January 22, 2026 • 19 mins
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:09):
It's seven oh six here fifty five arced. He talked station.
Brian Thomas was in airboat. A very appy Friday, even
welcoming back to the fifty five Karrisee Morning Show and
certainly salute and appreciate his willingness to come on the
fifty five KRSSE Morning Show and talk important issues with
my audience and me. Congressman Warren Davidson, welcome back, sir.
It's always great having you on my program.
Speaker 2 (00:29):
Yeah, I always look forward to it. Thanks, Brian.
Speaker 1 (00:31):
Nice talking with you, Always nice talking to you. And
uh in reverse order, you filed again to represent the
eighth district. I'm so pleased to see that you're running again.
And I want to let you know right up front,
because Joe put it on my rundown. You already have
Joe Strecker's vote. I don't know how he's able to
cast it. We're not gonna even ask that question, but
at least Joe Strecker's voting for your Congressman Davidson.
Speaker 2 (00:52):
Yeah, I'm encouraged.
Speaker 1 (00:54):
You know.
Speaker 2 (00:55):
The sad thing is you lose constituents when they redraw
the map. Because I've it's changed a bit since I
you know, since I first ran, and this is a
third redraw really of it, but it won't take effect
till January third next year, and I hope to be
the guy that gets a chance to keep serving in Congress.
It's obviously very frustrating at time. I think it's obvious
(01:17):
to anyone anywhere in the world, but this place is broken.
It's a little more broken and differently broken than I
think I thought before I got here. But it is
nice to be here working to make a difference on it,
and I feel like at times it's just one of
some of the most rewarding things I do. And I
will say, you look at it. I know lots of
people are frustrated. I think I'm probably slightly less frustrated
(01:41):
here because I go, well, you know, I see what
we're doing. But boy, it's exasperating sometimes to be at
a ringside seat and fighting hard to change something and
you just can't change the outcome. The epitome of that
was COVID, So you know, like, this is crazy and
you still couldn't stop people from doing crazy things.
Speaker 1 (02:00):
Well, isn't that true? And lord knows, we're going an
seemingly endless list of craziness that came out of COVID.
And since we are awash in stories of fraud, waste,
and abuse revelations among all these various government programs, I mean,
hell with the trillions of dollars that were thrown out
into the world. Apparently absolutely no one on any political
stripe was watching where the money was went and how
(02:21):
it was spent. And I've just discovered something, and maybe
you can confirm or maybe reject my flot or my
theory on this. All that COVID nineteen money in the
city of Cincinnati was one of the recipients of a
lot of it. Now they're struggling with how do they
manage the books and balance a budget in the absence
of COVID money. So my thought was that all this
COVID money left Washington, d c. Was thrown out of
(02:43):
all these underwater left wing cities New York, Chicago, the
other ones that were struggling with a budget, and they
use it to patch the budget holes that they created.
Speaker 2 (02:51):
Am I close, Oh, that's exactly what's going on with Obamacare.
You know, we put Obamacare subsidies in. They're like, oh,
you know, this is terrible, And you're like well, you
said Obamacare was the greatest thing in the world and
it was going to cure everything. Why do you need
to keep bailing it out. Well, because it's not great,
it's terrible. It's delivered terrible results for the market for
(03:14):
the people that have it. I guess there are upsides
of some of the policy changes. I think Republicans, even
some who were skeptics on some of those policies, say yeah, okay,
some of these things have worked for good on policy,
but on the financial structural part of this, giving the
money to the insurance companies is dumb instead of giving
it to consumers. And you know again, well, the more
(03:37):
things you subsidize, the worse the rate of inflation for
the things that get the subsidies. And it's exactly that,
because it masks all the inefficiencies and it says, I
don't worry about being inefficient, We'll just throw more money
at it. And we're seeing that all over the place,
and you watch. Look, I will say, there's no partisanship
when it comes to getting after scam centers. No one
supports these guys that are scamming centers seniors and particular.
(04:01):
And we shut one that was like fifteen billion dollars
down in Cambodia last year, Cambodia, So you know, yeah,
I mean that's a significant part of this. Cambodi is GDP, Right,
So when it comes to things like that, Republicans and
Democrats we stand arm in arm and I'm glad to
have their support for it. But it's the scam center
is like a Somali daycare center. Oh well, you can't
go after that. If it's what about you look at healthcare.
(04:25):
Illegals supposedly weren't getting Medicaid, but when you shut it down,
you want to audit the records of which illegals are
getting it. And now they're saying we can't share the
Medicaid records with Ice. Why guy had thought no illegals
for getting it and it's obvious in many states they
were getting it by design. So it's just a massive
amount of corruption on this stuff.
Speaker 1 (04:46):
Well with that question, and you know, the other point
on that, it's this fixing the problem of healthcare. Why
is healthcare so expensive? And covering up the costs the
true cost of healthcare. Offering subsidies just covers up the
dollar figure, revealing how bad it is. Your premium dollars
go up because the cost of paying claims has gone
(05:08):
through the roof. Why has the cost of paying claims
gone through the roof? And where are the fixes and
solutions related to that? Just throwing extra federal money and
covering someone's premium? Hell, you want to cover my auto insurance?
Why you're at it? You know that's gone up. I mean,
you want to cover my energy bill that's gone up
primarily because of stupid government policies and chasing carbon dioxide
(05:28):
out of the air. How about subsidizing our energy bills?
They have to do it in Germany. I mean, you know,
it's just crazy. The reality is the underlying problem never
gets solved when you mask over it by throwing money
on top of it.
Speaker 2 (05:42):
Yeah, I mean, isn't that a sort of analogy for
what's going on with the government right? It just keeps
getting bigger. And I will say, even in Ohio where
we have a balanced budget, when you look at what's
going on with spending at the state, you're like, the
rate of growth of spending here is pretty bad too.
So the spending problem is enormous. And this is why
(06:06):
I say, look, your money is being destroyed, you know,
it's nice you look at your house and they get
their appraisal and you're like, oh, well, it's nice that
my house is quote worth more until you get the
property tax bill and all that. But then you look
at the reality. No, your house didn't and if you
didn't make modifications or anything to it, it didn't automatically
(06:26):
go up by the one hundred thousand dollars. Your money
got less valuable over time, and that, unfortunately, that's part
of what's going on with the stock market. That's why
gold is soaring, is the money is being destroyed, and
that's happening with dustinance. You know, if you take five
trillion out of the economy every year with taxes, which
(06:47):
is roughly what happens, and you jump seven trillion dollars
worth of spending in, you're inherently having inflation. You're pouring
more into the system than you're taking out of this system.
And even in a redistribution mindset where oh a little
you know, the left thinks three distributions great, right, Look,
(07:07):
if you put it in a ten you know, ten
gallon drum and you take five gallons out of a
drum and you pour seven in. Obviously, the levels higher.
And that's what's going on in our economy over and over.
It's destroying the money. And a lot of times people
are arguing over things and blaming rich versus poor, red
versus blue, urban versus rural, pick your thing, But it's
(07:31):
really just the money is being destroyed and the people
with assets are less affected by it because you know
your assets are getting inflated.
Speaker 1 (07:41):
Well, I guess I also have to ask, you know,
is it nefarious or stupid? Is a typical question I
asked quite often in contemplating politicians and their actions. This
is such a stark, obvious problem we're facing, Congressman David Send,
thirty eight trillion dollars that we have to pay interest
on annually, the true million dollars every year before we
(08:02):
know to keep our solvency. It keeps growing under the
Trump administration thus far. I heard just yesterday that we've
grown an additional two trillion dollars or something in the hole.
We spent more than two trillion. Then we said we,
I mean, this can't end or this can't continue. And
the obvious problem is, you know, a country like Venezuela,
a country like Zimbabwe, a company like the Weimar Republican Germany.
(08:25):
You run the printing press long enough, the currency gets
devalue to the point where it's absolutely worthless. We've heard
tales in the past that people having to wheelbarrows full
of money to go to the store to get a
load for bread. This is the crash course we're on.
History has proven it, reality proves it, economy and economics
proves it. So is it the goal to crash the
(08:47):
Fiat currency? Is it the goal to basically upend the
entire globe, which seems to rely on the American taxpayer
dollar and the United States dollar? Or are they just
stupid Congressman David's.
Speaker 2 (09:01):
The answer is a little bit of both.
Speaker 3 (09:03):
Right, I'm not saying everyone that goes along with this
even understands it. It's like, you know, not everyone that
supports Marxism really thinks of themselves as a Marxist. You know,
they just want a little more free stuff for a few.
Speaker 2 (09:17):
More people or whatever. But the reality is they're the
people engineering it, absolutely understand it. And that's why it's
so great that Donald Trump goes to Davos and essentially
globalists versus patriots has become the real divide even across countries.
I mean, the Europeans and the Democrats are essentially the same,
(09:38):
and they're running the same op. They're invading the countries
with migrants from the Third World, trying to destroy and
undermine the sovereignty of Western civilization. Frankly, they're trying to
undo Western civilization and they want massive deathicits. And when
you look at what their messages are, they want total
control with money. They want a central bank digeral currency
(09:59):
with the digital ID. And then for Lord of the
Ring fans that's like the one ring to rule them all.
It's not that you have to have a swat team
stacked outside every door, though they're okay doing that if
you don't use the right pronouns or something. Storming churches
imagine storming in a church in the middle of a
worship service and thinking you're the good guys. And unfortunately
(10:20):
there's still no indictments and still nobody you know in jail.
But I am encouraged that they say that seems to
be underway. So I don't know how slow the wheels
of justice turn, but hopefully before Valentine's Day we've got
a few people in jail. But these are the stark
ideology contrasts, and the money is central to it because
(10:42):
if they get control of the money, you know, they
can filter your transactions, they can condition your own access
to your own money.
Speaker 1 (10:49):
And this is.
Speaker 2 (10:50):
Underway in China, and the Europeans are building a system
in working with the Chinese to do it, that does
all the same things. ID will basically build a social
credit score and say, well, you know, the good guys
can do these things. But you know, and that's what
they did with Choke Point. These these uh what they
(11:10):
called Operation Choke Point. They are debanking people and these
are building out the systems that the radical, radical left
wants to impose. And a lot of people who support
some of the left wing policies want to live in
denial and say, oh, that's not happening. Well, it's maybe
your neighbor who's a Democrat isn't doing that, And maybe
(11:31):
some of my colleagues aren't even the ones that are
smart and good people but jaded in some way because
the vote for these crazy policies. But if you look
at it, they're supporting that. Anyone that's supporting these globalists
is supporting central bank diseral currency digital ID is supporting
this dystopian system that destroys your money and then turns
(11:55):
it into a system for chordersion in control because it's
about power, and they mask it pretty well. But that's
the real answer of socialism and Marxism. It never works
for the people except for the people that are selling it.
It produced a path to power for them because it
plays on human envy and it's a condition of the soul.
(12:16):
So I think it's just painful to watch. It's like,
I say, your ringside seat. You're trying to fight it,
and the stakes are incredibly high, but sometimes you just
can't seem to change it. No Republican ran on saving Obamacare,
but we got seventeen that are like, oh, we can't
let it fail. Okay, yeah, all the votes. You got
(12:40):
a voting card too, But like police, send reinforcements in America.
Speaker 1 (12:44):
Plause for a moment, We'll bring Congress Warren Davidson backfind
out there's going to be a government shutdown and shut
down and yeah, I'm waiting for the records too, specifically
the Epstein files. Anyway, Ingram fifty five K the talk station.
If you have ks, you talk Jation. Broy Thomas, a
congressman Warren Davidson, who will be running for another term.
Vote for him. He's a great guy. And Congressman Davidson,
(13:06):
I guess I have to and this has been frustrating
to me. What the hell's going on with the Epstein files?
And I guess the other correlator to this is why
hold Bill Hillary Clinton in content for not showing up
for deposition when you don't even have all the documents
yet to fully depose them. That's the lawyer in me
asking that question. But either way, there's a deadline, it's passed.
The Epstein files still haven't been produced. What is going
on here?
Speaker 2 (13:26):
Congressman Davidson, you know, with respect to Bill and Hillary Clinton,
I will give a shout out to nine Democrats who
I don't remember their names, but they joined Republicans in
holding the Clintons in content. Oh yeah, And that's logically
consistent because they were service poena. They were called to
appear before the committee and they didn't show. And that's
(13:50):
the same thing that they charged Steve Bannon and Peter
Navarro with and both of them no prosecuted and went
to jail.
Speaker 1 (13:57):
No argument for me, that's that's exactly the path you
have to. You have to respect the power of the subpoena,
although in timing, I would rather as a lawyer have
all of the documents in my possession before deposing a
key witness about the relationship. So it seems like it's
out of order from my litigation mind perspective. But regardless,
(14:17):
the key to the problem is that documents haven't been produced.
So what's the story on that one.
Speaker 2 (14:24):
Well, they do have a lot of documents, and truly
they had a whole lot before this dischargedition passed, and
you put a very clear burden on the administration to
disclose everything. And frankly, they're also skirting the law on
the redactions. So what I think is very obvious is
they don't want to disclose all of the facts about Epstein,
(14:49):
even when compelled by law to disclose the information I
could see, well, gee, there's a lot of data. It's
hard to get it all out. Well, it's a whole
lot easier if you're not busy redacted, which is also
a violation of the law. So the law says disclosed it,
and it doesn't allow you to do the things. And
this goes to the heart of why they weren't prosecuting one.
(15:11):
A lot of the victims entered into settlement agreements because
they didn't want to go to trial, and that's not
uncommon even locally when you look at child sex issues.
You want the person who was the victim not to
have to go through all of that process. So they
work it out and they charge them. That there was
a ten counts charged in Hamilton County last year for
(15:33):
somebody that years ago. Right, But it does make it
hard after the fact to say, well, now we're going
to present it at an open trial because the testimony
that you would need is conditioned to the settlement agreements.
And then setting that aside, let's say that never happened.
(15:53):
We all know Epstein wasn't self employed, right. I'm not
saying he was on payroll, but he was. He was
coordinating his activities with someone. And when alex Acosta what
after him when he was attorney in Miami and got
a conviction or you know, for primes, he was told
(16:15):
to kind of back off a little bit because he's
intelligence affiliated. Well is that US intelligence? Is that an ally?
And what we're what we're seeing is this administration and
continuity with many administrations, isn't going to allow discovery to
take place, and when you go to open trial, you
have to allow discovery. And the reality they're not going
(16:37):
to let that discovery phase happen, including under compulsion of
the law. The redactions continue, and that's what's slowing the
release down. They're reviewing it so that they can redact things.
Speaker 1 (16:48):
Well, I mean, is there some nefarious motive behind this
because so many of these victims they have come out
and outed themselves, so they're not even asking for some
anonymity to be maintained. So what's what what's going on
behind the scenes that is the nefarious component of this
because seems to me because the laws says it overwhelmingly
bipartisan support to get the damn documents out by December
(17:10):
last year hasn't happened. I mean, I'm just not buying
into this whole redaction thing that they've been sitting on
them for how long?
Speaker 2 (17:19):
Yeah, well, I do buy the redactions, as I say,
but there is something nefarious there, because like, look, it's
one thing if someone was involved in some hideous crime
for an intelligence service to use that as blackmail and leverage,
and you know, that's sort of the stuff of movies.
(17:40):
On the one hand, But the other side is when
I'm talking to an intelligence official about something else, they said, well,
if there was no deviant behavior, there would be no leverage, right,
So you look for these kinds of things. So you
have blackmail in leverage. Well, that's a whole different thing
than when the intelligence service engineers the whole trap and
operates thing uh in particularly when it's something that exploits minors. Yeah,
(18:05):
and so it's one thing when you see consenting adults
participating in things that you find morally wrong. But it's
totally different when you're exploiting kids, uh and against their
consent even as kids. Right, Yeah, they were raped and
by by the accounts of the victims, and so I
think there has to be justice, and to get that
(18:26):
you've got to have facts. But I think, honestly, there
are enough facts right now to say you get to
change some things and people have to be held accountable
for it. And I think that's the sense of outrage
that a lot of people get for whatever reason at times.
President Trump seems to be immune to that, even though
he was pushing it for a long time before he
had the ability to do more on it. And I
(18:48):
think that's where a lot of people are like, well, well,
what what changed?
Speaker 1 (18:51):
I mean exactly, I'm one of those last year of
one of those people.
Speaker 2 (18:55):
What changed?
Speaker 1 (18:56):
What changed? Yeah? And those unanswered questions are what driving
people crazy like me, What the hell is the problem?
Why did he go one eighty? Why are people now
clamoring for them that weren't asking for them earlier when
they could have produced them themselves the Democrats anyway, I
apologize Congressman Davidson. We are at a time I could
talk to you for hours. You know that we'll get
you back on next week, and I sure appreciate your
willingness to come on the program and keep up the
(19:17):
great work.
Speaker 2 (19:17):
Sir, always an honor gab bless you and all your listeners.
Speaker 1 (19:21):
Thank you, sir. Seven twenty nine fifty five Karseite Talks
It's seven oh six here fifty five arced. He talked station.
Brian Thomas was in airboat. A very appy Friday, even
welcoming back to the fifty five Karrisee Morning Show and
certainly salute and appreciate his willingness to come on the
fifty five KRSSE Morning Show and talk important issues with
my audience and me. Congressman Warren Davidson, welcome back, sir.
It's always great having you on my program.
Speaker 2 (00:29):
Yeah, I always look forward to it. Thanks, Brian.
Speaker 1 (00:31):
Nice talking with you, Always nice talking to you. And
uh in reverse order, you filed again to represent the
eighth district. I'm so pleased to see that you're running again.
And I want to let you know right up front,
because Joe put it on my rundown. You already have
Joe Strecker's vote. I don't know how he's able to
cast it. We're not gonna even ask that question, but
at least Joe Strecker's voting for your Congressman Davidson.
Speaker 2 (00:52):
Yeah, I'm encouraged.
Speaker 1 (00:54):
You know.
Speaker 2 (00:55):
The sad thing is you lose constituents when they redraw
the map. Because I've it's changed a bit since I
you know, since I first ran, and this is a
third redraw really of it, but it won't take effect
till January third next year, and I hope to be
the guy that gets a chance to keep serving in Congress.
It's obviously very frustrating at time. I think it's obvious
(01:17):
to anyone anywhere in the world, but this place is broken.
It's a little more broken and differently broken than I
think I thought before I got here. But it is
nice to be here working to make a difference on it,
and I feel like at times it's just one of
some of the most rewarding things I do. And I
will say, you look at it. I know lots of
people are frustrated. I think I'm probably slightly less frustrated
(01:41):
here because I go, well, you know, I see what
we're doing. But boy, it's exasperating sometimes to be at
a ringside seat and fighting hard to change something and
you just can't change the outcome. The epitome of that
was COVID, So you know, like, this is crazy and
you still couldn't stop people from doing crazy things.
Speaker 1 (02:00):
Well, isn't that true? And lord knows, we're going an
seemingly endless list of craziness that came out of COVID.
And since we are awash in stories of fraud, waste,
and abuse revelations among all these various government programs, I mean,
hell with the trillions of dollars that were thrown out
into the world. Apparently absolutely no one on any political
stripe was watching where the money was went and how
(02:21):
it was spent. And I've just discovered something, and maybe
you can confirm or maybe reject my flot or my
theory on this. All that COVID nineteen money in the
city of Cincinnati was one of the recipients of a
lot of it. Now they're struggling with how do they
manage the books and balance a budget in the absence
of COVID money. So my thought was that all this
COVID money left Washington, d c. Was thrown out of
(02:43):
all these underwater left wing cities New York, Chicago, the
other ones that were struggling with a budget, and they
use it to patch the budget holes that they created.
Speaker 2 (02:51):
Am I close, Oh, that's exactly what's going on with Obamacare.
You know, we put Obamacare subsidies in. They're like, oh,
you know, this is terrible, And you're like well, you
said Obamacare was the greatest thing in the world and
it was going to cure everything. Why do you need
to keep bailing it out. Well, because it's not great,
it's terrible. It's delivered terrible results for the market for
(03:14):
the people that have it. I guess there are upsides
of some of the policy changes. I think Republicans, even
some who were skeptics on some of those policies, say yeah, okay,
some of these things have worked for good on policy,
but on the financial structural part of this, giving the
money to the insurance companies is dumb instead of giving
it to consumers. And you know again, well, the more
(03:37):
things you subsidize, the worse the rate of inflation for
the things that get the subsidies. And it's exactly that,
because it masks all the inefficiencies and it says, I
don't worry about being inefficient, We'll just throw more money
at it. And we're seeing that all over the place,
and you watch. Look, I will say, there's no partisanship
when it comes to getting after scam centers. No one
supports these guys that are scamming centers seniors and particular.
(04:01):
And we shut one that was like fifteen billion dollars
down in Cambodia last year, Cambodia, So you know, yeah,
I mean that's a significant part of this. Cambodi is GDP, Right,
So when it comes to things like that, Republicans and
Democrats we stand arm in arm and I'm glad to
have their support for it. But it's the scam center
is like a Somali daycare center. Oh well, you can't
go after that. If it's what about you look at healthcare.
(04:25):
Illegals supposedly weren't getting Medicaid, but when you shut it down,
you want to audit the records of which illegals are
getting it. And now they're saying we can't share the
Medicaid records with Ice. Why guy had thought no illegals
for getting it and it's obvious in many states they
were getting it by design. So it's just a massive
amount of corruption on this stuff.
Speaker 1 (04:46):
Well with that question, and you know, the other point
on that, it's this fixing the problem of healthcare. Why
is healthcare so expensive? And covering up the costs the
true cost of healthcare. Offering subsidies just covers up the
dollar figure, revealing how bad it is. Your premium dollars
go up because the cost of paying claims has gone
(05:08):
through the roof. Why has the cost of paying claims
gone through the roof? And where are the fixes and
solutions related to that? Just throwing extra federal money and
covering someone's premium? Hell, you want to cover my auto insurance?
Why you're at it? You know that's gone up. I mean,
you want to cover my energy bill that's gone up
primarily because of stupid government policies and chasing carbon dioxide
(05:28):
out of the air. How about subsidizing our energy bills?
They have to do it in Germany. I mean, you know,
it's just crazy. The reality is the underlying problem never
gets solved when you mask over it by throwing money
on top of it.
Speaker 2 (05:42):
Yeah, I mean, isn't that a sort of analogy for
what's going on with the government right? It just keeps
getting bigger. And I will say, even in Ohio where
we have a balanced budget, when you look at what's
going on with spending at the state, you're like, the
rate of growth of spending here is pretty bad too.
So the spending problem is enormous. And this is why
(06:06):
I say, look, your money is being destroyed, you know,
it's nice you look at your house and they get
their appraisal and you're like, oh, well, it's nice that
my house is quote worth more until you get the
property tax bill and all that. But then you look
at the reality. No, your house didn't and if you
didn't make modifications or anything to it, it didn't automatically
(06:26):
go up by the one hundred thousand dollars. Your money
got less valuable over time, and that, unfortunately, that's part
of what's going on with the stock market. That's why
gold is soaring, is the money is being destroyed, and
that's happening with dustinance. You know, if you take five
trillion out of the economy every year with taxes, which
(06:47):
is roughly what happens, and you jump seven trillion dollars
worth of spending in, you're inherently having inflation. You're pouring
more into the system than you're taking out of this system.
And even in a redistribution mindset where oh a little
you know, the left thinks three distributions great, right, Look,
(07:07):
if you put it in a ten you know, ten
gallon drum and you take five gallons out of a
drum and you pour seven in. Obviously, the levels higher.
And that's what's going on in our economy over and over.
It's destroying the money. And a lot of times people
are arguing over things and blaming rich versus poor, red
versus blue, urban versus rural, pick your thing, But it's
(07:31):
really just the money is being destroyed and the people
with assets are less affected by it because you know
your assets are getting inflated.
Speaker 1 (07:41):
Well, I guess I also have to ask, you know,
is it nefarious or stupid? Is a typical question I
asked quite often in contemplating politicians and their actions. This
is such a stark, obvious problem we're facing, Congressman David Send,
thirty eight trillion dollars that we have to pay interest
on annually, the true million dollars every year before we
(08:02):
know to keep our solvency. It keeps growing under the
Trump administration thus far. I heard just yesterday that we've
grown an additional two trillion dollars or something in the hole.
We spent more than two trillion. Then we said we,
I mean, this can't end or this can't continue. And
the obvious problem is, you know, a country like Venezuela,
a country like Zimbabwe, a company like the Weimar Republican Germany.
(08:25):
You run the printing press long enough, the currency gets
devalue to the point where it's absolutely worthless. We've heard
tales in the past that people having to wheelbarrows full
of money to go to the store to get a
load for bread. This is the crash course we're on.
History has proven it, reality proves it, economy and economics
proves it. So is it the goal to crash the
(08:47):
Fiat currency? Is it the goal to basically upend the
entire globe, which seems to rely on the American taxpayer
dollar and the United States dollar? Or are they just
stupid Congressman David's.
Speaker 2 (09:01):
The answer is a little bit of both.
Speaker 3 (09:03):
Right, I'm not saying everyone that goes along with this
even understands it. It's like, you know, not everyone that
supports Marxism really thinks of themselves as a Marxist. You know,
they just want a little more free stuff for a few.
Speaker 2 (09:17):
More people or whatever. But the reality is they're the
people engineering it, absolutely understand it. And that's why it's
so great that Donald Trump goes to Davos and essentially
globalists versus patriots has become the real divide even across countries.
I mean, the Europeans and the Democrats are essentially the same,
(09:38):
and they're running the same op. They're invading the countries
with migrants from the Third World, trying to destroy and
undermine the sovereignty of Western civilization. Frankly, they're trying to
undo Western civilization and they want massive deathicits. And when
you look at what their messages are, they want total
control with money. They want a central bank digeral currency
(09:59):
with the digital ID. And then for Lord of the
Ring fans that's like the one ring to rule them all.
It's not that you have to have a swat team
stacked outside every door, though they're okay doing that if
you don't use the right pronouns or something. Storming churches
imagine storming in a church in the middle of a
worship service and thinking you're the good guys. And unfortunately
(10:20):
there's still no indictments and still nobody you know in jail.
But I am encouraged that they say that seems to
be underway. So I don't know how slow the wheels
of justice turn, but hopefully before Valentine's Day we've got
a few people in jail. But these are the stark
ideology contrasts, and the money is central to it because
(10:42):
if they get control of the money, you know, they
can filter your transactions, they can condition your own access
to your own money.
Speaker 1 (10:49):
And this is.
Speaker 2 (10:50):
Underway in China, and the Europeans are building a system
in working with the Chinese to do it, that does
all the same things. ID will basically build a social
credit score and say, well, you know, the good guys
can do these things. But you know, and that's what
they did with Choke Point. These these uh what they
(11:10):
called Operation Choke Point. They are debanking people and these
are building out the systems that the radical, radical left
wants to impose. And a lot of people who support
some of the left wing policies want to live in
denial and say, oh, that's not happening. Well, it's maybe
your neighbor who's a Democrat isn't doing that, And maybe
(11:31):
some of my colleagues aren't even the ones that are
smart and good people but jaded in some way because
the vote for these crazy policies. But if you look
at it, they're supporting that. Anyone that's supporting these globalists
is supporting central bank diseral currency digital ID is supporting
this dystopian system that destroys your money and then turns
(11:55):
it into a system for chordersion in control because it's
about power, and they mask it pretty well. But that's
the real answer of socialism and Marxism. It never works
for the people except for the people that are selling it.
It produced a path to power for them because it
plays on human envy and it's a condition of the soul.
(12:16):
So I think it's just painful to watch. It's like,
I say, your ringside seat. You're trying to fight it,
and the stakes are incredibly high, but sometimes you just
can't seem to change it. No Republican ran on saving Obamacare,
but we got seventeen that are like, oh, we can't
let it fail. Okay, yeah, all the votes. You got
(12:40):
a voting card too, But like police, send reinforcements in America.
Speaker 1 (12:44):
Plause for a moment, We'll bring Congress Warren Davidson backfind
out there's going to be a government shutdown and shut
down and yeah, I'm waiting for the records too, specifically
the Epstein files. Anyway, Ingram fifty five K the talk station.
If you have ks, you talk Jation. Broy Thomas, a
congressman Warren Davidson, who will be running for another term.
Vote for him. He's a great guy. And Congressman Davidson,
(13:06):
I guess I have to and this has been frustrating
to me. What the hell's going on with the Epstein files?
And I guess the other correlator to this is why
hold Bill Hillary Clinton in content for not showing up
for deposition when you don't even have all the documents
yet to fully depose them. That's the lawyer in me
asking that question. But either way, there's a deadline, it's passed.
The Epstein files still haven't been produced. What is going
on here?
Speaker 2 (13:26):
Congressman Davidson, you know, with respect to Bill and Hillary Clinton,
I will give a shout out to nine Democrats who
I don't remember their names, but they joined Republicans in
holding the Clintons in content. Oh yeah, And that's logically
consistent because they were service poena. They were called to
appear before the committee and they didn't show. And that's
(13:50):
the same thing that they charged Steve Bannon and Peter
Navarro with and both of them no prosecuted and went
to jail.
Speaker 1 (13:57):
No argument for me, that's that's exactly the path you
have to. You have to respect the power of the subpoena,
although in timing, I would rather as a lawyer have
all of the documents in my possession before deposing a
key witness about the relationship. So it seems like it's
out of order from my litigation mind perspective. But regardless,
(14:17):
the key to the problem is that documents haven't been produced.
So what's the story on that one.
Speaker 2 (14:24):
Well, they do have a lot of documents, and truly
they had a whole lot before this dischargedition passed, and
you put a very clear burden on the administration to
disclose everything. And frankly, they're also skirting the law on
the redactions. So what I think is very obvious is
they don't want to disclose all of the facts about Epstein,
(14:49):
even when compelled by law to disclose the information I
could see, well, gee, there's a lot of data. It's
hard to get it all out. Well, it's a whole
lot easier if you're not busy redacted, which is also
a violation of the law. So the law says disclosed it,
and it doesn't allow you to do the things. And
this goes to the heart of why they weren't prosecuting one.
(15:11):
A lot of the victims entered into settlement agreements because
they didn't want to go to trial, and that's not
uncommon even locally when you look at child sex issues.
You want the person who was the victim not to
have to go through all of that process. So they
work it out and they charge them. That there was
a ten counts charged in Hamilton County last year for
(15:33):
somebody that years ago. Right, But it does make it
hard after the fact to say, well, now we're going
to present it at an open trial because the testimony
that you would need is conditioned to the settlement agreements.
And then setting that aside, let's say that never happened.
(15:53):
We all know Epstein wasn't self employed, right. I'm not
saying he was on payroll, but he was. He was
coordinating his activities with someone. And when alex Acosta what
after him when he was attorney in Miami and got
a conviction or you know, for primes, he was told
(16:15):
to kind of back off a little bit because he's
intelligence affiliated. Well is that US intelligence? Is that an ally?
And what we're what we're seeing is this administration and
continuity with many administrations, isn't going to allow discovery to
take place, and when you go to open trial, you
have to allow discovery. And the reality they're not going
(16:37):
to let that discovery phase happen, including under compulsion of
the law. The redactions continue, and that's what's slowing the
release down. They're reviewing it so that they can redact things.
Speaker 1 (16:48):
Well, I mean, is there some nefarious motive behind this
because so many of these victims they have come out
and outed themselves, so they're not even asking for some
anonymity to be maintained. So what's what what's going on
behind the scenes that is the nefarious component of this
because seems to me because the laws says it overwhelmingly
bipartisan support to get the damn documents out by December
(17:10):
last year hasn't happened. I mean, I'm just not buying
into this whole redaction thing that they've been sitting on
them for how long?
Speaker 2 (17:19):
Yeah, well, I do buy the redactions, as I say,
but there is something nefarious there, because like, look, it's
one thing if someone was involved in some hideous crime
for an intelligence service to use that as blackmail and leverage,
and you know, that's sort of the stuff of movies.
(17:40):
On the one hand, But the other side is when
I'm talking to an intelligence official about something else, they said, well,
if there was no deviant behavior, there would be no leverage, right,
So you look for these kinds of things. So you
have blackmail in leverage. Well, that's a whole different thing
than when the intelligence service engineers the whole trap and
operates thing uh in particularly when it's something that exploits minors. Yeah,
(18:05):
and so it's one thing when you see consenting adults
participating in things that you find morally wrong. But it's
totally different when you're exploiting kids, uh and against their
consent even as kids. Right, Yeah, they were raped and
by by the accounts of the victims, and so I
think there has to be justice, and to get that
(18:26):
you've got to have facts. But I think, honestly, there
are enough facts right now to say you get to
change some things and people have to be held accountable
for it. And I think that's the sense of outrage
that a lot of people get for whatever reason at times.
President Trump seems to be immune to that, even though
he was pushing it for a long time before he
had the ability to do more on it. And I
(18:48):
think that's where a lot of people are like, well, well,
what what changed?
Speaker 1 (18:51):
I mean exactly, I'm one of those last year of
one of those people.
Speaker 2 (18:55):
What changed?
Speaker 1 (18:56):
What changed? Yeah? And those unanswered questions are what driving
people crazy like me, What the hell is the problem?
Why did he go one eighty? Why are people now
clamoring for them that weren't asking for them earlier when
they could have produced them themselves the Democrats anyway, I
apologize Congressman Davidson. We are at a time I could
talk to you for hours. You know that we'll get
you back on next week, and I sure appreciate your
willingness to come on the program and keep up the
(19:17):
great work.
Speaker 2 (19:17):
Sir, always an honor gab bless you and all your listeners.
Speaker 1 (19:21):
Thank you, sir. Seven twenty nine fifty five Karseite Talks
Brian Thomas News
Popular Podcasts
Two Guys, Five Rings: Matt, Bowen & The Olympics
Two Guys (Bowen Yang and Matt Rogers). Five Rings (you know, from the Olympics logo). One essential podcast for the 2026 Milan-Cortina Winter Olympics. Bowen Yang (SNL, Wicked) and Matt Rogers (Palm Royale, No Good Deed) of Las Culturistas are back for a second season of Two Guys, Five Rings, a collaboration with NBC Sports and iHeartRadio. In this 15-episode event, Bowen and Matt discuss the top storylines, obsess over Italian culture, and find out what really goes on in the Olympic Village.
iHeartOlympics: The Latest
Listen to the latest news from the 2026 Winter Olympics.
Milan Cortina Winter Olympics
The 2026 Winter Olympics in Milan Cortina are here and have everyone talking. iHeartPodcasts is buzzing with content in honor of the XXV Winter Olympics We’re bringing you episodes from a variety of iHeartPodcast shows to help you keep up with the action. Follow Milan Cortina Winter Olympics so you don’t miss any coverage of the 2026 Winter Olympics, and if you like what you hear, be sure to follow each Podcast in the feed for more great content from iHeartPodcasts.