December 15, 2025 • 11 mins
The quiet celebrity enclave of Brentwood was shattered when the Los Angeles home of Rob Reiner (78) and his wife Michele Reiner (68) became the scene of a brutal double homicide. The couple was discovered dead after suffering horrific lacerations—their throats slit. Initial reports suggest this devastating violence, which occurred on a Sunday afternoon, may have been triggered by an argument inside the home. The investigation immediately zeroed in on someone tragically close: a family member. The shocking discovery was made by one of Rob’s daughters, who told police that a relative had killed her parents. She stressed that this individual "should be a suspect" because they are "dangerous." As the LAPD's Robbery Homicide Division handles the case, the couple’s son, Nick, is reportedly being questioned in connection with these gruesome murders. This podcast explores the exclusive details of the celebrity tragedy where the ultimate betrayal came from within.
Listen
Watch
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Welcome back to the deep dive. When a major, high
profile tragedy like this hits the news cycle, those first
few hours of reporting are just They're absolutely critical.
Speaker 2 (00:12):
They really are. They don't just give you the facts,
they actually build the entire frame for the story.
Speaker 1 (00:16):
Exactly, the frame through which everyone, the public, the media,
and you know, often even the investigators starts to view
what's happening.
Speaker 2 (00:23):
And that initial wave it's like a shortcut to context.
So for you listening to this, understanding what was in
those very first sources is well, it's the key to
being properly informed. Right.
Speaker 1 (00:33):
We aren't here to speculate about what happens next in
an investigation, not at all. No.
Speaker 2 (00:38):
Our job is to matiket you, pull apart and analyze
the verifiable bits of information that were presented in those
initial reports.
Speaker 1 (00:45):
And our focus today is exclusively on that initial coverage
dated December fifteenth, twenty twenty five, about the extremely tragic
deaths of Rob Reiner, who is seventy eight, and his wife,
Michelle Reiner, aged sixty eight, at their home in Los Angeles.
Speaker 2 (00:58):
The sourcing is pretty specific. We're looking primarily at an
exclusive TMZ report.
Speaker 1 (01:03):
Yeah, and that report cites a key detail from People magazine,
which helps cooperate one part of the story. So our
mission here is simple unpack the facts as they were
first reported and explore what those sources were really telling
us from the jump.
Speaker 2 (01:16):
We want to connect the dots for you. Yeah, show
not just what was reported, but why those specific details
were so pivotal in shaping the very first understanding of
this whole tragedy.
Speaker 1 (01:28):
Okay, let's unpack this. So to start, we have to
establish the basics, the scene, the when, and the where, which.
Speaker 2 (01:35):
Right away set the scale of the incident. The location
is pinned down very precisely. The Rainer's home in Brentwood.
Speaker 1 (01:42):
And Brentwood is not just any neighborhood in Los Angeles.
It's highly visible, very high profile.
Speaker 2 (01:47):
Absolutely. And then there's the timeline which was reported with
I mean remarkable speed. The incident reportedly went down Sunday afternoon.
Speaker 1 (01:54):
That's a pretty clear window.
Speaker 2 (01:56):
And defining that window is crucial for law enforcement when
they're starting an investigation like.
Speaker 1 (02:00):
This, and we actually get a really solid piece of
evidence for the police response time. The sources mentioned specific
dispatch audio right from broadcastfight dot Com, which confirms LAPD
was calling for backup to that Brentwood mansion at around
three point thirty pm on that Sunday.
Speaker 2 (02:16):
So that audio immediately puts police activity on the record.
It's not a rumor, it's a fact. They were there
and they were calling for more units.
Speaker 1 (02:24):
What's really fascinating to me, though, is that the reporting
didn't just confirm a police response. It immediately named the
investigating unit.
Speaker 2 (02:32):
The LAPD's Robbery Homicide Division RhD.
Speaker 1 (02:35):
RhD, And that is so much more than just a
local patrol car showing up to check things out.
Speaker 2 (02:40):
It's a world of difference.
Speaker 1 (02:41):
So for anyone listening who might not be familiar with
LAPD's structure, why is the presence of RhD such a
huge signal right at the beginning? What does that tell us?
Speaker 2 (02:50):
It tells us two major things instantly. First, RhD is
they're the elite. They're deployed for the most serious crimes,
especially high profile homicides.
Speaker 1 (03:00):
Involvement means the first officers who walked through that door
saw something that that ruled out anything but a major
crime exactly.
Speaker 2 (03:07):
They saw evidence that immediately contradicted any possibility of you know,
natural causes, an accident, anything like that the scene itself
demanded a top tier investigative unit right away.
Speaker 1 (03:18):
And the second thing.
Speaker 2 (03:19):
The second thing is speed. Because URHD was brought in
so fast, it means the case was flagged as high
priority and it jumped the normal chain of command almost instantly.
Speaker 1 (03:29):
So it bypasses that whole idea of a slow escalation, right.
Speaker 2 (03:32):
The determination was made for moment one. This is an
extremely serious violent crime. That's a critical piece of information
conveyed by.
Speaker 1 (03:40):
Those first reports, and that severity is I mean, it's
just brutally confirmed by the specific, very disturbing details about
the victims that were reported almost at the same time. Yes, unfortunately,
moving on to the description of the violence, the reports are.
They're tragically graphic. They are the source materials state that
Rob and Michelle had their throats slit and that both
of them suffered lacerations consistent with knife wounds, and.
Speaker 2 (04:04):
Those specific details, as horrific as they are, they immediately
established the mechanism of death.
Speaker 1 (04:10):
Right in the chaos of breaking news. That provides a
certain terrible clarity.
Speaker 2 (04:15):
It does it tells the public this wasn't random or accidental.
It was a focused, fatal attack with a blated weapon.
Speaker 1 (04:22):
And the person who discovered this scene. That detail makes
it even more intimate and tragic.
Speaker 2 (04:28):
One of Rob's daughters, she was the one who found
her parents. And you have to remember that initial witness
is so often the most important source of information for investigators.
Their first statements, made under incredible duress and shock, are
what sets the entire investigation in motion.
Speaker 1 (04:44):
What's also really interesting to me is how the sources
didn't just report the violence, they immediately offered a potential
internal context for it, the argument. The argument. The report
speculated that the violence happened, possibly after an argument inside
their Los Angeles home.
Speaker 2 (05:00):
And if you connect that to the bigger picture, including
the word argument even just as speculation is a very
powerful narrative tool that early on, how so well, when
a crime this violent happens, everyone, investigators and the public,
we immediately look for the why, sure the motive. By
suggesting an argument, the story's core becomes a domestic tragedy.
(05:21):
It's contained within an emotional framework we can sort of understand,
rather than say a random external threat like a home invasion.
It points the investigation inward before any suspects or even named.
Speaker 1 (05:32):
It directs everyone's attention toward the internal dynamics of that
family unit precisely, which brings us to the part of
this that I mean, it truly crystallized the entire narrative
from these initial reports, the speculation about a domestic issue,
it shifts, it.
Speaker 2 (05:47):
Shifts to alleged testimony. And that transition is what really
defines this breaking story, because the source material confirms that
the daughter who found the bodies, she immediately gave the
police an alleged identification.
Speaker 1 (06:01):
Here's where it gets really interesting. That pivot from assessing
a crime scene to the immediate identification of a person
of interest. That's where the narrative just explodes.
Speaker 2 (06:10):
It accelerates everything.
Speaker 1 (06:12):
The TMZ report details her communication with the police. It
says she explicitly told police a family member had killed them.
Speaker 2 (06:18):
And just think about that.
Speaker 1 (06:19):
That is no longer speculation about some vague argument. It's
an alleged eyewitness statement that is defining the entire scope
of the search. From minute one.
Speaker 2 (06:28):
It just narrows the focus immediately completely.
Speaker 1 (06:30):
The investigation goes from a broad search for an unknown
killer to a very targeted inquiry inside the rain or
family circle. The police have a starting point, a lead
they have to secure instantly.
Speaker 2 (06:42):
But her alleged statement, it went even further than just identification.
And this is the detail that is genuinely shocking to
see reported so soon after a.
Speaker 1 (06:50):
Crime, the characterization of the suspect.
Speaker 2 (06:52):
Yes, she reportedly gave a specific and damning characterization. The
source material confirmed she told police this family member should
be a suspect because they are dangerous dangerous.
Speaker 1 (07:04):
That is an absolutely explosive detail to leak. It fundamentally
shapes public perception right out of the gate.
Speaker 2 (07:10):
It does more than just name a person, oh much more.
It attaches an emotional, judgmental label dangerous. And it's coming
from a family member, an alleged eyewitness. It preemptively defines
the potential suspect in the public eye as someone learned
to be capable of violence.
Speaker 1 (07:26):
Before they're even formally charged with anything.
Speaker 2 (07:29):
Exactly, you have to consider the significance of that phrase
being leaked and reported. It's not just a piece of evidence.
It's a character statement.
Speaker 1 (07:37):
One that gives immediate context to the extreme violence we
heard about at the scene.
Speaker 2 (07:41):
It creates this sense of a known internal tragedy waiting
to happen. And this statement, according to the sources. It
immediately drove the investigation's direction.
Speaker 1 (07:52):
Leading directly to the naming of a specific individual being questioned.
The report citing that detail from People Special, is that
the couple's son, Nick Reiner, is being questioned in connection
with the murders.
Speaker 2 (08:04):
And there it is the simultaneous reporting of the daughter's
statement naming a dangerous family member and the police focus
on Nick. It connects all the docks for the public instantly.
Speaker 1 (08:15):
It's just incredible how quickly that all came together in
the reporting.
Speaker 2 (08:18):
I mean, what's fascinating here is how fast the investigation
focused on that internal family dynamic. You have the RhD involvement,
the graphic nature of the knife wounds, the mention of an.
Speaker 1 (08:28):
Argument, and then the alleged eyewitness ida and the warning.
Speaker 2 (08:32):
And it all converges to shine this massive spotlight on
one person inside the immediate family, all within the very
first news cycle.
Speaker 1 (08:40):
It really underscores the incredible influence of those first statements
given to police at the scene.
Speaker 2 (08:46):
Absolutely, if RhD is on site and they are immediately
handed and alleged internal lead like that, their entire investigative
process just accelerates exponentially.
Speaker 1 (08:57):
We often talk about how a median narrative evolves over days,
but not here.
Speaker 2 (09:02):
In this case, the foundational narrative, a high profile, violent
internal family tragedy focus on the sun, was basically set
in stone on day one, and it was built entirely
from the details in these first articles.
Speaker 1 (09:12):
So if we were to synthesize all this for the listener,
if we boiled down the core reported facts from this
really challenging source material, what are the absolute key takeaways
from the reports on December fifteenth, you get.
Speaker 2 (09:23):
A very very precise picture. You have rob Aged seventy
eight and Michelle sixty eight. They were victims of extreme
violence throat slit, knife wounds at their home in Brentwood
on a Sunday afternoon. The investigation was immediately escalated to
the top tier, to the Robbery Homicide division.
Speaker 1 (09:41):
And the focus of that investigation, the.
Speaker 2 (09:43):
Central focus was immediately turned inward based on the statement
of one of the couple's daughters. She allegedly named a
family member as the killer. She deemed them dangerous, and
that led directly to their son Nick, being questioned.
Speaker 1 (09:56):
So it's a tragedy that, based on these first reports,
was never framed as a mystery with an unknown intruder.
Speaker 2 (10:02):
Never from the outset. It was framed as an internal
family matter, one seemingly driven by some kind of intense
emotional conflict.
Speaker 1 (10:09):
And the speed with which those specific details, including that
alleged characterization of the suspect, were reported, it just defined
the case for everyone right away.
Speaker 2 (10:18):
It did. And you know, this raised a really important
question for you, the listener, to think about it as
you see these high profile crime stories unfold so quickly.
We saw in the source material how fast the daughter's
alleged statement labeling a family member as dangerous was leaked
and reported alongside the crime itself. So how does the
public's perception of a developing criminal investigation.
Speaker 1 (10:40):
Change when that kind of highly subjective, damning evidence is
made public immediately.
Speaker 2 (10:46):
Exactly when it essentially establishes a public narrative of guilt
and known risk before any formal legal action has even
been taken.
Speaker 1 (10:54):
That initial wave of reporting isn't just reporting facts, it's
building a framework, and that's a framework that is incredibly
difficult to dismantle or even nuance later on. Thank you
for helping us navigate the specifics of this very difficult
source material.
Speaker 2 (11:10):
Of course, it was important to do so with rigor
and with care.
Speaker 1 (11:13):
That concludes our deep dive into the initial reported facts
surrounding the tragic deaths of Rob and Michelle Reiner. We
hope this analytical look at the sources has given you
a clear, structured understanding of the verified facts reported in
that early coverage. We'll see you next time.
Welcome back to the deep dive. When a major, high
profile tragedy like this hits the news cycle, those first
few hours of reporting are just They're absolutely critical.
Speaker 2 (00:12):
They really are. They don't just give you the facts,
they actually build the entire frame for the story.
Speaker 1 (00:16):
Exactly, the frame through which everyone, the public, the media,
and you know, often even the investigators starts to view
what's happening.
Speaker 2 (00:23):
And that initial wave it's like a shortcut to context.
So for you listening to this, understanding what was in
those very first sources is well, it's the key to
being properly informed. Right.
Speaker 1 (00:33):
We aren't here to speculate about what happens next in
an investigation, not at all. No.
Speaker 2 (00:38):
Our job is to matiket you, pull apart and analyze
the verifiable bits of information that were presented in those
initial reports.
Speaker 1 (00:45):
And our focus today is exclusively on that initial coverage
dated December fifteenth, twenty twenty five, about the extremely tragic
deaths of Rob Reiner, who is seventy eight, and his wife,
Michelle Reiner, aged sixty eight, at their home in Los Angeles.
Speaker 2 (00:58):
The sourcing is pretty specific. We're looking primarily at an
exclusive TMZ report.
Speaker 1 (01:03):
Yeah, and that report cites a key detail from People magazine,
which helps cooperate one part of the story. So our
mission here is simple unpack the facts as they were
first reported and explore what those sources were really telling
us from the jump.
Speaker 2 (01:16):
We want to connect the dots for you. Yeah, show
not just what was reported, but why those specific details
were so pivotal in shaping the very first understanding of
this whole tragedy.
Speaker 1 (01:28):
Okay, let's unpack this. So to start, we have to
establish the basics, the scene, the when, and the where, which.
Speaker 2 (01:35):
Right away set the scale of the incident. The location
is pinned down very precisely. The Rainer's home in Brentwood.
Speaker 1 (01:42):
And Brentwood is not just any neighborhood in Los Angeles.
It's highly visible, very high profile.
Speaker 2 (01:47):
Absolutely. And then there's the timeline which was reported with
I mean remarkable speed. The incident reportedly went down Sunday afternoon.
Speaker 1 (01:54):
That's a pretty clear window.
Speaker 2 (01:56):
And defining that window is crucial for law enforcement when
they're starting an investigation like.
Speaker 1 (02:00):
This, and we actually get a really solid piece of
evidence for the police response time. The sources mentioned specific
dispatch audio right from broadcastfight dot Com, which confirms LAPD
was calling for backup to that Brentwood mansion at around
three point thirty pm on that Sunday.
Speaker 2 (02:16):
So that audio immediately puts police activity on the record.
It's not a rumor, it's a fact. They were there
and they were calling for more units.
Speaker 1 (02:24):
What's really fascinating to me, though, is that the reporting
didn't just confirm a police response. It immediately named the
investigating unit.
Speaker 2 (02:32):
The LAPD's Robbery Homicide Division RhD.
Speaker 1 (02:35):
RhD, And that is so much more than just a
local patrol car showing up to check things out.
Speaker 2 (02:40):
It's a world of difference.
Speaker 1 (02:41):
So for anyone listening who might not be familiar with
LAPD's structure, why is the presence of RhD such a
huge signal right at the beginning? What does that tell us?
Speaker 2 (02:50):
It tells us two major things instantly. First, RhD is
they're the elite. They're deployed for the most serious crimes,
especially high profile homicides.
Speaker 1 (03:00):
Involvement means the first officers who walked through that door
saw something that that ruled out anything but a major
crime exactly.
Speaker 2 (03:07):
They saw evidence that immediately contradicted any possibility of you know,
natural causes, an accident, anything like that the scene itself
demanded a top tier investigative unit right away.
Speaker 1 (03:18):
And the second thing.
Speaker 2 (03:19):
The second thing is speed. Because URHD was brought in
so fast, it means the case was flagged as high
priority and it jumped the normal chain of command almost instantly.
Speaker 1 (03:29):
So it bypasses that whole idea of a slow escalation, right.
Speaker 2 (03:32):
The determination was made for moment one. This is an
extremely serious violent crime. That's a critical piece of information
conveyed by.
Speaker 1 (03:40):
Those first reports, and that severity is I mean, it's
just brutally confirmed by the specific, very disturbing details about
the victims that were reported almost at the same time. Yes, unfortunately,
moving on to the description of the violence, the reports are.
They're tragically graphic. They are the source materials state that
Rob and Michelle had their throats slit and that both
of them suffered lacerations consistent with knife wounds, and.
Speaker 2 (04:04):
Those specific details, as horrific as they are, they immediately
established the mechanism of death.
Speaker 1 (04:10):
Right in the chaos of breaking news. That provides a
certain terrible clarity.
Speaker 2 (04:15):
It does it tells the public this wasn't random or accidental.
It was a focused, fatal attack with a blated weapon.
Speaker 1 (04:22):
And the person who discovered this scene. That detail makes
it even more intimate and tragic.
Speaker 2 (04:28):
One of Rob's daughters, she was the one who found
her parents. And you have to remember that initial witness
is so often the most important source of information for investigators.
Their first statements, made under incredible duress and shock, are
what sets the entire investigation in motion.
Speaker 1 (04:44):
What's also really interesting to me is how the sources
didn't just report the violence, they immediately offered a potential
internal context for it, the argument. The argument. The report
speculated that the violence happened, possibly after an argument inside
their Los Angeles home.
Speaker 2 (05:00):
And if you connect that to the bigger picture, including
the word argument even just as speculation is a very
powerful narrative tool that early on, how so well, when
a crime this violent happens, everyone, investigators and the public,
we immediately look for the why, sure the motive. By
suggesting an argument, the story's core becomes a domestic tragedy.
(05:21):
It's contained within an emotional framework we can sort of understand,
rather than say a random external threat like a home invasion.
It points the investigation inward before any suspects or even named.
Speaker 1 (05:32):
It directs everyone's attention toward the internal dynamics of that
family unit precisely, which brings us to the part of
this that I mean, it truly crystallized the entire narrative
from these initial reports, the speculation about a domestic issue,
it shifts, it.
Speaker 2 (05:47):
Shifts to alleged testimony. And that transition is what really
defines this breaking story, because the source material confirms that
the daughter who found the bodies, she immediately gave the
police an alleged identification.
Speaker 1 (06:01):
Here's where it gets really interesting. That pivot from assessing
a crime scene to the immediate identification of a person
of interest. That's where the narrative just explodes.
Speaker 2 (06:10):
It accelerates everything.
Speaker 1 (06:12):
The TMZ report details her communication with the police. It
says she explicitly told police a family member had killed them.
Speaker 2 (06:18):
And just think about that.
Speaker 1 (06:19):
That is no longer speculation about some vague argument. It's
an alleged eyewitness statement that is defining the entire scope
of the search. From minute one.
Speaker 2 (06:28):
It just narrows the focus immediately completely.
Speaker 1 (06:30):
The investigation goes from a broad search for an unknown
killer to a very targeted inquiry inside the rain or
family circle. The police have a starting point, a lead
they have to secure instantly.
Speaker 2 (06:42):
But her alleged statement, it went even further than just identification.
And this is the detail that is genuinely shocking to
see reported so soon after a.
Speaker 1 (06:50):
Crime, the characterization of the suspect.
Speaker 2 (06:52):
Yes, she reportedly gave a specific and damning characterization. The
source material confirmed she told police this family member should
be a suspect because they are dangerous dangerous.
Speaker 1 (07:04):
That is an absolutely explosive detail to leak. It fundamentally
shapes public perception right out of the gate.
Speaker 2 (07:10):
It does more than just name a person, oh much more.
It attaches an emotional, judgmental label dangerous. And it's coming
from a family member, an alleged eyewitness. It preemptively defines
the potential suspect in the public eye as someone learned
to be capable of violence.
Speaker 1 (07:26):
Before they're even formally charged with anything.
Speaker 2 (07:29):
Exactly, you have to consider the significance of that phrase
being leaked and reported. It's not just a piece of evidence.
It's a character statement.
Speaker 1 (07:37):
One that gives immediate context to the extreme violence we
heard about at the scene.
Speaker 2 (07:41):
It creates this sense of a known internal tragedy waiting
to happen. And this statement, according to the sources. It
immediately drove the investigation's direction.
Speaker 1 (07:52):
Leading directly to the naming of a specific individual being questioned.
The report citing that detail from People Special, is that
the couple's son, Nick Reiner, is being questioned in connection
with the murders.
Speaker 2 (08:04):
And there it is the simultaneous reporting of the daughter's
statement naming a dangerous family member and the police focus
on Nick. It connects all the docks for the public instantly.
Speaker 1 (08:15):
It's just incredible how quickly that all came together in
the reporting.
Speaker 2 (08:18):
I mean, what's fascinating here is how fast the investigation
focused on that internal family dynamic. You have the RhD involvement,
the graphic nature of the knife wounds, the mention of an.
Speaker 1 (08:28):
Argument, and then the alleged eyewitness ida and the warning.
Speaker 2 (08:32):
And it all converges to shine this massive spotlight on
one person inside the immediate family, all within the very
first news cycle.
Speaker 1 (08:40):
It really underscores the incredible influence of those first statements
given to police at the scene.
Speaker 2 (08:46):
Absolutely, if RhD is on site and they are immediately
handed and alleged internal lead like that, their entire investigative
process just accelerates exponentially.
Speaker 1 (08:57):
We often talk about how a median narrative evolves over days,
but not here.
Speaker 2 (09:02):
In this case, the foundational narrative, a high profile, violent
internal family tragedy focus on the sun, was basically set
in stone on day one, and it was built entirely
from the details in these first articles.
Speaker 1 (09:12):
So if we were to synthesize all this for the listener,
if we boiled down the core reported facts from this
really challenging source material, what are the absolute key takeaways
from the reports on December fifteenth, you get.
Speaker 2 (09:23):
A very very precise picture. You have rob Aged seventy
eight and Michelle sixty eight. They were victims of extreme
violence throat slit, knife wounds at their home in Brentwood
on a Sunday afternoon. The investigation was immediately escalated to
the top tier, to the Robbery Homicide division.
Speaker 1 (09:41):
And the focus of that investigation, the.
Speaker 2 (09:43):
Central focus was immediately turned inward based on the statement
of one of the couple's daughters. She allegedly named a
family member as the killer. She deemed them dangerous, and
that led directly to their son Nick, being questioned.
Speaker 1 (09:56):
So it's a tragedy that, based on these first reports,
was never framed as a mystery with an unknown intruder.
Speaker 2 (10:02):
Never from the outset. It was framed as an internal
family matter, one seemingly driven by some kind of intense
emotional conflict.
Speaker 1 (10:09):
And the speed with which those specific details, including that
alleged characterization of the suspect, were reported, it just defined
the case for everyone right away.
Speaker 2 (10:18):
It did. And you know, this raised a really important
question for you, the listener, to think about it as
you see these high profile crime stories unfold so quickly.
We saw in the source material how fast the daughter's
alleged statement labeling a family member as dangerous was leaked
and reported alongside the crime itself. So how does the
public's perception of a developing criminal investigation.
Speaker 1 (10:40):
Change when that kind of highly subjective, damning evidence is
made public immediately.
Speaker 2 (10:46):
Exactly when it essentially establishes a public narrative of guilt
and known risk before any formal legal action has even
been taken.
Speaker 1 (10:54):
That initial wave of reporting isn't just reporting facts, it's
building a framework, and that's a framework that is incredibly
difficult to dismantle or even nuance later on. Thank you
for helping us navigate the specifics of this very difficult
source material.
Speaker 2 (11:10):
Of course, it was important to do so with rigor
and with care.
Speaker 1 (11:13):
That concludes our deep dive into the initial reported facts
surrounding the tragic deaths of Rob and Michelle Reiner. We
hope this analytical look at the sources has given you
a clear, structured understanding of the verified facts reported in
that early coverage. We'll see you next time.
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by Audiochuck Media Company.