October 24, 2024 • 34 mins
Bruce Springsteen. Barack Obama. Tyler Perry. Kamala Harris is pulling out all the big names to try and get her campaign across the finish line, but is there anything left to shift it into a winning gear? The trend lines say 'no.'
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
This is Dan Caples and welcome to today's online podcast
edition of The Dan Caplis Show. Please be sure to
give us a five star rating if you'd be so kind,
and to subscribe, download, and listen to the show every
single day on your favorite podcast platform. Well, my guess
is you've been fighting for an American way for a
very long time, and you're just about twelve days a
way call thirteen. With the counting I think from being
(00:22):
very fulfilled.
Speaker 2 (00:23):
Could I be wrong?
Speaker 3 (00:24):
Sure?
Speaker 2 (00:24):
I mean, nothing's over till it's over.
Speaker 1 (00:26):
But so many indicators, so much data, so much hard data,
way beyond polls suggesting that what I've been saying for
mons is troup and that people are seeing Kamala Harris
for who she is and the bottom is dropping out,
and that Donald Trump's going to get another term eight
five five for zero five A two five five the number.
And let's hope that this Trump menum right now just
(00:49):
just maybe picks up another senator two or three at
this point, you know, and you've got temp senators in
key swing states running ads talking about how they worked
well with Trump, that yeah, things are looking good for
Trump in those states. But I do wonder how could
they still be doing this when Kama Harris just told
us yesterday that like Trump's Hitler, So how can these
(01:11):
Democrats senators be aligning with Hitler?
Speaker 2 (01:14):
It just doesn't make sense.
Speaker 4 (01:15):
Oh yeah, the country night voting for Hitler or a fascist?
As you said last night with Anderson Cooper dim.
Speaker 1 (01:21):
Every time every time she says that stuff, she's helping
Trump paid five to five for zero five eight two
five five remembers. We go back to the phone lines
and text that that was Biden's holdspiel at the time
they deposed and pulled the coup installed her in the
middle of the night. So if it wasn't working for Biden,
it's not going to be working for her. And you
know why, because he was president and people live through
(01:42):
that presidency and they know he didn't act like Hitler,
and whether they liked the stuff he did or not,
they know he wasn't a fascist, and they know that
things cost less and the world was much more at peace.
Speaker 2 (01:56):
Let's go to the phone lines.
Speaker 1 (01:57):
We'll start with Lynn in Denver, color out of your
Dan Caplis.
Speaker 2 (02:00):
You'll welcome, Hi, Thank you.
Speaker 5 (02:03):
Two things when it comes to musicians and movie stars,
I love movies and music. But they're not geniuses, and
there's except for few, I don't admire them, and so
I could care less what they think. They're irrelevant to
me when it comes to seventy nine. I was just
(02:24):
driving under on I twenty five, under a bridge with
a big banner that said, no, I'm seventy nine. I'm
discouraged about Colorado because when they voted for late late
term it's abortion. A few years ago, I realized that
I feel like we've lost Colorado as a native born
here in the fifties. I'm discouraged about that. But it's
(02:46):
very sad where the country is going, and I think
Trump is going to try to pull us all bout
from the edge. But it's really tragic to me what
Colorado is doing. And you know, I'm hopeful, But also
I want to say two more things, if she can
excuse me, if Paulus and what I'm served for one,
(03:10):
I know I'm not. I know I look at it
right on.
Speaker 2 (03:13):
That one though, No Linn. Third thing, oh please.
Speaker 6 (03:19):
Was it?
Speaker 1 (03:20):
Oh?
Speaker 2 (03:20):
Okay?
Speaker 1 (03:20):
Well, all I'm saying is it's our job to get
Colorado back back to sanity, sure, back to a state
of health.
Speaker 2 (03:28):
Instead of a state.
Speaker 1 (03:29):
Of drugs and and just it's our job to get
it back. Not easy, but it's not supposed to be easy. Hey,
appreciate the call. Thank you, Thank you. Lynn. Let's go
to beautiful Colorado Springs. Can you imagine, if.
Speaker 2 (03:43):
You know, have you ever been to the Broadmoor Rhyne?
Speaker 1 (03:46):
Yes, Okay, it's like so you know, it's like our
special occasion, like twentieth thirtieth anniversary well not thirtieth, but
twentieth anniversary place. It is like one of the greatest
European resorts. Just drop down in the middle of Colorado Springs.
It's amazing. Hey, John, welcome to the show.
Speaker 6 (04:03):
Hi Dan, And yes, I'm actually driving past a broad
as we speak.
Speaker 2 (04:08):
Don't yell for it is beautiful. Yeah, and Golf.
Speaker 6 (04:13):
Have a question for you. I am I Well, first
of all, I just want to give a shot out
to my son who's currently in Paras Island, South Carolina.
He is a third generation marine hoping Wow in December.
Speaker 2 (04:25):
Wow. Well, thank you for service.
Speaker 6 (04:28):
I'm well, thank you. I am very concerned on where
our country is going. And I just think about all
all these things and and my my background, my background
is Bolton Military and law enforcement. And during my time
and law enforcement, they had the Brady Bill or the
Brady lift, which is any any and you know this,
(04:51):
any law enforcement officer that that lied on the stand,
they were ostracized. What would be the possibility of holding
the media and politicians to a similar type of law
where they is outright law, you know, lie to everyone
(05:12):
and everyone knows that it's proving, but they're just doing
it for the uneducated voter.
Speaker 1 (05:19):
Yeah, yeah, good question. I don't think you'll ever see
a legal right to be able to sue or criminally
prosecute over that because the people who make the laws
are never going to expose themselves that way.
Speaker 2 (05:31):
What I would love to see.
Speaker 1 (05:33):
And again I know this is remote, but I would
love to see, my friend a law that allowed us
to sue, to sue sanctuary cities, sanctuary states. When a government, premeditated,
deliberate decides to create that danger, I think there should
be a right to bring a suit against that governmental
entity for the harm that it causes. I'm talking rapes
(05:56):
and murders and other horrible things that occur because of that.
I think there should be a right to sue over that.
But thank you for your service and your son's service.
My friend, Let's go to Boulder, and I have to
tell you Ryan. I was early this morning driving over
the scenic overlooking the Boulder, going to visit some clients
and just thinking, how is the entire world not living
in Boulder. You know, I lived there for decades. Such
(06:19):
an amazingly beautiful place. I know the politics can get
a little wild, but wow, it was so gorgeous there
this morning. Kevin, you're on the dan Kapla show.
Speaker 2 (06:27):
Welcome.
Speaker 3 (06:29):
Yeah, Before I ask you your two two test questions
and make a fast statement, can I tell you my
claim to fame with Bruce Springsteen please.
Speaker 7 (06:42):
I was visiting New Jersey Orwick, New Jersey in twenty
oh three. One Sunday we drove to Asbury on the
coast and where a lot of the mafia have their mansions.
And it was on a Sunday and most places were closed.
The places that were open all had signs saying restrooms
(07:06):
customers only. And I had to go to the restroom
really bad. So we finally came to a building that
was closed, so I went up to the entrance, niped
and got back in the car and later I found
out that I officially anointed the nightclub where Bruce Springsteen
(07:26):
was discovered.
Speaker 1 (07:28):
Kevin, that's a real stretch. I thought you're going to
say something like, you know, you got it on Bruce's
shoes or something.
Speaker 2 (07:33):
But no, but.
Speaker 1 (07:34):
Okay, no, I mean, hey, it's okay. No, I don't
doubt it.
Speaker 2 (07:38):
Yeah, anyway, thank you for that.
Speaker 7 (07:39):
I ask questions. Can you tell me who the top
law enforcement officer is in this country?
Speaker 2 (07:47):
President of the United States?
Speaker 7 (07:49):
Okay? Can you tell me what?
Speaker 2 (07:52):
I don't get any love for that.
Speaker 7 (07:55):
I'll send you a kiss by email.
Speaker 3 (07:56):
No, don't.
Speaker 7 (07:58):
Can you tell me the last final court of appeal
in the US.
Speaker 2 (08:05):
All right, So we got a trick question here.
Speaker 7 (08:08):
It's not a trick.
Speaker 2 (08:09):
It is so because coal.
Speaker 1 (08:13):
Okay, okay, So it's under your analysis obviously, not the
US Supreme Court, which in fact it is so.
Speaker 2 (08:22):
Euphemistically the people.
Speaker 7 (08:26):
No, okay, literally, it's the US Senate.
Speaker 2 (08:29):
Okay.
Speaker 7 (08:30):
At least two citizens have appealed to the US Senate,
and I believe one, if not each, was accepted.
Speaker 2 (08:39):
That workout for him.
Speaker 1 (08:40):
Like, so you're I haven't read we'd read through to
that next point, Kevin, Hey, I love it when you
call man, thank you for that, appreciate it.
Speaker 2 (08:48):
But I get the first one right, get no love?
What's theever? Yeah?
Speaker 1 (08:52):
Thank you, Dan uh So glad to hear you patch
yourself on the back again.
Speaker 2 (08:58):
If you're not right, what then? And I hope we
never find out, my friend Dan, where are Joe and Jill?
Speaker 1 (09:04):
Guess they're not as close to Kamlin Dougie as they claim.
That is what happens when Kamlin jor is stabbing each
other in the back.
Speaker 2 (09:11):
That from Alexi.
Speaker 4 (09:13):
Has Jill been on the campaign trail at all for Kamala?
Speaker 1 (09:16):
A token appearance or two because like Obama, you got
these people they want don't want to get blamed for
the loss, right, so they make an appearance or two
so people can't say they never showed up.
Speaker 2 (09:27):
That's obviously what's going on.
Speaker 1 (09:28):
You don't get Let me get back to that Axelrod
sound and then we'll get back to calls and texts.
You do not have David Axelrod, Barack Obama's brain, Barack
Obama's number one advisor. You don't have David Axelrod. Say
this last night on CNN after a CNN town hall
with Kamala Harris unless he is firmly one hundred.
Speaker 2 (09:46):
Percent convinced that she is going to lose.
Speaker 1 (09:49):
He would not say this about someone he thought was
going to be president elect in twelve days.
Speaker 8 (09:55):
The things that would concern me is when she doesn't
want to answer a question. Her habit is to kind
of go to world word salad city, and she did
that on a couple of answers. One was on Israel.
Anderson asked a direct question, would you be stronger on
Israel than Trump? And there was a seven minute answer,
but none of it related to the question he was asking.
(10:17):
And so you know, on certain questions like that on immigration,
I thought she missed an opportunity because she would acknowledge
no concerns about any of the administration's policies.
Speaker 2 (10:30):
And that's a mistake.
Speaker 1 (10:31):
You think he says that about somebody he thinks is
going to be president elect in twelve days. No, he
doesn't say that if he thinks there's even a real
chance she's going to win. He says that to distance himself.
But I want you to let us know if you
disagree with my belief. He says that because in part
he needs her to lose he wants her to lose.
So many of those who controlled the Democratic Party need
(10:54):
and want her to lose because she'd be so bad
as president. She would destroy the brand, get them wiped out.
Speaker 2 (11:00):
In twenty six and twenty eight, you're on the Dan.
Speaker 9 (11:03):
Caplas Show, and now back to the Dan Kaplass Show podcast.
Speaker 2 (11:09):
I think that's clip.
Speaker 10 (11:10):
That's exactly why Harris is in trouble at this point,
and it's something that I don't understand why the campaign
does not addressed. They asked her specifically, where.
Speaker 2 (11:19):
Do you stand on the wall? And what does she do?
She goes and.
Speaker 10 (11:22):
Shifts it right to Donald Trump immediately mentions him twice
within the first five seconds. She still hasn't closed the deal.
She still hasn't said to people exactly what she would do,
in fact, what she should have done. In the opening
of that town hall, is said, I want to tell
you what I'm gonna do in the first hour, in
the first day, and in the first week, and it's
(11:43):
gonna take me five minutes, So Anderson, you're gonna have
to sit tight. Here's what we're gonna do by one pm.
She didn't do any of that. She hasn't told the public,
step by step what she think about.
Speaker 1 (11:56):
Yeah, because here's what you're missing, Frank And I understand
he's one of the experts, all this and that, and
I get it, But here's what they're all missing. First,
she knows she's going to lose. So what she's doing
right now is not about, Oh, what gives me the
best chance to pull this out and win. It's about
positioning herself for the next part of her life, which
(12:18):
I think is where she really wants to be anyway.
She wants to be in entertainment. She wants to have
a talk show, she wants to do a book deal,
she wants to do think tank, she wants to be
a celebrity type analyst. That's the life she wants. That's
what she's preparing for right now. So down the stretch,
(12:39):
you know, her street cred just hate on Trump as
much as any human can hate on Trump, because all
the cool kids in Hollywood and all the cool kids
in media and all these uber rich people, they hate
on Trump. So she's just setting up her next life.
No moro on nobody could possibly imagine that this tres
(13:00):
you would be calibrated to win the presidency. It's not
it's calibrated to transition Kamala Harris to the next chapter,
which goes to another truth.
Speaker 2 (13:09):
She doesn't want this job.
Speaker 1 (13:11):
She wants to win, desperately wants to win because she
wants to win, and she wants to be elected president.
She wants to beat Donald Trump. But she doesn't want
this job. Right have you? Have you ever wanted a
job that you would be horrible at? And I'm sure
you're very, very good at lots of things, but there
must be something you're horrible at. There are things I
know I'm horrible at. I wouldn't want to do a
(13:32):
job that every day I had to go there and
do something I'm horrible at and get mocked and ridiculed
by the whole world because I'm horrible at it.
Speaker 2 (13:41):
She knows she's horrible at this. She doesn't want the job.
Speaker 1 (13:45):
Eight five to five for zero five eight two five
five They are My goodness, Ryan, What time did you
get up today?
Speaker 9 (13:51):
Eight o'clock?
Speaker 2 (13:52):
What time did Kelly get up today? Five thirty? Why
ask me what time I got up today? What time
did you get up to day? Three thirty?
Speaker 1 (13:59):
Come on, I'm a morning go are you doing? I'm
a morning guy? But here's the point. When was her
first public event today?
Speaker 2 (14:07):
Noon?
Speaker 1 (14:08):
No, I'm just talking about her schedule, when she first
was scheduled to appear anywhere publicly, even for transportation nine o'clock.
Speaker 2 (14:15):
What I heard on the news this morning was four
thirty in the afternoon? What yes? What is it?
Speaker 9 (14:19):
Joe Biden?
Speaker 1 (14:19):
But and that's after didn't she just have basically two
days off until she went to that town hall?
Speaker 2 (14:24):
But two days I'm just telling you she doesn't want
the job anymore. She's not fighting for her to be president.
Speaker 1 (14:31):
But after all of this, you know, once you got
beyond the vibes and this and that, didn't she I
see a news report that she used the F word.
Speaker 2 (14:38):
How do you go from joy to F word?
Speaker 9 (14:40):
In what context of what?
Speaker 2 (14:41):
Sad? It wasn't during the town stadline?
Speaker 4 (14:43):
Well, whatever, answers, I'm not sure if we have we might,
she answers by saying she needs to study more in
order to provide the answer, even though she should have
had the answers. We're twelve thirteen days out for this
town hall.
Speaker 2 (14:59):
I hear you.
Speaker 1 (15:00):
But this may be one of my favorites from last night.
And as one commentator said, she had a one person
debate and lost.
Speaker 4 (15:07):
What weaknesses do you bring to the table and how
do you plan to overcome them while you're in office.
Speaker 2 (15:13):
That's a great question, Joe.
Speaker 11 (15:15):
Well, I am certainly not perfect, so let's start there.
And I think that I perhaps a weakness, some would say,
but I actually think it's the strength as I really
do value having a team of very smart people around
me who bring to my decision making process.
Speaker 2 (15:39):
Different perspectives.
Speaker 1 (15:40):
So that's her weakness. She's such a great leader, she
assembles these great teams.
Speaker 2 (15:44):
I mean, how is that a weakness?
Speaker 1 (15:46):
Oh, it's just awesome, right, It's just so good for
Donald Trump. But the point is if you put in
and this goes to my point, she doesn't want this job.
If first, if you wanted the job, with twelve days
to go to the president and see and the race
in the polls very close, your first public event wouldn't
be at four in the afternoon.
Speaker 2 (16:06):
But here's the point.
Speaker 1 (16:07):
It would take fifteen minutes of prep, right, fifteen minutes
of prep at the beginning of the coup, to sit
down and lay out the most predictable questions you'll get,
and to have your canned answers, so the fact she
just wasn't ready to just immediately fire back on Okay,
what are your biggest weaknesses? Well, sometimes I just care
too much, and I've really got to work hard, you know,
(16:30):
just yeah, to make sure that I just don't get
so personally attached to the people who are suffering that
you know, yeah, something like that, right, takes fifteen minutes
to figure it out.
Speaker 2 (16:42):
She doesn't have an.
Speaker 1 (16:43):
Answer to that, or because she has very good staff
in the sense they're very capable improve.
Speaker 2 (16:48):
And they have very bad ideas.
Speaker 1 (16:50):
But you know, the staff has given her all those answers,
so it means she can't process them, she can't retain them.
That's the only thing I can think. What do you
think if you were asked that question? Ryan Schuling, what
are your biggest weaknesses?
Speaker 2 (17:02):
Oh?
Speaker 4 (17:02):
That you know, I don't have enough discipline when it
comes to managing my temper sometimes. Got some feedback I
think from listeners along those lines earlier today.
Speaker 1 (17:12):
Yeah, and I've got to tell you, I really disagree
with you on airic, but I disagreed with your response
to that texture. What was the response you saw the response? No,
I listened to your show. Oh, oh oh yeah, yeah,
I'm not reading your email. Yeah yeah, yeah, unless I can.
Speaker 2 (17:27):
Is there a way for me to do that?
Speaker 1 (17:28):
Maybe I don't know, you know, But anyway, there was
a text Ryan does a great show in Denver Market
six thirty kitsch a W two to four and and
this texture had loved him up and then said, you know,
but but you get too angry. And you wrote back
and said I'll work on that, yeah, which I thought
was the exact wrong response. Oh yeah, yeah, I thought.
(17:50):
I thought the response should have been thank you for
the kind words. I'm not going to change a thing.
Oh wow, just a humble thought. By the way, I
just read one of the greatest columns ever opposing amendments
seventy nine.
Speaker 2 (18:05):
Any luck getting that guest Kelly working on it. When
we Quebecca, I was able to send her an email. Okay,
well we Quebec. I'll tell you about the column here
on the Dan Kapler Show.
Speaker 9 (18:17):
You're listening to the Dan Kaeplas Show podcast.
Speaker 12 (18:20):
This is the future that we're looking at in the
next Trump term, if there is one.
Speaker 8 (18:25):
But this is what voters know right now that he.
Speaker 2 (18:30):
Is killing us.
Speaker 12 (18:30):
I'm talking about us women.
Speaker 1 (18:34):
So Trump is killing women. Meeka, Wait a second, I
thought it was your side, your side, led by Kamala
and Joe, that responsible for what how many deaths of
females each year? Over half a million? Yeah, half a
million females dead each year, Mika, because of what your
side is doing.
Speaker 2 (18:55):
Killing us. He is putting us at risk.
Speaker 8 (18:58):
He is making us a afraid to have babies.
Speaker 1 (19:03):
So, Donald Trump, what is making you afraid to have babies?
Speaker 2 (19:08):
See?
Speaker 1 (19:08):
This is Ryan, this is what we live for, right
all these months, I've said it for months. In these
final few weeks, when it's becoming clear that Kamalis sinking
Trump's gonna win, they will go insane right before our eyes.
It'll be one of the most entertaining things we've ever experienced.
I'm not trying to be mean. I don't revel in
her obvious emotional distress. I just say that for the
(19:30):
good of this nation, the left needs to be exposed
for what it is.
Speaker 2 (19:34):
It is whack.
Speaker 4 (19:35):
So Trump is making women afraid to have babies, but
wants to kill babies.
Speaker 2 (19:41):
Yeah, I want to kill them then, well, females.
Speaker 1 (19:44):
And this is the thing I mean, it just goes
back to has there ever been a more anti woman
group in America in modern times than the modern Democratic Party,
all the different ways it harms women, starting with killing
a half a million females a year, or to be
more precise, to supporting, advocating, celebrating expanding policies that result
(20:09):
in the killing of more than half a million females
a year. Ah, let's go back to the phone lines
and text, oh, I do want to get to this sound.
I mentioned it earlier, and in the interest of balance,
I want to play this. But it also has a
deeper point that I think you'll enjoy very much. This
is Harry anne Non CNN. Now we played a lot
(20:29):
of his stuff because he's been sounding the alarm and saying, hey,
wait a second look at this polling and that polling
and that polling. It's a lot better for Trump than
it was four years ago, folks. But now he does
this one to eighty as things get even worse for
Democrats and says, hey, way, no need to panic. She's
got a clear path to victory.
Speaker 12 (20:48):
Depending on which week, I get different friends from different
sides of the aisle coming back to me. One week
of the Republicans wearing This week it was the Democrats
that we're worrying. But then you look at polling like that,
and then we take a look at the rise of
two undred and seventy, and I should point out the
race to two hundred and seventy. The path of two
hundred and seventy for Kamala Harris is very clear right now.
You know, you talk about Wisconsin, Let's turn that blue,
(21:09):
all right, that gets Harris to two hundred and thirty
six electoral votes. How about Michigan, we'll give her a
blue there two hundred and fifty one electoral votes.
Speaker 2 (21:15):
About look at this to.
Speaker 12 (21:17):
Two hundred and seventy electoral votes if those Washington Post
polls are in fact correct, and so she has a
very clear path to two hundred and seventy electoral votes.
Of course, Aaron, I don't just like looking at one pole.
I like to look at an aggregate of polling. So
let's take a look at the recent aggregat of polls
in these blue Wall states.
Speaker 2 (21:34):
Now what do we see. We see very close contests.
Speaker 12 (21:36):
It's actually closer than the Washington Post polls, but again,
less than a point lead for Harrison Wisconsin, less than
a point lead in Michigan, less than a point lead
in Pennsylvania.
Speaker 1 (21:45):
What's so interesting and encouraging to me is a guy
wh wants to see Trump when is why he's doing this. Okay,
the reason he's doing this is because he believes in
many on the left believe that the left is given up,
that many voters on the left are giving up. They're disheartened,
they're dispirited, they're discouraged. They believe she's going to lose,
(22:07):
so they may not turn out to vote, and they're
basing that in part on what they see in these
early vote returns, which are not an exact science. There's
still time for it to level out, but right now
many places favors the GOP and them early voting downs.
So he's he has concocted that he didn't say anything
false there, but he didn't add the key fact that
(22:30):
disproves his premise, and I'll get to that in a second.
Speaker 2 (22:33):
So he's just trying to.
Speaker 1 (22:34):
Pump people up and saying don't quit. He could still win,
which is true in theory. But here's what he left out.
If you go back to where those same polls were
at four years ago, Joe Biden was ahead by a
bunch more than that a lot in states that he
either lost or won by a hair and Harry incites
(22:57):
the Washington Post without mentioning, Oh yeah, last Washington Post
poll in Wisconsin four years ago had Biden up seventeen.
It was crazy seventeen one by a handful of votes.
So that's what our friend Harry left out.
Speaker 4 (23:12):
And normally I like Harry, I know you did, and
I think he does a fair job. I really think
he's trying to get it right. But he's cherry picking
here and WAPO to your point, Dan, it's an outlier.
It is to the left. In fact, these polls were
just released today. Tip TPP has Harris plus three national poll. However,
CNBC separate poll and Wall Street Journal separate poll national
(23:35):
have Trump plus two CNBC Trump plus three Wall Street Journal.
Speaker 9 (23:40):
This is trending in Trump's direction.
Speaker 4 (23:42):
The real clear politics polling average right now, Dan is
Harris plus zero point two nationally.
Speaker 2 (23:48):
That's disastrous death right right, political death.
Speaker 1 (23:51):
But right, But any honest pollster I can get a
single poll wrong just because of who you happen to sample,
But when you look at the polls overall, when you
look at the trend lines, it's real clear what's happening now, right,
And then the more important data is what we can
tell not a perfect science from the early voting so far.
You mix those two together, and then you have to
(24:13):
factor in, of course common sense, right, which is clearly
the more people learn about the truth about Kamala Harris,
as we and you have expected for a long time,
the more her support's going to drop. So I think
the most significant poll finding in all of that was
in the Wall Street Journal poll because that's a prominent
DEM pollar and a prominent Republican pollster, and it does
(24:34):
not tend to favor Donald Trump generally speaking. But what
they found in there was that, consistent with some other polling,
Trump's favorability now higher than Harris's, which makes perfect sense, right,
because in terms of favorability, I understand Donald Trump at
times can color outside the lines, But in terms of favorability,
(24:56):
I think a lot of people put heavy weight on authenticity. Okay,
you know, I may not agree with somebody on this
and this and that and that, but I know what
I'm getting. I know they're just they are who they are,
and you know they're they're shooting straight with me. Whether
I agree with it or not. But also in favorability
is how have they affected me and Donald Trump? Yeah,
(25:17):
people had all these much better things like lower prices
in this and that.
Speaker 2 (25:20):
All I'm here to tell.
Speaker 1 (25:21):
You is in the Wall Street Journal, Paul Donald Trump's
favorability was fifty two percent, and he was significantly above
Kamala Harris, which makes sense, right because as more people
learn the truth about her, of course their favorability is
going to plummet. Remember this is somebody who was a
favorite to win in twenty in the Democratic primary, and
even in the Democratic primary she couldn't even make it
(25:44):
till Iowa. Ninety two percent of her staff is quit
during her tenure as VP. So the more people learn
the truth and Ryan, if the Trump campaign doesn't hammer, hammer,
hammer the last five seconds of this sound during this
last week in the swing states, that is political malpractice.
The first part it's useless, but listen to the last
(26:05):
five seconds needs to be in every swing state every
day in that last week.
Speaker 11 (26:10):
And when we all sing happy tunes of sing Merry
Christmas and wish each other merry Christmas, these children are.
Speaker 2 (26:17):
Not going to have them marry Christmas. Start the spot
right here.
Speaker 11 (26:21):
How dare we speak Merry Christmas?
Speaker 2 (26:23):
How dare we You gotta blast that.
Speaker 1 (26:27):
You gotta blast that Wisconsin, you gotta blast it in Michigan,
you gotta blast it in Pennsylvania, you gotta blast it
in Arizona.
Speaker 2 (26:34):
And here's the thing too, Dale Georgia too.
Speaker 4 (26:37):
All of these swing state Senate races, each of the
Democratic candidates, they are running far and fast from not
only Biden, which is a given, but Harris too if
they're not bringing her in. I think Eric Hovedy is
going to win Wisconsin and unseat Tammy Baldwin. I believe
that Bernie Moreno is going to unseat Shared Brown in Ohio.
I believe that Dave McCormick is going to unseat Casey.
(26:58):
And Pennsylvania, we know that Montana's flipping. Tester's done. She
he's in West Virginia's flipping. That's five seats. And I
believe strongly that Mike Rodgers can defeat Alyssa Slocken in Michigan.
She's nervous, she doesn't like the pulling for Harris. We
we could definitely be looking dan at a fifty five
to forty five Republican majority in the Senate.
Speaker 1 (27:18):
Which comes back to a critical premise. And I've tweeted
on this as well. Listen, nothing's guaranteed yet, but the
larger the Trump victory, that the bigger that critical first
step to national unity. And I'm not saying hey, Kumbaya
overnight all this and that, I'm just saying, we know
everybody knows this nation has got to get more unified
than it is now. The bigger the Trump victory, the
(27:42):
better chance to start back on that road to unity.
A FI five for zero five eight two five five
year on the Dane Caapla Ship.
Speaker 9 (27:50):
And now back to the Dan Kaplas Show podcast.
Speaker 2 (27:53):
Glad to hear here.
Speaker 1 (27:54):
Bruce Springsteen with Kamala Harrison Barack Obama tonight at Aurelly
in Georgie. It was stunning to me as Springsteen was
playing that the crowd behind him looked completely totally bored.
But even the Boss cannot save Kamala Harris. A couple
of quick notes here. Bobert Challenger Tricia Calvareesi hauls in
(28:15):
five hundred and seventy k in first Haffect October and
Colorado's fourth CD This is Colorado Politics piecelessen Tricia could
have hauled in five hundred and seventy million in the
first half of October, and it would not change the outcome.
Lauren Poper is going to win the fourth congressional district.
And so I mean, let's say, how much would you
(28:37):
have to pay each voter, let's say each pro life
voter to go out and vote for somebody pro abortion.
How much would you have to pay each pro life
voter to do that. I don't know that there's a
price for us, right, That's the point. Pro lifers have
nothing in it, nothing, no selfish interest for pro lifers. Now,
on the abortion side, you've got all sorts of selfish
(28:58):
interests going on with the abortion industry and their big money,
and they're funding of politician's is and that. On the
pro life side, there is nothing in it for pro lifers.
Under then, often abuse from the left and at times
societal rejection, etc. Pro lifers have the purest possible motives
(29:19):
just to save innocent human life. And so there is
no amount of money you can pay a pro lifer
to get them to vote for somebody pro abortion. So
she could raise five hundred and seventy million, it's not
going to change the outcome.
Speaker 2 (29:31):
Of CD four.
Speaker 1 (29:32):
Let me get to some text here, Dan, doesn't it
worry you that illegals will be voting because they're not
counted in any of the polling. I do worry about cheating.
I do, whether it's cheating in the forms of folks
here illegally voting, because I've seen some stories that suggest
some have been led to believe they can't. I do
(29:56):
worry about any kind of cheating. Do I sit here
believing that there's going to be enough cheating to change
the outcome of the race. I don't believe that, and
I sure is that cope not. And I like what
I see from the GOP in terms of everything it's
doing to try to make sure that there's real election
(30:16):
integrity here, Dan, I'm the texture said, Ryan sounds a
little angry, but truly, I know he's just very passionate
about what he believes in. And I totally get that.
I wasn't trying to be hateful offering a little feedback.
I still love a show. I never thought the texture
was hateful.
Speaker 2 (30:31):
No, No, not at all. Yeah, I just oh, and
I have fun listening.
Speaker 1 (30:36):
I just thought the answer should have been, thank you,
appreciate the kind words, I'm not going to change a thing.
Speaker 2 (30:40):
Oh thanks, Dan.
Speaker 1 (30:42):
That crowd strikes software up to a couple of months
ago makes me think cheating is afoot again. It's fascinating
to me because you see the polls, you have so
many people concerned that this election may be stolen. I
told you the anecdotal story about one of the most conservative,
autious people I've ever met in my life. Conservative in
(31:03):
the sense that they they don't throw bombs, you know,
rhetorical bombs or anything like that, just stunned me one
night at dinner when he said, I'm afraid they're going
to steal this one. He's the last guy in the
face of the earth I thought would have had any
suspicion about stolen elections. So I understand that fear is
out there.
Speaker 2 (31:25):
Dan.
Speaker 1 (31:25):
What a great text here, Ryan. If the Democratic Party
was so afraid of losing that they ousted Joe Biden,
why is that same Democratic Party now hoping Kamala loses
from David and Centennial. Great question and a great answer
to that. Yes, the left that controls the Democratic Party
does not want to lose the presidency. That's why they
(31:48):
conducted the coup. But then Joe Biden outsmarted them and
he forced Kamala on them. They didn't want Kamala because
they knew she would lose, but Biden out smarted him,
forced Kamala on him, and that was that the die
was cast. So now that they have Kamala, their problem
(32:09):
is that she, if she's actually elected, she will be
so terrible at this job. She will trash the Democratic brand.
She'll get them wiped out in twenty six, She'll get
him wiped out in twenty eight. If if the cabal
had its way and following the coup, they had either
Newsome or they had Shapiro, they had some other strong candidate,
(32:33):
horrible ideas, bad for the country, but just strong candidate skills,
they'd be in a very good position to win this
race right now. So that was the cabal's plan. Pull
the coup, get a really good candidate in.
Speaker 2 (32:45):
There, and win the race.
Speaker 1 (32:46):
But Biden not smarted him and stuck them with Kamala
eight five for is her five a two to five
to five useless information? Because they're coming up on the
end of the show, Dan, why does the whole world
not live in Boulder? Maybe because it's swoke Marxist and
a blank hole. First of all, listen, I understand the
politics and Boulder are far left and there's a lot
(33:07):
of goofy political stuff. I get that, But as a
guy who lived there for decades, I love Boulder so much.
Not the politics, obviously, but I loved it so much.
I did not leave Boulder until noon on my wedding day.
And I was marrying the most spectacular woman in the world.
But I knew she worked nights in Denver's anchor a
(33:27):
Channel four. I knew we would not be living in Boulder,
so I stayed there till noon. I remember I was
working out that morning at the gym and Boulder and
the guy said, man, aren't you getting married sometime soon?
Speaker 2 (33:38):
I said, yeah, today.
Speaker 3 (33:39):
But is that so much?
Speaker 1 (33:41):
I love Bolder, but I love her more and we've
had a fantastic life here.
Speaker 2 (33:47):
But driving back up there.
Speaker 1 (33:48):
I at an early morning meeting with clients in Boulder
and going over the scenic overlook early in the morning,
it's just I just think it's one of the most
beautiful places in the world. Final thoughts my friend as
we head down this stretch, run.
Speaker 4 (34:01):
Dan, I'm feeling better every day about this race. I'm
feeling more.
Speaker 2 (34:05):
Confidence of Chicago song isn't there.
Speaker 4 (34:07):
I'll dig that up for tomorrow, But I really am,
and I wouldn't just put out false bravado about that.
Every trend line that we've been talking about is going
in Trump's.
Speaker 1 (34:16):
Direction and critically common sense, Yeah yeah, exactly, so should be.
Speaker 2 (34:23):
Tremendous times in front of us.
Speaker 1 (34:25):
And let's pray for President Trump, pray for his safety,
and just do everything we can to defeat amendments seventy nine.
I just tweeted out a column at Dan Caplis, one
of the most powerful columns I've ever read, one of
the best arguments against insidias seventy nine. Read it at
Dan Caplis and spread it a rock
This is Dan Caples and welcome to today's online podcast
edition of The Dan Caplis Show. Please be sure to
give us a five star rating if you'd be so kind,
and to subscribe, download, and listen to the show every
single day on your favorite podcast platform. Well, my guess
is you've been fighting for an American way for a
very long time, and you're just about twelve days a
way call thirteen. With the counting I think from being
(00:22):
very fulfilled.
Speaker 2 (00:23):
Could I be wrong?
Speaker 3 (00:24):
Sure?
Speaker 2 (00:24):
I mean, nothing's over till it's over.
Speaker 1 (00:26):
But so many indicators, so much data, so much hard data,
way beyond polls suggesting that what I've been saying for
mons is troup and that people are seeing Kamala Harris
for who she is and the bottom is dropping out,
and that Donald Trump's going to get another term eight
five five for zero five A two five five the number.
And let's hope that this Trump menum right now just
(00:49):
just maybe picks up another senator two or three at
this point, you know, and you've got temp senators in
key swing states running ads talking about how they worked
well with Trump, that yeah, things are looking good for
Trump in those states. But I do wonder how could
they still be doing this when Kama Harris just told
us yesterday that like Trump's Hitler, So how can these
(01:11):
Democrats senators be aligning with Hitler?
Speaker 2 (01:14):
It just doesn't make sense.
Speaker 4 (01:15):
Oh yeah, the country night voting for Hitler or a fascist?
As you said last night with Anderson Cooper dim.
Speaker 1 (01:21):
Every time every time she says that stuff, she's helping
Trump paid five to five for zero five eight two
five five remembers. We go back to the phone lines
and text that that was Biden's holdspiel at the time
they deposed and pulled the coup installed her in the
middle of the night. So if it wasn't working for Biden,
it's not going to be working for her. And you
know why, because he was president and people live through
(01:42):
that presidency and they know he didn't act like Hitler,
and whether they liked the stuff he did or not,
they know he wasn't a fascist, and they know that
things cost less and the world was much more at peace.
Speaker 2 (01:56):
Let's go to the phone lines.
Speaker 1 (01:57):
We'll start with Lynn in Denver, color out of your
Dan Caplis.
Speaker 2 (02:00):
You'll welcome, Hi, Thank you.
Speaker 5 (02:03):
Two things when it comes to musicians and movie stars,
I love movies and music. But they're not geniuses, and
there's except for few, I don't admire them, and so
I could care less what they think. They're irrelevant to
me when it comes to seventy nine. I was just
(02:24):
driving under on I twenty five, under a bridge with
a big banner that said, no, I'm seventy nine. I'm
discouraged about Colorado because when they voted for late late
term it's abortion. A few years ago, I realized that
I feel like we've lost Colorado as a native born
here in the fifties. I'm discouraged about that. But it's
(02:46):
very sad where the country is going, and I think
Trump is going to try to pull us all bout
from the edge. But it's really tragic to me what
Colorado is doing. And you know, I'm hopeful, But also
I want to say two more things, if she can
excuse me, if Paulus and what I'm served for one,
(03:10):
I know I'm not. I know I look at it
right on.
Speaker 2 (03:13):
That one though, No Linn. Third thing, oh please.
Speaker 6 (03:19):
Was it?
Speaker 1 (03:20):
Oh?
Speaker 2 (03:20):
Okay?
Speaker 1 (03:20):
Well, all I'm saying is it's our job to get
Colorado back back to sanity, sure, back to a state
of health.
Speaker 2 (03:28):
Instead of a state.
Speaker 1 (03:29):
Of drugs and and just it's our job to get
it back. Not easy, but it's not supposed to be easy. Hey,
appreciate the call. Thank you, Thank you. Lynn. Let's go
to beautiful Colorado Springs. Can you imagine, if.
Speaker 2 (03:43):
You know, have you ever been to the Broadmoor Rhyne?
Speaker 1 (03:46):
Yes, Okay, it's like so you know, it's like our
special occasion, like twentieth thirtieth anniversary well not thirtieth, but
twentieth anniversary place. It is like one of the greatest
European resorts. Just drop down in the middle of Colorado Springs.
It's amazing. Hey, John, welcome to the show.
Speaker 6 (04:03):
Hi Dan, And yes, I'm actually driving past a broad
as we speak.
Speaker 2 (04:08):
Don't yell for it is beautiful. Yeah, and Golf.
Speaker 6 (04:13):
Have a question for you. I am I Well, first
of all, I just want to give a shot out
to my son who's currently in Paras Island, South Carolina.
He is a third generation marine hoping Wow in December.
Speaker 2 (04:25):
Wow. Well, thank you for service.
Speaker 6 (04:28):
I'm well, thank you. I am very concerned on where
our country is going. And I just think about all
all these things and and my my background, my background
is Bolton Military and law enforcement. And during my time
and law enforcement, they had the Brady Bill or the
Brady lift, which is any any and you know this,
(04:51):
any law enforcement officer that that lied on the stand,
they were ostracized. What would be the possibility of holding
the media and politicians to a similar type of law
where they is outright law, you know, lie to everyone
(05:12):
and everyone knows that it's proving, but they're just doing
it for the uneducated voter.
Speaker 1 (05:19):
Yeah, yeah, good question. I don't think you'll ever see
a legal right to be able to sue or criminally
prosecute over that because the people who make the laws
are never going to expose themselves that way.
Speaker 2 (05:31):
What I would love to see.
Speaker 1 (05:33):
And again I know this is remote, but I would
love to see, my friend a law that allowed us
to sue, to sue sanctuary cities, sanctuary states. When a government, premeditated,
deliberate decides to create that danger, I think there should
be a right to bring a suit against that governmental
entity for the harm that it causes. I'm talking rapes
(05:56):
and murders and other horrible things that occur because of that.
I think there should be a right to sue over that.
But thank you for your service and your son's service.
My friend, Let's go to Boulder, and I have to
tell you Ryan. I was early this morning driving over
the scenic overlooking the Boulder, going to visit some clients
and just thinking, how is the entire world not living
in Boulder. You know, I lived there for decades. Such
(06:19):
an amazingly beautiful place. I know the politics can get
a little wild, but wow, it was so gorgeous there
this morning. Kevin, you're on the dan Kapla show.
Speaker 2 (06:27):
Welcome.
Speaker 3 (06:29):
Yeah, Before I ask you your two two test questions
and make a fast statement, can I tell you my
claim to fame with Bruce Springsteen please.
Speaker 7 (06:42):
I was visiting New Jersey Orwick, New Jersey in twenty
oh three. One Sunday we drove to Asbury on the
coast and where a lot of the mafia have their mansions.
And it was on a Sunday and most places were closed.
The places that were open all had signs saying restrooms
(07:06):
customers only. And I had to go to the restroom
really bad. So we finally came to a building that
was closed, so I went up to the entrance, niped
and got back in the car and later I found
out that I officially anointed the nightclub where Bruce Springsteen
(07:26):
was discovered.
Speaker 1 (07:28):
Kevin, that's a real stretch. I thought you're going to
say something like, you know, you got it on Bruce's
shoes or something.
Speaker 2 (07:33):
But no, but.
Speaker 1 (07:34):
Okay, no, I mean, hey, it's okay. No, I don't
doubt it.
Speaker 2 (07:38):
Yeah, anyway, thank you for that.
Speaker 7 (07:39):
I ask questions. Can you tell me who the top
law enforcement officer is in this country?
Speaker 2 (07:47):
President of the United States?
Speaker 7 (07:49):
Okay? Can you tell me what?
Speaker 2 (07:52):
I don't get any love for that.
Speaker 7 (07:55):
I'll send you a kiss by email.
Speaker 3 (07:56):
No, don't.
Speaker 7 (07:58):
Can you tell me the last final court of appeal
in the US.
Speaker 2 (08:05):
All right, So we got a trick question here.
Speaker 7 (08:08):
It's not a trick.
Speaker 2 (08:09):
It is so because coal.
Speaker 1 (08:13):
Okay, okay, So it's under your analysis obviously, not the
US Supreme Court, which in fact it is so.
Speaker 2 (08:22):
Euphemistically the people.
Speaker 7 (08:26):
No, okay, literally, it's the US Senate.
Speaker 2 (08:29):
Okay.
Speaker 7 (08:30):
At least two citizens have appealed to the US Senate,
and I believe one, if not each, was accepted.
Speaker 2 (08:39):
That workout for him.
Speaker 1 (08:40):
Like, so you're I haven't read we'd read through to
that next point, Kevin, Hey, I love it when you
call man, thank you for that, appreciate it.
Speaker 2 (08:48):
But I get the first one right, get no love?
What's theever? Yeah?
Speaker 1 (08:52):
Thank you, Dan uh So glad to hear you patch
yourself on the back again.
Speaker 2 (08:58):
If you're not right, what then? And I hope we
never find out, my friend Dan, where are Joe and Jill?
Speaker 1 (09:04):
Guess they're not as close to Kamlin Dougie as they claim.
That is what happens when Kamlin jor is stabbing each
other in the back.
Speaker 2 (09:11):
That from Alexi.
Speaker 4 (09:13):
Has Jill been on the campaign trail at all for Kamala?
Speaker 1 (09:16):
A token appearance or two because like Obama, you got
these people they want don't want to get blamed for
the loss, right, so they make an appearance or two
so people can't say they never showed up.
Speaker 2 (09:27):
That's obviously what's going on.
Speaker 1 (09:28):
You don't get Let me get back to that Axelrod
sound and then we'll get back to calls and texts.
You do not have David Axelrod, Barack Obama's brain, Barack
Obama's number one advisor. You don't have David Axelrod. Say
this last night on CNN after a CNN town hall
with Kamala Harris unless he is firmly one hundred.
Speaker 2 (09:46):
Percent convinced that she is going to lose.
Speaker 1 (09:49):
He would not say this about someone he thought was
going to be president elect in twelve days.
Speaker 8 (09:55):
The things that would concern me is when she doesn't
want to answer a question. Her habit is to kind
of go to world word salad city, and she did
that on a couple of answers. One was on Israel.
Anderson asked a direct question, would you be stronger on
Israel than Trump? And there was a seven minute answer,
but none of it related to the question he was asking.
(10:17):
And so you know, on certain questions like that on immigration,
I thought she missed an opportunity because she would acknowledge
no concerns about any of the administration's policies.
Speaker 2 (10:30):
And that's a mistake.
Speaker 1 (10:31):
You think he says that about somebody he thinks is
going to be president elect in twelve days. No, he
doesn't say that if he thinks there's even a real
chance she's going to win. He says that to distance himself.
But I want you to let us know if you
disagree with my belief. He says that because in part
he needs her to lose he wants her to lose.
So many of those who controlled the Democratic Party need
(10:54):
and want her to lose because she'd be so bad
as president. She would destroy the brand, get them wiped out.
Speaker 2 (11:00):
In twenty six and twenty eight, you're on the Dan.
Speaker 9 (11:03):
Caplas Show, and now back to the Dan Kaplass Show podcast.
Speaker 2 (11:09):
I think that's clip.
Speaker 10 (11:10):
That's exactly why Harris is in trouble at this point,
and it's something that I don't understand why the campaign
does not addressed. They asked her specifically, where.
Speaker 2 (11:19):
Do you stand on the wall? And what does she do?
She goes and.
Speaker 10 (11:22):
Shifts it right to Donald Trump immediately mentions him twice
within the first five seconds. She still hasn't closed the deal.
She still hasn't said to people exactly what she would do,
in fact, what she should have done. In the opening
of that town hall, is said, I want to tell
you what I'm gonna do in the first hour, in
the first day, and in the first week, and it's
(11:43):
gonna take me five minutes, So Anderson, you're gonna have
to sit tight. Here's what we're gonna do by one pm.
She didn't do any of that. She hasn't told the public,
step by step what she think about.
Speaker 1 (11:56):
Yeah, because here's what you're missing, Frank And I understand
he's one of the experts, all this and that, and
I get it, But here's what they're all missing. First,
she knows she's going to lose. So what she's doing
right now is not about, Oh, what gives me the
best chance to pull this out and win. It's about
positioning herself for the next part of her life, which
(12:18):
I think is where she really wants to be anyway.
She wants to be in entertainment. She wants to have
a talk show, she wants to do a book deal,
she wants to do think tank, she wants to be
a celebrity type analyst. That's the life she wants. That's
what she's preparing for right now. So down the stretch,
(12:39):
you know, her street cred just hate on Trump as
much as any human can hate on Trump, because all
the cool kids in Hollywood and all the cool kids
in media and all these uber rich people, they hate
on Trump. So she's just setting up her next life.
No moro on nobody could possibly imagine that this tres
(13:00):
you would be calibrated to win the presidency. It's not
it's calibrated to transition Kamala Harris to the next chapter,
which goes to another truth.
Speaker 2 (13:09):
She doesn't want this job.
Speaker 1 (13:11):
She wants to win, desperately wants to win because she
wants to win, and she wants to be elected president.
She wants to beat Donald Trump. But she doesn't want
this job. Right have you? Have you ever wanted a
job that you would be horrible at? And I'm sure
you're very, very good at lots of things, but there
must be something you're horrible at. There are things I
know I'm horrible at. I wouldn't want to do a
(13:32):
job that every day I had to go there and
do something I'm horrible at and get mocked and ridiculed
by the whole world because I'm horrible at it.
Speaker 2 (13:41):
She knows she's horrible at this. She doesn't want the job.
Speaker 1 (13:45):
Eight five to five for zero five eight two five
five They are My goodness, Ryan, What time did you
get up today?
Speaker 9 (13:51):
Eight o'clock?
Speaker 2 (13:52):
What time did Kelly get up today? Five thirty? Why
ask me what time I got up today? What time
did you get up to day? Three thirty?
Speaker 1 (13:59):
Come on, I'm a morning go are you doing? I'm
a morning guy? But here's the point. When was her
first public event today?
Speaker 2 (14:07):
Noon?
Speaker 1 (14:08):
No, I'm just talking about her schedule, when she first
was scheduled to appear anywhere publicly, even for transportation nine o'clock.
Speaker 2 (14:15):
What I heard on the news this morning was four
thirty in the afternoon? What yes? What is it?
Speaker 9 (14:19):
Joe Biden?
Speaker 1 (14:19):
But and that's after didn't she just have basically two
days off until she went to that town hall?
Speaker 2 (14:24):
But two days I'm just telling you she doesn't want
the job anymore. She's not fighting for her to be president.
Speaker 1 (14:31):
But after all of this, you know, once you got
beyond the vibes and this and that, didn't she I
see a news report that she used the F word.
Speaker 2 (14:38):
How do you go from joy to F word?
Speaker 9 (14:40):
In what context of what?
Speaker 2 (14:41):
Sad? It wasn't during the town stadline?
Speaker 4 (14:43):
Well, whatever, answers, I'm not sure if we have we might,
she answers by saying she needs to study more in
order to provide the answer, even though she should have
had the answers. We're twelve thirteen days out for this
town hall.
Speaker 2 (14:59):
I hear you.
Speaker 1 (15:00):
But this may be one of my favorites from last night.
And as one commentator said, she had a one person
debate and lost.
Speaker 4 (15:07):
What weaknesses do you bring to the table and how
do you plan to overcome them while you're in office.
Speaker 2 (15:13):
That's a great question, Joe.
Speaker 11 (15:15):
Well, I am certainly not perfect, so let's start there.
And I think that I perhaps a weakness, some would say,
but I actually think it's the strength as I really
do value having a team of very smart people around
me who bring to my decision making process.
Speaker 2 (15:39):
Different perspectives.
Speaker 1 (15:40):
So that's her weakness. She's such a great leader, she
assembles these great teams.
Speaker 2 (15:44):
I mean, how is that a weakness?
Speaker 1 (15:46):
Oh, it's just awesome, right, It's just so good for
Donald Trump. But the point is if you put in
and this goes to my point, she doesn't want this job.
If first, if you wanted the job, with twelve days
to go to the president and see and the race
in the polls very close, your first public event wouldn't
be at four in the afternoon.
Speaker 2 (16:06):
But here's the point.
Speaker 1 (16:07):
It would take fifteen minutes of prep, right, fifteen minutes
of prep at the beginning of the coup, to sit
down and lay out the most predictable questions you'll get,
and to have your canned answers, so the fact she
just wasn't ready to just immediately fire back on Okay,
what are your biggest weaknesses? Well, sometimes I just care
too much, and I've really got to work hard, you know,
(16:30):
just yeah, to make sure that I just don't get
so personally attached to the people who are suffering that
you know, yeah, something like that, right, takes fifteen minutes
to figure it out.
Speaker 2 (16:42):
She doesn't have an.
Speaker 1 (16:43):
Answer to that, or because she has very good staff
in the sense they're very capable improve.
Speaker 2 (16:48):
And they have very bad ideas.
Speaker 1 (16:50):
But you know, the staff has given her all those answers,
so it means she can't process them, she can't retain them.
That's the only thing I can think. What do you
think if you were asked that question? Ryan Schuling, what
are your biggest weaknesses?
Speaker 2 (17:02):
Oh?
Speaker 4 (17:02):
That you know, I don't have enough discipline when it
comes to managing my temper sometimes. Got some feedback I
think from listeners along those lines earlier today.
Speaker 1 (17:12):
Yeah, and I've got to tell you, I really disagree
with you on airic, but I disagreed with your response
to that texture. What was the response you saw the response? No,
I listened to your show. Oh, oh oh yeah, yeah,
I'm not reading your email. Yeah yeah, yeah, unless I can.
Speaker 2 (17:27):
Is there a way for me to do that?
Speaker 1 (17:28):
Maybe I don't know, you know, But anyway, there was
a text Ryan does a great show in Denver Market
six thirty kitsch a W two to four and and
this texture had loved him up and then said, you know,
but but you get too angry. And you wrote back
and said I'll work on that, yeah, which I thought
was the exact wrong response. Oh yeah, yeah, I thought.
(17:50):
I thought the response should have been thank you for
the kind words. I'm not going to change a thing.
Oh wow, just a humble thought. By the way, I
just read one of the greatest columns ever opposing amendments
seventy nine.
Speaker 2 (18:05):
Any luck getting that guest Kelly working on it. When
we Quebecca, I was able to send her an email. Okay,
well we Quebec. I'll tell you about the column here
on the Dan Kapler Show.
Speaker 9 (18:17):
You're listening to the Dan Kaeplas Show podcast.
Speaker 12 (18:20):
This is the future that we're looking at in the
next Trump term, if there is one.
Speaker 8 (18:25):
But this is what voters know right now that he.
Speaker 2 (18:30):
Is killing us.
Speaker 12 (18:30):
I'm talking about us women.
Speaker 1 (18:34):
So Trump is killing women. Meeka, Wait a second, I
thought it was your side, your side, led by Kamala
and Joe, that responsible for what how many deaths of
females each year? Over half a million? Yeah, half a
million females dead each year, Mika, because of what your
side is doing.
Speaker 2 (18:55):
Killing us. He is putting us at risk.
Speaker 8 (18:58):
He is making us a afraid to have babies.
Speaker 1 (19:03):
So, Donald Trump, what is making you afraid to have babies?
Speaker 2 (19:08):
See?
Speaker 1 (19:08):
This is Ryan, this is what we live for, right
all these months, I've said it for months. In these
final few weeks, when it's becoming clear that Kamalis sinking
Trump's gonna win, they will go insane right before our eyes.
It'll be one of the most entertaining things we've ever experienced.
I'm not trying to be mean. I don't revel in
her obvious emotional distress. I just say that for the
(19:30):
good of this nation, the left needs to be exposed
for what it is.
Speaker 2 (19:34):
It is whack.
Speaker 4 (19:35):
So Trump is making women afraid to have babies, but
wants to kill babies.
Speaker 2 (19:41):
Yeah, I want to kill them then, well, females.
Speaker 1 (19:44):
And this is the thing I mean, it just goes
back to has there ever been a more anti woman
group in America in modern times than the modern Democratic Party,
all the different ways it harms women, starting with killing
a half a million females a year, or to be
more precise, to supporting, advocating, celebrating expanding policies that result
(20:09):
in the killing of more than half a million females
a year. Ah, let's go back to the phone lines
and text, oh, I do want to get to this sound.
I mentioned it earlier, and in the interest of balance,
I want to play this. But it also has a
deeper point that I think you'll enjoy very much. This
is Harry anne Non CNN. Now we played a lot
(20:29):
of his stuff because he's been sounding the alarm and saying, hey,
wait a second look at this polling and that polling
and that polling. It's a lot better for Trump than
it was four years ago, folks. But now he does
this one to eighty as things get even worse for
Democrats and says, hey, way, no need to panic. She's
got a clear path to victory.
Speaker 12 (20:48):
Depending on which week, I get different friends from different
sides of the aisle coming back to me. One week
of the Republicans wearing This week it was the Democrats
that we're worrying. But then you look at polling like that,
and then we take a look at the rise of
two undred and seventy, and I should point out the
race to two hundred and seventy. The path of two
hundred and seventy for Kamala Harris is very clear right now.
You know, you talk about Wisconsin, Let's turn that blue,
(21:09):
all right, that gets Harris to two hundred and thirty
six electoral votes. How about Michigan, we'll give her a
blue there two hundred and fifty one electoral votes.
Speaker 2 (21:15):
About look at this to.
Speaker 12 (21:17):
Two hundred and seventy electoral votes if those Washington Post
polls are in fact correct, and so she has a
very clear path to two hundred and seventy electoral votes.
Of course, Aaron, I don't just like looking at one pole.
I like to look at an aggregate of polling. So
let's take a look at the recent aggregat of polls
in these blue Wall states.
Speaker 2 (21:34):
Now what do we see. We see very close contests.
Speaker 12 (21:36):
It's actually closer than the Washington Post polls, but again,
less than a point lead for Harrison Wisconsin, less than
a point lead in Michigan, less than a point lead
in Pennsylvania.
Speaker 1 (21:45):
What's so interesting and encouraging to me is a guy
wh wants to see Trump when is why he's doing this. Okay,
the reason he's doing this is because he believes in
many on the left believe that the left is given up,
that many voters on the left are giving up. They're disheartened,
they're dispirited, they're discouraged. They believe she's going to lose,
(22:07):
so they may not turn out to vote, and they're
basing that in part on what they see in these
early vote returns, which are not an exact science. There's
still time for it to level out, but right now
many places favors the GOP and them early voting downs.
So he's he has concocted that he didn't say anything
false there, but he didn't add the key fact that
(22:30):
disproves his premise, and I'll get to that in a second.
Speaker 2 (22:33):
So he's just trying to.
Speaker 1 (22:34):
Pump people up and saying don't quit. He could still win,
which is true in theory. But here's what he left out.
If you go back to where those same polls were
at four years ago, Joe Biden was ahead by a
bunch more than that a lot in states that he
either lost or won by a hair and Harry incites
(22:57):
the Washington Post without mentioning, Oh yeah, last Washington Post
poll in Wisconsin four years ago had Biden up seventeen.
It was crazy seventeen one by a handful of votes.
So that's what our friend Harry left out.
Speaker 4 (23:12):
And normally I like Harry, I know you did, and
I think he does a fair job. I really think
he's trying to get it right. But he's cherry picking
here and WAPO to your point, Dan, it's an outlier.
It is to the left. In fact, these polls were
just released today. Tip TPP has Harris plus three national poll. However,
CNBC separate poll and Wall Street Journal separate poll national
(23:35):
have Trump plus two CNBC Trump plus three Wall Street Journal.
Speaker 9 (23:40):
This is trending in Trump's direction.
Speaker 4 (23:42):
The real clear politics polling average right now, Dan is
Harris plus zero point two nationally.
Speaker 2 (23:48):
That's disastrous death right right, political death.
Speaker 1 (23:51):
But right, But any honest pollster I can get a
single poll wrong just because of who you happen to sample,
But when you look at the polls overall, when you
look at the trend lines, it's real clear what's happening now, right,
And then the more important data is what we can
tell not a perfect science from the early voting so far.
You mix those two together, and then you have to
(24:13):
factor in, of course common sense, right, which is clearly
the more people learn about the truth about Kamala Harris,
as we and you have expected for a long time,
the more her support's going to drop. So I think
the most significant poll finding in all of that was
in the Wall Street Journal poll because that's a prominent
DEM pollar and a prominent Republican pollster, and it does
(24:34):
not tend to favor Donald Trump generally speaking. But what
they found in there was that, consistent with some other polling,
Trump's favorability now higher than Harris's, which makes perfect sense, right,
because in terms of favorability, I understand Donald Trump at
times can color outside the lines, But in terms of favorability,
(24:56):
I think a lot of people put heavy weight on authenticity. Okay,
you know, I may not agree with somebody on this
and this and that and that, but I know what
I'm getting. I know they're just they are who they are,
and you know they're they're shooting straight with me. Whether
I agree with it or not. But also in favorability
is how have they affected me and Donald Trump? Yeah,
(25:17):
people had all these much better things like lower prices
in this and that.
Speaker 2 (25:20):
All I'm here to tell.
Speaker 1 (25:21):
You is in the Wall Street Journal, Paul Donald Trump's
favorability was fifty two percent, and he was significantly above
Kamala Harris, which makes sense, right because as more people
learn the truth about her, of course their favorability is
going to plummet. Remember this is somebody who was a
favorite to win in twenty in the Democratic primary, and
even in the Democratic primary she couldn't even make it
(25:44):
till Iowa. Ninety two percent of her staff is quit
during her tenure as VP. So the more people learn
the truth and Ryan, if the Trump campaign doesn't hammer, hammer,
hammer the last five seconds of this sound during this
last week in the swing states, that is political malpractice.
The first part it's useless, but listen to the last
(26:05):
five seconds needs to be in every swing state every
day in that last week.
Speaker 11 (26:10):
And when we all sing happy tunes of sing Merry
Christmas and wish each other merry Christmas, these children are.
Speaker 2 (26:17):
Not going to have them marry Christmas. Start the spot
right here.
Speaker 11 (26:21):
How dare we speak Merry Christmas?
Speaker 2 (26:23):
How dare we You gotta blast that.
Speaker 1 (26:27):
You gotta blast that Wisconsin, you gotta blast it in Michigan,
you gotta blast it in Pennsylvania, you gotta blast it
in Arizona.
Speaker 2 (26:34):
And here's the thing too, Dale Georgia too.
Speaker 4 (26:37):
All of these swing state Senate races, each of the
Democratic candidates, they are running far and fast from not
only Biden, which is a given, but Harris too if
they're not bringing her in. I think Eric Hovedy is
going to win Wisconsin and unseat Tammy Baldwin. I believe
that Bernie Moreno is going to unseat Shared Brown in Ohio.
I believe that Dave McCormick is going to unseat Casey.
(26:58):
And Pennsylvania, we know that Montana's flipping. Tester's done. She
he's in West Virginia's flipping. That's five seats. And I
believe strongly that Mike Rodgers can defeat Alyssa Slocken in Michigan.
She's nervous, she doesn't like the pulling for Harris. We
we could definitely be looking dan at a fifty five
to forty five Republican majority in the Senate.
Speaker 1 (27:18):
Which comes back to a critical premise. And I've tweeted
on this as well. Listen, nothing's guaranteed yet, but the
larger the Trump victory, that the bigger that critical first
step to national unity. And I'm not saying hey, Kumbaya
overnight all this and that, I'm just saying, we know
everybody knows this nation has got to get more unified
than it is now. The bigger the Trump victory, the
(27:42):
better chance to start back on that road to unity.
A FI five for zero five eight two five five
year on the Dane Caapla Ship.
Speaker 9 (27:50):
And now back to the Dan Kaplas Show podcast.
Speaker 2 (27:53):
Glad to hear here.
Speaker 1 (27:54):
Bruce Springsteen with Kamala Harrison Barack Obama tonight at Aurelly
in Georgie. It was stunning to me as Springsteen was
playing that the crowd behind him looked completely totally bored.
But even the Boss cannot save Kamala Harris. A couple
of quick notes here. Bobert Challenger Tricia Calvareesi hauls in
(28:15):
five hundred and seventy k in first Haffect October and
Colorado's fourth CD This is Colorado Politics piecelessen Tricia could
have hauled in five hundred and seventy million in the
first half of October, and it would not change the outcome.
Lauren Poper is going to win the fourth congressional district.
And so I mean, let's say, how much would you
(28:37):
have to pay each voter, let's say each pro life
voter to go out and vote for somebody pro abortion.
How much would you have to pay each pro life
voter to do that. I don't know that there's a
price for us, right, That's the point. Pro lifers have
nothing in it, nothing, no selfish interest for pro lifers. Now,
on the abortion side, you've got all sorts of selfish
(28:58):
interests going on with the abortion industry and their big money,
and they're funding of politician's is and that. On the
pro life side, there is nothing in it for pro lifers.
Under then, often abuse from the left and at times
societal rejection, etc. Pro lifers have the purest possible motives
(29:19):
just to save innocent human life. And so there is
no amount of money you can pay a pro lifer
to get them to vote for somebody pro abortion. So
she could raise five hundred and seventy million, it's not
going to change the outcome.
Speaker 2 (29:31):
Of CD four.
Speaker 1 (29:32):
Let me get to some text here, Dan, doesn't it
worry you that illegals will be voting because they're not
counted in any of the polling. I do worry about cheating.
I do, whether it's cheating in the forms of folks
here illegally voting, because I've seen some stories that suggest
some have been led to believe they can't. I do
(29:56):
worry about any kind of cheating. Do I sit here
believing that there's going to be enough cheating to change
the outcome of the race. I don't believe that, and
I sure is that cope not. And I like what
I see from the GOP in terms of everything it's
doing to try to make sure that there's real election
(30:16):
integrity here, Dan, I'm the texture said, Ryan sounds a
little angry, but truly, I know he's just very passionate
about what he believes in. And I totally get that.
I wasn't trying to be hateful offering a little feedback.
I still love a show. I never thought the texture
was hateful.
Speaker 2 (30:31):
No, No, not at all. Yeah, I just oh, and
I have fun listening.
Speaker 1 (30:36):
I just thought the answer should have been, thank you,
appreciate the kind words, I'm not going to change a thing.
Speaker 2 (30:40):
Oh thanks, Dan.
Speaker 1 (30:42):
That crowd strikes software up to a couple of months
ago makes me think cheating is afoot again. It's fascinating
to me because you see the polls, you have so
many people concerned that this election may be stolen. I
told you the anecdotal story about one of the most conservative,
autious people I've ever met in my life. Conservative in
(31:03):
the sense that they they don't throw bombs, you know,
rhetorical bombs or anything like that, just stunned me one
night at dinner when he said, I'm afraid they're going
to steal this one. He's the last guy in the
face of the earth I thought would have had any
suspicion about stolen elections. So I understand that fear is
out there.
Speaker 2 (31:25):
Dan.
Speaker 1 (31:25):
What a great text here, Ryan. If the Democratic Party
was so afraid of losing that they ousted Joe Biden,
why is that same Democratic Party now hoping Kamala loses
from David and Centennial. Great question and a great answer
to that. Yes, the left that controls the Democratic Party
does not want to lose the presidency. That's why they
(31:48):
conducted the coup. But then Joe Biden outsmarted them and
he forced Kamala on them. They didn't want Kamala because
they knew she would lose, but Biden out smarted him,
forced Kamala on him, and that was that the die
was cast. So now that they have Kamala, their problem
(32:09):
is that she, if she's actually elected, she will be
so terrible at this job. She will trash the Democratic brand.
She'll get them wiped out in twenty six, She'll get
him wiped out in twenty eight. If if the cabal
had its way and following the coup, they had either
Newsome or they had Shapiro, they had some other strong candidate,
(32:33):
horrible ideas, bad for the country, but just strong candidate skills,
they'd be in a very good position to win this
race right now. So that was the cabal's plan. Pull
the coup, get a really good candidate in.
Speaker 2 (32:45):
There, and win the race.
Speaker 1 (32:46):
But Biden not smarted him and stuck them with Kamala
eight five for is her five a two to five
to five useless information? Because they're coming up on the
end of the show, Dan, why does the whole world
not live in Boulder? Maybe because it's swoke Marxist and
a blank hole. First of all, listen, I understand the
politics and Boulder are far left and there's a lot
(33:07):
of goofy political stuff. I get that, But as a
guy who lived there for decades, I love Boulder so much.
Not the politics, obviously, but I loved it so much.
I did not leave Boulder until noon on my wedding day.
And I was marrying the most spectacular woman in the world.
But I knew she worked nights in Denver's anchor a
(33:27):
Channel four. I knew we would not be living in Boulder,
so I stayed there till noon. I remember I was
working out that morning at the gym and Boulder and
the guy said, man, aren't you getting married sometime soon?
Speaker 2 (33:38):
I said, yeah, today.
Speaker 3 (33:39):
But is that so much?
Speaker 1 (33:41):
I love Bolder, but I love her more and we've
had a fantastic life here.
Speaker 2 (33:47):
But driving back up there.
Speaker 1 (33:48):
I at an early morning meeting with clients in Boulder
and going over the scenic overlook early in the morning,
it's just I just think it's one of the most
beautiful places in the world. Final thoughts my friend as
we head down this stretch, run.
Speaker 4 (34:01):
Dan, I'm feeling better every day about this race. I'm
feeling more.
Speaker 2 (34:05):
Confidence of Chicago song isn't there.
Speaker 4 (34:07):
I'll dig that up for tomorrow, But I really am,
and I wouldn't just put out false bravado about that.
Every trend line that we've been talking about is going
in Trump's.
Speaker 1 (34:16):
Direction and critically common sense, Yeah yeah, exactly, so should be.
Speaker 2 (34:23):
Tremendous times in front of us.
Speaker 1 (34:25):
And let's pray for President Trump, pray for his safety,
and just do everything we can to defeat amendments seventy nine.
I just tweeted out a column at Dan Caplis, one
of the most powerful columns I've ever read, one of
the best arguments against insidias seventy nine. Read it at
Dan Caplis and spread it a rock
Popular Podcasts
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Therapy Gecko
An unlicensed lizard psychologist travels the universe talking to strangers about absolutely nothing. TO CALL THE GECKO: follow me on https://www.twitch.tv/lyleforever to get a notification for when I am taking calls. I am usually live Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays but lately a lot of other times too. I am a gecko.
The Joe Rogan Experience
The official podcast of comedian Joe Rogan.