Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:07):
Welcome everybody, and welcome fellow patriots, Welcome, fellow deplorables. Welcome
all of you Terracis society, you rock toilers, you sick offense,
you stinkers, you make a Nazis yo, homophobes, xenophobes, you
heard it. Hope you hear this. We think of you
as friends, Alis and patriots, and we always want you
(00:28):
to know is this place You're always going to be welcome.
And it's the Conservative Commander's Radio Show, and I'm Rick
Trader coming to you from the My Pillars studios and
My Story studios of the AU and TV Network and
joining me today as my co host as he does
the lead off the week, is the President n CEO
(00:48):
of Frontiers of Freedom, and that is George Landrath. George,
welcome back, Welcome back to Conservative Commandos.
Speaker 2 (00:56):
Well, it's great to be here. After all, this is
a great place to be Conservative Commandos and the AU
and TV Network. That's like a double win.
Speaker 1 (01:06):
Well, George, I'm not one that does a lot of writing.
I'm not one that comes on too Conservative Commandos with
a lot of prepared stuff that I like to babylon about.
I really like to think that uh, That's why I
have co hosts. I just think of myself as a
(01:26):
straw that stirs to drink. I depend upon my co hosts,
you and Sharon. Our gas is the meat of the situation.
But events ever this past weekend has really stimulated my
thoughts and I kind of like to done some stuff
on you, and I'd like it you to kind of respond,
if you don't mind.
Speaker 2 (01:47):
George, absolutely copya, George.
Speaker 1 (01:50):
President Trump's actions this week has preserved if what every
American holds deeer, the existence of everyone and everything you
love and hold dear, is safer today because our president
did what every president for the last forty seven years
(02:12):
did not have the guts to do. If Iran ever
got this is my feelings. If a Ran ever got
hold of a nuclear weapon, I believe they surely would
use it on Israel and even possibly the United States itself.
And if Israel were ever hit with the nuke, Israel
(02:33):
in the United States would have no choice but to
respond in kind. What I fear is that could possibly
bring a response either from China or Russia or both.
And George, as you know, that's called a worldwide nuclear war.
I do not know about you, buddy. But that's something
(02:56):
I surely would not want to live through life on Earth,
surely would be a living hell. So I want to
say thank you, mister President, and all of those rushing
to condemn this military action against the Iranian regime. We're silent,
(03:16):
absolutely silent, when Iran was butchering thirty two thousand of
their own people. How in the world could they fire
on their own countrymen who were peacefully demonstrating in the streets, George,
I will never know. But President Trump did not start
(03:36):
this war with Iran. What he did was in forty seven,
a forty seven year war with Iran that was created
with the Jimmy Carter administration. And that's really what it's
coming down to, George. Now, Iran has since attacked eight
neighboring Muslim nations within the past twenty four years. And
(04:01):
omar ilean Omore is out there, and of course she
is condemning Donald Trump were beginning this attack. But where
is she, George? Where is she now? When you know
she was condemning the president for starting a war during Ramadan?
Speaker 3 (04:24):
So why is she so silent? Now?
Speaker 1 (04:27):
Why does she Why is she not condemning Iran? If
this is such a sacred holiday. I prefer, George. I
prefer a president who puts America's interests first, who blows
away our enemy rather than sneaking billions of dollars to
(04:47):
them American cash on palace delivered by the American Air
Force in the middle of the night.
Speaker 3 (04:55):
And it shocks me to say.
Speaker 1 (04:57):
This, George, as Fetterman said, quote, this is one of
the most evil people, referring to the Ayatola who is
now diseased. This is one of the most evil people
that have ever lived, and after thirty seven years in Iran,
he has been eliminated. I can't imagine why Democrats, Republicans,
(05:22):
everyone can't celebrate that, because tens of millions of tens
of millions of people in Iran are absolutely celebrating, George.
Why are the people in Iran celebrating but half this country,
half this country, is doing nothing but bad mouthing Donald
(05:44):
Trump in the actions that probably saved their lives, their
lives of their children, the lives of their grandchildren, and
everything that we hold here in this country.
Speaker 2 (05:57):
Yeah. Well, I think it's very interesting that people are
sounding like they want to support Kahmane and the Iranian
regime and acting like the attack on him was somehow
unqualified or just like, why would you do that? It's
kind of like, Okay, that might be a fair argument if,
for example, if we were attacking Denmark or Great Britain
or France. That doesn't mean we necessarily gree with everything
(06:17):
they do, but they haven't done anything that necessarily would
justify an attack. Kahmane and the Iranian regime has been
attacking America for forty seven years, including exactly an embassy
which violates all kinds of international law, and taking them
hostage and keeping them hostage for over a year. And
(06:37):
of course then they killed hundreds of people, maybe even
thousands actually well actually guaranteed thousands throughout the years, bombing
through their various groups that they've created. They have attacked
military installations in the Middle East where the US had forces.
They've done all kinds of stuff for years and years
and years, and then they've attacked their neighbors. They've killed
(07:01):
a record number of their own people, literally tens of
thousands probably now at this point, probably over one hundred
thousand in the last several many years. And then on
top of that they've killed the most Arabs of any
other nation on Earth, because they attack their neighbors with
missiles and with drones and other things and terrorism. And
(07:23):
as they're doing now, they're shooting missiles at nations that
are their neighbors, and they're Muslim nations, so you'd think
they'd have no reason to just you go after them,
but they are. And so it's kind of like this
is a nation that is, like you said, just clearly
evil because they want to kill all the Jews in
(07:43):
the world. They want to kill Americans, they want to
kill their neighbors because apparently their neighbors are not are
insufficiently committed to their views of the world, meaning like
their neighbors are willing to get along with Israel and
they're willing to be allies with America, and the sudden, Okay,
let's kill them all. And it's just that so that
they do so on some level, I don't see any
(08:05):
real reason to be sorry about what's happening to them.
I think we actually have to up the antea bit
and do it quickly, because they'll continue to retaliate against
our friends in the Middle East if we let them
continue to have the tools to do it with. So
I would say, we just need to wipe out all
their military tools so they don't have any. And I
(08:27):
think we have to continue to wipe out the rest
of the regime's leaders because all of them are thoroughly evil.
It wasn't just commaning, it was evil. It's all of them.
Speaker 1 (08:37):
I'm just wondering if we need to apologize to the
Iranian citizens for the arrogant liberals who wanted to continue
to see them being murdered, raped, and brutally oppressed by
a radical Islamic regime. Do we need to tell them
please understand that not all of us here in the
(08:59):
United States are crazy and deranged like the left. The
majority of us are celebrating, celebrating their chance to finally
be prosperous and free. It last the other thing that
really gets me, George, Now we've got members of Congress
who have the same beliefs as the Iatolis and the
(09:23):
leadership resum in Iran. The enemy is here. They need
to be removed and tried for treason. I'm serious about this, George.
Can anyone explain to me why the Democrats are suddenly
worried that the Iranian sleeper cells will now attack us
(09:43):
here in the United States from within. These are the
same Democrats who open the borders to let this threat in.
And also these are the same Democrats, George, who want
to disarm America to prevent us from protecting ourselves. And
what we're seeing in Iran when people take to the
(10:07):
streets because Iran does not allow their citizens to be armed,
they're being slaughtered. You know, George, it's not hard to
understand why Congress wasn't notified about these military operations ahead
of time. When you have people like to leave Omar
(10:28):
AOC Mark Kelly Chuck's humors sitting there. Their loyalty is
not to America or American citizens. Their loyalty is to
their or to their native countries. It is to regain
and hold power for their beloved socialist Democrat Party.
Speaker 3 (10:49):
And George, how fast you.
Speaker 1 (10:50):
Would think you think these individuals would have given the
information about this attack to our enemies. The USA will
never be taken down from inside forces, but the American
people need to realize this. The real threat is already here,
(11:11):
but here is another enemy within. George, I really do
believe there needs to be investigation into the Democrat Party,
their means, their methods, their madness, and where they're getting
backing from foreign entities.
Speaker 2 (11:33):
That's a good point because imagine if during World War
Two we had members of Congress acting as if Hitler
was a great guy, the Nazi Party was a great party,
and it was just outrageous that FDR was unwilling to
just accept all that and was wanting to fight them
(11:54):
and get them back out of power and so forth.
And I'm thinking to myself, I think that would be
considered pretty dangerous. And I don't think that. I mean,
I'm trying to figure out how many Americans did you
have during World War Two that were running around saying
Hitler's great, Hitler's awesome.
Speaker 3 (12:10):
It's just the opposite, George.
Speaker 1 (12:12):
Prior to World War Two, there was a pro Hitler
movement in the United States That all ended. That all
ended when Hitler went to war against Europe and the
United States was drawn into that war.
Speaker 3 (12:28):
If there was even talked that.
Speaker 1 (12:30):
Even Charles Charles Limberg, the great American hero, was prow
Hitler prior to the Second World War, that all changed.
Speaker 3 (12:43):
That all changed with the outbreak of the war.
Speaker 2 (12:45):
George, right, But after forty seven years of Iran's war
on its neighbors and on the US. The left in
America still isn't willing to call it as it is.
An example would be there have been recent strikes on Bahrain,
the uae, Qatar, Kuwait, and Jordan, and these are all countries,
they're US allies, they host military assets, in some cases
(13:08):
very important military bases, and they're being attacked as well
as Israel. And so it's just interesting to me that
people kind of act like, oh, yeah, I'm on their side.
It's like, really, that means they not only hate America,
but they hate our friends and allies.
Speaker 3 (13:24):
Indeed, George, we need to take good break.
Speaker 1 (13:27):
But on the other side of the break, I would
really like to talk with you about the War Powers Act.
Now we're hearing from the left, from the Democrats, how
illegal this, this war is, if you want to call
the war reinvention or whatever. And it's coming from the Democrats,
you know, George, they don't even understand the War Powers
(13:48):
Act that was pushed through Congress by their party. It
was their party, George, you pushed it through and they
don't even understand. I'd like to have that conversation with
you after this break. This is the conservative Commando's Radio
Show with George Landrith and I'm Rick Trader and Today's show,
Like each and every one of our show is being
(14:09):
brought to you by the First Amendment protected by the second.
Don't go wait, George Night will be right back.
Speaker 4 (14:30):
Are you having trouble hearing your TV or listening to
conversations and loud spaces, then it might be time to
consider nano hearing aids. The days of expensive hearing aids
are over. Nano's are FDA registered OTC hearing aids. They
are powerful, lightweight, and simple to use, and their tiny
in ear design makes them nearly invisible. Plus they are rechargeable,
(14:53):
saving you hundreds of dollars on batteries. Don't be fooled
by overpriced hearing aids. Prescription hearing aids could cost three
eight thousand dollars or more. Nano hearing eights are only
three hundred and ninety seven dollars. But wait, we are
so confident you are going to love your nanos, we
are offering one hundred dollars off through this special TV offer.
Call now and get two. See I se rechargeable hearing
(15:14):
eates for only two hundred and ninety seven dollars. You
get a free portable charging case, free twenty four seven
lifetime telephone support, free shipping, and a forty five day
money bag guarantee.
Speaker 5 (15:23):
Call eight five five six nine zero six four sixty four.
That's eight five y five six nine zero sixty four
sixty four. Call eight five five six nine zero sixty
four sixty four. That's eight fivey five six nine zero
sixty four sixty four. Call eight five five six nine
zero sixty four sixty four. That's eight fivey five six
nine zero sixty four sixty four.
Speaker 6 (15:43):
I'm excited to announce that we're having our biggest three
and one sale ever with a limited edition product, a
backen stock special, and a closeout deal you won't find
anywhere else. So go to my pillow dot commer call
at number on your screen, use your promo code to
get our mipillow bedchees only twenty nine eighty eight, Any color,
any style, any size, even kings Regular one nineteen ninety
(16:07):
eight only twenty nine eighty eight. Once they're gone, they're
gone for good. How about are my towels? They're finally
back in stock, but not for long. Get a six
piece my towel set regular sixty nine ninety eight, now
only thirty nine ninety eight, And for the first time
and the only time ever, get our limited edition Premium
My Pillows. They're made with Giza cotton and designer cuss
(16:30):
It Queen seventeen ninety eight kings only nineteen ninety eight.
So go to MyPillow dot comer call the number on
your screen use your promo code to get the best
offers ever. Clients are extremely limited, so order now.
Speaker 7 (16:43):
To order, please call eight hundred seven ninety seven seven
eight ninety three and please use the promotion code a
u NTV. To order, please call eight hundred seven ninety
seven seven eight nine three and please use the promotion
code a u nt To order, please call eight hundred
seven ninety seven seven eight ninety three and please use
(17:06):
the promotion code a u n TV. To order, please
call eight hundred seven ninety seven seven eight ninety three
and please use the promotion code a u n TV.
Speaker 1 (17:19):
And Welcome back, Welcome back to the Conservative Commandos with
George Landrath and Imric Trader.
Speaker 3 (17:24):
Commit to you from the My Pillar.
Speaker 1 (17:26):
Studios of My Store studios of the au n TV network.
George I want to get into the War Powers Act
with you. The War Powers Act of nineteen seventy three,
it was instituted when we were in Vietnam, is a
federal law limiting the US president's powers to commit armed
(17:49):
forces to hassaw actions without congressional approval. It requires notifying
Congress within forty eight hours of the development and mandates
troop removal within sixty to ninety days unless Congress declares
wars or authorizes an extension. Now, this was enacted over
(18:14):
President Nixon's veto. As I said, this was an implementation
of the Democrat Party at that time. Now you're hearing
calls from the usual suspects on the left saying this
is so illegal what Donald Trump is doing. But all
they need to do to find out about the War
(18:36):
Powers Act, George, is do what I do and google
the damn thing. They're too stupid to do that or
need to get your opinion.
Speaker 2 (18:45):
Well, yes, because I think it's important to recognize the work.
You hear the left say things like he can't do
anything without, for example, discussing with Congress in advance and
getting their permission, which is not true. An example would
be go back in time to our third president, to
Thomas Jefferson, and he engaged in a military action against
(19:09):
pirates in the Middle East in northern Africa. And one
of the things that people have to realize is that
he didn't go to Congress and get permission. He was
a relatively brief action that they went in and got
rid of the pirates, sunk their ships, and freed many
of the slaves that they had grabbed through the years,
(19:32):
and then they sailed home. And nobody argued that was
unconstitutional because the president is the commander in chief and
has the right to protect American interests. But you're going
to have a full fledged war which is long term,
and of course the Constitution has Congress playing a role
in that, and so the War Powers Act kind of
(19:53):
largely was designed to put some timelines on things, because
the Constitution doesn't actually put those timelines on it just
points out there.
Speaker 1 (20:01):
A lot of people are saying it's unconstitutional.
Speaker 2 (20:04):
I think it probably is because I don't think the
Constitution necessarily said the president is the commander in chief
for sixty days and then after that Congress gets to
step in and become the commander in chief. They certainly
have the power to cut off funding, I guess because
they have the power of the purse. But the point is,
generally speaking, that would be hard to do and politically
(20:26):
not popular by Americans because they wouldn't want to see
our troops somehow under under.
Speaker 3 (20:31):
If they did.
Speaker 1 (20:31):
In Vietnam, George, they cut off funding, and that's what
led to the fall of South Vietnam.
Speaker 2 (20:38):
Right, And that's what's funny that that horrible kind of
trying to escape and many Americans weren't able to, you know,
helicopters trying to fly out of the embassy and things
like that. But anyhow, you're right, because there's a sixty
day clock, which basically says after forces are introduced to
president has sixty days to continue the operation without congressional authorization.
And that's some times described as an automatic statutory authorization,
(21:03):
meaning that for that period he can just rely on
his judgment to conduct short campaigns. Then, of course, if
Congress does not authorize the action at some point, then
he has after the sixty days, he has thirty days
beyond that to pull the forces out, So basically he
can go as far as ninety days.
Speaker 1 (21:22):
Well, George, let's look at this number one First of all,
in the Constitution, right it says notifying Congress within forty
eight hours of deployment, mandates troop removal and sixty to
ninety days. First of all, what troop troops have been deployed?
Speaker 3 (21:39):
Zero?
Speaker 1 (21:40):
Zero troops have been deployed. And President Trump let Congress
know when the whole world know within that forty eight
hours of what was going on. So if it says
and mandates troop removal within sixty to ninety days, George,
if there are no troops on far we're in soil,
(22:01):
say Iran, how does this even apply? How does the
Work Powers Act even apply?
Speaker 2 (22:08):
That's a fair question because they'll be operating largely through
air and from ships and they won't be physically in Iran.
So it's just very interesting to me. But anyhow, I
just think it's kind of interesting because they act as if,
you know, like example, be Barack Obama bombed many in
(22:29):
the Middle East, including Assyria and other places, and he
had no authorization from Congress to do so he just
did it. And I don't recall hearing a single Republican
argue that he should be, for example, impeached for.
Speaker 3 (22:42):
That, or we're a single democrat.
Speaker 1 (22:45):
Yeah, you know, there were no democrats, or as I
love to call them, cicocrats, There is no There were
no sickocrats in the streets or in the polls of
Congress demanding demanding that Barack Obama stopped these actions.
Speaker 3 (23:00):
None. Zero.
Speaker 1 (23:02):
But now because it's Donald Trump, and of course they
hate Donald Trump as much as they do, and every
single one of them, except for John Fetterman, seeing these
suffering from Trump derangement syndrome. Now they're coming out with
their righteous indignation.
Speaker 2 (23:20):
Their self described righteous indignation. It's not actually righteous indignation,
it's unrighteous indignation. But yeah, it's very interesting because in general,
I just find it curious that when President Trump, for example,
closes the border and deports people, the left goes nuts.
But if, for example, when Barack Obama was deporting some people,
(23:43):
that was okay, no problem, no riots, no nothing, So apparently,
only when Donald Trump does the exact same thing, it's awful. Now,
of course I think he's doing a better job. But
my point is because back then the borders weren't wide open.
The fact they had illegal aliens here was because they
were sneaking across the border in places where we didn't
(24:05):
have a wall and they were getting in without it.
It wasn't like, I don't think at that time Barack
Obama's necessarily ushering them in and then flying them all
over the country. And so he actually deported millions of
illegal aliens, and yet the left didn't seem to mind that,
they didn't seem to get upset about it. But all
of a sudden, if Donald Trump does that after twenty
(24:26):
to thirty million have come in because a previous administration
decided to violate American law and American security and just
invited in people with terrorist backgrounds, people they knew were terrorists,
that they had records, and they were like, yeah, come
on in. It's like, okay, So that makes that administration
(24:46):
they are actually traders. I'm not the biggest fan of FDR,
but can you imagine if FDR's administration it invited in
tons of Nazis to attack Americans, wouldn't that have made
him a trader? And yet somehow it's okay when they
do it now, even though it wouldn't have been okay then.
So it's just very weird to me, and it's very
(25:09):
problematic because part of being a rational human being is
being willing to apply the same standards. An example would
be you and I believe in free speech, and we
don't just believe in free speech for you and me.
Meaning if some liberal were to say I disagree with
Donald Trump's policies, and then someone said, well, let's arrest
him for saying that, we'd be like, no, you can't
(25:30):
arrest him for saying that. He has the right to disagree.
He may be dead wrong and he may be stupid,
but he has the right to be dead wrong and stupid,
and so you can't arrest him for that. Now, if
you were to say, I disagree with Donald Trump, so
let's all gather around the White House and try to shoot,
you know, bombs into it and kill the president, that
would be a crime. But just expressing disagreement like well,
(25:51):
I don't agree with that example, be there a people
who say that I don't like this policy of that policy,
and that's fine. If you don't like the policy, you
have the right to say that. And you and I
would defend people with whom we have no agreement on
and we would just recognize all they're doing is expressing
an opinion. But yet on the left, that's not how
they work on the extreme left today. It's all there's
(26:12):
no basis for the rule of law. The rule of
law basically is for them, if you are someone I
don't like, then we will use the law to hammer you,
to screw you, and to you know, take away your
freedom and your rights. And if you're someone I agree with,
we'll ignore the law, will pretend it doesn't apply, and
we'll let you do whatever you want. And so this
(26:34):
is very interesting because I can guarantee you, for example,
if we were to have done what the you know,
the activists say in Minnesota we're doing when Barack Obama's
president and getting you know, deporting citizens, we would have
been in big trouble. We would not have gotten a pass.
(26:54):
We wouldn't be acting like oh, they they're just expressing
their views. It's kind of like, you know, like this
people on the left who pretended the guy who shot
Charlie Kirk and killed him was simply expressing his disagreement
with Charlie Kirk. And I'm thinking to myself, yeah, okay,
so when the guy assassinated JFK, that was just an
(27:19):
expression of disagreement. So he should, like, for example, have
been arrested. He should have been. It was freedom of speech.
It was just like, come on, people, stop being stupid,
right you know how about John Wilkes Booth. He didn't
assassinate a president. He was just expressing his disapproval of
(27:39):
Abraham Lincoln's policies. It's like, okay, that's interesting, very interesting
that they play these kind of stupid games. And so
it's kind of like they're either stupid people and I'm
by stupid, I mean really stupid, or they're just so
dishonest that they're willing to apply different standards based on
(28:00):
whether they like you or not. Kind of like an
example would be illegal aliens are allowed to rape and
murder young American girls like Lake and Riley, for example,
and if you don't like it, it's because you're a racist.
I think to myself, who actually cares what the race
is of the person who's raped your daughter and killed her?
What you care about is that someone did that to
(28:22):
your daughter. If they were exact, you know, the exact
same race as you, the exact same religion as you,
you wouldn't be okay with it. And yet somehow they
pretend that's the case. And so what that tells you
is they are not just stupid, they are unbelievably dishonest
and unbelievably untrustworthy. And if they want to run for office,
(28:45):
anybody who votes for them is an anti American and
a moron because you can't vote for people like that.
Speaker 1 (28:53):
Well, churech, now I'm going to agree with everything he's
said except for one thing. Traders. They're not traders their
trade tours. I'm a trader their trade tours.
Speaker 3 (29:04):
I'm saying that.
Speaker 1 (29:05):
And you know, George, the facts are this, fifteen hundred
people across our southern border during the Obiden administration who
were known terrorists. Half of those were allowed in in
this country. Now we don't know where those people are
(29:27):
or what they're up to, except we know about one
guy in Texas over the weekend wearing a t shirt
that says property of Allah went into a bar and
killed three people. You know, we know about him. But
what about these others seven or eight hundred or god
(29:47):
knows how many others that are roaming around this country
waiting for an opportunity. Maybe, George, they already have their
targets picked out. That's why we all, all of us,
all Americans, must be an alert and remember the old thing.
George sees something, says something. It's never more true than today,
(30:12):
never more.
Speaker 3 (30:13):
True than today.
Speaker 2 (30:15):
Yeah, that's true. I mean that's the problem. If they
had just snuck in, and they president had been doing
the best he could to stop that from happening, but
they were skillful at sneaking in, then it would be unfortunate,
but you wouldn't necessarily be like enraged. But I'm thinking
to myself, when you know they're coming in, you know
(30:36):
they're terrorist, and you let half of them in, you know,
like thousands of them in, that makes you a traitor.
It's just you know, that makes you anti American, and
it means you're looking forward to them killing Americans and
not doing harm to America, and that makes you unfit
for office, but fit for the guillotine.
Speaker 3 (30:59):
I agree.
Speaker 1 (30:59):
And when that happens, and I'm pretty sure, unfortunately it
will happen, those people that let them in. Are they
going to be held responsible? Hell no, Hell no they're not.
But you know what, the families of those victims, they're
the ones that are going to be doing the real suffering. George,
(31:20):
let's get a break in here. This is the conservative Commandos.
I'm Rick Trada to my coast is George Solandris. Don't
go away, we will be right back.
Speaker 8 (31:42):
Are you tired of making trip after trip on doctor
visits only to get wrong medications that waste time, money
and cause you side effects. If you're on Medicare, call
for a free medical assessment and determine which medications are
right for you based on your genetic makeup with our
convenience swab test performed in your home and mailed to
(32:02):
our laboratory. No more trial and error. The results will
tell you and your doctor which medications work for you.
Speaker 3 (32:08):
It's that easy.
Speaker 8 (32:09):
If you're on Medicare and take multiple medications, call now
and see if you qualify for our genetic testing service
covered by Medicare or your insurance. Improve your health, avoid
adverse side effects, and save money.
Speaker 7 (32:21):
Don't wait.
Speaker 8 (32:22):
Call right now and find out if the medications you're
taking are helping or hurting you. Make this free call
right now. Call eight five five eight two zero three
two nine to one. That's eight five five eight two
zero thirty.
Speaker 3 (32:35):
Two ninety one.
Speaker 5 (32:37):
Call eight five five eight two zero three two nine
to one. That's eight five five eight two zero thirty
two ninety one. Call eight five five eight two zero
three two nine one. That's eight five five eight two
zero thirty two ninety one.
Speaker 6 (32:53):
I'm excited to announce that we're having our biggest three
and one sale ever with a limited edition product of
back in stocks special and a closeout deal you won't
find anywhere else. So go to my pillow dot commer,
call the number on your screen, use your promo code
to get our MyPillow Bedsi's only twenty nine eighty eight,
any color, any style, any size even kings regular one
(33:16):
nineteen ninety eight only twenty nine eighty eight. Once they're gone,
they're gone for good. How about are my towels? They're
finally back in stock, but not for long. Get a
six piece my towel set Regular sixty nine ninety eight,
now only thirty nine ninety eight, And for the first
time and the only time ever, get our limited edition
premium my pillows. They're made with Giza cotton and designer
(33:39):
guss It Queen seventeen ninety eight, Kings only nineteen ninety eight.
So go to my pillow dot commer, call the number
on your screen, use your promo code to get the
best offers. Ever, coins are extremely limited, so order now.
Speaker 7 (33:53):
To order, please call eight hundred seven nine seven seven
eight ninety three and please use the promotion code a
u n TV. To order, please call eight hundred seven
nine seven seven eight nine three and please use the
promotion code a U n TV. To order, please call
eight hundred seven nine seven seven eight nine three and
(34:15):
please use the promotion code a u n TV. To order,
please call eight hundred seven nine seven seven eight nine
three and please use the promotion code a U n TV.
Speaker 3 (34:29):
And welcome back, Welcome back to you.
Speaker 1 (34:30):
The Conservative Commander is already at a show with George
Landreth and I'm Rick Trader, coming to you from the
My Pillar Studios and My Story Studios of the au
n TV network. And George, you know, we went pretty
heavy first part of the show talking about the actions
and ran also the War Powers Act. George, the primary
(34:52):
season is coming up very very shortly. Also, the midterm
elections are just six months away. What do you foresee
the ramifications of our attack on Iran to the primary
elections to the general elections coming up in just a
few months. No, it's kind of early to speculate, but
(35:15):
people are talking about it.
Speaker 2 (35:17):
Well, I think if this were to turn into World
War three, it'd probably hurt the administration and the Republicans
because Americans aren't interested in World War three. But if
it turns out to for example, essentially get rid of
the mollocracy in Iran and make Iran, the people safer
and the Iran's neighbors safer, because the Middle East has
(35:39):
been known as quota very unsafe region of the world.
But it's not because the other you know, it's not
because of the UAE, it's not because of Qatar, it's
not because of Saudi Arabia. It's because of Iran. Iran
attacks its neighbors, Arabs and Israelis in the US as well.
So I think that if it's successful, and I believe
(36:02):
that it likely will be, that it will end up
most Americans will be like, yeah, this is actually a
good thing. Because now, for example, then they'll be like,
right now, there's some talk of there being some volatility
and energy prices because anytime there's a war in the
Middle East, energy prices tend to go up just because
of anxiety about well.
Speaker 1 (36:22):
We're already seeing that, George. You know, there were some
out there that were speculating. And I know this is
very early into this that some were expecting the energy prices,
for instance, oil to shoot up tours one hundred dollars
a barrel. It's gone up some, but not just a
(36:43):
few dollars, so we're not even energy is not even
being affected that much. And I would think at the
beginning of the conflict you would see the biggest reaction
rather than later on in the conflict.
Speaker 2 (36:57):
Ye loving part of it is because we've done a
very good job of promoting American energy so that the
world isn't really necessily dependent on Iran for energy. China
may be, Russia may be, or whatever, but you know,
the fact is, most of the rest of the world
is not dependent on them, you know. And the price
of gasoline will just go up by you know, pennies
(37:19):
or nickels, not by even dollars. The barrel of oil
might go by a couple of dollars. But the bottom
line is I think that if this goes well, which
then it will make energy prices far less subject to
things because every time Iran, you know, does a missile strike,
or every time Iran causes trouble around the globe, energy
(37:40):
prices tend to go up because Iran creates this sort
of problem in the world and this sort of instability
in the world. And also it helps them financially because
if oil prices go up, they make more money, so
that gives them an financial incentive to cause prices to
go up by committing acts of violence and attacking it
neighbors and so forth. So we could end all of that,
(38:04):
not only end the murder of the Iranian citizens, but
the murder of other Arabs that are friends and allies
of ours and also of Israelis, and we can create
more stability. So I think that that could be a
very good thing and help in the elections. And so
it'll be interesting to see because I can guarantee you
(38:25):
that virtually all of the Democratic people like Gavin Newsom
and Kamala Harris and many others, they seem to be
pro Komani, pro Iran, and that's not going to go
well with the American people, because I think the American
people have had forty seven years of reason to not
(38:46):
be too excited about Iran, not today need to hate
the Iranian people, because most Americans know some Iranian people
in America and they're very good Americans. They're very loyal Americans,
and they very much dislike the current regime because they
have family members there were threatened, in some cases have
been killed. And my wife has a friend who's an
(39:07):
Reignian American and she cannot stand Jimmy Carter because Jimmy,
in her mind, Jimmy Carter is the reason why members
of her family were murdered by the regime. And so
she feels like, Yeah, that idiot did this to my family,
and so I don't like him. I understand that, and
so I think many Americans probably have a similar view.
(39:29):
So I don't see being pro Ayatola makes a lot
of sense. It's like, can you imagine would have been
helpful in the say, what nineteen fifty presidential election if
the Democrat had said I'm pro Nazi? Would Americans have
responded well to that? Of course, I know if if
I'm recalling correctly, that was at the time. Wasn't that
(39:52):
Harry S. Truman? He was actually the one who decided
to drop the atomic bombs to end the war, so
he wasn't going to do that. But can you imagine
if Harrius Truman spent the time of his next campaign
arguing for Nazism. I think that might have really sunk
his campaign.
Speaker 3 (40:10):
I really think so.
Speaker 1 (40:11):
You're just give me an idea of crude oil is
up roughly about four to four and a half dollars
a barrel today, certainly not approachingate approaching the one hundred
dollars a barrel that some people had had predicted. Crude
oil today is about seventy one dollars a barrel. Seventy
one dollars, so it's got quite a distance to go
(40:34):
to hit one hundred. For instance, natural gases is up
about twelve cents, gasoline about eight cents, heating oil thirty
three cents, but certainly certainly not astronomical increases over time.
As I said, I would think that the reaction would
be today. Since this event started over the weekend, the
(40:57):
big event would have had happened today. I think after
today the price will probably come back down. Might not
go back to where it was at the start of
the weekend, but it might come down from this seventy
one dollars the barrel.
Speaker 2 (41:13):
It is right, and obviously, once this conflict is over,
and once the regime is no longer in charge, it'll
go down and stay down because then there won't be
the same level because it's not like other countries then
at least that produce oil, they're not the reason for
this problem. It's Iran.
Speaker 3 (41:31):
Well, you're also removing.
Speaker 2 (41:32):
He's been the reason for the instability.
Speaker 1 (41:34):
You're removing that in that insecurity around around the Gulf,
around the Strait of her Moos. You know, for the
past several weeks there have been threats by Iran to
close off the Strait of her Moose that twenty percent
of the world's oil goes through each and every day.
(41:54):
The United States is just about obliterated Iran's navy. They've
a RAN's ability to close the straits for removes to
mind the straight So I think that in the long run, again,
in a not too distant future, you might see oil
(42:16):
go down much much lower than even what it was before.
Speaker 2 (42:21):
Well, yeah, because I would argue on any given day,
there's certainly the concerns about what might Iran do because
they have been so kind of just a wild, crazy,
you know, player in the world energy market, and they
profit from causing prices to escalate, so it gives them
a financial incentive to cause wars. Whereas you know, in
(42:45):
our economy. It may be an oil company can make
more money because of the prices going up, but it
would harm the economy in general, because we have a
very broad based economy and so it's the cost of
energy going down is helpful with the economy and causes
other growth, whereas Iran doesn't really have a large economy.
What they basically are is an energy producer, and so
(43:06):
they're happy to see the price go up, and so
they work to make it go up. So I think
it's time for us to recognize that not only are
they killing their neighbors, killing their own people, and I
don't just mean a few at a time. I find
it interesting, for example, they've killed over thirty thousand of
their own people in just a week or two, and
(43:28):
yet Ice kills two or three Americans who were trying
to harm or physically kill them, and the left goes nuts.
But you're killing thirty five thousand people and shooting tens
of thousands of missiles that all of our friends and
other nations in the Middle East, and of course there's
Israel as well. But the bottom line is that doesn't
(43:51):
matter to you. It's okay, don't get upset again. It
gets back to what we were talking earlier about the
double standards. If it weren't for double standards, theft have
no standards at all.
Speaker 1 (44:01):
Would Hey, George, you know we started this segment by
saying that we were going to talk about the elections.
In the primary commandment we've got talking about oil. Maybe
we will hold the election talk to the next segment.
But think about this, George. Think about a stable Middle
East where oil isn't threatened, where oil isn't used as
(44:23):
a weapon. Think about another stable, reliable supply of oil
coming out of Venezezuela. Think about think about that, George,
stable oil coming out of Venezuela, stable oil coming out
of the Middle East. Wow, that might that in and
of itself, will have a real effect on the price
(44:45):
of oil, the global price.
Speaker 2 (44:47):
Of oil economies across the globe.
Speaker 1 (44:50):
And you know, people are going, well, the Chinese, the
Chinese rely on on a rent.
Speaker 3 (44:55):
For the Royal.
Speaker 1 (44:56):
Maybe they'll come to the United States and buy the Royal, George,
And wouldn't that be great for our balance payments with
the Chinese?
Speaker 2 (45:05):
Oh yeah, Well, it's just interesting because I do feel
like the energy market in the world fuels the world economy.
And so if we allow the Iranians to continue to
mess with the world economy, then all we're really doing
is ensuring that there'll be people in maybe third world countries,
(45:26):
for example, they're a little poorer, well, they'll be starving
and suffering tremendously, not just having a little less money.
So they can't go to Disneyland this year, you know
what I mean. But for them it might mean they
can't buy food for their children, they can't have medical
care for their children, and so forth. And so I
think that this makes a lot of sense to create
(45:47):
a more stable environment across the globe.
Speaker 1 (45:51):
And George, that's been fifty years. It's been fifty years
before we've had oil stability, especially in the Middle Least.
It was it was during the night what was in
nineteen seventy three that we started having it started to
hav an oil crisis in the Middle East, and it
was doubled down in nineteen seventy nine when the Iatola
(46:15):
overthrew the shoal of Iran. So think about it. Stable
oil coming out of the Middle East, stable oil coming
out of Venezuela, and that can only mean good things
for the United States. And as you say, good things
for the world economy. All right, George, let's do go
to that break right now. This is the Conservative Commandos Metrader.
(46:38):
My coast is George Landers, and we promise we're going
to talk about how are our bombing of Iran taking
out the Iatola's possible government change is going to affect
elections here in the United States. Don't go away, George,
and I will be right back.
Speaker 6 (47:10):
Now.
Speaker 9 (47:10):
You can leave home and leave the tanks behind with Imagen,
the portable oxygen concentrator that moves with you.
Speaker 10 (47:17):
This little box changed my life. I can now do
all those things that I want to do. You just
press the button here and there's my oxygen.
Speaker 9 (47:23):
Imagen portable oxygen systems are small and light and deliver
up to twelve hours of medical grade oxygen on a
single charge.
Speaker 10 (47:30):
Now that I've got my Enagen, I've got my freedom back.
I'm back to living again.
Speaker 9 (47:34):
Call us right now try an Inagen system for thirty
days risk free.
Speaker 11 (47:38):
To order call now eight hundred six zero four three
nine sixty six To order Call now eight hundred six
zero four three nine sixty six To order call now
eight hundred six zero four three nine sixty six.
Speaker 12 (47:58):
Hello, I'm my Glendell and I'm I'm excited to announce
my new product, my Coffee. I get products all the
time from entrepreneurs for my new platform, mystore dot Com.
And when I tried my coffee for the first time,
I was blown away. It is the best coffee I've
ever had in my life. I spent the last four
months doing my due diligence, and this Stanley owned business
(48:21):
micromanages every step from the fields to the cup to
ensure the best quality coffee you're ever going to have.
It starts with the beans that are grown in Honduras.
Honduras's volcanic soil and humid climate make the perfect growing
conditions for coffee plants, which produced the best beans ever.
Then each batch is tested for its aroma, tastes, and
(48:43):
other aspects to.
Speaker 13 (48:44):
Meet the highest standards in the coffee industry.
Speaker 12 (48:47):
And after that it goes into production, which is all
done right here in the USA. It's like you're getting
that small batch, specialty coffee.
Speaker 13 (48:55):
But delivered right to your front door.
Speaker 12 (48:58):
So go to Mystore dot Com, call the number on
your screen, use the promo code, and you'll get your
very own my coffee p twenty five percent off. You
guys all know that I've traveled the country for the
past year and a half. I've stayed in hundreds of hotels.
I've tried every coffee out there. Well, some of the
coffees have that terrible after taste, some that leave me
jittery or I get an upset stomach.
Speaker 13 (49:19):
Well, my coffee is different.
Speaker 12 (49:21):
It's the richest, smoothest, best coffee I've ever had. My
coffee comes in a variety of players. You get them
ground or whole being. Plus it's certified organic and non GMO.
I guarantee it'll be the best coffee you've ever had.
So go to mystore dot com or call the number
on your screen, use your promo code, and you'll get
(49:41):
my coffee for twenty five percent off. And I'm gonna
give you deep discounts on all my store products. That's
mystore dot Com. It's my new platform for USA entrepreneurs.
Speaker 13 (49:52):
Please order now.
Speaker 7 (49:54):
To order, please call eight hundred seven nine seven seven
eight nine three and please use the promotion code a
U n TV. To order, please call eight hundred seven
ninety seven seven eight nine three and please use the
promotion code A u n TV. To order, please call
eight hundred seven ninety seven seven eight nine three and
(50:16):
please use the promotion code a u n TV. To order,
please call eight hundred seven nine seven seven eight nine
three and please use the promotion code a u n TV.
Speaker 3 (50:29):
Welcome back.
Speaker 1 (50:29):
Welcome back to the Conservative Commanders with George Landerth and
Imrick Trader, coming to you from the Mypillar Studios, the
Mysore Studios of the a u n TV network. Hey,
if you want to watch the Conservative Commanders, maybe you're
just listening to us on one of our eighteen terrestrial
radio stations or many many Internet outlet partners. You can
(50:51):
watch us by going to our website a u n
dashtv dot com a u n dash tv dot com.
Right below the banner, you'll see red stripe. This says
watch au n TV live.
Speaker 3 (51:04):
Click on it.
Speaker 1 (51:05):
We'll take you to our twenty four hours a day's,
seven day week stream on Rubble. Not just to watch
a Conservative Commanders, watch all the great shows on the
au n TV network like Denesi Suser, Roger Stone, Alan West,
Tony Perkins, uh, the Bruntiers of Freedom. We can report
with that guy named George Landreth. Anyway, check it out
(51:29):
check out the au N TV network. Check out all
the great shows that we air there. Again, go to
our website au n dashtv dot com a u n
dashtv dot com.
Speaker 3 (51:41):
Click on net link.
Speaker 1 (51:42):
This says watch au N TV Live. All right, George,
as promised, I want to talk with you about the elections.
I do believe that certainly, if we have a very
positive outcome in Iran, that's gonna be good for Donald Trump.
It's going to be good for the Republican Party. But
very shortly we've got some very important primaries coming up,
(52:04):
like the one in Texas.
Speaker 13 (52:06):
Yeah.
Speaker 2 (52:07):
Yeah, because you've got like Jasmine Crockett, who's just a
left wing kook, and she, for example, probably is very
pro Ayatola and will act as if somehow it was
completely illegitimate to have him be a target. He's literally
killed over the course of his leadership, hundreds of thousands
(52:29):
of people, some Americans, some Israelis, some various Arab neighbors,
et cetera. And then he's been exporting terrorism and somehow though,
how dare you it's you know, it's like and then
the guy running against her is Representative James tall Rico,
and he's not quite as crazy as she is. But
(52:50):
he's not a moderate Democrat. He's also you know, a lefty,
so he may not be quite as outspoken in his uh,
you know, maybe he is. I don't know. We'll see,
but I don't think that'll go well because they'll be
coming out and very much in favor of terrorists and
so forth, and the ayahtola and all that. I think myself,
(53:10):
that's going to be an ad in November, in October
of next year, of this coming year. And I think Americans,
once the war is over, and once it's ended and
turned out well, people will be like, these guys got
it wrong, you know. And then you've got on the
Republican side, John Cornyn, who a number of conservatives are
kind of tired of because he, if I recall it correctly,
when he ran the first time, he said he was
(53:32):
going to run for only two terms, and now he's
running for his fifth term. So evidently the promise of
you know, self imposed term limits has not been kept.
But there's also a Representative Wesley Hunt who's running for
the nomination, and Attorney General Ken Paxton, who has been
pretty supportive of what I would call a conservative agenda.
(53:53):
And I think so is Wesley Hunt. So I think
that the voters, and I think that the polling suggests
right now that Paxton's probably leading.
Speaker 1 (54:02):
And Paxson's got forty percent, John Cordon thirty nine, Wesley
Hunts seventeen, eighteen or eight percent somebody else. Now, George,
I believe in Texas, to win the primary, you've got
to get the majority of the votes. So that means
that the Republican primary may go to a runoff, right
(54:24):
and looking at so that would eliminate Wesley Hunt. So
my thinking is is that the people who who do
you think the people that are supporting Wesley Hunt, do
you think they'll fall to Paxton or Cornyon the incumbent?
Speaker 2 (54:39):
Well, yeah, I mean that'll be interesting to see because
I would think it's probably going to go to Paxton
because Wesley Hunt has been quite conservative, and he's been
very much a supporter of Donald Trump's and so it
would seem to me that most of his supporters would
have a hard time jumping on John Cornyn's side because
he had has been what you might call a Republican
(55:03):
in name only, He hasn't necessarily been a true champion
of conservative principles.
Speaker 1 (55:10):
Paxton Packson, what's he been the Attorney general in Texas?
Speaker 2 (55:15):
Yes.
Speaker 3 (55:16):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (55:17):
Now on the Democrat side, you got tul Rico with
fifty two percent, Jasmin Crockett with forty seven percent. Did
she She didn't have to leave her house seat to
run for that for this, did did she?
Speaker 3 (55:32):
George?
Speaker 2 (55:33):
I don't think so. I think that she can run
in the primary and at the same time. And I'm
not familiar with what Texas law might be, but in
most states you can't run for two offices at the
same time. But since she's a sitting congressman, she doesn't
assi have to give up her seat either, I don't
believe so if she loves no nominations, she'll she'll probably
(55:55):
then go back and run for her her House seat.
Speaker 1 (55:58):
But from what I understand, her house seat may be
redistricted to make it lean more Republican than Democrats.
Speaker 3 (56:08):
So either way, we might finally get rid of this woman.
Speaker 1 (56:13):
In a way, Georgia, because she's she's very entertaining, in
a bad way, let's put it that way.
Speaker 2 (56:22):
Very entertaining, And actually I would like to see her
get the nomination for the same reason I'd like to
see AOC get the nomination. Not because I'd want to
see Jasmine Crockett win the general election or AOC. It's
because I believe that they're so kind of empty headed
and silly and absurd and leftist that defeating them in
(56:43):
a general election should be pretty easy. Same thing with
someone like a Gavin Newsom if he were to win
the nomination, Like, who's going to want to vote to
have him do to America what he's done to California.
You know, I'm thinking to myself, I'm not even sure
he'd win California because right now he's polling in California
(57:03):
well behind two Republicans. Is something myself. You know, you
think of it as a democratic state, but he's done
such a lousy job and done so much damage to
the state that even Democrats who normally support Democrats are
going I've had enough of this, So it'll be interesting
to see, but I would like very much to make
sure that we do well in this next election because
(57:25):
having more, you know, Nancy Pelosi's more, Eric Swalwell's more,
Jasmine Crocketts more, AOC's in the House and the Senate
is just going to lead to the destruction of America
because these individuals hate America. These individuals want to destroy
America and turn it into a totalitarian, socialist state. And
(57:48):
so Americans need to say, no, I don't want that.
I want to maintain the freedom and opportunity that we
have and the stability that we've had as a nation
and the rule of law and things like that. So
you don't necessarily to agree with everything that Donald Trump
was for or that Ronald Reagan was for, but you
can be like, yeah, but I'm not for destroying America.
(58:09):
And I think that's an example of why I'm hoping
that American voters wake up, because you known example would
be Virginians voted for Abigail Spanberger and she is now
proven in just two months in office that she hates Americans,
she wants to screw Americans. We had a woman who
was murdered this past week at a bus stop, stabbed
(58:32):
to death by an illegal alien that was released from prison,
and she signed an executive order just a week or
so before. A month or so before that, the state
police could not cooperate with ICE. So in other words,
when he's being released from prison, you can't tell ICE
about it, because then ICE could go pick him up
(58:53):
and then deport him. He's not in prison anymore, but
they say goodbye, go home, but now he's still here.
And so, to be honest, Abigail Spanberger is somebody who
cooperated with and assisted in that crime. So she could
be tried for the murder. Because if you or I
were well the guy commit a murder, we would be
(59:16):
tried as an accomplice.
Speaker 1 (59:18):
Is there anybody down there in Virginia that has the
intestinal fortitude to actually bring a suit against her, that'd
be interesting.
Speaker 2 (59:28):
I think there might be some, you know, certainly not
in Fairfax County because the Fairfax County prosecutor is a
George Solis prosecutor and he's one of the worst prosecutors
in the country, and so, you know, not him, but
there's got to be at least a few, perhaps more
in southern Virginia or southwestern Virginia that a rule of law, people,
(59:48):
And understand an example be you and I wouldn't have
to actually go in to a bank to rob the
bank if we were part of a team, and let's
say we were up in you know, up and down
the streets with you know, walkie talkies letting them know
when police were coming and things like that, and we
were aiding in the bank robbery, but we never entered
(01:00:09):
the bank. That would not be defense for guilt for
being a bank robber. Once the police arrested the bank
robbers and found out that we were aiding them and
helping them and we were involved, we would be tried
as accomplices. And if they shot somebody, then we would
also be tried as accomplices for that murder, even though
(01:00:30):
we didn't pull the trigger. So maybe wouldn't get the
death penalty, but we could get a life term. And
so I think this is the interesting thing, is that
I think we need to start holding you know, judges responsible,
prosecutors responsible, and you know governors that, for example, help
criminals commit crimes against the citizens of our country.
Speaker 1 (01:00:53):
George, I know there's a big battle in Virginia and
bring this up you being a resident of Virginia about
re districting. One court said the redistricting was illegal. But
I'm just looking at the story now that another judge
says that the stake can go ahead with its redistricting plan.
Speaker 3 (01:01:13):
Do you know any more about this?
Speaker 2 (01:01:15):
Well, if I recall correctly, unless something's changed last day
or two. The Republicans brought a second case, are making
some different article.
Speaker 1 (01:01:24):
This is this is four hours ago, Virginia redistricting election
can move forward.
Speaker 3 (01:01:31):
Court rules.
Speaker 2 (01:01:32):
Who was the Supreme Court?
Speaker 3 (01:01:35):
It's not let me get into the article.
Speaker 2 (01:01:37):
Okay, here's while you look into it. I'll just explain
the first case that occurred. The Supreme Court in Virginia
heard the case and decided that they could go forward
with the vote, and then they would after the vote
decide whether or not it was illegal or not. Of course,
that seems kind of chicken because let's say it gets
(01:01:58):
some majority vote. I doubt the court would have the
courage to say, no, that's unconstitutional, even though it should, because,
for example, if they held a referendum saying let's round
up Jews and put them in gas chambers, I think
you could even if it passed by fifty five percent,
you'd hope that a court would say, Nope, that violates
(01:02:18):
the First Amendment. Can't do that, that's illegal.
Speaker 1 (01:02:21):
But unfortunately, Republicans are not either very very good or
successful at challenging these reistricting laws or even election laws.
And I keep pointing to Pennsylvania in twenty twenty, the
Secretary of State changed the election laws in Pennsylvania, and
(01:02:44):
the state constitution says election laws can only be changed
by the legislature. But the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in the
US Supreme Court both elect, both elect the Secretary of
State change elections in Pennsylvania. So Republicans are either two
(01:03:06):
done to fight these or very unlucky.
Speaker 2 (01:03:11):
Yeah, Or it could be the justices are too political
and don't believe in the rule of law or the constitution,
which means that they should be removed from office and
disbarred because a judge ought not be playing politics. What
a judge should do is interpret the constitution and the law.
And like you said, the law is quite clear. The
(01:03:31):
Constitution of Pennsylvania is quite clear. So if you can't
get that right, like I said, if a judge doesn't
understand that, for example, a law that wants to round
up whether it's Catholics or Jews or Baptists or whatever,
religion and then put them in prison because they don't
like their religion, you would hope that any judge would
(01:03:51):
understand that violates the First Amendment. And yet if they don't,
then they need to remove from office and they should
lose all their benefits. If they've qualified for a retirement,
they shouldn't get it. They should be kicked out, disbarred
because they're basically lousy pieces of garbage.
Speaker 1 (01:04:12):
Okay, Virginia redistricting election can move forward. Court rules letters
special election on April's twenty first focuses on redistrict in Virginia. Yes,
so are they putting this is? Are they putting it
to a referendum?
Speaker 2 (01:04:30):
George, Yeah, it's going to go to a referendum, And
then I think they're acting as if once it's either
passed or failed. If it fails, they don't need to
vote on it because it failed. But if it passes,
then they are acting like then they'll take a look
at it and decide if it's legal. The problem with
that is I doubt the court will have the courage
(01:04:51):
to do the right thing. But if they do, that'd
be fine. But the problem would be they don't have
to wait till it passes. An example would be I
would argue that they were a referendum on whether we
should grab some religious group and put them in prison
because we don't like their theology, that we don't wait
till it passes or fails to make a judgment, we
just say no, no, that's obviously wrong. You can't do that.
Speaker 1 (01:05:11):
And Jeorge, lastly, do you think that President Trump's actions
in Iran are going to change election outcomes? You know,
for for instance, right now the Republicans are underwater to
the Democrats in mid terms.
Speaker 2 (01:05:30):
In the mid terms, yeah, well, if the elections are
other day, it might not be great because we don't
yet have all the results in yet. An example would be,
while the economy is growing, it's still early in the
growing phase, but you know, say six eight months from now,
it could be growing much more rapidly and that would
really help the affordability question, which would help. Likewise, the
(01:05:53):
action in Row could have created some very good and
important outcomes. So I agree. If the election held a day,
I expect Republicans to lose seats in the House for sure,
maybe in the Senate. But I think it's very possible
that in November the weight will be favoring because I
(01:06:15):
think Americans are generally speaking, most Americans aren't terribly part
of Most of them are kind of pragmatic, and so
if they see their life improving from the Biden years
in the last two years, they'll probably be like, yeah,
I think I can't go back to what we just
had that didn't work out very well.
Speaker 1 (01:06:32):
Well, George, you know what I say about the polls.
They're entertaining. You know what the polls say don't always
come true. But it's kind of like the standings. Major
League Baseball doesn't mean to think until the last day
of the season, right, Hey, George, let's get a break
in why because it's that time and this is the
(01:06:52):
Conservative Commandos with George Landers. I'm Rick Trader. Good nowhere
George and them, and I will be back with more
news and coming jury after this break.
Speaker 4 (01:07:14):
Are you having trouble hearing your TV or listening to
conversations and loud spaces, then it might be time to
consider nano hearing aids. The days of expensive hearing aids
are over. Nanos are FDA registered OTC hearing aids. They
are powerful, lightweight, and simple to use, and their tiny
in ear design makes them nearly invisible. Plus they are rechargeable,
(01:07:36):
saving you hundreds of dollars on batteries. Don't be fooled
by overpriced hearing aids. Prescription hearing aids could cost three
thousand dollars or more. Nano hearing aids are only three
hundred and ninety seven dollars. But wait, we are so
confident you are going to love your nanos, we are
offering one hundred dollars off through this special TV offer.
Call now and get two CIC rechargeable hearing aids for
(01:07:57):
only two hundred and ninety seven dollars. You get a
free Georgia case, free twenty four seven lifetime telephone support,
free shipping, and a forty five day money bag guarantee.
Speaker 5 (01:08:05):
Call eight five five six nine zero six four six four.
That's a five to five six nine zero sixty four
sixty four. Call eight five five six nine zero six
four sixty four. That's a five y five six nine
zero sixty four sixty four. Call eight five five six
nine zero six four six four. That's a five to
five six nine zero sixty four sixty four.
Speaker 6 (01:08:24):
I'm excited to announce that we're having our biggest three
and one sale ever with a limited edition product, a
back in stock special, and a closeout deal you won't
find anywhere else. So go to my pillow dot comer
call at number on your screen, use your promo code
to get our my pillow bed sheeees only twenty nine
eighty eight, any color, any style, any size, even kings
(01:08:47):
Regular one nineteen ninety only twenty nine eighty eight. Once
they're gone, they're gone for good. How about are my Towels?
They're finally back in stock, but now for long. Get
a six piece my towel set, the sixty nine ninety
eight now only thirty nine ninety eight, And for the
first time and the only time ever, get our limited
(01:09:07):
edition Premium My Pillows. They're made with Giza cotton and
designer guss It Queen seventeen ninety eight, King's only nineteen
ninety eight. So go to my pillow dot comer call
and number on your screen use your promo code to
get the best offers. Ever, quents are extremely limited, so
order now.
Speaker 7 (01:09:24):
To order, please call eight hundred seven ninety seven seven
eight nine three and please use the promotion code a
U n TV. To order, Please call eight hundred seven
nine seven seven eight nine three and please use the
promotion code a U n TV. To order, Please call
eight hundred seven ninety seven seven eight nine three and
(01:09:47):
please use the promotion code a U n TV. To order,
please call eight hundred seven ninety seven seven eight nine
three and please use the promotion code a U N TV.
Speaker 3 (01:10:00):
And welcome back.
Speaker 1 (01:10:01):
Welcome back to the Conservative Commandos with George Landrath and
I'm Rick Trader, come to you from the My Pilis Studios,
my Stewage Studios of the au and TV Network. And hey, George,
when I first started the Conservative Commandos many many years ago,
our next guest was one of our first guests on
the show. He's a great friend of this show. And George,
(01:10:23):
please make that introduction.
Speaker 2 (01:10:25):
I'm happy to do that because here on the Conservative
Commandos and the AU N TV Network, we always have
the very best guests on TV and radio. And we've
got Steve Molloy here to prove it. And I've known
Steve a long time. He's the founder of junk science
dot com. And make this very clear, he's not promoting
junk science. He's actually trying to reveal it and make
(01:10:48):
it clear what the problem there is. And he's was
also a former member of the Trump presidential transition team
during his first term, and he focused at that point
on things like environmental and regulatory issues, and with his
focus on junk science, not surprising that that's an area
he knows a lot about. So thanks for joining us, Steve.
Speaker 14 (01:11:09):
We're glad to have you well, George Rick, thanks for
having me.
Speaker 2 (01:11:13):
Absolutely. I wanted to start off. You know, for years
you've been one of the most vocal critics of what's
called junk science and research that's politically motivated, poorly designed,
or deliberately misleading. And a lot of people hear that phrase,
but they don't fully understand how ridespread the problem is
(01:11:34):
or how it shapes public policy. So I want to
ask you, how do you define junk science and what
are the biggest red flags that the public should watch
for when politicians or activists claim something is sub old science.
Speaker 14 (01:11:52):
Well, junk science, as I define it, is bad science
that is used to advance some ulterior agenda. And there
are lots of people can use it. Lots of people
do use it. As a matter of fact, if you're
reading about science in the newspaper or hearing it on TV,
there's a there's a huge probability that it is junk science.
(01:12:17):
Junk science is used by activists, by politicians, by companies,
by activist groups, trial lawyers. There's just you know, individuals
after fame and fortunes. There's just you know, countries even
like China, just there's huge amounts of bad science out
there that people are trying to make money with or
(01:12:41):
advance their political agenda or their personal agenda or something
like that. So it's just it's bad science as used
for bad ends.
Speaker 2 (01:12:49):
That's a very good point, because if you did that
with medical stuff, people would die as a result. And
when you do that kind of with things that affect
the environment and aremy those things also don't do as well.
And when you're kind of like effectively killing off the economy,
that's bad.
Speaker 4 (01:13:07):
Maybe.
Speaker 2 (01:13:07):
So that's one reason why your work is so important.
It's not just theoretical, it has real practical implications.
Speaker 14 (01:13:13):
And I was just gonna to add, you know, the
probably the largest junk science scam of all time is
what we're living through right now, this climate hoax, this
notion that emissions of greenhouse gases from fossil fuel use
are destroying the climate.
Speaker 3 (01:13:30):
Yeah.
Speaker 2 (01:13:31):
Yeah, it's interesting as the world is greener now because
plants need CO two in the same way that we
need oxygen. And when plants have more CO two, they
do better. And that's one reason why you see things
like desert shrinking, because when there's not a lot of water,
the fact there's more CO two helps plants survive.
Speaker 14 (01:13:53):
Yeah, that's absolutely right. And the political left has been
pushing what I call the climate hoax now for about
for more than thirty five years. And it's important for
people to understand that before we started using burning fossil fuels,
there were fewer than a billion people on the planet. Today,
(01:14:13):
thanks to foss fuel missions, there are more than eight
billion people on the planet. Over the last thirty years,
since the climate hoax has started, global GDP has increased
by more than fourfold. People are living longer, wealthier, healthier,
freer lives than ever before thanks to false fuels. So naturally,
the left wants to end that because they don't like people,
(01:14:33):
they don't like progress, they don't like prosperity, and they
don't like fossil fuels. So, you know, thanks to President Trump,
of course, we've had a tremendous amount of success pushing
back on these people. But the war is not over.
Regardless of what you hear, regardless of how successful President
Trump has been, the climate hoax is a multi trillion
(01:14:56):
dollar industry. The left is half the population in the
United States, has half the voters. Anyways, they are not
going away just because President Trump has damaged to their scam.
Speaker 2 (01:15:11):
I help preval it, of course, so view. But anyhow,
we've seen environmental issues increasingly framed in moral or political
terms rather than scientific terms. And whether it's climate policy
or emission rules or energy restrictions, the debate often seems
driven by ideology rather than science or evidence. So from
(01:15:32):
your perspective, how much of today's environmental policy is driven
by politics rather than science and what are the consequences
of letting that sort of activism override facts and data.
Speaker 14 (01:15:45):
Well, so it's an interesting question, George. You know, climate
may have started out with some scientific curiosity, lack of knowledge, uncertainty,
but it was rapidly seized upon by the left, especially
after the Cold War ended, the Berlin Wall came down.
(01:16:06):
All these left wing activists dumped out of their anti
nuclear activism and came to climate because they recognized that
climate could be used to achieve their ends, which is
control of the global economy, control of every aspect of
our lives, even forcing depopulation, and so that has been
(01:16:27):
the driving force. Now, of course you can't take over
the world without some money, so they have enlisted various
capitalistic enterprises over the years they have they had captured
the banking system for one. Of course, you have these
scammers out there, like the wind and solar industry, you know,
(01:16:50):
who want to get rid of fossil fuels and make
us buy really expensive electricity generated by wind and solar.
Even the fossil fuel industry has been involved somewhat. They
can make more money with climate, right you big oil
can make more money with climate regulations than not. So
we have all these different and then of course we
have China, right, China has been using climate and its
(01:17:12):
sale of wind and solar to the US and other
Western economies to hamstring our economy make us dependent on China.
So there's all these bad actors out there that have
been able to advance their various economic and political agendas
through climate and it's really only recently with President Trump's
up that we've been able to successfully push back.
Speaker 2 (01:17:34):
Yeah, that's a very good point. One thing I was
going to point out is I think climate models are
often presented to the public as if they are precise
forecasts or factual scientific data, even though they just almost
always have just a long history of tremendously underestimating outcomes
and being wrong. And so you know, if it was
somebody who was predicting who's going to win the World
(01:17:56):
Series or the Super Bowl or the NBA Championship, and
they'd been doing that for thirty five years and they
were always wrong, never got it right, I don't know
that people would listen to them much anymore. So I
wanted to ask you what should people understand about the
limitations of climate models and why do you believe they're
often misused in public debates.
Speaker 14 (01:18:17):
Well, that was a great way you described it. When
people are always wrong, why believe them anymore? And so
climate models are used to predict what the future temperature
is based on emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse
gases like methae and we've you know, the climate activists
have been trying to do this for more than thirty
(01:18:40):
five years now, and they have always been wrong. They've
always been their models don't work. They can't even predict
past temperatures using their models because the models just don't work.
And the reason for that is that in fact, emissions
do not discernibly affect global weather global climate. They're not
(01:19:02):
They're not knowing. Emissions are not useful for predicting anything
beyond the models these people have predicted, you know, hot.
Speaker 8 (01:19:11):
More heat, more.
Speaker 14 (01:19:14):
Hot weather, cold weather, drought, storms, hurricanes, you know, more
of all, more of all extreme weather. And after thirty
five years, there is absolutely no shred of evidence that
emissions are related to any of that, none of no
sort of extreme weather correlates with emissions on a climatic scale.
(01:19:35):
So the bottom line is that while the climate hoax
is based on the assumption that emissions cause all this
bad stuff to happen, in fact, there is no evidence
that emissions have caused anything to happen except good stuff.
Like you mentioned earlier, emissions are plant food and the
earth is greener now than ever before. And that's a
(01:19:56):
good thing because we have more people than ever before
and we have to feet them and we do that
with agriculture, which benefits from not only warmer temperatures, but
more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.
Speaker 2 (01:20:10):
Very very good point, well, Steve. That was just a
great segment, and I really appreciate that you can stick
around for a second segment because I know our viewers
and listeners would be sad to see you go, and
they want to learn more and get a better sense
of all this, and I know you'll provide that, So
folks don't go away. The Conservative Commandos with Rick Trader,
George Landreth and our special guests Steve molloy will be
(01:20:32):
right back.
Speaker 8 (01:20:46):
Are you tired of making trip after trip on doctor
visits only to get wrong medications that waste time, money
and cause you side effects. If you're on Medicare, call
for a free medical assessment and determine which medications are
right for you based on your genetic makeup with our
convenience swab test performed in your home and mailed to
(01:21:06):
our laboratory. No more trial and error. The results will
tell you and your doctor which medications work for you.
Speaker 3 (01:21:13):
It's that easy.
Speaker 8 (01:21:14):
If you're on Medicare and take multiple medications, call now
and see if you qualify for our genetic testing service
covered by Medicare or your insurance. Improve your health, avoid
adverse side effects, and save money. Don't wait, call right
now and find out if the medications you're taking are
helping or hurting you. Make this free call right now.
(01:21:34):
Call eight five five eight two zero three two nine
to one. That's eight five five eight two zero thirty.
Speaker 5 (01:21:40):
Two ninety one. Call eight five five eight two zero
three two nine one. That's eight five five eight two
zero thirty two ninety one. Call eight five five eight
two zero three two nine to one. That's eight five
five eight two zero thirty two ninety one.
Speaker 6 (01:21:58):
I'm excited to announce that we're having our biggest three
in one sale ever, with a limited edition product, a
backing stock special, and a closeout deal you won't find
anywhere else. So go to my pillow dot commer call
the number on your screen, use your promo code to
get our MyPillow Bedchi's only twenty nine eighty eight, any color,
any style, any size, even kings Regular one nineteen ninety
(01:22:22):
eight only twenty nine eighty eight. Once they're gone, they're
gone for good. How about are my towels? They're finally
back in stock, but not for long. Get a six
piece my towel set Regular sixty nine ninety eight now
only thirty nine ninety eight, And for the first time
and the only time ever, get our limited edition premium
my pillows. They're made with Giza cotton and designer guss
(01:22:44):
It Queen seventeen ninety eight. King's only nineteen ninety eight,
So go to my pillow dot commer call the number
on your screen use your promo code to get the
best offers. Ever, coins are extremely limited, so order now.
Speaker 7 (01:22:58):
To order, please call eight hundred undred seven nine seven
seven eight nine three and please use the promotion code
a U n TV. To order, please call eight hundred
seven ninety seven seven eight nine three, and please use
the promotion code a U n TV. To order, please
call eight hundred seven ninety seven seven eight nine three
(01:23:20):
and please use the promotion code a U n TV.
To order, please call eight hundred seven ninety seven seven
eight nine three and please use the promotion code a
U n TV.
Speaker 3 (01:23:34):
And welcome back.
Speaker 1 (01:23:35):
Welcome back to the Conservative Commandos with George Landers, and
you're Shirley Rick Trader, coming to you from the Mypila
studios to my Store Studios of the a U n
TV network. Steve maloyaz our guests. He's a founder of
junk science dot Com. Must say junk science dot com
because we don't want you to think he actually invented
(01:23:57):
this junk science justin organization to put a great big
spotlight on it. Steve, thank you for holding through that break.
We really do appreciate your time, you know, Steve, great
conversation with you and George. And always interested in these
climate models. I can remember just a few days before
(01:24:19):
Hurricane Sandy, one of the most fierce storms ever to
hit the East Coast through the United States. All the
spaghetti models had Sandy going out to see except for one.
And I always look at these climate models as junk
in junk out.
Speaker 3 (01:24:36):
Seemed the same way, Steve. Oh.
Speaker 14 (01:24:39):
Absolutely, the fundamental junk assumption in every climate model is
that emissions matter. Now, you know, carbon dioxide is a
very important greenhouse gas. You know, it helps warm the
planet to the temperature we're at now. It makes our
planet hospitable. Of the reasons we have so many people
(01:25:01):
on the planet because it's nice and warm. But the
thing that most people don't understand is that it's not
just more CO two that causes more warming. There is
this there's only so much warming that comes off the planet,
and CO two has to compete for that warming with
water vapor, and water vapor is really the dominant greenhouse
(01:25:24):
gas in the atmosphere, and as it turns out, the
vast majority of warmth that comes off the planet is
absorbed by water vapor. CO two can capture a little bit.
But we're at the point now where you know, more
CO two is not making a difference. You know, if
imagine you had a room with a window and the
sun coming through the window. You pull down the shade,
(01:25:45):
and half you know in the room is half in darkness.
You pull down another shade, you know, another half in darkness,
And so we're at the point where pulling down shades
doesn't make any difference anymore. And so it's we're at
the point where adding more CO two doesn't make any
difference anymore. So controlling emissions is just it's a pointless expense.
It's accomplishing nothing.
Speaker 3 (01:26:08):
See.
Speaker 1 (01:26:08):
One of the things I learned in school and boait,
actually I actually did learn a few things in school
is about matter can't be made or destroyed, it can
only be altered. And this idea of carbon capture, I
think is something I don't totally understand. Carbon capture and
(01:26:29):
what do they want to do with carbon once.
Speaker 3 (01:26:31):
They capture it.
Speaker 1 (01:26:33):
I mean, it's ridiculous to think that you know carbon capture,
you know, trees capture carbon. You're great, you want to
capture carbon, plant more trees. Trees are great of great use.
I can remember Rush Limbaugh talking about wood and all
the wonderful things that can be done with what. You
can build pianos, you can build houses. I think that's
(01:26:55):
a good idea. But this idea of carbon capture and
then you kind.
Speaker 3 (01:27:00):
To do with it.
Speaker 14 (01:27:01):
Yeah, So the idea is to capture the carbon dioxide
as it comes out of smokestacks, and then you have
to use extra energy to turn it into a fluid,
which you can then you know, pipeline someplace and inject underground.
Speaker 3 (01:27:15):
Now, and like what's that cost?
Speaker 14 (01:27:18):
Right? It's very expensive, requires thirty percent more energy. So
but you know, even if you could do it, you know,
as we mentioned before, carbon dioxide cannot be shown to
be a problem for the climate. So why do it now?
The oil industry has done it for decades because what
they do with the carbon dioxide is injected underground to
(01:27:39):
to be able to produce hard to get at oil
that they otherwise.
Speaker 1 (01:27:45):
That sounds a lot like fracking to me. Well, cracking
was one of the big enemies of the left.
Speaker 14 (01:27:53):
It's it's not fracking, it's something it's just conventional oil drilling.
Sometimes it oil is hard to get to. If oil
companies can inject it's called enhanced oil recovery. If they
can inject the carbon doxide underground, some of the carbon
doxide will stay there and they can produce more oil,
which is a good thing and it has its own
economic value. The problem now is that there are billions
(01:28:14):
and billions of dollars that Joe Biden got put into
law through the you know, Inflation Reduction Act, the Green
New Scam as President Trump calls it, and so oil
companies now are being subsidized by taxpayers to do carbon
capture to produce more oil, which is just it's absurd.
It's you know, I'm an oil industry shareholder. I'm a
big fan of the industry, but this is just theft
(01:28:37):
from taxpayers there. You know, there are other technologies out
there some people think have built these contraptions to suck
carbon dioxide out of the air. As a matter of fact,
John Kerry, you know Biden's climates are said that, well,
not only do we have to stop emitting carbon dox side,
we need to suck out from the atmosphere all that
(01:28:58):
we've added which would be like one point six trillion tons,
which would cost about one point six quadrillion dollars to
do more money as every these people are insane.
Speaker 1 (01:29:13):
Steve, Are we winning this? Where are we winning this
battle against leftists? Are we winning this battle against the media?
Speaker 14 (01:29:21):
Well, yes and no. I mean President Trump has got
a great policy agenda and he's you know, he all
all his announcements are in the right direction. He has
given the orders to do the right things. But things
are kind of are getting done kind of slow. And
you know, he's only going to be president till January twenty,
(01:29:42):
twenty twenty nine, and we don't know who's going to
be president after that, and we need to get things done.
They need to be through the courts before he is
no longer president. Otherwise, you know, we're going to be
just like we were on January twenty of twenty twenty
one when Joe Biden took over and he just reversed
(01:30:02):
everything that President Trump did. We need to get these
changes made, get them through the courts and made permanent
so that, you know, if Democrats do win in twenty
twenty eight, it is not that easy to reverse as
it was before.
Speaker 1 (01:30:19):
You know, see if I think one of the hurdles
that we have to get across to make real changes,
we have to change the hearts and minds of people
of the electorate out there that they don't that whenever
a politician jumps up and down and says we've got
twelve years left, or the earth is going to be dead,
(01:30:41):
or the earth is going to burn to a crisp.
Speaker 3 (01:30:45):
I still got about.
Speaker 1 (01:30:46):
Six or eight inches of global warming in my backyard
that hasn't melted yet. The other day, the wife and
I drove down to the Delaware River, sit in the
car and drink hot chocolate and it was subtle frozen over.
Ships in the in the Delaware River couldn't move because
of the ice. And this, I could be one of
(01:31:07):
the advantages of being older than dirt like I am.
Speaker 3 (01:31:12):
I can remember.
Speaker 1 (01:31:13):
About six or seven different times when the Delaware River
was frozen over. This isn't anything new, but if you
listen to the media, it is like, oh my gosh,
look what has happened.
Speaker 3 (01:31:27):
Yeah.
Speaker 14 (01:31:27):
So I live in the Washington, DC area, and over
the weekend was like the coldest it's been in one
hundred and fifty years in Washington, d c it's it's
all just whether it's got nothing to do with carb dixide.
Speaker 1 (01:31:44):
You know.
Speaker 14 (01:31:44):
The thing is is that people need to be reminded
of this every day and the reason for that is
that the Left is not going away, especially on climate.
Climate has been the most successful scam they have ever run.
You know, since the Paris Climate Cords were signed in
twenty fifteen, the world has been conded to spending ten
(01:32:04):
trillion dollars on climate. Okay, the big three automakers have
lost tens of billions of dollars because of evs, because
they were conned into climate and mandated to do so
by the Biden administration. Basically in California. This has been
incredibly expensive. So the Left is not walking away from this.
(01:32:26):
And you know, if we say we throw up our
hands and go, oh look we won and you know,
move on to the next subject. No, the Left is
coming back at this and people don't realize that. I've
heard many people say, oh, the climate hoax is over,
and yeah, I like to take a victory lap now
and then, because you know, we have had tremendous success
against these people who own the media, they own the institutions,
(01:32:48):
own every university. They own every level of government basically
for and had for a very long time and have
been very successful and have conned the world into spending
tens of trillions of dollars and are still doing that
even with Press Trump. So we have not one yet.
I don't know that will ever win because I don't
know that the left is ever going going away. So
people need to be reminded constantly, and they need to
(01:33:10):
be vigil and constantly. You know, every leftist I know,
their full time job is leftism. They wherever they work,
whether it's in the government or a private corporation or
a charity, their work is leftism and they spread it constantly.
And they you know, if you're not one of them,
they know that, they know that you're a problem. If
(01:33:32):
they can't convert you, intimidate you, then they're going to
freeze you out. That's just how they are. This is
unfortunate that we live in a world like this, but
that's how it is.
Speaker 1 (01:33:41):
Yeah, Steve Bulite Junk Science dot Com, Steve Wee. Next
time we have you on, we're going to talk about
stock tips in the petroleum industry. We want we need
to make a little bit of money here, but Steve Olay,
thank you so much for joining us here. But before
you go, please tell our owns how they could connect
(01:34:01):
with you in junk science dot com.
Speaker 14 (01:34:03):
Okay, so my website is junk science dot com, but
you can find me on x I post at junk science.
Speaker 1 (01:34:12):
All right, Steve molloy again, thank you for joining us.
Take care and God bless.
Speaker 14 (01:34:17):
All right, thanks for having me, Rick, George and this.
Speaker 1 (01:34:19):
Is the Conservative Commanders with George Landrathumrick Trader. Don't go away.
We'll be back right after this break.
Speaker 9 (01:34:39):
Now you can leave home and leave the tanks behind
with Imagen, the portable oxygen concentrator that moves with you.
Speaker 10 (01:34:46):
This little box changed my life. I can now do
all those things that I want to do. You just
press the button here and there's my oxygen.
Speaker 9 (01:34:52):
Imagen portable oxygen systems are small and light and deliver
up to twelve hours of medical grade oxygen on a
single charge.
Speaker 10 (01:34:59):
Now that I I've got my Inagen, I've got my
freedom back. I'm back to living again.
Speaker 4 (01:35:03):
Call us right now.
Speaker 9 (01:35:04):
Try an Integen system for thirty days risk free.
Speaker 11 (01:35:07):
To order call now eight hundred six zero four three
nine sixty six to order Call now eight hundred six
zero four three nine sixty six. To order call now
eight hundred six zero four three nine sixty six.
Speaker 2 (01:35:27):
Hello.
Speaker 12 (01:35:28):
I'm Mike Lindell and I'm excited to announce my new product,
my coffee. I get products all the time from entrepreneurs
for my new platform, mystore dot Com, and when I
tried my coffee for the first time, I was blown away.
Speaker 13 (01:35:42):
It is the best coffee I've ever had in my life.
Speaker 12 (01:35:45):
I spent the last four months doing my due diligence,
and this family owned business micromanages every step from the
fields to the cup to ensure the best quality coffee
you're ever going to have.
Speaker 13 (01:35:57):
It starts with the beans that are grown in Honduras.
Speaker 12 (01:36:00):
Honduras's volcanic soil and humid climate make the perfect growing
conditions for coffee plants, which produce the best beans ever.
Then each batch is tested for its aroma, tastes, and
other aspects to meet the highest standards in the coffee industry.
And after that it goes into production, which is all
done right here in the USA.
Speaker 13 (01:36:21):
It's like you're getting that small batch.
Speaker 12 (01:36:23):
Specialty coffee, but delivered right to your front door. So
go to mystore dot com or call the number on
your screen, use the promo code, and you'll get your
very own my Coffee for twenty five percent off. You
guys all know that I've traveled the country for the
past year and a half. I've stayed in hundreds of hotels.
I've tried every coffee out there. Well, some of the
coffees have that terrible after taste, some that leave me
(01:36:46):
jittery or I get an upset stomach. Well, my coffee
is different. It's the richest, smoothest, best coffee I've ever had.
My coffee comes in a variety of flavors. You get
them ground or whole bean. Plus, it's certified organic and
non GMO. I guarantee it'll be the best coffee you've
ever had.
Speaker 13 (01:37:05):
So go to.
Speaker 12 (01:37:06):
Mystore dot com or call the number on your screen,
use your promo code, and you'll get my Coffee per
twenty five percent off. Can I'm gonna give you deep
discounts on all my store products. That's mystore dot Com.
It's my new platform for USA entrepreneurs. Please order now.
Speaker 7 (01:37:23):
To order, please call eight hundred seven nine seven seven
eight nine three and please use the promotion code a
u n TV. To order, please call eight hundred seven
nine seven seven eight nine three and please use the
promotion code a u n TV. To order, Please call
eight hundred seven nine seven seven eight nine three and
(01:37:46):
please use the promotion code a u n TV. To order,
Please call eight hundred seven nine seven seven eight nine
three and please use the promotion code a u n TV.
Speaker 1 (01:37:58):
Welcome back, Welcome back to d server to commandos with
George Landerth and Amric Trader, coming to you from the
my Pillar Studios and my Store studios of the au
n TV network. And the way you can connect with
us is with her voice text hotline four one five
eight five four two six seven seven four one five
(01:38:19):
eight five four two six seven seven. As soon as
the answers, you can leave a voice message, you can
leave a text message. Rest assure I personally personally read.
Speaker 3 (01:38:31):
Each and every comment.
Speaker 1 (01:38:33):
I answer most of them, sometimes even call people back
and thanks them for calling her voice text hotline, or
you can email us at au n TV at yahoo
dot com, au n TV at yahoo dot com. That's
a little different than our website address. Our website address
(01:38:54):
is au n dash tv dot com. Au N dash
TV dot com. That's where you can connect with the
au n TV twenty four hour days, seven day weeks
stream on Rumble. But once again, our email address is
a u n TV at yahoo dot com without that
little dash in there. Oh, George Mondani's in the news again.
Speaker 3 (01:39:17):
You know, we just had this big snowstorm.
Speaker 14 (01:39:21):
That uh.
Speaker 1 (01:39:23):
Shot through the Least coast. About a week ago. Mondani
put out a call for people to shovel the snow,
and a very interesting George. To get a volunteer job
to shovel the snow, you had to have two forms
of ID plus the socials here the guard George, you
(01:39:45):
need that to volunteer to shovel snow in New York.
Speaker 3 (01:39:48):
But not to vote. Very interesting, I thought.
Speaker 2 (01:39:52):
Yeah, no, you're right, that's kind of interesting. You apparently,
if you want to shovel snow, you got to produce
your wadership.
Speaker 1 (01:40:00):
He's continue to get worse with this guy. I mean,
it's amazing. He's not even been in office for a
month and already a lot of people up there are
having buyer's remorse with this guy.
Speaker 2 (01:40:12):
Oh yeah, well, it's interesting. He of course, issued a
statement recently taking Iran's side referring to the US's attack
as illegal war of aggression and claiming that Americans don't
want this. So apparently he's pro terrorist, he's pro Ayatolla Kamane,
et cetera. It's it's very interesting, so very kind of
(01:40:35):
nutty stuff. And then on top of that, there were Americans,
Iranian Americans in New York celebrating Ayatola Camane's demise, and
yet he's of course opposed to their says they're wrong,
and some people, for example, many people that live in
New York could point out they don't feel safe there
(01:40:55):
because he sympathizes with the regime that has killed more
than thirty thousand unarmed in less than twenty four hours,
and he's been there for thirty seven years, killing hundreds
of thousands of people across the globe. And so somehow
he's on that guy side. That just tells you what
a piece of garbage he is. And so it's just
(01:41:17):
very interesting to see because now we know, like we're
talking about earlier, there's sleeper cells, you know, Tara, sleeper
cells that could snuck across the border and that he
let in and so forth, and so it's just interesting
because if you're a New Yorker, you probably have to
be kind of nervous because you're wondering this guy is
going to be on the side of the terrorists. So
(01:41:39):
some guy shows up and starts shooting people with a
T shirt that says property of Allah, Mondami's going to
be like, oh, yeah, he's a good guy. And so
it's just very interesting to see how this breaks out.
But I think he also might contribute to the outcome
and the upcoming election because people like him and to
(01:42:00):
Spanberger ran pretending not to be left wing crazy cooks,
and they are demonstrating that they have moved the needle
on what it means to be a left wing crazy
cook because they are just absolutely beyond the pale. They're
not rational, they're not reasonable, they are not intelligent. To
(01:42:21):
be honest, I can guarantee you if we schedule the
debate and you gave me a let me pick a
senior student from a local high school here. I can
guarantee if you give me one week to prepare him
for that debate, he would crush Mundami.
Speaker 3 (01:42:35):
But he's got a great smile.
Speaker 2 (01:42:38):
They're not that bright.
Speaker 3 (01:42:39):
He's got a great smile. You know.
Speaker 1 (01:42:41):
Also, this past week, after that start, a couple of
police officers were assaulted with ice snow in rocks. Mandani
calls it, Oh, it's just a harmless snowball fight among kids.
So now the the police union, he's absolutely lost the
(01:43:02):
police union.
Speaker 3 (01:43:03):
George.
Speaker 2 (01:43:04):
Oh yeah, well there's video that showed that what he
said was a lie. So it was not just a
bunch of kids throwing because if they just spent a
bunch of little kids throwing snowballs at the police kind
of as a joke attack, they're not, for example, putting
rocks in the snowballs and things like that, then yeah,
I could see a mayor or a governor not acting
(01:43:25):
like it's a big, big problem. But this was clearly
an attack. He watched the videos. It was clearly not
kids just you know, throwing a few little snowballs. And
so it's just interesting, you know, I mean, this guy's
a fascist, and it's time for Americans to stop electing
(01:43:46):
fascists and see as a fascist, you know, or socialist,
and the reality is fascist were socialist. An example would
be the fascists in Italy with Mussolini and the fascist
in Germany with Hitler. We're socialists. That's why they called
their parties and like Nazi as the word socialist in
(01:44:07):
his name, and he was a card carrying socialist, and
so was Mussolini. So on some level, we have to
stop supporting socialism and fascism in America. And when I
say we, I don't mean you and me, and I
don't mean other conservatives.
Speaker 3 (01:44:25):
I mean the left, Georgia.
Speaker 1 (01:44:28):
One of the guys that were rested was twenty eight
years old. And by the way, he was released automatically
without charges, George. This time it was snowballs, ice and rocks.
The next time it can be could be much much worse.
And if this does lead to bloodshed, George, it's in
(01:44:48):
this guy's hands. It's absolutely on this guy's hands.
Speaker 3 (01:44:53):
George.
Speaker 1 (01:44:54):
Before we part today, let's talk about your book.
Speaker 2 (01:44:58):
Oh sure, I'm happy to do that. I mean, And
there's a lot to discuss in terms of freedom and opportunity.
And we live in a world where the opportunity to
have freedom is very worthwhile, and so the book that
I wrote was designed to have those discussions. Let freedom
ring again. Can self evident truths save America from for
(01:45:21):
the decline? Self evident truths? Like all men are created
equal and endowed by their creator, not by government, with
inaliable rights. Analiable means they can't be taken away. They
are basically attached to you. Those rights are chained to you.
They cannot be peeled off of you, taken from you.
They are yours and so anyhow, as America approaches it's
(01:45:45):
two hundred and fiftieth anniversary later this year, the celebration
of our nation's founding and it's enduring truths, many of
which were declared in seventeen seventy six, is a very
important time for us as a nation to revisit. How
did we go from being thirteen insignificant colonies to being
the world's economic, military, cultural, and innovative superpower. The answer
(01:46:10):
would be the Constitution did that, And so let Freedom
Ring Again offers a timely and compelling exploration of our
founding principles, the wisdom of our Constitution, and self evident
truths that fueled our nation's rise to greatness. So that's
what the book talks about. One of the things I'm
kind of proud of is that a number of people
(01:46:32):
like Rand Paul and Steven Moore and Grover Norquist and
Horace Cooper said some very nice things about the book,
and I don't want to take up all the time
here to but i'll I'll, for example, give you what
Grover and Norquist wrote about my book. He said, George Landers,
let freeom Ring Again is a celebration of America and
(01:46:54):
an owner's manual that reminds us that it is our
responsibility to keep America and prosperous. And he teaches us
the lessons he has learned in politics that will allow
each of us to do our part to protect our
nation and its future. So that's one thing that was
said about it, and so I hope people will be
(01:47:15):
willing to read it because I think this year would
be a great time for America to refocus itself on
the principles that made it a great nation, a free nation,
a prosperous nation, a secure nation.
Speaker 1 (01:47:28):
George Hunter one percent agree with that. And you know, George,
time flies when you're having fun. This is a two
hundred and fiftieth anniversary ever a country come out of
I remember the bi centennial in nineteen seventy six, being
on the steps of independence all and that seems like yesterday, George.
(01:47:50):
It was fifty years ago. Which means I don't have
to wait a whole lot longer for you and I
to do the show again next but right now we
are out of time. That means if we got to
run and we gotta go, take care Godless, we'll see
it tomorrow. That's going to be on TV and on radio.
Speaker 6 (01:48:30):
I'm excited to announce that we're having our biggest three
and one sale ever with a limited edition product, a
backing stock special, and a closeout deal you won't find
anywhere else. So go to MyPillow dot comer, call the
number on your screen use your promo code to get
our MyPillow bedchies only twenty nine eighty eight, any color,
any style, any size, even kings regular one nineteen ninety
(01:48:53):
eight only twenty nine eighty eight. Once they're gone, they're
gone for good. How about are my They're finally back
in stock, but now for long. Get a six piece
my towel set Regular sixty nine ninety eight now only
thirty nine ninety eight, And for the first time and
the only time ever, get our limited edition premium my pillows.
(01:49:14):
They're made with Giza cotton and designer guss It Queen
seventeen ninety eight. King's only nineteen ninety eight, So go
to my pillow dot comer, call the number on your
screen use your promo code to get the best offers. Ever,
clients are extremely limited, so order now.
Speaker 7 (01:49:30):
To order, please call eight hundred seven ninety seven seven
eight nine three and please use the promotion code a
U n TV. To order, please call eight hundred seven
nine seven seven eight nine three and please use the
promotion code a u NTV. To order, please call eight
hundred seven ninety seven seven eight nine three and please
(01:49:52):
use the promotion code a u n TV. To order,
please call eight hundred seven nine seven seven eight eight
nine three and please use the promotion code a U
n TV.