July 8, 2024 • 17 mins
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon is off to the United States this week – the world’s largest economy and our second biggest trading partner.
He’s there for what’s described as “D.C.’s diplomatic Super Bowl”, where dozens of foreign leaders will descend upon Washington for the NATO Summit.
A number of bilaterals with other NATO leaders is on the cards – as well as a spattering of sideline meetings with top US politicians.
Today on The Front Page, former NZ ambassador to the US, Tim Groser joins to discuss how important tapping into the US market is – and what movers and shakers Luxon will shake hands with.
Follow The Front Page on iHeartRadio, Apple Podcasts, Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts.
You can read more about this and other stories in the New Zealand Herald, online at nzherald.co.nz, or tune in to news bulletins across the NZME network.
Host: Chelsea Daniels
Sound Engineer: Paddy Fox
Producer: Ethan Sills
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:05):
Kilda. I'm Chelsea Daniels and this is the Front Page,
a daily podcast presented by the New Zealand Herald. Prime
Minister Christopher Luxon is off to the United States this week.
The world's largest economy and our second biggest trading partner,
(00:25):
is therefore what's described as DC's diplomatic super Bowl, where
dozens of foreign leaders will descend upon Washington for the
NATO summer. A number of bilaterals with other NATO leaders
is on the cards, as well as a spattering of
sideline meetings with top US politicians. Today on the front Page,
(00:47):
former NZ Ambassador to the US Tim Grocer is with
us to discuss how important tapping into the US market
is and what movers and shakers Luxon will shake hands with. Tim.
It's an intriguing time for Christopher Lackson's trip to the US,
isn't it, given both what's happening with the US and
(01:11):
European politics as well.
Speaker 2 (01:12):
Yeah.
Speaker 3 (01:13):
Intriguing in the sense of that old political cliche from
China centuries ago. May you live in interesting times? Is
the word interesting doesn't necessarily mean positive, So we are
living in very interesting times, and I think it gives
the Prime Minister an ideal opportunity to actually take the
pulse himself. I mean, all very well, people like me,
(01:35):
you've been involved in foreign policy briefing as the Prime
Minister in Wellington, but it's quite another matter to actually
get there at the highest level of international politics and
take the temperature himself. So I'm very very pleased he's
got this opportunity. Actually, there's a number of related themes
running through this visit, in the opportunities he has. So
(01:57):
first of all, the summit itself takes place against the
background of the essentially, as I read stalemate in Ukraine
and the end of this, I think fantasy that the
Ukrainians with the aid of the nature plus countries including US,
all of which are totally support Of course I support this,
(02:20):
but in my opinion, it was always a fantasy on
steroids to think you could drive the last Russian soldier
out of the entire of Ukraine, including Crimea and the
Donbas region, and then suddenly the Russians would stop fighting
and that would be all nice. I think it is
(02:40):
now clear that that was always the fantasy. It's now
dead as a reality, and I think the meeting itself,
while it will never talk as frankly as as I'm
talking in public, but there'll be a great deal of
serious discussion going on in the martyrs. Don't confuse what
I'm saying with lack of support. I'm talking about reality
(03:02):
as opposed to wishful thinking. The second element in this will,
of course, the opportunity not just to meet a range
of leaders of the most important Western countries. Western in
the political sense not no longer really a geographic term,
and that includes of course the new British Prime Minister,
which is an important person to New Zealand, always has
(03:23):
been and always will be. But it'll be also interesting
to see what their private take on the future is
considering what is going on in the biggest political theater
of all, which is the US presidential election, and who
knows what is going to happen in the next few days.
But you read the same things that I read the Economist,
(03:47):
the New York Times saying it is time to recognize reality.
President Biden would be eighty six at the end of
his office. And then you've also read all the opposing
arguments from the Biden camp. But if it goes on
in this state of uncertainty, leading up to the Democratic
Party's convention on the twentieth of August. He's going to
(04:09):
be able to sense what the other leaders are thinking.
I've had a few of my political contacts from my
days as ambassador in touch with me over the last
few days. It's clear that the odds of a Trump
presidency have increased, and it's also very clear from what
I'm being told that a number of the countries are
(04:31):
quietly polishing up their credentials with Trump personalities because we
may have to deal with this president again.
Speaker 1 (04:39):
I guess whether we'll hear about it or not is
the question. But I guess there'll be, no doubt there'll
be a lot of chatter, especially in private, about what
the potential return of Trump might mean for NATO in
other countries.
Speaker 3 (04:50):
None of what I'm talking about will emerge in public,
un least the whole thing blows up.
Speaker 1 (04:56):
Yeah, how big of a shadow will the return of Trump?
Asked I guess over the whole summit.
Speaker 3 (05:02):
Well, it must cast a shadow because of what he
said when he was a president. So when he was president,
I can't recall whether it was I think it was
twenty seventeen. In his first year he went to Russia
declared Putin was not a threat. The Russian had invaded
Ukraine back in twenty fourteen, when they came into Crimea.
(05:25):
I was literally detained in Moscow airport that weekend over
the decision, which I totally agreed to withdraw me as
Trade minister immediately from Moscow after they invaded Crimea. But
the decision to invade Crimea, I think is generally seen
as a different order of threat to the later decision
(05:46):
Putin took to invade western Ukraine. Now Trump went to
Russia declared in public Putin was not a threat. Clearly
the wrong call, And there he made this very very
challenging statement about the sanctity of what is called Article five.
(06:06):
Article five of NATO is the central commitment that an
attack on any one of the twenty seven or twenty
eight are call NATO countries is an attack on us
all and we will respond. So it's the core collective
security commitment, and by a country mile, the United States
(06:27):
is the most important enforcer of that commitment. So when
the President of the United States makes that statement, you
can imagine what that coused in terms of ri course, they.
Speaker 2 (06:39):
Asked me that question. One of the presidents of a
big country stood up said well, sir, if we don't
pay and we're attacked by Russia, will you protect us?
I said no, I would not protect you. In fact,
I would encourage them to do whatever the hell they want.
You got to pay, you got to pay your bills.
Speaker 3 (07:01):
And I will never forget. There was a massive patch
up job by NATO after that. I was ambassador in
Washington and I remember going to a black tie dinner
with hundreds of people, all the NATO plus ambassadors at Stockenberg,
the Secretary General of NATO, other leaders all got up
and said, there's no questioning of the strength of our commitment.
(07:23):
And then what I remember is that then Vice President
Hence got up and said made the same speech, and
there was definitely silence because everybody is thinking, mister vice president,
it really doesn't matter what you say if your president
and your boss has said something different. So if you
ask me, is this going to cause concern? Unquestionably?
Speaker 1 (07:45):
Well, you were the ambassador in Washington during Trump's first years. Hey,
what should our government be doing to prepare for another
Trump term?
Speaker 3 (07:52):
We should be doing exactly what I think the government
is doing, which is maintained absolutely the possible relationships with
the current Democratic administration while maintaining avenues that we can
open up with a second Trump presidency if necessary. People
who are not involved in diplomacy don't necessarily understand the
(08:16):
core point here. You deal with what you have. Whatever
people's opinions on mister Trump might or might not be,
it will be essential for the New Zealand government if
he becomes the president again, to maintain as good and
as correct a relationship with the presidency as possible because
this is fundamentally still the most important country in the world.
(08:39):
There's nothing that can be done right now. It's just
mentally prepare yourself for what could be another very challenging
and unorthodox presidency.
Speaker 1 (09:00):
While Christopher Luxon is over there, it's highly doubtful that
he'll be able to get a meeting with Joe Biden
or in fact Donald Trump, right, but he is going
to be meeting with some Republican and Democratic politicians while
over there, I understand there could be meetings with the
likes of Ted Cruz, John orsof Gavin Newsom, just to
name a few. How important are these meetings?
Speaker 3 (09:22):
Very important? Ted Cruz, as you know, stood against Donald
Trump for the candidacy in the first place, but he
remains a very, very influential Republican on the right of
the Republican Party, Gavin Newsom. From every possible angle, he
seems like the rising star of the next generation of
(09:45):
Democratic Party leaders and often mentioned should mister Biden finally
decide not to proceed with his candidate over the next
six weeks leading up to the Democratic Party convention. While
I suppose the conventional second choice would be the vice president,
he's certainly the next name in everybody's dance list.
Speaker 1 (10:07):
While also at the NATO summit, Luxelm will be meeting
with his Australian, Japanese and Korean counterparts as what's been
called the Indo Pacific four. It's the third time this
meeting has taken place. How significant is this alliance.
Speaker 3 (10:20):
Well, it's very significant. And the government, along with the
predecessor Labor government led by mister Hipkins, is exploring what
relationship we have not with the core of this that's
this jargon called Tier one and Tier two, but some
type of partnership. Look, the fundamental reality here is that
(10:42):
involves Australia and one New Zealand has an independent foreign policy.
At the end of the day, the single most important
country by a mile to US is Australia. So I
think it's entirely sensible what both the previous and the
current government did in exploring some type of relationship. I mean,
this is well short of the heavy duty defense side
(11:05):
of this relationship, but essential that we just keep in
touch with these people.
Speaker 1 (11:10):
Will you bring up defense, because a main issue or
big defense issue for New Zealand and in fact Australia
at the moment is around China, our relationship with China
and other superpowers and the tensions between them and our
other allies.
Speaker 2 (11:25):
Orcus as an agreement clearly aimed at China, our major
trading partner.
Speaker 3 (11:30):
We're making very strong ruises that they're going to join it.
Speaker 2 (11:33):
We think that's a major shift in foreign policy.
Speaker 1 (11:35):
Would you go to the public to get their approval? Again,
it's just way too premature. I know this isn't necessarily
an Aucus convention per se, but do you think that
could be a side discussion there?
Speaker 3 (11:49):
Oh, it's central to the whole issue. I mean, these
can't be divorced and our people. I've said in many
speeches and many comments on this New Zealand must maintain
as good a relationship with the two superfars as possible
and do whatever we can to avoid being forced to
make finally a choice. Now, I've used the old cliche
(12:12):
in the past about if you want to be in
the circus, you have to be able to ride two
horses at once. That's never easy. And if you can
use the visual metaphor of it is, if the two
horses part company on crucial issues, we may be forced
to make a choice, but we should delay that as
far as we possibly can, because China is way, way
(12:35):
more important to employment and to our economy than the
United States. It's about three or four times as large
a market for New Zealand as is the United States.
And yet the United States we have this history which
has many, many complex and positive elements to it. The
dilemma that we face is not a dilemma that little
(12:57):
New Zealand faces. It's a dilemma that every country in
the world that has important economic relationships with China faces.
And I was very much struck by what Gavin Newsom,
the Governor of California, said in Beijing about five months ago.
I think when he was the first governor of any
American state to visit Beijing and meet the president of China.
(13:21):
President she his statements on China and California's unwillingness to
follow this decoupling from China strategy could have been a
statement that New Zealand could have made. Honestly, So, while
it's a huge problem, it's not at all a New
Zealand problem. This is a global problem as these two
(13:42):
superpowers strive to find a modus for vendi between the
two of them, and our problem is shared by just
about everybody.
Speaker 1 (13:51):
We often hear commentators make a big deal about just
what you're saying, us being caught in the middle of
between the West in quotation marks and China from your
ex experience as an ambassador, is it really as bad
as that?
Speaker 3 (14:03):
It gets tough at times when extreme statements are made
by one side or the other. Yes, it gets tough,
But this is what politics is for. And we've just
got to be creative, and we have been creative in
the past, and I'm sure we've got very good people
in the field that we will continue to naborate as
(14:25):
best we can. It's, as I said, Muzine doesn't have
a particular problem. This is something that the world has
and fortunately there are clear signs in the last six
months of the sharp difficulties between Australia and China being repaired.
And then while the Foreign Minister has done I think
(14:46):
an outstanding job and the tension seemed to be the motion.
So the main point is when uzine and just think
about this is not to think this is particularly a
problem for MW Zealand. No, no, it's a problem for everybody.
Speaker 1 (14:57):
It seems like the immenseness of the u US economy
isn't lost on Luxon. He's made a point of saying
it's the largest economy in the world, our second biggest
trading partner, and even pinpointed California as being the fifth
biggest economy in the world if it were a country.
How vital is it for New Zealand to tap into
this market and essentially have Christopher Luxon as our number
one salesman.
Speaker 3 (15:18):
Well, I mean it's obviously very, very important, and this
is not to try and avoid the issue. It's just
remember that as an export market, China was about three
times as important to New Zealand. So the balancing act
must continue. But of course the United States is hugely
important to us in all their mentions, and not just
to be measured in terms of proved exports either. I mean,
(15:41):
we have many other interests in the economic sphere with
the United States, in terms of energy cooperation, a whole
range of issues that we work so closely with the
United States that we do not do that with China
to the same extent because of the linkages. To quote
John Key's famous statement of this issue, He's asked to
compare the relationship New Zealand has with China with that
(16:04):
of the United States. Said, well, with China, they buy stuff,
we sell stuff. With the United States, it's a little
more complicated.
Speaker 1 (16:14):
And tim what would success look like for Luxon at
the end of this summer. Does he necessarily need to
bring home some sort of deal or announcement to make
it work or are those backroom kind of meetings and
talks with other counterparts and of course other US politicians.
Is that really what counts here?
Speaker 3 (16:33):
Absolutely the latter. I'm not involved in the planning, so
there maybe some specific initiatives we'll hear about when and
if they are completed. But the real issue here is
in terms of his relationships with other leaders, their perception
of New Zealand through their meetings with our most important
political leader. So that's what this is really about.
Speaker 1 (16:53):
Thanks for joining us, Tim. That's it for this episode
of the Front Page. You can read more about today's
stories and extensive news coverage at enzed Herald dot co
dot z. The Front Page is produced by Ethan Siles
with sound engineer Patty Fox. I'm Chelsea Daniels. Subscribe to
(17:17):
the Front Page on iHeartRadio or wherever you get your podcasts,
and tune in tomorrow for another look behind the headlines.
Kilda. I'm Chelsea Daniels and this is the Front Page,
a daily podcast presented by the New Zealand Herald. Prime
Minister Christopher Luxon is off to the United States this week.
The world's largest economy and our second biggest trading partner,
(00:25):
is therefore what's described as DC's diplomatic super Bowl, where
dozens of foreign leaders will descend upon Washington for the
NATO summer. A number of bilaterals with other NATO leaders
is on the cards, as well as a spattering of
sideline meetings with top US politicians. Today on the front Page,
(00:47):
former NZ Ambassador to the US Tim Grocer is with
us to discuss how important tapping into the US market
is and what movers and shakers Luxon will shake hands with. Tim.
It's an intriguing time for Christopher Lackson's trip to the US,
isn't it, given both what's happening with the US and
(01:11):
European politics as well.
Speaker 2 (01:12):
Yeah.
Speaker 3 (01:13):
Intriguing in the sense of that old political cliche from
China centuries ago. May you live in interesting times? Is
the word interesting doesn't necessarily mean positive, So we are
living in very interesting times, and I think it gives
the Prime Minister an ideal opportunity to actually take the
pulse himself. I mean, all very well, people like me,
(01:35):
you've been involved in foreign policy briefing as the Prime
Minister in Wellington, but it's quite another matter to actually
get there at the highest level of international politics and
take the temperature himself. So I'm very very pleased he's
got this opportunity. Actually, there's a number of related themes
running through this visit, in the opportunities he has. So
(01:57):
first of all, the summit itself takes place against the
background of the essentially, as I read stalemate in Ukraine
and the end of this, I think fantasy that the
Ukrainians with the aid of the nature plus countries including US,
all of which are totally support Of course I support this,
(02:20):
but in my opinion, it was always a fantasy on
steroids to think you could drive the last Russian soldier
out of the entire of Ukraine, including Crimea and the
Donbas region, and then suddenly the Russians would stop fighting
and that would be all nice. I think it is
(02:40):
now clear that that was always the fantasy. It's now
dead as a reality, and I think the meeting itself,
while it will never talk as frankly as as I'm
talking in public, but there'll be a great deal of
serious discussion going on in the martyrs. Don't confuse what
I'm saying with lack of support. I'm talking about reality
(03:02):
as opposed to wishful thinking. The second element in this will,
of course, the opportunity not just to meet a range
of leaders of the most important Western countries. Western in
the political sense not no longer really a geographic term,
and that includes of course the new British Prime Minister,
which is an important person to New Zealand, always has
(03:23):
been and always will be. But it'll be also interesting
to see what their private take on the future is
considering what is going on in the biggest political theater
of all, which is the US presidential election, and who
knows what is going to happen in the next few days.
But you read the same things that I read the Economist,
(03:47):
the New York Times saying it is time to recognize reality.
President Biden would be eighty six at the end of
his office. And then you've also read all the opposing
arguments from the Biden camp. But if it goes on
in this state of uncertainty, leading up to the Democratic
Party's convention on the twentieth of August. He's going to
(04:09):
be able to sense what the other leaders are thinking.
I've had a few of my political contacts from my
days as ambassador in touch with me over the last
few days. It's clear that the odds of a Trump
presidency have increased, and it's also very clear from what
I'm being told that a number of the countries are
(04:31):
quietly polishing up their credentials with Trump personalities because we
may have to deal with this president again.
Speaker 1 (04:39):
I guess whether we'll hear about it or not is
the question. But I guess there'll be, no doubt there'll
be a lot of chatter, especially in private, about what
the potential return of Trump might mean for NATO in
other countries.
Speaker 3 (04:50):
None of what I'm talking about will emerge in public,
un least the whole thing blows up.
Speaker 1 (04:56):
Yeah, how big of a shadow will the return of Trump?
Asked I guess over the whole summit.
Speaker 3 (05:02):
Well, it must cast a shadow because of what he
said when he was a president. So when he was president,
I can't recall whether it was I think it was
twenty seventeen. In his first year he went to Russia
declared Putin was not a threat. The Russian had invaded
Ukraine back in twenty fourteen, when they came into Crimea.
(05:25):
I was literally detained in Moscow airport that weekend over
the decision, which I totally agreed to withdraw me as
Trade minister immediately from Moscow after they invaded Crimea. But
the decision to invade Crimea, I think is generally seen
as a different order of threat to the later decision
(05:46):
Putin took to invade western Ukraine. Now Trump went to
Russia declared in public Putin was not a threat. Clearly
the wrong call, And there he made this very very
challenging statement about the sanctity of what is called Article five.
(06:06):
Article five of NATO is the central commitment that an
attack on any one of the twenty seven or twenty
eight are call NATO countries is an attack on us
all and we will respond. So it's the core collective
security commitment, and by a country mile, the United States
(06:27):
is the most important enforcer of that commitment. So when
the President of the United States makes that statement, you
can imagine what that coused in terms of ri course, they.
Speaker 2 (06:39):
Asked me that question. One of the presidents of a
big country stood up said well, sir, if we don't
pay and we're attacked by Russia, will you protect us?
I said no, I would not protect you. In fact,
I would encourage them to do whatever the hell they want.
You got to pay, you got to pay your bills.
Speaker 3 (07:01):
And I will never forget. There was a massive patch
up job by NATO after that. I was ambassador in
Washington and I remember going to a black tie dinner
with hundreds of people, all the NATO plus ambassadors at Stockenberg,
the Secretary General of NATO, other leaders all got up
and said, there's no questioning of the strength of our commitment.
(07:23):
And then what I remember is that then Vice President
Hence got up and said made the same speech, and
there was definitely silence because everybody is thinking, mister vice president,
it really doesn't matter what you say if your president
and your boss has said something different. So if you
ask me, is this going to cause concern? Unquestionably?
Speaker 1 (07:45):
Well, you were the ambassador in Washington during Trump's first years. Hey,
what should our government be doing to prepare for another
Trump term?
Speaker 3 (07:52):
We should be doing exactly what I think the government
is doing, which is maintained absolutely the possible relationships with
the current Democratic administration while maintaining avenues that we can
open up with a second Trump presidency if necessary. People
who are not involved in diplomacy don't necessarily understand the
(08:16):
core point here. You deal with what you have. Whatever
people's opinions on mister Trump might or might not be,
it will be essential for the New Zealand government if
he becomes the president again, to maintain as good and
as correct a relationship with the presidency as possible because
this is fundamentally still the most important country in the world.
(08:39):
There's nothing that can be done right now. It's just
mentally prepare yourself for what could be another very challenging
and unorthodox presidency.
Speaker 1 (09:00):
While Christopher Luxon is over there, it's highly doubtful that
he'll be able to get a meeting with Joe Biden
or in fact Donald Trump, right, but he is going
to be meeting with some Republican and Democratic politicians while
over there, I understand there could be meetings with the
likes of Ted Cruz, John orsof Gavin Newsom, just to
name a few. How important are these meetings?
Speaker 3 (09:22):
Very important? Ted Cruz, as you know, stood against Donald
Trump for the candidacy in the first place, but he
remains a very, very influential Republican on the right of
the Republican Party, Gavin Newsom. From every possible angle, he
seems like the rising star of the next generation of
(09:45):
Democratic Party leaders and often mentioned should mister Biden finally
decide not to proceed with his candidate over the next
six weeks leading up to the Democratic Party convention. While
I suppose the conventional second choice would be the vice president,
he's certainly the next name in everybody's dance list.
Speaker 1 (10:07):
While also at the NATO summit, Luxelm will be meeting
with his Australian, Japanese and Korean counterparts as what's been
called the Indo Pacific four. It's the third time this
meeting has taken place. How significant is this alliance.
Speaker 3 (10:20):
Well, it's very significant. And the government, along with the
predecessor Labor government led by mister Hipkins, is exploring what
relationship we have not with the core of this that's
this jargon called Tier one and Tier two, but some
type of partnership. Look, the fundamental reality here is that
(10:42):
involves Australia and one New Zealand has an independent foreign policy.
At the end of the day, the single most important
country by a mile to US is Australia. So I
think it's entirely sensible what both the previous and the
current government did in exploring some type of relationship. I mean,
this is well short of the heavy duty defense side
(11:05):
of this relationship, but essential that we just keep in
touch with these people.
Speaker 1 (11:10):
Will you bring up defense, because a main issue or
big defense issue for New Zealand and in fact Australia
at the moment is around China, our relationship with China
and other superpowers and the tensions between them and our
other allies.
Speaker 2 (11:25):
Orcus as an agreement clearly aimed at China, our major
trading partner.
Speaker 3 (11:30):
We're making very strong ruises that they're going to join it.
Speaker 2 (11:33):
We think that's a major shift in foreign policy.
Speaker 1 (11:35):
Would you go to the public to get their approval? Again,
it's just way too premature. I know this isn't necessarily
an Aucus convention per se, but do you think that
could be a side discussion there?
Speaker 3 (11:49):
Oh, it's central to the whole issue. I mean, these
can't be divorced and our people. I've said in many
speeches and many comments on this New Zealand must maintain
as good a relationship with the two superfars as possible
and do whatever we can to avoid being forced to
make finally a choice. Now, I've used the old cliche
(12:12):
in the past about if you want to be in
the circus, you have to be able to ride two
horses at once. That's never easy. And if you can
use the visual metaphor of it is, if the two
horses part company on crucial issues, we may be forced
to make a choice, but we should delay that as
far as we possibly can, because China is way, way
(12:35):
more important to employment and to our economy than the
United States. It's about three or four times as large
a market for New Zealand as is the United States.
And yet the United States we have this history which
has many, many complex and positive elements to it. The
dilemma that we face is not a dilemma that little
(12:57):
New Zealand faces. It's a dilemma that every country in
the world that has important economic relationships with China faces.
And I was very much struck by what Gavin Newsom,
the Governor of California, said in Beijing about five months ago.
I think when he was the first governor of any
American state to visit Beijing and meet the president of China.
(13:21):
President she his statements on China and California's unwillingness to
follow this decoupling from China strategy could have been a
statement that New Zealand could have made. Honestly, So, while
it's a huge problem, it's not at all a New
Zealand problem. This is a global problem as these two
(13:42):
superpowers strive to find a modus for vendi between the
two of them, and our problem is shared by just
about everybody.
Speaker 1 (13:51):
We often hear commentators make a big deal about just
what you're saying, us being caught in the middle of
between the West in quotation marks and China from your
ex experience as an ambassador, is it really as bad
as that?
Speaker 3 (14:03):
It gets tough at times when extreme statements are made
by one side or the other. Yes, it gets tough,
But this is what politics is for. And we've just
got to be creative, and we have been creative in
the past, and I'm sure we've got very good people
in the field that we will continue to naborate as
(14:25):
best we can. It's, as I said, Muzine doesn't have
a particular problem. This is something that the world has
and fortunately there are clear signs in the last six
months of the sharp difficulties between Australia and China being repaired.
And then while the Foreign Minister has done I think
(14:46):
an outstanding job and the tension seemed to be the motion.
So the main point is when uzine and just think
about this is not to think this is particularly a
problem for MW Zealand. No, no, it's a problem for everybody.
Speaker 1 (14:57):
It seems like the immenseness of the u US economy
isn't lost on Luxon. He's made a point of saying
it's the largest economy in the world, our second biggest
trading partner, and even pinpointed California as being the fifth
biggest economy in the world if it were a country.
How vital is it for New Zealand to tap into
this market and essentially have Christopher Luxon as our number
one salesman.
Speaker 3 (15:18):
Well, I mean it's obviously very, very important, and this
is not to try and avoid the issue. It's just
remember that as an export market, China was about three
times as important to New Zealand. So the balancing act
must continue. But of course the United States is hugely
important to us in all their mentions, and not just
to be measured in terms of proved exports either. I mean,
(15:41):
we have many other interests in the economic sphere with
the United States, in terms of energy cooperation, a whole
range of issues that we work so closely with the
United States that we do not do that with China
to the same extent because of the linkages. To quote
John Key's famous statement of this issue, He's asked to
compare the relationship New Zealand has with China with that
(16:04):
of the United States. Said, well, with China, they buy stuff,
we sell stuff. With the United States, it's a little
more complicated.
Speaker 1 (16:14):
And tim what would success look like for Luxon at
the end of this summer. Does he necessarily need to
bring home some sort of deal or announcement to make
it work or are those backroom kind of meetings and
talks with other counterparts and of course other US politicians.
Is that really what counts here?
Speaker 3 (16:33):
Absolutely the latter. I'm not involved in the planning, so
there maybe some specific initiatives we'll hear about when and
if they are completed. But the real issue here is
in terms of his relationships with other leaders, their perception
of New Zealand through their meetings with our most important
political leader. So that's what this is really about.
Speaker 1 (16:53):
Thanks for joining us, Tim. That's it for this episode
of the Front Page. You can read more about today's
stories and extensive news coverage at enzed Herald dot co
dot z. The Front Page is produced by Ethan Siles
with sound engineer Patty Fox. I'm Chelsea Daniels. Subscribe to
(17:17):
the Front Page on iHeartRadio or wherever you get your podcasts,
and tune in tomorrow for another look behind the headlines.
Popular Podcasts
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.