May 15, 2024 • 31 mins
Michael Cohen has lied so many times it's hard to keep track. It's so bad that he wanted his own reality TV show... well, sadly, he got it! Sean has the latest...
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:01):
All right, thank you Scott Shannon, and thanks to all
of you for being with us. Here is our toll
free telephone number. It's eight hundred and ninety four one
Sean if you want to be a part of the program. Well,
the side show continues. And I don't know what to
what to make of this circus out of New York. Look,
I don't like to be pollyannish about anything. And and
(00:25):
we now have cross examination has been begun, and I'll
give you some details of what's been coming out. One
thing that has come out already is, oh, yeah, he
wants Donald Trump in jail. Oh he wants Donald Trump convicted.
Oh yeah, he but I enjoyed my time working for
Donald Trump. Uh and oh yeah, all these all these materials,
by the way, that they they had that he has
(00:48):
for sale, and his his TikTok video asking for gifts,
et cetera, et cetera. Oh, that's that's all perfectly fine.
No gag oingner on Michael Cohen at all in any
way whatsoever. It's pretty unbelievable because this is now their
star witness. This is the guy Donald Trump stuck at
a New York courtroom as this this political show trial,
(01:11):
sham trial, you know, continues. You have these phantom charges
that have been cooked up by Democrat Alvin Bragg. He
ran on a platform to destroy Donald Trump. You know,
the case in reality was a misdemeanor, you know, in
terms of a document labeling allegation that that never actually
(01:34):
met the smell test in any way shape, matter of
form either just putting that aside. You know, if you
look at the actual statue of the law seventeen one
point fifty two, that would be falsification of a business record.
The one thing they haven't been able to do is
is meet the standard even though the statute of limitations
again ran out. They would need to show that Donald
(01:54):
Trump intended to do so. And by the way, when
Donald Trump pays his lawyer in twenty eighteen or whatever
he paid or twenty seventeen after the election, it was
booked as a legal expense. Really, when you pay your
lawyer who was involved in a legal NDA, and it's
(02:15):
referred to as a legal expense, oh okay, that means
that that wouldn't be necessarily the wrong thing to do,
because actually NDAs like this are actually fairly common, more
common than most people actually know. You know, by the way,
it's not even clear why paying a lawyer or a lump
sum of money for services and costs, including an NDA
(02:36):
agreement that was not a legal expense. They've they've never
met that standard. But then you have this nebulous novel
application of a law that again hasn't even been really
specified to the defense. Although I thought in America that
every defendant would know what they're actually being charge with
(02:57):
as the case now is entering, it's what it's in
its week. You know, they would have an opportunity to
defend themselves, but they don't even know what they're defending
themselves with. But then they would have to, you know,
show that well, the intent was to falsify records with
the intent to break election laws, which the Department of
Justice themselves, even as weaponized as it is under Joe Biden, decided, yeah,
(03:19):
it didn't meet the criteria to bring forward a charge
against Donald Trump, and his predecessor didn't think this met
the standard either. Cy Vance, and in the beginning Alvin
Bragg didn't think so until he was embarrassed by two
prosecutors that very publicly ended up pulling out of the case.
(03:40):
But now he got the star witness in the courtroom,
Donald Trump, not on the campaign trail. You know, the
reality of this case is you got a misdemeanor document
labeling allegation from nearly a what what twenty fifteen sixteen,
twenty sixteen up charge to a felony because of this
unexplained fed election crime that was never prosecuted on the
(04:03):
federal level. And Democrats obviously using the system of justice.
This is what a weaponized doj of Joe Biden looks like.
This is not equal justice under the law, This is
not equal application of our laws. I mean, this is
a travesty of justice. And I'll tell you if you
go back and think about this, when was Bill What
(04:25):
happened the day that Bill Clinton was impeached? Remember his
poll numbers were quite high. If you look at everything
these radical Democrats, radical medium mob people that they have
thrown at Donald J. Trump, starting with three long years
of Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, not one but two impeachments.
(04:49):
You know, stormy, stormy, stormy, and it goes on and
on and on and January sixth, prime time hearings. But
will We're not going to show the American people that
many of you will peacefully, patriotically march so your voices
will be heard. We're not going to hear from the
Capitol Police chief Son who was begging for the National
(05:10):
Guard but was declined every time he asked. They're not
going to hear from the five people in the days
leading up to January sixth. They're not going to hear
from those people that heard Donald Trump approved up to
ten thousand Guard troops in case anything were to happen
that day with large crowds going to the nation's capital. Wow,
that sounds like the move of somebody with an insurrection.
(05:33):
So the American people have gotten hipped to the injustice
around all of this, and now you haven't. And you know,
this ridiculous case brought to and this star witness in
this case is a Trump hater by the name of
Michael Kohne. I mean, you just don't get any more
biased or corrupt in this. This star witness, this barred lawyer,
(05:57):
Trump hater, just admitted on the stand he hates Trump.
Wants him convicted, released from prison. Multi year sentenced, tax evasion,
bank fraud, variety of other crimes. Convicted of lying to
Congress after lying under oath is now facing more allegations
of lying to Congress, recently referred to Biden's weaponized DJ
(06:18):
But well, if Donald Trump became president, I don't think
the statute of limitations have run out. He might have
a lot to lose if Donald Trump's not convicted here
and gets elected president as the forty seventh president of
the United States. A guy all over TikTok looking for gifts,
wearing T shirts showing Donald Trump behind bars, and worse.
(06:39):
You know, even even fake news CNN, they cannot believe
this is happening. We played yesterday for Reid zacari is
saying if his last name wasn't Trump, this case would
not exist. And here's CNN, this guy Elai Hone. Let
me play this for you. You know, just shocked that
the prosecution would ask a jury to believe anything that
(07:01):
Michael Cohen has to say. But they are this is happening.
You know, it's been happening in the last day and
a half.
Speaker 2 (07:06):
Listen, here's what makes Michael Cohen so unusual, so unique.
I've never seen a witness with bigger credibility problems than
Michael Cohen.
Speaker 1 (07:14):
I've definitely seen witnesses.
Speaker 2 (07:15):
I've definitely used witnesses who've done way worse things than
Michael Cohen. But I've never seen a witness who's lied
to Congress, who's lied in court, who's lied to the irs,
who's lied to the Southern District of New York, who
lied to his banker. You know, the entire prosecution witness
team has been lied to by Michael Cohen.
Speaker 1 (07:32):
Oh, Johnath was interrely writing mister Fixit. Michael Cohen bombed
on the stand, offering no new evidence to convict Trump,
and then he pointed out something I had not seen this.
I don't know how I missed it yesterday, but the
New York Post reported, and I had the hard copy.
Maybe I got an earlier edition. But anyway, he wanted
a reality show. It turns out, well, he's got his
(07:52):
reality show right now. And anyway, he you know, you
can see that, I guess on TikTok and the mugs
that he wants to sell and the t shirts that
he's wearing of Donald Trump in jail. But anyway, before
he took the stand, the New York Post has pointed
out by Jonathan Turley, revealed that Cone had been peddling
a reality show called The Fixer, including working with some
(08:14):
guy named Colin Whalen who helped create Joe Exotic. Remember
the Joe Exotic guy tigers lies and cover up. Anyway,
apparently he appeared interested to stay within the genre and anyway,
that that pitch came with a pretty cheesy promo video
where he promised viewers, I am your fixer. Wow, it
(08:35):
sounds like he's trying to benefit all of this. He
tells viewers that he is now that their fix to
their problems because the little guy doesn't usually have access
to people with his particular skill set. He got to
like what Hope Pick set about Cone, and he's constantly
trying to insinuate himself into the campaign, and that he
(08:57):
used to like to call himself mixed or fix it,
but it was only because he first broke it. Anyway,
cross Examination, which just began a short time ago, literally
started off in a pretty combative tone. And anyway, you
know who I am, don't you, Defense Attorney Todd blanche
As Cohn. I do. In fact, on April twenty third,
(09:19):
you went on TTC a TikTok and called me a
crying little sh Adam shift. Didn't you sounds like something
I would say, Con said, prompting some laughter in the
overflow room. Prosecution objected, prompting a conference at the bench,
and then Michael Cone testifying about the fallout for his
(09:40):
work with Donald Trump. But he loved working for Donald Trump.
He said, I lost my law license as a direct
result of this, and he said he wrote his book
Disloyal to pass time in prison, wrote a second book, Revenge,
in which he was described as a forensic dis section
of the prosecution against the critic the president and the
(10:01):
jury then saw a twenty twenty three media post Michael
cones and convicted liar and felon anyway, the prosecutor questioned
Cone about Trump in this particular case. But you know,
the cross goes on right now, and it just has
been that kind of day. And you know, but one
(10:22):
thing that nobody's really, you know, able to get into
is the issue of the law and you know, the intent.
Where's the intent? Donald Trump is said on that tape
that was played in court yesterday that what payment actually
said that what payment referring to all of this, No,
did he intend to break laws? Is there any evidence
(10:44):
of what the intent behind all this was. But the
problem here is, and this is where I'm not Pollyannish,
is I don't think Donald Trump can get a fair
trial in New York or DC or Fulton County, Georgia.
I don't even know if he can get a fair
trial in any part of the at this point. For
crying out loud, but I mean, you got a guy
that is clearly on a mission for personal revenge, as
(11:07):
Mike Johnson, the Speaker of the House, was in the
courtroom today. But you know, here's a guy convicted of lying,
and well, you're telling the truth now or are you
telling the truth? Were you telling the truth? Then? How
does the jury take anything that this guy says, you know,
as as gospel truth? You just can't. And that's the problem.
(11:30):
The problem is with the law. The problem is with
the star witness. I mean, Michael Cohene admits that he
lied on paperwork for Stormy Daniels. You know, he admitted
that he lied on paperwork filing out of the form
describing the first Republic Bank Accounty open for the for
(11:51):
the payments that he made to Stormy Daniels. He made
the payments which by the way, he's a lawyer, is
nothing illegal about an NDA, but lying stuff like that, Yeah,
that's a problem. I'm not sure if they would have
opened it if it stated pay off an adult film
star for a non disclosure agreement. I realized during the process.
(12:11):
I couldn't realize why, you know, it's called resolution consultants. Anyway,
It's perfectly legal to be involved in an NDA. You know,
I don't know what else to say. The Iowa Attorney
General actually had interesting comments. Let the American people decide
who the leader of the free world will be, and
politics like this is no place in the courtroom. Our
(12:33):
friend Leo two point Oho Terrell, you know, has been
pretty amazing. This is not a single shred of evidence
that President Trump participated in a crime, falsified records or
to hide campaign, state or federal laws. Whoopsie Daisy. Anyway,
as you look at all of this, you know, Cone
says he was, you know, knee deep in the cult
(12:56):
of Donald Trump in twenty fifteen under questioning from Blanche.
Oh okay, I guess I was hypnotized and that caused
me to act that way. You know Trump, uh Trump
attorney Todd Blanche trying to establish Cone is very wealthy uh, Well,
before he entered Trump's orbit, he admits his first exhibit
(13:19):
exhibit the t shirt Cone is selling, apparently depicting Trump
behind bars. Lang Pin's Cone on whether he wants to
see Trump convicted is answer, yes, probably, I'd like to
see accountability. He said, It's not for me, it's for
the jury in this case. I'm asking you just to
say yes or no. Do you want to see Trump convicted? Sure?
(13:43):
I mean, he's a real lovable figure, is it a
real credible figure. It's an amazing eclectic group of people,
even on the left, that just see this for what
it is. It really is, Mike Golsmricconnish, the first four
or five weeks into a trial ought to be told
exactly what they're being prosecuted for, and that just hasn't happened.
(14:06):
And all those who are on radio and television, like myself,
act as if you know, if if it is the case,
that we all know that Trump's been put on notice,
But it really isn't true. I mean, you need an
intent to prove a crime. What is the crime that
they're even alleging they have not and cannot tell us
(14:31):
what that is? I mean, But yet you have to
have intent. Just look at the law we're talking about
seventeen fifty fifty two. All right, well, that'd be falsification
of business records. In New York, that'd be a misdemeanor. Well,
the statute of limitations have run out. But of course
the Biden downer judge with a family that appears to
(14:51):
have conflicts, you know, allows all of it in. He
was selected. He wasn't randomly chosen. How convenient our third
highest ranking deal official and Biden's the weaponized Justice department
running this. But you'd have to show intent to commit
a campaign finance violation that has never been proven. Case closed,
(15:12):
not guilty, but don't expect it in New York. I
don't trust it. Dude, dude, dude, Brandy, you're a five girl.
What a great wife you would be. But it's uh,
my life, my love and my lady is the sea.
(15:34):
That's cold, Linda, that is cold hearted? Man?
Speaker 3 (15:38):
Your agree?
Speaker 1 (15:40):
Love is love?
Speaker 3 (15:41):
And what is it? There's a thin line between love
and hate.
Speaker 1 (15:44):
So you know, well, wait a minute, girl, what a
good white wife you would be. But my but my
my life, my love and my lady is the sea.
I'd rather be talking about fish.
Speaker 3 (15:56):
Be found in the bottom of the bottle.
Speaker 1 (15:58):
No he's talking about No, no, no, he's.
Speaker 3 (16:03):
Listen.
Speaker 4 (16:04):
I sang that song for many years, and we contemplated
for a very long time what it meant.
Speaker 1 (16:08):
I bet everybody loved when you play that song, it's
a very.
Speaker 3 (16:11):
Everybody loves that song.
Speaker 4 (16:13):
They love that song, and they loved that song from Oh,
What's that movie with Vince.
Speaker 1 (16:19):
Vaughn Vince, which one Jon Favreau.
Speaker 3 (16:25):
Pick up the pieces? Do you remember that song back
in the day?
Speaker 1 (16:28):
How's it goes? Sing it?
Speaker 3 (16:30):
It's an instrumental.
Speaker 1 (16:34):
As long as long as it's nights, as long as
it's not In all the years I attended bar at weddings,
I worked at a wedding factory for a while, five
days a weekend, Friday night, two Saturday, two Sunday and
itebrate good.
Speaker 3 (16:47):
There was celebrate. There was last Dance a song, so.
Speaker 1 (16:52):
Last Dance, I can I can handle the dancing queen
kill me well. Last Dance was great because that meant
the night was coming to close. And that was Donnas.
Speaker 3 (17:00):
That the longest song. It's so long.
Speaker 1 (17:03):
She had a beautiful voice, you know how she knew
she was a good singer. The great story behind Donna
Summer is she knew because all she knows she was
singing in church and she would look out in the
crab and she didn't understand why everybody was crying. How
cool story is that. I remember reading that.
Speaker 4 (17:21):
I could go both ways, though, Sean, I don't know
if I look out and everybody's crying and be like,
oh my god, how bad is it?
Speaker 3 (17:26):
She's a little No.
Speaker 1 (17:27):
I was crying because it was I mean this, I
mean she she was. She was such a good singer.
Speaker 4 (17:33):
Her voice was ridiculous, her Whitney Houston ridiculous, ridiculous.
Speaker 1 (17:37):
Some people are you know, I don't have that gift
as you know.
Speaker 3 (17:41):
Well, I mean, Dodo, you just did. Were very impressive.
Speaker 1 (17:45):
Dude, Dude, Randy, you're a fine girl. What a what
a good wife you'd be. But my life, my love
and my lady is this sea. Ouch. I'd rather swim
with the fishes and deal with fifty foot swells like
you know, my buddy's over. Uh that work on Dudley
as catch all right, we got more information. Cone is
(18:05):
now saying, uh, they have a short break going on,
but he says his primary residence is still in a
Trump building. You gotta admit that's a little ironic and funny.
He uh, the lawyer grolled calling about his on and
they're going into his comments, vicious, vile postings, rantings and
ratings because he's been told ahead of time and trained
(18:28):
no matter what you do, just you know, act nice
before the jury. Then you get to see the real
Michael Cohen when he's doing his TikTok you know Trump
in jail uh t shirts that he's wearing, the mugs
that he's selling. Uh, I'd like to see Trump, you know,
he said, would you like to see Trump? Sure? Okay,
(18:48):
would you like to see him convicted?
Speaker 4 (18:50):
Yes?
Speaker 1 (18:50):
Sure, I mean it's just he's he's so cocky, it's unreal.
But anyway, at times the questions from Blanche way. For example,
he asked Cone if Anthony Scaramucci visited him in prison,
and he did. I think that Scaramuci just being a
nice guy, if you want to know the truth. But
if the defense was preparing to call a roster of witnesses,
(19:12):
one might speculate he was setting up a question for
later in the trial. But Blanche had already said that
the the I said, it's possible the defense won't call
any witnesses. Get this thing over. But you know, the end,
the issue of whether or not he lied during the
Muller probe came up, and you know, whether or not
he lied to them about the Trump proposal to build
(19:35):
a Trump branded skyscraper in Moscow. Coan said, yes, the
information I gave was not accurate. Trump's attorney says, was
it a lie? I don't know if i'd characterize it
as a lie. It was inaccurate. Was it a lie?
It wasn't a lie. It wasn't truthful. If you want
(19:57):
to call it a lie, we can call it a lie.
I believe the information I gave them is inaccurate, but
you're but you are not testifying it's a lie. Sure,
I'll say it's a lie. Now if you're on a
jury and you got somebody acting like that, which I
think is kind of jackash ass ish. Don't you think
(20:17):
that's kind of jackasses, Linda.
Speaker 3 (20:20):
That's kind of I mean, that's that's his default. I mean,
that's what.
Speaker 1 (20:23):
He's tharking for now. Remember he's in court, this barred lawyer,
released from prison multi year sentences for tax evasion, bank fraud,
convicted of lying to Congress, lying under oath, and now
facing even more allegations of lieing to Congress as a
recent referral by Jordan and Comer. But anyway, at one point,
(20:45):
he says, after he gave his testimony, wasn't able to
talk to Trump anymore. Then the issue of lying came
up again. He is resistant to being called a liar.
If you want to call it a lie, you can,
he said, after first saying the information he gave to
the Special Counsel's office about the Trump Moscow project was inaccurate.
I mean he lied to the Special Council. I mean,
(21:08):
why would anybody on this jury take after this point
what just based on this cross Why would you take
a single word that this man has to say with
any degree of seriousness. Let me let me go through
this again, because I think this is a very very
you know telling. So Trump's attorney is trying to get
(21:30):
him to admit he under oath that he lied during
conversations involving Robert Muller's probe of Trump and his links
to Russia, and Blanche pressing Cone to say that he
lied to them about the Trump Organization's proposal to build
a Trump branded skyscraper in Moscow. Cone replied, Yes, the
(21:50):
information I gave was not accurate. Trump's liar said, was
Trump's lawyer says, was it a lie? Well, I don't
know if I would characterize it as a lie. It
was inaccurate, Okay, was it a lie? It wasn't a lie.
It wasn't truthful. If you want me to call it
a lie, we can call it a lie. I believe
(22:12):
the information I gave them is inaccurate. So you're you're
not testifying it's a lie. Sure, I'll say it's a lie.
I mean, just imagine if you're a witness. I mean,
if you're on the jury and the witness is acting
this way, I mean, I'm sure there's gonna be a
lot of Well, he didn't put a den into Michael Cone,
because Michael Cohne's been prepped over and over again not
(22:33):
to get angry, not to get mad, not to get angry,
not to get mad, not to get rattled. I mean,
we learned that with the stormy Daniel's testimony, that they
spent all this time prepping. Okay, if you're spending time prepping,
who was prepping you? I'd like to know an answer
to that question was, was it the prosecution prepping you?
Were they coaching you? Were they giving you answers in
(22:55):
the as part of the coaching. And it's pretty unbelievable
to me. So the question is if this case hinges
on this. Now here's the downside. We're in New York.
This case is in New York right now. I'm not
in New York. I'm in Florida. But this case is
being tried in New York City. Nine out of ten
people registered Democrats, a jury pull that hates Donald Trump,
(23:21):
and I just do not have confidence he can get
a fair trial. And during jury selection, you know, what,
do you really know about what people are really thinking?
Sometimes you find out after cases, oh a person really
didn't like the person that they were involved in the
case with anyway. So you know, the bottom line is
(23:43):
that you got a guy that has been profiting off
of Donald Trump, wanting him convicted on TikTok, asking for
gifts all over a TV. Couldn't remember whether or not
in fact, the DA said not to go on TV.
I don't know, I don to remember. I'm not sure
I believe that either. I don't believe a word that
comes out of this guy's mouth, and I don't think
(24:06):
anybody on that jury's gonna believe it. However, you know,
then the question that has not been brought up before
the jury is the issue of the law. All of
the tawdry, salacious, sensational, irrelevant, immaterial information from Stormy Daniels, etc.
(24:27):
And David Pecker. I mean, what did this have to
do with the fundamental basics of the law in this case?
Because the law actually should matter, the law should be
relevant in this case, and the law is very, very clear.
Jonathan Turtley put it well, is that I can't imagine
any competent lawyer would not truly be embarrassed by what
(24:49):
happened in the courtroom. Lacone. You know, this should go
down as a day of infamy for the New York
legal system. Alan Dershowitz made similar comp comments about this.
Watching this unfold in the courtroom as a lawyer is
deeply disturbing. They keep on referring to these documents. These
documents don't move the ball. The documents show an NDA
(25:14):
and a payment that's not in dispute, that are not unlawful.
It's not unlawful. As a federal campaign contribution or Andy
McCarthy's saying, Breg knows what he's doing is improper, completely
political in this case, and he said, well, maybe Merchant
Mershawn is having second thoughts. They haven't come close to
(25:35):
proving that fraud took place, and they don't you have
to prove that fraud has taken place. They just have
to prove that it was fraud that included a specific
intent to commit another crime, which we believe is a
federal campaign finance crime, but nobody knows for sure. Is
not a scintilla of evidence that Trump was ever thinking
(25:57):
about federal campaign law. And as somebody that has known
Donald Trump for a long time during this time, I
could tell you I doubt he had any knowledge at
all whatsoever about any of it. Anyway, So we'll see
how this all turns out in them. But that's the
(26:18):
news from Lake Woolbegon. Yes, what would you like to add?
Speaker 3 (26:22):
I would like to add one thing, and I don't
think it can be said enough.
Speaker 4 (26:26):
If you look at Donald Trump as a member of
the community specifically in New York, New York City, new
York State, but New York City, right, and this is.
Speaker 3 (26:34):
A guy who doesn't drink, doesn't smoke.
Speaker 4 (26:37):
You may not like the way he talks, you may
not like, you know, his personal life and some choices
like tweeting, right, I love his tweeting personally, but that's
just me. But putting all that to the side, all
these little things that he does, never been convicted of
a crime, never had any problems, and then in the
last year we got ninety one indictments, no convictions, no evidence,
(27:00):
empty indictments. When we look at the cases of Alvin
Bragg thirty four times over, they all say the same thing.
But the problem is when you talk to democrats and
liberals and you just even begin to have the conversation
about Trump, they're like, oh my god, he's a convict.
He's not a convict. They're trying to create a persona
of him being a convict. There's far more evidence against
like I don't know anybody else than against him, because
(27:23):
when you get into the weeds, that's where you really
get the answers. But the thing is they just want
to tie him up, They want to keep him out
of the public eye. What they're not realizing is, you know,
wild in New Jersey is a perfect example of just
a very small sample of what the rest of the
world is feeling. And it is the world. It's not
the country, it is the world. Everybody is looking at
every Trump everything.
Speaker 1 (27:43):
And this is where I got to go to the polls,
because now the polls actually are impactful here and poles matter.
And when you look at these numbers, they are staggering.
You have Nevada twelve point Donald Trump lead. He didn't
win Nevada twenty six, twenty twenty, he didn't win it.
Arizona seven point lead, Georgia he's now up by ten,
(28:08):
Michigan seven point Trump lead, Pennsylvania three point Trump lead.
This is this isn't you know? Obviously something has happened here.
I say, defy conventional political gravity. Okay, that's my way. Uh,
it's gonna be interesting how this all plays out. Love
(28:29):
all the details, all of this. You know, there was
a CNN analyst that actually said this on top of
Forreids the carrier rightly saying nobody without the name Trump
wouldever it be tried, but ever be charged with this.
And by the way, a city that doesn't even charge
people on tape beating this living Adam Schiff out of cops.
I almost set up by the way, whoops, well.
Speaker 3 (28:50):
Did you hear him?
Speaker 1 (28:51):
Oh h that almost came out anyway. But but that
that happens. How sick is that I've never seen a
witness was lied to Congress, lied to court, lied to
the i R sled to the Southern District of New
York on this. Now we've know lied to by his
own admission. Finally, Robert Muller lied to his banker. The
(29:14):
entire prosecution witness witness team has been lied to by
Michael Cohne. You never see anything like this, and it's happening.
It's pretty unbelievable. What has happened to our country. Let
me tell you something. Every law has its foundation, its
roots on a document that we were brought up to
(29:37):
revere that documentists call our Constitution. Every law comes down
to that document. Why courts determined co equal branches of government,
three branches of government, the judicial branch determines as it's constitutional.
And then you have people that are abusing their power
(30:00):
and they weaponize our system of justice where we don't
have equal application, equal justice under the law. You want
to talk about a case that would be applicable in
terms of what their intent is and as it relates
to breaking the law and in other words, the falsification
(30:20):
of business records. Well, remember Hillary Clinton, it was a
business expense. Remember legal expense? Did she falsify that when
she funneled money to Perkins COOLi, a law firm that
then gave money to and hired Fusion GPS, an op
research firm that then hired Christopher Steele to put together
the lying Russian disinformation dossier? Was that a legal fee?
(30:44):
Did they falsify their business records? Why isn't Hillary Clinton
in trouble same timeframe, because Hillary Clinton's a Democrat. Hillary
Clinton's not a Republican. Hillary Clinton's protected by the Systemald
Trump is persecuted by the system. Don't expect justice in
New York. I'm telling you to expect the worst in
(31:06):
spite of no evidence of any crime. That is a
sad day for our country, our constitution, the rule of law,
equal justice under the law, equal application of our laws,
and that basically you might as well take your constitution
and put it in a shredder. How sad is that
All right, thank you Scott Shannon, and thanks to all
of you for being with us. Here is our toll
free telephone number. It's eight hundred and ninety four one
Sean if you want to be a part of the program. Well,
the side show continues. And I don't know what to
what to make of this circus out of New York. Look,
I don't like to be pollyannish about anything. And and
(00:25):
we now have cross examination has been begun, and I'll
give you some details of what's been coming out. One
thing that has come out already is, oh, yeah, he
wants Donald Trump in jail. Oh he wants Donald Trump convicted.
Oh yeah, he but I enjoyed my time working for
Donald Trump. Uh and oh yeah, all these all these materials,
by the way, that they they had that he has
(00:48):
for sale, and his his TikTok video asking for gifts,
et cetera, et cetera. Oh, that's that's all perfectly fine.
No gag oingner on Michael Cohen at all in any
way whatsoever. It's pretty unbelievable because this is now their
star witness. This is the guy Donald Trump stuck at
a New York courtroom as this this political show trial,
(01:11):
sham trial, you know, continues. You have these phantom charges
that have been cooked up by Democrat Alvin Bragg. He
ran on a platform to destroy Donald Trump. You know,
the case in reality was a misdemeanor, you know, in
terms of a document labeling allegation that that never actually
(01:34):
met the smell test in any way shape, matter of
form either just putting that aside. You know, if you
look at the actual statue of the law seventeen one
point fifty two, that would be falsification of a business record.
The one thing they haven't been able to do is
is meet the standard even though the statute of limitations
again ran out. They would need to show that Donald
(01:54):
Trump intended to do so. And by the way, when
Donald Trump pays his lawyer in twenty eighteen or whatever
he paid or twenty seventeen after the election, it was
booked as a legal expense. Really, when you pay your
lawyer who was involved in a legal NDA, and it's
(02:15):
referred to as a legal expense, oh okay, that means
that that wouldn't be necessarily the wrong thing to do,
because actually NDAs like this are actually fairly common, more
common than most people actually know. You know, by the way,
it's not even clear why paying a lawyer or a lump
sum of money for services and costs, including an NDA
(02:36):
agreement that was not a legal expense. They've they've never
met that standard. But then you have this nebulous novel
application of a law that again hasn't even been really
specified to the defense. Although I thought in America that
every defendant would know what they're actually being charge with
(02:57):
as the case now is entering, it's what it's in
its week. You know, they would have an opportunity to
defend themselves, but they don't even know what they're defending
themselves with. But then they would have to, you know,
show that well, the intent was to falsify records with
the intent to break election laws, which the Department of
Justice themselves, even as weaponized as it is under Joe Biden, decided, yeah,
(03:19):
it didn't meet the criteria to bring forward a charge
against Donald Trump, and his predecessor didn't think this met
the standard either. Cy Vance, and in the beginning Alvin
Bragg didn't think so until he was embarrassed by two
prosecutors that very publicly ended up pulling out of the case.
(03:40):
But now he got the star witness in the courtroom,
Donald Trump, not on the campaign trail. You know, the
reality of this case is you got a misdemeanor document
labeling allegation from nearly a what what twenty fifteen sixteen,
twenty sixteen up charge to a felony because of this
unexplained fed election crime that was never prosecuted on the
(04:03):
federal level. And Democrats obviously using the system of justice.
This is what a weaponized doj of Joe Biden looks like.
This is not equal justice under the law, This is
not equal application of our laws. I mean, this is
a travesty of justice. And I'll tell you if you
go back and think about this, when was Bill What
(04:25):
happened the day that Bill Clinton was impeached? Remember his
poll numbers were quite high. If you look at everything
these radical Democrats, radical medium mob people that they have
thrown at Donald J. Trump, starting with three long years
of Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, not one but two impeachments.
(04:49):
You know, stormy, stormy, stormy, and it goes on and
on and on and January sixth, prime time hearings. But
will We're not going to show the American people that
many of you will peacefully, patriotically march so your voices
will be heard. We're not going to hear from the
Capitol Police chief Son who was begging for the National
(05:10):
Guard but was declined every time he asked. They're not
going to hear from the five people in the days
leading up to January sixth. They're not going to hear
from those people that heard Donald Trump approved up to
ten thousand Guard troops in case anything were to happen
that day with large crowds going to the nation's capital. Wow,
that sounds like the move of somebody with an insurrection.
(05:33):
So the American people have gotten hipped to the injustice
around all of this, and now you haven't. And you know,
this ridiculous case brought to and this star witness in
this case is a Trump hater by the name of
Michael Kohne. I mean, you just don't get any more
biased or corrupt in this. This star witness, this barred lawyer,
(05:57):
Trump hater, just admitted on the stand he hates Trump.
Wants him convicted, released from prison. Multi year sentenced, tax evasion,
bank fraud, variety of other crimes. Convicted of lying to
Congress after lying under oath is now facing more allegations
of lying to Congress, recently referred to Biden's weaponized DJ
(06:18):
But well, if Donald Trump became president, I don't think
the statute of limitations have run out. He might have
a lot to lose if Donald Trump's not convicted here
and gets elected president as the forty seventh president of
the United States. A guy all over TikTok looking for gifts,
wearing T shirts showing Donald Trump behind bars, and worse.
(06:39):
You know, even even fake news CNN, they cannot believe
this is happening. We played yesterday for Reid zacari is
saying if his last name wasn't Trump, this case would
not exist. And here's CNN, this guy Elai Hone. Let
me play this for you. You know, just shocked that
the prosecution would ask a jury to believe anything that
(07:01):
Michael Cohen has to say. But they are this is happening.
You know, it's been happening in the last day and
a half.
Speaker 2 (07:06):
Listen, here's what makes Michael Cohen so unusual, so unique.
I've never seen a witness with bigger credibility problems than
Michael Cohen.
Speaker 1 (07:14):
I've definitely seen witnesses.
Speaker 2 (07:15):
I've definitely used witnesses who've done way worse things than
Michael Cohen. But I've never seen a witness who's lied
to Congress, who's lied in court, who's lied to the irs,
who's lied to the Southern District of New York, who
lied to his banker. You know, the entire prosecution witness
team has been lied to by Michael Cohen.
Speaker 1 (07:32):
Oh, Johnath was interrely writing mister Fixit. Michael Cohen bombed
on the stand, offering no new evidence to convict Trump,
and then he pointed out something I had not seen this.
I don't know how I missed it yesterday, but the
New York Post reported, and I had the hard copy.
Maybe I got an earlier edition. But anyway, he wanted
a reality show. It turns out, well, he's got his
(07:52):
reality show right now. And anyway, he you know, you
can see that, I guess on TikTok and the mugs
that he wants to sell and the t shirts that
he's wearing of Donald Trump in jail. But anyway, before
he took the stand, the New York Post has pointed
out by Jonathan Turley, revealed that Cone had been peddling
a reality show called The Fixer, including working with some
(08:14):
guy named Colin Whalen who helped create Joe Exotic. Remember
the Joe Exotic guy tigers lies and cover up. Anyway,
apparently he appeared interested to stay within the genre and anyway,
that that pitch came with a pretty cheesy promo video
where he promised viewers, I am your fixer. Wow, it
(08:35):
sounds like he's trying to benefit all of this. He
tells viewers that he is now that their fix to
their problems because the little guy doesn't usually have access
to people with his particular skill set. He got to
like what Hope Pick set about Cone, and he's constantly
trying to insinuate himself into the campaign, and that he
(08:57):
used to like to call himself mixed or fix it,
but it was only because he first broke it. Anyway,
cross Examination, which just began a short time ago, literally
started off in a pretty combative tone. And anyway, you
know who I am, don't you, Defense Attorney Todd blanche
As Cohn. I do. In fact, on April twenty third,
(09:19):
you went on TTC a TikTok and called me a
crying little sh Adam shift. Didn't you sounds like something
I would say, Con said, prompting some laughter in the
overflow room. Prosecution objected, prompting a conference at the bench,
and then Michael Cone testifying about the fallout for his
(09:40):
work with Donald Trump. But he loved working for Donald Trump.
He said, I lost my law license as a direct
result of this, and he said he wrote his book
Disloyal to pass time in prison, wrote a second book, Revenge,
in which he was described as a forensic dis section
of the prosecution against the critic the president and the
(10:01):
jury then saw a twenty twenty three media post Michael
cones and convicted liar and felon anyway, the prosecutor questioned
Cone about Trump in this particular case. But you know,
the cross goes on right now, and it just has
been that kind of day. And you know, but one
(10:22):
thing that nobody's really, you know, able to get into
is the issue of the law and you know, the intent.
Where's the intent? Donald Trump is said on that tape
that was played in court yesterday that what payment actually
said that what payment referring to all of this, No,
did he intend to break laws? Is there any evidence
(10:44):
of what the intent behind all this was. But the
problem here is, and this is where I'm not Pollyannish,
is I don't think Donald Trump can get a fair
trial in New York or DC or Fulton County, Georgia.
I don't even know if he can get a fair
trial in any part of the at this point. For
crying out loud, but I mean, you got a guy
that is clearly on a mission for personal revenge, as
(11:07):
Mike Johnson, the Speaker of the House, was in the
courtroom today. But you know, here's a guy convicted of lying,
and well, you're telling the truth now or are you
telling the truth? Were you telling the truth? Then? How
does the jury take anything that this guy says, you know,
as as gospel truth? You just can't. And that's the problem.
(11:30):
The problem is with the law. The problem is with
the star witness. I mean, Michael Cohene admits that he
lied on paperwork for Stormy Daniels. You know, he admitted
that he lied on paperwork filing out of the form
describing the first Republic Bank Accounty open for the for
(11:51):
the payments that he made to Stormy Daniels. He made
the payments which by the way, he's a lawyer, is
nothing illegal about an NDA, but lying stuff like that, Yeah,
that's a problem. I'm not sure if they would have
opened it if it stated pay off an adult film
star for a non disclosure agreement. I realized during the process.
(12:11):
I couldn't realize why, you know, it's called resolution consultants. Anyway,
It's perfectly legal to be involved in an NDA. You know,
I don't know what else to say. The Iowa Attorney
General actually had interesting comments. Let the American people decide
who the leader of the free world will be, and
politics like this is no place in the courtroom. Our
(12:33):
friend Leo two point Oho Terrell, you know, has been
pretty amazing. This is not a single shred of evidence
that President Trump participated in a crime, falsified records or
to hide campaign, state or federal laws. Whoopsie Daisy. Anyway,
as you look at all of this, you know, Cone
says he was, you know, knee deep in the cult
(12:56):
of Donald Trump in twenty fifteen under questioning from Blanche.
Oh okay, I guess I was hypnotized and that caused
me to act that way. You know Trump, uh Trump
attorney Todd Blanche trying to establish Cone is very wealthy uh, Well,
before he entered Trump's orbit, he admits his first exhibit
(13:19):
exhibit the t shirt Cone is selling, apparently depicting Trump
behind bars. Lang Pin's Cone on whether he wants to
see Trump convicted is answer, yes, probably, I'd like to
see accountability. He said, It's not for me, it's for
the jury in this case. I'm asking you just to
say yes or no. Do you want to see Trump convicted? Sure?
(13:43):
I mean, he's a real lovable figure, is it a
real credible figure. It's an amazing eclectic group of people,
even on the left, that just see this for what
it is. It really is, Mike Golsmricconnish, the first four
or five weeks into a trial ought to be told
exactly what they're being prosecuted for, and that just hasn't happened.
(14:06):
And all those who are on radio and television, like myself,
act as if you know, if if it is the case,
that we all know that Trump's been put on notice,
But it really isn't true. I mean, you need an
intent to prove a crime. What is the crime that
they're even alleging they have not and cannot tell us
(14:31):
what that is? I mean, But yet you have to
have intent. Just look at the law we're talking about
seventeen fifty fifty two. All right, well, that'd be falsification
of business records. In New York, that'd be a misdemeanor. Well,
the statute of limitations have run out. But of course
the Biden downer judge with a family that appears to
(14:51):
have conflicts, you know, allows all of it in. He
was selected. He wasn't randomly chosen. How convenient our third
highest ranking deal official and Biden's the weaponized Justice department
running this. But you'd have to show intent to commit
a campaign finance violation that has never been proven. Case closed,
(15:12):
not guilty, but don't expect it in New York. I
don't trust it. Dude, dude, dude, Brandy, you're a five girl.
What a great wife you would be. But it's uh,
my life, my love and my lady is the sea.
(15:34):
That's cold, Linda, that is cold hearted? Man?
Speaker 3 (15:38):
Your agree?
Speaker 1 (15:40):
Love is love?
Speaker 3 (15:41):
And what is it? There's a thin line between love
and hate.
Speaker 1 (15:44):
So you know, well, wait a minute, girl, what a
good white wife you would be. But my but my
my life, my love and my lady is the sea.
I'd rather be talking about fish.
Speaker 3 (15:56):
Be found in the bottom of the bottle.
Speaker 1 (15:58):
No he's talking about No, no, no, he's.
Speaker 3 (16:03):
Listen.
Speaker 4 (16:04):
I sang that song for many years, and we contemplated
for a very long time what it meant.
Speaker 1 (16:08):
I bet everybody loved when you play that song, it's
a very.
Speaker 3 (16:11):
Everybody loves that song.
Speaker 4 (16:13):
They love that song, and they loved that song from Oh,
What's that movie with Vince.
Speaker 1 (16:19):
Vaughn Vince, which one Jon Favreau.
Speaker 3 (16:25):
Pick up the pieces? Do you remember that song back
in the day?
Speaker 1 (16:28):
How's it goes? Sing it?
Speaker 3 (16:30):
It's an instrumental.
Speaker 1 (16:34):
As long as long as it's nights, as long as
it's not In all the years I attended bar at weddings,
I worked at a wedding factory for a while, five
days a weekend, Friday night, two Saturday, two Sunday and
itebrate good.
Speaker 3 (16:47):
There was celebrate. There was last Dance a song, so.
Speaker 1 (16:52):
Last Dance, I can I can handle the dancing queen
kill me well. Last Dance was great because that meant
the night was coming to close. And that was Donnas.
Speaker 3 (17:00):
That the longest song. It's so long.
Speaker 1 (17:03):
She had a beautiful voice, you know how she knew
she was a good singer. The great story behind Donna
Summer is she knew because all she knows she was
singing in church and she would look out in the
crab and she didn't understand why everybody was crying. How
cool story is that. I remember reading that.
Speaker 4 (17:21):
I could go both ways, though, Sean, I don't know
if I look out and everybody's crying and be like,
oh my god, how bad is it?
Speaker 3 (17:26):
She's a little No.
Speaker 1 (17:27):
I was crying because it was I mean this, I
mean she she was. She was such a good singer.
Speaker 4 (17:33):
Her voice was ridiculous, her Whitney Houston ridiculous, ridiculous.
Speaker 1 (17:37):
Some people are you know, I don't have that gift
as you know.
Speaker 3 (17:41):
Well, I mean, Dodo, you just did. Were very impressive.
Speaker 1 (17:45):
Dude, Dude, Randy, you're a fine girl. What a what
a good wife you'd be. But my life, my love
and my lady is this sea. Ouch. I'd rather swim
with the fishes and deal with fifty foot swells like
you know, my buddy's over. Uh that work on Dudley
as catch all right, we got more information. Cone is
(18:05):
now saying, uh, they have a short break going on,
but he says his primary residence is still in a
Trump building. You gotta admit that's a little ironic and funny.
He uh, the lawyer grolled calling about his on and
they're going into his comments, vicious, vile postings, rantings and
ratings because he's been told ahead of time and trained
(18:28):
no matter what you do, just you know, act nice
before the jury. Then you get to see the real
Michael Cohen when he's doing his TikTok you know Trump
in jail uh t shirts that he's wearing, the mugs
that he's selling. Uh, I'd like to see Trump, you know,
he said, would you like to see Trump? Sure? Okay,
(18:48):
would you like to see him convicted?
Speaker 4 (18:50):
Yes?
Speaker 1 (18:50):
Sure, I mean it's just he's he's so cocky, it's unreal.
But anyway, at times the questions from Blanche way. For example,
he asked Cone if Anthony Scaramucci visited him in prison,
and he did. I think that Scaramuci just being a
nice guy, if you want to know the truth. But
if the defense was preparing to call a roster of witnesses,
(19:12):
one might speculate he was setting up a question for
later in the trial. But Blanche had already said that
the the I said, it's possible the defense won't call
any witnesses. Get this thing over. But you know, the end,
the issue of whether or not he lied during the
Muller probe came up, and you know, whether or not
he lied to them about the Trump proposal to build
(19:35):
a Trump branded skyscraper in Moscow. Coan said, yes, the
information I gave was not accurate. Trump's attorney says, was
it a lie? I don't know if i'd characterize it
as a lie. It was inaccurate. Was it a lie?
It wasn't a lie. It wasn't truthful. If you want
(19:57):
to call it a lie, we can call it a lie.
I believe the information I gave them is inaccurate, but
you're but you are not testifying it's a lie. Sure,
I'll say it's a lie. Now if you're on a
jury and you got somebody acting like that, which I
think is kind of jackash ass ish. Don't you think
(20:17):
that's kind of jackasses, Linda.
Speaker 3 (20:20):
That's kind of I mean, that's that's his default. I mean,
that's what.
Speaker 1 (20:23):
He's tharking for now. Remember he's in court, this barred lawyer,
released from prison multi year sentences for tax evasion, bank fraud,
convicted of lying to Congress, lying under oath, and now
facing even more allegations of lieing to Congress as a
recent referral by Jordan and Comer. But anyway, at one point,
(20:45):
he says, after he gave his testimony, wasn't able to
talk to Trump anymore. Then the issue of lying came
up again. He is resistant to being called a liar.
If you want to call it a lie, you can,
he said, after first saying the information he gave to
the Special Counsel's office about the Trump Moscow project was inaccurate.
I mean he lied to the Special Council. I mean,
(21:08):
why would anybody on this jury take after this point
what just based on this cross Why would you take
a single word that this man has to say with
any degree of seriousness. Let me let me go through
this again, because I think this is a very very
you know telling. So Trump's attorney is trying to get
(21:30):
him to admit he under oath that he lied during
conversations involving Robert Muller's probe of Trump and his links
to Russia, and Blanche pressing Cone to say that he
lied to them about the Trump Organization's proposal to build
a Trump branded skyscraper in Moscow. Cone replied, Yes, the
(21:50):
information I gave was not accurate. Trump's liar said, was
Trump's lawyer says, was it a lie? Well, I don't
know if I would characterize it as a lie. It
was inaccurate, Okay, was it a lie? It wasn't a lie.
It wasn't truthful. If you want me to call it
a lie, we can call it a lie. I believe
(22:12):
the information I gave them is inaccurate. So you're you're
not testifying it's a lie. Sure, I'll say it's a lie.
I mean, just imagine if you're a witness. I mean,
if you're on the jury and the witness is acting
this way, I mean, I'm sure there's gonna be a
lot of Well, he didn't put a den into Michael Cone,
because Michael Cohne's been prepped over and over again not
(22:33):
to get angry, not to get mad, not to get angry,
not to get mad, not to get rattled. I mean,
we learned that with the stormy Daniel's testimony, that they
spent all this time prepping. Okay, if you're spending time prepping,
who was prepping you? I'd like to know an answer
to that question was, was it the prosecution prepping you?
Were they coaching you? Were they giving you answers in
(22:55):
the as part of the coaching. And it's pretty unbelievable
to me. So the question is if this case hinges
on this. Now here's the downside. We're in New York.
This case is in New York right now. I'm not
in New York. I'm in Florida. But this case is
being tried in New York City. Nine out of ten
people registered Democrats, a jury pull that hates Donald Trump,
(23:21):
and I just do not have confidence he can get
a fair trial. And during jury selection, you know, what,
do you really know about what people are really thinking?
Sometimes you find out after cases, oh a person really
didn't like the person that they were involved in the
case with anyway. So you know, the bottom line is
(23:43):
that you got a guy that has been profiting off
of Donald Trump, wanting him convicted on TikTok, asking for
gifts all over a TV. Couldn't remember whether or not
in fact, the DA said not to go on TV.
I don't know, I don to remember. I'm not sure
I believe that either. I don't believe a word that
comes out of this guy's mouth, and I don't think
(24:06):
anybody on that jury's gonna believe it. However, you know,
then the question that has not been brought up before
the jury is the issue of the law. All of
the tawdry, salacious, sensational, irrelevant, immaterial information from Stormy Daniels, etc.
(24:27):
And David Pecker. I mean, what did this have to
do with the fundamental basics of the law in this case?
Because the law actually should matter, the law should be
relevant in this case, and the law is very, very clear.
Jonathan Turtley put it well, is that I can't imagine
any competent lawyer would not truly be embarrassed by what
(24:49):
happened in the courtroom. Lacone. You know, this should go
down as a day of infamy for the New York
legal system. Alan Dershowitz made similar comp comments about this.
Watching this unfold in the courtroom as a lawyer is
deeply disturbing. They keep on referring to these documents. These
documents don't move the ball. The documents show an NDA
(25:14):
and a payment that's not in dispute, that are not unlawful.
It's not unlawful. As a federal campaign contribution or Andy
McCarthy's saying, Breg knows what he's doing is improper, completely
political in this case, and he said, well, maybe Merchant
Mershawn is having second thoughts. They haven't come close to
(25:35):
proving that fraud took place, and they don't you have
to prove that fraud has taken place. They just have
to prove that it was fraud that included a specific
intent to commit another crime, which we believe is a
federal campaign finance crime, but nobody knows for sure. Is
not a scintilla of evidence that Trump was ever thinking
(25:57):
about federal campaign law. And as somebody that has known
Donald Trump for a long time during this time, I
could tell you I doubt he had any knowledge at
all whatsoever about any of it. Anyway, So we'll see
how this all turns out in them. But that's the
(26:18):
news from Lake Woolbegon. Yes, what would you like to add?
Speaker 3 (26:22):
I would like to add one thing, and I don't
think it can be said enough.
Speaker 4 (26:26):
If you look at Donald Trump as a member of
the community specifically in New York, New York City, new
York State, but New York City, right, and this is.
Speaker 3 (26:34):
A guy who doesn't drink, doesn't smoke.
Speaker 4 (26:37):
You may not like the way he talks, you may
not like, you know, his personal life and some choices
like tweeting, right, I love his tweeting personally, but that's
just me. But putting all that to the side, all
these little things that he does, never been convicted of
a crime, never had any problems, and then in the
last year we got ninety one indictments, no convictions, no evidence,
(27:00):
empty indictments. When we look at the cases of Alvin
Bragg thirty four times over, they all say the same thing.
But the problem is when you talk to democrats and
liberals and you just even begin to have the conversation
about Trump, they're like, oh my god, he's a convict.
He's not a convict. They're trying to create a persona
of him being a convict. There's far more evidence against
like I don't know anybody else than against him, because
(27:23):
when you get into the weeds, that's where you really
get the answers. But the thing is they just want
to tie him up, They want to keep him out
of the public eye. What they're not realizing is, you know,
wild in New Jersey is a perfect example of just
a very small sample of what the rest of the
world is feeling. And it is the world. It's not
the country, it is the world. Everybody is looking at
every Trump everything.
Speaker 1 (27:43):
And this is where I got to go to the polls,
because now the polls actually are impactful here and poles matter.
And when you look at these numbers, they are staggering.
You have Nevada twelve point Donald Trump lead. He didn't
win Nevada twenty six, twenty twenty, he didn't win it.
Arizona seven point lead, Georgia he's now up by ten,
(28:08):
Michigan seven point Trump lead, Pennsylvania three point Trump lead.
This is this isn't you know? Obviously something has happened here.
I say, defy conventional political gravity. Okay, that's my way. Uh,
it's gonna be interesting how this all plays out. Love
(28:29):
all the details, all of this. You know, there was
a CNN analyst that actually said this on top of
Forreids the carrier rightly saying nobody without the name Trump
wouldever it be tried, but ever be charged with this.
And by the way, a city that doesn't even charge
people on tape beating this living Adam Schiff out of cops.
I almost set up by the way, whoops, well.
Speaker 3 (28:50):
Did you hear him?
Speaker 1 (28:51):
Oh h that almost came out anyway. But but that
that happens. How sick is that I've never seen a
witness was lied to Congress, lied to court, lied to
the i R sled to the Southern District of New
York on this. Now we've know lied to by his
own admission. Finally, Robert Muller lied to his banker. The
(29:14):
entire prosecution witness witness team has been lied to by
Michael Cohne. You never see anything like this, and it's happening.
It's pretty unbelievable. What has happened to our country. Let
me tell you something. Every law has its foundation, its
roots on a document that we were brought up to
(29:37):
revere that documentists call our Constitution. Every law comes down
to that document. Why courts determined co equal branches of government,
three branches of government, the judicial branch determines as it's constitutional.
And then you have people that are abusing their power
(30:00):
and they weaponize our system of justice where we don't
have equal application, equal justice under the law. You want
to talk about a case that would be applicable in
terms of what their intent is and as it relates
to breaking the law and in other words, the falsification
(30:20):
of business records. Well, remember Hillary Clinton, it was a
business expense. Remember legal expense? Did she falsify that when
she funneled money to Perkins COOLi, a law firm that
then gave money to and hired Fusion GPS, an op
research firm that then hired Christopher Steele to put together
the lying Russian disinformation dossier? Was that a legal fee?
(30:44):
Did they falsify their business records? Why isn't Hillary Clinton
in trouble same timeframe, because Hillary Clinton's a Democrat. Hillary
Clinton's not a Republican. Hillary Clinton's protected by the Systemald
Trump is persecuted by the system. Don't expect justice in
New York. I'm telling you to expect the worst in
(31:06):
spite of no evidence of any crime. That is a
sad day for our country, our constitution, the rule of law,
equal justice under the law, equal application of our laws,
and that basically you might as well take your constitution
and put it in a shredder. How sad is that
The Sean Hannity Show News
Popular Podcasts
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations.
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
The Nikki Glaser Podcast
Every week comedian and infamous roaster Nikki Glaser provides a fun, fast-paced, and brutally honest look into current pop-culture and her own personal life.