December 2, 2025 • 53 mins
Hosts Joe Maddon and Tom Verducci explore players available in free agency and some of the early signings we've seen. Tom notes reliever Devin Williams leaving the Yankees to sign with the Mets. The MLB Hall of Fame's 2026 Contemporary Baseball Era ballot features 8 players. Which three would Joe choose for the Hall? Plus, Joe gives his thoughts on the Rays hiring Brandon Hyde.
The Book of Joe Podcast is a production of iHeart Radio.
For more info on Joe's event in Tampa, Fl. please check out:
#fsr
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:04):
The Book of Joe Podcast is a production of iHeartRadio.
Hey Aaron, Welcome back.
Speaker 2 (00:16):
To the Book of Joe Podcast with Me, Tom Berducci
and of course Joe Madden and Joe. It's it's that
time of year, this month of December. There are a
lot of people who find out what they're worth. So
I want to give you a choice here. It's not
quite let's make a deal because I only have two doors,
but I want you to pick either door number one
or door number two, which path we're going to go
(00:36):
down at least to start this edition of the Book
of Joe.
Speaker 1 (00:41):
What's your choice?
Speaker 3 (00:42):
My choice.
Speaker 2 (00:43):
I'm not giving you a subjects you know, they don't
give you any hints, and let's make a deal.
Speaker 4 (00:46):
Okay, okay, okay, I'll go Dylan Cees.
Speaker 1 (00:52):
All right, that was door number one.
Speaker 2 (00:53):
So you're gonna be the door where we figure out
what your value is this time of year, we're talking
obviously about free agency. At door number two is we'll
get to a Hall of Fame vote coming up another
way to establish value perpetually for that matter. But you
mentioned Dylan Cees. I found this one really fascinating. We're
(01:16):
starting to see some free agents drop and it's all
about the pitching market. So far, we'll talk about Ryan
Helsley and Devin Williams, a couple of late ending guys.
But Dylan Ceese is fascinating to me, Joe, and you've
seen this guy. He's got excellent stuff. He's a guy
who throws ninety seven ninety eight.
Speaker 1 (01:32):
He actually spends the baseball more than anybody else in
terms of starting pitchers. And he's signing with Toronto.
Speaker 2 (01:39):
And you have to really like the Toronto rotation at
this point now with Dylan Ceas and a whole year
of Trey y Savage and Kevin Gosman and on and on.
Speaker 1 (01:48):
A ghost, tell me what you thought of this signing.
Speaker 2 (01:51):
You have to like the fit with Toronto building on
the momentum of winning an American League pennant.
Speaker 1 (01:57):
But Dylan Cees.
Speaker 2 (01:58):
What is it about Dylan Cees where the results don't
match the st else?
Speaker 3 (02:05):
Right?
Speaker 4 (02:05):
I mean you look at his overall record as a
major league pitcher and then you look at the number
of dollars he's getting paid to play. It's incredible, right,
I would My first thought was any old timers that's
still out there that kick butt in their in their
time frame, looks at their record.
Speaker 3 (02:23):
And go wow, and again just wins and losses.
Speaker 4 (02:28):
And you look at how the game is perceived today,
where you know, wins by starting pitchers aren't as valued
as they once had been. Or although I think to
the picture himself, it still is. However, it's uh the
way it's viewed. Uh, financially it's not the same.
Speaker 3 (02:45):
You're right.
Speaker 4 (02:45):
When I watched this guy, you wonder how I don't
know him. I never got to know him with the
Cubs before he was straighted. But just watching this might
be dumb, but how easily the manager could take the
ball away from him when he takes him out of
the game.
Speaker 3 (02:59):
It just seems it's almost like.
Speaker 4 (03:01):
He's been trained to to fit into that five inning
guy or six inning guy. Maybe throw X number of pitches,
throw as hard as you can. Like I said, it's
been the ball. Well, I just don't know where the
mental side of his game lies. That's it, and I
might be completely wrong, but that's that's just the perception
I get from watching. On the other hand, I think
(03:24):
the Blue Jays that's a great sign for the blue Jays.
I agree physically, he gives him an outstanding staff that
ballpark there, I don't know how it's playing now, meaning
Toronto Ballpark, because I remember when I was still working there,
the ball did fly and I and I think this
guy can be you know, he can make mistakes in
(03:44):
that ballpark that can't hurt him.
Speaker 3 (03:47):
So this is like curious.
Speaker 4 (03:48):
Yes, if I'm a team with all whatever, all these
different potential playoff teams next year, I would absolutely have
been in the game with with Dylan Cees.
Speaker 3 (03:58):
But I'd want to know more about him.
Speaker 4 (03:59):
I just don't know enough, because that's my perception from
watching from a distance.
Speaker 2 (04:04):
Yeah, I would say, first of all, when we look
at his era and it's not very good, right, coming
off a four point five to five season, and by
the way, there is some deferred money in this contract,
So to me, he's about a twenty six million dollars
a year pitcher, and he really equates to Carlos Verdam
the twenty seven and twenty six million for the Yankees.
Speaker 1 (04:25):
The same kind of pitcher, high strike out rate.
Speaker 2 (04:29):
He gets into bouts of inconsistencies because he just purely
does not throw enough strikes, and to me, he spins
the ball way too much.
Speaker 1 (04:35):
He's got to change that. This guy who throws the
ball spins the ball fifty three percent of the time.
Speaker 2 (04:40):
Major League gaverage is thirty one percent. He's essentially a
two pitch guy. And to me, when you throw that
much spin, hitters take it. There's nobody goes up to
the plate, very few who sit on spin. And if
Dylan Cez is gonna start you off with spin, which
he does a lot of times, and think he's gonna
throw his two strike slider and get a swing, it's
not happening. So he's consistently falling behind. When you look
(05:04):
at Dylan Sees' numbers, he does not do the fundamentals
of pitching well.
Speaker 1 (05:09):
He is below average and throwing first pitch strikes. He's
below average and filling the zone, which is ridiculous when
you have the kind of arm that he has. And
he's below average at hitting the edges of the plate
as well. So he's pitching from behind a lot.
Speaker 2 (05:25):
His ops allowed with no strikes on the batter and
he gets too many of these counts. Is over twelve hundred,
the third worst in baseball. He's in a class with
guys like Bailly Ober and JP Sears. That's not an
elite pitcher, elite stuff. Absolutely, he's a swing and miss guy.
And you know, Joe teams are looking at free agents,
they're not looking at era. They want to look at
(05:49):
does he get swing and miss?
Speaker 1 (05:50):
And he does.
Speaker 2 (05:51):
And they look at mechanics and durability injury history, and
this guy's been durable. He's taking the ball thirty two
or thirty three times five consecutive seasons.
Speaker 1 (06:02):
So there's a lot there to unpack. If you're the
Toronto Blue Jays and you're Pete Walker, the pitching coach,
and I've talked to him about this, he's.
Speaker 2 (06:09):
Going to Robbie Ray him. That's another good comp to
Dylan Ceas. Robbie Ray couldn't throw a strike, great stuff,
high strikeout guy getting more than eleven punchouts per nine.
Speaker 1 (06:18):
They got him in the zone.
Speaker 2 (06:20):
That's what the Toronto Blue Jays have to do with
Dylan Cees.
Speaker 1 (06:23):
I call it the ninety four percent solution.
Speaker 2 (06:27):
If you throw a pitch in the strike zone first pitch,
the result is going to be positive ninety four percent
of the time. I'm talking about a swing, a miss,
a called strike, or a foul ball. Why wouldn't you
do that. That's what the Tampa Bay Rays do. They
sit in the middle of the zone with the catcher.
Fill it up in the middle of the zone at
(06:47):
least aim at, you know, in the strike zone first pitch,
and then you expand outward.
Speaker 1 (06:52):
That's what Dylan Cees has to do. You can't be
throwing first pitch sliders on the edge of the plate
or off the edge of the plate and falling behind.
Speaker 2 (06:59):
One more issue here, he was tipping his pitches and
he figured something out later in the season and was better.
But this is what happens in today's game essentially, especially
when you're essentially a two pitch pitcher, which Cease is.
So there's a lot going on there for the Blue
Jays to say, you know what, with a mix of
pitches that we kind of revamp, cure the tipping problem.
(07:23):
This guy's going to be a dominant pitcher for us.
I can see why there's, you know, a ceiling for
Dylan Cease that he has not reached yet. So Mike
comp Sir Carlos Redon, who became a much better picture
with the Yankees by adding pitches, and I think Cease
to me has to add a two seamer.
Speaker 1 (07:40):
And getting in the strike someone more.
Speaker 2 (07:42):
There's the same story with Robbie Ray and with Matthew
Boyd another guy, very similar pictures, all three of them
high strikeout guys, high era, find another pitch, get in
the strike zone.
Speaker 3 (07:53):
That's an awesome breakdown.
Speaker 4 (07:54):
Actually, I mean, if you were you put your scouting
hat on right there, if you're sitting in a meeting
and you throw out through all of that out at me,
you're actually building a very convincing case to item. Because
what you're talking about there is that I could hear
all the Blue Jay staff, with the pitching coaches, front office, whomever,
analytical group, we could fix him.
Speaker 3 (08:13):
This is very doable.
Speaker 4 (08:14):
And having a history of having done in the past,
all the things you're speaking about there have a believable
component to them that they can get better. First of all,
when you talk about the breaking ball over the fastball usage,
immediately my mind goes to wherever he started or wherever
got into his head first major League wise convinced him
(08:36):
how good his breaking ball was and how often he
had to throw it. Now, I mean that happens in
analytical departments too. That can be part of it. I
don't know that, but that sounds like it may have
been that. It also sounds like for whatever reason, he's
not proud of his fastball, and maybe maybe you have
this too when it comes to throwing, Like if he
has command issues, does he fastball command it just seems
(08:59):
to be lacking. Does he actually feel like he could
throw his breaking ball for strike more consistently and he
can break the ball. And then also you kind of
alluded to, but there's two options on a break and
ball that's really good to have become a strike, one
that it's called the other one that it's chased. So
just like it's not like there's a whole lot of
stuff going on here that needs to be simplified. And again,
(09:21):
I think it is a good sign. I think it's
an interesting sign. Is actual baseball numbers outside of swing
and miss do not really, especially in today's game, reflect
why it should be paid that much money. But in
this world of we can fix them, and that happens, man,
and you know, we all believe we can fix somebody.
(09:42):
Every organization feels as though they have the secret sauce
to get a really impressive talent who's been under achieving,
and all of a sudden make him achieved to the
level that everybody deems is potential. So that's what's going
on here. I think they see it. They believe they're
better than others at doing these kind of things, and
(10:03):
I think that that's part of the reason why they
feel as though this is a good bet for them.
So it is a good bet on so many different reasons.
I don't know the guy, like I said, but beyond
fixing this mechanical breakdown or physical breakdown regarding percentage of
pitcherstone and how often and strike one and the importance
of all that, I'm sure he's been.
Speaker 3 (10:21):
Told that before. They think they can fix.
Speaker 4 (10:24):
This, and I think that's what it really breaks down to,
is that they have a lot of confidence in their group.
Speaker 2 (10:30):
Well, let's stay on the theme of fixing pitchers. Orioles
signed Ryan Helsley to a two year contract, reportedly twenty
eight million dollars. There's no way around this, Joe. He
was bad with the New York Mets last year. I
mean like really bad. Twenty innings, twenty two appearances. His
era was seven point two home run rates, strikeout rate,
walk rate, all of them not good.
Speaker 1 (10:54):
So I don't know if the Orioles.
Speaker 2 (10:56):
I don't want to say they're taking a flyer on
this guy, because he's got a tremendous arm. Right, He's
another guy essentially a two pitch pitcher, but he doesn't
throw strikes. He's only in the nineteenth percentile and walk rate.
Here's what's shocking to me, Joe, He's in the seventh percentile,
which is really low in terms of exs of velocity allowed.
(11:16):
He got hit, and he got hit hard, and especially
his fastball. He throws ninety nine. And the slugging percentage
against Ryan Helsley's fastball last year was six sixty seven.
The batting average was over four hundred. He had the fifth.
Speaker 1 (11:32):
Worst fastball in Major League Baseball, averaging ninety nine miles
per hour. And he ran away from his fastball.
Speaker 2 (11:39):
He wound up throwing a lot more spin and again,
two pitch guy. And we hear this a lot, and
I think it's true to some extent, but I think
it's also sometimes a crutch. You know, partly he blamed
it on tipping his pitches. You hear about this all
the time. Nobody ever gets hit because their stuff is bad.
They always get hit because it's these pitches. But what
(11:59):
do you see with the Orioles, You know, taking a
flyer somewhat on Helsy at least to me as a closer, because.
Speaker 1 (12:05):
He couldn't do that job in New York.
Speaker 2 (12:08):
I'm not that he was going to be a closer,
but I mean late inning leverage guy. I know he
had a problem with pitching more than one inning and
getting himself ready to pitch a non ninth inning. After
the trade from Saint Louis, he should be the ninth
inning guy in Baltimore.
Speaker 1 (12:22):
What do you see there in future with Hellsley and
the Orioles.
Speaker 4 (12:25):
Well, first of all, I saw him with the Cardinals
a couple of years ago, and I thought he pitched
pretty well.
Speaker 3 (12:30):
I loved the arm like you're talking about.
Speaker 4 (12:32):
And again I wrote different notes down as you're talking
about it that when I saw him last year, man,
I really thought there was way too many breaking balls.
One hundred percent that's what I thought I was seeing.
He was not proud of his fastball. It seemed as
though fastball being getting hit, so he lost confidence in
it and I'm gonna throw more breaking balls, and then
he became very predictable.
Speaker 3 (12:53):
But like you said, it is a great arm. It
is a fabulous arm.
Speaker 4 (12:56):
So for me, I'd be curious curious if he could
just add something soft. I don't know if that's a
change up, grip, change up once in a while, a split,
something to that effect. When you get to be his
age and what he's able or not able to do,
I would consider doing something like that. Spread your fingers
(13:17):
a little bit, try to throw it as hard as
you can, see what happens, see what comes out of it.
If he can get something that gets them all velocity
a I would do that, take some pressure off. Like
the two pitch mix, you get to a point in
your career sometimes you have to add something like that
if things you're doing to this point are not working.
So I'd be curious about that. As regarding what they think, however,
(13:40):
I think it's a good sign I do. I kind
of liked it when I saw it coming off such
a bad moment in Baltimore. The guy's got to do
a lot of soul searching and a lot of analyzation
over the offseason and try to figure out exactly what happened.
Speaker 3 (13:55):
I would Baltimore's.
Speaker 4 (13:56):
Position where they're at, It's not ten amount of signing kimberl.
I mean, I thought Craig was really much pretty much
at the end a couple of years ago, so when
they did that, I didn't like that sign for Baltimore
at all.
Speaker 3 (14:08):
But this guy, I still think he has.
Speaker 4 (14:10):
There's something left in the tank there, and I would
bet that there's They have some kind of an idea
of adding something softer to his mix in order to
get that fastball to explode more from the hitter's perspective.
Speaker 3 (14:23):
But I think it's a good sign. I think it's
kind of interesting.
Speaker 1 (14:26):
Interesting. Also, Devin Williams leaving the Yankees for the New
York Mets.
Speaker 2 (14:30):
Now, it doesn't mean they're out on Edwin Diaz. In fact,
I think he's still a priority for them. It would
be a great back end, right if you have Williams
and Diaz.
Speaker 1 (14:42):
To take care of it at least the last six outs
of the game. That's the plan.
Speaker 2 (14:47):
It's not a long contract, a three year deal, fifty
one million dollars with deferral, so it's actually less so
the money is not terrible. But Devin Williams struggled at
the beginning of last season. Now he pitched better at
the end of the year, but that was his best stuff.
Speaker 1 (15:02):
Was one of the Yankees took him out of the
closer's role and David Bednark came in wound up taking
those highest leverage situations. What do you see with.
Speaker 2 (15:11):
Williams because we know again another two pitch guy who
relies a lot on chase, I mean a lot. He's
well below the major league gaverage on the pitches in
the zone. I look the way he throws in every
year in his career. His arm angle has gotten lower
and lower, and he's got great movement on the change up.
That airbender pitch is just an outlier pitch, but the
(15:32):
more hitters see it, the more they're taking that pitch.
And he's to me, not in the zone enough. Another
guy who his fastball got hit gave up five home runs.
Speaker 1 (15:42):
Williams is a good sign for the Mets.
Speaker 2 (15:43):
Joe, But to me, there's always concern with some of
these closers two pitch guys, whether they're tipping or whether
they're just not in the strike zone enough.
Speaker 4 (15:52):
Yeah, I really do like this sign. I think he's
gonna have a bounce back here. I agree with the
armslot actually saw that action. I think I asked an
MLB network.
Speaker 3 (16:01):
I asked the guys.
Speaker 4 (16:01):
They said, it looks to me like his arms lower,
and you're saying they reiterated that was actually true. I
think with that everything's gotten flat to a certain extent,
and I have to believe he's going to make some
kind of adjustment going to this year, his second year
in the city, in New York City. I think it's
gonna actually help him. He had a bad look, man,
he just in the beginning of the year, and even
(16:23):
towards the end. I mean he looked a little bit better.
I mean, I'm a face reader. I can't help it.
He did not have the typical confidence because I seen
him really good.
Speaker 3 (16:32):
I would start right there.
Speaker 4 (16:33):
I would start at the arm a little bit higher,
get back to whatever his best year arm angle was,
attempt to at least, and then just cut it loose
from there, because it's like everything else, like your swing
or baseball swing, golf swing, armstroke, when that gets off
just a little bit, man, weird things happen and you're
just not the same. Whether it's a lot of times
it's unintentional, maybe an injury caused this unintentionally, or like
(16:57):
something was bothering him unintentionally. Could even have been something
in a lake that he was overcoming. So I like
this actually a lot. I think he's going to bounce
this year. He's getting back into the league that he
had done really well in. There's some kind of familiarity
component to that too, even though it's inbred now everybody
plays everybody else. But I kind of like this, and
(17:19):
I would start right there. Mariano Rivera was a one
pitch pitcher and was really good. You know, there's relief pitchers,
especially a devastating change up to me off of a fastball,
while that is the best other pitch, because his changeup
is like a split workball, whatever, it just dives it.
It's there and it's gone, and there's no not one hitter.
Speaker 3 (17:42):
It's hard.
Speaker 4 (17:43):
It's hard to sit on a change up and actually
do something with it, and it's that good. It's hard
to put your mind in that state of mind to
sit there. Something soft, soft, soft, So I like it.
I think he's going to do better than he did
last year. I'd like to start with the armstroke, where
is it and see why it's gotten lower, So they
(18:03):
could start with it there and do And I think
you suggested a fastball command.
Speaker 3 (18:08):
He does. He's shotgun at times.
Speaker 4 (18:10):
Man shotgun fastball really takes puts a lot more pressure
on the offs beach pitch because guys are going to
take him more often. There's no question fastball command him
getting ahead of a hitter early in account while that
changeup automatically becomes better. So it's not rocket science. That's
what he's probably thinking about right now. But I would
(18:31):
start with the armstroke and try to get it back
to a particular point from release, a point perspective where
it had been when he was very successful.
Speaker 1 (18:41):
That's a great breakdown. Excellent stuff, Joe.
Speaker 2 (18:43):
We're going to take a quick break and I promise
you we're going to talk about a Hall of Fame
vote coming up. It's one of the Era Committees of
the Hall of Fame, voting on contemporary era players. I'm
going to put you in a room, Joe, with fifteen
other people, with eight players on the ballot.
Speaker 1 (18:58):
You can vote for up to three. Who are you
voting for? We'll dive into that right after this.
Speaker 2 (19:04):
On the Book of Joe, Welcome back. It's the Book
of Joe podcast and it's also a Hall of Fame time,
at least when it comes to one of the era
committees of the Baseball Hall of Fame. It's a rotating
(19:25):
basis based on different eras of Major League Baseball history.
Speaker 1 (19:28):
This is the contemporary era. Eight players are on the ballot.
Speaker 2 (19:33):
You need to get seventy five percent of the sixteen
people in the room, and let's separate them out. You've
got three guys who've been tainted by steroid use, talking
about Barry Bonds, Roger Clemens, and Gary Sheffield. And of
the same ballot you have Carlos Delgado, Jeff Kent, Don Mattingly,
Dale Murphy, and Fernando Vealezuela.
Speaker 1 (19:54):
It's a really really good ballot.
Speaker 2 (19:57):
Once again, you need to get three quarters of the
vote here, as you do in the regular BBWAA balloting.
Speaker 1 (20:04):
What do you think about this ballot? Joan, where would
you go if you were in that room?
Speaker 4 (20:08):
I missed one guy, Delgado Kent maddingly and okay, okay.
Speaker 3 (20:14):
Thank you? Where would I go? No, it's not I
saw that immediately. You're right. This is this is like
you can make a case for everybody.
Speaker 4 (20:25):
On that list, right, I mean everybody there, And of
course the first three guys would have been there by
now had they not been tainted it in some way. Absolutely,
as I faced Elgatto he's one of my first shift guys.
Kent in the World Series in two thousand and two,
maddingly you know what he had done is so underrated
(20:45):
and how good he was. And of course Valenzuela just
turned on. He was almost like a Fidrich of his time,
just really turned on the baseball world with the quirkiness
and success simultaneously. Then you get a Murphy who just
quietly went about his business and what started out as
a catcher came a center for older hit bombs, just
(21:06):
played the game in a in a quite elegant way.
The guys just a really really big, strong, good baseball player.
Speaker 3 (21:13):
So where would I go?
Speaker 4 (21:13):
I mean, first of all, I think you have to
decide whether or not how do you feel about the
first three guys, Bonds, Clements, and Sheffield in regards to
the storoid issue. At what point do you are you
going to relax it as a voter or do you
never relax it as a voter. Then you look at
maybe some other guys you might be suspicious of that
(21:35):
have actually maybe eventually gotten to the hall, and then
somehow in the back of your mind, I still have
suspicions whether or not these guys were using or not.
So for me, like obviously the first three guys, yes,
we could all I think easily agree belonging in the
Hall of Fame. Then I think it comes down to
your your your your voting moras. How do I feel
(21:57):
about this? Do I feel that it's time? Have they
have they served enough time? Or do I never give
them an opportunity? Do I equate steroids with gambling in
a sense regarding you know, going against the rules of baseball?
And do I eventually put Pete Rose in and Shuley
Joe Jackson in that group? And if they're worthy based
(22:19):
on what's going on in the world today where gambling
has become a part of the fabric of industrial sports
is compared to in the past. So at what point
do I get over it? Am I over it? And
just a long answer, But so that's that's where you
have to start with. I believe and if in fact
so My point is, if in fact you can get
(22:39):
over it, I would choose those three guys. If in
fact you can't get over it, that's among three out
of the five below that, and I really believe that
Madningly in I would go at Balanzuela in and then
after that probably Delgado. So I would go with those
three guys if if I can't choose the first three,
if my sensibilities permit, I would go Bonds, Clements, and Sheffield.
(23:02):
And if not, I would go with Delgado, Madningly and Balanzuela.
Speaker 2 (23:07):
Otherwise, Yeah, you just spoke well about how difficult the
choice is.
Speaker 1 (23:12):
Now.
Speaker 2 (23:12):
Listen, Bonds and Clemens have been on one of these
ballots before. We know that they had ten shots on
the Baseball Writer's ballot.
Speaker 1 (23:18):
They got two thirds of the vote, but they didn't
get the three quarters to get in.
Speaker 2 (23:22):
Last time they were on one of these ballots, they
had fewer than five votes. It's definitely a lack of
support there. Think about this, Joe, you mentioned kind of
the moral question you have to raise with two of them.
Speaker 1 (23:35):
To me, it's not really a moral question. It's more
like did you play fairly?
Speaker 2 (23:39):
It's like the least thing you can ask of anybody
in sports, did you play on an even playing field?
And if you didn't, I'm sorry. I'm not voting for you,
and I think that's the problem here. You get into
that room, and I've been in that room.
Speaker 1 (23:51):
Not for this particular committee, but you have to get
there and make an argument for people who knowingly cheated
the game. When you have people like you just mentioned
Delgatto and Matt and Murphy and Vealnezuela. You're going to
make a case for those guys.
Speaker 2 (24:09):
Don't tell me that there weren't rules at the time.
Everybody knew when they were using peds they were doing
something they weren't proud of, and nobody talked about it.
And they still haven't admitted it to this day because
they know it's wrong and they know it's tainted.
Speaker 1 (24:22):
It is really hard to make that argument and convince.
Speaker 2 (24:25):
Three quarters of the people in any room that that
was worthy of the highest.
Speaker 1 (24:30):
Individual honor you can ever get in baseball.
Speaker 2 (24:33):
That's why it's so difficult for those guys not to
get votes, but to get enough votes, especially on a
ballot like this with so many good candidates. So for me,
I want to start with DoD maddingly and I want
to get your take on this, Joe, because when I'm
in that room, I would consider someone's entire contributions to
the game of baseball. Yes, you're on the ballot primarily
(24:54):
because of what you did as a player. And there
was a six year period there where Don Maddingley was the.
Speaker 1 (24:58):
Best player in baseball. You look at the whole package.
He had a six year period where he led the
Major leagues and slugging and was a Gold Glove defender
at first base. Not just a gold Glover, one of,
if not.
Speaker 2 (25:11):
The best defenders at that position or at any position actually.
But I look, he went on to manage twelve years
in the major leagues. I'm gonna draw a ven diagram
for you, Joe. Remember the ven diagrams? No, what is
it ven diagrams? Back in I don't know. I guess
it was the diagram, you know, the interlocking or intersecting
(25:32):
circle of subsets of things.
Speaker 3 (25:35):
But I wasn't good at that stuff.
Speaker 1 (25:37):
But yes, I'll keep it simple for you. There are
two hundred and ninety eight players who've had two thousand
hits in the major leagues. That's one of our circles.
Speaker 2 (25:46):
Then we've got another circle of guys who have managed
eighteen hundred games. There's seventy four in that circle. If
you combine the two of them two thousand hits eighteen
hundred games managed. There's only seven people in the history
of the game that have done both, and Don Manningly
is one of those. You know, I just look at
(26:08):
the fact that, yeah, he didn't win a championship as
a manager, but that's twelve years of managing. I just
can't not consider for a guy who put up those
kind of numbers offensively as well.
Speaker 1 (26:20):
One more thing.
Speaker 2 (26:21):
For you, Joe, you saw how good of a hitter
he was. You had to defend the field against him.
I mean, you weren't shifting on him. I don't think
Since the game was integrated in nineteen forty seven, there
have been thirty three players who have been career three
hundred hitters who also totaled more than thirty three hundred
total bases. So you're talking about premier hitters of that group,
(26:43):
the ones with the fewest strikeouts, Tony Gwynn, Don Mattingly,
and Stam Usual. That's a pretty good company for a
guy who's not just a great hitter, but put the
ball in play. Leading the league and slugging the major
leagues and slugging over six year period and not striking
out more walks than strikeouts in his career. It's pretty incredible.
(27:04):
I know it was a little short because of the
back injury. He lost power as he kept playing because
of that. Well, I would take a hard look at
Don Maddingly and.
Speaker 4 (27:13):
They all left tenant hitters that you described right there,
right Yeah, I think a six year window is pretty
significant to accomplish that over six years, And like you're
talking about put the entire game together. Is this just
like wins for a picture? Is it just batting average
for a hitter. I don't even know his war is
considered for his his career numbers.
Speaker 3 (27:35):
I don't even know what that may look like.
Speaker 4 (27:36):
But how about just the eyeball test on Maddeningly as
a Hall of Famer. As far as I'm concerned, you
said the twelve years of managing, I'd have to believe
it counts in some way.
Speaker 3 (27:50):
You're correct.
Speaker 4 (27:51):
You're probably thinking about Molatar, Joe Tory, Frank Robinson. I
bet you these other guys are on the list that
did something similar to that. I just think if you
check out the whole body of work, like you said,
offense defense, just as he was the captain of the
Yankees too, wasn't he for a bit? All the things
that he's done. If you if you put in one
(28:12):
big ball, it's pretty significant. So again, how do you
evaluate who's eligible and then who belongs in the Hall
of Fame? I think at some point you got to
go beyond numbers a little bit. I think the human
side of this thing and the whole body of work.
Again talking about the liberal arts component, liberal arts component
(28:33):
of the game. The fact that this guy did so
many things so well, and then, like I said, just
that six year window right there is significant. Does that
equal I don't know, four hundred ninety three home runs?
Does that equal two and fifty five wins that Bob
Gibson had. I mean, you know, there's this threshold that
(28:54):
sometimes guys don't reach those magic numbers. But again, if
you look at exactly what they did, yeah, that was
that was a Hall of Fame player.
Speaker 2 (29:01):
It's a great point you bring up, Joe, and I
think that that's where the debate really has gone more
in recent years, is like a six year period as
the best player in the game, is that enough to
be a Hall of Famer? And traditionally, and he alluded
to this, it was the counting numbers that got you in.
Speaker 1 (29:16):
You had to get some of those magic numbers, those thresholds.
Speaker 2 (29:19):
But I think more and more we're looking at did
someone dominate the game over an extended period of time?
And I used to think that period would have to
be like nine, ten years, But I think the standards
a little bit different now. First of all, I think
it is harder to dominate the game just the you know,
the talent level of the game is so high across
the board, it's hard to do that.
Speaker 1 (29:40):
But Dale Murphy fits in that same category.
Speaker 3 (29:43):
Joe.
Speaker 2 (29:43):
You talk about a six year period where he made
the All Star team every year, won five goal gloves,
two MVPs back to back, by the way, two home
run titles, two RBI titles. And he did that while
playing center field. You mentioned he was a guy catcher
starting out. They moved him out to center field. He
was a great center fielder. You look at his OPS
just when playing center field, eight to fifty f four ops.
(30:06):
There have been sixteen players who played at least a
thousand games in center field with an OPS that high.
Speaker 1 (30:12):
That's a pretty small group.
Speaker 2 (30:13):
Right of those sixteen, there's only been four of those
who won five goal gloves or more.
Speaker 1 (30:21):
While playing center field.
Speaker 2 (30:23):
Willie Mays, Ken Griffy Junior, Dale Murphy, and your boy
Jim Edmonds.
Speaker 1 (30:29):
That's it.
Speaker 2 (30:30):
Five goal gloves with an A fifty four ops in
center field.
Speaker 3 (30:33):
Yeah.
Speaker 4 (30:34):
I mean when you were starting to talk about them,
I immediately thought about Jim.
Speaker 3 (30:36):
You know, then you added them to that list. Listen,
that's what I'm saying. You're right.
Speaker 4 (30:41):
I mean, I'm glad I'm not in a position I
have to make these votes. But what you're doing right
now is exactly what I've probably would have done or
would have done, is like try to break all of
this stuff down, because the menu tay of all this
really is going to be the difference maker. Under the
hood stuff is going to be the difference maker.
Speaker 3 (30:55):
If you get to choose three of these eight, you
got to go there.
Speaker 4 (30:58):
Like I said, the first three, over fifty percent of
the voters are going to cross them off automatically, just
space on what had happened in their past.
Speaker 3 (31:06):
So they're really going three out of five on the bottom.
Speaker 4 (31:08):
So that gives you a chance to do a deep
dive into all those five guys. And so, yeah, well
you just said about Murphy is pretty outstanding, and I didn't,
you know, I didn't realize all the MVP stuff. I'm sorry,
but I didn't know that off the top of my head.
But it all makes sense. I mean, he was that good.
I mean America's team at that time. I watched them
often between WGN or TBS back in the day with
(31:31):
the Brave Mean on all the time. You got to
see these guys play, and he was all of that.
And I know he's a wonderful man. So again, that's it.
You have to do your own personal deep dive as
a voter and come up with your conclusions, because, like
you're just suggesting, you can make a case for all
of these people.
Speaker 1 (31:49):
Can I make a case for Jeff Kent?
Speaker 3 (31:51):
Sure?
Speaker 1 (31:51):
Why does he get more love?
Speaker 2 (31:53):
I mean, he got very little love from the writers
when he was on the ballot. This is a guy
who is His career batting average was two ninety. You
put runners out there in scoring position, he was better.
Speaker 1 (32:04):
He hit three hundred. He is the highest.
Speaker 2 (32:06):
Career postseason ops of any second basement in history. He
has more home runs, more hundred RBI seasons, and more
games hitting cleanup than any second basement in baseball history.
That's a pretty darn good credentials. You look at any
position on the field and the guy who had the
(32:27):
most home runs at that position, if you take out
Barry Bonds and steroid use, they're all in the Hall
of Fame or now by Pool's case at first base
going in and Jeff Kent, I'm not sure if he's
going to win on this ballot, because again it's a
really deep, good ballot. There's got to be a place
for a guy who hit more home runs than any
(32:47):
second basement in history.
Speaker 3 (32:49):
I think so.
Speaker 4 (32:50):
And then again, I don't want to belabor this, but
like Bobby Gritch, you look at Bobby Grich's war versus
Ryan Sandbury, and I love Ryan Sandburg, but look at
Ritchie did it? Nobody ever even talks about Ritchie. That's
another sub But what I realized was I was my
voting was leaned towards American leaguers. I saw Delgatto play,
(33:11):
I saw Maddingly play on the field, so I guess
automatically I went there. Kent I just saw in the
World Series. Primarily, I saw him in spring trainingsc is
at that time, you didn't see a lot of the
other league. Vealezuela was just the thing. I wasn't even around.
I was in the minor leagues pretty much. And Murphy,
like I said, was on TV. So again, yeah, listen,
Kent very dangerous. I saw himhen he was what the
(33:32):
Indians and the Mets right, Yes, and he do both
and he wasn't. It was just I just whenever I
saw him, I didn't see him that well.
Speaker 3 (33:40):
You know, then I know what he did. I get it.
And then all the I think part.
Speaker 4 (33:45):
Of the voting component of it, I just think it
might be a personality issue because I know he did
rub some people the wrong way, good, bad and different.
I'm just saying I think sometimes when you're when you're
voting or you're evaluating. To me, and I used to
have these meetings with my coaches all the time, Okay,
you need to keep the personality of this first. Okay,
I want you to evaluate the player as you're seeing it. Okay,
(34:08):
look at him. What are his tools all about? How
do you project the abilities? You know, hit, the five tools,
all of that. You've already brought up. What he does
with runners in scoring position, defensively, range, accuracy with armat
centa give me that and then tell me you don't
like him, Tell me you don't like him for whatever reason.
Tell you see a personality flaw that you think they
(34:28):
a lot Oftentimes to me, the personality flaw would be
that coaches cannot connect with the player, whereas, oh, he
doesn't listen, he doesn't retain things, whereas I for me
a lot of times was maybe just the coach didn't
say it in.
Speaker 3 (34:39):
The right words.
Speaker 4 (34:40):
So there's two different ways to evaluate, and for me,
the one that really should take center stage would be
the evaluation on ability and performance. That's number one, and
then interject the personality side of it. And then if
you saw some real flaws in there. I'm talking from
a team perspective, Yeah, I can influence how we like
to do business here. But in his situation, you had
(35:04):
a personality far or disliked from whatever reason. That should
be totally thrown in the waste basket because in this
situation it should be all about a good scouting report
and we saw him as a player and with the
numbers said and indicated. So I do believe possibly a
lot of the negative side of that was the evaluation,
you know, interaction with them, possibly turn some people off.
Speaker 1 (35:24):
Yeah, you might be right.
Speaker 2 (35:25):
I mean human nature, right, I mean it shouldn't factor in,
but human nature that it does. He also bounced around,
as you alluded to, a bunch of different teams. And
there's the defense. You know, people want to hold his
defense against him. Was he a great defender? And no,
But this is the way I look at it, Joe,
and I want your managers had on for this one.
There was only ten players in the history of the
game who played more games at second base than Jeff Kent.
(35:47):
Managers do not run guys out to a position who
can't play the position.
Speaker 1 (35:52):
Year after year. And he played on really good teams.
Speaker 2 (35:55):
He was in the postseason a lot with San Francisco, Houston,
you name it. So he was good enough that they
kept running him out there at second base. And when
you have a second baseman who slugs and heads clean up,
you know this, Joe, it's like having an offensive catcher.
You have an edge on the other team. That's a
huge advantage. So was he a great defender.
Speaker 1 (36:16):
No, but he was a defender year after year after
year at that position on winning teams. So to me,
don't hold his defense against him.
Speaker 4 (36:25):
Well, with a guy like that, then you can look
at a position that may be more offensive and get
a more defensive player to counteract the fact that this
guy's going to do so much damage at second manager
really speaking, man, I'll tell you what, when you didn't
have strong defense there at second base, that would always
bother me everything up the middle. However, I would look
back at the pitching staffs in general, and I don't
(36:46):
know this, but flyball versus ground ball pitchers, and then
how good were they at positioning at that time, because
that was done by lines on a chart that your
bench coach kept. So a guy like kent to me
really could survive easily if your staff was composed primarily
of flyball pitcher. And if they did, then you feel
better about him at second base. Secondarily, if that's not
(37:09):
the case, you really have to do a good job.
Where do I start this guy? You have to increase
his range by putting him closer to where the ball
is being hit and hit hard.
Speaker 3 (37:18):
That would be like, if I'm working with him.
Speaker 4 (37:20):
And I'm the charge of the defense, I would spend
a lot of time on where do I start Jeff
today regarding this whole line, because that would be part
of the way to maximize his defense.
Speaker 3 (37:31):
I think in today's game.
Speaker 4 (37:32):
With the analytical component, I think it would be easier
to put him in the right spot more consistently. And
I do believe, I mean, if he's an offensive second
basement like that, he would play today because after all,
analytics loves offense. Although run prevention is a big phrase utilized,
but those are the kind of my thoughts with him.
Speaker 3 (37:51):
That's what I would. I would because I did.
Speaker 4 (37:54):
I mean, I used to do the defense a lot
for the Angels back in the day, and I would
sit down after every game and Diego Lopez was the
video guy. I'd have Diego on a video cassette. He
would put down the twenty seven action pitches or thirty
whatever forty from the day before, and I would look
at the action pitches, whether it's a strikeout of ball
four ball and play. I'm looking at bad angles, how
(38:16):
the ball came off dude's bats, and I would combine
that with the actual scouting report, and then I would
try to decide for where does somebody have to be
and I would talk to him about that, and you
just watch watch bad angles and if he's late, he
looks to me late lately, he's not catching up the fastballs.
Those are the kind of things that you really want
to feed into it. Jeff Kent to make him a
better second basement. I would like to believe a lot
(38:37):
of that was done. But at the end of the day,
long answer, if this guy can hit to those levels
that you're talking about, he's going to play.
Speaker 2 (38:44):
That's the bottom line for me, Joe, And like you,
I love defense. I think you can't separate it from pitching.
They're interconnected. But I think about this, Think about the
New York Yankees up the middle. Hori Posada got knocked
for his defense, Derek Jeter got knocked for his defense.
Bertie Williams got knocked for his defense.
Speaker 1 (39:04):
What did the Yankees do every year they won with
those guys up the middle. So do I love defense?
Speaker 3 (39:11):
Absolutely?
Speaker 1 (39:12):
Do I trust defensive metrics? No, I don't. And I
think too many times people voters at least are working
off reputations and saying, you know what, that guy was
a good hitter, but he was not a good defender.
I'm not going to vote for him. You know that's
just gobbledegook. I mean, just watched it again. Derek Jeter
played shortstop his whole career until he was forty one
(39:32):
years old. You know, if he was that bad, they
would have moved him off that position.
Speaker 4 (39:36):
Watch the game. Watch the game. I you know, and
I know this for a fact, as I've been told this,
and I in today's world, I think a lot of
people that are observing the game in order to write
about the game are not watching the game. They're going
to react to what's being fed to them on their
feeds during the course of the game. They're going to
react to social media commentary things like that. Are not
(39:58):
really going to watch what's going on, and because they're
gonna rely on statistical information to make up their mind
when it comes to and I realize that sometimes you
can be deceived, like I will have a perception of
Tom Erducci as a hitter, and then when I bring
it to my guys.
Speaker 3 (40:14):
And my analytical department, they come back.
Speaker 4 (40:15):
I said, could you run this because I think I'm
seeing this, And I'll come back and I say, no,
it's completely opposite of what you think you're saying. Amen,
I believe you, and I listen and then I reevaluate.
But you got to watch the game. You got to
watch the game, and that comes right down to first
steps angles, How does.
Speaker 3 (40:33):
This you know?
Speaker 4 (40:34):
What is this guy accuracy of his arm? Like, what
are you seeing out there? What's going on out there?
And then if you want to overlay the statistical information
over what you actually saw, go ahead and do it.
But I think in today's world, with the reliance so
much on being told what is right and wrong as
opposed to attempt to observe and use your acumen to
(40:55):
see things. Listen, I love ron Rennicky. I talk about
Rags all the time. Rags saw things. Rags was a
great coach, not a good coach, because Ronnie saw things anytime.
I meaning that he would pick up on nuance of
a field. There is not getting set properly, coming set
too late, moving with the wrong foot first, getting deeked
in his position, base running just in, he came, got
(41:19):
his lead too late, whatever whatever it might be. He
would see things. And that's what you want to be
able to do. And you only do that by disconnecting
from the ball. In other words, you're not watching the
ball from the picture's hand of the hitter where it's
hit all the time. You have to really disconnect and
spare it down in the shortstop. It's almost like the
isolated camera they used to show a lot in sports,
and they would show it on somebody and then obviously
(41:41):
the ball would hit in that area and then you
would see this reaction on the camera and you would
see why the play was.
Speaker 3 (41:46):
Made or not play or not made.
Speaker 4 (41:48):
So these are the things I just I get frustrated
with because I am so in tune to and able
to see things based on my training, and I don't
have to rely on that information all the time.
Speaker 3 (42:02):
I want to overlay it and.
Speaker 4 (42:04):
When I'm wrong, ask the question, is I think I'm
seeing this, Tommy, what do you got And you come
back and said, no, listen, man, I ran this and
this is here's actually what is going on. And I
accept that, but I still want to challenge myself to
utilize my acumen to see things and then combine it
with data.
Speaker 3 (42:20):
I love that.
Speaker 2 (42:21):
And speaking of coaches, there was a bit of news
on one of your former coaches off your World Championship,
cub Staff. We'll get into that and our final thought
of the day right after this on the Book of Joe.
(42:47):
Welcome back to the Book of Joe. I'm sure you
probably saw this. Joe Brandon Hyde. Hyder, released of course
during the season last year by the Orioles as their manager,
signed on with the Tampa Bay Rays as an advisor.
Speaker 1 (43:02):
Interesting move, I believe. Doesn't a hider still live in
that area, the Tampa Bay area.
Speaker 3 (43:07):
He's done in Sarasota.
Speaker 4 (43:08):
I just talked to him right before it happened, so
I knew it had a chance that I could not
be happier. I mean, had this guy as a coach
for when I was with the Cubs. I trusted him implicitly.
The guy does his work. The guy he's not afraid
of a tough conversation. He's a baseball guy. Went to
Long Beach State. Amen, al lujah. I'll take those guys
every day of the week and twice on Sunday. They've
(43:30):
been they've been trained properly. They're straightforward, they don't know
how to lie. They're just they're just and they're just good,
solid baseball people.
Speaker 3 (43:38):
And that's Hyder. Hyder is really good at all this.
Speaker 4 (43:40):
So you know, as like I said, as a bench
coach for me and even as a first base coach
with the Cubs, and he did a lot in spring training.
He helped run all these spring training God, I would watch it.
It was precise. He had a sense of humor. He
takes charge of the situation. You're not He's not a pushover.
You're not going to mess with him. He has opinions,
(44:00):
he knows what he believes in all of this stuff.
So I could not happier I talked him about It
was so jack when he told me.
Speaker 3 (44:06):
And it's a great fit for him.
Speaker 1 (44:07):
I believe, Yeah, that is a great fit.
Speaker 2 (44:09):
And everything you said about him obviously is true, especially
your part about you know, don't.
Speaker 1 (44:14):
Mess with him if you're not playing the game the
right way. But I've always thought.
Speaker 2 (44:18):
Of a Hyter just as a truly authentic, honest guy, right,
that's right. You know, he speaks the truth and nothing
but the truth. And in this game, I think that
stands out. And I always say that's if you want
to be a great coach or a manager, it has
to start with that. You know, players you know this, Joe,
they'll see through it if you're just blowing smoke. I
never got any of that from Hyder.
Speaker 4 (44:39):
Is impossible, It doesn't. It doesn't possess that he's just
not capable of doing that. He's he I'm telling you
my time spend in Southern California. We've talked about this before.
One of the most cherished parts about that is the
baseball people that help me, help nurture me to do
what I eventually did. It's a it's a conservative bastion
(45:02):
of baseball Southern Collifornia for at least formerly the coaches,
head coaches, scouts in general, right down to Babbeloo, Bob.
Speaker 3 (45:10):
Clear my mentor with the Angels.
Speaker 4 (45:11):
I mean, these guys, God, if you did not want
to hear the answer, please don't ask the question, because
they're not going to dissemble. They're going to tell you straightforwardly.
And the only way to do that if you're going
to help make somebody better. There's a great line honesty
without compassion equals cruelty.
Speaker 3 (45:27):
So these guys they just didn't know that.
Speaker 4 (45:31):
They just told you. And that's where it was raised.
That's Hider was raised. That's how he was raised. It's
the only way to be raised. And that's why the
guy from that neck of the woods are so good
and I have such a warm fuzzy about it, right
down to Jim Deets, who recently passed away at San
Diego State. Deeker was the guy that got Tony Gwynn
to go to San Diego State. I worked with Diets
(45:55):
in Boulder, Colorado, in nineteen nineteen eighty and God, I mean,
I don't know if I've ever met anybody worked harder
than he did, or cared more than he did, and
taught the game. Jimmy would get on the ground literally
when a guy was hitting somebody's throwing a batting practice.
He would get bellied on the ground and he arms out.
(46:16):
He would hold the guy's feet and ankles and move
the feet and ankles as the ball was coming in
to teach him how to move his feet properly. Who
does that? Who does that? I mean, these guys were nuts.
He actually put the lights up. He put the lights
on the light towers at San Diego State. He got
up on the towers themselves and put the lights in
(46:36):
to save money.
Speaker 3 (46:37):
So all these dudes in southern California, I'm telling.
Speaker 4 (46:40):
You, man, high school coaches, junior college coaches, all of
them spectacular. And I'm always I'm going off on a tangent.
But that's Wherehyder comes from. And he was taught properly,
and that is the best and.
Speaker 3 (46:53):
Only way to coach.
Speaker 1 (46:54):
That's very cool.
Speaker 2 (46:55):
I've never heard about a guy beating on the ground
as a hitting coach to move his feet bellied down.
Speaker 4 (47:01):
I saw it in Boulder. I couldn't believe it, could
not believe it.
Speaker 2 (47:04):
Of course, Heider was a just a couple of years
ago Manager of the Year. I look back at this, Joe,
between twenty eighteen and twenty twenty three, the twelve Managers
of the year, eight of them are no longer managing.
Eight of the twelve that wasn't that long ago, folks,
buckshow Walter, Gabe, Kapler, Dob Manningly, Mike Schilt, Bright, Snicker,
Bob Melvin Rockobell Delli, and Brandon Hyde.
Speaker 1 (47:25):
So hopefully, if Hyde does want to manage again, hopefully
there's another opportunity for him in this game. But good
to year. He's sticking around with the Rays and sticking
around at home.
Speaker 2 (47:36):
That brings us to our final thought, Joe, we've been
over the map, all over the map a little bit today,
but we're talking about valuation, free agents, Hall of Fame.
I'm not sure what you've got in mind, whether that
dovetails with some of our topics today, but it's always interesting.
Speaker 1 (47:51):
What do you got today?
Speaker 3 (47:52):
Yeah, you know, weirdly I did.
Speaker 4 (47:55):
I had five of them or four of them circle
for today because I was not certain how about me?
And I went with I had a Mark Twain list
of stuff went in doubt quote Mark Twain.
Speaker 3 (48:08):
So I don't know. But there's a couple that I
really liked.
Speaker 4 (48:10):
I'm just and you could fit these in any way
you want, but they're really short, which I like, and
they're always perceptive.
Speaker 3 (48:16):
So I'm gonna go.
Speaker 4 (48:17):
I'm gonna start with number twenty four because I really
like this one a lot. A lie can travel halfway
around the world where the truth is putting on its shoes.
Speaker 3 (48:27):
Wow. Do I love that? We all know that, And that's.
Speaker 4 (48:31):
A really part of today's culture in general. I think, okay,
number five, Truth is stranger than fiction, but it is
because fiction is obliged to stick to the possibilities.
Speaker 3 (48:41):
Truth isn't.
Speaker 4 (48:42):
Wow, And again, wear that as you like wherever you
find yourself on Whenever you find yourself on the side
of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect.
And I've known that since the seventies. I love that one, right,
because sometimes you almost want to run away, for I
do oftentimes, and I guess I've been accused of I'll
run away from the crowd because the when you get
(49:04):
this group think going on, man, And when group think occurs,
it's the it's the head, it's the leader, it's whomever
the dictator might be of that group. That's regardless of
how open they want to make it appear. At the
end of the day, that's the voice and only voice
that's going to count. Maybe that's the right way to be.
I don't know, but when you get to those majority groups,
(49:27):
and man, I've always been a part of the minority.
Speaker 3 (49:30):
And I love this one, and I'll save this for last.
Speaker 4 (49:32):
I've had a lot of worries in my life, most
of which never happened.
Speaker 3 (49:36):
And it's true. And I was just talking to Wendy
about that the other day.
Speaker 4 (49:40):
I mean, we always worry about stuff, and we always
fabricate worry.
Speaker 3 (49:43):
And when you do that, you don't stay.
Speaker 4 (49:45):
In the present tense often enough, and it takes you
off on these tangents. And really there's a big energy
loss in that when you constantly permit yourself to go
off on tangents.
Speaker 3 (49:55):
So remember that you have a lot of worries in life.
Speaker 4 (49:59):
I don't even know over ninety percent, maybe ninety over
ninety five percent never happened.
Speaker 1 (50:05):
Wow, that's some great stuff. Mark Twade. By the way,
Hall of Famer, doubt first ballot of.
Speaker 3 (50:11):
Hall of Fame, first ballot, exactly.
Speaker 1 (50:14):
I love the part about the majority as well, Joe.
I mean where that phrase the wisdom of the crowd
came from? Man, run away from that. That's the way
I look at it.
Speaker 4 (50:24):
Don't walk run Absolutely, that's correct. Hey, Tommy, let me
tell you about something. On December seventeenth down here in
Tampa at Alva Restaurant, We're going to have a thanks Miss.
Thanks missus my invention kind of where you serve the homeless.
And I chose the word thanks miss because I wanted
to indicate these people are in need to need our
(50:46):
help regardless of the time of the year. We always
tend to focus on helping other people during holidays. Thanks
Miss to me indicated any any time of the year,
and I was really zeroing in on any date between
Thanksgiving and Christmas to come up with thanks Miss. But
we've been doing it since two thousand and six. Excuse me,
since the pandemic, it's gone more difficult, been doing it
(51:08):
in Pennsylvania, but but bringing it back as a fundraiser
at AVA on December seventeenth. Got thirty celebs involved already.
Coach Sean Cooper is going to be there, a Jason
Light from the Bucks, Freddie McGriff working on some Maddy Joyce,
some guys that used to be with the Rais and
working on some present rays and some others. Hopefully you
can try to trap Coach Gruden to come on down
(51:30):
to it also, But anyway, it's going to be like
thirty dudes there and also Brittany Linsey Come's going to
be there, so she's wonderful. We're going to serve this
petty meatball sausage and homemade piogi would be a part
of this. We got one hundred and fifty that we
could handle. You're going to get a copy of the
Book of Joe and a beanie that indicates the thanks Massana.
We have tables at twenty five hundred dollars sponsorships up
(51:53):
to a ten thousand dollars sponsorship, and I think general
admissions one hundred and fifty bucks and it's going to
be sold out. It almost already is so, but I
wanted to put it out there. Anybody's insted it in
the air in the area, get in touch with us
and I could get you that information. Even if you
just called Ava the restaurant Ava Ava seven eighteen South
(52:15):
Howard Avenue in Tampa, they'll be able to give you
information how to get this done. Anyway, it's just the
beginning of it. I have other plans. I want to
get it rolling again. I want to bring back thanks
here in Florida, which we are. I want to get
it back in Pennsylvania, want to do it in Chicago.
Those that'll be my triangle to work with. And it
is it's for the homeless, and we try to we
(52:36):
do serve them, we honor them at that point. We
do attempt to give them a gift every place that
we serve at and it could be anywhere from one
hundred people to two hundred and fifty three hundred people
that attend on a particular night. So anyway, that's the
cliff notes. If you're in Tampa, come by and see
us again. It's the first and I really want to
(52:58):
try to make it a part of spring training somehow,
and that would be my next idea and I'll keep
you posting on that.
Speaker 1 (53:03):
Oh that is awesome, Joe.
Speaker 2 (53:05):
I mean, obviously it's super important to remember those less fortunate,
especially this time of year. Wish all the best with
that event and all the people helping you with that.
And by the way, I have been to Ava and
it's awesome, so good luck with that event.
Speaker 3 (53:21):
Thank you man. Food's great. Thank you, Jail. Jail.
Speaker 4 (53:24):
Our chef is actually making a homemade piolgi for this
and I sampled it the other night.
Speaker 1 (53:28):
Outstanding, great stuff.
Speaker 3 (53:29):
Joe.
Speaker 1 (53:30):
We'll see you next time on the Book of Joe.
Speaker 3 (53:32):
See you, Tommy.
Speaker 1 (53:41):
The Book of Joe podcast is a production of iHeartRadio.
For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,
or wherever you get your podcasts.
The Book of Joe Podcast is a production of iHeartRadio.
Hey Aaron, Welcome back.
Speaker 2 (00:16):
To the Book of Joe Podcast with Me, Tom Berducci
and of course Joe Madden and Joe. It's it's that
time of year, this month of December. There are a
lot of people who find out what they're worth. So
I want to give you a choice here. It's not
quite let's make a deal because I only have two doors,
but I want you to pick either door number one
or door number two, which path we're going to go
(00:36):
down at least to start this edition of the Book
of Joe.
Speaker 1 (00:41):
What's your choice?
Speaker 3 (00:42):
My choice.
Speaker 2 (00:43):
I'm not giving you a subjects you know, they don't
give you any hints, and let's make a deal.
Speaker 4 (00:46):
Okay, okay, okay, I'll go Dylan Cees.
Speaker 1 (00:52):
All right, that was door number one.
Speaker 2 (00:53):
So you're gonna be the door where we figure out
what your value is this time of year, we're talking
obviously about free agency. At door number two is we'll
get to a Hall of Fame vote coming up another
way to establish value perpetually for that matter. But you
mentioned Dylan Cees. I found this one really fascinating. We're
(01:16):
starting to see some free agents drop and it's all
about the pitching market. So far, we'll talk about Ryan
Helsley and Devin Williams, a couple of late ending guys.
But Dylan Ceese is fascinating to me, Joe, and you've
seen this guy. He's got excellent stuff. He's a guy
who throws ninety seven ninety eight.
Speaker 1 (01:32):
He actually spends the baseball more than anybody else in
terms of starting pitchers. And he's signing with Toronto.
Speaker 2 (01:39):
And you have to really like the Toronto rotation at
this point now with Dylan Ceas and a whole year
of Trey y Savage and Kevin Gosman and on and on.
Speaker 1 (01:48):
A ghost, tell me what you thought of this signing.
Speaker 2 (01:51):
You have to like the fit with Toronto building on
the momentum of winning an American League pennant.
Speaker 1 (01:57):
But Dylan Cees.
Speaker 2 (01:58):
What is it about Dylan Cees where the results don't
match the st else?
Speaker 3 (02:05):
Right?
Speaker 4 (02:05):
I mean you look at his overall record as a
major league pitcher and then you look at the number
of dollars he's getting paid to play. It's incredible, right,
I would My first thought was any old timers that's
still out there that kick butt in their in their
time frame, looks at their record.
Speaker 3 (02:23):
And go wow, and again just wins and losses.
Speaker 4 (02:28):
And you look at how the game is perceived today,
where you know, wins by starting pitchers aren't as valued
as they once had been. Or although I think to
the picture himself, it still is. However, it's uh the
way it's viewed. Uh, financially it's not the same.
Speaker 3 (02:45):
You're right.
Speaker 4 (02:45):
When I watched this guy, you wonder how I don't
know him. I never got to know him with the
Cubs before he was straighted. But just watching this might
be dumb, but how easily the manager could take the
ball away from him when he takes him out of
the game.
Speaker 3 (02:59):
It just seems it's almost like.
Speaker 4 (03:01):
He's been trained to to fit into that five inning
guy or six inning guy. Maybe throw X number of pitches,
throw as hard as you can. Like I said, it's
been the ball. Well, I just don't know where the
mental side of his game lies. That's it, and I
might be completely wrong, but that's that's just the perception
I get from watching. On the other hand, I think
(03:24):
the Blue Jays that's a great sign for the blue Jays.
I agree physically, he gives him an outstanding staff that
ballpark there, I don't know how it's playing now, meaning
Toronto Ballpark, because I remember when I was still working there,
the ball did fly and I and I think this
guy can be you know, he can make mistakes in
(03:44):
that ballpark that can't hurt him.
Speaker 3 (03:47):
So this is like curious.
Speaker 4 (03:48):
Yes, if I'm a team with all whatever, all these
different potential playoff teams next year, I would absolutely have
been in the game with with Dylan Cees.
Speaker 3 (03:58):
But I'd want to know more about him.
Speaker 4 (03:59):
I just don't know enough, because that's my perception from
watching from a distance.
Speaker 2 (04:04):
Yeah, I would say, first of all, when we look
at his era and it's not very good, right, coming
off a four point five to five season, and by
the way, there is some deferred money in this contract,
So to me, he's about a twenty six million dollars
a year pitcher, and he really equates to Carlos Verdam
the twenty seven and twenty six million for the Yankees.
Speaker 1 (04:25):
The same kind of pitcher, high strike out rate.
Speaker 2 (04:29):
He gets into bouts of inconsistencies because he just purely
does not throw enough strikes, and to me, he spins
the ball way too much.
Speaker 1 (04:35):
He's got to change that. This guy who throws the
ball spins the ball fifty three percent of the time.
Speaker 2 (04:40):
Major League gaverage is thirty one percent. He's essentially a
two pitch guy. And to me, when you throw that
much spin, hitters take it. There's nobody goes up to
the plate, very few who sit on spin. And if
Dylan Cez is gonna start you off with spin, which
he does a lot of times, and think he's gonna
throw his two strike slider and get a swing, it's
not happening. So he's consistently falling behind. When you look
(05:04):
at Dylan Sees' numbers, he does not do the fundamentals
of pitching well.
Speaker 1 (05:09):
He is below average and throwing first pitch strikes. He's
below average and filling the zone, which is ridiculous when
you have the kind of arm that he has. And
he's below average at hitting the edges of the plate
as well. So he's pitching from behind a lot.
Speaker 2 (05:25):
His ops allowed with no strikes on the batter and
he gets too many of these counts. Is over twelve hundred,
the third worst in baseball. He's in a class with
guys like Bailly Ober and JP Sears. That's not an
elite pitcher, elite stuff. Absolutely, he's a swing and miss guy.
And you know, Joe teams are looking at free agents,
they're not looking at era. They want to look at
(05:49):
does he get swing and miss?
Speaker 1 (05:50):
And he does.
Speaker 2 (05:51):
And they look at mechanics and durability injury history, and
this guy's been durable. He's taking the ball thirty two
or thirty three times five consecutive seasons.
Speaker 1 (06:02):
So there's a lot there to unpack. If you're the
Toronto Blue Jays and you're Pete Walker, the pitching coach,
and I've talked to him about this, he's.
Speaker 2 (06:09):
Going to Robbie Ray him. That's another good comp to
Dylan Ceas. Robbie Ray couldn't throw a strike, great stuff,
high strikeout guy getting more than eleven punchouts per nine.
Speaker 1 (06:18):
They got him in the zone.
Speaker 2 (06:20):
That's what the Toronto Blue Jays have to do with
Dylan Cees.
Speaker 1 (06:23):
I call it the ninety four percent solution.
Speaker 2 (06:27):
If you throw a pitch in the strike zone first pitch,
the result is going to be positive ninety four percent
of the time. I'm talking about a swing, a miss,
a called strike, or a foul ball. Why wouldn't you
do that. That's what the Tampa Bay Rays do. They
sit in the middle of the zone with the catcher.
Fill it up in the middle of the zone at
(06:47):
least aim at, you know, in the strike zone first pitch,
and then you expand outward.
Speaker 1 (06:52):
That's what Dylan Cees has to do. You can't be
throwing first pitch sliders on the edge of the plate
or off the edge of the plate and falling behind.
Speaker 2 (06:59):
One more issue here, he was tipping his pitches and
he figured something out later in the season and was better.
But this is what happens in today's game essentially, especially
when you're essentially a two pitch pitcher, which Cease is.
So there's a lot going on there for the Blue
Jays to say, you know what, with a mix of
pitches that we kind of revamp, cure the tipping problem.
(07:23):
This guy's going to be a dominant pitcher for us.
I can see why there's, you know, a ceiling for
Dylan Cease that he has not reached yet. So Mike
comp Sir Carlos Redon, who became a much better picture
with the Yankees by adding pitches, and I think Cease
to me has to add a two seamer.
Speaker 1 (07:40):
And getting in the strike someone more.
Speaker 2 (07:42):
There's the same story with Robbie Ray and with Matthew
Boyd another guy, very similar pictures, all three of them
high strikeout guys, high era, find another pitch, get in
the strike zone.
Speaker 3 (07:53):
That's an awesome breakdown.
Speaker 4 (07:54):
Actually, I mean, if you were you put your scouting
hat on right there, if you're sitting in a meeting
and you throw out through all of that out at me,
you're actually building a very convincing case to item. Because
what you're talking about there is that I could hear
all the Blue Jay staff, with the pitching coaches, front office, whomever,
analytical group, we could fix him.
Speaker 3 (08:13):
This is very doable.
Speaker 4 (08:14):
And having a history of having done in the past,
all the things you're speaking about there have a believable
component to them that they can get better. First of all,
when you talk about the breaking ball over the fastball usage,
immediately my mind goes to wherever he started or wherever
got into his head first major League wise convinced him
(08:36):
how good his breaking ball was and how often he
had to throw it. Now, I mean that happens in
analytical departments too. That can be part of it. I
don't know that, but that sounds like it may have
been that. It also sounds like for whatever reason, he's
not proud of his fastball, and maybe maybe you have
this too when it comes to throwing, Like if he
has command issues, does he fastball command it just seems
(08:59):
to be lacking. Does he actually feel like he could
throw his breaking ball for strike more consistently and he
can break the ball. And then also you kind of
alluded to, but there's two options on a break and
ball that's really good to have become a strike, one
that it's called the other one that it's chased. So
just like it's not like there's a whole lot of
stuff going on here that needs to be simplified. And again,
(09:21):
I think it is a good sign. I think it's
an interesting sign. Is actual baseball numbers outside of swing
and miss do not really, especially in today's game, reflect
why it should be paid that much money. But in
this world of we can fix them, and that happens, man,
and you know, we all believe we can fix somebody.
(09:42):
Every organization feels as though they have the secret sauce
to get a really impressive talent who's been under achieving,
and all of a sudden make him achieved to the
level that everybody deems is potential. So that's what's going
on here. I think they see it. They believe they're
better than others at doing these kind of things, and
(10:03):
I think that that's part of the reason why they
feel as though this is a good bet for them.
So it is a good bet on so many different reasons.
I don't know the guy, like I said, but beyond
fixing this mechanical breakdown or physical breakdown regarding percentage of
pitcherstone and how often and strike one and the importance
of all that, I'm sure he's been.
Speaker 3 (10:21):
Told that before. They think they can fix.
Speaker 4 (10:24):
This, and I think that's what it really breaks down to,
is that they have a lot of confidence in their group.
Speaker 2 (10:30):
Well, let's stay on the theme of fixing pitchers. Orioles
signed Ryan Helsley to a two year contract, reportedly twenty
eight million dollars. There's no way around this, Joe. He
was bad with the New York Mets last year. I
mean like really bad. Twenty innings, twenty two appearances. His
era was seven point two home run rates, strikeout rate,
walk rate, all of them not good.
Speaker 1 (10:54):
So I don't know if the Orioles.
Speaker 2 (10:56):
I don't want to say they're taking a flyer on
this guy, because he's got a tremendous arm. Right, He's
another guy essentially a two pitch pitcher, but he doesn't
throw strikes. He's only in the nineteenth percentile and walk rate.
Here's what's shocking to me, Joe, He's in the seventh percentile,
which is really low in terms of exs of velocity allowed.
(11:16):
He got hit, and he got hit hard, and especially
his fastball. He throws ninety nine. And the slugging percentage
against Ryan Helsley's fastball last year was six sixty seven.
The batting average was over four hundred. He had the fifth.
Speaker 1 (11:32):
Worst fastball in Major League Baseball, averaging ninety nine miles
per hour. And he ran away from his fastball.
Speaker 2 (11:39):
He wound up throwing a lot more spin and again,
two pitch guy. And we hear this a lot, and
I think it's true to some extent, but I think
it's also sometimes a crutch. You know, partly he blamed
it on tipping his pitches. You hear about this all
the time. Nobody ever gets hit because their stuff is bad.
They always get hit because it's these pitches. But what
(11:59):
do you see with the Orioles, You know, taking a
flyer somewhat on Helsy at least to me as a closer, because.
Speaker 1 (12:05):
He couldn't do that job in New York.
Speaker 2 (12:08):
I'm not that he was going to be a closer,
but I mean late inning leverage guy. I know he
had a problem with pitching more than one inning and
getting himself ready to pitch a non ninth inning. After
the trade from Saint Louis, he should be the ninth
inning guy in Baltimore.
Speaker 1 (12:22):
What do you see there in future with Hellsley and
the Orioles.
Speaker 4 (12:25):
Well, first of all, I saw him with the Cardinals
a couple of years ago, and I thought he pitched
pretty well.
Speaker 3 (12:30):
I loved the arm like you're talking about.
Speaker 4 (12:32):
And again I wrote different notes down as you're talking
about it that when I saw him last year, man,
I really thought there was way too many breaking balls.
One hundred percent that's what I thought I was seeing.
He was not proud of his fastball. It seemed as
though fastball being getting hit, so he lost confidence in
it and I'm gonna throw more breaking balls, and then
he became very predictable.
Speaker 3 (12:53):
But like you said, it is a great arm. It
is a fabulous arm.
Speaker 4 (12:56):
So for me, I'd be curious curious if he could
just add something soft. I don't know if that's a
change up, grip, change up once in a while, a split,
something to that effect. When you get to be his
age and what he's able or not able to do,
I would consider doing something like that. Spread your fingers
(13:17):
a little bit, try to throw it as hard as
you can, see what happens, see what comes out of it.
If he can get something that gets them all velocity
a I would do that, take some pressure off. Like
the two pitch mix, you get to a point in
your career sometimes you have to add something like that
if things you're doing to this point are not working.
So I'd be curious about that. As regarding what they think, however,
(13:40):
I think it's a good sign I do. I kind
of liked it when I saw it coming off such
a bad moment in Baltimore. The guy's got to do
a lot of soul searching and a lot of analyzation
over the offseason and try to figure out exactly what happened.
Speaker 3 (13:55):
I would Baltimore's.
Speaker 4 (13:56):
Position where they're at, It's not ten amount of signing kimberl.
I mean, I thought Craig was really much pretty much
at the end a couple of years ago, so when
they did that, I didn't like that sign for Baltimore
at all.
Speaker 3 (14:08):
But this guy, I still think he has.
Speaker 4 (14:10):
There's something left in the tank there, and I would
bet that there's They have some kind of an idea
of adding something softer to his mix in order to
get that fastball to explode more from the hitter's perspective.
Speaker 3 (14:23):
But I think it's a good sign. I think it's
kind of interesting.
Speaker 1 (14:26):
Interesting. Also, Devin Williams leaving the Yankees for the New
York Mets.
Speaker 2 (14:30):
Now, it doesn't mean they're out on Edwin Diaz. In fact,
I think he's still a priority for them. It would
be a great back end, right if you have Williams
and Diaz.
Speaker 1 (14:42):
To take care of it at least the last six outs
of the game. That's the plan.
Speaker 2 (14:47):
It's not a long contract, a three year deal, fifty
one million dollars with deferral, so it's actually less so
the money is not terrible. But Devin Williams struggled at
the beginning of last season. Now he pitched better at
the end of the year, but that was his best stuff.
Speaker 1 (15:02):
Was one of the Yankees took him out of the
closer's role and David Bednark came in wound up taking
those highest leverage situations. What do you see with.
Speaker 2 (15:11):
Williams because we know again another two pitch guy who
relies a lot on chase, I mean a lot. He's
well below the major league gaverage on the pitches in
the zone. I look the way he throws in every
year in his career. His arm angle has gotten lower
and lower, and he's got great movement on the change up.
That airbender pitch is just an outlier pitch, but the
(15:32):
more hitters see it, the more they're taking that pitch.
And he's to me, not in the zone enough. Another
guy who his fastball got hit gave up five home runs.
Speaker 1 (15:42):
Williams is a good sign for the Mets.
Speaker 2 (15:43):
Joe, But to me, there's always concern with some of
these closers two pitch guys, whether they're tipping or whether
they're just not in the strike zone enough.
Speaker 4 (15:52):
Yeah, I really do like this sign. I think he's
gonna have a bounce back here. I agree with the
armslot actually saw that action. I think I asked an
MLB network.
Speaker 3 (16:01):
I asked the guys.
Speaker 4 (16:01):
They said, it looks to me like his arms lower,
and you're saying they reiterated that was actually true. I
think with that everything's gotten flat to a certain extent,
and I have to believe he's going to make some
kind of adjustment going to this year, his second year
in the city, in New York City. I think it's
gonna actually help him. He had a bad look, man,
he just in the beginning of the year, and even
(16:23):
towards the end. I mean he looked a little bit better.
I mean, I'm a face reader. I can't help it.
He did not have the typical confidence because I seen
him really good.
Speaker 3 (16:32):
I would start right there.
Speaker 4 (16:33):
I would start at the arm a little bit higher,
get back to whatever his best year arm angle was,
attempt to at least, and then just cut it loose
from there, because it's like everything else, like your swing
or baseball swing, golf swing, armstroke, when that gets off
just a little bit, man, weird things happen and you're
just not the same. Whether it's a lot of times
it's unintentional, maybe an injury caused this unintentionally, or like
(16:57):
something was bothering him unintentionally. Could even have been something
in a lake that he was overcoming. So I like
this actually a lot. I think he's going to bounce
this year. He's getting back into the league that he
had done really well in. There's some kind of familiarity
component to that too, even though it's inbred now everybody
plays everybody else. But I kind of like this, and
(17:19):
I would start right there. Mariano Rivera was a one
pitch pitcher and was really good. You know, there's relief pitchers,
especially a devastating change up to me off of a fastball,
while that is the best other pitch, because his changeup
is like a split workball, whatever, it just dives it.
It's there and it's gone, and there's no not one hitter.
Speaker 3 (17:42):
It's hard.
Speaker 4 (17:43):
It's hard to sit on a change up and actually
do something with it, and it's that good. It's hard
to put your mind in that state of mind to
sit there. Something soft, soft, soft, So I like it.
I think he's going to do better than he did
last year. I'd like to start with the armstroke, where
is it and see why it's gotten lower, So they
(18:03):
could start with it there and do And I think
you suggested a fastball command.
Speaker 3 (18:08):
He does. He's shotgun at times.
Speaker 4 (18:10):
Man shotgun fastball really takes puts a lot more pressure
on the offs beach pitch because guys are going to
take him more often. There's no question fastball command him
getting ahead of a hitter early in account while that
changeup automatically becomes better. So it's not rocket science. That's
what he's probably thinking about right now. But I would
(18:31):
start with the armstroke and try to get it back
to a particular point from release, a point perspective where
it had been when he was very successful.
Speaker 1 (18:41):
That's a great breakdown. Excellent stuff, Joe.
Speaker 2 (18:43):
We're going to take a quick break and I promise
you we're going to talk about a Hall of Fame
vote coming up. It's one of the Era Committees of
the Hall of Fame, voting on contemporary era players. I'm
going to put you in a room, Joe, with fifteen
other people, with eight players on the ballot.
Speaker 1 (18:58):
You can vote for up to three. Who are you
voting for? We'll dive into that right after this.
Speaker 2 (19:04):
On the Book of Joe, Welcome back. It's the Book
of Joe podcast and it's also a Hall of Fame time,
at least when it comes to one of the era
committees of the Baseball Hall of Fame. It's a rotating
(19:25):
basis based on different eras of Major League Baseball history.
Speaker 1 (19:28):
This is the contemporary era. Eight players are on the ballot.
Speaker 2 (19:33):
You need to get seventy five percent of the sixteen
people in the room, and let's separate them out. You've
got three guys who've been tainted by steroid use, talking
about Barry Bonds, Roger Clemens, and Gary Sheffield. And of
the same ballot you have Carlos Delgado, Jeff Kent, Don Mattingly,
Dale Murphy, and Fernando Vealezuela.
Speaker 1 (19:54):
It's a really really good ballot.
Speaker 2 (19:57):
Once again, you need to get three quarters of the
vote here, as you do in the regular BBWAA balloting.
Speaker 1 (20:04):
What do you think about this ballot? Joan, where would
you go if you were in that room?
Speaker 4 (20:08):
I missed one guy, Delgado Kent maddingly and okay, okay.
Speaker 3 (20:14):
Thank you? Where would I go? No, it's not I
saw that immediately. You're right. This is this is like
you can make a case for everybody.
Speaker 4 (20:25):
On that list, right, I mean everybody there, And of
course the first three guys would have been there by
now had they not been tainted it in some way. Absolutely,
as I faced Elgatto he's one of my first shift guys.
Kent in the World Series in two thousand and two,
maddingly you know what he had done is so underrated
(20:45):
and how good he was. And of course Valenzuela just
turned on. He was almost like a Fidrich of his time,
just really turned on the baseball world with the quirkiness
and success simultaneously. Then you get a Murphy who just
quietly went about his business and what started out as
a catcher came a center for older hit bombs, just
(21:06):
played the game in a in a quite elegant way.
The guys just a really really big, strong, good baseball player.
Speaker 3 (21:13):
So where would I go?
Speaker 4 (21:13):
I mean, first of all, I think you have to
decide whether or not how do you feel about the
first three guys, Bonds, Clements, and Sheffield in regards to
the storoid issue. At what point do you are you
going to relax it as a voter or do you
never relax it as a voter. Then you look at
maybe some other guys you might be suspicious of that
(21:35):
have actually maybe eventually gotten to the hall, and then
somehow in the back of your mind, I still have
suspicions whether or not these guys were using or not.
So for me, like obviously the first three guys, yes,
we could all I think easily agree belonging in the
Hall of Fame. Then I think it comes down to
your your your your voting moras. How do I feel
(21:57):
about this? Do I feel that it's time? Have they
have they served enough time? Or do I never give
them an opportunity? Do I equate steroids with gambling in
a sense regarding you know, going against the rules of baseball?
And do I eventually put Pete Rose in and Shuley
Joe Jackson in that group? And if they're worthy based
(22:19):
on what's going on in the world today where gambling
has become a part of the fabric of industrial sports
is compared to in the past. So at what point
do I get over it? Am I over it? And
just a long answer, But so that's that's where you
have to start with. I believe and if in fact
so My point is, if in fact you can get
(22:39):
over it, I would choose those three guys. If in
fact you can't get over it, that's among three out
of the five below that, and I really believe that
Madningly in I would go at Balanzuela in and then
after that probably Delgado. So I would go with those
three guys if if I can't choose the first three,
if my sensibilities permit, I would go Bonds, Clements, and Sheffield.
(23:02):
And if not, I would go with Delgado, Madningly and Balanzuela.
Speaker 2 (23:07):
Otherwise, Yeah, you just spoke well about how difficult the
choice is.
Speaker 1 (23:12):
Now.
Speaker 2 (23:12):
Listen, Bonds and Clemens have been on one of these
ballots before. We know that they had ten shots on
the Baseball Writer's ballot.
Speaker 1 (23:18):
They got two thirds of the vote, but they didn't
get the three quarters to get in.
Speaker 2 (23:22):
Last time they were on one of these ballots, they
had fewer than five votes. It's definitely a lack of
support there. Think about this, Joe, you mentioned kind of
the moral question you have to raise with two of them.
Speaker 1 (23:35):
To me, it's not really a moral question. It's more
like did you play fairly?
Speaker 2 (23:39):
It's like the least thing you can ask of anybody
in sports, did you play on an even playing field?
And if you didn't, I'm sorry. I'm not voting for you,
and I think that's the problem here. You get into
that room, and I've been in that room.
Speaker 1 (23:51):
Not for this particular committee, but you have to get
there and make an argument for people who knowingly cheated
the game. When you have people like you just mentioned
Delgatto and Matt and Murphy and Vealnezuela. You're going to
make a case for those guys.
Speaker 2 (24:09):
Don't tell me that there weren't rules at the time.
Everybody knew when they were using peds they were doing
something they weren't proud of, and nobody talked about it.
And they still haven't admitted it to this day because
they know it's wrong and they know it's tainted.
Speaker 1 (24:22):
It is really hard to make that argument and convince.
Speaker 2 (24:25):
Three quarters of the people in any room that that
was worthy of the highest.
Speaker 1 (24:30):
Individual honor you can ever get in baseball.
Speaker 2 (24:33):
That's why it's so difficult for those guys not to
get votes, but to get enough votes, especially on a
ballot like this with so many good candidates. So for me,
I want to start with DoD maddingly and I want
to get your take on this, Joe, because when I'm
in that room, I would consider someone's entire contributions to
the game of baseball. Yes, you're on the ballot primarily
(24:54):
because of what you did as a player. And there
was a six year period there where Don Maddingley was the.
Speaker 1 (24:58):
Best player in baseball. You look at the whole package.
He had a six year period where he led the
Major leagues and slugging and was a Gold Glove defender
at first base. Not just a gold Glover, one of,
if not.
Speaker 2 (25:11):
The best defenders at that position or at any position actually.
But I look, he went on to manage twelve years
in the major leagues. I'm gonna draw a ven diagram
for you, Joe. Remember the ven diagrams? No, what is
it ven diagrams? Back in I don't know. I guess
it was the diagram, you know, the interlocking or intersecting
(25:32):
circle of subsets of things.
Speaker 3 (25:35):
But I wasn't good at that stuff.
Speaker 1 (25:37):
But yes, I'll keep it simple for you. There are
two hundred and ninety eight players who've had two thousand
hits in the major leagues. That's one of our circles.
Speaker 2 (25:46):
Then we've got another circle of guys who have managed
eighteen hundred games. There's seventy four in that circle. If
you combine the two of them two thousand hits eighteen
hundred games managed. There's only seven people in the history
of the game that have done both, and Don Manningly
is one of those. You know, I just look at
(26:08):
the fact that, yeah, he didn't win a championship as
a manager, but that's twelve years of managing. I just
can't not consider for a guy who put up those
kind of numbers offensively as well.
Speaker 1 (26:20):
One more thing.
Speaker 2 (26:21):
For you, Joe, you saw how good of a hitter
he was. You had to defend the field against him.
I mean, you weren't shifting on him. I don't think
Since the game was integrated in nineteen forty seven, there
have been thirty three players who have been career three
hundred hitters who also totaled more than thirty three hundred
total bases. So you're talking about premier hitters of that group,
(26:43):
the ones with the fewest strikeouts, Tony Gwynn, Don Mattingly,
and Stam Usual. That's a pretty good company for a
guy who's not just a great hitter, but put the
ball in play. Leading the league and slugging the major
leagues and slugging over six year period and not striking
out more walks than strikeouts in his career. It's pretty incredible.
(27:04):
I know it was a little short because of the
back injury. He lost power as he kept playing because
of that. Well, I would take a hard look at
Don Maddingly and.
Speaker 4 (27:13):
They all left tenant hitters that you described right there,
right Yeah, I think a six year window is pretty
significant to accomplish that over six years, And like you're
talking about put the entire game together. Is this just
like wins for a picture? Is it just batting average
for a hitter. I don't even know his war is
considered for his his career numbers.
Speaker 3 (27:35):
I don't even know what that may look like.
Speaker 4 (27:36):
But how about just the eyeball test on Maddeningly as
a Hall of Famer. As far as I'm concerned, you
said the twelve years of managing, I'd have to believe
it counts in some way.
Speaker 3 (27:50):
You're correct.
Speaker 4 (27:51):
You're probably thinking about Molatar, Joe Tory, Frank Robinson. I
bet you these other guys are on the list that
did something similar to that. I just think if you
check out the whole body of work, like you said,
offense defense, just as he was the captain of the
Yankees too, wasn't he for a bit? All the things
that he's done. If you if you put in one
(28:12):
big ball, it's pretty significant. So again, how do you
evaluate who's eligible and then who belongs in the Hall
of Fame? I think at some point you got to
go beyond numbers a little bit. I think the human
side of this thing and the whole body of work.
Again talking about the liberal arts component, liberal arts component
(28:33):
of the game. The fact that this guy did so
many things so well, and then, like I said, just
that six year window right there is significant. Does that
equal I don't know, four hundred ninety three home runs?
Does that equal two and fifty five wins that Bob
Gibson had. I mean, you know, there's this threshold that
(28:54):
sometimes guys don't reach those magic numbers. But again, if
you look at exactly what they did, yeah, that was
that was a Hall of Fame player.
Speaker 2 (29:01):
It's a great point you bring up, Joe, and I
think that that's where the debate really has gone more
in recent years, is like a six year period as
the best player in the game, is that enough to
be a Hall of Famer? And traditionally, and he alluded
to this, it was the counting numbers that got you in.
Speaker 1 (29:16):
You had to get some of those magic numbers, those thresholds.
Speaker 2 (29:19):
But I think more and more we're looking at did
someone dominate the game over an extended period of time?
And I used to think that period would have to
be like nine, ten years, But I think the standards
a little bit different now. First of all, I think
it is harder to dominate the game just the you know,
the talent level of the game is so high across
the board, it's hard to do that.
Speaker 1 (29:40):
But Dale Murphy fits in that same category.
Speaker 3 (29:43):
Joe.
Speaker 2 (29:43):
You talk about a six year period where he made
the All Star team every year, won five goal gloves,
two MVPs back to back, by the way, two home
run titles, two RBI titles. And he did that while
playing center field. You mentioned he was a guy catcher
starting out. They moved him out to center field. He
was a great center fielder. You look at his OPS
just when playing center field, eight to fifty f four ops.
(30:06):
There have been sixteen players who played at least a
thousand games in center field with an OPS that high.
Speaker 1 (30:12):
That's a pretty small group.
Speaker 2 (30:13):
Right of those sixteen, there's only been four of those
who won five goal gloves or more.
Speaker 1 (30:21):
While playing center field.
Speaker 2 (30:23):
Willie Mays, Ken Griffy Junior, Dale Murphy, and your boy
Jim Edmonds.
Speaker 1 (30:29):
That's it.
Speaker 2 (30:30):
Five goal gloves with an A fifty four ops in
center field.
Speaker 3 (30:33):
Yeah.
Speaker 4 (30:34):
I mean when you were starting to talk about them,
I immediately thought about Jim.
Speaker 3 (30:36):
You know, then you added them to that list. Listen,
that's what I'm saying. You're right.
Speaker 4 (30:41):
I mean, I'm glad I'm not in a position I
have to make these votes. But what you're doing right
now is exactly what I've probably would have done or
would have done, is like try to break all of
this stuff down, because the menu tay of all this
really is going to be the difference maker. Under the
hood stuff is going to be the difference maker.
Speaker 3 (30:55):
If you get to choose three of these eight, you
got to go there.
Speaker 4 (30:58):
Like I said, the first three, over fifty percent of
the voters are going to cross them off automatically, just
space on what had happened in their past.
Speaker 3 (31:06):
So they're really going three out of five on the bottom.
Speaker 4 (31:08):
So that gives you a chance to do a deep
dive into all those five guys. And so, yeah, well
you just said about Murphy is pretty outstanding, and I didn't,
you know, I didn't realize all the MVP stuff. I'm sorry,
but I didn't know that off the top of my head.
But it all makes sense. I mean, he was that good.
I mean America's team at that time. I watched them
often between WGN or TBS back in the day with
(31:31):
the Brave Mean on all the time. You got to
see these guys play, and he was all of that.
And I know he's a wonderful man. So again, that's it.
You have to do your own personal deep dive as
a voter and come up with your conclusions, because, like
you're just suggesting, you can make a case for all
of these people.
Speaker 1 (31:49):
Can I make a case for Jeff Kent?
Speaker 3 (31:51):
Sure?
Speaker 1 (31:51):
Why does he get more love?
Speaker 2 (31:53):
I mean, he got very little love from the writers
when he was on the ballot. This is a guy
who is His career batting average was two ninety. You
put runners out there in scoring position, he was better.
Speaker 1 (32:04):
He hit three hundred. He is the highest.
Speaker 2 (32:06):
Career postseason ops of any second basement in history. He
has more home runs, more hundred RBI seasons, and more
games hitting cleanup than any second basement in baseball history.
That's a pretty darn good credentials. You look at any
position on the field and the guy who had the
(32:27):
most home runs at that position, if you take out
Barry Bonds and steroid use, they're all in the Hall
of Fame or now by Pool's case at first base
going in and Jeff Kent, I'm not sure if he's
going to win on this ballot, because again it's a
really deep, good ballot. There's got to be a place
for a guy who hit more home runs than any
(32:47):
second basement in history.
Speaker 3 (32:49):
I think so.
Speaker 4 (32:50):
And then again, I don't want to belabor this, but
like Bobby Gritch, you look at Bobby Grich's war versus
Ryan Sandbury, and I love Ryan Sandburg, but look at
Ritchie did it? Nobody ever even talks about Ritchie. That's
another sub But what I realized was I was my
voting was leaned towards American leaguers. I saw Delgatto play,
(33:11):
I saw Maddingly play on the field, so I guess
automatically I went there. Kent I just saw in the
World Series. Primarily, I saw him in spring trainingsc is
at that time, you didn't see a lot of the
other league. Vealezuela was just the thing. I wasn't even around.
I was in the minor leagues pretty much. And Murphy,
like I said, was on TV. So again, yeah, listen,
Kent very dangerous. I saw himhen he was what the
(33:32):
Indians and the Mets right, Yes, and he do both
and he wasn't. It was just I just whenever I
saw him, I didn't see him that well.
Speaker 3 (33:40):
You know, then I know what he did. I get it.
And then all the I think part.
Speaker 4 (33:45):
Of the voting component of it, I just think it
might be a personality issue because I know he did
rub some people the wrong way, good, bad and different.
I'm just saying I think sometimes when you're when you're
voting or you're evaluating. To me, and I used to
have these meetings with my coaches all the time, Okay,
you need to keep the personality of this first. Okay,
I want you to evaluate the player as you're seeing it. Okay,
(34:08):
look at him. What are his tools all about? How
do you project the abilities? You know, hit, the five tools,
all of that. You've already brought up. What he does
with runners in scoring position, defensively, range, accuracy with armat
centa give me that and then tell me you don't
like him, Tell me you don't like him for whatever reason.
Tell you see a personality flaw that you think they
(34:28):
a lot Oftentimes to me, the personality flaw would be
that coaches cannot connect with the player, whereas, oh, he
doesn't listen, he doesn't retain things, whereas I for me
a lot of times was maybe just the coach didn't
say it in.
Speaker 3 (34:39):
The right words.
Speaker 4 (34:40):
So there's two different ways to evaluate, and for me,
the one that really should take center stage would be
the evaluation on ability and performance. That's number one, and
then interject the personality side of it. And then if
you saw some real flaws in there. I'm talking from
a team perspective, Yeah, I can influence how we like
to do business here. But in his situation, you had
(35:04):
a personality far or disliked from whatever reason. That should
be totally thrown in the waste basket because in this
situation it should be all about a good scouting report
and we saw him as a player and with the
numbers said and indicated. So I do believe possibly a
lot of the negative side of that was the evaluation,
you know, interaction with them, possibly turn some people off.
Speaker 1 (35:24):
Yeah, you might be right.
Speaker 2 (35:25):
I mean human nature, right, I mean it shouldn't factor in,
but human nature that it does. He also bounced around,
as you alluded to, a bunch of different teams. And
there's the defense. You know, people want to hold his
defense against him. Was he a great defender? And no,
But this is the way I look at it, Joe,
and I want your managers had on for this one.
There was only ten players in the history of the
game who played more games at second base than Jeff Kent.
(35:47):
Managers do not run guys out to a position who
can't play the position.
Speaker 1 (35:52):
Year after year. And he played on really good teams.
Speaker 2 (35:55):
He was in the postseason a lot with San Francisco, Houston,
you name it. So he was good enough that they
kept running him out there at second base. And when
you have a second baseman who slugs and heads clean up,
you know this, Joe, it's like having an offensive catcher.
You have an edge on the other team. That's a
huge advantage. So was he a great defender.
Speaker 1 (36:16):
No, but he was a defender year after year after
year at that position on winning teams. So to me,
don't hold his defense against him.
Speaker 4 (36:25):
Well, with a guy like that, then you can look
at a position that may be more offensive and get
a more defensive player to counteract the fact that this
guy's going to do so much damage at second manager
really speaking, man, I'll tell you what, when you didn't
have strong defense there at second base, that would always
bother me everything up the middle. However, I would look
back at the pitching staffs in general, and I don't
(36:46):
know this, but flyball versus ground ball pitchers, and then
how good were they at positioning at that time, because
that was done by lines on a chart that your
bench coach kept. So a guy like kent to me
really could survive easily if your staff was composed primarily
of flyball pitcher. And if they did, then you feel
better about him at second base. Secondarily, if that's not
(37:09):
the case, you really have to do a good job.
Where do I start this guy? You have to increase
his range by putting him closer to where the ball
is being hit and hit hard.
Speaker 3 (37:18):
That would be like, if I'm working with him.
Speaker 4 (37:20):
And I'm the charge of the defense, I would spend
a lot of time on where do I start Jeff
today regarding this whole line, because that would be part
of the way to maximize his defense.
Speaker 3 (37:31):
I think in today's game.
Speaker 4 (37:32):
With the analytical component, I think it would be easier
to put him in the right spot more consistently. And
I do believe, I mean, if he's an offensive second
basement like that, he would play today because after all,
analytics loves offense. Although run prevention is a big phrase utilized,
but those are the kind of my thoughts with him.
Speaker 3 (37:51):
That's what I would. I would because I did.
Speaker 4 (37:54):
I mean, I used to do the defense a lot
for the Angels back in the day, and I would
sit down after every game and Diego Lopez was the
video guy. I'd have Diego on a video cassette. He
would put down the twenty seven action pitches or thirty
whatever forty from the day before, and I would look
at the action pitches, whether it's a strikeout of ball
four ball and play. I'm looking at bad angles, how
(38:16):
the ball came off dude's bats, and I would combine
that with the actual scouting report, and then I would
try to decide for where does somebody have to be
and I would talk to him about that, and you
just watch watch bad angles and if he's late, he
looks to me late lately, he's not catching up the fastballs.
Those are the kind of things that you really want
to feed into it. Jeff Kent to make him a
better second basement. I would like to believe a lot
(38:37):
of that was done. But at the end of the day,
long answer, if this guy can hit to those levels
that you're talking about, he's going to play.
Speaker 2 (38:44):
That's the bottom line for me, Joe, And like you,
I love defense. I think you can't separate it from pitching.
They're interconnected. But I think about this, Think about the
New York Yankees up the middle. Hori Posada got knocked
for his defense, Derek Jeter got knocked for his defense.
Bertie Williams got knocked for his defense.
Speaker 1 (39:04):
What did the Yankees do every year they won with
those guys up the middle. So do I love defense?
Speaker 3 (39:11):
Absolutely?
Speaker 1 (39:12):
Do I trust defensive metrics? No, I don't. And I
think too many times people voters at least are working
off reputations and saying, you know what, that guy was
a good hitter, but he was not a good defender.
I'm not going to vote for him. You know that's
just gobbledegook. I mean, just watched it again. Derek Jeter
played shortstop his whole career until he was forty one
(39:32):
years old. You know, if he was that bad, they
would have moved him off that position.
Speaker 4 (39:36):
Watch the game. Watch the game. I you know, and
I know this for a fact, as I've been told this,
and I in today's world, I think a lot of
people that are observing the game in order to write
about the game are not watching the game. They're going
to react to what's being fed to them on their
feeds during the course of the game. They're going to
react to social media commentary things like that. Are not
(39:58):
really going to watch what's going on, and because they're
gonna rely on statistical information to make up their mind
when it comes to and I realize that sometimes you
can be deceived, like I will have a perception of
Tom Erducci as a hitter, and then when I bring
it to my guys.
Speaker 3 (40:14):
And my analytical department, they come back.
Speaker 4 (40:15):
I said, could you run this because I think I'm
seeing this, And I'll come back and I say, no,
it's completely opposite of what you think you're saying. Amen,
I believe you, and I listen and then I reevaluate.
But you got to watch the game. You got to
watch the game, and that comes right down to first
steps angles, How does.
Speaker 3 (40:33):
This you know?
Speaker 4 (40:34):
What is this guy accuracy of his arm? Like, what
are you seeing out there? What's going on out there?
And then if you want to overlay the statistical information
over what you actually saw, go ahead and do it.
But I think in today's world, with the reliance so
much on being told what is right and wrong as
opposed to attempt to observe and use your acumen to
(40:55):
see things. Listen, I love ron Rennicky. I talk about
Rags all the time. Rags saw things. Rags was a
great coach, not a good coach, because Ronnie saw things anytime.
I meaning that he would pick up on nuance of
a field. There is not getting set properly, coming set
too late, moving with the wrong foot first, getting deeked
in his position, base running just in, he came, got
(41:19):
his lead too late, whatever whatever it might be. He
would see things. And that's what you want to be
able to do. And you only do that by disconnecting
from the ball. In other words, you're not watching the
ball from the picture's hand of the hitter where it's
hit all the time. You have to really disconnect and
spare it down in the shortstop. It's almost like the
isolated camera they used to show a lot in sports,
and they would show it on somebody and then obviously
(41:41):
the ball would hit in that area and then you
would see this reaction on the camera and you would
see why the play was.
Speaker 3 (41:46):
Made or not play or not made.
Speaker 4 (41:48):
So these are the things I just I get frustrated
with because I am so in tune to and able
to see things based on my training, and I don't
have to rely on that information all the time.
Speaker 3 (42:02):
I want to overlay it and.
Speaker 4 (42:04):
When I'm wrong, ask the question, is I think I'm
seeing this, Tommy, what do you got And you come
back and said, no, listen, man, I ran this and
this is here's actually what is going on. And I
accept that, but I still want to challenge myself to
utilize my acumen to see things and then combine it
with data.
Speaker 3 (42:20):
I love that.
Speaker 2 (42:21):
And speaking of coaches, there was a bit of news
on one of your former coaches off your World Championship,
cub Staff. We'll get into that and our final thought
of the day right after this on the Book of Joe.
(42:47):
Welcome back to the Book of Joe. I'm sure you
probably saw this. Joe Brandon Hyde. Hyder, released of course
during the season last year by the Orioles as their manager,
signed on with the Tampa Bay Rays as an advisor.
Speaker 1 (43:02):
Interesting move, I believe. Doesn't a hider still live in
that area, the Tampa Bay area.
Speaker 3 (43:07):
He's done in Sarasota.
Speaker 4 (43:08):
I just talked to him right before it happened, so
I knew it had a chance that I could not
be happier. I mean, had this guy as a coach
for when I was with the Cubs. I trusted him implicitly.
The guy does his work. The guy he's not afraid
of a tough conversation. He's a baseball guy. Went to
Long Beach State. Amen, al lujah. I'll take those guys
every day of the week and twice on Sunday. They've
(43:30):
been they've been trained properly. They're straightforward, they don't know
how to lie. They're just they're just and they're just good,
solid baseball people.
Speaker 3 (43:38):
And that's Hyder. Hyder is really good at all this.
Speaker 4 (43:40):
So you know, as like I said, as a bench
coach for me and even as a first base coach
with the Cubs, and he did a lot in spring training.
He helped run all these spring training God, I would watch it.
It was precise. He had a sense of humor. He
takes charge of the situation. You're not He's not a pushover.
You're not going to mess with him. He has opinions,
(44:00):
he knows what he believes in all of this stuff.
So I could not happier I talked him about It
was so jack when he told me.
Speaker 3 (44:06):
And it's a great fit for him.
Speaker 1 (44:07):
I believe, Yeah, that is a great fit.
Speaker 2 (44:09):
And everything you said about him obviously is true, especially
your part about you know, don't.
Speaker 1 (44:14):
Mess with him if you're not playing the game the
right way. But I've always thought.
Speaker 2 (44:18):
Of a Hyter just as a truly authentic, honest guy, right,
that's right. You know, he speaks the truth and nothing
but the truth. And in this game, I think that
stands out. And I always say that's if you want
to be a great coach or a manager, it has
to start with that. You know, players you know this, Joe,
they'll see through it if you're just blowing smoke. I
never got any of that from Hyder.
Speaker 4 (44:39):
Is impossible, It doesn't. It doesn't possess that he's just
not capable of doing that. He's he I'm telling you
my time spend in Southern California. We've talked about this before.
One of the most cherished parts about that is the
baseball people that help me, help nurture me to do
what I eventually did. It's a it's a conservative bastion
(45:02):
of baseball Southern Collifornia for at least formerly the coaches,
head coaches, scouts in general, right down to Babbeloo, Bob.
Speaker 3 (45:10):
Clear my mentor with the Angels.
Speaker 4 (45:11):
I mean, these guys, God, if you did not want
to hear the answer, please don't ask the question, because
they're not going to dissemble. They're going to tell you straightforwardly.
And the only way to do that if you're going
to help make somebody better. There's a great line honesty
without compassion equals cruelty.
Speaker 3 (45:27):
So these guys they just didn't know that.
Speaker 4 (45:31):
They just told you. And that's where it was raised.
That's Hider was raised. That's how he was raised. It's
the only way to be raised. And that's why the
guy from that neck of the woods are so good
and I have such a warm fuzzy about it, right
down to Jim Deets, who recently passed away at San
Diego State. Deeker was the guy that got Tony Gwynn
to go to San Diego State. I worked with Diets
(45:55):
in Boulder, Colorado, in nineteen nineteen eighty and God, I mean,
I don't know if I've ever met anybody worked harder
than he did, or cared more than he did, and
taught the game. Jimmy would get on the ground literally
when a guy was hitting somebody's throwing a batting practice.
He would get bellied on the ground and he arms out.
(46:16):
He would hold the guy's feet and ankles and move
the feet and ankles as the ball was coming in
to teach him how to move his feet properly. Who
does that? Who does that? I mean, these guys were nuts.
He actually put the lights up. He put the lights
on the light towers at San Diego State. He got
up on the towers themselves and put the lights in
(46:36):
to save money.
Speaker 3 (46:37):
So all these dudes in southern California, I'm telling.
Speaker 4 (46:40):
You, man, high school coaches, junior college coaches, all of
them spectacular. And I'm always I'm going off on a tangent.
But that's Wherehyder comes from. And he was taught properly,
and that is the best and.
Speaker 3 (46:53):
Only way to coach.
Speaker 1 (46:54):
That's very cool.
Speaker 2 (46:55):
I've never heard about a guy beating on the ground
as a hitting coach to move his feet bellied down.
Speaker 4 (47:01):
I saw it in Boulder. I couldn't believe it, could
not believe it.
Speaker 2 (47:04):
Of course, Heider was a just a couple of years
ago Manager of the Year. I look back at this, Joe,
between twenty eighteen and twenty twenty three, the twelve Managers
of the year, eight of them are no longer managing.
Eight of the twelve that wasn't that long ago, folks,
buckshow Walter, Gabe, Kapler, Dob Manningly, Mike Schilt, Bright, Snicker,
Bob Melvin Rockobell Delli, and Brandon Hyde.
Speaker 1 (47:25):
So hopefully, if Hyde does want to manage again, hopefully
there's another opportunity for him in this game. But good
to year. He's sticking around with the Rays and sticking
around at home.
Speaker 2 (47:36):
That brings us to our final thought, Joe, we've been
over the map, all over the map a little bit today,
but we're talking about valuation, free agents, Hall of Fame.
I'm not sure what you've got in mind, whether that
dovetails with some of our topics today, but it's always interesting.
Speaker 1 (47:51):
What do you got today?
Speaker 3 (47:52):
Yeah, you know, weirdly I did.
Speaker 4 (47:55):
I had five of them or four of them circle
for today because I was not certain how about me?
And I went with I had a Mark Twain list
of stuff went in doubt quote Mark Twain.
Speaker 3 (48:08):
So I don't know. But there's a couple that I
really liked.
Speaker 4 (48:10):
I'm just and you could fit these in any way
you want, but they're really short, which I like, and
they're always perceptive.
Speaker 3 (48:16):
So I'm gonna go.
Speaker 4 (48:17):
I'm gonna start with number twenty four because I really
like this one a lot. A lie can travel halfway
around the world where the truth is putting on its shoes.
Speaker 3 (48:27):
Wow. Do I love that? We all know that, And that's.
Speaker 4 (48:31):
A really part of today's culture in general. I think, okay,
number five, Truth is stranger than fiction, but it is
because fiction is obliged to stick to the possibilities.
Speaker 3 (48:41):
Truth isn't.
Speaker 4 (48:42):
Wow, And again, wear that as you like wherever you
find yourself on Whenever you find yourself on the side
of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect.
And I've known that since the seventies. I love that one, right,
because sometimes you almost want to run away, for I
do oftentimes, and I guess I've been accused of I'll
run away from the crowd because the when you get
(49:04):
this group think going on, man, And when group think occurs,
it's the it's the head, it's the leader, it's whomever
the dictator might be of that group. That's regardless of
how open they want to make it appear. At the
end of the day, that's the voice and only voice
that's going to count. Maybe that's the right way to be.
I don't know, but when you get to those majority groups,
(49:27):
and man, I've always been a part of the minority.
Speaker 3 (49:30):
And I love this one, and I'll save this for last.
Speaker 4 (49:32):
I've had a lot of worries in my life, most
of which never happened.
Speaker 3 (49:36):
And it's true. And I was just talking to Wendy
about that the other day.
Speaker 4 (49:40):
I mean, we always worry about stuff, and we always
fabricate worry.
Speaker 3 (49:43):
And when you do that, you don't stay.
Speaker 4 (49:45):
In the present tense often enough, and it takes you
off on these tangents. And really there's a big energy
loss in that when you constantly permit yourself to go
off on tangents.
Speaker 3 (49:55):
So remember that you have a lot of worries in life.
Speaker 4 (49:59):
I don't even know over ninety percent, maybe ninety over
ninety five percent never happened.
Speaker 1 (50:05):
Wow, that's some great stuff. Mark Twade. By the way,
Hall of Famer, doubt first ballot of.
Speaker 3 (50:11):
Hall of Fame, first ballot, exactly.
Speaker 1 (50:14):
I love the part about the majority as well, Joe.
I mean where that phrase the wisdom of the crowd
came from? Man, run away from that. That's the way
I look at it.
Speaker 4 (50:24):
Don't walk run Absolutely, that's correct. Hey, Tommy, let me
tell you about something. On December seventeenth down here in
Tampa at Alva Restaurant, We're going to have a thanks Miss.
Thanks missus my invention kind of where you serve the homeless.
And I chose the word thanks miss because I wanted
to indicate these people are in need to need our
(50:46):
help regardless of the time of the year. We always
tend to focus on helping other people during holidays. Thanks
Miss to me indicated any any time of the year,
and I was really zeroing in on any date between
Thanksgiving and Christmas to come up with thanks Miss. But
we've been doing it since two thousand and six. Excuse me,
since the pandemic, it's gone more difficult, been doing it
(51:08):
in Pennsylvania, but but bringing it back as a fundraiser
at AVA on December seventeenth. Got thirty celebs involved already.
Coach Sean Cooper is going to be there, a Jason
Light from the Bucks, Freddie McGriff working on some Maddy Joyce,
some guys that used to be with the Rais and
working on some present rays and some others. Hopefully you
can try to trap Coach Gruden to come on down
(51:30):
to it also, But anyway, it's going to be like
thirty dudes there and also Brittany Linsey Come's going to
be there, so she's wonderful. We're going to serve this
petty meatball sausage and homemade piogi would be a part
of this. We got one hundred and fifty that we
could handle. You're going to get a copy of the
Book of Joe and a beanie that indicates the thanks Massana.
We have tables at twenty five hundred dollars sponsorships up
(51:53):
to a ten thousand dollars sponsorship, and I think general
admissions one hundred and fifty bucks and it's going to
be sold out. It almost already is so, but I
wanted to put it out there. Anybody's insted it in
the air in the area, get in touch with us
and I could get you that information. Even if you
just called Ava the restaurant Ava Ava seven eighteen South
(52:15):
Howard Avenue in Tampa, they'll be able to give you
information how to get this done. Anyway, it's just the
beginning of it. I have other plans. I want to
get it rolling again. I want to bring back thanks
here in Florida, which we are. I want to get
it back in Pennsylvania, want to do it in Chicago.
Those that'll be my triangle to work with. And it
is it's for the homeless, and we try to we
(52:36):
do serve them, we honor them at that point. We
do attempt to give them a gift every place that
we serve at and it could be anywhere from one
hundred people to two hundred and fifty three hundred people
that attend on a particular night. So anyway, that's the
cliff notes. If you're in Tampa, come by and see
us again. It's the first and I really want to
(52:58):
try to make it a part of spring training somehow,
and that would be my next idea and I'll keep
you posting on that.
Speaker 1 (53:03):
Oh that is awesome, Joe.
Speaker 2 (53:05):
I mean, obviously it's super important to remember those less fortunate,
especially this time of year. Wish all the best with
that event and all the people helping you with that.
And by the way, I have been to Ava and
it's awesome, so good luck with that event.
Speaker 3 (53:21):
Thank you man. Food's great. Thank you, Jail. Jail.
Speaker 4 (53:24):
Our chef is actually making a homemade piolgi for this
and I sampled it the other night.
Speaker 1 (53:28):
Outstanding, great stuff.
Speaker 3 (53:29):
Joe.
Speaker 1 (53:30):
We'll see you next time on the Book of Joe.
Speaker 3 (53:32):
See you, Tommy.
Speaker 1 (53:41):
The Book of Joe podcast is a production of iHeartRadio.
For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,
or wherever you get your podcasts.
Fox Sports Radio News
Host
Jonas Knox
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
Are You A Charlotte?
In 1997, actress Kristin Davis’ life was forever changed when she took on the role of Charlotte York in Sex and the City. As we watched Carrie, Samantha, Miranda and Charlotte navigate relationships in NYC, the show helped push once unacceptable conversation topics out of the shadows and altered the narrative around women and sex. We all saw ourselves in them as they searched for fulfillment in life, sex and friendships. Now, Kristin Davis wants to connect with you, the fans, and share untold stories and all the behind the scenes. Together, with Kristin and special guests, what will begin with Sex and the City will evolve into talks about themes that are still so relevant today. "Are you a Charlotte?" is much more than just rewatching this beloved show, it brings the past and the present together as we talk with heart, humor and of course some optimism.