All Episodes

January 13, 2026 29 mins

(January 13,2026)

Amy King and Neil Saavedra join Bill for Handel on the News. Supreme Court takes up ‘monumental’ case about transgender athletes. Senator sues Pete Hegseth after censure over video insinuating ‘unlawful orders’ have been made. Apple asks Google to help bring more AI features to the iPhone.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Mark as Played
Transcript

Episode Transcript

Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:01):
You're listening to Bill Handle on demand from KFI AM
six fortys.

Speaker 2 (00:11):
Young adults are lonelier, dating is declining, friend groups are shrinking.
Penises are more flaccid. By the way, I don't know
if it's true or not, but I just wanted to
get your attention.

Speaker 1 (00:24):
And now Handle on the news. Ladies and gentlemen. Here's
Bill Handle.

Speaker 2 (00:32):
Good morning everybody, Bill Handle here, it's good morning crew.
It's also a Monday morning, January twelve. Another football game
last night which I didn't see, so some team one
and some team lost, and so I'm happy to report
how it went. I know Aaron Rodgers. This was probably

(00:55):
his last game ever. Dot do they make a big
deal about it that everybody announced and cheered and last
game ever? Kind of thing? Really? Okay, no big deal.

Speaker 3 (01:08):
You can where he is Pittsburgh and Houston last night.

Speaker 2 (01:11):
By the way, Okay, well, he has a lot to
do with the fact that he's sort of crazy with
this vaccine and the autism stuff. Maybe all right, guys,
let me say a quick hello. Good morning, Neil, you're
back again. Good morning Willie Woolf okay, and Will Coachswriiber, Hello, Will,

(01:32):
Good morning Bill all right, Yeah, everybody's happy camp or
and there you are. Hi, Today's gonna be fun. Why
is today going to be fun?

Speaker 3 (01:44):
You're extra kuffuffled.

Speaker 2 (01:46):
Oh yeah, I mean this morning, my printer and I
do this all off of paper. The printer would not
work this morning. I started to do the show off
my phone because that's the device I used to print,
and nothing would work. So I just kept on pressing buttons.

Speaker 3 (02:05):
Did you restart the printer?

Speaker 2 (02:07):
I restarted everything. I restarted the printer three times. I
restarted my phone. It wouldn't work. It then said the
paper was out and the paper was in, so I
redid the paper and then I interrupted the job. I mean,
I did it all, and finally, for some reason, the
printer gods came down and said, here you go, we'll

(02:28):
get it working.

Speaker 3 (02:29):
So I just have three versions of the first hour,
so that yeah, and then.

Speaker 2 (02:35):
I've only read the news, so I now have to
put together during the breaks all the rest of the show.
I mean, it happens and Amy, good morning, Hi Bill, Hi,
so your coffee machine is working? Yes, yes, she got
a new coffee machine and she texted me this coffee
takes grace great, and I said yeah, because, frankly, up

(02:58):
to this point, you've been using water down urine samples,
youurine specimens that for some reason we call coffee.

Speaker 3 (03:07):
And this is a little stronger than that.

Speaker 2 (03:10):
It's good coffee.

Speaker 3 (03:11):
This is great coffee.

Speaker 2 (03:12):
Did you buy her a coffee machine? I did? Okay,
this is what coffee, because I couldn't stand her talking
about how her coffee machine was broken, how crappy the
coffee was. So yeah, I did. I couldn't. It was
an espresso.

Speaker 4 (03:26):
Yeah, oh they're great.

Speaker 2 (03:28):
Oh they are great. I have one, Neil, you have one.

Speaker 3 (03:30):
But normally I can have like four cups of coffee,
like on a Saturday or Sunday, and I'm fine. And
I had my coffee on Sunday morning and I was like, yeah,
it's a little stronger.

Speaker 2 (03:43):
Hey Bill, Yes, Coney's car, Yeah, yeah, yeah, I know,
I know, yeah, I know. But there's a very big difference.
There is a very big difference between a coffee machine
and a new car.

Speaker 3 (03:58):
Well, the car's more necessary.

Speaker 2 (04:01):
Well, I don't know, you drink coffee? Yes, thanks for that, guy. Thanks.

Speaker 3 (04:05):
Should needs to get to work.

Speaker 2 (04:07):
Do we should do a go go fund me camp?
Allowed to do that? Neil, are we allowed to do that?
You go fund him? Uh? Okay, but that you are
we allowed to do a go fund me campaign for
con What does.

Speaker 4 (04:22):
Everybody think I'm still working in management because.

Speaker 2 (04:24):
You have a better idea. You have a better idea
about we went We did a go fund me campaign
for your damn kidney. No we didn't, Yes we did.
I went out there and said, if anybody has a
spare kidney, can use it. No you didn't, but I
certainly did. I hustled your kidney like you could not believe.

Speaker 4 (04:44):
I'm fine.

Speaker 3 (04:45):
You know what?

Speaker 4 (04:46):
Going forward?

Speaker 2 (04:50):
I think, you know what, go yeah, let's let's open
up a go fund me campaign just for the you know,
and if they do, they shut it down?

Speaker 4 (04:58):
What Cono, the Pride the Ie?

Speaker 2 (05:01):
Uh yeah, yeah, you know, I don't know if we
I don't know if we can do that. You know,
before I we do, I should ask the powers to
be whether I could do a go fund me campaign.
The argument is that at this point, Cono is taking
a bus to get to work, and he lives in
the IE, and he has no access to a car

(05:21):
because he works here at iHeart, So he has no
access to a car and he has no access to money.
But don't you buy a car.

Speaker 4 (05:30):
Don't they call buses limos in the ie?

Speaker 2 (05:35):
Yeah, yeah they do. So anyway, I'm gonna find that out.
And okay, I have to mute here. I have to.
I got to figure that out because I think, you know,
with a go fund me campaign, we may actually raise
a couple of dollars. CONO need a couple eighteen thousand couples.

Speaker 4 (05:54):
Now I'm going to give money to a campaign when
they know that you're loaded.

Speaker 2 (06:00):
It doesn't mean I'm not going to give money to
the go fund me.

Speaker 4 (06:02):
Campaign, but nobody they're going to wait for you to
come forward and pay for it.

Speaker 2 (06:07):
Now, I'm not going to pay for it. I'm not
gonna give I'm not gonna have it. Whole ten thousand
dollars out of your mind. I wouldn't spend sixteen thousand
dollars for a life saving medical treatment for my kids,
sixteen thousand dollars for.

Speaker 4 (06:22):
God's sake, bumper of your BMW and raise enough money
for his whole car.

Speaker 2 (06:27):
Yeah, but then you need a bumper, don't you. Okay,
I have to find out if we can do a
go I am I'm going to ask, because I'll tell you.
If we do a go fund me campaign, uh, you're
probably there. We're probably going to raise a good chunk
of the money for you, Kono. We'll see, all right,
Well I appreciate it that No, no, it's I you

(06:48):
know I never thought that year. No, no, you you
know we work together. We've been together for years. You've
never gotten a raise, you never will get a raise.
So true. I know it's how liberal of bill to go.
Don't worry about it. We'll get other people to pay
for your needs. Of course, of course he did. I

(07:08):
did I give you? Did I give you my kidney?
I did not. Oh, by the way, I just got
word from Michelle that they can absolutely do a GoFundMe
for Cono. Okay, can you? That's great? So now we
have management telling me and can you set up a
gofund me? I don't know how it was that happened? No, no, no,

(07:31):
if you can, someone's got to set it up. I
don't know. I don't know how it works. Okay, Cono,
I'll let you do it. Cono, you set up a
gofund me campaign, Well, I'm not going to do it.
I don't know how to do. I couldn't get my
printer working this morning. For God's say, Okay, someone's got
to set up a gofund me campaign and tomorrow we
start begging like I did for that stupid kidney of

(07:53):
yours you did.

Speaker 4 (07:55):
What makes you think that you begged my kidney to
be inside me?

Speaker 2 (08:00):
Because that's what I did. I begged for a kidney
to be inside you. Please please, like here, Neil needs
a kidney. Neil needs a kidney.

Speaker 3 (08:11):
Please.

Speaker 4 (08:12):
Oh my gosh, I'm gonna pull it out with my
bare hands.

Speaker 2 (08:17):
Go fund me kidney campaign. That's done. Now it's the
new car campaign for Kno. All right, let's go ahead
and start with the news. I said hello to everybody,
and we are ready to go. And yes I did
say hello to you. All right, guys, let's do it.
It's time for handle on the news on this ever
lovely Tuesday. I have Monday out there, Tuesday, January thirteenth,

(08:42):
and it is time for handle on the news. Amy,
Neil and Me lead story. Supreme Court is taking up
what's being described as a monumental case about transgender athletes.
This one I really don't understand. And because the number
of transgender athletes that are playing on women's sports has

(09:05):
to be minuscule. But this is certainly a social issue,
and the issue. Can states bar transgender girls and women
from joining female sports teams in school and they're good.
They don't know. People don't know which way it's going

(09:26):
to go. There was a decision in October where the
court ruled that that law to strike down a Colorado
law blocking theramists, therapists or trying to use or trying
to change it young person's sexuality, or gender conversion therapy,

(09:49):
crazy shrinks, trying to tell kids there's something wrong with
you because you're gay. Well, the law that says you
can't do that in Colorado was over to So now
we'll see what happens, which way the justices go. It's
gonna be very interesting. And I think most of us,

(10:09):
even those people that are huge lbgt Q fans, which
I am, have been forever, you know, I'm pretty uncomfortable
saying transgender girls can't play on girls teams because it's
it's a huge advantage and it is body mass, different physiology,

(10:33):
more muscles, upper body strength, stout shoes, flannel shirts. Okay,
why don't we go ahead?

Speaker 4 (10:47):
You couldn't have played US a women's sports team because
they have all those advantages over you.

Speaker 2 (10:52):
That's yeah, and coordination too, let me yeah, absolutely, okay, guys.

Speaker 3 (10:57):
And Arizona Senator suesg Seth. Senator Mark Kelly has filed
a lawsuit against Secretary of War Pete HeiG Seth, arguing
that HeiG Seth's censure of Kelly last week over his
role in that social media video that told service members

(11:18):
they have to refuse illegal orders violated its constitutional right.
Kelly participated in the video in November alongside a handful
of other Democrats, who again told military members not to
carry out illegal orders, but didn't say what those illegal
orders were.

Speaker 2 (11:38):
Interesting on this one. First of all, First Amendment rights
are really limited when you're in the military, and you
can get nailed for doing a video that says don't
follow orders period, or don't join a group of soldiers
that being ordered to do something that is constitutional, and

(12:01):
then you get decide what's constitutional or not. But this,
heg Seth is arguing that what they did is sedition
that effectively traitorous and the President said they should be
killed for doing this, and as you said, heg Seth
said that they specifically said not to follow an order,

(12:21):
and that's not the case.

Speaker 3 (12:22):
No, he said don't follow illegal order.

Speaker 2 (12:25):
Right, right, he's going Now is he going to lose? Yeh,
he's going to lose because I think the court's going
to say the ability of the Secretary of Defense, secretary
of War is absolute.

Speaker 3 (12:35):
Even if he's not in the military anymore.

Speaker 2 (12:37):
He no, he's a member of the reserves, so he
can be recalled to the military, and he's being recalled
for the purpose of being demoted and reducing his pay.
That is the purpose of.

Speaker 4 (12:51):
This, and jacking with his pension as well.

Speaker 3 (12:54):
Yeah, oh yeah, no, he's going to raise it has
a senate pension.

Speaker 2 (12:59):
You know what, you don't He's only been in the
Pennas Senate for a limited amount of time. It's not
like he's been there for thirty years.

Speaker 4 (13:06):
How can they say if you have that qualifier, how
can of saying illegal order?

Speaker 2 (13:14):
Right? Can they say? That's because they're saying what they're
saying is just making that statement is a violation of
good order and discipline in the military. Hegg set this crazy.
It is political retribution on its face, and that's what

(13:35):
he's going to argue, But no, I understand everybody understands that.

Speaker 4 (13:40):
I mean, there's but you couldn't as a being in
the military, you couldn't speak ill of the President of
the United States because.

Speaker 2 (13:46):
You have a hard time that that you would get
nailed for, because that's good order and discipline that you can't.
But you can say, don't follow illegal orders.

Speaker 3 (13:55):
Isn't part of this though, that they were insinuating that
illegal orders were issued.

Speaker 2 (14:01):
That's the argument. But insinuation, how do you nail someone
for insinuation? That's a problem. The day that we put people,
we reduce pay or convict people on insinuation, that becomes problematic.
He insinuated now, and this is the Code of Military Conduct,

(14:23):
by the way Military Justice Code, It's in the code
you can't follow illegal orders. They were simply parroting what
was in the code. And he's gonna lose. I mean,
he's gonna win. Except he's gonna lose because I think
the court is going to hold that the Secretary of
Defense has the absolute right to do that. It's like
the pardon. The president can say and does say I

(14:46):
think this guy is great, and I'm pardoning him, and
it doesn't matter that he took a machine gun and
wiped out an entire kindergarten class. Obviously it didn't happen,
but I have the right to pardon, and that's absolutely
and I think the Secretary of State is going to
be given that same kind of power or the same interpretation. Okay,

(15:07):
moving on, all right.

Speaker 4 (15:10):
The man who drove the U haul truck into a
crowd of protesters in Westwood this past weekend, there was
that peaceful or seemingly otherwise peaceful anti Iranian regime demonstration
turned to absolute chaos. The driver was identified in booking records.

(15:30):
There is color or color Matta neet never mind.

Speaker 2 (15:36):
He's forty eight.

Speaker 4 (15:37):
He was arrested but later released on his own recognizant
because they're saying it was at worse, it was reckless driving.

Speaker 2 (15:47):
So he plowed into he plowed into a group of demonstrators.
How I guess they're going to label it as an accident,
that it was reckless.

Speaker 4 (15:58):
Well, you may argue that he he didn't plow. He
was driving in and they were attacking it because it
had good belief.

Speaker 2 (16:06):
I figured the surrounded him, and.

Speaker 4 (16:08):
Yeah, this guy on the car was trying to kick
the windows open.

Speaker 3 (16:11):
He didn't kick the windshield in Yeah, so watch the video.

Speaker 2 (16:14):
Okay, I feel better if I had known the story
a little bit. Uh, if I had really looked at
the story, which I should.

Speaker 3 (16:20):
By the way, But you had trouble with your printer.

Speaker 2 (16:23):
Oh my god. I'm still going through the rest of
the show, and I usually do this an hour before
the show, and now I'm scrambling. All right, let us in.

Speaker 3 (16:33):
That's the message from twelve Democrats in the House who
are challenging a new policy put in place by the
administration that imposes limits on unannounced visits to ICE detention facilities.
Back in December, those same members of Congress won a
lawsuit challenging a Department of Homeland Security policy that required

(16:54):
a week's notice from lawmakers before they could go and
visit for oversight. Now they're accused Homeland Security of having
secretly reimposed the requirement last week.

Speaker 2 (17:05):
Yeah, seven calendar days now, and how are they justifying
that because there's a law on the books. Well, Homeland
Security Secretary Christinomes says, because the money to pay for
these detention centers came from another bucket in the federal government. Therefore,

(17:26):
we have the right to say no to Congress. Okay,
explain that one to me. I mean, that's the dumbest
thing I've ever heard of in my life. But anything
to keep Congress from overseeing, and they have oversight duties,
you know, Congress oversees all of this. But this is
the Trump administration saying we're on our own and no

(17:49):
one is going to tell us what to do. So far,
they've paid attention to the courts, but we'll see how
far that goes. You know, the Supreme Court absolutely no
enforcement ability. You're aware of that. There is no policing.
There is nothing. The only kind of policing that the
Court has is the executive branch to further its orders.

(18:13):
And if the executive brand says no, we're not paying attention,
there's nothing the courts can do.

Speaker 4 (18:21):
All right, This isn't about face, for sure. The US
Environmental Protection Agency is expected to announce that FEMA will
pay for soil testing. After all, they want to look
for lead, of course, and at least one hundred homes
that were destroyed and to eat and fire. It was
supposedly cleaned up by federal disaster workers. But as we know,

(18:44):
there's been questions about whether the job was done well
or not, And they have pushed back multiple times and
now they are doing this about face and not resisting
anymore to test the properties for this toxic substance.

Speaker 2 (18:58):
One hundred homes though, and this is being done at random.
I mean, obviously they're not going across the board. So
it's sort of a pilot program. So how do they
choose them? Well, it's any meani mine mode.

Speaker 4 (19:10):
Was there like a mathematical equation or something. They assume
that if you take a test, yes.

Speaker 2 (19:15):
I'm sure, yeah, I'm sure if fifty percent are don't
have appropriate testing, or they weren't able to clean up
enough of the debris, so the toxic chemicals and the
soil have not been cleaned up. There's a problem.

Speaker 3 (19:33):
This guy's at Jim stealing from six sick kids. There's
a group, Painted Turtle, co founded by Paul Newman back
in nineteen ninety nine. It's a year round camp that
offers free programming for children who have medical challenges. It
relies on donations from individuals, corporations, foundations. Well Now, a

(19:54):
former executive of the Painted Turtle has been accused of
embezzling more than five million dollar from the organization and
then also messing with computer records to hide what he did. Yeah,
And prosecutors say the five point two million dollars in
fraud happened over the course of his seven year tenure
with a nonprofit.

Speaker 2 (20:12):
Organization nothing like in Besley money and taking money away
from kids who need its kids no less Yeah, Oh yeah,
it's just Newman's Own, you know, the salad dressing, which
is every kind. Is that? Yeah? Is that part of this?
And I don't know. I remember Paul Newman started Newman's
Own for the purpose of a charitable He wasn't going

(20:35):
to take any money. It's a nonprofit.

Speaker 4 (20:37):
Yeah. I was wondering the same thing. I have no idea.

Speaker 2 (20:40):
Yeah, whether that's part of it, that's kind of neat
that Paul Newman did that.

Speaker 4 (20:44):
It's huge and to have it, you know, after he died,
to have it be mismanaged like this is vulgar.

Speaker 2 (20:52):
Yeah, you're not kidding. Okay, we can do one more.

Speaker 4 (20:56):
Okay, you got it. Video evidence do we have? But
do we not? The FBI said a court document made
public just yesterday found no surveillance, no other video or
anything like that of Border Patrol agents shooting and wounding
two people in a pickup truck during the immigration enforcement operation.
They're in Portland, organ last week, FBI interviewed for the

(21:18):
six agents on the scene. It did not identify them
at this at this point as far as who was
the one who actually opened fire, but agents told investigators
that one of their colleagues shot Thursday after the driver
put the truck in reverse and repeatedly slammed it into
an unoccupied car the agents had rented.

Speaker 2 (21:40):
Since there is no video, they're going to have to
rely on witnesses and tell me which way witnesses are
going to go. Depending on which side of the coin
you are, You'll have those that are conservative and pro
administration and who believe in the immigration policy say they
try to kill these agents when out this woman tried

(22:03):
to go out of her way. Then you have witnesses
on the other side who are saying, nope, absolutely not,
it was not their fault. So I have the two conflated.
So witnesses me nothing. You know, if you have three
witnesses to a crime, you have four stories. Witnesses are
the least reliable evidence that you can get.

Speaker 4 (22:23):
Well, you know, they refer to the guy driving into
the protest the other day as driving a deadly weapon.

Speaker 2 (22:31):
Yeah with ye. That woman, Christine nom weaponized your car
and she's a domestic terrorist.

Speaker 4 (22:40):
I'm not talking about that, Oh, I'm talking the news
that I heard referred to the guy who drew drove
with his.

Speaker 3 (22:46):
Protest at the Iranian protest, the.

Speaker 4 (22:49):
Iranian protest on Sunday. They referred to that as a
deadly weapon. But the woman who may or may not
have driven it towards law enforcement off, Sir I e Ice.
That was just her trying to get home to her kids.
It's all perspective, yeah, all of it. Suspect in an

(23:09):
investigation of a fire at the prominent Jackson, Mississippi synagogue,
I guess can confess. He's nineteen years old. His name
is Stephen Spencer Pittman, and the suspect set a fire
to Beth Israel Congregation. It's the state's largest Jewish house
of worship.

Speaker 2 (23:29):
Neil, I'm going to step in. We're doing that story
at seven twenty. Yeah. Yeah, and so you're giving away
all the facts and making my segment irrelevant. Let me
explain how life works here. It's my job to make
your segment irrelevant, not yours to make mine.

Speaker 4 (23:50):
This is in the news. Steck, sir, are you going
to trust you or me? Well, I'm number eight here. No,
we're not on number eight. We're on there's two number
seven's this morning. If you read the rundown.

Speaker 2 (24:05):
Okay, fair enough, seven suspect synagogue, self loathing jew Okay.

Speaker 3 (24:12):
Moving on, Apple needs Google to make smartphones smarter. Apple
says it's going to rely on Google to help finish
its efforts to smarten up its Virtual assistant theory and
bring other AI features to the iPhone. Of course, Apple's
been sort of behind in getting its artificial intelligence up

(24:36):
and running. The deal just announced will allow Apple to
tap into Google's AI technology. The partnership will drop on
the Gemini technology to customize a suite of AI features
dubbed Apple Intelligence on the iPhone and other products.

Speaker 4 (24:55):
Apple doesn't like playing with others. They prefer to go out.

Speaker 2 (24:58):
It doesn't just hand on this.

Speaker 3 (25:00):
But it's so far behind in the AI they were
that Jamia was talking about, how I think of the
seventeen or six whatever, the latest iPhones were supposed to
have that Apple Intelligence, and they're just not quite ready
to yet.

Speaker 2 (25:12):
As a matter of fact, We're going to talk to
rich about that when he comes aboard at eight actually
eight o'clock.

Speaker 3 (25:20):
Yeah, see that, I just made your story relevant.

Speaker 2 (25:22):
Bill, You did good for your job.

Speaker 4 (25:25):
It is jeez. The United States has accused Russia yesterday
of dangerous and inexplicable escalation of it's nearly now four
year ward war in Ukraine. So the Trump administration is
obviously trying to advance negotiations towards peace and all of this,
and Russia just goes yet.

Speaker 2 (25:49):
Oh yeah, Russia is playing this huge game and it
just has no intention of cutting a deal with Ukraine
unless Ukraine gives up all of his land, the eastern
part of Ukraine.

Speaker 1 (26:01):
You know.

Speaker 4 (26:01):
The weird thing is is Trump thinks he gets to
know him, and then he opens up Putin and there's
a little smaller Putin, and then he opens that one up.

Speaker 2 (26:09):
Okay, very funny. That's very funny. And Putin has figured
out Trump just keep on giving you accolades, just keep
sucking up to him. Yes, mister President, Yes you're brilliant.
Yes you're terrific. And Putin gets everything he wants. Now.
This statement was made by the deputy US Deputy Ambassador
to the United Nations. Tammy Bruce, who used to work

(26:33):
here at KFI. She was a talk show host right
here at KFI. I remember working with Tammy.

Speaker 4 (26:39):
Oh yeah, she was a liberal the Tim and Neil Show. Actually, yeah, she.

Speaker 2 (26:42):
Was very liberal. And then then she switched, well, then
became an ultra conservative. Yes, she's what you.

Speaker 4 (26:49):
Call a law and order liberal.

Speaker 2 (26:51):
Yeah she. I mean, I mean a lot of people
have done that in the world of talk radio. They
have moved to the right. Very few have moved to
the left. Matter of fact, I don't know anybody who
is now a liberal who used to be a conservative.
It's the other way around. So anyway, putin he's going
to tell us to pound sand then a quick one

(27:14):
before we bail out of here.

Speaker 3 (27:16):
Amy Paramount is not backing down. Last week, Warner Brothers
board unanimously rejected Paramount's most recent thirty dollars a share
all cash proposal that included a personal guarantee by Ellison,
Larry Ellison's father, or actually guaranteed by tech billionaire Larry Ellison. Anyway,

(27:38):
so Warner Brothers is suing again. Now. They want to
know and get more information about the events leading up
to the Warner auction that culminated on December fourth. They
want to know details of that Netflix deal.

Speaker 2 (27:55):
Now. Even though Netflix and Netflix board or the Warner
Brothers board has accepted the Netflix deal, Paramount is filing
lawsuits and going crazy. It has a hostile it's doing
a hostile takeover. And one of the things that happens
is I'm surprised and I don't know much about this,

(28:16):
but a little bit how unusual. That's what this show
is about. But usually it's a shareholder who files a lawsuit.
A shareholder of Warner Brothers would file a lawsuit saying
the Paramount offer was better than the Netflix offer, and
you're not helping us. You're hurting us the shareholders by

(28:37):
not accepting the more money. And Netflix is saying no, no, no,
we're talking about the board now is Netflix saying we
have the better deal? And Warners has already accepted the
Netflix deal. Okay, we're done, guys, All right? Coming up
a little bit wonky, a little bit of statistics that
I'm gonna try to unwonk, But how many people are

(29:00):
do now consider themselves independence? And I'm going to explain
that in terms of the midterms coming up and what's
going on politically, and what's happening and we're gonna have
a rip roaring good time, right right, This is KFI
AM sixty. You've been listening to The Bill Handle Show,

(29:23):
Catch My Show Monday through Friday, six am to nine am,
and anytime on demand on the iHeartRadio app

The Bill Handel Show News

Advertise With Us

Popular Podcasts

Two Guys, Five Rings: Matt, Bowen & The Olympics

Two Guys, Five Rings: Matt, Bowen & The Olympics

Two Guys (Bowen Yang and Matt Rogers). Five Rings (you know, from the Olympics logo). One essential podcast for the 2026 Milan-Cortina Winter Olympics. Bowen Yang (SNL, Wicked) and Matt Rogers (Palm Royale, No Good Deed) of Las Culturistas are back for a second season of Two Guys, Five Rings, a collaboration with NBC Sports and iHeartRadio. In this 15-episode event, Bowen and Matt discuss the top storylines, obsess over Italian culture, and find out what really goes on in the Olympic Village.

iHeartOlympics: The Latest

iHeartOlympics: The Latest

Listen to the latest news from the 2026 Winter Olympics.

Milan Cortina Winter Olympics

Milan Cortina Winter Olympics

The 2026 Winter Olympics in Milan Cortina are here and have everyone talking. iHeartPodcasts is buzzing with content in honor of the XXV Winter Olympics We’re bringing you episodes from a variety of iHeartPodcast shows to help you keep up with the action. Follow Milan Cortina Winter Olympics so you don’t miss any coverage of the 2026 Winter Olympics, and if you like what you hear, be sure to follow each Podcast in the feed for more great content from iHeartPodcasts.

Music, radio and podcasts, all free. Listen online or download the iHeart App.

Connect

© 2026 iHeartMedia, Inc.