September 16, 2025 • 18 mins
The assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk has shone a spotlight on political violence in the US, and around the world.
The 31-year-old was shot at a Utah university last week in front of thousands of people the alleged killer is 22-year-old Tyler Robinson, who’s set to appear in court this week.
While his motive remains unclear, the killing has sparked conversations about the widening gap between left and right politics.
It’s also highlighted the deep, dark depths of the internet, and how young people can be radicalised online.
Today on The Front Page, Massey University emeritus professor and sociologist Paul Spoonley is with us to dissect the inner workings of those who perpetrate political violence, and how we might be able to stop them.
Follow The Front Page on iHeartRadio, Apple Podcasts, Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts.
You can read more about this and other stories in the New Zealand Herald, online at nzherald.co.nz, or tune in to news bulletins across the NZME network.
Host: Chelsea Daniels
Editor/Producer: Richard Martin
Producer: Jane Yee
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:05):
Kyota.
Speaker 2 (00:06):
I'm Chelsea Daniels and This is the Front Page, a
daily podcast presented by The New Zealand Herald. The assassination
of conservative activist Charlie Kirk has shone a spotlight on
political violence in the US and around the world. The
(00:26):
thirty one year old was shot at a Utah University
last week in front of thousands of people. The alleged
killer is twenty two year old Tyler Robinson, who's set
to appear in court this week. While his motive remains unclear,
the killing has sparked conversations about the widening gap between
(00:46):
left and right politics. It's also highlighted the deep dark
depths of the Internet and how young people can be
radicalized online. Today on the Front Page, Massy University emeritus
professor and sociologist Paul Spoonley is with us to dissect
the inner workings of those who perpetrate political violence and
(01:08):
how we might be able to stop them. So, Paul,
the race is on to try and figure out why
this shooter targeted Charlie Kirk. And there are a lot
of accusations being thrown around at the moment. At the
end of the day, though, does it really matter what
side he was on, left or right, It's still political violence,
(01:32):
isn't it.
Speaker 1 (01:32):
It is political violence, and unfortunately, and particularly in the US,
we're seeing more of it. And the difficulty, the difficulty
there and the difficulty here in New Zealand is that
when we get these local actors, these homegrown local actors,
very often they're invisible. They send out quite weak signals.
(01:53):
And I think, Chelsea, we're naive. I think we're naive
to think that this is something that happens in America,
not here. It has happened here, and it will happen here.
But we're also a naive in terms of what we
need to look for, because in the case of the
Charlie Kirk killing, but also in the case of the
christ Church shooter, there were people around both of those
(02:18):
shooters who would have seen something but didn't possibly didn't
know what they were looking at. So I do think
we need to increase the awareness of families and peers
and teachers in terms of what they might look for
as people get radicalized.
Speaker 2 (02:39):
And in terms of that as well, I mean, I've
seen a lot of conversation around on the Internet and
kind of deciphering this language used I know that bullets
found after the shooting carried a range of messages and
the Internet is kind of racing to decipher those, and
it looks like, you know, they're referencing video games, meme culture.
(03:02):
I mean, it seems to me like a completely different language.
And that isn't foreign to these kind of people, right.
Speaker 1 (03:10):
No, it's not. And I mean I would go to
the christ Church shooter and the advantage, if there are
any advantages there was that he published a manifesto, so he,
like the killer of Charlie Kirk, had insignia or memes
or sayings on the guns and the ammunition. In the
(03:33):
case of the christ Church shooter, he did have that
as well, but he also had a manifesto, so we
can get a sense of why what prompted him to
do what he did in christ Church in twenty nineteen.
It's a little bit more difficult with this one, particularly
as the shooter is not being cooperative and so we
now got to do a forensic check of what's happened online,
(03:56):
what we can get from that, and of course what
the police and other are athorities are doing, which is
talking to family and friends.
Speaker 2 (04:02):
I mean, regardless what these inscriptions actually mean it just
it points to a person who's like deeply entrenched in
those online forums and that online culture, and this is
where a lot of that radicalization happens nowadays.
Speaker 1 (04:18):
Hey, yes it does, and it's actually relatively recent Chelsea
in terms of what we're seeing. Last year the Five
Eyes of which New Zealand's part, produced a very interesting
report on young people in the five countries and radicalization.
And what we're seeing is that younger people, sometimes educated
(04:42):
so well educated, perhaps students who are doing well or
university students and you know that's the case with this shooter,
are attracted and then they go down these rabbit holes
into conspiratorial extreme views and ideologies. I have to say
that the the bulk of people who express those extreme
(05:02):
views online do not necessarily act out those views. But
we still have that possibility and what we need to
understand and I don't think we do really as much
as we would like to. What's the process who's vulnerable
in the first instance, but what's the process whereby people
(05:24):
get convinced that these extreme views are views that they
should hold, in which they demonize others. The difficulty at
the moment is we're really paralyzed, and we've got declining trust.
We've got declining trust and politicians, unfortunately Chelsea, and the media,
and so we tend to revert to these echo chambers
(05:44):
in which we get affirmation of our own views. So
what starts that process? What leads you into that echo chamber?
And you know, we know vulnerability, we know social isolation.
There are a number of cues that we need to
be aware of, but we really do need to understand
more about it. And how do we intervene much earlier
(06:05):
in that process before they do get radicalized?
Speaker 2 (06:08):
And generally we're talking about this kind of right wing conservatism,
it's disenfranchised young men as well. Nine times out of ten.
How do we get to that group and steer them
away from these kind of forums that make them feel
so included and so part of a pack, so to speak.
Speaker 1 (06:32):
Yeah, And I was at the University of California at
Berkeley with an author called Ali Hodgchild, and what she
pointed to in the American context was the disaffection and
the alienation of particularly white working class men, increasingly white
middle class men in terms of the recognition of diversity.
(06:56):
So what we've got is an inversion. In the past,
we would have probably said that particular groups, let's say
Afro Americans, have been the victims of institutional racism, to
use a word. What we're now seeing is the flip
of that, and that the victims in modern society are
(07:16):
very often white males who were being excluded from promotion,
from jobs. And so we're getting this combination of economic circumstances.
And remember a lot of us began to emerge during
the global financial crisis two and eight twenty twelve, and
then got accelerated during COVID, and so's there's certainly a constituency.
(07:38):
And by the way, there is a constituency in New Zealand.
If you look at a group like right wing Resistance,
they tended to be young males and very much into
the manisphere, so you know, a toxic masculinity, and a
number of them were a university student. So those old
ideas that somehow the people who are going to be
(08:01):
recruited were not educated, were not aware of the world
around them, is no longer true.
Speaker 2 (08:07):
These interpretations of the messages as well as the shooters
online blueprint, it's hard to decipher what his political leaning is.
So you've got these very niche references to anti fascism,
but you've also got these references used by groups like
neo Nazi nick for Winters as followers who didn't actually
like Charlie Kirk. Does this show that the far right
(08:29):
isn't as black and white anymore?
Speaker 1 (08:31):
Yes. And indeed our own groups inside New Zealand, our
security and intelligence agencies, but also the Combined Threats Assessment Group,
which is the main government group that looks at the
threat landscape in New Zealand, have developed some new categories.
And it looks as though those new categories of people
who bring together various traditions both sort of less than right,
(08:54):
as you've pointed out, to provide new political view points,
but they're still extreme. And for me, I think one
of the things that I've focused on the extreme right,
but one of the things that strikes me is that
when you look at the extreme left and the extreme right,
very often they look quite similar. They look the way
(09:17):
in which they demonize particular people. They might demonize different people,
but the way in which they demonize people and the
way in which they justify are violence towards government. And
so what we've seen, and I think the US evidence
over the last two decades. They've got an excellent report
on what's contributed to tourist attacks and redcalization is that
(09:41):
seventy percent have come from the extreme right. And yes,
white supremacists, so they would be classic sort of Nazi
fascist groups. But the other major category is anti government.
And so I think what we've seen as a new
set of as a new set of groups begin to emerge,
(10:02):
particularly since COVID, in which attacking the government, attacking the
police sovereign citizens would be a case in point. And
so we had a we had an activist, Richard Silvill,
who was sentenced and earlier this year, and he was
sentenced because he shared objectionable material the christ Church stream
(10:23):
of the shooting, but because he threatened to kill the
Prime Minister, just Sindra Adourn. And so I think we're
getting these diverse but mixed set of messages and positions
that are beginning to emerge. It's much more complex than
when I first began to look at the extreme right
some decades ago.
Speaker 2 (10:42):
Yeah, I mean, because it's from my learnings online, it's
not really right versus left anymore. And even that kind
of spectrum, you can question whether that's a particularly good
way of describing these groups. I learned that there are
factions of the far right actually in conflict with each other,
so these people called gropers who think MAGA is actually liberal.
(11:08):
So knowing the kind of colorful array and all of
the different gray bits in between will probably help us
moving forward, right.
Speaker 1 (11:18):
It will. It will, but we need to map that landscape.
So it's changed and constantly changing. So I've talked about
its diversity, but we're also seeing new positions beginning to emerge,
which is what you've highlighted. And we do need good
evidence for this, And can I go to There's a
private group in New Zealand called Global Risk Consulting Group,
(11:41):
and their latest assessment, which came out a while ago,
think says that there's a seventy percent chance that we
will see a terrorist act in the next five years
in New Zealand. And I think we've got to take
that seriously. So one of the things I would dearly
love us to do is to understand both the international
(12:04):
but also the domestic landscape here, because I do think
we face the possibility that because we don't understand all
of these permutations, somebody's going to come out of somewhere
that we haven't actually paid much attention to. And that was,
of course the Royal Commission's concern after the christ shooting,
that we paid too much attention to Islamic terrorism and
(12:26):
not enough to write a white supremacy terrorism.
Speaker 3 (12:37):
Jennie Vancier live from my office in the White House
complex and filling in for somebody who cannot be filled
in for. But I'm going to try to do my
best my dear friend, the great Charlie Kirk. The thing is,
every single person in this building we owe something to Charlie.
He was a joyful warrior for our country. He loved
(12:59):
America did voted himself tirelessly to making our country a
better place. He was a critical part of getting Donald
Trump elected as president, getting me elected as vice president,
and so much of our success over the last seven
months is due to his efforts, his staffing, his support
in his friendship.
Speaker 2 (13:21):
I think it's quite interesting in the US if we
go back to the Charlie Kirk shooting. Donald Trump has
continued to accuse his political opponents of inciting violence and
placing blame on the left. He said, the problem is
on the left. It's not on the right. He then
blamed left wing radicals. Then we have JD. Vance signaling
a growing and powerful minority on the left as well,
(13:44):
and the very quick to point fingers. And I read
a comment from Seawan Westwood. He's the director of the
Polarization Research Lab at Dartmouth College, and he said, in
the aftermath of the assassination attempt against Donald Trump, say,
leaders on both side of the IOWA called the national
temperature issuing unified condemnation, and in the way of Kirk's murder,
(14:07):
the opposite is happening. He said, We're witnessing the cynical
minting of a martyr and a call to fight instead.
How important is it that they're taking this route as
opposed to unifying and calling for condemnation of all political violence.
Speaker 1 (14:26):
Yeah, and I think that's really disappointing. And so I
think there are a number of public commentators and politicians
in the United States that have asked, we're toning down
at the temperature around this, because if you look at
the evidence of President Trump's own agencies, then the major
(14:46):
threat comes from the far right, not from the far left.
So this attempt to recategorize where the threat is coming
from is actually not supported by the evidence. So the
Department Justice has done some really good works around looking
at where terrorism is likely to come from. And if
I can give an example, Timothy McVeigh was a sovereign
(15:07):
citizen and he was involved in the Oklahoma bombing. So
those major events of terrorism have involved the far right,
and I just don't think it's helpful, I mean politically,
but also in terms of how you rebuild trust. You're
really effectively cementing in some of the divisions and some
(15:29):
of the hostility and the polarization and the demonization of
particular groups. And of course we forget or have forgotten,
and it's not mentioned now that a Democratic senator was
shot in their own home not so long ago. So
why the outrage now not the outrage?
Speaker 2 (15:50):
Then?
Speaker 1 (15:51):
It seems very one sided to me and very unfortunate,
because how do you rebuild when you dig these sort
of trenches and conduct the sort of warfare.
Speaker 2 (16:01):
How do we catch up to these kind of groups,
and how do we learn their language online? And how
can New Zealand make sure that nothing similar happens here?
Speaker 1 (16:11):
I think there's some excellent work being done internationally. So
the International Strategic dialogue and one of the researchers might
have come Ifort has done some really good work in
New Zealand. By the way, that research shows that New
Zealand is accessing far right YouTube or Facebook, I'm not
sure which sites. Was double the rate of Australian, triple
(16:36):
the rate of Canada. So why is that the case?
And I think we need to access some of the
initiatives and the understanding that's available internationally. The EU has
done some really good work around what to do in
terms of identifying the dynamics of a particular country and
internationally and then what we might do. By the way,
(16:58):
there are some initiatives in New Zealand which I think
we need to acknowledge. The New Zealand Security Intelligence Service
had produced a very good little Booklet's saying No the Signs.
So there is something that is happening here. There are
some things that are happening here. But I would really
like us to pay more attention, fund more activity to
(17:20):
make sure that we are on top of what's happening.
And particularly I think we're going to struggle given the
volume of material that's appearing online and so our agencies,
our security and intelligence agencies are really swamped by this material.
The amount of material and then trying to identify where
the potential risks might be coming from just got to
(17:40):
be a much more community wide response. And I do
think we need to talk about digital literacy and digital citizenship.
We've really got to understand what's happening, particularly to young
people but also others online at the moment and what
the possibilities and the problems.
Speaker 2 (18:00):
Thanks for joining us, Paul.
Speaker 1 (18:02):
Thank you, Chelsea. Always a pleasure.
Speaker 2 (18:07):
That's it for this episode of the Front Page. You
can read more about today's stories and extensive news coverage
at enzidherld dot co dot nz. The Front Page is
produced by Jane Ye and Richard Martin, who is also
our editor. I'm Chelsea Daniels. Subscribe to The Front Page
on iHeartRadio or wherever you get your podcasts, and tune
(18:30):
in tomorrow for another look behind the headlines.
Kyota.
Speaker 2 (00:06):
I'm Chelsea Daniels and This is the Front Page, a
daily podcast presented by The New Zealand Herald. The assassination
of conservative activist Charlie Kirk has shone a spotlight on
political violence in the US and around the world. The
(00:26):
thirty one year old was shot at a Utah University
last week in front of thousands of people. The alleged
killer is twenty two year old Tyler Robinson, who's set
to appear in court this week. While his motive remains unclear,
the killing has sparked conversations about the widening gap between
(00:46):
left and right politics. It's also highlighted the deep dark
depths of the Internet and how young people can be
radicalized online. Today on the Front Page, Massy University emeritus
professor and sociologist Paul Spoonley is with us to dissect
the inner workings of those who perpetrate political violence and
(01:08):
how we might be able to stop them. So, Paul,
the race is on to try and figure out why
this shooter targeted Charlie Kirk. And there are a lot
of accusations being thrown around at the moment. At the
end of the day, though, does it really matter what
side he was on, left or right, It's still political violence,
(01:32):
isn't it.
Speaker 1 (01:32):
It is political violence, and unfortunately, and particularly in the US,
we're seeing more of it. And the difficulty, the difficulty
there and the difficulty here in New Zealand is that
when we get these local actors, these homegrown local actors,
very often they're invisible. They send out quite weak signals.
(01:53):
And I think, Chelsea, we're naive. I think we're naive
to think that this is something that happens in America,
not here. It has happened here, and it will happen here.
But we're also a naive in terms of what we
need to look for, because in the case of the
Charlie Kirk killing, but also in the case of the
christ Church shooter, there were people around both of those
(02:18):
shooters who would have seen something but didn't possibly didn't
know what they were looking at. So I do think
we need to increase the awareness of families and peers
and teachers in terms of what they might look for
as people get radicalized.
Speaker 2 (02:39):
And in terms of that as well, I mean, I've
seen a lot of conversation around on the Internet and
kind of deciphering this language used I know that bullets
found after the shooting carried a range of messages and
the Internet is kind of racing to decipher those, and
it looks like, you know, they're referencing video games, meme culture.
(03:02):
I mean, it seems to me like a completely different language.
And that isn't foreign to these kind of people, right.
Speaker 1 (03:10):
No, it's not. And I mean I would go to
the christ Church shooter and the advantage, if there are
any advantages there was that he published a manifesto, so he,
like the killer of Charlie Kirk, had insignia or memes
or sayings on the guns and the ammunition. In the
(03:33):
case of the christ Church shooter, he did have that
as well, but he also had a manifesto, so we
can get a sense of why what prompted him to
do what he did in christ Church in twenty nineteen.
It's a little bit more difficult with this one, particularly
as the shooter is not being cooperative and so we
now got to do a forensic check of what's happened online,
(03:56):
what we can get from that, and of course what
the police and other are athorities are doing, which is
talking to family and friends.
Speaker 2 (04:02):
I mean, regardless what these inscriptions actually mean it just
it points to a person who's like deeply entrenched in
those online forums and that online culture, and this is
where a lot of that radicalization happens nowadays.
Speaker 1 (04:18):
Hey, yes it does, and it's actually relatively recent Chelsea
in terms of what we're seeing. Last year the Five
Eyes of which New Zealand's part, produced a very interesting
report on young people in the five countries and radicalization.
And what we're seeing is that younger people, sometimes educated
(04:42):
so well educated, perhaps students who are doing well or
university students and you know that's the case with this shooter,
are attracted and then they go down these rabbit holes
into conspiratorial extreme views and ideologies. I have to say
that the the bulk of people who express those extreme
(05:02):
views online do not necessarily act out those views. But
we still have that possibility and what we need to
understand and I don't think we do really as much
as we would like to. What's the process who's vulnerable
in the first instance, but what's the process whereby people
(05:24):
get convinced that these extreme views are views that they
should hold, in which they demonize others. The difficulty at
the moment is we're really paralyzed, and we've got declining trust.
We've got declining trust and politicians, unfortunately Chelsea, and the media,
and so we tend to revert to these echo chambers
(05:44):
in which we get affirmation of our own views. So
what starts that process? What leads you into that echo chamber?
And you know, we know vulnerability, we know social isolation.
There are a number of cues that we need to
be aware of, but we really do need to understand
more about it. And how do we intervene much earlier
(06:05):
in that process before they do get radicalized?
Speaker 2 (06:08):
And generally we're talking about this kind of right wing conservatism,
it's disenfranchised young men as well. Nine times out of ten.
How do we get to that group and steer them
away from these kind of forums that make them feel
so included and so part of a pack, so to speak.
Speaker 1 (06:32):
Yeah, And I was at the University of California at
Berkeley with an author called Ali Hodgchild, and what she
pointed to in the American context was the disaffection and
the alienation of particularly white working class men, increasingly white
middle class men in terms of the recognition of diversity.
(06:56):
So what we've got is an inversion. In the past,
we would have probably said that particular groups, let's say
Afro Americans, have been the victims of institutional racism, to
use a word. What we're now seeing is the flip
of that, and that the victims in modern society are
(07:16):
very often white males who were being excluded from promotion,
from jobs. And so we're getting this combination of economic circumstances.
And remember a lot of us began to emerge during
the global financial crisis two and eight twenty twelve, and
then got accelerated during COVID, and so's there's certainly a constituency.
(07:38):
And by the way, there is a constituency in New Zealand.
If you look at a group like right wing Resistance,
they tended to be young males and very much into
the manisphere, so you know, a toxic masculinity, and a
number of them were a university student. So those old
ideas that somehow the people who are going to be
(08:01):
recruited were not educated, were not aware of the world
around them, is no longer true.
Speaker 2 (08:07):
These interpretations of the messages as well as the shooters
online blueprint, it's hard to decipher what his political leaning is.
So you've got these very niche references to anti fascism,
but you've also got these references used by groups like
neo Nazi nick for Winters as followers who didn't actually
like Charlie Kirk. Does this show that the far right
(08:29):
isn't as black and white anymore?
Speaker 1 (08:31):
Yes. And indeed our own groups inside New Zealand, our
security and intelligence agencies, but also the Combined Threats Assessment Group,
which is the main government group that looks at the
threat landscape in New Zealand, have developed some new categories.
And it looks as though those new categories of people
who bring together various traditions both sort of less than right,
(08:54):
as you've pointed out, to provide new political view points,
but they're still extreme. And for me, I think one
of the things that I've focused on the extreme right,
but one of the things that strikes me is that
when you look at the extreme left and the extreme right,
very often they look quite similar. They look the way
(09:17):
in which they demonize particular people. They might demonize different people,
but the way in which they demonize people and the
way in which they justify are violence towards government. And
so what we've seen, and I think the US evidence
over the last two decades. They've got an excellent report
on what's contributed to tourist attacks and redcalization is that
(09:41):
seventy percent have come from the extreme right. And yes,
white supremacists, so they would be classic sort of Nazi
fascist groups. But the other major category is anti government.
And so I think what we've seen as a new
set of as a new set of groups begin to emerge,
(10:02):
particularly since COVID, in which attacking the government, attacking the
police sovereign citizens would be a case in point. And
so we had a we had an activist, Richard Silvill,
who was sentenced and earlier this year, and he was
sentenced because he shared objectionable material the christ Church stream
(10:23):
of the shooting, but because he threatened to kill the
Prime Minister, just Sindra Adourn. And so I think we're
getting these diverse but mixed set of messages and positions
that are beginning to emerge. It's much more complex than
when I first began to look at the extreme right
some decades ago.
Speaker 2 (10:42):
Yeah, I mean, because it's from my learnings online, it's
not really right versus left anymore. And even that kind
of spectrum, you can question whether that's a particularly good
way of describing these groups. I learned that there are
factions of the far right actually in conflict with each other,
so these people called gropers who think MAGA is actually liberal.
(11:08):
So knowing the kind of colorful array and all of
the different gray bits in between will probably help us
moving forward, right.
Speaker 1 (11:18):
It will. It will, but we need to map that landscape.
So it's changed and constantly changing. So I've talked about
its diversity, but we're also seeing new positions beginning to emerge,
which is what you've highlighted. And we do need good
evidence for this, And can I go to There's a
private group in New Zealand called Global Risk Consulting Group,
(11:41):
and their latest assessment, which came out a while ago,
think says that there's a seventy percent chance that we
will see a terrorist act in the next five years
in New Zealand. And I think we've got to take
that seriously. So one of the things I would dearly
love us to do is to understand both the international
(12:04):
but also the domestic landscape here, because I do think
we face the possibility that because we don't understand all
of these permutations, somebody's going to come out of somewhere
that we haven't actually paid much attention to. And that was,
of course the Royal Commission's concern after the christ shooting,
that we paid too much attention to Islamic terrorism and
(12:26):
not enough to write a white supremacy terrorism.
Speaker 3 (12:37):
Jennie Vancier live from my office in the White House
complex and filling in for somebody who cannot be filled
in for. But I'm going to try to do my
best my dear friend, the great Charlie Kirk. The thing is,
every single person in this building we owe something to Charlie.
He was a joyful warrior for our country. He loved
(12:59):
America did voted himself tirelessly to making our country a
better place. He was a critical part of getting Donald
Trump elected as president, getting me elected as vice president,
and so much of our success over the last seven
months is due to his efforts, his staffing, his support
in his friendship.
Speaker 2 (13:21):
I think it's quite interesting in the US if we
go back to the Charlie Kirk shooting. Donald Trump has
continued to accuse his political opponents of inciting violence and
placing blame on the left. He said, the problem is
on the left. It's not on the right. He then
blamed left wing radicals. Then we have JD. Vance signaling
a growing and powerful minority on the left as well,
(13:44):
and the very quick to point fingers. And I read
a comment from Seawan Westwood. He's the director of the
Polarization Research Lab at Dartmouth College, and he said, in
the aftermath of the assassination attempt against Donald Trump, say,
leaders on both side of the IOWA called the national
temperature issuing unified condemnation, and in the way of Kirk's murder,
(14:07):
the opposite is happening. He said, We're witnessing the cynical
minting of a martyr and a call to fight instead.
How important is it that they're taking this route as
opposed to unifying and calling for condemnation of all political violence.
Speaker 1 (14:26):
Yeah, and I think that's really disappointing. And so I
think there are a number of public commentators and politicians
in the United States that have asked, we're toning down
at the temperature around this, because if you look at
the evidence of President Trump's own agencies, then the major
(14:46):
threat comes from the far right, not from the far left.
So this attempt to recategorize where the threat is coming
from is actually not supported by the evidence. So the
Department Justice has done some really good works around looking
at where terrorism is likely to come from. And if
I can give an example, Timothy McVeigh was a sovereign
(15:07):
citizen and he was involved in the Oklahoma bombing. So
those major events of terrorism have involved the far right,
and I just don't think it's helpful, I mean politically,
but also in terms of how you rebuild trust. You're
really effectively cementing in some of the divisions and some
(15:29):
of the hostility and the polarization and the demonization of
particular groups. And of course we forget or have forgotten,
and it's not mentioned now that a Democratic senator was
shot in their own home not so long ago. So
why the outrage now not the outrage?
Speaker 2 (15:50):
Then?
Speaker 1 (15:51):
It seems very one sided to me and very unfortunate,
because how do you rebuild when you dig these sort
of trenches and conduct the sort of warfare.
Speaker 2 (16:01):
How do we catch up to these kind of groups,
and how do we learn their language online? And how
can New Zealand make sure that nothing similar happens here?
Speaker 1 (16:11):
I think there's some excellent work being done internationally. So
the International Strategic dialogue and one of the researchers might
have come Ifort has done some really good work in
New Zealand. By the way, that research shows that New
Zealand is accessing far right YouTube or Facebook, I'm not
sure which sites. Was double the rate of Australian, triple
(16:36):
the rate of Canada. So why is that the case?
And I think we need to access some of the
initiatives and the understanding that's available internationally. The EU has
done some really good work around what to do in
terms of identifying the dynamics of a particular country and
internationally and then what we might do. By the way,
(16:58):
there are some initiatives in New Zealand which I think
we need to acknowledge. The New Zealand Security Intelligence Service
had produced a very good little Booklet's saying No the Signs.
So there is something that is happening here. There are
some things that are happening here. But I would really
like us to pay more attention, fund more activity to
(17:20):
make sure that we are on top of what's happening.
And particularly I think we're going to struggle given the
volume of material that's appearing online and so our agencies,
our security and intelligence agencies are really swamped by this material.
The amount of material and then trying to identify where
the potential risks might be coming from just got to
(17:40):
be a much more community wide response. And I do
think we need to talk about digital literacy and digital citizenship.
We've really got to understand what's happening, particularly to young
people but also others online at the moment and what
the possibilities and the problems.
Speaker 2 (18:00):
Thanks for joining us, Paul.
Speaker 1 (18:02):
Thank you, Chelsea. Always a pleasure.
Speaker 2 (18:07):
That's it for this episode of the Front Page. You
can read more about today's stories and extensive news coverage
at enzidherld dot co dot nz. The Front Page is
produced by Jane Ye and Richard Martin, who is also
our editor. I'm Chelsea Daniels. Subscribe to The Front Page
on iHeartRadio or wherever you get your podcasts, and tune
(18:30):
in tomorrow for another look behind the headlines.
Popular Podcasts
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
The Joe Rogan Experience
The official podcast of comedian Joe Rogan.