September 29, 2025 • 15 mins
There has been an update in the Austin Yogurt Shop Murders (episodes #133 - #135 from 2020). In September 2025, authorities announced that they had identified a suspect in the 1991 murders of four teenage girls in Austin, Texas...
If you would like to support this podcast and others, consider heading to https://www.patreon.com/unresolvedpod to become a Patron or Producer
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/unresolved--3266604/support.
If you would like to support this podcast and others, consider heading to https://www.patreon.com/unresolvedpod to become a Patron or Producer
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/unresolved--3266604/support.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:05):
On the night of December sixth, nineteen ninety one, just
before midnight, a patrol officer driving through northwest Austin, Texas
noticed smoke seeping from the roofline of a small frozen
yogurt shop. Fire crews responded quickly, prying open the front
door and pushing back the flames. The fire was small
enough to contain, but what they found at the rear
(00:26):
of the shop froze them where they stood. Fourteenage girls
had been bound, shot, and set on fire. The victims
were seventeen year old Jennifer Harbison and her best friend,
seventeen year old Eliza Thomas, both employees that had been
closing the I can't believe it's yogurt store that night.
Jennifer's younger sister, Sarah, just fifteen, had stopped by to
(00:47):
catch a ride home. Along with her was Sarah's best friend,
thirteen year old Amy Ayers. But should have been an
ordinary Friday night shift turned into a crime that would
shape the reputation of Austin for decades. The brutality of
the crime itself was staggering. The four girls had been
forced to undress and were bound with their own clothing.
Each had been shot in the head. Three bodies were
(01:10):
stacked together, the fourth placed just a few feet away.
The fire was deliberately set in an attempt to erase evidence,
but it only partially did the job. Investigators noted that
the back door had been left unlocked and more than
five hundred dollars was missing from the cash register. The
machine's last entry was a no sale at eleven o
three pm. Arson investigators estimated the fire was set at
(01:33):
around eleven forty two that men who ever carried out
the crime and lingered inside for close to an hour.
Witnesses from the yogurt shop that evening were called unsettling details.
A security professional noticed a fidgety young man in a
green military style jacket near closing. A couple who stopped
for yogurt saw two men seated closest to the register.
(01:53):
None of those leads, however, produced much clarity. In the
wake of the crime, Austin was horrified. Detectives, with help
from the FBI, created a profile suggesting at least two offenders.
They believed the killers were familiar with the neighborhood and
likely had some history with Arson, but the caves quickly
spiraled into a labyrinth. Investigators chased theories about local robberies,
(02:17):
drug connections, even possible cult involvement. The city's brush with
the national Satanic panic of the early nineteen nineties meant
alternative subcultures in Austin suddenly found themselves interrogated. None of
that led to any arrest. What did follow was a
flood of false confessions, more than fifty in all, many
obtained under questionable circumstances. One lead came just eight days
(02:39):
after the crime. Sixteen year old Maurice Pierce was arrested
at the nearby North Cross Mall with a twenty two
caliber pistol in his waistband. He implicated three of his friends,
Robert Springsteen, Michael Scott, and Forrest Welborn. At the time,
investigators dismissed his story, but years later it would return
with enormous consequences. By nineteen ninety nine, nearly a decade later,
(03:03):
the case had stalled, Austin police began circling back to
Maurice Pearce and his friends. They obtained videotaped confessions from
Springsteen and Scott, each blaming the other. Prosecutors charged all
four men with involvement. Forrest Welborne was never indicted, but
both Robert Springsteen and Michael Scott were eventually convicted. Springsteen
(03:24):
received death sentence in two thousand one, Scott life in
prison in two thousand two. Maurice Pearce, cast as the ringleader,
had his charges dismissed in two thousand three, mainly because
the evidence never held up. In two thousand, ETF experts
had concluded that Pierce's revolver was not the murder weapon,
a fact that the Austin police had actually known months earlier.
(03:46):
Questions about interrogation practices also undermined the case. A photograph
from Scott's videotaped confession showed a detective pressing a gun
to his head, a stunning image that eroded all credibility
following their cavictions. Appeals followed the U. S. Supreme Court's
ruling in Crawford v. Washington, which reinforced the right of
defendants to confront their accusers, gutted the way confessions had
(04:10):
been used at trial. Advanced DNA testing in two thousand
and eight and two thousand nine revealed multiple unknown male
contributors from the crime scene, including a partial ystr lineage
profile in DNA beneath Amyre's fingernails, then if it matched
the four young men that had been accused by two
thousand and nine, prosecutors dropped charges and Springsteen and Scott
(04:32):
were freed. Maurice Pierce was killed in an unrelated police
encounter in twenty ten after resisting arrest during a traffic stop.
Forrest Wellborne receded from public life, never publicly addressing his
role in the case. For the families of the four
victims and for Austin, Texas in general, the crime remained
devastatingly unresolved until just recently. In the summer of twenty
(04:58):
twenty five, premiered a four part documentary series titled The
Yogurt Shop Murders. It brought the case back into the
national conversation, revisiting the horror of the crime itself and
the failures of the following investigation. The series did what
many documentaries hope to do. It reignited attention. In the
wake of this documentary series airing, Austin police convened a
(05:20):
multi agency review of the case. Detectives, forensic scientists, and
outside experts began coming through every scrap of retained evidence.
Advances in genetic analysis and ballistics technology meant that the
items two degraded or insignificant in nineteen ninety one could
now be tested again decades later. Police also leaned on
national resources that had matured in the intervening decades, including
(05:44):
the National Integrated Ballistic Information Network or NIBBIN, which links
shillcasings from crimes across the country. The renewed investigation was
methodical rather than sudden. Detectives did not stumble upon a
miraculous new clue. Instead, it was the low accumulation of
evidence genetic, ballistic, geographic, replicated across labs and double checked
(06:06):
against databases, and this time the results converged. The turning
point lay in DNA. When the original case had collapsed
back in two thousand and nine, investigators already had fragments,
including a YSTR lineage profile, and partial profiles that excluded
the Ford defendants. They believed this was an end to
(06:27):
their case, but in reality it should have compelled them
to begin. Anew YSTR, which follows the male line of inheritance,
is valuable for identifying a family line, but cannot pinpoint
a single individual. In their new twenty twenty five review,
laboratories used cutting edge kits designed for degraded or low
quality DNA samples. They re examined retained swabs and cuttings
(06:51):
with contamination controls more rigorous than anything available in the
early nineteen nineties. Replication across independent labs confirmed consistent male
dans DA beneath Amy Ayre's fingernails. The ystr lineage was
redrawn and compared against other cases. A laboratory in South
Carolina reported a correlation between the Austin profile and a
(07:12):
sexual assault and murder committed there in nineteen ninety That
case was already linked to a man named Robert Eugene Brashers.
At the same time, Austin investigators revisited the ballistic evidence.
Among the items collected back in nineteen ninety one was
a three eighty casing found in a drain near the
yogurt shop. Entered into NIBBIN, the National Integrated Ballistic Information Network.
(07:37):
It produced a correlation to a firearm tied to a
homicide just outside of Texas, a case already associated with
Robert Brashers. The DNA and ballistics pointed in the same direction.
Investigators then pursued one to one confirmation Brashers had actually
died back in nineteen ninety nine, but his remains had
previously been exhumed in connection with other cold cases. From
(08:01):
those remains, investigators obtained his DNA and compared it directly
to the Austin samples. The profiles matched the DNA found
under Amy Ayer's fingernails and the YSQR lineage, both aligned
with Brashers. The three eighty ksing linked to a gun
known to have been his. Forensic genealogy and hard lab
(08:21):
science had converged on the same name. Robert Eugene Brashers
was already infamous among cold case investigators. Born in nineteen
fifty eight, he had a long criminal record, stretching across
several states. In nineteen eighty five, he was convicted of
attempted murder in Florida. After his release from custody, his
(08:43):
crimes escalated. He was later implicated in assaults and homicides
in South Carolina, Missouri, and Arkansas. His pattern involved sexual assault,
binding of victims, and occasional efforts to destroy evidence with fire.
Brashers led a double life. Outwardly, he presented as a
husband and father, moving frequently but maintaining the veneer of
(09:05):
stability In secret, he committed predatory violence. He was intelligent, mobile,
and comfortable with weapons. In January nineteen ninety nine, as
police prepared to arrest him in Missouri for unrelated crimes,
he barricaded himself in a motel and died by suicide.
By the time Austin police identified him, he had been
dead for more than twenty five years. What makes him
(09:27):
fit the yogurt shop case is not just the DNA
or the ballistics, but the way these scientific signals aligned
with his established pattern. He was capable of both sexual
assault and lethal violence. He sometimes used fire to destroy evidence.
He moved through the South in the years leading up
to nineteen ninety one, and investigators belief he could have
(09:47):
pausibly been in Austin at the time of the murders.
For the families of the four victims, the identification of
Robert Brasher's as their daughter's potential killer mixed with sorrow.
After thirty four years, there is finally a credible answer
to the question of who, But there will never be
(10:08):
any trial, no cross examination of sentencing. Justice in the
formal sense is impossible when the suspect is already dead.
What remains is the truth supported by science, which can
hopefully finally give families something to hold on to for
the men once convicted of this crime, the identification is vindication.
The DNA exclusions already showed they were not responsible, but
(10:32):
the naming of Brashers proves beyond a shadow of a
doubt that someone else was likely responsible. The prosecutions of
nineteen ninety nine were a devastating mistake, built on cowerst
confessions and flawed investigative logic. That mistake consumed a decade
of two men's lives and left scars that remained today.
The identification of Brashers highlights just how wrong those prosecutions were.
(10:55):
For the case itself, Austin police emphasized that it technically
remains open. While the evidence points squarely at Robert Brascher's,
investigators continue to explore whether anyone else was involved. Earlier
DNA testing had suggested multiple unknown male profiles. Some witnesses
remembered two men in the shop near closing. It remains possible,
(11:17):
though unproven, that Brashers had helped that night. Police say
they are still evaluating that question. Authorities have noted that
Brashers is connected to other crimes the South Carolina. Sexual
assault and murder that produced the ystr correlation is one
of them. The homicide associated with the three eighty shell
casing as another. Reporters have pointed out that his methods
(11:39):
sexual assault, binding, and sometimes arson align with the yogurt
shop murders. While officials are cautious about drawing firm connections
beyond what is confirmed, it is likely that Robert Brascher's
was responsible for multiple unsolved cases across the South. The
yogurt shop murders now fit into a larger pattern of
violence that spanned decades. The identification of Robert Eugene Brashers
(12:10):
as the likely killer of Jennifer and Sarah Harbison, Eliza Thomas,
and Amy Years is as close to a resolution as
this case may ever see. Brashers is dead, having taken
the coward's way out a quarter century ago, so there
will be no trial. The families will never see him
face judgment in a court room. But police and forensic
experts believe that the science is clear. DNA from beneath
(12:33):
Amy Year's fingernails the y stre lineage pointing to his
family line in the ballistics correlation from a three eighty
shellcasing together paint a coherent picture. The case remains technically unsolved,
with investigators considering the possibility of an accomplice, but the
central question of who killed these four girls in Austin
(12:53):
in nineteen ninety one appears to finally have an answer.
The four men, once prosecuted, are now firmly out of
the frame. Their convictions, already vacated, are now publicly and
scientifically discredited. It is impossible to ignore that the key
evidence in this case, the three eighty showcasing in the
DNA beneath Amiare's fingernails, was never hidden. Both were collected
(13:17):
back in nineteen eighty one. They sat in evidence lockers
through trial after trial, through conviction and appeal, through years
when men sat in prison for a crime the biology
did not support the science to analyze this evidence fully
did not exist at the start of the case, But
the decision to rely on cowerced confessions rather than wait
for better tools was human, not technical. Families have waited
(13:41):
thirty four years for this answer, and part of that
weight is owed to choices that investigators made, to leads
they mishandled, and to evidence that was left to gather dust,
that truth should stand alongside the relief of finally having
a name for Austin, a city that lost its sense
of safety that winter night. The answer comes late, but
(14:01):
it still comes. Fire and time tried to obscure the truth,
but not every scrap of evidence. Burned with science and persistence,
they have been brought back in a focus. The murders
may never reach the courtroom resolution that the families once
hoped for, but they no longer rest in the realm
of mystery, while the finer details of the story remain
buried in ash and decades lost. The story of the
(14:24):
Austin yogurt shot murders and the four victims may finally
be at least partially resolved.
On the night of December sixth, nineteen ninety one, just
before midnight, a patrol officer driving through northwest Austin, Texas
noticed smoke seeping from the roofline of a small frozen
yogurt shop. Fire crews responded quickly, prying open the front
door and pushing back the flames. The fire was small
enough to contain, but what they found at the rear
(00:26):
of the shop froze them where they stood. Fourteenage girls
had been bound, shot, and set on fire. The victims
were seventeen year old Jennifer Harbison and her best friend,
seventeen year old Eliza Thomas, both employees that had been
closing the I can't believe it's yogurt store that night.
Jennifer's younger sister, Sarah, just fifteen, had stopped by to
(00:47):
catch a ride home. Along with her was Sarah's best friend,
thirteen year old Amy Ayers. But should have been an
ordinary Friday night shift turned into a crime that would
shape the reputation of Austin for decades. The brutality of
the crime itself was staggering. The four girls had been
forced to undress and were bound with their own clothing.
Each had been shot in the head. Three bodies were
(01:10):
stacked together, the fourth placed just a few feet away.
The fire was deliberately set in an attempt to erase evidence,
but it only partially did the job. Investigators noted that
the back door had been left unlocked and more than
five hundred dollars was missing from the cash register. The
machine's last entry was a no sale at eleven o
three pm. Arson investigators estimated the fire was set at
(01:33):
around eleven forty two that men who ever carried out
the crime and lingered inside for close to an hour.
Witnesses from the yogurt shop that evening were called unsettling details.
A security professional noticed a fidgety young man in a
green military style jacket near closing. A couple who stopped
for yogurt saw two men seated closest to the register.
(01:53):
None of those leads, however, produced much clarity. In the
wake of the crime, Austin was horrified. Detectives, with help
from the FBI, created a profile suggesting at least two offenders.
They believed the killers were familiar with the neighborhood and
likely had some history with Arson, but the caves quickly
spiraled into a labyrinth. Investigators chased theories about local robberies,
(02:17):
drug connections, even possible cult involvement. The city's brush with
the national Satanic panic of the early nineteen nineties meant
alternative subcultures in Austin suddenly found themselves interrogated. None of
that led to any arrest. What did follow was a
flood of false confessions, more than fifty in all, many
obtained under questionable circumstances. One lead came just eight days
(02:39):
after the crime. Sixteen year old Maurice Pierce was arrested
at the nearby North Cross Mall with a twenty two
caliber pistol in his waistband. He implicated three of his friends,
Robert Springsteen, Michael Scott, and Forrest Welborn. At the time,
investigators dismissed his story, but years later it would return
with enormous consequences. By nineteen ninety nine, nearly a decade later,
(03:03):
the case had stalled, Austin police began circling back to
Maurice Pearce and his friends. They obtained videotaped confessions from
Springsteen and Scott, each blaming the other. Prosecutors charged all
four men with involvement. Forrest Welborne was never indicted, but
both Robert Springsteen and Michael Scott were eventually convicted. Springsteen
(03:24):
received death sentence in two thousand one, Scott life in
prison in two thousand two. Maurice Pearce, cast as the ringleader,
had his charges dismissed in two thousand three, mainly because
the evidence never held up. In two thousand, ETF experts
had concluded that Pierce's revolver was not the murder weapon,
a fact that the Austin police had actually known months earlier.
(03:46):
Questions about interrogation practices also undermined the case. A photograph
from Scott's videotaped confession showed a detective pressing a gun
to his head, a stunning image that eroded all credibility
following their cavictions. Appeals followed the U. S. Supreme Court's
ruling in Crawford v. Washington, which reinforced the right of
defendants to confront their accusers, gutted the way confessions had
(04:10):
been used at trial. Advanced DNA testing in two thousand
and eight and two thousand nine revealed multiple unknown male
contributors from the crime scene, including a partial ystr lineage
profile in DNA beneath Amyre's fingernails, then if it matched
the four young men that had been accused by two
thousand and nine, prosecutors dropped charges and Springsteen and Scott
(04:32):
were freed. Maurice Pierce was killed in an unrelated police
encounter in twenty ten after resisting arrest during a traffic stop.
Forrest Wellborne receded from public life, never publicly addressing his
role in the case. For the families of the four
victims and for Austin, Texas in general, the crime remained
devastatingly unresolved until just recently. In the summer of twenty
(04:58):
twenty five, premiered a four part documentary series titled The
Yogurt Shop Murders. It brought the case back into the
national conversation, revisiting the horror of the crime itself and
the failures of the following investigation. The series did what
many documentaries hope to do. It reignited attention. In the
wake of this documentary series airing, Austin police convened a
(05:20):
multi agency review of the case. Detectives, forensic scientists, and
outside experts began coming through every scrap of retained evidence.
Advances in genetic analysis and ballistics technology meant that the
items two degraded or insignificant in nineteen ninety one could
now be tested again decades later. Police also leaned on
national resources that had matured in the intervening decades, including
(05:44):
the National Integrated Ballistic Information Network or NIBBIN, which links
shillcasings from crimes across the country. The renewed investigation was
methodical rather than sudden. Detectives did not stumble upon a
miraculous new clue. Instead, it was the low accumulation of
evidence genetic, ballistic, geographic, replicated across labs and double checked
(06:06):
against databases, and this time the results converged. The turning
point lay in DNA. When the original case had collapsed
back in two thousand and nine, investigators already had fragments,
including a YSTR lineage profile, and partial profiles that excluded
the Ford defendants. They believed this was an end to
(06:27):
their case, but in reality it should have compelled them
to begin. Anew YSTR, which follows the male line of inheritance,
is valuable for identifying a family line, but cannot pinpoint
a single individual. In their new twenty twenty five review,
laboratories used cutting edge kits designed for degraded or low
quality DNA samples. They re examined retained swabs and cuttings
(06:51):
with contamination controls more rigorous than anything available in the
early nineteen nineties. Replication across independent labs confirmed consistent male
dans DA beneath Amy Ayre's fingernails. The ystr lineage was
redrawn and compared against other cases. A laboratory in South
Carolina reported a correlation between the Austin profile and a
(07:12):
sexual assault and murder committed there in nineteen ninety That
case was already linked to a man named Robert Eugene Brashers.
At the same time, Austin investigators revisited the ballistic evidence.
Among the items collected back in nineteen ninety one was
a three eighty casing found in a drain near the
yogurt shop. Entered into NIBBIN, the National Integrated Ballistic Information Network.
(07:37):
It produced a correlation to a firearm tied to a
homicide just outside of Texas, a case already associated with
Robert Brashers. The DNA and ballistics pointed in the same direction.
Investigators then pursued one to one confirmation Brashers had actually
died back in nineteen ninety nine, but his remains had
previously been exhumed in connection with other cold cases. From
(08:01):
those remains, investigators obtained his DNA and compared it directly
to the Austin samples. The profiles matched the DNA found
under Amy Ayer's fingernails and the YSQR lineage, both aligned
with Brashers. The three eighty ksing linked to a gun
known to have been his. Forensic genealogy and hard lab
(08:21):
science had converged on the same name. Robert Eugene Brashers
was already infamous among cold case investigators. Born in nineteen
fifty eight, he had a long criminal record, stretching across
several states. In nineteen eighty five, he was convicted of
attempted murder in Florida. After his release from custody, his
(08:43):
crimes escalated. He was later implicated in assaults and homicides
in South Carolina, Missouri, and Arkansas. His pattern involved sexual assault,
binding of victims, and occasional efforts to destroy evidence with fire.
Brashers led a double life. Outwardly, he presented as a
husband and father, moving frequently but maintaining the veneer of
(09:05):
stability In secret, he committed predatory violence. He was intelligent, mobile,
and comfortable with weapons. In January nineteen ninety nine, as
police prepared to arrest him in Missouri for unrelated crimes,
he barricaded himself in a motel and died by suicide.
By the time Austin police identified him, he had been
dead for more than twenty five years. What makes him
(09:27):
fit the yogurt shop case is not just the DNA
or the ballistics, but the way these scientific signals aligned
with his established pattern. He was capable of both sexual
assault and lethal violence. He sometimes used fire to destroy evidence.
He moved through the South in the years leading up
to nineteen ninety one, and investigators belief he could have
(09:47):
pausibly been in Austin at the time of the murders.
For the families of the four victims, the identification of
Robert Brasher's as their daughter's potential killer mixed with sorrow.
After thirty four years, there is finally a credible answer
to the question of who, But there will never be
(10:08):
any trial, no cross examination of sentencing. Justice in the
formal sense is impossible when the suspect is already dead.
What remains is the truth supported by science, which can
hopefully finally give families something to hold on to for
the men once convicted of this crime, the identification is vindication.
The DNA exclusions already showed they were not responsible, but
(10:32):
the naming of Brashers proves beyond a shadow of a
doubt that someone else was likely responsible. The prosecutions of
nineteen ninety nine were a devastating mistake, built on cowerst
confessions and flawed investigative logic. That mistake consumed a decade
of two men's lives and left scars that remained today.
The identification of Brashers highlights just how wrong those prosecutions were.
(10:55):
For the case itself, Austin police emphasized that it technically
remains open. While the evidence points squarely at Robert Brascher's,
investigators continue to explore whether anyone else was involved. Earlier
DNA testing had suggested multiple unknown male profiles. Some witnesses
remembered two men in the shop near closing. It remains possible,
(11:17):
though unproven, that Brashers had helped that night. Police say
they are still evaluating that question. Authorities have noted that
Brashers is connected to other crimes the South Carolina. Sexual
assault and murder that produced the ystr correlation is one
of them. The homicide associated with the three eighty shell
casing as another. Reporters have pointed out that his methods
(11:39):
sexual assault, binding, and sometimes arson align with the yogurt
shop murders. While officials are cautious about drawing firm connections
beyond what is confirmed, it is likely that Robert Brascher's
was responsible for multiple unsolved cases across the South. The
yogurt shop murders now fit into a larger pattern of
violence that spanned decades. The identification of Robert Eugene Brashers
(12:10):
as the likely killer of Jennifer and Sarah Harbison, Eliza Thomas,
and Amy Years is as close to a resolution as
this case may ever see. Brashers is dead, having taken
the coward's way out a quarter century ago, so there
will be no trial. The families will never see him
face judgment in a court room. But police and forensic
experts believe that the science is clear. DNA from beneath
(12:33):
Amy Year's fingernails the y stre lineage pointing to his
family line in the ballistics correlation from a three eighty
shellcasing together paint a coherent picture. The case remains technically unsolved,
with investigators considering the possibility of an accomplice, but the
central question of who killed these four girls in Austin
(12:53):
in nineteen ninety one appears to finally have an answer.
The four men, once prosecuted, are now firmly out of
the frame. Their convictions, already vacated, are now publicly and
scientifically discredited. It is impossible to ignore that the key
evidence in this case, the three eighty showcasing in the
DNA beneath Amiare's fingernails, was never hidden. Both were collected
(13:17):
back in nineteen eighty one. They sat in evidence lockers
through trial after trial, through conviction and appeal, through years
when men sat in prison for a crime the biology
did not support the science to analyze this evidence fully
did not exist at the start of the case, But
the decision to rely on cowerced confessions rather than wait
for better tools was human, not technical. Families have waited
(13:41):
thirty four years for this answer, and part of that
weight is owed to choices that investigators made, to leads
they mishandled, and to evidence that was left to gather dust,
that truth should stand alongside the relief of finally having
a name for Austin, a city that lost its sense
of safety that winter night. The answer comes late, but
(14:01):
it still comes. Fire and time tried to obscure the truth,
but not every scrap of evidence. Burned with science and persistence,
they have been brought back in a focus. The murders
may never reach the courtroom resolution that the families once
hoped for, but they no longer rest in the realm
of mystery, while the finer details of the story remain
buried in ash and decades lost. The story of the
(14:24):
Austin yogurt shot murders and the four victims may finally
be at least partially resolved.
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Las Culturistas with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang
Ding dong! Join your culture consultants, Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang, on an unforgettable journey into the beating heart of CULTURE. Alongside sizzling special guests, they GET INTO the hottest pop-culture moments of the day and the formative cultural experiences that turned them into Culturistas. Produced by the Big Money Players Network and iHeartRadio.
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.