problem is you get a library
card and play basketball, then you don't commit crime. See
what I'm saying This is brilliant, Judge carry Bloom. Is
is this judge a Democrat bingo? Not just the demontrat

(01:10:16):
him or her? You can't find her on the left
with a pair of binocular Is it a him or her?
It's a her, a female white liberal. It's about the worst.
I'm surprised you didn't have multicolored hair and has a
nosering in court. Judge Carrie Bloom says we've got to
fix the problem by getting them a library card and
sign up for basketball. Makes sense, doesn't It will leave

(01:10:39):
the stuge reporters approach service every local Thamestar Heating and
air conditioning dealers Tamestar Paul of you could feel in
Cincinnati called WINDGate Heating and Air five one, three, seven,
three nine forty two thirty eight or visit call WINDGate
dot com segment. Get a library card. You're breaking into cars,

(01:11:02):
feeding people to death. Get a library card and play
some basketball. Willie Reds embraces tonight in game one of
their three game series Downtown the Grand Holmes up against
Chris Paddock, five forty Sports Talk, Arnel Carriers, Inside Pitch,
and then Kelsey Chevrolet Extra Ding Show after the game. Now,
NCAA Baseball Cincinnati Bearcats in Louisiana tonight in the first

(01:11:26):
round of the Starkville Regional. Game time tonight is seven pm.
Thank you a library card. No, back to the Reds.
They made a roster move. I told you it would happen.
Not him, what No, the Reds have placed on the
sixty day injured list. Now, Graham Ashcraft, what's all in him?
Ucl sprain and his right forearm, Oh my gosh, and

(01:11:49):
you know what that might mean, Tommy TJ time. So
Graham Ashcraft is out basically for the rest of the year,
two more months at least. You nor Marte right handed
pitchers coming up mark triple A Louisville. No, it's not
the route. Not the hitter marches a lot of Martes,

(01:12:09):
running a lot of Martes. But why not Arroyo, not Bronson.
He's I think he's on stage tonight singing something playing.
Is he going to be called up? Let's see Willie
College Basketball News skyline. Charlie Crosstown Shootout, according to reports
between UC and X will be played next season Saturday,
December fifth, at the fifth Third Arena. Remember last year

(01:12:32):
it was like in the afternoon. It was stupid, stupid. Also,
the Ohio State High School Tennis Tournament go ahead. Ohio
State Tennis Tournament is underway with Ted McKay at the
Linder Tennis Center, the home of the Cincinnati opened Saint
Xavier doubles champs. They're the state champs at a Saint

(01:12:53):
x Carson Dwyer that's my buddy, and the Hall Narris SETI.
They beat North Royalton.

Speaker 2 (01:13:00):
Uh.

Speaker 1 (01:13:01):
Let's see the D one singles final. You got a
kid from Mason playing and then D two. Indian Hill
is in action trying to get us state champs. Carson
Dreyer is the best state title holder. I think he's
going to go to the French Open next year. Carson's
got to because they're they're getting every everybody's getting knocked
off over there. Well, what about Edwin. What about Edwin?

(01:13:25):
Edwin and Carnassi owned Edwin Arroyo, You fool, I don't
know he's related. Is he related to Bronson Arroyo? I
don't think so. Well, he's sitting on that. Bring him up.
He needs probably a little bit more refinement. Bring him up.
Can this markte Pitcher? Can he throw strikes? I better
get him up. Somebody's got to Graham Hanscraft sixty tod dl.

(01:13:46):
He's gone until June, July to August. Then they'll have
Tommy John and then he'll wait until March of the
next year. Hunter Green should be back by then. He's
throwing right now, isn't it coming up this weekend? I
think I've read that somewhere. I don't keep an eye
on him. It's unbelievable. So now who's in the bullpen?
When when the bullpen gate opens? Well, who comes out?

Speaker 3 (01:14:10):
Uh?

Speaker 1 (01:14:10):
Rod Serling and the Twilight Zone sego yeah, And then
let's see also in town today Willie Amilio, Pegan and
Jose Travino both out with those hamstring polls. Will get
imaging to check and see the progress of being What
about Pagan? What about Pegan? Can he That's what I'm

(01:14:31):
just saying. I know he's got Well, I don't know
you when the gate opens, who comes out, Rod Serling,
because you don't know the twilight zone. What if they're good?
What if the nasty boys? Oh they have ten more wins,
that's for sure. When it leaves, if they've blown? And
now who's the main guy in the bullpen? Roll the

(01:14:54):
dice on a waitning conduct yourselves and tonight when you
play the Braves that the best team in baseball, and
the schedule doesn't get easier, but Kansas City and the
city comes in starting Monday, and then I think they
go off on another road trip the end of next week.
Got to get the team back, segment. Gotta get the
team back. I know you're interested, like mo Is about

(01:15:18):
the NBA playoffs. Do you care about the playoffs? NBA playoffs?
I mean the San Antonio and the Thunder play game seven.
What Tomorrow night, Tomorrow night and then the win all
the Knicks. It's all on the line segment. And I
mean they I bet you they could spill. If they
could build seven more Madison Square gardens down there, they

(01:15:39):
could fill it up. What happens if the Knicks win
at all. Oh, I don't believe we won't know what
to do. It'll be to be Willis Reid, Earl or
with Clyde Thede, you know, the starting five and the
seventy three Nicks. I'm glad you brought that up. Willis Reid, Okay,
Clyde the Clyde Drexler or no Frasier sorry uh to Busher, Yes, Senator,

(01:16:05):
can I say Senator New Jersey Phil Bradley, Chris Chris
Oh not Chris not not, not exactly. I thought he
was a man in the middle. And Jerry Lucas. Oh
there you go. Pretty good team in a while, like
fifty three years at least. But you're not focusing on
this big story juvenile court Hamle in the county Judge
Kerry Bloom, where was where was this great idea? Where

(01:16:29):
was this solution? I mean that that'll that'll crime will
be exact extinct in Cincinnati if that happens. Get a library. No, no,
don't go to the library. Just go get a card.
And then you got to sign up to play basketball
and swim. So there's like you can't like go to
the library and get like at least five books. I
had a library card for a long time. No, I

(01:16:50):
don't have it.

Speaker 2 (01:16:51):
I don't.

Speaker 1 (01:16:51):
I think today I would assume it's online. I mean everything.
You know, you've got a computer, there's your library. We
have a criminal judge who says those who commit serious
crimes with guns have to get a library card and
sign up for basketball, and that person gets elected all
the time. This November, she's up again against a woman

(01:17:12):
named Luken I think related to Charlie to run for
the seat. But based upon local history, the liberal, uber leftist,
progressive commy Democrat wins almost every time. Assuming you have
a library charge and you have you sign up to

(01:17:33):
play basketball and swim every now and then. I don't
get it. I don't get it. But that's what takes
the place of holding accountable. If we had normal judges
in this county, we have a lot less crime. What
about the crusher? Bring him back, Tom and Games a crush.
I think he's in the arms of God Almighty along

(01:17:54):
with Judge Natal present time. But we have to reduce offenses,
including guns related crimes. Let's get him a library card.
That'll do it. We're in trouble more ways, Let's continue
with morse seg thank you, yes, sir, and uh, let's
continue and we'll see what happens with Graham Ashcroft craft

(01:18:14):
gone for at least two months. He won't pitch anymore
this year. And hopefully they'll bring up some offense. Hopefully
they can go somewhere and get some pitching. And who's
coming up? Marte's coming up?

Speaker 4 (01:18:26):
Yeah?

Speaker 1 (01:18:26):
You nor you? Nor Martin or not regular Marte normal?
Yeah two segment give me out on the Stuge report.
Please will he everybody have a safe and great weekend? Said,
weather's going to be beautiful all weekend. Mike, couldn't we
had this weekend's weather last weekend? Took the words right
out of my mouth. One might ask, we leave you

(01:18:46):
with the immortal words of the student record. No, they
don't know.

Speaker 3 (01:18:51):
I referred to them when they made that statement as
the three Stooges And.

Speaker 1 (01:18:58):
That's really mollies in the free Stooges talking. I think
about the Butler County Commissioners. Not sure the three stooges.
Sheriff Richard Kerry Bloom right there, get him a library card.
Sign up for basketball and gun related offenses, pistol whipping people,

(01:19:20):
holding people up breaking into cars. It's okay with me,
Bill Cunningham, News Radio seven hundred WW