Kerre Woodham: What do we do with children of overstayers?

What on Earth do we do with young people who were born in New Zealand, who have lived in New Zealand all of their lives, but who aren't New Zealanders? They've never known any other home, but they can't get healthcare, they can't get a driver's licence, they can't get a job, they can't pay taxes.  

In 2006, a law change under the Helen Clark Government removed the right to citizenship by birth for children born in New Zealand. The justification was that it stopped people from country shopping by going from country to country, having a baby in the one they liked and therefore being granted citizenship through their child. That's a fight Donald Trump's having right now with the US Supreme Court, the US being one of 33 countries that grants jus soli – the right of the soil, or the right of citizenship to anyone born within a territory.  

We did away with jus soli in 2006, and now young people, it's not known how many, because of course they live in the shadows, are leaving the education system and are locked in limbo. The education system will educate anyone here, even if they're here unlawfully, until the age of 18. After that, all services of the state are denied to them, and they are on their own. Stuff has an excellent story highlighting the plight of New Zealand born overstayers this morning. At the moment, it appears there is no pathway for children born to overstayers after 2006. It's even more cruel to think that siblings born to those same overstaying parents before 2006 have New Zealand citizenship but their brothers and sisters born after don't.  

At the moment the only option is to go to the Minister of Immigration and plead individual cases, which is time consuming, lengthy, costly, and takes up a lot of bureaucrats' time.  

So what do we do with these 18 and 19 year olds? An immigration lawyer quoted in the Stuff story wants a repeal of the 2006 law change, which removed the right the birthright citizenship. Or, he suggests, we do what the Aussies and the Brits do and that is grant citizenship if you're born here and have lived here for 10 years or more. Surely that seems the most humane way of dealing with these young adults. They're here, they've been here all their lives, they likely have siblings who have New Zealand citizenship – those siblings are working or at university. Should the same rights be granted to those kids who, through no fault of their own were born in this country and now find themselves in effect stateless, without a country, without a place to call home, despite the fact that New Zealand is the only home they've known?  

I would do what the Aussies and the Brits do. If you have been born here, if you have lived here for 10 years or more, you're a Kiwi.   

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:06):
You're listening to the Carrywood and Mornings podcast from News Talks.

Speaker 2 (00:10):
He'd be, what on earth do we do with young
people who were born in New Zealand, who have lived
in New Zealand all of their lives, but who aren't
New Zealanders, They've never known any other home. But they
can't get healthcare, they can't get a driver's license, they
can't get a job, they can't pay taxes. In two

(00:33):
thousand and six, a law change under the Helen Clark
government removed the right to citizenship by birth for children
born in New Zealand. The justification was that it stopped
people from country shopping by going from country to country,
having a baby and the one they liked, and therefore
being granted citizenship through their child. That's a fight Donald

(00:55):
Trump's having right now at the US Supreme Court. The
US being one of thirty three countries that grants just
solely the right of the soil literally or the right
of sla citizenship to anyone born within a territory. We
did away with just solely in two thousand and six.
And now young people, it's not known how many, because

(01:16):
of course they live in the shadows, are leaving the
education system and are locked in limbo. The education system
will educate anyone here, even if they're here unlawfully, until
the age of eighteen. After that, all services of the
state are denied to them and they are on their own.
Stuff has an excellent story highlighting the plight of New

(01:39):
Zealand born overstairs this morning. At the moment, it appears
there is no pathway for children born to overstays after
two thousand and six. It's even more cruel to think
that siblings born to those same overstaying parents before two
thousand and six have New Zealand citizenship, but their brothers

(02:00):
and sisters born after don't. At the moment, the only
option is to go to the Minister of Immigration and
plead individual cases, which is time consuming and lengthy and
costly and takes up a lot of bureaucrats' time. So

(02:26):
what do we do with these eighteen and nineteen year olds.
An immigration lawyer quoted in this Stuff story wants a
repeal of the two thousand and six law change which
removed the right the birthright citizenship, or he suggests we
do what the Aussies and the Brits do, and that
is grant citizenship if you're born here and have lived

(02:49):
here for ten years or more, surely that seems the
most humane way of dealing with these young adults. They're here,
they've been here all their lives. They likely have siblings
who have New Zealand citizenship. Those siblings are working or

(03:11):
at university. Should the same rights be granted to those
kids who threw no fault of their own, were born
in this country and now find themselves in effect stateless,
without a country, without a place to call home, despite
the fact that New Zealand is the only home they've known.

(03:31):
I would do what the Aussies and the Brits do.
If you have been born here, if you have lived
here for ten years or more, you're a kiw

Speaker 1 (03:43):
For more from Carrywood and Mornings, listen live to news
talks that be from nine am weekdays, or follow the
podcast on iHeartRadio.