Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
The Mandy Connell Show is sponsored by Belle and Pollock
Accident and injury Lawyers.
Speaker 2 (00:05):
No, it's Mandy Connell and Dona.
Speaker 3 (00:11):
Ka.
Speaker 2 (00:13):
Ninety one FM got.
Speaker 3 (00:17):
Satty and the Nicys through Frey Many Connell keeping your
sad bab Welcome, Welcome, Welcome to a seventeen minute show.
Speaker 2 (00:30):
I'm your host for the next seventeen minutes Mandy Connell.
That guy's Anthony Rodriguez. Today, we're going to take you
right up until twelve twenty two, when we then hand
the station over to the Colorado Rockies as they continue
to try and beat the Cubs again. It is going
to be a glorious day to watch a baseball game.
Looking first, weep, Oh, the weather is spectacular outside. Oh lovely.
(00:52):
But you know what's also lovely? My blog. You got
to find it at mandyblog dot com. That's mandyblog dot com.
You can also go to Themandyconnell dot substack dot com,
or just go to Mandy Blog. Look for the headline
that says six eleven twenty six blog I'd like to
rescind my apology. Click on that. Oh yes, and here
(01:14):
are the headlines you will find within that. He says
you're me. I know Office half of American, all the
ships and clipments of SA's going to press plats today
on the Blood Baseball eats the show at twelve thirty today.
Yesterday I stepped on my own. You know what, scrolling, scrolling, scrolling.
AI is getting dumber because of AI. Douglas County Schools
(01:38):
is about to welcome the union back. Cherry Creek Schools
is searching for a new superintendent. These people deserve the
death penalty. The mob is taking over Aurora. Paulis wants
another in viro wacka noodle on the CPW board. Trump says, well,
you will take card Island just for fun. A former
Mark supporter endorses Barb. Phil Wiser took campaign money from attorneys.
(02:00):
His office was fighting seven hidden global dining gems in Aurora.
Those are the headlines on the blog at mandy'sblog dot
com Tick tech toe a winner. Of course that was
a winner. So I am late to the party. Have
you ever heard of Dave loves Denver the YouTube channel
(02:21):
I think so? I am now obsessed with Dave loves Denver.
I reached out and asked him if he would come
on the program, but he just finds these, you know,
cool places to eat like just little hidden. These are
all hidden gems in Aurora. Did you even know about
the Havanah Street night market that happens on the last
Saturday of every month. No, I didn't either, But I'll
(02:42):
know about it this month because I'm going because I
saw Dave loves Denver do it, and I got a
video today set in seven hidden global dining gems in Aurora.
I will argue forever that the best restaurant seene in
the entire metro area is in Aurora, just for sheer,
(03:02):
variety and interest and affordability. So yeah, that's at the
bottom of the blog. But let's get back up to
the top because maybe some of you were listening to
the show yesterday when I was making a point about
Victor Marx and on the show, I realized that I'd
gotten something wrong on the blog, and immediately I was like, well,
(03:26):
I got to fix that, and I said, I owe
Victor Marx and apology. I took to X and I
was like, hey, I owe Victor Marx and apology. I
said that there was no proof that he was associated
with this task force, which is true. But then I
went back when I got home last night. I didn't
get home last night till like seven. It was a long,
long day for Mandy. And got home and I start
(03:46):
looking at it. I'm like, wait a minute, wait a minute,
and I realized my initial instincts not to trust Victor
Marx were correct. I don't want to just do a
quick walkthrough of what happened yesterday. Just consider this like
an analysis of something very much like the Zippruter films. Right,
We're gonna break it down frame by frame. Yesterday I
(04:07):
responded to a post that Victor Marks made on X
and I guess he made it on Facebook as well well.
First of all, he criticized journalists. It starts with a
criticized It's about a pattern I've seen far too long
among some journalists, radio host political commentators, and social media influencers.
A narrative gets repeated before the homework gets done. Okay, great,
(04:31):
And then he shows a snippet of him on with
Kyle Clark, specifically talking about his work or his you know,
missionary work, and hey, Rod, give me my audio real quick,
and I'll just play this this part of his video
because he's trying to score some points here. He's trying
(04:53):
to trying to dunk.
Speaker 4 (04:56):
Forty three children happen that the internet they pulled.
Speaker 5 (05:00):
Where did that rescue of forty three children happen.
Speaker 6 (05:02):
In the US?
Speaker 4 (05:03):
And that was buy through them with law enforcement, through
with special operations that we do with protecting children's innocence.
Speaker 1 (05:10):
Are you referring to Operation Northern Lights in Florida? Yes, okay,
So the US Marshal's named twenty five partner agencies, including
two rescue ministries, that were involved in that operation. They
said nothing about you and your ministry. They didn't even mention.
Speaker 2 (05:24):
You, okay. And now he cuts to a press conference.
In this press conference is in Florida. It's from the
press conference announcing the success of Operation Northern Lights, which rescued,
actually rescued forty three children who were missing and endangered
and brought them to a safer place or backed home
to their parents. And in this press conference, the guy
(05:45):
goes on to talk about this guy in charge, he's
with the US Marshals. He goes on to talk about
all the member organizations, and then they cut to another guy,
a completely different guy with homeland security investigations, and he
says is he says dag nab it. Let me get
to that. Oh here, it is, got to get to
(06:06):
the right guy. And he says this, wait, let's finish
this guy up.
Speaker 5 (06:19):
Josh.
Speaker 2 (06:21):
Now, he says, thanks to all of these law enforcement
organizations in Northern Florida, including the Protecting Child's Innocence task Force. Now,
when I did a quick search of the Protecting Children's
Innocence task Force, I came up with a news story
about the press conference about the creation of the Protecting
(06:42):
Children's Innocence Task Force. And I made an assumption, and
you know what happens when you assume I have I am.
I am suitably chastised by this. Just so you know,
I made the assumption that that he was just glomming
onto that name. But then during the show I read
the fallow. According to Wayley, the task Force is funding
(07:02):
an additional detective in Wacola County at no cost to taxpayers.
The funds for that position, which include benefits, equipment, and
a vehicle, were provided by Colorado Springs based Anything as
Possible Ministries through donations. ATP provides law enforcement with advanced technologies,
operational support, and counseling, and ol lah blah blah blah
(07:23):
blah blah. But obviously he was credited by that task force.
Now here's where it gets interesting. That task force provided
some measure of support and cooperation with the other task
force that was headed by the US Marshals that actually
ran Operation whatever it's called, Operation Northern Lights. So the
(07:47):
US Marshall Service was running Operation Northern Lights in northern
Florida with so many other law enforcement agencies. They're all
listed now. Wacola County Sheriff's Office is listed in here.
But the thank you was to the task force that
was initially created that included the Wacolla County Sheriff's Office,
(08:10):
Leon County sheriffs. All of these Panhandle sheriff's departments are
in the Protecting Child's Innocence task Force, which then provided
some support for the US Marshall's Task Force that actually
rescued the children. Are you following along now? But this
is what Victor does so perfectly. This is exactly how
(08:34):
he does it. He gives a lie with a kernel
of truth, or as he called it talking about his
abusive stepfather, a lie based in reality. Don't believe me,
this is Victor himself.
Speaker 7 (08:49):
He does crazy stuff like that, always reinforcing that he
could kill me. Oh I have other people kill me,
or how was the reason why people.
Speaker 6 (08:58):
Would not he did things.
Speaker 7 (09:00):
I call him lies based in reality, you know, And
somebody can say, well, I've been to the moon and back.
Speaker 6 (09:06):
That's one type of line.
Speaker 7 (09:08):
Well, when another person tells you a lie that's connected
with a horrible truth, those are the worst ones to
really get over.
Speaker 2 (09:18):
A lie based in reality. So what Victor did here
was take his participation with one task force that then
participated in another task force, and his participation was limited
to cash donations. And here's the kicker about this whole thing. Guys,
(09:39):
it's really cool that this ministry paid for the benefits
and the automobile and the training of an officer to
go fight this. That is a very cool thing on
its own. There's no reason to embellish. There's no reason
to make that more than it is unless you figured
out that telling people you were involved with the rescue
(10:01):
of forty three children in Florida is better for fundraising
because just saying hey, we made a grant to one
of the departments, and we made a grant to this
other task force that then did some stuff with his
big task force. That was the level of support that's
not nearly as sexy or as easy to separate people
(10:21):
from their money with. So he has to make it
bigger than it is. This is the behavior of someone
who has suffered in childhood in such a way that
it has destroyed their self esteem. So no matter what
they actually do, they have to make what they did
seem bigger than it already is. And I went back
(10:44):
and I grabbed Victor's interview with Kyle Clark to hear
the whole exchange instead of what Victor edited for the
purposes of this post.
Speaker 6 (10:54):
Listen to this able to do some of the things
that we've done.
Speaker 1 (10:58):
You certainly do use spec if a rescue numbers though,
when you feel that.
Speaker 5 (11:02):
It suits your purposes.
Speaker 1 (11:04):
You wrote in February of this year, just last month,
our team rescued forty three children from the grips of
evil predators.
Speaker 5 (11:10):
Where did that rescue of forty three children happen.
Speaker 6 (11:13):
In the US?
Speaker 4 (11:14):
And that was buy through and with law enforcement through
with special operations that we do with protecting children's innocence.
Speaker 5 (11:21):
Are you referring to Operation Northern Light? Now?
Speaker 2 (11:23):
Does that sound like I mean? Right there? You know what,
he could have said, yes, we gave a grant to
a task force that supported that operation. That would have
been absolutely one hundred percent clear, one hundred percent clear.
But instead, yes, we did that with a law enforcement
and you know, but it goes on from there in Florida.
Speaker 1 (11:44):
Yes, okay, So the US Marshal's named twenty five partner agencies,
including two rescue ministries, that were involved in that operation.
They said nothing about you and your ministry, but you're
claiming credit for those forty three rescues. They didn't even
mention you.
Speaker 6 (11:58):
Yeah, not credit it participation in what we do?
Speaker 2 (12:03):
You said, yeah, wait a minute. Even then, even that participation,
participation implies that they were there, boots on the ground,
participating in the saving of the children. His words are
chosen very carefully to make what he does seem bigger,
even though again I think it's amazing that this ministry
(12:25):
is supporting law enforcement so they can go after children.
That's incredible, but not sexy enough to get the donations.
Speaker 1 (12:31):
I guess team rescued forty three children, and the marshals
who ran that operation named twenty five partners and never said.
Speaker 6 (12:38):
A word about you. Does that mean we didn't help them.
Speaker 5 (12:41):
No, I'm just curious why you think that is.
Speaker 4 (12:46):
We don't require that we be listed or named in
any operations.
Speaker 6 (12:51):
Sometimes they do, sometimes they don't.
Speaker 1 (12:54):
When you say, our team rescued forty three children, what
did your team specifically do well?
Speaker 2 (13:00):
And this is where it gets really good.
Speaker 4 (13:02):
When I say our team, our team has expanded, associate
team members and what we do we were part of seeing
forty three kids being rescued?
Speaker 6 (13:12):
What part training? Equipping? Again?
Speaker 2 (13:19):
The see again, this is where he needs to say,
we gave a grant, we funded some of the deputies
so they could and that's a noble and good thing.
But he doesn't. He jumps at training like these guys
all flew to Colorado Springs to do training at his little.
Speaker 4 (13:35):
Compound Protecting Children's Instance task Force. We come alongside to
help law enforcement.
Speaker 2 (13:43):
Again, come alongside. That is another phrase designed to make
you think that they are walking next to law enforcement
as they say forty three children. These are such purposely
chosen words. The language this guy uses matters so much
because it could be taken more than one way. So
(14:04):
what this is plausible deniability language. But I'll let them finish.
Speaker 1 (14:08):
Folks grants so that they can hire officers, they can
hire they can buy vehicles, they can get technology, that
kind of thing, and your own organization PCI says that
you do so without directing cases, so you're not actually
involved in the actual rescues themselves.
Speaker 6 (14:24):
In those situations here in the US.
Speaker 2 (14:26):
No nos, How long did it take to get to that?
How long? Anyway, that's on the blog today if you'd
like to see it. But I am officially rescinding my
apology as of yesterday, I am rescinding it. This Texter,
I'm starting to think Victor is just a show filler. No,
Republicans are not going to win, and in nowhere Republicans
(14:49):
going to win any substantial down ballots. I don't know
where you This is like the salty texture too, three
six seven nine. I see your number, and I already
know whatever is going to come after that is just
going to be now nasty crap. That's honestly what I
see when I see your phone number, text or I'm
not trying to hurt your feelings, but whatever makes you
so miserable in life that you just spend all day
just sending nasty crap to a talk show host. I
(15:11):
hope that some point that gets fixed. I hope that
you can live a happy and joyful life at some point.
I genuinely, genuinely mean that for you.
Speaker 6 (15:20):
Now.
Speaker 2 (15:21):
I've got other bunch of stuff on the blog today,
really really interesting post on the way AI is going
to destroy AI. It's fascinating and it's this is a
concept I've heard before, but this is laid out very
very cleanly, and very very in an easy to understand way. Now,
if you don't understand how AI does what AI does,
(15:41):
let me explain it to you very badly. AI just
scours the entire Internet and looks for information about whatever
is you're asking, and then they pull all that information
together and they condense it down and they spit out
your answer. But what's happening now is people are cutting
and pasting answers from AI all over social media, all
(16:01):
over everywhere, and they are then pasting sometimes wrong answers
from AI, and that goes in the Internet. And then
when AI goes back out to scrape the Internet, it's
actually scraping its own bad information. You start to see
how this is going to go right. Researchers at Oxford
and Cambridge publish a paper in Nature proving what is happening.
(16:24):
They call it model collapse. Here's the mechanism in one sentence.
AI trained on AI generated data gets dumber every generation
until it forgets what real human data look like. The
Internet is billing with AI generated content. You got blog posts,
you got articles, you got reviews, comments, social media AI
(16:45):
companies scrape the internet to train the next generation of models,
which means the next generation of AI is being trained
on the output of the current generation, and so on
and so on and so on. This is why I
know that chat is getting worse. Chat is just getting worse. Uh,
text he orho texted back, how is that nasty? It's
(17:08):
it's when you send things, it's negative. I guess nasty
is the wrong word. Texture negative. You're always negative, nothing, positive, nothing,
And I think that's just kind of telling so and
you weren't nasty at me. He's now like, wow, finskin much.
Nothing I said was nasty. It's not thin skin. It's
(17:28):
just unpleasant. And I found in my life that when
someone is perpetually unpleasant, it is because their life is
unpleasant and they don't want to do anything to fix
their unpleasant life. So they just take out their unpleasantness
on everyone else. And if that's not you, texture, I
am deeply sorry for offending your delicate sensibilities. All Right,
you guys, we will be back tomorrow with a full
(17:49):
show and looking forward to it. Right now, we've got
a good get well, whoa, hang on one second. Oh we
got a cool thing. Oh we got so much cool.
Speaker 6 (17:59):
Sof come off tomorrow.
Speaker 2 (18:00):
Just tune in. In the meantime, go Rockies sway for
the Cubs. You can do it. You can do it.
Until then, do me a favor, keep it right here
on KOA