Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
You're listenings KFI AM six forty the Bill handles show
on demand on the iheartradiop.
Speaker 2 (00:09):
It is the first hour. It is top of the
first hour, always the best time to call, because we
come in with a clean slate on the phone. Calls
after Dean Sharp locks out and says goodbye, and then
I say hello. So it's eight hundred and five two
zero one, five three four, And depending on the day,
(00:30):
sometimes we fill up very quickly and you're not getting
in for an hour hour and a half, or if
the lines are open, you're coming in virtually immediately. And
of course the rules are hopefully you have a good case.
If you are unintelligible I cannot understand one word you say,
that means you're at the top of the list. You're
instantly on. If you are special needs, no arms, no legs,
(00:53):
et cetera, in a wheelchair, drooling, and maybe you have
a big case of skilliusek scaliosis. Yeah, good for me, Bill,
Then you get up at the top of the list anywhere.
And if you are a LGBTQ, that's a good combination.
Put them all together there and man your first up
(01:13):
eight hundred five two zero one five three four, write
that down or don't eight hundred five two zero one
five three four and jump aboard, and we're going to
have a ripper in good time. As I give you
the kind of advice that I am famous for. As
I've often said, yes, I am a license attorney, have
(01:36):
been for many, many years, and my knowledge of the
law is vast. Now granted it's a quarter inch deep,
so it's very wide and very shallow. And that's what
makes us show work. Eight hundred five two zero one
five three four. This is handle on the law, marginal
(01:58):
legal advice where I tell you have absolutely no case. Okay,
here's one that I said from the get go, absolutely
no case. And at the same time and had all
kinds of political repercussions. And the US Attorney the Department
of Justice is now an arm of the president. It
(02:20):
has no independence whatsoever. It used to be an independent body,
Now not a chance. Now it's at the whim of
the president, who, as you know, goes after people who
are well don't like him, state something against him, file lawsuits,
are involved in agencies that somehow make a decision independent
(02:41):
of his, that are not in line with what he
thinks and also used for political purposes. Case in point.
All right, as you probably know, the reflecting pool of
the Lincoln Memorial Pool long expanse of a pool about
a foot and a half deep, and it goes on
for hundreds of yards twenty yards wide or whatever. The
(03:02):
President decided he was going to repaint the bottom a
much deeper blue, the blue that'saw on the American flag.
So he drained the pool, or he had a drain,
and then the entire bottom repainted, and this is a
lining that is at the bottom that was repainted. Then
the water fills up again. Well literally, within a matter
(03:25):
of about a week, the lining that paint separated from
the lining, and chunks of it started floating to the surface.
And what happened, Well, all of a sudden, this is
an embarrassment. This was the president's pet project. And so
now why did that float to the surface. Is it
(03:48):
possible that the contractor who got a no big contract
screwed up and they went way too fast? No, no,
someone has to be at fault. Government cannot be at fault.
So immediately there was well here was the case. A
former Olympic canoeist David Hearn was there, got off his
bicycle and reached into the pool and came up with
(04:12):
a chunk of this paint that had floated. It became
sort of a if you can imagine maybe a paper size,
legal size, legal paper size, a bit of paint that
came up. And he was arrested and charged with maliciously
destroying the lining, and that is he was charged federally,
(04:36):
and he was charged. It was a felony that he
was charged with, I mean a felony for reaching in
and grabbing a piece of paint that had already been
separated from the lining. Of course, the argument was that
he actually had destroyed it, that he pulled it off,
and the President had said someone had taken a box
cutter and run all the way up from one end
(04:58):
to the other, and that's what happened, and that was malicious.
So Jeanine Pirout, who is the US Attorney for the
District of Columbia, I had a press conference after the
indictment of David Hearn for desecrating a public market monument,
and she went in did her press conference that David
(05:20):
hern maliciously put his hands into the water, both his
hands in the water, and he did it with such
force that it created the lining and the paint to separate.
And I don't have the story in front of me.
I'm just paraphrasing now, and it was he did it
(05:41):
with great force. He put his hands into the water
with great force. And then he was rude to the
park rangers who went up to him, So what are
you doing? And so he was indicted and I said,
this is ridiculous. I said, this is a stupid political
ploy to avert attention. I mean, she went nuts. She
(06:04):
talked about how great the president was, and how monuments,
all the monuments that he is refurbishing, how he believes
in the monuments of the United States, and I mean
just on and on, just complete crapple, and then discussed
what David Hurd had done in great detail and why
he was charged for a felony. And I said, there's
(06:27):
no way, you know, box cutter wasn't used because when
they drained it, there was no proof whatsoever that anything
had been sliced open. It was just pieces of paint
that had floated to the surface. And he went down there,
David Herd just went down there and looked at it,
and I guess pulled some up or it floated and
he grabbed. It doesn't matter, so monument, the facement of
(06:48):
a public monument. And of course there was no proof
of anything. The government said and all the blabber that
she did malicious, horrible destruction purposely with great force, I mean,
just on and on, and of course nothing came of
it because it turned out that they were pieces of
paint that floated, because it did separate, and it was stupid.
(07:10):
It was just it was badly apply. It was just
that simple. So what just happened, Well, us attorney the
DJ quietly went into court and said, we really don't
have any proof that he did anything wrong. Yeah, he
put his hands into the reflecting pool and he went
(07:31):
ahead and just grab some pieces of paint. So we
really don't have any evidence that there was anything intentional,
or that he destroyed anything, or he in some way
interfered with the monument. And so what do they do?
They quietly asked that the case be dismissed, which just happened.
(07:52):
See that's how it works. I mean, it is crazy.
That's exactly how it works in Washington these days. All right,
before I take a break, a quick reminder, Well, today
you're going to hear a lot of questions regarding personal
injury guarantee it. People are in car accidents, slip and
falls and are going to ask me what do I do?
(08:14):
Do I see a lawyer? The answer is yes, you
see a lawyer. Can I do it on my own?
Speaker 3 (08:18):
No?
Speaker 2 (08:18):
You cannot do it on your own. If you've been
in an accent, it's not your fault and you've been injured,
you are crazy to do it on your own. So
let me suggest going to one of the lawyers at
handle on the Law dot com. These are vetted lawyers.
They specialize in personal injury. They're really good because they're
part of handle on the Law dot com. If there's
a problem, by the way I make the phone call,
(08:40):
you need help and you might as well get the
best help you can get. That's why I created Handle
on the Law. So injured, slip and fall, a t bone,
rear ended, whatever the case called a day, eight a
daight eight eight sixty six eight eight eight eight eight
eight eight eight six six eight visit handle on the
Law dot com. This is Handle on the Law.
Speaker 4 (09:01):
You're listening to Bill Handle on Demand from KFI AM
six forty.
Speaker 2 (09:07):
Eight hundred and five two zero, one, five, three four,
and welcome back to handle on the law marginal legal advice. Brandon, Oh,
we have a fatal letter error here. Okay, let me
try it, Mario. I think I need some help here.
We have a glitch going on with the computer. But
(09:27):
let's go Brandon.
Speaker 3 (09:29):
Hey, Bill, Hey, what's a've recently? I recently read about
a remote worker in the UK who won a case
after employer kept insisting she'd be on camera despite her anxiety.
I'm also a remote worker currently in therapy for anxiety
and moderate depression, and being forced to stay on camera
has kind of become a major source of stress for me.
(09:52):
My boss actually recently told me, if you're not going
to turn on your camera, just quit.
Speaker 5 (09:56):
So I've got a couple of questions.
Speaker 3 (09:58):
Do I need to formally dis close my condition and
request accommodation before I have any legal prequestions?
Speaker 2 (10:04):
Yeah? I think the employer has to know exactly what
this is. I would argue this is a hostile work
environment and that it gets complicated. Does the employer have
the right to put you on camera? For example, have
a camera in an open pit. Let's say you have
a call center, and does the employer have the right
to put a camera up there. I think so. Now,
(10:26):
if it causes you great anxiety and depression, you have
certain rights. But does that mean you have to be excluded?
It's really interesting. But either way, you have to disclose
what's going on because the employer has to be given
some kind of opportunity to fix the problem. It may
not be fixable the way you describe it, but it
(10:47):
certainly is something that the employer should try if possible,
to accommodate you. Okay, so that's question number one.
Speaker 3 (10:54):
Question number two, Yeah, second question is the way my
boss is treating the potentially does that potentially create a
legal issue once on?
Speaker 2 (11:03):
Maybe? Maybe? And what just by saying either a camera
or quit?
Speaker 6 (11:07):
Right?
Speaker 2 (11:08):
No, it's people do that all the time. Bosses do.
If you don't do a you're going to quit.
Speaker 5 (11:14):
You know.
Speaker 2 (11:14):
I've had that happen to be dozens of times.
Speaker 3 (11:15):
Bill.
Speaker 2 (11:16):
If you don't shut up, I'm going to fire you.
And I say things like I'm a talk show host.
What am I supposed to do? Just look at the microphone? Well,
obviously I'm being ridiculous, but the boss can you know,
let's say you're working, you're a salesperson and there's a
dress code. Boom, you don't dress the way that the
company wants you to address, you're out, then just quit.
(11:37):
So the issue here is where I don't know is
that Is it an issue where the only thing the
boss can do is turn off the camera? And why
does he want to camera in there? Is he looking
at you typing in your board? I mean, what exactly
does he want to see your facial expressions? Do you
(11:59):
have any idea why? I specifically again pointed at you.
Speaker 3 (12:03):
That's that's what my assumption is for meetings facial expressions.
Speaker 2 (12:07):
Yeah, then you if you have meetings and you're doing
zoom or teams meeting and you don't want to be
on camera, too bad, because you can say that's what
we do with teams meetings, you know, people look at
each other. I think that's legitimate for him to do that.
So I would think you're not going to win on
that case. So so why don't you quit? I mean seriously,
why if you don't like it, quit or wear a
(12:31):
ghow mask, you know, or you know, put on a
spider man mask or whatever. Yeah, I don't know what
to tell you. I mean, do you like that job
this much?
Speaker 5 (12:42):
Not really?
Speaker 2 (12:43):
Okay, Well let's say, you know, let's get practical now, Okay,
do you start looking for a job. Yeah, I would,
and certainly your boss is not going to know, I
don't think and then just switch or then you come
back if you have a job offer and say to him, hey,
here's the bottom line. If if you don't eliminate the
camera on my face, I'm going to quit, although I'd
rather be fired if I were you. If are you
(13:05):
an employee or you a gig employee?
Speaker 5 (13:09):
Oh?
Speaker 2 (13:09):
Okay, well you know you don't want to quit because
you want to collect unemployment if you can't. Okay, all right,
we'll try for that. Okay. As I said, we have
a glitch going on with the computer. Mario. Who's next.
Let's go with Mollie. Okay, Mollie, Hello, Molly, Welcome to
handle on the law.
Speaker 7 (13:27):
Good morning, Bill.
Speaker 5 (13:27):
How are you?
Speaker 2 (13:28):
I am miserable and horrible, but that doesn't matter. What
can I do for you?
Speaker 7 (13:34):
Here's our issue. We have an elderly mother who's ninety five,
and we have a family trust and my brother and
I and we have another sister, our sister who's been
living in one of the property's rent free for years,
has decided that she's going to move herself, her boyfriend,
(13:56):
four dogs, and a bird into our mother's house.
Speaker 8 (14:01):
Without letting know, not yet on her own.
Speaker 2 (14:04):
She's going to do that. So your question is can
she do that? Right?
Speaker 5 (14:08):
Yeah?
Speaker 7 (14:09):
Can you do that?
Speaker 5 (14:10):
Okay? Yeah?
Speaker 2 (14:12):
Okay, Okay? Who's the trustee? If the property is owned
under a trust, there is a trustee.
Speaker 5 (14:19):
Do you know my mother.
Speaker 7 (14:23):
Was originally the trust and trustee and then the rest
of us are all co trustees.
Speaker 2 (14:29):
Ah? Okay, So but your mother is when she's still alive,
and she's still the trustee. Okay? And does she not
want your sister to move in? Do you have to
know what mom is thinking?
Speaker 7 (14:41):
Well, well, when she talks to just the two of us,
my brother and I, she doesn't want to say anything.
But when we brought our sister into the situation, she
changed her tune.
Speaker 2 (14:52):
Okay, let me ask this, Let me ask you this.
Is she prepared? Is she prepared to say no? And
if the sister moves in toss her out? Is she
prepared to do that?
Speaker 5 (15:00):
Oh?
Speaker 7 (15:00):
I don't, I don't know.
Speaker 5 (15:01):
I don't think.
Speaker 2 (15:03):
And if then sister moves in, because she's moving into
a property that is controlled by the trustee of the trust.
Speaker 7 (15:10):
No, no, no, no, no, no, sorry, she's moving into
my mom. That's not part of the trust.
Speaker 2 (15:16):
Oh she's moving into your mom's house. Oh yeah, what
can you do about that. It's your mom's house. It's
your mom's house. How can you tell your mom and
your sister can't move in? It's her house.
Speaker 7 (15:23):
But she's moving in her boyfriend a criminal director.
Speaker 2 (15:27):
Doesn't matter, doesn't man, No, there's nothing unless the trust
specifically says, well, doesn't even matter. If it's out of
the trust. Your mom determines. I mean, your mom can
just say I don't want anybody who is shorter than
five foot eight to move in. Okay, don't move in.
I don't want anybody that's not gainfully employed.
Speaker 5 (15:44):
Yeah.
Speaker 2 (15:44):
No, it's it's hers, it's she can do anything you want.
I know you hate sister. I know she's mooching off
your mom, and it's totally unfair. Her boyfriend is a
sleezeball probably probably is some kind of a predator. But
there's nothing. You can do.
Speaker 7 (15:58):
Nothing, Okay, even with the four dogs, yes, four dogs,
eight dogs, a dozen dogs, a kangaroo.
Speaker 2 (16:06):
It doesn't matter. All right, let me talk about privacy
for a moment. In privacy online, there isn't any everything.
I mean, everything about you is available out there. Your
home address, where you work, or you bank, what you buy,
where you buy it, court records, accident history, DMV records,
(16:26):
your credit score, social media. I go on for an hour.
It's all out there and it's not very hard to get.
And that even gets worse than that because all the
information that is out there is collected by hundreds of
data brokers, hundreds of data brokers, and then gets sold
to anyone wants to buy it, even the bad guys.
This is where Incogny comes into play and fights back.
(16:48):
What Incogy does is contact hundreds of these data brokers
and then legally demands your information be deleted. That's what
Incognate does, and Cogny absolutely works. I'm a huge fan.
Before the show every show, I log onto my Incognitia
account and there they are hundreds of removal requests have
been completed, hundreds more are in progress, and they tell
(17:08):
me about it all the time, every day. Actually, in
Cogni has helped hundreds of thousands of people. So why
don't you take a little bit more control, a lot
more control of your life and your privacy. Get sixty
percent off in Cogni when you use my name handle
h A N D E L. So go to in
Cogni I N C O G N I in cogny
dot com. Slash handle in Cogni dot com slash handle.
(17:33):
This is Handle on the Law.
Speaker 4 (17:36):
You're listening to Bill Handle on demand from KFI A M.
Speaker 5 (17:40):
Six forty.
Speaker 2 (17:42):
Good morning everybody. It is a Saturday, and the phone
numbers here eight hundred five two zero one five three four,
eight hundred five two zero one five three four And
we do have a couple of glitches going on with
my phone lines here, so Mario, if I don't click through,
(18:03):
you're going to have to do it for me, and
so let's try it. Welcome back, Handle on the Law. Liz, Morning, Liz. Nope, okay,
we are having englishes here, So Mario put Liz through,
would you please?
Speaker 6 (18:16):
Yeah?
Speaker 2 (18:17):
Hi Liz, Yes, ma'am you're here.
Speaker 9 (18:20):
Hi, Okay, great, Hi. I'm calling about right and what
type of an attorney I need. I've been as a
healthcare care center for six months and in my mid seventies.
Speaker 2 (18:38):
You're in your mid seventies.
Speaker 9 (18:39):
Yeah, yeah, no, do you know how old you to sound?
Speaker 6 (18:43):
Yeah?
Speaker 2 (18:43):
Really, I mean it's just h yeah, I know, I know.
Speaker 5 (18:47):
Yeah.
Speaker 2 (18:47):
There you go. Some people genetics, I know how it works,
or spoken for your entire life. Okay, you're a major center,
you're a health care facility, all right, So what's happening?
Speaker 9 (18:56):
They want to discharge me or transfer me? And I
really don't want to be transferred.
Speaker 2 (19:04):
I'm there.
Speaker 8 (19:04):
My doctors.
Speaker 9 (19:07):
They say I'm high functional because most of the people
got it, not all of them. Most of the people
don't have dementia. I do have health issues. I have
pulmlinary books.
Speaker 2 (19:22):
Okay, let me okay, let me ask I got it.
I got it. Okay, I understand you've got some physical issues.
You don't have the mental issues that you think that
meet the level of everybody else. So who's paying for
you to be in the facility?
Speaker 9 (19:36):
Medical? And I just got renewed for a year.
Speaker 5 (19:39):
And five months.
Speaker 2 (19:40):
I got to tell you they have the right to
say not here. It's there. Yes, it's their call, it's
not yours. I mean as much as you say yeah,
because they're the ones that are giving you the service.
They're the ones they are the provider. Basically, they're the doctor.
Is what you're looking at for medical care? And the
doctor is saying I don't want to treat you. Okay,
(20:03):
there it is.
Speaker 9 (20:03):
Well, they really don't treat me though, I'm just.
Speaker 2 (20:07):
Okay, do you understand. Do you understand what I'm saying?
You're not dead. It's like a doctor. They are the
ones that you cannot force them to keep you in
the facility if they don't want you. And is it
being reasonable? Are they? Well, yeah, they're being reasonable. And
here is their reasonability. We think Liz uh has too
(20:29):
much cognitive abilities to be an our center. Uh, and
this is not the place for her. Goodbye, You're going
someplace else. They have the right to say that.
Speaker 9 (20:38):
And I can't get an attorney.
Speaker 2 (20:41):
So what why why would you get an attorney because
you don't have the right.
Speaker 9 (20:45):
Okay, okay, yes, okay.
Speaker 2 (20:50):
Let's go through it again. Let's go through it again.
Yes they can discharge you. Let's go through it again.
Yes they can discharge you. All right? Uh Stan, Hey Stan, welcome, Hey.
Speaker 5 (21:02):
Bill, Hello up. Question from a couple of weeks ago.
I live in North Las Vegas. Builders coming through here
two three in the morning. I don't know if you
remember you told me to blow up the city. I've
already been doing that. I'm done. What I want to
do is I'm going to pay the early termination to
see of about one thousand dollars, and what I'm going
to do is move, and then I'm going to sue
(21:22):
either the builder and or the manager being company of
this place in small claims core for everything I paid
far the last four.
Speaker 2 (21:31):
All right, so you are living, you are living there,
and they are building in your area and they start
at two am. That's kind of interesting. So I am
all right, So you want a moon in the morning?
Speaker 5 (21:43):
Okay, okay, all right, I got it. Do you own you?
Speaker 2 (21:46):
Do you own the property?
Speaker 5 (21:47):
No, it's a condo, but it's the same the same
builder that's Are you a rent this place?
Speaker 2 (21:52):
Are you a renter? Okay, you're a renter? Okay, and
you went with a city and uh and you're gonna move. Well,
I I don't know why they're doing that other than
maybe they're up against the timeline and penalties.
Speaker 5 (22:06):
Seventeen degrees turing and noise.
Speaker 2 (22:09):
Okay, okay, so here, all right, yeah, I got it.
I got it. So let me ask this what time?
Since they can't they can't work from let's say nine
o'clock until four o'clock. It is one hundred and twenty
degrees out there. When would you like them to work?
Speaker 5 (22:23):
Not at two am when I'm sleeping.
Speaker 2 (22:25):
Okay, four am? Does that work?
Speaker 5 (22:28):
Four thirty would be better?
Speaker 2 (22:29):
Four thirty. So you were going to establish this, so
they're going to go four thirty to nine. Okay. So
and maybe they're up against the deadline, so you're going
to say, okay, four thirty to nine. How many hours
is that nine? Three? Okay? Five and a half hours, right,
five and a half hours, and then they can start
working again at five o'clock or six o'clock at night. No,
(22:51):
it's too hot, then until about seven o'clock. So they
go until nine thirty and then they stop and the
crew have to sit around, go to a mall, go
see a movie, and then come back at five o'clock
or six o'clock in the evening and work until ten,
let's say, or work till midnight. Yeah, So here's the problem.
(23:15):
What do you do with that? Let's say David, let's
say you're the judge, what do.
Speaker 5 (23:19):
You do with that rule? In my favor, they should
be at two am.
Speaker 2 (23:23):
Okay, So you, as the judge, would say, that's correct.
You cannot do it at two am. You're gonna have
to work four and a half hours, do nothing for
another eight or nine hours, uh, and then go back
to work. Even if it breaks you, even if you
have to go bankrupt, and you, as the judge, would say,
then that's too bad. Then you go bankrupt.
Speaker 5 (23:43):
Not going at bank crept, I'm sorry anytime soon.
Speaker 2 (23:46):
How do you know Orn is not going How do
you know? How do you know you've done that? You've
looked at the books, you know you know what the
You can walk in and say, I they're not going
to go bankrupt. And here is the evidence, your honor.
Speaker 5 (23:58):
I haven't checked their stock price.
Speaker 2 (24:00):
But stock price means nothing. Stock price means nothing. It
doesn't mean a company to solve it or not. So
that's the problem you've got, you really do. There's no
even though it is a huge drag, there is no alternative.
The alternative is just not to build, just stop it cold.
So I don't know where you're gonna go with that.
How about earplugs? I know that's tough, but how about
(24:20):
going and spending two dollars nine nine cents for air plugs.
Speaker 5 (24:23):
Well, I wear well, I do have some, but they
don't work.
Speaker 2 (24:27):
Well, how about getting some at work?
Speaker 5 (24:28):
It's pretty loud?
Speaker 2 (24:30):
Okay, Well, how about getting really thick airplanes? How about
putting on some How about putting on some noise canceling headsets?
And those are about one hundred dollars? All right, Yeah,
where do you go with that? All right? So let
me talk to someone or all of you who have
been injured in an accident, slip and fall, or you've
been t boned, or usually it's a rear ender, or
(24:51):
maybe some rent a cop at some facility has thrown
you out and assaulted you. We've had a few cases
about that. If you've been injured, not your fault, and
you've been paying to pretty good, what do you do. Well,
you're going to get an insurre. You get to tell
you contact the people that own the organization or the
owner of the car and say I want some money.
I mean, that's the bottom line. It's all you can
(25:12):
get is money after the cars replaced, et cetera. So
you're going to get this phone conversation and you're crazy
to even begin to talk to those people. Why Because
they're going to offer you some money and you're talking
to people that make a living living not paying you.
That's what happens in personal injury cases. So I'm going
to suggest, strongly suggests that you get a good attorney
(25:36):
Handle on the Law dot Com. That's why I created
Handle on the Law dot Com. You don't pay money upfront,
by the way, the attorneys get a piece of the settlement,
a percentage of the settlement. So no money, no money.
Call eight eight eight eight eight eight eight sixty six eight.
These are vetted attorneys. I make the phone call if
there's a problem. Handle on the Law dot Com call
eight eight eight a day to eight eight six six eight.
(25:58):
This is Handle on the Law.
Speaker 4 (26:01):
You're listening to Bill Handle on demand from KF I
am six forty welcome back.
Speaker 2 (26:10):
More Handle on the Law Marginal legal advice, Brian, What
can I do for you? Are you yes, sir?
Speaker 6 (26:17):
I'm let me give you a little background. I'm suffering
from a protection order that is bogus.
Speaker 2 (26:23):
There's an injunction against you, correct.
Speaker 5 (26:26):
I have, yes, I am the respondent.
Speaker 2 (26:29):
Okay, so tell me a little bit of when you
say is bogus who has.
Speaker 5 (26:34):
A little history.
Speaker 6 (26:35):
This is the second time my wife has done this.
Speaker 2 (26:39):
Okay, so your first time first?
Speaker 6 (26:41):
Yeah, first time was twenty two. I dropped the kids
off at her house Christmas Eve, went to go pick
them up Christmas Day after they texted me they want
to pick up and she kept them from me for
three months. The police were there. It took me four
months and almost eight thousand dollars to get that terminated.
(27:01):
It was terminated. So I went out of town.
Speaker 5 (27:04):
Okay, go ahead, all right.
Speaker 2 (27:05):
So in a second time, what's the same happened? Correct?
Speaker 5 (27:08):
Same thing? Two weeks?
Speaker 2 (27:10):
All right? Yeah, I came back, all right, okay, and
you have joint custody I'm assuming, or at least visitation.
Speaker 5 (27:17):
Yes, well, they lived with me prior.
Speaker 2 (27:19):
Yes, all right, Well, I mean we're talking about now
either joint custody that they live half with you and
half with your ex.
Speaker 5 (27:25):
Or yeah we lived together to this at this.
Speaker 2 (27:28):
Point right now, you live together.
Speaker 5 (27:31):
We lived together, and you live together.
Speaker 2 (27:33):
Okay, I understood. So now you're living apart and there
is and again I'm going to ask you, is it
joint custody? Is it just visitation on your part?
Speaker 5 (27:41):
What is it.
Speaker 2 (27:42):
It's joint custody, got it, okay, So you're entitled to
the kids half the time based on what the court says.
Let's they're in school Monday through Friday and you get
weekends or whatever. All right. So the second time around,
she went in and did she do an emergency restraining order?
Was or was there a hearing?
Speaker 6 (27:58):
It was a protection order? She did it the day
before I came back into town because.
Speaker 2 (28:04):
Okay, okay, got it. So she did it, okay, So
she did it without you there. Now I'm assuming there
was a hearing date.
Speaker 5 (28:12):
There was one, yes, okay, three months.
Speaker 2 (28:15):
Okay when you went past there and uh, the court
upheld the restraining order? Is that right?
Speaker 5 (28:22):
Yes?
Speaker 2 (28:22):
Okay? And you say, is bogus because when she every.
Speaker 6 (28:29):
She alleged that beat her with the vacuum cleaner, okay,
and then okay, in the stomach, all right, crazy stuff.
Speaker 2 (28:36):
And the court and not.
Speaker 6 (28:37):
Only that, no, no police reports, no medical right.
Speaker 2 (28:41):
So you got to you have a judge that is
uh schorely, a little scorely, So you got to go
in uh and then the procedures you need a family
law attorney on this one. Man, You're not going to
do this one on your.
Speaker 6 (28:51):
I get it, I get it. But the problem is
last time it costs me eight thousand.
Speaker 5 (28:56):
It's going to cost you this place.
Speaker 2 (28:58):
Yeah, it's gonna cost place for Why were you displaced
from your house because you went broke?
Speaker 6 (29:03):
No, because my wife said, I couldn't even come back
to the house with.
Speaker 2 (29:06):
The court and the court and you do you both
own the house?
Speaker 5 (29:10):
Yes, I am on the title.
Speaker 2 (29:11):
You're on title, and the judge forced you out of
the house. Is that correct?
Speaker 5 (29:15):
Yes, I couldn't even get my power.
Speaker 2 (29:18):
You need a family law attorney. You're not going to
do this one on your own. There's no way.
Speaker 6 (29:22):
Well, it's almost done. They're they're deciding this Frida.
Speaker 5 (29:25):
Okay, so what's the question? Believe they are paled it? Okay, well, okay,
the judge is I thought.
Speaker 6 (29:30):
My question is that I thought that in order to
uphold the protection order there has to be a preponderance
of evidence.
Speaker 2 (29:39):
You're right, the judge that doesn't believe you. The judge
rules there are the preponderance of evidence. It's the judges,
call I.
Speaker 5 (29:45):
Have given sixty pages.
Speaker 2 (29:47):
It is the judges. It is the judges. I judge, Brian,
You're not the judge. It's not your call. It is
the judge's call based on what you say and based
on you We have sixty pages of evidence you should win,
and on top of that, you should you should get
attorney's fees. I'm assuming your h I am assuming that
(30:08):
your attorney is asking for attorney's fees sanctions on your behalf.
So okay, that makes sense. All right, we won't do
one real quickly because this is an easy one. Okay, David,
all right, what can I do for you?
Speaker 5 (30:22):
David?
Speaker 8 (30:22):
Yeah, yeah, Bill, My idiot brother in law his tree
branch fell into the next door neighbor's yard. He's saying,
since it's in their yard, they are responsible for being
for the cleanup.
Speaker 2 (30:38):
Okay, So let me ask you this. If I were
to call you up and say, my idiot brother in
law says that since my tree fell on the neighbor's yard,
they should be responsible for cleaning up my tree's branches,
what would you say.
Speaker 8 (30:54):
I would say, he's really an idiot.
Speaker 2 (30:56):
That is absolutely correct. Well done. You. You really should
have your own radio show giving legal advice. That is correct.
If your tree branch breaks and falls on the other side,
you are responsible for any damage. What a shocker, huh. Now,
before we go on to our next segment, I'm going
(31:19):
to spend just a minute talking to you about your privacy.
What privacy online? No, you don't have any privacy online
doesn't exist. Everything about you, I mean everything is available
out there. Your home address, where you work, where you bank,
what you buy, where you buy it, court records, accident history,
DMV information, credit score. I mean I could go on
(31:41):
for an hour, all out there, all available, all easy
to get, and your information is then collected by hundreds
of data brokers. I don't know if you knew that
hundreds of data brokers collected and then they sell it
to anyone who wants to buy it, and even the
bad guys. So let me tell you about this company, Cogni,
of which I am a customer. In Cogni, I n
(32:02):
c og n I. Let me tell you what in
Cogni does. They contact hundreds of these data brokers and
legally demand your information be deleted. That's in Cogny and
they have to delete it. And before the show, every
time I go onto my Incognita account and I check yep,
there there are hundreds of removal requests. Have been completed
(32:24):
changes all the time because new ones pop up. Hundreds
more are in progress and are scheduled. That's in Cogny.
So take your life back. At least help yourself as
far as your privacy and as far as the bad
guys getting your information in Cogny. Sixty percent off when
you use my name handle h A N D E L.
Go to incognyi n c og ni in cogny dot com.
(32:46):
Slash handle in cogny dot com slash handle, this is
handle on the law. You've been listening to the Bill
Handle Show.
Speaker 1 (32:56):
Catch my show Monday through Friday, six am to nine am,
and anytime on demand on the iHeartRadio app