May 14, 2025 • 19 mins
If you’ve looked at headlines around the world lately, you’d be forgiven for thinking that immigration is the root of all our problems.
Perhaps the most vocal anti-immigration critic at the moment is the United States, with mass deportations happening against undocumented migrants.
Now the UK Government is vowing to fix a ‘broken’ immigration system with new policies, which are estimated to lead to a 100,000 drop in immigration per year by 2029.
The move comes after the rise of Reform UK, with a staunch anti-immigration policy that has become more mainstream in recent years.
So why are a lot of countries turning against immigration, and are those concerns valid or passing the blame?
Today on The Front Page, Massey University distinguished professor Paul Spoonley is with us to explore the realities and fiction of immigration policy.
Follow The Front Page on iHeartRadio, Apple Podcasts, Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts.
You can read more about this and other stories in the New Zealand Herald, online at nzherald.co.nz, or tune in to news bulletins across the NZME network.
Host: Chelsea Daniels
Sound Engineer/Producer: Richard Martin
Producer: Ethan Sills
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:04):
Hilda. I'm Chelsea Daniels and this is the Front.
Speaker 2 (00:07):
Page, a daily podcast presented by the New Zealand Herald.
If you've looked at headlines around the world lately, you'd
be forgiven for thinking that immigration is the root of
all our problems. Perhaps the most vocal anti immigration critic
at the moment is the United States, with mass deportations
(00:29):
happening against undocumented migrants. Now, the UK is vowing to
fix a broken immigration system with new policies which are
estimated to lead to a one hundred thousand drop in
immigration per year by twenty twenty nine. The move comes
after the rise of reform UK with a staunch anti
immigration policy that has become more mainstream in recent years.
(00:53):
So why are a lot of countries turning against immigration
and are those concerns valid or passing? Theme today on
the Front Page, Massy University Distinguished Professor Paul Spoonley is
with us to explore the realities and fictions of immigration policy.
Speaker 1 (01:15):
So Paul, can you.
Speaker 2 (01:16):
Tell me a bit about the UK reforms and what
changes might be on the table there?
Speaker 3 (01:22):
Yes, the announcement by Kirs Starmer was really interesting. It
indicates something of a reversal policy. You must understand that
in twenty twenty three the UK experienced a major surgeon migration.
Nearly nine hundred thousand people are own and what Starma
announced was that he was going to reverse what he
(01:43):
called a failed experiment. The paper is called Restoring Control
over the Immigration System. So essentially what they want to
do is reduce immigration by about one hundred thousand per year.
By the way, the numbers are dropped by about forty
percent since that peak and twenty three, so they were
already falling, but they want to reduce them by a
further one hundred thousand. They're essentially going to tighten the rules.
(02:04):
They're going to focus on skilled migrants. They're going to
reduce the number of international students that are coming across.
Speaker 4 (02:13):
They're going to.
Speaker 3 (02:13):
Start particular categories, like there's a lot of international recruitment
for social key workers and that's going to be stopped.
Speaker 4 (02:21):
So there's a whole lot of things that they're going
to do.
Speaker 3 (02:23):
But essentially they're going to tighten up the regulations, reduce
the numbers, focus more on skilled migrants.
Speaker 5 (02:31):
A strategy absolutely central to my plan for change that
will finally take back control of our borders and close
the book on a squalid chapter for our politics, our
economy and our country. Take back control. Everyone knows that slogan,
(02:54):
and everyone knows what it meant on immigration, or at
least that's what people thought.
Speaker 2 (03:04):
I've seen a commentator calling the move completely untethered from reality.
Speaker 1 (03:10):
Would you agree with that?
Speaker 3 (03:11):
No, I wouldn't entirely. I think there's a sense in
which we need to control immigration, and for a country
that has a population as large as the UK's, then
migration needs to come in. The thing that always gets
me is that when they debate how to manage migration,
they look to what they call the Australian system. In fact,
(03:34):
it's the Canadian, Australian and New Zealand system, which allocates
points to those people that you want to come to
your country, so you know, you focus on particular sets
of skills, certain characteristics. The British media and to some
extent the British public always react negatively to that possibility,
and so it's not appropriate for the UK. I do
(03:56):
think there's an element of racism here, and I noticed
that Starma has faced quite considerable backlash from his backbenches
who say that this is not what labor should be doing,
because I think Starma has really tried to undermine some
of the support that's been growing for the Reform Party.
(04:18):
But in the meantime, what he's done is really antagonized
some of his some of his own MPs.
Speaker 6 (04:26):
Well.
Speaker 2 (04:26):
The readmission of the English test would point towards a
kind of racist aspect, wouldn't it.
Speaker 4 (04:33):
Yes, it does.
Speaker 3 (04:35):
I mean the thing is whether or not you test
people at the border and stop them from coming because
they don't have adequate English language competency, or whether that's
something that you provide once they arrive. So in the
case of Canada, you get a very generous allocation of
free English language tuition once you arrive in the country.
(04:59):
So when you you start putting up barriers like that,
and when you start using criteria like language, it does
tend to suggest that there's a racist element to all
of theirs. Now, I don't have a problem with testing
on competency and English language competency, but then she shouldn't.
The country that's going to accept these skilled migrants also
(05:22):
have some responsibility.
Speaker 1 (05:23):
I do remember.
Speaker 2 (05:24):
Actually, my mum was born in the UK when she
was younger and brought over to Australia, and when she
finally got her Australian citizenship at the age of I
think like forty five or fifty or something, she was
terrified of the English language test. It's not just people
from other non speaking countries, it's everyone that has to
do it. A So the UK move has been influenced
(05:46):
by Nigel Faraja's Reform UK Party, which in the last
year has emerged as perhaps the main opposition party there
in terms of poll numbers. Anyway, does it seem that
anti immigration policy is coming a lot more in the mainstream.
Speaker 3 (06:01):
Absolutely, And in twenty twenty four we had what was
called the super election year, a lot of elections around
the world, and what you noticed in Europe and including
in the UK, is the rise and rise of the
far right and anti immigrant politics. So you know, you
can think of Italy, France, Germany, Sweden, Hungary, Poland all
(06:24):
of these countries saw parties and politicians who, as part
of the central policy platform are anti immigrant get support.
So I think it's a particular moment. It's particularly a
moment in Europe. But of course we've also seen some
very strong anti immigrant politics emerge in the United States.
Speaker 4 (06:47):
Under President Trump.
Speaker 3 (06:48):
So I just think it's one of those moments when
we are seeing quite a strong pushback and concern around
what's happening in terms of of immigrants impacting upon an
economy or a society.
Speaker 6 (07:07):
We're tracking down the illegal alien criminals, we're detaining them,
and we are throwing them the hell out of our country.
We have no apologies, and we're moving forward very fast.
They're very dangerous people, you know. I think my campaign
I really focused on the border more than anything else.
A lot of people said the biggest thing was inflation
and the economy, and then maybe the border was third.
(07:28):
I always thought the border was first because I felt
that people could really understand that you can't have people
pouring in from the prisons all over the world and
from mental institutions all over the world and dumped into
our country.
Speaker 2 (07:42):
You mentioned the US there, and I mean, obviously that's
turned against immigration quite strongly.
Speaker 1 (07:47):
Under Donald Trump's regime.
Speaker 2 (07:49):
You're reading stories every other day about families being separated
by ice, about mass raids in major cities, or people
being wrongly deported, notably Kilma Abrego Garci, Yeah, who has
been sent to prison in El Salvador, why are countries
like the US and the UK so against immigration.
Speaker 3 (08:08):
Well, I think it's part of a general anxiety, and
I always see an economic dimension to this as well
as a cultural dimension. And what you're seeing in Europe
is arguments about what's called replacement, which is the idea
that somehow non Western, particularly Muslim immigrants are replacing what
you had before they were a threat. But then what
(08:29):
you get with particularly people like Oban and Hungary or
Trump in America, is you get these very explicit arguments
that immigrants equals crime, that when you get immigrants coming
into your country, your crime rate goes up, so they
demonize immigrants. I do think there's a moment that we're
seeing where quite considerable groups within societies see immigrants as
(08:54):
a threat, and politicians are reflecting and speaking to that threat.
Speaker 2 (09:06):
Housing shortages as well is often blamed on immigrants. You've
had that sentiment here as well with the previous governments
foreign buyers ban.
Speaker 1 (09:14):
Is that really the case?
Speaker 4 (09:16):
Yes, it is so.
Speaker 3 (09:18):
In New Zealand in twenty twenty three we saw the
population grow by two point eight percent, and two point
four percent of that came from net migration gains.
Speaker 4 (09:27):
So New Zealand had really high as did.
Speaker 3 (09:29):
A lot of other countries, but New Zealand had really
high net migration. And what you see is that the
deficit when it comes to the provision of services and infrastructure,
it's greater because the population growth outstrips the ability to
provide those services. So what we're seeing is in Europe
the far right beginning to normalize anti immigrant sentiments. But
(09:51):
we've also seen less of center governments in Australia, Canada
and the UK all announced that they go to reduce
the number of immigrants coming into all three countries.
Speaker 4 (10:05):
And a key argument, or a key part of what they're.
Speaker 3 (10:08):
Doing is that they think that the social license that
existed and allowed governments to bring in immigrants is being
undermined by the fact that when you're getting significant immigrant arrivals,
you know, the provision of housing, the cost of housing,
the provision of services like transport or whatever else, and
particularly in the major cities, is simply not keeping up
(10:31):
with immigrant arrivals. So we've seen these left of center
governments also beginning to harden their approach to immigration and
reduce the.
Speaker 2 (10:41):
Numbers immigrants, though aren't they often the ones who take
up the jobs that people don't want to do. In
the UK, for example, into this new proposal, care companies
will be prevented from recruiting staff from overseas. But those
companies have come out and warned that some services will
struggle to survive without those international record So what's the
thinking there?
Speaker 3 (11:02):
Yes, and I think this is universally the case, so
that in New Zealand, for example, a very significant proportion
of our eldercare workforce are immigrants, a very significant part
of our dairy sector workforce are immigrants. And when you
translate that into countries like the UK, and what you
see is these whole range of sectors and positions where
(11:25):
immigrants absolutely fill essential positions. We're all struggling to get
healthcare workers right from the top skill to the people
that help out on the wards. And what you see
is this major churn around the world where people recruit
immigrants to help and those sectors in the UK, and
(11:47):
for example, in nursing, they've got a very significant target
for a nurse of recruiting nurses. They're coming from the Philippines,
Nigerian and Kenya this year, and I just don't see
the alternative.
Speaker 4 (11:58):
And I've got.
Speaker 3 (12:00):
I don't know whether you're going to ask the Chelsea,
but I've got to say that when you look at
the evidence, then migrants are a significant net contributor to
the economy and to the finances of the country. So
on balance, you know, migrants are good. Migrants are good
for the economy, they're good for particular sectors. But we're
(12:21):
still seeing this pushback in terms of anxiety about migrants
taking our jobs.
Speaker 4 (12:26):
And I put quotation backs around it.
Speaker 7 (12:31):
To be honest with you. Six of the stomach is
my opinion. All has always been a darvel s culture.
From me growing up, there's been mixed race people yet,
so it's nothing to do with skin prejudices. These riots.
It's mounted or with race or religion. I think it's
(12:52):
just got a point where the British public a six
a death of the government prioritizing all the new immigrants
that are coming in the contrary over the rom recessions.
Speaker 2 (13:06):
Yeah, and if you look at some of those far
right parties in Europe, a lot of them are pretty
anti Muslim, anti refugee, anti their culture being taken over.
I guess how would you place New Zealand in that
kind of sentiment.
Speaker 3 (13:20):
I don't think it's the same at all, and there
are some important differences in terms of immigration. So in
most of Europe, the immigrants we're talking about are actually refugees.
So in twenty fifteen and again in twenty sixteen, a
million over a million people arrived at the borders of
various European countries. Australian, Canada, New Zealand target skilled migrants
(13:43):
and we use our points system to identify who's going
to be appropriate, and we have a very managed immigration system.
Most of Europe does not. I think that there are differences,
and I just want to add that when you approve
migrants who are skilled, well educated, and in the New
Zealand case, they are better educated and sometimes more skilled
(14:06):
than the New Zealand population, when you approve them, the outcomes,
the settlement outcomes for those migrants tend to be much better.
But of course Europe is dealing with people who are traumatized,
who are refugees, very significant numbers of asylum seekers, and
of course there are issues around settling those migrants into society.
(14:27):
I wouldn't I just think New Zealand and Australia and Canada,
the general approach to migration is much more positive. The
way in which we manage migration is very different, and
we just don't have those very strong anti immigrant policies
we have into immigrant you know communities in New Zealand
we have people who are very anxious about but that
(14:48):
they don't represent significant parts of our political constituencies.
Speaker 2 (14:54):
And do you think that those different sentiments perhaps towards
different kinds of tiers of migrants, For examp, I'm thinking
whether they're asylum seekers or refugees. I mean Australia still
parrots on about boat people, which is a derogatory term. Now,
I mean, do you think that there's different feelings towards
different types of people entering our country?
Speaker 4 (15:14):
Oh?
Speaker 3 (15:14):
Absolutely? And the surveys, let's stick with New Zealand. The
surveys of New Zealand showed that absolutely.
Speaker 6 (15:20):
So.
Speaker 3 (15:21):
Refugees are always seen as different from migrants more generally
and are seen in a more negative light. People from
the UK and to some extent places like South Africa
are rated much more positively as migrants that we want
compared to those who come from Asia. And unfortunately the
migrants from the Pacific tend to be rated as the
(15:43):
lowest the least desirable by the New Zealand's is answering
these surveys. So there is a ranking that operates, and
definitely people within New Zealand that see migrants quite differently
depending upon where they come from, what they look like.
Speaker 2 (15:57):
I guess when it comes to the care industry, for example,
in nursing, I guess an easy solution would be for
those types of companies in those industries to pay people
better rather.
Speaker 1 (16:08):
Than relying on low wage, low skilled workers. Do you
think that will ever happen.
Speaker 3 (16:12):
I know, I don't think the economies of particular sectors
and organizations allow them to pay a lot better, as
much as that would be desirable. I think that's quite
an issue, and you see it in hospitality, you can
see it in a number of sectors. And of course
when you don't have a domestic population that's not keen
(16:33):
on the conditions or the pay, then almost inevitably those
employers will seek people from overseas to come and work
in their sector. So it's a conundrum and I'm not
sure that there's an easy fix to that, And in
terms of your question, I don't see any major changes
occurring anytime soon. Those companies and those organizations and those
(16:56):
sectors will.
Speaker 4 (16:57):
Rely on low skilled.
Speaker 3 (16:59):
Migrants who are prepared to accept the conditions in pain.
Speaker 6 (17:03):
Well.
Speaker 2 (17:03):
I know that with the city rail link in Auckland,
one of the things that has held that up has
been that we rely on foreign workers from the Philippines
and the like to work on that, and many of
them went home during COVID. So are some of our
key industries perhaps over reliant on migrant workers.
Speaker 3 (17:21):
Yes, and I think that some of those sectors have
realized that. So the IT sector, which is very reliant
on immigrant workers coming in the level tuns typically around
ten or twelve thousand jobs per year, and what you
see is over half of those jobs quite often filled
by migrants. And what they've decided is that they need
(17:42):
to invest more in terms of local recruitment, local training,
and not rely on migrants. I don't think it's true universally,
but for some sectors, I think this is what I
would call a sugar rush that you know, there's a
easy fix, and you can get it by getting more
agrson and it avoids you having to do more work
(18:04):
and invest more in terms of recruiting and training local
new Zealanders, and the Minister, by the way, has made
it fear that there must be much more effort put
into recruiting New Zealanders rather than just simply relying on immigrants.
If the answer is immigration, I think probably the wrong
questions being asked. I think we do tend in some
(18:25):
sectors to be over reliant on immigrants, and that that
needs to be looked at quite closely.
Speaker 1 (18:30):
Thanks for joining us, Paul, You're welcome.
Speaker 4 (18:32):
Thank you, Chelsea.
Speaker 2 (18:37):
That's it for this episode of the Front Page. You
can read more about today's stories and extensive news coverage
at enzadherld dot co dot MZ. The Front Page is
produced by Ethan Seals and Richard Martin, who is also
our sound engineer. I'm Chelsea Daniels. Subscribe to The Front
Page on iHeartRadio or.
Speaker 1 (18:58):
Wherever you get your podcas
Speaker 2 (19:00):
Casts, and tune in tomorrow for another look behind the headlines.
Hilda. I'm Chelsea Daniels and this is the Front.
Speaker 2 (00:07):
Page, a daily podcast presented by the New Zealand Herald.
If you've looked at headlines around the world lately, you'd
be forgiven for thinking that immigration is the root of
all our problems. Perhaps the most vocal anti immigration critic
at the moment is the United States, with mass deportations
(00:29):
happening against undocumented migrants. Now, the UK is vowing to
fix a broken immigration system with new policies which are
estimated to lead to a one hundred thousand drop in
immigration per year by twenty twenty nine. The move comes
after the rise of reform UK with a staunch anti
immigration policy that has become more mainstream in recent years.
(00:53):
So why are a lot of countries turning against immigration
and are those concerns valid or passing? Theme today on
the Front Page, Massy University Distinguished Professor Paul Spoonley is
with us to explore the realities and fictions of immigration policy.
Speaker 1 (01:15):
So Paul, can you.
Speaker 2 (01:16):
Tell me a bit about the UK reforms and what
changes might be on the table there?
Speaker 3 (01:22):
Yes, the announcement by Kirs Starmer was really interesting. It
indicates something of a reversal policy. You must understand that
in twenty twenty three the UK experienced a major surgeon migration.
Nearly nine hundred thousand people are own and what Starma
announced was that he was going to reverse what he
(01:43):
called a failed experiment. The paper is called Restoring Control
over the Immigration System. So essentially what they want to
do is reduce immigration by about one hundred thousand per year.
By the way, the numbers are dropped by about forty
percent since that peak and twenty three, so they were
already falling, but they want to reduce them by a
further one hundred thousand. They're essentially going to tighten the rules.
(02:04):
They're going to focus on skilled migrants. They're going to
reduce the number of international students that are coming across.
Speaker 4 (02:13):
They're going to.
Speaker 3 (02:13):
Start particular categories, like there's a lot of international recruitment
for social key workers and that's going to be stopped.
Speaker 4 (02:21):
So there's a whole lot of things that they're going
to do.
Speaker 3 (02:23):
But essentially they're going to tighten up the regulations, reduce
the numbers, focus more on skilled migrants.
Speaker 5 (02:31):
A strategy absolutely central to my plan for change that
will finally take back control of our borders and close
the book on a squalid chapter for our politics, our
economy and our country. Take back control. Everyone knows that slogan,
(02:54):
and everyone knows what it meant on immigration, or at
least that's what people thought.
Speaker 2 (03:04):
I've seen a commentator calling the move completely untethered from reality.
Speaker 1 (03:10):
Would you agree with that?
Speaker 3 (03:11):
No, I wouldn't entirely. I think there's a sense in
which we need to control immigration, and for a country
that has a population as large as the UK's, then
migration needs to come in. The thing that always gets
me is that when they debate how to manage migration,
they look to what they call the Australian system. In fact,
(03:34):
it's the Canadian, Australian and New Zealand system, which allocates
points to those people that you want to come to
your country, so you know, you focus on particular sets
of skills, certain characteristics. The British media and to some
extent the British public always react negatively to that possibility,
and so it's not appropriate for the UK. I do
(03:56):
think there's an element of racism here, and I noticed
that Starma has faced quite considerable backlash from his backbenches
who say that this is not what labor should be doing,
because I think Starma has really tried to undermine some
of the support that's been growing for the Reform Party.
(04:18):
But in the meantime, what he's done is really antagonized
some of his some of his own MPs.
Speaker 6 (04:26):
Well.
Speaker 2 (04:26):
The readmission of the English test would point towards a
kind of racist aspect, wouldn't it.
Speaker 4 (04:33):
Yes, it does.
Speaker 3 (04:35):
I mean the thing is whether or not you test
people at the border and stop them from coming because
they don't have adequate English language competency, or whether that's
something that you provide once they arrive. So in the
case of Canada, you get a very generous allocation of
free English language tuition once you arrive in the country.
(04:59):
So when you you start putting up barriers like that,
and when you start using criteria like language, it does
tend to suggest that there's a racist element to all
of theirs. Now, I don't have a problem with testing
on competency and English language competency, but then she shouldn't.
The country that's going to accept these skilled migrants also
(05:22):
have some responsibility.
Speaker 1 (05:23):
I do remember.
Speaker 2 (05:24):
Actually, my mum was born in the UK when she
was younger and brought over to Australia, and when she
finally got her Australian citizenship at the age of I
think like forty five or fifty or something, she was
terrified of the English language test. It's not just people
from other non speaking countries, it's everyone that has to
do it. A So the UK move has been influenced
(05:46):
by Nigel Faraja's Reform UK Party, which in the last
year has emerged as perhaps the main opposition party there
in terms of poll numbers. Anyway, does it seem that
anti immigration policy is coming a lot more in the mainstream.
Speaker 3 (06:01):
Absolutely, And in twenty twenty four we had what was
called the super election year, a lot of elections around
the world, and what you noticed in Europe and including
in the UK, is the rise and rise of the
far right and anti immigrant politics. So you know, you
can think of Italy, France, Germany, Sweden, Hungary, Poland all
(06:24):
of these countries saw parties and politicians who, as part
of the central policy platform are anti immigrant get support.
So I think it's a particular moment. It's particularly a
moment in Europe. But of course we've also seen some
very strong anti immigrant politics emerge in the United States.
Speaker 4 (06:47):
Under President Trump.
Speaker 3 (06:48):
So I just think it's one of those moments when
we are seeing quite a strong pushback and concern around
what's happening in terms of of immigrants impacting upon an
economy or a society.
Speaker 6 (07:07):
We're tracking down the illegal alien criminals, we're detaining them,
and we are throwing them the hell out of our country.
We have no apologies, and we're moving forward very fast.
They're very dangerous people, you know. I think my campaign
I really focused on the border more than anything else.
A lot of people said the biggest thing was inflation
and the economy, and then maybe the border was third.
(07:28):
I always thought the border was first because I felt
that people could really understand that you can't have people
pouring in from the prisons all over the world and
from mental institutions all over the world and dumped into
our country.
Speaker 2 (07:42):
You mentioned the US there, and I mean, obviously that's
turned against immigration quite strongly.
Speaker 1 (07:47):
Under Donald Trump's regime.
Speaker 2 (07:49):
You're reading stories every other day about families being separated
by ice, about mass raids in major cities, or people
being wrongly deported, notably Kilma Abrego Garci, Yeah, who has
been sent to prison in El Salvador, why are countries
like the US and the UK so against immigration.
Speaker 3 (08:08):
Well, I think it's part of a general anxiety, and
I always see an economic dimension to this as well
as a cultural dimension. And what you're seeing in Europe
is arguments about what's called replacement, which is the idea
that somehow non Western, particularly Muslim immigrants are replacing what
you had before they were a threat. But then what
(08:29):
you get with particularly people like Oban and Hungary or
Trump in America, is you get these very explicit arguments
that immigrants equals crime, that when you get immigrants coming
into your country, your crime rate goes up, so they
demonize immigrants. I do think there's a moment that we're
seeing where quite considerable groups within societies see immigrants as
(08:54):
a threat, and politicians are reflecting and speaking to that threat.
Speaker 2 (09:06):
Housing shortages as well is often blamed on immigrants. You've
had that sentiment here as well with the previous governments
foreign buyers ban.
Speaker 1 (09:14):
Is that really the case?
Speaker 4 (09:16):
Yes, it is so.
Speaker 3 (09:18):
In New Zealand in twenty twenty three we saw the
population grow by two point eight percent, and two point
four percent of that came from net migration gains.
Speaker 4 (09:27):
So New Zealand had really high as did.
Speaker 3 (09:29):
A lot of other countries, but New Zealand had really
high net migration. And what you see is that the
deficit when it comes to the provision of services and infrastructure,
it's greater because the population growth outstrips the ability to
provide those services. So what we're seeing is in Europe
the far right beginning to normalize anti immigrant sentiments. But
(09:51):
we've also seen less of center governments in Australia, Canada
and the UK all announced that they go to reduce
the number of immigrants coming into all three countries.
Speaker 4 (10:05):
And a key argument, or a key part of what they're.
Speaker 3 (10:08):
Doing is that they think that the social license that
existed and allowed governments to bring in immigrants is being
undermined by the fact that when you're getting significant immigrant arrivals,
you know, the provision of housing, the cost of housing,
the provision of services like transport or whatever else, and
particularly in the major cities, is simply not keeping up
(10:31):
with immigrant arrivals. So we've seen these left of center
governments also beginning to harden their approach to immigration and
reduce the.
Speaker 2 (10:41):
Numbers immigrants, though aren't they often the ones who take
up the jobs that people don't want to do. In
the UK, for example, into this new proposal, care companies
will be prevented from recruiting staff from overseas. But those
companies have come out and warned that some services will
struggle to survive without those international record So what's the
thinking there?
Speaker 3 (11:02):
Yes, and I think this is universally the case, so
that in New Zealand, for example, a very significant proportion
of our eldercare workforce are immigrants, a very significant part
of our dairy sector workforce are immigrants. And when you
translate that into countries like the UK, and what you
see is these whole range of sectors and positions where
(11:25):
immigrants absolutely fill essential positions. We're all struggling to get
healthcare workers right from the top skill to the people
that help out on the wards. And what you see
is this major churn around the world where people recruit
immigrants to help and those sectors in the UK, and
(11:47):
for example, in nursing, they've got a very significant target
for a nurse of recruiting nurses. They're coming from the Philippines,
Nigerian and Kenya this year, and I just don't see
the alternative.
Speaker 4 (11:58):
And I've got.
Speaker 3 (12:00):
I don't know whether you're going to ask the Chelsea,
but I've got to say that when you look at
the evidence, then migrants are a significant net contributor to
the economy and to the finances of the country. So
on balance, you know, migrants are good. Migrants are good
for the economy, they're good for particular sectors. But we're
(12:21):
still seeing this pushback in terms of anxiety about migrants
taking our jobs.
Speaker 4 (12:26):
And I put quotation backs around it.
Speaker 7 (12:31):
To be honest with you. Six of the stomach is
my opinion. All has always been a darvel s culture.
From me growing up, there's been mixed race people yet,
so it's nothing to do with skin prejudices. These riots.
It's mounted or with race or religion. I think it's
(12:52):
just got a point where the British public a six
a death of the government prioritizing all the new immigrants
that are coming in the contrary over the rom recessions.
Speaker 2 (13:06):
Yeah, and if you look at some of those far
right parties in Europe, a lot of them are pretty
anti Muslim, anti refugee, anti their culture being taken over.
I guess how would you place New Zealand in that
kind of sentiment.
Speaker 3 (13:20):
I don't think it's the same at all, and there
are some important differences in terms of immigration. So in
most of Europe, the immigrants we're talking about are actually refugees.
So in twenty fifteen and again in twenty sixteen, a
million over a million people arrived at the borders of
various European countries. Australian, Canada, New Zealand target skilled migrants
(13:43):
and we use our points system to identify who's going
to be appropriate, and we have a very managed immigration system.
Most of Europe does not. I think that there are differences,
and I just want to add that when you approve
migrants who are skilled, well educated, and in the New
Zealand case, they are better educated and sometimes more skilled
(14:06):
than the New Zealand population, when you approve them, the outcomes,
the settlement outcomes for those migrants tend to be much better.
But of course Europe is dealing with people who are traumatized,
who are refugees, very significant numbers of asylum seekers, and
of course there are issues around settling those migrants into society.
(14:27):
I wouldn't I just think New Zealand and Australia and Canada,
the general approach to migration is much more positive. The
way in which we manage migration is very different, and
we just don't have those very strong anti immigrant policies
we have into immigrant you know communities in New Zealand
we have people who are very anxious about but that
(14:48):
they don't represent significant parts of our political constituencies.
Speaker 2 (14:54):
And do you think that those different sentiments perhaps towards
different kinds of tiers of migrants, For examp, I'm thinking
whether they're asylum seekers or refugees. I mean Australia still
parrots on about boat people, which is a derogatory term. Now,
I mean, do you think that there's different feelings towards
different types of people entering our country?
Speaker 4 (15:14):
Oh?
Speaker 3 (15:14):
Absolutely? And the surveys, let's stick with New Zealand. The
surveys of New Zealand showed that absolutely.
Speaker 6 (15:20):
So.
Speaker 3 (15:21):
Refugees are always seen as different from migrants more generally
and are seen in a more negative light. People from
the UK and to some extent places like South Africa
are rated much more positively as migrants that we want
compared to those who come from Asia. And unfortunately the
migrants from the Pacific tend to be rated as the
(15:43):
lowest the least desirable by the New Zealand's is answering
these surveys. So there is a ranking that operates, and
definitely people within New Zealand that see migrants quite differently
depending upon where they come from, what they look like.
Speaker 2 (15:57):
I guess when it comes to the care industry, for example,
in nursing, I guess an easy solution would be for
those types of companies in those industries to pay people
better rather.
Speaker 1 (16:08):
Than relying on low wage, low skilled workers. Do you
think that will ever happen.
Speaker 3 (16:12):
I know, I don't think the economies of particular sectors
and organizations allow them to pay a lot better, as
much as that would be desirable. I think that's quite
an issue, and you see it in hospitality, you can
see it in a number of sectors. And of course
when you don't have a domestic population that's not keen
(16:33):
on the conditions or the pay, then almost inevitably those
employers will seek people from overseas to come and work
in their sector. So it's a conundrum and I'm not
sure that there's an easy fix to that, And in
terms of your question, I don't see any major changes
occurring anytime soon. Those companies and those organizations and those
(16:56):
sectors will.
Speaker 4 (16:57):
Rely on low skilled.
Speaker 3 (16:59):
Migrants who are prepared to accept the conditions in pain.
Speaker 6 (17:03):
Well.
Speaker 2 (17:03):
I know that with the city rail link in Auckland,
one of the things that has held that up has
been that we rely on foreign workers from the Philippines
and the like to work on that, and many of
them went home during COVID. So are some of our
key industries perhaps over reliant on migrant workers.
Speaker 3 (17:21):
Yes, and I think that some of those sectors have
realized that. So the IT sector, which is very reliant
on immigrant workers coming in the level tuns typically around
ten or twelve thousand jobs per year, and what you
see is over half of those jobs quite often filled
by migrants. And what they've decided is that they need
(17:42):
to invest more in terms of local recruitment, local training,
and not rely on migrants. I don't think it's true universally,
but for some sectors, I think this is what I
would call a sugar rush that you know, there's a
easy fix, and you can get it by getting more
agrson and it avoids you having to do more work
(18:04):
and invest more in terms of recruiting and training local
new Zealanders, and the Minister, by the way, has made
it fear that there must be much more effort put
into recruiting New Zealanders rather than just simply relying on immigrants.
If the answer is immigration, I think probably the wrong
questions being asked. I think we do tend in some
(18:25):
sectors to be over reliant on immigrants, and that that
needs to be looked at quite closely.
Speaker 1 (18:30):
Thanks for joining us, Paul, You're welcome.
Speaker 4 (18:32):
Thank you, Chelsea.
Speaker 2 (18:37):
That's it for this episode of the Front Page. You
can read more about today's stories and extensive news coverage
at enzadherld dot co dot MZ. The Front Page is
produced by Ethan Seals and Richard Martin, who is also
our sound engineer. I'm Chelsea Daniels. Subscribe to The Front
Page on iHeartRadio or.
Speaker 1 (18:58):
Wherever you get your podcas
Speaker 2 (19:00):
Casts, and tune in tomorrow for another look behind the headlines.
Popular Podcasts
Are You A Charlotte?
In 1997, actress Kristin Davis’ life was forever changed when she took on the role of Charlotte York in Sex and the City. As we watched Carrie, Samantha, Miranda and Charlotte navigate relationships in NYC, the show helped push once unacceptable conversation topics out of the shadows and altered the narrative around women and sex. We all saw ourselves in them as they searched for fulfillment in life, sex and friendships. Now, Kristin Davis wants to connect with you, the fans, and share untold stories and all the behind the scenes. Together, with Kristin and special guests, what will begin with Sex and the City will evolve into talks about themes that are still so relevant today. "Are you a Charlotte?" is much more than just rewatching this beloved show, it brings the past and the present together as we talk with heart, humor and of course some optimism.
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com